File size: 6,456 Bytes
13a6eac
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3af4220
13a6eac
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
09149b2
 
6cdd41c
09149b2
 
 
6cdd41c
 
 
 
09149b2
 
6cdd41c
09149b2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6cdd41c
 
09149b2
 
 
6cdd41c
 
 
 
09149b2
6cdd41c
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
09149b2
 
 
21b237e
 
 
 
 
454955a
21b237e
0d9cbf3
09149b2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
---
annotations_creators:
- expert-generated
language:
- en
license:
- unknown
multilinguality:
- monolingual
size_categories:
- n<10K
source_datasets:
- extended|other
task_categories:
- text-classification
- token-classification
- question-answering
- other
task_ids:
- topic-classification
- named-entity-recognition
- abstractive-qa
pretty_name: SuperTweetEval
tags:
- super_tweet_eval
- tweet_eval
- natural language understanding
---


# SuperTweetEval

# Dataset Card for "super_tweet_eval"

## Dataset Description

- **Homepage:** TBA
- **Repository:** TBA
- **Paper:** TBA
- **Point of Contact:** TBA

### Dataset Summary
TBA


## Dataset Structure
### Data Fields

The data fields are the same among all splits.

#### tweet_topic
- `text`: a `string` feature.
- `label_list`: a list of  `string` feature.
- `id`: a `string` feature.
- `date`: a `string` feature.

#### tweet_ner7
- `text_tokenized`: a list of `string` feature.
- `label_sequence`: a list of `string` feature.
- `id`: a `string` feature.
- `date`: a `string` feature.

#### tweet_qa
- `text`: a `string` feature.
- `label_str`: a `string` feature.
- `pargraph`: a `string` feature.
- `question`: a `string` feature.

#### tweet_intimacy
- `text`: a `string` feature.
- `labe_float`: a `float` feature.

#### tweet_similarity
- `text_1`: a `string` feature.
- `text_2`: a `string` feature.
- `labe_float`: a `float` feature.


### Data Splits

| task             | description                 | number of instances (train / validation / test)   |
|:-----------------|:----------------------------|:----------------------|
| tweet_intimacy   | regression on a single text | 1191 / 396 / 396      |
| tweet_ner7       | sequence labeling           | 4616 / 576 / 2807     |
| tweet_qa         | generation                  | 9489 / 1086 / 1203    |
| tweet_similarity | regression on two texts     | 450 / 100 / 450       |
| tweet_topic      | multi-label classification  | 4585 / 573 / 1679     |

## Citation Information
- TweetTopic
```
@inproceedings{antypas-etal-2022-twitter,
    title = "{T}witter Topic Classification",
    author = "Antypas, Dimosthenis  and
      Ushio, Asahi  and
      Camacho-Collados, Jose  and
      Silva, Vitor  and
      Neves, Leonardo  and
      Barbieri, Francesco",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
    month = oct,
    year = "2022",
    address = "Gyeongju, Republic of Korea",
    publisher = "International Committee on Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.299",
    pages = "3386--3400",
    abstract = "Social media platforms host discussions about a wide variety of topics that arise everyday. Making sense of all the content and organising it into categories is an arduous task. A common way to deal with this issue is relying on topic modeling, but topics discovered using this technique are difficult to interpret and can differ from corpus to corpus. In this paper, we present a new task based on tweet topic classification and release two associated datasets. Given a wide range of topics covering the most important discussion points in social media, we provide training and testing data from recent time periods that can be used to evaluate tweet classification models. Moreover, we perform a quantitative evaluation and analysis of current general- and domain-specific language models on the task, which provide more insights on the challenges and nature of the task.",
}
```

- TweetNER7
```
@inproceedings{ushio-etal-2022-named,
    title = "Named Entity Recognition in {T}witter: A Dataset and Analysis on Short-Term Temporal Shifts",
    author = "Ushio, Asahi  and
      Barbieri, Francesco  and
      Sousa, Vitor  and
      Neves, Leonardo  and
      Camacho-Collados, Jose",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 12th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = nov,
    year = "2022",
    address = "Online only",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.aacl-main.25",
    pages = "309--319",
    abstract = "Recent progress in language model pre-training has led to important improvements in Named Entity Recognition (NER). Nonetheless, this progress has been mainly tested in well-formatted documents such as news, Wikipedia, or scientific articles. In social media the landscape is different, in which it adds another layer of complexity due to its noisy and dynamic nature. In this paper, we focus on NER in Twitter, one of the largest social media platforms, and construct a new NER dataset, TweetNER7, which contains seven entity types annotated over 11,382 tweets from September 2019 to August 2021. The dataset was constructed by carefully distributing the tweets over time and taking representative trends as a basis. Along with the dataset, we provide a set of language model baselines and perform an analysis on the language model performance on the task, especially analyzing the impact of different time periods. In particular, we focus on three important temporal aspects in our analysis: short-term degradation of NER models over time, strategies to fine-tune a language model over different periods, and self-labeling as an alternative to lack of recently-labeled data. TweetNER7 is released publicly (https://huggingface.co/datasets/tner/tweetner7) along with the models fine-tuned on it (NER models have been integrated into TweetNLP and can be found at https://github.com/asahi417/tner/tree/master/examples/tweetner7{\_}paper).",
}
```
- TweetQA
```
@inproceedings{xiong2019tweetqa,
  title={TweetQA: A Social Media Focused Question Answering Dataset},
  author={Xiong, Wenhan and Wu, Jiawei and Wang, Hong and Kulkarni, Vivek and Yu, Mo and Guo, Xiaoxiao and Chang, Shiyu and Wang, William Yang},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics},
  year={2019}
}
```

- TweetIntimacy
```
@misc{pei2023semeval,
      title={SemEval 2023 Task 9: Multilingual Tweet Intimacy Analysis}, 
      author={Jiaxin Pei and Vítor Silva and Maarten Bos and Yozon Liu and Leonardo Neves and David Jurgens and Francesco Barbieri},
      year={2023},
      eprint={2210.01108},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={cs.CL}
}
```