Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -8,22 +8,20 @@ Using the [DistilRoBERTa](https://huggingface.co/distilroberta-base) model as st
|
|
8 |
### Climate performance model card
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
-
|
|
12 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
|
13 |
| 1. Is the resulting model publicly available? | Yes |
|
14 |
| 2. How much time does the training of the final model take? | 8 hours |
|
15 |
| 3. How much time did all experiments take (incl. hyperparameter search)? | 288 hours |
|
16 |
| 4. What was the energy consumption (GPU/CPU)? | 0.7 kW |
|
17 |
| 5. At which geo location were the computations performed? | Germany |
|
18 |
-
|
19 |
-
| Extended card | |
|
20 |
-
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
|
21 |
| 6. What was the energy mix at the geo location? | 470 gCO2eq/kWh |
|
22 |
| 7. How much CO2eq was emitted to train the final model? | 2.63 kg |
|
23 |
| 8. How much CO2eq was emitted for all experiments? | 94.75 kg |
|
24 |
| 9. What is the average CO2eq emission for the inference of one sample? | 0.62 mg |
|
25 |
| 10. Which positive environmental impact can be expected from this work? | This work can be categorized as a building block tools following Jin et al (2021). It supports the training of NLP models in the field of climate change and, thereby, have a positive environmental impact in the future. |
|
26 |
| 11. Comments | Block pruning could decrease CO2eq emissions |
|
|
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
|
|
8 |
### Climate performance model card
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
+
| distilroberta-base-climate-f | |
|
12 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
|
13 |
| 1. Is the resulting model publicly available? | Yes |
|
14 |
| 2. How much time does the training of the final model take? | 8 hours |
|
15 |
| 3. How much time did all experiments take (incl. hyperparameter search)? | 288 hours |
|
16 |
| 4. What was the energy consumption (GPU/CPU)? | 0.7 kW |
|
17 |
| 5. At which geo location were the computations performed? | Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
| 6. What was the energy mix at the geo location? | 470 gCO2eq/kWh |
|
19 |
| 7. How much CO2eq was emitted to train the final model? | 2.63 kg |
|
20 |
| 8. How much CO2eq was emitted for all experiments? | 94.75 kg |
|
21 |
| 9. What is the average CO2eq emission for the inference of one sample? | 0.62 mg |
|
22 |
| 10. Which positive environmental impact can be expected from this work? | This work can be categorized as a building block tools following Jin et al (2021). It supports the training of NLP models in the field of climate change and, thereby, have a positive environmental impact in the future. |
|
23 |
| 11. Comments | Block pruning could decrease CO2eq emissions |
|
24 |
+
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|