text_1: "A Johns Hopkins scientist issued a ""blistering report"" on flu vaccine dangers in the British Medical Journal."
text_2: "What's true: A piece published in British Medical Journal argued the potential risks of aggressive vaccination against the flu have not been highlighted sufficiently, and that the benefits of the flu shot are overestimated. What's false: The British Medical Journal piece was neither a ""research article"" nor a peer-reviewed study, and it was authored by an anthropologist who is neither a ""Johns Hopkins scientist"" nor a professional in the medical or biological fields."