{ "interaction_id": "0b6abab4-0ef8-4cf1-a997-1de6b4d0013a", "search_results": [ { "page_name": "The Best Movies That Were Made To Look Like A Single Take (Including ...", "page_url": "https://screenrant.com/1917-best-movies-single-take/", "page_snippet": "1917's "one-shot technique" has people talking. So, what are the best movies that were made to look like they were shot in a single take?Updated January 25th, 2021 by Kristen Palamara: Innovation continues to be paramount in the movie industry as filmmakers should feel a need to be creative and try to do something that's more challenging and engaging for their movies. A creative, innovative, and challenging technique that isn't used very often is the one-shot technique. But, how many other films have used this technique? The statistics aren't out there but here are the best ones to watch if you want to get the experience of feeling close to the main character(s). Updated January 25th, 2021 by Kristen Palamara: Innovation continues to be paramount in the movie industry as filmmakers should feel a need to be creative and try to do something that's more challenging and engaging for their movies. The \"One-Shot Technique\" has been a hot topic of conversation ever since Sam Mendes' World War I thriller 1917 came out. Basically, it's a method used by directors to make the movie look as if it was shot filmed without cuts. The aim is to make the viewer feel as though they are part of the proceedings and also to make events feel like they are happening in real-time. The movie follows several people in Los Angeles as they make preparations for the filming of a movie. It's a movie about a movie and it's been shot with groundbreaking movie techniques. It's a masterpiece though it gives the viewer a hard time trying to keep up with all four mini-screens.", "page_result": "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \t\n\t \t \n\t \t \n\t \t\t\t\t\n\t The Best Movies That Were Made To Look Like A Single Take (Including 1917), Ranked\n\t \n\t \t \t \n\t \t \n\t \t\t\t\n\t \t\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\n\n\t\t\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n

Screen Rant

\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n Log in\n
\n \n \n
\n\n
\n
\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n
\n\n \n \n\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n \n\n\n \n\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n

The Best Movies That Were Made To Look Like A Single Take (Including 1917), Ranked

\n\n
\n
\n \n By\n \n \n Philip Etemesi\n \n \n
\n\n \n Updated \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

1917's \"one-shot technique\" has people talking. So, what are the best movies that were made to look like they were shot in a single take?

\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n \n \n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

The \"One-Shot Technique\" has been a hot topic of conversation ever since Sam Mendes' World War I thriller 1917 came out. Basically, it's a method used by directors to make the movie look as if it was shot filmed without cuts. The aim is to make the viewer feel as though they are part of the proceedings and also to make events feel like they are happening in real-time.

\n

RELATED:\u00a01917: 5 Reasons Why It's Better Than Saving Private Ryan (& 5 It's Not)

\n

It's not easy to pull off hence many directors tend to shun away from it, but Mendes did it quite brilliantly in his latest project. But, how many other films have used this technique? The statistics aren't out there but here are the best ones to watch if you want to get the experience of feeling close to the main character(s).

\n

Updated January 25th, 2021 by Kristen Palamara:\u00a0Innovation continues to be paramount in the movie industry as filmmakers should feel a need to be creative and try to do something that's more challenging and engaging for their movies. A creative, innovative, and challenging technique that isn't used very often is the one-shot technique. There are countless scenes in movies that use this technique like the iconic fight scene in the original Oldboy movie, but there are significantly fewer movies that attempt to film the entire movie in one-shot and these movies should be celebrated for taking the chance even with varying degrees of success.\u00a0

\n

\n A Boy. A Girl. A Dream (2018)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

A Boy. A Girl. A Dream: Love on Election Night\u00a0was successfully and impressively filmed in one single shot, but unfortunately its plot is a little lackluster.

\n

The movie follows two people meeting on the night of the 2016 American Presidential election, Cass being a local club promoter in Los Angeles and Frida visiting from the Midwest. The two spend the night having an adventure after just meeting and encouraging each other to follow their dreams.

\n

\n Invasion (2017)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Invasion\u00a0is another movie that was literally\u00a0filmed in one unedited shot and has a bit more of an engaging plot at its center.\u00a0Invasion\u00a0takes place during an eclipse follows Ali who is accused of murdering a man in a club.

\n

The police think it will be an easy case to solve but are planning to\u00a0re-enact the crime without the knowledge that the murders plan to kill the deceased's twin sister the same night. It's a complicated plot that impressively uses the one-shot technique.

\n

\n Silent House (2011)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Silent House\u00a0is a psychological horror movie that follows a young woman who goes with her father and uncle to clean up an older family property that has been deserted for years and is suddenly terrorized by perceived squatters or intruders in the house.

\n

The entire movie presents\u00a0the events in real-time and is filmed to look like it was filmed in one-shot, similar to Alfred Hitchcock's\u00a0Rope,\u00a0and has a complicated plot along with\u00a0its stereotypical\u00a0horror movie plot.

\n

\n Lost In London (2017)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Lost in London\u00a0is a completely unique movie as it was filmed in one day with one camera and live broadcasted to several theaters on the same day.

\n

The movie is from and stars Woody Harrelson and several other actors and musicians appearing as themselves including Owen Wilson, Willie Nelson, and Daniel Radcliffe. The action/adventure comedy follows Harrelson as he struggles to get home after a night out in London and runs into several members of the royal family.

\n

\n Fish & Cat (2013)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Fish & Cat is a time-bending movie that cleverly uses the one-shot technique to travel between two stories happening at the same time foreshadowing that they will collide.

\n

The movie switches between a group of college students gathering to participate and watch a kite-flying tournament and two men with ties to a restaurant serving human flesh, based on a real-life case, who are making their way to the campsite.

\n

\n Russian Ark (2003)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

About 2000 actors and extras were needed to\u00a0shoot\u00a0Russian Ark at St. Petersburg\u2019s Winter Palace. The whole movie plays out in one 96-minute take. Director Alexander Sokurov confessed to using the \"One-Shot\u00a0Technique\" because he hated editing; he wasn't doing it for the art.

\n

The film follows a ghost\u00a0who\u00a0drifts through\u00a0the rooms and corridors of Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg and\u00a0meets\u00a0various historical figures. The cast had to rehearse for months for the film to prepare for the one-day shoot.\u00a0In total, 33 rooms were used.

\n

\n Macbeth (1982)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

There have been\u00a0numerous adaptations of Shakespeare's work but Hungarian filmmaker B\u00e9la Tarr\u2019s version 1982 version of Macbeth stands out for the visual elements.\u00a0The film consists of only\u00a0two shots\u00a0that were merged to look like one.\u00a0The camera also\u00a0primarily focuses on faces instead of the bodies.\u00a0As a result, the facial expressions are captured quite superbly.

\n

Macbeth\u00a0isn't exactly faithful to Shakespeare's work. It\u00a0often takes a direction of its own. You can't help but feel that\u00a0B\u00e9la Tarr should have just gone with a different story. However, the expertise in directing is clearly visible and that's what makes Macbeth awesome.

\n

\n Ut\u00f8ya: July 22 (2018)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Ut\u00f8ya: July 22 is based on the\u00a0Ut\u00f8ya summer camp massacre that happened in Norway in July 2011.\u00a0Director\u00a0Erik Poppe interviewed\u00a040 survivors before making the film in order to make the action as realistic as he could. Using a single shot, the movie follows a lady called Kaja\u00a0as she moves just before and during the\u00a072-minute terror attack.

\n

RELATED:\u00a0The 10 Best Movies About World War I (Including 1917) According To Rotten Tomatoes

\n

The terrorist is only shown from afar and his face never appears in close range. Most of the characters were fictionalized in order to protect the identity of the victims. The real attacks were conducted by a man known as\u00a0Anders Behring Breivik who is currently in prison.

\n

\n Rope (1948)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

The legendary Hollywood director\u00a0Alfred Hitchcock was the pioneer of the long shot. Among his many great films was\u00a0Rope. He filmed it using a couple of 10-minute takes. He would have used much longer takes but he was limited to 10 minutes because that was the capacity of 35 mm film cameras at the time. However, you won't notice any of the cuts. Despite the limitations, only 10 shots were needed to wrap up things. That was an incredible feat in the 1940s.

\n

According to Hitchcock, he used a single shot in order to truly capture the feel of the play which the movie was based on. Rope was also his first-ever Technicolor film. The plot is quite intriguing as well. Two aesthetes\u00a0kill their\u00a0former Harvard University classmate\u00a0just for fun, to see if they can commit the perfect crime.

\n

\n Time Code (2000)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

As if one shot isn't enough, director Mike Figgis used four shots for Time Code and\u00a0displayed them all using a split-screen. All the shots run at the same time for 93 minutes. The audio keeps getting raised and reduced for each quadrant in order for the viewer to figure out what's going on.

\n

The movie follows several people in Los Angeles as they make preparations for the filming of a\u00a0movie. It's a movie about a movie and it's been shot with groundbreaking movie techniques. It's a\u00a0masterpiece though it gives the viewer a hard time trying to keep up with all four mini-screens.

\n

\n Son Of Saul (2015)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

For 107 minutes, the camera rarely leaves the lead's head in Son Of Saul. The man known as Saul Ausl\u00e4nder goes on to\u00a0get a first-hand experience of the hellish proceedings in a German concentration camp.\u00a0He is forced to participate in the killing of other prisoners in order to keep his own life.

\n

Son Of Saul was well received by critics. It won the Best Foreign Language Film award at the Oscars. On Rotten Tomatoes, it holds a score of 96%. Interestingly, it was only the first film that director\u00a0L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Nemes, had ever made in his career. Such a good way to start.

\n

\n Birdman (2014)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Director Alejandro G. I\u00f1\u00e1rritu experimented with lengthy shots in The Revenant but for Birdman, he went all the way. He apparently shot each scene about 15 to 20 times and stitched them all together to look like one take. The dedication paid off, with the Academy handing him another Oscar.

\n

Birdman tells the story of Riggan (Michael Keaton), an actor who isn't popular anymore. During the peak of his fame, Riggan was known for playing the superhero \"Birdman.\" He now seeks to revive his career by staging a Broadway play that's an adaptation of a short story.

\n

\n Victoria (2015)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Unlike other entrants that were edited to look like a single take, the German crime thriller Victoria was actually shot without cuts in three single takes, each from start to finish. The film tells the story of a\u00a0lady and a group of men who attempt to rob a bank at night but everything doesn't turn out as they expected.

\n

RELATED:\u00a010 Seriously Trippy German Science Fiction Movies

\n

Director Sebastian Schipper filmed the entire movie from\u00a04:30 am to 7:00 am. Within this time frame, he took three attempts at filming without stopping the camera. In the end, all that was left was to decide which of three shots was better. It was a huge risk but everything turned out fine. Victoria\u00a0literally makes you one of the wannabe robbers and it came as no surprise when it won Best Feature Film at the German Film Awards.

\n

\n Blind Spot (2018)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Blind Spot tells the story of a family\u00a0that struggles to come to terms with the fact that their daughter has suffered a terrible injury that she will never recover from.\u00a0The director gives you no chance to take a break from the sorrow. When watching the film, you are obligated to feel the family's pain.

\n

The emotions run deep in Blind Spot. When it ends, there is a mixture of relief and sadness. Relief because the pain has t least been put to a halt and sadness because no solution has been found. The movie was chosen as the Norweigan entry for the Best Foreign Language film at the Oscars.

\n

\n 1917 (2019)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

1917 is clearly the best ever movie that was made to look like a single take. Sam Mendes\u00a0made us all feel like we were running alongside\u00a0Lance Corporals William Schofield and\u00a0Tom Blake as they tried to save\u00a0another unit from being ambushed by German forces.

\n

During an interview with Vox, director Sam Mendes explained why he decided to use a single take: \"I wanted to tell this story in two hours of 'real time.' ... In a movie that operates more like a ticking-clock thriller at times, I wanted an audience to feel every second passing and take every step with them, and also be aware of geography and distance and physical difficulty.\"

\n

NEXT:\u00a0Top 10 Hollywood Directors And Their Signature Styles

\n
\n \n\n \n \n\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n \n \n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n", "page_last_modified": "" }, { "page_name": "Great Movies Filmed in One Take, or Look Like They Were", "page_url": "https://movieweb.com/one-take-movies/", "page_snippet": "The "one-shot technique" has been a hot topic of discussion for the past few years ever since the opening of Sam Mendes' military drama 1917. This method involves filming an entire movie in one continuous shot, or, at least, making it appear that way. Cinephiles adore this ambitious filming ...The \"one-shot technique\" has been a hot topic of discussion for the past few years ever since the opening of Sam Mendes' military drama 1917. This method involves filming an entire movie in one continuous shot, or, at least, making it appear that way. Cinephiles adore this ambitious filming technique, which aims to make the audience feel as if the action is taking place in real-time. The film was meant to look as if it had been shot in one continuous take (though technically a character's blackout transitions the movie from day to night). It feels like real-time to the audience as they follow every step and experience the tension, danger, and tragedy alongside the soldiers. The film's grand scale of literally half a thousand extras and a $100 million budget made the \"single-take\" approach incredibly challenging, but it became one of the most well-known for its use of this technique (or at least the appearance of it). 1917\u2019s success brought conversations about \u201cone-shot\u201d films into the mainstream. What other great movies have used this single-take technique? This method involves filming an entire movie in one continuous shot, or, at least, making it appear that way. Cinephiles adore this ambitious filming technique, which aims to make the audience feel as if the action is taking place in real-time. It's not one that's easy to pull off, which is why only a handful of directors have even tried; however, there's no denying that for those who have, most of them have absolutely nailed it.", "page_result": "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \t\n\t \t \n\t \t \n\t \t\t\t\t\n\t Great Movies Filmed in One Take, or Look Like They Were\n\t \n\t \t \t \n\t \t \n\t \t\t\t\n\t \t\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\n\n\t\t\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n

MovieWeb

\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n Log in\n
\n \n \n
\n\n
\n
\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n
\n\n \n \n\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n \n\n\n \n\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n

Great Movies Filmed in One Take, or Look Like They Were

\n\n
\n
\n \n By\n \n \n Sophie Collins\n \n \n
\n\n \n Updated \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

1917\u2019s success brought conversations about \u201cone-shot\u201d films into the mainstream. What other great movies have used this single-take technique?

\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n \n \n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
DreamWorks Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

The "one-shot technique" has been a hot topic of discussion for the past few years ever since the opening of Sam Mendes' military drama 1917. This method involves filming an entire movie in one continuous shot, or, at least, making it appear that way. Cinephiles adore this ambitious filming technique, which aims to make the audience feel as if the action is taking place in real-time. It's not one that's easy to pull off, which is why only a handful of directors have even tried; however, there's no denying that for those who have, most of them have absolutely nailed it.

\n

Updated April 26th, 2023: Want to know more about the one-shot technique? Then you'll be happy to know that this article has been updated with additional content and entries by Amanda Minchin.

\n

So, if you’re looking to get an up close and personal experience with a film, this is an assortment of movies that were filmed in one take (or, at the very least, look like they were).

\n

\n 13 \n Rope\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Warner Bros. Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Alfred Hitchcock was one of the first to attempt a one-shot movie. His earliest tries were with 1937s Young and Innocent and 1946s Notorious, respectively. It wasn't until two years later that he struck gold with 1948s Rope.

\n

One of his most experimental films, this movie was filmed in a series of 10-minute takes out of necessity — The 35 mm film cameras at the time couldn’t shoot for any longer. The Master of Suspense and the movie’s cinematographers, Joseph A. Valentine and William V. Skall, decided to hide any of the cuts. Instead, they shot the film in real-time.

\n

In doing so, they perfectly captured the claustrophobia encapsulated in the play by Patrick Hamilton upon which the movie was based. Hitchcock’s thriller about two murderous students attempting to hide a body has gone down in history as both a compelling and technically bold movie.

\n

Related: 10 Best Alfred Hitchcock Films, Ranked

\n

\n 12 \n Macbeth\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
A24, Apple TV+
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

While Hitchcock's film looks as if it's in one take, it wasn't until 1983’s TV movie adaptation of William Shakespeare’s Macbeth that audiences would experience an actual one-shot take film for the first time (almost). Hungarian filmmaker Béla Tarr composed a 57-minute-long shot for the majority of the film, though. Technically speaking, the film is composed of two shots; the first prior to the main title is five minutes long and the second comprises the rest of this short film's whopping 57 minutes.

\n

\n 11 \n Utøya: July 22\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Nordisk Film
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

The 2018 film Utøya: July 22 is a one-shot depiction based on the true events of the Norwegian summer camp tragedy of July 2011 in which a right-wing extremist posed as a police officer and shot and killed sixty-nine teenagers. Unfortunately, many more were either left injured or emotionally scarred over the course of the attack, turning the youth summer camp into an unimaginable horror scene from straight out of a movie.

\n

Before creating the film about this experience, director Erik Poppe conducted interviews with forty survivors in order to portray the events as realistically as possible. In doing so, Poppe recreated the incident in one continuous, 83-minute shot, exactly as it happened on the day, which allowed the audience to see the catastrophe through the eyes of the victim. Utøya: July 22, according to Poppe, even stays true to the total number of shots fired during the attack; you can't get any more accurate than that. The only inaccuracy here is the movie was filmed on a neighboring island, and not on Utøya itself.

\n

After a week of rehearsals, Poppe and his crew spent five days trying to get the perfect take, with just one take attempted per day. The take from the fourth day was the one used in the film.

\n

\n 10 \n Victoria\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Senator Film
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

German director Sebastian Schipper achieved the impossible with Victoria, a one-shot film released in 2015. The movie follows a party girl and three men as they attempt to rob a bank late at night. As one might expect, things don't go exactly as planned.

\n

The 138-minute crime thriller features 22 locations, a bank robbery, nightclub scenes, a large cast and crew, and was shot in Berlin in one take between 4:30 a.m. and 7:00 a.m.

\n

As if that wasn't enough, even Schipper wasn't sure if it would be possible, but he wanted to make something that existed outside modern cinema audiences' expectations. He succeeded by shooting the film three times in one take from beginning to end. After each take was complete, he watched all three and chose his favorite, which he then used as the final film.

\n

\n 9 \n Running Time\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Anchor Bay
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Another example of a heist movie that takes advantage of the one-shot technique is the 1997 film Running Time. The story follows beloved actor Bruce Campbell as a recently released convict gearing up for his next big heist as he finds out the hard way that good help is hard to find. Directed by Josh Becker and co-written alongside Peter Choi, this film pays homage to the noir steeped heist movies of the 1940s and 50s.

\n

Inspired by Hitchcock's Rope, the movie itself is in black and white and seems to take place in one fluid, continuous shot thanks to some killer editing. Shooting took place over the course of ten days, ending fittingly on the last day at 10 AM sharp. Its stellar editing has convinced at least one critic that the film was truly a one-shot.

\n

\n 8 \n Son of Saul\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Mozinet
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Son of Saul is a heartbreaking drama that follows the life of Saul Ausländer, a Hungarian Jew imprisoned at Auschwitz, as he's ordered to clean up after the executions of other prisoners in order to save his own life. For 107 minutes, the camera rarely leaves the lead's head as he fights to hide and bury a boy's body according to proper Jewish rites.

\n

As one can imagine, the film is incredibly distressing and emotional to watch, but its one-shot approach gives the audience a very real experience by doing so. Director László Nemes intended for the film's point of view to not wander beyond Saul's limited perspectives, therefore giving the film a vibe that synchronizes the audience with the headspace of the struggling protagonist.

\n

Upon its release, Son of Saul earned positive reviews from critics and was even the first Hungarian film to win the Best Foreign Language Film at the Academy Awards.

\n

Related: 8 Haunting Films About the Holocaust

\n

\n 7 \n 1917\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Universal Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Oscar-winning director Sam Mendes brought his one-shot vision to the big screen with his 2019 World War I film, 1917. In the film, two soldiers are forced to cross into enemy territory in order to deliver a message that will stop a deadly attack on hundreds of soldiers.

\n

This literal race against time was the perfect backdrop in which to showcase the experimental one-shot technique. The film was meant to look as if it had been shot in one continuous take (though technically a character's blackout transitions the movie from day to night). It feels like real-time to the audience as they follow every step and experience the tension, danger, and tragedy alongside the soldiers.

\n

The film's grand scale of literally half a thousand extras and a $100 million budget made the "single-take" approach incredibly challenging, but it became one of the most well-known for its use of this technique (or at least the appearance of it). Sam Mendes and renowned cinematographer Roger Deakins truly elevated cinematic artistry with technical excellence and gritty narrative for this feature. After its release, the film became not just a hit, but a cinematic achievement to boot. The no-edit viewpoint in this film is unlike anything most audiences had ever seen before. It was as if Mendes took the legendary ten-minute survival scene from Alejandro Iñárritu's masterpiece Children of Men and extended it by two more hours.

\n

Once the dust settled, this alone was the movie that took conversation of the one-shot technique back into the mainstream.

\n

\n 6 \n Beyond the Infinite Two Minutes\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Third Window Films
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

That being said, an endless cast and inflated budget is by no means a requirement for the one-shot genre. Take the movie Beyond the Infinite Two Minutes, for example. Made overnight during the course of seven days using a tiny camera strapped to the back of a smartphone, this microbudget film was edited to appear as if it was done in just one long shot.

\n

The creators refused to pull punches with the plot here either. This Japanese science fiction dramedy reads as if Everything Everywhere All at Once were a microgenre. Instead of a laundromat, this film takes place in a Kyoto café. The movie follows a man who discovers a screen that is streaming his life a whole two whole minutes in the future.

\n

It should be noted that this movie was heavily inspired by the new cult classic One Cut of the Dead, which followed a film crew as they shot a real-life zombie film for television. While this early example of a nagamawashi (long-shot) film is made up of what appears to be a small handful of long takes, this movie took the concept to a whole new level.

\n

Premiering in a small theater to an audience of 12, this movie gained traction after it was chosen to screen in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. It now holds a near-perfect 99% score on Rotten Tomatoes.

\n

\n 5 \n Invasion\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Iranian Independents
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Shahram Mokri's 2017 crime drama, Invasion, follows the police's investigation of a murder at a stadium. Though the police have arrested the suspect, the friends of the murdered person have proven uncooperative. Things only get more complicated from there with the introduction of art-house vampires to this Iranian detective story. This movie is, in a word, complicated, but that is also what makes it intricate, unique, and intense as hell.

\n

Invasion was filmed in one impressive continuous shot, which allowed the audience to feel as though they are solving the crime in real-time alongside the police. This enhancement really brought to life the engaging plot, even though it is, in reality, distinctly improbable and downright bonkers. With exceptions (see below), there are hardly any horror films that utilize the one-shot technique, though many could benefit from its use. It's a simple method that's wonderfully conducive to nerve-wracking, edge-of-your-seat thrills.

\n

\n 4 \n Blind Spot\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Nordisk Film
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Blind Spot depicts the tragedy that a girl's mother faces as she attempts to come to grips with her daughter's mental illness, only to discover that it is considerably worse than she could ever have imagined. We follow her through every heart-wrenching minute as she is forced to stand aside during a traumatic and dangerous point in her daughter's life. The Swedish film is written and directed by Tuva Nuvotny, who uses her history as a great actor herself to tap into the heart of soul of her characters and unleash the remarkable performances from within.

\n

This superbly intimate one-shot film is nothing short of heart-wrenching. Once inside, the audience is never released from the overwhelming grief. It's an emotional rollercoaster, and the one-shot technique works well for it. The audience feels as if they're actually with the family, which makes it more captivating and personal.

\n

\n 3 \n Silent House\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Universal Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Both the American psychological horror movie Silent House and the Uruguayan film of the same name manufacture the appearance of one tense, grueling, continuous shot. The film revolves around a young woman and her father as they set out to clean up a long deserted family property... that is until they're unexpectedly terrorized by the violent squatters and intruders inside.

\n

Although this film was not shot in one take, it was ingeniously edited and choreographed to give the impression of such. In doing so, it portrays a complex plot in seemingly real-time. The use of this single-take mechanism helps to engross the audience in the details and is also extremely powerful in capturing every moment of the terror to come. Fans of horror films will enjoy feeling like they're in a haunted house or theme park horror night because it's almost as if they're right in the middle of the terrifying action. Elizabeth Olsen, who takes on the role in the American version, is brilliant — no easy feat, especially for a remake.

\n

After all, acting in a one-take film is akin to acting on stage, in real-time, where everyone can see your mistakes.

\n

\n 2 \n Birdman\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Fox Searchlight Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

In Birdman, Mexican filmmaker Alejandro González Iñárritu and Mexican cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki created the illusion that their Oscar-winning comedy-drama was done in one long tracking shot.

\n

Iñárritu told Variety that the illusion of a single uninterrupted take was used because he wanted the main character, a fading movie actor once famous for playing a Hollywood superhero, "to be submerged in that inescapable reality, and the audience has to live these desperate three days alongside him."

\n

Each scene was shot fifteen to twenty times and then stitched together to make it look like one take. An impressive technical achievement, Iñárritu broke cinematic boundaries with the film and even won an Oscar for his work alongside Lubezki. This Iñárritu film with Michael Keaton in the lead role is a must-see.

\n

Related: These are Michael Keaton’s Best Movies

\n

\n 1 \n Russian Ark\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Wellspring Media
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

The historical drama Russian Ark follows an unnamed narrator who wanders the corridors of the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg, claiming that he died in a terrible accident and is now a ghost adrift. Throughout his travels, he comes across various historical figures throughout time. It's an elusive plot as ghostly as its main character, but it's also a stunning and hypnotic masterpiece for lovers of art-house cinema.

\n

It took four years to prepare for the film, which was shot in an impressive, continuous 96-minute take, using thirty-three rooms spread out over the course of a mile, with over two thousand actors and three orchestras. Director Alexander Sokurov reportedly practiced the camera work over and over again for months with the cinematographer in order to get it just right.

\n

What makes this one of the best one-take films isn't just that it's legitimate (with no hidden edits). In rare form, it's that the medium of the film matches its message, and the form it takes suits its meaning perfectly. As Meg Shields writes for Film School Rejects, "Russian Ark‘s feature-length take is no gimmick. You simply could not tell this story any other way. And this is what makes Russian Ark so remarkable: not that its story justifies its format or vice versa, but that together, the result is mesmerizing."

\n

Films of all kinds, but particularly those of art house or genre, should take note of the one-shot technique for future movies. While they are certainly costly in time, money, and supplies, when done well, they are far worth the moviegoer's wait.

\n
\n \n\n \n \n\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n \n \n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n", "page_last_modified": "" }, { "page_name": "Great Movies Filmed in One Take, or Look Like They Were", "page_url": "https://movieweb.com/one-take-movies/", "page_snippet": "The "one-shot technique" has been a hot topic of discussion for the past few years ever since the opening of Sam Mendes' military drama 1917. This method involves filming an entire movie in one continuous shot, or, at least, making it appear that way. Cinephiles adore this ambitious filming ...The \"one-shot technique\" has been a hot topic of discussion for the past few years ever since the opening of Sam Mendes' military drama 1917. This method involves filming an entire movie in one continuous shot, or, at least, making it appear that way. Cinephiles adore this ambitious filming technique, which aims to make the audience feel as if the action is taking place in real-time. The film was meant to look as if it had been shot in one continuous take (though technically a character's blackout transitions the movie from day to night). It feels like real-time to the audience as they follow every step and experience the tension, danger, and tragedy alongside the soldiers. The film's grand scale of literally half a thousand extras and a $100 million budget made the \"single-take\" approach incredibly challenging, but it became one of the most well-known for its use of this technique (or at least the appearance of it). 1917\u2019s success brought conversations about \u201cone-shot\u201d films into the mainstream. What other great movies have used this single-take technique? This method involves filming an entire movie in one continuous shot, or, at least, making it appear that way. Cinephiles adore this ambitious filming technique, which aims to make the audience feel as if the action is taking place in real-time. It's not one that's easy to pull off, which is why only a handful of directors have even tried; however, there's no denying that for those who have, most of them have absolutely nailed it.", "page_result": "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \t\n\t \t \n\t \t \n\t \t\t\t\t\n\t Great Movies Filmed in One Take, or Look Like They Were\n\t \n\t \t \t \n\t \t \n\t \t\t\t\n\t \t\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\n\n\t\t\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n

MovieWeb

\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n Log in\n
\n \n \n
\n\n
\n
\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n
\n\n \n \n\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n \n\n\n \n\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n

Great Movies Filmed in One Take, or Look Like They Were

\n\n
\n
\n \n By\n \n \n Sophie Collins\n \n \n
\n\n \n Updated \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

1917\u2019s success brought conversations about \u201cone-shot\u201d films into the mainstream. What other great movies have used this single-take technique?

\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n \n \n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
DreamWorks Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

The "one-shot technique" has been a hot topic of discussion for the past few years ever since the opening of Sam Mendes' military drama 1917. This method involves filming an entire movie in one continuous shot, or, at least, making it appear that way. Cinephiles adore this ambitious filming technique, which aims to make the audience feel as if the action is taking place in real-time. It's not one that's easy to pull off, which is why only a handful of directors have even tried; however, there's no denying that for those who have, most of them have absolutely nailed it.

\n

Updated April 26th, 2023: Want to know more about the one-shot technique? Then you'll be happy to know that this article has been updated with additional content and entries by Amanda Minchin.

\n

So, if you’re looking to get an up close and personal experience with a film, this is an assortment of movies that were filmed in one take (or, at the very least, look like they were).

\n

\n 13 \n Rope\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Warner Bros. Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Alfred Hitchcock was one of the first to attempt a one-shot movie. His earliest tries were with 1937s Young and Innocent and 1946s Notorious, respectively. It wasn't until two years later that he struck gold with 1948s Rope.

\n

One of his most experimental films, this movie was filmed in a series of 10-minute takes out of necessity — The 35 mm film cameras at the time couldn’t shoot for any longer. The Master of Suspense and the movie’s cinematographers, Joseph A. Valentine and William V. Skall, decided to hide any of the cuts. Instead, they shot the film in real-time.

\n

In doing so, they perfectly captured the claustrophobia encapsulated in the play by Patrick Hamilton upon which the movie was based. Hitchcock’s thriller about two murderous students attempting to hide a body has gone down in history as both a compelling and technically bold movie.

\n

Related: 10 Best Alfred Hitchcock Films, Ranked

\n

\n 12 \n Macbeth\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
A24, Apple TV+
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

While Hitchcock's film looks as if it's in one take, it wasn't until 1983’s TV movie adaptation of William Shakespeare’s Macbeth that audiences would experience an actual one-shot take film for the first time (almost). Hungarian filmmaker Béla Tarr composed a 57-minute-long shot for the majority of the film, though. Technically speaking, the film is composed of two shots; the first prior to the main title is five minutes long and the second comprises the rest of this short film's whopping 57 minutes.

\n

\n 11 \n Utøya: July 22\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Nordisk Film
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

The 2018 film Utøya: July 22 is a one-shot depiction based on the true events of the Norwegian summer camp tragedy of July 2011 in which a right-wing extremist posed as a police officer and shot and killed sixty-nine teenagers. Unfortunately, many more were either left injured or emotionally scarred over the course of the attack, turning the youth summer camp into an unimaginable horror scene from straight out of a movie.

\n

Before creating the film about this experience, director Erik Poppe conducted interviews with forty survivors in order to portray the events as realistically as possible. In doing so, Poppe recreated the incident in one continuous, 83-minute shot, exactly as it happened on the day, which allowed the audience to see the catastrophe through the eyes of the victim. Utøya: July 22, according to Poppe, even stays true to the total number of shots fired during the attack; you can't get any more accurate than that. The only inaccuracy here is the movie was filmed on a neighboring island, and not on Utøya itself.

\n

After a week of rehearsals, Poppe and his crew spent five days trying to get the perfect take, with just one take attempted per day. The take from the fourth day was the one used in the film.

\n

\n 10 \n Victoria\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Senator Film
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

German director Sebastian Schipper achieved the impossible with Victoria, a one-shot film released in 2015. The movie follows a party girl and three men as they attempt to rob a bank late at night. As one might expect, things don't go exactly as planned.

\n

The 138-minute crime thriller features 22 locations, a bank robbery, nightclub scenes, a large cast and crew, and was shot in Berlin in one take between 4:30 a.m. and 7:00 a.m.

\n

As if that wasn't enough, even Schipper wasn't sure if it would be possible, but he wanted to make something that existed outside modern cinema audiences' expectations. He succeeded by shooting the film three times in one take from beginning to end. After each take was complete, he watched all three and chose his favorite, which he then used as the final film.

\n

\n 9 \n Running Time\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Anchor Bay
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Another example of a heist movie that takes advantage of the one-shot technique is the 1997 film Running Time. The story follows beloved actor Bruce Campbell as a recently released convict gearing up for his next big heist as he finds out the hard way that good help is hard to find. Directed by Josh Becker and co-written alongside Peter Choi, this film pays homage to the noir steeped heist movies of the 1940s and 50s.

\n

Inspired by Hitchcock's Rope, the movie itself is in black and white and seems to take place in one fluid, continuous shot thanks to some killer editing. Shooting took place over the course of ten days, ending fittingly on the last day at 10 AM sharp. Its stellar editing has convinced at least one critic that the film was truly a one-shot.

\n

\n 8 \n Son of Saul\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Mozinet
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Son of Saul is a heartbreaking drama that follows the life of Saul Ausländer, a Hungarian Jew imprisoned at Auschwitz, as he's ordered to clean up after the executions of other prisoners in order to save his own life. For 107 minutes, the camera rarely leaves the lead's head as he fights to hide and bury a boy's body according to proper Jewish rites.

\n

As one can imagine, the film is incredibly distressing and emotional to watch, but its one-shot approach gives the audience a very real experience by doing so. Director László Nemes intended for the film's point of view to not wander beyond Saul's limited perspectives, therefore giving the film a vibe that synchronizes the audience with the headspace of the struggling protagonist.

\n

Upon its release, Son of Saul earned positive reviews from critics and was even the first Hungarian film to win the Best Foreign Language Film at the Academy Awards.

\n

Related: 8 Haunting Films About the Holocaust

\n

\n 7 \n 1917\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Universal Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Oscar-winning director Sam Mendes brought his one-shot vision to the big screen with his 2019 World War I film, 1917. In the film, two soldiers are forced to cross into enemy territory in order to deliver a message that will stop a deadly attack on hundreds of soldiers.

\n

This literal race against time was the perfect backdrop in which to showcase the experimental one-shot technique. The film was meant to look as if it had been shot in one continuous take (though technically a character's blackout transitions the movie from day to night). It feels like real-time to the audience as they follow every step and experience the tension, danger, and tragedy alongside the soldiers.

\n

The film's grand scale of literally half a thousand extras and a $100 million budget made the "single-take" approach incredibly challenging, but it became one of the most well-known for its use of this technique (or at least the appearance of it). Sam Mendes and renowned cinematographer Roger Deakins truly elevated cinematic artistry with technical excellence and gritty narrative for this feature. After its release, the film became not just a hit, but a cinematic achievement to boot. The no-edit viewpoint in this film is unlike anything most audiences had ever seen before. It was as if Mendes took the legendary ten-minute survival scene from Alejandro Iñárritu's masterpiece Children of Men and extended it by two more hours.

\n

Once the dust settled, this alone was the movie that took conversation of the one-shot technique back into the mainstream.

\n

\n 6 \n Beyond the Infinite Two Minutes\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Third Window Films
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

That being said, an endless cast and inflated budget is by no means a requirement for the one-shot genre. Take the movie Beyond the Infinite Two Minutes, for example. Made overnight during the course of seven days using a tiny camera strapped to the back of a smartphone, this microbudget film was edited to appear as if it was done in just one long shot.

\n

The creators refused to pull punches with the plot here either. This Japanese science fiction dramedy reads as if Everything Everywhere All at Once were a microgenre. Instead of a laundromat, this film takes place in a Kyoto café. The movie follows a man who discovers a screen that is streaming his life a whole two whole minutes in the future.

\n

It should be noted that this movie was heavily inspired by the new cult classic One Cut of the Dead, which followed a film crew as they shot a real-life zombie film for television. While this early example of a nagamawashi (long-shot) film is made up of what appears to be a small handful of long takes, this movie took the concept to a whole new level.

\n

Premiering in a small theater to an audience of 12, this movie gained traction after it was chosen to screen in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. It now holds a near-perfect 99% score on Rotten Tomatoes.

\n

\n 5 \n Invasion\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Iranian Independents
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Shahram Mokri's 2017 crime drama, Invasion, follows the police's investigation of a murder at a stadium. Though the police have arrested the suspect, the friends of the murdered person have proven uncooperative. Things only get more complicated from there with the introduction of art-house vampires to this Iranian detective story. This movie is, in a word, complicated, but that is also what makes it intricate, unique, and intense as hell.

\n

Invasion was filmed in one impressive continuous shot, which allowed the audience to feel as though they are solving the crime in real-time alongside the police. This enhancement really brought to life the engaging plot, even though it is, in reality, distinctly improbable and downright bonkers. With exceptions (see below), there are hardly any horror films that utilize the one-shot technique, though many could benefit from its use. It's a simple method that's wonderfully conducive to nerve-wracking, edge-of-your-seat thrills.

\n

\n 4 \n Blind Spot\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Nordisk Film
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Blind Spot depicts the tragedy that a girl's mother faces as she attempts to come to grips with her daughter's mental illness, only to discover that it is considerably worse than she could ever have imagined. We follow her through every heart-wrenching minute as she is forced to stand aside during a traumatic and dangerous point in her daughter's life. The Swedish film is written and directed by Tuva Nuvotny, who uses her history as a great actor herself to tap into the heart of soul of her characters and unleash the remarkable performances from within.

\n

This superbly intimate one-shot film is nothing short of heart-wrenching. Once inside, the audience is never released from the overwhelming grief. It's an emotional rollercoaster, and the one-shot technique works well for it. The audience feels as if they're actually with the family, which makes it more captivating and personal.

\n

\n 3 \n Silent House\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Universal Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Both the American psychological horror movie Silent House and the Uruguayan film of the same name manufacture the appearance of one tense, grueling, continuous shot. The film revolves around a young woman and her father as they set out to clean up a long deserted family property... that is until they're unexpectedly terrorized by the violent squatters and intruders inside.

\n

Although this film was not shot in one take, it was ingeniously edited and choreographed to give the impression of such. In doing so, it portrays a complex plot in seemingly real-time. The use of this single-take mechanism helps to engross the audience in the details and is also extremely powerful in capturing every moment of the terror to come. Fans of horror films will enjoy feeling like they're in a haunted house or theme park horror night because it's almost as if they're right in the middle of the terrifying action. Elizabeth Olsen, who takes on the role in the American version, is brilliant — no easy feat, especially for a remake.

\n

After all, acting in a one-take film is akin to acting on stage, in real-time, where everyone can see your mistakes.

\n

\n 2 \n Birdman\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Fox Searchlight Pictures
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

In Birdman, Mexican filmmaker Alejandro González Iñárritu and Mexican cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki created the illusion that their Oscar-winning comedy-drama was done in one long tracking shot.

\n

Iñárritu told Variety that the illusion of a single uninterrupted take was used because he wanted the main character, a fading movie actor once famous for playing a Hollywood superhero, "to be submerged in that inescapable reality, and the audience has to live these desperate three days alongside him."

\n

Each scene was shot fifteen to twenty times and then stitched together to make it look like one take. An impressive technical achievement, Iñárritu broke cinematic boundaries with the film and even won an Oscar for his work alongside Lubezki. This Iñárritu film with Michael Keaton in the lead role is a must-see.

\n

Related: These are Michael Keaton’s Best Movies

\n

\n 1 \n Russian Ark\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
Wellspring Media
\n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

The historical drama Russian Ark follows an unnamed narrator who wanders the corridors of the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg, claiming that he died in a terrible accident and is now a ghost adrift. Throughout his travels, he comes across various historical figures throughout time. It's an elusive plot as ghostly as its main character, but it's also a stunning and hypnotic masterpiece for lovers of art-house cinema.

\n

It took four years to prepare for the film, which was shot in an impressive, continuous 96-minute take, using thirty-three rooms spread out over the course of a mile, with over two thousand actors and three orchestras. Director Alexander Sokurov reportedly practiced the camera work over and over again for months with the cinematographer in order to get it just right.

\n

What makes this one of the best one-take films isn't just that it's legitimate (with no hidden edits). In rare form, it's that the medium of the film matches its message, and the form it takes suits its meaning perfectly. As Meg Shields writes for Film School Rejects, "Russian Ark‘s feature-length take is no gimmick. You simply could not tell this story any other way. And this is what makes Russian Ark so remarkable: not that its story justifies its format or vice versa, but that together, the result is mesmerizing."

\n

Films of all kinds, but particularly those of art house or genre, should take note of the one-shot technique for future movies. While they are certainly costly in time, money, and supplies, when done well, they are far worth the moviegoer's wait.

\n
\n \n\n \n \n\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n \n \n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n", "page_last_modified": "" }, { "page_name": "'1917' and 12 Other 'One-Shot' Movies, From 'Timecode' to 'Birdman' ...", "page_url": "https://www.thewrap.com/1917-movies-accomplished-in-one-shot-from-timecode-to-birdman-photos/", "page_snippet": "Alfred Hitchcock's "Rope" was the first film to experiment with the single-take techniqueWhile other filmmakers hid their cuts between invisible edits and other trickery, director Alexander Sokurov actually filmed \u201cRussian Ark\u201d in one continuous take. His 96-minute long film boasted 2000 actors on-screen alongside three live orchestras as they all traversed the massive Winter Palace of the Russian state Hermitage Museum in Saint Petersburg, telling a story of Russian history spread across 300 years. ... Both the Uruguayan film \u201cLa Casa Muda\u201d and its American remake \u201cSilent House\u201d starring Elizabeth Olsen claim to have been filmed in a single, unbroken take to capture the real-time effect of a woman venturing through a haunted house, with the story supposedly based on real events. But it\u2019s often so complex and so ambitious that only a handful of directors have ever dared make their movie to appear as though it was filmed in one continuous, unbroken shot. Sam Mendes is the latest to attempt the feat for his World War I epic \u201c1917,\u201d and boy did he nail it. Here are some other films that helped pave the way for him. Photo credit: Warner Bros. ... The master of suspense Alfred Hitchcock was the first to attempt a single-take feature film, taking on a radical experiment with a big budget and A-list stars that included James Stewart. His movie \u201cRope\u201d was inspired by a play by Patrick Hamilton and concerned a pair of men who murdered someone, hid his body in a large wooden trunk and then hosted a dinner party with the trunk as the centerpiece, all to prove they could commit the perfect murder. Both the Uruguayan film \u201cLa Casa Muda\u201d and its American remake \u201cSilent House\u201d starring Elizabeth Olsen claim to have been filmed in a single, unbroken take to capture the real-time effect of a woman venturing through a haunted house, with the story supposedly based on real events. However, it\u2019s suspected that both films actually have cuts, as the original was shot on a shoestring budget with a digital camera that could only film for a maximum of 15 minutes at a time. Filming a long, extended take in a movie is one of the best ways to win some acclaim and show off a bit of your directorial prowess. But it\u2019s often so complex and so ambitious that only a handful of directors have ever dared make their movie to appear as though it was filmed in one continuous, unbroken shot.", "page_result": "\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n'1917' and 12 Other 'One-Shot' Movies, From 'Timecode' to 'Birdman' (Photos) - TheWrap\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\n\n\n\n
\n\tSkip to content\n\n\t
\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t
\n\n\t
\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t
\n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\tSubscribe to PRO\n\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\tSubscribe to PRO\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\n\t\t\t\tNewsletters\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Search

\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t\n\t
\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSubscribe\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t
\n\t
\n\n\t
\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

\u20181917\u2019 and 12 Other \u2018One-Shot\u2019 Movies, From \u2018Timecode\u2019 to \u2018Birdman\u2019 (Photos)

\n\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

Alfred Hitchcock\u2019s \u201cRope\u201d was the first film to experiment with the single-take technique

\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\n\t\t
\"One
\n\t
\n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\t\t\t\t
\n

\n\n\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t
\n\t
\n
\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\n\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t
\n\n\t\t\n\n\t\t
\n\t\n\t

Comments

\n\t\n\n\t\n
\n\t
\n\n\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\n\t
\n\t\n\t
\n
\n\n
\n\t\t
\n\t
\n\n\t\n
\n\n\n\t\n\t\t\t
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "page_last_modified": "" }, { "page_name": "The Best Movies That Were Made To Look Like A Single Take (Including ...", "page_url": "https://screenrant.com/1917-best-movies-single-take/", "page_snippet": "1917's "one-shot technique" has people talking. So, what are the best movies that were made to look like they were shot in a single take?Updated January 25th, 2021 by Kristen Palamara: Innovation continues to be paramount in the movie industry as filmmakers should feel a need to be creative and try to do something that's more challenging and engaging for their movies. A creative, innovative, and challenging technique that isn't used very often is the one-shot technique. But, how many other films have used this technique? The statistics aren't out there but here are the best ones to watch if you want to get the experience of feeling close to the main character(s). Updated January 25th, 2021 by Kristen Palamara: Innovation continues to be paramount in the movie industry as filmmakers should feel a need to be creative and try to do something that's more challenging and engaging for their movies. The \"One-Shot Technique\" has been a hot topic of conversation ever since Sam Mendes' World War I thriller 1917 came out. Basically, it's a method used by directors to make the movie look as if it was shot filmed without cuts. The aim is to make the viewer feel as though they are part of the proceedings and also to make events feel like they are happening in real-time. The movie follows several people in Los Angeles as they make preparations for the filming of a movie. It's a movie about a movie and it's been shot with groundbreaking movie techniques. It's a masterpiece though it gives the viewer a hard time trying to keep up with all four mini-screens.", "page_result": "\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \t\n\t \t \n\t \t \n\t \t\t\t\t\n\t The Best Movies That Were Made To Look Like A Single Take (Including 1917), Ranked\n\t \n\t \t \t \n\t \t \n\t \t\t\t\n\t \t\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\n\n\t\t\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n

Screen Rant

\n\n\n
\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n Log in\n
\n \n \n
\n\n
\n
\n\n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n
\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n
\n\n \n \n\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n \n\n\n \n\n \n \n
\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n

The Best Movies That Were Made To Look Like A Single Take (Including 1917), Ranked

\n\n
\n
\n \n By\n \n \n Philip Etemesi\n \n \n
\n\n \n Updated \n \n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n
\n
\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n

1917's \"one-shot technique\" has people talking. So, what are the best movies that were made to look like they were shot in a single take?

\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n \n \n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

The \"One-Shot Technique\" has been a hot topic of conversation ever since Sam Mendes' World War I thriller 1917 came out. Basically, it's a method used by directors to make the movie look as if it was shot filmed without cuts. The aim is to make the viewer feel as though they are part of the proceedings and also to make events feel like they are happening in real-time.

\n

RELATED:\u00a01917: 5 Reasons Why It's Better Than Saving Private Ryan (& 5 It's Not)

\n

It's not easy to pull off hence many directors tend to shun away from it, but Mendes did it quite brilliantly in his latest project. But, how many other films have used this technique? The statistics aren't out there but here are the best ones to watch if you want to get the experience of feeling close to the main character(s).

\n

Updated January 25th, 2021 by Kristen Palamara:\u00a0Innovation continues to be paramount in the movie industry as filmmakers should feel a need to be creative and try to do something that's more challenging and engaging for their movies. A creative, innovative, and challenging technique that isn't used very often is the one-shot technique. There are countless scenes in movies that use this technique like the iconic fight scene in the original Oldboy movie, but there are significantly fewer movies that attempt to film the entire movie in one-shot and these movies should be celebrated for taking the chance even with varying degrees of success.\u00a0

\n

\n A Boy. A Girl. A Dream (2018)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

A Boy. A Girl. A Dream: Love on Election Night\u00a0was successfully and impressively filmed in one single shot, but unfortunately its plot is a little lackluster.

\n

The movie follows two people meeting on the night of the 2016 American Presidential election, Cass being a local club promoter in Los Angeles and Frida visiting from the Midwest. The two spend the night having an adventure after just meeting and encouraging each other to follow their dreams.

\n

\n Invasion (2017)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Invasion\u00a0is another movie that was literally\u00a0filmed in one unedited shot and has a bit more of an engaging plot at its center.\u00a0Invasion\u00a0takes place during an eclipse follows Ali who is accused of murdering a man in a club.

\n

The police think it will be an easy case to solve but are planning to\u00a0re-enact the crime without the knowledge that the murders plan to kill the deceased's twin sister the same night. It's a complicated plot that impressively uses the one-shot technique.

\n

\n Silent House (2011)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Silent House\u00a0is a psychological horror movie that follows a young woman who goes with her father and uncle to clean up an older family property that has been deserted for years and is suddenly terrorized by perceived squatters or intruders in the house.

\n

The entire movie presents\u00a0the events in real-time and is filmed to look like it was filmed in one-shot, similar to Alfred Hitchcock's\u00a0Rope,\u00a0and has a complicated plot along with\u00a0its stereotypical\u00a0horror movie plot.

\n

\n Lost In London (2017)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Lost in London\u00a0is a completely unique movie as it was filmed in one day with one camera and live broadcasted to several theaters on the same day.

\n

The movie is from and stars Woody Harrelson and several other actors and musicians appearing as themselves including Owen Wilson, Willie Nelson, and Daniel Radcliffe. The action/adventure comedy follows Harrelson as he struggles to get home after a night out in London and runs into several members of the royal family.

\n

\n Fish & Cat (2013)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Fish & Cat is a time-bending movie that cleverly uses the one-shot technique to travel between two stories happening at the same time foreshadowing that they will collide.

\n

The movie switches between a group of college students gathering to participate and watch a kite-flying tournament and two men with ties to a restaurant serving human flesh, based on a real-life case, who are making their way to the campsite.

\n

\n Russian Ark (2003)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

About 2000 actors and extras were needed to\u00a0shoot\u00a0Russian Ark at St. Petersburg\u2019s Winter Palace. The whole movie plays out in one 96-minute take. Director Alexander Sokurov confessed to using the \"One-Shot\u00a0Technique\" because he hated editing; he wasn't doing it for the art.

\n

The film follows a ghost\u00a0who\u00a0drifts through\u00a0the rooms and corridors of Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg and\u00a0meets\u00a0various historical figures. The cast had to rehearse for months for the film to prepare for the one-day shoot.\u00a0In total, 33 rooms were used.

\n

\n Macbeth (1982)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

There have been\u00a0numerous adaptations of Shakespeare's work but Hungarian filmmaker B\u00e9la Tarr\u2019s version 1982 version of Macbeth stands out for the visual elements.\u00a0The film consists of only\u00a0two shots\u00a0that were merged to look like one.\u00a0The camera also\u00a0primarily focuses on faces instead of the bodies.\u00a0As a result, the facial expressions are captured quite superbly.

\n

Macbeth\u00a0isn't exactly faithful to Shakespeare's work. It\u00a0often takes a direction of its own. You can't help but feel that\u00a0B\u00e9la Tarr should have just gone with a different story. However, the expertise in directing is clearly visible and that's what makes Macbeth awesome.

\n

\n Ut\u00f8ya: July 22 (2018)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Ut\u00f8ya: July 22 is based on the\u00a0Ut\u00f8ya summer camp massacre that happened in Norway in July 2011.\u00a0Director\u00a0Erik Poppe interviewed\u00a040 survivors before making the film in order to make the action as realistic as he could. Using a single shot, the movie follows a lady called Kaja\u00a0as she moves just before and during the\u00a072-minute terror attack.

\n

RELATED:\u00a0The 10 Best Movies About World War I (Including 1917) According To Rotten Tomatoes

\n

The terrorist is only shown from afar and his face never appears in close range. Most of the characters were fictionalized in order to protect the identity of the victims. The real attacks were conducted by a man known as\u00a0Anders Behring Breivik who is currently in prison.

\n

\n Rope (1948)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

The legendary Hollywood director\u00a0Alfred Hitchcock was the pioneer of the long shot. Among his many great films was\u00a0Rope. He filmed it using a couple of 10-minute takes. He would have used much longer takes but he was limited to 10 minutes because that was the capacity of 35 mm film cameras at the time. However, you won't notice any of the cuts. Despite the limitations, only 10 shots were needed to wrap up things. That was an incredible feat in the 1940s.

\n

According to Hitchcock, he used a single shot in order to truly capture the feel of the play which the movie was based on. Rope was also his first-ever Technicolor film. The plot is quite intriguing as well. Two aesthetes\u00a0kill their\u00a0former Harvard University classmate\u00a0just for fun, to see if they can commit the perfect crime.

\n

\n Time Code (2000)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

As if one shot isn't enough, director Mike Figgis used four shots for Time Code and\u00a0displayed them all using a split-screen. All the shots run at the same time for 93 minutes. The audio keeps getting raised and reduced for each quadrant in order for the viewer to figure out what's going on.

\n

The movie follows several people in Los Angeles as they make preparations for the filming of a\u00a0movie. It's a movie about a movie and it's been shot with groundbreaking movie techniques. It's a\u00a0masterpiece though it gives the viewer a hard time trying to keep up with all four mini-screens.

\n

\n Son Of Saul (2015)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

For 107 minutes, the camera rarely leaves the lead's head in Son Of Saul. The man known as Saul Ausl\u00e4nder goes on to\u00a0get a first-hand experience of the hellish proceedings in a German concentration camp.\u00a0He is forced to participate in the killing of other prisoners in order to keep his own life.

\n

Son Of Saul was well received by critics. It won the Best Foreign Language Film award at the Oscars. On Rotten Tomatoes, it holds a score of 96%. Interestingly, it was only the first film that director\u00a0L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Nemes, had ever made in his career. Such a good way to start.

\n

\n Birdman (2014)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Director Alejandro G. I\u00f1\u00e1rritu experimented with lengthy shots in The Revenant but for Birdman, he went all the way. He apparently shot each scene about 15 to 20 times and stitched them all together to look like one take. The dedication paid off, with the Academy handing him another Oscar.

\n

Birdman tells the story of Riggan (Michael Keaton), an actor who isn't popular anymore. During the peak of his fame, Riggan was known for playing the superhero \"Birdman.\" He now seeks to revive his career by staging a Broadway play that's an adaptation of a short story.

\n

\n Victoria (2015)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Unlike other entrants that were edited to look like a single take, the German crime thriller Victoria was actually shot without cuts in three single takes, each from start to finish. The film tells the story of a\u00a0lady and a group of men who attempt to rob a bank at night but everything doesn't turn out as they expected.

\n

RELATED:\u00a010 Seriously Trippy German Science Fiction Movies

\n

Director Sebastian Schipper filmed the entire movie from\u00a04:30 am to 7:00 am. Within this time frame, he took three attempts at filming without stopping the camera. In the end, all that was left was to decide which of three shots was better. It was a huge risk but everything turned out fine. Victoria\u00a0literally makes you one of the wannabe robbers and it came as no surprise when it won Best Feature Film at the German Film Awards.

\n

\n Blind Spot (2018)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

Blind Spot tells the story of a family\u00a0that struggles to come to terms with the fact that their daughter has suffered a terrible injury that she will never recover from.\u00a0The director gives you no chance to take a break from the sorrow. When watching the film, you are obligated to feel the family's pain.

\n

The emotions run deep in Blind Spot. When it ends, there is a mixture of relief and sadness. Relief because the pain has t least been put to a halt and sadness because no solution has been found. The movie was chosen as the Norweigan entry for the Best Foreign Language film at the Oscars.

\n

\n 1917 (2019)\n

\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n
\n\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n\n
\n
\n

1917 is clearly the best ever movie that was made to look like a single take. Sam Mendes\u00a0made us all feel like we were running alongside\u00a0Lance Corporals William Schofield and\u00a0Tom Blake as they tried to save\u00a0another unit from being ambushed by German forces.

\n

During an interview with Vox, director Sam Mendes explained why he decided to use a single take: \"I wanted to tell this story in two hours of 'real time.' ... In a movie that operates more like a ticking-clock thriller at times, I wanted an audience to feel every second passing and take every step with them, and also be aware of geography and distance and physical difficulty.\"

\n

NEXT:\u00a0Top 10 Hollywood Directors And Their Signature Styles

\n
\n \n\n \n \n\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n \n \n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n \n \n\n \n \n \n \n", "page_last_modified": "" } ] }