/sex/ - Sexual art stylization thread

Previous thread >>7115012

If you're looking for a place to practice and post all sexual works, from simple pinups with exaggerated proportions to explicit pornography, then this is the right general for you. Both Eastern and Western styles are welcomed, and encouraged.

>Rules & Guidelines
1) All forms of cartooning styles are welcome; submit and receive feedback from others.
2) Please resize your images below 1000x1000 before posting.
3) Share your knowledge, any tips are certainly welcome for all beginners.
4) Do to not be afraid of asking for critique, please be specific on what help you need.
5) Remember all GB3 related content such as LOLICON, SHOTACON, FURRY pornography, FURRY and BESTIALITY are banned on ALL boards, including red boards, except /b/ and /trash/. DO NOT post that content here.
6) DO NOT reply to AI bait posts. Report and hide, then let the janitors and moderators deal with the problem.

>Community Resources
>>>/ic/courses
>>>/ic/artbook
characterdesignreferences.com/chara<wbr>cter-anatomy

>NSFW image resources
pornpics.com
female-anatomy-for-artist.com
realbooru.com
hegrehunter.com

>Timed drawing gallery
line-of-action.com
quickposes.com/en

First for big booby black mamas paired up with big-dicked blonde twinks <3

I did something for /sex/ check it here >>>/f/3507269

From a comic I'm working on about a young hoodlum. Like a drill rap version of torpedo 1936. This is more of a concept than a full idea. I want it to have explicit sex and violence so it's not just hentai

Thoughts? Any critique or red line would be appreciated.

>>7153575
looks fucking horrible, but yeah is ok if you are autistic, everyone has the right to draw

>>7153802
Why did you draw her vagina so droopy?

>>7153485
Have Fallout 2 on the brain right now

How's my anatomy? Im especially worried about the legs. Any critique is appreciated.

>>7153819
Why does she suffer from megalencephaly?

Figure this doesn't deserve its own thread, so I'll ask here:<br>Does anyone have any good sources for NSFW settei? Seeing how artists set up their coom characters is really helpful for me.

>>7153675
There's a lot of stuff that looks weird with this

>>7154571
Tell me about it. I dont mean that in a combative way either. I did design everything for compositional purposes. I wanted to emphasize depth with the inside of the fridge, the middleground with the characters and the backdrop establishing a kitchen setting.

This is the worst general. Even worse than /fag/. I hope you all poop your pants.

>>7154624
its literally the best one. People actually make stuff here and give constructive critiques

>>7154624
Someone didn't make it in the sticky...

>>7154624
Your contribution definitely made it better.
You fit in here perfectly kek.

>>7153817
I want them to have "personality", a lot of detail an variety to work with. Shit needs to be interesting and fun, I can't just draw a hole on a slit. Come on.
Of course that doesn't just "happen", i.e., someone recommended in this board a western artist from the 80's Don Lomax it was, never heard of him, I thought his work was freaking awesome. So I take things from that. As well as stuff from Niku ringo, mimasaka ideaki, the white passion series from ohtado, onikubo hirohisa, and a million other artist add fun things to the mix. You can't get into a saturated art genre like this and do just ordinary stuff. Weird and out of the ordinary is what makes things fun to take a peek. I would place "weird and out of the ordinary" even above of "good artistic skill+anatomy+rendering+whatever". I think the best example of that is Ganassa, the guy is a fucking master of anatomy and artistic skills, but the stuff he does has absolute ZERO erotic appeal. Such a waste of talent. But, he adds to the market's variety and that's good and fine. Everyone should have a sit on the table.

>>7154902
I like your stuff. Any place where you put all your stuff?

>>7154902
Yeah, I see your point anon. Cool to see that you're exploring possibilities. Reminds me to do the same.

>>7154902
I love how deranged your shit is, keep being you

>>7154939
Thanks anon!
>Any place where you put all your stuff
/ic/ and /f/ lol. I just can't finish shit. That image in example, all of those figures will be animated, the shapes are already done, but it takes a lot of time to put together a final swf with all those bit and pieces. I don't know what to do with those nuns in example.
I'll probably add more girls to this one >>>/f/3507269
I should put an Id to the flashes to help search on swfchan, but that's useless since anybody can reuse the animation assets and do new flashes. That's fine, I'm ok with that, we are all just having fun.

Little doodle idea I had. Someone posted a comic of a fat lady getting stuck on an escalator. So I turned it into a mimic fighting my OC, Blanche. It's really small tho so forgive the poor quality. 0.1 pen.

>>7154902
Nice midnset. It's a shame you lack mainstream appeal. Drawing porn in this style is a waste of time imo, but you do you. If you enjoy it, then you are winning.

>>7154902
Niku Ringo’s recent futanari exorcist comic is one of the greatest futa doujins I’ve seen only ruined by the stupid nose hook fetish.

God I wanna fuck her, her sweaty armpits and her beautiful body all day so bad

>>7154902
>>7155166
>Niku Ringo fans
patricians

>>7154810
Looking good, just keep at the anatomy studies. Take a little more time on your line art weight. I think you're probably just not giving it much thought but it can really make your art pop, so just spend that extra time making those lines juicy.
I'd suggest doing a study on 'values' in grey scale, it'll help you be bolder with your hue choices when colouring. I think most people when they aren't super experienced with painting make the mistake of having a desaturated choice of colours.You look like someone that's probably progressing quite fast, so just keep at it! I like the look of a lot of these.

>>7154902
those are some sexy fuckin puss's

>>7155178
Niku struck gold with this character design imo. She’s not super skinny like most manga/doujin designs but she’s also not fat, she’s got a body type I love and the haircut with the outfit works together perfectly. It also helps that he didn’t make her dick all gross looking either like a lot of futa artists. And the faces she makes when she’s trying not to cum is just *chef’s kiss*
Perfect woman

>>7154567
Handle of an artist that used to lurk here who drew similar subject matter

>>7155091
Little flash idea I had. Someone posted a hot OC getting stuck on a mimic escalator. So I turned it into a flash game.
I thought it would be a fun thing to do, it was. Hope you like it. You can check the animation here >>>/f/3507313
Click on [embed] and it will play on the browser. Click on the file link and you will save it to have it on your pc. Have fun.

>>7155301
Holy. moly. I am honoured you liked the idea so much you turned it into a flash game :3 I saw the animation too. It's great!

Hello fellow coomers.

How do you usually come up with a good lewd outfit for your characters? Especially when it needs t be semi-believable and still leaving pussy/ass/tits in the open.

>>7155551
can't go wrong with a skirt and vest ;)

>>7154902
You do you. Though personally I think you have gone the same way Tradd Moore did - his latest works are so stylized they don't read as a comic book but more like some kind of fresco. And while I can appreciate the skill needed to do them I think that's a mistake as you kinda lose the flow of the story due to it.

You have a similar problem with your figures barely reading as people. And combining that with nudity? Seems kinda self defeating.

I love drawing porn for niche indie games

Gave up in the middle because it looks like shit…<br>Only liked the more clean one (which is why it is more polished than the other ones lmao)

Is this over saturated or over exposed or does it work?

>>7156204
definitely eye catching but the reese's draws the eye more than the badge and the eye path between the warm elements is a little awkward, maybe it shouldn't have legible text or push it back like the cube, and the badge should be a little brighter

>>7157759
size kink always gets a vote from me, good shit
>>7157910
nice cock, looks tasty

>>7157759
Your sense of perspective never ceases to impress me.

>>7160248
Hot. Make it come out from her ass, or mouth

>>7160441
Holy schizo.
meds, now. faggot.

>>7160500
Whenever this faggot posts there is immediate dicksucking to his incomplete sketches. Either collective shit taste, which isn't unlikely either, or samefag.

>>7160623
If you don't understand how good his forms and sense for perspective are, that's a you problem.
Pyw, I'm sure you can do better (you can't).

>>7158723
>>7157910
i like these cocks.
do you post elsewhere? I haven't checked the self-promo thread in a long time.

>>7153643
>>7157759
please add lighting.

For the anon that posted pic related last thread:
all you did was amass information over time piece by piece and string it together into a reasonable narrative to rationalize your core beliefs about the world. That's all that was and that's why you are completely absent from all your descriptions about the world and you describe as some distant "dissociated" object.

Did you know? Words create images too! You appear to have lots of images about the world, mostly related to:

>consumption
>true sexuality

>the modern vs. not-modern
>a dichotomy between 3dpd and hentai
>a dichotomy between natural and unnatural
>a dichotomy between nature and nurture
>black and white, true and false, on/off state thinking

>coomer visualization practice
>The Realm of Futanari

You don't know the first thing about "image formation" it's probably part of the reason you're awful at perspective drawing. Do I know? I actually do know anon, thanks for wondering. :)

You have a fixed sense of reality and your judgements amount to what's called "a value system."

You live in a world where there's a non-zero chance a meteor could strike your house and anon calls you autistic because you write like an incel robot.

The structure of your language and reasoning is basic.
That's why you sound like you go on "tangents" and you always have to draw opposites and say "yes, but" over and over to reason yourself out of all the corners you write yourself into when you try to articulate yourself.

>"With imagination anything is possible"
"Anything" is the limit of imagination and you probably aren't ready to go beyond it.

How do you tolerate such an aggressive avoidance of ignorance, anon?

>>7160500
>>7160623
>>7160827
Anon, people can photo edit over the screenshot of (you's) to hide the others. It's a tactic that I use to gain power over my weaker skilled anons.

>>7161171
yah its in the promo thread
>>7161314

>>7161366
No one would take that much work for some shitposting on an anonymous shit board.

>>7161366
>didn't pyw
As expected. You are just envious but your ego is too big for you to admit it.
Or just a massive dunning kruger.

I have not had sex can I make this kind of art?

>>7161522
No one ever had sex here. And no one who draws this shit have sex. That's why they do it. To cope with that. Having sex dries up any deranged desire or motivation to do this shit.
That's why that "no-fap" bullshit is so fucking retarded and criminal. Men need to take that shit out of their system periodically. So their brains can function normally with out the hormonal dis-balance fucking up their thoughts and turning their brains into an sponge full of cum.

>>7161561
I have sex with my gf just about everyday and we've been together for about 6~ months or so. She knows I draw porn and we watch porn together fairly often.

>>7161561
I do it because it's easy money. Your copium is showing kek.

>>7161841
What's the story behind this scene, anon?

>>7161848
A boy and a girl discover a mystical pond where a female elf, who is the avatar of Baphomet teaches them to surrender to lust

>>7161853
Cool. That is worthy of a whole story-comic.

>>7161859
I have a similar one in mind for this OC of mine. I'm trying to find the strength to start it because it's going to be a huge undertaking

>>7153675
>>7160493
tell me more, I like this idea (I'm also drawing you a cover :)
whos the girl(s)? whats like the general plot of an episode? why does he wear the mask?

>>7161930
Nobody cared until he put on the mask.

>>7155301
anon I cant see it, what can I do?!

>>7162066
Check it on swfchan under the same file name, I guess it must be there. I know swfchan isn't so user friendly (ad pop-ups and shit), but they keep alive much of the flash still out there.
I could post it again on /f/ but I don't want to be a nuisance there. If you don't find it on swfchan, I'll post it again on /f/.

BTW, I'll be posting a new flash soon on /f/. Not related, but, you'll see...

>>7159186
very cute and adorable. just some nitpicking:
penis is flat. give it some room to curve upwards. show penis volume with the panties.
left thigh is thinner than right one.
ribbon should follow the gravity.
nipple goes up when arm is raised.
biceps should be flexed in this arm position.
show volume of pillow with overlapping.
fold lines don´t seem to follow any direction.

you are hiding hands and feet. this is propably your weak point.

>>7127055
one more thing
>"Why is everybody obsessed with futa, are you all trans or something?"
>everybody
This is called a "cognitive distortion" anon and this one in particular is associated with depression.

What makes you obsessed with transsexuals anon?

I know you don't have an answer and that you want to turn this into an argument where one of us is right or wrong and you want to dance around what I write because I'm "laying a trap."
I mean no harm. The trap here is how your mind reacts to what I'm saying.

When did you start combining a personal sense of identity with your sexuality?
What makes taxonomy so important to you when it comes to your relationships with other people?
What leads you to the conclusion that evolutions in representational drawing are a consequence of an addictive cycle?
How are you able to judge some evolutions as more harmonious than others?
Where do your values come from?
What are values for?

>>7127206
>porn-sickness brought out the faggotry. If you stare at dicks all day, you're bound to get attached
To correct you,
we get attached to things that we need.
That is the simplest explanation I can offer to a simpleton such as yourself.
Now, reality:
>contact between our sense organs and "sensory stuff" produces "physiological changes." Physiological fluctuations produce a subjective experience of fluctuating sensation. Nerves that fire together wire together.

That's all for the science. That is the actual limit of what we can say "conclusively."
You say "fag" because you've been conditioned to speak like an infant, anon. You're conditioned to relate to others like an infant, and you need other people to meet your "needs" because you are "attached."

As a scientist: your hypothesis or "argument" is "unfalsifiable."

I am smart, anon. Part of the reason I am and you aren't is that I learned to eat with a knife and fork and you're still spooning baby formula.
You don't vote anon because nothing you believe is worth voting for.

>>7159186
I'll join in too.
I like longer torsos.
This is an image manipulation and you can do whatever you want with it I think the most my critique can hope to do is provide an alternative perspective, maybe you notice something you don't like or do like.

added some color to an old sketch, how do we feel about the cool under-light?

tits painting colorized light experiment.png

>>7162279
I understand you are a schizo science denier, but I'll bait.
>we get attached to things that we need.
This is such an over-simplification that it hurts.
Do you seriously believe being attached to a gay friend could turn a person gay? Or being attached to your line of work (drawing penises) would turn a person gay?
Please, I need a citation for that.

>>7162347
You're gonna banned for false reports underage faggot

>>7162413
One post shows internal organs, the other is loli.
Also I haven't reported anyone. I'm just reminding these idiots they have a containment board for that stuff.

>>7153485
the girl on the far right is hot

>>7162417
You're reporting a piece without a single drop of blood as "guro". You're a mouth-breather or a newfag

>>7162472
>You're reporting a piece
Do you have bad reading comprehension?
Tissue penetration and showing internal organs is guro. You don't need blood for that to be the case.
That's my last reply to you.

>>7162482
>Tissue penetration and showing internal organs is guro
no it's not you fucking moron, guro is GORE, do you think this is gore? This is tom and jerry level of violence you fucking moron
>That's my last reply to you.
Good. Then I won, lurk more newfag

>>7162596
HNNGGHH Fuck that ass is hot. Impressive work anon. Thanks for sharing anon.

>>7162689
Consult with an optician (or psychiatrist) as soon as possible.

>>7162596
needs a cute blonde shota next to her <3

>>7153708
Cool to see one of the first arts here, be Vera.

>stylised sexuality
We can go even more abstract

>>7162345
My entire post was actually about the gay anon that was stating obviously that he believes those things by avoidant-ly phrasing things in an autistic rhetorical tirades.

I don't believe gay is a thing. It's a word that dumb people use to describe dudes kissing other dudes, often with a sense that it's "not right".
Society has conditioned a select population of mediocre midwits that think being attached to a gay friend turns people gay or that staring at penises all day or some of the day or any part of the day turns you gay.
They gather like rats on 4chan where no one knows who they are(a person that they have lots of internalized hatred for by the way)
and they make lots of threads concerned about sexuality gender and identity.
Ironically, I think these people are closer to transsexuals than they allow themselves to admit.
I'm not projecting: that's a statistical likelihood. A safe bet. People who are actually comfortable in their own skin don't worry about being gay.
I appreciate people you even though this feels like friendly fire to me.
Please ask retards for citations I was stunned that someone called last threads schizo post "food for thought." It was not food for thought: it was a schizo science denier bugging out of his mind because he doesn't like what other people like.

>>7163193

>What makes anon obsessed with transsexuals?"
This anon is not a doctor he is a loser with zero love in his life.
Anon has no love in his life because he has no discriminating faculty when it comes to love. No "compassion" for himself or for others. That's why he worries about "making it" and "not working hard enough" and wants impostor syndrome so he can fight every single day to "be a man."

Anon obsesses over transsexuals the same way he obsesses over being wrong in an argument: his ego can't accept "I'm wrong" or even just "maybe I'm wrong." This anon is needs "explanations" for everything that he can follow so that he can be lead from one blind stupidity to another.

Gay people who are uncomfortable in their own skin are reasonably uncomfortable around this dangerously aspergian retarded "sociopathic" "know-it-all" intellectual.
The discourse around "trannime" and "what's with all the futas" is infantile.
"In in its infancy."
Babies hate being "woke" because babies need time to sleep before they grow up.
They cry when they're shaken awake and they cry when they see penis instead of vagina on girl, because girls are objects in their world and are meant to look a certain way according to their "mental object" of what girls "are." Likewise, they apply this to "boys" and "men" and "themselves" and come up with all kinds of profoundly asinine rationalities because the brain is designed to be reasonable and to avoid "cognitive dissonance." The "smartass" will never realize he's being unreasonable without someone having the sense to "take the bait" and point out the problem and ask for "citations."
The person who avoids citations and argues anyway is trying to "force views on other people" and is stunningly incapable of recognizing the immense value in a difference of viewpoint.

I'm so straight I could fuck a dude deep in his throat,
>lovingly
ask him to smash me from behind like I'm a bad girl
and it wouldn't be gay.

>>7162345
sorry if it sounded like that's what I was saying
as what I was saying was intended to be on the contrary.

Regarding attachment: It is an oversimplification.
The anon I'm responding to was overcomplicating it. It's clear he's a beginner and he needs to go back to basics before he moves on to those painful details you're aware of.

I was aghast at how many anons claim to have well-reasoned positions on subjects that they only understand the side they prefer to be on.
These people look to me like they are are slaves to the whims of their feelings and their thoughts.

They've grown into manchildren, incapable of holding the dialectic and incapable of participating in the democratic process with any good faith.
They shitposts on 4chan about shit no self-respecting man, gay, trans, straight, lesbian, teletubby, grouch, circle or square has any good reason to make time for.
Their ideas are "erroneous" and have failed in the natural selection of ideas.
No one gives a fuck if anon thinks he's figured out "the reason" for futanari artwork like he's some kind of pseud doctor who isn't allowed to practice medicine because he can't meet basic requirements to do so. This anon can barely pick up a pencil to draw, let alone write a thesis paper.

I'm not "schizo" I just "jump around" when I write sometimes. I'm writing for the idiot that gets pissed off by what I say and is too afraid to "take the bait" when I tell certain people that they're wrong and I have a very long list of words alone that are sufficient to prove out the many problems with "the futanari realm" and "coomer visualization" that don't even require me to ask questions about "what does anon mean by those things." I know what he means by those things. I know those things are fucking stupid and I know why because I know what those things actually are. I have "truths" that cut through "stupid talking points" like a knife to warm butter.

>>7163212
He's just a troll having a laugh. That people you describe are not here lurking and shitposting in /ic/-/sex/ from all places lol. Those retards are in YT comments.

>>7163066
cavemen saw shit like this and immediately started gooning in their literal goon caves

/beg/ trying to fix and finish an older pic, I could use some critique and tips<br>the shoulder/arm/chest area has been a problem so I've been trying to study other artists to figure it out. still not really sure how to attach the arm properly.

>>7163193
I see. Well, I wholeheartedly agree with what you said. I am 100% sure that sexuality is a spectrum and a lot of people are bi or gay without even realizing it.
I apologize for calling you out. English isn't my first language and you probably just write too eloquently for me to follow your line of thought.

>>7162596
>>7162689
>>7162893
anon you really need to stop replying to your own posts with praise. Your art is not just unappealing, it's outright bad, and everybody knows that it's you because you do it in every thread where you post your stuff.

I don't understand as well, if you're going to lean into the "gelatinous thicc" meme why aren't you out there actually studying fat women's anatomy?

>>7163399
nigga you KNOW that's not how an arm works

>>7163399
Amazing stuff! Super hot anon, looking forward to seeing more! You got socials?

>>7163399
Goofy looking, poor anatomy, stupid expression

Fuck I hate this

>>7162506
Very good pose and shading, but the freckles look way off.
Freckles are blotches of varying shape, size, color and density, not identical dots.

>>7163489
Thanks. I can rework the freckles, what do you think is a better way to render them? I'm also going to work on adding better lighting to the hair, I got lazy and rushed it.

>>7163494
Use a softer brush with opacity, redraw the freckles with uneven shapes, start with large blotches and then smaller, more sparse ones around them
Freckled areas often have a different color compared to the rest of the skin

>>7163399
Anon this is amazing, keep on going

>>7162689
>>7162893
>>7163446
>>7163595
Cmon, stop trolling him. This is akin to making fun of mentally challenged people and you know it.

>>7163399
Bad anatomy, horrible pose and angle, Crap, bullshit

>>7163503
Way too much work. Just use a scatter brush and a clipping mask and then lower the opacity

>>7163232
amazed my long-form "futa/traps aren't gay" shitpost with a mix of mcluhan and baudrillard style lingo is still getting mileage an entire thread later... but if you are getting off to images with no real referent no real partner no actualization in another person then it reasons that the images one can be attracted to in his fantasy may start to become increasingly unreal and fetish-driven, e.g. "normal" ero-manga/hentai with correct genitals progresses to futa or tentacles or monster girls or vore or whatever
i don't see how you can really deny this unless you don't believe "reality" exists apart in the first place, which is just a more extreme version of what I am saying regarding images and not a serious objection, so if the objections are indeed coming from a "schizo" who does not inhabit the same mental environment a neurotypical person does then all the seethe seems reasonable

>>7163399
Holy Double dubs of truth... that deserves a reward.
I used your pic as inspiration for one of the animations in my last flash little project, you can check it here >>>/f/3507629
I like how your resolve a complex scene like that, you're good anon. Thanks for the inspo. Keep at it.

>>7163909
I was not amazed anon. I knew you'd read all my posts and write something like this.

I don't blame you for calling them "shitposts" to diminish yourself. You think it makes you more of a sympathetic character and that it helps you hide from scrutiny.

What you've actually demonstrated is that you don't value your own ideas.
You borrow other people's "lingo" and "style" and you don't believe in the power of your own speech.

I have no need deny what you say anon. Nothing you write bears any "truth" to be denied.

I was speaking the truth, that's why you needed to write back at me.

You're struggling with "cognitive dissonance," and you can see you've grown "content" and "dependent" on your adaptive patterns.
You are inside denial, subjectively experienced as "confusion" followed by providing more evidence to support your claims because you're happy to continue paying the cost
of a life without compassion and feeling for other human beings.

You don't care about any of those things in the first place.
You as a person feel very little. You're "dead" on the inside, and
you hate yourself. Compassion is the last thing you want.

That's part of what makes it hard for you to draw. You don't allow yourself to be a bad artist that can't make it.
You have no faith in your abilities and you know that no amount of effort on your part will ever be enough to realize your dreams.

Women scare you, that's why they're "monster girls."
You're more comfortable with futa than you let on, that's why you started with them.
Penises make you angry, you prefer "tentacles."

Girls always appeared to you like they had it easy.
I leave that to you to unpackage for yourself.

Girls were also more deserving of sympathy than you were.
That's why you call yourself a "bitch" when you cry.
Being a "sissy" is the only way for you to feel like you deserve to have tears.

>>7164301
god DAMN

anon went full kendrick and dismantled him

>>7163909
You see girls above you, and you want to be "vored" by something greater than yourself.

You feel a disconnect from the world.
You've grown accustomed to seeing yourself alone in the world.
You try to take away other people's humanity because you have none of it yourself.

You probably philosophize for hours about "what's fair" in the world.
You've stopped judging for yourself. You leave that to your favorite writers and whatever you or the world conditions you to believe. You're an "unoriginal' thinker because nothing in your head
is anything you can own or take responsibility for.
Did you know? The ego is the "I" that holds on to reasoning. I'm not denying science, reality, or the value of reasoning.
You're a "science denier" because you love to live in denial
as long as it makes sense for you to. It does make sense! You're powerless in the world and that's scary for you.

That's why you made yourself "neurotypical" in this conversation.
You dissociate to evade what's in front of you.
It's partially why you procrasinate.

Do you know what your attachment style is anon?
You don't! But I bet you know what that word means and you've "researched" the topic a little.
It's all "psychotherapy babble nonsense," because you can't stand how easy I make it look to reduce your mind to all it ever was in the first place. A little shitty turing machine that halts or doesn't halt, depending.

Promised pain is terrifying for you.
You're also smart by the way anon, that's what allows you "consider all the possibilities" and stupidly read into my words rather than listen and take them at face value.
This is also part of what makes you god awful at creative work.

You are in a hedgehog's dilemma when it comes to relationships, anon.
That's partially what makes you autistic. You want to be like Sonic. Sonic has friends
even though he's a hedgehog.
He also goes fast, and you're slow,
and one day you'd like to go fast like Sonic
with Tails and Knuckles too.

>>7163909
I'm glad you didn't continue after vore.
Your thoughts were getting "scatological." They smell "offensive" because they're shitty and anyone who swallows it as "food for thought" is going to get sick.

It is physiologically impossible to "get off' to an image with no reference to a real partner. It is not possible to "imagine" any of the things you talk about with a real experience.

You're dumb and you think experience is different from thought
and different from memory
and different from imagination.
You have needlessly complicated ideas about how your mind works because you have zero clue about how the mind works.
You protect yourself from real complexity in the world. You "compartmentalize" everything with mental categories like "ero-manga" and "correct genitals" and "fantasies."

Your avoidance of complexity is what makes you mediocre. Nothing you put your mind to requires any hard work on your part.
You write "shit posts", react like an ape, and regurgitate things you've conditioned yourself to think.

You do not comprehend that experience and reality are the same thing, and you'd like to imagine that I'm some kind of extremist that "actually" agrees with your stupidity. It's a fantasy for your mind to "escape" into.

What I'm saying is not an "objection." It is a catalog of targeted insults directed at your ideas, which you only responded to because you got "defensive."
You're confused about your identity as a person and you fill that darkness with ideas about identity.
You obsess over transsexuals because they've figured out who they are and you haven't. You get angry because everyone drawing futanari is happy and you're not and you can't figure out "why."

>>7164312
He is the naked emperor so it doesn't take much.
I'm glad we could enjoy a little point and a laugh at something incredibly stupid.

>>7164323
And here comes BBL drizzy to pile on LMAO

>>7164264
Wtf this is great man, pretty good job!!
You can try Krenz Cushart perspective vids if you wanna develop this skill, also do composition studies on films where you break the scenes in just 2 values.
Very nice stuff

>>7163446
Glad you like it!
https://twitter.com/joojo67011
https://www.deviantart.com/repainth<wbr>eretic

>>7164488
>>7164490
>>7164492
>Mr Racism
>Hairy arms on girls
When you have to resort to controversy in order to get reactions, since the art skills are missing.
Holy kek.

>>7139272
>>7141781
anyone know the artist behind these draws?

>>7164301
>>7164315
>>7164323
you're mixing up me with what I am describing because you have a hard time separating a position on something from agreeing with a position on something; I am not saying I am into futa or vore or monstergirls I am describing where those sexualities come from
is a cancer doctor himself a type of cancer?
if I know how to play baseball am I a professional baseball player?
Is a scholar of chinese history inherently an ethnic chinese person?
no... but you might feel the need to argue anyway
>You do not comprehend that experience and reality are the same thing, and you'd like to imagine that I'm some kind of extremist that "actually" agrees with your stupidity
experience is "images" and sensation that is what I said, so yes if you are saying the experience is real and there is no other real you are saying your futa fetish is real in your mind, which is a more extreme version of my saying that the futa fetish is image based, you are agreeing that it is necessarily image based because for you the images are the only real-experience

>>7164394
Thank you so much anon. To be honest, I do these things without too much thought. I just wanted to do a version of that image as fast as possible for that flash. If I have to do that for real, many things would change it would not look like the same idea at all. The guy fucking the ass in the back wouldn't be there just his torso, same as the guys on the side, and the guys on the back wouldn't be even visible. You can't put EVERYTHING on a picture like that, you have to chose. BUT, this is the beauty of crude coom art, it doesn't have to be "accurate". We really want to see an "idea", it may work better on one people and not so much on others. I love checking this raw coom artists, they are clean out of "artist's prejudices and tropes", they have the best and purest form of "coom mojo". The opposite to Sakimichan, if I can make it more clear.

Aside from that, when doing an animation like that, you have to put limits and rules, many times opposite to "common sense" in regards to color theory and composition. That one has 9 animated pieces, that was the least amount of pieces that I thought it would make it work, well, almost. I don't like the "thrusting" effect, I'll have to add a couple more layers, to make it work. I'll add that in the next update.
Thanks for the advice, it is good advice, and you're right. I just may be forced to deviate from those rules in favor of speed lol. But you're 100% correct.

>>7164910
lol, though that shit looks more like some european north eastern celtic druidic satanic bullshit.

>>7164811
Probably (you).
Other than samefagging, I don't see the reason why you'd be interested.

>>7164811
>>7165024
one of the posts says "/ic/ is my blog," so it sounds like the artist is anonymous

>>7164821
This has not been disagreements or agreements, anon.
This has been you becoming wrong, and all I did was point it out.

You defend yourself because you put yourself in weak positions that need to be defended, anon.
You enjoy positions where you're on your back.

My random stories hit so close to home for you that you need to say "I am not saying"
to cover up yourself.
You felt "exposed." My post was violating for you to read, anon.

You were reactive, and when you react you tell people what you're afraid of.
You're confused because you're a "demisexual", and you only allow yourself to experience attraction
when you feel safe.
You're a "control freak," and you probably get intrusive, unwanted thoughts around emotionally available people.

What gets "mixed up" for you are your beliefs, which are really just thoughts about how you think things work.
I'd like to say you're stupid again, but really, you're an "ignoramus" as one anon already pointed out.

You lack awareness, and it's the source of your suffering. Do you actually practice anything you preach?
You'd see that all your -phobias if you did.
You'd see your "existential dread."

Please do not speak as if you have positions, anon. All of your positions are cheaply borrowed from other people.
You're a broke beta male and it's probably the only thing you can afford.

I'd bet you're "passive" during sex.
You worry about sounding stupid. "What if I get called a gay schizo again?"
You're not worth standing up for yourself, so you stand up "arguments" like so many houses of cards.

You think about big bad wolves when you hear the wind blow.
We were playing Jenga anon, and you lost.

>Fetishes
This word means "to fixate." I know you think there's more and I'm here to tell you there isn't.

You have contrived a new word for focus in order to create an antagonist in your dichotomous, fractured and delusional language of "unorthodox" people.

>>7165143

Powerless people like you win in the world by creating a home for imaginary friends
to foster your own obsolescence, anon.
I know all about your art plateaus.

"Alternate versions" of what people say are in your imagination,
and they help you avoid being the loser you're afraid to be.
You think life is a race, you're such a loser you need to feel like a winner.

You sound like a hungry whore for motivation.
I'd bet you depend on willpower and "reasons" to do hard things.

You don't see yourself fetishizing chinese scholarship, baseball, or medical doctors, anon.
You embarrassingly compare yourself to people that you see as superior and place on a pedestal.
A key difference is that make conclusions where the real experts leave "questions."

You make these comparisons when you feel "bad" and you create analogies to make yourself feel "good."
You feel bad because you're a small halfling anon, and you need to picture yourself as Frodo on a noble journey.

It's your "personal narrative," and it's obvious that you see yourself and people that "agree" with you as "right" and other people are "wrong." You're favorite words to hide behind in this position is
>separating a position on something from
>agreeing with a position on something

You separate to create an agreeable concordance in your disordered mind.

That's what I meant when I told you about compartmentalization. It's normal by the way. We all compartmentalize.
The difference is that you're doing it with your "repressed sexuality," and it's so bad that you need to leap to "extreme images"
to articulate the words of your porn-addicted mind.
How do you think you keep track of all those fetishes?
The avoidant mind adapts in the ways that it knows how.

You don't know how to live in a world where your interests are conditioned.
This is why you're careful about what you expose yourself to. You easily become a slave to your mind
and you rant to create excuses for this problem.

>>7165158
You have a mind that needs to be active all the time just to stay functionally autistic.

"shitposts"
nothing you say has value or means anything.
It is a "cry for attention"
because it's growing painful to live a life where you are not worth attending to.
You focus on everyone else 'cause y'know y'ain't worth your own time.

(You) want to know where sexuality comes from because it's hard to accept what your mind is turned on by.

Did you know? Understanding of mind is a consequence of mind. The answer is recursive, and you're wasting your time trying to understand yourself by trying to understand everybody else as if you're really all that different.

I feel sorry that you were unable to experience the embarrassment of puberty.
I think it's stunted your growth.

You're unable to accept yourself and you only look to self-knowledge for a reason to accept the person you see in the mirror.

I have had no need to argue anything, anon.
This is just me telling you that you sound stupid.

The ideas you've articulated are incorrect
and they're also invalidating towards yourself so I don't need to do anything.

You can't recognize the difference between having what you've said devalued
and having what you've said evaluated. You overvalue your own thoughts and opinions over the vast pages of life available to you.

Lastly:
It's not my futa fetish anon, it's yours! :)
I am in awe of how difficult it is for you recognize your own compulsive disorder.

Do you want to know my fetishes? Do I arouse you that much?

They're called preferences anon, and you don't have any of your own.
That's probably why (you) draw porn in your personal time:
you don't have anything important to you that's worth drawing.
You just like being "turned on" and "turned off" like a little robot or a light-switch.

>BBC-chan this is my least favorite of your pictures. Please redo it. Make it less condescending. Romanticism was cool then, it's cringe now.

>>7165143
>This has been you becoming wrong
>>7165158
>you rant to create excuses for this problem.
enough projection to fill two posts' worth of word limits, well done

>>7165179
Thanks.
I'm pretty confident he's spanked it to
golden showers and bimboification and
probably likes facials.

For anyone wondering what projection means, it means our ability to use personal experience to understand the experience of others. It's normal and I don't blame you for doing it.

>>7165178
>>BBC-chan this is my least favorite of your pictures. Please redo it. Make it less condescending. Romanticism was cool then, it's cringe now.
lol, why are you addressing BBC? he's not been around for a while.

>>7165143
>>7165158
>>7165178
>>7165179
TL;DR
"Projection" is sometimes the last bastion of "non-traditional narcissism."
Everything was written to give the reader new exotic search terms with a little humor.

Thank you for tolerating my prose. I know it's wordy, condescending, an looks like "projection" and "narcissism" to a lot of idiots who wish they knew better.

>Please make more paintovers in addition to your critiques.
What makes critique and paintovers shitty:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=932<wbr>eSyHbUgw&t=7s

Here is a beginner-unfriendly lecture about "fundamentals":
https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech<wbr>.edu/fml.html#7

"Fun to Imagine" is more playful and beginner-friendly series:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3p<wbr>YRn5j7oI&list=PL04B3F5636096478C

If you have trouble with overthinking and you'd rather read than draw:
Labyrinths of Reason

Has an Audiobook:
"Conjectures and Refutations" is okay.
I preferred "Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow."
"Meditations" by Marcus Aurelius

Some okay speeches about sex drive if you've dabbled in BDSM:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpL<wbr>jEp4mxAo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2A<wbr>Uat93a8Q

Sources to learn more about non-traditional narcissism for boomers:
"Mindset" by Carol Dweck, and
"The Mahabharata" translation by Sri Swami Satchidananda.

If you play computer games and want self-improvement advice
I recommend HealthyGamerGG.

A perspective on "mind":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ur<wbr>VkZXVHcQ&t=1865s
How being an artist becomes cringe:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Fggq<wbr>hbm8J3U
Envy towards other artists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOU<wbr>oDCuKYbU&t=1423s
Dating advice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSr<wbr>ymhSn6I8&t=5561s
"Why are artists traumatized and autistic?":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Tk<wbr>bP4XfggM
Types of procrastination:
https://youtu.be/bavdneN9sKg?t=585
Regarding "emotional expression"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kli<wbr>AI9umFyY&t=3338s

May you have fun this Summer, /sex/

>>7165241
I dunno. xd
I kind of have some beef to squash with him and that picture came to mind after I finished writing.
The last time I had a stubborn conversation like this one I was watching BBC-chan have a meltdown
about one or two anons that weren't receptive to some shitty redline advice/teaching "muh fundamentals" thing he was trying to do.
That picture of his kind of embodies what I think rubs a few people wrong about him and brings them to dislike his artwork.

>>7165143
>>7165158
>>7165178
>>7165309
none of what your sayin make any sense my nigga

>>7165410
Lamest use of AI yet. I tried to read it, genuinely interested. Boring an nonsensical as fuck. The fuck it's all that about?
I'm just hoping for the satanic artist to post some more stuff. That's the most interesting shit posted here in quite a while.

>>7165410
that's okay. That means you're still on your way here, anon.
It took me four years to understand everything I've laid down and 10 years of various art schooling programs prior to that.

>For those of you that managed to read and thought "post your work"
tell me what my ego is /sex/ and I'll post my professional work and a link to an AMA.
Tell me who I think I am, not who you think I am.

Please request something for me to draw while you're at it. I love making new pictures.
What kind of lingerie do you think I wear for others? What do you think my kinks are? What kinds of stories about the world do you think I make up?

There are multiple sound bytes from those sources I linked that will explicitly state the nature of my ego.

Please be specific. Remote accuracy is remotely incorrect.
Use a paragraph or be very succint.
The shortest answer is a self-contradicting sentence that happens to be true. It's good for flirting.

I won't acknowledge any answers that don't take place within the lifespan of this particular thread.

I don't mind posting my work. I'll do it for people that can demonstrate clairvoyant perceptiveness which is a very rare marketable skill. It is the minimum respect I've learned to expect from good jobs.
Having this ability to guess who people are from word choice alone is the final lesson of my self-taught curriculum.

I've included the picture that inspired me to pursue character design when I was 12 if it helps ya'll think.
One last hint: I love to draw femdom for my oomfies.

>>7165338
why so petty lol
I wish I could draw half as good

>>7165496
I remember that pic, and the series made by the artist. I thought it was really cool at that time. So you're supposed to be 27 years old aprox? How do you get to reach that squizo level at that young age? I don't care who you are, I'm more interested in what do you expect from your immediate future. Do your generation have any aspiration in life at all? I'm thinking that this generation should be called "S" for sex and squizo. The 4chan generation. You were raised in this fucked up hyper reality, we may have build it, but you made it your home and world.

>>7165496
well for starters i would like to see you draw my pic in your style

Hanako Isuzuki Running (Color - Final).png

odds and I cancel this furry art commission because this autist is way too fucking picky and is trying to befriend me and I'm a little desperate for money but I've got another one and fuck this fucking weirdo shit give me fucking odds now<br>evens I finish it

>>7165911
Throw that thing in a AI and see what comes out of it.

Any criticisms and/or redlines would be helpful, i wanted to place the lizard's pointer finger around the bunnys neck and the rest of the hand sprawled since his neck is too small for the whole hand

>>7157759

>>7157759
>>7165937
 Oops mean to ask, just as a req, next time u draw a big guy and a boi could u make the guy wearing military gear, and wearing a mask? As an estrogenized femboi i love that stuff! (btw ur stuff is gr8)

>>7164834
>You can't put EVERYTHING on a picture
Preach it man, less is more!
I honestly love the idea, animating so much movement and keeping it all coherent to the scene is an incredible skill, I once went crazy just trying to animate two dudes fighting it out so kudos to you for doing it!

>>7165911
You want the proportions to be more like this anon.
Don't be afraid to use references when you're making this kind of design.

>>7164823
I don't know what is this but I like it a lot. I'm doing a Flash thing with it. I already have 2/3 of the project done. I hope I get it finished by tomorrow.
I like this one as well >>7161841

>>7166593
please tell me this is an old drawing

>>7165960
>>7166723
Nice seeing you still active. Good stuff as always.

>>7165241
>he's not been around for a while.
I feel called out.

>>7165513
I'm so proud of you for seeing 2024--2009=15 and then adding 12.
There's a 14 somewhere in there too, though.

I wish there was a way for me to convince you that "ego death" does not mean what you think it does and that you cheapen yourself by not caring about who other people are.

>4chan generation
"Reality" can't be hyper or fucked up but I can totally understand using those terms in the /sex/ thread to get a rise out of people.
What's really fucked up is the notion of a "matrix" and a history of people invalidating or ignoring others' experience.

>>7165504
I wanted for him to feel a little "called out" wherever he is.
You can probably draw about half as good.
The skill ceiling is lower than we like to imagine
and higher than we think often before we start

>>7165524
I would like to but *slams table* that's not how the game's played.

>>7166593
You again, you always post the same poorly drawn shit over and over again, they look like deformed dolls made by a 10 year old child

>>7166740
I don't approve if this drawing. Just wanted to let you know. Girls with dick and balls is gay.

I am an idiot and lost a lot of shit due to user error. Does anyone have tutorials/helpful images for drawing cock and balls?

>>7166740
The perspective was not wrong.
Please keep words like "off" and "right and wrong" out of your mouth around good drawings.
Don't go around telling other people what it takes to improve when you really don't know
yourself.
All you did was "work hard," and that's the limit of your understanding on improvement.

You do not know what "accuracy" looks like in a drawing, which is why you have such a strange array of the same words that only refer to one thing. "Looks correct."

You see it, and then you recognize it based on your last experience of what looked right last time.

You have to sleep on your pictures and ask for feedback. It helps you jog your memory to get into the habit of doing what you did last time. You're careful to get feedback from people that respect you since you can't tolerate the perceived vitriol of those that don't.

I only wish you could experience how it feels to get feedback on a picture that is both perfect and capable of being better.
How it feels to do something you really have never done before.
"I prefer your old art." Where do you think that comment comes from?

You're so polite in a conversation and eager to show others how you accept compliments and well wishes.
you speak in 4 tones:
"ThankyouThankyou" "YourtookindTookind" "YoullNeverImprove" and
"Nothing bothers me, that's why I lurk on 4chan and have reactions to schizo posts that vaguely remind me of myself and have my name and picture on the end"

I'm sorry you got doxxed. I think the critiques you got were low quality and written largely by assholes.

I know you think love is clicking like on everything and saying thanks to everyone but it's not.
It's making up for your own lost time at best.

You live in a "walled garden" and it's nice in there, I'm not trying to take anything away from you. Any "devaluing" you see here is coming from you, not me. Don't blame me again for you seeing things that aren't there.

>>7166793
I don't mind if you think so. I personally just don't think there's anything wrong with being gay.

>>7166815
Are you replying to the wrong post(er)?

>>7166723
>@triggerwytch
Why did you abandon ortamaw and do you love me?

Feeling like the practice is finally starting to pay off :)

>>7166822
>I personally just don't think there's anything wrong with being gay

>check comments under my drawing
>"why is the guy's eye blue? I can't relate,"

>>7166940
>>7166941
Kys and back to pol chudcuck

>>7166822
I definitely wrote everything there just for BBC-chan.

My first three posts were taunts
the last three were supplementary reading for >>7163909

and the one after that was written just for BBC-chan
about things only BBC-chan will have a sense
about what is meant by what is being said.

>>7163909
>anon thinks he understand things about the other people's sexual preferences
>unlikely to have friends to discuss these matters and is a "lone reasoner"
This is a typical problem for the alcoholic philosophy major that browses Reddit.

Anon can't see that and thinks I'm projecting when I point it out.
>gets angry when you use "reflective listening" on him
>is lonely and likely touch-starved
>depends on emotion-focused coping and only writes jokes when he finally feels that he's being "attacked"
And then he gets defensive and tries to let everyone know he doesn't care blah blah blah
A good lecture about why people get angry about being right or wrong:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DW9<wbr>JLSyYVXY&t=1803s

Anon is "a danger to himself and those around him."

>were you saying i'm wrong? were you disagreeing with me?
>aren't traps gay?
>but muh images
Those are the only talking points that reading metaphysics, sociology, and watching The Matrix can afford you.

After they've outlived what little use they have one has no other choice but to
>cope and seethe

>projecting
simpler translation:
"I know you are but what am I?" - a 4 yr old
That's what your brain really does with that stuff.

There's too much women with dicks in this thread. I can't cope.<br>This is why I'm not popular.

>>7167090
>A good lecture about why people get angry about being right or wrong
and you've written how many angry, projecting posts now?

>>7167149
>>7167108

finally
>mad
>shut up!
>i hate u! ><
Ultimate impotence.
here's a pic to cheer you up

>>7167149
>>7167108
Learn to discern between your anger and my anger.

There's very little in there but I acknowledge some of it's there. It's annoying for me to talk about stuff. It feels unfair that what's obvious to me is not obvious to others. There's a similar effect within perspectives for a drawing.

>anon presents argument for his notion of right and wrong
>Remember Shakespeare?
That's all I pointed out. It's that simple.

It's not even really a house of cards.
It's just two cards that you played in different positions. "Good, bad."
"Stuff I like, stuff I don't like" and lots of pedantry to make it sound like more than that.

>a) It's important to notice when someone is blaming others for things they don't control.

>b) It's important to notice how this person displaces responsibility for their negative experience onto others.

>c) Don't take responsibility for things that aren't yours to take responsibility for. We all have enough problems of our own to deal with, and a few of us forget that and become irresponsible.

I have done what I can to return a certain amount of agency to two users in particular that appear to me like they live responsively, not responsibly.

They do not take responsibility for the displacement of personal problems onto others. That's part of what makes it hard for them to just draw.

I want to tell you how to recognize anger in text but I won't. :3 is a secret

Both the people I targetted sometimes see themselves as people with every reason to be be happy, show everyone all the time how they don't get upset about stuff
and are mysteriously infuriated by small
"pet peeves"

They get mad at at the way I write because I'm not interested in being kind enough to "be more considerate."
They felt reduced, and they didn't like it, and it amazes me that these two users can't see that there's no mystery to how they behave. All the mystery is beneath the behavior.

>What makes you...?
Those are good questions to ask.

>>7166773
Hey, after 5-6 year Gains Goblin finally started to use thinner lines to define the muscles on the figure. Previously outlines and muscle groups used the same line weight. Another 10 years and he is gonna master the art gesture so that his figures don't look so plastic.

>>7167385
that's your self-talk anon.
Don't go imposing what's yours onto others
just because it helps you survive.

Yall a bunch of dumb nigger-faggots, frankly go fuck yourselves

>>7167550
Which Deviantart account did you snag this image from?

>>7167548
By that time, pets would be able to draw better.

>>7163489
>>7163503
>>7163768
I worked on it some, what do you think?

>>7164823
>>7166691
Alright, I have everything I need ready to assemble in flash. Again I went beyond of what I expected to do. Now to get a big cupa coffee and start my favorite part, to build the flash. It could take a while or it could be super fast, we'll see. Preview on Picrel. I don't know the title yet, "Forest Sacrifice" sounds cool.

>>7167090
>I definitely wrote everything there just for BBC-chan.
I see, then I guess you are just being incoherent because of alcohol or drugs or something. That's how all you wrote sounds to me. Either that or you are a complete schizo.

I'm trying to find some good artists to study that does realistic anatomy, but render it in a simple yet appealing way. Something that isn't just cell shading. Recommendations?

I did not expect what got me in the mood to draw was they/them pussy, but here we are.

doodle 2024MAY15 xanthe theythempussy 002 REV2.jpg

So what I'm getting from this thread is that everybody is implying that they're a corporate cuck, or a tranny. This is strange.

>>7169385
Can we see her hot sweated ass? pleasemmmhgghhss...

>>7169321
It looks like washed shit, all the paint seems muddy and opaque, Even drawing coomer you are shit

>>7169385
Why so much porn in this thread, don't you guys go outside?

>>7169472
Are you lost, or just illiterate?

>>7169418
thats why its called a wip smart guy

>>7156090
Ngl, i wanna start with drawing women with hips, then draw bbws. How do i start?

>>7169462
>>7169411
I was going to post some of the ones I've already drawn, but I'll draw her ass.

>>7169583
ooh, those seams, is she a robot?

doodle 2024MAY16 xanthe theythempussy 05.jpg

>>7164823
>>7168602
IT'S DONE. I came up with a little story, the forest god ask for three offerings, you get any of the three outcomes at random. And starts again. Very simple.
You can check it here >>>/f/3507802

I want to do this one >>7161841 next. I already have a story. But this time it will be a "kinetic type"of thing, no options. Just a story. It may take more time to do than the Forest God one. We'll see.

>>7166941
Oh no a 4channer thinks im trans for being ok with homos what will I ever do!

Does anyone have experience with doing r18 art commissions via Pixiv request? I don't have the mental capacity anymore to deal commissioners who belong to padded rooms. I just want to draw, ship it and get paid.

>>7170440
OtakuMindy on twitter, I just made it so nothing else atm :0)

>>7170362
what texture brush are you using for the skin, or is it a noise filter?

rough sketch, could I get some feedback on it? Need a way to make the leg more structured so it doesn't just look like a big almond lol

>>7170549
also there's an unfortunate tangent line with the panties and the arm that I'd like to rectify but I'm not sure how - maybe tuck her arm in more so that it's in front of her forearm?

I'm starting to move to NSFW. I really like the way I captured the volume of the boobs.

>>7170549
the honkers

>>7170549
man, the legs on your drawing looks better already than the ref itself. You got this. The most obvious thing could be her torso, it should be a little bit more lengthy, just a tiny bit. A good element of reference is her belly in the ref pic, there's much more room there than in your drawing, you can stretch her belly a bit and add a few line details like in the hip area. And maybe improve a little her shoulder, push it up a tiny bit.

>>7170653
Fuck I love so much some of the pics you do. Like this one. Hot shit.

Doodling some low effort slop, since never tried to draw that and i kinda like it<br>I know that i need more coomis and copy some Japanese artist, what also you can rec?

>>7167550
Did you draw this pic related btw? I'm a huge fan. Pls share socials.

>some of these drawings are actual abominations not even the "its muh style" excuse can justify it

I will never be so hard on myself whenever i get a bad sketch/drawing

>>7170791
Critique them you lazy bastard!

yotsuba nakano (the quintessential quintuplets)

>>7170674
I really like the shape language on the midsection

Why don’t you give yous to people who ost decent work but only to drama and bait?

>>7170716

This thread is useless and you are a bunch of niggerinos

>>7169236
You must be 18 to post here, incel kiddo

A lot of you draw penises really poorly.

>>7170874
It's just what my penis looks like, don't judge

I came to part when I start thinking about doing NSFW more like a job, and less like just a hobby, and monetizing myself as I keep getting commissions. I want to ask a few questions about this sphere:
When it comes to monetizing yourself as a whole, how do you nsfw artist do it?
All I know is artist do this "teaser" picture on twitter, censored on pixiv, and the good stuff is paywalled, but what should I use as paywall?
I don't really want to censor my stuff after all people paid for it, and I do want them to see the finished product so pixiv fanbox is questionable. I dunno about alternatives. Pateron hates NSFW artists' guts too, so does Paypal, so I don't know, what and how to do it, to not get booted.

As for other, the question, do I need to register myself as a company, that I have an income by doing this to my country's tax office or no?

>>7170954
Isn't much more easier and safe to make money in ANY OTHER way unrelated to nsfw? And I'm not against nsfw stuff, on the contrary. I just think that people like you shoot themselves in the foot making things extremely difficult, when "making money" should be the least difficult issue.
The normie sfw scene is infinite in possibilities to monetize any shit. You can edit videos, make art for thumbnails, build stock content in sites that produces shit on demand like shirts, mugs, etc, doing catch phrases with personalized logos. Nsfw will always be a niche market, hard to monetize, hard to "advertise" and harder to cope with mentally. You will always be cornered by that shit.
Going back to the issue, let's say the people funding you, know who you are, they want to keep you going, so they will find your real nsfw stuff in places like this site. They know it is you. You can even have an alibi by saying "that's not me, anybody can post any edited shit in 4chan trollin' honest god fearing artists! GODDAMNIT! HOW DARE YOU! YOU PIECES OF SHIT! I'LL SUE YOUR ASS!". So you can have a Patreon a Paypal or whatever monetizing platform to cash, just posting sfw stuff there. It doesn't matter, you will post you're fucked up shit in free anonymous sites like this one and your content will reach your funding crowd anyways in a safe way. And you will be clean, you just have to be adamant to faggots making false accusations against you. Fuck them losers. You do you. You're swimming in a shark tank, be a shark or be shark food.

>>7170970
SFW sphere is bloated my man, and unlike nsfw its viewerbase consist of ultranormalfags.
Sure you can get in with some meme drawings, and pray the algo picks you up, but I have noticed this:
I'm not saying you need to be the next mika pikazo, and constantly get 1st place on pixiv, but let's face it, normalfags DO NOT pay for art. Most people will not do so either. They want it free, and to be able to see on their shitty phones for cca 5-6 seconds and move on, they are not going to commission you, I can assure you that. Designing logos? Dead fucking end, you'll get one gig/month at best, waging away in an AD company, and even that is because you are the "I know a guy who does this" via connections, but if you just start out? My man, a safer bet is getting a saw and cutting off your libs then applying for autism bux, disability benefits and foodstamps.

All the shit you listed takes a fuckton of time, and its outsourced for a reason. Video editing? They are all teenagers, and zoomers who work for a bag of rice. Andrew Tate, and other influencers literally became viral by doing this, paying laughable money to them to make youtube shorts. Animation is terrible too, and Invincible is a very good indicator how bad it is. Learn 3d? Have fun with your indian coworkers, and I guarantee you, flipping burgers will be extremely attractive at the end of the day. (and a lot better paid too). The whole entertainment industry is in a deep shit now that ESGfunds dried up too.
NSFW has a lot more dedicated people, who are more willing to pay, despite smaller pool, and harder exposure.

>>7170995
oh, I agree with everything you wrote there. But, still, the mainstream market is a much better and safer bet to build a business. It's a big enough market to find your own place. You have rugrats-tier level artists making bank there. Anyone can make it. Think about all the known artists wearing off and falling from grace and fame, not because they suck, but because, people gets bored of the PERSON. Art still is a human interaction driven activity, even you can have your chance and your place if you put the work.
NSFW will just be harder to go through. Everything is against you, the global money system, state law, even the people's hypocrisy, the backstabbing. No one will step up for you, you will sink alone if shit hits the fan.

>>7170995
>>7171127
With coomer art, you are constrained by the fact that nobody will use their real name or face to promote your stuff to other people. Nobody normal chats with their friends "hey you should check out this hentai bro." Doesn't mean you can't make money or grow an audience, but you are highly dependent on access to pseudonymous/anonymous platforms—that can decide at any moment to end their relationship with you for making smut—to do very direct marketing, because again there's no real organic or word of mouth growth, just you trying to capture the willing-to-pay-for-smut audience's attention in the places they spend time browsing.

>>7170716
How do you render like this? Is it a combination of brushes? Techniques like subsurface scattering? Colored lines? Ambient occlusion? Tips? This is confusing?

>>7161841
Ok, a quick WIP. Picrel has a bunch of animated elements put together just for this image. I have other stuff done already. A young couple of human virgins walks into a forbidden place, guarded by a hot dark elf. She has been guarding the place for centuries and the punishment for trespassing is DEATH, non negotiable. The young couple face their tragic fate with sexual consequences. Will the dark elf spare their lives? We'll see... dropping soon on /f/

>>7171256
>swan and background is only good thing here
Anon... Beside porn you can be a illustrator for a book and get way more money

>>7171260
You may be right, but, like an anon wrote above, be honest, don't you think that it wouldn't be too hard to get this sort of art easily available everywhere? And add AI on top of that now. I'll be competing against a whole universe sucking dick left and right trying to get a "job" from some loser trying to get me to do a masterpiece for free.

I get what you say. I totally do, but if I have to choose, without "money" involved, I would choose the hot sex animated story to exist rather than some lame art for some lame cash grabbing product that no one gives a fuck about. You know, as time passes, I wonder what are the things that I come back to, films, games, stuff. And, it is shit like this, that leaves a mark. Those early awesome hot anime, some classic porn that you always keep going back to, these old flash games. Mainstream shit, like movies, (saving the classics like Predator or Die hard, Star Wars, whatever), you rarely keep that shit in your head. Games of thrones i.e., That was fucking amazing to me, but I wouldn't watch that shit again. But there's old shit that I keep enjoying like it's eternal, it just refills my spirit every time a new again. Good Sexy shit, is just eternal. It never gets old. Doesn't matter how many times I see some classic shit like I dunno, "The Fashionistas" and all that italian classic porn form the 90s, that shit is outside of time and space.
This shit "games", this is the kind of shit that I would "commission" someone to do. Can you imagine that? Paying an artist, to do all this shit, and paying extra for the revisions, paying a coder guy, (willing to do this shit), and paying him extra for the infinite revisions to the animation or game... That shit is impossible to afford. It's fucking priceless. People spend fortunes, their life work in money, to buy shit, a watch, a car, a travel, just one night in an hotel in fucking Dubai, they do that. Well, I may be buying this shit as well, by doing it. And I love it

I call this one Le thug watches the sunset, thoughts?

>>7171307
Hey what's up anon! Yeh, just having a little bit of fun. I guess this is my final form. I can do shitty visual novels in shitty dead flash format for fun now. A couple years back I couldn't do any of that. Who said /ic/ can't help anybody? heh

>>7171314
>thoughts?
A real nigga doesn't leave his back wide open.
You got distracted and now you're paying for consequences that you'll remember for the rest of your life.
You're not making it out of the hood with this mindset.

>>7170995
>normalfags DO NOT pay for art
>They want it free to be able to see on their phones for 5 seconds and move on
But it is exactly the same with NSFW.
The majority of the online audience is there only to get free shit, and you are playing the lottery to get found by a minority in a niche who is willing to pay for their own specific fetishes, when the big majority is a young audience, followed by porn addicts who will just take anything and give you likes and validation so you keep feeding them more, followed by lots of grifters i.e. other "content creators/nsfw artists" who just play the hugbox game to farm numbers, followed by scrapers who will take your coom to sell merch, followed by a minority of "game developers" and an even bigger minority of commissioners.
Commissioners who commission nsfw artists are always the same people maybe commissioning a few big accounts to draw their OCs, so others will draw their OCs for free to ride that clout/trend.
It's akin to a marketing strategy:
>"Sure, i might have spent xyz amount for a comm of my OC, but if the artists share it and it starts to go viral, then other artists pick it up and draw me free shit. If it don't work, i still didn't waste money because i still got something out of it"
You very rarely see someone commissioning an artist multiple times for the same character in a short time span; wouldn't you want to have more scenarios and art of "your OC"? Go lurk OC/draw threads on other boards to get an idea.
In the end, commissioners just have superficial fetishes and they try to get people infected with it, like a fetishist stereotypically does to ultimately get more content of their fetish.

If i liked xyz, i would comm here and there so it would create a chain reaction of other starving artists trying to get in on the trend and make me free xyz shit.
If i can think of this, having no interest in getting free xyz, do you think someone who is obsessed with a fetish won't do that?

>>7171139
soft brush and a round brush at 30% flow with opacity and flow toggled on


Design Cinema - Episode 112 - Targeting Your Portfolio Discussion

Anonymous

>industrial design this
>industrial design that
there's more to art

https://youtu.be/L_NCNSnDWK4?si=l2K<wbr>NQZgZUkL8_Pvl

https://youtu.be/buYK6-ku4Pc?si=ooZ<wbr>u2mEeagPoP0G0

>>7157031
>there's more to art
who said otherwise?

I'm glad all industry cucks will be completely replaced by AI

>>7157031
>watch channel focused on industrial design
>reeeeee whys there industrial design

a lot of far-fetched assumptions on this one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16P<wbr>pprbBLGk<br>dinosaurs... there's still hope for us...

haha so do i, fellow redditor. upvotes to the left

Fuck ive been doing the hard shit this whole time

>>7157803
try a stool softener. eat more fiber.

>>7157000
I hate the "90% real ref 10% your design injection" thing. it's what all his schools student portfolios look like and they are all boring. I get it, it's what the industry wants. but I hate it.

>>7157031
thanks for linking these. Going thru the first vid now and its so much more insightful than anything fzd. Just not interested in design. If you hav any mor plz link them

This board used to worship guys like Feng and Ruan Jia and now they're hated what happened?

>>7157828
Feng fucking over his business partners soured us on him quite a bit. ask ben mauro.

actually nobody on this board gives a shit and just wants to draw anime.

>>7157835
>Feng fucking over his business
https://www.instagram.com/p/Ba3FdcD<wbr>BKav/?igsh=MXJpa3pqZzB5OWt1
Damn, that's crazy.

>>7157856
Feng is a businessman above everything else, no real artist would use "photo bashing" people following him only have themselves to blame.

>>7157805
seems like a good idea. It can help you get on with a solo project and find yourself stuck fantasizing about worldbuilding for too long.

>>7158057
>*not get stuck fantasizing about worldbuilding for too long.

>>7157856
The guys art is absolutely trash, why would fe g partner with him lmao

>>7157000
>>7157805
>>7158057

that's exactly why AI will win. You get to 90% a lot faster.

>>7157805
It's why most things top out at about 10% today. 10% human input won't even be a thing in the future of the industry, it'll just be 1% (like editing out awkward looking fingernails and swirly bits from the AI.) And they'll find a way to automate even that as well.

Then the future of all entertainment and design will finally shift fully to playing the social media and marketing game. In the future, an artist will be someone who automates prompts and spends their whole day optimizing search engine listings and keywords to keep up with the deluge of trends hoping to stand out from the millions of others doing the same. It'll be the same for books, games, movies, etc. It'll all be mechanical, near fully automated business warfare, all fighting for a piece of the consumer pie. Concept artists will be a dime a dozen, the only ones who will stand out are those that can also paint, since they'll be better at touching up machine generated works. Market saturation means they will be working for pennies despite having both manual and AI art skill. Since the average consumer will have even less taste and discernment than they already do (you know who to thank for this,) they will eat it up and the bubble will grow.

The future of the internet is a junkyard. Return to conventions irl and gatekeep them.

>>7157828
>2021 Ruan Jia = Godtier artstyle
>2025 Ruan Jia = AI slop
real simble.

>>7159425
>AI slop
not even close
I'm convinced AI shills are simply too incompetent.

>>7159701
>being this delusional
Show me his best work and I will show you better looking AI slop

>>7157856
Doesn't surprise me at all but honestly those guys were super naive, nothing Feng said sounded believable at all.
>yah guys I'll pay you MORE with a NEW company hah wouldn't that be great why would I screw you? just TRUST ME bro
Like come on

>>7160119
obviously those are not his exact words, lol. have you ever stepped outside? people don't talk like that and you'll be fooled more than once in your life.

>>7160128
The fact he said he was gonna somehow pay them more with a new company is an obvious lie and it's something a bad liar would come up with.

>>7160146
why wouldn't it ever be possible to be paid more? he does have money from his school.

>>7160154
Every bad scam does the o'l "too good to be true."
Offered more pay, free housing and starting a company together. If you can't tell that's a scam you're naive

>>7160159
do you think people comminicate through email, text, discord, online outside?
talk to real people outside your basement. first, they establish trust, help you out a little, buy you lunch or dinner. they don't offer you money right away, not on the first meeting. they pretend to understand you and appear sympathetic. did you ever have friends? or are you skeptical of everyone around you? you'll die alone.
pic rel applies to you, my friend. may you have a blessed day.

>>7160236
Bruh I don't know this upsets you so much

>>7160277
today i decided to give a shit about opinions because i'm bored. as to why this particular thing, it's because of display of ignorance. i mean you don't even know all the details of what transpired and think you can superimpose email scams to a one-on-one interaction. i've seen way too many scams to recognize how it's done, i'm sure you internet armchair experts would sink and burn if anyone tried to pull one on you.

just an example, you get locked out of your car because the keys are inside and you call locksmiths in your area each of whom would tell you a different price. so you find one who offers $100 to open your car and then the mechanic who comes over says it's going to cost $150. so what are you going to to? you need to go to work the next day. i know that it's easy to judge after the fact, especially when you can look at it from the 3rd person perspective with a clear mind, but without prior experience it's very easy to fall prey.

>>7160289
>i mean you don't even know all the details of what transpired
The instagram post gave more than enough information to tell you that something was off right from the beginning.
Your example doesn't make any sense because it has nothing to do with what happened.

>>7159781
>I will show you better looking AI slop
It's gonna be "better looking" for you because you can't draw, and won't notice how horrible it is. AI is perfectly designed for room temp normies like you.

>>7160236
I feel sorry for you anon it sounds like you've never had friends yourself.
>pretend to understand you
>appear sympathetic
>help you out a little, buy you lunch
>establish trust
>long ago, anon left his basement, and the basement stayed with anon.

>>7160119
I hope you can forgive yourself for being super naive and believing things that turned out to be wrong as you learned better, anon.

>>7160128
Obvious, because anon likes to feel smart and cheer phrases like "I knew it!"

Both of ya'll sound like you have trust issues. Not surprising by the way coming from the anonymous messaging board.
I forgive both of you for being impressively naive and stupid about how we work as people.

I'll give you a few hints:
"trust" also means "safety." That word also used to mean "solid, firm." It refers to something that is "reliable."

Finally, I have taken the liberty of googling a vague approximation of how long it takes to establish "trust." For the attentive reader (which neither of you appear to be) you may now refer back to your instagram post.
>look at that, 8 months on the job.
We have two extra months to feel extra close!
>don't make friends with coworkers
On the contrary anon! We love to make friends with our coworkers! YOU don't like to because YOU have those "trust issues" I mentioned!

>You're WRONG!
I could be! I have my doubts about my own conclusions. You two don't seem to have that unfortunately.

You are right that none of what Feng sounds believable.
It's not naive to sign a bad contract. It's "I don't have the self-respect to turn down a bullshit contract." It's also called "I'm easily starstruck by big idiots that are called experts because they got here before I did."

I really hope that the rest of his posts weren't written like this.

"I've been working quietly, never disturbing anyone."
"I haven't said a SINGLE negative thing about Prog"

Yes, it's a little weird not having anything negative to say about other people. It's a little weird when you're "all smiles" "on the surface."
"I stay pretty quiet...you are out of line."

"People need to hear the truth"

"I consider these to be personal attacks."

"If I'm guilty of something I'll fess up. But if I'm not, I will speak up."

I know this hurts anon, but actually, it's up to other people sometimes to tell you if you're guilty of something.
Usually we feel "betrayal" for a reason and it's considered "dismissive" to ignore your own role in a "relationship" where ideally responsibility is like a 50/50 split or something.

I am no longer confused about what makes me feel like I'm in a prison visiting room every time I click on a design cinema video.
OH >"have a blessed day"

>>7160325
I can draw very well. Stop lying on the internet. Also, I am not a normal person. I am donwnvoting your post. IQ tests are for sissies. I ve never did one.

>>7157000
why would i work as an art wagie when i can draw coom and get passive income

>>7160457
https://warosu.org/ic/thread/319023<wbr>6#p3190375
found it there.

>>7160514
>>7160325
>>7159781
>>7159701
>>7159425
this was funny to read I liked it I can't tell if the whole thing was satire from the beginning

>>7160514
>I can draw very well.
pyw
>IQ tests are for sissies. I ve never did one.
NGMI, real artists take IQ test before every drawing session.

>>7161191
10 actually
what a bunch of gossiping women

>>7160373
>random quantification based on nothing
you are too mindless. stop using google.


Whew boy, is this guy the most overrated painter of all time or what?

>>7157654
what is this? Did you intend for this to be a Bob Ross hate thread? Go fuck yourself faggot

the original slop purveyor and a massive shill. i wouldn't even classify him as an artist, he's a business man that saw early on there is a massive market of morons that think the key to art are the right brushes then exploited the shit out of that.

>>7157654
Is he even recognised as a great artist? He's a beloved television presenter.
But regardless, art is subjective, so it's reasonable for people to like Bob's work;
meanwhile your retardation is objective fact, and nobody can reasonably argue otherwise.

>>7157654
>Started late in life
>Made it
he's the ultimate crab killer

>>7157654
Is he even rated highly as a painter? People watch and like him for his calming voice and beautiful commentary

Bob Ross brought the possibility of learning to paint to the everyday people. His methodology for creating effects was simple,and most of his finished work could easily be for the fantasy market,just insert a dragon and or castle somewhere. I respect his attempt to make people try.

>>7157843
He never taught painting, that's not what he even set out to do, his show was about a paint-by-numbers-like approach to replicating whatever painting he did in that episode as a therapeutic activity, which is what painting was to him. It was never about art, it was about making yourself feel good, every painting composed of a tiny handful of elements that were easy to reproduce so as not to stress you out.
He gave you a handful of "techniques" that would produce certain effects with no consideration to anything and that's it. Like the way he told you to paint rocks was to put light paint on one side of the brush and dark on the other, then just dab to produce vaguely rock-looking stains with no regard to light in the scene. The trees are always lit from above, the mountain from the side, rocks are fucking random, etc.
I hate to say it, but there's a lot of parallels to AI with what he did and what people find appealing about the approach.
The weird thing is that I don't even think he dumbed down the process for the show since I can't find a single non-show painting that doesn't fit the pattern.
He's nominally an artist, but he's a step above people making you do macaroni paintings in the looney bin if we're being completely honest.

>>7157858
holy shit that's so much text for whatever the dumb point is ou're trying to convey lmao

>>7157858
>he doesn't feel good while doing his art
>not only that, he also thinks that's wrong
Absolute NGMI behavior here, lmao

>>7157654
You're a faggot OP and I don't care if you like pussy you're still a huge faggot.
>>7157779
>FPBP
>>7157797
PYW

He was significant because he developed a technique that turned painting into a craft. Easily replicated, aesthetically pleasing for the most part, a relaxing process. There's nothing objectively wrong with that. He never reached the upper tiers of creative expression but at least the dude seemed chill and happy, unlike most tryhard artists who seem to be in a state of perpetual torment

>>7157654
>chill dude who had fun, smiled and tried to show others how to do the same
>/ic/:
>WHAT A FUCKING HACK
>WHAT A SCAMMER
>WHAT A SHILL
>FUCKING SUCKS
>CANT PAINT
get therapy

he was a based guy who is probably better praised for making people engage with art as a timesink rather than anything he made in particular -- not that he is bad.

>>7157654
No, his goal was to teach the joy and simplicity of painting to the general public and he achieved that.

Sage

>>7157797
Dude was fucking broke when he died. They didn't start exploiting his name until he was cold and in the ground. Still, it's funny that this is the one place where someone is trying to shit. He tried to show people that at can be relaxing and therapeutic when most people here use art as a form of self-flagellation

Anonymous

>>7157797
>the original slop purveyor
No, that would be Andy Warhol.

>>7157654
>Most overrated of all time
That would be Picasso

https://youtu.be/WGN5xaQkFk0?si=xSE<wbr>FQIyhEXuaAK4W

>>7158454
he lived from selling his (low quality) art supply line
I'm not agreeing with the other guy, but selling bad supplies to hobbyists is how he earned his money while alive

>>7157654
You are such a dumb nigger. So dumb it is hard to grasp.
God damn you are retarded.
Holy fuck...

>>7159398
he used his "low quality" art supply line. there's no scam.

>>7159567
why the quotes, are you seriously implying it's not low quality?
>there's no scam
okay? did I call it a scam? he lived from selling supplies with his name on it, not painting, that's the definition of a businessman

>>7158575
My god, some episodes of ERB are ten years old... argh...

He's not an exceptional painter, but he proves you don't have to be exceptional to make it. I do like his works, for whatever it matters.

Bob Ross is my favorite artist. The most important lessons I've learned about art I've learned from Bob Ross.

I know OP is bait, but Bob Ross is the literal example of someone learning how to create art and then tried to share that with the world.

He was trying to show that art isn't some magical bullshit only a few people can do. No, if you just get off your ass and stop making idiotic threads like this you too can learn how to paint.

>>7159757
did he, though? where are the artists he taught?
he's the boomer asmr thot

>>7157654
He's more of a TV personality than an actual painter, but I do agree.

>>7159743
fuck you Bob, the draftsmanship pill is that everything you do is probably a mistake

>>7157654
He gives off really creepy vibes. His whole "le heckin wholesome" persona is so fake and comes of as a guy trying really hard to compensate for whatever fucked up skeletons he has in the closet. Probably a pedo.

>>7163184
You think a story would have come out of he was a sex pest. I don't have a good reason to doubt the story that he'd gotten sick of yelling at people as a drill agent and wanted to go the extreme opposite direction. I agree it was an affectation, but I don't think there was anything evil behind it.

>>7163184
>He gives off really creepy vibes. His whole "le heckin wholesome" persona is so fake and comes of as a guy trying really hard to compensate for whatever fucked up skeletons he has in the closet. Probably a pedo.
That's enough projection for today.

>>7157797
He never said he was an artist.

>>7157842
You should see the documentary on him. His viewers who don't paint saw him as a proto-ASMR.

>>7157654
You have to be at the bottom of the /beg/ barrel to even think of crabbing this man. Sometimes I feel bad trolling and shitposting in this board, but this type of threads remind me why you deserve it.

>>7163424
> came back with nothing but a dumbass reply

>>7157869
Categorizing Bob Ross' work as ""slop"" doesn't make you hip or cool or unique. You're just another retard in 4chan who won't make it, and you will die alone like everyone else.

OP is a bitter, lonely faggot and so is the niggers agreeing with him. Also, bait used to be less obvious...

>>7163435
>projecting
I'm a professional artist, I'm already further along than he ever got, and I didn't have to lower myself to a sideshow to do it.

>>7163441
>I'm a professional artist
>I'm already further along than he ever got
Indeed, you're already further along than he ever got with whatever fucked up skeletons he has in his closet. Probably a bigger pedo than he was am I right?

>bob Ross overrated
Bob Ross is the greatest artist of the last 100 years you fucking pleb.

>>7158331
>chill dude
It's unlikely Bob Ross was a chill dude. That was his brand, but I'm sure the man was a huge asshole and probably crabbed others out of the game in whatever internet equivalent they had back in the 1940s or whenever the fuck it was he was active. He made some comments on the show that suggested he struggled with anger, rage, resentment and a general hatred of the world.

>>7163404
Watch an episode. Now imagine he's talking about sex acts instead of drawing and his huge fan base of lonely women will suddenly make sense. Mhmm. That's it. Yeah. Right there.

>>7157797
yet, you need a working match of material and technique to get somewhere. you can't do Schmid with old holland, no medium and absorbent surfaces

>>7157654
If he was from Austria, he might have been more talented

Can you stupid fucking faggots stop bumping this worthless bait thread

>>7163661
He was Air Force and hated being the guy who had to yell at people.

>>7157654
Do people really think his art is good? Genuinely curious to know.

>>7166813
It's not "deep", or anything, and the techniques he uses on camera are simple, but the paintings are nice to look at and have some very cool impressionistic effects. You'd have to be a paint-huffing, beret-ed snob smoking ten packs a day to have any problem with the guy.

>>7166813
If you're a complete beginner (or haven't even started), then his paintings look nice. But even then, I have never encountered anyone who said that his paintings were of particular skill. As many anons have said, Bob Ross was liked because he made painting a relaxing thing where you don't have to stress over the end result, and he showed how anyone could do that. He never held himself out as some kind of artistic savant. He just wanted people to paint and chill out.

>>7157654
>Hating on Bob Ross
Still better than 99% off this board.

>>7166813
He's no Shishkin but I wouldn't call his art bad, just not great.

>>7166979
there's literally nothing impressionistic about them

I just find him soothing to listen to, man...