atrytone commited on
Commit
81abf6c
1 Parent(s): ec1878a

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +9 -10
README.md CHANGED
@@ -67,12 +67,11 @@ claims = inference(abstract) # string of claim joining with \n
67
  Takes in a statement and classifies as Claim (1) or Null (0).
68
  Here are some examples -
69
 
70
- - {'text': 'We consistently found that participants selectively chose to learn that bad (good) things happened to bad (good) people (Studies 1 to 7) that is, they selectively exposed themselves to deserved outcomes.',
71
- 'label': 1 (Claim)}
72
- - {'text': 'Members of higher status groups generalize characteristics of their ingroup to superordinate categories that serve as a frame of reference for comparisons with outgroups (ingroup projection).',
73
- 'label': 0 (Null)}
74
- - {'text':Motivational Interviewing helped the goal progress of those participants who, at pre-screening, reported engaging in many individual pro-environmental behaviors, but the more directive approach worked better for those participants who were less ready to change.
75
- 'label': 1 (Claim)}
76
 
77
 
78
  ## Training procedure
@@ -81,10 +80,10 @@ Here are some examples -
81
 
82
  The following hyperparameters were used during training:
83
 
84
- learning_rate: 3e-05
85
- train_batch_size: 32
86
- eval_batch_size: 32
87
- n_epochs: 6
88
 
89
  ### Training results
90
 
 
67
  Takes in a statement and classifies as Claim (1) or Null (0).
68
  Here are some examples -
69
 
70
+ | Statement | Label |
71
+ |:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------:|:----------:|
72
+ |We consistently found that participants selectively chose to learn that bad (good) things happened to <br>bad (good) people (Studies 1 to 7) that is, they selectively exposed themselves to deserved outcomes.| 1 (Claim) |
73
+ |Members of higher status groups generalize characteristics of their ingroup to superordinate categories<br> that serve as a frame of reference for comparisons with outgroups (ingroup projection).| 0 (Null) }|
74
+ |Motivational Interviewing helped the goal progress of those participants who, at pre-screening, reported<br> engaging in many individual pro-environmental behaviors, but the more directive approach <br> worked better for those participants who were less ready to change.| 1 (Claim) |
 
75
 
76
 
77
  ## Training procedure
 
80
 
81
  The following hyperparameters were used during training:
82
 
83
+ - learning_rate: 3e-05
84
+ - train_batch_size: 32
85
+ - eval_batch_size: 32
86
+ - n_epochs: 6
87
 
88
  ### Training results
89