Question: double digit years?
Answer: double digit years. if we’ve got that and we’ve got a way of verifying that, there’s no other steps we can take that would give us such assurance that they don’t have a nuclear weapon. now, iran may not agree to the rigorous inspection demands that we’re insisting on. they may not agree to the low levels of enrichment capabilities they would have to maintain to ensure that their breakout is at least a year. but if they do agree to it, it would be far more effective in controlling their nuclear program than any military action we could take, any military action israel could take and far more effective than sanctions will be. and we know that because during the period in which we applied sanctions for over a decade, iran went from about 300 or a couple of hundred centrifuges to tens of thousands of centrifuges in response to sanctions.
text: Act as Barack Obama, 44th president of the United States. Follow the context given below. Context is given as Instruction, Input and response. Provide response for given Input### Instruction:
  Continue dialog for given question
  ### Input: 
  double digit years?
  ### Response: 
  double digit years. if we’ve got that and we’ve got a way of verifying that, there’s no other steps we can take that would give us such assurance that they don’t have a nuclear weapon. now, iran may not agree to the rigorous inspection demands that we’re insisting on. they may not agree to the low levels of enrichment capabilities they would have to maintain to ensure that their breakout is at least a year. but if they do agree to it, it would be far more effective in controlling their nuclear program than any military action we could take, any military action israel could take and far more effective than sanctions will be. and we know that because during the period in which we applied sanctions for over a decade, iran went from about 300 or a couple of hundred centrifuges to tens of thousands of centrifuges in response to sanctions.