text_1: Report: 20-somethings can go 2 years between Paps
text_2: Despite its brevity, this story about revised guidelines for cervical cancer screening does a few things well:   It compares the new and old recommendations clearly. It puts the guidelines in the context of the much-debated cervical cancer vaccine. Most similar stories, including longer ones, failed to do this. It alludes to the study findings upon which the new recommendations are based. Having said that, the story fails to include viewpoints from any independent experts. It also fails to discuss costs. Essentially, the story distilled the revised guidelines on the readers’ behalf. This is necessary for such a story. But it is not sufficient.