text
stringlengths 1
29.3k
โ | label
float64 0
1
|
---|---|
pretty much everyone from warren county/surrounding regions was born at glens falls hospital. myself included. however, i'm not sure this qualifies anyone as being a glens falls native. rachel ray is, i believe, actually from the town of lake luzerne. โThe preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.100.229.154 04:28:57, August 19, 2007 (UTC) | 0 |
"
Is it scientific to attribute an event A, to cause B, where cause B was deliberate designed, with some sort of intelligent intent? Don't answer the questions beyond that
Well, the problem with not answering beyond that is that your example is completely rigged. There are several major fundamental problems here.
First, you completely fail to mention the fact that the intelligence behind ID is quite literally not of this earth. Natural science might look at a honeycomb, see it is built by bees, and then find an odd looking fossilized honeycomb, and theorize that it was made by odd looking bees. That is fundamentally different than saying it was made by something not of this earth. ID has at its core the notion that something OUTSIDE the system we can observe is at cause here. This is not science in any sense of the word, it is mythology. When Paul Bunyan was having a wrestling match with babe his blue ox, they kicked up so much dirt they created the great lakes. No evidence of paul and his ox remain. i mean, really.
Second, natural science takes an approach to knowledge that nothing is known scientific law unless it is irrefutable. Theories must have heavy supporting empirical data to back it up. ID turns this on its head and does an end run around knowledge and plays games with ""probabilities"". If no one can say how flagella on bacteria could have formed naturally, how in the hell can ID proponents come up with any sort of mathematically accurate PROBABILITY of flagella naturally forming on bacteria? If you don't understand it, you can't do statistics on it. ID jumps right over that hurdle and takes anything that doesn't have a complete, detailed, natural explanation and jams in their own statistics that say ""well, it's so improbable for this to happen, that someone MUST have designed it"". This is such a perversion of science. You can assign probabilities to something you don't understand. ID is just making up their numbers.
Finally, your example has A->B, where B was deliberate design. that's all well and good for a rigged example, except that with respect to life on earth, ""B"" is unknown. Your A->B example might qualify as forensic science, if ""A"" were a dead body and ""B"" were a bullet in the heart. You see a bunch of dead bodies with bullets through the heart, the next time you see a body with a bullet through the heart, you can probably figure that's what killed him. You don't have that with life on earth. You have ONE scenario, ""A"", and you have no other cases to observe or test. So, in that sense, A->B is not scientific if you've never actually observed ""B"". (btw, B is teh intelligent designer, which has NEVER been observed). So, in that sense, no, it isn't science. " | 0 |
"
Opinion Please Pt II
As SRQ continues to make personal remarks after she said she wouldn't, may I assume you will help me with a WP:RFC/U? Also, I believe she has violated the 3RR rule today. Edit warring over one accurate word is ridiculous, as is edit warring in general. Let's make it stop! May I also ask what was wrong with the honest statement I made on talk page and what you mean by hasty refactoring? I appreciate any assistance and welcome any questions. BTW, when do pivotal, accurate, well referenced entries become ""peacock""? My understanding is that it refers to unneceessary editorializing, not to precise vital info in the sequence of events? Thanks! " | 0 |
From what I've seen with editors other than Eric, the elephant in the room is the issue of baiting/poking the bear/whatever the hell you want to call passive/aggressive baiting. No one wants to touch that one, even though it's uncivil as hell and appears to be the tactic of choice whenever someone wants to get rid of someone or get their way. That's the part that saddens me. darkness | 0 |
)
We are not treating this as a forum. A question arose and was appropriately answered. End of story. ;- | 0 |
"
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Allowing username change to GianLuigiPalermoย . Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.
Request handled by:
Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request." | 0 |
Fatima bint Asad
I noticed you added a large chunk to this article recently. Could you post your sources (webpages, books, etc.)? It would be really helpful. Thanks. 23:56, July 29, 2005 (UTC) | 0 |
"
Unfortunately, judging from previous ""warnings,"" some people here have a rather unusual view of what personal attacks are. Pointing out that the individuals accusing me of using sockpuppets were incorrect and in fact the two main people making the accusations have been harassing me for months and had used sockpuppets and meat puppets themselves for getting around edit conflicts and to stack votes on a Request for Admin proceding, as pointed out by several editors at the time certainly cannot be considered a personal attack. Pointing out that admins did not have any actual policy basis to make the blocks is not a personal attack (and it has, in fact, been confirmed by the overruling of the blocks more than once).
Frankly, if you are looking for personal attacks, try yourself for your AGF-violating attacks on my actions based upon limited information and actually misleading information given to you by other individuals, or David Gerard for claiming that I am ""trolling"" when all i am doing is defending myself from false accusations of others. It's very clear that a number of people here need to realize that the very things they are accusing me of and trying to justify for a block are exactly what they themselves are doing from behind the pretense of trying to solve things.
If you want to start blocking for incivility, I might suggest removing David Gerard for a while for his actions, or Elonka for falsely claiming that I was using sockpuppets or that I was harassing her, or the sysop whose very talk page says he's going to go around blocking people no questions asked and in fact did so after I caught him restoring placing illegal information on how to pirate software an article talk page. Rules should apply to everyone, and a number of people have been getting away with pretty flagrant violations and trying to rationalize them away by just labeling me as an alleged problem editor and not taking any sort of responsibility for their own actions. " | 0 |
"
I have to laugh when watching the supposedly BRITISH national news, with guys barely up to their ankles in snow implying that Ragnarok is upon us, yet on the same day, when trees are being blown down and main roads being blocked by snow in Scotland, it doesn't seem to be noteworthy. Scotland routinely gets ignored on the ""national"" news, and even people from the north of England were complaining about the fuss made by the southern oriented news. Tourists appear to be amazed that things are falling apart because of something like this. My mother had a very good giggle at the reporters live in Trafalgar Square in a couple of inches of snow, or beside a main road, barely ankle deep.194.106.220.19 Lance Tyrell" | 0 |
"
Great links, IMO the American people are on the whole good and decent, but the so called leaders are fully controlled by an Elite bent on domination and control. This whistelblower says the same. . talk " | 0 |
", 20 January 2013 (UTC)
The argument at WP:NATURAL seems to rely on showing that the other name is common, so you need to prove that the other name is common. Numbers might help a bit. Also, above we are told that ""Gohatto"" rather than ๅพกๆณๅบฆ is the name of the film in Japan, but this turned out to be false. Incidentally, Ryuhei Matsuda, it seems to me, looks more like his mother than his father. What do you think? Also, how authentic is the portrayal of the Shinsengumi in this film? Do you have any historical insights? 15:12" | 0 |
more mature way. Central posted 6 | 0 |
Hamish MacDonald (disambiguation)
Hello. Just to let you know that as this now only has two entries - one of this name and one with a very similar name, I have tagged it for deletion using Template:db-disambig. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. Best wishes, | 0 |
Belarus a developed country
Hahaha, nothing more to say 82.209.225.33 | 0 |
"
=^_^=
I just watched the entire series, and I agree, this entire article and several other in the suzumiya haruhi articles are all from a ""somebody who knows haruhi personally"" sort of view.
So Im going to fix it.
" | 0 |
"
Baer didnt invent video games. This is jewish propaganda supported by a wiki troll named, ""Goldberg"" Go figure.
Hey, ""goldberg"", try educating yourself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfBwz_SiK8s" | 0 |
Ok, I just ask. For your experience, what you think about the portal? | 0 |
You need to prove notability using reliable sources. Just because it has some festivities (how large are they? who organized them?) in part of a country doesn't make it notable. Also, you need to change your username; this one will probably be blocked soon for violating the username policy (no names of web sites/businesses). (talk to me) | 0 |
"
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. โ talk " | 0 |
"You need to understand that he is not here do help Wikipedia, he is here with a political mission: ""attack brazilian press"" (no, I'm not crazy, but I see this crazy people all day, here in Brazil). " | 0 |
I'm thinking about deleting War on Terror, Operation Enduring Freedom - Horn of Africa, and Operation Enduring Freedom - Phillipines because they are redundant. I'd like for people vote on it. | 0 |
They are all cunts
It's not worth editing articles here concerning any serious issue. All sides consist of either people employed to edit or people with very strong opinions that will never, ever change. They advocate their stance as something that is interesting to them instead of using the encyclopedia as a book of knowledge and contributing what they are sure to know. Soon with the centralization of the net into larger and larger sites, independent information in general will be extinguished. Wikipedia, a project that started by nerds and professionals within their set fields will become the altar of knowledge where depth and true insight is sacrificed for becoming the sound magnifier of yellow press and popular science. The new tool that is intended to auto translate articles from one Wikipedia to an other will extinguish the few national wikipedias that through their niche provide those of multilingual capacity an ability to cross-check facts through other perspectives. With few small, independent sites left, with no or few free university pages left, real knowledge will be the privilege of the few that know how to use academic search engines and have the money to pay for them 78.68.210.173 | 0 |
"
Two things
It makes no difference to the validity of edits if an editor is ""anon"", and going around reverting a persons edits en masse (because you didn't like one of them) will yield time-consuming problems for you. 94.192.38.247 " | 0 |
"
Rajputs, not Rajasthanis...right? -P
Prof. Hancock's studies mention that the Romani people are most closely related to the Punjabis and Rajputs, I'm pretty sure - not Rajasthanis. He calls Proto-Romani ""Rajputic."" The distinction is important; if they are partly descended from Rajputs, who were never really confined to any one part of India, that would explain the linguistic variation within the Indic words in Romani.
For example, why the use of ""-o"" instead of ""-aa"" at the end of masculine nouns/adjectives in Romani? This is certainly a characteristic of Gujarati and Sindhi, but is it a characteristic of Rajasthani languages? Anyway, if I'm wrong in making the last change I made as of now, I'll be happy to revert it myself.
Oh, of course, " | 0 |
At Bookfinder.com I found Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference
Softcover, ISBN: 1558604790 Publisher: Morgan Kaufmann Pub, 1988
Bookfinder | 0 |
Chicadee
i think the article name should be moved to chickadee | 0 |
"
That admission begs the question ""Is it better to punish adolescent boys if they are going to engage in bullying behaviour here, or extend them welcome?"" /talk/ " | 0 |
"
Other attractions
What is a ""water place"" and ""animal place""? " | 0 |
thanks
thanks but i know | 0 |
Edit: In 1991, Canwest issued a successful initial public offering on the Toronto Stock Exchange, included multi voting shares
If CNN had multi voting shares, would it not be an essential fact? | 0 |
"
about your delete
ok im talking to you as a wikipedian so please forget from this conflict and focused on the facts ok. the herut was never israeli minister therefor she can not be the major party ok. and about her policy i see you know hebrew so read this ืืืคืืื ืืืืฆื ืงื ืฉื ืืฉื ืื ืืื ื ืงืืฆืื ื, ืืืื ืืืชืจ ืชืืขื ืืช ืืืืจื ืืืืกืืื ืืชืืื ืืช ืืืืืงื. ืกืืกืืชื ืชืืื ืืช ืงื ืืฆ""ื, ""ืฉืชื ืืืืช ืืืจืื, ืื ืฉืื ื ืื ืื ืื"" http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%97%D7%9D_%D7%91%D7%92%D7%99%D7%9F for god sake this is wikipedia is mean to bring people facts we should not enter this conflict here ok there is forums for that. i won't even argue with you about this conflict if you want you can be a member here https://www.facebook.com/JewishVoiceforPeace?fref=ts and write your opinion wiki is not the right place." | 0 |
Donnot merge this page
The single has been comfirmed:
Proof:
([url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob9KWtc78kA[/url]) | 0 |
|in=Democratic Republic of the Congo | 0 |
"
Please look at the original in page 197 of this link in case my copying made stupid jokes. Let's talk " | 0 |
I'm just someone trying to explain to you what the policies of this website are. As I said on your talk page, WP is not censored: see WP:NOTCENSORED. ย โJIM | 0 |
|listas = Phillips, Melanie | 0 |
"Thanks for experimenting with the page Earth on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. โ Talk " | 0 |
:ActiveRain
A tag has been placed on ActiveRain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 |
"
Unclear Statement
The use of the phrase, ""It caught on fast"" is ambiguous. Someone might want to revise the sentence, making it more clear what ""it"" is. In it's current context, ""it"" can refer to the styles of the product, or the product in general.
75.26.188.64 " | 0 |
He is director of the Tate. Done. | 0 |
This article does nothing but list a bill of particulars in attempt to villainize the AEL, without even giving a cursory glance at their side of the issues at hand (e.g., racist violence against Arabs across Europe). As such, it's going into the NPOV disputes category. Let someone who doesn't get all their information from FoxNews get a crack at it. | 0 |
"
You just vandalized Geography of Canada after a level 4 warning. It's admin finding time! " | 0 |
It is also crystal clear to notice, only federer has these so called fake achievements page about his shitting n even pissing, when players like Nadal Sampras who had way more better records dont have it? Its because this page was trolled by fans of federer over and over and they added almost every non existent things as records- a total lie to wikipedia viewers. | 0 |
"
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! '''''' Talk/Cont " | 0 |
"
One Addition
Mustafaa, I promised much more stuff but have been too busy lately.
One thing that sticks out and could be fixed quickly is the beginning of the invasion.
Yes, it is my fault for adding only the Argov incident, which now makes it sounds as if it was the main reason for invasion, which is of course wrong. So, the sentence:
""On 1982-06-06 Israel invaded Lebanon in response to the attempted assassination of Israeli Ambassador Shlomo Argov by Abu Nidal in London on June 4.""
should be expanded. This is a quickie list of basic facts:
Israel had been bombing Lebanon/PLO for months, from the air, sea and land; and preparing for the invasion (see below, they couldn't have pulled of the invasion in a matter of days otherwise.)
There was the attempted assassination Shlomo Argov ...
The assassination attempt was used by Begin as an impetus to shortcut the Knesset's debate and move into Lebanon without full approval.
Israel invaded with 60,000 troops.
I'll post links and add more explanations if needed.
08:56, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC)" | 0 |
I found a better reference.
In ,page 24,
Theoretically, polygamy can assume any one of three possible forms: polygyny or the marriage of one man to two or more wives at a time, polyandry or the coexistent union of one woman with two or more men, and group marriage or a marital union embracing at once several men and several women. Of these, only the first is common.
And on page 25
A statistical analysis of Kaingang genealogies for a period of 100 years showed that 8 per cent of all recorded unions were group marriages, as compared with 14 per cent for polyandrous, 18 per cent for polygynous, and 60 per cent for monogamous unions.
The disadvantage of working at a medical school is that the anthropology texts are not extensive, but they aren't checked out often either. This had been sitting on the shelf for over 20 years, deep in the recesses of the basement. Murdock is a sufficient reference for polygamy including group marriage. | 0 |
Interesting
Only way to keep the POV going is to ban all dissent. How Stalin of you! And OM does to his opposition just what was done to his 'brethren'. He is a mirror image of what he complains about. | 0 |
"
Number 11 was not made up! I wasn't ""inventing"" that ""insult""! It wasn't even an insult, for Pete's sake! Now you're going overboard. I told him exactly what he said, that ""God must have made us, though we don't know how""! If you don't believe me you didn't read that section thoroughly. " | 0 |
" 2007 (UTC)
Well, see first if anyone at the page is question objects to unlocking - without bias towards future editorial decisions. D 14:21, 23 July" | 0 |
"
never mind, i saw the name calling section where you posted this same incident in a link. but it still is disturbing on how Arilang1234's current apology is worded in exactly the same way as his previous ""apology"". " | 0 |
South and Central America?
My understanding is that enough of the dead languages in south and central American culture have been cracked as to allow a better understanding of their level of science? I have no data but perhaps this article could benefit from another section. 87.68.244.139 myg | 0 |
"
You were wrong and you know it. I never was ""vandalising"" the page129.2.44.118 " | 0 |
Your low self-esteem
I see you have such a low self-esteem that you have to warn others not to attack you.4.130.134.233 | 0 |
Migdia Chinea
1326 Cordova Avenue
Glendale, California 91207
818.956.0536
March 11, 2008
Robert Deegan
General Liability Claims Section
Los Angeles Unified School District
333 S Beaudry Ave 28th Floor
Los Angeles CA 90017
Dear Mr. Deegan:
This letter shall constitute a claim pursuant to the California Tort Claims Act, Section 910 et seq of the California Government Code.
My address information in compliance with Section 910(a) and (b) is set forth above.
Per Section 910(c), (d) and (e), the date of occurrence was October 5, 2007. I was assaulted and battered by students T and I and possibly other students at Markham Middle School, 145 W 108th Street, Los Angeles. The Police Report is DR#071828895.
LAUSD personnel, specifically, Steven Thomas Rooney, aided and abetted violations of the Ralph and Bane Civil Rights Acts, Sections 51.7, 52 and 52.1 of the California Civil Code and Sections 242, 245, and 422.6 of the California Penal Code, by failing and refusing to report the matter to police authorities. LAUSD violated my rights under Article I, Section One of the California Constitution to safety and my specific right to safety on a school campus under Article I, Section 28 of the California Constitution. I have suffered physical damages and extreme emotional trauma as a result.
David Brewer and other personnel knew or should have known based upon my complaints and upon past known misconduct by Rooney that Rooney was unfit as a supervisory employee of LAUSD. LAUSD therefore negligently hired, trained, assigned, supervised and retained Rooney and ignored my complaints about his misconduct.
LAUSDโs conduct towards me is motivated by benign neglect of complaints of discrimination, retaliation, and harassment by Latino employees, as exemplified in past incidents by Superintendent Brewer and the General Counselโs office failing to properly investigate and take appropriate action when complaints were levelled against anti-Hispanic ethnocentric misconduct against an attorney employed by the Office of the General Counsel, and other incidents.
Pursuant to Section 910(f) this claim is for damages within the jurisdiction of the unlimited division of the Los Angeles Superior Court.
Respectfully Submitted,
Migdia Chinea
cc: California LULAC Civil Rights Commission, United For Education Coalition | 0 |
(UTC)
But that way you'd have to include that factor (and its powers) into time complexity of almost every algorithm! It's not a very useful thing to care about, and so in the usual computational model, used for analysis of algorithms (RAM machine), a machine word is assumed to be of size bits, and so addition of numbers of that size is . 14:26, 22 September 2009 | 0 |
I understand now. | 0 |
"
I posted a thread about Donny on WP:ANI on Saturday after he 1) accused me of WP:BITE and then 2) demanded checkuser to clear his name. I thought that took some nerve, since I haven't run across any newbies who were so conversant with checkuser, but checkuser isn't employed to establish innocence. In any case, a passing checkuser confirmed that Donny evaded 3RR using IP's. Whether or not the IP that raised the Iberian/Arabian issue was Donny is probably beside the point - there's no possibility of AGF with Donny anymore. You've seen FisherQueen's warning, and I agree with her strategy - that comment isn't quite worthy of blocking, but ignoring her warning will be. (talk)
By the way, I will be away on vacation - in Wyoming/Montana in fact - later this month for ten days or so. I have no intention of being anywhere near a computer. There will be a few folks (including admins) watching my user/talk pages in case of trouble, and I'll suggest they keep an eye on horse-related articles as well. (talk) " | 0 |
The new image only shows Superwoman, and gives a much clearer illustration than the previous one, so I think it does ENHANCE the page. | 0 |
BTW, no hard feelings if you delete this afterwards. | 0 |
"
, I have to assume you have not been listening, and are just trolling now. Let me try to educate you. Per WP policy, ""On other talk pages, especially where such text is directed against you, removal should typically be limited to clear-cut cases where it is obvious the text is a true personal attack."" Shouldn't admins know this??? For my part, I might ask the user who made a certain comment I dislike, in extreme situations, to retract it, but at least I ask the opinion of others first on whether that comment really is a ""personal attack"". To just go to someone else's Talk page and delete comments you don't like is intrusive, bad-mannered and abusive. I have never done that, and never will, and I say this having been the target of actual personal attacks myself. Please go troll somewhere else. ~ " | 0 |
"
In the first par, it says evidence points to an 11 C entry ""at the very earliest""... and two sentences later, other evidence is suggesting as early as 900 AD, ie, the beginning of the 10th C. Also, use of the word ""our"" when refering to Europe is exclusionary." | 0 |
Removal of referenced information
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Also should I remove all references, that I consider to be nationalist, in your style? | 0 |
Alyssaa oconnor is reatrded | 0 |
Lots of places have different dates. Perhaps Hollywood Video is just going on rumors. That commment towards the IP editor wasn't needed. From what I see, that editor hasn't edited for a bit... so there was no reason to drag that into this discussion. | 0 |
"
Response to your email
Dear Mr. Lawrence or Mr. Ramirez or whoever you may be:
Thank you for your email, but I prefer to keep Wikipedia business on Wikipedia, not in private communication, so I will respond here.
Your email to me requesting your IP address be unblocked failed to instill any trust. You claim to be one person (Lawrence), yet you send me email from an address that clearly belongs to another (Ramirez)? Are all accounts at your organization as compromised as your Wikipedia account has been?
You state ""It is not possible for me to set up another account on another IP address because this is my IP address."" No, it is not your IP address. It belongs to your organization. And your organization has lost the trust of the Wikipedia community, with its history of promotional edits and multiple people accessing the same account. Therefore, not just this account, but your organization (at least one particular IP address), is blocked.
You were instructed above to refer to WP:COMPROMISED for information on how to proceed. Please do so. If you wish to create a new account, you can do so from home or from any number of internet access locations (coffee shops or what not) available in your area. If you do so, you should clearly disclose your conflict of interest and prior accounts you have used on your user page.
Sorry, but I will not unblock this account or this IP address. If you wish to contest this block, you are welcome to post another unblock request with your new rationale on here on this talk page. ~ " | 0 |
There is no reason why you could not edit the page and also take part in the GA review; however, sometimes it might be simpler not to work on the page. Nevertheless, it is sensible to form a consensus about images, if you are in doubt.
The diagramme showing hormones (image 2) is probably more suitable for the calcium metabolism page.
The anatomical diagramme is quite good, and could augment the a high resolution version of File:Gray1177.png.
Re File:Gray1177.png; this images in the gallery has poor resolution; however the 1918 PD version in Gray's is available at a much better resolution and can be uploaded over the poor quality image. | 0 |
Relax. The original anonymous poster is obviously spewing inflammatory rhetoric; they are naught but a simple drive by troll. I do, however, like the ongoing documentation of such obtuseness. Sociologists of the future have rich pickings herein. | 0 |
deletion discussion
You may want to voice an opinion, one way or the other, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incidents at independent parks | 0 |
|Lesson learned, I will always post on discussion forum, if there is no opposition, then revert(provided a reputable source}} | 0 |
}}
{{Image requested|in=Collin County, Texas|of=Headquarters, 7100 Corporate Drive Plano, Texas 75024, United States | 0 |
I think so. Good luck. ;) | 0 |
"
""GREEK CAPITAL LETTER YOT"" in Unicode 6.0.0
Newest Unicode 5.2.0 still features only small ""GREEK LETTER YOT"" () but misses big ""GREEK CAPITAL LETTER YOT"". Can you put into effect as soon as possible adding into proper Unicode 6.0.0 final this big ""GREEK CAPITAL LETTER YOT"", as separate codepoint or if not possible, can you at least put into effect as soon as possible adding into Unicode 6.0.0 casemapping definitions following mapping of lowercase ""GREEK LETTER YOT"" to , which is combination of ""GREEK CAPITAL LETTER IOTA"" and ""COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT""? I explain that ""COMBINING DOT ABOVE"" is not suitable because it collides with ""GREEK CAPITAL LETTER IOTA"" glyph by partial overlapping with it. Avoiding of fixing of this problem is already long overdue, because many font designers are using for ""GREEK CAPITAL LETTER YOT"" illegal codepoints, for example:
Vusillus font uses illegal U+03F5 for ""GREEK CAPITAL LETTER YOT"", which conflicts with official ""GREEK LUNATE EPSILON SYMBOL""
New Athena Unicode uses illegal U+03FF for ""GREEK CAPITAL LETTER YOT"", which conflicts with official ""GREEK CAPITAL REVERSED DOTTED LUNATE SIGMA SYMBOL""
As you see, this confusion must be ended as soon as possible. 78.46.51.229 " | 0 |
"
""Ein Oes Oesau""
This is of little importance, but ""ein oes oesau"" does not exactly mean ""for ever and ever"". Literally it means ""for ages to come"" or something to that degree. I thought I should post it here rather than just add it in without checking to see if I'm correct or not. " | 0 |
Whoa...this article is wearing thin
This needs to be reworded so that it sounds more concrete and it needs to be more organized instead of spitting random facts at my face. Can someone do that? | 0 |
Clean this crap up
Why are there so many references that reference the same line? There are multiple occurences of double, triple, even quadruple referencing on this page. That is completely unnecessary. Can someone take the time to clean this up? | 0 |
Nah I wont sign. STOP DELETING MY COMMENTS! | 0 |
"==Removal of prod==
I've removed the prod notice from the article. I think that the services offered by the city is important, verifiable, and can become a comprehensive article. The only source cited for this information so far explicitly states the broad class of services funded (but not particular programs), and this list appears in the article with brief explanations.
If you truly believe this article adds no value to Wikipedia, there's always Articles for deletion. matrix " | 0 |
Yes, this confirms that I agree to refrain completely from editing Female genital mutilation and related pages for six months. Thank you for your peacekeeping efforts and TIA for the unblock.(tโขc) | 0 |
Welcome to the site of chimpo14 you are allowed to send messages but not delete them thank you very much ...good bye | 0 |
"
Again you offer no alternative reference, just personal opinion and threats. Frankly you are not adding to this conversation unless you can find a citation that gives a different definition for ""city proper"" that we can use, superior to that from the UN currently cited. Until then, we will use the UN definition, with the understanding that cities are defined differently in different countries and this is a compromise. " | 0 |
Sorry to see you go. In any case, thanks for what was obviously a tremendous effort on your part. | 0 |
I'm actually quite pleased to see Jimbo get involved. Sometimes a executive decision needs to be made that is unpopular but fair and this does appear to be a fair request. | 0 |
Hi. We have three members already. We all seem interested in the project. I have created a template to place on article's talk pages. An user from the Spanish WikiProject has just suggested that we translate articles from one Wikipedia to the other using an automatic translator, but no-one responded yet. One of the members is interested in writing about gay literature, and there has been somewhat of a discussion about whether it should be gay literature or LGBT literature. I believe this was the first discussion of the project. Two of us think that LGBT literature would be best. I don't have a lot of time to dedicate to the project, so I would like it if it didn't depend on me to survive and grow and be successful. The other two members have asked what they can do for the project. I would like to write something to better explain what a Wiki Project is for, because this seems unclear. I believe it's not much of a big deal, it's just a way to have all people interested in the same subject in the same place, so if something important happens concerning that subject (for example a page gets nominated for deletion), all interested people get to know. It should also create a sense of community, and it's good to have that since we'll be editing the same articles. I think things are going fine, except that I don't know whether the other members see this as I do. | 0 |
It could be possible to evade, if you just find a good place to hide. Does anybody have a link to the complete FBI finding? | 0 |
Mathematician / Astrologer
User is modifying the article to emphasize al-Khwarizmi's work as an astrologer.
It began here:
This was reverted by [[User:Lumos3|Lumos3]:
Theodore again modified it:
This was reverted by
Theodore again modified it:
This was reverted by who left a message at Theodore7's talk page.
I left a follow-up message to discuss. In the meantime, Theodore again modified it:
I'm going to revert the changes now, and move the discussion from Theodore7's talk page to this newly created subsection. | 0 |
Yes, you have a point there. I humbly excuse for those edits related to 1 and 3 as they're doubtable. As for 2, I added alleged CIA operative in the article. It is more accurate than 'cult depogrammer' although no such title/profession at all would suffice too. What cults or cult members has he deprogrammed? The word 'cult' is out of context. My edits with regard to 4 are at least better than the previous state. Note, that point 4 is proven by Project Monarch entry and various of its sources on bottom. It is therefore completely bogus to say that CoB and MP are somehow 'the only source'. 2 and 4 in CoB entry were inconsistent with PM entry. The article is now more accurate according to Wikipedia's policies IMO. Have a look and a nice day or 2. | 0 |
"
I'm not sure from that comment how much you understand about research in this area. There is for example a dispute about the validity of self-reported results in the general evidence base for CBT which has gained momentum in the last five years. A lot of new work has been done since 2004 that would throw those claims into dispute. At the moment you are giving prominence to a one country study in a controversial area that is itself 8 years old. That is cherry picking as the table gives a false impression of CBT's position in the pantheon of methods. I can understand an advocate pushing it, but we have to be balanced here. TALK " | 0 |
"
It really did read like an attack piece on Yobol and certainly was not written in the tone or style of a statement from a supposed research/philanthropic foundation. But the bottom line is that this article likely affects their bottom line and charity, after all, is a business these days. Perhaps we should consider protecting the page with pending changes? These new primary studies are likely to attract users with an agenda, and if the established research is correct that Morgellons is a delusional condition we have to keep in mind that we are literally dealing with people suffering a massive delusion. talk " | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Sun Hwa (Filipino School) | 0 |
Is this some kind of joke?
I'm baffled and not too far from voting for deletion. | 0 |
not be allowed to play the Intercontinental Cup even if they beat the South Americans. The reason: the Intercontinental Cup was a European/South American title, NOT a world title. | 0 |
How much of this page's content should be removed from the SPACEWAY-1 page where it originated? With the addition of SPACEWAY-2, it was best to separate the material but should I go back and remove it as well? | 0 |
No idea what you're getting at - this really isn't a big deal. | 0 |
"
Coordinator slot open
Due to an unfortunate recent episode in which Eco was indefblocked (and then retired) for real-life harassment, we have a coordinator slot open. See discussion here. Cheers, โ (converse) " | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Never Bet the Devil Your Head. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Martin451 (talk) " | 0 |
"
Main photo
Isn't the main photo with the text ""Jimmy Wales in December 2008"" the exact same one shown here, in a 2005 version? " | 0 |
"
Oh, I know why. You see, I was pointing out to Linuxbeak that someone else hates him too. I just searched for ""Linuxbeak"" on Google, I didn't create that stuff. " | 0 |
"
We don't keep non-free material just because we like it. (see: WP:ILIKEIT) Wikipedia is about having free, reusable content for everybody. Keeping nonfree material that doesn't particularly improve the encyclopedia in any way (those images weren't really relevant and made the article cluttered, anyway) goes against our basic principle. " | 0 |
Also it might be a reference to One After 909. | 0 |
}}
{{WikiProject University of Oxford|class=B|importance=Mid | 0 |