webersni commited on
Commit
14b18d9
1 Parent(s): 046b11a

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +2 -4
README.md CHANGED
@@ -8,22 +8,20 @@ Using the [DistilRoBERTa](https://huggingface.co/distilroberta-base) model as st
8
  ### Climate performance model card
9
 
10
 
11
- | Minimum card | |
12
  |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
13
  | 1. Is the resulting model publicly available? | Yes |
14
  | 2. How much time does the training of the final model take? | 8 hours |
15
  | 3. How much time did all experiments take (incl. hyperparameter search)? | 288 hours |
16
  | 4. What was the energy consumption (GPU/CPU)? | 0.7 kW |
17
  | 5. At which geo location were the computations performed? | Germany |
18
-
19
- | Extended card | |
20
- |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
21
  | 6. What was the energy mix at the geo location? | 470 gCO2eq/kWh |
22
  | 7. How much CO2eq was emitted to train the final model? | 2.63 kg |
23
  | 8. How much CO2eq was emitted for all experiments? | 94.75 kg |
24
  | 9. What is the average CO2eq emission for the inference of one sample? | 0.62 mg |
25
  | 10. Which positive environmental impact can be expected from this work? | This work can be categorized as a building block tools following Jin et al (2021). It supports the training of NLP models in the field of climate change and, thereby, have a positive environmental impact in the future. |
26
  | 11. Comments | Block pruning could decrease CO2eq emissions |
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
 
8
  ### Climate performance model card
9
 
10
 
11
+ | distilroberta-base-climate-f | |
12
  |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
13
  | 1. Is the resulting model publicly available? | Yes |
14
  | 2. How much time does the training of the final model take? | 8 hours |
15
  | 3. How much time did all experiments take (incl. hyperparameter search)? | 288 hours |
16
  | 4. What was the energy consumption (GPU/CPU)? | 0.7 kW |
17
  | 5. At which geo location were the computations performed? | Germany |
 
 
 
18
  | 6. What was the energy mix at the geo location? | 470 gCO2eq/kWh |
19
  | 7. How much CO2eq was emitted to train the final model? | 2.63 kg |
20
  | 8. How much CO2eq was emitted for all experiments? | 94.75 kg |
21
  | 9. What is the average CO2eq emission for the inference of one sample? | 0.62 mg |
22
  | 10. Which positive environmental impact can be expected from this work? | This work can be categorized as a building block tools following Jin et al (2021). It supports the training of NLP models in the field of climate change and, thereby, have a positive environmental impact in the future. |
23
  | 11. Comments | Block pruning could decrease CO2eq emissions |
24
+ |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
25
 
26
 
27