diff --git "a/36_years1992-04.jsonl" "b/36_years1992-04.jsonl"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/36_years1992-04.jsonl"
@@ -0,0 +1,647 @@
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87247ede-077e-4ed9-baab-e0448518ccfa", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending for the thirteenth time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-01", "subjects": "approximation of laws,carcinogenic substance,consumer protection,health risk,labelling,marketing standard", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0195,comnat:COM_1992_0195_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_157_R_0006_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "carcinogenic substance", "consumer protection", "health risk", "labelling", "marketing standard"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87247ede-077e-4ed9-baab-e0448518ccfa", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 195 final - SYN 414 \n\nBrussels, 1 June 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending for the thirteenth time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation \n\nof the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions of the Member States \n\nrelating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain \n\ndangerous substances and preparations \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nE X P L A N A T O RY M E M O R A N D UM \n\nI. I N T R O D U C T I ON \n\ntheir \n\ne x a m i n ed \n\nIntention \n\nS t a t es of \n\nthe matter \n\nto r e s t r i ct \n\nIn June 1990 the G e r m an a u t h o r i t i es n o t i f i ed the C o m m i s s i on \nand Member \nthe \nm a r k e t i ng and use of c r e o s o te and of wood t r e a t ed t h e r e w i th \nso as to protect the health of c o n s u m e r s. The C o m m i s s i o n, \nthe \nhaving \nMember \nd e t a i l ed o p i n i o ns and o b s e r v a t i o ns of the o t h er \nS t a t e s, gave n o t i ce \nIts \nto the G e r m an \nIntention of p r o p o s i ng to the Council an a m e n d m e nt to Annex \nI of \nh a r m o n i z ed \nl i m i t a t i o ns on the m a r k e t i ng and use of c r e o s o te and wood so \nt r e a t e d. In this way G e r m a ny w as r e q u i r e d, In a c c o r d a n ce \nwith A r t. 9 ( 2) of D l r. 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E E C, to p o s t p o ne the a d o p t i on \nof its draft m e a s u re for a period of 1 year from the date of \nnot i f i cat I o n. a u t h o r i t i es \n\nc o n s i d e r ed \n\n7 6 / 7 6 9 / E EC \n\nD i r e c t i ve \n\np r o v i de \n\nh a v i ng \n\nand \n\nfor \n\nof \n\nto \n\nto the general \n\nIn p r e p a r i ng its proposal the C o m m i s s i on d e c i d ed to include \nIn a d d i t i on to c r e o s o te two further c a t e g o r i es of s u b s t a n c es \nand p r e p a r a t i o ns w h i ch pose a danger \nto the h e a l th of \nc o n s u m e r s. T h us It d e c i d ed to p r o p o se l i m i t a t i o ns on the \nm a r k e t i ng \nc h l o r i n a t ed \ns o l v e n t s, several of w h i ch had been the s u b j e ct of another \na l so \nn o t i f i c a t i on \nd e c i d ed \nC a n c e r\" \nl i m i t a t i o ns on use by the general \np r o g r a m me to p r o p o se \nc a r c i n o g e n i c, \np u b l ic \nm u t a g e n ic and t e r a t o g e n ic \n1 and 2) and of \np r e p a r a t i o ns c o n t a i n i ng t h e s e. In the context of the \" E u r o pe a g a i n st \n\nc l a s s i f i ed \n( c a t e g o r i es \n\np u b l ic of c e r t a in \n\nin S e p t e m b er \n\ns u b s t a n c es \n\nG e r m a ny \n\n1 9 9 0. from \n\nall \n\nIt \n\nas \n\nof \n\nThe C o m m i s s i on c o n s i d e rs that this proposal is c o n s i s t e nt \nwith the high level of p r o t e c t i on r e q u i r ed under the T r e a t y. The r a t i o n a le u n d e r l y i ng the C o m m i s s i o n 's p r o p o s al Is g i v en \nbe Iow. I I. C R E O S O TE \n\n22. cJig. r_o. Lmd \n\nC r e o s o te Is a b y p r o d u ct of the m a n u f a c t u re of coke from coal \nand may also arise from c e r t a in p r o c e s s i ng of w o o d. It has \nbeen a v a i l a b le In q u a n t i ty since the Industrial R e v o l u t i on \nand In a c o m p o s i t i on d e p e n d i ng on several f a c t o r s, n o t a b ly \nthe type of c a r b o n i s a t i on p r o c e ss by w h i ch it Is p r o d u c ed \nand the c o m p os Ition and p r o p e r t i es of the raw m a t e r i a ls from \nwhich it Is derIved. - 3 -\n\nCreosote has been used traditionally In the treatment of \nwood for exterior use, especially for railway sleepers, \ntelegraph poles and waterway construction but also for \nfencing and general \"Do it y o u r s e lf (DIY) applications. It \nIs also used Industrially, for example, in the manufacture \nof carbon black. As might be expected creosotes placed on the market can have \nwidely different compositions and thus exhibit different \nproperties. Potentially they may cause skin irritation and \ncreosotes \ncause harm when swallowed. Furthermore, all \ncontain aromatic type substances, some of which are known \ncarcinogens. Ail contain phenols which may pose a threat to \nthe water compartment of the environment. The public may come Into contact with creosote and wood \ntreated therewith In a number of ways. Consumers can buy \ncreosote and apply It by brush tn DIY applications. They \ncan also buy wood freshly treated with creosote and old \ntreated wood e. g. old railway sleepers for the same sort of \nappI i cat Ions. The environment may also come Into contact with creosote and \nespecially with treated wood. The latter is used almost \nexclusively outdoors where It Is exposed to weathering over \nthe period of its life. Given the hazards of creosote and of treated wood and the \nlikelehood that man and the environment are likely to be \nexposed to these hazards In everyday situations It is \ndesirable that the use of creosote for wood treatment and \nthe use of treated wood should be limited so as to minimize \nthe overall risk to man and the environment. _ailnlilfiii_fii_c. _ftfi_fii_ \n\nThe family of substances and preparations termed \"creosote\" \nhad not previously been defined though certain Individual \ncreosote substances had been identified and In some cases \nclassified according to Directive 67/548/EEC. Creosote for the purposes of this directive is defined as \nany of the following substances either alone or In a \nmixture: \na) \nb) \nc) \n\nCreosote (CAS Nr 8001-58-9) \nCreosote oil (CAS Nr 61789-28-4) \nDistillates (coal t a r ), naptttalene oils (CAS Nr 84650-\n04-4) \nCreosote oil, acenaphthene fraction (CAS Nr 90640-84-9) \nDistillates (coal t a r ), upper (CAS Nr 65996-91-0) \n\nd) \ne) \n\n\f- 4 -\n\nf) \ng) \nh) \nj) \n\nA n t h r a c e ne oil (CAS Nr 9 0 6 4 0 - 8 0 - 5) \nTar A c i d s, C o a l, C r u de (CAS Nr 6 5 9 9 6 - 8 5 - 2) \nC r e o s o t e, wood (CAS Nr 8 0 2 1 - 3 9 - 4) \nLow t e m p e r a t u re tar o i l, a l k a l i ne e x t r a c t ed (CAS Nr \n1 2 2 3 8 4 7 8 5) \n\nThis d e f i n i t i on thus c o v e rs any liquid b y - p r o d u ct of the \nc a r b o n i s a t i on of either coal or w o o d. ELfi-_-li---fil--L_fi_fil-\n\nskin \n\nmay \ncause \ne s p e c i a l ly \nwood \n\nbeen \nC r e o s o te \nor \nreported \nhandling \nbeen \nr e p o r ts of v a r i o us c a n c e rs e. g. cancer of the s c r o t um among \nthese \nc a u s e / e f f e ct \nno \ng r o u ps \nr e l a t i o n s h ip has been e s t a b l i s h e d. have \nc r e o s o te \na l so \n\nI r r i t a t i o n. C a s es \n\nt h e r e w i t h. T h e re \n\namong w o r k e rs \n\nd e f i n i te \n\na p p l y i ng \n\ntreated \n\nthough \n\nhave \n\nsame \n\nc r e o s o t e; of \n\nThe likelihood of a d v e r se health e f f e c ts has been c o r r e l a t ed \nwith the p r e s e n ce of c e r t a in m u l t i - r i ng a r o m a t ic c o m p o u n ds \nknown \nIn \nof \nc a r c i n o g e n. s o m e t h i ng b e t t e r, \nto \nthe \nchoose \npotential a d v e r se health e f f e c ts of c r e o s o t e. a \na b s e n ce \nit has been p r o v i s i o n a l ly d e c i d ed \nas \n\nB e n z o - a - p y r e ne \nIn \nfound. ( B A P ), \nthe \n\nc o n c e n t r a t i on \n\nInvariably \n\nIndicator \n\nthese \n\nthe \n\nBAP \n\nIs \n\nof \n\nof \n\nA c c o r d i ng to a v a i l a b le I n f o r m a t i on c r e o s o t es c o n t a i n i ng less \nthan 50 ppm BAP pose n e g l l b le danger to h e a l th and those \nwith m o re than 500 ppm present an u n a c c e p t a b le danger when \nused In wood t r e a t m e n t. C r e o s o t es may also present a danger to the e n v i r o n m e nt due \nto their content of water s o l u b le p h e n o l s. The latter may \nbe washed out of c r e o s o te treated r a i l w ay s l e e p e r s, p o l e s, \nto \nfences \nthe \ne n v i r o n m e n t. The C o m m i s s i on t h e r e f o re p r o p o s es that this \ndanger should also be c o n t r o l l ed by e s t a b l i s h i ng a limit to \nthe amount of water e x t r a c t a b le p h e n o ls a l l o w ed In c r e o s o te \nwhich Is used Industrially for wood t r e a t m e n t. c o m p a r t m e nt \n\np o l l u te \n\nwater \n\netc \n\nthe \n\nof \n\n\u00a3&i&lftnc. ft-fil-&Ub_&limift\u00a3 \n\ntreatment \n\nc h e m i c a ls \n\nare \nWood \nn a t u re \nT h us \np o t e n t i a l ly d a n g e r o us to health and the e n v i r o n m e n t. e. g. the use of several \ns u b s t i t u t es \nIt Is \nP e n t a c h l o r o p h e n oI and CCA, has already been limited. very p r o b l e m a t ic to find s u b s t i t u t es for c r e o s o te In the \noutdoor a p p l i c a t i o ns w h e re it is m a i n ly u s e d. the potential \n\ntheir \n\nvery \n\nby \n\nof \n\nGiven the d i f f i c u l ty of finding safer s u b s t i t u t es and that \nas a \nc r e o s o te \n\ninevitably will c o n t i n ue \n\nto be p r o d u c ed \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nb y p r o d u ct \nIs to \nIndustry \nc o n t i n ue to a l l ow c r e o s o te to be u s ed for w o od t r e a t m e nt but \nonly under s t r i c t ly c o n t r o l l ed c o n d i t i o n s. of the coke \n\nthe best \n\np o l i cy \n\n\u00a3finc. lu&lfin \n\nIt is c o n c l u d ed that c r e o s o te and w o od t r e a t ed t h e r e w i th can \nunder c e r t a in c i r c u m s t a n c es p o se d a n g e rs to h u m an h e a l th and \nto the e n v i r o n m e n t. The s t r a t e gy p r o p o s ed t h e r e f o re Is the \nfoI IowIng: \n\nC r e o s o te w i th less than 50 ppm BAP and w o od t r e a t ed \nt h e r e w i th s h o u ld not be c o n t r o l l e d. C r e o s o te w i th from 50 to 5 00 ppm s h o u ld be a v a i l a b le \no n ly for \nindustrial use w h i le u se of the w o od so \nt r e a t ed s h o u ld be c o n f i n ed to p r o f e s s i o n al a p p l i c a t i o ns \nw h e re t h e re \nthe \np u b l i c. Only old w o od t r e a t ed m a ny y e a rs b e f o re may be \nm a de a v a i l a b le to c o n s u m e rs and then o n ly for c e r t a in \nu s e s. is little c h a n ce of c o n t a ct \n\nw i th \n\nThe use for w o od t r e a t m e nt of c r e o s o te w i th m o re than \n5 00 ppm BAP and the use of w o od so t r e a t ed s h o u ld be \ntotaI Iy b a n n e d. No c r e o s o te w h i ch Is c o v e r ed by the p r o p o s al and w h i ch \nc o n t a i ns m o re than 3% water s o l u b le p h e n o ls s h o u ld be \nused for wood t r e a t m e nt nor s h o u ld w o od so t r e a t ed be \nused. III. C H L O R I N A T ED S O L V E N TS \n\n&a. c. fc. gxfiimd \n\nC h l o r i n a t ed s o l v e n ts are w i d e ly used In i n d u s t ry m a i n ly to \nclean a r t i c l es of all s h a p e s, s i z es and m a t e r i a l s; \nthis is \nn o n - f l a m m a b l e. e f f e c t i v e, \nb e c a u se \nSimilar u s es by c o n s u m e rs but on a much s m a l l er s c a le have \nbeen d e v e l o p ed for some such s o l v e n t s. c h e ap \n\nthey \n\nare \n\nand \n\nMany c h l o r i n a t ed s o l v e n ts are d a n g e r o us w h en Inhaled or w h en \ns w a l l o w e d; some c a u se c o n c e rn for m an o w i ng to p o s s i b le \nc a r c i n o g e n ic e f f e c ts but In respect of w h i ch the a v a i l a b le \ni n f o r m a t i on \ns a t i s f a c t o ry \na s s e s s m e nt. for m a k i ng \n\na d e q u a te \n\nis not \n\na \n\nthese \n\nG i v en \nc h e m i c a ls \nc h l o r i n a t ed s o l v e n ts by c o n s u m e rs s h o u ld be l i m i t e d. h a z a r ds \nIn the home \n\nIt Is p r o p o s ed \n\np o t e n t i al \n\nthat \n\nand \n\nthe \n\nfor \n\nm i s u se \n\nof \nthe use of \n\n\f- 6 -\n\n_Lfl. _ft_QL__Q-i_ft_fl. l_aiiO. _ \n\nof \n\nD i r e c t i ve \n\n6 7 / 5 4 8 / E E C; \n\nFour c r i t e r ia have been used In s e l e c t i ng c a n d i d a t es for \nc o n t r o l s. First Is their c l a s s i f i c a t i o n, if a n y, w i t h in the \nf r a m e w o rk \nd a n g e r o us \ns o l v e n ts should c l e a r ly be a v o i d e d. S e c o n d l y, t h e re Is the \nq u e s t i on of w h e t h er p a r t i c u l ar s o l v e n ts are p r e s e n t ly used \nby c o n s u m e r s; d a n g e r o us c h e m i c a ls not p r e s e n t ly used by \nthird \ns h o u ld \nc o n s u m e rs \nc r i t e r i on \nd a n g e r o us \nis the a v a i l a b i l i ty of s u b s t i t u t e s; \nc h e m i c a ls w h i ch are p r e s e n t ly used but for w h i ch s u b s t i t u t es \nF i n a l ly a f o u r th c r i t e r i on Is \nexist s h o u ld a l so be a v o i d e d. w h e t h er \nby \nare s u b j e ct \ns o l v e n ts \np a r t i c u l ar \ne x i s t i ng C o m m u n i ty l e g i s l a t i o n. to c o n t r ol \n\nf u t u r e. A \n\nbe used \n\nIn the \n\nmost \n\nthe \n\nnot \n\n____lan_fta_ft_a_l_ft_ \n\nEleven c h l o r i n a t ed s o l v e n ts w e re e x a m i n ed In t e r ms of t h e se \nfour c r i t e r ia to e s t a b l i sh p r i o r i t i es for limiting use by \nform a \nthe p u b l i c. T h r ee g r o u ps w e re \nh i e r a r c hy for control p u r p o s e s. i d e n t i f i ed w h i ch \n\n_L__D. _1 \n\nThe f o l l o w i ng s u b s t a n c e s: \n\nC h l o r o f o rm (CAS Nr 6 7 - 6 6 - 3) \nC a r b on T e t r a c h l o r i de (CAS Nr 5 6 - 2 3 - 5) \n1,1,2 T r I c h l o r o e t h a ne (CAS Nr 7 9 - 0 0 - 5) \n1,1,2,2 T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a ne (CAS Nr 7 9 - 3 4 - 5) \n1,1,1,2 T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a ne (CAS Nr 6 3 0 - 2 0 - 6) \nP e n t a c h l o r o e t h a ne (CAS Nr 7 6 - 0 1 - 7) \n1,1 D I c h l o r o e t h y l e ne (CAS Nr 7 5 - 3 5 - 4) \n\nare d a n g e r o u s, being c l a s s ed \" h a r m f u l\" or w o r s e, have no \nconsumer u s es or have both of these c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s. T h e se \nare r e g a r d ed as high p r i o r i ty for control p u r p o s e s. _ \u00a3 _ _ _ __ \n\nThe f o l l o w i ng s u b s t a n c e: \n\n1,1,1 Tr I c h l o r o e t h a ne (CAS N* 7 1 - 5 5 - 6) \n\nis harmful and is used to some extent by c o n s u m e r s. It Is \ndue to be banned e n t i r e ly by 2005 w i t h in the f r a m e w o rk of \np r o t e c t i ng the O z o ne layer. Control of this s u b s t a n ce has \nsomewhat less p r i o r i t y. - 7 -\n\nThe f o l l o w i ng s u b s t a n c e s: \n\nM e t h y l e ne C h l o r i de (CAS N* 7 5 - 0 9 - 2 ), \nTr I c h l o r o e t h y l e ne (CAS N* 7 9 - 0 1 - 6 ), \nP e r c h l o r o e t h y l e ne (CAS N* 1 2 7 - 1 8 - 4) \n\nare a l so harmful and are u s ed to a c o n s i d e r a b le e x t e nt by \nc o n s u m e r s. H o w e v e r, s u b s t i t u t i on \nC o n t r ol \nof these s u b s t a n c es d o es not seem w a r r a n t ed at p r e s e n t. Is p r o b l e m a t i c. _ _ _ _ l _ a l Q_ \n\nIt Is p r o p o s ed that that the use by the p u b l ic of the \ns u b s t a n c es In G r o up 1 and of p r e p a r a t i o ns c o n t a i n i ng them \ns h o u ld be b a n n ed on e n t ry into f o r ce of t h is d i r e c t i v e. It is f u r t h er p r o p o s ed that the s i n g le s u b s t a n ce in G r o up 2 \nviz 1,1,1 T r I c h I o r o e t h a ne and p r e p a r a t i o ns c o n t a i n i ng It be \nbanned five y e a rs from e n t ry Into f o r c e. In the case of G r o up 3 s u b s t a n c es the C o m m i s s i on Intends to \ncarry out a r e v i ew on their c o n t i n u ed use t h r ee y e a rs from \nent ry Into force. IV. CMT S U B S T A N C ES AND P R E P A R A T I O NS \n\n\" E u r o pe \n\nThe p r o g r a m me \nthe \na t t e n t i on of the C o m m u n i ty on s u b s t a n c es and p r e p a r a t i o ns \ntermed c a r c i n o g e n ic (may c a u se c a n c e r ), m u t a g e n ic (may c a u se \nh e r i t a b le g e n e t ic d a m a g e) and t e r a t o g e n ic (may c a u se birth \nd e f e c t s ). C a n c e r\" \n\nf o c u s ed \n\na g a i n st \n\nhas \n\nA first I n i t i a t i ve w as to d e v e l op a m e t h o d o l o gy for the \nc l a s s i f i c a t i on of c a r c i n o g e n i c, m u t a g e n ic and \nt e r a t o g e n ic \ns u b s t a n c e s. As a s i m i l ar s y s t em has b e en a d o p t ed for each \nof the three c a s e s, only the c l a s s i f i c a t i on of c a r c i n o g e ns \nwill be o u t l i n ed h e r e. D i r e c t i ve \nc a r c i n o g e ns viz c a t e g o r i es 1, 2 and 3 as f o l l o w s: \n\n9 1 / 3 2 5 / E EC \n\nd e f i n es \n\nthree \n\nthe \n\nc a t e g o r i es \n\nof \n\nC a t e g o ry 1 \n\nIs \nS u b s t a n c es \ns u f f i c i e nt \na s s o c i a t i on \nb e t w e en h u m an e x p o s u re to a s u b s t a n ce and the d e v e l o p m e nt of \nc a n c e r. to be c a r c i n o g e n ic \n\nk n o wn \ne v i d e n ce \n\nto m a n. T h e re \n\na causal \n\ne s t a b l i sh \n\nto \n\nC a t e g o ry 2 \n\nS u b s t a n c es w h i ch s h o u ld be r e g a r d ed as if they are \n\n\f8 -\n\nto \nc a r c i n o g e n ic \np r o v i de a s t r o ng p r e s u m p t i on \nto a \ns u b s t a n ce may result In the d e v e l o p m e nt of c a n c e r, g e n e r a l ly \non the bas Is o f: \n\nthat h u m an e x p o s u re \n\nto m a n. T h e re \n\nIs s u f f i c i e nt \n\ne v i d e n ce \n\na p p r o p r i a te long-term animal s t u d i e s, \nother relevant i n f o r m a t i o n. C a t e g o ry 3 \n\nS u b s t a n c es w h i ch c a u se c o n c e rn for man o w i ng to p o s s i b le \nc a r c i n o g e n ic e f f e c ts but In respect of w h i ch the a v a i l a b le \ns a t i s f a c t o ry \nI n f o r m a t i on \na s s e s s m e n t. T h e re is some e v i d e n ce from a p p r o p r i a te animal \ns t u d i e s, but this Is i n s u f f i c i e nt to p l a ce the s u b s t a n ce in \nc a t e g o ry 2. for m a k i ng \n\na d e q u a te \n\nIs not \n\na \n\nAnnex \nc l a s s i f i c a t i o ns for a first batch of s u b s t a n c e s. d i r e c t i ve \n\nsame \n\nthis \n\nto \n\nI \n\ne s t a b l i s h es \n\nCMT \n\np u b l ic of s u b s t a n c es c l a s s i f i ed \n\nThe p r e s e nt proposal w o u ld e s t a b l i sh a f u r t h er p r o c e d u re \na c c o r d i ng to w h i ch the p l a c i ng on the m a r k et for use by the \ngeneral \nI of \nD i r e c t i ve 6 7 / 5 4 8 / E EC as c a r c i n o g e ns of c a t e g o r i es 1 and 2, \nm u t a g e ns of c a t e g o r i es 1 and 2 and t e r a t o g e ns of c a t e g o r i es \n1 and 2 Is p r o h i b i t e d; f u r t h e r m o re an a u t o m a t ic ban for \nconsumer use will apply to s u b s t a n c es that may be c l a s s i f i ed \nIn a d d i t i on the p l a c i ng on the \nas such in the f u t u r e. market \np r e p a r a t i o ns \nc o n t a i n i ng the same s u b s t a n c es will a l so be b a n n ed if the \nc o n c e n t r a t i on of such a s u b s t a n ce is a b o ve a c e r t a in v a l u e; \nthe latter may be s p e c i f i ed in the c l a s s i f i c a t i on of the CMT \ns u b s t a n c e; f a i l i ng this It Is the general v a l ue p r o v i d ed by \nD i r e c t i ve 8 8 / 3 7 9 / E EC w h i ch a p p l i e s. for use by \n\nthe general \n\nIn A n n ex \n\np u b l ic \n\nof \n\nV. C O N F O R M I TY W I TH THE T R E A TY \n\nAs Is clear \nthis \nproposal Is Intended to afford a high level of p r o t e c t i on \nfor both p e r s o ns and the e n v i r o n m e nt and Is t h e r e f o re In \nc o n f o r m i ty with A r t i c le 1 0 0 A ( 3) of the T r e a t y. from s e c t i o ns \n\nII, III and \n\nIV a b o v e, \n\nThe proposal d o es not call for any special p r o v i s i o ns of the \nkind r e f e r r ed to In A r t i c le 8c of the T r e a t y. V I. C O N S U L T A T I ON \n\nOF \nE C O N O M IC AND S O C I AL C O M M I T T EE \n\nTHE \n\nE U R O P E AN \n\nP A R L I A M E NT \n\nAND \n\nTHE \n\nc o m p l i a n ce \n\nthe \nIn \nc o o p e r a t i on \nIs \na p p l i c a b l e. The E c o n o m ic and Social C o m m i t t ee has to be \nc o n s u I t e d. T r e a t y, \nP a r l i a m e nt \n\nof \nE u r o p e an \n\nA r t i c le \nwith \n\np r o c e d u re \n\nwith \n\n100A \n\nthe \n\nthe \n\n\f- *-\n\nP r o p o s aI for a \n\n_0___C_iL__lRE_IiYE \n\na m e n d i ng for the t h i r t e e n th time D i r e c t i ve 7 6 / 7 6 9 / E EC on the \n\na p p r o x i m a t i on of the laws, r e g u l a t i o ns and a d m i n i s t r a t i ve \n\np r o v i s i o ns of the Member S t a t es r e l a t i ng to r e s t r i c t i o ns on \n\nthe m a r k e t i ng and use of c e r t a in d a n g e r o us s u b s t a n c es and \n\nprepar at Ions \n\nTHE C O U N C IL OF THE E U R O P E AN C O M M U N I T I E S, \n\nH a v i ng regard to the T r e a ty e s t a b l i s h i ng the E u r o p e an \n\nE c o n o m ic C o m m u n i t y, and in p a r t i c u l ar A r t i c le 100a t h e r e o f, \n\nHaving regard to the p r o p o s al from the C o m m i s s i o n ,1 \n\nIn c o o p e r a t i on with the E u r o p e an P a r l i a m e n t ,2 \n\nHaving regard to the o p i n i on of the E c o n o m ic and Social \n\nCommI 11ee , 3 \n\nW h e r e as m e a s u r es s h o u ld be a d o p t ed for the p r o g r e s s i ve \n\ne s t a b l i s h m e nt of the Internal m a r k et by 31 D e c e m b er 1 9 9 2; \n\nw h e r e as the internal m a r k et is an area w i t h o ut Internal \n\nf r o n t i e rs In w h i ch the free c i r c u l a t i on of g o o d s, p e r s o n s, \n\ns e r v i c es and capital is g u a r a n t e e d; \n\n1 \n\n2 \n\n3 \n\nOJ No \n\nOJ No \n\nOJ No \n\n\f- 10 -\n\nW h e r e as work on the internal m a r k et s h o u ld g r a d u a l ly improve \n\nthe quality of life, health p r o t e c t i on and c o n s u m er s a f e t y; \n\nw h e r e as the m e a s u r es proposed by this D i r e c t i ve are in line \n\nwith the Council Resolution of 9 N o v e m b er 1989 on future \n\np r i o r i t i es for relaunching c o n s u m er p r o t e c t i on p o l i c y ;4 \n\nW h e r e as the Council and the r e p r e s e n t a t i v es of the \n\nG o v e r n m e n ts of the Member S t a t e s, m e e t i ng w i t h in the \n\nCouncil, adopted Decision 90/238 / E u r a t o m, E C S C, EEC \n\nc o n c e r n i ng a \n\n1 9 9 0 - 94 a c t i on plan in the context of the \" E u r o pe against \n\nc a n c e r\" p r o g r a m m e; \n\nW h e r e as the s u b s t a n c es which appear in A n n ex I to Council D i r e c t i ve \n\n6 7 / 5 4 8 / E E C, as last amended by C o m m i s s i on D i r e c t i ve 9 1 / 6 3 2 / E E C, \n\nand are c l a s s i f i ed as c a r c i n o g e ns c a t e g o ry 1 or category 2 may cause \n\nc a n c e r; w h e r e as to improve h e a l th p r o t e c t i on such s u b s t a n c es \n\nand p r e p a r a t i o ns c o n t a i n i ng them s h o u ld not be placed on the \n\nmarket for use by the general p u b l i c; \n\nWhereas the s u b s t a n c es which a p p e ar in Annex I to D i r e c t i ve 6 7 / 5 4 8 / E EC \n\nand are c l a s s i f i ed as mutagens c a t e g o ry 1 or category 2 may cause \n\nh e r i t a b le g e n e t ic d a m a g e; w h e r e as to improve h e a l th \n\np r o t e c t i on such s u b s t a n c es and p r e p a r a t i o ns c o n t a i n i ng them \n\ns h o u ld not be placed on the m a r k et for use by the general \n\npub I Ic; \n\nWhereas the s u b s t a n c es which appear in Annex I to Directive 6 7 / 5 4 8 / E EC \n\nand are classified as t e r a t o g e ns c a t e g o ry 1 or category 2 may cause \n\nbirth d e f e c t s; w h e r e as to improve h e a l th p r o t e c t i on such \n\ns u b s t a n c es or p r e p a r a t i o ns c o n t a i n i ng them s h o u ld not be \n\np l a c ed on the market for use by the g e n e r al p u b l i c; \n\n4 \n5 \n6 \n\n7 \n\n0J No C 2 9 4, 2 3. 1 1. 1 9 8 9, p. 1. 0J No L 137, 30. 5. 1990, p. 31. 0J No L 196, 16. 8. 1967, p. 1. 0J No L 3 3 8, 1 0. 1 2. 1 9 9 1, p. 2 3, and 0J No L 338A, 1 0. 1 2. 1 9 9 1, p. 2 \n\n\f- r; -\n\nWhereas Annex I to D i r e c t i ve 6 7 / 5 4 8 / E EC lays down i n d i v i d u al \n\nc o n c e n t r a t i on limits for such s u b s t a n c es and, in the a b s e n ce \n\nof such l i m i t s. Table VI of Annex I to C o u n c il D i r e c t i ve \n\n8 \n\n9 \n\n8 8 / 3 7 9 / E E C, \n\nas last amended by C o m m i s s i on D i r e c t i ve 9 0 / 4 9 2 / E E C, \n\nlays down g e n e r al c o n c e n t r a t i on limits which a p p ly to such \n\ns u b s t a n c es c o n t a i n ed in p r e p a r a t i o n s; \n\nW h e r e as c r e o s o t e, as defined in the Annex to t h is D i r e c t i v e, \n\nmay be d a m a g i ng to health b e c a u se of its c o n t e nt of k n o wn \n\nc a r c i n o g e n s; w h e r e as for these r e a s o ns the use of c r e o s o te \n\nin wood t r e a t m e nt and the m a r k e t i ng and use of c r e o s o te \n\ntreated w o od s h o u ld be limited; \n\nW h e r e as s o me of the c o m p o n e n ts of c r e o s o te are p o o r ly \n\nd e g r a d a b le and d e l e t e r i o us to o r g a n i s ms in the e n v i r o n m e n t; \n\nw h e r e as t h e se c o m p o n e n ts may enter the e n v i r o n m e nt as a \n\nresult of the use of treated w o o d; \n\nW h e r e as s o me c h l o r i n a t ed s o l v e n ts p r e s e nt a d a n g er to health \n\nand s h o u ld not be m a r k e t ed to the g e n e r al pub I ic in \n\ns u b s t a n c es and p r e p a r a t i o n s; \n\nW h e r e as the r e s t r i c t i o ns on the u se of c r e o s o te in w o od \n\nt r e a t m e n t, on the m a r k e t i ng and u se of c r e o s o te t r e a t ed wood \n\nand on the m a r k e t i ng and use of c h l o r i n a t ed s o l v e n ts laid \n\ndown by this D i r e c t i ve take into a c c o u nt the c u r r e nt s t a te \n\nof k n o w l e d ge and t e c h n i q u es r e g a r d i ng safer a l t e r n a t i v e s; \n\n8 \n9 \n\nOJ No L 1 8 7, 1 6. 7. 1 9 88 p. 1 4. OJ No L 2 7 5, 5. 1 0. 1 9 9 0, p. 3 5. - 12 -\n\nW h e r e as l i m i t a t i o ns a l r e a dy a d o p t ed by c e r t a in M e m b er S t a t es \n\non t he u se or m a r k e t i ng of t he s u b s t a n c es m e n t i o n ed a b o ve or \n\nthe p r e p a r a t i o n s\" c o n t a i n i ng t h em d i r e c t ly a f f e ct t he \n\nc o m p l e t i on a nd f u n c t i o n i ng of t he i n t e r n al m a r k e t; w h e r e as \n\nit is t h e r e f o re n e c e s s a ry to a p p r o x i m a te t he l a ws of t he \n\nM e m b er S t a t es in t h is f i e ld a nd c o n s e q u e n t ly a m e nd A n n ex I \nto C o u n c il D i r e c t i ve 7 6 / 7 6 9 / E E C, \n\nas last a m e n d ed by \n\n1 0 \n\nD i r e c t i ve 9 1 / 3 3 9 / E E C; \n\n11 \n\nW h e r e as \n\nt h is \n\nD i r e c t i ve d o es n ot a f f e ct C o m m u n i ty \n\nl e g i s l a t i on l a y i ng d o wn m i n i m um r e q u i r e m e n ts for t he \n\np r o t e c t i on of w o r k e r s, c o n t a i n ed in C o u n c il D i r e c t i ve \n\n8 9 / 3 9 1 / E EC \n\n1 2 \n\nand in i n d i v i d u al D i r e c t i v es b a s ed t h e r e o n, \n\nin p a r t i c u l ar C o u n c il D i r e c t i ve 9 U / 3 9 4 / E E C, \n\n1 3 \n\nH AS A D O P T ED T H IS D I R E C T I V E: \n\nA r t i c le 1 \n\nA n n ex I to D i r e c t i ve 7 6 / 7 6 9 / E EC is h e r e by a m e n d ed as set o ut \n\nin t he A n n ex h e r e t o. 10 \n\n11 \n\n12 \n\n13 \n\n0J No L 262, 27. 9. 1976, p. 201 \n\n0J No L 186, 12. 7. 1991, p. 64. 0J No L 183, 29. 6. 1989, p. 1. 0J No L 196, 26. 7. 1990, p. 1. )- 13 -\n\nA r t i c le 2 \n\n1. M e m b er S t a t es s h a ll a d o pt a nd p u b l i sh t he l a w s, \n\nr e g u l a t i o ns a nd \n\na d m i n i s t r a t i ve p r o v i s i o ns n e c e s s a ry to \n\nc o m p ly w i th t h is D i r e c t i ve no l a t er t h an 1 y e ar a f t er \n\nt he d a te of its a d o p t i on a nd s h a ll f o r t h w i th i n f o rm t he \n\nC o m m i s s i on t h e r e o f. T h ey s h a ll a p p ly t h e se p r o v i s i o ns \n\nf r om /_3 m o n t hs a f t er t he d a te s t a t ed a b o v e ?. 2. S h o u ld A n n ex I to D i r e c t i ve 6 7 / 5 4 8 / E EC be a m e n d ed \n\na f t er \n\nn o t i f i c a t i on \n\nof \n\nt h is \n\nD i r e c t i ve \n\nw i th \n\nr e s p e ct to t he s u b s t a n c es a nd p r e p a r a t i o ns r e f e r r ed to \n\nin p o i n ts 2 9, 30 & 31 of t he A n n ex to t h is D i r e c t i v e, \n\nM e m b er S t a t es s h aI If b r i ng i n to f o r ce t he l a w s, \n\nr e g u l a t i o ns a nd a d m i n i s t r a t i ve p r o v i s i o ns n e c e s s a ry to \n\ni n t r o d u ce t he l i m i t a t i o ns p r o v i d ed f or in t h is D i r e c t i ve \n\na r i s i ng f r om a ny a m e n d i ng D i r e c t i v es by t he d e a d l i n es \n\nl a id d o wn for i m p l e m e n t a t i on of s u ch a m e n d i ng D i r e c t i v e s. M e m b er S t a t es s h a ll f o r t h w i th i n f o rm t he C o m m i s s i on \n\nt h at t he p r o v i s i o ns r e f e r r ed to in t h is p a r a g r a ph h a ve \n\nb e en b r o u g ht i n to f o r c e. 3. W h en M e m b er S t a t es a d o pt t he p r o v i s i o ns r e f e r r ed to in \n\np a r a g r a p hs 1 and 2, t h e se s h a ll c o n t a in a r e f e r e n ce to \n\nt h is D i r e c t i ve or s h a ll be a c c o m p a n i ed by s u ch r e f e r e n ce \n\nat t he t i me of t h e ir o f f i c i al p u D l i c a t i o n. T ne p r o c e d u re \n\nfor s u ch r e f e r e n ce s h a ll be a d o p t ed by M e m b er S t a t e s. A r t i c le 3 \n\nT h is D i r e c t i ve is a d d r e s s ed to t he M e m b er S t a t e s. D o ne at B r u s s e l s, \n\nF or t he C o u nc i I \n\nT he P r e s i d e nt \n\n\f- 14 -\n\nANNEX \n\nAnnex I to Directive 76/769/EEC is hereby amended as \n\nfoI Iows: \n\nDesignation of the substance. Condition of Restrictions \n\nof the group of substances \n\nor of the preparation \n\n29. Substances which appear \n\nMay not be used in an \n\nin Annex I to Directive \n\nindividual concentration \n\n67/548/EEC classified as \n\nequal to or greater than: \n\ncarcinogen category 1 or \n\n- either the concentration \n\ncarcinogen category 2 and \n\nspecified in Annex I to \n\nlabelled at least as \"Toxic \n( T )H with risk phrase R45: \n\nDirective 67/548/EEC, or \n\n- the concentration specified \n\n\"May cause cancer\" or risk \n\nin Point 6 Table VI of Annex I \n\nphrase R49: \"May cause \n\nto Directive 88/379/EEC \n\ncancer by inhalation\". where no concentration limit \n\nappears in Annex I to \n\nDirective 67/548/EEC \n\nin the substances and \n\npreparations placed on the \n\nmarket for sale to the general \n\npub lie. Without prejudice to the \n\nimplementation of other \n\nCommunity provisions relating \n\nto the classification, \n\npackaging and labelling of \n\ndangerous substances and \n\npreparations, the packaging of \n\nsuch substances and \n\npreparations must be marked \n\nlegibly and indelibly as \n\nfollows: \"Restricted to \n\nprofessional users\" \n\n\f- 15 -\n\nBy way of derogation, this \nprovision shall not apply to: \na) medicinal or veterinary \nproducts as defined by \nDirective 65/65/EEC< 1 4>, as \nlast amended by Directive \n89/381/EEC< 15); \nb) cosmetic products as \ndefined by Directive \n76/768/EEC< 16), as last \namended by Directive \n89/679/EEC< 17); \n\nc) motor fuels which are \ncovered by Directive \n85/210/EEC<18 ) ; \n\nd) waste covered by Directives \n75/442/EECd\u00b0 ) and \n78/319/EEC<20) ; \n\ne) substances and preparations \nlisted In Annex I to Dir. 76/769/EEC which are not the \nsubject of points 29, 30 & 31 \nof the annex to this Directive \n\n(14) \n(15) \n(16) \n(17) \n(18) \n(19) \n(20) \n\n22, 9. 2. 1965, p. 369. 0J No \n0J No L 181, 28. 6. 1989, p. 44. 0J No L 262, 27. 9. 1976, p. 169. 0J No L 398, 30. 12. 1989, p. 25. 0J No L 96, 3. 4. 1985, p. 25. 0J No L 194, 25. 7. 1975, p. 39. 0J No L 84, 31. 3. 1978, p. 43. - 16 -\n\n30. Substances which appear \n\nMay not be used in an \n\nin Annex I to Directive \n\nindividual concentration \n\n67/548/EEC classified as \n\nequal to or greater than: \n\nmutagen category 1 or \n\n- either the concentration \n\nmutagen category 2 and \n\nspecified in Annex I to \n\nlabelled with risk phrase \n\nDirective 67/548/EEC, \n\nor \n\nR46: \"May cause heritable \n\n- the concentration specified \n\ngenet i c damage\". in Point 6 Table VI of Annex I \n\nto Directive 88/379/EEC \n\nwhere no concentration limit \n\nappears in Annex I to \n\nDirective 67/548/EEC \n\nin the substances and \n\npreparations placed on the \n\nmarket for sale to the general \n\npub lie. Without prejudice to the \n\nimplementation of other \n\nCommunity provisions relating \n\nto the classification, \n\npackaging and labelling of \n\ndangerous substances and \n\npreparations, the packaging of \n\nsuch substances and \n\npreparations must be marked \n\nlegibly and indelibly as \n\nfoI Iows: \n\n\"Restricted to professional \n\nusers \". By way of derogation, this \n\nprovision shall not apply to: \n\n(a) medicinal or veterinary \n\nproducts as defined by \n\nDirective 65/65/EEC,. as \n\nlast amended by Directive \n\n89/381/EEC; \n\n(b) cosmetic products as \n\n\f-17-i \n\ndefined by Directive \n\n76/768/EEC , \n\nas last \n\namended by Directive \n\n89/679/EEC; \n\n(c) motor fuels which are \n\ncovered by Directive \n\n85/210/EEC; \n\n(d) waste covered by \n\nDirectives 75/442/EEC \n\nand \n\n78/319/EEC; \n\n(e) substances and \n\npreparations listed in Annex I \n\nto Dir. 76/769/EEC which are \n\nnot the subject of points 29, \n\n30 & 31 of the annex to of \n\nthis Di rect i ve-\n\n\f- 18 -\n\n31. Substances which appear \n\nMay not be used in an \n\nin Annex I to Directive \n\nindividual concentration \n\n67/548/EEC classified as \n\nequal to or greater than: \n\nteratogen category 1 or \n\n- either the concentration \n\nteratogen category 2 and \n\nspecified in Annex I to \n\nlabelled with risk phrase \n\nDirective 67/548/EEC \n\nor \n\nR47: \"May cause birth \n\n- the concentration specified \n\ndefects\". in Point 6 Table VI of Annex I \n\nto Directive 88/379/EEC \n\nwhere no concentration limit \n\nappears in Annex I to \n\nDirective 67/548/EEC \n\nin the substances and \n\npreparations placed on the \n\nmarket for sale to the general \n\npub lie. Without prejudice to the \n\nimplementation of other \n\nCommunity provisions relating \n\nto the classification, \n\npackaging and labelling of \n\ndangerous substances and \n\npreparations, the packaging of \n\nsuch substances and \n\npreparations must be marked \n\nlegibly and indelibly as \n\nfoI Iows: \n\n\"Restricted to professional \n\nuser s\". By way of derogation, this \n\nprovision shall not apply to: \n\n(a) medicinal or veterinary \n\nproducts as defined by \n\nDirective 65/65/EEC, \n\nas \n\nlast amended by Directive \n\n89/381/EEC; \n\n(b) cosmetic products as \n\n\f- \\9 \n\n-\n\ndefined by Directive \n\n76/768/EEC > \n\nas last \n\namended by Directive \n\n89/679/EEC; \n\n(c) motor fuels which are \n\ncovered by Directive \n\n85/210/EEC ; \n\n(d) waste covered by \n\nDirectives 75/442/EEC \n\nand \n\n78/319/EEC; \n\n(e) substances and \n\npreparations listed in Annex I \n\nto Dir. 76/769/EEC which are \n\nnot the subject of points 29, \n\n30 & 31 of the annex to this \n\nDirect I v e. - 20 -\n\n32. Substances and Prepa \n\n32. 1. May not be used for wood \n\nrations, containing \n\ntreatment if they contain \n\none or more of the fol \n\na) Benzo-a-Pyrene at a \n\nlowing substances \n\na) Creosote \n\nconcentration of greater \n\nthan 0. 005% by mass \n\nEINECS Nr 232-287-5 \n\nor b) water extractable \n\nCAS Nr 8001-58-9 \n\nb) Creosote o i I \n\nphenols at a concen \n\ntration of greater \n\nEINECS Nr 263-047-8 \n\nthan 3% by mass \n\nCAS Nr 61789-28-4 \n\nor both a) and b) \n\nc) Distillates (coa I \n\nt a r ), napht ha Iene \n\noils \n\nEINECS Nr 283-484-8 \n\nCAS Nr 84650-04-4 \n\nFurthermore wood so \n\ntreated may not be \n\nplaced on the market \n\nd) Creosote Oil, ace-\n\nHowever by way of deroga-\n\nnaphthene fraction \n\ngat i on : \n\nEINECS Nr 292-605-3 \n\n(i) Rotating to the substan \n\nCAS Nr 90640-84-9 \n\nces and preparations: \n\ne) Distillates (coa I \n\nthese may be used for wood \n\ntar). upper \n\ntreatment in industrial \n\nEINECS Nr 266-026-1 \n\ninstallations if they \n\nCAS Nr 65996-91-0 \n\nconta i n: \n\nf) Anthracene O i I \n\nEINECS Nr 292-602-7 \n\nCAS Nr 90640-80-5 \n\na) Benzo-a-Pyrene at \n\na concentration of \n\nless than 0. 05% by mass \n\ng) Tar Ac i ds , CoaI , \n\nand \n\nCrude \n\nEINECS Nr 266-019-3 \n\nCAS Nr 65996-85-2 \n\nb) Water extractable \n\nphenols at a concen \n\ntration of less than \n\nh) Creosote, wood \n\n3% by mass. EINECS Nr 232-419-1 \n\nCAS Nr 8021-39-4 \n\n\f- 21 -\n\nJ) Low temperature \n\nSuch substances and \n\ntar o i l, alkaline \n\nprepa r a t i ons \n\nextracted \n\n- may be placed on the \n\nEINECS Nr 310 t9f 5 \n\nmarket only in packaging \n\nCAS Nr 122384785 \n\nof a capacity equal to or \n\ngreater than 200 litres \n\n- may not be sold to the \n\ngener a I pub I i c \n\nWithout prejudice to the \n\napplication of other \n\nCommunity provisions on \n\nthe classification, \n\npackaging and labelling \n\nof dangerous substances \n\nand preparations, the \n\npackaging of such sub \n\nstances and preparations \n\nshall be legible and \n\nindelibly marked as \n\nfo I Iows: \n\n\"For use in industrial \n\ninstallations only\" \n\n(ii) Relating to wood treated \n\naccording to (i) which is \n\nplaced on the market for \n\nthe first time: \n\nthis is permitted for \n\nprofess i onaI and \n\nindustrial use only e. g. on railways, in electric \n\npower transmission and \n\ntelecommunications, for \n\nfencing and in harbours \n\nand wa t erways. However, such wood may not \n\n\f- 22 -\n\nbe used: \n\n- inside buildings whether \n\nfor decorative purposes or \n\nnot whatever their purpose \n\n(residence, employment, \n\nIe i sure) ; \n\n- for the manufacture of \n\ncontainers intended for \n\ngrowing purposes and any \n\nre-treatment and the \n\nmanufacture of packaging \n\nwhich may come into \n\ncontact with or other \n\nmaterials which may \n\ncontaminate raw, \n\nintermediate and/or \n\nfinished products intended \n\nfor human and/or animal \n\nconsumption and any re-\n\nt reatment; \n\n- in playgrounds and in \n\nother outdoor places of \n\npublic pleasure or in \n\nother situations where \n\nthere is a risk that it \n\nmay come into contact with \n\nskin. (iii) Relating to old treated \n\nwood: \n\nthe prohibition shall not \n\napply where this is placed \n\non the second hand market. However such wood may not \n\nbe used: \n\n- inside buildings whether \n\nfor decorative purposes or \n\n\f-'23 -\n\nnot w h a t e v er their p u r p o se \n\n( r e s i d e n c e, e m p l o y m e n t, \n\nl e i s u r e ); \n\n- for the m a n u f a c t u re of \n\nc o n t a i n e rs intended for \n\ng r o w i ng p u r p o s es and any \n\nr e - t r e a t m e nt and the \n\nm a n u f a c t u re of p a c k a g i ng \n\nw h i ch may come into \n\nc o n t a ct with or other \n\nm a t e r i a ls w h i ch may \n\nc o n t a m i n a te raw, \n\ni n t e r m e d i a te and/or \n\nf i n i s h ed p r o d u c ts intended \n\nfor h u m an a n d / or animal \n\nc o n s u m p t i on and any r e-\n\nt r e a t m e n t; \n\n- in p l a y g r o u n ds and in \n\nother o u t d o or p l a c es of \n\npub lie p i e a s ur e. 33. C h i o r o f o rm \n\n\"\\ \n\nMay not be used in \n\nCAS N r. 6 7 - 6 6 -3 \n\nc o n c e n t r a t i o ns equal to \n\n3 4. C a r b on T e t r a c h l o r i de \n\nor g r e a t er than 0 , 1% by \n\nCAS N r. 5 6 - 2 3 -5 \n\nw e i g ht in s u b s t a n c es and \n\n3 5. 1,1,2 Trich I o r o e t h a ne \n\np r e p a r a t i o ns p l a c ed on \n\nCAS Nr. 7 9 - 0 0 -5 \n\n36. 1,1,2,2 T e t r a c h l o r o e t h a ne \n\nCAS Nr. 7 9 - 3 4 -5 \n\ny \n\n3 7. 1,1,1,2 T e t r a c h I o r o e t h a ne \n\nCAS Nr. 6 3 0 - 2 0 -6 \n\n3 8. P e n t a c hI o r o e t h a ne \n\nthe m a r k et for sale to \n\nthe g e n e r al p u b l i c. CAS Nr. 7 6 - 0 1 -7 \n\nW i t h o ut p r e j u d i ce to the \n\n39. 1,1 D i c h I o r o e t h y I e ne \n\na p p l i c a t i on of other \n\nCAS Nr. 7 5 - 3 5 -4 \n\nC o m m u n i ty p r o v i s i o ns on \n\nj \n\nthe c l a s s i f i c a t i o n, p a c k a \n\nging and labelling of \n\n\f- 24 -\n\ndangerous substances and \n\npreparations, the packa \n\nging of such substances \n\nand preparat i ons \n\nconta i n i ng them i n \n\nconcentrations equal to or \n\ngreater than 0. 1% \n\nshall be legible and inde \n\nlibly marked as follows: \n\n\"Restricted to professio-\n\nna I users\" \n\nBy way of derogation this \n\nprovision shall not apply \n\nto: \n\n(a) med i c i na I or \n\nveterinary products as \n\ndefined by Directive \n\n65/65/EEC, \n\nas last \n\namended by Directive \n\n89/381/EEC; \n\n(b) cosmetic products as \n\ndefined by Directive \n\n76/768/EEC, \n\nas last \n\namended by Directive \n\n89/679/EEC; \n\n(c) waste covered by \n\nDirectives 75/442/EEC \n\nand 78/319/EEC. - 25 -\n\n4 0. 1,1,1 T r i c h I o r o e t h a ne \n\nFrom five y e a rs of entry \n\nCAS N r. 7 1 - 5 5 -6 \n\ninto f o r ce of \n\nthis D i r e c t i v e, may not be \n\nused in c o n c e n t r a t i o ns \n\nequal to or g r e a t er than \n\n0 , 1% by we i ght in \n\nsubs t a n c es and \n\np r e p a r a t i o ns p l a c ed on the \n\nm a r k et for sale to the \n\ngener a I pub lie. W i t h o ut p r e j u d i ce to the \n\na p p l i c a t i on of other \n\nC o m m u n i ty p r o v i s i o ns on \n\nthe c l a s s i f i c a t i o n, \n\np a c k a g i ng and labelling of \n\nd a n g e r o us s u b s t a n c es and \n\np r e p a r a t i o n s, the \n\np a c k ag i ng of this \n\ns u b s t a n ce and of \n\np r e p a r a t i o ns c o n t a i n i ng it \n\nin c o n c e n t r a t i o ns equal to \n\nor g r e a t er than 0. 1% shall \n\nbe l e g i b le and indelibly \n\nm a r k ed as f o l l o w s: \n\n\"Rest r i cted to \n\np r o f e s s i o n al u s e r s\" \n\nBy way of d e r o g a t i on this \n\np r o v i s i on shall not apply \n\nto: \n\n( a ) med i c i naI or \n\nv e t e r i n a ry p r o d u c ts as \n\nd e f i n ed by D i r e c t i ve \n\n6 5 / 6 5 / E E C, \n\nas last \n\na m e n d ed by D i r e c t i ve \n\n8 9 / 3 8 1 / E EC ; \n\n(b) c o s m e t ic p r o d u c ts as \n\n\f- 26 -\n\ndefined by Directive \n\n76/768/EEC, \n\nas last \n\namended by Directive \n\n89/679/EEC; \n\n(c) waste covered by \n\nDirectives 75/442/EEC \n\nand 78/319/EEC. - 27 \n\ni \n} FINANCIAL STATEMENT \n\nSECTION 1: FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\n1. Title of operation \n\nProposal for a thirteenth amendment to Directive 76/769/EEC \n\n2. Budget heading Involved \n\nArticle B5-300: completing the Internal market \n\n3. Legal basis \n\n- Article 100a of the Treaty \n- Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical \nharmonization and standardization \n\n4. Description of operation \n\n4. 1 Specific objective of operation \n\nThe proposed operation involves: \n- restricting the marketing and use of creosote, chlorinated solvents \n\nand substances class I fed as carcinogenic, mutagenic or teratogenic-, \nrestricting the marketing and use of preparations containing these \nthree categories of substance. 4. 2 Duration \n\nThis is a \"one-off\" operation \n\n4. 3 Target population \n\nIndustrialists and consumers \n\n5. Classification of expenditure \n\n- Differentiated appropriation \n\nNon-compuIsory \n\nm mi. ii- iiII\u2022-. !. i m-mmmmmm*m*-v*~*'~~m-immw*mmmm'm \n\n\"'\u2014i^mm^immmmmmmmmmilHIB \n\n\f- 28 -\n\n6. Type of expenditure \n\nThe expenditure would consist of financial support granted by the \nCommission to standardization organizations. As In the case of other \n\"New Approach\" directives, the Commission Intends to entrust the CEN \nwith the task of drafting a harmonized standard. This will apply only \nto creosote Intended for controlled use; no standards are needed In the \nother two cases, where the substances concerned are banned. The \nnecessary mandate for this task comes under the framework contract \nsigned on 10 October 1985, which provides for Just such financial \nsupport from the Commission. Financial Impact on appropriations for operations \n\n7. 1. Method of calculating the cost \n\nThe calculation method relating to Article B5-300 applies here. According to calculations performed by the European Committee for \nStandardization (CEN) on the basis of their experience of existing \nmandates, the average cost to the Commission of each new standard \nIs ECU 50 000. Since only one standard is to be Introduced, the Impact should be \nabout ECU 50 000. 7. 2 Proportion of the mini-budget \n\nN/A \n\n7. 3 Schedule of commitment (CE) and payment (CP) appropriations \n\n(Article 5B-300) \n\nCE \n\nCP \n\n1992 50 000 \n1993 \n\nTOTAL 50 000 \n\n25 000 \n25 000 \n\n50 000 \n\n8. What anti-fraud measures are planned? \n\nExpenditure under the CEN contract is subject to the anti-fraud measures \nlaid down in that contract and to any audits carried out by CEN. SECTION 2: ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE \n\nNo new administrative expenditure Is foreseen. Any meetings to be held \nwould take place pursuant to Directive 76/769/EEC and would be covered by \nthe budget for that Directive. -;29 \" \n\nSECTION 3: ELEMENTS OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS \n\n1. Objective and coherence with financial programming \n\n1. The aim of the proposed operation Is to harmonize restrictions on the \nmarketing and use of the three types of product concerned (creosote, \nchlorinated solvents, CMT) so as to avoid creating obstacles to trade \nand, at the same time, to provide a high level of protection for humans \nand the environment. The proposal lays down essential requirements In the case of creosote. These will provide a solid basis for standardization In Europe. The amount \nof work to be done on standards should thus be reduced and, consequently, \nthe Impact on the Community budget lessened. 2. The operation is Incorporated In DG Ill's financial programming and is \nIncluded In the appropriations allocated to technical standardization and \nharmonlzatIon. 3. The general objective Is to complete the Internal market. II. Grounds for the operation \n\nHarmonization serves to prevent obstacles to trade and, at the same time, \nto provide a high level of protection for humans and the environment. Standardization is necessary In the case of creosote; otherwise the various \ntests and conditions considered necessary before marketing the product \nmight act as obstacles to trade. I I I. Monitoring and evaluation of the operation \n\nThe Committee set up under Directive 76/769/EEC will be responsible for \nmonitoring the application of this Directive. Evaluation will be carried out annually via the progress reports on the \nadoption of the standard drafted by the CEN. \u00ab\u00bbt*. \u00ab\u00abc*\u00bbn\u00ab-\n\n\f- 30 -\n\nCOMPETITIVENESS AND EMPLOYMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT \n\n1. The current proposal concerns restrictions on the marketing and use of \nthree families of substances and preparations viz creosote, chlorinated \nsolvents ami CMT. 1. 1 Creosote \n\nCreosote Is produced as a byproduct of coke production. It is used by \nindustry as an Intermediate for making certain industrial products. It \nis also used by Industry and by the consumer for wood treatment. Creosote for wood treatment and treated wood may endanger human health \nand the environment. It has been decided, therefore that the marketing and use for wood \ntreatment of certain creosotes and the marketing and use of treated \nwood should be limited. 1. 2 Chlorinated solvents \n\nCertain chlorinated solvents are used to a small extent by the general \npublic and certain others may potentially be used In the future. Such solvents present or potentially present varying degrees of hazard \nto the health of consumers. Depending on the potential hazard to health, the extent of use, the \nexistance of substitues and the provisions of existing Community \nlegislation, priorities for limiting use by consumers have been \nestablished. Seven solvents would be Immediately banned for consumer \nuse, another would be banned from 5 years and a further three would be \nreviewed after three years. 31 -\n\n1,3 CMT \n\nSubstances which are carcinogenic, teratogenic or mutagenic may at \npresent be used by consumers either alone or In preparations. Consumers may thus be put at risk. it has been decided that substances and preparations classified as \ncarcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic In categories 1 and 2 or that \nmay In future be so classified can no longer be placed on the market \nfor use by the general public. II, Features of the Business In Question \n\nCreosote is a byproduct of the coke Industry which Is of course \nconcentrated In the big coal producing Member States viz Germany and \nUK. Industrial treatment of wood with creosote Is also largely \nconcentrated in these same Member States. Treated wood Is marketed \nthroughout the Community. Chlorinated solvents are widely used In Industry mainly for various \ncleaning purposes e. g. metal degreasing. A very small amount is used \nin consumer products e. g. stain removers, paint removers etc. CMT substances and preparations are also used to a very small extent by \nconsumers except for the case of motor fuels which, being covered by an \nexisting directive, are excluded from the proposal limitations. III. What direct obligations does the Measure Impose on Industry? \n\nIn the case of creosote the producing Industry will have to modify Its \nprocess plant so that product meets the essential requirements set down \nin this directive. It must also ensure that creosote for Industrial \nuse Is appropriately packaged and labelled. These costs, which will be \nborne mainly by large companies, are likely to be small. Neither the \ncost of the measures nor the timing are of particular concern to the \nIndustry. The chlorinated solvents industry must begin now to examine alternative \nsolvents and systems for consumer use. The proposed measures will \nhowever be phased in over a period of years thus giving the industry \nadequate time for the transition. The costs, which again are down \nmainly to large companies, will be small. Neither the cost of the \nmeasures nor the timing are of particular concern to the Industry. The measures on CMT substances and preparations are not expected to \nImpose significant obligations beyond labelling. The cost of the \nmeasures are not of particular concern to the Industry. The timing \ncould pose a problem as limitations on CMT substances will follow \nautomat leally on. class if I cat Ion. - 32 -\n\nIV. What Indirect obligations are local authorItes likely to impose on \n\nbusiness? \n\nNone. V. Are there any special measures in respect of SME's? \n\nNo. As indicated In Section III above, the proposal will Impact mainly \non large companies. VI What is the likely effect on: \n\n(a) \n(b) \n\ncompetitiveness of Industry \nemployment \n\n(a) \n\nThere may be a very marginal Increase in the cost of treated wood \nand of certain preparations for consumer use. The effects on \ncompetitiveness are however likely to be negligible. (b) \n\nIt Is unlikely that the measure will have significant Impact on \nemployment. VII. Consul tat Ion \n\nThe following Industry groups were consulted on preparation of the proposal \nand participated in meetings of the Member States experts : \n\nSection of Proposal \n\nIndustry Association Consulted \n\n1. Creosote \n\n2. Chlorinated solvents \n\nWestern European Institute for \nWood Preservation, Brussels \n\nEuropean Chlorinated Solvent \nAssociation, Brussels \n\n3. CMT \n\nCEFIC. Brussels \n\nAM are In broad agreement. CEFIC however expressed some concern about the \nautomatlclty of CMT limitations. The European consumer representative group BEUC was also consulted. - 33 -\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 195 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n06 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-212-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44024-4 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/854fb566-5aae-4f4b-8645-85e7ebf06798", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1098/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with a Commission directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,construction equipment,occupational safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E001098", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "construction equipment", "occupational safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/854fb566-5aae-4f4b-8645-85e7ebf06798", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5f8da64b-c1bb-4386-81a6-8a4aec499a3f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1083/92 by Mr Jes\u00fas CABEZ\u00d3N ALONSO to the Commission. EEC vocational training proposals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CABEZON ALONSO,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Japan,United States,advisory committee (EU),labour market,manpower needs,professional qualifications,proposal (EU),technical education,technological change,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E001083", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Japan", "United States", "advisory committee (EU)", "labour market", "manpower needs", "professional qualifications", "proposal (EU)", "technical education", "technological change", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5f8da64b-c1bb-4386-81a6-8a4aec499a3f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1723b27c-ebad-4f62-9c29-34a7b44a9e08", "title": "Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE ON THE APPROXIMATION OF MEMBER STATES' LAWS REGULATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS ON ADVERTISING FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "advertising,approximation of laws,public health,sponsorship,tobacco,tobacco industry", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0196,comnat:COM_1992_0196_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_129_R_0005_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["advertising", "approximation of laws", "public health", "sponsorship", "tobacco", "tobacco industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1723b27c-ebad-4f62-9c29-34a7b44a9e08", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/310da768-095a-4cd2-ae07-94ebc693bed9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1053/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Animal welfare", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "European Commissioner,application of EU law,protection of animals,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:91992E001053", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commissioner", "application of EU law", "protection of animals", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/310da768-095a-4cd2-ae07-94ebc693bed9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a1229aa-8a09-44fd-baaa-0b53a55e84c3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1084/92 by Mr Paul LANNOYE to the Commission. Filing of patents on the application of biotechnologies by the Commission", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LANNOYE", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "European Patent Office,bioprocess,biotechnology,genetic engineering,impact study,patent,report,scientific research", "workIds": "celex:91992E001084", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Patent Office", "bioprocess", "biotechnology", "genetic engineering", "impact study", "patent", "report", "scientific research"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a1229aa-8a09-44fd-baaa-0b53a55e84c3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25661a98-9871-420a-822f-17db188ce40d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1097/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with a Commission directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,construction equipment,occupational safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E001097", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "construction equipment", "occupational safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25661a98-9871-420a-822f-17db188ce40d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8110b604-8cd1-4e89-94fd-4ac64cda9302", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1060/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Examination of passports at airports", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EU national,airport,application of EU law,carriage of passengers,contract of carriage,free movement of persons,passport,police checks", "workIds": "celex:91992E001060", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "airport", "application of EU law", "carriage of passengers", "contract of carriage", "free movement of persons", "passport", "police checks"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8110b604-8cd1-4e89-94fd-4ac64cda9302", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4187e533-93b1-49ca-bf33-ea3bee23c3cc", "title": "Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE ON RENTAL RIGHT AND LENDING RIGHT AND ON CERTAIN RIGHTS RELATED TO COPYRIGHT IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EU law,copyright,heritage protection,intellectual property", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0159,comnat:COM_1992_0159_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_128_R_0008_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "copyright", "heritage protection", "intellectual property"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4187e533-93b1-49ca-bf33-ea3bee23c3cc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 159 f i n al \n\n- SYN 319 \n\nB r u s s e l s, 30 A p r il 1992 \n\nAmended proposal \n\nf or a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\nON RENTAL R I G HT AND L E N D I NG R I G HT AND ON C E R T A IN \n\nR I G H TS RELATED TO COPYRIGHT \n\nIN THE F I E LD OF \n\nI N T E L L E C T U AL PROPERTY \n\n( p r e s e n t ed by the Commission pursuant \nthe E E C - T r e a t y) \n\nof \n\nto A r t i c le 1 4 9 ( 3) \n\n\f-A \n\n-\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nOn 13 December 1990, the Commission presented to the Council Its proposal \n\nfor a Council Directive on rental right, lending right, and on certain \n\nrights related to copyright. The Economic and Social Committee delivered Its opinion on the proposal on \n\n3 July 1991. The European Parliament, consulted under the cooperation procedure, \n\ndiscussed the proposal In detail In Its Committees and on 11 February 1992 \n\ndebated the report drawn up on behalf of the Committee on Legal Affairs and \n\nCitizens' rights by Mr. Anastassopoulos, voting in support of the proposed \n\nDirective as amended by Parliament on 12 February 1992. The amended proposal for a Directive presented by the European Commission is \n\nintended to take Into account the Opinion of the European Parliament. The amended proposal contains six major modifications to the original \n\nproposal. (a) In the definitions of rental and lending, It Is explicitly clarified \n\nthat rental and lending for the purpose of public performance Is not \n\ncovered. Accordingly, In particular the rental of film copies to \n\n\f- 2 -\n\ncinemas for the purpose of performance, to broadcasting organisations \n\nfor the purpose of broadcasting, as well as the rental of sheet music \n\nfor the purpose of performance, remains excluded from the scope of the \n\nDirect Ive. (b) In the context of the determination of the rightholders, it Is stated \n\nthat at least the principal director of a cinematographic work shall be \n\nits author. While this already corresponds to the legal situation in \n\nmost Member States, it seems useful to take up the proposal of the \n\nEuropean Parliament and to safeguard the legal protection for this \n\nImportant group of creative persons in all Member States. This does not \n\nprejudice any possible harmonlsatIon of authorship of films but is \n\nrather a minimum provision which leaves it to Member States to \n\ndetermine in detail, which other contributors to a film should be \n\nconsidered to be its co-authors under national law. (c) On the basis of the proposal of the European Parliament and with \n\nrespect, in particular, to the concerns of the film industry and to \n\nconsiderations of practicabiI Ity, the amended proposal provides for a \n\nrebuttable presumption of rights in favour of film producers, according \n\nto which performing artists are presumed to have assigned their \n\nexclusive rental right, lending right, reproduction right and \n\ndistribution right to film producers In the contract concerning film \n\nproduction. This will considerably facilitate in practice the \n\nexploitation of films by film producers. This potential loss of rights \n\nfor performing artists is compensated to a certain extent, as the \n\npresumption of assignment Is rebuttable and subject to the right of \n\neconomic participation in the revenues from exploitation under Article \n\n3 of the proposed Directive. (d) Following the Opinion of the European Parliament, the Commission In the \n\nnew Article 4 bis proposes both a consolidation and, In part, a larger \n\nscope of protection, as no changes, cuts or additions may be made to a \n\nwork by the person making available for rental, the renter, the lender \n\nor the borrower without specific authorization of the author. This \n\namendment concerns some aspects of moral rights which Member States In \n\ngeneral recognize as such. This partial harmonlsation \n\n\f- 3 -\n\nof authors' moral rights In the field of rental and lending is not \n\nIntended to prejudice a possible future harmonlsation of moral rights \n\nIn the Community; It rather constitutes a minimum rule which does not \n\nInterfere with general national provisions on moral rights. Member \n\nStates may go beyond this rule also in respect of rental and lending. (e) As a supplement to chapter II of the proposed Directive which is mainly \n\ndedicated to the fight against piracy, the new Article 6 bis follows \n\nthe proposal made by the European Parliament and provides an exclusive \n\nright of broadcasting and communication to the public for performing \n\nartists and broadcasting organisations, as well as a right to \n\nremuneration for performing artists and phonogram producers If a \n\nphonogram published for commercial purposes Is used for broadcasting or \n\ncommunication to the public. In the proposed formulation, these rights \n\nlargely correspond to the provisions of the Rome Convention for the \n\nprotection of performers, producers of phonograms and broadcasting \n\norganisations of 1961, but go to some extent beyond the protection \n\nprovided in this Convention due to the widespread practice of piracy. Here, too, the proposed protection is already Implemented in most \n\nMember States, with some differences In detail. It therefore seems \n\nuseful, also in view of the problems caused by piracy, to extend \n\nharmonlsation for neighbouring right holders to the right of \n\nbroadcasting and communication to the public. This protection also \n\nconstitutes a common minimum level which Member States may exceed in \n\ntheir national law, as Is already often the case. Article 6 bis \n\nparagraph 4 ensures that no divergent legislation is enacted at \n\nCommunity level, by stating that the specifically relevant provisions \n\nof the proposed Directive on satellite broadcasting and retransmission \n\nby cable, which is at present under consideration, will not be \n\nprejudiced. - 4 -\n\n(f) In order to achieve harmonlsation as early as possible, the Commission \n\nin its original proposal had provided for an immediate application of \n\nthe Directive to all protected works and subject matter. Later on, \n\ncertain groups of users and producers In particular have asked for an \n\nexplicit transitional period, In order to take better account of \n\nacquired rights and obligations. As suggested by the European \n\nParliament, the Commission meets this request in its amended proposal \n\nIn Article 11 paragraph 2. In particular, under this provision the \n\nDirective will in principle apply as of Its entry into force, but will \n\nnot affect existing contractual rights and obligations for a period of \n\nthree years from jts entry Into force. Contracting parties are thus \n\ngiven the possibility of adapting their contracts to the provisions of \n\nthe Directive within a transitional period of three years. Only two of the amendments proposed by the Parliament were not adopted by \n\nthe Commission in its amended proposal. The addition to recital n\" 15 which was suggested by the Parliament was \n\nconnected with a previously proposed amendment concerning a remuneration for \n\nprivate copying, which already had been rejected by the Committee on Legal \n\nAffairs and Citizens' rights and was not tabled any more In the Parliament. With the deletion of this previously proposed amendment, the suggested \n\naddition to recital n\" 15 has lost its function, too, and cannot be adopted \n\nby the Commission for reasons of the coherence of the text as a whole. The proposed amendment n* 36 concerning Article 11 paragraph 1 has not been \n\naccepted, as It does not add anything to the original proposal of the \n\nCommission and appears to be rather less precise. Instead, the amended \n\nproposal contains a different addition of a clarifying character to this \n\nprovIslon. - 5 -\n\nCommentary on the title and the recitals \n\nWith respect to the additional or modified provisions of the Directive, the \n\nCommission has included additional recitals or additions to existing \n\nrecitals in its proposal. Title \n\nIn accordance with the Opinion of the European Parliament, the words \"in the \n\nfield of intellectual property\" have been added to the title of the \n\nproposal. This constitutes a useful clarification, as it explicitly states \n\nthat the Directive does not cover the rental or lending of housing, cars or \n\nthe like, which is Irrelevant under copyright. However, for this purpose, \n\nthe addition has to be placed at the end of the title. The second amendment \n\nin the title, which is not relevant in all language versions, serves the \n\npurpose of clarification. The normally used expression \"neighbouring rights\" \n\nbecomes clearer In the formulation \"rights related to copyright\". This \n\nformulation shows that these rights are related to copyright rather than to \n\nrental or lending. Recital n' 3 \n\nThe additional reference to Article 3f EEC-Treaty serves the purpose of \n\nclarification and does not change the purpose of the Directive. Recital n' 5 \n\nIn view of the new Article 6 bis, a reference to the right of broadcasting \n\nand to the right of communication to the public has been added to this \n\nreeltal. - 6 -\n\nRecital n' 7. The proposed amendment specifies that an adequate legal protection is \n\nnecessary for \"the first rlghtholders concerned\". This means In the context \n\nof the original text of recital n\" 7 that creative and artistic persons -\n\nauthors and performing artists - as well as organisational and economic \n\ncontributors - producers of phonograms and films, broadcasters - are \n\nentitled to legal protection where their works and efforts are concerned by \n\nthe exploitation. Recital n' 10 \n\nThe Commission has accepted the clarifying proposed amendment to recital n* \n\n10, since it duly stresses once again the consideration expressed In recital \n\nn* 9. According to this consideration, the activities which the provision of \n\nthe Directive intends to facilitate, are \"to a large extent\" self-employed \n\nactivities or services. Thereby It is clarified at the same time that the \n\nDirective does not deal mainly with the rights and Interests of employees as \n\nsuch In relation to their employers. Where rlghtholders are at the same time \n\nemployees, their relationship to their employers are covered by this \n\ndirective only as a consequence of its structure. Recital n- 15 \n\nIn view of the new Article 6 bis, a reference to the right of broadcasting \n\nand to the right of communication to the public has been added to this \n\nrecital. Recital n' 15a \n\nThis additional recital is also a consequence of the Introduction of the new \n\nArticle 6 bis, as it states that the rights Included therein are minimum \n\nrIghts. - 7 -\n\nRftdtal n- 15b \n\nAs was already evident from the original proposal for a Directive by the \n\nCommission and Its explanatory memorandum, the Commission holds the view \n\nthat it would not be useful to define In this Directive which only deals \n\nwith certain aspects of copyright, the groups of rightholders it covers. This view is now explicitly confirmed In the new recital n* 15b, based on \n\nthe proposal of the European Parliament. Since the Directive itself \n\nintentionally does not contain a definition, the groups of rightholders \n\ntherefore have to be clearly defined in the national law of the Member \n\nStates. This is mostly already the case. Recital n* 16a \n\nThe Commission accepts the consideration which is underlying the proposal of \n\nthe Parliament for the additional recital n* 16a. According to this \n\nconsideration, Member States should review, after the Implementation of this \n\nDirective, In certain cases their relations to such third countries where \n\nthe Directive may create a new situation, with a view to the possible \n\nconclusion of agreements on mutual legal protection. The formulation has \n\nbeen modified In the amended proposal for the sake of clarity. - 8 -\n\nCommentary on the Articles \n\nArticle 1 paragraph 2 \n\nThe Commission accepts the amendments proposed by the Parliament to \n\nArticle 1 paragraph 2 of the original proposal since they render the \n\ndefinition of rental more precise without changing the substance or the main \n\npurpose of the Directive. In the view of the Commission this is true In \n\nparticular for the first amendment which replaces the term \"for profit \n\nmaking purposes\" by the formulation \"for direct or indirect economic \n\nadvantage\". This sentence which has been added to paragraph 2 is of a \n\nclarifying character, too. While already the original proposal Intended to \n\ncover the frequent exploitation in the form of rental to the \"last user\", it \n\nis now explicitly stated that rental for the purpose of public performance \n\nremains outside the scope of the Directive. This concerns In particular the \n\nrental of film copies to cinemas or the rental of sheet music for the \n\npurpose of performance of music. The language (\"public performance\") has \n\nbeen adapted to the French version which Is correct In substance. Article 1 paragraph 3 \n\nThe Parliament's proposal for Article 1 paragraph 3 also Includes two \n\namendments : the new second sentence contains the same precision for the \n\ndefinitions of lending for the purpose of public performance as Is provided \n\nfor rental. The Commission accepts this amendment with reference to the \n\ncomments on Article 1 paragraph 2. Due to the second amendment, the deletion \n\nof the word \"direct\" in the first part of the paragraph, the scope of \n\nlending has been limited in favour of rental. Thus, activities in particular \n\nof those institutions which act towards users like public libraries but \n\nwhich pursue indirect profit making purposes, are considered to be rental \n\nrather than lending. The Commission accepts this amendment since it draws an \n\neven clearer distinction between rental and lending. - 9 -\n\nArt icle 1 paragraph 4 \n\nThe Commission has accepted the Parliament's drafting amendment on Article 1 \n\nparagraph 4, as It constitutes no change in substance. Like the original \n\ntext, the new formulation is intended to state that the exclusive rental \n\nright and the lending right as referred to in Article 1 paragraph 1, are not \n\naffected by any sale or other act of distribution of originals or copies of \n\nworks or other subject matter, and remain valid. Article 2 paragraph 2 \n\nThe Commission has accepted the proposal of the European Parliament that at \n\nleast the principal director of a cinematographic work shall be considered \n\nto be its author. At least in the context of this Directive, It is thereby \n\nguaranteed that these creative persons obtain legal protection as authors \n\nthroughout the Community and no longer suffer disadvantages In some Member \n\nStates due to a lack of protection. Without prejudice to a possible overall \n\nharmonlsation of authorship of cinematographic works, it seems therefore \n\nuseful to Include the provision the Parliament has proposed. The formulation \n\nof this paragraph has been adjusted In order to state even more clearly the \n\npurpose of the provision and to clarify that Its application Is limited to \n\nthe scope of this Directive and that It only Is a minimum harmonlsation. Article 2 paragraph 4 \n\nThe proposal for amendment of Article 2 paragraph 4 which has been accepted \n\nby the Commission does not change the substance, but only takes Into account \n\nthat the Directive on the legal protection of computer programs was In the \n\nmeantime adopted by the Council. 10 \n\nArticle 2 paragraph 5 \n\nThe original proposal of the Commission did not contain any specific \n\nprovisions on the relations between performing artists and producers of \n\ncinematographic works, but rather left it to Member States whether and if so \n\nhow to deal with this relation. The Commission now follows the opinion of \n\nthe European Parliament pursuant to the request of the film Industry to deal \n\nwith this relation with respect to the exclusive rental and lending right \n\nIn the framework of this Directive on Community level. This means a major \n\nfacilitation of the exploitation of films for film producers throughout the \n\nCommunity on equal terms. In order to compensate the performing artist for \n\nthis potential weakening of his legal position with a minimum protection, \n\nthe presumption of assignment is rebuttable and subject to a written \n\ncontract as well as to the economic participation under Article 3. The \n\namended proposal extends the scope of this provision, as compared with the \n\nwording proposed by the Parliament, for the benefit of producers beyond work \n\ncontracts to a I I contracts, and includes some minor modifications to the \n\nformulation in order to safeguard the coherence with the other provisions of \n\nthis Directive. Article 3 \n\nThe Parliament's proposed amendment to the first sentence has been accepted \n\nby the Commission to the extent that It constitutes a more precise \n\nformulation of the original proposal. The other proposals of the Parliament \n\nhave been accepted subject to modifications which appear necessary for the \n\nsake of clar i ty. The amended proposal adopts the Idea of the Parliament to further specify In \n\nan additional second sentence the part of the revenues which are the object \n\nof the right under Article 3, but presents this idea in a slightly modified \n\nand, in the view of the Commission, even more precise formulation as \n\ncompared with the Parliament's proposal. According to this formulation, the \n\nimportance of the contribution of the rightholders concerned to the sound \n\nrecording, visual recording or visual and sound recording has to be taken \n\nInto account for the distribution of the revenues. In conformity with Its \n\noriginal proposal and pursuant to the proposal of the Parliament, the \n\nCommission presumes that the creative and artistic contributions of authors \n\nand performing artists are of major Importance for the exploitation of the \n\nwork, as for Instance, they Influence the decision of the consumer to rent a \n\npart icular fIIm. - 11 -\n\nThe amended proposal has adopted the Opinion of the European Parliament on \n\nthe second part of the third sentence, but has chosen a clearer formulation \n\nin accordance with the Intended meaning. Accordingly, the right of authors \n\nand performing artists to obtain a share may be entrusted to collecting \n\nsocieties, representing the professional categories concerned, as they \n\nappear to be particularly qualified for this task. The terminology \n\n(\"entrusted\") has been adapted to the French version which is correct In \n\nsubstance. Article 4 \n\nNo amendments were proposed by the European Parliament. Article 4 Pis \n\nArticle 4 bis adds aspects of moral rights to the economic aspects of the \n\nrental and lending right. The provision which the Commission has \n\nIncorporated Into Its amended proposal from the Parliament contains a \n\npartial aspect of moral right. Most Member States already provide for a \n\ncomprehensive protection of moral rights; it therefore seems useful to \n\nharmonize at least In respect of rental and lending, without preventing \n\nMember States from enacting more far-reaching moral rights in their national \n\nlaws. Article 5 \n\nNo amendments were proposed by the European Parliament. - 12 -\n\nArticle 6 \n\nThe Commission has followed the proposal of the Parliament to provide, with \n\nreference to the new Article 2 paragraph 5, a rebuttable presumption of \n\nassignment also for the right of reproduction, in the sense that the \n\nperforming artist Is presumed to have assigned his exclusive right In the \n\nwritten contract to the film producer. This presumption of assignment is \n\nrebuttable by contractual provisions to the contrary, and is subject to the \n\neconomic participation under Article 3 which applies here in Its substance. This presumption of assignment accommodates the interest of film producers \n\nIn a facilitation of the exploitation of films also with respect to the \n\nreproduction right, without neglecting a certain minimum protection for \n\nperforming artists. Article 6 bis \n\nWith minor modifications in the formulation, the amended proposal adopts the \n\nproposition of the Parliament to add the basic rights of broadcasting and of \n\ncommunication to the public for certain holders of neighbouring rights to \n\nChapter II of the Directive. Whereas, pursuant to chapter 2 of the Green \n\nPaper on Copyright, the original proposal was limited to forms of piracy In \n\nconnection with material exploitation, the Commission now follows the \n\nOpinion of the Parliament and widens the scope of the Directive to the area \n\nof piracy connected with non-material exploitation, by Inserting a new \n\nArticle 6 bis. Here, the amended proposal follows to a large extent the \n\nminimum provisions of the Rome Convent Ion of 1961, In order to achieve, for \n\nthe time being, an equal minimum protection In the Community. It Is up to \n\nthe Member States, to maintain or Introduce a more far-reaching protection. Article 6 bis paragraph 1 \n\nAs a minimum provision, paragraph 1 of the newly added Article 6 bis \n\nprovides for an exclusive right to broadcast and an exclusive right of \n\ncommunication to the public for performing artists In respect of their live \n\nperformances. - 13 -\n\nArticle 6 bis paragraph 2 \n\nParagraph 2 provides for a remuneration for performing artists and \n\nproducers of phonograms, If a phonogram published for commercial purposes \n\nwas used for broadcasting or for communication to the public. This provision \n\nhas been implemented in principle by most Member States in their law; it Is \n\na minimum provision. Article 6 bis paragraph 3 \n\nParagraph 3, modelled on Article 13 (a) and (d) of the Rome Convention, \n\nprovides for an exclusive right of rebroadcastIng for broadcasting \n\norganisations and, correcting a drafting mistake In the Parliament's \n\nproposal, for an exclusive right of communication to the public of \n\ntelevision broadcasts under the conditions already mentioned in the Rome \n\nConvention. Article 6 bis paragraph 4 \n\nParagraph 4 states clearly that the provisions of Article 6 bis may only be \n\napplied without prejudice to the specifically relevant provisions of the \n\nDirective on cable and satellite broadcasting (Proposal for a Council \n\nDirective COM (91) 276 final - SYN 358) which has not yet been adopted by \n\nthe Council. Therefore, these provisions of the cable and satellite \n\nDirective prevail over those of Article 6 bis, if they are In contradiction. For the time being, the cable and satellite Directive provides as a minimum \n\nprotection performing artists with an exclusive right of communication to \n\nthe public by satellite In respect of their live performances, performing \n\nartists and/or producers of phonograms with a remuneration for the \n\ncommunication to the public of a phonogram published for commercial \n\npurposes, and broadcasting organisations with the exclusive right of \n\nsimultaneous rebroadcasting by satellite. Article 6 bis provides for a more \n\nfar-reaching protection, as it contains In particular the right to \n\nbroadcast, without limiting it to the broadcasting by satellite, and in \n\naddition the remuneration for broadcasting for performing artists and \n\nproducers of phonograms as well as the right of communication to the public \n\nSince the cable and satellite Directive only constitutes a minimum \n\nprotection, Article 6 bis in this respect does not create any contradiction \n\n\f- 14 -\n\nArticle 7 \n\nIn its amended proposal, the Commission adopts the proposal of the \n\nParliament to apply the presumption of assignment under Article 2 \n\nparagraph 5 to the distribution right also. Thus, also In respect of the \n\ndistribution right, the performing artist is presumed to have assigned his \n\nexclusive right to the film producer In their written contract. Here, the \n\nsame considerations apply as for the application of the presumption to the \n\nreproduction right (Article 6 ). Article 8 \n\nNo amendments were proposed by the European Parliament. Article 9 \n\nNo amendments were proposed by the European Parliament. - 15 -\n\nArticle 10 \n\nNo amendments were proposed by the European Parliament \n\nArticle 11 paragraph 1 \n\nThe amendment n* 36 proposed by the Parliament for Article 11 paragraph 1 \n\n(originally the only paragraph of Article 11) intended to render the \n\ndrafting more concise. It cannot be accepted by the Commission, because It \n\nwould rather give rise to misunderstandings without adding anything in \n\nsubstance. Instead, the amended proposal Includes a supplement to Article 11 \n\nparagraph 1, due to the inclusion of the new paragraph 2, which now more \n\nclearly defines both paragraphs of Article 11 In their relation to each \n\nother. Article 11 paragraph 2 \n\nAccording to the original proposal, the Directive applied without exception \n\nto all subject matter covered therein, which was still protected on \n\n1 January 1993. Since some considered this provision to go too far in its \n\neffects, the Commission now follows the proposal made by the Parliament, to \n\ngrant a transitional period of three years In order to enable contracting \n\nparties to adjust their contracts to the new legal situation within this \n\nperiod. At the latest three years after the entry Into force of the \n\nDirective, the provisions of the Directive would then have to be observed \n\nwithout exception. The Commission considers it useful to complement this \n\ntransitional period by a provision which states some kind of good faith \n\nprotection for the continued use of such objects for rental or lending which \n\nhad already previously been acquired or made available. The last sentence of \n\nparagraph 2 takes account of this particular situation. - 16 -\n\nArticle 11 bis \n\nPursuant to the Opinion of the Parliament, Article 11 bis includes a new \n\nprovision which corresponds to a generally recognized principle and is \n\nalready included In its substance in Article 1 of the Rome Convention for \n\nthe protection of performers, producers of phonograms and broadcasting \n\norganisations. Since most Member States already adhere to this convention or \n\nare in the process of adjusting their legislation to this convention, the \n\nInclusion of Article 11 bis only serves to clarify that this principle is \n\nalso valid in the context of this Directive. The provision is of a general \n\ncharacter and applies to the whole Directive. It Is therefore not placed in \n\nthe first chapter as proposed by the Parliament, but in Chapter IV (Common \n\nProvisions). Article 12 \n\nNo amendments were proposed by the European Parliament \n\nArticle 13 \n\nNo amendments were proposed by the European Parliament \n\n\fORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n- 17 -\n\nPROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\nPROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\nON RENTAL RIGHT. LENDING RIGHT. AND \n\nON RENTAL RIGHT AND LENDING RIGHT \n\nON CERTAIN RIGHTS RELATED TO \n\nAND ON CERTAIN RIGHTS RELATED TO \n\nCOPYRIGHT \n\nCOPYRIGHT IN THE FIELD OF \n\nINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN \n\nCOMMUNITIES, \n\n\u2022 \n\nCOMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty \n\nunchanged \n\nestablishing the European Economic \n\nCommunity and in particular Articles \n\n57 (2), 66 and 100A thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from \n\nunchanged \n\nthe Commission, \n\nIn co-operation with the European \n\nunchanged \n\nPar I lament, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the \n\nunchanged \n\nEconomic and Social Committee, \n\nWhereas differences exist In the \n\nunchanged \n\nlegal protection provided by the \n\nlaws and practices of the Member \n\nStates for copyright works and \n\nsubject matter of related rights \n\nprotection as regards rental and \n\nlending, and such differences are \n\nsources of barriers to trade and \n\ndistortions of competition which \n\nImpede the proper functioning of the \n\ninternal market; \n\n\f- 18 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nWhereas such differences in legal \n\nunchanged \n\nprotection could well become greater \n\nas Member States adopt new and \n\ndifferent legislation or as national \n\nJurisprudence Interpreting such \n\nlegislation develops differently; \n\nWhereas such differences should \n\nWhereas such differences should \n\ntherefore be eliminated by 31 \n\ntherefore be eliminated by 31 \n\nDecember 1992 in accordance with the \n\nDecember 1992 in accordance with the \n\nobjective of Introducing an area \n\nobjective of introducing an area \n\nwithout internal frontiers as set out \n\nwithout internal frontiers as set \n\nin Article 8A of the Treaty, \n\nout In Article 8A of the Treaty so \n\nas to establish, pursuant to Article \n\n3(f) of the EEC Treaty, a system \n\nensuring that competition In the \n\ncommon market is not distorted; \n\nWhereas rental and lending of \n\nunchanged \n\ncopyright works and the subject \n\nmatter of related rights protection \n\nIs playing an increasingly important \n\nrole In particular for creators, \n\nartists and a broad range of \n\nindustries, and piracy is becoming an \n\nIncreasing threat; \n\nWhereas the adequate protection of \n\nWhereas the adequate protection of \n\ncopyright works and subject matter of \n\ncopyright works and subject matter \n\nrelated rights protection by rental \n\nof related rights protection by \n\nand lending rights as well as the \n\nrental and lending rights as well as \n\nprotection of the subject matter of \n\nthe protection of the subject matter \n\nrelated rights protection by the \n\nof related rights protection by the \n\nfixation right, reproduction right \n\nfixation right, reproduction right, \n\nand distribution right can \n\ndistribution right, right to \n\naccordingly be considered as being of \n\nbroadcast and communication to the \n\nfundamental importance for the \n\npublic can accordingly be considered \n\nCommunity's industrial and cultural \n\nas being of fundamental importance \n\ndevelopment; \n\nfor the Community's industrial and \n\ncultural development; \n\n\f- 19 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nWhereas copyright and related rights \n\nunchanged \n\nprotection must adapt to new economic \n\ndevelopments such as new forms of \n\nexploltat ion; \n\nWhereas the creative and artistic \n\nWhereas the creative and artistic \n\nwork of authors and performing \n\nwork of authors and performing \n\nartists necessitates an adequate \n\nartists necessitates an adequate \n\nIncome as a basis for further \n\nIncome as a basis for further \n\ncreative and artistic work, and the \n\ncreative and artistic work, and the \n\ninvestments required particularly for \n\ninvestments required particularly \n\nthe production of phonograms and \n\nfor the production of phonograms and \n\nfilms are especially high and risky \n\nfilms are especially high and risky \n\nand the possibility for securing that \n\nand the possibility for securing \n\nIncome and recouping that Investment \n\nthat Income and recouping that \n\ncan only effectively be guaranteed \n\ninvestment can only effectively be \n\nthrough adequate legal protection; \n\nguaranteed through adequate legal \n\nprotection of the first rlghtholders \n\nconcerned; \n\nWhereas without effective and \n\nunchanged \n\nharmonized protection throughout the \n\nMember States, such creative and \n\nartistic work as well as such \n\ninvestment might decrease or never be \n\nmade; \n\nWhereas these creative, artistic and \n\nunchanged \n\nentrepreneurial activities are, to a \n\nlarge extent, activities of self-\n\nemployed persons, and the pursuit of \n\nsuch activities must be made easier \n\nby providing a uniform legal \n\nprotection within the Community; \n\n\fORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n- 20 -\n\nWhereas, to the extent that these \n\nWhereas, to the extent that these \n\nactivities constitute services, their \n\nactivities principally constitute \n\nprovision must equally be facilitated \n\nservices, their provision must \n\nby the establishment in the Community \n\nequally be facilitated by the \n\nof a uniform legal framework; \n\nestablishment In the Community of a \n\nuniform legal framework; \n\nWhereas protection by rental and \n\nunchanged \n\nlending rights and protection in the \n\nfield of rights related to copyright \n\nby existing legislation, \n\nadministrative practice, and court \n\njurisprudence does not exist at all \n\nIn some Member States and, where it \n\nexists, Is not the same or has \n\ndifferent characteristics; \n\nWhereas the uncoordinated development \n\nunchanged \n\nin the Community of legal protection \n\nin these fields in the Member States \n\ncould result in the creation of new \n\ndisincentives to trade to the \n\ndetriment of further industrial and \n\ncultural development and of the \n\ncompletion of the internal market; \n\nWhereas existing differences having \n\nunchanged \n\nsuch effects need to be removed and \n\nnew ones having a negative Impact on \n\nthe functioning of the common market \n\nand the development of trade In \n\ncultural goods and services need to \n\nbe prevented from arising; \n\n\f- 21 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nWhereas the legislation of the Member \n\nunchanged \n\nStates should be harmonized in such a \n\nway so as not to conflict with the \n\nexisting international conventions on \n\nwhich many Member States' copyright \n\nand related rights laws are based; \n\nWhereas the Community's legal \n\nWhereas the Community's legal \n\nframework on the rental and lending \n\nframework on the rental and lending \n\nright and on certain rights related \n\nright and on certain rights related \n\nto copyright can be limited to \n\nto copyright can be limited to \n\nestablishing that Member States \n\nestablishing that Member States \n\nprovide rights with respect to rental \n\nprovide rights with respect to \n\nand lending for certain groups of \n\nrental and lending for certain \n\nright owners and further to \n\ngroups of right owners and further \n\nestablishing the exclusive rights of \n\nto establishing the exclusive rights \n\nfixation, reproduction and \n\nof fixation, reproduction, \n\ndistribution for certain groups of \n\ndistribution, broadcasting and \n\nright owners In the field of related \n\ncommunication to the public for \n\nrights protection; \n\ncertain groups of right owners in \n\nthe field of related rights \n\nprotect ion; \n\nWhereas Member States may provide \n\nfor more far-reaching protection for \n\nauthors and owners of rights related \n\nto copyright than that required by \n\nArticle 6 bis of this Directive; \n\nWhereas it is necessary for Member \n\nStates to define clearly the groups \n\nof rlghtholders covered by this \n\nDirect Ive; \n\n\f- 22 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nWhereas the harmonized rental and \n\nunchanged \n\nlending rights and the harmonized \n\nprotection In the field of rights \n\nrelated to copyright should not be \n\nexercised in a way which constitutes \n\na disguised restriction on trade \n\nbetween Member States; \n\nWhereas the harmonized legal \n\nprotection resulting from the \n\nimplementation of the provisions of \n\nthis Directive may create a new \n\nsitutatlon In regard to Member \n\nStates' relations with certain third \n\ncountries; whereas therefore It will \n\nbe necessary to step up negotiations \n\nand consultations with such third \n\ncountries. In particular within the \n\nrelevant International \n\norganizations, with a view to \n\nsecuring at least reciprocal legal \n\nprotect Ion; \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\n\f- 23 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nCHAPTER I RENTAL AND LENDING RIGHT \n\nCHAPTER I RENTAL AND LENDING RIGHT \n\nArticle 1 \n\nObject of Harmonization Article 1 Object of Harmonization \n\n(1) In accordance with the provisions \n\n(1) unchanged \n\nof this Chapter, Member States \n\nshall provide a right to \n\nauthorize or prohibit the rental \n\nand lending of originals and \n\ncopies of copyright works, and \n\nother subject matter as set out \n\nin Article 2 (1). (2) For the purposes of this \n\n(2) For the purposes of this \n\nDirective, \"rental\" means making \n\nDirective , \"rental\" means making \n\navailable for use, for a limited \n\navailable for use, for a limited \n\nperiod of time and for profit-\n\nperiod of time and for direct or \n\nmaking purposes, without \n\nprejudice to paragraph 3. indirect economic advantage, \n\nwithout prejudice to paragraph 3. \"Rental\" within the meaning of \n\nthis paragraph does not cover \n\nmaking available for the purpose \n\nof public performance. - 24 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n(3) For the purposes of this \n\n(3) For the purposes of this \n\nDirective, \"lending\" means making \n\nDirective, \"lending\" means making \n\navailable for use, for a limited \n\navailable for use, for a limited \n\nperiod of time, and not for \n\nperiod of time, and not for \n\ndirect profit-making purposes, if \n\nprofit-making purposes, if it Is \n\nit is made through Institutions \n\nmade through Institutions which \n\nwhich are accessible to the \n\nare accessible to the public, \n\npublic, such as public libraries, \n\nsuch as public libraries, \n\nresearch libraries, specialized \n\nresearch libraries, specialized \n\nlibraries, school libraries, \n\nlibraries, school libraries, \n\nchurch libraries, collections of \n\nchurch libraries, collections of \n\nnew media or of works of visual \n\nnew media or of works of visual \n\nart, libraries organized or \n\nart and other collections of \n\nsponsored by public or private \n\nsubject matter as set out In \n\ncompanies, and other collections \n\nArticle 2 (1). \"Lending\" within \n\nof subject matter as set out In \n\nthe meaning of this paragraph \n\nArticle 2 ( 1 ). does not cover making available \n\nfor the purpose of public \n\nperformance. (4) The rights referred to In \n\n(4) The rights referred to In \n\nparagraph 1 shall not be affected \n\nparagraph 1 shall not be \n\nby any sale, or other act of \n\nexhausted by any sale, or other \n\ndistribution, of originals and \n\nact of distribution, of originals \n\ncopies of works and other subject \n\nand copies of works and other \n\nmatter, as set out in Article 2 \n\nsubject matter, as set out In \n\n(1). Article 2 ( 1 ). ORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n- 25 -\n\nArticle 2 \n\nFirst Owner and Subject \n\nArticle 2 First Owner and Subject \n\nMatter of Rental and \n\nLending Right. Matter of Rental and \n\nLending Right. (1) The right to authorize or \n\n(1) unchanged \n\nprohibit the rental and lending \n\nshalI belong \n\n- to the author In respect of the \n\noriginal and copies of his work, \n\n- to the performing artist In \n\nrespect of fixations of his \n\nperformance, \n\n- to the phonogram producer in \n\nrespect of his phonograms, and \n\n- to the producer of the first \n\nfixations of cinematographic \n\nworks and moving images in \n\nrespect of his visual recordings, \n\nand visual and sound recordings. (2) For the purposes of this \n\nDirective the principal director \n\nof a cinematographic work shall \n\nbe its author. Member States may \n\nprovide for others to be its co \n\nauthors. (2) A rental and lending right does \n\n(3) A rental and lending right does \n\nnot arise In relation to \n\nnot arise In relation to \n\nbuildings and to works of \n\nbuildings and to works of applied \n\napplled art. art. ORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n- 26 -\n\n(3) The provisions of this Directive \n\n(4) The provisions of this Directive \n\nshall be without prejudice to any \n\nshall be without prejudice to \n\nprovisions of Council Directive \n\n- Article 4 c) of Council Directive \n\n(EEC)N*. of. on the Legal \n\n91/250/EEC of 14 May 1991 on the \n\nProtection of Computer \nPrograms^1). legal protection of computer \nprograms^1). (5) Any contract concerning film \n\nproduction between a performing \n\nartist and a producer of a film, \n\nas set out in paragraph 1 \n\n4th indent, must be concluded in \n\nwriting. When the performing \n\nartist signs a contract \n\nconcerning film production with \n\nthe film producer as set out in \n\nparagraph 1, he shall be \n\npresumed, subject to contractual \n\nprovisions to the contrary, to \n\nhave assigned his rental and \n\nlending right, subject to the \n\nprovisions of Article 3. Article 3 \n\nAuthorization of Renta \n\nArticle 3 Authorization of Rental \n\nand Lending \n\nand Lending \n\nIf the rightholders authorize to a \n\nIf the rightholders set out In \n\nthird party against payment the \n\nArticle 2 (1) authorize to a third \n\nrental or lending of a sound \n\nparty against payment the rental or \n\nrecording, visual recording or \n\nlending of a sound recording, visual \n\nvisual and sound recording, then each \n\nrecording or visual and sound \n\nof the rightholders set out in \n\nrecording, then each of the said \n\nArticle 2 (1) shall retain the right \n\nrightholders shall retain the right \n\n(1) \n\n(1) OJ No. L 122, 17. 5. 1991, P. 42 \n\n\fORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n- 27 -\n\nto obtain an adequate part of the \n\nto obtain an adequate part of the \n\nsaid payment, notwithstanding any \n\nsaid payment, notwithstanding any \n\nassignment of the rental or lending \n\nassignment of the rental or lending \n\nright or granting of licences. This \n\nright or granting of licenses. This \n\nright to obtain an adequate part of \n\npart shall be adequately proportional \n\nthe payment cannot be waived, but its \n\nto the Importance of the contribution \n\nadministration may be assigned. of the rightholders concerned to the \n\nsound recording, visual recording or \n\nvisual and sound recording. This \n\nright to obtain an adequate part of \n\nthe payment cannot be waived, but its \n\nadministration may, for authors and \n\nperforming artists, be entrusted to \n\ncollecting societies representing the \n\nprofessional categories concerned. Article 4 Derogation from exclusive \n\nArticle 4 Derogation from exclusive \n\nlending right \n\nlending right \n\nMember States may, for cultural or \n\nunchanged \n\nother reasons, derogate from the \n\ncopyright based exclusive lending \n\nright referred to in Article 1 (1) \n\nfor one or several categories of \n\nobjects, provided that \n\nat least authors obtain an \n\nequitable remuneration through \n\nadministering bodies for such \n\nlending; and \n\nsuch derogation measures comply \n\nwith Community law, In particular \n\nArticle 7 of the EEC Treaty. - 28 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nArticle 4 bis Moral Rights \n\nNo changes, cuts or additions may be \n\nmade to a work by the person making \n\nit available for rental, the rentor, \n\nthe lender or the borrower without \n\nspecific authorization of the author \n\nCHAPTER II \n\nPROTECTION IN THE FIELD \n\nCHAPTER II PROTECTION IN THE FIELD \n\nOF RIGHTS RELATED TO COPYRIGHT \n\nOF RIGHTS RELATED TO COPYRIGHT \n\nArt icle 5 \n\nFixation Right \n\nArticle 5 Fixation Right \n\nMember States shall provide for \n\nunchanged \n\nperforming artists the right to \n\nauthorize or prohibit the fixation of \n\ntheir performances. Likewise, they \n\nshall provide for broadcasting \n\norganizations the right to authorize \n\nor prohibit the fixation of their \n\nbroadcasts. Article 6 \n\nReproduction Right \n\nArticle 6 Reproduction Right \n\nMember States shall provide the right \n\n(1) unchanged \n\nto authorize or prohibit the direct \n\nor Indirect reproduction : \n\n\f- 29 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nfor performing artists, of \n\nfIxatIons of their \n\nperformances, \n\nfor phonogram producers, of \n\ntheir phonograms, \n\nfor producers of the first \n\nfixations of cinematographic \n\nworks or moving images, of \n\ntheir visual recordings, and \n\nvisual and sound recordings, \n\nfor broadcasting \n\norganizations, of fixations \n\nof their broadcasts. (2) When the performing artist signs \n\na contract as set out In Article \n\n2 paragraph 5, he shall be \n\npresumed, subject to contractual \n\nprovisions to the contrary, to \n\nhave assigned his reproduction \n\nright, subject to the provisions \n\nof Article 3 which apply mutatis \n\nmutandis. Article 6 bis: Broadcasting and \n\nCommunication to the \n\nPub 11c \n\n(1) Member States shall provide for \n\nperforming artists the right to \n\nauthorize or prohibit the \n\nwireless broadcasting and the \n\ncommunication to the public of \n\ntheir performance, unless the \n\nperformance Is itself already a \n\nbroadcast performance or Is made \n\nfrom a f IxatIon. ORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n- 30 -\n\n(2) Member States shall provide the \n\nright to be paid a single \n\nequitable remuneration to both \n\nperforming artists and phonogram \n\nproducers by the user, If a \n\nphonogram published for \n\ncommercial purposes, or a \n\nreproduction of such phonogram is \n\nused for wireless broadcasting, \n\nor for any communication to the \n\npublic. In the absence of \n\nagreement between the performing \n\nartists and the phonogram \n\nproducers, Member States may fix \n\nthe conditions determining how \n\nthe payment is to be shared \n\nbetween them. (3) Member States shall provide for \n\nbroadcasting organisations the \n\nright to authorize or prohibit \n\nthe wireless rebroadcastIng of \n\ntheir broadcasts and the \n\ncommunication to the public of \n\ntheir television broadcasts if \n\nsuch communication is made in \n\nplaces accessible to the public \n\nagainst payment of an entrance \n\nfee. (4) The provisions of this Article \n\nshall be without prejudice to \n\nthose provisions of Council \n\nDirective. /EEC on the \n\ncoordination of certain rules on \n\ncopyright and related rights \n\napplicable to satellite \n\nbroadcasting and retransmission \n\nby cable which provide for \n\n\fORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n- 31 -\n\nperforming artists and producers \n\nof phonograms the right of \n\ncommunication to the public by \n\nsatellite, and for broadcasting \n\norganisations the right of \n\nsimultaneous retransmission of \n\ntheir broadcasts by satellite. Article 7 \n\nDistribution Right \n\nArticle 7 Distribution Right \n\n(1) Member States shall provide \n\n(1) Member States shall provide \n\nfor performing artists In \n\nfor performing artists In \n\nrespect of fixations of their \n\nrespect of fixations of their \n\nperformances, \n\nperformances, \n\nfor phonogram producers In \n\nfor phonogram producers In \n\nrespect of their phonograms, \n\nrespect of their phonograms, \n\nfor producers of the first \n\nfor producers of the first \n\nfixations of cinematographic \n\nfixations of cinematographic \n\nworks and moving Images in \n\nworks and moving Images In \n\nrespect of their visual \n\nrespect of their visual \n\nrecordings, and visual and \n\nrecordings, and visual and \n\nsound recordings, \n\nfor broadcasting \n\nsound recordings, \n\nfor broadcasting \n\norganizations in respect of \n\norganizations In respect of \n\nfIxatIons of their \n\nbroadcasts, \n\nf ixatIons of their \n\nbroadcasts, \n\nthe exclusive right to make \n\nthe exclusive right to make \n\navailable, for an unlimited \n\navailable, for an unlimited \n\nperiod of time, their respective \n\nperiod of time, their respective \n\nsubject matter to the publIc by \n\nsubject matter to the public by \n\nsale or otherwise, without \n\nsale or otherwise, without \n\nprejudice to paragraph 2. prejudice to paragraph 3. - 32 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n(2) When the performing artist signs \n\na contract as set out in Article \n\n2 paragraph 5, he shall be \n\npresumed, subject to contractual \n\nprovisions to the contrary, to \n\nhave assigned his distribution \n\nright, subject to the provisions \n\nof Article 3 which apply mutatis \n\nmutandis. (2) If a subject matter referred to \n\n(3) unchanged \n\nin paragraph 1 has been put Into \n\ncirculation within the Community \n\nby the right owner or with his \n\nconsent, then Its Import into \n\nanother Member State may not be \n\nprohibited by virtue of the right \n\nreferred to in paragraph 1. Article 8 \n\nLimitations to Rights \n\nArticle 8 Limitations to Rights \n\n(1) Member States may provide \n\n(1) unchanged \n\nlimitations to the rights \n\nreferred to in Chapter II In \n\nrespect of: \n\n(a) private use; \n\n(b) use of short excerpts in \n\nconnection with the reporting \n\nof current events; \n\n(c) ephemeral fixation by a \n\nbroadcasting organization by \n\nmeans of its own facilities \n\nand for its own broadcasts; \n\n(d) use solely for the purposes \n\nof teaching or academic \n\nresearch. - 33 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n(2) Irrespective of paragraph 1, any \n\n(2) unchanged \n\nMember State may provide the same \n\nkinds of limitations with regard \n\nto the protection of performers, \n\nproducers of phonograms, \n\nbroadcasting organizations and of \n\nproducers of the first fixations \n\nof cinematographic works and \n\nmoving images, as it provides in \n\nconnection with the protection of \n\ncopyright In literary and \n\nartistic works. However, \n\ncompulsory Iicences may be \n\nprovided only to the extent that \n\nthey are compatible with the Rome \n\nConvention (International \n\nConvention for the Protection of \n\nPerformers, Producers of \n\nPhonograms and Broadcasting \n\nOrganlzatIons). (3) Paragraph 1 a) shall be without \n\n(3) unchanged \n\nprejudice to any existing or \n\nfuture legislation on \n\nremuneration for reproduction for \n\nprIvate use. - 34 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nCHAPTER III \n\nDURATION \n\nCHAPTER III DURATION \n\nArticle 9 \n\nRights \n\nDuration of Authors' \n\nArticle 9 \n\nDuration of Authors' \n\nRights \n\nUntil further harmonization, the \n\nunchanged \n\nauthors' rights referred to In this \n\nDirective shall not expire before the \n\nend of the term provided by the Berne \n\nConvention for the Protection of \n\nLiterary and Artistic Works; this \n\nshall be without prejudice to the \n\nparticular terms of protection of \n\nauthors' rights not explicitly dealt \n\nwith by that Convention. Article 10 Duration of Related Rights Article 10 Duration of Related Rights \n\nUntil further harmonization, the \n\nunchanged \n\nrights referred to in this Directive \n\nof performing artists, phonogram \n\nproducers and broadcasting \n\norganizations shall not expire before \n\nthe end of the respective terms \n\nprovided by the Rome Convention. This \n\nshall apply mutatis mutandis to the \n\nrights referred to In this Directive, \n\nof producers of the first fixations \n\nof cinematographic works and moving \n\nimages. - 35 -\n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nCHAPTER IV \n\nCOMMON PROVISIONS \n\nCHAPTER IV COMMON PROVISIONS \n\nArticle 11 \n\nApplication in Time \n\nArticle 11 Application in Time \n\nThe provisions of this Directive \n\n(1) The provisions of this Directive \n\nshall apply also in respect of all \n\nshall apply In respect of all \n\ncopyright works, performances, \n\ncopyright works, performances, \n\nphonograms, broadcasts and first \n\nphonograms, broadcasts and first \n\nfixations of cinematographic works \n\nfixations of cinematographic \n\nand moving images referred to In this \n\nworks and moving Images referred \n\nDirective which are, on 1 January \n\nto In this Directive which are, \n\n1993, still protected by the \n\non 1 January 1993, still \n\nnational legislation in the field of \n\nprotectable by the national \n\nauthors' rights and related rights. legislation or this Directive in \n\nthe field of authors' rights and \n\nrelated r ights. (2) Contractual rights and \n\nobligations arising from \n\nlegislation applying prior to the \n\ndate laid down in Article 12 \n\nshall not be affected by this \n\nDirective for a period of three \n\n(3) years from its entry Into \n\nforce. All parties concerned \n\nshall, however, within a period \n\nof three (3) years from the entry \n\ninto force of this Directive, \n\nreview the terms of their \n\ncontracts with a view to bringing \n\nthem Into line with the \n\nprovisions of this Directive. Member States in which no \n\nexclusive right within the \n\nmeaning of Article 1 paragraph 1 \n\nexisted before 1 January 1993 \n\nshall provide that the \n\n\f- 36 \n\nORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\nrlghtholders are deemed to have \n\ngiven their authorization to the \n\nrental or lending of an object \n\nset out in Article 2 paragraph 1, \n\nwhich is proven to have been made \n\navailable to third parties for \n\nthis purpose or to have been \n\nacquired before 1 January 1993. Article 11 bis Relation between \n\nCopyright and Related \n\nRights \n\nProtection of copyright related \n\nrights under this Directive shall \n\nleave intact and shall In no way \n\naffect the protection of copyright as \n\nsuch. Article 12 \n\nFinal provisions \n\nArticle 12 Final provisions \n\nMember States shall bring Into force \n\nunchanged \n\nthe laws, regulations and \n\nadministrative provisions necessary \n\nto comply with this Directive not \n\nlater than 1 January 1993. Member States shall forthwith inform \n\nthe Commission thereof and \n\ncommunicate to the Commission the \n\nprovisions of national law which they \n\nadopt in the field covered by this \n\nDi rectIve. ORIGINAL PROPOSAL \n\nAMENDED PROPOSAL \n\n- 37 -\n\nWhen Member States adopt these \n\nprovisions, these shall contain a \n\nreference to this Directive or shall \n\nbe accompanied by such reference at \n\nthe time of their official \n\npublication. The procedure for such \n\nreference shall be adopted by Member \n\nStates. Article 13 \n\nArticle 13 \n\nThis Directive is addressed to the \n\nunchanged \n\nMember States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the CounclI \n\nThe President \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 159 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n16 06 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-176-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43547-X \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/26ae4d50-c82d-477d-ae54-57c618b07958", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1085/92 by Mrs Maria AGLIETTA to the Commission. Application of Article 52 of the EEC Treaty on freedom of establishment and the Council Directive on recognition of higher-education diplomas", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "AGLIETTA,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Luxembourg,access to a profession,application of EU law,higher education,lawyer,recognition of diplomas,right of establishment,traineeship", "workIds": "celex:91992E001085", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Luxembourg", "access to a profession", "application of EU law", "higher education", "lawyer", "recognition of diplomas", "right of establishment", "traineeship"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/26ae4d50-c82d-477d-ae54-57c618b07958", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b08328d1-b33c-4d3e-841b-0780130031cf", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1113/92 of 30 April 1992 concerning applications for STM licences for submitted on 24 April 1992 for imports into Portugal", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Portugal,import,rice,supplementary trade mechanism", "workIds": "celex:31992R1113,oj:JOL_1992_117_R_0074_074", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "import", "rice", "supplementary trade mechanism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b08328d1-b33c-4d3e-841b-0780130031cf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cc4ad94e-e4e0-4011-8c56-9343a978f723", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1058/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. VAT on village halls", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "United Kingdom,VAT,cultural event,sociocultural facilities,tax law,tax system", "workIds": "celex:91992E001058", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "VAT", "cultural event", "sociocultural facilities", "tax law", "tax system"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cc4ad94e-e4e0-4011-8c56-9343a978f723", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f7fce7d9-4b74-4c52-866b-8cb1f6307002", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1089/92 by Mr Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Environmental pollution at Aghios Theodori", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPAYANNAKIS", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Central Greece,air quality,industrial pollution,industrial waste,oil refining,pollution control,public health,soil pollution,toxic substance,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001089", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "air quality", "industrial pollution", "industrial waste", "oil refining", "pollution control", "public health", "soil pollution", "toxic substance", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f7fce7d9-4b74-4c52-866b-8cb1f6307002", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86a4a4c1-a2ba-4dd1-9d6c-511db97a998f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1065/92 by Virginio BETTINI to the Commission. Plans for a ' Club Mediterran\u00e9e' holiday village opposite the St. Mark' s Square in Venice", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BETTINI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Veneto,environmental protection,heritage protection,tourist infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:91992E001065", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Veneto", "environmental protection", "heritage protection", "tourist infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86a4a4c1-a2ba-4dd1-9d6c-511db97a998f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/db6bea8f-6c5e-4995-9c83-c9bb390f0c79", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1092/92 by Mr Ernest GLINNE to the Commission. Renewed exports of arms to areas of conflict in the Third World", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GLINNE", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "European political cooperation,arms control,arms supply,arms trade,defence policy,developing countries,directory,international conflict,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E001092", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European political cooperation", "arms control", "arms supply", "arms trade", "defence policy", "developing countries", "directory", "international conflict", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/db6bea8f-6c5e-4995-9c83-c9bb390f0c79", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/383fcac7-d723-4b05-8b92-394e3f37018a", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1124/92 of 30 April 1992 on the issuing of import licences for certain processed mushroom products originating in third countries and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 17/92", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "import,import licence,mushroom-growing,preserved product,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992R1124,oj:JOL_1992_117_R_0103_085", "eurovoc_concepts": ["import", "import licence", "mushroom-growing", "preserved product", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/383fcac7-d723-4b05-8b92-394e3f37018a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5d1a9252-d6ba-4925-8c69-6171c84b896e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1087/92 by G\u00fcnter L\u00dcTTGE to the Commission. Commission press release IP/92/52 of 30 January 1992 on road transit through Hungary and Czechoslovakia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LUETTGE", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Czechoslovakia,European Commission,Hungary,international road transport,press release,transit,transit charge,transport authorisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E001087", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Czechoslovakia", "European Commission", "Hungary", "international road transport", "press release", "transit", "transit charge", "transport authorisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5d1a9252-d6ba-4925-8c69-6171c84b896e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6b379963-2619-4c6e-bd41-1e50086c5b03", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1116/92 of 30 April 1992 continuing market research measures within and outside the Community in respect of milk and milk products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EU market,foreign market,market enlargement,milk,milk product", "workIds": "celex:31992R1116,oj:JOL_1992_117_R_0079_077", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU market", "foreign market", "market enlargement", "milk", "milk product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6b379963-2619-4c6e-bd41-1e50086c5b03", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/38fad818-ecf0-4d60-b7de-adde80a4636a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1068/92 by Mr Jaak VANDEMEULEBROUCKE to the Commission. Recognition of diplomas", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VANDEMEULEBROUCKE", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Belgium,Spain,diploma,equivalence of diplomas,free movement of persons,higher education,provision of documents,recognition of diplomas,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E001068", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgium", "Spain", "diploma", "equivalence of diplomas", "free movement of persons", "higher education", "provision of documents", "recognition of diplomas", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/38fad818-ecf0-4d60-b7de-adde80a4636a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/23fe88c1-ba26-4442-a052-de2a7083a1af", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1079/92 by Mr Friedrich MERZ to the Commission. Purchase of holiday homes in Denmark", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MERZ", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Denmark,application of EU law,capital movement,land and buildings,secondary residence", "workIds": "celex:91992E001079", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "application of EU law", "capital movement", "land and buildings", "secondary residence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/23fe88c1-ba26-4442-a052-de2a7083a1af", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/183b16df-c00e-4f89-9967-1b34c631957a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1059/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. The status of the denomination ECU", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EEC Treaty,European Monetary Cooperation Fund,Treaty on European Union,euro", "workIds": "celex:91992E001059", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EEC Treaty", "European Monetary Cooperation Fund", "Treaty on European Union", "euro"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/183b16df-c00e-4f89-9967-1b34c631957a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5486b7ad-ede7-4937-a565-74b0f62c9b22", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1076/92 by Mr Giuseppe MOTTOLA to the Commission. Request for the exclusion of Corallium Rubrum (red coral) from the proposal for a Council regulation on the possession of and trade in specimens of species of wild fauna and flora", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MOTTOLA", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,Italy,exploitation of resources,marketing,regulation (EU),wildlife", "workIds": "celex:91992E001076", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "Italy", "exploitation of resources", "marketing", "regulation (EU)", "wildlife"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5486b7ad-ede7-4937-a565-74b0f62c9b22", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c284200d-9f49-4226-86f0-778d0ee288ac", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1057/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. VAT on farmhouse cider", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "United Kingdom,VAT,cider,farmer", "workIds": "celex:91992E001057", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "VAT", "cider", "farmer"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c284200d-9f49-4226-86f0-778d0ee288ac", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/315799e5-2ebe-4017-8321-a9db3e0057bf", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1064/92 by Mr Virginio BETTINI to the Commission. The need to include experimental research plants among projects requiring environmental impact assessments", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BETTINI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,Friuli-Venezia Giulia,environmental impact,impact study,nuclear technology,radioactive materials", "workIds": "celex:91992E001064", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "Friuli-Venezia Giulia", "environmental impact", "impact study", "nuclear technology", "radioactive materials"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/315799e5-2ebe-4017-8321-a9db3e0057bf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a6045d76-72f2-4afd-8122-d91699316569", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1080/92 by Friedrich MERZ to the Commission. Taxation of Danish pension payments to German nationals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MERZ", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Denmark,Germany,bilateral agreement,double taxation,pension scheme,tax on income", "workIds": "celex:91992E001080", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "Germany", "bilateral agreement", "double taxation", "pension scheme", "tax on income"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a6045d76-72f2-4afd-8122-d91699316569", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9f98eb47-f39b-4e3d-a006-00a27f964e74", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1090/92 by Mr Alexandros ALAVANOS to the Commission. Bill on copyright and neighbouring rights", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ALAVANOS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Greece,application of EU law,approximation of laws,artistic profession,copyright,government bill,industrial property,information profession,software", "workIds": "celex:91992E001090", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "artistic profession", "copyright", "government bill", "industrial property", "information profession", "software"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9f98eb47-f39b-4e3d-a006-00a27f964e74", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f08966a3-8bf0-4b51-882d-1ebe8cf5ac65", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1248/92 of 30 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self- employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Community migration,cumulative pension entitlement,pension scheme,self-employment,social security,wage earner", "workIds": "celex:31992R1248,oj:JOL_1992_136_R_0007_006", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community migration", "cumulative pension entitlement", "pension scheme", "self-employment", "social security", "wage earner"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f08966a3-8bf0-4b51-882d-1ebe8cf5ac65", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fcefb464-432e-4641-a6f2-d5eb1d2fec80", "title": "92/269/Euratom: Commission Opinion of 30 April 1992 concerning the nuclear fuel reprocessing plant Thorp of the Sellafield establishment (United Kingdom)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "United Kingdom,fuel reprocessing,health risk,radioactive pollution,radioactive waste", "workIds": "celex:31992A0269,oj:JOL_1992_138_R_0036_045", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "fuel reprocessing", "health risk", "radioactive pollution", "radioactive waste"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fcefb464-432e-4641-a6f2-d5eb1d2fec80", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ab93b026-7adf-4962-877d-f7ee16c1c995", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1051/92 by Mrs Nicole FONTAINE to the Commission. Implementation of the fiscal directive on mergers adopted in July 1990", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FONTAINE", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "European company,European undertaking,application of EU law,demerger,merger,national law,tax system", "workIds": "celex:91992E001051", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European company", "European undertaking", "application of EU law", "demerger", "merger", "national law", "tax system"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ab93b026-7adf-4962-877d-f7ee16c1c995", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a3798607-c73d-4c2f-b1b0-810e41289102", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1093/92 by Mr Ernest GLINNE to the Council. Renewed exports of arms to areas of conflict in the Third World", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GLINNE", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "European political cooperation,arms control,arms supply,arms trade,developing countries,international conflict", "workIds": "celex:91992E001093", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European political cooperation", "arms control", "arms supply", "arms trade", "developing countries", "international conflict"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a3798607-c73d-4c2f-b1b0-810e41289102", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c820190-8973-4a83-b8e8-b7e706f5e8a3", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) fixing the guideline figure for the 1992/93 milk year for the fat content of standardized whole milk imported into Ireland and the United Kingdom", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Ireland,United Kingdom,marketing standard,milk fat,whole milk", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0172,comnat:COM_1992_0172_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ireland", "United Kingdom", "marketing standard", "milk fat", "whole milk"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c820190-8973-4a83-b8e8-b7e706f5e8a3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 172 final \n\nBrussels, 30 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nfixing the guideline figure for the 1992/93 milk year \nfor the fat content of standardized whole milk \nimported into Ireland and the United Kingdom \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f2 \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nIn accordance with Regulation (EEC) No 1411/71t1), as amended by Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 566/76(2), with effect on 1 October 1976 the Member States applied the \n\nformula for non-standardized whole milk with a fat content that has not been \n\naltered since the milking stage (Ireland and the United Kingdom) or the formula \n\nfor standardized whole milk with a fat content of at least 3,5% (other Member \n\nStates, excepting Italy, which makes use of the authorization provided for in \n\nArticle 6(3) of that Regulation) for whole milk for drinking. In accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 1411/71, Ireland and the \n\nUnited Kingdom must however allow standardized whole milk from other Member \n\nStates to be marketed within their territory where the fat content of the milk is \n\nnot less than the figure to be fixed for each milk year, corresponding to the \n\nweighted average of the fat content of whole milk produced and marketed in the \n\nMember state concerned during the preceding year (guideline figure). On 20 November 1991, the Commission submitted a proposal to amend the \n\nabovementioned arrangements from the 1992/93 milk year(3). Given progress in \n\ndiscussions on that proposal, it is clear that it will not be possible to abide \n\nby that date of entry into force. Guideline figures must accordingly be fixed for the 1992/93 milk year in order to \n\npermit the arrangements in force to continue to operate temporarily. The guideline figures proposed correspond to the weighted averages as notified by \n\nthe two Member States in question. The measure covered by this proposal has no financial impact. (1) OJ No L 148, 3. 7. 1971, p. 4. (2) OJ No L 67, 15. 3. 1976, p. 23. (3) OJ No C 320, 11. 12. 1991, p. 9. s \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\n/92 \n\nOf \n\nfixing the guideline figure for the 1992/93 milk year \nfor the fat content of standardized whole milk \nimported into Ireland and the United Kingdom \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1411/71 of 29 June 1971 laying down \n\nadditional rules on the common market organization in milk and milk products for \n\ndrinking milkf1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 222/88<2>, and in \n\nparticular Article 3(6)(b) thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas, pursuant to Article 3(5) of Regulation (EEC) No 1411/71, Ireland and the \n\nUnited Kingdom are to apply within their territory the formula for non-\n\nstandardized whole milk within the meaning of the second indent of Article \n\n3(1)(b) of that Regulation; \n\nWhereas the Commission has submitted a proposal(3) to amend the arrangements \n\nlaid down in abovementioned Article 3 from the 1992/93 milk year; whereas, \n\nhowever, it does not appear possible to abide by that date of entry into force; \n\nwhereas the guideline figure which the fat content of standardized whole milk \n\nfrom another Member state must meet to be marketed in the territory of the two \n\nabovementioned Member States must accordingly be set for the 1992/93 milk year in \n\naccordance with paragraphs 6 and 7 of that Article; whereas that guideline figure \n\ncorresponds to the weighted average fat content of whole milk produced and \n\nmarketed in the importing Member State during the preceding year; \n\n(1) OJ No L 148, 3. 7. 1971, p. 4. (2) OJ NO L 28, 1. 2. 1988, p. 1. (3) OJ No C 320, 11. 12. 1991, p. 9. HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe guideline figure referred to in Article 3(6)(b) of Regulation (EEC) \n\nNo 1411/71 for the 1992/93 milk year shall be: \n\nY \n\n3,50% for Ireland, \n\n4,00% for the United Kingdom. Article 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication \n\nin the Official Journal of the European Communities. It shall apply until 31 December 1992. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all \n\nMember states. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\n\f1 \n\n1 FINANCIAL STATEMENT \n\ni \n\nDATE: \n\ni \n\n! \n\n! 1. BUDGET HEADING: Chapter 20 \n\nAPPROPRIATIONS: ECU 5 625 mi 11 ion \n\nj \n\n! 2. TITLE: \n! \n! \n\nDraft Council Regulation fixing the guideline figure for the 1992/93 milk year for the fat content of \nstandardized whole milk imported into Ireland and the United Kingdom \n\n! 3. LEGAL BASIS: \n! \n\nArticle 3(6)(b) of Regulation (EEC) ND 1411/71 \n\n! 4. AIMS OF PROJECT: \n! \n! \n\nFixing the guideline figure for the fat content of whole milk imported into Ireland and the United \nKingdom from other Member States \n\nj \n! \ni \n\n! \n} \n\n| \n! \ni \n\nJ 5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\n! 5. 0 EXPENDITURE \n! \nJ \n! \n! \n\n- CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET \n- (REFUNDS/INTERVENTION) \n- NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION \n-OTHER \n\n! Period of 12 months \n\n1 Current Financial Year \n1992 \n! \n\n! Following Financial Year \n1993 \n\n! \n: \n\np. m. p. m. p. m. i \n\n! 5. 1 REVENUE \n! \n! \n! \n\n- NATIONAL \n\n- OWN RESOURCES OF THE EC \n(LEVIES/CUSTOMS DUTIES) \n\np. m. p. m. p. m. ! \n\n! 5. 0. 1 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE \n| 5. 1. 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE \n\n! \n\n! 5. 2 METHOD OF CALCULATION: \n\ni \n\n! 6. 0 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM APPROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? j \n\nj 6. 1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n! 6. 2 IS A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET NECESSARY? \n\n! 6. 3 WILL FUTURE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE NECESSARY? \n\n! OBSERVATIONS: \n! The financial impact is nil or negligible. J \n\nj \n\n| \n\ni \ni \n\n\f\fr \n\nISSN0254-147S \n\nCOM (92) 172 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-187-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43673-5 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nLr2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/15e2bb2c-d9e4-4522-b425-2009ffb558a7", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 1799/87 on special arrangements for imports of maize and sorghum into Spain from 1987 to 1991", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Spain,maize,sorghum", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0168,comnat:COM_1992_0168_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_138_R_0011_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "maize", "sorghum"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/15e2bb2c-d9e4-4522-b425-2009ffb558a7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0MC90) 168 final \n\nBrussels, 30 April 1990 \n\n\u2022 ^ , 3 ^ \" \u00ab J M KS \n\n2SSS \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nfrre?mtnortR\nfor imports of maize and sorghum i n to Spain from 1987 to 1991 \n\nN\u00b0 1 7\"/ 8? \u00b0n SPe c i al arrangements \n\ne 9 Ufl a t i 0n ^ \n\ns\n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fz \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nAccording to the Agreement between the European Economic \nCommunity and the United States of America concluding \nnegociations under GATT Article XXIV. 6, as approved by Counci I \nDecision of 30 January 1987, the Community was committed to open \nan annual quota of 2 Mio tonnes of maize and 0,3 Mio tonnes of \nsorghum for import into Spain for each of the years 1987-1990. These annual quotas were to be reduced by the quantities of \ncertain non-grain feed ingredients imported into Spain within the \nyear. Special arrangements for imports of maize and sorghum into Spain \nfrom 1987 to 1991 were laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) \nNo 1799/87 of 25 June 1987 (1) as amended by regulation (EEC) \nNo 3391/91 ( 2 ), with the aim of ensuring the achievement of the \nabove committment. An extension of one year for 1991 of the initial Agreement \nbetween the Community and the United States of America was \napproved by Council Regulation 91/30/EEC (3) of 21 December 1990. The application of the measures taken under this Agreement was \nextended until 31 December 1992 by Council Regulation (EEC) \nNo 3919/91 of 19 December 1991 ( 4 ). Accordingly, the present draft regulation foresees the amendment \nof Council Regulation (EEC) No 1799/87. This amendment consists \nof an extension for one year of tne said Regulation with \nretroactive effect as from 1. 1. 1992. ( 1) \n( 2) \n( 3) \n( 4) \n\nOJ \n0J \nOJ \nOJ \n\nNo \nNo \nNo \nNo \n\nL \nL \nL \nL \n\n1 7 0, \n3 2 0, \n1 7, \n3 7 2, \n\n30. 06. 1987, p. 1 \n22. 11. 1991, p. 1 \n23. 01. 1991 , p. 17 \n31. 12. 1991 , p. 35 \n\n\fProposal puk A \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\n/92 \n\nof \n\n1992 \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 1799/87 on special arrangements \nfor imports of maize and sorghum into Spain from 19 87 to 19 91 \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in \n\nparticular Article 43 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission^*), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(^), \n\nWhereas, by its Decision 91/30/EEC^), the Council approved an Exchange of \n\nLetters supplementing the Agreement between the European Economic Community and \n\nthe United States of America concluded on 30 January 19 87 under GATT \n\nArticle XXIV. 6 and providing in particular for its extension to 1991; whereas the \n\nmeasures referred to in the mentioned exchange of letters have been extended \n\nuntil 31 December 1992 by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3919/91 of \n\n19 December 1991<4); whereas Regulation (EEC) No 1799/87<5) should \n\nconsequently also be extended, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3391/91<6); \n\nWhereas Regulation (EEC) No 1799/87 must be amended as a result, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\n(1) OJ No C \n(2) Opinion delivered on \n\n, \n\n199. , p. 199. (not yet published in the Official \n\nJournal). (3) OJ No L 17, 23. 1. 1991, p. 17. (4) OJ No L 372, 31. 12. 1991, p. 35. (5) OJ No L 170, 30. 6. 1987, p. 1. (6) OJ No L 320, 22. 11. 1991, p. 1. Article 1 \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1799/87 is hereby amended as follows: \n\n1. in the title, 'from 1987 to 1991* shall be replaced by 'from 1987 to 1992'. 2. the first recital shall be replaced by the following: \n\n'Whereas under agreements between the European Economic Community and the \n\nUnited States of America concerning the conclusion of the negotiations under \n\nArticle XXIV. 6 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), approved \n\nby Decisions 87/224/EEC<2) and 91/30/EEC<2a), and Regulation (EEC) \n\nNo 3919/91(2b)t the Community undertook, in respect of the years 1987 to \n\n1992, to open annual quotas for imports into Spain of 2 million tonnes of \n\nmaize and 300 000 tonnes of sorghum, minus the quantities of certain grain \n\nsubstitutes imported into that country during the same year, either directly \n\nor indirectly; whereas the quantities of maize and sorghum imported must be \n\nused or processed in Spain; \n\n(2) OJ No L 98, 10. 4. 1987, p. 1. (2a) OJ No L 17, 23. 1. 1991, p. 17. (2b) OJ No L 372, 31. 12. 1991, p. 35. ' \n\n3. Article 1 shall be replaced by the following: \n\n'Article 1 \n\nFor a period of six years from 1987 onwards, a maximum quantity of 2 million \n\ntonnes of maize and 300 000 tonnes of sorghum shall be imported annually from \n\nthird countries for free circulation in Spain under the conditions laid down \n\nin the following Articles. ' \n\n\f-s-\n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the \n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities. It shall apply from 1 January 1992. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all \n\nMember States. Done at Brussels, \n\n199. For the Council \n\n\fFINANCIAL S TATEMENT \n\n^ \n\n1. BUDGET HEADING: Expenditure: 10 \n: 100 \n\nRevenue \n\nDATE: 20 March 1992 \n\nAPPROPRIATIONS: ECU 6 423 mi 11 ion \nECU 1 369. 5 million \n\n2. TITLE: Amendment to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1799/87 on special arrangements for imports of maize and \n\nsorghum into Spain \n\n3. LEGAL BASIS: EEC Treaty and in particular Article 43 thereof. 4. AIMS OF PROJECT: To extend for one year the agreement on imports of maize and sorghum into Spain. 5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\n5. 0 EXPENDITURE \n\n- CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET \n- (REFUNDS/INTERVENTION) \n- NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION \n-OTHER \n\n5. 1 REVENUE \n\n- OWN RESOURCES OF THE EC \n(LEVIES/CUSTOMS DUTIES) \n\n- NATIONAL \n\n5. 0. 1 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE \n5. 1. 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE \n\nPeriod of 12 months \n\nCurrent Financial Year \n1992 \n\nFollowing Financial Year \n1993 \n\nECU mi 11 ion \n\nECU mi 11 ion \n\nECU mi 11 ion \n\n193,8 \n\np. m. 193,8 \n\n176,6 \n\n117,7 \n\n58,9 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n5. 2 METHOD OF CALCULATION: \nRevenue in 1992: \n(Levies) 1993: \n\n1. 0 million t x ECU 100/t x 1,177 (DR) \n0. 5 million t x ECU 100/t x 1,177 (DR) \n\nECU 117,7 million \nECU 58,9 mi 11 ion \n\nTotal revenue \n\nECU 176,6 million \n\nExpenditure in 1993: 1. 3 mi 11 ion t (maize) x \n(Refunds) \n\nECU 114/t x 1,144 (DR) - \n0. 2 mi 11 ion t (fodder cereals) x ECU 106/t x 1,145 (DR) - \n\nECU 169,5 mi 11 ion \nECU 24,3 mi 11 ion \n\nTotal expenditure ECU 193,8 mi iI ion \n\n6. 0 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM APPROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n6. 1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n6. 2 IS A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET NECESSARY? \n\n6. 3 WILL FUTURE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE NECESSARY? \n\nOBSERVATIONS: \nThese calculations take account of deductions of cereal substitute products imported into Spain and \nthe increase in cereals exports resulting from its application. YES \n\nYES \n\nNO \n\nYES \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 168 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-184-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43646-8 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a69da5e0-8c7b-4194-8a3b-68566f06eb8d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1055/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Twinning", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EU aid,European integration", "workIds": "celex:91992E001055", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "European integration"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a69da5e0-8c7b-4194-8a3b-68566f06eb8d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aad25f04-462f-429e-a922-12249455a5e3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1074/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Incomes policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "European integration,Greece,budget deficit,budget policy,economic integration,economic stabilisation,income,income stabilisation,monetary integration,standard of living", "workIds": "celex:91992E001074", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European integration", "Greece", "budget deficit", "budget policy", "economic integration", "economic stabilisation", "income", "income stabilisation", "monetary integration", "standard of living"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aad25f04-462f-429e-a922-12249455a5e3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3e122da-3b31-4c8c-8d9f-83ae40d6d639", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1078/92 by Mr Reimer B\u00d6GE to the Commission. Use of biological oils for offshore drilling", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BOEGE,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "North Sea,biodegradability,environmental impact,environmental protection,lubricants,marine pollution,mineral oil,offshore drilling,oil pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001078", "eurovoc_concepts": ["North Sea", "biodegradability", "environmental impact", "environmental protection", "lubricants", "marine pollution", "mineral oil", "offshore drilling", "oil pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3e122da-3b31-4c8c-8d9f-83ae40d6d639", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a43e6c7-e686-45af-a1df-08e2bff10dc7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1075/92 by Mr Gianfranco AMENDOLA to the Commission. Infringement by Italy of Directive 76/464/EEC and the amendments thereto and of related directives on the discharge of dangerous substances into water", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "AMENDOLA,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EC Directive,application of EU law,dangerous substance,waste disposal,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001075", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "application of EU law", "dangerous substance", "waste disposal", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a43e6c7-e686-45af-a1df-08e2bff10dc7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a2b1c3a6-f4a4-49f7-bc63-b408b955734a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1095/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with a Commission directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,electrical equipment,harmonisation of standards,medicine,veterinarian", "workIds": "celex:91992E001095", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "electrical equipment", "harmonisation of standards", "medicine", "veterinarian"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a2b1c3a6-f4a4-49f7-bc63-b408b955734a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/14694e9f-1294-4f43-ab1b-3254e1d68cea", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1091/92 by Mr Ernest GLINNE to the Commission. Ban on self-defence aerosols in Community countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GLINNE", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Germany,free movement of goods,national law,personal weapon,trade restriction", "workIds": "celex:91992E001091", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "free movement of goods", "national law", "personal weapon", "trade restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/14694e9f-1294-4f43-ab1b-3254e1d68cea", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e27fb8cf-fd72-434c-8cb4-11ef1c06c605", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1069/92 by Mr Jaak VANDEMEULEBROUCKE to the Council. Recognition of diplomas", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VANDEMEULEBROUCKE", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "free movement of persons,higher education,length of studies,recognition of diplomas,secretarial staff,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E001069", "eurovoc_concepts": ["free movement of persons", "higher education", "length of studies", "recognition of diplomas", "secretarial staff", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e27fb8cf-fd72-434c-8cb4-11ef1c06c605", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/78ef2e90-b863-4fb6-8d30-136ebbc32d41", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1070/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "GATT,anti-crisis plan,economic recession,liberalisation of trade,tariff negotiations", "workIds": "celex:91992E001070", "eurovoc_concepts": ["GATT", "anti-crisis plan", "economic recession", "liberalisation of trade", "tariff negotiations"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/78ef2e90-b863-4fb6-8d30-136ebbc32d41", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/23b85a9a-3ea1-482b-877e-36d075d5f82d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1063/92 by Mr Ferruccio PISONI to the Commission. Termination of service of officials of the European Communities", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PISONI FERRUCCIO", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "European official,enlargement of the Union,personnel administration,report,servant (EU),termination of employment", "workIds": "celex:91992E001063", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European official", "enlargement of the Union", "personnel administration", "report", "servant (EU)", "termination of employment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/23b85a9a-3ea1-482b-877e-36d075d5f82d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9fc0ffe1-dffe-4799-b78c-21e2c68ef0f8", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1100/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with a Commission directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,packaged product,pre-packaging", "workIds": "celex:91992E001100", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "packaged product", "pre-packaging"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9fc0ffe1-dffe-4799-b78c-21e2c68ef0f8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d805c43f-b83b-4094-b0f8-b57cae1cb93b", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1117/92 of 30 April 1992 on the improvement of the quality of milk in Spain, Ireland, Northern Ireland and Portugal", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Ireland,Northern Ireland,Portugal,Spain,milk,production improvement", "workIds": "celex:31992R1117,oj:JOL_1992_117_R_0085_078", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ireland", "Northern Ireland", "Portugal", "Spain", "milk", "production improvement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d805c43f-b83b-4094-b0f8-b57cae1cb93b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7867bc52-bba1-4b27-9d61-ff50d24755b0", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables and the Annex to Directive 90/642/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on certain products of plant origin, including fruit and vegetables and providing for the establishment of a first list of maximum levels", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "crop production,food inspection,fruit,pesticide,pesticide residue,vegetable", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0161(02),comnat:COM_1992_0161(02)_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["crop production", "food inspection", "fruit", "pesticide", "pesticide residue", "vegetable"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7867bc52-bba1-4b27-9d61-ff50d24755b0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 161 final \n\nBrussels, 30 April 1992 \n\nK1 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending the Annexes to Council Directives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC \n\non the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues \n\nin and on cereals and foodstuffs of animal origin respectively \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum \n\nlevels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables and the Annex to \n\nDirective 90/642/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide \n\nresidues in and on certain products of plant origin, including fruit and \n\nvegetables and providing for the establishment of a first list of maximum \n\nlevels \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f- 2 -\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nWith the progressive adoption over the period 1986-1990 of Community \n\nframework measures for the establishment of mandatory maximum pesticide \n\nresidue levels (MRLs) in cereals (Directive 86/362/EEC*1)), foodstuffs of \n\nanimal origin (Directive 86/363/EEC<2>) and in fruit and vegetables and \n\nother products of plant origin (Directive 90/642/EEC<3>), the Community now \n\nhas the possibility to establish harmonized MRLs simultaneously for \n\nindividual pesticides in most major components of the diet, taking into \n\naccount total dietary intake of pesticide residues at Community level when \n\nestablishing the MRLs. Whilst an early review of the functioning of these various measures was \n\nenvisaged at the time of the adoption of the 1986 Directives, there has in \n\nfact been insufficient experience of their operation. Furtheremore, \n\nDirective 91/414/EEC^4^ concerning the authorization and placing on the \n\nmarket of plant protection products, adopted in 1991, contains further \n\nprovisions relating to the fixing of maximum residue levels, not foreseen in \n\n1986, which will come into force only in 1993. The Commission considers that under these circumstances and in order to \n\nfacilitate the proper working of the internal market it is important that \n\nharmonized maximum residue levels be established as quickly as possible \n\nunder existing legislation. It is the Commission's intention to establish, \n\non an annual basis, a priority list of pesticides not previously harmonized \n\nunder Community pesticide residue legislation; the present proposals \n\nconstitute, inter alia, the result of the first list. The principal aims of the proposals are as follows: \n\n1. To establish Community MRLs for 22 major pesticides which may \n\nleave residues in food and have not been previously covered by \n\nharmonized Community legislation. In the case of certain \n\npesticide product combinations, a sufficient period of time \n\nwill be allowed for the generation of data where that \n\navailable has been considered inadequate by current standards \n\nto establish Community MRLs. (1) 0J No L 221, 7. 8. 1986, p. 37. (2) 0J No L 221, 7. 8. 1986, p. 43. (3) OJ No L 350, 14. 12. 1990, p. 71. (4) OJ No L 230, 19. 8. 1991, p. 1. 2. To establish Community MRLs for 14 pesticides either used \n\n- 3 -\n\ncurrently or previously in the production of tea and provide \n\nfor a deadline for the fixing of MRLs for a further 18 \n\npesticides currently used in the production of tea but lacking \n\nadequate up to date data. In the case of three pesticides \n\nwhich may leave measurable residues when used in the \n\nproduction of tea, it is proposed to establish the MRLs at the \n\nlimit of analytical determination due to the possibility of a \n\nconsumer health hazard arising in certain circumstances. 3. To transfer and, where necessary, amend the provisions for 19 \n\npesticides from the old optional Directive 76/895/EEC^5) \n\nrelating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide \n\nresidues in and on fruit and vegetables, to Directive \n\n90/642/EEC. On transfer the maximum levels shall become mandatory and be \n\napplicable to all product groups covered by Directive \n\n90/642/EEC. 4. To establish provisions for birds' eggs which were foreseen in \n\nDirective 86/363/EEC at the time of its adoption and fix such \n\nMRLs for the 8 pesticides contained in Annex II to the \n\ndirective at the time of its adoption and for which maximum \n\nlevels have already been established for other foodstuffs of \n\nanimal origin. In cases where insufficient data has been available to establish MRLs under \n\n1 and 2 above, a period not exceeding four years will be allowed for the \n\ngeneration of the necessary data. During this period, Member States will be \n\npermitted to maintain the MRLs they may have established. In addition to the main points listed above, the proposals also envisage a \n\nnumber of technical amendmends to the lists of products covered by the \n\nmaximum levels. These proposals will have little or no impact on small or medium-sized \n\nenterpr ises. The proposals would have no impact on the budget of the European \n\nCommuni t i es. (5) OJ No L 340, 9. 12. 1976, p. 26. - 4 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending the Annexes to Council Directives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC \n\non the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues \n\nin and on cereals and foodstuffs of animal origin respectively \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Directive 86/362/EEC on the fixing of maximum levels for \n\npesticide residues in cereals(1), as last amended by Council Directive \n\n88/298/EEC<2) and in particular Article 11 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to Directive 86/363/EEC on the fixing of maximum levels for \n\npesticide residues in foodstuffs of animal origin^3) and in particular \n\nArticle 11 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas, it appears desirable to update the nomenclature in Annexes I to \n\nDirectives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC to conform with Commission Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2587/91<4>; \n\nWhereas, it appears also desirable to enlarge the scope of Annex I of \n\nDirective 86/362/EEC to include husked rice, milled rice and semi-milled or \n\nwholly milled rice in addition to paddy or rough rice, since a significant \n\nproportion of rice is put into circulation as such; \n\n(1) O. J. No. L 221, 07. 08. 1986, p. 37 \n\n(2) O. J. No. L 126, 20. 05. 1988, p. 53 \n\n(3) O. J. No. L 221, 07. 08. 1986, p. 43 \n\n(4) O. J. No. L 259, 26. 07. 1991, p. 1 \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nWhereas, in the light of technical and scientific progress and the \n\nrequirements of public health and agriculture, it is now desirable to \n\ncomplete Annex II to Directive 86/363/EEC in respect of the provisions for \n\nthe establishment of maximum levels for birds' eggs and egg yolks and to \n\nestablish levels for the pesticides therein listed; whereas for clarity, it \n\nappears desirable to present a consolidated version of the said Annex; \n\nWhereas, it is also desirable to amend, in the light of technical and \n\nscientific progress, Directives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC by adding \n\nprovisions relating to further pesticide residues for cereals and foodstuffs \n\nof animal origin, namely, acephate, benomyl, carbendazim, chlorpyriphos, \n\nchlorpyriphos-methyl, chlorothaloniI, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, \n\nfenvalerate, glyphosate, imazalil, iprodione, mancozeb, maneb, \n\nmethamidophos, metiram, permethrin, procymidone, propineb, thiophanate-\n\nmethyl, vinclozolin, zineb. HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\nDirective 86/362/EEC is hereby amended as follows: \n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. Annex I is replaced by the following: \n\nDescription \n\n_ \n\nheading \n\nNo \n\nex 1001 \n\nWheat \n\n10020000 Rye \n\nex 100300 Barley \n\nex 100400 Oats \n\nex 1005 \n\nMaize \n\nex 1006 \n\nR i ce \n\nex 100700 Grain sorghum \n\nex 1008 \n\nBuckwheat, millet, other cereals \n\n2. The following pesticide residues are added to Part A of Annex II. - 6 -\n\nPesticide residues \n\nMaximum levels in mg/kg \n\n(ppm) \n\n20. ACEPHATE \n\n0. 02* \n\n21. BENOMYL \n22. CARBENOAZIM \n23. THIOPHANATE-METHYL) \n\n) \n) sum expressed as carbendazim \n\n(1) : barley \n0. 1* : other cereals \n\n24. CHLOROPYRIPHOS \n\n25. CHLOROPYRIPHOS-METHYL \n\n26. CHLOROTHALONIL \n\n27. CYPERMETHRIN \n\n28. OELTAMETHRIN \n\n29. FENVALERATE \n\n30. CLYPHOSATE \n\n31. IMAZALIL \n\n32. IPROOIONE \n\n(sum of IprodIone and all metabolites \ncontaining the 3. 5-dichloroanlIine moiety, \nexpressed as iprodione) \n\n(2) : barley \n0. 05*: other cereals \n\n0. 05*: rice \n(2) : other cereals \n\n0. 1 : wheat, rye, barley, oats and \n\ntriticale \n\n0. 01*: other cereals \n\n(2) : wheat, barley, oats and rye \n0. 05*: other cereals \n\n(2) : barley, oats, rye and triticale \n0. 05*: other cereals \n\n: wheat, rye and triticale \n: barley and oats \n\nS \n20 \n0. 1* : other cereals \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 5 : wheat \n(3) : barley and rice \n0. 02*: other cereale \n\n33. MANCOZEB \n34. MANEB \n33. METIRAM \n36. PROP INEB \n37. ZINEB \n\nsum expressed as CS2 \n\n(2) : barley \n0. 05*: other cereals \n\n38. METHAMIOOPHOS \n\n0. 01* \n\n39. PERMETHRIN \n\n(sum of Isomers) \n\n0. 2 : molze \n2 \n\n: other cereal! \n\n40. PROCYMIDONE \n\n(sum of procymidone and all metabolites \ncontaining the 3. 5-dichloroanlIIne moiety, \nexpressed as procymidone) \n\n4 1. VINCLOZOMN \n\n(sum of vlnclozlln and all metabolites containing \n\nthe 3. 5-dlchloroaniIine moiety, expressed as \nvinclozolIn) \n\no. or \n\n0. 05* \n\n* Indicates lower limit of analytical determination \n\n(1)(2)(3) Should levels not be adopted by 1 January 1996. the following moxlmum levels shall opply \nas Indicated thereafter \n\n(1) - 0. 1 \n(2) - 0. 05 \n(3) - 0. 02 \n\n\f-? \n\nArticle 2 \n\nDirective 86/363/EEC is hereby amended as follows \n\n1. Annex I is replaced by the following: \n\nCCT \n\nheading \n\nNo \n\nANNEX I \n\nDescr ipt ion \n\n0201 \n\nMeat of bovine animals, fresh or chilled \n\n0202 \n\nMeat of bovine animals, frozen \n\n0203 \n\nMeat of swine, fresh, chilled or frozen \n\n0204 \n\nMeat of sheep or goats, fresh, chilled or frozen \n\n02050000 Meat of horses, asses, mules or hinnies, fresh, chilled or \n\nfrozen \n\n0206 \n\n0207 \n\nEdible offal of bovine animals, swine, sheep, goats, horses, \nasses, mules or hinnies, fresh, chilled or frozen \n\nMeat and edibie offal, of the poultry of heading No 0105 (fowls \nof the species Gal I us domesticus, ducks, geese, turkeys and \nguinea fowls), fresh, chilled or frozen \n\nex 0208 \n\nOther meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen \n\n020900 \n\nPig fat free of lean meat and poultry fat (not rendered), fresh, \nchilled, frozen, salted in brine, diced or smoked \n\n0210 \n\n0401 \n\n0402 \n\nMeat and edible meat offal, salted in brine, dried or smoked; \nedible flours and meals of meat or meat offal \n\nMilk and cream, not concentrated nor contaning added sugar or \nother sweetening matter \n\nMilk and cream, concentrated or containing added sugar or other \nsweetening matter \n\n* \n\n040500 \n\nButter and other fats and oils derived from milk \n\n0406 \n\nCheese and curd \n\n040700 \n\nBirds' eggs, in shell, fresh, preserved or cooked \n\n0408 \n\nBirds' eggs, not in shell, and egg yolks, fresh, dried, cooked \nby steaming or by boiling in water, moulded, frozen or otherwise \npreserved, whether or not containing added sugar or other \nsweetening matter \n\n160100 \n\nSausages and similar products, of meat, meat offal or blood: \nfood preparations based on these products \n\n1602 \n\nOther prepared or preserved meat offal or blood \n\n\f2. Former Annex \n\nII becomes Annex \n\nre-presented as \n\nf o l l o w s: \n\n- 8 -\nII Part A and is amended and \n\nMaximum levels In mg/kg (ppm) \n\nof fat, contained in meat, \npreparations of meat, \noffals and animol fats \nlisted In Annex 1 under \nhooding Nos ex 0201. 0202. 0203. 0204. 02050000. 0206. 0207. ex 0208. 020900. 0210, \n160100. 1602 (1)(4) \n\nfor raw cow's milk and \nwhole cream cow's milk \nlisted In Annex 1 under \nheading No 0401; for the \nother foodstuffs in \nheading Nos 0401. 0402. 040500. 0406 in accordance \nwith(2)(4) \n\nof shelled fresh eggs, \nfor birds* eggs and egg \nyolks listed in Annex 1 \nunder heading No 040700, \n0408 (3)(4) \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 006 \n\n0. 02 \n\nPeetlcide residues \n\n1. ALDRIN \n\n)singly or \n)combined, expressed \n\n2. DIELDRIN )os dleldrln \n\n(HEOO) )(HE00) \n\n3. CHLORDANE (sum of cis\u2014 and \n\ntrans\u2014isomers and \noxychlordane expressed oe \nchlordane) \n\n4. DDT (sum of 0DT-. TDE- and \n\nDDE-isomers,expressed as DOT) \n\n5. ENDRIN \n\n6. HEPTACHLOR (sum of heptachlor \n\nand heptachlor epoxide. expressed as heptachlor) \n\n7. HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) \n\n8. HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANE (HCH) \n\n8. 1. alpha\u2014isomer \n\n8. 2. beto-Isomer \n\n8. 3. gammo\u2014isomer (lindane) \n\n9. CHLOROPYRIPHOS \n\n10. CHLOROPYRIPHOS-METHYL \n\n11. CYPERMETHRIN \n\n12. DELTAMETHRIN \n\n13. FENVALERATE \n\n0. 05 \n\n1 \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1 \n\n2 \n\nex 0204 sheepmeat \n\n1 other products \n\n0. 05* \n\nex 0207 Poultry meat \n\n0. 2 other products \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 05* \n\nex 0207 Poultry meat \n\n0. 2 other products \n\n0. 05 \n\nex 0207 Poultry meat \n\n(5) \n\nex 0207 Poultry meat \n\n0. 5 other products \n\n0. 002 \n\n0. 04 \n\n0. 0008 \n\n0. 004 \n\n0. 01 \n\n0. 004 \n\n0. 003 \n\n0. 008 \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 005 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 005 \n\n0. 02 \n\n0. 02 \n\n0. 02 \n\n0. 01 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(5) \n\n0. 05 \n\n14. PERMETHRIN \n\n0. 5 \n\n\u00bb Indicates lower limit of analytical determination. (1) In the case of foodstuffs with o fat content of 10% or less by weight, the reeldue Is related to the total weight of the boned \n\nfoodstuff. In such casee, the maximum level Is one-tenth of the value related to fat content, but must be no less than 0. 01 mg/kg. (2) In determining the residues In raw cow's milk and whole cream cow's milk, a fat content of 4% by weight should be taken as a basis \n\nFor raw milk and whole cream milk of another animal origin the residues are expressed on the basis of the fat. For the other foodstuffs listed In Annex I under heading Nos 0401, 0402, 040500, 0406 : \n- with a fat content of less than 7X by weight, the maximum level Is taken as half that set for raw milk and whole cream milk, \n- with a fat content of 2% or more by weight, the maximum level Is expressed In mg/kg of fat. In such cases, the maximum level \n\nIs 25 times that set for raw milk and whole cream milk. (3) For egg products with a fat content higher than 10 X the maximum level is expressed in mg/kg fat. In this case the maximum level \n\nIs 10 times higher than the maximum level for fresh eggs. (4) Footnotes (1) (2) and (3) do not apply In cases where the lower limit of analytical determination Is indicated. (5) Should levels not be adopted by 1 January 1996, the following maximum level shall apply: 0. 05 \n\n\f- 9 -\n\n3. The following is added to Annex II \n\n* PART B * \n\n\u2022 \n\nPesticide residues \n\nof meat, including fat. preparations of meat, \noffale and animal fate ae \nlisted in Annex 1 under \nheading Noe ex 0201. 0202. 0203. 0204, 02050000. 0206. 0207. ex 0208. 020900, \n0210. 160100 ond 1602 \n\nMaximum levele In mg/kg (ppm) \n\nfor milk and milk products \nlisted in Annex 1 under \nhead Inge Noe 0401. 0402. 040500. 0406 \n\nof shelled fresh eggs. for birds* egge ond egg \nyolks listed in Annex 1 \nunder heading No 040700. 0408 \n\n1. ACEPHATE \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n2. BENOMYL \n\n3. CARBENDAZIM \n\n) sum \n)expreessd \n) as \n) corben-\n\n4. THIOPHONATE METHYL) dazlm \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n5. CHLOROTHALONIL \n\n0. 01* \n\n6. GLYPHOSATE \n\n0. 5 \nex 0206 pig kidney \n\n2 \n\nex 0206 cattle, goat \nand sheep kidney \n\n0. 1* other products \n\n7. IMAZALIL \n\n0. 02* \n\n8. IPROOIONE (sum of iprodlone \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\nand ail metabolites \ncontaining the 3,5-dlchloro-\noni1Ine moiety, expressed \noe Iprodlone) \n\n9. MANCOZEB ) \n10. MANE6 \n11. METIRAM \n12. PROP1 NEB ) \n) \n13. ZINEB \n\n) sum expressed \n) ae CS2 \n\n14. METHAMIDOPHOS \n\n15. PROCYMIDONE (sum of procyml-\ndone ond all metabolites \ncontaining the 3. 5\u2014dlchloro\u2014 \naniline moiety, expressed \nos procymidone) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n16. VINCLOZOLIN (sum of vinclo-\n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\nzolln and all metabolites \ncontaining the 3,5-dichloro-\nonl1ine moiety, expressed \nos vinclozolin) \n\n\u2022 Indicatee lower limit of analytical determination \n\n\f- 10 -\nArticle 3 \n\nMember States shall bring into force not later than 31 December 1992, the \n\nlaws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with this \n\nDirective. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to \n\nthis Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of \n\ntheir official publication. The methods of making such a reference shall be \n\nlaid down by the Member States. This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Article 4 \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\n\fProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels \n\nfor pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables and the Annex to Directive \n\n90/642/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and \n\non certain products of plant origin, including fruit and vegetables and providing \n\nfor the establishment of a first list of maximum levels. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES: \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum \nlevels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables^1), as last amended \nby Council Directive 89/186/EEC(2>, and in particular Article 5 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to Council Directive 90/642/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum \n\nlevels for pesticide residues in and on certain products of plant origin, \n\nincluding fruit and vegetables*3*, and in particular Article 1 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas the pesticides chlorbenside and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(4-ethyl-phenyI) \n\nethane are no longer of economic importance and their residues are unlikely to \n\noccur in foodstuffs; whereas it is appropriate therefore to delete them from \n\nAnnex II of Directive 76/895/EEC; \n\nWhereas in order to establish mandatory maximum levels of pesticide residues at \n\nCommunity level it is necessary to transfer provisions from Directive 76/895/EEC \n\nto Directive 90/642/EEC relating to the pesticides amitrole, atrazine, binapacryl, \n\nbromophos-ethyl, captafol, DDT, dichlorprop, dinoseb, dioxathion, endrin, ethylene \n\ndibromide, fenchlorphos, heptachlor, maleic hydrazide, methyl bromide, paraquat, \n\nTEPP, 2,4,5-T, toxaphene; whereas, certain of these provisions should be amended \n\nin the light of technical and scientific progress; \n\n(1) 0J No L 340, 9. 12. 1976, p. 26 \n(2) 0J No L 66, 10. 3. 1989, p. 36 \n(3) OJ No L 350, 14. 12. 1990, p. 71 \n\n\fWhereas it is necessary to amend the annex to Directive 90/642/EEC, in order that \n\nsunflower seed and olives may be more appropriately described considering current \n\ntrade practices, thereby facilitating control of pesticide residues therein; \n\nWhereas, pesticide residues may arise in products of plant origin including fruit \n\nand vegetables as a result of present or previous agricultural practices; whereas, \n\nto establish maximum levels for the former, it is necessary to take into account \n\nrelevant data for both authorized pesticide uses and supervised trials; whereas, \n\nhowever, available data is frequently insufficient by current standards to \n\nestablish maximum levels; whereas, in the case of the previous agricultural \n\npractices, appropriate monitoring data must be evaluated; \n\nWhereas, satisfactory monitoring data exist in order to establish maximum \n\npesticide residue levels in tea for aldrin, dieldrin, chlordane, DDT, endrin, \n\nheptachlor, HCH and HCB; \n\nWhereas, in the case of the pesticides cartap and endosulfan which are used in the \n\nproduction of tea, sufficient data for both authorized uses and supervised trials \n\nexist to establish maximum residue levels; \n\nWhereas, in the case of certain other pesticides used in the production of tea, \n\ninsufficient data exist by present standards to establish maximum residue levels; \n\nwhereas, however data exist to indicate that the residues which may be present are \n\nunlikely to constitute a health hazard; whereas, Member States may therefore \n\nmaintain the maximum levels they have fixed in order to allow sufficient time for \n\nthe generation of the necessary data for a Community decision to be taken; \n\nWhereas, in the case of the pesticides omethoate, dimethoate and ethion used in \n\nthe production of tea, available data indicate that in certain circumstances a \n\npublic health hazard may occur; whereas, therefore, the maximum level should be \n\nestablished at the limit of analytical determination; \n\n\f-A3 \n\n-\n\nWhereas, in order to better estimate dietary intake of pesticide residues, it is \n\nprudent to establish simultaneously, where possible, maximum residue levels for \n\nindividual pesticides in all major components of the diet; whereas these levels \n\nrepresent the use of minimum quantities of pesticide to achieve adequate control, \n\napplied in such a manner that the amount of residue is the smallest practicable \n\nand is toxicologically acceptable; \n\nWhereas, it is now appropriate that maximum levels be fixed for certain pesticides \n\nin products of plant origin, namely, acephate, benomyl, carbendazim, thiophanate-\n\nmethyl, maneb, mancozeb, met!ram, propineb, zineb, methamidophos, procymidono, \n\nchlorothaloniI, chlorpyriphos, chlorpyriphos-methyI, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, \n\nfenvalerate, glyphosate, imazalil, iprodione, permethrin, vinclozolin; \n\nWhereas, however, available data is insufficient to establish levels for certain \n\npesticides crop combinations; whereas a period of time, not exceeding four years, \n\nwill be necessary to generate such data; whereas, therefore, maximum levels should \n\nbe established on the basis of such data by 1 January 1996 at the latest; failure \n\nto provide satisfactory data shall result in the establishment of levels at the \n\nappropriate limit of determination. HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\n\fArticte 1 \n\nThe entries in Annex II of Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the following \n\npesticide residues shall be deleted: \n\nam Itrole \n\natrazlne \n\nblnapacryl \n\nbromophos-ethyI \n\ncaptafol \n\nchlorbenside \n\nDDT (sum of DDT-, TDE- and DDE-isomers, expressed as DDT) \n\ndichlorprop \n\n1,1-dichloro-2,2-bls(4-ethyl-phenyl) ethane \n\nd i noseb \n\ndloxathlon \n\nendrin \n\nethylene dibromide \n\nfenchlorphos \n\nheptachlor \n\nmaleic hydrazide \n\nmethyl bromide \n\nparaquat \n\nTEPP \n\ntoxaphene \n\n2,4,5 -T \n\n\f- 4S-\n\nArticle 2 \n\nDirective 90/642/EEC is hereby amended as follows: \n\n1. The former Annex becomes Annex I \n\n2. That part of the Annex relating to miscellaneous fruit and oil seeds is \n\namended as follows: \n\nGroups of products \n\nProducts included \n\nPart of product to which \n\nin the groups \n\nmaximum residue levels apply \n\n1. Fruit, fresh, dried or uncooked, preserved by freezing, not containing \n\nadded sugar; nuts \n\n(Vi) MISCELLANEOUS \n\nFRUIT \n\nOlives for oil extrac \n\nWhole fruit after removal \n\ntion and for table \n\nof stems (if any) and in \n\nconsumpt ion. the case of olives for oil \n\nextraction after removal of \n\nsoil (if any) by rinsing in \n\nrunning water \n\n4. Oil seeds \n\nSunflower seed \n\nWhole seed including shell \n\nwhen present and whole \n\nseed without shell, when \n\nshe 11 is absent \n\n3. The following Annex is added \n\n\"ANNEX \n\n\fCroups and e x a r p l es of \n\nI n d i v i d u al \n\nAcsphoto \n\nChlorothalonl 1 ' \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\nproducts to which t he M is apply \n\nPeetlcids res \n\nduet andmaxlnun reeldue levels (moAfl) \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\u2022msthyl \n\nCypermethrln \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs) \n\nOsltamthrin \n\nFenvalerote \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs) \n\nGlyahosate \n\nImozolil \n\nIprodiane \n\nPermsthrin \n(sun of \n\nisomers \n\n1. F r u i t, f r e s h, d r i ed or uncooked \n\npreserved by f r e e z i ng not \nc o n t a i n i ng added sugar; n u t s. ( i) CITRUS FRUIT \n\n1 \n\n0. 01* \n\n2 \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n5 \n\n0. 5 \n\nG r a p e f r u it \n\nLemons \nLimn \nMandarins ( i n c l. clcrantines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPunmelo \nOthers \n\n( i i) TREE NUTS \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n0. O5* \n\n0. 3 \n\n(3) \n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n\u2022-\u2022-\n0. O5* \n\n(D \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 1 \n\n(D \n\n(D \n\n(2) \n\n0. 9 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n(D \n\n(D \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(2) \n(2) \n(2) \n\n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n\n1 \n(2) \n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n(3) \n(3) \n\n0. 2 \n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 2 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. O5* \n\n1 \n\n2 \n1 \n2 \n\n1 \n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 1* \n\n5 \n\n0. 02* \n10 \n\n0. 05* \n1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n1 \n\n0> \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(D \n\nO. OB* \n\n(D \n5 \n(D \n\n5 \n0. 02* \n\n10 \n\n10 \n\n5 \n\n1 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(shelled or Almonds \nunshelled) Brazil nuts \nOashsw nuts \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazelnuts \nMocodomio. Pecans \n\nPine nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthers \n\n( i l l) POC FRUIT \n\nApples \nPears \nQuinces \nOthers \n\n( i v) STOC FRUIT \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPeaches (fncl. nectarines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(v) BERRIES AN) 9*LL FRUIT \n\n(a) Table and wine \n\ngropes \nTable grapes \nWine grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other than wiId) \n\n(c) Cans fruit \n\n(other than wild) \nBlackberries \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthers \n\n\fIndividual \nGroups and exorplee of \nproducts to which ths IffLs apply \n\nAcsphate \n\nChlorotholonil \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\nPesticide res \n\ndues and moxlm/n reeldue levels \n\n(mo/fca,) \n\nChlorpyriphos \n-methyl \n\nCypermsthrln \n(sun of \n\niscmsrs) \n\nDsltantthrln \n\nFenvalerate \n(sun of \n\niscmsrs) \n\nGlyphosate \n\n\u2022ratal II \n\nIprodlone \n\nPormethr in \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs \n\n(d) Other small fruit \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\nand berries (other \nthan wlId) \nBilberries \n( f r u it of species \nvoce In Inn ityrtl 1 lus) \nCranberries \nCurrants (red, black \nend shite) \nGooseberries \nOthers \n\n(s) Wild berries and \nwild f r u it \n\n( v i) MISCELLAM3DUS \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\nAcfrocodoc \nBoioncw \nDates \nFigs \nKiwi \nKunquate \nLltchls \nMangoes \nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPomegranate \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncocked, frozen or dry \n(1) ROOT AN) TUBER VEGETABLES \n\n0. 02* \n\nBeetroot \nCarrots \nCslerlac \nHorse radish \nJerusalem artichokes \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \nSwedes \nTurnips \nYam \nOthers \n\n( t l) BULB VEGETABLES \n\n0. 02* \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShal lots \nSpring onions \nOthers \n\n2 \n(2) \n\n(2) \n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(2) \n(2) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n\n0. 01* \n\n(3) \n(3) \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n2 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n2 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n2 \n\n(4) \n\n10 \n\n10 \n\n10 \no. oe* \n0. O2* \n\n(D \n\n5 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n0. 06* \n0. 05* \n\n1 \n\n(3) \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\nJ \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n(D \n\n0. 02 \n\n5 \n5 \nS \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n\n0. O5* \n0. 06* \n\n0. 5 \n\n\fGroups and excnples of \nproducts to which the sfLs apply \n\nindividual \n\nAuphot# \n\nChlorotholonil \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\nPsstlcids ree \n\ndues and mat 1mm residue levels (moAg) \n\nChlorpyriphos \n-methyl \n\nCypermsthrln \n(sun of \n\niscmsrs) \n\nDsltonsthrln \n\nFenvalerate \n(sun of \n\niscmsrs) \n\nGlyphceate \n\nbnazalil \n\n1prodlone \n\nPenrethrin \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs \n\n( H i) FRUITINJ \n\n(a) Solanacea \nTomatoes \nPeppers \nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\n\u00a3Sl \nOucuTbers \nGherkins \nCourgettes \nOthers \n\n(c) Cucurbits inedible \n\n0. 5 \n(D \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n(D \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\nJKSl \nMslons \nSquashes \nWat snns Ions \nOthers \n(d) Swsst com \n( I v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(a) Flowering Brasslcas \n\nBroccoli \nCauliflower \nOthers \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(D \n\n(2) \n\n(b) Head Brasslcas \n\n2 \n\n0. 5 \n(2) \n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n\n(D \n\nBrussels Sprouts \nI^VWl. fVsMtefVBSB \n\nOthers \n\n(c) Leafy Brass leas \nChinese cabbage \nKale \nOthers \n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES \nAN) FRESH HERBS \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1* \n\n2 \n\n(2) \n\n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1 \n\n(2) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n1 \n0. 2 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n1 \n\n(D \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(D \n\n0. O2* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n(3) \n0. 05* \n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n1 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n1 \n(3) \n0. 05* \n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 06* \n\n5 \n\n2 \n\n(D \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n5 \n0. 02* \n\n(D \n\n0. O2* \n0. 1 \n\n(a) Lettuce * slml lor \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n10 \n\nCress \nLotto's lettuce \nLettuce \nScorole \nOthers \n\n(b) Spinach * simi lar \n\nBest 1saves (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n(d) Witloof \n(e) herbs \n\nChervil \nChives \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthers \n\n1 \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n(2) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n2 \n2 \n2 \n2 \n0. 05* \n0. 5 \n\n0. 05* \n(3) \n2 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 06* \n(3) \n0. 5 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. O5* \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. O2* \n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n1 \n10 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n0. 1 \n0. 06* \n(3) \n\n1 \n\n0. 06* \n\n2 \n\n1 \n\n0. 06* \n0. 06* \n2 \n\n\fCroups and excnples of \nproducts to which the M is apply \n\nindividual \n\nAcephate \n\nChlorothalonll \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\nPsstlcids rss \n\ndues and moxlnun reeldue ieveis \n\n[moAa) \n\nChlorpyriphos \n-msthyl \n\nCypsrmsthrin \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs) \n\nDsltonsthrin \n\nFenvalerate \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs) \n\nGlyphosate \n\nknazalll \n\nIprodlone \n\nPermsthrln \n(sun of \nIsomers \n\n(2) \n(2) \n2 \n(2) \n0. 01* \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n0. 01* \n\n(2) \n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n(3) \n0. 06* \n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(D \n\n( v i) LEGUME VEGETABLES \n\n(fresh) Beans(wlth pods) \n\nBsans(without poos) \nPeas (with pods) \nPeas(w!thout pods) \nOthers \n( v i l) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n(D \n(D \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n(1) \n0. 02* \n(D \n0. O2* \n0. 02* \n\nAsparagus \nCardoons \nCelery \nFennel \nGlobs artichokes \nLeek \nRhubarb \nOthers \n\n( v i i l) FUNGI \n\n(a) Cultivated \nmushrooms \n(b) Wl Id mushrocms \n\n3. PULSES \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nBeans \nLentils \nPeas \nOthers \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPoppy seed \nSsscms seed \nSunflower seed \nRape seed \nSoya bean \nMjstard \nCotton ssed \nOthers \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEarly and wars potatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Black tea processed from the \nleaves of Camilla sinensis) \n7. HOPS (dried), including hop \npel lets end unconcentroted \npowder \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n(\u2022) \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 5 \n0. 05* \n(3) \n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n(3) \n(3) \n0. 5 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n1 \n\n0. 09* \n\n(3) \n0. 06* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n(4) \n\n30 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n(D \n0. 5 \n(D \n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 2 \n0. 06* \n0. 1 \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 5* \n0. 05* \n0. 1 \n0. 06* \n0. 05* \n\n2 \n(3) \n\n0. 5 \n2 \n0. 06* \n0. 06* \n\n1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n5 \n\n5 \n\n0. 1* \n50 \n\n1 \n0. 1* \n(4) \n0. 1* \n\n10 \n\n10 \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 05* \n\n(4) \n\n5 \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n5 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n<D \n\nO) \n(D \n0. 1 \n0. 5 \n\n(1) \n\n4. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n' \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n(3) \no. \u00bb \n\n0. 4 \n0. 2 \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n\n^ \nVD \n\n\f- 2o-\n\nPsstlcids reeiduss one \n\nmaxlnun reeldue levels \n\n(mgAg) \n\nGroups and exaiples of individual \nproducts to which the MRLs apply \n\nBENOMVL \nCARBEKMZIM \nTHICPHANATE-METHn. sun expreeeed ae \noarbendazim \n\nt*NEB \nmtXBEB \nMETIRAM \nPRCPINEB, ZINEB \neun expreeeed as CSj \n\nMETHtMIDOPHOS \n\nPROCYMIDCNE \n\nVINCLOZaiN \nSun of vinclozolin \nand all metabolites \ncontaining the 3,5 \ndicloroanl I ine moiety, \nexpreeeed as vinclozol ii \n\n1. Fruit, freeh. dried or uncooked \n\npreserved by freezing not \ncontaining added euger; nuts. (i) CITRUS FRUIT \n\n5 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\nGrapefruit \nLemons \nLimes \nMandarins (incl. Clementines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPumnslo \nOthers \n\n(ii) TREE NUTS \n(shelled or Almonds \nunshslled) Brazil nute \nCashew nute \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazelnuts \nMocodomia \nPecans \nPine nute \nPletochloe \nWolnuts \nOthere \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(ill) P OC FRUIT \n\n2 \n\nApples \nPeore \nQuinces \nOthers \n\n(iv) STONE FRUIT \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPeaches (incl. nectarines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(4) \n(4) \n\n(4) \n0. 1* \n\n2 \n\n2 \n1 \n2 \n\n1 \n0. 05* \n\n(v) BERRIES AN) SMNX FRUIT \n\n(a) Table and wine grapes \n\n(4) \n\n2 \n\nTable grapes \nWine grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other than wi Id) \n(c) Cane fruit (other \n\nthan wild) \nBlackberries \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthers \n\n2 \n\n(4) \n\n2 \n\n(3) \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n0. 01* \n\n1 \n\n2 \n0. 5 \n2 \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n5 \n\n5 \n\n5 \n\n(D \n(D \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n\n5 \n\n5 \n\n10 \n0. 02* \n\n\f- Z'? -\n\nPeetlcids reslduss and maxImm residue leveli \n\n(ma/kg) \n\nCroupe and exaiples of Individual \nproducts to which ths MRLs apply \n\nBENGMVL \nCARBEKMZIM \nTHICPHAmTEHyETHYL \neun expressed as \ncarbendazlm \n\nMMNEB \nMWGOZEB \nMETIRtM \nPRCPINEB. ZINEB \neun expreeeed as C&g \n\nMETHAMIDCPHOS \n\nPRCCYMIDONE \n\nVINCLOZOLIN \nSun of vlnclozolin \nand all metabolites \ncontaining the 3,5-\ndlcloroani 1 tne moiety, \nexpreeeed as vincloaol in \n\n(d) Other small fruit \n\nand berries (other \nthan wild) \nBllberrlee \n\n(fruit of species \nvaoclntue myrt 11 lus) \nCranberreie \nCur rante (red, black \nand white) \nGooseberries \nOthere \n\n(e) Wild berries and \nwild fruit \n\n(vi) MISCELLANEOUS \n\nAAp^ooodoB \nBOTHTtOS \n\nDates \nFigs \nKiwi \n\nKunauate \nLltchls \nMangoes \nOlives (table coneurptlon) \nWives (oil extraction) \nPassion fruit \nPineapples \nPomegranate \nOthere \n\n2. Vegetables, freeh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n\n(1) ROOT AND TUBER VGQETABLES \n\nBeetroot \nOar rote \nCelerlac \nHoree radish \nJerusalem artichokes \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \nSwedes \nTurnips \nYam \nOthers \n\n(II) BULB VEGETABLES \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShol lots \nSpring onions \nOthere \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02* \n\n5 \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n5 \n\n10 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n1 \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(4) \n(4) \n\n(4) \n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n(3) \n0. 2 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\no. os* \n\n1 \n\n\f- 2Z -\n\nPsstlcids residues and maximum reeldue levels \n\n(moAg) \n\nGroups and exaiples of \nIndividual \nproducts to which ths MRLs apply \n\nBENOMtL \nCARBEKMZIM \nTHICfHANATE-METHTL \neun expressed as \noarbendazim \n\nWNEB \nMWOOZEB \nMETIRAM \nPRCPINEB. ZINEB \nsun expreeeed ae CS? \n\nMETWMIOCPH06 \n\nPRCCYMIDCNE \n\nVINXOZCLIN \nSun of vinclozol in \n\nand o il metabolites \ncontaining ths 3. 5-\ndiclorocnt 1 ine moiety, \nexpreeeed as vinclozolin \n\n( i l l) FRUITING \n\n( a) Solonooso \nTomatoes \nPeppers \nAuberginee \n\nOthere \n\n(b) Oucurblto - edible peel \n\nCucuitoere \nGherkins \nCourgettee \nOthere \n(c) Cucurbits - \nMelons \nSquashes \nWatermelons \nOthere \n(d) Sweet corn \n\ninedible peel \n\n( I v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(a) Flowering Brasslcas \n\nBroccoli \nCauliflower \n\nOthere \n\n(b) Head Brasslcas \n\nBrussels sprouts \nHead ntoh^p* \nOthere \n\n(c) Leafy Brass loos \nChinese cabbage \n\nKale \nOthere \n\n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n( v) LEAF VEGETABLES AND FRESH HERBS \n\n(a) Lettuce * ekni lor \n\nCreee \nLaito'e lettuce \nLettuce \nScarole \n\nOthers \n\n(b) Spinach * skid lor \n\nBset leaves (chord) \n\n(c) Water creee \n(d) Wit loot \n(e) Herbs \n\nChervil \nChives \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \n\nOthere \n\n1 \n\n1 \n0. 5 \n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n\n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n3 \n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n0. 1* \n\n2 \n\n0. 5 \n\n(3) \n(3) \n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n( 3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n5 \n5 \n0. 06* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n0. 2 \n\n1 \n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n\n( 2) \n0. 2 \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n1 \n\n0. 0 1* \n0. 0 1* \n\n2 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n3 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(2) \n\n0. 5 \n\n( 2) \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 0 1* \n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 0 1* \n0. 01* \n\n(D \n5 \n5 \n5 \n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n2 \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n5 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n2 \n0. 05* \n\n\fT \n\n- \n\nZl! \n\nCroups and exorplee of \nproducts to which ths I4\u00ab. s apply \n\nindividual \n\nBENCMYL \n\nCARBEKMZIM \n\nMWEB \n\nMtNDCZEB \n\nMETHtMIDOPHOS \n\nPRCCYMIDONE \n\nPesticide reslduss andmaxlnun rssldus Isveli \n\n(moAa) \n\nTHIOPHtt*ATE-*ETHYL \n\nMETIR4M \n\ne un e x p r e e e ed as \n\nPRCPINEB. ZIMEB \n\nc a r b s n d a z im \n\ne un e x p r e e e ed as C Sj \n\nVIMX0ZCLIN \nSun of vinclozol in \nand a ll metabolite* \ncontaining the 3 , 5-\ndlcloroani 1 ine moiety, \nexpressed as vinclozolin \n\n( v i) LEGUME VEGETABLES (freeh) \n\n(3) \n\n(2) \n\nBeans (with pods) \nBscra (without pods) \nPeae (with pods) \n\nPeas (without pods) \nOthers \n\n( v l i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\nAsparagus \nCarobons \nCelery \n\nFennel \n\nGlobe artlchokee \nLeek \nRhubarb \n\nOthers \n\n( v l l l) FUNGI \n\na) Cultivated mushrooms \nb) Wl Id mushrooms \n\n3. PULSES \n\nBeans \n\nLentils \nPeas \nOthers \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nLIneeed \nPeanuts \nPoppy seed \nSee one eeed \nSunflower eeed (with sN \nSunflower eeed (without \nRape eeed \nSoya bean \nMustard \nCotton seed \nOthers \n\nH I) \nshell) \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEarly and ware \npotatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Block tea pro cess id from the \nleaves of Camellia sinensis) \n\n7. HOPS ( d r i e d ), \n\nincluding hop \n\n(4) \n(4) \n(4) \n(4) \n0. 1* \n\n( 4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n1 \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1* \n\n( 4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n2 \n(D \n(D \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n\n2 \n\n(3) \n1 \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n1 \n1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n(2) \n0. 0 1* \n\n(2) \n0. 01* \n\n0. 1 \n0. 01* \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\npellete end unconcentrated powder \n\n(4) \n\n25 \n\n2 \n\n0. 1* \n\n40 \n\n\f- 2 4-\n\nPesticide residues andmaxlwun reeidue levele (moAg) \n\nGroups and exoiples of individual \nproducts to which the wflLe apply \n\nALORIN \nDIELDRIN (HOED) \nsingly or combined, \nexpreeeed as \ndleldrln (HOED) \n\nDDT \n\n(eunof DDT-, DTE-\nand DDE-learners, \nexpresssd as DDT) \n\nENDOSULFAM \n(sun of olpha- and \nbeto-lecmere and of \nendosulfan sulphate, \nexpressed as \n\nI fan) \n\nHEXACK. CRCCYCLO-\nHEXANE (HCH) \nalpha- and beto-\nI \n\nHEXACH-CfOCYCLCHEXANE \n\n( \u00ab H) \n\ngcmro-leamer (lindane) \n\n1. F r u i t, fresh, dried or uncooked \n\npreserved by freezing not \ncontaining added sugar; nuts. ( I) CITRUS FRUIT \n\n0. 05* \n\nGrapefruit \nLemons \nLbnss \nMandarins ( I n c l. clemsntlnss and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPutmslo \nOthere \n\n( i t) TREE NUTS \n\n(shelled or Almonds \n\nlied) Brazil nute \nCashew nute \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazslnuts \nMocadomla \n\nPins nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthere \n\n(III) PCME FRUIT \n\nApplee \nPeace \nQuinces \nOthere \n\n(iv) STONE FRUIT \n\nApricote \nCherries \nPeachee (incl. nsctorinss and \nsimilar hybrids) \n\nPlum \nOthere \n\n( v) BERRIES AN) SbtfLL FRUIT \n\n(a) Table and wine grapes \n\nTable grapes \nWine grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other than wl Id) \n(c) Cans f r u it (other \n\nthan wl Id) \nBloakberriee \nD\u2014tier r lee \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthere \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n\f- 2 _T_ \n\nPesticide residues and maximum residus levels (mgAg) \n\nindividual \nCroups and exaiplee of \nproducts to which the MRLe apply \n\nALDRIN \nDIELDRIN (HOED) \nsingly or combined. expressed as \ndleldrin \n\nDDT \n(sun of DDT-, DTE-\nand DDE -Isomere, \nexpressed as DDT) \n\nEKDSULFAN \n(sun of olpha- and \nbsto-l earners and of \nendbsulfan sulphate. expressed as \nendoeulfan) \n\nHEXACH. CRCCYCL0-\nHEXANE ( \u00ab H) \nalpha- and beto-\nleamsre \n\nItXAChLCROCriCLCHEXANi \n\n(HCH) \n\nejaimo-iecrner (lindane) \n\n(d) Other \u2022 n a il f r u it \n\nand berries (other \nthan wild) \n\nBilberries \n( f r u it of species \n\nvacclnlunm/rtillus) \nCranberrele \n\nCurrants ( r e d. black \nand white) \nOoossbsrrlee \nOthere \n\n(e) Wild berries end \nwild f r u it \n\n( v l) MISCELLANEOUS \n\n0. 05* \n\nAdvocados \n\nBontTsOei \nDotes \nFigs \nKiwi \nKunquote \nLltchle \nMangpee \n\n( t a b le ooneuiption) \n( o il extraction) \n\nOlives \nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \n\nPomegranate \nOthere \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n\n(1) ROOT AND TUBER VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\nBeetroot \nOar rote \nCeleries \nHaree radish \nJerusalem a rt ichokes \nPorenlp \nPareley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \n\nSweet Potatoes \nSwedes \nTurnips \nVan \n\nOthere \n\n( I I) BULB VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShallots \nSpring anions \nOthers \n\n\f2Q-\n\nPssticids reeiduee ant \n\n1 maxlnun reeldue levels \n\n( m g / k a) \n\nCroups and exorplee of \nIndividual \nproducte to which the MRLe apply \n\nAUK IN \nOIELORIN \nsingly or combined. expressed as \ndisldrin (HOED) \n\nDDT \n(sun of DOT-. DTE-\nand DCC-I earnere. expreseed as DDT) \n\nENDOSULFAN \n\nHEXACHLOROCYCLO-\n\nHEXACH. CRCCTICLCHEXANE \n\n( e un of a l p h a- a nd \n\nHEXANE (HCH) \n\n(HCH) \n\nb e t o - i e c m e re and of \n\na l p h a- a nd b e t o-\n\ngarma-isamsr \n\n( l i n d a n e) \n\ne n d o s u l f an s u l p h a t e. ieomere \n\ne x p r e s s ed as \n\ne n d o s u l f a n) \n\n( I I I) FRUITING \n\n0. 05* \n\n(a) Solanaceo \nTcmatoss \nPeppere \n\nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits - edible peel \n\nCucuitosrs \nGherkins \nCourgettes \nOthers \n( c) Cucurbits - \nMelons \nSquashes \nWat enne lone \n\nOthers \n(d) Sweet corn \n\nInedible peel \n\n( i v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n( a) Flowering Brassleas \n\n0. 05* \n\nBroccoli \nCaul if lower \nOthers \n\n(b) Head Brossloas \n\nBrussels sprouts \n\n\u00bb\u2022 \n\n\u2022 \n\n11 I S B l ll \u2022\u2022 \n\n\u2022\u2022 \n\nliBOCJ CCK>Og> \nOthers \n\n(c) Leafy Brass icas \nChinese cohboge \n\nKale \nOthere \n\n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES AND FRESH HERBS \n\n0. 06* \n\n(a) Lettuce ft ebid 1 or \n\nCress \nLotto's lettuce \n\nLettuce \nScorole \n\nOthere \n\n(b) Sbinach ft similar \n\nBsst leaves (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n\n(d) Wltloof \n( s) Herbs \n\nChsrvil \nChives \n\nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthere \n\n\f- \n\n21-\n\nPesticide residues end moxlrrun residue levels (moAq) \n\nGroups and exawplee of Individual \nproducts to which ths MLs apply \n\nALORIN \nDiaORIN (HOED) \nsingly or combined, \nexpressed as \ndleldrln (HOED) \n\nDDT \n(eunof DDT-, DTE*-\nand DDE-iecmere, \nexprssssd as DDT) \n\nEND09ULFAN \n(sun of alpha- and \nbeto-iecmere and of \nendgeulfan sulphate, \n\nrBWCHLCROCYCLO-\nHEXANE (HCH) \nalpha- and beta-\nI \n\nH E X A C H L C R X T T C L C H E X A NE \n\n(hCH) \n\ngarmo-leamer \n\n( l i n d a n e) \n\nI fan) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n( v i) LEGUME VEGETABLES (fresh) \n(with pods) \n(without pods) \n\nPeas (with pods) \nPeas (without pods) \nOthere \n\n( v i l) STEM VEGETABLES \nAsparagus \nCardoons \nCelery \nFennel \n\nGlobe artichokes \nLeek \nRhubarb \nOthers \n\n( v l i i) FUNGI \n\na) Cultivated mushrooms \nb) Wt Id mushrooms \n\n3. PULSES \n\nLentils \nPeas \nOthers \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPoppy ssed \n\nSunflower eeed (with ehell) \nSunflower eeed (without ehell) \n\nSoya bean \nMustard \nCotton ess \nOthere \n\n5. POTATOES \n\n0. 06* \n\nEarly and wore \npotatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Block tea processed from the \nleaves of Cornel I la einenele) \n\n7. HOPS ( d r i e d ), including hap \n\npellete and unconcentrated powder \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 2 \n\n30 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 06* \n\n\fGroups and exaiplee of individual \nproducts to which the M\u00ab. s apply \n\nAmi t role \n\nAtrazlne \n\nBincpacryl \n\nBiphentrln \n\nBrorophofr \nethyl \n\nBremopropylate Oortap \n\nCopt of oI \n\n(expressed \nae free bass) \n\nCyholothrin \n(sun of \n\nIsomers) \n\nChlordane \n(sun of els-ft \ntrans-! earners) \n\nDlchlor prop \n\nPesticide residues ondmoximm residue levels (mgyfcfl) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n1. Fruit, fresh, dried or uncooked \n\npreserved by freezing not \ncontaining added sugar; nuts, \n\n(i) CITRUS FRUIT \n\nGrapefruit \nLemons \nLimes \nMandarins (Incl. Clementines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPuimslo \nOthers \n\n(it) TREE NUTS \n(shel Isd or Almonds \n\nlied) \n\nBrail I nuts \nCashew nuts \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazelnuts \nMacedonia \n\nPins nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthers \n\n(III) POVE FRUIT \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\nApples \nPeare \nQuinces \nOthsrs \n\n(tv) STONE FRUIT \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(M \n\nApricots \nCherriss \nPsochss (incl. nectarines and \nsbnilor hybrids) \nPlums \nOthsrs \n\n(v) BERRIES AN) SMALL FRUIT \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(a) Table and wine \n\nSESESL \nTable grapes \nWins grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other tharTwtld) \n\n(c) Cane fruit \n\n(other than wild) \nBlackberries \nDswbsrriss \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthsrs \n\n\fGroups end exoiplss of Individual \nproducts to which ths MO apply \n\nAmitrole \n\nAtrazine \n\nBlnopocryl \n\nBlphentrin \n\nBrofflophotj^ \nethyl \n\nBrcmaprcpy late Cortap \n\nCopt of o I \n\nCyholothrln \n\n(expressed \nas free bass) \n\n(sun of \nisomers) \n\nChlordane \n(eunof c i e - ft \ntrens-iscmsrs) \n\nDlchlorprop \n\nPesticide residues andmaxlnun residue levels (mpAfl) \n\n(d) Other t o ll \n\nfruit \n\nand berries (other \nthan wl Id) \nBilberries \n(fruit of species \nvaccln iun nyrt 11 lus) \nCranberries \nCurrants (rsd. black \nand white) \nGooseberries \nOthers \nWild berries end \nwild fruit \n\n(\u2022) \n\n( v l) MIS03XANECU5 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\nAdVococbs \n\nDates \nFigs \nKiwi \nKunquots \nLitchls \n\nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPcfflsgranats \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n( i) ROOT AN) TUBER VEGETABLES \n\nBeetroot \nCarrots \nCslsrlae \nHorse radish \nJerusalem artichoke \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \nSwsdss \nTurnips \nYon \nOthers \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(11) BULB VEGETABLES \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShol lots \nSpring onions \nOthers \n\n\fGroups end examples of Individual \nproducte to which the MLe apply \n\nAmitrole \n\nAtrazine \n\nBincpacryl \n\nBlphentrln \n\nBrcmophoe\u2014 \nethyl \n\nBromapropy I ate Cartap \n\nCaptafol \n\nCyhalothrin \n\n(expressed \nas frss bass) \n\n(sun of \nIsamsrs) \n\nChlordane \n(sun of e l s- ft \ntrans-lscmsrs) \n\nDlchlor prop \n\nPesticide residue* ondmaxlnun residue levele (ma/kg) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0 \n\n( i l l) \n\nFRUITINS \n\n(a) Solanoceo \nTcmotoss \n\nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\npeel \nCucuitosrs \nGherkins \nCourgsttss \nOthers \n\n(c) Cucurbits Inedible \n\npssl_ \nMelons \nScwashes \nIntot #nv\u00bbt Ions \nOthsrs \n(d) Sweet corn \n( i v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(o) Flowering BrassIcos \n\nBroccoli \nCaul If lower \nOthsrs \n\n(b) Head BrassIces \n\nBrussels Sprouts \nHsad cabbags \nOthere \n\n(c) Leafy Brass loos \nChinese cobbaue \nKals \nOthers \n\n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES \n\nAND FRESH HERBS \n\n(o) Lettuce ft similar \n\nCrsss \nLamb's lettuce \nLettuce \nScarole \nOthere \n\n(b) Splnoch ft similar \n\nBeet leaves (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n(d) Witloof \n(e) Herbs \n\nChsrvtl \nChives \nPorslsy \nCelery Le \nOthers \n\n\findividual \nGroups and examples of \nproducte to which the MRLs apply \n\nAmi trole \n\nAtrazlne \n\nBlnopoeryl \n\nBlphentrln \n\nBrujiuphos* \nsthyl \n\nBrcmopropy 1 ate \n\nOartap \n(expressed \nas f rss base) \n\nCqptafol \n\nCyhalothrln \n\n(sun of \niscmsrs) \n\nChlordans \n(sun of e l s - ft \ntrcns-lscmsrs) \n\nDlehlorprop \n\n( v i) LEDLME VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 05* \n\nPesticlds rss \n\ndues andmaxlnun residue levele \n\nma/kg) \n\n(fresh) Bsons(wlth pods) \n\nBsans(without pods) \nPsas (with pods) \nPsas(without pods) \nOthsrs \n\n( v i i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\nAsparagus \nCardoons \nCslsry \nFennel \nGlobe artichokes \nLssk \nRhubarb \nOthsrs \n\n( v i i i) FUNGI \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(a) Cultivated \nnushrocms \n\n(b) WJ Id mushrooms \n\n3. PULSES \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\nBsans \nLentHe \nPeas \nOthsrs \n\n4, OIL SEEDS \n\n0. 05* \n\n0,T\u00bb \n\n0. 05* \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPappy sssd \nSssam sssd \nSunflower sssd \nRape eeed \nSoya bean \nMjstard \nCotton sssd \nOthers \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEar ly and wars potatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Brack tea processed from the \nleaves of Cornellio sinensis) \n7. HOPS (dried), including hop \npel lets end unooncentrated \npowder \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\nO J* \n\nC4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05. 0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\nOJXb* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n-\n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0*05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(*7 \n\n0vO2* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n20 \n\n-^l \n\n</0 \n\nJ \n\n\fDlchiorvos Oicofol \n\nDbnethcote \n\nDlnossb \n\nDioxothion \n\nEndrln \n\nEthylene \n\ndibrcmtds \n\nEthlon \n\nFenehlor-\nphos \n\nFen Itrothion Flucythrinote \n\nPestlctds residue* ondmaxlnun residue levels (moAfl) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n\\ \n\nGroups and sxaiples of \nproducts to which ths M is apply \n\nIndividual \n\n1. Fruit, fresh, dried or uncooked \n\npreserved by freezing not \ncontaining added sugar; nuts, \n\n( i) CITRUS FRUIT \n\nGrapefruit \nLemons \nLimes \nMandarins ( i n c l. Clementines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPumwlo \nOthers \n\n( i i) TREE NUTS \n\n(shsllsdor Almonds \nunshsllsd) Brazil nuts \nCashew nuts \nChsstnuts \nCoconuts \nHazelnuts \n\nPins nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthers \n\n(111) PO\u00a3 FRUIT \n\nApplss \n\nQuinces \nOthers \n\n( I v) STONE FRUIT \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPeachss ( i n c l. nsctarinss and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(v) BERRIES AND SMMJL FRUIT \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(a) Table and wine \n\nSESS. Table grapes \nWins grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(othsr thanwlld) \n\n(c) Cone fruit \n\n(other than wild) \nBlackberries \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberriss \nOthsrs \n\n\fDlchlorvce Dlcofol \n\nDbmthoote \n\nDlnoeeb \n\nDIOMOthlon \n\nEndrln \n\nEthylene \n\nEthlen \n\ndlbraidds \n\nFenchlor-\nphoo \n\nFen I troth ion Flucythrlnotel \n\nPesticide residues cndmaxlnun reeldue levele (moAg) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\nO. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nOJ \nV/O \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n|Croups and sxarplss of \nIndividual \nproducte to which the MRU apply \n\n(d) Othsr smal I fruit \n\nand berries (other \nthan wild) \nBilberries \n( f r u it of species \nvacciniun nyrti I lus) \nCranberries \nCurrants (rsd, block \nand whits) \nGooseberries \nOthsrs \n\n(s) Wild bsrriss and \nwild f r u it \n\n( v i) MISCELLANEOUS \n\nAoVocodos \n\nDatss \n\nKiwi \nKunauots \nLltchls \n\nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPomegranate \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n( I) ROOT AND TUBER VEGETABLES \n\nBeetroot \nCorrote \nCelerlac \nHxss radish \nJsrusalsm artichoke \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \n\nTurnips \nYam \nOthsrs \n\n( I I) BULB VEGETABLES \n\nGarlic \nChions \nShallots \nSt>rinQ onions \nOthers \n\n\fGroups end sxorplee of Indlviduol \nproducts to which the eRLe apply \n\nDlchlorvos Dlcofol \n\nDbmthoate \n\nDlnoseb \n\nDloxothlon \n\nEndrin \n\nEthylene \n\nEthlon \n\ndlbrcmlds \n\nPsstlctds residues cndmnclnun residue Isvele (mpAg) \n\n(ill) PRUITIN3 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nFenltrothlan Flucythrlnate \n\nFsnchlor-\nphos \n\n0. 01* \n\n(a) Solanaceo \nTanatoes \nPeppers \nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\nCucuiDsrs \nGhsrkins \nCourgsttss \nOthsrs \n\n(c) Cucurbits Inedible \n\nMslons \nSaucshe* \nWatsnnslons \nOthsrs \n(d) Swsst corn \n(iv) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(a) Flowering BrassIc \n\nBroccoli \nCauliflower \nOthers \n(b) Head Bros*It \n\nBrussels Sprouts \n\nOthsrs \n\n(c) Lsafy Brassloos \nChinese oabbags \nKale \nOthers \n( d) Kohlrabi \n\n( v) LEAF VEGETABLES \n\nAN) FRESH HERBS \n\n(a) Lettuce ft stml lor \n\nCrese \nLamb's lettuce \nLettuce \nScorole \nOthers \n\n(b) Spinach ft similar \n\nBest leaves (chard) \n\n(c) Water crsss \n(d) Wit loot \n(s) herbs \n\nChervil \nChives \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthsrs \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n) \n\nJ \n\n\fDlchlorvos Dlcofol \n\nDbnsthoats \n\nDlnoeeb \n\nDloxathlcn \n\nEndrin \n\nEthylene \n\nEthicn \n\ndlbrcmids \n\nPesticide residues cndmoxlmjn residue levels (mgAfl) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nFsnitrothlon Flucythrlnate \n\nFenehlor-\nphos \n\n0. 01* \n\nGroups aid example* of \nIndividual \nproducts to which ths MtLs apply \n\n(vi) LEGUME VEGETABLES \n\n(fresh) Beane(with pods) \n\nBeans(wlthout poos) \nPsas (with pods) \nPsas(without pods) \nOthers \n\n( v i i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nAsparagus \nCar ebons \nCelery \nFennel \nGlobe artichokes \nLeek \nftuborb \nOthers \n\n( v i l i) FUNDI \n\n(a) Cultivated \nnushrocms \n(b) W1 Id nushrocms \n\n3. PULSES \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nLent lie \n\nOthere \n\nLlneeed \nPeanuts \nPoppy sssd \nSssam sssd \nSunflower seed \nRape eeed \nSoya bean \nMustard \nCotton ssed \nOthers \n\nPOTATOES \n\nEarly and ware potatoes \n\nTEA \n(Black tsa processed f rem the \nleaves of Camel Ilo sinensis) \nHOPS (dried). Including hop \npellets and unconcentroted \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n\fHsMoch loroMTCMns | \n\nMolothlon \n\nMalelc hydrozide Msthidothlon Mithyl brcmlds \n\nOntthOQt0 \n\nPofOCJLKlt \n\nProfonofoQ \n\n(WB) \n\nPesticide residue* andmaxliiun residue levels (mpAq) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\nGroups end sxcmplss of \nproducts to which t he MRLs a p p ly \n\ni n d i v l d u ol \n\nHsptochlor \n( s un of \nhsptachlor \n\nend \n\nhsptachlor \nepoxide) \n\n1. F r u i t, \n\nf r e s h, d r i ed or uncooked \n\npreserved by f r e e z i ng not \n\nc o n t a i n i ng added s u g a r; nuts \n\n( 1) CITRUS FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\nG r a p e f r u it \n\nLemons \n\nLimes \n\nMandarins \n\n( I n c l. clement I nee end \n\ns i m i l ar h y b r i d s) \n\nOranges \n\nP o m e lo \n\nOthers \n\n( i t) TREE NUTS \n\n( s h s l l s d or \n\nAlmond* \n\nl i e d) \n\nB r a z il n u ts \n\n0. 01* \n\nCashew n u te \n\nChestnuts \n\nCoconuts \n\nHazelnute \n\nP i ne nuts \n\nP i s t a c h i os \nWalnuts \nOthere \n\n( i l l) POC FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\nApples \nPears \nQuinces \nOthers \n\n( I v) STONE FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPooches (Incl. nectar inee and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(v) BERRIES AND SMALL FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(a) Table end wins \n\ngrapes \nTable crapes \nWins grape* \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other thcnwlld) \n\n(c) Cane fruit \n\n(other than wild) \nBlockbsrriee \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthere \n\n\fGroups and excmples of Individual \nproducts to which the M is apply \n\nHwoch lorobtvieWnt) \n(KB) \n\nHsptochlor \n(sun of \nhsptochlor \nond \nhsptochlor \nepoxide) \n\nPesticide roe I dues and maxlnvn residue levels (moAg) \n\nMolothlon \n\nMolele hydrozlde Msthldothion \n\nMethyl bremlds MDnocrotophoa Cmethoote \n\nParaquat | Phoxbn \n\nProfenofos \n\n(d) Other small fruit \n\nand berries (other \nthen wild) \nBilberries \n( f r u it of specie* \nvccelnlun myrti I lus) \nCrertoerries \nCurrants (rsd, block \nend whits) \nGooseberries \nOthers \n\n(s) Wild berries and \nwild f r u it \n\n( v i) MISCELLANEOUS \n\n0. 01* \n\nActoctxte \nBononos \nDote* \nFlos \nKiwi \nKunquate \nLitchis \n\nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPemsgranots \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n(I) ROOT AN) TUBER VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\nBeetroot \nCar rote \nCelerlac \ntorse radish \nJerusalem artichokes \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \n\nTurnips \nYon \nOthers \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n\\ \n\n(II) BULB VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShallots \nSpring onions \nOthers \n\n\fPestle Ids rsslduss ondmaxlnun residue Isvele (moAfl) \n\nMaleic hydrazide Mrthldothlen \n\nMethyl bramids Mmrotophos Onethoote \n\nParaquat \n\nPhOKbn \n\nProfenofos \n\nHsMoch lor ob*Vmton#| \n(MCB) \n\nMotathlon \n\nHsptocblor \n(sun of \nhsptoehlor \nend \nheptochlor \nspoxias) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\nGroups end exenples of Individual \nproducte to which the M le apply \n\n(HI) FRUITING \n\n(a) Solanocea \nTanatoes \nPeppers \nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\nSSSL \nCucuitoere \nGherkins \nCourgsttss \nOthers \n\n(c) Cucurbits insdlbls \n\nMslcns \nSquashes \nWot srms Ions \nOthsrs \n(d) Sweet com \n( i v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(a) Flowering Braeelc \n\nDroccoli \nCauliflower \nOthere \n\n(b) Head Braeelc \n\nBrussels Sprouts \n\nOthsrs \n\n(c) Leafy Brassloos \nChinese cabbage \nKale \nOthers \n\n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES \nAND FRESH HERBS \n\n(a) Lettuce ft slmi lor \n\n0. 01* \n\nCress \nLotto's lettuce \nLettuce \nScarole \nOthsrs \n\n(b) Spinach ft similar \n\nBsst Isaves (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n(d) Wltloof \n(s) Hsrbs \n\nChervil \nChives \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthsrs \n\n\fGroups end examples of individual \nproducts to which the M is apply \n\nnMOCh loroMnzon91 \n(K\u00bb) \n\nMslathian \n\nHsptcchlor \n(sun of \nhsptcchlor \nand \nheptochlor \nepoxide) \n\nPesticide roolduss and maximum residue levels (mcyVg) \n\nMalelc hydroxide Mrthldothlcn \n\nMethyl bromide MDnocrc*ophos Cmsthoots \n\nParoquet \n\nPhoxbn \n\nProfenofoo \n\n( v l) LEGUME VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\n(fresh) Beans(wlth pods) \n\nBeans(wlthout poos) \nPeas (with pods) \nPsas(without pods) \nOthers \n\n( v i i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\nAsparagus \nCar doom \nCelery \nFennel \nGlobe artichokes \nLeek \nRhubarb \nOthers \n\n( v l i i) FUNGI \n\n(a) Cultivated \n\nffUBhrocffloi \n\n(b) Wl Id \n\n3. PULSES \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nLentils \nPsas \nOthers \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\n0. 01* \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPoppy sssd \nSesoms ssed \nSunflower ssed \nRope seed \nSoya bean \nMustard \nCotton seed \nOthers \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEarly and wore potatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Black tea processed from the \nleaves of Cemelllo sinensis) \n\n7. HOPS (drisd), including hop \npel lets and unconcsntrated \npowder \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02 \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01 \n\n(4) \n\nSO \n1* early potatoee \n1. (4) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 06* \n\nK3 \n\n(4) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n<*) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 06* \n\n\fProporglte Qulnolphos \n\nTEPP \n\nToKcphsns \n\n2. 4,5-T \n\nPhosmet \n\nPestle id* rssiduss end maxinun rssidus levels (moAg) \n\n(sun of choemst \nand its oxygen \nanalogue) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\nGroups and exenples of \nproducts to which ths M is apply \n\nindividual \n\n1. Fruit, fresh, drisdor uncooked \n\npreeerved by freezing not \ncontaining added sugar; nuts. (1) CITRUS FRUIT \n\nGrapefruit \nLenone \nLbnss \nMandarins ( I n c l. Clementines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPuimslo \nOthers \n\n( i i) TREE NUTS \n\n(shelled or Almond* \nunshsllsd) Brazil nuts \nCashew nuts \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazslnuts \nMacedonia \nPecans \nPins nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthers \n\n( i i i) POVE FRUIT \n\nApples \nPsors \nQuinces \nOthers \n\n( I v) STONE FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPeaches ( I n c l. nsctarinss and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(v) BERRIES AN) SMALL FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(a) Table and wine \n\n7\u00b0P\u00bb\u00bb \nTable grapes \nWins grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(othsr thai wl Id) \n\n(c) Cane f r u it \n\n(other than wild) \nBlackberries \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthsrs \n\n1 \n\nI \n\nO \n\n\fGroups and examples of Individual \nproducts to wMeh the M is apply \n\nPraporglte Ouinalphos \n\nTEPP \n\nToxaphene \n\n2. 4. 5-* \n\nPhosmet \n(sun of \nand its oxygen \nanalogue) \n\nPesticide residues crtdmaxlnun reeidue levele (mpAo) \n\n(d) Other smol I f r u it \nand berries (other \nthan wl Id) \nBilberries \n( f r u it of species \nvacciniun rryrti I lus) \nCranberries \nCurrants (rsd, block \nand shits) \nGooseberries \nOthers \n\n(s) Wild bsrriss end \nwild f r u it \n\n( v i) MISOELLANEOUS \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\nAtVocodos \nBananas \nDot ss \nFigs \nKiwi \nKunauats \nLitchls \n\nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPomsgranats \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n(I) ROOT AN) TUBER VEGETABLES \n\nBeetroot \nCarrots \nCelerloc \nHoree radish \nJsrusolen artichokes \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \nSwsdss \nTurnips \nYcm \nOthers \n(II) BULB VEGETABLES \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShallots \nSpring onions \nOthers \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n\fGroups and excnplee of individual \nproduete to which the M le apply \n\nPrcporglte Quinalphos \n\nTEPP \n\nTOMsphsVM \n\n2,4. 5-T \n\n(sun of phosmst \nand ite oxygen \nanalogue) \n\n( H i) FRUITING \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\nPesticide rsslduss cndmaxiwun reel due levels (mcAcj) \n\n(a) Solonocoo \nTomatoes \nPeppers \nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\npeel \nCucuitosrs \nGhsrklns \nCourgsttss \nOthers \n\n(c) Cucurbits Inedible \n\npeel. Melons \nSquashes \nWotermelone \nOthsrs \n(d) Swest corn \n( i v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(o) Flowering Br ass I cos \n\nBroccoli \nCauliflower \nOthers \n\n(b) Head Brass I c \n\nBruseels Sprouts \nHsod cabbage \nOthers \n\n(c) Leafy Brass loos \nChinese cabbage \nKals \nOthers \n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES \n\nAND FRESH HERBS \n\n(a) Lettuce ft similar \n\nCress \nLamb's lettuce \nLettuce \nScarole \nOthers \n\n(b) Spinach ft similar \n\nBest Isave* (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n(d) Wltloof \n(s) Herbs \n\nChervil \nChive* \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthsrs \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n\fGroups and examples of Individual \nproducts to which ths M is apply \n\nProporglts \n\nQulnalphos \n\nTEPP \n\nTox0pfMn# \n\n2. 4. 5-T \n\nrTsOeVlwtt \n(sun of phovwt \nand Its oxygen \nonologu\u00ab) \n\nPesticide rsslduss ondmoxlnun residue levels (mcyVg) \n\n( v i) LEGUME VEGETABLES \n\n(fresh) Beons(wlth pods) \n\nBsans(without pods) \nPeae (with poos) \nPeos(without pods) \nOthers \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n( v l i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\nAeparocus \nCar ebons \nCelery \nFennel \nGlobe artichokes \nLeek \nRhubarb \nOthers \n\n( v l i I) FUNGI \n\n(a) Cultivated \n\nnristtnroCsTei \n(b) Wi Id mushroom \n\n3. PULSES \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nLent l ie \nPeas \nOthers \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPoppy seed \nSeeems seed \nSunflower seed \nRape eeed \nSoya bean \nsustard \nCotton sssd \nOthers \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEarly and wars potatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Black tea processed f rem the \nleaves of Camellia sinensis) \n\n7. HOPS (dried), including hap \npel lets and unconcentrated \npowder \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n\u2022 Indicates lower limit of analytical determination. (1)(2)(3)(4) Should levels not be adopted by 1 January 1996, the following rrnxinun levels shall apply as Indicated thereafter: \n\n(1) - 0. 02* \n(2) - 0. 01* \n(3) - 0. 05* \n( 4 ) - 0. 1* \n\nWo \n\n\f-MM -\n\nArticle 3 \n\nMember States shall bring into force not later than 31 December 1992 the \n\nlaws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with this \n\nDirect ive. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to \n\nthis Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of \n\ntheir official publication. The methods of making such a reference shall be \n\nlaid down by the Member states. Art icle 4 \n\nThis Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\n\f- M - 5 \"-\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 161 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-178-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43565-8 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/499f8707-441b-45ff-8b65-6b75813a745b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1099/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with a Commission directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,packaging product", "workIds": "celex:91992E001099", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "packaging product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/499f8707-441b-45ff-8b65-6b75813a745b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2939da91-d13e-4067-b129-8fbc1288c1fb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1082/92 by Mr Jes\u00fas CABEZ\u00d3N ALONSO to the Commission. Vocational training and subsidiarity", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CABEZON ALONSO,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EU aid,European Social Fund,long-term unemployment,professional qualifications,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E001082", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "European Social Fund", "long-term unemployment", "professional qualifications", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2939da91-d13e-4067-b129-8fbc1288c1fb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6b84116e-7bbe-4207-95a2-3fa73c9d3d0d", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 1180/92 of 30 April 1992 fixing a weighting applicable to the remuneration of officials and other servants of the European Communities serving in Munich", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Bavaria,European official,pay,pay rise,regulations for civil servants,servant (EU)", "workIds": "celex:31992R1180,oj:JOL_1992_123_R_0001_013", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Bavaria", "European official", "pay", "pay rise", "regulations for civil servants", "servant (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6b84116e-7bbe-4207-95a2-3fa73c9d3d0d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f579403-ae4a-43d5-bc3d-46c5d645674a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1073/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Bonuses for employees", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Greece,allowances and expenses,civil servant,equal pay,gender equality,incomes policy,maternity leave,pay policy,pay rise,sick leave", "workIds": "celex:91992E001073", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "allowances and expenses", "civil servant", "equal pay", "gender equality", "incomes policy", "maternity leave", "pay policy", "pay rise", "sick leave"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f579403-ae4a-43d5-bc3d-46c5d645674a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b29e5ad0-7b71-4afc-8923-4a0f40424521", "title": "Council Directive 92/32/EEC of 30 April 1992 amending for the seventh time Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "approximation of laws,classification,dangerous substance,labelling,packaging", "workIds": "celex:31992L0032,oj:JOL_1992_154_R_0001_006", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "classification", "dangerous substance", "labelling", "packaging"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b29e5ad0-7b71-4afc-8923-4a0f40424521", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c62495fb-c63d-49fe-8b4a-b5a58e3e986c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1061/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Connection between the use of fuel oil and CO2 emissions in Spain", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Spain,air quality,anhydride,coal,combustion gases,energy consumption,fuel oil,meteorology,petroleum,stratospheric pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001061", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "air quality", "anhydride", "coal", "combustion gases", "energy consumption", "fuel oil", "meteorology", "petroleum", "stratospheric pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c62495fb-c63d-49fe-8b4a-b5a58e3e986c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3662d532-6fb0-4fa2-ba64-285f276e5d82", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1067/92 by Mr Karl von WOGAU to the Commission. Mutual recognition of higher education diplomas -diplomas awarded by German colleges of public administration", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VON WOGAU", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,Germany,higher education,recognition of diplomas", "workIds": "celex:91992E001067", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "Germany", "higher education", "recognition of diplomas"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3662d532-6fb0-4fa2-ba64-285f276e5d82", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf214cfb-ee22-4a93-a88e-2cdf0fbf9179", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1054/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Atlantic ARC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Atlantic Ocean,EU aid,France,Ireland,Portugal,Spain,Structural Funds,United Kingdom,littoral", "workIds": "celex:91992E001054", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Atlantic Ocean", "EU aid", "France", "Ireland", "Portugal", "Spain", "Structural Funds", "United Kingdom", "littoral"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf214cfb-ee22-4a93-a88e-2cdf0fbf9179", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/56c1f508-2224-4d83-9dd0-0182c057d3db", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1123/92 of 30 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1707/90 laying down detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EEC) No 1796/81 concerning imports of mushrooms originating in third countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "import licence,mushroom-growing,preserved product,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992R1123,oj:JOL_1992_117_R_0100_084", "eurovoc_concepts": ["import licence", "mushroom-growing", "preserved product", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/56c1f508-2224-4d83-9dd0-0182c057d3db", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/157a85e4-f78f-4d80-9b0e-8bdf58d7e4e0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1081/92 by Mr Friedrich MERZ to the Commission. Labour market levy in Denmark for importers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MERZ", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Denmark,EC Directive,VAT,import tax,judgment of the Court (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E001081", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "EC Directive", "VAT", "import tax", "judgment of the Court (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/157a85e4-f78f-4d80-9b0e-8bdf58d7e4e0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aac929fb-7936-452a-9a7c-794e58c19b72", "title": "European Social Fund : Community support framework 1990-1992: Objectives 3 and 4: United Kingdom.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EU financing,EU policy,Structural Funds,United Kingdom,development policy", "workIds": "PUB_CM7391009", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "EU policy", "Structural Funds", "United Kingdom", "development policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aac929fb-7936-452a-9a7c-794e58c19b72", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ebb0085-a425-4a5b-a03b-5b951c9461ce", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1088/92 by Mr Reimer B\u00d6GE to the Commission. Use of animal carcases in the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BOEGE,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "agro-industry,animal disease,animal product,carcase,food processing,health control,physical process,veterinary legislation,waste disposal,waste recycling", "workIds": "celex:91992E001088", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agro-industry", "animal disease", "animal product", "carcase", "food processing", "health control", "physical process", "veterinary legislation", "waste disposal", "waste recycling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ebb0085-a425-4a5b-a03b-5b951c9461ce", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9232a8bc-bb94-44ce-82e2-fc5c3f6b8cf0", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1115/92 of 30 April 1992 laying down precautionary measures for fruit and vegetables as regards cauliflowers for the period 1 May to 31 May 1992", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "leaf vegetable,purchase price", "workIds": "celex:31992R1115,oj:JOL_1992_117_R_0078_076", "eurovoc_concepts": ["leaf vegetable", "purchase price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9232a8bc-bb94-44ce-82e2-fc5c3f6b8cf0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0dd25292-84be-47cc-9c1a-ea9919919d77", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1052/92 by Mr Virginio BETTINI to the Commission. Rubbish tip in the Mincio nature part (Lombardy -Italy)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BETTINI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,Lombardy,domestic waste,impact study,nature reserve,waste disposal,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001052", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "Lombardy", "domestic waste", "impact study", "nature reserve", "waste disposal", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0dd25292-84be-47cc-9c1a-ea9919919d77", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/93964af0-ca4e-48cd-b4cd-09953bf485d3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1071/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. European cultural policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Treaty on European Union,artistic creation,copyright,cultural policy,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E001071", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Treaty on European Union", "artistic creation", "copyright", "cultural policy", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/93964af0-ca4e-48cd-b4cd-09953bf485d3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4afe177c-4103-4eb0-85df-649bc5dac65e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1056/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Voluntary bodies and NGOs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EU policy,cooperation policy,interest group,non-governmental organisation,voluntary organisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E001056", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "cooperation policy", "interest group", "non-governmental organisation", "voluntary organisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4afe177c-4103-4eb0-85df-649bc5dac65e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/40ed4915-1c95-413a-95b7-b89fd755febf", "title": "European Social Fund : Community support framework 1990-1992: Objectives 3 and 4: The Netherlands.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EU financing,EU policy,European Social Fund,Netherlands,development policy", "workIds": "PUB_CM7391008", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "EU policy", "European Social Fund", "Netherlands", "development policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/40ed4915-1c95-413a-95b7-b89fd755febf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/982447ed-dce2-48ed-a0c2-e6ff404f84e2", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92 of 30 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self- employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "dependant,disabled person,discrimination on the basis of nationality,migrant worker,self-employed person,self-employment,social assistance,social-security benefit,wage earner", "workIds": "celex:31992R1247,oj:JOL_1992_136_R_0001_005", "eurovoc_concepts": ["dependant", "disabled person", "discrimination on the basis of nationality", "migrant worker", "self-employed person", "self-employment", "social assistance", "social-security benefit", "wage earner"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/982447ed-dce2-48ed-a0c2-e6ff404f84e2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/481a14a5-fb03-48bb-9dba-7ac9aedd3a44", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending the Annexes to Council Directives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC on the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on cereals and foodstuffs of animal origin respectively", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "animal product,cereals,food inspection,pesticide residue", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0161(01),comnat:COM_1992_0161(01)_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["animal product", "cereals", "food inspection", "pesticide residue"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/481a14a5-fb03-48bb-9dba-7ac9aedd3a44", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 161 final \n\nBrussels, 30 April 1992 \n\nK1 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending the Annexes to Council Directives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC \n\non the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues \n\nin and on cereals and foodstuffs of animal origin respectively \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum \n\nlevels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables and the Annex to \n\nDirective 90/642/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide \n\nresidues in and on certain products of plant origin, including fruit and \n\nvegetables and providing for the establishment of a first list of maximum \n\nlevels \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f- 2 -\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nWith the progressive adoption over the period 1986-1990 of Community \n\nframework measures for the establishment of mandatory maximum pesticide \n\nresidue levels (MRLs) in cereals (Directive 86/362/EEC*1)), foodstuffs of \n\nanimal origin (Directive 86/363/EEC<2>) and in fruit and vegetables and \n\nother products of plant origin (Directive 90/642/EEC<3>), the Community now \n\nhas the possibility to establish harmonized MRLs simultaneously for \n\nindividual pesticides in most major components of the diet, taking into \n\naccount total dietary intake of pesticide residues at Community level when \n\nestablishing the MRLs. Whilst an early review of the functioning of these various measures was \n\nenvisaged at the time of the adoption of the 1986 Directives, there has in \n\nfact been insufficient experience of their operation. Furtheremore, \n\nDirective 91/414/EEC^4^ concerning the authorization and placing on the \n\nmarket of plant protection products, adopted in 1991, contains further \n\nprovisions relating to the fixing of maximum residue levels, not foreseen in \n\n1986, which will come into force only in 1993. The Commission considers that under these circumstances and in order to \n\nfacilitate the proper working of the internal market it is important that \n\nharmonized maximum residue levels be established as quickly as possible \n\nunder existing legislation. It is the Commission's intention to establish, \n\non an annual basis, a priority list of pesticides not previously harmonized \n\nunder Community pesticide residue legislation; the present proposals \n\nconstitute, inter alia, the result of the first list. The principal aims of the proposals are as follows: \n\n1. To establish Community MRLs for 22 major pesticides which may \n\nleave residues in food and have not been previously covered by \n\nharmonized Community legislation. In the case of certain \n\npesticide product combinations, a sufficient period of time \n\nwill be allowed for the generation of data where that \n\navailable has been considered inadequate by current standards \n\nto establish Community MRLs. (1) 0J No L 221, 7. 8. 1986, p. 37. (2) 0J No L 221, 7. 8. 1986, p. 43. (3) OJ No L 350, 14. 12. 1990, p. 71. (4) OJ No L 230, 19. 8. 1991, p. 1. 2. To establish Community MRLs for 14 pesticides either used \n\n- 3 -\n\ncurrently or previously in the production of tea and provide \n\nfor a deadline for the fixing of MRLs for a further 18 \n\npesticides currently used in the production of tea but lacking \n\nadequate up to date data. In the case of three pesticides \n\nwhich may leave measurable residues when used in the \n\nproduction of tea, it is proposed to establish the MRLs at the \n\nlimit of analytical determination due to the possibility of a \n\nconsumer health hazard arising in certain circumstances. 3. To transfer and, where necessary, amend the provisions for 19 \n\npesticides from the old optional Directive 76/895/EEC^5) \n\nrelating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide \n\nresidues in and on fruit and vegetables, to Directive \n\n90/642/EEC. On transfer the maximum levels shall become mandatory and be \n\napplicable to all product groups covered by Directive \n\n90/642/EEC. 4. To establish provisions for birds' eggs which were foreseen in \n\nDirective 86/363/EEC at the time of its adoption and fix such \n\nMRLs for the 8 pesticides contained in Annex II to the \n\ndirective at the time of its adoption and for which maximum \n\nlevels have already been established for other foodstuffs of \n\nanimal origin. In cases where insufficient data has been available to establish MRLs under \n\n1 and 2 above, a period not exceeding four years will be allowed for the \n\ngeneration of the necessary data. During this period, Member States will be \n\npermitted to maintain the MRLs they may have established. In addition to the main points listed above, the proposals also envisage a \n\nnumber of technical amendmends to the lists of products covered by the \n\nmaximum levels. These proposals will have little or no impact on small or medium-sized \n\nenterpr ises. The proposals would have no impact on the budget of the European \n\nCommuni t i es. (5) OJ No L 340, 9. 12. 1976, p. 26. - 4 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending the Annexes to Council Directives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC \n\non the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues \n\nin and on cereals and foodstuffs of animal origin respectively \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Directive 86/362/EEC on the fixing of maximum levels for \n\npesticide residues in cereals(1), as last amended by Council Directive \n\n88/298/EEC<2) and in particular Article 11 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to Directive 86/363/EEC on the fixing of maximum levels for \n\npesticide residues in foodstuffs of animal origin^3) and in particular \n\nArticle 11 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas, it appears desirable to update the nomenclature in Annexes I to \n\nDirectives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC to conform with Commission Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2587/91<4>; \n\nWhereas, it appears also desirable to enlarge the scope of Annex I of \n\nDirective 86/362/EEC to include husked rice, milled rice and semi-milled or \n\nwholly milled rice in addition to paddy or rough rice, since a significant \n\nproportion of rice is put into circulation as such; \n\n(1) O. J. No. L 221, 07. 08. 1986, p. 37 \n\n(2) O. J. No. L 126, 20. 05. 1988, p. 53 \n\n(3) O. J. No. L 221, 07. 08. 1986, p. 43 \n\n(4) O. J. No. L 259, 26. 07. 1991, p. 1 \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nWhereas, in the light of technical and scientific progress and the \n\nrequirements of public health and agriculture, it is now desirable to \n\ncomplete Annex II to Directive 86/363/EEC in respect of the provisions for \n\nthe establishment of maximum levels for birds' eggs and egg yolks and to \n\nestablish levels for the pesticides therein listed; whereas for clarity, it \n\nappears desirable to present a consolidated version of the said Annex; \n\nWhereas, it is also desirable to amend, in the light of technical and \n\nscientific progress, Directives 86/362/EEC and 86/363/EEC by adding \n\nprovisions relating to further pesticide residues for cereals and foodstuffs \n\nof animal origin, namely, acephate, benomyl, carbendazim, chlorpyriphos, \n\nchlorpyriphos-methyl, chlorothaloniI, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, \n\nfenvalerate, glyphosate, imazalil, iprodione, mancozeb, maneb, \n\nmethamidophos, metiram, permethrin, procymidone, propineb, thiophanate-\n\nmethyl, vinclozolin, zineb. HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\nDirective 86/362/EEC is hereby amended as follows: \n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. Annex I is replaced by the following: \n\nDescription \n\n_ \n\nheading \n\nNo \n\nex 1001 \n\nWheat \n\n10020000 Rye \n\nex 100300 Barley \n\nex 100400 Oats \n\nex 1005 \n\nMaize \n\nex 1006 \n\nR i ce \n\nex 100700 Grain sorghum \n\nex 1008 \n\nBuckwheat, millet, other cereals \n\n2. The following pesticide residues are added to Part A of Annex II. - 6 -\n\nPesticide residues \n\nMaximum levels in mg/kg \n\n(ppm) \n\n20. ACEPHATE \n\n0. 02* \n\n21. BENOMYL \n22. CARBENOAZIM \n23. THIOPHANATE-METHYL) \n\n) \n) sum expressed as carbendazim \n\n(1) : barley \n0. 1* : other cereals \n\n24. CHLOROPYRIPHOS \n\n25. CHLOROPYRIPHOS-METHYL \n\n26. CHLOROTHALONIL \n\n27. CYPERMETHRIN \n\n28. OELTAMETHRIN \n\n29. FENVALERATE \n\n30. CLYPHOSATE \n\n31. IMAZALIL \n\n32. IPROOIONE \n\n(sum of IprodIone and all metabolites \ncontaining the 3. 5-dichloroanlIine moiety, \nexpressed as iprodione) \n\n(2) : barley \n0. 05*: other cereals \n\n0. 05*: rice \n(2) : other cereals \n\n0. 1 : wheat, rye, barley, oats and \n\ntriticale \n\n0. 01*: other cereals \n\n(2) : wheat, barley, oats and rye \n0. 05*: other cereals \n\n(2) : barley, oats, rye and triticale \n0. 05*: other cereals \n\n: wheat, rye and triticale \n: barley and oats \n\nS \n20 \n0. 1* : other cereals \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 5 : wheat \n(3) : barley and rice \n0. 02*: other cereale \n\n33. MANCOZEB \n34. MANEB \n33. METIRAM \n36. PROP INEB \n37. ZINEB \n\nsum expressed as CS2 \n\n(2) : barley \n0. 05*: other cereals \n\n38. METHAMIOOPHOS \n\n0. 01* \n\n39. PERMETHRIN \n\n(sum of Isomers) \n\n0. 2 : molze \n2 \n\n: other cereal! \n\n40. PROCYMIDONE \n\n(sum of procymidone and all metabolites \ncontaining the 3. 5-dichloroanlIIne moiety, \nexpressed as procymidone) \n\n4 1. VINCLOZOMN \n\n(sum of vlnclozlln and all metabolites containing \n\nthe 3. 5-dlchloroaniIine moiety, expressed as \nvinclozolIn) \n\no. or \n\n0. 05* \n\n* Indicates lower limit of analytical determination \n\n(1)(2)(3) Should levels not be adopted by 1 January 1996. the following moxlmum levels shall opply \nas Indicated thereafter \n\n(1) - 0. 1 \n(2) - 0. 05 \n(3) - 0. 02 \n\n\f-? \n\nArticle 2 \n\nDirective 86/363/EEC is hereby amended as follows \n\n1. Annex I is replaced by the following: \n\nCCT \n\nheading \n\nNo \n\nANNEX I \n\nDescr ipt ion \n\n0201 \n\nMeat of bovine animals, fresh or chilled \n\n0202 \n\nMeat of bovine animals, frozen \n\n0203 \n\nMeat of swine, fresh, chilled or frozen \n\n0204 \n\nMeat of sheep or goats, fresh, chilled or frozen \n\n02050000 Meat of horses, asses, mules or hinnies, fresh, chilled or \n\nfrozen \n\n0206 \n\n0207 \n\nEdible offal of bovine animals, swine, sheep, goats, horses, \nasses, mules or hinnies, fresh, chilled or frozen \n\nMeat and edibie offal, of the poultry of heading No 0105 (fowls \nof the species Gal I us domesticus, ducks, geese, turkeys and \nguinea fowls), fresh, chilled or frozen \n\nex 0208 \n\nOther meat and edible meat offal, fresh, chilled or frozen \n\n020900 \n\nPig fat free of lean meat and poultry fat (not rendered), fresh, \nchilled, frozen, salted in brine, diced or smoked \n\n0210 \n\n0401 \n\n0402 \n\nMeat and edible meat offal, salted in brine, dried or smoked; \nedible flours and meals of meat or meat offal \n\nMilk and cream, not concentrated nor contaning added sugar or \nother sweetening matter \n\nMilk and cream, concentrated or containing added sugar or other \nsweetening matter \n\n* \n\n040500 \n\nButter and other fats and oils derived from milk \n\n0406 \n\nCheese and curd \n\n040700 \n\nBirds' eggs, in shell, fresh, preserved or cooked \n\n0408 \n\nBirds' eggs, not in shell, and egg yolks, fresh, dried, cooked \nby steaming or by boiling in water, moulded, frozen or otherwise \npreserved, whether or not containing added sugar or other \nsweetening matter \n\n160100 \n\nSausages and similar products, of meat, meat offal or blood: \nfood preparations based on these products \n\n1602 \n\nOther prepared or preserved meat offal or blood \n\n\f2. Former Annex \n\nII becomes Annex \n\nre-presented as \n\nf o l l o w s: \n\n- 8 -\nII Part A and is amended and \n\nMaximum levels In mg/kg (ppm) \n\nof fat, contained in meat, \npreparations of meat, \noffals and animol fats \nlisted In Annex 1 under \nhooding Nos ex 0201. 0202. 0203. 0204. 02050000. 0206. 0207. ex 0208. 020900. 0210, \n160100. 1602 (1)(4) \n\nfor raw cow's milk and \nwhole cream cow's milk \nlisted In Annex 1 under \nheading No 0401; for the \nother foodstuffs in \nheading Nos 0401. 0402. 040500. 0406 in accordance \nwith(2)(4) \n\nof shelled fresh eggs, \nfor birds* eggs and egg \nyolks listed in Annex 1 \nunder heading No 040700, \n0408 (3)(4) \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 006 \n\n0. 02 \n\nPeetlcide residues \n\n1. ALDRIN \n\n)singly or \n)combined, expressed \n\n2. DIELDRIN )os dleldrln \n\n(HEOO) )(HE00) \n\n3. CHLORDANE (sum of cis\u2014 and \n\ntrans\u2014isomers and \noxychlordane expressed oe \nchlordane) \n\n4. DDT (sum of 0DT-. TDE- and \n\nDDE-isomers,expressed as DOT) \n\n5. ENDRIN \n\n6. HEPTACHLOR (sum of heptachlor \n\nand heptachlor epoxide. expressed as heptachlor) \n\n7. HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) \n\n8. HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANE (HCH) \n\n8. 1. alpha\u2014isomer \n\n8. 2. beto-Isomer \n\n8. 3. gammo\u2014isomer (lindane) \n\n9. CHLOROPYRIPHOS \n\n10. CHLOROPYRIPHOS-METHYL \n\n11. CYPERMETHRIN \n\n12. DELTAMETHRIN \n\n13. FENVALERATE \n\n0. 05 \n\n1 \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1 \n\n2 \n\nex 0204 sheepmeat \n\n1 other products \n\n0. 05* \n\nex 0207 Poultry meat \n\n0. 2 other products \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 05* \n\nex 0207 Poultry meat \n\n0. 2 other products \n\n0. 05 \n\nex 0207 Poultry meat \n\n(5) \n\nex 0207 Poultry meat \n\n0. 5 other products \n\n0. 002 \n\n0. 04 \n\n0. 0008 \n\n0. 004 \n\n0. 01 \n\n0. 004 \n\n0. 003 \n\n0. 008 \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 005 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 005 \n\n0. 02 \n\n0. 02 \n\n0. 02 \n\n0. 01 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(5) \n\n0. 05 \n\n14. PERMETHRIN \n\n0. 5 \n\n\u00bb Indicates lower limit of analytical determination. (1) In the case of foodstuffs with o fat content of 10% or less by weight, the reeldue Is related to the total weight of the boned \n\nfoodstuff. In such casee, the maximum level Is one-tenth of the value related to fat content, but must be no less than 0. 01 mg/kg. (2) In determining the residues In raw cow's milk and whole cream cow's milk, a fat content of 4% by weight should be taken as a basis \n\nFor raw milk and whole cream milk of another animal origin the residues are expressed on the basis of the fat. For the other foodstuffs listed In Annex I under heading Nos 0401, 0402, 040500, 0406 : \n- with a fat content of less than 7X by weight, the maximum level Is taken as half that set for raw milk and whole cream milk, \n- with a fat content of 2% or more by weight, the maximum level Is expressed In mg/kg of fat. In such cases, the maximum level \n\nIs 25 times that set for raw milk and whole cream milk. (3) For egg products with a fat content higher than 10 X the maximum level is expressed in mg/kg fat. In this case the maximum level \n\nIs 10 times higher than the maximum level for fresh eggs. (4) Footnotes (1) (2) and (3) do not apply In cases where the lower limit of analytical determination Is indicated. (5) Should levels not be adopted by 1 January 1996, the following maximum level shall apply: 0. 05 \n\n\f- 9 -\n\n3. The following is added to Annex II \n\n* PART B * \n\n\u2022 \n\nPesticide residues \n\nof meat, including fat. preparations of meat, \noffale and animal fate ae \nlisted in Annex 1 under \nheading Noe ex 0201. 0202. 0203. 0204, 02050000. 0206. 0207. ex 0208. 020900, \n0210. 160100 ond 1602 \n\nMaximum levele In mg/kg (ppm) \n\nfor milk and milk products \nlisted in Annex 1 under \nhead Inge Noe 0401. 0402. 040500. 0406 \n\nof shelled fresh eggs. for birds* egge ond egg \nyolks listed in Annex 1 \nunder heading No 040700. 0408 \n\n1. ACEPHATE \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n2. BENOMYL \n\n3. CARBENDAZIM \n\n) sum \n)expreessd \n) as \n) corben-\n\n4. THIOPHONATE METHYL) dazlm \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n5. CHLOROTHALONIL \n\n0. 01* \n\n6. GLYPHOSATE \n\n0. 5 \nex 0206 pig kidney \n\n2 \n\nex 0206 cattle, goat \nand sheep kidney \n\n0. 1* other products \n\n7. IMAZALIL \n\n0. 02* \n\n8. IPROOIONE (sum of iprodlone \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\nand ail metabolites \ncontaining the 3,5-dlchloro-\noni1Ine moiety, expressed \noe Iprodlone) \n\n9. MANCOZEB ) \n10. MANE6 \n11. METIRAM \n12. PROP1 NEB ) \n) \n13. ZINEB \n\n) sum expressed \n) ae CS2 \n\n14. METHAMIDOPHOS \n\n15. PROCYMIDONE (sum of procyml-\ndone ond all metabolites \ncontaining the 3. 5\u2014dlchloro\u2014 \naniline moiety, expressed \nos procymidone) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n16. VINCLOZOLIN (sum of vinclo-\n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\nzolln and all metabolites \ncontaining the 3,5-dichloro-\nonl1ine moiety, expressed \nos vinclozolin) \n\n\u2022 Indicatee lower limit of analytical determination \n\n\f- 10 -\nArticle 3 \n\nMember States shall bring into force not later than 31 December 1992, the \n\nlaws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with this \n\nDirective. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to \n\nthis Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of \n\ntheir official publication. The methods of making such a reference shall be \n\nlaid down by the Member States. This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Article 4 \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\n\fProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending Annex II to Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels \n\nfor pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables and the Annex to Directive \n\n90/642/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and \n\non certain products of plant origin, including fruit and vegetables and providing \n\nfor the establishment of a first list of maximum levels. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES: \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum \nlevels for pesticide residues in and on fruit and vegetables^1), as last amended \nby Council Directive 89/186/EEC(2>, and in particular Article 5 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to Council Directive 90/642/EEC relating to the fixing of maximum \n\nlevels for pesticide residues in and on certain products of plant origin, \n\nincluding fruit and vegetables*3*, and in particular Article 1 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas the pesticides chlorbenside and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(4-ethyl-phenyI) \n\nethane are no longer of economic importance and their residues are unlikely to \n\noccur in foodstuffs; whereas it is appropriate therefore to delete them from \n\nAnnex II of Directive 76/895/EEC; \n\nWhereas in order to establish mandatory maximum levels of pesticide residues at \n\nCommunity level it is necessary to transfer provisions from Directive 76/895/EEC \n\nto Directive 90/642/EEC relating to the pesticides amitrole, atrazine, binapacryl, \n\nbromophos-ethyl, captafol, DDT, dichlorprop, dinoseb, dioxathion, endrin, ethylene \n\ndibromide, fenchlorphos, heptachlor, maleic hydrazide, methyl bromide, paraquat, \n\nTEPP, 2,4,5-T, toxaphene; whereas, certain of these provisions should be amended \n\nin the light of technical and scientific progress; \n\n(1) 0J No L 340, 9. 12. 1976, p. 26 \n(2) 0J No L 66, 10. 3. 1989, p. 36 \n(3) OJ No L 350, 14. 12. 1990, p. 71 \n\n\fWhereas it is necessary to amend the annex to Directive 90/642/EEC, in order that \n\nsunflower seed and olives may be more appropriately described considering current \n\ntrade practices, thereby facilitating control of pesticide residues therein; \n\nWhereas, pesticide residues may arise in products of plant origin including fruit \n\nand vegetables as a result of present or previous agricultural practices; whereas, \n\nto establish maximum levels for the former, it is necessary to take into account \n\nrelevant data for both authorized pesticide uses and supervised trials; whereas, \n\nhowever, available data is frequently insufficient by current standards to \n\nestablish maximum levels; whereas, in the case of the previous agricultural \n\npractices, appropriate monitoring data must be evaluated; \n\nWhereas, satisfactory monitoring data exist in order to establish maximum \n\npesticide residue levels in tea for aldrin, dieldrin, chlordane, DDT, endrin, \n\nheptachlor, HCH and HCB; \n\nWhereas, in the case of the pesticides cartap and endosulfan which are used in the \n\nproduction of tea, sufficient data for both authorized uses and supervised trials \n\nexist to establish maximum residue levels; \n\nWhereas, in the case of certain other pesticides used in the production of tea, \n\ninsufficient data exist by present standards to establish maximum residue levels; \n\nwhereas, however data exist to indicate that the residues which may be present are \n\nunlikely to constitute a health hazard; whereas, Member States may therefore \n\nmaintain the maximum levels they have fixed in order to allow sufficient time for \n\nthe generation of the necessary data for a Community decision to be taken; \n\nWhereas, in the case of the pesticides omethoate, dimethoate and ethion used in \n\nthe production of tea, available data indicate that in certain circumstances a \n\npublic health hazard may occur; whereas, therefore, the maximum level should be \n\nestablished at the limit of analytical determination; \n\n\f-A3 \n\n-\n\nWhereas, in order to better estimate dietary intake of pesticide residues, it is \n\nprudent to establish simultaneously, where possible, maximum residue levels for \n\nindividual pesticides in all major components of the diet; whereas these levels \n\nrepresent the use of minimum quantities of pesticide to achieve adequate control, \n\napplied in such a manner that the amount of residue is the smallest practicable \n\nand is toxicologically acceptable; \n\nWhereas, it is now appropriate that maximum levels be fixed for certain pesticides \n\nin products of plant origin, namely, acephate, benomyl, carbendazim, thiophanate-\n\nmethyl, maneb, mancozeb, met!ram, propineb, zineb, methamidophos, procymidono, \n\nchlorothaloniI, chlorpyriphos, chlorpyriphos-methyI, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, \n\nfenvalerate, glyphosate, imazalil, iprodione, permethrin, vinclozolin; \n\nWhereas, however, available data is insufficient to establish levels for certain \n\npesticides crop combinations; whereas a period of time, not exceeding four years, \n\nwill be necessary to generate such data; whereas, therefore, maximum levels should \n\nbe established on the basis of such data by 1 January 1996 at the latest; failure \n\nto provide satisfactory data shall result in the establishment of levels at the \n\nappropriate limit of determination. HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\n\fArticte 1 \n\nThe entries in Annex II of Directive 76/895/EEC relating to the following \n\npesticide residues shall be deleted: \n\nam Itrole \n\natrazlne \n\nblnapacryl \n\nbromophos-ethyI \n\ncaptafol \n\nchlorbenside \n\nDDT (sum of DDT-, TDE- and DDE-isomers, expressed as DDT) \n\ndichlorprop \n\n1,1-dichloro-2,2-bls(4-ethyl-phenyl) ethane \n\nd i noseb \n\ndloxathlon \n\nendrin \n\nethylene dibromide \n\nfenchlorphos \n\nheptachlor \n\nmaleic hydrazide \n\nmethyl bromide \n\nparaquat \n\nTEPP \n\ntoxaphene \n\n2,4,5 -T \n\n\f- 4S-\n\nArticle 2 \n\nDirective 90/642/EEC is hereby amended as follows: \n\n1. The former Annex becomes Annex I \n\n2. That part of the Annex relating to miscellaneous fruit and oil seeds is \n\namended as follows: \n\nGroups of products \n\nProducts included \n\nPart of product to which \n\nin the groups \n\nmaximum residue levels apply \n\n1. Fruit, fresh, dried or uncooked, preserved by freezing, not containing \n\nadded sugar; nuts \n\n(Vi) MISCELLANEOUS \n\nFRUIT \n\nOlives for oil extrac \n\nWhole fruit after removal \n\ntion and for table \n\nof stems (if any) and in \n\nconsumpt ion. the case of olives for oil \n\nextraction after removal of \n\nsoil (if any) by rinsing in \n\nrunning water \n\n4. Oil seeds \n\nSunflower seed \n\nWhole seed including shell \n\nwhen present and whole \n\nseed without shell, when \n\nshe 11 is absent \n\n3. The following Annex is added \n\n\"ANNEX \n\n\fCroups and e x a r p l es of \n\nI n d i v i d u al \n\nAcsphoto \n\nChlorothalonl 1 ' \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\nproducts to which t he M is apply \n\nPeetlcids res \n\nduet andmaxlnun reeldue levels (moAfl) \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\u2022msthyl \n\nCypermethrln \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs) \n\nOsltamthrin \n\nFenvalerote \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs) \n\nGlyahosate \n\nImozolil \n\nIprodiane \n\nPermsthrin \n(sun of \n\nisomers \n\n1. F r u i t, f r e s h, d r i ed or uncooked \n\npreserved by f r e e z i ng not \nc o n t a i n i ng added sugar; n u t s. ( i) CITRUS FRUIT \n\n1 \n\n0. 01* \n\n2 \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n5 \n\n0. 5 \n\nG r a p e f r u it \n\nLemons \nLimn \nMandarins ( i n c l. clcrantines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPunmelo \nOthers \n\n( i i) TREE NUTS \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n0. O5* \n\n0. 3 \n\n(3) \n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n\u2022-\u2022-\n0. O5* \n\n(D \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 1 \n\n(D \n\n(D \n\n(2) \n\n0. 9 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n(D \n\n(D \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(2) \n(2) \n(2) \n\n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n\n1 \n(2) \n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n(3) \n(3) \n\n0. 2 \n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 2 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. O5* \n\n1 \n\n2 \n1 \n2 \n\n1 \n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 1* \n\n5 \n\n0. 02* \n10 \n\n0. 05* \n1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n1 \n\n0> \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(D \n\nO. OB* \n\n(D \n5 \n(D \n\n5 \n0. 02* \n\n10 \n\n10 \n\n5 \n\n1 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(shelled or Almonds \nunshelled) Brazil nuts \nOashsw nuts \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazelnuts \nMocodomio. Pecans \n\nPine nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthers \n\n( i l l) POC FRUIT \n\nApples \nPears \nQuinces \nOthers \n\n( i v) STOC FRUIT \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPeaches (fncl. nectarines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(v) BERRIES AN) 9*LL FRUIT \n\n(a) Table and wine \n\ngropes \nTable grapes \nWine grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other than wiId) \n\n(c) Cans fruit \n\n(other than wild) \nBlackberries \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthers \n\n\fIndividual \nGroups and exorplee of \nproducts to which ths IffLs apply \n\nAcsphate \n\nChlorotholonil \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\nPesticide res \n\ndues and moxlm/n reeldue levels \n\n(mo/fca,) \n\nChlorpyriphos \n-methyl \n\nCypermsthrln \n(sun of \n\niscmsrs) \n\nDsltantthrln \n\nFenvalerate \n(sun of \n\niscmsrs) \n\nGlyphosate \n\n\u2022ratal II \n\nIprodlone \n\nPormethr in \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs \n\n(d) Other small fruit \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\nand berries (other \nthan wlId) \nBilberries \n( f r u it of species \nvoce In Inn ityrtl 1 lus) \nCranberries \nCurrants (red, black \nend shite) \nGooseberries \nOthers \n\n(s) Wild berries and \nwild f r u it \n\n( v i) MISCELLAM3DUS \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\nAcfrocodoc \nBoioncw \nDates \nFigs \nKiwi \nKunquate \nLltchls \nMangoes \nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPomegranate \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncocked, frozen or dry \n(1) ROOT AN) TUBER VEGETABLES \n\n0. 02* \n\nBeetroot \nCarrots \nCslerlac \nHorse radish \nJerusalem artichokes \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \nSwedes \nTurnips \nYam \nOthers \n\n( t l) BULB VEGETABLES \n\n0. 02* \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShal lots \nSpring onions \nOthers \n\n2 \n(2) \n\n(2) \n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(2) \n(2) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n\n0. 01* \n\n(3) \n(3) \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n2 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n2 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n2 \n\n(4) \n\n10 \n\n10 \n\n10 \no. oe* \n0. O2* \n\n(D \n\n5 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n0. 06* \n0. 05* \n\n1 \n\n(3) \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\nJ \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n(D \n\n0. 02 \n\n5 \n5 \nS \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n\n0. O5* \n0. 06* \n\n0. 5 \n\n\fGroups and excnples of \nproducts to which the sfLs apply \n\nindividual \n\nAuphot# \n\nChlorotholonil \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\nPsstlcids ree \n\ndues and mat 1mm residue levels (moAg) \n\nChlorpyriphos \n-methyl \n\nCypermsthrln \n(sun of \n\niscmsrs) \n\nDsltonsthrln \n\nFenvalerate \n(sun of \n\niscmsrs) \n\nGlyphceate \n\nbnazalil \n\n1prodlone \n\nPenrethrin \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs \n\n( H i) FRUITINJ \n\n(a) Solanacea \nTomatoes \nPeppers \nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\n\u00a3Sl \nOucuTbers \nGherkins \nCourgettes \nOthers \n\n(c) Cucurbits inedible \n\n0. 5 \n(D \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n(D \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\nJKSl \nMslons \nSquashes \nWat snns Ions \nOthers \n(d) Swsst com \n( I v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(a) Flowering Brasslcas \n\nBroccoli \nCauliflower \nOthers \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(D \n\n(2) \n\n(b) Head Brasslcas \n\n2 \n\n0. 5 \n(2) \n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n\n(D \n\nBrussels Sprouts \nI^VWl. fVsMtefVBSB \n\nOthers \n\n(c) Leafy Brass leas \nChinese cabbage \nKale \nOthers \n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES \nAN) FRESH HERBS \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1* \n\n2 \n\n(2) \n\n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1 \n\n(2) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n1 \n0. 2 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n1 \n\n(D \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(D \n\n0. O2* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n(3) \n0. 05* \n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n1 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n1 \n(3) \n0. 05* \n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 06* \n\n5 \n\n2 \n\n(D \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n5 \n0. 02* \n\n(D \n\n0. O2* \n0. 1 \n\n(a) Lettuce * slml lor \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n10 \n\nCress \nLotto's lettuce \nLettuce \nScorole \nOthers \n\n(b) Spinach * simi lar \n\nBest 1saves (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n(d) Witloof \n(e) herbs \n\nChervil \nChives \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthers \n\n1 \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n(2) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n2 \n2 \n2 \n2 \n0. 05* \n0. 5 \n\n0. 05* \n(3) \n2 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 06* \n(3) \n0. 5 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. O5* \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. O2* \n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n1 \n10 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n0. 1 \n0. 06* \n(3) \n\n1 \n\n0. 06* \n\n2 \n\n1 \n\n0. 06* \n0. 06* \n2 \n\n\fCroups and excnples of \nproducts to which the M is apply \n\nindividual \n\nAcephate \n\nChlorothalonll \n\nChlorpyriphos \n\nPsstlcids rss \n\ndues and moxlnun reeldue ieveis \n\n[moAa) \n\nChlorpyriphos \n-msthyl \n\nCypsrmsthrin \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs) \n\nDsltonsthrin \n\nFenvalerate \n(sun of \n\nIscmsrs) \n\nGlyphosate \n\nknazalll \n\nIprodlone \n\nPermsthrln \n(sun of \nIsomers \n\n(2) \n(2) \n2 \n(2) \n0. 01* \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n0. 01* \n\n(2) \n0. 01* \n0. 01* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n(3) \n0. 06* \n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(D \n\n( v i) LEGUME VEGETABLES \n\n(fresh) Beans(wlth pods) \n\nBsans(without poos) \nPeas (with pods) \nPeas(w!thout pods) \nOthers \n( v i l) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n(D \n(D \n\n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n(1) \n0. 02* \n(D \n0. O2* \n0. 02* \n\nAsparagus \nCardoons \nCelery \nFennel \nGlobs artichokes \nLeek \nRhubarb \nOthers \n\n( v i i l) FUNGI \n\n(a) Cultivated \nmushrooms \n(b) Wl Id mushrocms \n\n3. PULSES \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nBeans \nLentils \nPeas \nOthers \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPoppy seed \nSsscms seed \nSunflower seed \nRape seed \nSoya bean \nMjstard \nCotton ssed \nOthers \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEarly and wars potatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Black tea processed from the \nleaves of Camilla sinensis) \n7. HOPS (dried), including hop \npel lets end unconcentroted \npowder \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n(\u2022) \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 5 \n0. 05* \n(3) \n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n(3) \n(3) \n0. 5 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n1 \n\n0. 09* \n\n(3) \n0. 06* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n(4) \n\n30 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n(D \n0. 5 \n(D \n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 2 \n0. 06* \n0. 1 \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 5* \n0. 05* \n0. 1 \n0. 06* \n0. 05* \n\n2 \n(3) \n\n0. 5 \n2 \n0. 06* \n0. 06* \n\n1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n5 \n\n5 \n\n0. 1* \n50 \n\n1 \n0. 1* \n(4) \n0. 1* \n\n10 \n\n10 \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 05* \n\n(4) \n\n5 \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n5 \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n<D \n\nO) \n(D \n0. 1 \n0. 5 \n\n(1) \n\n4. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n' \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n(3) \no. \u00bb \n\n0. 4 \n0. 2 \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n\n^ \nVD \n\n\f- 2o-\n\nPsstlcids reeiduss one \n\nmaxlnun reeldue levels \n\n(mgAg) \n\nGroups and exaiples of individual \nproducts to which the MRLs apply \n\nBENOMVL \nCARBEKMZIM \nTHICPHANATE-METHn. sun expreeeed ae \noarbendazim \n\nt*NEB \nmtXBEB \nMETIRAM \nPRCPINEB, ZINEB \neun expreeeed as CSj \n\nMETHtMIDOPHOS \n\nPROCYMIDCNE \n\nVINCLOZaiN \nSun of vinclozolin \nand all metabolites \ncontaining the 3,5 \ndicloroanl I ine moiety, \nexpreeeed as vinclozol ii \n\n1. Fruit, freeh. dried or uncooked \n\npreserved by freezing not \ncontaining added euger; nuts. (i) CITRUS FRUIT \n\n5 \n\n(3) \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\nGrapefruit \nLemons \nLimes \nMandarins (incl. Clementines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPumnslo \nOthers \n\n(ii) TREE NUTS \n(shelled or Almonds \nunshslled) Brazil nute \nCashew nute \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazelnuts \nMocodomia \nPecans \nPine nute \nPletochloe \nWolnuts \nOthere \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(ill) P OC FRUIT \n\n2 \n\nApples \nPeore \nQuinces \nOthers \n\n(iv) STONE FRUIT \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPeaches (incl. nectarines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(4) \n(4) \n\n(4) \n0. 1* \n\n2 \n\n2 \n1 \n2 \n\n1 \n0. 05* \n\n(v) BERRIES AN) SMNX FRUIT \n\n(a) Table and wine grapes \n\n(4) \n\n2 \n\nTable grapes \nWine grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other than wi Id) \n(c) Cane fruit (other \n\nthan wild) \nBlackberries \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthers \n\n2 \n\n(4) \n\n2 \n\n(3) \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n0. 01* \n\n1 \n\n2 \n0. 5 \n2 \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n5 \n\n5 \n\n5 \n\n(D \n(D \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n\n5 \n\n5 \n\n10 \n0. 02* \n\n\f- Z'? -\n\nPeetlcids reslduss and maxImm residue leveli \n\n(ma/kg) \n\nCroupe and exaiples of Individual \nproducts to which ths MRLs apply \n\nBENGMVL \nCARBEKMZIM \nTHICPHAmTEHyETHYL \neun expressed as \ncarbendazlm \n\nMMNEB \nMWGOZEB \nMETIRtM \nPRCPINEB. ZINEB \neun expreeeed as C&g \n\nMETHAMIDCPHOS \n\nPRCCYMIDONE \n\nVINCLOZOLIN \nSun of vlnclozolin \nand all metabolites \ncontaining the 3,5-\ndlcloroani 1 tne moiety, \nexpreeeed as vincloaol in \n\n(d) Other small fruit \n\nand berries (other \nthan wild) \nBllberrlee \n\n(fruit of species \nvaoclntue myrt 11 lus) \nCranberreie \nCur rante (red, black \nand white) \nGooseberries \nOthere \n\n(e) Wild berries and \nwild fruit \n\n(vi) MISCELLANEOUS \n\nAAp^ooodoB \nBOTHTtOS \n\nDates \nFigs \nKiwi \n\nKunauate \nLltchls \nMangoes \nOlives (table coneurptlon) \nWives (oil extraction) \nPassion fruit \nPineapples \nPomegranate \nOthere \n\n2. Vegetables, freeh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n\n(1) ROOT AND TUBER VGQETABLES \n\nBeetroot \nOar rote \nCelerlac \nHoree radish \nJerusalem artichokes \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \nSwedes \nTurnips \nYam \nOthers \n\n(II) BULB VEGETABLES \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShol lots \nSpring onions \nOthere \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02* \n\n5 \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n5 \n\n10 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n1 \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(4) \n(4) \n\n(4) \n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1 \n\n(3) \n(3) \n0. 2 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\no. os* \n\n1 \n\n\f- 2Z -\n\nPsstlcids residues and maximum reeldue levels \n\n(moAg) \n\nGroups and exaiples of \nIndividual \nproducts to which ths MRLs apply \n\nBENOMtL \nCARBEKMZIM \nTHICfHANATE-METHTL \neun expressed as \noarbendazim \n\nWNEB \nMWOOZEB \nMETIRAM \nPRCPINEB. ZINEB \nsun expreeeed ae CS? \n\nMETWMIOCPH06 \n\nPRCCYMIDCNE \n\nVINXOZCLIN \nSun of vinclozol in \n\nand o il metabolites \ncontaining ths 3. 5-\ndiclorocnt 1 ine moiety, \nexpreeeed as vinclozolin \n\n( i l l) FRUITING \n\n( a) Solonooso \nTomatoes \nPeppers \nAuberginee \n\nOthere \n\n(b) Oucurblto - edible peel \n\nCucuitoere \nGherkins \nCourgettee \nOthere \n(c) Cucurbits - \nMelons \nSquashes \nWatermelons \nOthere \n(d) Sweet corn \n\ninedible peel \n\n( I v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(a) Flowering Brasslcas \n\nBroccoli \nCauliflower \n\nOthere \n\n(b) Head Brasslcas \n\nBrussels sprouts \nHead ntoh^p* \nOthere \n\n(c) Leafy Brass loos \nChinese cabbage \n\nKale \nOthere \n\n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n( v) LEAF VEGETABLES AND FRESH HERBS \n\n(a) Lettuce * ekni lor \n\nCreee \nLaito'e lettuce \nLettuce \nScarole \n\nOthers \n\n(b) Spinach * skid lor \n\nBset leaves (chord) \n\n(c) Water creee \n(d) Wit loot \n(e) Herbs \n\nChervil \nChives \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \n\nOthere \n\n1 \n\n1 \n0. 5 \n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 5 \n0. 5 \n\n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n3 \n0. 1* \n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n0. 1* \n\n2 \n\n0. 5 \n\n(3) \n(3) \n0. 06* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n( 3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n5 \n5 \n0. 06* \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n0. 2 \n\n1 \n0. 05* \n\n0. 5 \n\n( 2) \n0. 2 \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n1 \n\n0. 0 1* \n0. 0 1* \n\n2 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n3 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(2) \n\n0. 5 \n\n( 2) \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 0 1* \n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 0 1* \n0. 01* \n\n(D \n5 \n5 \n5 \n0. 02* \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n2 \n\n0. 05* \n0. 05* \n\n5 \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n2 \n0. 05* \n\n\fT \n\n- \n\nZl! \n\nCroups and exorplee of \nproducts to which ths I4\u00ab. s apply \n\nindividual \n\nBENCMYL \n\nCARBEKMZIM \n\nMWEB \n\nMtNDCZEB \n\nMETHtMIDOPHOS \n\nPRCCYMIDONE \n\nPesticide reslduss andmaxlnun rssldus Isveli \n\n(moAa) \n\nTHIOPHtt*ATE-*ETHYL \n\nMETIR4M \n\ne un e x p r e e e ed as \n\nPRCPINEB. ZIMEB \n\nc a r b s n d a z im \n\ne un e x p r e e e ed as C Sj \n\nVIMX0ZCLIN \nSun of vinclozol in \nand a ll metabolite* \ncontaining the 3 , 5-\ndlcloroani 1 ine moiety, \nexpressed as vinclozolin \n\n( v i) LEGUME VEGETABLES (freeh) \n\n(3) \n\n(2) \n\nBeans (with pods) \nBscra (without pods) \nPeae (with pods) \n\nPeas (without pods) \nOthers \n\n( v l i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\nAsparagus \nCarobons \nCelery \n\nFennel \n\nGlobe artlchokee \nLeek \nRhubarb \n\nOthers \n\n( v l l l) FUNGI \n\na) Cultivated mushrooms \nb) Wl Id mushrooms \n\n3. PULSES \n\nBeans \n\nLentils \nPeas \nOthers \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nLIneeed \nPeanuts \nPoppy seed \nSee one eeed \nSunflower eeed (with sN \nSunflower eeed (without \nRape eeed \nSoya bean \nMustard \nCotton seed \nOthers \n\nH I) \nshell) \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEarly and ware \npotatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Block tea pro cess id from the \nleaves of Camellia sinensis) \n\n7. HOPS ( d r i e d ), \n\nincluding hop \n\n(4) \n(4) \n(4) \n(4) \n0. 1* \n\n( 4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n1 \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1* \n\n( 4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n2 \n(D \n(D \n(D \n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 02* \n\n(D \n\n2 \n\n(3) \n1 \n\n(3) \n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n1 \n1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(3) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(2) \n\n(2) \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n(2) \n0. 0 1* \n\n(2) \n0. 01* \n\n0. 1 \n0. 01* \n\n0. 0 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\npellete end unconcentrated powder \n\n(4) \n\n25 \n\n2 \n\n0. 1* \n\n40 \n\n\f- 2 4-\n\nPesticide residues andmaxlwun reeidue levele (moAg) \n\nGroups and exoiples of individual \nproducts to which the wflLe apply \n\nALORIN \nDIELDRIN (HOED) \nsingly or combined, \nexpreeeed as \ndleldrln (HOED) \n\nDDT \n\n(eunof DDT-, DTE-\nand DDE-learners, \nexpresssd as DDT) \n\nENDOSULFAM \n(sun of olpha- and \nbeto-lecmere and of \nendosulfan sulphate, \nexpressed as \n\nI fan) \n\nHEXACK. CRCCYCLO-\nHEXANE (HCH) \nalpha- and beto-\nI \n\nHEXACH-CfOCYCLCHEXANE \n\n( \u00ab H) \n\ngcmro-leamer (lindane) \n\n1. F r u i t, fresh, dried or uncooked \n\npreserved by freezing not \ncontaining added sugar; nuts. ( I) CITRUS FRUIT \n\n0. 05* \n\nGrapefruit \nLemons \nLbnss \nMandarins ( I n c l. clemsntlnss and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPutmslo \nOthere \n\n( i t) TREE NUTS \n\n(shelled or Almonds \n\nlied) Brazil nute \nCashew nute \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazslnuts \nMocadomla \n\nPins nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthere \n\n(III) PCME FRUIT \n\nApplee \nPeace \nQuinces \nOthere \n\n(iv) STONE FRUIT \n\nApricote \nCherries \nPeachee (incl. nsctorinss and \nsimilar hybrids) \n\nPlum \nOthere \n\n( v) BERRIES AN) SbtfLL FRUIT \n\n(a) Table and wine grapes \n\nTable grapes \nWine grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other than wl Id) \n(c) Cans f r u it (other \n\nthan wl Id) \nBloakberriee \nD\u2014tier r lee \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthere \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n\f- 2 _T_ \n\nPesticide residues and maximum residus levels (mgAg) \n\nindividual \nCroups and exaiplee of \nproducts to which the MRLe apply \n\nALDRIN \nDIELDRIN (HOED) \nsingly or combined. expressed as \ndleldrin \n\nDDT \n(sun of DDT-, DTE-\nand DDE -Isomere, \nexpressed as DDT) \n\nEKDSULFAN \n(sun of olpha- and \nbsto-l earners and of \nendbsulfan sulphate. expressed as \nendoeulfan) \n\nHEXACH. CRCCYCL0-\nHEXANE ( \u00ab H) \nalpha- and beto-\nleamsre \n\nItXAChLCROCriCLCHEXANi \n\n(HCH) \n\nejaimo-iecrner (lindane) \n\n(d) Other \u2022 n a il f r u it \n\nand berries (other \nthan wild) \n\nBilberries \n( f r u it of species \n\nvacclnlunm/rtillus) \nCranberrele \n\nCurrants ( r e d. black \nand white) \nOoossbsrrlee \nOthere \n\n(e) Wild berries end \nwild f r u it \n\n( v l) MISCELLANEOUS \n\n0. 05* \n\nAdvocados \n\nBontTsOei \nDotes \nFigs \nKiwi \nKunquote \nLltchle \nMangpee \n\n( t a b le ooneuiption) \n( o il extraction) \n\nOlives \nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \n\nPomegranate \nOthere \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n\n(1) ROOT AND TUBER VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\nBeetroot \nOar rote \nCeleries \nHaree radish \nJerusalem a rt ichokes \nPorenlp \nPareley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \n\nSweet Potatoes \nSwedes \nTurnips \nVan \n\nOthere \n\n( I I) BULB VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShallots \nSpring anions \nOthers \n\n\f2Q-\n\nPssticids reeiduee ant \n\n1 maxlnun reeldue levels \n\n( m g / k a) \n\nCroups and exorplee of \nIndividual \nproducte to which the MRLe apply \n\nAUK IN \nOIELORIN \nsingly or combined. expressed as \ndisldrin (HOED) \n\nDDT \n(sun of DOT-. DTE-\nand DCC-I earnere. expreseed as DDT) \n\nENDOSULFAN \n\nHEXACHLOROCYCLO-\n\nHEXACH. CRCCTICLCHEXANE \n\n( e un of a l p h a- a nd \n\nHEXANE (HCH) \n\n(HCH) \n\nb e t o - i e c m e re and of \n\na l p h a- a nd b e t o-\n\ngarma-isamsr \n\n( l i n d a n e) \n\ne n d o s u l f an s u l p h a t e. ieomere \n\ne x p r e s s ed as \n\ne n d o s u l f a n) \n\n( I I I) FRUITING \n\n0. 05* \n\n(a) Solanaceo \nTcmatoss \nPeppere \n\nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits - edible peel \n\nCucuitosrs \nGherkins \nCourgettes \nOthers \n( c) Cucurbits - \nMelons \nSquashes \nWat enne lone \n\nOthers \n(d) Sweet corn \n\nInedible peel \n\n( i v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n( a) Flowering Brassleas \n\n0. 05* \n\nBroccoli \nCaul if lower \nOthers \n\n(b) Head Brossloas \n\nBrussels sprouts \n\n\u00bb\u2022 \n\n\u2022 \n\n11 I S B l ll \u2022\u2022 \n\n\u2022\u2022 \n\nliBOCJ CCK>Og> \nOthers \n\n(c) Leafy Brass icas \nChinese cohboge \n\nKale \nOthere \n\n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES AND FRESH HERBS \n\n0. 06* \n\n(a) Lettuce ft ebid 1 or \n\nCress \nLotto's lettuce \n\nLettuce \nScorole \n\nOthere \n\n(b) Sbinach ft similar \n\nBsst leaves (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n\n(d) Wltloof \n( s) Herbs \n\nChsrvil \nChives \n\nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthere \n\n\f- \n\n21-\n\nPesticide residues end moxlrrun residue levels (moAq) \n\nGroups and exawplee of Individual \nproducts to which ths MLs apply \n\nALORIN \nDiaORIN (HOED) \nsingly or combined, \nexpressed as \ndleldrln (HOED) \n\nDDT \n(eunof DDT-, DTE*-\nand DDE-iecmere, \nexprssssd as DDT) \n\nEND09ULFAN \n(sun of alpha- and \nbeto-iecmere and of \nendgeulfan sulphate, \n\nrBWCHLCROCYCLO-\nHEXANE (HCH) \nalpha- and beta-\nI \n\nH E X A C H L C R X T T C L C H E X A NE \n\n(hCH) \n\ngarmo-leamer \n\n( l i n d a n e) \n\nI fan) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n( v i) LEGUME VEGETABLES (fresh) \n(with pods) \n(without pods) \n\nPeas (with pods) \nPeas (without pods) \nOthere \n\n( v i l) STEM VEGETABLES \nAsparagus \nCardoons \nCelery \nFennel \n\nGlobe artichokes \nLeek \nRhubarb \nOthers \n\n( v l i i) FUNGI \n\na) Cultivated mushrooms \nb) Wt Id mushrooms \n\n3. PULSES \n\nLentils \nPeas \nOthers \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPoppy ssed \n\nSunflower eeed (with ehell) \nSunflower eeed (without ehell) \n\nSoya bean \nMustard \nCotton ess \nOthere \n\n5. POTATOES \n\n0. 06* \n\nEarly and wore \npotatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Block tea processed from the \nleaves of Cornel I la einenele) \n\n7. HOPS ( d r i e d ), including hap \n\npellete and unconcentrated powder \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 2 \n\n30 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 06* \n\n\fGroups and exaiplee of individual \nproducts to which the M\u00ab. s apply \n\nAmi t role \n\nAtrazlne \n\nBincpacryl \n\nBiphentrln \n\nBrorophofr \nethyl \n\nBremopropylate Oortap \n\nCopt of oI \n\n(expressed \nae free bass) \n\nCyholothrin \n(sun of \n\nIsomers) \n\nChlordane \n(sun of els-ft \ntrans-! earners) \n\nDlchlor prop \n\nPesticide residues ondmoximm residue levels (mgyfcfl) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\n1. Fruit, fresh, dried or uncooked \n\npreserved by freezing not \ncontaining added sugar; nuts, \n\n(i) CITRUS FRUIT \n\nGrapefruit \nLemons \nLimes \nMandarins (Incl. Clementines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPuimslo \nOthers \n\n(it) TREE NUTS \n(shel Isd or Almonds \n\nlied) \n\nBrail I nuts \nCashew nuts \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazelnuts \nMacedonia \n\nPins nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthers \n\n(III) POVE FRUIT \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\nApples \nPeare \nQuinces \nOthsrs \n\n(tv) STONE FRUIT \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(M \n\nApricots \nCherriss \nPsochss (incl. nectarines and \nsbnilor hybrids) \nPlums \nOthsrs \n\n(v) BERRIES AN) SMALL FRUIT \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(a) Table and wine \n\nSESESL \nTable grapes \nWins grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other tharTwtld) \n\n(c) Cane fruit \n\n(other than wild) \nBlackberries \nDswbsrriss \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthsrs \n\n\fGroups end exoiplss of Individual \nproducts to which ths MO apply \n\nAmitrole \n\nAtrazine \n\nBlnopocryl \n\nBlphentrin \n\nBrofflophotj^ \nethyl \n\nBrcmaprcpy late Cortap \n\nCopt of o I \n\nCyholothrln \n\n(expressed \nas free bass) \n\n(sun of \nisomers) \n\nChlordane \n(eunof c i e - ft \ntrens-iscmsrs) \n\nDlchlorprop \n\nPesticide residues andmaxlnun residue levels (mpAfl) \n\n(d) Other t o ll \n\nfruit \n\nand berries (other \nthan wl Id) \nBilberries \n(fruit of species \nvaccln iun nyrt 11 lus) \nCranberries \nCurrants (rsd. black \nand white) \nGooseberries \nOthers \nWild berries end \nwild fruit \n\n(\u2022) \n\n( v l) MIS03XANECU5 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\nAdVococbs \n\nDates \nFigs \nKiwi \nKunquots \nLitchls \n\nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPcfflsgranats \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n( i) ROOT AN) TUBER VEGETABLES \n\nBeetroot \nCarrots \nCslsrlae \nHorse radish \nJerusalem artichoke \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \nSwsdss \nTurnips \nYon \nOthers \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(11) BULB VEGETABLES \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShol lots \nSpring onions \nOthers \n\n\fGroups end examples of Individual \nproducte to which the MLe apply \n\nAmitrole \n\nAtrazine \n\nBincpacryl \n\nBlphentrln \n\nBrcmophoe\u2014 \nethyl \n\nBromapropy I ate Cartap \n\nCaptafol \n\nCyhalothrin \n\n(expressed \nas frss bass) \n\n(sun of \nIsamsrs) \n\nChlordane \n(sun of e l s- ft \ntrans-lscmsrs) \n\nDlchlor prop \n\nPesticide residue* ondmaxlnun residue levele (ma/kg) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0 \n\n( i l l) \n\nFRUITINS \n\n(a) Solanoceo \nTcmotoss \n\nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\npeel \nCucuitosrs \nGherkins \nCourgsttss \nOthers \n\n(c) Cucurbits Inedible \n\npssl_ \nMelons \nScwashes \nIntot #nv\u00bbt Ions \nOthsrs \n(d) Sweet corn \n( i v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(o) Flowering BrassIcos \n\nBroccoli \nCaul If lower \nOthsrs \n\n(b) Head BrassIces \n\nBrussels Sprouts \nHsad cabbags \nOthere \n\n(c) Leafy Brass loos \nChinese cobbaue \nKals \nOthers \n\n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES \n\nAND FRESH HERBS \n\n(o) Lettuce ft similar \n\nCrsss \nLamb's lettuce \nLettuce \nScarole \nOthere \n\n(b) Splnoch ft similar \n\nBeet leaves (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n(d) Witloof \n(e) Herbs \n\nChsrvtl \nChives \nPorslsy \nCelery Le \nOthers \n\n\findividual \nGroups and examples of \nproducte to which the MRLs apply \n\nAmi trole \n\nAtrazlne \n\nBlnopoeryl \n\nBlphentrln \n\nBrujiuphos* \nsthyl \n\nBrcmopropy 1 ate \n\nOartap \n(expressed \nas f rss base) \n\nCqptafol \n\nCyhalothrln \n\n(sun of \niscmsrs) \n\nChlordans \n(sun of e l s - ft \ntrcns-lscmsrs) \n\nDlehlorprop \n\n( v i) LEDLME VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 05* \n\nPesticlds rss \n\ndues andmaxlnun residue levele \n\nma/kg) \n\n(fresh) Bsons(wlth pods) \n\nBsans(without pods) \nPsas (with pods) \nPsas(without pods) \nOthsrs \n\n( v i i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 05* \n\nAsparagus \nCardoons \nCslsry \nFennel \nGlobe artichokes \nLssk \nRhubarb \nOthsrs \n\n( v i i i) FUNGI \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(a) Cultivated \nnushrocms \n\n(b) WJ Id mushrooms \n\n3. PULSES \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\nBsans \nLentHe \nPeas \nOthsrs \n\n4, OIL SEEDS \n\n0. 05* \n\n0,T\u00bb \n\n0. 05* \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPappy sssd \nSssam sssd \nSunflower sssd \nRape eeed \nSoya bean \nMjstard \nCotton sssd \nOthers \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEar ly and wars potatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Brack tea processed from the \nleaves of Cornellio sinensis) \n7. HOPS (dried), including hop \npel lets end unooncentrated \npowder \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\nO J* \n\nC4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05. 0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\nOJXb* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. O2* \n\n0. 02* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n-\n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0*05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(*7 \n\n0vO2* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n20 \n\n-^l \n\n</0 \n\nJ \n\n\fDlchiorvos Oicofol \n\nDbnethcote \n\nDlnossb \n\nDioxothion \n\nEndrln \n\nEthylene \n\ndibrcmtds \n\nEthlon \n\nFenehlor-\nphos \n\nFen Itrothion Flucythrinote \n\nPestlctds residue* ondmaxlnun residue levels (moAfl) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n\\ \n\nGroups and sxaiples of \nproducts to which ths M is apply \n\nIndividual \n\n1. Fruit, fresh, dried or uncooked \n\npreserved by freezing not \ncontaining added sugar; nuts, \n\n( i) CITRUS FRUIT \n\nGrapefruit \nLemons \nLimes \nMandarins ( i n c l. Clementines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPumwlo \nOthers \n\n( i i) TREE NUTS \n\n(shsllsdor Almonds \nunshsllsd) Brazil nuts \nCashew nuts \nChsstnuts \nCoconuts \nHazelnuts \n\nPins nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthers \n\n(111) PO\u00a3 FRUIT \n\nApplss \n\nQuinces \nOthers \n\n( I v) STONE FRUIT \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPeachss ( i n c l. nsctarinss and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(v) BERRIES AND SMMJL FRUIT \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(a) Table and wine \n\nSESS. Table grapes \nWins grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(othsr thanwlld) \n\n(c) Cone fruit \n\n(other than wild) \nBlackberries \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberriss \nOthsrs \n\n\fDlchlorvce Dlcofol \n\nDbmthoote \n\nDlnoeeb \n\nDIOMOthlon \n\nEndrln \n\nEthylene \n\nEthlen \n\ndlbraidds \n\nFenchlor-\nphoo \n\nFen I troth ion Flucythrlnotel \n\nPesticide residues cndmaxlnun reeldue levele (moAg) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\nO. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nOJ \nV/O \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n|Croups and sxarplss of \nIndividual \nproducte to which the MRU apply \n\n(d) Othsr smal I fruit \n\nand berries (other \nthan wild) \nBilberries \n( f r u it of species \nvacciniun nyrti I lus) \nCranberries \nCurrants (rsd, block \nand whits) \nGooseberries \nOthsrs \n\n(s) Wild bsrriss and \nwild f r u it \n\n( v i) MISCELLANEOUS \n\nAoVocodos \n\nDatss \n\nKiwi \nKunauots \nLltchls \n\nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPomegranate \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n( I) ROOT AND TUBER VEGETABLES \n\nBeetroot \nCorrote \nCelerlac \nHxss radish \nJsrusalsm artichoke \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \n\nTurnips \nYam \nOthsrs \n\n( I I) BULB VEGETABLES \n\nGarlic \nChions \nShallots \nSt>rinQ onions \nOthers \n\n\fGroups end sxorplee of Indlviduol \nproducts to which the eRLe apply \n\nDlchlorvos Dlcofol \n\nDbmthoate \n\nDlnoseb \n\nDloxothlon \n\nEndrin \n\nEthylene \n\nEthlon \n\ndlbrcmlds \n\nPsstlctds residues cndmnclnun residue Isvele (mpAg) \n\n(ill) PRUITIN3 \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nFenltrothlan Flucythrlnate \n\nFsnchlor-\nphos \n\n0. 01* \n\n(a) Solanaceo \nTanatoes \nPeppers \nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\nCucuiDsrs \nGhsrkins \nCourgsttss \nOthsrs \n\n(c) Cucurbits Inedible \n\nMslons \nSaucshe* \nWatsnnslons \nOthsrs \n(d) Swsst corn \n(iv) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(a) Flowering BrassIc \n\nBroccoli \nCauliflower \nOthers \n(b) Head Bros*It \n\nBrussels Sprouts \n\nOthsrs \n\n(c) Lsafy Brassloos \nChinese oabbags \nKale \nOthers \n( d) Kohlrabi \n\n( v) LEAF VEGETABLES \n\nAN) FRESH HERBS \n\n(a) Lettuce ft stml lor \n\nCrese \nLamb's lettuce \nLettuce \nScorole \nOthers \n\n(b) Spinach ft similar \n\nBest leaves (chard) \n\n(c) Water crsss \n(d) Wit loot \n(s) herbs \n\nChervil \nChives \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthsrs \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n) \n\nJ \n\n\fDlchlorvos Dlcofol \n\nDbnsthoats \n\nDlnoeeb \n\nDloxathlcn \n\nEndrin \n\nEthylene \n\nEthicn \n\ndlbrcmids \n\nPesticide residues cndmoxlmjn residue levels (mgAfl) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nFsnitrothlon Flucythrlnate \n\nFenehlor-\nphos \n\n0. 01* \n\nGroups aid example* of \nIndividual \nproducts to which ths MtLs apply \n\n(vi) LEGUME VEGETABLES \n\n(fresh) Beane(with pods) \n\nBeans(wlthout poos) \nPsas (with pods) \nPsas(without pods) \nOthers \n\n( v i i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nAsparagus \nCar ebons \nCelery \nFennel \nGlobe artichokes \nLeek \nftuborb \nOthers \n\n( v i l i) FUNDI \n\n(a) Cultivated \nnushrocms \n(b) W1 Id nushrocms \n\n3. PULSES \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nLent lie \n\nOthere \n\nLlneeed \nPeanuts \nPoppy sssd \nSssam sssd \nSunflower seed \nRape eeed \nSoya bean \nMustard \nCotton ssed \nOthers \n\nPOTATOES \n\nEarly and ware potatoes \n\nTEA \n(Black tsa processed f rem the \nleaves of Camel Ilo sinensis) \nHOPS (dried). Including hop \npellets and unconcentroted \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n\fHsMoch loroMTCMns | \n\nMolothlon \n\nMalelc hydrozide Msthidothlon Mithyl brcmlds \n\nOntthOQt0 \n\nPofOCJLKlt \n\nProfonofoQ \n\n(WB) \n\nPesticide residue* andmaxliiun residue levels (mpAq) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\nGroups end sxcmplss of \nproducts to which t he MRLs a p p ly \n\ni n d i v l d u ol \n\nHsptochlor \n( s un of \nhsptachlor \n\nend \n\nhsptachlor \nepoxide) \n\n1. F r u i t, \n\nf r e s h, d r i ed or uncooked \n\npreserved by f r e e z i ng not \n\nc o n t a i n i ng added s u g a r; nuts \n\n( 1) CITRUS FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\nG r a p e f r u it \n\nLemons \n\nLimes \n\nMandarins \n\n( I n c l. clement I nee end \n\ns i m i l ar h y b r i d s) \n\nOranges \n\nP o m e lo \n\nOthers \n\n( i t) TREE NUTS \n\n( s h s l l s d or \n\nAlmond* \n\nl i e d) \n\nB r a z il n u ts \n\n0. 01* \n\nCashew n u te \n\nChestnuts \n\nCoconuts \n\nHazelnute \n\nP i ne nuts \n\nP i s t a c h i os \nWalnuts \nOthere \n\n( i l l) POC FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\nApples \nPears \nQuinces \nOthers \n\n( I v) STONE FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPooches (Incl. nectar inee and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(v) BERRIES AND SMALL FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(a) Table end wins \n\ngrapes \nTable crapes \nWins grape* \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(other thcnwlld) \n\n(c) Cane fruit \n\n(other than wild) \nBlockbsrriee \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthere \n\n\fGroups and excmples of Individual \nproducts to which the M is apply \n\nHwoch lorobtvieWnt) \n(KB) \n\nHsptochlor \n(sun of \nhsptochlor \nond \nhsptochlor \nepoxide) \n\nPesticide roe I dues and maxlnvn residue levels (moAg) \n\nMolothlon \n\nMolele hydrozlde Msthldothion \n\nMethyl bremlds MDnocrotophoa Cmethoote \n\nParaquat | Phoxbn \n\nProfenofos \n\n(d) Other small fruit \n\nand berries (other \nthen wild) \nBilberries \n( f r u it of specie* \nvccelnlun myrti I lus) \nCrertoerries \nCurrants (rsd, block \nend whits) \nGooseberries \nOthers \n\n(s) Wild berries and \nwild f r u it \n\n( v i) MISCELLANEOUS \n\n0. 01* \n\nActoctxte \nBononos \nDote* \nFlos \nKiwi \nKunquate \nLitchis \n\nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPemsgranots \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n(I) ROOT AN) TUBER VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\nBeetroot \nCar rote \nCelerlac \ntorse radish \nJerusalem artichokes \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \n\nTurnips \nYon \nOthers \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n\\ \n\n(II) BULB VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShallots \nSpring onions \nOthers \n\n\fPestle Ids rsslduss ondmaxlnun residue Isvele (moAfl) \n\nMaleic hydrazide Mrthldothlen \n\nMethyl bramids Mmrotophos Onethoote \n\nParaquat \n\nPhOKbn \n\nProfenofos \n\nHsMoch lor ob*Vmton#| \n(MCB) \n\nMotathlon \n\nHsptocblor \n(sun of \nhsptoehlor \nend \nheptochlor \nspoxias) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\nGroups end exenples of Individual \nproducte to which the M le apply \n\n(HI) FRUITING \n\n(a) Solanocea \nTanatoes \nPeppers \nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\nSSSL \nCucuitoere \nGherkins \nCourgsttss \nOthers \n\n(c) Cucurbits insdlbls \n\nMslcns \nSquashes \nWot srms Ions \nOthsrs \n(d) Sweet com \n( i v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(a) Flowering Braeelc \n\nDroccoli \nCauliflower \nOthere \n\n(b) Head Braeelc \n\nBrussels Sprouts \n\nOthsrs \n\n(c) Leafy Brassloos \nChinese cabbage \nKale \nOthers \n\n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES \nAND FRESH HERBS \n\n(a) Lettuce ft slmi lor \n\n0. 01* \n\nCress \nLotto's lettuce \nLettuce \nScarole \nOthsrs \n\n(b) Spinach ft similar \n\nBsst Isaves (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n(d) Wltloof \n(s) Hsrbs \n\nChervil \nChives \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthsrs \n\n\fGroups end examples of individual \nproducts to which the M is apply \n\nnMOCh loroMnzon91 \n(K\u00bb) \n\nMslathian \n\nHsptcchlor \n(sun of \nhsptcchlor \nand \nheptochlor \nepoxide) \n\nPesticide roolduss and maximum residue levels (mcyVg) \n\nMalelc hydroxide Mrthldothlcn \n\nMethyl bromide MDnocrc*ophos Cmsthoots \n\nParoquet \n\nPhoxbn \n\nProfenofoo \n\n( v l) LEGUME VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\n(fresh) Beans(wlth pods) \n\nBeans(wlthout poos) \nPeas (with pods) \nPsas(without pods) \nOthers \n\n( v i i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\nAsparagus \nCar doom \nCelery \nFennel \nGlobe artichokes \nLeek \nRhubarb \nOthers \n\n( v l i i) FUNGI \n\n(a) Cultivated \n\nffUBhrocffloi \n\n(b) Wl Id \n\n3. PULSES \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01* \n\nLentils \nPsas \nOthers \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\n0. 01* \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPoppy sssd \nSesoms ssed \nSunflower ssed \nRope seed \nSoya bean \nMustard \nCotton seed \nOthers \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEarly and wore potatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Black tea processed from the \nleaves of Cemelllo sinensis) \n\n7. HOPS (drisd), including hop \npel lets and unconcsntrated \npowder \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 02 \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 01 \n\n(4) \n\nSO \n1* early potatoee \n1. (4) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 06* \n\nK3 \n\n(4) \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n<*) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 06* \n\n\fProporglte Qulnolphos \n\nTEPP \n\nToKcphsns \n\n2. 4,5-T \n\nPhosmet \n\nPestle id* rssiduss end maxinun rssidus levels (moAg) \n\n(sun of choemst \nand its oxygen \nanalogue) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\nGroups and exenples of \nproducts to which ths M is apply \n\nindividual \n\n1. Fruit, fresh, drisdor uncooked \n\npreeerved by freezing not \ncontaining added sugar; nuts. (1) CITRUS FRUIT \n\nGrapefruit \nLenone \nLbnss \nMandarins ( I n c l. Clementines and \nsimilar hybrids) \nOranges \nPuimslo \nOthers \n\n( i i) TREE NUTS \n\n(shelled or Almond* \nunshsllsd) Brazil nuts \nCashew nuts \nChestnuts \nCoconuts \nHazslnuts \nMacedonia \nPecans \nPins nuts \nPistachios \nWalnuts \nOthers \n\n( i i i) POVE FRUIT \n\nApples \nPsors \nQuinces \nOthers \n\n( I v) STONE FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\nApricots \nCherries \nPeaches ( I n c l. nsctarinss and \nsimilar hybrids) \nPlum \nOthers \n\n(v) BERRIES AN) SMALL FRUIT \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n(a) Table and wine \n\n7\u00b0P\u00bb\u00bb \nTable grapes \nWins grapes \n(b) Strawberries \n\n(othsr thai wl Id) \n\n(c) Cane f r u it \n\n(other than wild) \nBlackberries \nDewberries \nLoganberries \nRaspberries \nOthsrs \n\n1 \n\nI \n\nO \n\n\fGroups and examples of Individual \nproducts to wMeh the M is apply \n\nPraporglte Ouinalphos \n\nTEPP \n\nToxaphene \n\n2. 4. 5-* \n\nPhosmet \n(sun of \nand its oxygen \nanalogue) \n\nPesticide residues crtdmaxlnun reeidue levele (mpAo) \n\n(d) Other smol I f r u it \nand berries (other \nthan wl Id) \nBilberries \n( f r u it of species \nvacciniun rryrti I lus) \nCranberries \nCurrants (rsd, block \nand shits) \nGooseberries \nOthers \n\n(s) Wild bsrriss end \nwild f r u it \n\n( v i) MISOELLANEOUS \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\nAtVocodos \nBananas \nDot ss \nFigs \nKiwi \nKunauats \nLitchls \n\nOlives \nPassion f r u it \nPineapples \nPomsgranats \nOthers \n\n2. Vegetables, fresh or \n\nuncooked, frozen or dry \n(I) ROOT AN) TUBER VEGETABLES \n\nBeetroot \nCarrots \nCelerloc \nHoree radish \nJsrusolen artichokes \nParsnip \nParsley root \nRadishes \nSalsify \nSweet Potatoes \nSwsdss \nTurnips \nYcm \nOthers \n(II) BULB VEGETABLES \n\nGarlic \nOnions \nShallots \nSpring onions \nOthers \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n\fGroups and excnplee of individual \nproduete to which the M le apply \n\nPrcporglte Quinalphos \n\nTEPP \n\nTOMsphsVM \n\n2,4. 5-T \n\n(sun of phosmst \nand ite oxygen \nanalogue) \n\n( H i) FRUITING \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\nPesticide rsslduss cndmaxiwun reel due levels (mcAcj) \n\n(a) Solonocoo \nTomatoes \nPeppers \nAubergines \nOthers \n\n(b) Cucurbits -edible \n\npeel \nCucuitosrs \nGhsrklns \nCourgsttss \nOthers \n\n(c) Cucurbits Inedible \n\npeel. Melons \nSquashes \nWotermelone \nOthsrs \n(d) Swest corn \n( i v) BRASSICA VEGETABLES \n\n(o) Flowering Br ass I cos \n\nBroccoli \nCauliflower \nOthers \n\n(b) Head Brass I c \n\nBruseels Sprouts \nHsod cabbage \nOthers \n\n(c) Leafy Brass loos \nChinese cabbage \nKals \nOthers \n(d) Kohlrabi \n\n(v) LEAF VEGETABLES \n\nAND FRESH HERBS \n\n(a) Lettuce ft similar \n\nCress \nLamb's lettuce \nLettuce \nScarole \nOthers \n\n(b) Spinach ft similar \n\nBest Isave* (chard) \n\n(c) Water cress \n(d) Wltloof \n(s) Herbs \n\nChervil \nChive* \nParsley \nCelery Leaves \nOthsrs \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. O5* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n\fGroups and examples of Individual \nproducts to which ths M is apply \n\nProporglts \n\nQulnalphos \n\nTEPP \n\nTox0pfMn# \n\n2. 4. 5-T \n\nrTsOeVlwtt \n(sun of phovwt \nand Its oxygen \nonologu\u00ab) \n\nPesticide rsslduss ondmoxlnun residue levels (mcyVg) \n\n( v i) LEGUME VEGETABLES \n\n(fresh) Beons(wlth pods) \n\nBsans(without pods) \nPeae (with poos) \nPeos(without pods) \nOthers \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n( v l i) STEM VEGETABLES \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\nAeparocus \nCar ebons \nCelery \nFennel \nGlobe artichokes \nLeek \nRhubarb \nOthers \n\n( v l i I) FUNGI \n\n(a) Cultivated \n\nnristtnroCsTei \n(b) Wi Id mushroom \n\n3. PULSES \n\n4. OIL SEEDS \n\nLent l ie \nPeas \nOthers \n\nLinseed \nPeanuts \nPoppy seed \nSeeems seed \nSunflower seed \nRape eeed \nSoya bean \nsustard \nCotton sssd \nOthers \n\n5. POTATOES \n\nEarly and wars potatoes \n\n6. TEA \n\n(Black tea processed f rem the \nleaves of Camellia sinensis) \n\n7. HOPS (dried), including hap \npel lets and unconcentrated \npowder \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n(4) \n\n(4) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 05* \n\n0. 1* \n\n(4) \n\n0. 01* \n\n0. 1* \n\n0. 06* \n\n\u2022 Indicates lower limit of analytical determination. (1)(2)(3)(4) Should levels not be adopted by 1 January 1996, the following rrnxinun levels shall apply as Indicated thereafter: \n\n(1) - 0. 02* \n(2) - 0. 01* \n(3) - 0. 05* \n( 4 ) - 0. 1* \n\nWo \n\n\f-MM -\n\nArticle 3 \n\nMember States shall bring into force not later than 31 December 1992 the \n\nlaws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with this \n\nDirect ive. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to \n\nthis Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of \n\ntheir official publication. The methods of making such a reference shall be \n\nlaid down by the Member states. Art icle 4 \n\nThis Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\n\f- M - 5 \"-\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 161 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-178-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43565-8 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ab91076-69ee-4c78-9b8b-bc5d49e0ba25", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1062/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Connection between nuclear energy and leukaemia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "cancer,health risk,impact study,nuclear energy,nuclear power station", "workIds": "celex:91992E001062", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cancer", "health risk", "impact study", "nuclear energy", "nuclear power station"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ab91076-69ee-4c78-9b8b-bc5d49e0ba25", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7f5129e-4c02-46fe-b60b-afcd7e2cf5a3", "title": "Council Regulation (ECC) No 1249/92 of 30 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self- employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Community migration,dependant,self-employment,social security,wage earner", "workIds": "celex:31992R1249,oj:JOL_1992_136_R_0028_007", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community migration", "dependant", "self-employment", "social security", "wage earner"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7f5129e-4c02-46fe-b60b-afcd7e2cf5a3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ac92859-6d8c-4732-a818-b3c084b93f68", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1096/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with a Commission directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,electrical equipment,harmonisation of standards,medicine,veterinarian", "workIds": "celex:91992E001096", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "electrical equipment", "harmonisation of standards", "medicine", "veterinarian"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ac92859-6d8c-4732-a818-b3c084b93f68", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/40a01cec-4eca-457e-acdf-e119fd62551c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1077/92 by Mr Antonio LA PERGOLA to the Commission. Wing shooting at Madonna del Tonnaro (Messina)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LA PERGOLA", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Sicily,area management,hunting,hunting regulations,protected species,protection of animal life,sports facilities,wildlife", "workIds": "celex:91992E001077", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Sicily", "area management", "hunting", "hunting regulations", "protected species", "protection of animal life", "sports facilities", "wildlife"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/40a01cec-4eca-457e-acdf-e119fd62551c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/755595a3-8a34-48df-9b86-8f240897fd98", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1072/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Insurance contributions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Greece,insurance company,privatisation,public sector,shipbuilding,social security,social-security contribution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001072", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "insurance company", "privatisation", "public sector", "shipbuilding", "social security", "social-security contribution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/755595a3-8a34-48df-9b86-8f240897fd98", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/64c1bfa9-5998-4d88-a029-79cd30083fe3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1086/92 by Mr Madron SELIGMAN to the Commission. Botswana fence", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SELIGMAN", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Botswana,environmental impact,foot-and-mouth disease,grassland,impact study,livestock,protection of animals,wildlife,zoology", "workIds": "celex:91992E001086", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Botswana", "environmental impact", "foot-and-mouth disease", "grassland", "impact study", "livestock", "protection of animals", "wildlife", "zoology"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/64c1bfa9-5998-4d88-a029-79cd30083fe3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf5b7b9f-1dfa-41ef-8bf8-6bb4192175a7", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1112/92 of 30 April 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN codes 6401 and 6402, originating in Malaysia, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Malaysia,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1112,oj:JOL_1992_117_R_0073_073", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Malaysia", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf5b7b9f-1dfa-41ef-8bf8-6bb4192175a7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4060eba6-5896-4220-bdb2-b42ae5c84680", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the Commission document entitled 'From the Single Act to Maastricht and beyond - The means to match our ambitions'", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Community budget,EU policy,Single European Act,own resources,reform of the CAP", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0501,oj:JOC_1992_169_R_0034_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "EU policy", "Single European Act", "own resources", "reform of the CAP"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4060eba6-5896-4220-bdb2-b42ae5c84680", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/96e81617-aab6-4bca-8721-f80f3b3fdc6f", "title": "European Social Fund : Community support framework 1990-1992: Objectives 3 and 4: Federal Republic of Germany.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "EU aid,EU financing,EU policy,Germany,Structural Funds,development policy,economic conversion,economic region,regional policy", "workIds": "PUB_CM7391003", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "EU financing", "EU policy", "Germany", "Structural Funds", "development policy", "economic conversion", "economic region", "regional policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/96e81617-aab6-4bca-8721-f80f3b3fdc6f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7d61c033-62a9-4c2d-87c7-6705985285e5", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 relating to a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of video cassette originating in Hong Kong", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Hong Kong,anti-dumping duty,export price,free-at-frontier price,trading margin,video cassette", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0157,comnat:COM_1992_0157_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Hong Kong", "anti-dumping duty", "export price", "free-at-frontier price", "trading margin", "video cassette"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7d61c033-62a9-4c2d-87c7-6705985285e5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 157 final \n\nBrussels, 30 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 relating to a \n\ndefinitive anti-dumping duty on imports of video \n\ncassettes originating in Hong Kong \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n(1) By Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89, the Council imposed a definitive \n\nanti-dumping duty of 21. 9% on imports of VHS video tape in cassettes \n\noriginating in Hong Kong. In this Regulation, the Council indicated \n\nthat the Commission will review this duty, should a newcoming \n\nexporter make a substantiated request in this respect. (2) By a notice published in the Official Journal on the 11 January 1991 \n\nthe Commission initiated such a review of Regulation (EEC) No \n\n1768/89 as it concerned a Hong Kong company, Wai Shing. (3) The investigation showed that Wai Shing had begun to export own \n\nproduced video cassettes to the European Community after the entry \n\ninto force of the above Regulation. (4) Normal value was determined on the basis of constructed value of the \n\nmodels concerned. Export price was based on the actual price paid or \n\npayable for export. The dumping margin established was 13. 8%. (5) Given the specific economic circumstances of this case, the anti \n\ndumping duty to be imposed should be a variable duty equal to the \n\ndifference between the normal value and the net price free-at-the-\n\nCommunity-frontier. (6) In conclusion, it is proposed that the Council amends its Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 1768/89, and impose on VHS video tapes in cassettes \n\nmanufactured by Wai Shing and originating in Hong Kong the above \n\nvariable duty for the models exported to the Community. - 3 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 relating to a \n\ndefinitive anti-dumping duty on imports of video \n\ncassettes originating in Hong Kong \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on \n\nprotection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not \n\nmembers of the European Economic Community(^), and in particular \n\nArticle 14 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after \n\nconsultation within the Advisory Committee as provided for under the \n\nabove Regulation, \n\nWhereas: \n\nI - PREVIOUS PROCEDURE \n\n(1) In Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89(2), the Council imposed in \n\nparticular a definitive anti-dumping duty of 21. 9% on imports of VHS \n\nvideo tape in cassettes falling within CN code ex 8523 13 00 \n\noriginating in Hong Kong, with the exception of imports from several \n\nexporters specifically mentioned which were subject to a lesser rate \n\nof duty or no duty at all. (1) OJ No L 209, 2. 8. 1988, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 174, 22. 6. 1989, p. 1 \n\n\f- 4 -\n\n(2) In recital 43 of Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89, concerning companies \n\nwhich started or will start exporting own-produced cassettes to the \n\nCommunity after the investigation period (newcomers), the Council \n\nnoted that the Commission was ready to initiate without delay a \n\nreview proceeding if the exporting company could show the \n\nCommission, and supply to that effect sufficient evidence, that it \n\ndid not export the products concerned to the Community during the \n\nperiod of investigation. The company also had to demonstrate that \n\nit only started those exports after the said period and that it is \n\nnot related to or associated with any of the companies subject to \n\nthe investigation. II - REVIEW PROCEDURE \n\n(3) By a notice published on 11 January 1991 (3), the Commission, after \n\nconsultation with the Advisory Committee and in accordance with \n\nArticle 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 initiated a review of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1768/89 as it concerned a Hong Kong company, Wai \n\nShing. This company had submitted that it did not export the \n\nproducts subject to the anti-dumping duty during the previous period \n\nof investigation (1 January - 30 November 1987). In addition, it \n\nsubmitted that it was not related to any of the companies subject \n\nto the previous investigation for which dumping was found and \n\nprovided substantiated evidence that it just had begun to export \n\nvideo cassettes to the Community. Accordingly, the Commission \n\ncommenced an investigation in order to verify that Wai Shing could \n\nbe considered as a newcomer and to establish a dumping margin, if \n\nany, for this company. (3) OJ Ho C 7, 11. 1. 1991, p. 2. - 5 -\n\nIII - RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION \n\n1. Newcomer \n\n(4) The investigation showed that Wai Shing began to export own-produced \n\nvideo cassettes to the Community after the previous investigation \n\nperiod mentioned in recital 3. In addition, it was found that this \n\ncompany had no link of any sort with the exporters involved in the \n\nprevious procedure and for which dumping was found. The Council \n\nconfirms that it should accordingly be considered as a newcomer and \n\nthat a partial review of Regulation (CEE) No 1768/89 as it concerned \n\nWai Shing was warranted. 2. Normal value \n\n(5) Since Wai Shing did not sell any video cassettes on the domestic \n\nmarket during the investigation period for this review, normal value \n\nwas determined on the basis of the constructed value of the models \n\nconcerned in accordance with Article 2(3)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No \n\n2423/88. This constructed value was computed on the basis of all \n\ncosts, both fixed and variable, in the country of origin, of \n\nmaterials and manufacture for the models exported to the Community \n\nplus a reasonable amount for selling, administrative, other general \n\nexpenses and profit. (6) As far as selling, administrative and general expenses were \n\nconcerned, they were calculated by reference to such expenses \n\nincurred by another Hong Kong manufacturer for its sales of video \n\ncassettes on the domestic market, since it was verified that these \n\nexpenses corresponded to such costs as they were stated in the \n\naudited accounts of Wai Shing. As far as profit was concerned, it was found appropriate to apply a \n\nprofit rate of 8% on turnover; this rate was used in Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 1768/89 for the Hong Kong exporters and, according to the \n\ninformation available to the Commission, can still be regarded as \n\nthe profit that Hong Kong companies can normally achieve on their \n\ndomestic market. The Council confirms the foregoing findings. - 6 -\n\n(7) On this basis, normal value was established for the models exported \n\nto the Community and for the three qualities of tapes used by Wai \n\nShing , namely normal grade, high grade and super high grade. 3. Export price \n\n(8) Export prices were determined on the basis of the prices, net of all \n\nrebates, actually paid or payable for the video cassettes sold for \n\nexport by Wai Shing to the Community. Indeed, since exports were \n\nmade directly to independent importers in the Community, these \n\nexport prices were found to be reliable. The Council confirms this finding. 4. Comparison \n\n(9) For the purpose of a fair comparison between normal value and export \n\nprice, the Commission took account of differences affecting price \n\ncomparability in accordance with Article 2(9) and (10) of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2423/88. All comparisons were made at ex-works level, at \n\nthe same level of trade and, for the export price, on a \n\ntransaction by transaction basis. The examination of the facts shows the existence of dumping, the \n\nmargin of dumping being equal to the amount by which normal value \n\nexceeds the price for export to the Community, which, as expressed \n\nas a percentage of total c. i. f. value, was 13. 8%. The Council confirms the above findings. - 7 -\n\nIV - AMENDMENT OF THE REVIEWED MEASURES \n\n(10) No new investigation was carried out as regards injury since this \n\nwas not requested. In addition, the Commission considers that the \n\ninjury findings established in Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 are still \n\nvalid. Therefore, since the price increase which would be required \n\nto eliminate the injury level exceeds the dumping margin found for \n\nthe company concerned, as established in Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 \n\n(recital 7 1 ), the duty to be imposed should correspond to the \n\ndumping margin. (11) The complainants and Wai Shing were informed of the essential facts \n\nand considerations on the basis of which it was intended to propose \n\nthe replacement of the duty imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 \n\nin respect of Wai Shing by an anti-dumping duty established on the \n\nbasis of the above and were given every opportunity to comment. After this disclosure, Wai Shing offered a price undertaking. However, in the light of the economic structure of the exporter, in \n\nparticular the fact that it supplies and exports to the Community \n\nvideo cassettes of various origins, and given the evolution of the \n\nflows of trade for this product from Hong Kong, the monitoring of \n\nsuch undertaking would not be manageable. Therefore, the Commission \n\nconsidered, after consultation, that the undertaking offer submitted \n\nby Wai Shing was not acceptable. (12) In addition, the Commission found that the prices of video cassettes \n\noriginating in Hong Kong were subject to a high volatility. The \n\nCommission thus considered that, for the models investigated, the \n\nduty should take the form of a variable duty equal to the difference \n\nbetween price per cassette net, free-at-Community-frontier, not \n\ncleared through customs, and a floor price established on the basis \n\nof the normal value for each individual model. Since it cannot be \n\nexcluded that the exporter will also export models which were not \n\ncovered by the investigation, it appears appropriate to establish an \n\nad valorem duty at the level of the dumping margin found for all \n\nother video cassettes exported to the Community by this company. The \n\nCouncil confirms the above findings. - 8 -\n\n(13) Accordingly, it is considered appropriate that Regulation (EEC) No \n\n1768/89 should be amended in respect of Wai Shing and that, until \n\nthe Regulation's expiry, a definitive anti-dumping duty shall be \n\nimposed on VHS video tapes in cassettes manufactured by Wai Shing \n\nand originating in Hong Kong in respect of the models E-30, E-60, E-\n\n90, E-120, E-180, E-195 and E-240, either normal grade, or high \n\ngrade or super high grade. This duty shall be equal to the \n\ndifference between a floor price based on this normal value and \n\ntheir net price free-at-the-Community-frontier not cleared through \n\ncustoms, payable by the first importer. All other models of video \n\ncassettes manufactured by Wai Shing and originating in Hong Kong \n\nshall be subject to a duty of 13. 8% ad valorem, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe following subparagraph is added to Article 1(3) of Regulation (EEC) \n\nNo 1768/89: \n\n\"The duty specified in paragraph 2(b) shall not apply to models of video \n\ntape in cassettes E-30, E-60, E-90, E-120, E-180, E-195 and E-240 in \n\nquality normal grade (NG), high grade (HG) or super high grade (SHG) as \n\nspecified hereafter and manufactured and sold for export to the Community \n\nby Wai Shing (Hong Kong) (TARIC additional Code 8255); these models shall \n\ninstead be subject to a duty equal to the difference between the price \n\nmentioned hereunder for each of the models concerned and their net price, \n\nfree-at-Community-frontier before duty: \n\nE-30 \n\nSHG \n\nE-60 \n\nSHG \n\nHG \n\nE-90 \n\nSHG \n\nECU \n\nAdditional Taric Code \n\n0,55 \n\n0,68 \n\n0,66 \n\n0,81 \n\n8626 \n\n8627 \n\n8628 \n\n8629 \n\n\fE-120 \n\nSHG \n\nHG \n\nE-180 \n\nSHG \n\nHG \n\nNG \n\nSHG \n\nHG \n\nSHG \n\nHG \n\nE-195 \n\nE-240 \n\n- 9 -\n\n0,94 \n\n0,85 \n\n1,20 \n\n1,13 \n\n1,10 \n\n1,27 \n\n1,20 \n\n1,47 \n\n1,36 \n\n8630 \n\n8631 \n\n8632 \n\n8633 \n\n8634 \n\n8635 \n\n8636 \n\n8637 \n\n8638 \n\nFor all other video tapes in cassettes produced by Wai Shing the duty \n\nshall be 13. 8% of their net price, free-at-Community-frontier before \n\nduty. \" \n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its \n\npublication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable \n\nin all Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council, \n\n\f\f^ 10 -\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 157 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n11 02 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-175-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43474-0 \n\noffice for Officiai Publications of the European Commimities \ni -2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2442fa3a-12cd-4ea8-9052-bac2e76399b4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1066/92 by Joaquim MIRANDA DA SILVA to the Commission. Protection of the cultural and natural heritage", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MIRANDA DA SILVA", "date": "1992-04-30", "subjects": "Council of Europe,Unesco,administrative cooperation,cultural heritage,cultural object,heritage protection", "workIds": "celex:91992E001066", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of Europe", "Unesco", "administrative cooperation", "cultural heritage", "cultural object", "heritage protection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2442fa3a-12cd-4ea8-9052-bac2e76399b4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1c89508c-f4d9-4546-9480-dd537dd5faf6", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1065/92 of 29 April 1992 amending for the second time Regulation (EEC) No 2282/90 laying down detailed rules for increasing the consumption and utilization of apples and the consumption of citrus fruit", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "EU financing,citrus fruit,food consumption,pip fruit,sales promotion", "workIds": "celex:31992R1065,oj:JOL_1992_112_R_0025_039", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "citrus fruit", "food consumption", "pip fruit", "sales promotion"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1c89508c-f4d9-4546-9480-dd537dd5faf6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e3b69cd9-237c-4ea3-a96c-f5dca1ea9805", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1131/92 of 29 April 1992 amending the list annexed to Regulation (EEC) No 55/87 establishing the list of vessels exceeding eight metres length overall permitted to use beam trawls within certain areas of the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Germany,Netherlands,United Kingdom,fishing regulations,fishing vessel,technical standard", "workIds": "celex:31992R1131,oj:JOL_1992_120_R_0013_025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "Netherlands", "United Kingdom", "fishing regulations", "fishing vessel", "technical standard"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e3b69cd9-237c-4ea3-a96c-f5dca1ea9805", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/84a6708c-e0f3-4c47-b088-8cc30931ad4a", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the communication from the Commission on 'The Role of Mutual Guarantee Systems (MGSs) in the Financing of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the European Community'", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "corporate finance,industrial policy,small and medium industries,small and medium-sized enterprises", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0492,oj:JOC_1992_169_R_0007_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["corporate finance", "industrial policy", "small and medium industries", "small and medium-sized enterprises"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/84a6708c-e0f3-4c47-b088-8cc30931ad4a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7770213a-8562-4b8b-bf68-e3d9e4f25367", "title": "92/272/EEC: Council Decision of 29 April 1992 on the dissemination and exploitation of knowledge resulting from the specific programmes of research and technological development of the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "EU financing,EU programme,dissemination of information,research and development,technological change", "workIds": "celex:31992D0272,oj:JOL_1992_141_R_0001_010", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "EU programme", "dissemination of information", "research and development", "technological change"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7770213a-8562-4b8b-bf68-e3d9e4f25367", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ebca615f-101b-40d5-970f-e684aa227be5", "title": "Social security for migrant workers : Guide concerning the rights and obligations with regard to social security of employed persons and self-employed persons going to work in Portugal.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion,European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Portugal,migrant worker,social security", "workIds": "PUB_CE1888004", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "migrant worker", "social security"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ebca615f-101b-40d5-970f-e684aa227be5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d1f1ae91-bd61-4de6-8afd-5feaa7978040", "title": "92/368/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of Portugal pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the Portugese text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Portugal,fishing fleet,fishing vessel", "workIds": "celex:31992D0368,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0048_034", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "fishing fleet", "fishing vessel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d1f1ae91-bd61-4de6-8afd-5feaa7978040", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/321ce937-8de6-4592-9fed-9c0dc9e16d71", "title": "A new Community standards policy : the new approach in harmonization, motor vehicles, tractors and agricultural machinery, foodstuffs, pharmaceutical products, chemical products, construction, other areas. volume 4.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "agricultural machinery,building,foodstuff,harmonisation of standards,motor vehicle,pharmaceutical product,single market,standardisation", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CO6291004", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural machinery", "building", "foodstuff", "harmonisation of standards", "motor vehicle", "pharmaceutical product", "single market", "standardisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/321ce937-8de6-4592-9fed-9c0dc9e16d71", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9111ddf9-bab6-41cc-a30c-133c054e25e9", "title": "Social security for migrant workers : Guide concerning the rights and obligations with regard to social security of persons going to work in Italy.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion,European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Italy,migrant worker,social security", "workIds": "PUB_CE1888002", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "migrant worker", "social security"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9111ddf9-bab6-41cc-a30c-133c054e25e9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1f4fb79a-12aa-4afb-91e8-f5ceb3f247f6", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive relating to fertilizers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "agricultural policy,fertiliser,means of agricultural production", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0493,oj:JOC_1992_169_R_0011_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural policy", "fertiliser", "means of agricultural production"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1f4fb79a-12aa-4afb-91e8-f5ceb3f247f6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b1719d3d-7f78-43cc-bc55-95ccded3a4f9", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1132/92 of 29 April 1992 amending the list annexed to Regulation (EEC) No 55/87 establishing the list of vessels exceeding eight metres length overall permitted to use beam trawls within certain areas of the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Community fisheries,fishing industry,fishing vessel,standard", "workIds": "celex:31992R1132,oj:JOL_1992_120_R_0015_026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community fisheries", "fishing industry", "fishing vessel", "standard"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b1719d3d-7f78-43cc-bc55-95ccded3a4f9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/39b78954-292c-4664-bc05-a186d28e1b0e", "title": "92/361/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of Germany pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the German text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Germany,fishing fleet,fishing vessel", "workIds": "celex:31992D0361,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0015_027", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "fishing fleet", "fishing vessel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/39b78954-292c-4664-bc05-a186d28e1b0e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/376eac99-a48e-4c97-af1f-daffb0d0abe5", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive concerning minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers in the extractive industries for the exploration and exploitation of minerals in mines and quarries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "document,mining extraction,occupational health,occupational safety,working conditions", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0499,oj:JOC_1992_169_R_0028_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["document", "mining extraction", "occupational health", "occupational safety", "working conditions"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/376eac99-a48e-4c97-af1f-daffb0d0abe5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/327abd06-a342-41f4-a926-b81a376be38a", "title": "92/359/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of Belgium pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the Dutch and the French texts are authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "common fisheries policy,fishing fleet,fishing vessel", "workIds": "celex:31992D0359,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0006_025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common fisheries policy", "fishing fleet", "fishing vessel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/327abd06-a342-41f4-a926-b81a376be38a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/97dfd5a1-0e2e-429b-a00e-4fb7976622aa", "title": "92/275/Euratom: Council Decision of 29 April 1992 adopting a supplementary research programme to be implemented by the Joint Research Centre for the European Atomic Energy Community (1992-1995)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Joint Research Centre,nuclear energy,nuclear reactor,nuclear safety,research programme", "workIds": "celex:31992D0275,oj:JOL_1992_141_R_0027_009", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Joint Research Centre", "nuclear energy", "nuclear reactor", "nuclear safety", "research programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/97dfd5a1-0e2e-429b-a00e-4fb7976622aa", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/901cea2b-0875-430e-9ad6-aec5130b33cd", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1063/92 of 29 April 1992 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 916/92 on the transfer to Portugal of 140 000 tonnes of breadmaking wheat held by the French intervention agency", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "France,Portugal,award of contract,common wheat,intervention agency", "workIds": "celex:31992R1063,oj:JOL_1992_112_R_0019_037", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "Portugal", "award of contract", "common wheat", "intervention agency"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/901cea2b-0875-430e-9ad6-aec5130b33cd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/93dcd70b-be1a-4e2d-9f07-34ec1b2a8a5c", "title": "92/367/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of Spain pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the Spanish text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Spain,fishing fleet,fishing vessel", "workIds": "celex:31992D0367,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0043_033", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "fishing fleet", "fishing vessel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/93dcd70b-be1a-4e2d-9f07-34ec1b2a8a5c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/383ca76b-076b-4041-831d-1a4c2d761010", "title": "92/362/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of Italy pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the Italian text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Italy,fishing fleet,fishing vessel", "workIds": "celex:31992D0362,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0020_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "fishing fleet", "fishing vessel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/383ca76b-076b-4041-831d-1a4c2d761010", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d3f6d2a7-e7e6-48c5-a482-dfae49f54a56", "title": "Council Resolution of 29 April 1992 concerning the activities to be undertaken by the Joint Research Centre", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_legislative_other_oj_c,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Joint Research Centre,financial aid,research expenditure (EU),research programme,staff", "workIds": "celex:31992Y0509(01),oj:JOC_1992_118_R_0008_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Joint Research Centre", "financial aid", "research expenditure (EU)", "research programme", "staff"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d3f6d2a7-e7e6-48c5-a482-dfae49f54a56", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3d3ad9e9-3bf9-4609-b38f-253231f3a91d", "title": "92/360/EECCommission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of the Netherlands pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the Dutch text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Netherlands,fishing fleet,fishing vessel", "workIds": "celex:31992D0360,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0010_026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Netherlands", "fishing fleet", "fishing vessel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3d3ad9e9-3bf9-4609-b38f-253231f3a91d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cebf20bb-e9ed-400f-b725-a57916fb8078", "title": "92/243/EEC: Council Decision of 29 April 1992 on the granting of daily allowances to Members of the Economic and Social Committee, alternates and experts", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "European Economic and Social Committee,European official,allowances and expenses,self-employed person", "workIds": "celex:31992D0243,oj:JOL_1992_124_R_0039_039", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic and Social Committee", "European official", "allowances and expenses", "self-employed person"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cebf20bb-e9ed-400f-b725-a57916fb8078", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e1efa9f-d077-4afa-952b-e370c84ad36b", "title": "Occupational profiles of vocational counsellors in the Federal Republic of Germany.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Cedefop", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Germany,educational guidance,vocational guidance,vocational training", "workIds": "PUB_HX7492362", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "educational guidance", "vocational guidance", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e1efa9f-d077-4afa-952b-e370c84ad36b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9150b049-529c-4c06-a6a6-9da649d6a980", "title": "92/358/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of France pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the French text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "France,action programme,fishing fleet", "workIds": "celex:31992D0358,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0001_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "action programme", "fishing fleet"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9150b049-529c-4c06-a6a6-9da649d6a980", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b2d8c623-1bc0-49e0-b9a3-6ea026022fd0", "title": "Council Directive 92/36/EEC of 29 April 1992 amending, with regard to African horse sickness, Directive 90/426/EEC on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "equidae,health certificate,health control,import,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992L0036,oj:JOL_1992_157_R_0028_013", "eurovoc_concepts": ["equidae", "health certificate", "health control", "import", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b2d8c623-1bc0-49e0-b9a3-6ea026022fd0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fbdbfb2c-0f4f-4424-b4fc-c252cbfa900e", "title": "92/273/EEC: Council Decision of 29 April 1992 adopting specific research programmes to be implemented by the Joint Research Centre for the European Economic Community (1992-1994)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "applied research,basic research,dissemination of information,research body,research programme", "workIds": "celex:31992D0273,oj:JOL_1992_141_R_0011_011", "eurovoc_concepts": ["applied research", "basic research", "dissemination of information", "research body", "research programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fbdbfb2c-0f4f-4424-b4fc-c252cbfa900e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cc15a009-dbf4-43a6-9b52-5910f0c79aea", "title": "92/365/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of Denmark pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the Danish text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Denmark,fishing fleet,fishing vessel", "workIds": "celex:31992D0365,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0033_031", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "fishing fleet", "fishing vessel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cc15a009-dbf4-43a6-9b52-5910f0c79aea", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/72f7a8fe-7f4d-4a28-9d63-85e066ebf616", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1064/92 of 29 April 1992 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 916/92 on the transfer to Portugal of 170 000 tonnes of barley held by the Spanish intervention agency", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Portugal,Spain,award of contract,barley,intervention agency", "workIds": "celex:31992R1064,oj:JOL_1992_112_R_0022_038", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "Spain", "award of contract", "barley", "intervention agency"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/72f7a8fe-7f4d-4a28-9d63-85e066ebf616", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1a451b3e-c782-44c6-a468-9fe42609f706", "title": "OWN-INITIATIVE OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the draft notice from the Commisison to the Member States laying down guidelines for operational programmes which Member States are invited to establish within the framework of the Community initiative for regions heavily dependent on the textiles and clothing sector (Retex)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_other_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "clothing,regional policy,textile industry,textile product", "workIds": "celex:51992IE0498,oj:JOC_1992_169_R_0025_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["clothing", "regional policy", "textile industry", "textile product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1a451b3e-c782-44c6-a468-9fe42609f706", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e1094c35-699c-4186-abed-f5a04630d21d", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1061/92 of 29 April 1992 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 916/92 on the transfer to Portugal of 12 000 tonnes of durum wheat held by the Spanish intervention agency", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Portugal,Spain,award of contract,durum wheat,intervention agency", "workIds": "celex:31992R1061,oj:JOL_1992_112_R_0013_035", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "Spain", "award of contract", "durum wheat", "intervention agency"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e1094c35-699c-4186-abed-f5a04630d21d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/48458abc-0058-4f5b-a1e1-5ec7400a8a63", "title": "92/364/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of Ireland pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the English text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Ireland,action programme", "workIds": "celex:31992D0364,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0029_030", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ireland", "action programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/48458abc-0058-4f5b-a1e1-5ec7400a8a63", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e59a817-44b0-4a37-85f8-47cf263eb3b0", "title": "Council Directive 92/35/EEC of 29 April 1992 laying down control rules and measures to combat African horse sickness", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "animal plague,epidemiology,equidae,vaccination,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:31992L0035,oj:JOL_1992_157_R_0019_012", "eurovoc_concepts": ["animal plague", "epidemiology", "equidae", "vaccination", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e59a817-44b0-4a37-85f8-47cf263eb3b0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d7af8639-960f-4e53-9b7b-09c616a2fee7", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1062/92 of 29 April 1992 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 916/92 on the transfer to Portugal of 30 000 tonnes of feed wheat held by the Danish intervention agency", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Denmark,Portugal,award of contract,common wheat,intervention agency", "workIds": "celex:31992R1062,oj:JOL_1992_112_R_0016_036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "Portugal", "award of contract", "common wheat", "intervention agency"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d7af8639-960f-4e53-9b7b-09c616a2fee7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ac1230e1-91fd-48e4-9218-c55bb2045a68", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive concerning the minimum safety and health requirements for work on board fishing vessels - Tenth individual Directive within the meaning of Directive 89/391/EEC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "crew,fishing vessel,occupational health,occupational safety,worker information", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0504,oj:JOC_1992_169_R_0046_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["crew", "fishing vessel", "occupational health", "occupational safety", "worker information"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ac1230e1-91fd-48e4-9218-c55bb2045a68", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d9733ba0-cfe3-4a38-80d8-3c5b66499ae9", "title": "92/274/Euratom: Council Decision of 29 April 1992 adopting specific research programmes to be implemented by the joint research centre for the European Atomic Energy Community (1992-1994)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "nuclear energy,nuclear reactor,nuclear safety,research body,research programme", "workIds": "celex:31992D0274,oj:JOL_1992_141_R_0020_008", "eurovoc_concepts": ["nuclear energy", "nuclear reactor", "nuclear safety", "research body", "research programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d9733ba0-cfe3-4a38-80d8-3c5b66499ae9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b3c51216-c97c-41d0-9380-f3bf09696c79", "title": "92/247/EEC: Council Decision of 29 April 1992 adopting a specific research and technological development programme in the field of measurements and testing (1990-1994)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "metrology,research and development,research body,testing", "workIds": "celex:31992D0247,oj:JOL_1992_126_R_0012_022", "eurovoc_concepts": ["metrology", "research and development", "research body", "testing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b3c51216-c97c-41d0-9380-f3bf09696c79", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a52da364-8eb4-4de9-b0f0-fdf2894ac85f", "title": "92/363/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of the United Kingdom pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the English text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "United Kingdom,action programme", "workIds": "celex:31992D0363,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0025_029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "action programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a52da364-8eb4-4de9-b0f0-fdf2894ac85f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2a49fd3-2fbb-412c-a254-6019cbf27024", "title": "European Social Fund : Community support framework 1990-1992: Objectives 3 and 4: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "EU aid,EU financing,EU policy,Luxembourg,Structural Funds,development policy,economic conversion,economic region,regional policy", "workIds": "PUB_CM7391007", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "EU financing", "EU policy", "Luxembourg", "Structural Funds", "development policy", "economic conversion", "economic region", "regional policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2a49fd3-2fbb-412c-a254-6019cbf27024", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/28197848-0fdb-41e6-bc68-56f9ba9fbe8f", "title": "92/366/EEC: Commission Decision of 29 April 1992 on a transitional guidance programme for the fishing fleet (1992) of Greece pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (Only the Greek text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "Greece,fishing fleet,fishing vessel", "workIds": "celex:31992D0366,oj:JOL_1992_193_R_0038_032", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "fishing fleet", "fishing vessel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/28197848-0fdb-41e6-bc68-56f9ba9fbe8f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a0e1ab2-601e-4707-b1b1-0714e67e9b7a", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1130/92 of 29 April 1992 amending the list annexed to Regulation (EEC) No 55/87 establishing the list of vessels exceeding eight metres length overall permitted to use beam trawls within certain areas of the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "EU waters,Germany,coastal region,fishing regulations,fishing vessel,technical standard", "workIds": "celex:31992R1130,oj:JOL_1992_120_R_0011_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU waters", "Germany", "coastal region", "fishing regulations", "fishing vessel", "technical standard"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a0e1ab2-601e-4707-b1b1-0714e67e9b7a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34640469-64bc-4027-9763-f8985dfbc19b", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive relating to the freedom of management and investment of funds held by institutions for retirement provision", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-04-29", "subjects": "European social policy,free movement of capital,investment transaction,pension scheme,supplementary pension", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0491,oj:JOC_1992_169_R_0002_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European social policy", "free movement of capital", "investment transaction", "pension scheme", "supplementary pension"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34640469-64bc-4027-9763-f8985dfbc19b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8c275922-0df4-4900-bd9a-7f36ea6e13bf", "title": "Guidelines for publication of the results of R& TD and related programmes.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for the Information Society and Media,European Commission", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "consultation of information,database,documentary tool,research programme,software", "workIds": "PUB_CD7391223", "eurovoc_concepts": ["consultation of information", "database", "documentary tool", "research programme", "software"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8c275922-0df4-4900-bd9a-7f36ea6e13bf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46796c43-44a3-4f91-9dbb-dcce5154c506", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1048/92 of 28 April 1992 concerning applications for export licences for products falling within CN code 1101 00 00 with advance fixing of the refund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "cereal flour,export licence,export refund,wheat", "workIds": "celex:31992R1048,oj:JOL_1992_111_R_0006_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cereal flour", "export licence", "export refund", "wheat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46796c43-44a3-4f91-9dbb-dcce5154c506", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/faefb8c2-641e-4f7b-bff7-240bd7ab97af", "title": "Council Directive 92/31/EEC of 28 April 1992 amending Directive 89/336/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electromagnetic compatibility", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "broadcasting,noise pollution,radio equipment,technical regulations,telecommunications", "workIds": "celex:31992L0031,oj:JOL_1992_126_R_0011_021", "eurovoc_concepts": ["broadcasting", "noise pollution", "radio equipment", "technical regulations", "telecommunications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/faefb8c2-641e-4f7b-bff7-240bd7ab97af", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/650a6872-b6f5-4fb3-b234-f16c6ff53e8c", "title": "PHARE : Assistance for economic restructuring in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe: An operational guide.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "Bulgaria,EU financing,EU programme,German Democratic Republic,Hungary,Poland,Romania,aid programme,financial aid", "workIds": "PUB_CC7492588", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Bulgaria", "EU financing", "EU programme", "German Democratic Republic", "Hungary", "Poland", "Romania", "aid programme", "financial aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/650a6872-b6f5-4fb3-b234-f16c6ff53e8c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aa1c7af6-94e4-4802-808e-618fc3c9e4f9", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1060/92 of 28 April 1992 on the supply of corned beef as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "Israel,Lebanon,food aid,meat product", "workIds": "celex:31992R1060,oj:JOL_1992_112_R_0009_034", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Israel", "Lebanon", "food aid", "meat product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aa1c7af6-94e4-4802-808e-618fc3c9e4f9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/41359e65-1d96-4274-bb5e-d88a952fab2f", "title": "92/240/EEC: Council Decision of 28 April 1992 amending Decision No 90/233/EEC establishing a trans-European mobility scheme for university studies (Tempus)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "EU programme,action programme,higher education,student mobility,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:31992D0240,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0043_056", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU programme", "action programme", "higher education", "student mobility", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/41359e65-1d96-4274-bb5e-d88a952fab2f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0eb95a4b-7210-4191-8c90-4c12641590ae", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 1084/92 of 28 April 1992 amending Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom determining the emoluments of the President and Members of the Commission, of the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice and of the President, Members and Registrar of the Court of First Instance, and Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 2290/77 determining the emoluments of the Members of the Court of Auditors", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "European Commissioner,General Court (EU),member of the Court of Auditors (EU),member of the Court of Justice (EU),pay,special tax", "workIds": "celex:31992R1084,oj:JOL_1992_117_R_0001_045", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commissioner", "General Court (EU)", "member of the Court of Auditors (EU)", "member of the Court of Justice (EU)", "pay", "special tax"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0eb95a4b-7210-4191-8c90-4c12641590ae", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2b65f9ec-8d40-4f82-9681-93b5ba733ba8", "title": "92/385/EEC: Commission Decision of 28 April 1992 declaring the compatibility with the common market of a concentration (Case No IV/M. 126 - Accor/Wagons-Lits) - Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the French text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "France,catering,competition policy,economic concentration,takeover bid,vehicle on rails", "workIds": "celex:31992D0385,oj:JOL_1992_204_R_0001_008", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "catering", "competition policy", "economic concentration", "takeover bid", "vehicle on rails"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2b65f9ec-8d40-4f82-9681-93b5ba733ba8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c976425-ba62-418c-ac73-3b12291fa00b", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1049/92 of 28 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 611/77 fixing the specific levy in respect of live bovine animals and beef and veal other than frozen", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "Sweden,Switzerland,agricultural levy,beef,cattle", "workIds": "celex:31992R1049,oj:JOL_1992_111_R_0007_018", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Sweden", "Switzerland", "agricultural levy", "beef", "cattle"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c976425-ba62-418c-ac73-3b12291fa00b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/535b7d66-29b8-47ac-bd3c-d963c940bd78", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE laying down the hygiene rules applicable on board certain vessels in accordance with Article 3 (1) (a) (i) of Directive 91/493/EEC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "fishery product,fishing vessel,food inspection,food preserving,health control", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0160,comnat:COM_1992_0160_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["fishery product", "fishing vessel", "food inspection", "food preserving", "health control"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/535b7d66-29b8-47ac-bd3c-d963c940bd78", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 160 final \n\nBrussels, 28 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\nlaying down the hygiene rules applicable on board certain vessels \n\nin accordance with Article 3(1)(a)(i) of Directive 91/493/EEC \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nOn 22 July 1991 the Council adopted Directive 91/493/EEC laying down the \n\nhealth conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery \n\nproducts(1). Article 3(1)(a)(i) provides for the establishment of health rules for fishery \n\nproducts caught and where appropriate handled for bleeding, heading, gutting \n\nand the removal of fins, chilled or frozen, on board vessels. The Article \n\nprovides for the submission by the Commission of a proposal before 1 October \n\n1992. The health conditions set out in the draft proposal consist of general \n\nconditions applicable to fishing vessels and additional conditions applicable \n\nto fishing vessels on board which products are kept for more than 24 hours. It should be emphasized that the inspections and controls carried out pursuant \n\nto Directive 91/493/EEC will apply to the vessels referred to in this \n\nDirective. (1) O J N OL 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15. - 2 -\n\nProposal for a Council Directive \n\nlaying down the hygiene rules applicable on board certain vessels \n\nin accordance with Article 3(1)(a)(i) of Directive 91/493/EEC \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the \n\nhealth conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery \n\nproducts(1), and in particular Article 3(1)(a)(i) thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas in accordance with Article 3(1)(a)(i) of council Directive 91/493/EEC \n\nit is essential that hygiene rules be laid down for fishery products caught \n\nand where appropriate handled for bleeding, heading, gutting and the removal \n\nof fins, chilled or frozen, on board certain vessels; \n\nWhereas general hygiene conditions applicable to fishing vessels should be \n\nlaid down; \n\nWhereas it is essential to lay down additional hygiene conditions applicable \n\nto fishing vessels on board which catches are kept for more than 24 hours; \n\nWhereas provision should be made for the possibility of taking into \n\nconsideration certain specific characteristics of certain fishing vessels; \n\nWhereas it is appropriate to point out that the inspections and controls \n\ncarried out by the competent authorities of the Member States and by the \n\ncommission experts pursuant to Council Directive 91/493/EEC apply equally to \n\nthe vessels referred to in this Directive, \n\n(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 15 \n\n\fHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\n- 3 -\n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. The general hygiene conditions laid down in Annex I shall apply to fishing \n\nvessels. 2. The additional hygiene conditions laid down in Annex II shall apply to \n\nfishing vessels designed and equipped to preserve fishery products on \n\nboard under satisfactory conditions for more than 24 hours, other than \n\nthose equipped for keeping fish, shellfish and molluscs alive without \n\nother means of conservation on board. 3. if necessary, and in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 2, \n\nderogations from or conditions additional to the provisions of Annex I may \n\nbe laid down in order to take account of the specific characteristics, if \n\nany, of certain fishing vessels. Article 2 \n\nThe Commission shall be assisted by the Standing Veterinary committee \n\nestablished by Council Decision 68/361/EEC. The commission representative shall present to the Committee a draft of \n\nthe measures to be taken. The Committee shall deliver its opinion thereon \n\nwithin a period to be determined by the chairman in relation to the \n\nurgency of the matter, if necessary, by proceeding to a vote. The opinion shall be entered in the minutes. Member States shall be \n\nentitled, furthermore, to request that their positions be inserted in the \n\nminutes. The commission shall take the greatest account of the opinion delivered by \n\nthe Committee. It shall inform the Committee of the manner in which it \n\nhas taken account of its opinion. - 4 -\n\nArticle 3 \n\nThe Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and \n\nadministrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive before 1 \n\nJanuary 1993. They shall inform the commission thereof. Where Member States adopt such provisions they shall contain a reference to \n\nthis Directive or be accompanied by such reference on their official \n\npublication. Details of this reference shall be adopted by the Member States. This Directive is addressed to the Member States \n\nArticle 4 \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nANNEX I \n\nGeneral hygiene conditions applicable to fishing vessels \n\n1. The sections of vessels or the containers reserved for the storage of \nfishery products must not contain objects or products liable to transmit \nharmful properties or abnormal characteristics to the foodstuffs. These \nsections or containers must be so designed as to allow them to be cleaned \neasily and to ensure that melt water cannot remain in contact with the \nfishery products. 2. When used, the sections of vessels or the containers reserved for the \nstorage of fishery products must be completely clean and, in particular, \nmust not be capable of being contaminated by the fuel used for the \npropulsion of the vessel or by bilge water. 3. As soon as they are taken on board, the fishery products must be protected \nfrom contamination and from the effects of the sun or any other source of \nheat. When they are washed, there must be no possibility that the water \nused might impair their quality or wholesomeness. 4. The fishery products shall be handled and stored in such a way as to \nprevent bruising. The use of cp\\ked instruments shall be tolerated for the \nmoving of large fish or fish which might injure the handler, provided the \nflesh of these products is not damaged. 5. Fishery products other than those kept alive must undergo cold treatment \nas soon as pof ;ible after loading. However, in the case of fishing vessels \nwhere cooling is not possible from a practicable point of view, the \nfishery products must not be kept on board for more than 8 hours. 6. Ice used for the chilling of products must be made from drinking water or \nclean seawater. Before use, it must be stored under conditions which \nprevent its contamination. 7. After the fishery products have been unloaded, the containers, equipment \nr. d sections of vessels which are directly in contact with the fishery \nproducts must be cleaned with drinking water or clean seawater. 8. liner e fish is headed and/or gutted on board, such operations must be \ncarried out hygienically and the products must be washed immediately and \nthoroughly with drinking water or clean seawater. The viscera and parts \nwhich may pose a threat to public health must be removed and set apart \nfrom products intended for human consumption. Livers and roes intended for \nhuman consumption must be refrigerated or frozen. 9. Equipment used for gutting, heading and the removal of fins, and \ncontainers and equipment in contact with the fishery products, must be \nmade of or coated with a material which is waterproof, resistant to decay, \nsmooth and easy to clean and disinfect. When used they must be completely \nclean. - 6 -\n\nANNEX II \n\nAdditional hygiene conditions applicable to the fishing vessels \nreferred to in Article 1(2) \n\n1. Fishing vessels must be equipped with holds, tanks or containers for the \nstorage of refrigerated or frozen fishery products at the temperatures \nlaid down by Directive 91/493/CEE. These holds shall be separated from the \nmachinery space and the quarters reserved for the crew by partitions which \nare sufficiently impervious to prevent any contamination of the stored \nfishery products. 2. The inside surface of the holds, tanks or containers shall be watertight \nand easy to wash and disinfect. It shall consist of a smooth material or, \nfailing that, smooth paint maintained in good condition, not being capable \nof transmitting to the fishery products substances harmful to human \nhealth. 3. The holds shall be designed to ensure that melt water cannot remain in \n\ncontact with the fishery products. 4. Containers used for the storage of products must ensure their preservation \nunder satisfactory conditions of hygiene and, in particular, allow \ndrainage of melt water. When used they must be completely clean. 5. The working decks, the equipment and the holds, tanks and containers shall \nbe cleaned each time they are used. Drinking water or clean seawater shall \nbe used for this purpose. Disinfection, the removal of insects or rat \nextermination shall be carried out whenever necessary. 6. Cleaning products, disinfectants, insecticides and all potentially toxic \nsubstances shall be stored in locked premises or cupboards. Their use must \nnot present any risk of contamination of the fishery products. 7. If fishery products are frozen on board, this operation must be carried \nout in accordance with the conditions laid down in chapter IV(II)(1) and \n(3) of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC. Where freezing in brine is used, \nthe brine shall not be a source of contamination for the fish. 8. Vessels equipped for chilling of fishery products in cooled seawater, \neither chilled by ice (CSW) or refrigerated by mechanical means (RSW), \nshall comply with the following requirements : \n\na) tanks must be equipped with adequate seawater filling and drainage \ninstallations and must incorporate devices for achieving uniform \ntemperature throughout the tanks; \n\nb) tanks must have a means of recording temperature connected to a \ntemperature sensor positioned in the section of the tank where \ntemperatures are highest; \n\nc) the operation of the tank or container system must secure a chilling \nrate which ensures the mix of fish and seawater reaches 3\u00b0C at the most \n6 hours after loading and O'C at the most after 16 hours; \n\n\f- 7 -\n\nd) after each unloading, the tanks, circulation systems and containers \nmust be completely emptied and thoroughly cleaned using drinking water \nor clean seawater. They should only be filled with clean seawater; \n\ne) the date and the number of the tank must be clearly indicated on the \ntemperature recordings which must be kept available for the control \nauthorities. 9, The competent authority shall keep up to date for control purposes a list \nof the vessels equipped in accordance with points 7 or 8, with the \nexception however of vessels equipped with removable containers and not \nengaged regularly in preserving fish in chilled seawater. 10. Staff assigned to the handling of fishery products shall be required to \n\nmaintain a high standard of cleanliness for themselves and their clothes. 13. Shipowners or their representatives shall take all the measures necessary \nto prevent persons liable to contaminate fishery products from working on \nand handling them, until there is evidence that such persons can do so \nwithout risk. The routine medical monitoring of such persons shall be \ngoverned by the national laws in force in the Member state concerned. ISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 160 \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92'177-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43556-9 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07269df3-10df-4787-a28b-f9dc2d93dcfd", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1188/92 of 28 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1637/91 fixing compensation with regard to the reduction of the reference quantities referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 and compensation for the definitive discontinuation of milk production", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "agricultural quota,dairy production,indemnification,redirection of production", "workIds": "celex:31992R1188,oj:JOL_1992_124_R_0001_021", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural quota", "dairy production", "indemnification", "redirection of production"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07269df3-10df-4787-a28b-f9dc2d93dcfd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a4729a3-f35c-47cd-958d-eb48bc5fca16", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1158/92 of 28 April 1992 opening for 1992, as an autonomous measure, a special import quota for high-quality, fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal falling within CN codes 0201 and 0202 and for products falling within CN codes 0206 10 95 and 0206 29 91", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "fresh meat,frozen product,refrigerated product,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:31992R1158,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0005_032", "eurovoc_concepts": ["fresh meat", "frozen product", "refrigerated product", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a4729a3-f35c-47cd-958d-eb48bc5fca16", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/780f9fbe-c9d1-457c-a427-8664eda63869", "title": "Council Directive 92/33/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the marketing of vegetable propagating and planting material, other than seed", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "health control,marketing,plant propagation,seedling,vegetable", "workIds": "celex:31992L0033,oj:JOL_1992_157_R_0001_010", "eurovoc_concepts": ["health control", "marketing", "plant propagation", "seedling", "vegetable"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/780f9fbe-c9d1-457c-a427-8664eda63869", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e521a98-80ea-4082-a114-e442e1896edb", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1156/92 of 28 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 on the common organization of the market in fruit and vegetables", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "fruit,import,quality control of industrial products,third country,vegetable", "workIds": "celex:31992R1156,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0003_030", "eurovoc_concepts": ["fruit", "import", "quality control of industrial products", "third country", "vegetable"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e521a98-80ea-4082-a114-e442e1896edb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b8de5d8c-0644-463a-83a3-039ef839acac", "title": "92/234/EEC: Council Decision of 28 April 1992 authorizing the automatic renewal or maintenance in force of provisions governing matters covered by the common commercial policy contained in the friendship, trade and navigation treaties and similar agreements concluded between Member States and third countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "extra-EU trade,international agreement,third country,trade agreement", "workIds": "celex:31992D0234,oj:JOL_1992_120_R_0037_036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["extra-EU trade", "international agreement", "third country", "trade agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b8de5d8c-0644-463a-83a3-039ef839acac", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7923df19-357b-4ad8-a8b7-35bca37ef0e3", "title": "The European Parliament.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "European Parliament,competence of the institution", "workIds": "PUB_AX7291762", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Parliament", "competence of the institution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7923df19-357b-4ad8-a8b7-35bca37ef0e3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/433a9aa8-3291-4951-ae74-3adb7997a1d7", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1157/92 of 28 April 1992 authorizing the implementation of management measures relating to imports of live bovine animals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "cattle,import licence,live animal", "workIds": "celex:31992R1157,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0004_031", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cattle", "import licence", "live animal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/433a9aa8-3291-4951-ae74-3adb7997a1d7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a821529-144b-4a67-aa00-4bcfc36b8367", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1122/92 of 28 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1796/81 on measures applicable to imports of preserved cultivated mushrooms", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "import,mushroom-growing,preserved product,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992R1122,oj:JOL_1992_117_R_0098_083", "eurovoc_concepts": ["import", "mushroom-growing", "preserved product", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a821529-144b-4a67-aa00-4bcfc36b8367", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66399cf9-55d5-46e1-aae2-7e51533cc71d", "title": "Council Directive 92/34/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "fruit-growing,marketing standard,plant health control,plant propagation,seedling", "workIds": "celex:31992L0034,oj:JOL_1992_157_R_0010_011", "eurovoc_concepts": ["fruit-growing", "marketing standard", "plant health control", "plant propagation", "seedling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66399cf9-55d5-46e1-aae2-7e51533cc71d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f06955df-257e-4fa2-a63a-b93ed9fe15d0", "title": "92/239/EEC: Council Decision of 28 April 1992 authorizing extension or tacit renewal of certain trade agreements concluded between Member States and third countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-28", "subjects": "member country,third country,trade agreement", "workIds": "celex:31992D0239,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0039_055", "eurovoc_concepts": ["member country", "third country", "trade agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f06955df-257e-4fa2-a63a-b93ed9fe15d0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98d0efac-0a7c-4d98-aa05-fee5d45b92f2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1028/92 by Mr Filippos PIERROS to the Commission. Community aid for peppers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PIERROS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU aid,GATT,Peloponnese,T\u00fcrkiye,agro-industry,competition,fruit vegetable,preserved product,third country", "workIds": "celex:91992E001028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "GATT", "Peloponnese", "T\u00fcrkiye", "agro-industry", "competition", "fruit vegetable", "preserved product", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98d0efac-0a7c-4d98-aa05-fee5d45b92f2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08fa510f-9da1-441a-82b3-70030caca31f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1044/92 by Mrs Anne ANDR\u00c9 to the Commission. Europe against cancer", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ANDRE-LEONARD,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "action programme,administrative structures,association,cancer,medical institution,medical research,public health,scientific cooperation,transfer of businesses", "workIds": "celex:91992E001044", "eurovoc_concepts": ["action programme", "administrative structures", "association", "cancer", "medical institution", "medical research", "public health", "scientific cooperation", "transfer of businesses"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08fa510f-9da1-441a-82b3-70030caca31f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2515e8a1-26a4-4504-95e4-c88486ab85a7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1011/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The Greek Sarakatsani population of Bulgaria", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Bulgaria,Council of Europe,Greece,OSCE,ethnic group,financial aid,protection of minorities,return migration", "workIds": "celex:91992E001011", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Bulgaria", "Council of Europe", "Greece", "OSCE", "ethnic group", "financial aid", "protection of minorities", "return migration"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2515e8a1-26a4-4504-95e4-c88486ab85a7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/632a8ffc-103e-4676-a1e2-56975d81153a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1019/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Council. Community aid for Russia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU aid,USSR,emergency aid,food aid,free price,national minority,poverty,republic,retail selling,social assistance", "workIds": "celex:91992E001019", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "USSR", "emergency aid", "food aid", "free price", "national minority", "poverty", "republic", "retail selling", "social assistance"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/632a8ffc-103e-4676-a1e2-56975d81153a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/17a7224f-3de9-4fb6-a8d2-e668c80db893", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1014/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. EC cereal subsidies", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU aid,Greece,cereals,fraud,import,wine", "workIds": "celex:91992E001014", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Greece", "cereals", "fraud", "import", "wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/17a7224f-3de9-4fb6-a8d2-e668c80db893", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a8ac6de9-2cbb-4407-85ad-feb9c2791311", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1037/92 of 27 April 1992 on the implementation of promotional and publicity measures in respect of milk and milk products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "advertising,milk,milk product,sales promotion", "workIds": "celex:31992R1037,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0035_029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["advertising", "milk", "milk product", "sales promotion"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a8ac6de9-2cbb-4407-85ad-feb9c2791311", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6d59d3e9-3756-4d64-8429-16cf681c7d95", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1041/92 by Mr Andrea RAGGIO to the Commission. European Business Week", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,RAGGIO", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU competence,EU policy,Sardinia,conference proceedings,election campaign publicity,local government,public authorities,report,small and medium-sized enterprises", "workIds": "celex:91992E001041", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU competence", "EU policy", "Sardinia", "conference proceedings", "election campaign publicity", "local government", "public authorities", "report", "small and medium-sized enterprises"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6d59d3e9-3756-4d64-8429-16cf681c7d95", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a3d6251-28b6-412d-aac7-d4538e290e82", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1018/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Council. Voting rights of Community citizens", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "European political cooperation,Treaty on European Union,electoral law,local election,right to stand for election,right to vote", "workIds": "celex:91992E001018", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European political cooperation", "Treaty on European Union", "electoral law", "local election", "right to stand for election", "right to vote"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a3d6251-28b6-412d-aac7-d4538e290e82", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fc1544fb-1350-43b8-8e4f-224ea94b34be", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1039/92 by Mr Filippos PIERROS to the Commission. Creation of an independent body under the Directive on competition in markets for telecommunication services", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PIERROS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU law - national law,EU market,application of EU law,competition,telecommunications", "workIds": "celex:91992E001039", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law - national law", "EU market", "application of EU law", "competition", "telecommunications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fc1544fb-1350-43b8-8e4f-224ea94b34be", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3d6b5a53-ed8c-44a6-a89f-3c15a76dc1eb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1027/92 by Mr Carles-Alfred GASOLIBA I B\u00f6HM to the Commission. Seat of the future European Environment Agency", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GASOLIBA I BOEHM", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "seat of institution,town", "workIds": "celex:91992E001027", "eurovoc_concepts": ["seat of institution", "town"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3d6b5a53-ed8c-44a6-a89f-3c15a76dc1eb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a4236be3-6222-4780-b105-610a51eca5d6", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1047/92 of 27 April 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code 3102 80 00, originating in Bulgaria, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "chemical salt,originating product,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1047,oj:JOL_1992_111_R_0005_016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["chemical salt", "originating product", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a4236be3-6222-4780-b105-610a51eca5d6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/75337592-4883-4b3f-901e-2b5fc0572937", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1040/92 by Mrs Leyla ONUR to the Commission. Community funds for Lower Saxony", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ONUR", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EAGGF,EU aid,European Regional Development Fund,European Social Fund,Lower Saxony,action programme,fund (EU),statistics", "workIds": "celex:91992E001040", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF", "EU aid", "European Regional Development Fund", "European Social Fund", "Lower Saxony", "action programme", "fund (EU)", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/75337592-4883-4b3f-901e-2b5fc0572937", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d5bede00-ae69-43b7-bfd2-1562052cdd89", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1010/92 by Mr James FORD to the Commission. Pricing of passports", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Ireland,United Kingdom,competence of the Member States,free movement of persons,passport,price disparity", "workIds": "celex:91992E001010", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ireland", "United Kingdom", "competence of the Member States", "free movement of persons", "passport", "price disparity"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d5bede00-ae69-43b7-bfd2-1562052cdd89", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/963cdcb1-3f34-4ed1-8483-9cf78ee8298f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1008/92 by Mr James FORD to the Commission. Transport of toxic waste", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Belgium,application of EU law,cross-border transport,import restriction,toxic substance,transport of dangerous goods,waste management", "workIds": "celex:91992E001008", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgium", "application of EU law", "cross-border transport", "import restriction", "toxic substance", "transport of dangerous goods", "waste management"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/963cdcb1-3f34-4ed1-8483-9cf78ee8298f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d347831b-dc64-47af-9762-d4119ad8704a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1047/92 by Mr Hemmo MUNTINGH to the Commission. CITES proposals for tropical trees in Kyoto", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MUNTINGH", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "multilateral agreement,protection of plant life,trade regulations,tree,tropical zone", "workIds": "celex:91992E001047", "eurovoc_concepts": ["multilateral agreement", "protection of plant life", "trade regulations", "tree", "tropical zone"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d347831b-dc64-47af-9762-d4119ad8704a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2300b9c9-480c-4c5a-ac2a-a2ec1627b621", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1021/92 by Mr Des GERAGHTY to the Commission. Commission decision on interlining case -BMA v Aer Lingus", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GERAGHTY", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EC Decision,European Commission,Ireland,air transport,competition,economic consequence,fine,inter-company agreement", "workIds": "celex:91992E001021", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Decision", "European Commission", "Ireland", "air transport", "competition", "economic consequence", "fine", "inter-company agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2300b9c9-480c-4c5a-ac2a-a2ec1627b621", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c557867-4104-4abe-87eb-14253cd613b7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1049/92 by Mr Arturo ESCUDER CROFT to the Commission. Investment in the Canaries from the EAGGF Guidance Section", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ESCUDER CROFT,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Canary Islands,EAGGF,EU financing", "workIds": "celex:91992E001049", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canary Islands", "EAGGF", "EU financing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c557867-4104-4abe-87eb-14253cd613b7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66d9ab1d-c984-453c-ba3c-9534724e1099", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1030/92 by Mr Karl von WOGAU to the Commission. Professional experience as a condition of applying for posts with the European Communities", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VON WOGAU", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "admission to examinations,competition (EU),diploma,national service,professional qualifications", "workIds": "celex:91992E001030", "eurovoc_concepts": ["admission to examinations", "competition (EU)", "diploma", "national service", "professional qualifications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66d9ab1d-c984-453c-ba3c-9534724e1099", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/eba76c8f-558a-454e-a69f-858ff6386796", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1043/92 by Mrs Anne ANDR\u00c9 to the Commission. PERIFRA Programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ANDRE-LEONARD,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU aid,NATO,Province of Antwerp,Walloon region (Belgium),job cuts,military base,vocational retraining", "workIds": "celex:91992E001043", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "NATO", "Province of Antwerp", "Walloon region (Belgium)", "job cuts", "military base", "vocational retraining"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/eba76c8f-558a-454e-a69f-858ff6386796", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/12bd3a95-f83d-446b-9acd-37ab6c09431d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1005/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to European Political Cooperation. Human rights violations in Togo", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "European political cooperation,Togo,democratisation,human rights", "workIds": "celex:91992E001005", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European political cooperation", "Togo", "democratisation", "human rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/12bd3a95-f83d-446b-9acd-37ab6c09431d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7215bc6a-3a73-434b-aa3b-9419b1c54b38", "title": "Advanced business and home systems, peripherals : market, competitors, development, future : dimensions of change and strategic developments : proceedings of a special session on advanced business and home systems-peripherals held as part of the Esprit Conference in Brussels on Wednesday 27 November 1991.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for the Information Society and Media", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU Member State,computer equipment,conference proceedings,research programme,telecommunications", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CDNA14243", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "computer equipment", "conference proceedings", "research programme", "telecommunications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7215bc6a-3a73-434b-aa3b-9419b1c54b38", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b87ee9b1-e446-4592-b600-6cc982ada7a6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1025/92 by Pedro BOFILL ABEILHE and Enrique SAPENA GRANELL to the Commission. Copyright guarantees for European films on the US market", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BOFILL ABEILHE,European Parliament,SAPENA GRANELL", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU production,GATT,United States,bilateral agreement,copyright,film production,international convention,literary and artistic property", "workIds": "celex:91992E001025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU production", "GATT", "United States", "bilateral agreement", "copyright", "film production", "international convention", "literary and artistic property"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b87ee9b1-e446-4592-b600-6cc982ada7a6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ab1867f0-4a59-4aae-a515-3de84b2d1fb4", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1038/92 of 27 April 1992 laying down definitive measures on the issuing of STM licences for beef and veal in trade with Portugal", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Portugal,beef,supplementary trade mechanism", "workIds": "celex:31992R1038,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0041_030", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "beef", "supplementary trade mechanism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ab1867f0-4a59-4aae-a515-3de84b2d1fb4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/38eafb4f-318e-48ba-92e5-85dbf8f67ede", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1039/92 of 27 April 1992 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the common customs tariff", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "cannery,common customs tariff,mushroom-growing,statistical nomenclature,tariff nomenclature", "workIds": "celex:31992R1039,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0042_031", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cannery", "common customs tariff", "mushroom-growing", "statistical nomenclature", "tariff nomenclature"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/38eafb4f-318e-48ba-92e5-85dbf8f67ede", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5820cd2-a78f-4ccb-8c77-503d1f50199b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1037/92 by Mr Georgios ROMEOS to the Commission. Environmental consequences of the extension of a Greek Electricity Board plant", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROMEOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EC Directive,Greece,action for failure to fulfil an obligation,application of EU law,electrical industry,environmental impact,impact study", "workIds": "celex:91992E001037", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "Greece", "action for failure to fulfil an obligation", "application of EU law", "electrical industry", "environmental impact", "impact study"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5820cd2-a78f-4ccb-8c77-503d1f50199b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9b7ed541-f077-4e9e-8210-aeeff9cf48bd", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1017/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Discrimination on grounds of religious convictions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "European social policy,anti-discriminatory measure,competence of the Member States,equal treatment,religious discrimination", "workIds": "celex:91992E001017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European social policy", "anti-discriminatory measure", "competence of the Member States", "equal treatment", "religious discrimination"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9b7ed541-f077-4e9e-8210-aeeff9cf48bd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bad71bd8-7c60-4bc3-9064-3b7df96df387", "title": "Research & development and standardization : a guide.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DG III \u2013 Industry,European Commission", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EFTA,project evaluation,public contract,research and development,standardisation", "workIds": "PUB_CO7291164", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA", "project evaluation", "public contract", "research and development", "standardisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bad71bd8-7c60-4bc3-9064-3b7df96df387", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/97965cea-2a12-4fb9-a1e4-4361138fc4db", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1050/92 by Mr Arturo ESCUDER CROFT to the Commission. ERDF funding in 1990 and 1991", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ESCUDER CROFT,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Canary Islands,EU investment,European Regional Development Fund,integrated development programme,power plant,road building,tourism,water treatment", "workIds": "celex:91992E001050", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canary Islands", "EU investment", "European Regional Development Fund", "integrated development programme", "power plant", "road building", "tourism", "water treatment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/97965cea-2a12-4fb9-a1e4-4361138fc4db", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07f11cb4-6231-4a68-a71d-c503c45dccf9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1029/92 by Mr Diego de los SANTOS L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Construction of a dam in the Andevalo (Huelva) , Andalusia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LOS SANTOS LOPEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Andalusia,EU financing,application of EU law,engineering structure,environmental impact,environmental protection,impact study", "workIds": "celex:91992E001029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Andalusia", "EU financing", "application of EU law", "engineering structure", "environmental impact", "environmental protection", "impact study"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07f11cb4-6231-4a68-a71d-c503c45dccf9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ab54efc3-7fa2-46fd-b3b7-ddb6ebfdff73", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1004/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to European Political Cooperation. Prisoners of conscience in Tibet", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "China,European political cooperation,autonomy,human rights,occupied territory,opposition,political prisoner", "workIds": "celex:91992E001004", "eurovoc_concepts": ["China", "European political cooperation", "autonomy", "human rights", "occupied territory", "opposition", "political prisoner"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ab54efc3-7fa2-46fd-b3b7-ddb6ebfdff73", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/991961b1-ca99-4d87-a2bc-99230b15415e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1024/92 by Mr John CUSHNAHAN to the Commission. Legislation in the area of nurse training", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CUSHNAHAN,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "mentally disabled person,paediatrics,paramedical profession,paramedical training,psychiatry,recognition of diplomas", "workIds": "celex:91992E001024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["mentally disabled person", "paediatrics", "paramedical profession", "paramedical training", "psychiatry", "recognition of diplomas"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/991961b1-ca99-4d87-a2bc-99230b15415e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9eb3b3ea-fdf3-4566-9b83-f69c09186d85", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1007/92 by Mrs Concepci\u00f3 FERRER to the Commission. Aid to the Community' s synthetic fibre sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FERRER", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "aid to industry,competitiveness,distribution of aid,man-made fibre,market stabilisation,modernisation aid,production capacity,production quota,supply and demand,suspension of aid", "workIds": "celex:91992E001007", "eurovoc_concepts": ["aid to industry", "competitiveness", "distribution of aid", "man-made fibre", "market stabilisation", "modernisation aid", "production capacity", "production quota", "supply and demand", "suspension of aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9eb3b3ea-fdf3-4566-9b83-f69c09186d85", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dd40ed2c-89b0-473e-b729-e691c3527b30", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1015/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Fraud by wine producers at the expense of the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU aid,Greece,cereals,fraud,import,wine", "workIds": "celex:91992E001015", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Greece", "cereals", "fraud", "import", "wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dd40ed2c-89b0-473e-b729-e691c3527b30", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/722041b9-9523-4599-9fdd-6d31cf4c17c6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1026/92 by Mrs Carole TONGUE to the Commission. Unfair competition through disparate policies within the car industry", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,TONGUE", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "European Social Charter,arrangement of working time,labour law,living conditions,motor vehicle industry,organisation of work,recruitment,restriction on competition,social rights,working conditions", "workIds": "celex:91992E001026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Charter", "arrangement of working time", "labour law", "living conditions", "motor vehicle industry", "organisation of work", "recruitment", "restriction on competition", "social rights", "working conditions"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/722041b9-9523-4599-9fdd-6d31cf4c17c6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/20be0a0d-7bd6-496d-a865-c31ec67db8a4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1034/92 by Mr Alman METTEN to the Commission. Improving the quality of European cars", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,METTEN", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Japan,competition,competitiveness,motor car,product quality,type of business", "workIds": "celex:91992E001034", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Japan", "competition", "competitiveness", "motor car", "product quality", "type of business"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/20be0a0d-7bd6-496d-a865-c31ec67db8a4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5349c079-9cdd-45d1-bf4f-8e43976dc18a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1002/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to European Political Cooperation. Missing persons in Mauritania", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "European political cooperation,Mauritania,forced disappearance,human rights,political prisoner", "workIds": "celex:91992E001002", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European political cooperation", "Mauritania", "forced disappearance", "human rights", "political prisoner"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5349c079-9cdd-45d1-bf4f-8e43976dc18a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb3c92fc-4c35-4f40-9d26-04d4f46a778e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1012/92 by Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The ethnic Greeks of North America and Community programmes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Greece,cultural heritage,cultural policy,migrant,national minority", "workIds": "celex:91992E001012", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "cultural heritage", "cultural policy", "migrant", "national minority"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb3c92fc-4c35-4f40-9d26-04d4f46a778e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6f3b4384-897f-4497-9276-41b05a507d0a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1038/92 by Mr Filippos PIERROS to the Commission. Compliance by Greece with the deadlines set by the Directive on competition in the markets in telecommunications terminal equipment.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PIERROS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "European standard,Greece,application of EU law,competition,international standard,peripheral,technical specification,telecommunications", "workIds": "celex:91992E001038", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "Greece", "application of EU law", "competition", "international standard", "peripheral", "technical specification", "telecommunications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6f3b4384-897f-4497-9276-41b05a507d0a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6ae1e055-91e9-425a-a55b-51f1639f014f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1048/92 by Mr Arturo ESCUDER CROFT to the Commission. ESF investment in the Canaries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ESCUDER CROFT,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Canary Islands,EU regional policy,European Social Fund,credit policy,fight against unemployment,job creation,statistics,unemployment,youth unemployment", "workIds": "celex:91992E001048", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canary Islands", "EU regional policy", "European Social Fund", "credit policy", "fight against unemployment", "job creation", "statistics", "unemployment", "youth unemployment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6ae1e055-91e9-425a-a55b-51f1639f014f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c79651f2-f94c-4d90-8eb2-07417854558f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1046/92 by Mrs Anne ANDR\u00c9 to the Commission. Objective 2 Regions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ANDRE-LEONARD,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU aid,Structural Funds,region,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E001046", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Structural Funds", "region", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c79651f2-f94c-4d90-8eb2-07417854558f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/45c20076-1d47-437f-99c3-0860c625e588", "title": "92/258/EEC: Commission Decision of 27 April 1992 on the increase, for the period from 1 July to 31 December 1992, in the Community cabotage quota for national road haulage services performed by non-resident carriers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "inland transport,quantitative restriction", "workIds": "celex:31992D0258,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0032_049", "eurovoc_concepts": ["inland transport", "quantitative restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/45c20076-1d47-437f-99c3-0860c625e588", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/49894d0e-bcec-4446-bc5c-a6f5181790eb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1023/92 by Mr John CUSHNAHAN to the Commission. Europe against Cancer Programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CUSHNAHAN,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,association,cancer,jute,management,medical research,public health", "workIds": "celex:91992E001023", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "association", "cancer", "jute", "management", "medical research", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/49894d0e-bcec-4446-bc5c-a6f5181790eb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a0ba08b-0be0-4a00-b16c-606f1c5d90bb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1020/92 by Mr Peter CRAMPTON to the Commission. Customs declarations on items posted between EC countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CRAMPTON,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "free movement of goods,postal service,simplification of formalities,single market", "workIds": "celex:91992E001020", "eurovoc_concepts": ["free movement of goods", "postal service", "simplification of formalities", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a0ba08b-0be0-4a00-b16c-606f1c5d90bb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b03d3e1e-fa8b-4bd6-8779-50c2ee994bd3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1035/92 by Mr Fran\u00e7ois GUILLAUME to the Commission. Proposal for a regulation on the common organization of the market in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GUILLAUME", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "agro-industry,common organisation of markets,competition,ethanol,free movement of goods,proposal (EU),socioeconomic conditions", "workIds": "celex:91992E001035", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agro-industry", "common organisation of markets", "competition", "ethanol", "free movement of goods", "proposal (EU)", "socioeconomic conditions"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b03d3e1e-fa8b-4bd6-8779-50c2ee994bd3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24b9ffa1-4f1f-43a2-97c6-4dba670f1a2b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1036/92 by Mr Rudolf LUSTER to the Commission. EC funds for Berlin 1985-1991", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LUSTER", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Berlin,EAGGF,EU aid,European Regional Development Fund,European Social Fund,research programme", "workIds": "celex:91992E001036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Berlin", "EAGGF", "EU aid", "European Regional Development Fund", "European Social Fund", "research programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24b9ffa1-4f1f-43a2-97c6-4dba670f1a2b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bbf64e38-b826-4ba7-8a72-47830986885e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1003/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to European Political Cooperation. Detentions in Egypt", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Egypt,European political cooperation,human rights,imprisonment,prisoner", "workIds": "celex:91992E001003", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Egypt", "European political cooperation", "human rights", "imprisonment", "prisoner"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bbf64e38-b826-4ba7-8a72-47830986885e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4d59fd37-f1e1-4610-8aac-f3fe8c2b9fa6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1013/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Income support for Greek farmers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU aid,Greece,administrative procedure,aid to agriculture,farmers' income,terms for aid", "workIds": "celex:91992E001013", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Greece", "administrative procedure", "aid to agriculture", "farmers' income", "terms for aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4d59fd37-f1e1-4610-8aac-f3fe8c2b9fa6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5d94b708-2894-4556-9141-b76a7c765e73", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1009/92 by Mr James FORD to the Commission. Pricing of compact discs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "United Kingdom,United States,consumer price,price agreement,record,restriction on competition", "workIds": "celex:91992E001009", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "United States", "consumer price", "price agreement", "record", "restriction on competition"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5d94b708-2894-4556-9141-b76a7c765e73", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/061eb515-08d0-4491-9e87-8f866e8623ed", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1036/92 of 27 April 1992 laying down detailed rules for transferring Community aid granted for collective projects for the restructuring of vineyards under Council Regulation (EEC) No 458/80 and amending Decision 81/525/EEC on applications for refunds of and advances on premiums paid for collective projects for the restructuring of vineyards", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "agricultural structure,aid to agriculture,vineyard", "workIds": "celex:31992R1036,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0031_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural structure", "aid to agriculture", "vineyard"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/061eb515-08d0-4491-9e87-8f866e8623ed", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e1c09ef-adc1-465f-8b2a-1db245cf0515", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1042/92 by Mr G\u00e9rard CAUDRON to the Commission. Customs agents and the Single Market", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CAUDRON,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Belgium,European Regional Development Fund,France,approximation of laws,customs,frontier worker,redevelopment aid,rights of aliens,single market", "workIds": "celex:91992E001042", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgium", "European Regional Development Fund", "France", "approximation of laws", "customs", "frontier worker", "redevelopment aid", "rights of aliens", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e1c09ef-adc1-465f-8b2a-1db245cf0515", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7674d207-7766-4c4a-bbf1-1ae534e2f98f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1001/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to European Political Cooperation. Death sentences in Pakistan", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "European political cooperation,Pakistan,UN international covenant,court having special jurisdiction,death penalty,human rights,right to justice", "workIds": "celex:91992E001001", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European political cooperation", "Pakistan", "UN international covenant", "court having special jurisdiction", "death penalty", "human rights", "right to justice"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7674d207-7766-4c4a-bbf1-1ae534e2f98f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/50cf64c3-01f8-42e1-8027-8873bba14071", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1032/92 by Mrs Christine CRAWLEY to the Commission. Imprisonment and suicide of juveniles in penal establishments", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CRAWLEY,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "United Kingdom,criminal law,infancy,juvenile court,legal cooperation,penal institution,prison system,suicide,young person", "workIds": "celex:91992E001032", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "criminal law", "infancy", "juvenile court", "legal cooperation", "penal institution", "prison system", "suicide", "young person"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/50cf64c3-01f8-42e1-8027-8873bba14071", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3881e5a8-d180-4a6b-9164-cce928d07d9c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1045/92 by Mrs Anne ANDR\u00c9 to the Commission. Leader Programme (Coordination of Programmes for the Development of the Rural Economy)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ANDRE-LEONARD,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "action programme,development plan,regional economy,rural development,rural region", "workIds": "celex:91992E001045", "eurovoc_concepts": ["action programme", "development plan", "regional economy", "rural development", "rural region"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3881e5a8-d180-4a6b-9164-cce928d07d9c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5108b340-ce55-4119-922b-02f0d7296ae2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1033/92 by Mr Paul LANNOYE to the Commission. Revision of the proposal for a regulation (COM(89) 667 final) concerning raw milk", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LANNOYE", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "European Commission,European Parliament,amendment,dairy industry,health legislation,legislative procedure,marketing,milk product,proposal (EU),raw milk", "workIds": "celex:91992E001033", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "European Parliament", "amendment", "dairy industry", "health legislation", "legislative procedure", "marketing", "milk product", "proposal (EU)", "raw milk"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5108b340-ce55-4119-922b-02f0d7296ae2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ca4c5eb1-1946-4090-9abd-11c85f772556", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1022/92 by Mr Henry CHABERT to the Commission. TEMPUS programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CHABERT,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "EU financing,Rh\u00f4ne-Alpes,higher education,student mobility,teaching curriculum,university", "workIds": "celex:91992E001022", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "Rh\u00f4ne-Alpes", "higher education", "student mobility", "teaching curriculum", "university"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ca4c5eb1-1946-4090-9abd-11c85f772556", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/677dbd9e-4a40-4c82-8cbc-78bce814315f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1006/92 by Mrs Concepci\u00f3 FERRER to the Commission. Grants for primary school teacher exchange programmes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FERRER", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "continuing education,education grant,educational exchange,educational institution,primary education,teacher", "workIds": "celex:91992E001006", "eurovoc_concepts": ["continuing education", "education grant", "educational exchange", "educational institution", "primary education", "teacher"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/677dbd9e-4a40-4c82-8cbc-78bce814315f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/53944b24-38d2-43f5-9321-f45f16eac426", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1016/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Tsikalaria industrial estate, Chania", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Crete,Integrated Mediterranean Programmes,craft business,development plan,environmental impact,impact study,industrial concentration", "workIds": "celex:91992E001016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Crete", "Integrated Mediterranean Programmes", "craft business", "development plan", "environmental impact", "impact study", "industrial concentration"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/53944b24-38d2-43f5-9321-f45f16eac426", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e3dd2333-0ed4-4663-a117-9b684b3f48cb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1031/92 by Willi ROTHLEY to the Commission. EEIG", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROTHLEY", "date": "1992-04-27", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EU Member State,EU statistics,Economic Interest Grouping,inter-company cooperation,regulation (EU),staff,white-collar worker", "workIds": "celex:91992E001031", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EU Member State", "EU statistics", "Economic Interest Grouping", "inter-company cooperation", "regulation (EU)", "staff", "white-collar worker"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e3dd2333-0ed4-4663-a117-9b684b3f48cb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/89a10e4d-191d-4e52-b4ce-0d291ab58fae", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1035/92 of 24 April 1992 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-24", "subjects": "aromatic plant,medical plant,statistical nomenclature,tariff nomenclature,tobacco industry", "workIds": "celex:31992R1035,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0029_027", "eurovoc_concepts": ["aromatic plant", "medical plant", "statistical nomenclature", "tariff nomenclature", "tobacco industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/89a10e4d-191d-4e52-b4ce-0d291ab58fae", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/61247c30-2018-47da-8695-603bc7229437", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1024/92 of 24 April 1992 adopting definitive measures on the issuing of STM licences for milk and milk products in regard to Spain", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-24", "subjects": "Spain,cheese,supplementary trade mechanism", "workIds": "celex:31992R1024,oj:JOL_1992_108_R_0029_039", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "cheese", "supplementary trade mechanism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/61247c30-2018-47da-8695-603bc7229437", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/840e1016-4896-48f6-9216-4b6b7f5b41c6", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1022/92 of 24 April 1992 on the supply of white sugar as urgent aid for the people of St Petersburg, Saratov, Chellabinsk and Nizhny-Novgorod pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 330/92", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-24", "subjects": "USSR,award of contract,emergency aid,food aid,white sugar", "workIds": "celex:31992R1022,oj:JOL_1992_108_R_0021_037", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "award of contract", "emergency aid", "food aid", "white sugar"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/840e1016-4896-48f6-9216-4b6b7f5b41c6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+null
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8b81e1b1-a2ee-477d-a1f7-dff2d74e9782", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1034/92 of 24 April 1992 on the supply of various consignments of white sugar as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-24", "subjects": "developing countries,food aid,white sugar", "workIds": "celex:31992R1034,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0021_026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["developing countries", "food aid", "white sugar"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8b81e1b1-a2ee-477d-a1f7-dff2d74e9782", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/72433538-8be2-44f0-8b33-7ab6571c21d3", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1032/92 of 24 April 1992 on the supply of refined rape seed oil as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-24", "subjects": "Ethiopia,Mozambique,award of contract,food aid,vegetable oil", "workIds": "celex:31992R1032,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0012_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ethiopia", "Mozambique", "award of contract", "food aid", "vegetable oil"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/72433538-8be2-44f0-8b33-7ab6571c21d3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ffb1b1e-af02-4514-b11a-55e0b00e3544", "title": "Tourism in Europe : summarizing the work of the European Parliament in the context of the European Year of Tourism.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-24", "subjects": "EU Member State,consumer protection,environmental protection,tourism,tourism policy,transport policy", "workIds": "PUB_AX7191930", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "consumer protection", "environmental protection", "tourism", "tourism policy", "transport policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ffb1b1e-af02-4514-b11a-55e0b00e3544", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7e0e948a-5a02-4942-bcbb-77d27c0ba156", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1033/92 of 24 April 1992 on the supply of refined sunflower oil as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-24", "subjects": "UNRWA,food aid,sunflower seed oil", "workIds": "celex:31992R1033,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0017_025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["UNRWA", "food aid", "sunflower seed oil"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7e0e948a-5a02-4942-bcbb-77d27c0ba156", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4d30e3cc-5b1a-41c1-ba59-e6d22a0390f9", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION establishing a multiannual programme for the development of Community statistics on Research, Development and Innovation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-24", "subjects": "EU programme,EU statistics,information system,innovation,statistical method,technological change", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0091,comnat:COM_1992_0091_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_122_R_0014_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU programme", "EU statistics", "information system", "innovation", "statistical method", "technological change"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4d30e3cc-5b1a-41c1-ba59-e6d22a0390f9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 91 final \n\nBrussels, 21 ApriI 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nestablishing a multiannnual programme for the \ndevelopment of Community statistics on \nResearch, Development and Innovation \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f-\n\nFXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nIntroduction \n\nFor some years now, the Community has operated a policy of promoting innovation and the market \nfor information of telecommunication equipments and services. This policy has been aimed at \naddressing the issue of the great concern at the Community level about the competitiveness of the \nEC industries in the world market in general, and with its major trading partners, the United States \nand Japan, in particular. Research and technological development, forming a significant part of the innovative process has \nlong been realised to be a key element of that competitiveness. Yet, many indicators of competitiveness \"come too late\" as they most often report what has already \nhappened, or at best, what is currently happening in the industrial sector. On the other hand, \nindicators emanating from research, technological development and innovation statistics are \"early \nwarning signs\" of what to expect within the industry in future. To policy makers, such indicators \nare indispensable. The Commission requires statistical information on RTD for policy purposes, in particular for the \ncompletion of the Internal Market and the achievement of a European socio-economic space. The statistical services of Member States co-ordinated by Eurostat have a significant role to play in \nmeeting the Community's need for these information. Backzround Information \n\nIn 1989, the Scientific and Technological Research Committee drew the Commission's attention to \ncertain weaknesses in Community R&D statistics. A group of experts met at the initiative of the \nDutch delegation and came up with a number of suggestions on how to remedy the current \nshortcomings, with the emphasis on finding better ways of meeting the needs of users. In response to these suggestions and in an attempt to improve the supply of reliable and comparable \ninformation on research, technological development and innovation, Eurostat took action in a \nnumber of areas in 1990. Further developments are still needed. These developments include: \n\nrevision of the nomenclature (NABS) used for the annual survey; \n\nregionalization of certain sets of statistics of particular interest to the Community; \n\ninformation on human resources; \n\ninformation on private sector R&D; \n\nmeasuring the impact of RTD and technological innovation. - ? -\n\nAim of the Decision \n\nThe aim is to present the different measures required for the development of an integrated system of \ninformation on research, technological development and innovation, and to link these measures to \none single implementing procedure which would guarantee their usefulness, consistency and \neffectiveness. More specifically, the aims of the programme set out in the Decision are \n\n1. 2. to set up a Community reference framework for statistics on research, technological \ndevelopment and innovation, and, \n\nto define the concepts and methods, within the framework provided by the international \norganisations (such as OECD and UNESCO), to be applied in preparing, monitoring and \nassessing Community policies and in meeting the demands of national regional and local \nauthorities, international organisations, economic operators, professional associations and \nother interested parties. The following work shall be carried out under the programme. a) \n\nb) \n\nc) \n\nd) \n\ne) \n\nf) \n\nanalysis and evaluation of user demand for statistics on research and development and \ninnovation; \n\ndeveloping a methodology for statistics on research and development and innovation; \n\nidentification of existing information on research and development and innovation; \n\nsetting up the organisational and technical components of a Community statistical \ninformation system for research and development and innovation; \n\ncarrying out pilot surveys; \n\ndeveloping basic statistical tools. The programme should promote the convergence of national statistical systems for RTD and \ninnovation and lead to the creation of a Community system of statistical information. Proposal for a \n\nestablishing a multiannniMl programme for the \ndevelopment of Community statistics on \nResearch, Development and Innovation \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular \nArticle 213 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, \n\nWhereas there is the need for the reinforcement of statistics on research and development and \ninnovation in order to compare and analyse national policies; \n\nWhereas the Council Resolution of 19th June 1989 on the implementation of a plan of priority \nactions in the field of statistical information: Statistical Programme of the European Communities \n(1989-1992) , highlighted the need for a comprehensive and coherent framework that will satisfy \nCommunity statistical information requirements by ensuring the approximation of methods and a \ncommon basis for concepts, definitions and standards; \n\nWhereas this development forms part of the Statistical Programme of the European Communities \n1993-1997; \n\nWhereas the design of policies trying to encourage progress requires accurate and \nknowledge about trends in science and technology endeavours; \n\nfactual \n\nWhereas statistical indicators are devised in order to support the management of science and \ntechnology policies in the Member States and the Community as a whole; \n\nWhereas these statistical indicators are complementary and essential to other priority areas and \nprogrammes of the EEC e. g. the programme SPRINT \nconcerning innovation and technology \ntransfer and the regional programme STRIDE , \n\nWhereas the specific programmes needed for the implementation of the Framework Programmes for \nCommunity Research and Technological Development, and the Framework Programmes themselves \nneed the report of a statistical information system on RTD; \n\nWhereas the amount of existing statistical information varies in each Member State and the data that \nexist are not always comparable; \n\n1 \n2 \n3 \n\nOJ No C 161, 28. 06. 1989, p. 1 \n\nOJ No L 112, 25. 04. 1989, p. 12 \n\nOJ No C 196, 04. 08. 1990, p. 18 \n\n\f4-\n\nWhereas the implementation of a statistical information system for research and development and \ninnovation necessitates a sequence of interrelated actions starting from the assessment of the needs \nup to the dissemination of information, and whereas this action should be organized in a coherent \nframework; \n\nWhereas the timely delivery of suitable comparable data can only be guaranteed by appropriate \nlegal provisions and these provisions have to be prepared together with the relevant Commission \nservices; whereas the provisions can most efficiently be met by Commission measures prepared \nfollowing consultation with Member States; \n\nWhereas to ensure their usefulness and comparability, the details of data to be provided by the \nMember States to the Commission should be set by the Commission in conformity with agreed \ndefinitions and methods established by OECD, UNESCO, and other international organisations; \n\nWhereas the data collection procedure for the industry and administrations should be simplified as \nmuch as possible while still maintaining at the same time the quality of the data, which is made \npossible by the development of appropriate basic statistical tools; \n\nWhereas it is essential that developments in official research and development and innovation \nstatistics are coordinated to meet essential international, community, national and regional needs at \nminimum public and private cost; \n\nWhereas this coordination can most conveniently and effectively be done within the established \nprocedures of cooperation between the Commission, the statistical services of \ninternational \norganisations and those of Member States; whereas it is therefore appropriate to adopt a 5 year \nprogramme to ensure this coordinated development; \n\nWhereas consultation with Member States on the carrying out of this programme can be made \nthrough the Committee on the Statistical Programme of the European Communities set up by \nCouncil Decision 89/382/EEC of 19 June 1989 , and whereas that Committee can also be called on \nto give its opinion on the Commission's specific proposals for collection and submission of \nstatistical data by Member States; \n\nWhereas the Scientific and Technological Research Committee (CREST)5 has given its opinion; \n\n4 \n5 \n\nOJ No L 181, 28. 06. 1989, p. 47 \n\nOJ No C 7, 29. 01. 1974, p. 2 \n\n\f7 \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe multiannual programme (1993-1997) for the development of Community statistics on research \nand development and innovation (hereinafter referred to as \"the programme\") is hereby established. Article 2 \n\nThe objectives of the programme referred to in Article 1 are as follows: \n\n(a) \n\n(b) \n\n(c) \n\nto set out a Community reference framework for statistics on research and development and \ninnovation defining the most appropriate concepts and methods for supporting the \ncorresponding Community policies, and for satisfying the needs of national, regional and \ninternational organisations, economic operators, professional \nlocal administrations, \nassociations and the general public; \n\nto establish a Community statistical information system for research and development and \ninnovation; \n\nto promote and support harmonization of statistics on research and development and \ninnovation in the Member States; \n\n(d) \n\nto facilitate the dissemination of comparable information. With a view to achieving the objectives referred to in Article 2, the following work shall be carried \nout by the Commission in line with the action plan set out in the Annex: \n\nArticle 3 \n\n(a) \n\n(b) \n\n(c) \n\n(d) \n\n(e) \n\n(f) \n\nanalysis and evaluation of user demand, subject to its feasibility and based on cost \nefficiency \nin order to define actions and priorities, for statistics on research and \ndevelopment and innovation; \n\nimprovement, where necessary, of existing methodological framework; \n\nidentification of existing statistical \ninnovation; \n\ninformation on research and development and \n\nsetting up the organizational and technical components of a Community statistical \ninformation system for research and development and innovation; \n\ncarrying out pilot surveys and \n\ndeveloping basic statistical tools. The Commission shall make use of existing sources of information, instruments and procedures to \ncarry out these tasks. - 6 \n\nArticle 4 \n\nThe Member States shall ascertain and analyse the needs of the main national users for Community \ndata on Research, Technological Development and Innovation Statistics and \nthis \ninformation to the Commission within eight months after the adoption of this Decision. The \nCommission shall coordinate these activities. transmit \n\nArticle 5 \n\nFor the work referred to in Article 3, Member States shall transmit to the Commission, existing \nstatistics on research and development and innovation and any information it may require \nconcerning the methodology used for collecting such statistics. These shall include any data which \nare claimed as confidential under national legislation; these data should be clearly marked as such. Article 6 \n\n(a) \n\nit considers appropriate, particularly on \n\nThe Commission shall present an interim report to the Council in 1995, accompanied if \nnecessary by proposals \nthe methodological \nframework referred to in Article 3 (b) and on the implementation of a system based on that \nmethodology, for the regular collection of harmonized statistics on research, development \nand innovation, as well as to cover the requirements of Community policy on research and \ntechnological development (RDT) and innovation, and the requirement for regional data to \naid structural policies. (b) \n\nThe Commission shall present a final report in 1997 to evaluate, in 1997, the results of the \nwork referred to in Article 3. This decision is addressed to the Member States. Article 7 \n\nDone at Brussels \n\nFor the Council \n\n\f- \n\n/ \n\nAnm \n\nPlan of action for the \ndevelopment of Community Statistics on \nResearch, Development and Innovation \n\na) \n\nAnalysis and evaluation of user demand for statistics on research, development and \ninnovation. The aim is to collect information on, and analyse the requirements of the main users, i. e. the Community institutions, the CREST, the national, regional and local administrations, \nthe international organisations and the economic operators. In order to facilitate long term planning and a convergence of statistical actions at \ninternational, Community, national and regional levels, the analysis will take into account \nlong term requirements. b) \n\nImprovement, where necessary, of existing methodological framework. The aim will be a reference framework for statistics on research and development and \ninnovation, both for existing data at national level and for additional data collection at \nCommunity level. This reference framework will increase the comparability of data between \nthe various Member States. Further development of the methodology will be done in close collaboration with, and \nwithin the framework provided by OECD, in order to take benefit of what has already been \ndone by that institution in the field and in order to guarantee comparability with third \ncountries. Where an adequate or adoptable methodology does not already exist, the \nCommission shall take the lead and initiative in developing the framework to cater for the \nspecial needs of the Community. The methodology will be used as the basic harmonization tool for the development of \nofficial Community statistics on research \nand development and innovation and as a \nrecommended framework for non-official statistics. The further methodological development will be formulated in manuals which will be \nadopted at the Community level. c) \n\nIdentification of existing statistical information on research and development and \ninnovation. In order to develop the methodology and the information system, examinations must be \nmade to reveal the amount of existing information on research and development and \ninnovation. This investigation is aimed at showing the extent of accessible data in the \nMember States and the differences between the Member States. This knowledge \nis \nnecessary for the collection of identical and comparable data. It stresses and highlights \nwhere to make special effort to promote and support the harmonization of statistics on \nresearch and development and innovation. d) \n\nSetting up the organizational and technical components of a European statistical \ninformation system for research, development and innovation. Priorities will be given to the following: \n\nResources: \n\nModes of financing research and development activities (both private and public). Research and development personnel by qualification. R&D expenditure by sector (of enterprise, the state, higher education). Results: \n\nTechnological innovation in the enterprises \n\nExchange of goods and services of high technology \n\nOn a circumstantial basis, the works are also undertaken on the direct repercussions of the \nresearch on patents and bibliography. Data will be classified according to European nomenclatures (NABS, NACE Rev. l. ). Special attention will be given to the regional dimension. Data are stored in data bases which will contain: \n\n1) \n\n2) \n\n3) \n\nharmonised data on R&D and Innovation; \n\nnational data collected according to national practices not yet fully harmonised; \n\ndata collected by the Commission. e) \n\nCarrying out pilot surveys. Improving the availability of data on research and development and innovation requires \nsometimes the carrying out of pilot surveys in order to test the feasibility of some data \ncollection exercises. The pilot surveys will prepare the way for regular data collection \nbased on the methodology. These pilot surveys will be carried out in accordance with the \nconcepts and methods developed in the methodology. 0 \n\nDeveloping the basic statistical tools. Basic statistical tools must be developed in order to simplify as far as possible data \ncollection procedures for suppliers, whilst maintaining data quality. These statistical tools \nwill include registers, EDI techniques (Electronic Data Interchange), classification systems, \nsampling, questionnaires, survey processing tools, data analysis systems. Plan of aril\u2014 for the \ndevelopment of Community Statistics on \nResearch, Development and Innovation \n\na) \n\nAnalysis and evaluation of user demand for statistics on research, development and \ninnovation. The aim is to collect information on, and analyse the requirements of the main users, i. e. the Community institutions, the CREST, the national, regional and local administrations, \nthe international organisations and the economic operators. In order to facilitate long term planning and a convergence of statistical actions at \ninternational, Community, national and regional levels, the analysis will take into account \nlong term requirements. b) \n\nImprovement, where necessary, of existing methodological framework. The aim will be a reference framework for statistics on research and development and \ninnovation, both for existing data at national level and for additional data collection at \nCommunity level. This reference framework will increase the comparability of data between \nthe various Member States. Further development of the methodology will be done in close collaboration with, and \nwithin the framework provided by OECD, in order to take benefit of what has already been \ndone by that institution in the field and in order to guarantee comparability with third \ncountries. Where an adequate or adoptable methodology does not already exist, the \nCommission shall take the lead and initiative in developing the framework to cater for the \nspecial needs of the Community. The methodology will be used as the basic harmonization tool for the development of \nofficial Community statistics on research \nand development and innovation and as a \nrecommended framework for non-official statistics. The further methodological development will be formulated in manuals which will be \nadopted at the Community level. c) \n\nIdentification of existing statistical information on research and development and \ninnovation. In order to develop the methodology and the information system, examinations must be \nmade to reveal the amount of existing information on research and development and \ninnovation. This investigation is aimed at showing the extent of accessible data in the \nMember States and the differences between the Member States. This knowledge is \nnecessary for the collection of identical and comparable data. It stresses and highlights \nwhere to make special effort to promote and support the harmonization of statistics on \nresearch and development and innovation. -40-\n\nd) \n\nSetting up the organizational and technical components of a European statistical \ninformation system for research, development and innovation. #\u00abt *. 't m. y-i \nPriorities will be given to the following:. - \n\n\u2022\"\u2022- \u2022- -\n\nResources: \n\nModes of financing research and development activities (both private and public). Research and development personnel by qualification. R&D expenditure by sector (of enterprise, the state, higher education). Results: \n\nTechnological innovation in the enterprises \n\nExchange of goods and services of high technology \n\nOn a circumstantial basis, the works are also undertaken on the direct repercussions of the \nresearch on patents and bibliography. Data will be classified according to European nomenclatures (NABS, NACE Rev. l. ). Special attention will be given to the regional dimension. Data are stored in data bases which will contain: \n\n1) \n\n2) \n\n3) \n\nharmonised data on R&D and Innovation; \n\nnational data collected according to national practices not yet fully harmonised; \n\ndata collected by the Commission. e) \n\nCarrying out pilot surveys. Improving the availability of data on research and development and innovation requires \nsometimes the carrying out of pilot surveys in order to test the feasibility of some data \ncollection exercises. The pilot surveys will prepare the way for regular data collection \nbased on the methodology. These pilot surveys will be carried out in accordance with the \nconcepts and methods developed in the methodology. 0 \n\nDeveloping the basic statistical tools. Basic statistical tools must be developed in order to simplify as far as possible data \ncollection procedures for suppliers, whilst maintaining data quality. These statistical tools \nwill include registers, EDI techniques (Electronic Data Interchange), classification systems, \nsampling, questionnaires, survey processing tools, data analysis systems. -H-\n\nFINANCIAL STATEMENT \n\nSECTION 1: FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\n1. Title of operation \n\nStatistical Programme of the EC (1993-97) \n\n2. Budget headings involved \n\n- Financial prospects - Heading 4. Other policies. - Subsection B-5 - Consumers, internal market, industry and \n\ninnovation. - Chapter B5-60 - Statistical information policy connected with the \n\ncompletion of the internal market and in support of Community \npolicies. Line B5 - 6000 \n\nLine B8 - 5900 \n\n3. Legal basis \n\nArticle 213 of the Treaty \n\n4. Description of operation \n\n(former B5-600, 10, 20, 30) \n\n(former B8-5900, 10, 20, 30) \n\n4. 1 Specific objectives of operation \n\na) analysis and evaluation of the demand from users of statistics \n\non research, development and innovation; \n\nb) improvement, where necessary, of the existing methodological \n\nframework; \n\nc) identification of the statistical information available on \n\nresearch, development and innovation; \n\nd) establishment of the organizational and technical components of \n\na European system for statistical information on research, \ndevelopment and innovation; \n\ne) pilot surveys; \n\nf) development of basic statistical tools. 4. 2 Duration \n\nOne-off \n\nDor OS/8727EN92L00 \n\n\f4. 3 Target population \n\n-{%\u2022-\n\n- The beneficiaries of this operation are: the Community \n\nInstitutions, the governments of the Member States, the economic \nand social decision-makers in the Member States, research \ninstitutes, universities and the media. 5. Classification of expenditure or of revenue \n\n5. 1 NCE \n\n5. 2 DA/NDA \n\n5. 3 Type of income envisaged: NONE \n\n6. Type of expenditure or revenue \n\n6. 1 100% subsidy \n\nNO - \n\nthe Commission's contribution represents only a small part \nof the actual cost of collecting the data, i. e. some 1-5%, \nsince the Commission's statistical work is subsidized to a \nvery large extent. Nevertheless, the expenditure is \nessential to provide an incentive for standardizing the \ndata collected, processing them and forwarding them data to \nEurostat. 6. 2 Subsidy for cofinancing with other sources in the public and/or \n\nprivate sector \n\nYES \n\n- cofinancing with the public sector (budgets of the \nnational statistical services) (income from sales of \nstatistical products and financing of surveys by \nbusinesses). 6. 3 Interest subsidy \n\nNO \n\n6. 4 Other \n\nNONE \n\n6. 5 Should the operation prove an economic success, is there provision \nfor all or part of the Community's financial contribution to be \nreimbursed? \n\nNO \n\n6. 6 Will the proposed operation cause any change in the level of \n\nrevenue? \n\n7. Financial impact on appropriations for operations (Part B of the \n\nbudget) \n\nDoc. OS/8 727EN92L00 \n\n\f7. 1 Method of calculating total cost of operation: \n\n\u2022\n\n** \n\n- PDB 1993 \n\nincluding \n\nTotal: ECU 400 000 \n\n- Provision of services (studies, analysis, data management) \n\nECU 320 000 \n\n7. 2 Proportion of mini-budget in total cost of operation: \n\n- B8-5900 for \n\nECU 80 000 \n\n7. 3 Indicative schedule of commitment and payment appropriations \n\nFinancial year \n\n1993 \n1994 \n\nC. A. 400 \n\nP. A. (ECU '000) \n\n280 \n120 \n\n8. What anti -fraud measures are planned in the proposal for the \n\noperation? \n\na) For the contracts and agreements entered into by the Commission \n\npayment is solely on results. b) The statistical information is considered to be an objective \n\ninstrument for evaluating Community action programmes and thus \ncontributes to consolidating the anti-fraud provisions. Doc. OS/8727EN92L00 \n\n\f-ih-\n\nSECTION 2: ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE \n(Part A of the budget) \n\n1. Will the proposed operation involve an increase in the number of \nCommission staff? \n\nDG unit mainly involved in the work (in accordance with the \nDirectory as at 1 January 1991) \n\nGO (sector attached to the Director-General) \n\nStaff: two persons on 1 January 1991, \n\nthree requested from 1993 budget \none requested from 1994 budget \ntwo requested from 1995 budget. 2. Indicate the amount of staff and administrative expenditure \n\ninvolved in the proposed operation: \n\nproportional to the staff attached to the operation, two persons on \n1 January 1992. Doc. OS/8727EN92L00 \n\n\f-4T-\n\nSECTION 3: ELEMENTS OF COST/EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS \n\n1. Objectives and cohesion with financial programming \n\n1. 1 Specific objective(s) of proposed operation: \n\nStatistics in the context of research and development: \n\nPublic and private statistics on research and development, \nstatistics on technological innovation \n\n1. 2 Is the operation incorporated in the financial programming of the \n\nD6 for t! --\u00bb years concerned? \n\nYES \n\n1. 3 To which broader objective defined in the DG's financial \nprogramming does the objective of the proposed operation \ncorrespond?: \n\nGeneral objective: EC statistical action 1993-1997 \n\n2. Grounds for the operation \n\n2. 1 Reasons for choosing this operation rather than an alternative \n\nwhich would achieve the same objectives \n\nThis operation will achieve four objectives: \n\n- it gives the Institutions the quantitative data for drawing up, \nmonitoring and evaluating any plan of action in accordance with \nArticle 3 (2) of the Financial Regulation: \"it therefore \ncontributes to the more effective and appropriate use of the \nCommunity budget\". - it gives the national governments comparable statistics on all \nthe Member States for evaluating and monitoring the progress of \nCommunity and national R&D programmes and policies. - it provides political, economic and social bodies in the \nCommunity with statistical information on which to make and \nevaluate their decisions in their respective fields of action: it \nis therefore an essential part of the European information \nmarket. - it makes available to the scientific community the information \nneeded to enhance its analysis and knowledge of economic and \nsocial life in the Community as regards research, development and \ninnovation. Doc. OS/8727EN92L00 \n\n\f-a-\n\na) \n\ncost: \n\n- The finance for this operation comes mainly from the Member \nStates (Section 1, item 6. 1), which have a well-established \nstructure for collecting and processing data. If the Commission \nhad to finance the whole of this programme, the cost would be \nextremely high for a product which would certainly be less \nreliable. b) \n\nspin-off effect: \n\n- Statistical information is collected by a highly decentralized \nsystem, in which the national systems have a responsibility at \nindividual Member State level. The Community statistical \nprogramme is becoming an integral part of the national \nstatistical programmes, thereby contributing to establishing a \nEuropean statistical area. c) \n\nmultiplier effect: \n\n- Effect of drawing the national statistical systems into a \nEuropean statistical area and thus into further integration at \nCommunity level. 3. Monitoring and evaluation of the operation \n\n3. 1 Performance indicators selected: \n\n- monitoring the operational objectives using the TBPS (Statistical \nProgramme Monitoring File), interim reports and the annual report. 3. 2 Annual progress report on programme: \n\nThe statistical programme is continuously monitored by a TBPS \n(Statistical Programme Monitoring File), which lays down for each \ngeneral operation the operational objectives and resources required \non the basis of the programming/execution principle. At the \nbeginning of each year Eurostat produces a report on the progress \nof its programme during the preceding year. This report falls into \nthree parts, as follows: \n\n- the first summarizes, for each policy, the main achievements in \nthe year; \n\n- the second describes, for each operation, the objectives laid \ndown and the results achieved; \n\n- the third gives statistics on the utilization of human, \nbudgetary, computer and administrative resources during the \npreceding year. The Council Decision provides for a report on the execution of the \nprogramme. Annexes: \n\n1) Mini-budget \n2) Timetable \n\nDec. OS/8727EN92L00 \n\n\fJUDGET LINES WITH MINI-BUDGETS \nI \n\nBudget \nline \n\nTITLE \n\nTotal mini-budget \n\nALLOCATION CODES \n\nExpenditure on infrastructure \n\n20 \n\n30 \n\n40 \n\n41 \n\n50 \n\n1 \n\n\u2022 \n\n\u2022 \n\n* \n\nAnnex 1 \n\nECU '000 \n\nPlanned number \nof staff \n\nOperation support \nappropriations - B5-6000 \n\n(For information) \n\nExp. on \n\u2022taff \n\nOperating \nexp. Direct \n\nexp. (DGs) \n\nDG XX quota \n(1) \n\nIxp. on \n\ninformation \nand \npublications \n\nm \n\nB8-5900 \n\nEC Statistical Programme \n1993 \n\n80 \n\n60 \n\n20 \n\n1 \n\n\f-w \n\nThe indicative schedule of commitment and payment appropriations is as \nfollows: \n\nAnnex 2 \n\nArt. B5-6000 \nECU '000 \n\n- DA -\n\nCOMMITMENTS \n\nPAYMENTS \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n4. 1993 appropriations \n\n400 \n\n280 \n\n; \n\n120 \n\n\u2022 \n\nDoc. OS/6727EN92L00 \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-147S \n\nJ \n\nCOM(92) 91 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n17 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-104-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-42031-6 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nI ^2985 Luxembourg \n\n\f\f\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nJ \n\nCOM(92) 91 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n17 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-104-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-42031-6 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1584aac5-45c1-4c9d-a3b3-f0b086eca572", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending for the second time Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 on Community measures to improve and adapt structures in the fisheries and aquaculture sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-23", "subjects": "EU policy,financial aid,fishing industry,market", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0155,comnat:COM_1992_0155_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_127_R_0010_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "financial aid", "fishing industry", "market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1584aac5-45c1-4c9d-a3b3-f0b086eca572", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMVKJNITIES \n\nCOM(90) 155 final \n\nBrussels, 23 April 1990 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending for -the second -time Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 \non Community measures to improve and adapt structures \nin the fisheries and aquaculture sector \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fL-\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nThis proposal for a Council regulation amending for the second time the Council \nregulation (CEE) n\u00b04028/86 of 18 December 1986 (' ) has the following objective: \n\n- to increase the rates of community aid in the aquaculture sector in the \nfollowing regions: in the five new Landers of Unified Germany and in Ceuta and \nMelilla, these being part of the less developed regions of the Community. 1 O. J. a\u00b0 L 376 of 31. 12. 1986. p. 7 \n\n\f-5 -\n\nPROPOSAL FOR A \n\nCT \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\nof \n\n1992 \n\namending for the second time Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 \non Community measures to improve and adapt structures \nin the fisheries and aquaculture sector \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \nand in particular Articles 42 and 43 thereof. Having regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal, and in \nparticular Article 155(2)(a) thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission*, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament^, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of Economic and Social Committee-', \n\nWhereas the new statistics available show that the five new German LSnder \nmay, as far as aquaculture is concerned, be regarded as less-developed \nCommunity regions in respect of which Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 \nof 18 December 1986 on Community measures to improve and adapt structures \nin the fisheries and aquaculture sector4, as last amended by Council \nRegulation (EEC) No 3944/90 of 20 December 19905, provides for a higher \nrate of Community aid; \n\nWhereas Ceuta andMelilla qualifies as regions which may receive the maximum \nlevel of aid for aquaculture; \n\nWhereas Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 provides for the maximum level of \nCommunity aid for Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and for Ceuta-Melilla for measures \naimed at the restructuring, renewal, and modernisation of the fishing \nfleet; \n\nWhereas the regions in question should, accordingly, be included in \nAnnex III to that Regulation, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nAnnex III to Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 is hereby replaced by the Annex to \nthis Regulation. Article 1 \n\n1 \n2 \n3 \n4 \n5 \n\nOJ NO C \nOpinion delivered on \nOpinion delivered on \nOJ No L 376, \nOJ No L 380, \n\n31. 12. 86, \n31. 12. 90, \n\np. 7 \np. l \n\n(ZPE/006) \n\n\f-4 -\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in \nthe official Journal of European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable \nin all Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \nThe President \n\n;m. t ips/oo*) \n\n\fANNEX \n\nCOMMUNITY AID AND FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MEMBER STATES FOR THE \nDEVELOPMENT OF AQUACULTURE AND STRUCTURAL WORKS IN COASTAL WATERS \n\nI. Aquaculture \n\nRegions \n\nCommunity \naid \n\nFinancial contributions \nfrom Member States \n\n1. Greece, Andalusia, Canary Islands, \nCeuta and Melilla, Castile-Leon, \nCastile-La-Mancha, Extremadura, \nGalicia, West of Scotland(l), \narrondissements of Quimper and \nLorient, Ireland, Northern \nIreland, Mezzogiorno, Portugal, \nthe French Overseas Departments, \nVeneto, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, \nBrandenburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, \nThtiringen and Sachsen \n\n40% \n\n2. Other regions \n\n25% \n\nbetween 10 \nand 30% \n\nbetween 10 \nand 25% \n\n(1) The 'West of Scotland' shall mean Dumfries and Galloway, the Western \nIsles, Orkney and Shetland, together with the districts of Caithness, \nSutherland, Ross and Cromarty, skye and Lochalsh, Lochaber, Argyll \nand Bute, cunninghame, Kyle and Carrick. II. Protected marine areas \n\nCommunity aid: 50% \n\nContributions from Member States: between 10 and 35% \n\n(IPE/0O6) \n\n\f\u00a3 -\n\nFINANCIAL STATEMENT \n\n1. Budget heading involved: \n\nB2-9301 \n\n2. Appropriations entered under the heading for 1992 \n\nECU 224 000 000 \n\n3. Carryovers authorized or requested: \n\nautomatic: \nnon-automatic: \n\nX \n\n4. Expenditure resulting from amendment of the proposed Regulation: \n\n(a) current budget year: \n\nECU 600 000 \n\n(b) following years: \n\n(1993) \n\nECU 600 000 \n\n5. Other financial impact of the amendement, if any: \n\nNone \n\nCalculation method (to be explained in detail): \n\nIncrease in the Community contribution to the regions in question \nby between 25% and 40%, or 15% of forecast investment in 1992 of \nECU 4 million and in 1993 of ECU 4 million. This gives a figure of \nECU 600 000 for each budget year. Opinion of Director-General for Budgets: \n\nApproved, \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 155 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-173-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43420-1 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nLr2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/232d71ac-617d-40f8-bc3e-479311a9cc6b", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1016/92 of 23 April 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products of category 3 (order No 40.0033), originating in India, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-23", "subjects": "man-made fibre,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1016,oj:JOL_1992_108_R_0007_031", "eurovoc_concepts": ["man-made fibre", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/232d71ac-617d-40f8-bc3e-479311a9cc6b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6434adcd-f680-41dc-97e2-03c1ead98a82", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1018/92 of 23 April 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN codes 8527, 8528 and 8529, originating in China, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-23", "subjects": "radio equipment,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference,television equipment", "workIds": "celex:31992R1018,oj:JOL_1992_108_R_0011_033", "eurovoc_concepts": ["radio equipment", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference", "television equipment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6434adcd-f680-41dc-97e2-03c1ead98a82", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0e627111-a06e-46e7-b42b-86ca9d1f64f7", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1008/92 of 23 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2677/85 laying down implementing rules in respect of the system of consumption aid for olive oil", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-23", "subjects": "EU aid,aid system,consumption,olive oil,product quality,quality control of industrial products", "workIds": "celex:31992R1008,oj:JOL_1992_106_R_0012_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "aid system", "consumption", "olive oil", "product quality", "quality control of industrial products"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0e627111-a06e-46e7-b42b-86ca9d1f64f7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb9df463-d9bf-491f-b281-80c6d4931245", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1031/92 of 23 April 1992 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of potassium chloride (potash) originating in Belarus, Russia or Ukraine", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-23", "subjects": "USSR,chemical salt,dumping,import", "workIds": "celex:31992R1031,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0005_023", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "chemical salt", "dumping", "import"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb9df463-d9bf-491f-b281-80c6d4931245", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7e4217ae-ae14-4ace-ab6e-fa0aab0e4005", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1015/92 of 23 April 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products of category 90 (order No 40.0900), originating in Bulgaria, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-23", "subjects": "man-made fibre,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1015,oj:JOL_1992_108_R_0005_030", "eurovoc_concepts": ["man-made fibre", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7e4217ae-ae14-4ace-ab6e-fa0aab0e4005", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dc7021e3-4385-4f0a-a94d-b78e70762dbf", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1017/92 of 23 April 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products of category 26 (order No 40.0260), originating in Indonesia, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-23", "subjects": "Indonesia,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1017,oj:JOL_1992_108_R_0009_032", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Indonesia", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dc7021e3-4385-4f0a-a94d-b78e70762dbf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/288f0847-d5c3-48a7-bc10-5d9783b0c6ee", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1007/92 of 23 April 1992 providing for the grant of compensation to producers' organizations in respect of tuna delivered to the canning industry during the period 1 July to 30 September 1991", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-23", "subjects": "indemnification,producer organisation,sea fish", "workIds": "celex:31992R1007,oj:JOL_1992_106_R_0009_016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["indemnification", "producer organisation", "sea fish"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/288f0847-d5c3-48a7-bc10-5d9783b0c6ee", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae35719c-8577-4c8f-a708-da7a08319324", "title": "Energi : \u00c5rlig statistik 1990.,Energie : Statistisch jaarboek 1990.,Energy : Statistical yearbook 1990.,\u00c9nergie : Annuaire statistique 1990.,\u0395\u03bd\u03ad\u03c1\u03b3\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1 : \u03a3\u03c4\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u03b5\u03c0\u03b5\u03c4\u03b7\u03c1\u03af\u03b4\u03b1 1990.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission,Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-22", "subjects": "coal,gas,petroleum product,price of energy,statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA7291495", "eurovoc_concepts": ["coal", "gas", "petroleum product", "price of energy", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae35719c-8577-4c8f-a708-da7a08319324", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d35464d0-33e6-4173-8bfe-c4f85569cdf1", "title": "Conditions for business cooperation, public procurement : company law, intellectual property, company taxation. volume 3.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-22", "subjects": "company law,industrial cooperation,intellectual property,public contract,single market,tax system", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CO6291003", "eurovoc_concepts": ["company law", "industrial cooperation", "intellectual property", "public contract", "single market", "tax system"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d35464d0-33e6-4173-8bfe-c4f85569cdf1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8117657d-1d15-43da-b758-123fbfd97cdd", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) temporarily suspending the autonomous common customs tariff duties on a number of agricultural products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-22", "subjects": "CCT duties,suspension of customs duties", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0153,comnat:COM_1992_0153_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["CCT duties", "suspension of customs duties"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8117657d-1d15-43da-b758-123fbfd97cdd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "\u00a3s \n\nCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 153 final \n\nBrussels, 22 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\ntemporarily suspending the autonomous common customs tariff \nduties on a number of agricultural products \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. 2. 3. In the first quarter of this year, the Commission, with the \nassistance of the Economic Tariff Questions Group, examined all \nrequests, submitted by Member States, for temporary suspension of \ncommon customs tariff duties, including the requests for prolongation \nof the suspensions currently in force. The attached proposal concerns a number of agricultural products. The \nproposal foi industrial products is being prepared. Requests for suspension relating to the above products were examined \nin the light of the criteria defined in the Commission communication \nto the Council and the Member States, concerning autonomous tariff \nsuspensions (cf. O. J. No. C 235 of 13. 9. 89, p. 2 ). As a result of this examination, the Commission deems it justifiable \nto suspend the duty on those products listed in the Annex to the \nattached draft Regulation. 4. As stated in Article 1 of the aforementioned draft Regulation, the \nproposed period of validity is 6 months or 12 months, depending on \nthe case. proposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\n192 \n\nof \n\n1991 \n\ntemporarily suspending the autonomous C o m m on C u s t o ms Tariff duties on a \nnumber of agricultural products \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European \nEconomic Community, and \nin particular Article 28 \nthereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas production in the Community of the products \nis currently inadequate or \nspecified \nthe \nnon-existent; whereas producers thus cannot meet \nneeds of user industries in the Community ; \n\nin this Regulation \n\nto \n\nin one \n\ncase \nsuspend \n\nit is in the interest of \nthe \nWhereas \nCommunity \nthe autonomous Common \nCustoms Tariff duties only partially, particularly since the \ngoods in question are produced in the Community, and \nin the other cases to suspend them totally ; \n\nvant sectors, suspension measures should be taken only \ntemporarily by fixing their period of validity by reference \nto the interests of Community production, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION : \n\nArticle I \n\nThe autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties for the \nproducts listed in the Annex hereto shall be suspended at \nthe level indicated against each of them. These suspensions shall be valid \n\u2014 from 1 July to 31 December 1992. for the products \n\nmentioned in Table I, \n\n\u2014 from 1 July 1992 to 30 June 1993 for the products \n\nmentioned in Table II. Whereas, in view of the difficulty of assessing accurately \nshort-term trends in the economic situation in the rele \n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1992 \n\nThis Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at \n\n1992. For the Council \n\nThe President \n\n<\u00a3 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription of goods \n\nAutonoaous duties (X) \n\nANNEX \nI \n\nTABLE \n\n1 \n\n63826528 \n63637526 \n6x63641898 \nex63649897 \n\n2 6x63826998 \n8x83837998 \n\n3 6x63626998 \n\n4 6x63626998 \nex6303799P \n\n5. 83627008 \n6x83636880 \n\n6 ex8383ieee \n\n168 \n131 \n\n\u2022 30 \n130 \n\n140 \n\n\u2022 50 \n140 \n\ntie \n120 \n\nHO \n\nDogfish of the 6pecies Squalus \nfrozen \n\nacanihias, \n\nfresh, chilled or \n\nSturgeons, fresh, chilled or frozen, for processing (a) (b) \n\nLuap fish \n(Cycloplarus \nfor processing (a) \n\nluapus) \n\nwith roe, fresh or chilled, \n\nRed Snapper \nfor processing (a) (c) \n\n(Luljanus \n\npurpureas), \n\nfresh, chilled or frozen, \n\nHard fish roes, fresh, chilled or frozen \n\nific salaon \nspp. ), \nthe processing industry for aanufacture into pastes or \n\nfrozen and headless, \n\n(Oncorhynchus \n\nspreads (a) \n\n7 ex030380ee \n\n116 \n\nSoft roe, frozen, for the aanufacture of deoxyribonucleic acid \nor protaaine sulphate (a) \n\n8 ex03052000 \n\n110 \n\nHard fish roes, salted or in brine \n\n9 ex03061990 \nex03062990 \n\n20 exl6041166 \n6x16042016 \n\n21 6x16043098 \n\n22 exl6051000 \n\nne \n116 \n\n126 \n126 \n\ntlO \n\ntil \n119 \n\nKrill for processing (a) \n\nPacific salaon \nindustry for aanufacture into pastes or spreads (a) \n\nspp. ), for the processing \n\n(Oncorhynchus \n\nHard fish roes, \u2022ashed, cleaned of adherent organs and siaply \nsalted or in brine, for processing (a) \n\ncaachaiicus), \n\nCrabs of the species 'King' (Paraliihodes \n'Hanasaki' (Paraliihodes brevipas), 'Kegani' \n(. Eriaacrus isanbaclci), 'Queen* and *Sno\u00ab' \n(. Chionoecetas spp. ), 'Red' (Geryon quinquedans), \n'Rough stone' (Meoli thodas asperriaus), Liihodas \nanlarctica, \n(Portunus \nor not frozen, in iaaediate packings of a net content of 2kg \nor aore \n\nsiaply boiled in water and shelled, nhelher \n\n'Mud' (Scylla sarrala), 'Blue' \n\nspp. ), \n\n23 exl66S3068 \n\ntlO \n\nLobster flesh, cooked, for the processing industry for the \naanufacture of butlers based on lobster, or of pastes, pates, \nsoups or sauces (a) (c) \n\n3 \n\n\fTABLE II \n\nCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription of goods \n\nAutonomous duties (X) \n\n16 6x87162180 \n\ntlO \n\nPees in pods, of the species Pi SUB sativum of the variety \nHortansa axiphiua, \n6aa, to be used, in their pods, in the aenufacture of prepared \nseals (a) (C) \n\nfrozen, of a thickness not exceeding \n\n0 \n\n12 6x07119056 \n\n13 6x97123086 \n\n14 6x87133390 \n\n15 6x88641668 \n\n16 6x08641060 \n\n114 \n192 \n\n\u202217 \n\u202224 \n\n\u202220 \n\ntil \n121 \n\n\u202212 \n\u202222 \n\nNushrooas, excluding aushrooas of the species Agaricus spp. , \nprovisionally preserved in brine, in sulphur water, or in other \npreservative solutions, but unsuitable in thai stale for \niaaediale consumption, for the food-canning industry (a) \n\nMushrooas, excluding aushrooas of the species Agaricus spp. , \ndried, whole or in identifiable slices or pieces, for treatment \nother than siaple repacking for retail sale (a) (C) \n\nBeans, white, dried, of the species Phasaolus vulgaris, \nwhich not aora than 2X by weight ere retained by a screen with \napertures of a diameter of 8aa, for use in the food-canning \nindustry (a) \n\nof \n\nDeles, fresh or dried, for the processing industry, other then \nfor the production of alcohol (a) \n\nDates, fresh or dried, for packing for retail sale into \niaaediale packings of a net content not exceeding 11kg (a) \n\n17 8x08104656 \n\n110 \n\nFruit of the species Vacciniua \n\naacrocarpon, \n\nfresh \n\n18 \n\n08119050 \n08119070 \n8x08119096 \n\n135 \n\nFruit of the genus Vacciniua, \nnot containing added sugar or other sweetening aatter \n\n\u2022hether or not cooked, frozen, \n\n(a) Control of the use for this special purpose shall be carried out pursuant to \n\nthe ralavanl Coaaunily provisions. (b) Tha suspension shall apply to fiah intended to undergo any operation unless \n\nthey are intended to undergo exclusively one or aore of the following \noparaliona: \n- cleaning, gutting, tailing, heading, \n- cutting (excluding, filiating or cutting of frozen blocks), \n- aaapling, sorting, \n- labelling, \n- packing, \n- chilling, \n- freezing, \n- deep freezing, \n- thaaing, separation. Tha suspension is not allowed for products intended, in addition, to undergo \nIrealaenl (or operations) qualifying for suspension ahere such treslaenl (or \noparaliona) is (are) carried out at retail or catering level. The suspension \nof cusloas duties shall apply only to fiah intended for huean conauaplion. (c) Hoaever, tha suspension is not allowed where processing is carried out by \n\nretail or catering undertakings. FINANCIAL RECORD \n\n1. Budget Iine concerned : Chap. 12 Art. 120 \n\n2. Title of the tariff measure concerned : Draft proposal for a Council \nRegulation, temporarily suspending the autonomous common customs \ntariff duties on a number of agricultural products \n\n3. Legal basis : Art. 28 of the Treaty \n\n4. Object ive : suspension of CCT duties on the abovementioned products \n\n5. Cost of this tariff-measure : \n\nTo be borne by the EEC-budget : \n\n- \n\nfor the same exercise in 1991, the loss of own resources was \nexpected to be of the order of 23 400 000 ecus (of P. E. E/391/91 \nC0M(91) 103 of 25. 03. 1991) \n\nfor the current exercise, based on the Community statistics \navailable, a reasonable estimate for the cost of the operation \nfor the period covered by the attached draft Regulation would be \nof the order of 24 570 000 ecus. vT \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 153 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-168-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43281-0 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg \n\nC"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/301c1a6a-f06a-4698-91f0-aafb5e1fd06b", "title": "Veterinary and plant health controls : veterinary controls, plant health controls. volume 5.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-22", "subjects": "agricultural policy,health control,plant health control,public health,single market", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CO6291005", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural policy", "health control", "plant health control", "public health", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/301c1a6a-f06a-4698-91f0-aafb5e1fd06b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e379559a-9eb7-4c48-aa61-d1b5438cf0ed", "title": "92/439/Euratom: Commission Decision of 22 April 1992 concerning the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Atomic Energy Community, the Government of Japan, the Government of the Russian Federation, and the Government of the United States of America on cooperation in the engineering design activities for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) and of its Protocol 1, by the Commission for and on behalf of the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-22", "subjects": "EAEC,International Atomic Energy Agency,cooperation agreement,nuclear energy,nuclear reactor", "workIds": "celex:31992D0439", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC", "International Atomic Energy Agency", "cooperation agreement", "nuclear energy", "nuclear reactor"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e379559a-9eb7-4c48-aa61-d1b5438cf0ed", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5135da8-d7ff-4e37-aaef-1cd4b7256b61", "title": "Encuesta de las fuerzas de trabajo : resultados 1990.,Enqu\u00eate sur les forces de travail : r\u00e9sultats 1990.,Erhebung \u00fcber Arbeitskr\u00e4fte : Ergebnisse 1990.,Indagine sulle forze di lavoro : risultati 1990.,Labour force survey : results 1990.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-22", "subjects": "labour force,sampling,statistical method,statistics,working population", "workIds": "PUB_CA7291390", "eurovoc_concepts": ["labour force", "sampling", "statistical method", "statistics", "working population"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5135da8-d7ff-4e37-aaef-1cd4b7256b61", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2f0b8776-42be-41a1-b38c-87751d0c2592", "title": "Agreement among the European Atomic Energy Community, the Government of Japan, the Government of the Russian Federation, and the Government of the United States of America on cooperation in the engineering design activities for the international thermonuclear experimental reactor - Statement of the European Atomic Energy Community's Delegation on the occasion of the last Quadripartite negotiation meeting on Cooperation in the Engineering Design Activities for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Atomic Energy Community,Japan,Russia,United States", "date": "1992-04-22", "subjects": "EAEC,International Atomic Energy Agency,cooperation agreement,nuclear energy,nuclear reactor", "workIds": "celex:21992A0826(01)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC", "International Atomic Energy Agency", "cooperation agreement", "nuclear energy", "nuclear reactor"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2f0b8776-42be-41a1-b38c-87751d0c2592", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/11e3b93d-1519-47ac-b5ef-b498373d4e18", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 991/92 of 21 April 1992 concerning the stopping of fishing for common sole by vessels flying the flag of Ireland", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "Ireland,sea fish,sea fishing", "workIds": "celex:31992R0991,oj:JOL_1992_105_R_0013_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ireland", "sea fish", "sea fishing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/11e3b93d-1519-47ac-b5ef-b498373d4e18", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bc0309f7-d5d2-4775-9690-18114e7a17a8", "title": "92/257/EEC: Commission Decision of 21 April 1992 amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "health control,import,meat product", "workIds": "celex:31992D0257,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0030_048", "eurovoc_concepts": ["health control", "import", "meat product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bc0309f7-d5d2-4775-9690-18114e7a17a8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9e894b5d-79e9-4d69-bdc2-9b8dea14eb22", "title": "Directory of public databases produced by the institutions of the European Communities January 1992.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security,Publications Office of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "European Commission,database,directory,documentation centre", "workIds": "PUB_CB7291972", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "database", "directory", "documentation centre"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9e894b5d-79e9-4d69-bdc2-9b8dea14eb22", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b1b5228e-b7e6-4ab0-b0df-f16dd1c8e4f2", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 981/92 of 21 April 1992 opening for 1992 and laying down detailed rules for the application of an import quota for live bovine animals weighing between 160 and 300 kilograms, originating in and coming from the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Hungary and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "Czechoslovakia,Hungary,Poland,import licence,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:31992R0981,oj:JOL_1992_104_R_0034_036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Czechoslovakia", "Hungary", "Poland", "import licence", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b1b5228e-b7e6-4ab0-b0df-f16dd1c8e4f2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d19bfd84-eee6-4575-9111-a80c2b7535ae", "title": "The rules governing medicinal products in the European Community. Volume I, The rules governing medicinal products for human use in the European Community : revised and completed edition, September 1991.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "EC Directive,EU Member State,health legislation,health policy,medicinal product,pharmaceutical industry,pharmaceutical legislation,pharmaceutical product,pharmacology,technical rule", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CO7191631", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "EU Member State", "health legislation", "health policy", "medicinal product", "pharmaceutical industry", "pharmaceutical legislation", "pharmaceutical product", "pharmacology", "technical rule"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d19bfd84-eee6-4575-9111-a80c2b7535ae", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/59394001-6f8a-444f-a9d1-7f7e6abab158", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1214/92 of 21 April 1992 on provisions for the implementation of the Community transit procedure and for certain simplifications of that procedure", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "Union transit,customs document", "workIds": "celex:31992R1214,oj:JOL_1992_132_R_0001_003", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Union transit", "customs document"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/59394001-6f8a-444f-a9d1-7f7e6abab158", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bb367ffa-2608-4bff-b644-cf1e1cde3490", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 977/92 of 21 April 1992 fixing for the 1992 marketing year the Community offer prices for peaches including nectarines applicable with regard to Spain and Portugal", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "Portugal,Spain,offer price,stone fruit", "workIds": "celex:31992R0977,oj:JOL_1992_104_R_0025_032", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "Spain", "offer price", "stone fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bb367ffa-2608-4bff-b644-cf1e1cde3490", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a33d261c-29eb-4e1c-b8f7-613a311d0208", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directive 90/425/EEC concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "intra-EU trade,live animal,single market,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0147,comnat:COM_1992_0147_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_122_R_0018_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["intra-EU trade", "live animal", "single market", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a33d261c-29eb-4e1c-b8f7-613a311d0208", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 147 final \n\nBrussels, 21 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending Directive 90/425/EEC concerning veterinary \n\nand zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community \n\ntrade in certain live animals and products \n\nwith a view to the completion of the internal market \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n2 \n\nCouncil Directive 90/425/EEC concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks \napplicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a \nview to the completion of the internal market*1) provides that veterinary and \nzootechnical checks on certain live animals and products are no longer to be \ncarried out at the Community's internal borders. However, the Directive leaves open the rules applicable after the expiry of \ncertain transitional provisions (Articles 24 and 25). In addition, the fourth \nparagraph of Article 21 provides for inclusion in the scope of Council Directive \n89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community \ntrade with a view to the completion of the internal market*2^ or of Directive \n90/425/EEC of the animals and products of animal origin not covered by the said \nDirect ives. This proposal provides for the abolition, from 1 July 1992, of veterinary checks \nat internal borders for all trade in live animals. It is clearly not \nappropriate to apply the arrangements provided for in Directive 90/425/EEC to \nchecks on the movements between Member States of pets accompanied by a natural \nperson. Such movements are not the subject of a commercial transaction and \ntherefore fall outside the scope of Directive 90/425/EEC and will be dealt with \nin a specific Commission proposal. This proposal takes account of the considerable progress made in the \nharmonization of veterinary rules, particularly those concerning: \n\n- checks on live animals from third countries (Council Directive 91/496/EEC of \n15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organization of \nveterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and \namending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC(3>) \n\n- measures to control foot-and-mouth disease (Council Directive 90/423/EEC of 26 \nJune 1990 amending Directive 85/511/EEC introducing Community measures for the \ncontrol of foot-and-mouth disease, Directive 64/432/EEC on animal health \nproblems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine and \nDirective 72/462/EEC on health and veterinary inspection problems upon \nimportation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat or meat products from \nthird countries)*4* and swine fever (Council Directive. /. /EEC of \namending Directive 80/217/EEC introducing Community measures for the control \nof classical swine fever)(5). (1) 0J No L 224, 18. 08. 1990, p. 29. (2) 0J No L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13. (3) 0J No L 268, 24. 09. 1991, p. 56. (4) 0J No L 224, 18. 08. 1990, p. 13. (5) 0J No L \n\n\f3 \n\nproposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending Directive 90/425/EEC concerning veterinary \n\nand zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community \n\ntrade in certain live animals and products \n\nwith a view to the completion of the internal market \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in \n\nparticular Article 43 thereof. Having regard to the proposal from the Commission*1), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament*2), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee*3), \n\nWhereas the Community is to adopt measures designed to establish the internal \n\nmarket progressively over a period expiring on 31 December 1992; \n\nWhereas Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and \n\nzootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals \nand products with a view to the completion of the internal market*4), as last \namended by Directive 91/628/EEC*5), provides that veterinary checks on certain \nlive animals and animal products are no longer to be carried out at the \n\nCommunity's internal borders; \n\n(1) 0J No C \n(2) 0J No C \n(3) OJ No C \n(4) OJ No L 224, 18. 08. 1990, p. 29. (5) OJ No L 340, 11. 12. 1991, p. 17. ,^^-^Am. t. imiam^v&m&\u00b1 \n\n^ \n\nWhereas, since adopting Directive 90/425/EEC, the Council has fixed the \n\nprinciples governing the organization of veterinary checks on live animals and \n\nanimal products entering the Community from third countries; whereas, in this \n\nrespect, account should be taken of Council Directive 90/675/EEC of 10 December \n\n1990 laying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary checks \n\non products entering the Community from third countries*6) and Council \n\nDirective 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the \n\norganization of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third \n\ncountries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC*7); \n\nWhereas the fourth paragraph of Article 21 of Directive 90/425/EEC provides for \n\nthe inclusion in the scope of the said Directive, and of Council Directive \n\n89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community \n\ntrade with a view to the completion of the internal market*8) of live animals \n\nand products of animal origin not covered by the said Directives; \n\nWhereas Article 25 of Directive 90/425/EEC stipulates that the arrangements \n\nwhich are to apply when the transitional provisions provided for in Article 24 \n\nexpire should be determined; whereas, in this regard, account should be taken of \n\nthe progress made in the Community as regards both the adoption of rules \n\nconcerning live animals and animal products from third countries and the \n\nharmonization of measures to control foot-and-mouth disease and swine fever, \n\nspecifically Council Directive 90/423/EEC of 26 June 1990 amending Directive \n\n85/511/EEC introducing Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth \n\ndisease, Directive 64/432/EEC on animal health problems affecting intra-\n\nCommuni ty trade in bovine animals and swine and Directive 72/462/EEC on health \n\nand veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine animals and swine \n\nand fresh meat or meat products from third countries*9) and Council Directive. /. /EEC of \n\namending Directive 80/217/EEC introducing Community measures \n\nfor the control of classical swine fever*1 0); \n\n(6) 0J NO L 373, 31. 12. 1990, p. 1 \n(7) 0J No L 268, 24. 09. 1991, p. 56 \n(8) 0J No L 395, 30. 12. 1989, p. 13 \n(9) 0J No L 224, 18. 08. 1990, p. 13 \n(10) OJ No L \n\n\fvj-\n\nWhereas, particularly in the light of the progress made in harmonizing \n\nveterinary rules, provision should be made for the abolition, from 1 July 1992, \n\nof veterinary checks carried out at internal borders on all live animals and \n\nanimal products; \n\nWhereas, however, provision must be made for specific rules concerning the \n\nveterinary checks applicable to movements of pets accompanied by and under the \n\nresponsibility of a natural person, where such movements are not the subject of \n\na commercial transaction; \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\nDirective 90/425/EEC is hereby amended as follows: \n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. The following paragraph is added to Article 1: \n\n\"This Directive shall not apply to veterinary checks on movements between \n\nMember States of pets accompanied by and under the responsibility of a \n\nnatural person, where such movements are not the subject of a commercial \n\ntransaction. \" \n\n2. In Article 7(2), \"1 January 1993\" is replaced by \"1 July 1992\". 3. In the first paragraph of Article 21, the words \"until 31 December 1992\" are \n\ndeleted. 4. The second paragraph of Article 21 is replaced by the following; \n\n\"Member States shall communicate to the Commission and the other Member \n\nStates the conditions and procedures applicable to trade in the animals and \n\nproducts referred to in the first paragraph. \" \n\n5. The last sentence of the third paragraph of Article 21 is deleted. \u2022 zr&~. ^**ii \n\n6. Article 22 is replaced by the following: \n\n\"Article 22 \n\n1. Member States shall submit to the Commission, using a harmonized model, \n\nthe relevant information concerning the checks carried out pursuant to \n\nthis Direct ive. 2. The Commission shall examine the information referred to in paragraph 1 \n\nwithin the Standing Veterinary Committee. It may adopt appropriate \n\nmeasures in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 18. 3. Detailed rules for the application of this Article, in particular the \n\nfrequency of communication of information , the model to be used and the \n\ntype of information required, shall be laid down in accordance with the \n\nprocedure laid down in Article 18. \" \n\n7. Articles 24 and 25 are deleted. 8. Part A of Annex B is replaced by the following: \n\n\"A. Veterinary legislation - Other live animals not covered by Annex A. 1. \" \n\n9. Part B of Annex B is replaced by the following: \n\n\"B. Veterinary legislation - Semen, ova and embryos not covered by Annex \n\nA. 1. \" \n\nArt icle 2 \n\n1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative \n\nprovisions necessary to comply with this Directive on 1 July 1992. They \n\nshall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. 2. When these measures are adopted by the Member States, they shall contain a \n\n7-\n\nreference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the \n\noccasion of their official publication. The methods of making such a \n\nreference shall be laid down by the Member States. Article 3 \n\nThis Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the CounciI \n\n\f\fISSN0254-X475 \n\nCOM (92) 147 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-164-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43245-4 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nLr2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/193d32d8-2d3a-401d-ba3d-a42f720f506f", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending Decision 89/631/EEC on a Community financial contribution towards expenditure incurred by Member States for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the Community system for the conservation and management of fishery resources", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "EU financing,conservation of fish stocks,fishery product,fishery resources", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0150,comnat:COM_1992_0150_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_138_R_0010_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "conservation of fish stocks", "fishery product", "fishery resources"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/193d32d8-2d3a-401d-ba3d-a42f720f506f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\n\u00a7\u00ab \n'vSUi \n\nCOM(92)150 final \n\nBrussels, 21 ApriI 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\namending Decision 89/631/EEC on a Community financial \ncontribution towards expenditure incurred by Member States \nfor the purpose of ensuring compliance with the Community \nsystem for the conservation and management of fishery resources \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nFollowing the presentation of a proposal from the Commission^), the Council \n\nadopted a Decision (89/631/EEC) on 27 November 1989(2) making provision for \n\na Community financial contribution towards expenditure incurred by Member \n\nStates in the enforcement of the conservation rules of the Common Fisheries \n\nPolicy. Under the said Decision, the Community may contribute up to 22 million Ecu \n\nper annum over an initial period of five years (1991 - 1995). However, \n\nArticle 1(1) of the Decision stipulates that, pending the adoption of \n\nCommunity rules for the conservation and management of fishery resources \n\napplicable in Mediterranean waters, the Community, as far as Member States of \n\nthe Mediterranean basin are concerned, is empowered to make such a \n\ncontribution on a provisional basis until 31 December 1991. The budgetary commitments made following the adoption of Council Decision \n\n89/631/EEC made provision for the payment by the Community of up to fifty \n\npercent of the total costs of all Member States engaged in the conservation \n\nof fishery resources. Subsequent to the Council Decision, a number of Member States of the \n\nMediterranean basin have submitted national multiannual programmes which \n\ncontribute to the implementation of the fishery resources conservation \n\narrangements applicable in Mediterranean waters. These programmes have been \n\nexamined, approved and partially funded by the Community for 1991<3). The purpose of this proposed Council Decision is to permit the continuation \n\nof a Community financial contribution towards the expenditure borne by Member \n\nStates of the Mediterranean basin who submit investment plans for the \n\nconservation of fishery resources in subsequent years. (1) COM(88) 703 \n(2) O. J. No L 364 of 1 4. 1 2. 8 9, p. 6 4. 9 of 1 2. 0 1. 9 1, p. 3 4. (3) O. J. No L \n\nf i n a l. A t C E W. f e l l / e x. i n c m o. c n / cm \n\n/ \n\n\fProposal for a Council Decision \namending Decision 89/631/EEC on a Community financial \ncontribution towards expenditure incurred by Member States \nfor the purpose of ensuring compliance with the Community \nsystem for the conservation and management of fishery resources \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and \n\nin particular Article 43 thereof. Having regard to the proposal from the Commission^), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(-*), \n\nWhereas on 27 November 1989 the Council adopted Decision 89/631/EEC(4) \n\nproviding, on a provisional basis until 31 December 1991, for a Community \n\nfinancial contribution towards expenditure incurred by Member States of the \n\nMediterranean basin in the furtherance of the applicable rules for the \n\nconservation and management of fishery resources, pending the adoption of \n\nCommunity rules applicable in Mediterranean waters; \n\nWhereas Community rules for the conservation and management of fishery \n\nresources applicable to Mediterranean waters have not yet been adopted and it \n\nis essential to allow the continuation of a Community financial contribution \n\ntowards expenditure incurred by those Member States of the Mediterranean \n\nBasin pending the adoption of Community rules for the conservation and \n\nmanagement of fishery resources applicable in that area; \n\n(1) \n(2) \n(3) \n(4) O. J. No L 364 of 14. 12. 89, p. 64. AMEND. \u00ab31/en/cm \n\n\fHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: \n\n1 - 2 -\n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe second subparagraph of Article 1(1) of Decision 89/631/EEC is hereby \n\nreplaced by the following : \n\n\"Pending the adoption of Community rules for the conservation and \n\nmanagement of fishery resources applicable in Mediterranean waters, the \n\nCommunity shall contribute under the same conditions as those set out in \n\nthis Decision to the financing of the expenditure incurred by the Member \n\nStates concerned to ensure compliance with the applicable rules. Member \n\nStates which wish to benefit from this contribution shall notify such \n\nrules to the Commission and justify their merits. \" \n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\n1992. For the Council \n\nThe President \n\nAMBMl>. \u00ab-)i/*n/ca \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 150 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-166-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43263-2 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bdca2e67-4f3c-475a-a4b1-27cde5445cff", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 980/92 of 21 April 1992 laying down detailed rules for applying the aid scheme for the marketing in Martinique and Guadeloupe of rice produced in French Guiana", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "EU aid,Guadeloupe,Guyana,Martinique,marketing,rice", "workIds": "celex:31992R0980,oj:JOL_1992_104_R_0031_035", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Guadeloupe", "Guyana", "Martinique", "marketing", "rice"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bdca2e67-4f3c-475a-a4b1-27cde5445cff", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/304b1dd0-c2b5-4a29-9b9c-6c957ad72687", "title": "Encuesta de las fuerzas de trabajo : Resultados 1983-1989.,Enqu\u00eate sur les forces de travail : R\u00e9sultats 1983-1989.,Erhebung \u00fcber Arbeitskr\u00e4fte : Ergebnisse 1983-1989.,Indagine sulle forze di lavoro : Risultati 1983-1989.,Labour force survey : Results 1983-1989.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-21", "subjects": "labour force,sampling,statistical method,statistics,working population", "workIds": "PUB_CA7291382", "eurovoc_concepts": ["labour force", "sampling", "statistical method", "statistics", "working population"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/304b1dd0-c2b5-4a29-9b9c-6c957ad72687", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ec4bdf7e-0bb1-4b1a-8287-8c88ae68fd6e", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 956/92 of 15 April 1992 fixing for the 1992 marketing year the reference prices for cherries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "stone fruit", "workIds": "celex:31992R0956,oj:JOL_1992_102_R_0027_034", "eurovoc_concepts": ["stone fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ec4bdf7e-0bb1-4b1a-8287-8c88ae68fd6e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/37eebcce-a6db-4eaa-827d-89ecc23a3eb3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 959/92 by Mr Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Infringement of Council Directive of 22 March 1988 relating to the coordination of procedures on the award of public supply contracts", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPAYANNAKIS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Greece,application of EU law,economic concentration,public contract,supplies contract,works contract", "workIds": "celex:91992E000959", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "application of EU law", "economic concentration", "public contract", "supplies contract", "works contract"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/37eebcce-a6db-4eaa-827d-89ecc23a3eb3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d24538d7-a4c0-4243-bd11-411ae1329e3e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 968/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: illegal immigrants", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,exchange of information,illegal migration,police checks,political asylum,refugee", "workIds": "celex:91992E000968", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "exchange of information", "illegal migration", "police checks", "political asylum", "refugee"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d24538d7-a4c0-4243-bd11-411ae1329e3e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b50365a1-ee7b-4827-8ca5-4f3d0ea58806", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 909/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Rehabilitation of the Greek economy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU borrowing,Economic and Monetary Union,European integration,Greece,balance of payments,civil service,dismissal,economic convergence,economic integration,privatisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000909", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU borrowing", "Economic and Monetary Union", "European integration", "Greece", "balance of payments", "civil service", "dismissal", "economic convergence", "economic integration", "privatisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b50365a1-ee7b-4827-8ca5-4f3d0ea58806", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4437ceab-d563-4f85-846e-018675bfe0b5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 927/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: law and order", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,exchange of information,public order", "workIds": "celex:91992E000927", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "exchange of information", "public order"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4437ceab-d563-4f85-846e-018675bfe0b5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a8f152cd-7809-41ef-b903-e7db5ff47c62", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 916/92 by: Lord O' HAGAN , Hugh McMAHON and Bartho PRONK to the Commission. The future prospects of the European Social Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MCMAHON,O'HAGAN,PRONK", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European Social Fund,Treaty on European Union,aid recipient,decision-making,employment aid,employment policy,financing method", "workIds": "celex:91992E000916", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Fund", "Treaty on European Union", "aid recipient", "decision-making", "employment aid", "employment policy", "financing method"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a8f152cd-7809-41ef-b903-e7db5ff47c62", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/73b01ee4-c321-45a1-ac16-1ff95fa11872", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 949/92 by Diego SANTOS L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Free trade agreement with Morocco", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LOS SANTOS LOPEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EC Accession Treaty,European Commission,Morocco,Spain,agricultural product,free-trade agreement,industrial product,liberalisation of trade", "workIds": "celex:91992E000949", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Accession Treaty", "European Commission", "Morocco", "Spain", "agricultural product", "free-trade agreement", "industrial product", "liberalisation of trade"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/73b01ee4-c321-45a1-ac16-1ff95fa11872", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6428bca3-098a-4a91-a510-e85ec6bb23e9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 977/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. Schengen: data protection authorities", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,data processing,police,protection of privacy,supervisory body", "workIds": "celex:91992E000977", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "data processing", "police", "protection of privacy", "supervisory body"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6428bca3-098a-4a91-a510-e85ec6bb23e9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7b71f1d6-629b-43eb-a052-40be4aeaf970", "title": "92/255/EEC: Commission Decision of 15 April 1992 establishing a list of semen collection centres approved for the export to the Community of deep-frozen semen of domestic animals of the bovine species from certain third countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "cattle,health control,import,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992D0255,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0027_046", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cattle", "health control", "import", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7b71f1d6-629b-43eb-a052-40be4aeaf970", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/974ea7d7-04c0-4fa2-abd6-a2cc5fc9e91a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 915/92 by: Lord O' HAGAN , Hugh McMAHON and Bartho PRONK to the Commission. The future prospects of the European Social Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MCMAHON,O'HAGAN,PRONK", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European Social Fund,Treaty on European Union,aid recipient,decision-making,employment aid,employment policy,financing method", "workIds": "celex:91992E000915", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Fund", "Treaty on European Union", "aid recipient", "decision-making", "employment aid", "employment policy", "financing method"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/974ea7d7-04c0-4fa2-abd6-a2cc5fc9e91a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/84323eef-7022-423f-ba73-9a023460d454", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 904/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The environment in Ptolemaida", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Greece,asbestos,competence of the Member States,degradation of the environment,electrical industry,mining operation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000904", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "asbestos", "competence of the Member States", "degradation of the environment", "electrical industry", "mining operation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/84323eef-7022-423f-ba73-9a023460d454", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/14e4071c-75e2-47fb-b375-75602c948259", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 958/92 by Mr Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Infringement of the Treaty and competition regulations", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPAYANNAKIS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU law - national law,Greece,State aid,application of EU law,competition,free service,merger control,privatisation,transfer of businesses", "workIds": "celex:91992E000958", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law - national law", "Greece", "State aid", "application of EU law", "competition", "free service", "merger control", "privatisation", "transfer of businesses"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/14e4071c-75e2-47fb-b375-75602c948259", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e312f724-d329-4457-a84e-93305b63f4f2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 926/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: illegal immigrants", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,exchange of information,illegal migration,police checks,political asylum,refugee", "workIds": "celex:91992E000926", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "exchange of information", "illegal migration", "police checks", "political asylum", "refugee"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e312f724-d329-4457-a84e-93305b63f4f2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9bf0644e-88d6-4dc1-a456-6be17d8795b2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 985/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Commission. Mauritius -exemptions and fraud involving EUR 1 certificates", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "ACP countries,EU Member State,Mauritius,customs duties,customs fraud,export licence,fraud", "workIds": "celex:91992E000985", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ACP countries", "EU Member State", "Mauritius", "customs duties", "customs fraud", "export licence", "fraud"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9bf0644e-88d6-4dc1-a456-6be17d8795b2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed6af2af-b35a-4b20-8390-384751bc7653", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 943/92 by Mrs Ursula SCHLEICHER to the Commission. European Community expenditure on health", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCHLEICHER", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU Member State,EU statistics,health expenditure,social security,social-security benefit", "workIds": "celex:91992E000943", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "EU statistics", "health expenditure", "social security", "social-security benefit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed6af2af-b35a-4b20-8390-384751bc7653", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/82c07f04-548b-4b7e-b0a6-d03879bfc5e1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 928/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: bilateral agreements on liaison officers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,bilateral agreement,diplomatic protection,exchange of information,fight against crime,police", "workIds": "celex:91992E000928", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "bilateral agreement", "diplomatic protection", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "police"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/82c07f04-548b-4b7e-b0a6-d03879bfc5e1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0d92f7d2-3546-4d4e-a906-8427904bf4b9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 974/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: combating terrorism", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,exchange of information,fight against crime,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:91992E000974", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0d92f7d2-3546-4d4e-a906-8427904bf4b9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c4d2fbf4-7182-4ce1-97bb-5b205417d46f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 919/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Application of the social security system to retired Community nationals resident in Spain", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU national,Spain,economic integration,elderly person,health policy,pension scheme,social integration,social security,social-security harmonisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000919", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "Spain", "economic integration", "elderly person", "health policy", "pension scheme", "social integration", "social security", "social-security harmonisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c4d2fbf4-7182-4ce1-97bb-5b205417d46f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71f42435-5df0-48f2-9867-75a3d113f50c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 992/92 by Mr John McCARTIN to the Commission. Spending on marketing and processing in the agricultural sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MCCARTIN", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Ireland,agricultural product,agro-industry,fund (EU),marketing", "workIds": "celex:91992E000992", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ireland", "agricultural product", "agro-industry", "fund (EU)", "marketing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71f42435-5df0-48f2-9867-75a3d113f50c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/269af68b-8096-439e-b2d6-911137957ec6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 966/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: monitored deliveries and the fight against drugs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,drug traffic,fight against crime,police", "workIds": "celex:91992E000966", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "drug traffic", "fight against crime", "police"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/269af68b-8096-439e-b2d6-911137957ec6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/103c8a33-2e73-4a49-9c74-d447c3bfea4b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 964/92 by Virginio BETTINI, Enrico FALQUI and Yves FR\u00c9MION to the Commission. The vocational training school attached to the Ispra JRC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BETTINI,European Parliament,FALQUI,FREMION", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU financing,Italy,Joint Research Centre,overheads,technical education,vocational education", "workIds": "celex:91992E000964", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "Italy", "Joint Research Centre", "overheads", "technical education", "vocational education"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/103c8a33-2e73-4a49-9c74-d447c3bfea4b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06189c5c-10d5-48f6-b2ef-d3f58cd7a642", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 998/92 by Mr Stephen HUGHES to the Commission. European Social Fund projects", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,HUGHES STEPHEN", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European Social Fund,Structural Funds,action programme,public administration,regions of the United Kingdom", "workIds": "celex:91992E000998", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Fund", "Structural Funds", "action programme", "public administration", "regions of the United Kingdom"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06189c5c-10d5-48f6-b2ef-d3f58cd7a642", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/51197e19-8b8f-41ea-9354-7995d0981116", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 905/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The fertilizer factory in Nea Karvali", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Greece,cadmium,dangerous substance,environmental protection,fertiliser industry,waste disposal,waste management,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E000905", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "cadmium", "dangerous substance", "environmental protection", "fertiliser industry", "waste disposal", "waste management", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/51197e19-8b8f-41ea-9354-7995d0981116", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/47769ce5-3412-434a-a341-49b573212aa3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 967/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: police cooperation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,fight against crime,frontier region,police", "workIds": "celex:91992E000967", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "fight against crime", "frontier region", "police"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/47769ce5-3412-434a-a341-49b573212aa3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/27775c95-cbfa-4eb2-82d1-84d5fd39910f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 902/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The Mikri Prespa Lake", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Macedonia,application of EU law,ecosystem,environmental protection,forest,national park,protected area,stagnant water,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E000902", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Macedonia", "application of EU law", "ecosystem", "environmental protection", "forest", "national park", "protected area", "stagnant water", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/27775c95-cbfa-4eb2-82d1-84d5fd39910f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/abc6f289-24d9-4321-84b3-9307612ad08e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 986/92 by Mrs Astrid LULLING to the Commission. Amendment of Council Directive of 17 March 1980 coordinating the requirements for the drawing up, scrutiny and distribution of the listing particulars to be published for the admission of securities to official stock exchange listing", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LULLING", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "publication,securities,stock exchange,stock-exchange listing", "workIds": "celex:91992E000986", "eurovoc_concepts": ["publication", "securities", "stock exchange", "stock-exchange listing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/abc6f289-24d9-4321-84b3-9307612ad08e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c595bbda-3033-4e52-b8c4-503c0cc6e00e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 917/92 by: Lord O' HAGAN , Hugh McMAHON and Bartho PRONK to the Commission. The future prospects of the European Social Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MCMAHON,O'HAGAN,PRONK", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European Social Fund,Treaty on European Union,aid recipient,decision-making,employment aid,employment policy,financing method", "workIds": "celex:91992E000917", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Fund", "Treaty on European Union", "aid recipient", "decision-making", "employment aid", "employment policy", "financing method"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c595bbda-3033-4e52-b8c4-503c0cc6e00e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c2f91512-79da-4891-99a1-475b56ec0213", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 988/92 by Mrs Teresa DOMINGO SEGARRA to the Council. Secondment of employees as staff representatives", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DOMINGO SEGARRA,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,European official,personnel administration,workers' representation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000988", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "European official", "personnel administration", "workers' representation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c2f91512-79da-4891-99a1-475b56ec0213", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cbf39664-356a-4d32-add2-121e289ab45d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 947/92 by Mrs Cristiana MUSCARDINI to the Commission. Approximation of legislation on precious metals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MUSCARDINI", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European standard,harmonisation of standards,precious metal,quality control of industrial products,quality label,trade restriction", "workIds": "celex:91992E000947", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "harmonisation of standards", "precious metal", "quality control of industrial products", "quality label", "trade restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cbf39664-356a-4d32-add2-121e289ab45d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fdf8f5f1-40d9-46c1-9590-bae4d0eb4ccd", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 942/92 by Mrs Ursula SCHLEICHER to the Commission. Efficiency of CELEX system", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCHLEICHER", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU law,Publications Office of the European Union,access to information,database,dissemination of information,free service,information system,national parliament,public administration", "workIds": "celex:91992E000942", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "Publications Office of the European Union", "access to information", "database", "dissemination of information", "free service", "information system", "national parliament", "public administration"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fdf8f5f1-40d9-46c1-9590-bae4d0eb4ccd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/601358e9-f3bd-4b77-a853-a5718415448e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 978/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. EC asylum policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU policy,European cooperation,illegal migration,immigration,political asylum,refugee", "workIds": "celex:91992E000978", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "European cooperation", "illegal migration", "immigration", "political asylum", "refugee"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/601358e9-f3bd-4b77-a853-a5718415448e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/707e66dc-65e5-4369-a7c0-0b6dc0d127c5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 922/92 by Mrs Annemarie GOEDMAKERS to the Commission. Monk seals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GOEDMAKERS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU financing,Greece,Madeira,marine mammal,protection of animals", "workIds": "celex:91992E000922", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "Greece", "Madeira", "marine mammal", "protection of animals"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/707e66dc-65e5-4369-a7c0-0b6dc0d127c5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f40c0063-61c0-467e-8950-8b0de957ea02", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 981/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. Exchange of information between EC police forces", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,exchange of information,information system,police,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E000981", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "exchange of information", "information system", "police", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f40c0063-61c0-467e-8950-8b0de957ea02", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c43dc2ec-1f56-435f-b143-29b211d42057", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 950/92 by Mr Paul LANNOYE to the Commission. Ammonia emissions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LANNOYE", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "air quality,biological standard,chemical salt,industrial pollution,livestock farming,organic fertiliser,pollution control measures,quality of the environment", "workIds": "celex:91992E000950", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air quality", "biological standard", "chemical salt", "industrial pollution", "livestock farming", "organic fertiliser", "pollution control measures", "quality of the environment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c43dc2ec-1f56-435f-b143-29b211d42057", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/270f32d8-35c5-4e50-a4b2-b51e82c7401a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 970/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: bilateral agreements on liaison officers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,bilateral agreement,diplomatic protection,exchange of information,fight against crime,police", "workIds": "celex:91992E000970", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "bilateral agreement", "diplomatic protection", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "police"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/270f32d8-35c5-4e50-a4b2-b51e82c7401a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7b855e09-757b-4ab7-9683-364c18d5b5bd", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 952/92 by Mr James ELLES to the Commission. COMETT II", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ELLES JAMES,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "activity report,educational exchange,invitation to tender,project evaluation,school-industry relations,school-working life relations,student mobility,technology,traineeship", "workIds": "celex:91992E000952", "eurovoc_concepts": ["activity report", "educational exchange", "invitation to tender", "project evaluation", "school-industry relations", "school-working life relations", "student mobility", "technology", "traineeship"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7b855e09-757b-4ab7-9683-364c18d5b5bd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c30b8ebc-b71e-442c-b57b-7e116e5f7979", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 946/92 by: Virginio BETTINI and Gianfranco AMENDOLA to the Commission. Car-free city centre", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "AMENDOLA,BETTINI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "exchange of information,motor car,quality of the environment,report,research programme,town,transport policy,urban transport", "workIds": "celex:91992E000946", "eurovoc_concepts": ["exchange of information", "motor car", "quality of the environment", "report", "research programme", "town", "transport policy", "urban transport"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c30b8ebc-b71e-442c-b57b-7e116e5f7979", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f92416f0-9695-49bd-b395-95fc155e9813", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 937/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. Asylum seekers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "admission of aliens,data collection,database,exchange of information,free movement of persons,immigration,information system,political asylum,residence permit,supervisory power", "workIds": "celex:91992E000937", "eurovoc_concepts": ["admission of aliens", "data collection", "database", "exchange of information", "free movement of persons", "immigration", "information system", "political asylum", "residence permit", "supervisory power"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f92416f0-9695-49bd-b395-95fc155e9813", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f308edc-3b08-4e9d-bd2f-3e224176beba", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 954/92 of 15 April 1992 amending Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3866/91 fixing the standard values to be used in calculating the financial compensation and the advance pertaining thereto in respect of fishery products withdrawn from the market during the 1992 fishing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "producer organisation,production aid,selling price,withdrawal from the market,withdrawal price", "workIds": "celex:31992R0954,oj:JOL_1992_102_R_0025_032", "eurovoc_concepts": ["producer organisation", "production aid", "selling price", "withdrawal from the market", "withdrawal price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f308edc-3b08-4e9d-bd2f-3e224176beba", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f5c5415-e6df-40d2-80aa-2f0375c85b0f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 913/92 by: Lord O' HAGAN and Hugh McMAHON to the Commission. The future prospects of the European Social Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MCMAHON,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European Social Fund,Treaty on European Union,aid recipient,decision-making,employment aid,employment policy,financing method", "workIds": "celex:91992E000913", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Fund", "Treaty on European Union", "aid recipient", "decision-making", "employment aid", "employment policy", "financing method"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f5c5415-e6df-40d2-80aa-2f0375c85b0f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d846bf49-1e4c-432d-8f79-0e8192645f12", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 971/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: liaison officers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,exchange of information,fight against crime,police,public order", "workIds": "celex:91992E000971", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "police", "public order"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d846bf49-1e4c-432d-8f79-0e8192645f12", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bba46003-08cd-49bc-a1ab-f332681be003", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 962/92 by Mr Christos PAPOUTSIS to European Political Cooperation. Turkish annexation of the occupied territories of Cyprus", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPOUTSIS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Cyprus,European political cooperation,T\u00fcrkiye,UN resolution,occupied territory", "workIds": "celex:91992E000962", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Cyprus", "European political cooperation", "T\u00fcrkiye", "UN resolution", "occupied territory"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bba46003-08cd-49bc-a1ab-f332681be003", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/975fc540-bd73-4bbd-aa03-e26b6bb3974a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 969/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: law and order", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,exchange of information,public order", "workIds": "celex:91992E000969", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "exchange of information", "public order"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/975fc540-bd73-4bbd-aa03-e26b6bb3974a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4a6bba07-cdd5-4f7d-9cb9-baf9f8efc38e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 921/92 by Mrs Karla PEIJS to the Commission. Central quota management system", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PEIJS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "GATT,import licence,information network,single market,textile product,trade policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000921", "eurovoc_concepts": ["GATT", "import licence", "information network", "single market", "textile product", "trade policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4a6bba07-cdd5-4f7d-9cb9-baf9f8efc38e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1e4cc89a-d406-4cac-9aa5-413cb610f667", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 920/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Council. Application of the social security system to retired EC nationals in their country of residence", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU national,residence,retired person,social security,social-security harmonisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000920", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "residence", "retired person", "social security", "social-security harmonisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1e4cc89a-d406-4cac-9aa5-413cb610f667", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68c9593e-9fd7-4793-b8ed-5836a275ad8d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 995/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Commission. Review of in-service vocational training for Community staff in 1991", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "continuing education,in-service training,servant (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E000995", "eurovoc_concepts": ["continuing education", "in-service training", "servant (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68c9593e-9fd7-4793-b8ed-5836a275ad8d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46906cf1-c921-46ef-98b8-4f7a1e9d3654", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 987/92 by Mr Pierre BERNARD-REYMOND to the Commission. Nuclear power stations in eastern Europe", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BERNARD-REYMOND,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,EU aid,Eastern Bloc countries,Western Balkans,financing,financing method,nuclear power station,nuclear safety,report,technical cooperation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000987", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "EU aid", "Eastern Bloc countries", "Western Balkans", "financing", "financing method", "nuclear power station", "nuclear safety", "report", "technical cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46906cf1-c921-46ef-98b8-4f7a1e9d3654", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5155b4c-f8ab-4404-a019-de06945b168c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 963/92 by Mr Juan de Dios RAM\u00cdREZ HEREDIA to the Council. Legalization of private broadcasting in all the EC Member States", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,RAMIREZ HEREDIA", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU Member State,Netherlands,broadcasting,freedom of expression,national law", "workIds": "celex:91992E000963", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "Netherlands", "broadcasting", "freedom of expression", "national law"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5155b4c-f8ab-4404-a019-de06945b168c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/af9870a5-8f21-4705-af3a-e5d43510a4b4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 910/92 by Mr Madron SELIGMAN to the Commission. Spaniards exempt from property taxes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SELIGMAN", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Spain,competence of the Member States,real property,residence,tax on income,wealth tax", "workIds": "celex:91992E000910", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "competence of the Member States", "real property", "residence", "tax on income", "wealth tax"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/af9870a5-8f21-4705-af3a-e5d43510a4b4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/700fe576-7b9f-491a-b2d7-6659c8d0f316", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to RECREATIONAL CRAFT", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European standard,approximation of laws,free movement of goods,pleasure craft,safety standard,technical specification", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0141,comnat:COM_1992_0141_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_123_R_0007_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "approximation of laws", "free movement of goods", "pleasure craft", "safety standard", "technical specification"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/700fe576-7b9f-491a-b2d7-6659c8d0f316", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92)141 final- SYN 410 \n\nBrussels,15 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non the approximation of the laws, \n\nregulations and administrative provisions \n\nof the \n\nMember States \n\nrelating to \n\nRECREATIONAL CRAFT \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\nti&-\n\nIff \n\nft \n\nHi \n\nssfc \n\n\f- 1 -\n\nI. Explanatory memorandum \n\n1. Background and origin of the proposal \n\nBetween 1970 and 1982, the Commission attempted to draw up a draft \ndirective (doc. 111/308/81) for the approximation of legislation on the \nhulls of recreational craft. However, this attempt was abandoned owing \nto divergent views on the construction principles. The situation in the Member States is characterized by the following: \n\n- regulat ions: technical rules based on national legislation involving \ntype-approval in France and Italy result in obstacles to trade and \nhigher production costs (only the largest undertakings persisted in \ntrying to overcome these difficulties); \n\n- standards: in other Member States, national standards not backed by \nnational legislation create no obstacles to trade but, since they are \nnot obligatory, they present no guarantee of protection against the \nproduction and placing on the market of potentially dangerous \nproducts. In view of the potential benefits of the single market and the \nadvantages of improving the safety of recreational craft and their \ncomponents, the representatives of the European industry organized in \nICOMIA (International Council of Marine Industry Associations) asked the \nCommission to put to the Council a directive based on Article 100a of \nthe Treaty on the safety of recreational craft. The background to this request was in particular the work begun in the \n1980s on a large number of standards (about 50) in the framework of the \nISO**) (TC 188), in which industry from the Member States, the EFTA \ncountries and the USA in particular was involved. As the other means of harmonization did not appear suitable, the \nCommission has prepared a draft directive in close collaboration with \nindustry, particularly in respect of the essential requirements, and has \nconsulted the national administrations and professional \ncircles \nconcerned. (*) \n\nInternational Organization for Standardization \n\n/ul/gaboh/LC/NO/mot-EN - 18/3/92 \n\n\f- 2 -\n\n2. Consultations \n\nNational experts, representatives of the industry, the boat users \n(European Boating Association) and classification societies were \nconsulted in depth. The proposal was on the whole welcomed by all the experts representing \nthe above groups. It has been supplemented and amended following the \nthree consultation meetings held in 1990. On a general level, the \npreparatory work produced a consensus on the value of this intitiative. 3. Risks covered and essential requirements \n\nApart from two essential requirements concerning identification of the \ncraft and the manufacturer, the risks covered and the essential \nrequirements have been grouped as follows: \n\n- risks relating to use, in particular at sea \n\n* falIing overboard \n* structure, stability, buoyancy \n* openings, drainage \n* capacity \n* compartmenta Iization \n* rescue, towing, mooring \n\n- performance \n- safety of the propulsion system \n- safety of the fuel system \n- safety of the electrical system \n- safety of the steering system \n- fire protection, in particular gas appliances \n\nlights. 4. Implementation \n\nIt is estimated that it will take about two years from adoption of the \ndirective by the Council before all the standards necessary for its \napplication are available; the planned implementation date is therefore \n1 July 1995. /ul/gobohAG/NO/mot-EN - 18/3/92 \n\n\fProposal for a \n\nCounciI DIrect i ve \n\nof \n\non the approximation of the laws, \n\nregulations and administrative provisions \n\nof the \n\nMember States \n\nrelating to \n\nRECREATIONAL CRAFT \n\nThe Council of the European Communities, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nand in particular Article 100A thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, in cooperation with the \n\nEuropean Parliament. Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, \n\nHaving regard to the Council's decision of 13 December 1990 concerning the \n\nmodules for the various phases of the conformity assessment procedures \nwhich are intended to be used in technical harmonization directives*1) \n\nWhereas the laws, regulations and administrative provisions in force in the \n\nvarious Members States relating to the safety characteristics of \n\nrecreational craft differ in scope and content, whereas such disparities \n\nare liable to create barriers to trade and unequal conditions of \n\ncompetition within the internal market. (1) OJ L 380, 31. 12. 1990, p. 13 \n\n/ul/goboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 16 Morch. 1992. - 2 -\n\nWhereas the minimum length of recreational craft should be 2. 5 m, since \n\ncraft under this length cannot be considered as recreational craft; whereas \nthe maximum length of 24 m for recreational craft is derived from IMO*2) \nconventions and ISO*3) standards; \n\nWhereas the removal of technical barriers in the field of recreational \n\ncraft and their components , to the extent that they cannot be removed by \n\nmutual recognition of equivalence among all the Member States, should \n\nfollow the new approach set out in the Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 \n\nwhich calls for the definition of essential requirements on safety and \n\nother aspects which are important for the general well-being; whereas \n\nparagraph 3 of article 100 A foresees that, in its proposals, concerning \n\nhealth, safety, environmental protection and consumer protection, the \n\nCommission will take as a base a high level of protection, whereas the \n\nessential requirements constitute the criteria with which recreational \n\ncraft and their components as referred to in Annex II when separate and \n\nwhen installed must comply; \n\nWhereas, as a basis for the harmonized standards or other technical \n\nspecification at European level, concrete form must be given to the \n\nessential requirements at a technical level; \n\nWhereas these essential requirements provide the basis for the preparation \n\nof harmonized standards at European level on recreational craft and their \n\ncomponents; whereas, to remove technical barriers to trade and to ensure \n\nmarket transparency, harmonized standards should be established; \n\nWhereas recreational craft and components thereof are presumed to conform \n\nto the essential requirements of the Directive if they conform to \n\nharmonized standards; \n\n(2) International Mar itime Organization \n\n(3) International Organization for Standardization \n\n/u1/gaboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 18 March. 1992. 3 -\n\nWhereas recreational craft considered fit for use are easily recognizable \n\nby the EC mark; whereas they must be allowed free movement and free taking \n\ninto use for their intended purpose throughout the Community; \n\nWhereas the responsibility of the Member States for safety, and other \n\nmatters covered by the essential requirements on their territory should be \n\nrecognized in a safeguard clause providing for appropriate Community \n\nprotective measures; \n\nWhereas the Standing Committee set up under Council Directive 83/189 \n\nEEC*4) of March 1983, as last amended by Directive 88/182 EEC*5) \n\nconstitues an appropriate forum for the delivery of opinions on matters \n\nreferred to in this directive; \n\n(4) OJ L 109, 26. 4. 1983, p. 8. (5) OJ L 89, 26. 3. 1988, p. 75. /ul/gobah/LG/NO/4002-EN - 18 March. 1992. - 4 -\n\nWhereas compliance with the technical requirements must be monitored in \n\norder to ensure adequate user and third-party safety; whereas existing \n\nmonitoring procedures may differ appreciably from one Member State to \n\nanother; whereas, in order to avoid numerous checks which merely impede the \n\nfree movement of boats and of their components, provision should be made \n\nfor the mutual recognition of the inspections conducted by the Member \n\nStates; whereas, in order to facilitate such recognition, it is necessary \n\nto lay down harmonized Community procedure and to harmonize the criteria to \n\nbe taken into account in selecting the bodies responsible for examination, \n\nmonitoring and verification; \n\nWhereas the internal production control (module A) including the written \n\ndeclaration of conformity by the manufacturer, the estabI ishement of the \n\ntechnical documentation and the inspections by the relevant national \n\nauthorities seems to be adequate for the assesment of conformity of boats \n\nunder 6 m length of the hull, whereas this procedure should be reinforced \n\nby one or two test or equivalent calculation on boat(s) representative of \n\nthe production of a manufacturer when it reaches a certain number of units \n\nduring a certain period, whereas the same procedure should apply to boats \n\nbetween 6 and 12 m length of the hull, whereas the assesment of conformity \n\nof boats from 12 to 24 m length of the hull and of components should be \n\nleft open between several given modules; \n\nWhereas the internal market shall comprise an area without internal \n\nfrontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and \n\ncapital is ensured; \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE \n\n/ul/gobohAC/NO/4002-EN - 13 March. 1992. - 5 -\n\nCHAPTER 1 \n\nScope, marketing and free movement \n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. This Directive applies to recreational \n\ncraft of all types, \n\nregardless of the means of propulsion, from 2. 5 to 24 m length of \n\nthe hull, measured according to the appropiate harmonized standard. This directive shall also apply to components referred to in Annex II \n\nwhen separate and when installed. 2. A recreational craft shall mean any boat intended for recreational \n\npurposes, within the scope of this Directive. This include those \n\nused for charter or for recreational boating training. 3. The following are excluded from the scope of this directive : \n\n- craft intended solely for racing including rowing racing boats and \n\nso labelled by the manufacturer, \n\n- canoes and kayaks, \n\n- sailing surfboards, \n\n- powered surfboards, personal watercraft and other similar craft, \n\n- individual replicas of historic craft so labelled by the \n\nmanufacturer, \n\n- experimental craft, \n\n- craft with crew and carrying passengers for commercial purposes, \n\n- \n\n- \n\n- \n\nsubmersibles, \n\nair cushion vehicles, \n\nhydrofoils. /u1/gobohAC/NO/4002-EN \n\n- 13 March. 1992. - 6 -\n\nArtigle ? \n\n1. Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the \n\nproducts referred to in Article 1 may be placed on the market and put \n\ninto use only if they do not endanger the safety of persons and \n\nproperty when they are taken into use for their intended purpose. 2. The provisions of the present directive do not exclude the \n\npossibility that the Council adopts others provisions concerning the \n\nnavigation on certain waters, provided this does not lead to \n\nmodifications to the construction of craft, as foreseen by the \n\npresent directive. Article 3 \n\nThe products referred to in Article 1 shall meet the essential safety \n\nrequirements as in Annex I. Article 4 \n\n1. Member States shall not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on \n\nthe market or puting into use in their territory of the products \n\nreferred to in Article 1 which meet the provisions of this Directive. 2. Member States shall not prohibit, restrict or impede the placing on \n\nthe market or puting into use of components as referred to in Annex \n\nII when separate and when installed which are intended, according to \n\nthe declaration of the manufacturer or his authorized representative \n\nestablished in the Community referred to in Annex ill, to be \n\nincorporated in recreational craft referred to in Article 1. /ul/gobohAC/MO/4002-CN. - 24 February. 1992. - 7 -\n\nArticle 5 \n\nMember States shall presume that the products referred to in Article 1, \n\nwhich meet the harmonized standards, reference to which has been published \n\nin the Official Journal of the European Communities comply with the \n\nessential requirements referred to in Article 3. Member States shall publish the references of the national standards \n\ntransposing the harmonized standards. Art icle 6 \n\nWhere a Member State or the Commission is of the opinion that the \n\nharmonized standards referred to in Article 5 do not fully meet the \n\nessential requirements referred to in Article 3, the Commission or the \n\nMember State shall notify the committee, set up under the Directive 83/189 \n\nEEC setting out its reasons. The committee shall deliver an urgent \n\nopinion. In the light of the opinion of the committee, the Commission shall inform \n\nMember States if the standards concerned should be withdrawn from the \n\npublications referred to in Article 5. Art icle 7 \n\nWhere a Member State ascertains that recreational craft referred to \n\nin Article 1 bearing the CE mark referred to in Annex IV or \n\nconstituent products thereof and used for their proper use may \n\nendanger the safety of persons and property, it shall take all \n\nnecessary measures to withdraw them from the market, prohibit use \n\nthereof and restrict free movement thereof. /u1/goboh/lG/N0/4002-EN - 24 Februory. 1982. - 8 -\n\nThe Member State shall immediately inform the Commission of any such \n\nmeasure, indicating the reasons for its decision and, in particular, \n\nwhere the non-conformity is due to: \n\n(a) \n\nfailure to comply with the essential requirements referred to \n\nin Article 3; \n\n(b) \n\nincorrect \n\napplication of the standards referred to in \n\nArticle 5, in so far it is claimed that the standards have been \n\napplied; \n\n(c) \n\nshortcomings in the standards referred to in Article 5 \n\nthemseIves \n\nThese measures are applicable until the entry into force of the act \n\nprovided for in paragraph 2. The measures adopted under paragraph 1 shall be confirmed and \n\nextended, possibly amended, to the whole Community or repealed by an \n\nact of the Commission. However, where the measures were adopted under paragraph 1 on the \n\nground of a shortcoming in the standards provided for in Article 5, \n\nthe procedure laid down in Article 6 is applicable. 3. Where a non-complying component referred to in Annex II or craft \n\nbears the EC mark, the competent Member State shall take appropriate \n\naction against whomsoever has affixed the mark and shall inform the \n\nCommission and the other Member States thereof. 4. The Commission shall ensure that the Member States are kept informed \n\nof the progress and outcome of this procedure. /ul/gaboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 18 Morch. 1992. - 9 -\n\nCHAPTER I I \n\nConformity assesment \n\nArt icle 8 \n\nBefore producing and placing recreational craft under the scope of this \ndirective or their components on the market, the manufacturer or his \nauthorized representative established in the Community shall fulfill the \nfollowing procedures : \n\n- for boats of less than 6 m lengh of the hull and a total production by a \nmanufacturer of 20 boats or less per year : the internal production \ncontrol (module A), referred to in annex V \n\n- for boats of less than 6 m lengh of the hull and a total production by a \n\nmanufacturer of more than 20 boats per year, \n\nand for all boats from 6 to 12 m lengh of the hull \nthe internal \nproduction control plus test (module Aa. option 1) referred to in annex \nVI. - for all boats from 12 to 24 m lengh of the hull and for components \nreferred to in Annex II when separate and when installed the following \nmodules(s) \n\nEither : The EC type examination (module B) referred to in annex VII \n\nfollowed by one of the following modules : \n\n- conformity to type (module C) referred to in annex VI 11 \n\nor \n\n- production quality assurance (module D) referred to in annex \n\nIX \nor \n\n/ul/gaboh/UG/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 10 -\n\n- product verification (module F) referred to in annex X \n\nOr : \n\none of the modules G or H : \n\nG : unit verification referred to in annex XI \n\nH : full quality assurance referred to in annex \n\nXII \n\nArticle 9 \n\n1. Each Member State shall notify to the Commission, which informs the \n\nMember States, the bodies responsible for the execution of the \n\nconformity assesment in the conformity assesment procedures referred to \n\nin article 8. For information purposes, the Commission shall publish in \n\nthe Official Journal of the European Communities and keep up to date a \n\nlist giving the names of these bodies and their distinguishing number. 2. Member States shall apply the criteria laid down in Annex XIV in \n\nassessing the bodies to be indicated in such notification. Bodies \n\nmeeting the assessment criteria laid down in the relevant harmonized \n\nstandards shall be presumed to fulfil those criteria; \n\n3. A Member State shall withdraw its approval from such a body if it \n\nestablished that the latter no longer satisfies the criteria referred to \n\nin Annex XIV. It shall inform the Commission and the other Member States \n\nof its action forthwith. /u1/gobah/LG/N0/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 11 -\n\nCHAPTER III \n\nCE Mark \n\nArticle 10 \n\n1. The CE mark of conformity with the provisions of this Directive and as \n\nset out in Annex IV shall be affixed or marked on each component as \n\nreferred to in Annex II or boat as to be visible, legible and indelible. 2. Marks or inscriptions which could be confused with the CE mark as far as \n\nits meaning or graph ism are concerned may not be affixed to components \n\nor boats under this directive. /ul/gobohAC/MO/4002-EN - 13 Morch. 1992. - 12 -\n\nCHAPTER IV \n\nFinal provisions \n\nArticle 11 \n\nDetailed grounds shall be given for any decision taken pursuant to this \n\nDirective leading to a restriction on the marketing and use of recreational \n\ncraft. The party concerned shall be informed of the decision as soon as \n\npossible together with the means of redress available under the laws in \n\nforce in the Member State concerned and the periods within which appeals \n\nmust be lodged. Article 12 \n\nThe Commission shall take the necessary measures to ensure that data \n\naffecting all pertinent decisions concerning the management of this \n\nDirective are made available. A r t i c le 13 \n\n1. Member States shall adopt and publish the laws, regulations and \n\nadministrative provisions necessary to comply with the provisions of \n\nthis Directive at the latest on the 31st of December 1994. They shall \n\nforthwith inform the Commission thereof. /u 1/gobohAC/HO/4002-CN - 24 February. 1992. - 13 \n\nThey shall apply the above mentionned laws, regulations and \n\nadministrative provisions, on the 1st of July 1995. In adopting these provisions, the Member States will give reference \n\nto the present directive or make such a reference within their \n\nofficial publications. The way this reference is made, is a matter \n\nfor the Member States. 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the \n\nprovisions of national law which they adopt in the field governed by \n\nthis Directive. Article 14 \n\nThis Directive is addressed to the Member States \n\nDone at Brussels, For the Council \n\nThe President \n\n/u1/gobah/LC/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 14 -\n\nAnnex I \n\nESSENTIAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS \n\nFOR \n\nTHE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION \n\nOF \n\nRECREATIONAL CRAFT \n\n1. GENERAL \n\n1. 1 Boat usage group : \n\nA. Suitable for extended voyages on craft largely self-sufficient. B. Suitable for offshore and coastal voyages; \n\nC. Suitable for short voyages in coastal waters, bays, estuaries, \n\nlarge rivers and large lakes. D. Suitable for voyages on small river, small lakes and canals; \n\n1. 2 Definit ions : \n\nRowing boat : a rowing boat is a craft whose primary means of \n\npropulsion are oars. Sailboat : \n\na sailboat is a craft whose primary means of propulsion \n\nis saiI, \n\nMotorboat : a motorboat is a craft whose primary means of \n\npropulsion is engine power. /ul/gabah/LG/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 15 -\n\n2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS \n\n2. 1. Boat identification \n\nEach craft shall be marked with a Hull Identification Number \n\nincluding the following information : \n\n- manufacturer's code \n\n- country of manufacture \n\n- unique serial number \n\n- month and year of production \n\n- model year. The detail requirements shall be in accordance with the relevant \n\nharmonized standard. 2. 2. BuiIder's plate \n\nEach craft shall carry a permanently affixed plate mounted separately \n\nfrom the boat Hull Identification Number containing at least the \n\nfollowing information : \n\n- manufacturer's name \n\n- boat usage group according to sect. 1. 1 \n\n- maximum load \n\n- number of persons which the boat is designed to carry when \n\nunderway. Craft fitted with or intended to be used with outboard engine(s) \n\nshall display the additional information : \n\n- maximum rated engine power for which the boat is designed. /u1/gobah/LG/NO/4002-EN - 13 March. 1992. - 16 -\n\n2. 3. Protection from falling overboard and means of recovery \n\nDepending on the boat usage group \n\n2. 3. 1 Working surfaces, toerails, safety rails and grabrails shall be \n\ndesigned to minimize the risks of falling overboard and \n\n2. 3. 2 the boat shall be designed or equipped to enable reboarding. 2. 4. Visibility from the main steering position \n\n2. 4. 1 For motor boats, the main steering position shall give the operator, \n\nunder the normal conditions of speed and load, good direct visibility \n\nforward and to the side, whilst operating throttle, gear, and \n\nsteer ing controls. 2. 4. 2 Provision shall also be made for reasonable visibility astern. 2. 5. Owner's manual \n\nAll craft shall be provided with an owner's manual in the ianguage(s) \n\nof the country in which it is marketed. This owner's manual should \n\ndraw particular attention to the risks of fire and flooding. 3. INTEGRITY, STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS \n\n3. 1. Structure \n\nThe choice and combinaison of materials and its construction shall \n\nensure that the craft is strong enough in all respects considering \n\nboat usage group according to section 1. 1. , and boat definition \n\naccording to section 1. 2, for its intended purpose and intended \n\nloadings. /u1/goboh/LG/N0/4002-EN - 13 March. 1992. - 17 -\n\n3. 2. StabiIitv \n\nThe craft shall have sufficient stability considering its boat usage \n\ngroup according to sect 1. 1, boat definition according to section \n\n1. 2, and its intended purpose and its intended loadings. 3. 3 \n\nBuoyancy \n\nThe craft shall be constructed to ensure that it has buoyancy \n\ncharacteristics appropriate to its size and considering its boat \n\nusage group according to section 1. 1, boat definition according to \n\nsection 1. 2, and its intended purpose and its intended loadings. 3. 4. Openings in hull, deck and superstructure \n\nOpenings in hull, deck(s) and superstructure shall not impair the \n\nstructural integrity of the craft or its weathertight integrity. Windows, port lights, doors and hatches shall withstand the water \n\npressure likely to be encountered in their specific position, as well \n\nas point loads applied by the weight of persons moving on deck; \n\nThrough hull fittings below its static flotation plane, designed to \n\nallow water passage through the hull, shall be fitted with shut-off \n\nmeans which shall be readily accessible, except where a pipe of a \n\nstrength equivalent to that of the hull is fitted and extends above \n\nstatic flotation plane. /u1/gobohAC/NO/4002-EN - 13 Morch. 1992. - 18 -\n\n3. 5. Cockpits and we I Is \n\nDepending on boat usage group according to paragraph 1. 1, the boat \n\nshall either : \n\n- be self-draining or \n\n- have buoyant elements according to paragraph 3. 3 or \n\n- have other means of keeping the water out of the boat interior. 3. 6. Removal of water \n\nAll craft suceptible to flooding shall be fitted with a means of \n\nremoving water from the craft. 3. 7. Carrying capacity \n\nThe maximum load for which the boat is designed and the maximum \n\nnumber of persons on board when underway, for which the boat is \n\ndesigned, as marked on the builder's plate, shall be set according to \n\nthe stability, section 3. 2, buoyancy, section 3. 3 and shall take into \n\naccount the boat usage group according to section 1. 1 and its \n\ndefinition according to section 1. 2. 3. 8. Compartmentat ion \n\nAll boats should be comparmented according to their usage group, \n\npaying special attention to collision bulkheads. 3. 9. Liferaft stowage \n\nAll boats should be provided with a stowage for a liferaft if the \n\nusage group demands it. The stowage shall be easily accessible at all \n\ntimes, including the case of a capsized multihull. /u1/goboh/LG/N0/4002-EN - 24 February, 1992. - 19 -\n\n3. 10. Escape hatches for multihulls \n\nAll habitable multihull craft shall be fitted with escape hatches \n\nthan can allow escape from a capsized multihull craft. 3. 11. Mooring and towing \n\nAll craft, taking \n\ninto account \n\ntheir usage group and their \n\ncharacteristics should be provided with arrangements for stowage and \n\nusage of mooring ropes or cables. All craft shall be fitted with a means of towing the craft. 4. PERFORMANCE \n\nThe manufacturer shall ensure that the boat is capable of being \n\nproperly handled with the most powerful engine for which the boat is \n\ndesigned and constructed. The engine power shall be in accordance \n\nwith the appropriate harmonized standard. /ul/gaboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 20 -\n\n5. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS \n\n5. 1. Propulsion system \n\n5. 1. 1 General \n\nAll inboard mounted engines shall be placed within an enclosure \n\nseparated from living quarters. The craft shall be so constructed as \n\nto minimise hazard in the living quarters from fumes, heat, noise and \n\nvibrations. Engine parts and accessories that require frequent inspection and/or \n\nservicing shall be readily accessible. The insulating materials inside engine spaces prevent the fire from \n\nspreading. 5. 1. 2 Ventilation \n\nThe engine compartment shall be suitably ventilated, depending on the \n\nequipment inside and considering both the temperature requirements \n\nand the air consumption of the engine(s), as specified by the engine \n\nmanufacturer. 5. 1. 3 Exposed parts \n\nUnless the engine(s) is protected by a cover or its own enclosure, \n\nexposed moving or hot parts of the engine shall be effectively \n\nshielded \n\n5. 1. 4 Outboard starting \n\nAll boats with outboard engines shall have a device to prevent \n\nstarting the engine in gear, except \n\na) when the engine produces less than 500 N of static thrust or a \n\npower of x kw \n\nb) when the engine has a throttle limiting device to limit thrust to \n\n500 N or a power of x kw at the time of starting the engine. /u1/gobohAC/NO/4002-EN - 24 February, 1992. - 21 -\n\n5. 2 \n\nFuel systems \n\n5. 2. 1 General \n\nThe filling, storage, venting and fuel supply arrangements and \n\ninstallations shall be designed and installed so as to minimize the \n\nrisk of fire and explosion. 5. 2. 2 Fuel tanks \n\nFuel tanks shall be separated or protected from any source of \n\nsignificant heat. The material the tanks are made of and their \n\nmethod of construction shall be according to their capacity and the \n\ntype of fuel. Unless fully isolated from the engine compartment and any source of \n\nignition, all tank spaces shall be ventilated. Liquid fuel with a flash point below 55'C shall be kept in tanks \n\nwhich do not form part of the hull and are \n\na) separate from the engine compartment unless all electrical \n\ncomponents contained within it are ignition-protected, \n\nb) separate from living quarters. Liquid fuel with a flash point equal to or above 55'C may be kept in \n\ntanks that are integral with the hull. 5. 3 \n\nElectrical system \n\n5. 3. 1 General \n\nElectrical systems shall be designed and installed so as to ensure \n\nproper operation of the craft under normal conditions of use and \n\nshall be such as to minimize risk of fire and electric shock. /ul/gobohAC/NO/4002-EN - 24 Februory. 1992. - 22 -\n\nAttention shall be paid to the provision of overload and short \n\ncircuit protection of all circuits, except engine starting circuits, \n\nsupplied from batteries. Adequate ventilation shall be provided to minimise the accumulation \n\nof gas which might be emitted from batteries. 5. 4 \n\nSteering system \n\n5. 4. 1 General \n\nSteering systems shall be designed, constructed and installed in \n\norder to allow the transmission of steering loads under normal \n\noperating conditions. 5. 4. 2 Emergency arrangements \n\nSingle-engined inboard boats with remote-controlled rudder steering \n\nsystems and sailboats without auxiliary engines shall be provided \n\nwith emergency means of steering the craft at reduced speed. 5. 5 Gas system \n\nGas systems for domestic use shall be of the vapour withdrawal type \n\nand shall be designed and installed so as to avoid leaks and the risk \n\nof explosion. Materials and components shall be suitable for the \n\nspecific gas used and designed to withstand the stresses and \n\nexposures found in marine environment. /u1/gabah/LG/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 23 -\n\nEach appliance shall be equipped with a flame failure device \n\neffective on all burners. Each gas-consuming appliance must be \n\nsupplied by a separate branch of the distribution system, and each \n\nbranch must be controlled by a separate closing device. Gas bottles shall be stored in an enclosure separated from the living \n\nquarters, and ventilated to the outside so that the gas drains \n\noverboard unless the bottle contains less than 3 kg of liquid gas \n\nand is directly attached to the appliance with no weight bearing on \n\nthe gas connection. The system shall be tested after installation. 5. 6 \n\nFire protection \n\n5. 6. 1 General \n\nThe type of equipment installed and the layout of the craft shall \n\ntake account of the risk and spread of fire. Attention shall be paid to the surroudings of open flame devices. 5. 6. 2 Fire-fighting equipment \n\nCraft shall be supplied with fire-fighting equipment suitable for \n\ntheir size and boat usage group. Number, size and distribution of \n\nextinguishers shall take account of the type and number of the \n\npropulsion units, the size of engine spaces, and any equipment which \n\nmay present a fire risk. Where fitted, portable fire extinguishers shall be readily accessible \n\nand one shall be so positioned that it can easily be reached from the \n\nmain steering position of the boat. 5. 7. Navigat ion Iights \n\nProvisions shall be made for the fitting of navigation lights when \n\nrequired. /ul/goboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 24 Februory, 1992. - 24 -\n\nCOMPONENTS \n\nANNEX I \n\n1. Ignition protection for inboard and sterndrive engines. 2. Start-in-gear protection for outboard engines. 3. Steering wheels, steering mechanisms and cable assemblies. 4 Fuel tanks and fuel hoses. 5. Ignition-protected components sited in engine and fuel spaces when fuel \n\nof a flash point less than 55 degrees centigrade is used. 6. Prefabricated hatches and port lights. /u1/gobahAG/N0/4002-EM - 13 Morch. 1992. - 25 -\n\nANNEX I I I \n\nDECLARATION OF THE MANUFACTURER OR HIS AUTHORIZED \n\nREPRESENTATIVE \n\nESTABLISHED IN THE COMMUNITY (ARTICLE 4(2). The declaration of the manufacturer referred to in Aticle 4(2) shall \n\ncontain the following : \n\n- name and address of the manufacturer or his authorized representative \n\nestablished in the Community; \n\n- description of the components as referred to in Annex II; \n\n- statement that the sale of the recreational craft in which the \n\ncomponents are to be incorporated is prohibited until the recreational \n\ncraft has been declared to conform to the provisions of the Directive; \n\n- name and address of the person signing. /ul/goboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 13 March. 1992. - 26 -\n\nANNEX IV \n\nCE MARK OF CONFORMITY \n\nThe CE mark of conformity consists of the initials \"CE\" as shown below \n\nCE \n\nThese initials shall consist of a semi-circular letters. The length of the \n\nbar inside the \"E\" shall be at least 80 % of the outer radius of the \n\nsemicircle. The thickness of the letters must be at least one fifth of the height of \n\nthe CE mark. The various elements of the CE mark must have about the same vertical \n\ndimension, which shall not be less than 5 mm. The CE mark is followed by the identification number of the notified body, \n\nif it intervenes in the control of production, as well as by the last two \n\nfigures of the year that the CE mark is affixed. /ul/gabah/LG/NO/4002-EN - 18 March, 1992. - 27 -\n\nAnnex V \n\nINTERNAL PRODUCTION CONTROL \n\n(module A ) \n\n1. The manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the \n\nCommunity, who carries out the obligations laid down in point 2, ensures \n\nand declares that the products concerned satisfy the requirements of the \n\nDirective that apply to them. The manufacturer shall affix the CE mark \n\nto each product and draw up a written declaration of conformity. 2. The manufacturer shall establish the technical documentation described \n\nin paragraph 3 and he or his authorized representative established \n\nwithin the Community shall keep it for a period ending at least 10 years \n\nafter the last product has been manufactured at the disposal of the \n\nrelevant national authorities for inspection purposes. Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorized representative is \n\nestablished within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical \n\ndocumentation available shall be the responsabiIity of the person who \n\nplaces the product on the Community market. /u1/gaboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 28 -\n\n3. Technical documentation shall enable the conformity of the product with \n\nthe requirements of the Directive to be assessed. It shall, as far as \n\nrelevant for such assessment, cover the design, manufacture and \n\noperation of the product, (see annex XI11). 4. The manufacturer or his authorized representative shall keep a copy of \n\nthe declaration of conformity with the technical documentation. 5. The manufacturer shall take all measures-necessary in order that the \n\nmanufacturing process shall ensure compliance of the manufactured \n\nproducts with the technical documentation referred to in point 2 and \n\nwith the requirements of the Directive that apply to them. /u 1/gobahAC/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 29 -\n\nANNEX VI \n\nINTERNAL PRODUCTION CONTROL, PLUS TESTS \n\n(Module Aa,opt ion 1) \n\n1. This module consists of module A, as referred in annex V, plus the \n\nfollowing supplementary requirements : \n\nOn one or several boats representing the production of the manufacturer \n\none or more of the following tests, equivalent calculation or control \n\nshall be carried out by the manufacturer or on his behalf : \n\n- test of stability according to point 3. 2 of the Essential \n\nRequirements, \n\n- test of buoyancy characteristics according to point 3. 3 of the \n\nEssential Requirements. These tests or calculations or control shall be carried out on the \n\nresponsabiIity of a notified body chosen by the manufacturer. On the \n\nresponsabiMty of the notified body, the manufacturer shall affix the \n\nformer's distinguish number during the manufacturing process. /u1/gobohAC/MO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 30 -\n\nAnnex VI I \n\nEC TYPE EXAMINATION (module B) \n\n1. A notified body ascertains and attests that a specimen, representative \n\nof the production envisaged, meets the provisions of the Directive that \n\napply to it. 2. The application for the EC type-examination shall be lodged by the \n\nmanufacturer or his authorized representative established within the \n\nCommunity with a notified body of his choice. The application shall include : \n\n- the name and address of the manufacturer and, if the application is \n\nlodged by the authorized representative, his name and address in \n\naddition; \n\n- a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged \n\nwith any other notified body; \n\n- the technical documentation, as described in point 3. The applicant shall place at the disposal of the notified body a \n\nspecimen, representative of the production envisaged and hereinafter \ncal led \"type,,(*>. The notified body may request further specimens if needed for carrying \n\nout the test programme. (*) A type may cover several versions of the product provided that the \n\ndifferences between the versions do not affect the level of safety and \n\nthe other requirements concerning the performance of the product. /ul/gobohAC/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 31 -\n\n3. The technical documentation shall enable the conformity of the \n\nproduct with the requirements of the Directive to be assessed. It \n\nshall, as far as relevant for such assessment, cover the design , \n\nmanufacture and functionning of the product (see annex XIII). 4. The notified body shall : \n\n4. 1. examine the technical documentation, verify that the type has been \n\nmanufactured in conformity with the technical documentation and \n\nidentify the elements which have been designed in accordance with the \n\nrelevant provisions of the standards referred to in Article 5, as \n\nwell as the components which have been designed without applying the \n\nrelevant provisions of those standards; \n\n4. 2. perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary \n\ntests to check whether, where the standards referred to in Article 5 \n\nhave not been applied, the solutions adopted by the manufacturer meet \n\nthe Essential Requirements of the Directive; \n\n4. 3. perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary \n\ntests to check whether, where the manufacturer has chosen to apply \n\nthe relevant standards, these have actually been applied; \n\n4. 4. agree with the applicant the location where the examinations and \n\nnecessary tests shall be carried out. 5. Where the type meets the provisions of the Directive, the notified \n\nbody shall issue an EC type-examination certificate to the applicant. The certificate shall contain the name and address of the \n\nmanufacturer, conclusions of the examination, conditions for its \n\nvalidity and the necessary data for identification of the approved \n\ntype. /ul/goboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 32 -\n\nA list of the relevant parts of the technical documentation shall be \n\nannexed to the certificate and a copy kept by the notified body. If the manufacturer is denied a type certification, the notified body \n\nshall provide detailed reasons for such denial. 6. The applicant shall inform the notified body that holds the technical \n\ndocumentation concerning the EC types examination certificate of ail \n\nmodifications to the approved product which must receive additional \n\napproval where such changes may affect the conformity with the essential \n\nrequirements or the prescribed conditions for use of the product. This \n\nadditional approval is given in the form of an addition to the original \n\nEC type-examination certificate. 7. Each notified body shall communicate to the other notified bodies the \n\nrelevant information concerning the EC type-examination certificates and \n\nadditions issued and withdrawn. 8. The other notified bodies may receive copies of the EC type-examination \n\ncertificates and/or their additions. The annexes to the certificates \n\nshall be kept at the disposal of the other notified bodies. 9. The manufacturer or his authorized representative shall keep with the \n\ntechnical documentation copies of EC type-examination certificates and \n\ntheir additions for a period ending at least ten years after the last \n\nproduct has been manufactured. Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorized representative is \n\nestablished within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical \n\ndocumentation available shall be the responsibility of the person who \n\nplaces the product on the Community market. /u 1/gabohAC/NO/4002-EN - 24 Februory. 1992. - 33 -\n\nAnnex VI11 \n\nCONFORMITY TO TYPE \n\n(mpdule C) \n\n1. The manufacturer or his authorized representative established within the \n\nCommunity ensures and declares that the products concerned are in \n\nconformity with the type as described in the EC type-examination \n\ncertificate and satisfy the requirements of the Directive that applies \n\nto them. The manufacturer shall affix the CE mark to each product and \n\ndraw up a written declaration of conformity. 2. The manufacturer shall take all measures necessary to ensure that the \n\nmanufacturing process assures compliance of the manufactured products \n\nwith the type as described in the EC type-examination certificate and \n\nwith the requirements of the Directive that apply to them; \n\n3. The manufacturer or his authorized representative shall keep a copy of \n\nthe declaration of conformity for a period ending at least ten years \n\nafter the last product has been manufactured. Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorized representative is \n\nestablished within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical \n\ndocumentation available shall be the responsibility of the person who \n\nplaces the product on the Community market (see annex XIII). /ul/gabohAC/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 34 \n\nAnnex IX \n\nPRODUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE (module D) \n\n1. The manufacturer who satisfies the obligations of point 2 ensures and \n\ndeclares that the products concerned are in conformity with the type \n\nas described in the EC type-examination certificate and satisfy the \n\nrequirements of the Directive that apply to them. The manufacturer \n\nshall affix the CE mark to each product and draw up a written \n\ndeclaration of conformity. The CE mark shall be accompanied by the \n\ndistinguishing number of the notified body responsible for the \n\nmonitoring as specified in point 4. 2. The manufacturer shall operate an approved quality system for \n\nproduction, final product inspection and testing as specified in \n\nparagraph 3 and shall be subject to monitoring as specified in point \n\n4. 3. Qua Iity system \n\n3. 1 \n\nThe manufacturer shall lodge an application for assessment of his \n\nquality system with a notified body of his choice, for the products \n\nconcerned. The application shall include : \n\n- all relevant information for the product category envisaged; \n\n- the documentation concerning the quality system; \n\n- the technical documentation of the approved type (see annex XIII) \n\nand a copy to the EC type-examination certificate. /u1/gaboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 16 March. 1992. - 35 -\n\n3. 2 \n\nThe quality system shall ensure compliance of the products with the \n\ntype as described in the EC type-examination certificate and with the \n\nrequirements of the Directive that apply to them. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the \n\nmanufacturer shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner \n\nin the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. The \n\nquality system documentation must permit a consistent interpretation \n\nof the quality programmes, plan, manuals and records. It shall contain in particular an adequate description of \n\n- the \n\nquality \n\nobjectives \n\nand \n\nthe organizational \n\nstructure, \n\nresponsibilities and powers of the management with regard to \n\nproduct qua Iity; \n\n- the manufacturing, quality \n\ncontrol \n\nand \n\nquality \n\nassurance \n\ntechniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used; \n\n- the examinations and tests that will be carried out before, during \n\nand after manufacture, and the frequency with which they will be \n\ncarrled out; \n\n- the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, \n\ncalibration \n\ndata, qualification \n\nreports of \n\nthe \n\npersonnel \n\nconcerned, etc. ; \n\n- the means to monitor the achievement of the required product \n\nquality and the effective operation of the quality system. /ul/gabohAG/NO/4002-EN - 16 Morch. 1992. - 36 -\n\n3. 3 \n\nThe notified body shall assess the quality system to determine \n\nwhether it satisfies the requirements referred to in point 3. 2. It \n\nshall presume conformity with these requirements in respect of \n\nquality systems that implement the relevant harmonized standard. The auditing team shall have at least one member with experience of \n\nevaluation in the product technology concerned. The evaluation \n\nprocedure shall include an inspection visit to the manufacturer's \n\npremises. The decision shall be notified to the manufacturer. The notification \n\nshall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned \n\nassessment decision. 3. 4 \n\nThe manufacturer shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising \n\nout of the quality system as approved and to uphold it so that it \n\nremains adequate and efficient. The manufacturer or his authorized representative shall keep the \n\nnotified body that has approved the quality system informed of any \n\nintended updating of the quality system; \n\nThe notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and \n\ndecide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the \n\nrequirements referred to in prargraph 3. 2 or whether a re-assessment \n\nis required. It shall notify its decisions to the manufacturer. The notification \n\nshall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned \n\nassessment decision. /ul/gobohAG/MO/4002-EN - 1\u00ab Morch. 1992. - 37 -\n\n4. Surveillance under the responsibility of the notified body \n\n4. 1 \n\nThe purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the manufacturer \n\nduly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality \n\nsystem. 4. 2 The manufacturer shall allow the notified body entrance for \n\ninspection purposes to the locations of manufacture, inspection and \n\ntesting, and storage and shall provide it with all necessary \n\ninformation in particular \n\n- the quality system documentation \n\n- the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, \n\ncalibration \n\ndata, qualification \n\nreports of the personnel \n\nconcerned, etc. 4. 3 The notified body shall periodically carry out audits to make sure \n\nthat the manufacturer maintains and applies the quality system and \n\nshall provide an audit report to the manufacturer. 4. 4 \n\nAdditionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the \n\nmanufacturer. During such visits the notified body may carry out, or \n\ncause to be carried out, tests to verify that the quality system is \n\nfunctioning correctly, if necessary. The notified body shall provide \n\nthe manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has taken place, \n\nwith a test report. /ul/goboh/lC/NO/4002-EN - 16 March. 1992. - 38 -\n\n5. The manufacturer shall, for a period ending at least ten years after \n\nthe last product has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the \n\nnational authorities : \n\n- The documentation referred to in the second indent of point 3. 1; \n\n- the updating referred to in the second paragraph of point 3. 4; \n\n- the decision and reports from the notified body which are referred to \n\nin the final paragraph of point 3. 4, point 4. 3 and point 4. 4. 6. Each notified body shall give the other notified bodies the relevant \n\ninformation concerning the quality system approvals issued and \n\nwithdrawn. /u1/gobohAG/N0/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 39 -\n\nPRODUCT VERIFICATION \n\n(module F) \n\nAnnex X \n\n1. This module describes the procedure whereby a manufacturer or his \n\nauthorized representative established within the Community checks and \n\nattests that the products subject to the provisions of point 3 are in \n\nconformity with the type as described in the EC-type examination \n\ncertificate and satisfy the requirements of the Directive that apply \n\nto them. 2. The manufacturer shall take all measures necessary in order that the \n\nmanufacturing process ensures conformity of the products with the \n\ntype as described in the EC- type examination certificate and with \n\nthe requirements of the Directive that apply to them. He shall affix \n\nthe CE mark to each product and shall draw up a declaration of \n\nconformity. 3. The notified body shall carry out the appropriate examinations and \n\ntests in order to check the conformity of the product with the \n\nrequirements of the Directive either by examination and testing of \n\nevery product as specified in point 4 or by examination and testing \n\nof products on a statistical basis, as specified in point 5, at the \n\nchoice of the manufacturer. 3. a. The manufacturer or his authorized representative shall keep a copy \n\nof the declaration of conformity for a period ending at least ten \n\nyears after the last product has been manufactured. 4. Verification by examination and testing of every product \n\n4. 1. All products shall be individually examined and appropriate tests as \n\nset out in the relevant standard(s) referred to in Article 5 or \n\nequivalent tests shall be carried out in order to verify their \n\n/ul/gaboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 40 -\n\nconformity with the type as described in the EC-type examination \n\ncertificate and the requirements of the Directive that apply to them. 4. 2. The notified body shall affix or cause to be affixed, its \n\ndistinguishing number to each approved product and draw up a written \n\ncertificate of conformity relating to the tests carried out. 4. 3. The manufacturer or his authorized representative shall ensure that \n\nhe is able to supply the notified body's certificates of conformity \n\non request. 5. Statistical verification \n\n5. 1. The manufacturer shall present his products in the form of \n\nhomogeneous lots and shall take all measures necessary in order that \n\nthe manufacturing process ensures the homogeneity of each lot \n\nproduced. 5. 2. All products shall be available for verification in the form of \n\nhomogeneous lots. A random sample shall be drawn from each lot. Products in a sample shall be individually examined and appropriate \n\ntests as set out in the relevant standard(s) referred to in Article \n\n5, or equivalent tests, shall be carried out to ensure their \n\nconformity with the requirements of the Directive which apply to them \n\nand to determine whether the lot is accepted or rejected. 5. 3. The statistical procedure shall use the following elements : \n\n- the statistical method to be applied, \n\n- the sampling plan with its operational characteristics. 5. 4. In the case of accepted lots, the notified body shall affix, or cause \n\nto be affixed, its distinguishing number to each product and shall \n\ndraw up a written certificate of conformity relating to the tests \n\ncarried out. All products in the lot may be put on the market except \n\nthose products from the sample which were found not to be in \n\nconformity. /ul/gaboh/LC/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 41 -\n\nIf a lot is rejected, the notified body or the competent authority \n\nshall take appropriate measures to prevent the putting on the market \n\nof that lot. In the event of frequent rejection of lots the notified \n\nbody may suspend the statistical verification. The manufacturer may, under the responsibility of the notified body, \n\naffix the latter's distinguishing number during the manufacturing \n\nprocess. 5. 5. The manufacturer or his authorized representative shall ensure that \n\nhe is able to supply the notified body's certificates of conformity \n\non request. /ul/goboh/LC/NO/4002-EN - 16 Morch. 1992. - 42 -\n\nUNIT VERIFICATION \n\n(module G) \n\nAnnex XI \n\n1. This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer ensures and \n\ndeclares that the product concerned, which has been issued with the \n\ncertificate referred to in point 2, conforms to the requirements of the \n\nDirective that apply to it. The manufacturer shall affix the CE mark to \n\nthe product and draw up a declaration of conformity. 2. The notified body shall examine the individual product and carry out the \n\nappropriate tests as set out in the relevant standard(s) referred to in \n\nArticle 5, or equivalent tests, to ensure its conformity with the \n\nrelevant requirements of the Directive. The notifed body shall affix, or cause to be affixed, its distinguishing \n\nnumber on the approved product and shall draw up a certificate of \n\nconformity concerning the tests carried out. 3. The aim of the technical documentation is to enable conformity with the \n\nrequirements of the Directive to be assessed and the design, manufacture \n\nand operation of the product to be understood (see Annex XIII). /u1/gaboh/LG/N0/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 43 -\n\nAnnex XI I \n\nFULL QUALITY ASSURANCE \n\n(module H) \n\n1. This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer who \n\nsatisfies the obligations of paragraph 2 ensures and declares that \n\nthe products concerned satisfy the requirements of the Directive that \n\napply to them. The manufacturer shall affix the CE mark to each \n\nproduct and draw up a written declaration of conformity. The CE mark \n\nshall be accompanied by the distinguishing number of the notified \n\nbody responsible for the surveillance as specified in point 4. 2. The manufacturer shall operate an approved quality system for design, \n\nmanufacture and final product inspection and testing as specified in \n\npoint 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 4. 3. Qua Iity system \n\n3. 1. The manufacturer shall lodge an application for assessment of his \n\nquality system with a notified body. The application shall include : \n\n- all relevant information for the product category envisaged \n\n- the quality system's documentation. 3. 2. The quality system shall ensure compliance of the products with the \n\nrequirements of the Directive that apply to them. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the \n\nmanufacturer shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner \n\nin the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. This \n\nquality system documentation shall ensure a common understanding of \n\n/ul/gaboh/LG/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 44 -\n\nthe quality policies and procedures such as quality programmes, \n\nplans, manuals and records. It shall contain in particular an adequate description of \n\n- the quality objectives and the organizational \n\nstructure, \n\nresponsibilities and powers of the management with regard to \n\ndesign and product quality. - the technical design specifications, including standards, that \n\nwill be applied and, where the standards referred to in Article 5 \n\nwill not be applied in full, the means that will be used to ensure \n\nthat the essential requirements of the Directive that apply to the \n\nproducts wi l\"l be met, \n\n- the design control and design verification techniques, processes \n\nand systematic actions that will be used when designing the \n\nproducts pertaining to the product category covered, \n\n- the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality \n\nassurance techniques, processes and systematic actions that will \n\nbe used, \n\n- the examinations and tests that will be carried out before, during \n\nand after manufacture, and the frequency with which they will be \n\ncarried out, \n\n- the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, \n\ncalibration data, qualification \n\nreports of the personnel \n\nconcerned, etc. , \n\n- the means to monitor the achievement of the required design and \n\nproduct quality and the effective operation of the quality system. /u1/goboh/LG/N0/4002-EN - 24 February, 1992. - 45 -\n\n3. 3. The notified body shall assess the quality system to determine \n\nwhether it satisfies the requirements referred to in point 3. 2. It \n\nshall presume compliance with these requirements in respect of \n\nquality systems that implement the relevant harmonized standard (EN \n\n29001) \n\nThe auditing team shall have at least one member experienced as an \n\nassessor in the product technology concerned. The evaluation \n\nprocedure shall include an assessment visit to the manufacturer's \n\npremises. The decision shall be notified to the manufacturer. The notification \n\nshall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned \n\nassessment decision. 3. 4. The manufacturer shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising \n\nout of the quality system as approved and to uphold it so that it \n\nremains adequate and efficient. The manufacturer or his authorized representative shall keep the \n\nnotified body that has approved the quality system informed of any \n\nintended updating of the quality system. The notified body shall evaluate the modifications proposed and \n\ndecide whether the amended quality system will still satisfy the \n\nrequirements referred to in paragraph 3. 2. or whether a re-assessment \n\nIs required. It shall notify its decision to the manufacturer. The notification \n\nshall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned \n\nassessment decision. 4. EC surveillance under the responsibility of the notified body \n\n4. 1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the manufacturer \n\nduly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality \n\nsystem. /u1/gobohAC/N0/4002-EN \n\n- 24 February. 1992. - 46 -\n\n4. 2. The manufacturer shall allow the notified body entrance for \n\ninspection purposes to the locations of design, manufacture, \n\ninspection and testing, and storage, and shall provide it with all \n\nnecessary information, in particular \n\n- the quality system documentation; \n\n- the quality records as foreseen by the design part of the quality \n\nsystem, such as results of analyses, calculations, tests, etc. ; \n\n- the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part of the \n\nquality system, such as inspection reports and test data, \n\ncalibration \n\ndata, qualification \n\nreports of the personnel \n\nconcerned, etc. 4. 3. The notified body shall periodically carry out audits to make sure \n\nthat the manufacturer maintains and applies the quality system and \n\nshall provide an audit report to the manufacturer. 4. 4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the \n\nmanufacturer. At the time of such visits, the notified body may carry \n\nout tests or have them carried out in order to check the proper \n\nfunctioning of the quality system where necessary ; it shall provide \n\nthe manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has been carried \n\nout, with a test report. 5. The manufacturer shall, for a period ending at least ten years after \n\nthe last product has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the \n\nnational authorities : \n\n- the documentation referred to in the second indent of the second \n\nsubparagraph of point 3. 1. ; \n\n- the updating referred to in the second subparagraph of point 3. 4. ; \n\n- the decisions and reports from the notified body which are \n\nreferred to in the final subparagraph of point 3. 4. , point 4. 3. and point 4. 4. /ul/goboh/lG/NO/4002-EN - 16 March. 1992. - 47 -\n\n6. Each notified body shall forward to the other notified bodies the \n\nrelevant information concerning the quality system approvals issued and \n\nwithdrawn. /ul/gobohAC/NO/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 48 -\n\nANNEX XIII \n\nTECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION SUPPLIED \n\nBY THE MANUFACTURER \n\nThe technical documentation referred to in Annexes, V, VII, V I M, ix, XI, \n\nmust comprise all relevant data or means used by the manufacturer to ensure \n\nthat components or craft comply with the essential requirements relating to \n\nthem. The technical documentation shall enable understanding of the design, \n\nmanufacture and operation of the product, and shall enable assessment of \n\nconformity with the requirements of this directive. The documentation shall contain so far as relevant for assessment : \n\n- a general description of the type; \n\n- conceptual design and manufacturing drawings and schemes of components, \n\nsub-assembiles, circuits; etc \n\n- descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of said \n\ndrawings and schemes and the operation of the product; \n\n- a list of the standards referred to in Article 5, applied in full or in \n\npart, and descriptions of the solutions adopted to fulfil the essential \n\nrequirements when the standards referred to in Article 5 have not been \n\napplied; \n\n- results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc. - test reports, or calculations namely on stability according to point 3. 2 \n\nof the Essential Requirements and on buoyancy according to point 3. 3 of \n\nthe Essential Requirements. /u1/goboh/LC/N0/4002-EN - 16 Morch. 1992. - 49 -\n\nANNEX XIV \n\nMINIMUM CRITERIA TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT BY \n\nMEMBER STATES FOR THE NOTIFICATION OF BODIES \n\n1. The body, its director and the staff responsible for carrying out the \n\nverification tests shall not be the designer, manufacturer, supplier or \n\ninstaller of boat or components which they inspect, nor the authorized \n\nrepresentative of any of these parties. They shall not become either \n\ninvolved directly or as authorized representatives in the design, \n\nconstruction, marketing or maintenance of the said products. This does \n\nnot preclude the possibility of exchanges of technical information \n\nbetween the manufacturer and the body. 2. The body and its staff shall carry out the verification tests with the \n\nhighest degree of professional integrity and technical competence and \n\nshall be free from all pressures and inducements, particularly \n\nfinancial, which might influence their judgement or the result of the \n\ninspection, especially from persons or groups of persons with an \n\ninterest in the result of verifications. 3. The body shall have at its disposal the necessary staff and possess the \n\nnecessary facilities to enable it to perform properly the administrative \n\nand technical tasks connected with verification; it shall also have \n\naccess to the equipment required for special verification. /u1/goboh/LG/N0/4002-EN - 24 February. 1992. - 50 -\n\n4. The staff responsible for inspection shall have \n\n- sound technical and professional training, \n\n- satisfactory knowledge of the requirements of the tests they carry \n\nout and adequate experience of such tests, \n\n- the ability to draw up the certificates, records and reports required \n\nto authenticate the performance of the tests. 5. The impartiality of inspection staff shall be guaranteed. Their \n\nremuneration shall not depend on the number of tests carried out or on \n\nthe results of such tests. 6. The body shall take out liability insurance unless its liability is \n\nassumed by the State in accordance with national law, or the Member \n\nStates itself is directly responsible for the tests. 7. The staff of the body shall be bound to observe professional secrecy \n\nwith regard to all information gained in carrying out its tasks (except \n\nvis-a-vis the competent administrative authorities of the State in which \n\nits activities are carried out) under the Directive or any provision of \n\nnational law giving effect to it. /u1/gobohAC/>K>/4002-EN \n\n- 24 Februory. 1992. Brussels, 6 February 1992 \n\nRECREATIONAL CRAFT \n\nFINANCIAL STATEMENT \n\nSection 1: Financial implications \n\n1. Title of operation: \n\nTechnical \n\nharmonization \n\nDirective \n\n(Article 100a): Recreational craft. 2. Budget heading involved: B5-300 \"Completing the internal market\" (former \n\nItem 7750). 3. Legal basis: Article 100a of EEC Treaty. 4. Description of operation \n\n4. 1 \n\n4. 2 \n\n4. 3 \n\nSpecific objectives of operation: Removal of trade barriers and \nof technical barriers. Duration: Date proposed for the implementation of the Directive: \n1 July 1995 \n\nTarget population: Member States' authorities, maritime \nindustries, users of recreational craft. 5. Classification of expenditure or revenue \n\n5. 1 \n\nNon-compulsory expenditure \n\n5. 2 \n\nDifferentiated appropriations \n\n5. 3 \n\nNo revenue \n\n6. Type of expenditure or revenue \n\n6. 1 \n\n100% subsidy: No \n\n6. 2 \n\nSubsidy for joint financing with other sources in the public \nand/or private sector: Yes \n\n6. 3 \n\nInterest subsidy: No \n\n6. 4 \n\nOther: (Possibly) defraying of meeting expenses \n\n6. 5 \n\n6. 6 \n\nShould the operation prove an economic success, is there \nprovision for all or part of the Community contribution to be \nreimbursed: No \n\nWill the proposed operation cause any change in the level of \nrevenue? If so, what sort of change and what type of revenue is \ninvolved? No \n\n/u1/gabah/LG/\u00bb0/ftr\u00bb-\u20acM - 18/3/92 \n\n\f- 2 -\n\n7. Financial impact on appropriations for operations (part B of the budget) \n\n7. 1 \n\nProvision should be made for the following resources as part of \nthe budgetary procedure concerned. - transposition of 5 published ISO*1) standards as CEN*2) \n\nstandards \n\nECU 10 000 X 5 - 50 000 \n\n- completion of 13 standards at an advanced stage of preparation \n\nas CEN standards \n\nECU 30 000 x 13 - 390 000 \n\n- preparation of 7 standards on subjects not yet covered \n\nECU 50 000 x 7 -350 000 \n\n790 000 # 800 000 \n\n7. 2 \n\nProportion of mini-budget in total cost of operation. Explain method of calculation \n\n7. 3 \n\nIndicative schedule of commitment and payment appropriations \nCommitment appropriations 1992: ECU 800 000 \n\nPayment appropriations 1992: ECU 300 000 \n1993: ECU 350 000 \n1994: ECU 150 000 \n\n8. What anti-fraud measures are planned in the proposal for the operation? \nPossible control and audit provisions are included in framework contract \nbetween the Commission and the CEN. (1) International Organization for Standardization \n(2) European Committee for Standardization \n\n/ul/gobohAC/MO/f in-EN - 18/3/92 \n\n\f3 -\n\nSection 2: Administrative expenditure \n(part A of the budget) \n\nWill the proposed operation involve an increase in the number of \nCommission staff? If so, how many? It will be incorporated into the \ntasks of Units lll/E/4 and lll/B/2. Indicate the amount of staff and administrative expenditure involved in \nthe proposed operation. Explain the method of calculation: Directive \n83/189 + (possibly) specialized Committee (ECU 20 000 per annum) \n\nSection 3: Elements of cost-effectiveness analysis \n\n1. Objectives and coherence with financial programming \n\n1. 1 \n\n1. 2 \n\n1. 3 \n\nSpecific objective(s) of proposed operation. If possible this \nshould be quantified and must be shown for each of the years \nconcerned in the case of a multiannual operation: Completing the \ninternal market and making the industrial sector concerned more \ncompetitive; preparing harmonized standards needed to implement \nthe Direct ive \n\nIs the operation incorporated in the financial programming of \nthe DG for the years concerned? Yes \n\nTo which broader objective defined in the DG's financial \nprogramming does the objective of the proposed operation \ncorrespond?: \n- Removal of technical barriers \n- Harmonization of technical legislation and standardization \n\n2. Grounds for the operation \n\n2. 1 \n\nReasons for choosing this operation rather than an alternative \nwhich would achieve the same objectives. The justification must \nbe based on three criteria: \n\nMutual recognition is not applicable; as the approval of \nrecreational craft covers numerous systems, a Directive is \nneeded. /u1/gobah/LG/N0/f irt-EN - 18/3/92 \n\n\f- 4 \n\n(a) cost: Agreement CEN/Commission \n(b) spin-off effect (impact beyond the specific objective(s): \n\nDevelopment of the sector \n\n(c) multiplier effect (ability to mobilize other sources of \n\nfinance): None \n\n3. Monitoring and evaluation of the operation \n\n3. 1 \n\n3. 2 \n\n3. 3 \n\nPerformance indicators selected: Compliance with the deadlines \nfor preparing the standards, and follow-up of the target dates \nin the mandate. Details and frequency of planned evaluation: Follow-up of the \nmandate to the CEN on a yearly base. Main factors of uncertainty which could affect the specific \nresults of the operation: None \n\n/ul/gobah/LG/KO/f irt-EN - 18/3/92 \n\n\fI M P A CT \n\nA S S E S S M E NT \n\n/ul/goboh/LG/NO/impoct-EN - 16/3/92 \n\n\f\f- 1 \n\n1. The proposal \n\nThe Directive is proposed in order to remove comprehensive barriers to \ntrade in force in two major boating countries with large boating \nindustries, and with the threat of regulations being brought into force \nin other countr ies. 2. The Impact on Business \n\na) All sectors of the boating industry will be affected, except a few \ncompanies making craft that are excluded from the Directive (boats \nconstructed solely for racing, replicas of historic craft, canoes, \nkayaks, submersibles, hovercraft etc). manufacturers will be affected \n\njust as much as \nComponent \nboatbuiIders, although component manufacturers will generally not be \nmanufacturing products exclusively for the boating industry. b) 98% of boatbuiIders have less than 200 employees \n80% of boatbuiIders have less than 20 employees \n45% of boatbuiIders have less than 10 employees \n\nc) Small firms are in general evenly distributed throughout the EEC. d) There are 3 companies with between 1000 and 1500 employees (2 in \n\nFrance and 1 in UK). 3. Compliance by Companies \n\nThe Directive attempts to minimise the evaluation of conformity load for \nsmall builders of small boats, and therefore keep their compliance \ncosts-per-boat to a minimum. Small business operating under the Internal Production Control procedure \nwill have to keep full records of designs, tests, calculations carried \nout etc. for a period of 10 years after the last product has been \nmanufactured at the disposal of the relevant national authorities for \ninspection purposes. /u1/goboh/lG/NO/impoct-EN - 16/3/92 \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nLarger companies will be involved with Notified Bodies, and hence \ninvolve higher costs. Every effort will be made to keep certification costs to the minimum. 4. Economic effects \n\nThe advantages of having no barriers, standard methods of boat \nconstruction and certification, and the disciplines of keeping full \nrecords of designs, tests and calculations will result in greater \nefficiency, and economies of scale in some cases. In this way it is \nexpected that prices will be kept to reasonable levels and the sales of \nboats will be maintained. This will result in greater investment and \nthe creation of new businesses. 5. Special Measures for SME's \n\nThe proposal is that the smaller boatbuilders of smaller boats (under 20 \nboats per year of less than 6m length) should operate Internal \nProduction Control. If a small boatbuilder is reliable and efficient, \nthis will avoid the need for inspection by a Notified Body and so avoid \nthose costs. 6. Consul tat ion \n\n1. All EEC governments, \n\n2. The national boating industry federations of all EEC countries, \nIndustry \n\nrepresented by the International Council of Marine \nAssociations. I COM IA has not only asked for the presentation of such \na directive, but has actively participated in the drafting of the \nEssential Requirements and in the preparation of the standards \nnecessary for its implementation. 3. The European Boating Association representing the boating user \norganisations of eight EEC countries. This Association gives general \nsupport to the Directive but stresses that the conformity assessment \nprocedure included within the Directive should be the least onerous \npossible. /ul/goboh/LG/NO/impoct-EN - 16/3/92. ISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 141 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n06 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-169-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43290-X \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ca1de11-63ef-4071-b3bd-926c2354eb13", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 980/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. Ad-hoc group on immigration", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,admission of aliens,computer systems,illegal migration,immigration,political asylum,refugee", "workIds": "celex:91992E000980", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "admission of aliens", "computer systems", "illegal migration", "immigration", "political asylum", "refugee"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ca1de11-63ef-4071-b3bd-926c2354eb13", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f734e4fb-1fd4-4471-8ee5-658dac711f9f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 996/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Commission. Subsidies paid to French associations under the Community budget for 1991", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU aid,France,association,economic support,non-profit organisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000996", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "France", "association", "economic support", "non-profit organisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f734e4fb-1fd4-4471-8ee5-658dac711f9f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3ef6b2ff-2214-41fa-baa8-fb6622aeeeb7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 983/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Commission. Mauritius -exemptions and fraud involving EUR 1 certificates", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Asia,Mauritius,fraud,import,import licence,tax exemption,textile product", "workIds": "celex:91992E000983", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Asia", "Mauritius", "fraud", "import", "import licence", "tax exemption", "textile product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3ef6b2ff-2214-41fa-baa8-fb6622aeeeb7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7301730-823c-492f-ab10-4e5e93b3d62e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 994/92 by Mr Alexandros ALAVANOS to the Council. Arbitrary action by Member State officials", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ALAVANOS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Greece,admission of aliens,competence of the Member States,foreign national,removal", "workIds": "celex:91992E000994", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "admission of aliens", "competence of the Member States", "foreign national", "removal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7301730-823c-492f-ab10-4e5e93b3d62e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2910ff0-0f40-4387-b1a0-f5a90fdb839c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 979/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. Asylum seekers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,admission of aliens,data processing,database,immigration,political asylum,refugee", "workIds": "celex:91992E000979", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "admission of aliens", "data processing", "database", "immigration", "political asylum", "refugee"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2910ff0-0f40-4387-b1a0-f5a90fdb839c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c34a272c-d51d-438e-8378-123f59074adb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 951/92 by Mr Alexandros ALAVANOS to the Commission. The situation of olive-growers in Greece", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ALAVANOS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Greece,Tunisia,free movement of goods,intervention policy,olive,olive oil,private stock,production aid,safety standard,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:91992E000951", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "Tunisia", "free movement of goods", "intervention policy", "olive", "olive oil", "private stock", "production aid", "safety standard", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c34a272c-d51d-438e-8378-123f59074adb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c69a9084-67e8-46d6-b723-122d9efc9c67", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 976/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. Schengen: information system", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,data processing,information storage,information system,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E000976", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "data processing", "information storage", "information system", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c69a9084-67e8-46d6-b723-122d9efc9c67", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/89c343ce-3b72-47b9-bd4e-544d2d5b614b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 906/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Infringement of the Community Charter", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European Social Charter,Greece,civil service,national law,social policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000906", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Charter", "Greece", "civil service", "national law", "social policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/89c343ce-3b72-47b9-bd4e-544d2d5b614b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3ecfeeb8-fc84-44bb-9bc7-93a45d7e7540", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 940/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: central anti-terrorist coordinating unit", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,exchange of information,fight against crime,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:91992E000940", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3ecfeeb8-fc84-44bb-9bc7-93a45d7e7540", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4ff4450a-a96c-44c4-8611-6c20f1c3fbb6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 973/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: drugs intelligence unit", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,drug traffic,exchange of information,information centre,narcotic", "workIds": "celex:91992E000973", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "drug traffic", "exchange of information", "information centre", "narcotic"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4ff4450a-a96c-44c4-8611-6c20f1c3fbb6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5239e3c-4c83-44e2-976c-b648a5b4764e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 903/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The environment in Aridaia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Macedonia,asbestos,environmental impact,environmental protection,health risk,impact study,mining extraction,prevention of pollution,public health", "workIds": "celex:91992E000903", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Macedonia", "asbestos", "environmental impact", "environmental protection", "health risk", "impact study", "mining extraction", "prevention of pollution", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5239e3c-4c83-44e2-976c-b648a5b4764e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/295ee518-b33b-46b6-b7fc-310cd50c2e54", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 961/92 by Mr Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Diversion of the Acheloos River and infringement of Community directives", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPAYANNAKIS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Central Greece,EU financing,application of EU law,environmental impact,hydroelectric development,impact study,protected area", "workIds": "celex:91992E000961", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "EU financing", "application of EU law", "environmental impact", "hydroelectric development", "impact study", "protected area"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/295ee518-b33b-46b6-b7fc-310cd50c2e54", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c7fb7f2-6e53-4ec2-8f5c-43dd9123ec9d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 924/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: monitored deliveries and the fight against drugs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,drug traffic,fight against crime,police", "workIds": "celex:91992E000924", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "drug traffic", "fight against crime", "police"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c7fb7f2-6e53-4ec2-8f5c-43dd9123ec9d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/090fba9f-b75d-4e65-94e7-52e91034c6a1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 930/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: definitions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,drug traffic,exchange of information,fight against crime,illegal migration,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:91992E000930", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "drug traffic", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "illegal migration", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/090fba9f-b75d-4e65-94e7-52e91034c6a1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9a3e8827-2325-406d-bd3b-34791b858241", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 912/92 by: Hemmo MUNTINGH , Jan BERTENS , Bryan CASSIDY , Jessica LARIVE and Henry McCUBBIN to the Commission. Overfishing and the revival of the hunt for harp seals in Canada", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BERTENS,CASSIDY,European Parliament,LARIVE,MCCUBBIN,MUNTINGH", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Canada,North-West Atlantic Fisheries Organisation,conservation of fish stocks,ecological balance,fishery resources,marine mammal,over-exploitation of resources,sea fish", "workIds": "celex:91992E000912", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canada", "North-West Atlantic Fisheries Organisation", "conservation of fish stocks", "ecological balance", "fishery resources", "marine mammal", "over-exploitation of resources", "sea fish"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9a3e8827-2325-406d-bd3b-34791b858241", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6c3bd071-af6b-4c1e-9f11-f22b483be8cc", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1000/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to European Political Cooperation. Attitude of various states to European Parliament resolutions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Cuba,European political cooperation,Israel,Morocco,T\u00fcrkiye,charter on human rights,human rights,primacy of the law", "workIds": "celex:91992E001000", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Cuba", "European political cooperation", "Israel", "Morocco", "T\u00fcrkiye", "charter on human rights", "human rights", "primacy of the law"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6c3bd071-af6b-4c1e-9f11-f22b483be8cc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1d39fea4-3a1a-4bd1-9caa-bbc36d205f60", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 929/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: liaison officers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,exchange of information,fight against crime,police,public order", "workIds": "celex:91992E000929", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "police", "public order"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1d39fea4-3a1a-4bd1-9caa-bbc36d205f60", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe008166-c6cd-4786-8bf7-d3d2101fba7f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 948/92 by Mr Bryan CASSIDY to the Commission. Alcohol stocks in the EC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CASSIDY,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU statistics,alcohol,award of contract,common organisation of markets,distillation,ethanol,stock", "workIds": "celex:91992E000948", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU statistics", "alcohol", "award of contract", "common organisation of markets", "distillation", "ethanol", "stock"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe008166-c6cd-4786-8bf7-d3d2101fba7f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/42b10ed8-340d-4c9e-8f74-6d7f05e840c8", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 956/92 by Mr Manfred VOHRER to the Commission. Verification of environmental impact assessments required by law", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VOHRER", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Central Greece,EU aid,Integrated Mediterranean Programmes,co-financing,ecosystem,environmental impact,hydroelectric development,impact study,public works,watercourse", "workIds": "celex:91992E000956", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "EU aid", "Integrated Mediterranean Programmes", "co-financing", "ecosystem", "environmental impact", "hydroelectric development", "impact study", "public works", "watercourse"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/42b10ed8-340d-4c9e-8f74-6d7f05e840c8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c057cfac-0cf1-40b9-b357-8c14c43605ff", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 957/92 by Tullio REGGE, Giulio FANTUZZI and Virginio BETTINI to the Commission. Funding for the ' Research, development and production of low temperature storage chipping (crisping) potato cultures' programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BETTINI,European Parliament,FANTUZZI,REGGE", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU financing,agro-industry,food contamination,potato,research and development", "workIds": "celex:91992E000957", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "agro-industry", "food contamination", "potato", "research and development"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c057cfac-0cf1-40b9-b357-8c14c43605ff", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8617a0d9-48fa-4865-ba24-381022e4fb7d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 932/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: measures to combat terrorism", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,exchange of information,fight against crime,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:91992E000932", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8617a0d9-48fa-4865-ba24-381022e4fb7d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4fa94eac-de8e-4e5f-8fb1-12ef821b1f2a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 914/92 by: Lord O' HAGAN , Hugh McMAHON and Bartho PRONK to the Commission. The future prospects of the European Social Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MCMAHON,O'HAGAN,PRONK", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European Social Fund,Treaty on European Union,aid recipient,decision-making,employment aid,employment policy,financing method", "workIds": "celex:91992E000914", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Fund", "Treaty on European Union", "aid recipient", "decision-making", "employment aid", "employment policy", "financing method"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4fa94eac-de8e-4e5f-8fb1-12ef821b1f2a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/05bd49b9-1897-460e-bb40-d76ad874569e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 991/92 by Mr James FORD to the Commission. Environmental regulations for roadworks", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU law,housing,nuisance,road building,road network", "workIds": "celex:91992E000991", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "housing", "nuisance", "road building", "road network"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/05bd49b9-1897-460e-bb40-d76ad874569e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb1bdca3-2191-42bc-b157-ca0f3655684a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 993/92 by Mrs Ursula BRAUN-MOSER to the Commission. Amendment to the directive on liability for services", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BRAUN-MOSER,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EC Directive,approximation of laws,building industry,damage,health care profession,legal profession,liability,provision of services", "workIds": "celex:91992E000993", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "approximation of laws", "building industry", "damage", "health care profession", "legal profession", "liability", "provision of services"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb1bdca3-2191-42bc-b157-ca0f3655684a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d6f9a901-62dc-4a5e-b8c9-c2e2ab155889", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 938/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. Ad Hoc Group on Immigration", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU institution,admission of aliens,approximation of policies,computer systems,free movement of persons,frontier,illegal migration,immigration,police checks,political asylum", "workIds": "celex:91992E000938", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU institution", "admission of aliens", "approximation of policies", "computer systems", "free movement of persons", "frontier", "illegal migration", "immigration", "police checks", "political asylum"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d6f9a901-62dc-4a5e-b8c9-c2e2ab155889", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bebc457d-dbb5-4c66-8cc9-fc4eb834c046", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 957/92 of 15 April 1992 fixing for the 1992 marketing year the Community offer prices for apricots applicable with regard to Spain and Portugal", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Portugal,Spain,stone fruit", "workIds": "celex:31992R0957,oj:JOL_1992_102_R_0029_035", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "Spain", "stone fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bebc457d-dbb5-4c66-8cc9-fc4eb834c046", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25a74252-de5e-4494-8de7-0ee32cc9778b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 989/92 by Mr James FORD to the Commission. Provision for reciprocal arrangements for EC nationals upon death", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU national,European cooperation,customs formalities,freedom of movement,health control,mortality", "workIds": "celex:91992E000989", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "European cooperation", "customs formalities", "freedom of movement", "health control", "mortality"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25a74252-de5e-4494-8de7-0ee32cc9778b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/684aa746-a0b3-4beb-959e-6462cf579b5e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 911/92 by: Hemmo MUNTINGH , Jan BERTENS , Bryan CASSIDY , Jessica LARIVE and Henry McCUBBIN to the Commission. Overfishing and the revival of the hunt for harp seals in Canada", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BERTENS,CASSIDY,European Parliament,LARIVE,MCCUBBIN,MUNTINGH", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Canada,animal nutrition,catch quota,fishery product,hunting,marine mammal,over-exploitation of resources,sea fish,total catch", "workIds": "celex:91992E000911", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canada", "animal nutrition", "catch quota", "fishery product", "hunting", "marine mammal", "over-exploitation of resources", "sea fish", "total catch"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/684aa746-a0b3-4beb-959e-6462cf579b5e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b26a1bfa-4700-475f-a502-407a1d512dec", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 955/92 by Mr Manfred VOHRER to the Commission. Conflict between national and EC legislation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VOHRER", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU law - national law,Italy,action for failure to fulfil an obligation,hunting regulations,judgment of the Court (EU),primacy of EU law,protected species,protection of animal life", "workIds": "celex:91992E000955", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law - national law", "Italy", "action for failure to fulfil an obligation", "hunting regulations", "judgment of the Court (EU)", "primacy of EU law", "protected species", "protection of animal life"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b26a1bfa-4700-475f-a502-407a1d512dec", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e5ec9aeb-5fe2-4ed4-94ea-28afc13c2b6d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 936/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. EC asylum policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU policy,UNHCR,admission of aliens,advisory committee (EU),customs inspection,exchange of information,free movement of persons,immigration,political asylum,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E000936", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "UNHCR", "admission of aliens", "advisory committee (EU)", "customs inspection", "exchange of information", "free movement of persons", "immigration", "political asylum", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e5ec9aeb-5fe2-4ed4-94ea-28afc13c2b6d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6b7e3da1-8170-43f9-bd44-c0071c4f3cfc", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 953/92 by Mrs Ursula BRAUN-MOSER to the Commission. Additional obstacles facing tour leaders in Italy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BRAUN-MOSER,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Italy,freedom to provide services,group travel,tourist profession,worker (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E000953", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "freedom to provide services", "group travel", "tourist profession", "worker (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6b7e3da1-8170-43f9-bd44-c0071c4f3cfc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/99ab7f68-eba5-4e8a-acaa-f5e87387242e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 972/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: definitions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,drug traffic,exchange of information,fight against crime,illegal migration,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:91992E000972", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "drug traffic", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "illegal migration", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/99ab7f68-eba5-4e8a-acaa-f5e87387242e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cca88320-e3b0-4feb-bd19-7556fa921035", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 960/92 by Mr Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Construction of a road through the Katafiki Gorge", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPAYANNAKIS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU financing,Peloponnese,Structural Funds,conservation of resources,environmental impact,environmental protection,impact study,natural resources,road building", "workIds": "celex:91992E000960", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "Peloponnese", "Structural Funds", "conservation of resources", "environmental impact", "environmental protection", "impact study", "natural resources", "road building"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cca88320-e3b0-4feb-bd19-7556fa921035", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7bb7213b-c97b-44a6-a028-1a94afc10e78", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 990/92 by Mr James FORD to the Commission. Advertisements for places in the institutions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU institution,European Commission,competition (EU),equal treatment,ethnic group,female work,gender equality,job vacancy,press,recruitment", "workIds": "celex:91992E000990", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU institution", "European Commission", "competition (EU)", "equal treatment", "ethnic group", "female work", "gender equality", "job vacancy", "press", "recruitment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7bb7213b-c97b-44a6-a028-1a94afc10e78", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c620bf10-c2db-4acf-9173-b2e1ea72ce4c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 925/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: police cooperation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,fight against crime,frontier region,police", "workIds": "celex:91992E000925", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "fight against crime", "frontier region", "police"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c620bf10-c2db-4acf-9173-b2e1ea72ce4c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3df1a319-c956-425d-ab0d-00dd15faf3f9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 918/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Toxic waste incineration plant in Almad\u00e9n (Spain)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Castile-La Mancha,Council of the European Union,EC Directive,access to information,environmental protection,impact study,waste disposal", "workIds": "celex:91992E000918", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Castile-La Mancha", "Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "access to information", "environmental protection", "impact study", "waste disposal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3df1a319-c956-425d-ab0d-00dd15faf3f9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/903169d4-8a45-448d-bd78-2a35604b86c5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 982/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: coordination centre for combating terrorism", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,exchange of information,fight against crime,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:91992E000982", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/903169d4-8a45-448d-bd78-2a35604b86c5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7f78cbf-f5bc-4b56-b5f6-9ab6de226a11", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 934/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. Schengen: information system", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European convention,data processing,information system,police checks,protection of privacy,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E000934", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European convention", "data processing", "information system", "police checks", "protection of privacy", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7f78cbf-f5bc-4b56-b5f6-9ab6de226a11", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/00ae9963-bcf0-4fc3-9d8e-e9328fa4c875", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 935/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. Schengen: Data inspection boards", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "OSCE,data protection,data recording,international meeting,judicial cooperation,member country,protection of privacy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000935", "eurovoc_concepts": ["OSCE", "data protection", "data recording", "international meeting", "judicial cooperation", "member country", "protection of privacy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/00ae9963-bcf0-4fc3-9d8e-e9328fa4c875", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07a0be24-3f19-4689-b143-46dbbb69d40c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 975/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: information system", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,data processing,information storage,information system,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E000975", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "data processing", "information storage", "information system", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07a0be24-3f19-4689-b143-46dbbb69d40c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/684beb15-aedc-4f60-bd1c-6373114f6204", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 907/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The aquatic environment of Nea Kiou", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Peloponnese,application of EU law,ecosystem,environmental protection,protected area", "workIds": "celex:91992E000907", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Peloponnese", "application of EU law", "ecosystem", "environmental protection", "protected area"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/684beb15-aedc-4f60-bd1c-6373114f6204", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/35c5472b-0133-4b19-84e4-0df7d3aba9b7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 984/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Commission. Mauritius -exemptions and fraud involving EUR 1 certificates", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "ACP countries,EU Member State,Mauritius,customs duties,customs fraud,export licence,fraud,originating product,restriction on competition,textile product", "workIds": "celex:91992E000984", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ACP countries", "EU Member State", "Mauritius", "customs duties", "customs fraud", "export licence", "fraud", "originating product", "restriction on competition", "textile product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/35c5472b-0133-4b19-84e4-0df7d3aba9b7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a34c95e2-be49-438f-92b8-60186c9eb2b3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 931/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: drugs intelligence unit", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,European organisation,action programme,drug traffic,exchange of information,fight against crime,information centre", "workIds": "celex:91992E000931", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "European organisation", "action programme", "drug traffic", "exchange of information", "fight against crime", "information centre"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a34c95e2-be49-438f-92b8-60186c9eb2b3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/020bce90-9912-4f2a-ab48-c64645fd974e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 997/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Commission. Use of subcontracting in the Commission' s translation service", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European Commission,directory,self-employed person,services company,statistics,subcontracting,translation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000997", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "directory", "self-employed person", "services company", "statistics", "subcontracting", "translation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/020bce90-9912-4f2a-ab48-c64645fd974e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d30d2e50-f10b-40c1-bdb7-d575daf27f55", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 941/92 by Mr Reimer B\u00f6GE to the Commission. Administrative problems affecting the rapeseed support system", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BOEGE,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Community budget,administrative check,fraud,oil seed rape,production aid,remote sensing", "workIds": "celex:91992E000941", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "administrative check", "fraud", "oil seed rape", "production aid", "remote sensing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d30d2e50-f10b-40c1-bdb7-d575daf27f55", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1c2eccef-0769-41a0-a7a3-602f1783d6f0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 933/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI information system", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,data processing,information storage,information system,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E000933", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "data processing", "information storage", "information system", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1c2eccef-0769-41a0-a7a3-602f1783d6f0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf22047f-2362-424e-9fe9-39329d4139b6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 908/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The Zliros gorges", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,Crete,EC Directive,dangerous substance,environmental protection,impact study,waste disposal", "workIds": "celex:91992E000908", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "Crete", "EC Directive", "dangerous substance", "environmental protection", "impact study", "waste disposal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf22047f-2362-424e-9fe9-39329d4139b6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/62f9e73d-5f4a-49ad-99fc-a4e9a012491a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 965/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Council. TREVI: exchange of information and the fight against drugs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,drug traffic,exchange of information,fight against crime", "workIds": "celex:91992E000965", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "drug traffic", "exchange of information", "fight against crime"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/62f9e73d-5f4a-49ad-99fc-a4e9a012491a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/47c15b38-798f-4f96-8701-cee86348aa87", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 901/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Yannina Lake", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Epirus,ecosystem,environmental protection,stagnant water,water analysis,water pollution,water treatment", "workIds": "celex:91992E000901", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Epirus", "ecosystem", "environmental protection", "stagnant water", "water analysis", "water pollution", "water treatment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/47c15b38-798f-4f96-8701-cee86348aa87", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24669c7e-856d-472c-846f-f2b9a3abb570", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 945/92 by Mr Francesco SPERONI to the Commission. Disdavantage to employees of Community institutions arising from the new welfare provisions introduced by the Italian Government", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SPERONI Francesco Enrico", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "EU law - national law,European official,Italy,cumulative pension entitlement,economic discrimination,social-security benefit,transfer of pension rights", "workIds": "celex:91992E000945", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law - national law", "European official", "Italy", "cumulative pension entitlement", "economic discrimination", "social-security benefit", "transfer of pension rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24669c7e-856d-472c-846f-f2b9a3abb570", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/77678d4e-31cc-48c9-add6-1c85fc1d4afb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 944/92 by Mr Ingo FRIEDRICH to the Commission. Proceedings against legislation on state aid to the new federal L\u00e4nder", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FRIEDRICH INGO", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "Federation State,Germany,State aid,economic reconstruction,free service,investment aid,regional aid,tax exemption", "workIds": "celex:91992E000944", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Federation State", "Germany", "State aid", "economic reconstruction", "free service", "investment aid", "regional aid", "tax exemption"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/77678d4e-31cc-48c9-add6-1c85fc1d4afb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2e434511-4baf-478a-b41e-307823cf83f2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 923/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. TREVI: exchange of information and the fight against drugs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,drug traffic,exchange of information,fight against crime", "workIds": "celex:91992E000923", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "drug traffic", "exchange of information", "fight against crime"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2e434511-4baf-478a-b41e-307823cf83f2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/beb73586-dccc-45d9-bfb0-8d22e635eaa4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 939/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. Exchange of information between EC police forces", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European cooperation,exchange of information,information system,police,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E000939", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "exchange of information", "information system", "police", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/beb73586-dccc-45d9-bfb0-8d22e635eaa4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b5a2a4b0-a78f-4d6c-841c-7e54de856c89", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 999/92 by Mr John BIRD to the Commission. Health and safety in the European Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BIRD,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "European Commission,application of EU law,civil servant,exchange of information,occupational safety,professional qualifications,public health,supervisory power", "workIds": "celex:91992E000999", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "application of EU law", "civil servant", "exchange of information", "occupational safety", "professional qualifications", "public health", "supervisory power"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b5a2a4b0-a78f-4d6c-841c-7e54de856c89", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/88697c76-2456-4cb4-aed7-b1cddb74276c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 954/92 by Mrs Ursula BRAUN-MOSER to the Council. Entry into force of the package travel Directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BRAUN-MOSER,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-15", "subjects": "application of EU law,consumer protection,financial solvency,package travel,tourism policy,travel agency", "workIds": "celex:91992E000954", "eurovoc_concepts": ["application of EU law", "consumer protection", "financial solvency", "package travel", "tourism policy", "travel agency"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/88697c76-2456-4cb4-aed7-b1cddb74276c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c9ff67b9-0910-43bd-b100-03e089e5db27", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 872/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Japan,United States,accession to the European Union,application of the law,collective bargaining,legislative procedure,member country,social partners,social policy,trade union rights", "workIds": "celex:91992E000872", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Japan", "United States", "accession to the European Union", "application of the law", "collective bargaining", "legislative procedure", "member country", "social partners", "social policy", "trade union rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c9ff67b9-0910-43bd-b100-03e089e5db27", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/047b8feb-bcf2-40b3-9b61-60ad32e3c586", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 891/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. The Channel Tunnel", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "concrete,cross-channel connection,exchange of information,fraud,industrial counterfeiting", "workIds": "celex:91992E000891", "eurovoc_concepts": ["concrete", "cross-channel connection", "exchange of information", "fraud", "industrial counterfeiting"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/047b8feb-bcf2-40b3-9b61-60ad32e3c586", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c2c3b277-b1ef-492d-83e4-562f5f2b5969", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 806/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Public procurement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EC Directive,EU Official Journal,European Regional Development Fund,United Kingdom,award of contract,contract,dissemination of information,economic support,local government,public contract", "workIds": "celex:91992E000806", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "EU Official Journal", "European Regional Development Fund", "United Kingdom", "award of contract", "contract", "dissemination of information", "economic support", "local government", "public contract"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c2c3b277-b1ef-492d-83e4-562f5f2b5969", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c0cc7694-a974-4dec-9e87-ec4713b71781", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 855/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. The new French nuclear waste plant", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EAEC Treaty,France,fuel reprocessing,nuclear safety,radioactive waste,waste management", "workIds": "celex:91992E000855", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC Treaty", "France", "fuel reprocessing", "nuclear safety", "radioactive waste", "waste management"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c0cc7694-a974-4dec-9e87-ec4713b71781", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4f007104-0284-47d6-809f-a597f010da91", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 889/92 by Mr Winfried MENRAD to the Commission. Transport of animals for slaughter", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MENRAD", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,meat processing industry,protection of animals,slaughter of animals,transport of animals", "workIds": "celex:91992E000889", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "meat processing industry", "protection of animals", "slaughter of animals", "transport of animals"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4f007104-0284-47d6-809f-a597f010da91", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e17f1e55-17f8-47f6-a98b-5b3798806507", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 801/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. EURATOM", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EAEC,South East (England),public health,radioactive waste,storage of waste", "workIds": "celex:91992E000801", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC", "South East (England)", "public health", "radioactive waste", "storage of waste"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e17f1e55-17f8-47f6-a98b-5b3798806507", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b67e5e9e-cce8-4e76-8910-8c61a30b7634", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 880/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European Community,application of the law,collective bargaining,joint action,member country,social partners,social policy,trade union,trade union rights", "workIds": "celex:91992E000880", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Community", "application of the law", "collective bargaining", "joint action", "member country", "social partners", "social policy", "trade union", "trade union rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b67e5e9e-cce8-4e76-8910-8c61a30b7634", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08c47a89-21d0-4e60-a5dd-becfcd23c2c9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 848/92 by: Giulio FANTUZZI and Luigi COLAJANNI to the Commission. Production and use of biological fuels", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "COLAJANNI,European Parliament,FANTUZZI", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "agro-energy,air quality,biomass,economic support,energy production,energy use,stratospheric pollution,substitute fuel,tax incentive,technical specification", "workIds": "celex:91992E000848", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agro-energy", "air quality", "biomass", "economic support", "energy production", "energy use", "stratospheric pollution", "substitute fuel", "tax incentive", "technical specification"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08c47a89-21d0-4e60-a5dd-becfcd23c2c9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b9c2bed8-1dc7-4506-802a-aece4219d6f9", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 958/92 of 14 April 1992 introducing prior and retrospective Community surveillance of imports of unwrought aluminium falling within CN code 7601 and originating in the independent States resulting from the former Soviet Union", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "USSR,alloy,aluminium,free circulation,import licence,market supervision", "workIds": "celex:31992R0958,oj:JOL_1992_102_R_0031_036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "alloy", "aluminium", "free circulation", "import licence", "market supervision"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b9c2bed8-1dc7-4506-802a-aece4219d6f9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a4e440b1-4ac1-4e44-ad60-69ba51742bd5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 810/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. EURATOM", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EAEC,International Atomic Energy Agency,United Kingdom,nuclear safety,radioactive waste,waste recycling", "workIds": "celex:91992E000810", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC", "International Atomic Energy Agency", "United Kingdom", "nuclear safety", "radioactive waste", "waste recycling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a4e440b1-4ac1-4e44-ad60-69ba51742bd5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e9bb0825-8dd3-4189-9ca2-4800f9d9b60e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 898/92 by Mr Antoni GUTI\u00c9RREZ D\u00cdAZ to the Commission. Irrigation in Spain (Almaz\u00e1n-G\u00f3mera)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GUTIERREZ DIAZ", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Castile-Leon,EAGGF Guidance Section,action programme,environmental impact,feasibility study,impact study,less-favoured agricultural area,water management in agriculture", "workIds": "celex:91992E000898", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Castile-Leon", "EAGGF Guidance Section", "action programme", "environmental impact", "feasibility study", "impact study", "less-favoured agricultural area", "water management in agriculture"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e9bb0825-8dd3-4189-9ca2-4800f9d9b60e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e7e270ed-9652-4fe2-bf25-b468fcdfaab7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 900/92 by Mr Francesco SPERONI to the Commission. State aids to industrial groups for the opening of productive plants in southern Italy to the detriment of northern workers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SPERONI Francesco Enrico", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Mezzogiorno,State aid,application of EU law,economic consequence,holding company,labour market,man-made fibre,motor vehicle industry,production capacity", "workIds": "celex:91992E000900", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Mezzogiorno", "State aid", "application of EU law", "economic consequence", "holding company", "labour market", "man-made fibre", "motor vehicle industry", "production capacity"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e7e270ed-9652-4fe2-bf25-b468fcdfaab7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7b2524db-4b48-4c88-b710-21c85d5ccf7e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 812/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Environmental information", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EC Directive,EU policy,access to information,environmental protection", "workIds": "celex:91992E000812", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "EU policy", "access to information", "environmental protection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7b2524db-4b48-4c88-b710-21c85d5ccf7e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b8287afe-3650-41b2-9721-3d240fefc86e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 883/92 by Mr Peter CRAMPTON to the Commission. Cohesion Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CRAMPTON,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Economic and Monetary Union,European integration,European standard,budgetary equilibrium,environmental protection,fund (EU),gross national product,member country,transport infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:91992E000883", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Economic and Monetary Union", "European integration", "European standard", "budgetary equilibrium", "environmental protection", "fund (EU)", "gross national product", "member country", "transport infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b8287afe-3650-41b2-9721-3d240fefc86e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1668e14f-f3d2-40fd-a8ed-aa6af0a5b5a0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 895/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Commission. Sunday trading", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "approximation of laws,competence of the Member States,customs and traditions,religion,retail trade,trade restriction,weekly rest period", "workIds": "celex:91992E000895", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "competence of the Member States", "customs and traditions", "religion", "retail trade", "trade restriction", "weekly rest period"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1668e14f-f3d2-40fd-a8ed-aa6af0a5b5a0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2d2c4834-c3e7-4899-ba22-90b38419969f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 896/92 by Mr Antoni GUTI\u00c9RREZ D\u00cdAZ to the Commission. Tomato production in the Canaries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GUTIERREZ DIAZ", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Canary Islands,Morocco,competition,fruit vegetable,import,single market", "workIds": "celex:91992E000896", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canary Islands", "Morocco", "competition", "fruit vegetable", "import", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2d2c4834-c3e7-4899-ba22-90b38419969f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c9b33bd8-68ec-45cf-a22f-666178e2bd73", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 864/92 by Mr Gerardo FERN\u00c1NDEZ-ALBOR to the Commission. Role of the European Community in airline mergers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FERNANDEZ ALBOR", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU Member State,civil aviation,competition law,economic concentration,economic recession,inter-company cooperation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000864", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "civil aviation", "competition law", "economic concentration", "economic recession", "inter-company cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c9b33bd8-68ec-45cf-a22f-666178e2bd73", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e12bc053-3572-4a74-b2f8-b7b9dd517210", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 873/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "collective agreement,decree,legislation,private international law,social partners,work contract", "workIds": "celex:91992E000873", "eurovoc_concepts": ["collective agreement", "decree", "legislation", "private international law", "social partners", "work contract"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e12bc053-3572-4a74-b2f8-b7b9dd517210", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2b320c7-e74b-485d-a05d-29778dfe4f73", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 854/92 by Mrs Christine ODDY to the Commission. Cross-vocational divide in Germany", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ODDY", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Germany,exchange of information,fight against unemployment,school-industry relations,social partners,vocational training,young person", "workIds": "celex:91992E000854", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "exchange of information", "fight against unemployment", "school-industry relations", "social partners", "vocational training", "young person"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2b320c7-e74b-485d-a05d-29778dfe4f73", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/51ad0fca-17a4-41c7-a31e-404eca73b622", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 868/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Treaty on European Union,application of the law,collective bargaining,employers' organisation,joint action,ratification of an agreement,social partners,social policy,trade union rights,work", "workIds": "celex:91992E000868", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Treaty on European Union", "application of the law", "collective bargaining", "employers' organisation", "joint action", "ratification of an agreement", "social partners", "social policy", "trade union rights", "work"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/51ad0fca-17a4-41c7-a31e-404eca73b622", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3a4b881-128e-415a-ad9d-90726b5dcc97", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 890/92 by Mrs Marijke VAN HEMELDONCK to the Commission. Delays in processing ESF applications", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VAN HEMELDONCK", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Belgium,European Social Fund,action programme,advance payment,payment,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E000890", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgium", "European Social Fund", "action programme", "advance payment", "payment", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3a4b881-128e-415a-ad9d-90726b5dcc97", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/36895939-5c2d-4f77-ae0d-a14f610d5325", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 867/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European industrial area,Treaty on European Union,employers' organisation,social partners,standing committee (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E000867", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European industrial area", "Treaty on European Union", "employers' organisation", "social partners", "standing committee (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/36895939-5c2d-4f77-ae0d-a14f610d5325", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/65539dd6-1d90-4581-9aa7-9523b97c1d18", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 824/92 by Mr Stephen HUGHES to the Commission. International youth exchanges", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,HUGHES STEPHEN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "United Kingdom,action programme,cultural relations,management,young person", "workIds": "celex:91992E000824", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "action programme", "cultural relations", "management", "young person"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/65539dd6-1d90-4581-9aa7-9523b97c1d18", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2bfd93a5-b9d8-46ea-8cad-549673c2a91e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 851/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 LAFUENTE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. A Community ' complaints box'", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LAFUENTE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU national,European Commission,appeals by private individuals,application of EU law,form", "workIds": "celex:91992E000851", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "European Commission", "appeals by private individuals", "application of EU law", "form"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2bfd93a5-b9d8-46ea-8cad-549673c2a91e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cecd004d-21cf-4e83-b2ec-67a740787e3a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 807/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Public procurement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EC Directive,EU Official Journal,European Regional Development Fund,United Kingdom,award of contract,dissemination of information,economic support,local government,public contract", "workIds": "celex:91992E000807", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "EU Official Journal", "European Regional Development Fund", "United Kingdom", "award of contract", "dissemination of information", "economic support", "local government", "public contract"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cecd004d-21cf-4e83-b2ec-67a740787e3a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46f06523-fb3c-442c-a192-9afe96bf007b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 857/92 by Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Payment of subscriptions to scientific journals as part of aid to the former Soviet Union", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU aid,USSR,document acquisition,international organisation,research body,research staff,scientific research,serial publication,technical cooperation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000857", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "USSR", "document acquisition", "international organisation", "research body", "research staff", "scientific research", "serial publication", "technical cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46f06523-fb3c-442c-a192-9afe96bf007b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4cafc852-f61f-4f3a-8441-a23e9795faf2", "title": "92/465/EEC: Commission Decision of 14 April 1992 concerning aid granted by the Land of Berlin to Daimler- Benz AG Germany (C 3/91 ex NN 5/91) (Only the German text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "State aid,aid to undertakings,industrial plot,regions of Germany,restriction on competition,selling price", "workIds": "celex:31992D0465,oj:JOL_1992_263_R_0015_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["State aid", "aid to undertakings", "industrial plot", "regions of Germany", "restriction on competition", "selling price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4cafc852-f61f-4f3a-8441-a23e9795faf2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86c37d1a-4249-47d2-9c47-7b584e4239bc", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 862/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Variation in VAT rates applied to newspapers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "VAT rate,economic discrimination,newspaper,press", "workIds": "celex:91992E000862", "eurovoc_concepts": ["VAT rate", "economic discrimination", "newspaper", "press"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86c37d1a-4249-47d2-9c47-7b584e4239bc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0599c5b1-1f2d-4da1-ab1f-78cdaf77d7dc", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 882/92 by Mr Peter CRAMPTON to the Commission. ' Personal allowances'", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CRAMPTON,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "VAT,excise duty,free movement of goods,tax exemption", "workIds": "celex:91992E000882", "eurovoc_concepts": ["VAT", "excise duty", "free movement of goods", "tax exemption"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0599c5b1-1f2d-4da1-ab1f-78cdaf77d7dc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c4e78d1-e29d-41ac-92bc-c6bfb388b990", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 831/92 by Mr Ben VISSER to the Commission. Price undercutting in European container transshipments in sea ports", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VISSER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "State aid,harbour installation,investment policy,public investment", "workIds": "celex:91992E000831", "eurovoc_concepts": ["State aid", "harbour installation", "investment policy", "public investment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c4e78d1-e29d-41ac-92bc-c6bfb388b990", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c9950662-dfe3-45a1-98cb-8ffa67677c54", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 893/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Commission. Staff of the Commission' s specialized services as at 31 December 1991", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European Commission,European official,servant (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E000893", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "European official", "servant (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c9950662-dfe3-45a1-98cb-8ffa67677c54", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4532c75f-8fae-4ea2-bd00-83233d065c11", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 805/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Public procurement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU Official Journal,European Commission,Publications Office of the European Union,award of contract,public contract", "workIds": "celex:91992E000805", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Official Journal", "European Commission", "Publications Office of the European Union", "award of contract", "public contract"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4532c75f-8fae-4ea2-bd00-83233d065c11", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d9e7569a-3ada-4d51-a6e0-9dfa65eb5748", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 885/92 by Mr Madron SELIGMAN to the Commission. Help for seaside resorts from the structural funds", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SELIGMAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU aid,Mediterranean region (EU),Structural Funds,United Kingdom,coastal region,hotel industry,terms for aid,tourism,tourist infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:91992E000885", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Mediterranean region (EU)", "Structural Funds", "United Kingdom", "coastal region", "hotel industry", "terms for aid", "tourism", "tourist infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d9e7569a-3ada-4d51-a6e0-9dfa65eb5748", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/316fbaa8-e55e-413d-a259-eb5bf7632ae4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 800/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Sustainable fiscal instruments", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "anhydride,environmental policy,environmental protection,excise duty,fuel tax,mineral oil,tax,tax incentive,tax relief", "workIds": "celex:91992E000800", "eurovoc_concepts": ["anhydride", "environmental policy", "environmental protection", "excise duty", "fuel tax", "mineral oil", "tax", "tax incentive", "tax relief"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/316fbaa8-e55e-413d-a259-eb5bf7632ae4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/877e638c-8d07-4ae3-8d2f-99c88e095b6a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 861/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Community action to encourage the adoption of children", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU Member State,administrative formalities,adoption of a child,family law,judicial cooperation,national law", "workIds": "celex:91992E000861", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "administrative formalities", "adoption of a child", "family law", "judicial cooperation", "national law"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/877e638c-8d07-4ae3-8d2f-99c88e095b6a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9f95f720-b303-4fe2-8db7-52f9a79f4b24", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 802/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Public procurement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU Official Journal,European Commission,Publications Office of the European Union,award of contract,public contract", "workIds": "celex:91992E000802", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Official Journal", "European Commission", "Publications Office of the European Union", "award of contract", "public contract"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9f95f720-b303-4fe2-8db7-52f9a79f4b24", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34e9bd47-85d5-404a-9179-11b5cab9c745", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 879/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU Member State,social partners,statistics,trade union,wage earner", "workIds": "celex:91992E000879", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "social partners", "statistics", "trade union", "wage earner"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34e9bd47-85d5-404a-9179-11b5cab9c745", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/395726d1-b854-4036-983e-63cb1dae0359", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 842/92 by: Rinaldo BONTEMPI , Tullio REGGE , Mauro CHIABRANDO , Maria MAGNANI NOYA, Kenneth COLLINS and Hugh McMAHON to the Commission. Possible lack of funds for the OUVERTURE programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BONTEMPI,CHIABRANDO,COLLINS,European Parliament,MAGNANI NOYA,MCMAHON,REGGE", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,EU financing,East-West relations,European Regional Development Fund,action programme,exchange of information,less-favoured region,regional and local authorities", "workIds": "celex:91992E000842", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "EU financing", "East-West relations", "European Regional Development Fund", "action programme", "exchange of information", "less-favoured region", "regional and local authorities"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/395726d1-b854-4036-983e-63cb1dae0359", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/af90422a-8252-4bf5-a4ed-fa0ae9f03a24", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 884/92 by Mrs Anita POLLACK to the Commission. Structural funds in general", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,POLLACK", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "South West (England),Structural Funds,distribution of aid", "workIds": "celex:91992E000884", "eurovoc_concepts": ["South West (England)", "Structural Funds", "distribution of aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/af90422a-8252-4bf5-a4ed-fa0ae9f03a24", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1edee66b-c0fd-4c65-9ab1-12e2534f887a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 823/92 by Mr Gijs de VRIES to the Commission. Protection of software in Germany: US Trade Bill", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE VRIES,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Germany,United States,commercial law,computer piracy,copyright,data-processing law,software,trade policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000823", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "United States", "commercial law", "computer piracy", "copyright", "data-processing law", "software", "trade policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1edee66b-c0fd-4c65-9ab1-12e2534f887a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3d9c5e35-ffba-4615-8d17-0d62bae02876", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 828/92 by Mr Christopher JACKSON to the Commission. Victim support schemes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,JACKSON CHRISTOPHER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU national,European cooperation,competence of the Member States,crime against individuals,damages,indemnification,offence,victim", "workIds": "celex:91992E000828", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "European cooperation", "competence of the Member States", "crime against individuals", "damages", "indemnification", "offence", "victim"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3d9c5e35-ffba-4615-8d17-0d62bae02876", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c978c098-87fe-48cb-8658-4118b8a6cd21", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 852/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 LAFUENTE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Restrictions on teaching posts on grounds of nationality", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LAFUENTE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU national,Spain,anti-discriminatory measure,application of EU law,civil service,free movement of workers,job access,nationality,teacher", "workIds": "celex:91992E000852", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "Spain", "anti-discriminatory measure", "application of EU law", "civil service", "free movement of workers", "job access", "nationality", "teacher"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c978c098-87fe-48cb-8658-4118b8a6cd21", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ce08b239-ea52-4a44-a2ba-87e7e2e31fd4", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 945/92 of 14 April 1992 preventing the supply of certain goods and services to Libya", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Libya,air traffic,aircraft,international sanctions,refusal to sell", "workIds": "celex:31992R0945,oj:JOL_1992_101_R_0053_029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Libya", "air traffic", "aircraft", "international sanctions", "refusal to sell"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ce08b239-ea52-4a44-a2ba-87e7e2e31fd4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b5b6556b-91ce-4e43-b9ad-4d431560be8f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 815/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Dounreay", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Scotland,environmental impact,health risk,marine pollution,offshore drilling,offshore oil structure,public health,radioactive waste", "workIds": "celex:91992E000815", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Scotland", "environmental impact", "health risk", "marine pollution", "offshore drilling", "offshore oil structure", "public health", "radioactive waste"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b5b6556b-91ce-4e43-b9ad-4d431560be8f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bfd277b5-4b51-4c51-a0ee-5c44658d882c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 863/92 by Mr Gerardo FERN\u00c1NDEZ-ALBOR to the Commission. Naming of streets and squares after the European Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FERNANDEZ ALBOR", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU national,European Movement,local government,public opinion,social life,trends of opinion", "workIds": "celex:91992E000863", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "European Movement", "local government", "public opinion", "social life", "trends of opinion"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bfd277b5-4b51-4c51-a0ee-5c44658d882c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2aa2626-8e49-4f17-8dfa-e06ae6630932", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 809/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. EURATOM", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EAEC,EAEC Treaty,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E000809", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC", "EAEC Treaty", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2aa2626-8e49-4f17-8dfa-e06ae6630932", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4f1e5905-eefd-4bbe-a6a9-9e0ed2be4a9b", "title": "92/254/Euratom: Commission Opinion of 14 April 1992 concerning the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste of the 'Quercus' uranium ore processing plant of Enusa in Saelices el Chico (Spain) in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Castile-Leon,impact study,radioactive pollution,radioactive waste,uranium", "workIds": "celex:31992A0254,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0026_041", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Castile-Leon", "impact study", "radioactive pollution", "radioactive waste", "uranium"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4f1e5905-eefd-4bbe-a6a9-9e0ed2be4a9b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6c5bc754-09ed-4424-9d3d-ba917751a7d8", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 850/92 by Mr Wilfried TELK\u00c4MPER to the Commission. Community imports of wood, paper and wood-pulp", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,TELKAEMPER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU production,cellulose,chlorine,ecosystem,forest conservation,forestry economics,import (EU),paper,statistics,waste recycling", "workIds": "celex:91992E000850", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU production", "cellulose", "chlorine", "ecosystem", "forest conservation", "forestry economics", "import (EU)", "paper", "statistics", "waste recycling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6c5bc754-09ed-4424-9d3d-ba917751a7d8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/62c86e11-eb2c-46c7-aa1d-937906d95d70", "title": "92/245/EEC: Commission Decision of 14 April 1992 concerning the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the importation of meat products from Tunisia and amending Council Decision 79/542/EEC and Commission Decision 91/449/EEC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "fmx4,html,pdfa1b,print,xhtml", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Tunisia,health certificate,health control,import,meat product", "workIds": "celex:31992D0245,oj:JOL_1992_124_R_0042_041", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Tunisia", "health certificate", "health control", "import", "meat product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/62c86e11-eb2c-46c7-aa1d-937906d95d70", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["fmx4", "html", "pdfa1b", "print", "xhtml"], "text": "L_1992124EN. 01004201. xml\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n9. 5. 1992\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\nEN\n\n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities\n\n\nL 124/42\n\n\n\n\n\nCOMMISSION DECISION\nof 14 April 1992\nconcerning the animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the importation of meat products from Tunisia and amending Council Decision 79/542/EEC and Commission Decision 91/449/EEC\n(92/245/EEC)\nTHE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,\nHaving regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on animal health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and swine, fresh meat or meat products from third countries\u00a0(1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3763/91\u00a0(2), and in particular Articles 21a and 22 thereof,\nWhereas Council Decision 79/542/EEC\u00a0(3), as last amended by Commission Decision 92/162/EEC\u00a0(4), draws up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorize imports of bovine animals, swine and equidae, fresh meat and meat products; whereas this list was supplemented by Commission Decision 91/361/EEC\u00a0(5) by the addition, inter alia, of Tunisia for the purpose of allowing importation of meat products which have been treated in a hermetically sealed container to an Fo value of three or more;\nWhereas Commission Decision 91/449/EEC\u00a0(6), as last amended by Decision 91/244/EEC\u00a0(7), lays down the specimen animal health certificates in respect of meat products imported from third countries;\nWhereas, following a Community veterinary mission, it appears that notwithstanding the animal health situation, Tunisia is covered by sufficiently well-structured and organized veterinary services; whereas the production of certain heat-treated meat products for export to the Community will be supervised by an official veterinarian appointed by the Department of Veterinary Services;\nWhereas animal health conditions and veterinary certification must be adapted according to the animal health situation of the third country concerned;\nWhereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:\nArticle 1\n1. Member States shall authorize the importation from Tunisia of meat products which have undergone:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\neither a treatment in a hermetically sealed container to an Fo value of three or more,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nor a heat treatment so that a centre temperature of at least 80 o C has been achieved. 2. Member States shall not authorize the importation from Tunisia of meat products other than those referred to in paragraph 1. Article 2\n1. Decision 79/542/EEC is amended as follows:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nin the Annex under the column headed \u2018special remarks\u2019 concerning meat products, the figure \u2018(4)\u2019 is inserted in the line corresponding to Tunisia after the figure (3);\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nat the end of the list of countries under the footnote heading \u2018Special remarks\u2019, the following last sentence is added:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2018(4)\n\n\nNotwithstanding any restrictions indicated in the above list, meat products which have undergone a heat treatment so that a centre temperature of at least 80 oC has been achieved are authorized. \u2019\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. In Part II of Annex C to Decision 91/449/EEC the list of countries approved to use the model animal health certificate is hereby amended by the insertion of the following country:\n\n\u2018Tunisia\u2019. Article 3\nThis Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 14 April 1992. For the Commission\n\nRay MAC SHARRY\n\nMember of the Commission\n\n\n\n\n\n(1)\u00a0\u00a0OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28. (2)\u00a0\u00a0OJ No L 356, 24. 12. 1991, p. 1. (3)\u00a0\u00a0OJ No L 146, 14. 6. 1979, p. 15. (4)\u00a0\u00a0OJ No L 71, 18. 3. 1992, p. 30. (5)\u00a0\u00a0OJ No L 195, 18. 7. 1991, p. 43. (6)\u00a0\u00a0OJ No L 240, 29. 8. 1991, p. 28. (7)\u00a0\u00a0See page 40 of this Official Journal"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9675301d-5c44-40de-a8db-ed4cc19dfc82", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 830/92 by Claudia ROTH , Marco TARADASH to the Commission. ' Comitology'", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROTH,TARADASH", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European cooperation,European organisation,drug addiction,fight against crime,free movement of persons,public safety,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:91992E000830", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "European organisation", "drug addiction", "fight against crime", "free movement of persons", "public safety", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9675301d-5c44-40de-a8db-ed4cc19dfc82", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0f80d711-9762-4746-90be-879b7e0c4eeb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 820/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Council. Inclusion of cooperatives in the annexes to directives on mergers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "application of EU law,cooperative,corporation tax,economic concentration,merger,tax harmonisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000820", "eurovoc_concepts": ["application of EU law", "cooperative", "corporation tax", "economic concentration", "merger", "tax harmonisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0f80d711-9762-4746-90be-879b7e0c4eeb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/021badce-6c18-4e4b-84ee-0fd1f3362f81", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 858/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. What is a region?", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU office or agency,Treaty on European Union,committee (EU),competence of the Member States,region,regional and local authorities", "workIds": "celex:91992E000858", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU office or agency", "Treaty on European Union", "committee (EU)", "competence of the Member States", "region", "regional and local authorities"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/021badce-6c18-4e4b-84ee-0fd1f3362f81", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/53e1878f-bce3-46cb-8c43-d5b63d9d9838", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 869/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Court of Justice of the European Union,European Ombudsman,action for annulment,decision-making,legislative procedure,social partners", "workIds": "celex:91992E000869", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Court of Justice of the European Union", "European Ombudsman", "action for annulment", "decision-making", "legislative procedure", "social partners"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/53e1878f-bce3-46cb-8c43-d5b63d9d9838", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cb01cafe-a816-48e5-bee7-8debf9180298", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 843/92 by Mrs Teresa DOMINGO SEGARRA to the Commission. The Dupont multinational and right of association", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DOMINGO SEGARRA,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Principality of Asturias,collective agreement,labour relations,multinational enterprise,recruitment,trade union freedom", "workIds": "celex:91992E000843", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Principality of Asturias", "collective agreement", "labour relations", "multinational enterprise", "recruitment", "trade union freedom"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cb01cafe-a816-48e5-bee7-8debf9180298", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46c088e0-c2b5-4a00-baf4-182c7f9eca0b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 847/92 by Mr S\u00e9rgio RIBEIRO to the Commission. The crisis in the textile sector and its repercussions in the city and municipality of Coimbra", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,RIBEIRO", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Central Portugal,Structural Funds,aid to undertakings,cessation of trading,textile industry", "workIds": "celex:91992E000847", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Portugal", "Structural Funds", "aid to undertakings", "cessation of trading", "textile industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46c088e0-c2b5-4a00-baf4-182c7f9eca0b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/56aa5841-c906-488e-bf72-cae759edd3c6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 819/92 by Mrs Anne ANDR\u00c9 to the Council. UN Convention on the Rights of the Child", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ANDRE-LEONARD,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European Community,United Nations Charter,children's rights,competence of the Member States,signature of an agreement", "workIds": "celex:91992E000819", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Community", "United Nations Charter", "children's rights", "competence of the Member States", "signature of an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/56aa5841-c906-488e-bf72-cae759edd3c6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe5f1975-e7c8-4b3b-8512-d0da7a49398e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 808/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Public procurement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU Official Journal,European Regional Development Fund,United Kingdom,award of contract,dissemination of information,economic support,local government,offence,public contract,suspension of aid", "workIds": "celex:91992E000808", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Official Journal", "European Regional Development Fund", "United Kingdom", "award of contract", "dissemination of information", "economic support", "local government", "offence", "public contract", "suspension of aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe5f1975-e7c8-4b3b-8512-d0da7a49398e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3eab4ec-9f50-462d-a12f-4270466c1d02", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 803/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Public procurement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU Official Journal,European Commission,Publications Office of the European Union,award of contract,public contract", "workIds": "celex:91992E000803", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Official Journal", "European Commission", "Publications Office of the European Union", "award of contract", "public contract"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3eab4ec-9f50-462d-a12f-4270466c1d02", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e806be2-9380-4f76-b09e-949665fc8fa7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 881/92 by Mr James FORD to the Commission. Munir Ahmed", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU national,United Kingdom,application of EU law,racial discrimination,residence permit", "workIds": "celex:91992E000881", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "United Kingdom", "application of EU law", "racial discrimination", "residence permit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e806be2-9380-4f76-b09e-949665fc8fa7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/80eabceb-0131-4669-b785-170e1f5dc805", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 839/92 by Mr Ernest GLINNE to the Commission. Equivalence of secondary education qualifications", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GLINNE", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "access to a profession,craftsman,equivalence of diplomas,frontier region,professional qualifications,recognition of diplomas,secondary education,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E000839", "eurovoc_concepts": ["access to a profession", "craftsman", "equivalence of diplomas", "frontier region", "professional qualifications", "recognition of diplomas", "secondary education", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/80eabceb-0131-4669-b785-170e1f5dc805", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d42c0745-eaf4-4fac-8250-f5df9581035d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 829/92 by Mr Joaquim MIRANDA DA SILVA to the Commission. Drought in Portugal", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MIRANDA DA SILVA", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EAGGF Guidance Section,EU aid,Portugal,action programme,agricultural disaster,agricultural situation,aid to agriculture,drought", "workIds": "celex:91992E000829", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF Guidance Section", "EU aid", "Portugal", "action programme", "agricultural disaster", "agricultural situation", "aid to agriculture", "drought"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d42c0745-eaf4-4fac-8250-f5df9581035d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/61db25ba-9f08-437f-a6b0-8e9b33009c5e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 875/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European Trade Union Confederation,Treaty on European Union,access to information,consultation procedure,international negotiations,labour force,member country,social partners,trade union", "workIds": "celex:91992E000875", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Trade Union Confederation", "Treaty on European Union", "access to information", "consultation procedure", "international negotiations", "labour force", "member country", "social partners", "trade union"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/61db25ba-9f08-437f-a6b0-8e9b33009c5e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae0914f9-6c6e-4a85-a8c2-f2b00a8ac694", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 846/92 by Mrs Nel van DIJK to the Commission. Infringement of Articles 92 and/or 93 of the Treaty by Wunseradiel local authority (Netherlands)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VAN DIJK", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Netherlands,State aid,access to information,camping,municipality,sale,selling price", "workIds": "celex:91992E000846", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Netherlands", "State aid", "access to information", "camping", "municipality", "sale", "selling price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae0914f9-6c6e-4a85-a8c2-f2b00a8ac694", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a51c591-8d42-494f-b324-bf4925e1f6d1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 874/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "application of the law,collective bargaining,government,joint action,legislation,legislative procedure,powers of parliament,social partners,social policy,trade union rights", "workIds": "celex:91992E000874", "eurovoc_concepts": ["application of the law", "collective bargaining", "government", "joint action", "legislation", "legislative procedure", "powers of parliament", "social partners", "social policy", "trade union rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a51c591-8d42-494f-b324-bf4925e1f6d1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7963904-d757-45ea-95bc-6bda94638cfa", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 813/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Civil liability in respect of the environment", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "civil liability,degradation of the environment,industrial pollution,oil pollution,pollution from agricultural sources", "workIds": "celex:91992E000813", "eurovoc_concepts": ["civil liability", "degradation of the environment", "industrial pollution", "oil pollution", "pollution from agricultural sources"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7963904-d757-45ea-95bc-6bda94638cfa", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ba7444c0-6a0d-4788-a6b4-d2588190557d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 871/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "accession to the European Union,collective agreement,legislative power,social partners", "workIds": "celex:91992E000871", "eurovoc_concepts": ["accession to the European Union", "collective agreement", "legislative power", "social partners"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ba7444c0-6a0d-4788-a6b4-d2588190557d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0f5fbea2-b605-4f08-8978-e68163b87e84", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 886/92 by Paul HOWELL to the Commission. Aid to Eastern Europe and the CIS", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,HOWELL", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,aid programme,costing", "workIds": "celex:91992E000886", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "aid programme", "costing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0f5fbea2-b605-4f08-8978-e68163b87e84", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08830aac-3fad-4ae3-b8bf-aebd75f408fe", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 845/92 by Mr Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Slaughterhouses in Greece", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPAYANNAKIS", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU aid,Greece,application of EU law,health legislation,marketing,meat,meat processing industry,single market,slaughter of animals", "workIds": "celex:91992E000845", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Greece", "application of EU law", "health legislation", "marketing", "meat", "meat processing industry", "single market", "slaughter of animals"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08830aac-3fad-4ae3-b8bf-aebd75f408fe", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ba3985ff-6b1e-4a10-acf7-3333d73898d4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 834/92 by Mr Gerardo GAIBISSO to the Commission. Allocation of dairy quotas, levies: situation in certain areas of Italy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GAIBISSO", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Italy,agricultural quota,common organisation of markets,dairy production,international criminal law,producer co-responsibility,regulation of agricultural production,sanction (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E000834", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "agricultural quota", "common organisation of markets", "dairy production", "international criminal law", "producer co-responsibility", "regulation of agricultural production", "sanction (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ba3985ff-6b1e-4a10-acf7-3333d73898d4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae98252d-0cdb-4c2e-8c57-68926680f704", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 816/92 by Mr Francesco SPERONI to the Commission. European Monetary Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SPERONI Francesco Enrico", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Economic and Monetary Union,European Monetary Fund,European Union,budget deficit,budget policy,economic integration,euro,gross domestic product,public debt", "workIds": "celex:91992E000816", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Economic and Monetary Union", "European Monetary Fund", "European Union", "budget deficit", "budget policy", "economic integration", "euro", "gross domestic product", "public debt"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae98252d-0cdb-4c2e-8c57-68926680f704", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/61f3c812-9026-4eb4-b0ff-b84b14acfcb1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 860/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Cooperation with Cuba by NGOs operating in the field of development aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Cuba,EU aid,World Food Programme,administrative formalities,cooperation policy,development aid,humanitarian aid,non-governmental organisation,political system,poverty", "workIds": "celex:91992E000860", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Cuba", "EU aid", "World Food Programme", "administrative formalities", "cooperation policy", "development aid", "humanitarian aid", "non-governmental organisation", "political system", "poverty"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/61f3c812-9026-4eb4-b0ff-b84b14acfcb1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6fd0ca7b-2a64-4976-95a1-45afa733aa8c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 817/92 by Agostino MANTOVANI , Nino PISONI to the Commission. Diversion to Eastern Europe of food aid intended for developing countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MANTOVANI Mario,PISONI NINO", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,FAO,World Food Programme,developing countries,distribution of aid,financing of aid,food aid,hunger", "workIds": "celex:91992E000817", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "FAO", "World Food Programme", "developing countries", "distribution of aid", "financing of aid", "food aid", "hunger"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6fd0ca7b-2a64-4976-95a1-45afa733aa8c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9e23c77d-37d0-42e3-bc85-916429a3ddf7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 827/92 by Mr Richard BALFE to the Commission. Committee of the Regions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BALFE,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU regional policy,appointment of staff,committee (EU),regional cooperation,representative of local or regional authority", "workIds": "celex:91992E000827", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU regional policy", "appointment of staff", "committee (EU)", "regional cooperation", "representative of local or regional authority"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9e23c77d-37d0-42e3-bc85-916429a3ddf7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7003bb2-72f8-45d3-ab92-ad977e9b5855", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 841/92 by Mr Alonso PUERTA to the Commission. Draft law presented by the Spanish Ministry of Economic and Financial Affairs concerning tax arrangements for the Canary Islands", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PUERTA", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Canary Islands,State aid,registration of a company,restriction on competition,ship's flag,tax system", "workIds": "celex:91992E000841", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canary Islands", "State aid", "registration of a company", "restriction on competition", "ship's flag", "tax system"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7003bb2-72f8-45d3-ab92-ad977e9b5855", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9d3c8791-c29f-4b0e-805d-053fab5c051a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 853/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 LAFUENTE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Community arbitration in the area of distribution of processed food products.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LAFUENTE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "agri-foodstuffs,agro-industry,business policy,distributive trades,payment,small and medium-sized enterprises,supermarket", "workIds": "celex:91992E000853", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agri-foodstuffs", "agro-industry", "business policy", "distributive trades", "payment", "small and medium-sized enterprises", "supermarket"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9d3c8791-c29f-4b0e-805d-053fab5c051a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/59f61526-6a06-401c-8919-5465889620a3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 877/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU competence,European Economic and Social Committee,trade union", "workIds": "celex:91992E000877", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU competence", "European Economic and Social Committee", "trade union"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/59f61526-6a06-401c-8919-5465889620a3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b612229b-849c-460f-8f3c-476437663934", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 865/92 by Mr Gerardo FERN\u00c1NDEZ-ALBOR to the Council. The plight of foreign workers in Kuwait", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FERNANDEZ ALBOR", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Kuwait,foreign national,freedom of movement,human rights,labour law,migrant worker,removal,working conditions", "workIds": "celex:91992E000865", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Kuwait", "foreign national", "freedom of movement", "human rights", "labour law", "migrant worker", "removal", "working conditions"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b612229b-849c-460f-8f3c-476437663934", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fbfb8df2-c5da-487c-aeca-032a3523d2e3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 840/92 by Mr Ben VISSER to the Commission. Underground transport of goods and persons", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VISSER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "carriage of goods,carriage of passengers,common transport policy,environmental protection,rail transport,underground transport", "workIds": "celex:91992E000840", "eurovoc_concepts": ["carriage of goods", "carriage of passengers", "common transport policy", "environmental protection", "rail transport", "underground transport"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fbfb8df2-c5da-487c-aeca-032a3523d2e3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/81c6b1b3-9ab1-44af-971b-fdf061ee6000", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 825/92 by Mrs Ursula BRAUN-MOSER to the Commission. Obstacles to the export of German products to Italy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BRAUN-MOSER,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Italy,action for failure to fulfil an obligation,application of EU law,charge having equivalent effect,customs formalities,customs regulations,customs tariff,non-tariff barrier", "workIds": "celex:91992E000825", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "action for failure to fulfil an obligation", "application of EU law", "charge having equivalent effect", "customs formalities", "customs regulations", "customs tariff", "non-tariff barrier"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/81c6b1b3-9ab1-44af-971b-fdf061ee6000", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dcdf5370-66ab-4e1e-a158-07286bb108ff", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 892/92 by Mr Yves FR\u00c9MION to the Commission. Funding for projects under the ' Caleidoscope' cultural programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FREMION", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European Movement,cultural event,cultural policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000892", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Movement", "cultural event", "cultural policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dcdf5370-66ab-4e1e-a158-07286bb108ff", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ddd4bb7-e2c6-4c10-8a30-eebae22071a5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 811/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. UNCED", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU policy,UN Conference,biotechnology,conference proceedings,development aid,environmental policy,environmental protection,report,stratospheric pollution,structural policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000811", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "UN Conference", "biotechnology", "conference proceedings", "development aid", "environmental policy", "environmental protection", "report", "stratospheric pollution", "structural policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ddd4bb7-e2c6-4c10-8a30-eebae22071a5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bc92b59c-a168-47ba-b259-60d366ff0567", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 836/92 by Mr Eolo PARODI to the Council. Recognition of the Free International University of Tourism and Community Sciences of San Remo (Imperia)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PARODI", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Italy,Liguria,competence of the Member States,diploma,open university,recognition of diplomas,teaching method", "workIds": "celex:91992E000836", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "Liguria", "competence of the Member States", "diploma", "open university", "recognition of diplomas", "teaching method"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bc92b59c-a168-47ba-b259-60d366ff0567", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dafcaf89-73ed-415c-aaaf-34a374a45191", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 849/92 by Mr Wilfried TELK\u00c4MPER to the Commission. Imports of wood from areas with ill-defined rights of use", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,TELKAEMPER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Canada,EU policy,ethnic group,forestry holding,forestry property,human rights,import,ownership,political rights,wood product", "workIds": "celex:91992E000849", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canada", "EU policy", "ethnic group", "forestry holding", "forestry property", "human rights", "import", "ownership", "political rights", "wood product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dafcaf89-73ed-415c-aaaf-34a374a45191", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/333ca235-bc08-444a-8d42-21384bc12ac7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 899/92 by Mr Antoni GUTI\u00c9RREZ D\u00cdAZ to the Commission. Structural Funds: public access to information", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GUTIERREZ DIAZ", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU aid,European Regional Development Fund,Spain,Structural Funds,access to information,environmental impact,impact study,non-governmental organisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000899", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "European Regional Development Fund", "Spain", "Structural Funds", "access to information", "environmental impact", "impact study", "non-governmental organisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/333ca235-bc08-444a-8d42-21384bc12ac7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/444ad0dd-8789-46b6-9099-ad3ec9ef2815", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 822/92 by Mr Gijs de VRIES to the Commission. US-South Korea telecommunications agreement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE VRIES,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "South Korea,United States,bilateral agreement,restriction on competition,telecommunications", "workIds": "celex:91992E000822", "eurovoc_concepts": ["South Korea", "United States", "bilateral agreement", "restriction on competition", "telecommunications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/444ad0dd-8789-46b6-9099-ad3ec9ef2815", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/00041032-06b0-4ab0-8aca-fd0a4869309f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 804/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Public procurement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU Official Journal,European Commission,Publications Office of the European Union,award of contract,public contract", "workIds": "celex:91992E000804", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Official Journal", "European Commission", "Publications Office of the European Union", "award of contract", "public contract"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/00041032-06b0-4ab0-8aca-fd0a4869309f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f0072d1e-aee8-4fba-888e-762615c2a8a0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 814/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. European Environment Agency", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "environmental monitoring,environmental policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000814", "eurovoc_concepts": ["environmental monitoring", "environmental policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f0072d1e-aee8-4fba-888e-762615c2a8a0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a67b2e2-3bb3-420b-a978-872e3a87eb20", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 944/92 of 14 April 1992 on the supply of food for infants in Moscow and St Petersburg as urgent aid under Council Regulation (EEC) No 330/92", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "USSR,agricultural product,award of contract,baby food,emergency aid,intervention agency", "workIds": "celex:31992R0944,oj:JOL_1992_101_R_0044_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "agricultural product", "award of contract", "baby food", "emergency aid", "intervention agency"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a67b2e2-3bb3-420b-a978-872e3a87eb20", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a7f7f60-68df-4388-8a0b-c9ccec3e5d90", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 832/92 by Mr Kenneth STEWART to the Commission. Coal importation at Bootle Docks Merseyside", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STEWART KENNETH", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "North West (England),atmospheric pollutant,coal,energy storage,environmental impact,harbour installation,impact study,import,power plant,public health", "workIds": "celex:91992E000832", "eurovoc_concepts": ["North West (England)", "atmospheric pollutant", "coal", "energy storage", "environmental impact", "harbour installation", "impact study", "import", "power plant", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a7f7f60-68df-4388-8a0b-c9ccec3e5d90", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/534dc9db-1001-4515-b9f3-1f638ec20a95", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 835/92 by Mr Gerardo GAIBISSO to the Commission. Dairy quota system: request by the Italian Prime Minister to the Commission", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GAIBISSO", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Italy,agricultural quota,application of EU law,dairy production,reform of the CAP,regulation of agricultural production", "workIds": "celex:91992E000835", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "agricultural quota", "application of EU law", "dairy production", "reform of the CAP", "regulation of agricultural production"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/534dc9db-1001-4515-b9f3-1f638ec20a95", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/975da238-164c-4144-b22a-822250e3c60d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 876/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European Trade Union Confederation,Treaty on European Union,application of the law,collective bargaining,labour force,member country,social partners,social policy,trade union,trade union rights", "workIds": "celex:91992E000876", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Trade Union Confederation", "Treaty on European Union", "application of the law", "collective bargaining", "labour force", "member country", "social partners", "social policy", "trade union", "trade union rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/975da238-164c-4144-b22a-822250e3c60d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c1899b51-33e4-40b0-b458-862dae77a106", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 844/92 by Mrs Marijke VAN HEMELDONCK to the Commission. Future of the 'Europe against Cancer' programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VAN HEMELDONCK", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,association,cancer,jute,management,medical research,public health", "workIds": "celex:91992E000844", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "association", "cancer", "jute", "management", "medical research", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c1899b51-33e4-40b0-b458-862dae77a106", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a910f514-3b61-4072-965a-d9bb7ee2f62c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 818/92 by Anne ANDR\u00c9-L\u00c9ONARD to the Commission. Sporting and cultural patronage", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ANDRE-LEONARD,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "corporation tax,national law,patronage,tax harmonisation,tax on income,tax relief", "workIds": "celex:91992E000818", "eurovoc_concepts": ["corporation tax", "national law", "patronage", "tax harmonisation", "tax on income", "tax relief"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a910f514-3b61-4072-965a-d9bb7ee2f62c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/54fd1f85-55ce-4722-a9f2-7b2fa100d069", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 859/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Allocation of Community funds to NGOs working in the field of development", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU financing,co-financing,development aid,directory,non-governmental organisation,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E000859", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "co-financing", "development aid", "directory", "non-governmental organisation", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/54fd1f85-55ce-4722-a9f2-7b2fa100d069", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/219fd83d-2d39-4a79-b631-604eb8b31dd0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 897/92 by Mr Antoni GUTI\u00c9RREZ D\u00cdAZ to the Commission. Irrigation in Spain (Gevora)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GUTIERREZ DIAZ", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Portugal,Spain,action programme,engineering structure,environmental impact,frontier region,impact study,water management in agriculture,watercourse", "workIds": "celex:91992E000897", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "Spain", "action programme", "engineering structure", "environmental impact", "frontier region", "impact study", "water management in agriculture", "watercourse"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/219fd83d-2d39-4a79-b631-604eb8b31dd0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d65fef6a-9780-4b68-ac2c-1081a5e79768", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 878/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European Trade Union Confederation,application of the law,collective bargaining,electorate,employers' organisation,joint action,social partners,social policy,trade union,trade union rights", "workIds": "celex:91992E000878", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Trade Union Confederation", "application of the law", "collective bargaining", "electorate", "employers' organisation", "joint action", "social partners", "social policy", "trade union", "trade union rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d65fef6a-9780-4b68-ac2c-1081a5e79768", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5605e93b-e42a-4678-91da-f54c55a1adab", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 826/92 by Mr Anthony SIMPSON to the Commission. ECSC conversion loans eligibility", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SIMPSON ANTHONY", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "ECSC loan,European Regional Development Fund,Structural Funds,coordination of aid,industrial conversion", "workIds": "celex:91992E000826", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ECSC loan", "European Regional Development Fund", "Structural Funds", "coordination of aid", "industrial conversion"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5605e93b-e42a-4678-91da-f54c55a1adab", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c478a65b-56bb-47bf-aad3-abe9a7c38feb", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 943/92 of 14 April 1992 reducing the quantities of table wine covered by approved contracts and declarations for distillation as provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 3721/91", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "distillation,table wine", "workIds": "celex:31992R0943,oj:JOL_1992_101_R_0043_027", "eurovoc_concepts": ["distillation", "table wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c478a65b-56bb-47bf-aad3-abe9a7c38feb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/033432e8-a8e1-4a56-b1b2-2753f0eb3221", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 870/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European Ombudsman,appeal to an administrative authority,collective bargaining,decision-making,indemnification,legislative procedure,political responsibility,social partners,social policy,trade union rights", "workIds": "celex:91992E000870", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Ombudsman", "appeal to an administrative authority", "collective bargaining", "decision-making", "indemnification", "legislative procedure", "political responsibility", "social partners", "social policy", "trade union rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/033432e8-a8e1-4a56-b1b2-2753f0eb3221", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ad2111fb-9ebd-4ea4-a906-1642e8d2367c", "title": "92/246/EEC: Commission Decision of 14 April 1992 amending Commission Decision 91/449/EEC laying down the specimen animal health certificates in respect of meat products imported from third countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "fresh meat,health control,import,live animal,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992D0246,oj:JOL_1992_124_R_0043_042", "eurovoc_concepts": ["fresh meat", "health control", "import", "live animal", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ad2111fb-9ebd-4ea4-a906-1642e8d2367c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fdbb3713-8c1e-4d97-8635-bc1658c9de8b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 887/92 by Mr Henry McCUBBIN to the Commission. Imports of mohair and cashmere into the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MCCUBBIN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU policy,EU production,import,luxury products industry,trade volume,wool", "workIds": "celex:91992E000887", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "EU production", "import", "luxury products industry", "trade volume", "wool"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fdbb3713-8c1e-4d97-8635-bc1658c9de8b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/91e2aa5d-377b-4238-8360-7157b7b8dea7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 894/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Commission. In-service training for Community officials in 1991", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "EU statistics,European official,continuing education,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E000894", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU statistics", "European official", "continuing education", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/91e2aa5d-377b-4238-8360-7157b7b8dea7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25e0c505-bf38-45fd-80b2-7fedf52431db", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 866/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Social partners", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "European social policy,Treaty on European Union,legislative procedure,powers of parliament,social cost,social partners,validation of expenditure", "workIds": "celex:91992E000866", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European social policy", "Treaty on European Union", "legislative procedure", "powers of parliament", "social cost", "social partners", "validation of expenditure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25e0c505-bf38-45fd-80b2-7fedf52431db", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf0b456c-f30e-49f1-8210-ad056c630daa", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 856/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. European cooperation for the ' Boliviamar' outlet to the Pacific Ocean", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-14", "subjects": "Bolivia,EU aid,Pacific Ocean,Peru,cooperation policy,free zone", "workIds": "celex:91992E000856", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Bolivia", "EU aid", "Pacific Ocean", "Peru", "cooperation policy", "free zone"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf0b456c-f30e-49f1-8210-ad056c630daa", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f7d38f8c-9298-4045-8306-76a7eceb2d4b", "title": "Proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) introducing specific measures for the Canary Islands concerning certain agricultural products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-13", "subjects": "Canary Islands,agricultural product,aid system,customs duties,supply", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0144,comnat:COM_1992_0144_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_145_R_0013_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canary Islands", "agricultural product", "aid system", "customs duties", "supply"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f7d38f8c-9298-4045-8306-76a7eceb2d4b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 144 \n\nfinal \n\nBrussels, 9 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nintroducing spsclfIc Measures for the Canary Islands \n\nconcerning certain agricultural products \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nOn 26 June 1991 the Council adopted Regulation (EEC) No 1911/91 concerning \n\nthe integration of the Canary Islands Into the customs territory of the \n\nCommunity and all the common policies. On the same day, the Council \n\nadopted a programme of options specific to the remote and insular nature of \n\nthe Canary Islands (Decision 91/314/EEC, Poseican) to accompany this \n\nintegration. This proposal constitutes the initial implementation of Poeeican and \n\nestablishes a framework regulation for agricultural measures financed by \n\nthe EAGGF Guarantee Section. The purpose of Poseican is to reduce the cost of supplies and encourage the \n\neconomic and social development of the Islands, which have an exceptional \n\ngeographic situation and are structurally very backward in relation to \n\nother regions in the Community. In view of the specific problems of the Canary Islands, which are an \n\nintegral part of the Community, and the imminent completion of the internal \n\nmarket, the proposal provides for a eeries of mult(annua I, multisectors I \n\nmeasures to facilitate supply and help to improve the production and \n\nmarketing of the agricultural produce of the region. At. - 1 -\n\nDRAFT \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION \n\nntroducing specific measures for the Canary Islands \n\nconcerning certain agricultural products \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nand in particular Articles 43 and 28 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, \n\nWhereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 1911/91 of 26 June 1991 on the \n\napplication of the provisions of Community law to the Canary Islands1, as \n\namended by Regulation (EEC) No 284/922, integrates the Canary Islands into \n\nthe Community's customs territory and into the common policies; whereas, \n\nunder Articles 2 and 10 of the above-mentioned Regulation, application of \n\nthe common agricultural policy is subject to the entry into force of \n\nspecific supply arrangements; whereas such application must also be \n\naccompanied by specific measures concerning agricultural production; \n\nWhereas Council Decision 91/314/EEC of 26 June 1991 setting up a programme \n\nof options specific to the remote and insular nature of the Canary Islands \n\n(Poseican) outlines the options to be implemented to take account of the \n\nspecific problems and constraints faced by the Islands; \n\n1 0J No L 171, 29. 6. 1991. 2 0J No L \n\nA* \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nWhereas the exceptional geographical situation of the Canary Islands in \n\nrelation to the sources of supply of products used as inputs for the \n\neveryday consumption or manufacture of certain essential foodstuffs in the \n\nislands imposes costs which constitute a severe handicap to the sectors \n\nconcerned; whereas this natural handicap can be remedied by exemption from \n\nlevies and/or customs duties on the products in question imported directly \n\nfrom third countries; \n\nWhereas, to maintain the competitiveness of the above products of Community \n\norigin in the Islands, both in order to achieve the Poselcan objective of \n\nreducing prices by promoting competition between sources of supply and to \n\nprevent disruption of traditional trade flows, provision should be made for \n\nthe supply to this region of products originating in the rest of the \n\nCommunity, on terms equivalent for the end user to exemption from the levy \n\nand/or customs duties on products originating in third countries, based on \n\nthe prices applied to exports to third countries; \n\nWhereas the quantities of products benefiting from the specific supply \n\narrangements must be determined within the framework of periodic forecast \n\nsupply balances, which may be adjusted during the year on the basis of the \n\nessential requirements of the local market and taking account of local \n\nproduction and traditional trade flows; \n\nWhereas the arrangements in question are intended to reduce production \n\ncosts and consumer prices; whereas their actual impact should therefore be \n\nmonitored; \n\n\f- 3 -\n\nWhereas, to avoid any deflection of trade, products covered by the specific \n\nsupply arrangements may not be redispatched to other parts of the Community \n\nor re-exported to third countries; whereas, however, an exception to this \n\nprinciple should be made for products traditionally processed in the Canary \n\nIslands and redispatched or re-exported, within the limits of usual trade \n\nfIows; \n\nWhereas the specific conditions of agriculture in the Canary Islands \n\nrequire special attention and whereas measures to accompany the entry into \n\nforce of the common agricultural policy are necessary in this regard, both \n\nfor stockfarming and animal products and for crop products; \n\nWhereas, to promote the development of traditional stockfarming in the \n\nCanaries, assistance should be given for genetic improvement through the \n\npurchase of pure-bred breeding animals and supplementary premiums should be \n\ngranted for the fattening of adult male bovine animals, for the maintenance \n\nof suckler herds and for sheepmeat and goatmeat production, and the \n\nconsumption of locally produced fresh milk products should be promoted; \n\nwhereas, pending the development of local stockfarming, provision should be \n\nmade, on a temporary and degressive basis so as not to compromise the \n\nabove-mentioned objective, for the supply of male animals for fattening, \n\nwithin the limits of local consumption requirements, as periodically \n\nassessed; \n\nWhereas, in the fruit, vegetables, plants and flor(cultural sector, \n\nmeasures should be taken to increase production and to improve farm \n\nproductivity and product quality; whereas measures should also be taken to \n\nimprove the marketing of the Islands' tropical products; \n\n\f- 4 -\n\nWhereas the creation and promotion of a graphic symbol can also facilitate \n\nthe marketing of specific quality products; \n\nWhereas, in order to help support local production with a view to \n\nsatisfying consumer habits in the Islands, provision should be made for \n\nspecific aid for potato-growing, within the limits of the areas under \n\ncultivation on entry into force of this Regulation and, during a \n\ntransitional period, for degressive restrictions on imports of this product \n\nduring the sensitive period when local production is placed on the market; \n\nWhereas, with the same objectives in mind, intervention measures under the \n\nmarket organization for wine and grubbing premiums should not be applied \n\nand aid should be granted for vines producing quality wines psr which meet \n\nthe requirements laid down in the Community rules; \n\nWhereas, to contribute to maintaining IScai cereal production, the co-\n\nresponsibility levy payable by cereal producers should not be applied in \n\nthe Canary Islands; \n\nWhereas, in view of the animal health status of the region, it must be \n\npossible to grant a temporary derogation to the requirements of Council \n\nDirective 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary \n\ninspection problems upon importation of animals from third countries; \n\nWhereas farms in the Canary Islands present major structural weaknesses \n\nfrom which specific difficulties derive; whereas a derogation is therefore \n\nnecessary from the rules which restrict or prohibit the grant of certain \n\nforms of structural aid; \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nWhereas certain structural measures essential for the development of \n\nagriculture in the Islands are financed under Community support frameworks \n\nto promote the development and structural adjustment of regions whose \n\ndevelopment is lagging behind (Objective 1) pursuant to Articles 130a and \n\n130c of the Treaty; whereas the Commission has approved an initiative \n\n(Regis) to encourage the economic development of the remotest regions, \n\nproviding for the diversification of agricultural production, the upgrading \n\nof traditional products and measures to reduce the risks associated with \n\nnatural disasters; \n\nWhereas banana cultivation is of fundamental importance to the economy of \n\nthe Canary Islands; whereas all the problems relating to banana production \n\nare the subject of a Community study under way and appropriate measures \n\nwill be taken on conclusion of the study, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThis Regulation lays down specific measures to remedy, in respect of \n\ncertain agricultural products, the difficulties caused by the remote and \n\ninsular nature of the Canary Islands. TITLE I \n\nSPECIFIC SUPPLY MEASURES \n\nArticle 2 \n\nFor each marketing year, a forecast supply balance for the Canary Islands \n\nshall be established for the agricultural products necessary for \n\n\f- 6 -\n\n\u00abuman consumption and processing in the Islands listed in the Annex. This \n\nbalance may be revised during the year on the basis of trends in the \n\nIslands' requirements. A separate forecast may be made to assess the \n\nrequirements of the processing and packaging industries regarding products \n\nfor the local market or traditionally dispatched to the rest of the \n\nCommunity. Article 3 \n\n1. Levies and/or customs duties shall not apply to direct imports into the \n\nCanary Islands from third countries of products covered by the specific \n\nsupply arrangements, within the limit of the quantities determined in \n\nt he suppIy baIance. 2. To ensure coverage of the requirements referred to in Article 2 in terms \n\nof quantity, price and quality, with a view to ensure that the \n\nproportion of products supplied by the Community is preserved, supplies \n\nto the Canary Islands shall also be effected through the mobilization of \n\nCommunity products held in intervention storage or available on the \n\nCommunity market, on terms equivalent, for the end user, to the \n\nadvantage resulting from exemption from import duties on imports of \n\nproducts from third countries. The terms of supply shall be fixed with reference to the costs of \n\nvarious sources of supply and the prices applied to exports to third \n\ncountr ies. 3. The arrangements provided for in this Article shall be implemented in \n\nsuch a way as to take account, in particular, of: \n\nthe specific requirements of the Canary Islands and, in the case of \n\nproducts intended for processing, the specific quality \n\nrequirements; \n\ntraditional trade flows with the rest of the Community; \n\n\f- 7 -\n\npossibilities for supply by neighbouring developing countries. 4. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26 of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2727/75 on the common organization of the market in cereals1 \n\nor the corresponding Articles of the Regulations on the common \n\norganization of the markets in the sectors concerned. They shall cover \n\nin particular the determination of the quantities of products covered by \n\nthe specific supply arrangements and the provisions to ensure that the \n\nadvantages are actually passed on to the end user pursuant to Article 6. Article 4 \n\n1. Aid shall be granted for the supply to the Canary Islands of the \n\nfollowing products of Community origin: \n\n(a) pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species falling within CN \n\ncode 0102 10 00, \n\n(b) pure-bred breeding swine falling within CN code 0103 10 00, \n\n(c) pure-bred breeding rabbits falling within CN code ex 0106 00 10, \n\n(d) multiplier or breeding chicks falling within CN code ex 0105 11 00, \n\n(e) hatching eggs, other, for the production of multiplier or breeding \n\nchicks falling within CN code ex 0407 00 19. 2. The aid terms shall take account of the requirements of the Canary \n\nIslands with regard to the start-up of production, in particular for \n\nthose breeds most suited to conditions in the Islands. The aid shall be \n\npaid for the delivery of animals which fulfil the requirements specified \n\nunder Community rules. 3. The aid shall be determined having regard to the following factors: \n\n1 0J No L 281, 1. 11. 1975, p. 1 \n\n\f- 8 -\n\n(a) the conditions of supply to the Canary Islands resulting from their \n\ngeographical situation; \n\n(b) the price of animals or products on the Community market and on the \n\nworId market; \n\n(c) whether or not customs duties and/or levies are charged on imports \n\nfrom third countries; \n\n(d) the economic aspect of the aid envisaged. 4. The amounts of aid, the quantity of products receiving aid each year and \n\nthe detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted \n\nin accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 27 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 805/68 on the common organization of the market in \n\nbeef and veal1 or the corresponding articles in the Regulations on the \n\ncommon organization of the markets concerned. In the case of products covered by Regulation (EEC) No 827/68 on the \n\ncommon organization of the market in certain products listed in Annex II \n\nto the Treaty2, these measures shall be adopted in accordance with the \n\nprocedure referred to in the previous subparagraph. Article 5 \n\n1. During the marketing years for beef and veal 1992/93 to 1995/96: \n\n(a) the customs duties and/or levies referred to in Article 9 of \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 shall not be applied to direct \n\nimports, for fattening purposes, of bovine animals from third \n\ncountries for consumption in the Islands; \n\n(b) aid shall be granted for the supply, on equivalent terms, of \n\n1 0J No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 24. 2 0J No L 151, 30. 6. 1968, p. 16. - 9 -\n\nanimals as referred to at (a) originating in the rest of the \n\nCommunity. 2. The number of animals concerned by the measures referred to in the first \n\nparagraph shall be based on a periodic supply balance and determined \n\ndegressive Iy to take account of the development of local production. The number of animals and the amount of the aid referred to in paragraph \n\nK b ), as well as the detailed rules for the application of this Article, \n\nshall be determined in accordance with the procedure laid down in \n\nArticle 27 of Regulation (EEC) No 805/68. 3. Not later than 6 months before the end of the 1995/96 marketing year, \n\nthe Commission shall submit to the Council an assessment of the measures \n\nprovided for in this Article, together with any appropriate proposals. Article 6 \n\n1. Customs duties shall not be applied to direct imports into the Canary \n\nIslands of raw and semi-manufactured tobacco falling respectively within \n\n- CN code 2401, \n\n- and subheadings. ex 2403 10 00 unfinished cigars without envelope,. ex 2403 10 00 cut tobacco (final blends for the manufacture of \n\ncigarettes),. ex 2403 91 00 \"homogenized\" or \"reconstituted\" tobacco, whether or \n\nnot in leaf or strip form,. ex 2403 99 90 expanded tobacco for the manufacture of tobacco. The exemption referred to in the previous subparagraph shall apply to \n\nproducts intended for the local manufacture of tobacco products, within \n\nthe limits of an annual imported quantity of 20 000 tonnes of stripped \n\nraw tobacco equivalent. 2. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Council \n\n\f- 10 -\n\nRegulation (EEC) No 727/70 of 21 April 1970 on the common organization \n\nof the market in raw tobacco1. Article 7 \n\n1. Application of the supply arrangements provided for in Articles 2 and 3 \n\nshall be subject to the advantage derived from exemption from the levy \n\nand/or customs duty or, in the case of supply from the rest of the \n\nCommunity, from the Community aid being actually passed on to the end \n\nuser. 2. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, if \n\nnecessary, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 3(4). Article 8 \n\nThe products covered by the specific supply arrangements provided for in \n\nthis Title may not be re-exported to third countries or redispatched to the \n\nrest of the Community. Where the products in question are processed in the Islands, the aforesaid \n\nprohibition shall not apply to traditional exports or shipments to the rest \n\nof the Community. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, if \n\nnecessary, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 4(4). Article 9 \n\nProducts covered by the specific supply arrangements provided for in this \n\nTitle and products processed therefrom shall not be eligible for refunds on \n\nexportation from the Canary Islands. 1 0J No L 94, 28. 4. 1970, p. 1 \n\n\f- 11 -\n\nTITLE II \n\nMeasures to assist livestock products \n\nArticle 10 \n\nAid shall be granted In support of traditional activities connected with \n\nbeef and veal production and measures to improve product quality, within \n\nthe limits of the consumption needs of the Islands as assessed in the \n\ncontext of a periodic supply balance. This balance shall also take account \n\nof breeding animals supplied pursuant to Article 4 and animals covered by \n\nthe supply arrangements referred to in Article 5. 1. Fattening aid for male bovine animals shall represent a supplement of \n\nECU 40 per head to the special premium provided for in Article 4a of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 805/68. The supplement may be granted in respect of \n\nan animal of a minimum weight to be determined in accordance with the \n\nprocedure laid down in Article 12. 2. A supplement to the premium for maintaining suckler cows provided for in \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 1357/801 shall be paid to beef and veal \n\nproducers. The amount of this supplement shall be ECU 40 per suckler \n\ncow held by the producer on the day on which the application is \n\nsubmitted. Article 11 \n\nAid shall be granted for the human consumption of locally produced fresh \n\ncows' milk products, within the limits of the consumption needs of the \n\nIslands as assessed periodically. The aid shall amount to ECU 5 per 100 kg \n\nof whole milk. The amount of the aid shall be adjusted in accordance with \n\nthe procedure laid down in Article 12 in order to ensure the regular \n\ndisposal of the aforementioned products on the local market. The aid shall \n\nbe paid to the dairies. Payment shall be subject to the benefit therefrom \n\nbeing actually passed on to the consumer. 1 0J No L 140, 5. 6. 1980, p. 1. - 12 -\n\nArticle 12 \n\nThe Commission shall determine the detailed rules for the application of \n\nArticles 10 and 11 in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 30 \n\nof Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/681 or in Article 27 of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 805/681, as applicable. Article 13 \n\n1. A supplement to the ewe premium payable pursuant to Article 5(3) of \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89 of 25 September 1989 on the common \n\norganization of the market in sheepmeat and goatmeat2 shall be paid to \n\nthe producers of light lambs referred to in Article 4(3) of that \n\nRegulat ion. The amount of the supplement shall be equal to the difference between \n\nthe amounts of the premiums determined pursuant to Article 5(2) and (3) \n\npayable to producers of heavy lambs and light lambs respectively, plus \n\nthe difference between the amounts of the specific aid provided for \n\nunder the \"rural society\" measures in the first and second indents of \n\nArticle 1(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1323/90 of 14 May 1990 \n\ninstituting specific aid for sheep and goat farming in certain less-\n\nfavoured areas of the Community3. 2. The supplement determined in accordance with paragraph 1 shall also be \n\npaid to producers of goatmeat, without prejudice to payment of the \n\npremium provided for in Article 5(5) of Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89. 3. Grant of the supplements referred to in Articles 1 and 2 shall be \n\nsubject to the same conditions as those laid down for the grant of the \n\n1 0J No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13. 2 0J No L 289, 7. 10. 1989, p. 1. 3 OJ No L 132, 23. 5. 1990, p. 17. - 13 -\n\npremium to producers of sheepmeat and goatmeat pursuant to Article 5 of \n\nthe above-mentioned Regulation. 4. Additional implementing rules shall, where necessary, be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 30 of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 3013/89. Article 14 \n\nThe words \"the autonomous region of the Canary Islands\" shall be added for \n\nSpain to Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89. TITLE III \n\nMeasures to assist fruit and vegetable production \n\nArticle 15 \n\n1. Aid per hectare shall be granted to producers and producer groups and \n\norganizations which undertake a programme of initiatives, approved by \n\nthe competent authorities, with a view to the development and \n\ndiversification of production and/or the improvement of the quality of \n\nthe fruit, vegetables, flowers and live plants listed in Chapters 6, 7 \n\nand 8 of the combined nomenclature and of plants falling within CN code \n\n1211. The eligible initiatives shall seek in particular to develop production \n\nand product quality, particularly through varietal conversion and \n\ncultural improvements. These initiatives shall form an integral part of \n\nprogrammes conducted over at least three years. The aid shall be granted for programmes covering a minimum area of \n\n0. 3 ha. - 14 -\n\n2. The amount of Community aid shall be at most ECU 500/ha. This amount \n\nshall be paid where the Member State provides official financing of at \n\nleast ECU 300/ha and the contribution of the individual producer or \n\ngroup amounts to at least ECU 200/ha. If the contributions of the \n\nMember State and the producers are less than the amounts specified, the \n\nCommunity aid shall be reduced proportionately. The aid shall be paid each year of execution of the programme, for a \n\nperiod not exceeding three years. 3. The aid shall be increased by Ecu 100/ha where the programme of \n\ninitiatives is submitted and carried out by a producer group or \n\norganization and where, for its implementation, recourse to technical \n\nassistance is envisaged. The additional aid shall be granted in respect \n\nof programmes involving a minimum area of 2 ha. 4. This measure shall not apply to banana production pending the \n\nconclusions relating to the treatment of all the problems connected with \n\nsuch production, in accordance with point 9 of the Council's Decision on \n\nPoseican. This measure shall not apply to the production of tomatoes nor \n\nof potatoes for human consumption falling within CN codes 0701 90 51, \n\n0701 90 59 and 0701 90 90. 5. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 33 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1035/72(1>. Article 16 \n\n1. Community aid shall be granted for the conclusion of annual contracts \n\nconcerning the marketing of tropical products included in the products \n\nreferred to in Article 15 and harvested in the Canary Islands. This aid \n\nshall be paid up to a limit of a volume of trade of 10 000 tonnes per \n\nyear. (1) \n\nOJ No L 118 of 20. 5. 1972, p. 1. - 15 -\n\nThe contracts shall be concluded between individual producers or \n\nproducer groups or associations and natural or legal persons established \n\nin the rest of the Community. 2. The amount of the aid shall be 10% of the value of the production \n\nmarketed, free at destination. 3. The aid shall be granted to purchasers who undertake to market the \n\nCanaries products under the contracts referred to in paragraph 1. 4. Where the measures provided for in paragraph 1 are undertaken by Joint \n\nventures constituted, with the aim of marketing products harvested in \n\nthe Canaries, by producers or producer groups or associations in the \n\nIslands and natural or legal persons established in the rest of the \n\nCommunity, and where the partners undertake to pool the knowledge and \n\nknow-how required to achieve the objective of the Joint venture over a \n\nminimum period of three years, the amount of the aid specified in \n\nparagraph 2 shall be increased to 13% of the value of the annual \n\nproduction marketed Jointly. 5. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 33 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1035/72. Article 17 \n\n1. The Community shall contribute up to a maximum of ECU 100 000 towards \n\nthe financing of an economic analysis and forward study of the fruit and \n\nvegetable processing industry in the Canary Islands, with particular \n\nreference to tropical products. - 16 -\n\nThe study shall produce an economic and technical assessment of the \n\nsector. It shall pay particular attention to supply data and processing \n\ncosts and examine the conditions and scope for development and sales at \n\nregional and international level, having regard to competition on the \n\nworId market. 2. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid Idown In Article 22 of Council \nRegulation (EEc) No 426/86<1>. Article 18 \n\n1. A graphic symbol shall be introduced with a view to ensuring greater \n\nawareness and consumption of quality processed agricultural products \n\nspecific to the Canary Islands as remote regions. 2. The graphic symbol shall be chosen on the basis of an invitation to \n\ntender published by the Commission in the Official Journal of the \n\nEuropean Communities. 3. The conditions of utilization of the symbol shall be proposed by the \n\ntrade organizations. The competent authorities shall forward such \n\nproposals, with their opinion, to the Commission for approval. The utilization of the symbol shall be monitored by an official \n\nauthority or a body approved by the competent authorities. 4. The Community shall finance the production of the graphic symbol and its \n\npromotion. 5. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, as \n\nnecessary, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 33 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1035/72 or the corresponding Articles of other \n\nRegulations on the common organization of the markets. (1) \n\nOJ No L 49 of 27. 2. 1986, p. 1. - 17 -\n\nArticle 19 \n\nTitle III of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the \n\ncommon organization of the market in wine1 and Council Regulation (EEC) No \n\n1442/88 of 24 May 1988 on the granting, for the 1988/89 to 1995/96 wine \n\nyears, of permanent abandonment premiums in respect of winegrowing areas2 \n\nshall not apply to the Canary Islands. Article 20 \n\n1. A flat-rate aid per hectare shall be granted for the continued \n\ncultivation of vines for the production of quality wines psr in the \n\ntraditional production zones. Aid shall be paid in respect of areas: \n\n(a) planted to varieties included in the list of vine varieties \n\nsuitable for the production of each of the quality wines psr \n\nproduced and belonging to the recommended or authorized categories \n\nreferred to in Article 13 of Regulation (EEC) No 822/87; \n\n(b) and on which the yield per hectare is below a maximum limit fixed \n\nby the Member State, expressed in quantities of grapes, grape must \n\nor wine, subject to the conditions of Article 11 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 823/87 of 16 March 1987 laying down special \n\nprovisions relating to quality wines produced In specified \n\nregions1. 2. The aid shall amount to ECU 400 per hectare. From the beginning of the \n\n1997/98 marketing year, the aid shall be paid exclusively to producer \n\ngroups or organizations. 1 0J No L 84, 27. 3. 1987, p. 1. 2 0J No L 132, 28. 5. 1988, p. 3. 1 0J No L 84, 27. 3. 1987, p. 59. - 18 -\n\n3. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, as \n\nnecessary, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 83 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 822/87. Article 21 \n\n1. Aid per hectare shall be granted annually for the cultivation of \n\npotatoes for human consumption falling within codes 0701 90 51, \n\n0701 90 59 and 0701 90 90 of the combined nomenclature (CN). The aid shall be \">aid in respect of areas cultivated and harvested to to \n\na maximum of 12 000 hectares per year. 2. The amount of the annual aid shall be ECU 500/ha. 3. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 2358/71 of 26 October 1971 on the common \n\norganization of the market in seeds1. Article 22 \n\nDeliveries to the Canary Islands of potatoes for human consumption falling \n\nwithin codes 0701 90 51, 0701 90 59 and 0701 90 90 of the combined \n\nnomenclature (CN) shall be restricted during sensitive periods for the \n\nmarketing of Canaries production. This restriction shall be implemented on \n\na degressive basis for L period of ten marketing years. The Commission shall determine the period of application of the \n\nquantitative restrictions and the volume of deliveries pursuant to this \n\nArticle in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 21(3). 1 OJ No L 246, 5. 11. 1971, p. 1. - 19 -\n\nArticle 23 \n\nFrom the beginning of the 1992/93 marketing year, the aid to olive oil \n\nconsumption provided for in Article 11 of Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC \n\nof 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organization of the \n\nmarket in oils and fats2 applicable in the Community as constituted at 31 \n\nDecember 1985 shall be paid to undertakings in the Canary Islands packaging \n\nolive oil produced in the rest of the Community. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, as \n\nnecessary, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 38 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 136/66/EEC. Article 24 \n\nSpain is hereby authorized to grant a regional aid for the production of \n\ntobacco as a supplement to the aid introduced by Regulation (EEC) No \n\n727/70, on condition that the supplement cannot give rise to discrimination \n\nbetween producers. The maximum amount of the regional aid shall be equal to ti. o difference \n\nbetween the aid paid to the Canaries prior to the application of the above-\n\nmentioned Regulation and the Community premium. The regional aid shall be \n\ngranted within the limit of the quantity traditionally produced in the \n\nIslands. Article 25 \n\n1. Aid shall be granted for the production of quality honey specific to the \n\nCanary Islands, produced by the indigenous breed of \"black bees\". The aid shall be paid to associations of beekeepers recognized by the \n\ncompetent authorities on the basis of the number of hives of black bees \n\nin production, up to a maximum of 5 000 hives. 2 OJ No L 172, 30. 9. 1966, p. 3025. - 20 -\n\nThe amount of the aid is hereby fixed at ECU 20 per hive in production \n\nand per marketing year. For the purposes of this Regulation, the \n\nmarketing year shall commence on 1 July and end on 30 June. 2. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be drawn up, as \n\nnecessary, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common \n\norganization of the market in eggs1. Art icle 26 \n\nThe co-responsibility levy payable by cereal producers pursuant to \n\nArticle 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2727/75 of 29 October 1975 on the \n\ncommon organization of the market in cereals shall not apply to the Canary \n\nIslands. TITLE IV \n\nSPECIFIC PROVISIONS \n\nSi t'tie 1: Derogations applicable to structural aasures \n\nArticle 27 \n\n1. Notwithstanding Articles 5, 6, 7 and 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) No \n\n2328/91 of 15 July 1991 on improving the efficiency of agricultural \n\nstructures1, investment aid for agricultural holdings in the Canary \n\nIslands shall be gra. ced on the following conditions: \n\n1 0J No L 282, 1. 11. 1975, p. 49. 1 0J L 218, 6. 8. 1991, p. 1. - 21 -\n\n(a) notwithstanding Article 5(1)(a), the investment aid scheme provided \n\nfor in Articles 5 to 9 of the above-mentioned Regulation may be \n\napplied in the Canary Islands to farmers who, while they do not \n\npractise farming as their main occupation, derive at least 25% of \n\ntheir total income from farming carried out on the holding and \n\nwhose holding does not require more than the equivalent of one MWU, \n\nprovided that the envisaged investments do not exceed ECU 25 000; \n\n(b) the authorization concerning the keeping of simplified accounts \n\nprovided for in Article 5(1)(d) shall apply beyond 31 December \n\n1991; \n\n(c) pig production shall not be subject to the conditions laid down in \n\nArticle 6(4); \n\n(d) notwithstanding Article 6(5), the beef and veal sector shall not be \n\nsubject to the conditions laid down; \n\n(e) with regard to eggs and poultry production, the prohibition \n\nreferred to in Article 6(6) shall not apply to family farms in so \n\nfar as their size is in proportion to the need to ensure balanced \n\ndevelopment in the region and does not lead to increased production \n\nin the sector in question; \n\n(f) notwithstanding Article 7(1), expenditure relating to initial \n\npurchases of pigs may be eligible under the system of investment \n\naid referred to in Article 6(1) of the above-mentioned Regulation; \n\n(g) notwithstanding the fifth subparagraph of Article 7(2), the maximum \n\nvalue of the investment aid shall continue to be increased by 10% \n\nafter 31 December 1991; \n\n\f- 22 -\n\nThe measures mentioned in the first subparagraph under (c), (d), (e) and \n\n(f) shall apply only in so far as livestock production is undertaken in \n\na manner compatible with animal welfare and environmental protection \n\nrequirements and provided that production is for the domestic market of \n\nthe region. 2. Notwithstanding Article 17 of Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91, the \n\ncompensatory allowance referred to in Article 19 of that Regulation may \n\nbe granted in the Canary Islands for all crops, provided they are \n\ncultivated in a manner compatible with environmental protection \n\nrequirements and vibject to a maximum income per holding to be \n\ndetermined. In addition, cows whose milk is intended for the domestic market of the \n\nregion may be taken into consideration for the calculation of the \n\ncompensatory allowance in ail areas of the region specified in Article \n\n3(4) and (5) of Council Directive 75/268/EEC of 28 April 1975 on \n\nmountain and hill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas1, \n\nup to a maximum of 20 livestock units. 3. Notwit* landing the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2328/91, the compensatory allowance may be granted to farmers \n\nin the region with less than one hectare of utilizable agricultural \n\narea. 4. Notwithstanding Article 24 of (EEC) Regulation No 2328/91 the maximal \n\neligible amount of th ; premium per hectare referred to in Article 22 of \n\nthat Regulation s^ M be fixed at Ecu 600/ha. 5. Notwithstanding Article 37(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91, Spain is \n\nhereby authorized not to apply the schemes provided for in Titles I and \n\nII of that Regulation in the Canary Islands. 1 0J No L 128, 19. 5. 1975, p. 1. - 23 -\n\n6. The Commission, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 29 \n\nof Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88, \n\n(a) shall adopt the conditions for applying this Article; \n\n(c) may decide, on a reasoned request by the competent authorities, \n\n- to modify the investment ceiling referred to in Article 8(1) of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 2328/91, \n\n- notwithstanding Article 12(1) and the second indent of Article 13 \n\nof Regulation (EEC) No 866/90 and from the corresponding \n\nprovisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 867/90 on improving the \n\nprocessing and marketing conditions for forestry products1 to \n\nextend the coverage of these measures to essential imports from \n\nthird countries, provided that the products processed and/or \n\nmarketed are intended exclusively for the domestic market in the \n\nCanary Islands. Subtitle 2: Veterinary measures \n\nArticle 28 \n\n1. The following Article is hereby inserted in Directive 72/462/EEC: \n\n\"Article 31b \n\nWithout prejudice to Article 17 of Directive 90/675/EEC2, the \n\nCommission may, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article \n\n29, derogate until 31 December 1994 from certain provisions of Articles \n\n4 and 17 with regard to imports of meat into the Canary Islands. 1 0J No L 91, 6. 4. 1990, p. 7. 2 0J No L 373, 31. 12. 1990, p. 1. - 24 -\n\nWhen the decisions provided for in the preceding paragraph are taken, \n\nthe rules applicable after importation shall be laid down in accordance \n\nwith the same procedure. \" \n\n2. In Annex I of Council Directive 90/675/EEC, of 10. 12. 1990, laying down \n\nthe principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on \n\nproducts entering the Community from third countries, the point 4 is \n\nreplaced by the following text: \n\n\"4. The territory of Spain except Ceuta and Mel ilia. \" \n\nTITLE V \n\nGENERAL PROVISIONS \n\nArt icle 29 \n\nThe measures provided for in this Regulation, excluding Articles 24, 27 and \n\n28, shall constitute intervention designed to stabilize the agricultural \n\nmarkets with n *he meaning of Article 3(1) of Regulation (E. \") No 729/70. Article 30 \n\n1. The Commission shall submit to the Council and to Parliament an annual \n\nreport on the implementation of the measures provided for in this \n\nRegulation, accompanied where appropriate by proposals concerning any \n\nadjustment measures wi ich may prove necessary in order to achieve the \n\nobjectives of the ; \u00a9gramme. 2. At the end of the third year of application of the scheme the Commission \n\nshall submit to the Council and to Parliament a general report on the \n\neconomic situation of the Canary Islands showing the impact of the \n\nmeasures taken pursuant to this Regulation. In the light of the report's conclusions, the Commission shall submit, \n\nwhere sr this proves necessary, appropriate adjustments. - 25 -\n\nArticle 31 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1992. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in \n\nall Member States. For the CounciI \n\n\fCANARIES \n\nANNEX \n\nLIST OF PRODUCTS COVERED BY THE SPECIFIC SUPPLY ARRANGEMENTS PROVIDED FOR \nIN ARTICLE 3 \n\nDESCRIPTION OF THE PRODUCTS \n\nCN CODE \n\n- CEREALS. wheat. barley. oats. maize. meal and pellets. malt \n\n- HOPS \n\n- RICE \n\n- VEGETABLE OILS \n\n- SUGAR \n\n- CONCENTRATED FRUIT JUICE \n\n(raw mat. -i-*ls) \n\n- B E E F / V E ^^. fresh or chilled. frozen \n\n- PIGMEAT. frozen \n\n- POULTRYMEAT. frozen \n\n- DRIED EGGS \n\n(for the food industries) \n\n- TABLE WINES \n\n- SEED POTATOES \n\n1001 \n1003 \n1004 \n1005 \n1103 \n1107 \n\n1210 \n\n1006 \n\nex (1507 to 1516) \n\n1701 \n1702 \n\n2007 99 \n2008 \n\n0201 \n0202 \n\n0203 21, 22, 29 \n\n0207 21, 22, 41, 43, 50 \n\n0408 \n\nex 2204 \n\n0704 A0 00 \n\n\fDESCRIPTION OF THE PRODUCTS \n\nCN CODE \n\n- 2 -\n\n- MILK PRODUCTS. liquid milk. concentrated milk or powder. butter. cheese \n\n0401 \n0402 \n0405 \n0406 30 \n0406 90 23, 25, 27, 77, 79, \n81, 89. milk-based preparations \n\n- for children \n- without animal fats \n\n2106 90 91 \n1901 90 90 \n\nFOR THE 1992/93 to 1995/96 MARKETING YEARS \n\n- FRESH OR CHILLED PIGMKAT \n\n0203 11, 12, 19 \n\n- PROCESSED MEAT PRODUCTS \n\n1601 \n1602 \n\n27 \n\n\fFinancial S tatement \n\nDate : 0^. 0^. 1992 \n\n1. BUDGET HEADING : 183, 251, 381 \n\nAPPROPRIATIONS : \n\nECU 45, 21, 20 million \n\n2. TITLE : \n\nCouncil Regulation introducing specific measures in respect of certain agricultural products \nfor the benefit of the Canary Islands \n\n3. LEGAL BASIS : Article 43 of the Treaty \n\n4. AIMS \n\nImplementation in the agricultural sector of the Council Decision setting up Poseican \n\n5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\nPERIOD OF 12 MONTHS \n\n5. 0 EXPENDITURE \n\n- CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET \n\n(INTERVENTIONS) \n\nCURRENT FINANCIAL YEAR \n\n( 1992 ) \n\nFOLLOWING FINANCIAL YEAR \n\n( 1993 } \n\np. m. ECU 49,6 m i l l i on \n\n\u2022 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES \n\n- OTHER \n\n5. 1 REVENUE \n\n- OWN RESOURCES OF THE EC \n(LEVIES/CUSTOMS DUTIES) \n\n- NATIONAL \n\n5. 0. 1 ESTIMATED EXPENDITUPC \n5. 1. 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE \n\n5. 2 METHOD OF CALCULATi \n\np. m. p. m. 1994. 1995. 1996. 1997. ECU 48,8 m \n\np. m. ECU 47,3 m \n\np. m. ECU Zf,1 m \np. m. ECU 25,\u00a3j m \n\np. m. For detailed calculation for Canaries, see Annex. The double rate used is 1. 145 \n\n6. 0 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM At. ROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET ? \n\n6. 1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF THE CURRENT BUDGET ? \n\n6. 2 WILL A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET BE NECESSARY ? \n\n6. 3 WILL FUTURE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE NECESSARY ? \n\nYESXN* \n\nYES/46 \n\n\u00a5\u20ac\u00ab/NO \n\nYES/4W. COMMENTS : \nIn addition, a ve/y large part of expenditure on supplies, estimated at ECU 16*,4 \nmillion is substituted by expenditure on refunds in favour of Community products \nintended for the Canary Islands, currently borne by the EAGGF Guarantee Section. Similarly, budget revenue lost, estimated at ECU 108 million, corresponds to a large \nto the amount of levies not collected when the CAP did not apply in the \npart \n\n\f| \n\u2022Regulation I \u201e. P r o A Kt \n! Article \n\n\u201e. *. tJ I B u d a et ~\" \n\n1993 \n\nI 1994 I 1995 I 1996 I 1997 I 1998 I 1999 I \n\n|Typeofa,d ,. ^ \n\n\u201e \n\n, \n\n, \n\n, \n\n, \n\n, \n\n, \n\nI \n\n(ECU million (A)) \nTOTAL \n\nI \nI \n\nCANARIES - AGRICULTURAL SECTION: COST OF THE PROPOSAL \n\n2 *3 \n\nI \n> \n\n1 3 *5 \nI \n\n4 \n\nI \ni \n}\n'\n1 10 \n\nI Permanent \nI Supply \n\ni per tonne \nI \n\n1 Temporary \nI Supply \n\n1 per tonne \nI \n\nI \nI \n\n1 \n1 \n\n183 \n251 \n\n183 \n251 \n\nn \nII \n\nn \nII \n\n54. 0 \n88. 6 \n\n0. 0 \n14. 5 \n\n1 54. 0 \n88. 6 \nI \n\nI \nI \n\n0. 0 \n12. 8 \n\n1 Pure-bred \n1 animals \n\u2022\n\n\u2022\n\n1 Cattle \n\n1 per head \n' \ni \n\u2022\u2022 \n1 per head \n\n1 ' 251 \n\n11 \n\n3. 3 \n\n1 \n\n3. 3 \n\nI \n\n11 \n\n1 251 11 1. 3 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n1 54. 0 \n88. 6 \nI \n\n1 54,\u00a9 \n88. 6 \nI \n\n1 54. c \n88. 6 \nI \n\n1 54. 0 \n88. 6 \nI \n\n1 54. o \n88. 6 \nI \n\n1 &2. 0 \n620. 5 \nI \n\n1 \nI \n\nO. o \n11. 2 \n\n1 \n\n3. 3 \n\n1 \nI \n\n1 \n\nI \nI \n\n1 \n\n0. 0 \n9. 5 \n\n1 \n\n3. 3 \n\n0. 0 \n0. 0 \n\n1 \n\n3. 3 \n\n1 \nI \n\n1 \n\nO. o \u2022' \n0. 0 \n\n1 \n\n3. 3 \n\n1 \nI \n\n1 \n\n1 \nI \n\n1 \n\n0. 0 \n0. 0 \n\n1 \nI \n\n0. 0 \n47. 9 \n\n1 \nI \n\n1 \n\np. m. 1 20. 0 \n\nI \n\n1 \n\nl \n\nI \n\n1. 3 \u00ab-\u2022 1 - 1. 3 \n\n1 1. 3 \n\n1 1. 3 \n\n1 1. 3 \n\n1 1. 3 \n\n1 9. 2 I \n\n\u2022 11 \n\nI M ^k \n\n| per tonne \n\nI 251 II 2. 2 \n\nI 2. 2 \n\nI 2. 2 \n\nI 2. 2 \n\nI 2. 2 \n\nI 2. 2 \n\nI 2. 2 \n\nI 15. 4 I \n\n1 \n\n13 \n\n1 15 \n1 \n1* \n1 17 \n\n1 Sheep \n\n1 per head \n\n' \n\n251 \n\n11 1. 0 \n\n1 1. 5 \n\n1 1. 5 \n\n1 1. 3 \n\nI 1. 5 \n\n1 1. 5 \n\nI 1. 5 \n\n1 9. 8 I \n\n1. Fruit and \n1 vegetables \n1 \n\n\u2022 per ha \n183 \n' by value \n' fixed rate ' 183 \n\nI 183 11 7. 5 \n11 5. 4 \nn \u00b0-1 \n\nI \n\n1 8. 1 \n5. 5 \n1 \n0 ,\u00b0 \n! \n\nI 8. 6 \n\n1 1. 6 \n\n1 1. 0 \n\n1 0. 5 t 0. 0 \n\n1 27. 3 I \n\nI 5. 6 \n\nI 5. 7 \n\n' \u00b0*\u00b0 \n\n' \u00b0-\u00b0 \n\n1 5. 8 \n' \u00b0-\u00b0 \n\n1 5. 9 \n' \u00b0-\u00b0 \n\nI 6. 0 \n' \u00b0-\u00b0 \n\n1 39. 9 1 \n\u00b0'1 ' \n' \n\n1 18 \n\n1 logo \n\n> fixed rate ' 381 11 0. 3 \n\n1 0. 5 \n\n1 0. 5 \n\n1 0. 3 \n\n1 p. m. 1 \n\n1 \n\n1 1. 6 I \n\n1 20 \n\n1 wine \n\n1 per ho \n\nI 183 11 1. 0 \n\nI 1. 0 \n\n1 1. 0 \n\nI 1. 0 \n\n1 1. 0 \n\nI 1. 0 i 1. 0 \n\n1 6. 7 I \n\n1 21 \n\n(Potatoes \n\nI per ha \n\n1 183 11 6. 0 \n\n1 6. 0 \n\n1 6. 0 \n\n1 6. 0 \n\n1 6. 0 \n\n1 6. 0 \n\n1 6. 0 \n\n1 42. 0 1 \n\nI 23 \n\nI Olive Oil \n\nI per tonne \n\nI 187 II 0. 6 \n\nI 0. 3 \n\nI 0. 0 \n\nI 0. 0 \n\nI 0. 0 \n\nI 0. 0 \n\nI 0. 0 \n\nI 0. 9 I \n\nI \n\n25 \n\n1 Honey \n\n1 per hive \n\n1 \n\n251 \n\n11 \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n1 \n\no. i \n\n1 \n\n0. 8 \n\nI \n\n26 \n\n1 Cereals \n1 \nITOTAL \nI \n1. Plant prods. I \nI Animals \nI \nI Other \n\njtojrespcrsibi l i ty \nI \n, \nI \nI \n\nI \nt \nI \nI \n\ni83 \n\n183 \n251 \n381 \n\nITOTAL EXCLUDING Supply \n\u00ab \n1 \n\u2022 \n\n1 \nplant products! \nI \nanimals \nI \nOtter \n\n| \n1 \n\u2022 \nI \n\n183 \n251 \n381 \n\n11 \nII \n11 \nII \nII \n\nM \nII \nII \nII \n\n0. 0 \n186. 0 \n\n1 \nI \n7?. 9 1 \nI \nI \n\n107. 8 \n0. 3 \n\n0. 0 \n1o5-3 \nn. t \n106. 6 \n0. 5 \n\n1 \n' \nI \nI \nI \n\n0. 0 \n,83-9 \n\n7#. $ \n104. 9 \n0. 5 \n\n1 \nI \nI \nI \nI \n\n74. <5 1 \nI \n103. 3 \nI \n0. 3 \n\n1 \nI \n\\ \nijA \n93. 8 \nI \np. m. I \n\n0. 0 \n17$. 1 \n\n0. 0 \n1 \nI M^. % \n\n0. 0 \n16<U \n\n1 \n' \n\n0. 0 \n16^. ^- \n\n1 \n0. 0 \nI 1220. 3 \n\n10. -f 1 \nI \n93. 8 \n- I \n\n670 1 \nI \n93. 8 \n- I \n\n4$;$ \n\n$$. 4 \n4. 6 \n0. 3 \n\n1 \nI \nI \nI \n\n(,1. 6 \n\n3?. 0 \n5. 1 \n0. 5 \n\nI \nI \nI \nI \n\n41. 3 \n\n%$. l \n5. 1 \n0. 5 \n\nl 3?. 5 \nI \nI \nI \n\n27/\\ \n5. 1 \n0. 3 \n\nI \n1 \nI \nI \n\n22. 2 \n\nI \n17. 1 1 \n5. 1 \nI \np. m. I \n\n21. 8 \n\nI \n16. 7 1 \nI \n5. 1 \n- I \n\n13. 0 1 \nI \n5. 1 \n\n-I \n\n18. 1 \n\nI t*\\. 1 \n\n1 \nI \nI \n5\\t,H \n703. 7 I \n1. 6 I \n\nI \n12<U\u00ab 1 \n35. 3 I \n1. 8 I \n\n\fC A N A R I ES \n\n0 ^ - 0 ^ - 1 9 92 \n\nI. LOSS OF LEVIES \n\nThe figures are indicative and based on the quantities currently \n\n*\" imported from third countries. They will have to be reviewed annually \nin accordance with Articles 2 and 3. The loss, of levies is calculated \non the basis of the levy or customs duty currently charged. In the case of permanent supply, the loss of levies will amount to \nECU 83 million (A) (see Annex), plus about ECU 40 million (A) in lost \ncustoms duties on 20 000 tonnes of tobacco. In the case of temporary \nsupply (bovine animals for fattening), the loss will amount to \nECU 1. 9 million (A) in the first year, and will cease to apply ia five \nyears, as shown below. II. SUPPLY AID \n\nThe figures are indicative and based on the quantities currently \nimported from the Community. They will have to be reviewed annually \nin accordance with Articles 2 and 3. The amount of the aid is \ncalculated on the basis of the refund currently in force. PERMANENT SUPPLY \n\nThe figures in Annex I show that supply aid amounts to ECU 14i million \n(A). TEMPORARY SUPPLY \n\n!\u2022 Bovine animals for fattening (Article 5) \n\nFrom the EEC \n\nFrom third countries \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n150 kg \n\nOuont i ty \nAid \nCost \n\n(Tonnes) \n\n(ECU/t) \n\n3. 700 \n144 \n0. 53 \n\n2. 800 \n144 \n0. 40 \n\n1. 900 \n144 \n0. 27 \n\n1. 000 \n144 \n0. 14 \n\n250 kg \n\nOuontIty \nAid \nCost \n\n(Tonnes) \n(ECU/t) \n\n3. 700 \n240 \n0. 89 \n\n2. 800 \n240 \n0. 87 \n\n1. 900 \n240 \n0. 46 \n\n1. 000 \n240 \n0. 24 \n\nT O T AL COST \nin ECU million (A) \n\n1. 4 \n\n1. 1 \n\n0. 7 \n\n0. 4 \n\n150 kg \n\nOuont i ty \nLevy \nLost levies \n\n(Tonnes) \n(ECU/t) \n\n2. 500 \n200 \n0. 50 \n\n1. 900 \n200 \n0. 38 \n\n1. 300 \n200 \n0. 26 \n\n700 \n200 \n0. 14 \n\n250 kg \n\nOuontIty \nLevy \nLost levies \n\n(Tonnes) \n(ECU/t) \n\nT O T AL LOST LEVIES \nIn ECU million (A) \n\n4. 300 \n330 \n1. 42 \n1. 9 \n\n3. 200 \n330 \n1. 08 \n\n2. 100 \n330 \n0. 69 \n\n1. 000 \n330 \n0. 33 \n\n1. 4 \n\n1. 0 \n\n0. 5 \n\n1* \n\n\f- 2 -\n\n2. Chllled Dlomeat \n\n(From the EEC) \n\n10% r\u00e9duction in initial quantIty each year \n\n\u2022 \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\nQuantity (T) \nAid \n\n(ECU/T) \n\n3. 000 \n300 \n\n2. 700 \n300 \n\n2. 400 \n300 \n\nCoat (ECU m (A)) \n\n0,9 \n\n0,8 \n\n0,7 \n\n2. 100 \n300 \n\n0,6 \n\n3. Procetaed, roejt protfUCtB \n\n(frcai the EEC) \n\n10% r\u00e9duction in i n i t i al quantity each year \n\nProduct \n\nCCT code \n\nQuantity \n(T) \n\nAid \n(ECU/T) \n\nCoat \n(ECU m (A)) \n\nPrep meat* proda. Liver \nPoultry ; \nH\\m \nPork shoulder \nOther: Pork \n\nBeef/veal \n\n16. 01. 00 \n16. 02. 20 \n16. 02. 31 \n16. 02. 41 \n16. 02. 42 \n16. 02. 49 \n16. 02. 50 \n\nT O T AL \n\n14. 500 \n1. 900 \n600 \n3. 000 \n1. 800 \n1. 700 \n2. 500 \n\n26. 000 \n\n350 \n300 \n0 \n570 \n510 \n670 \n1. 160 \n\n5,08 \n0,57 \n\n-\n1. 71 \n0,92 \n0,97 \n2,90 \n\n12. 2 \n\n4. ffUMUrY 9f gott Pf tfBPOriTV 8UBBIV l i ti \n\n(frem EEC) \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\nitee \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\nBovine animals for fattening 1,42 \n\n1,07 \n\n0,73 \n\n0,38 \n\nChi 1 led plgmeat \n\n0,90 \n\n0,81 \n\n0,72 \n\n0,63 \n\nProcessed meat products \n\n12,15 \n\n10,93 \n\n9,71 \n\n8,49 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\nT O T AL (ECU m (A)) \n\n14,5 \n\n12,8 \n\n11. 2 \n\n9,6 \n\n-\n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n-\n\ny \n\n\f- 3 -\n\nSupply of breeding animals \n(from the EEC) \n\n(Article 4) \n\nType \n\nNumber/year \n\nAmount \n(ECU/head) \n\ncoat \n(ECU (A)) \n\nBovine animals \nMale swine \nFemale swine \nMale rabbits \nFemale rabbits \nChicks \nEggs for hatching \n\nT O T AL \n\n4. 300 \n160 \n2. 200 \n1. 600 \n10. 000 \n525. 000 \n525. 000 \n\n1. 300 \n410 \n380 \n\n0,50 \n0,35 \n0,05 \n\n5. 590. 000 \n65. 600 \n836. 000 \n800 \n3. 500 \n131. 250 \n26. 250 \n\n6. 653. 400 \n\nThe EEC wiI I bear 50% of the cost, i. e. ECU 3. 3 mi I I ion (A). Tobacco (Article 6) \n\nExemption from customs duties on 20,000 tonnes \n20. 000 t x ECU 5l6/t - ECU 10. 3 million (A) \n\nAbolitlor requires a token entry under revenue and expei 'iture \n\nIII. PRODUCT AID \n\nBovine animals \n\n(Article 10) \n\nFattening aid \n25. 000 head x ECU 40/head - ECU 1. 0 mi II ion (A) \n\nSuckler cow aid \n\n8. 000 head x EC 40/head - ECU 0. 3 million (A) \n\nMilk products (Article 11) \n\nConsumption aid for milk \n44. 000 tonnes x ECU 50/t \n\nECU 2. 2 mi I I ion (A) \n\nSheep and goats (Article 13) \n\nSupplement to ewe premium \n\nCoIculot Ion of supplement \n\nSupplenient \u2022\u00bb \nheavy ewe premium - \n- 21. 974 - 15. 382 + ( 5. 5 x 30 X) - ECU 8 242/hood \n\nlight ewe premium + supplement \"rural society\" premium \n\n\f- 4 -\n\nAnnuoI cost \n\n- 178. 000 heod x ECU 8. 242/hood - ECU 1. 5 million (A) \n\nOnly the second half of the 1992 marketing year is concerned \nTherefore, expenditure for the 1993 budget year will be: \n1,5 x 50 % - ECU 0. 7 million (A). Fruit and vegetables \n\n1. Programme of Initiatives (Article 15) \n\n(see Annex) \n\nECU mill ion (A) \n\nExpenditure \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1st instalment \n2nd instalment \n3rd instalment \n4th instalment \n\n7,5 \n\n7,5 \n0,6 \n\n7. 5 \n0. 6 \n0. 5 \n\n0. 6 \n0. 5 \n0,5 \n\n0,5 \n0,5 \n\n0,5 \n\nT O T AL \n\n7,5 \n\n8,1 \n\n8. 6 \n\n1,6 \n\n1,0 \n\n0,5 \n\n2. Marketing - annual contract (Article 16) \n\n(see Annex) \n\n:CU mil I \nE \n\non (A) \n\nExpenditure \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1999 \n\n5. 4 \n\n5. 5 \n\n5. 6 \n\n5. 7 \n\n5,8 \n\n5,9 \n\n6,0 \n\n3. Processed fruit and vegetables (Article 17) \n\nStudy: ECU 100. 000 (A) in 1993 \n\nGraphic symbol \n\n(Article 18) \n\nExpenditure \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n0,3 \n\n0,5 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 3 \n\np. m. Ecu mi 11 Ion 'A) \n\n(Article 20) \n\nAid par hectare \n\n2. 400 ha x ECU 400/ha \n\nECU 1. 0 mil I Ion (A) \n\n?5 \n\n\fPotatoes (Article 21) \n\nAid per hectare \n\n- 5 -\n\n12 000 ha x ECU 500/ha = ECU 6. 0 million (A) \n\nOlive oil (Article 23) \n\nCompensation for consumption aid \n1993: 10 000 t x ECU (539-477)/t = ECU 0. 6 million (A) \n1994: 10 000 t x ECU (539-508)/t - ECU 0. 3 million (A) \n\nHoney (Article 25) \n\nAid per hive \n5 000 hives x ECU 20/hive - ECU 0. 1 million (A) \n\nCereals (Article 26) \n\nExemption from co-responsibility levy. For the 1992/93 marketing year, the co-responsibility levy (basic and \nadditional) amounts to ECU 4. 9/t. 4 500 t x ECU 4. 9/t x 2 \u00bb ECU 44 100 (A). 3-\n\n\fS U P P LY \n\nTO \n\nT HE \n\nC A N A RY \n\nI S L A N OS \n\nA N N E X \n\nF \n\nram the EEC \n\nOrig \n\nine PAYS TIERS \n\nP R O D U CT \n\nQuant Ity \n\n(tonnes) \n\nAid \n\n(- refunds) \n(ECU(A)/t) \n\nCost \n\nQuantity \n\nLevy \n\n(ECU \u00ab (A)) \n\n(tonnes) \n\n(ECU(A)/t) \n\nLost \nlevies \n(ECU m (A)) \n\nCereals. /. Wheat \nBarley \nOats \nMoize \nDurum wheat meal \nCommon wheat meal \nMeal of other \ncereals \nPellets \nMalt \n\nRice \n\nSuaar \n\n105. 000 \n9. 000 \n1. 000 \n35. 000 \n4. 300 \n30. 000 \n\n1. 200 \n1. 500 \n12. 500 \n\n105 \n105 \n105 \n105 \n167 x 1. 5 \n105 x 1. 5 \n\n105 x 1. 5 \n105 x 1. 02 \n104 x 1. 33 \n\n11. 03 \n0. 94 \n0. 11 \n3. 68 \n1. 08 \n4. 73 \n\n0. 19 \n0. 16 \n1. 73 \n\n17. 000 \n\n145. 000 \n\n4. 000 \n\n145 \n135 \n135 \n130 \n195 x 1. 5 \n130 x 1. 5 \n\n135 x 1. 5 \n133 x 1. 02 \n135 x 1. 33 \n\n12. 000 \n\n275 \n\n3. 30 \n\n2. 000 \n\n370 \n\n59. 000 \n\n425 \n\n25. 08 \n\n1. 000 \n\n425 \n\nHops (cones) \n\nci; \n\n400 \n\n(t) \n\n100 \n\n(D \n\n2. 47 \n\n18. 85 \n\n0. 72 \n\n0. 74 \n\n0. 43 \n\n\u2014 \n\n6. 41 \n2. 53 \n\nMilk products \n\nLiquid milk \nPowdered mi Ik \nButter \nCheese \nMi ik preparations \nwithout animal fat \nMilk preparations \nfor chiIdren \n\nBeef/veal \n\n65. 000 \n16. 000 \n3. 500 \n12. 000 \n12. 000 \n\n154 \n1. 120 \n1. 760 \n1. 108 \n700 \n\n700 \n\n700 \n\n10. 01 \n17. 92 \n6. 16 \n13. 30 \n8. 40 \n\n0. 49 \n\n3. 000 \n1. 000 \n\n2. 135 \n2. 530 \n1. 880 \n1. 760 \n\n100 \n\n1. 760 \n\n0. 18 \n\nFresh or chi1 led \nFrozen \n\n7. 000 \n13. 000 \n\n1. 800 \n1. 100 \n\n12. 60 \n14. 30 \n\n2. 000 \n14. 000 \n\n2. 500 \n1. 800 \n\n5. 00 \n25. 20 \n\nPiameat \n\nFrozen \n\nPoultrymeot \n\nFrozen \n\nEaas \n\n4. 000 \n\n300 \n\n1. 20 \n\n15. 000 \n\n650 \n\n9,75 \n\n12. 000 \n\n325 \n\n3. 90 \n\n18. 000 \n\n600 \n\n10. 80 \n\nDrisd eggs \n\n400 \n\n900 \n\n0. 36 \n\nVsastabls oil \n\n23. 000 \n\n33. 5 \n\n0. 77 \n\n10. 000 \n\n33. 5 \n\n0. 34 \n\nFruit iuics \n\nPuree CN 20-07-99 \nOther CN 20-08 \n\n1. 200 \n10. 000 \n\nSo. oooM \n\nTable wine \n\nT O T AL \n\n(1) Data not available \n\n18 \n\n20 \n\n12 \n142. 6 \n\n100 \n4. 000 \n\n-\n\n^8 \n\n-\n\n_ \n\n83. 4 \n\nl< \n\n\fCANARY ISLANDS: PLANT PRODUCT SECTION (FRUIT & VEGETABLE, FLORICULTURE) \n\n1) PROGRAM* OF INITIATIVES \n\nProduct \n\n| \nCURRENT \nAREA \n| \n(1991) (ha) 1 \n\nESTIMATED \nAREA-\n\n(ho) \n\n1 MAXIMUM \n1 \n1 \n\nAID \n(ECU/ha) \n\n, INITIAL \nI COST \nI (ECU m) \n\nESTIMATED \n1 COST - | \n'(ECUm) \n\n(D l \n\n(2) \n\n1 \n\n(3) \n\n1 \n\n(4)-(3) \n\n1 \n\n(5)-(3)l \n\ni \n| \ni \n\nAVOCADO \nMANGO \nPAPAYA \nOTHER TROPICAL \nCITRUS FRUIT \ni \nOTHER FRUIT \n| \n1 \nVEGETABLES \nORNAMENTAL PLANTS' 1 \n1 \nEXOTIC FLOWERS \n\n901 \n105 \n81 \n75 \n2015 \n5659 \n5470 \n176 \n462 \n\n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n! \nI \nI \n1 \n1 \n\n1100 \n500 \n300 \n600 \n2889 \n6597 \n5470 \n200 \n500 \n\n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n1 \n-500 \n1 ' 500 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n\n1 0. 451 \n0. 053 \n! \n1 0. 041 \n1 0. 038 \n1 \n1. 008 \n1 2. 830 \n1 2. 735 \n1 0. 088 \n1 0. 231 \n\nI 0. 550 1 \n1 0. 250 1 \n1 0. 150 1 \nI 0. 300 1 \nI 1. 445 1 \n1 3. 299 ! \n1 2. 735 1 \n1 0. 100 I \n! 0. 250 1 \n\nTOTAL \n\n1 \n\n14944 \n\nI \n\n18156 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n7. 47 \n\n1 \n\n9. 08 1 \n\na) ANNUAL CONTRACTS \n\n| \n1 \n1 \n1 \nI \n, \n\nAVOCADO \nMANGO \nPAPAYA \nOTHER TROPICAL \nSEEDED FRUITS \nCITRUS FRUIT \nVEGETABLES. ORNAMENTAL PLANTS 1) \nI) \nEXOTIC FLOWERS \n\nCURRENT \nQUANTITY \n(1990) (T) \n\nESTIMATED \nQUANTITY \n(T) \n\nl SELLING PRICE \n(ECU/T) \n1 \n\n, INITIAL \n1 COST \n! (ECU/t) \n\nESTIMATED , \nCOST \n, \n(ECU m) \n\n(0 \n\n(2) \n\n2950 \n20 \n100 \n100 \n\nI \n\n3000 \n100 \n1000 \n125 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n! \n1 \n1 \n\n700 \n1710 \n890 \n1570 \n\n4100 \n\n4500 \n\n1 \n\n9500 \n\n(3) \n\n1 \n\n(4)-(3) \n\n(5)-(3)1 \n\n2. 065 \n! \n! \n0. 034 \n1 0. 089 \n1 0. 157 \n! \n0. 000 \n1 0. 000 \n1 0. 000 \n1 38. 950 \nI 0. 000 \n\n2. 100 ! \n0. 171 1 \n0. 890 ! \n0. 196 1 \n0. 000 1 \n0. 000 1 \n0. 000 1 \n42. 750 1 \n0. 000 1 \n\nTOTAL \n\n1 \n\n7270 \n\n8725 \n\n1 \n\n1 41. 30 \n\n46. 11 ! \n\nThe EAGGF contribution is 13X of the commercial value. Community assistance amounts to ECU 5. 4 m i l l i on in the f i r st year and w i ll reach \nECU 6. 0 m i l l i on in the f i n al year. ISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 144 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-158-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43011-7 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nLr2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a7472905-9ef6-4563-bebd-fa35c37788d0", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the supervision and placing on the market of explosives for civil uses and the mutual recognition of authorizations and approvals relating to such explosives", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-13", "subjects": "explosive,free movement of goods,harmonisation of standards,preparation for market,safety standard,transport of dangerous goods", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0123,comnat:COM_1992_0123_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_121_R_0019_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["explosive", "free movement of goods", "harmonisation of standards", "preparation for market", "safety standard", "transport of dangerous goods"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a7472905-9ef6-4563-bebd-fa35c37788d0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a66b6e00-913b-4043-84b5-9a3781569b3a", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 930/92 of 13 April 1992 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 1738/89 laying down detailed rules on production aid for durum wheat", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-13", "subjects": "Italy,durum wheat,production aid,regional aid", "workIds": "celex:31992R0930,oj:JOL_1992_100_R_0021_014", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "durum wheat", "production aid", "regional aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a66b6e00-913b-4043-84b5-9a3781569b3a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d93837d4-4434-480a-8caf-14e0b36dff66", "title": "92/263/EEC: Commission Decision of 13 April 1992 approving an amendment to the varietal conversion programme for hops submitted by the United Kingdom pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2997/87 (Only the English text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-13", "subjects": "United Kingdom,plant breeding,producer organisation,production aid", "workIds": "celex:31992D0263,oj:JOL_1992_135_R_0009_015", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "plant breeding", "producer organisation", "production aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d93837d4-4434-480a-8caf-14e0b36dff66", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a116e932-1c8f-4ef7-af15-f553d4ee0f52", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 1637/91 fixing compensation with regard to the reduction of the reference quantities referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 and compensation for the definitive discontinuation of milk production", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-13", "subjects": "agricultural quota,dairy production,indemnification,redirection of production", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0151,comnat:COM_1992_0151_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural quota", "dairy production", "indemnification", "redirection of production"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a116e932-1c8f-4ef7-af15-f553d4ee0f52", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 151 final \n\nBrussels, 13 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 1637/91 fixing compensation with regard \nto the reduction of the reference quantities referred to in \nArticle 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 and compensation \nfor the definitive discontinuation of milk production \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\npf:J&i\u00abS \n\nrase*'-; V^Jy-'\" !'i-: \n\nIP \n\nifc-\n\ni ll \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 1637/91 Introduces In particular a Community scheme \n\nto fund the definitive discontinuation of milk production In order both to make \n\nit easier to reduce quantities of milk marketed in line with the 2% reduction in \n\nthe total quantities decided for 1991/92 and to mobilize the quantities needed \n\nfor the allocation of the SLOM II quotas. Council Regulation (EEC) No 1637/91 \n\nthus allocates total funding allowing 3% of national total quantities to be freed \n\nthanks to compensation of ECU 10/100 kg per year while granting each Member State \n\nsubstantial latitude in using the funds. It also provides that the target reduction/mobilization of reference quantities \n\nmay be achieved through compensation of less than ECU 10/100 kg or, where the \n\ntotal funds are not exhausted either because the Member State has decided not to \n\nimplement the programme or because the programme has not met with the success \n\nanticipated, that the amounts available are allocated to producers whose \n\nreference quantities have been reduced and remain so, in the form of compensation \n\nof ECU 10/100 kg per year. However, in certain Member States the target reduction/mobilization has been \n\nattained and even exceeded with compensation of less than ECU 10/100 kg without \n\nthe Community funds being exhausted. This proposal for a Regulation covers this \n\neventuality, which was not anticipated, and proposes that the Member States be \n\nauthorized in that event to continue the scheme for an additional six-month \n\nper iod. In addition, in view of the regional development needs in certain Member States \n\nand with a view to safeguarding structural adjustments and developments \n\naccomplished, this proposal grants the Member States the possibility of offering \n\nproducers who have not been able to resume milk production at 1 April 1992 to \n\napply within a short space of time for the compensation for the definitive \n\ndiscontinuation of milk production up to the financial ceiling allocated to those \n\nStates. Proposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\n/92 \n\nOf \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 1637/91 fixing compensation with regard \nto the reduction of the reference quantities referred to in \nArticle 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 and compensation \nfor the definitive discontinuation of milk production \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common \norganization of the market In milk and milk products*1), as last amended by \nRegulation (EEC) No 816/92*2>, and in particular Article 5c(6) thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission*3^, \n\nWhereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 1637/91*4) Introduces In particular a \n\nCommunity scheme to finance the definitive discontinuation of milk production in \n\nrespect of up to 3% of the guaranteed total quantities, deliveries and direct \n\nsales, and provides, where certain eligibility requirements are met, for \n\ncompensation to be paid after the definitive discontinuation of all milk \n\nproduction not later than 31 March 1992; whereas that Regulation provides that \n\nthe target reduction set by the Member State may be met by means of compensation \n\nof less than ECU 10 per 100 kg and per year; \n\nWhereas the target reduction has been reached, and even exceeded, In certain \n\nMember States by means of compensation of less than ECU 10 per 100 kg and per \n\nyear without the available Community funds being exhausted; whereas, this being \n\nthe case and so that the necessary structural adjustments can be continued, the \n\nMember States should be authorized to continue the scheme for the definitive \n\ndiscontinuation of milk production for a further six-month period; \n\n(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13. (2) OJ No L 86, 1. 4. 1992, p. 83. (3) OJ No C \n(4) 0J No L 150, 15. 6. 1991, p. 30. _ 2 -\n\ny \n\nWhereas In addition, In view of the extension of the additional levy arrangements \n\nand of regional development needs in certain Member States, in order to safeguard \n\nthe structural adjustments and developments the Member States should be granted \n\nthe possibility of offering producers who have not resumed milk production at \n\n1 April 1992 the chance of applying for compensation, within the limits laid down \n\nIn the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 1637/91, for the definitive discontinuation \n\nof milk production provided for In Article 2 of that Regulation; whereas \n\nparagraph 5 of that Article should therefore be amended accordingly without, \n\nhowever, the consequences of these new provisions being Imposed on producers who \n\nelect to receive the compensation as originally provided for, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe following subparagraphs are hereby added to Article 2(5) of Regulation (EEC) \n\nNO 1637/91: \n\n\"However, without prejudice to the first subparagraph, Member States may use the \n\namounts available to continue the scheme referred to in paragraph 1 until \n\n30 September 1992 at the latest. In that case, Member States shall forward to \n\nthe Commission the Information provided for in Article 4 before 31 December 1992. In addition, the Member States may offer producers who have not resumed milk \n\nproduction at 1 April 1992 the chance of submitting applications before \n\n1 June 1992 In accordance with this Article. The quantities thus freed shall be \n\nre-allocated in accordance with paragraph 4 unless the producers concerned elect \n\nto receive the compensation as originally provided for in the first subparagraph. In that case, the Member States shall include the additional information to be \n\nforwarded In accordance with Article 4 before 31 December 1992. \" \n\n\f3 -\n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication \n\nin the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in Its entirety and directly applicable in all \n\nMember States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\n\f\u00a3 \n\nF I N A N C I AL S T A T E M E NT \n\nDATT. 1. BUDGET HEADING: Article 206 \n\nAPPROPRIATIONS: ECU 871 ml 11 Ion \n\n2. TITLE: \n\nProposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EEC) ND 1637/91 fixing compensation with regard \nto the reduction of the reference quantities referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) ND 804/68 and \ncompensation for the definitive discontinuation of milk production. 3. LEGAL BASIS: Article 5c(6) of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 \n\n4. AIMS OF PROJECT: \n\nTo extend possibilities for qualifying under the definitive discontinuation arrangements within the \nceiling laid down. Period of 12 months \n\nECU ml 11 ion \n\nCurrent Financial Year \n1992 \nECU ml 11 Ion \n\nFollowing Financial Year \n1993 \n\nECU ml 11 Ion \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\n5. 0 EXPENDITURE \n\n- CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET \n- (REFUNDS/INTERVENTION) \n- NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION \n- OTHER \n\n5. 1 REVENUE \n\n- OWN RESOURCES OF THE EC \n(LEVIES/CUSTOMS DUTIES) \n\n- NATIONAL \n\n5. 0. 1 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE \n5. 1. 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE \n\n5. 2 METHOD OF CALCULATION: \n\n6. 0 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM APPROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n6. 1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n6. 2 IS A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET NECESSARY? \n\n6. 3 WILL FUTURE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE NECESSARY? \n\nYES \n\nYES/ND \n\nYES/ND \n\nND \n\nOBSERVATIONS: \nSince the measure extends the possibi I ities for qual ifying under the definitive discontinuation arrangements \nwithin the eel Iing laid down there is no additional expenditure over the budget. ISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 151 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-170-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43335-3 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cf2c4dcd-c8b3-418a-ae33-86c062896271", "title": "92/238/EEC: Commission Decision of 13 April 1992 calling upon the Kingdom of the Netherlands to postpone the adoption of a draft Regulation in respect of the labelling of emulsified fats (Only the Dutch text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-13", "subjects": "Netherlands,fats,labelling,marketing standard", "workIds": "celex:31992D0238,oj:JOL_1992_121_R_0048_040", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Netherlands", "fats", "labelling", "marketing standard"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cf2c4dcd-c8b3-418a-ae33-86c062896271", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/312c45f4-f266-426f-8d8d-47a685a449fb", "title": "NOTICE - COMMON POSITION ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COOPERATION PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 149 (2) OF THE EEC TREATY: Proposal for a Council Directive widening the scope of Directives 65/65/EEC and 75/319/EEC on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to proprietary medicinal products and laying down additional provisions on homeopathic medicinal products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#position_council,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-11", "subjects": "alternative medicine,approximation of laws,homeopathic product,labelling,marketing standard,medicinal product", "workIds": "celex:51992AG0411(02),oj:JOC_1992_092_R_0001_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["alternative medicine", "approximation of laws", "homeopathic product", "labelling", "marketing standard", "medicinal product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/312c45f4-f266-426f-8d8d-47a685a449fb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2f274573-9974-4913-89da-fad17033c8df", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Directive amending Council Directive 90/426/EEC on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "animal disease,animal plague,epidemiology,equidae,exchange of information,health control,health legislation,infectious disease,vaccination,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0103(01)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["animal disease", "animal plague", "epidemiology", "equidae", "exchange of information", "health control", "health legislation", "infectious disease", "vaccination", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2f274573-9974-4913-89da-fad17033c8df", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f4b94d58-d966-4f21-9ccb-15db117ffa43", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EEC) No. 827/68 on the common organization of the market in certain products listed in Annex II to the Treaty", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "agricultural market,agricultural product,agricultural product nomenclature,agricultural production,common organisation of markets,cork,free movement of goods,honey", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0102", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural market", "agricultural product", "agricultural product nomenclature", "agricultural production", "common organisation of markets", "cork", "free movement of goods", "honey"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f4b94d58-d966-4f21-9ccb-15db117ffa43", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ec13ca90-beec-4d10-8605-a2abfc60f6f5", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 921/92 of 10 April 1992 adjusting certain rates of aid fixed in advance for sunflower seed in the wake of the suspension of the Spanish customs duty on sunflower seed imported from third countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "Spain,import,sunflower,suspension of customs duties,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992R0921,oj:JOL_1992_098_R_0016_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "import", "sunflower", "suspension of customs duties", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ec13ca90-beec-4d10-8605-a2abfc60f6f5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/eaa707ee-bdc1-4830-b5d6-30afde1b18c1", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation opening for 1992, as an autonomous measure, a special import tariff quota for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal falling within CN codes 0201 and 0202 and for products falling within CN codes 0206 10 95 and 0206 29 91", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on External Economic Relations,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "CCT duties,beef,fresh meat,frozen product,import (EU),refrigerated product,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0104", "eurovoc_concepts": ["CCT duties", "beef", "fresh meat", "frozen product", "import (EU)", "refrigerated product", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/eaa707ee-bdc1-4830-b5d6-30afde1b18c1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e9cbe13e-a8e3-484d-aa1d-3ddf5a07bbb5", "title": "RESOLUTION on economic and trade relations between the EC and ASEAN", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on External Economic Relations,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "ASEAN,EU investment,International Labour Organisation,Malaysia,Singapore,child labour,cooperation agreement,deforestation,development aid,drug traffic,economic cooperation,environmental protection,generalised preferences,human rights,intellectual property,political cooperation,tertiary sector,trade cooperation,trade restriction,trading operation", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0119", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ASEAN", "EU investment", "International Labour Organisation", "Malaysia", "Singapore", "child labour", "cooperation agreement", "deforestation", "development aid", "drug traffic", "economic cooperation", "environmental protection", "generalised preferences", "human rights", "intellectual property", "political cooperation", "tertiary sector", "trade cooperation", "trade restriction", "trading operation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e9cbe13e-a8e3-484d-aa1d-3ddf5a07bbb5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c8d788c-7984-4fc0-8c9b-7f3822f0550d", "title": "RESOLUTION on a Community initiative for regions heavily dependent on the textiles and clothing sector (RETEX)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Regional Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "EU aid,Greece,Ireland,Portugal,Spain,aid programme,modernisation of industry,regional development,textile industry", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0110", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Greece", "Ireland", "Portugal", "Spain", "aid programme", "modernisation of industry", "regional development", "textile industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c8d788c-7984-4fc0-8c9b-7f3822f0550d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6c3d8e53-16d0-40bf-bf83-6a2340f2be66", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1360/78 on producer groups and associations thereof", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "EAGGF Guidance Section,EU aid,agricultural production,co-financing,producer organisation,production aid", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0101", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF Guidance Section", "EU aid", "agricultural production", "co-financing", "producer organisation", "production aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6c3d8e53-16d0-40bf-bf83-6a2340f2be66", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c157c39d-e254-4d74-9d0a-0b2949f68afc", "title": "92/260/EEC: Commission Decision of 10 April 1992 on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for temporary admission of registered horses", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "equidae,health certificate,health control,temporary admission", "workIds": "celex:31992D0260,oj:JOL_1992_130_R_0067_034", "eurovoc_concepts": ["equidae", "health certificate", "health control", "temporary admission"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c157c39d-e254-4d74-9d0a-0b2949f68afc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ea974179-d0a1-4283-80c3-be5a9b60affe", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) on the system of minimum import prices for certain soft fruits originating in Hungary, Poland and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "Hungary,Poland,import price,minimum price,soft fruit", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0139,comnat:COM_1992_0139_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Hungary", "Poland", "import price", "minimum price", "soft fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ea974179-d0a1-4283-80c3-be5a9b60affe", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(90) 139 final \n\nBrussels, 10 April 1990 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\non the system of minimum import prices for certain soft fruit \n\nor \n\niginating in Hungary, Poland and the Czech and Slovak Federal Re Republic \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nSubject: Proposal for a Council Regulation on the system of minimum import \n\nprices for certain soft fruits originating in Hungary, Poland and the \nCzech and Slovak Federal Republic. The Association Agreements between the European Economic Community and Poland, \nHungary and CSFR provide for the fixing of minimum import prices for certain soft \nfruits qualifying for a reduced tariff on import into the Community. The aim of this draft Regulation is to lay down general rules for the system of \nminimum import prices, and in particular the criteria for fixing the latter and \nthe provisions applying where those prices are not met. Proposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\nOf \n\non the system of minimum import prices for certain soft fruits \noriginating in Hungary, Poland and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in \n\nparticular Article 113 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas the Association Agreements between the European Economic Community, of \n\nthe one part, and the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Poland and the Czech \n\nand Slovak Federal Republic (CSFR), of the other hand, were signed on \n\n16 December 1991; whereas, pending the entry into force of those Agreements, the \n\nCommunity has concluded Interim Agreements on trade and trade-related measures \n\nwith those countries; \n\nWhereas the Interim Agreements provide for the fixing of minimum import prices \n\nfor certain soft fruits originating in Hungary, Poland and the CSFR; whereas \n\nthose prices are fixed for each marketing year in the light of the trend in \n\nprices for Community and imported products, the trend in quantities imported, the \n\ntrend on the market and customs duties; whereas provision should also be made for \n\nthe possibility of introducing the measures required where the minimum prices \n\nthus fixed are not met; \n\n\f* 3 - \n\nr \n\n\u2022\u2022:\u2022:\u2022\u2022\u2022 \n\n<PfLF/\u20ac\u00ab/t3$9) \n\nWhereas the urgent nature of these measures requires tfiat they be implemented on \n\nthe day following their publication, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION, \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe minimum import prices for the products listed in the Annex hereto and \n\noriginating in Hungary, Poland and CSFR shall be fixed for each marketing year in \n\nthe Iight of: \n\nthe prices for Community products and products imported from the countries \n\nconcerned in previous years; \n\nthe trend in quantities imported during the year preceding that for which the \n\nprice is fixed; \n\nthe general trend on the Community market for these products; \n\ncustoms duties. Article 2 \n\nWhere the prices fixed in accordance with Article 1 are not met, the Commission \n\nshall adopt the provisions necessary to ensure that a minimum import price is \n\npaid for each consignment imported and that countervailing charges are collected. h \n\n\f- 4 - \n\n(PFLF/EN/1389) \n\nArticle 3 \n\nDetailed rules for the application of this Regulation shall be laid down and the \n\nminimum import prices shall be fixed in accordance with the procedure provided \n\nfor in Article 33 of Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 and in Article 22 of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 426/86. Article 4 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in \n\nthe Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all \n\nMember States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the CounciI \n\n\f(PFLF/EN/1389) \n\n- \u20225 -\n\nANNEX \n\nDescription \n\nRaspberries \n\nBlack-currants \n\nRed-currants \n\nStrawberries, frozen, containing added sugar \nor other sweetening matter, with a sugar \ncontent exceeding 13% by weight \n\nStrawberries, frozen, containing added sugar \nor other sweetening matter, with a sugar \ncontent not exceeding 13% by weight \n\nStrawberries, frozen, not containing added \nsugar or other sweetening matter \n\nRaspberries, frozen, containing added sugar \nor other sweetening matter, with a sugar \ncontent not exceeding 13% by weight \n\nCN code \n\n0810 20 10 \n\n0810 30 10 \n\n0810 30 30 \n\n0811 10 11 \n\n0811 10 19 \n\n0811 10 90 \n\nex 0811 20 19 \n\nex 0811 20 31 \n\nRaspberries, frozen, not containing added \nsugar or other sweetening matter \n\n0811 20 39 \n\n0811 20 51 \n\nBlack-currants, frozen, not containing \nadded sugar or other sweetening matter \n\nRed-currants, frozen, not containing added \nsugar or other sweetening matter \n\n(o \n\n\fF I N A N C I AL S T A T E M E NT \n\nDATE: 18 March 1992 \n\n1. BUDGET HEADING: 1 000 \n\nAPPROPRIATIONS: ECU 1 369. 5 mi 11 ion \n\n2. TITLE: \n\nProposal for a Council Regulation on the system of minimum import prices for certain soft fruits \noriginating in Hungary, Poland and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic \n\n3. LEGAL BASIS: \n\nArt iceI 113 of the Treaty \n\n4. AIMS OF PROJECT: \n\nTo introduce a system of minimum import prices for certain soft fruits from Hungary, Poland and \nthe CSFR \n\n5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\nPeriod of 12 months \n\nCurrent Financial Year \n1992 \n\nFollowing Financial Year \n1993 \n\n5. 0 EXPENDITURE \n\n- CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET \n- (REFUNDS/INTERVENTION) \n- NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION \n-OTHER \n\n5. 1 REVENUE \n\n- OWN RESOURCES OF THE EC \n(LEVI ES/CUSTCMS DUTIES) \n\n- NATIONAL \n\n5. 0. 1 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE \n5. 1. 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE \n\n5. 2 METHOD OF CALCULATION: \n\np. m. p. m. p. m. 1994 \n\n1996 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n6. 0 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM APPROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n6. 1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n6. 2 IS A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET NECESSARY? \n\n6. 3 WILL FUTURE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE NECESSARY? \n\nOBSERVATIONS: \n\nWhere the minimum price is rot met, counter vai I ing charges may be col lee ted. YES \n\nYES \n\nNO \n\nNO \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 139 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-156-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-42912-7 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9e1dc45a-fe8d-4007-89e9-25ade73ce588", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission' s proposal for a Council regulation laying down control rules and measures to combat African horse sickness", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "animal disease,animal plague,epidemic,epidemiology,equidae,exchange of information,health control,health legislation,import (EU),infectious disease,third country,vaccination,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0103", "eurovoc_concepts": ["animal disease", "animal plague", "epidemic", "epidemiology", "equidae", "exchange of information", "health control", "health legislation", "import (EU)", "infectious disease", "third country", "vaccination", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9e1dc45a-fe8d-4007-89e9-25ade73ce588", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2259ccd2-19d0-4c29-adfa-e8b0439a1bf5", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 on the common organization of the market in products processed from fruit and vegetables", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-10", "subjects": "common organisation of markets,fruit vegetable,minimum price,processed foodstuff,producer price", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0138,comnat:COM_1992_0138_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_116_R_0010_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common organisation of markets", "fruit vegetable", "minimum price", "processed foodstuff", "producer price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2259ccd2-19d0-4c29-adfa-e8b0439a1bf5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 138 final \n\nBrussels, 10 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 on the common organization \nof the market in products processed from fruit and vegetables \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fV1J'M8;'31& \n\n(Ffl. 11 j'Lllj'130>\u00bb \n\n<, \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nArticle 4(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 provides that in the case of fresh \ntomatoes intended for processing, the minimum price to be paid to producers is to \nbe adjusted as from the 1991/92 marketing year on the basis of the dry weight \ncontent of the raw material. Experience shows that the existing analysis methods for measuring dry extract \nrequire a lot of time, can only be conducted in a laboratory and call for major \nanalysis equipment. In addition, they are conducted at the processor's, whereas \nthe regulations require that the analysis be conducted in the presence of the \nproducers, which poses additional practical problems. Under these circumstances \nmeasuring the soluble dry extract, which may be achieved easily and quickly, is \nmore in line with the needs of the industry. It is therefore proposed to replace the existing system by the latter. That is \nthe aim of the appended proposal for a Regulation. \u2022 \u00a5 I / D 4 1 J ' 9 E1 H1LF/1SH/13M) \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\nof \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 on the common organization \nof the market in products processed from fruit and vegetables \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in \n\nparticular Article 43 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission(*), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(3), \n\nWhereas Article 4(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 of 24 February 1986 on \n\nthe common organization of the market in products processed from fruit and \n\nvegetables^), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1943/91^5)f provides that \n\nthe minimum price to be paid to producers of tomatoes is to be adjusted according \n\nto the dry weight content of the raw material for the manufacture of tomato \n\nconcentrate, juice and flakes; \n\nWhereas, in the light of experience gained, the existing methods for measuring \n\nthe soluble dry extract content of the raw material are in line with the \n\nrequirements of the industry; whereas, in future, the appropriate provisions \n\nshould therefore be adapted and in consequence the minimum price should be fixed \n\non the basis of the soluble dry extract, \n\n(1) \n(2) \n(3) \n(4) OJ No L 49, 27. 2. 1986, p. 1. (5) OJ No L 175, 4. 7. 1991, p. 1. - 2 - \n\n\u2022' \u00a5 1 / 0 4 1 ^ 9 01 \n\n(BFIMF,(mijt 130 \n\ni) \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe second subparagraph of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 is hereby \n\nreplaced by the following: \n\n\"In the case of tomatoes, the minimum price to be paid to producers shall be \n\nadjusted as from the 1992/93 marketing year according to the soluble dry extract \n\ncontent of the raw material. However, this provision shall not apply to tomatoes \n\nused in the manufacture of peeled tomatoes. \" \n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication \n\nin the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all \n\nMember States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\n\fP I N A N C I AL S T A T E M E NT \n\n1. BUDGET HEADING: 1511 \n\n2. TITLE: \n\nJ* \n\nwtm\u00abp (pruvD^'iaOT) \n\nDATE: 10 Muiuli 1WC \n\nAPPROPRIATIONS: ECU 416 mi 11 ion \n\nProposal for a Counci I Regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 426/86 on the cannon organization of the \nmarket in products processed from fruit and vegetables \n\n3. LEGAL BASIS: \n\nArticle 43 of the Treaty \n\n4. AIMS OF PROJECT: \n\nTo fix the minimum price in terms of the soluble dry extract content. 5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\n1992 \n\nPeriod of 12 months Current Financial Year \n\nFollowing Financial Year \n1993 \n\n5. 0 EXPENDITURE \n\n- CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET \n- (REFUNDS/INTERVENTION) \n- NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION \n- OTHER \n\n5. 1 REVENUE \n\n- O WN RESOURCES OF THE EC \n(L\u00a3VIES/CUSTCMS DUTIES) \n\n- NATIONAL \n\n5. 0. 1 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE \n5. 1. 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE \n\n5. 2 METHOD OF CALCULATION: \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n6. 0 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM APPROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n6. 1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n6. 2 IS A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET NECESSARY? \n\n6. 3 WILL FUTURE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE NECESSARY? \n\nOBSERVATIONS: \n\nYES \n\nYES \n\nNO \n\nYES \n\n\f\fWSN0254-U75 \n\nCOM(92) 138 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-155-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-42903-8 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ce24491-5007-4ae6-a072-c0324f205af8", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for certain quality wines and sparking wines, originating in Austria", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "sparkling wine,tariff quota,wine of superior quality", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0135,comnat:COM_1992_0135_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["sparkling wine", "tariff quota", "wine of superior quality"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ce24491-5007-4ae6-a072-c0324f205af8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "ti \n\nWW Iff \n\n\u00bb \n\nmi \n\nviwm \n\nIf \n\nCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 135 final \n\nBrussels, 9 Apr!I 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC^ \n\nopening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for \ncertain quality wines and sparkling wines, originating in Austria \n\nM \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f1 \n\n\u2022J \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nUnder an agreement concluded with Austria, approved by decision of \n\nthe Council of 12 December igss^1) and about to be prolonged for \n\nanother quota-period of one year, the Community has to open annually \n\ntariff quotuj for the importation of the following products of \n\nAustr ian or igin : \n\nCN Code \n\nDescription \n\nVolume \n\nRate of \n\nof quota \n\nduty \n\n(in hi) \n\n(in %) \n\nex 2204 21 25 Quality wines, conforming to \n\nex 2204 21 29 wine and viticulture law of \n\nex 2204 21 35 1985 of the Republic of Austria, \n\nex 2204 21 39 originating in that country and \n\nex 2204 21 49 in containers of a capacity not \n\nexceeding 2 litres \n\n85 000 \n\nex 2204 10 19 Sparkling wines, conforming to \n\nex 2204 10 90 wine and viticulture law of \n\n1985 of the Republic of Austria, \n\noriginating in that country and \n\nin containers of a capacity not \n\nexceeding 2 litres \n\n2 000 \n\nThe agreement also provides that these quotas should be opened for \n\nperiods from 1 July of every year to 30 June of the next year, and \n\nthe duties applicable in Spain and Portugal in the context of these \n\ntariff quotas must be the same as those applied respectively by these \n\nMember States towards the Community as composed at 31st December \n\n1985. (1) \n\n0J No L 348, 17. 12. 1988, P. 56 \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nThe attached proposal purpose is to provide for the opening of tariff \n\nquotas for the period 1 July 1992 to 30 June 1993 in order to respect \n\nthe provisions of the Agreement. 3. As in the past, the Commission proposes not to allocate the tariff \n\nquota volumes among the Member States but to allow the latter to draw \n\nagainst the said volumes quantities corresponding to actual \n\nimportations made. In addition, this procedure is more in keeping \n\nwith the Community nature of these tariff quotas. Proposal for a \n\ny \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\n/ 92 \n\nof \n\nopening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for \ncertain quality wines and sparkling wines, originating in Austria \n\nTHE COUNCIL Or THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European \nEconomic Community, \nin particular Article 113 \n\"d \nthereof. Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nfull \n\nthe Community \n\nis committed \nthe customs duties applicable \n\nWhereas, in accordance with the Agreement with Austria f \nprolonged, by the outcome of the exchange of \nletters (1), for the period from 1 July 1992 to \n30 June 1993. regarding reciprocal creation of tariff quotas for certain \nto \nquality wines, \nsuspending \nto \nin \nquality wines and sparkling wines, originating in Austria, \nwhich conform to the wine and viticulture law of 1985 of \nthe Republic of Austria, presented \nin containers not \nexceeding two litres, within the limits of annual tariff \nrespectively; \nquotas of S5 000 and 2 000 hectolitres \nthe quota \nwhereas \nperiod is from 1 July of each year to 30 June of the next \nyear and whereas the duties applicable in Spain and \nPortugal are equal to those applied by Member States with \nrespect to the Community as constituted at 31 December \nIV8S; whereas it is necessary therefore to open for the \nperiod 1 July 1992 to 30 June 1993 the Community tariff \nquotas in question at the amounts provided for in the \nAgreement; \n\nthis Agreement also provides that \n\nit \n\nis \n\nin particular necessary \n\nWhereas \nto allow all \nCommunity importers equal and uninterrupted access to \nthe \nthe uninterrupted \napplication of the rates laid down for the quotas to all \n\nsaid quotas and \n\nto ensure \n\nto take \n\nthe necessary measures \n\nimports of the products concerned into all Member States \nit \nuntil \nis \nthe quotas have been used u p; whereas \nappropriate \nto ensure \nefficient Community administration of these tariff quotas \nwhile offering the Member States the opportunity to draw \nfrom the quota volumes the necessary quantities corre \nthis method of \nsponding \nadministration \nthe \nMember States and the Commission and the latter must, \nin particular, be able to monitor the rate at which the \nquotas are being used up and inform the Member States \naccordingly ; \n\nrequires close cooperation between \n\nimports; whereas \n\nto actual \n\nWhereas, since the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of \nthe Netherlands and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg \nare united within and jointly represented by the Benelux \nEconomic Union, \nin \nparticular, the administration of quota shares allocated to \nthat economic union may be carried out by any of its \nmembers, \n\ntransactions \n\nconcerning, \n\nall \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION \n\nArticle 1 \n\nFrom 1 July 1992 to 30 June 1993 the customs \n1. duties applicable on \nfollowing \nproducts originating in Austria shall, without prejudice to \nparagraph 3, be suspended at levels and within the limits \nof tariff quotas as indicated with respect to each product: \n\nimportation of \n\nthe \n\nOrder \nNo \n\nt:N code \n(') \n\n09. 080? \n\nex 2204 21 25 \nex 2204 21 29 \nex 2204 21 35 \nex 2204 21 39 \nex 2204 21 49 \n\nDescription \n\nQuality wines presented in containers of a capacity not exceeding \ntwo litres \n\nVolume \nof quota \n(I. I) \n\n85 000 \n\n09. 080 S \n\nex 2204 10 19 \nex 2204 10 90 \n\nSparkling quality wines, and presented in container* of a capacity \nnot exceeding two litres \n\n2 000 \n\n(') See 'laric codes in the Annex. (1) J. O. No L. of. 1992, p. t. hiol. i \n\nInly \n\n(\"/\u201e) \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n\f- 2-\n\n2. Within the limits of the tariff quotas referred to in \nparagraph I, the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese \nRepublic shall apply the same duties as those they apply \nto similar products of the Community as constituted at 31 \nDecember 198 5. the tariff quotas referred \n\n}. Admission under \nto in \nparagraph 1 shall be reserved to wines accompanied by a \ndocument VI 1 or an extract VI 2, completed \nin \naccordance with the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No \n3590/85 ('). Document VI I must \nfollowing endorsements, certified by \nAustrian organization : \n\ninclude in Box I 5 one of the \nthe competent \n\nThis is to certify that the wines referred to in this \ndocument are quality wines/quality sparkling wines (*) \noriginating \nthe \n1985 Wine Law of the Republic of Austria. in conformity with \n\nin Austria and \n\n(') Delete whichever entry is not applicable. ' \n\nFurthermore, the wines in question shall remain subject \nto observance of the free-at-frontier reference price. In \nthe tariff quotas, \norder that these wines benefit from \nArticle 54 of Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 (2), as last \namended by Regulation (EEC) No 3577/90 ('), must be \ncomplied with. Article 2 \n\nThe tariff quotas referred to in Article 1 shall be managed \ntake all appropriate \nby the Commission, which may \nto ensure effective \nin order \nadministrative measures \nadministration thereof. Article 3 \n\nIf an importer presents, in a Member State, a declaration \ninto free circulation, including a request for \nof entry \nthis \npreferential benefit \n\nfor a product covered by \n\nif this declaration \n\nis accepted by the \nRegulation and \ncustoms authorities, the Member State concerned shall \ndraw from the tariff quota, by means of notification to the \nCommission, a quantity corresponding to these needs. The drawing requests, with \nthe date of \nacceptance of the said declaration, must be communicated \nto the Commission without delay. indication of \n\nThe drawings are granted by the Commission on the basis \nof the date of acceptance of the declaration of entry into \nfree circulation by the uistoms authoiilies of (lie Menibet \nState concerned to the extent that the available balance so \npermits. If a Member State does not use the quantities drawn, it \nshall return them as soon as possible to the tariff quota. If the quantities requested are greater than the available \nbalance of the quota, allocation shall be made on a pro \nrata basis with respect to the requests. The Commissin \nthe Member States of the drawings made. shall inform \n\nArticle 4 \n\nEach Member State shall ensure that importers of the \nproducts in question have equal and continuous access to \nthe quotas for as long as the balance of the relevant quota \n* \nvolume so permits. Article 5 \n\nThe Member States and the Commission shall cooperate \nclosely to ensure that this Regulation is complied with. Article 6 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July \n\nI9l\u00a3. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at Brussels \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n(') OJ No L 343, 20. 12. 198. 5, p. 20. (') OJ No L 84, 27. 3. 1987, p. 1. (') ( )| No L 353, 17. 12. 1990, p. 23. <0 \n\n-3-\n\nA A/A//. A' \n\nTaric codes \n\nOrder no \n\nCN Code \n\nTaric code \n\n09. 0803 \n\n09. 0805 \n\nex \nex \n\n2204 21 25 \n\n2204 21 29 \n\nex \n\n2204 21 35 \n\nex \n\n2204 21 39 \n\nex \n\n2204 21 49 \n\nex \n\n2204 10 19 \n\nex \n\n2204 10 90 \n\n\u20229. 5 \n\n'96 \n\n\u202295 \n\n'96 \n\u20229. 5 \n\n'96 \n'29 \n\n\u202291 \n\n\"91 \n\n\f? \n\nFINANCIAL RECORD \n\nBudget Iine concerned : Chap. 12 Art. 120 \n\nLegal basis : Art. 113 of the Treaty \n\nTitle of the tariff measure concerned : Proposal for a Council \n\nregulation (EEC) opening and providing for the administration of \n\nCommunity tariff quotas for quality wines, originating in Austria \n\nObject ive : Fulfilment of contractual obligations of the Community \n\nMethod of calculation : \n\nCCT heading: \n\nex 2204 21 25 \n\nex 2204 21 29 \n\nex 2204 21 35 \n\nex 2204 10 19 \n\nex 2204 21 39 \n\nex 2204 10 90 \n\nex 2204 21 49 \n\nVolume of the quota: 85 000 hi \n\nDuty to be applied: 0 % \n\n2 000 hi \n\n0 % \n\nNormal CCT duty: \n\n14,5 and 16,9 ecus/hi \n\n40 ecus/hi \n\n(average duty : 15,7 ecus/hi) \n\nDuty-Ioss : \n\nLoss \n\n85 000 x 15,7 ecus \n\n2 000 x 40 ecus \n\n1 334 500 ecus \n\n80 000 ecus \n\n1 414 500 ecus \n\nCompared with the preceding quota period. - no change \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 135 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-153-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-42885-6 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/51542f64-2aa8-444b-923e-d4bb0c867a75", "title": "RESOLUTION on the risk that authors of war crimes and crimes against humanity may be rehabilitated in Bulgaria", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Left Unity", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Bulgaria,barring of penalties by limitation,crime against humanity,human rights,war crime", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0521", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Bulgaria", "barring of penalties by limitation", "crime against humanity", "human rights", "war crime"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/51542f64-2aa8-444b-923e-d4bb0c867a75", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/16a9af7e-5e56-4a97-aab4-e22636459dea", "title": "RESOLUTION on night working and the denunciation of ILO Convention No. 89", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group for the European United Left,Left Unity,Rainbow Group in the European Parliament,Socialist Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "arrangement of working time,gender equality,international convention,judgment of the Court (EU),night work,public health,ratification of an agreement,sexual discrimination,shift work", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0588", "eurovoc_concepts": ["arrangement of working time", "gender equality", "international convention", "judgment of the Court (EU)", "night work", "public health", "ratification of an agreement", "sexual discrimination", "shift work"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/16a9af7e-5e56-4a97-aab4-e22636459dea", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98dc7e2c-6a66-483a-875e-87648c1d75c8", "title": "GREEN PAPER on the impact of Transport on the Environment - A Community strategy for \"sustainable mobility\"", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#communication_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#document_com_other_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "EU environmental policy,EU programme,environmental impact,greenhouse gas,pollution,pollution control measures,reduction of gas emissions,sustainable mobility,traffic regulations,transport regulations", "workIds": "celex:51992DC0046,comnat:COM_1992_0046_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU environmental policy", "EU programme", "environmental impact", "greenhouse gas", "pollution", "pollution control measures", "reduction of gas emissions", "sustainable mobility", "traffic regulations", "transport regulations"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98dc7e2c-6a66-483a-875e-87648c1d75c8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMVIISSION OF THE, EUROPEAN COI\\MUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 46 final \n\nBrussels, 20 February 1992 \n\nGREEN PAPER \n\non \n\nThe lnapact of Transport on the Envlror. nent \n\n-~-\n\nA Community strategy for \u2022sustainable mobility\u2022 \n\n(Communication from the Commission). ,. Green Paper \n\non \nThe Impact of TransPort on the Environment \nA COmmunity strategy for \u2022sKstainable 1ft0bility\u2022 \n\nI. GENERAL \n\nINTRODUCTION \n\na. Pre I iminary comments \n\nb. Historical background \n\nI I. PROBLEMS AND ISSUES \n\na. Current issues \nb. The role of transport \n\nc. Impact of transport on the environment \n\nI I I. ENVIRONMENTAL \n\nIMPACT \n\na. Operational pollution \n\nb. Land-use and intrusion \n\nc. Congestion \nd. Risks inherent to the transport of dangerous goods \n\ne. Conclusions of assessment \n\nIV. ECONOMIC TRENDS \n\na Trends and forecasts \n\nb. Structural changes \n\nc. The user's choice \n\nV. A COMMON STRATEGY \n\na. A global approach \nb. Balance sheet of Community action \n\nc. 'Sustainable mobility' and future transport \n\ndevelopment \nd. A new framework \n\npage \n\n1 \n\n2 \n\n6 \n\n7 \n\n8 \n\n11 \n\n25 \n\n29 \n32 \n\n34 \n\n36 \n\n38 \n\n39 \n\n43 \n\n45 \n\n49 \n\n53 \n\n\f\fI. GENERAL INTRODUCTION \n\na. Preliminary comments \n\n1. The \n\nimpact of transport on \n\nthe \n\nscrutiny \nin \n\nin \nthe Community. close \nparticularly \nenv i ronmenta I issues -\nled \napproach to environmental problems. to a growing awareness of \n\nthe environment \ni ndustr i a Ii sed wor Id \nThe \n\nis coming under \nand more \ng loba I nature of \nsuch as the \"greenhouse effect\" - has \nthe need for a world-wide \n\nThis global approach in turn has high I lghted the need to focus \non the causes of environmental problems in a different manner. It is no longer considered sufficient to assess the primary or \nimmediate causes, but to go to the very root of the problem -\nhuman behaviour. Thus, \nthe Bergen DeclarationC1) stresses \nthat \"unsustainable patterns of production and consumption, \nparticularly in industrialised countries, are at the root of \nnumerous env i ronmenta I prob I ems, not ab I y foreclosing opt ions \nby \nfor \nresource \n\"the attainment of susta i nab I e \nbase\". < 1) \n\nfuture generations \nIt warns \n\ndepletion of \n\nthat \n\nthe \n\ndeve I opment. requires fundamenta I changes \n\nin human va I ues \n\nthe environment and \n\nin this respect high I lghts \n\nin patterns of behaviour and \ntowards \nconsumption. 11 <1> and \nthe need \n\"to reduce the harmful effects of the transport sector on the \nenvironment by promoting fast, safe, and convenient urban and \ncar \nregional \nlow \ntraffic\" (1). Also noted, \ntransport demand. and \nthe need \n\nservices \nis \n\nto encourage \n\ntransport \n\nreducing \n\nurban \n\n2. Hence, a number of human activities, of which transport, has \ncome under close scrutiny. Indeed, transport is increasing I y \nbeing qualified as a human activity with a negative impact on \nthe environment. A clear illustration of this is the concern \nabout \nthe \nthe env i ronmenta I nuisance and damage caused by \nhigh level of traffic in sensitive geographical areas such as \n\n(1) Bergen Ministerial Declaration on sustainable Development \n\nECE Region, 16 May 1990, p. 2, 4 and 11. in the \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nthe Alps, as well as in densely populated areas, particularly \n\nlarge conurbations. This view is also endorsed by the Group Transport 2000 Plus in \n\nits report \"Transport \n\nIn a Fast Changing Europe\", which \n\nidentifies transport as a major contributor \n\nto energy and \n\nenvironmental problems since it is one of the main consumers \n\nof fossil fuels and is responsible for considerable nuisance \n\nand damage to the environment<1>. b. Historical background \n\n3. Fol lowing the declarations at the Paris Summit \n\nin October 1972 \n\na decisive political impetus was given to consideration of the \nin planning the socio-economic development of the \nenvironment \n\nCommunity. As a result, the Commission adopted a first Action \n\nProgramme on \n\nthe Environment for \n\nthe period 1973 \n\nto 1977. The main concern was to ensure the proper functioning of the \n\nCommon Market \n\nby \n\namongst others \n\nintroducing harmonised \n\nstandards for consumer products. Hence, for \n\nthe transport sector this programme provided for \n\ntechnical \n\nimprovements of noise and gaseous emissions of \n\nmotor vehicles as wel I as for the maximum content of lead in \nfuel. in the area of \nmarine pollution resulting from sea transport. The programme \n\nIt also provided for specific action \n\nalready drew attention to transport problems \n\nin \n\nthe urban \n\nenvironment. 4. The \n\nsecond Action Programme \n\nfor \n\nthe period 1977 \n\nto 1981 \n\ncontinued the same line of action. It concentrated as far as \n\ntransport was concerned on marine pollution, measures \n\nto \n\nreduce noise from motor vehicles, motor cycles and aircraft. (1) Group Transport 2000 Plus, Transport \n\nDecember, 1990. in a Fast Changing Europe, \n\n\f- 3 -\n\nThe third Action Programme for the period 1982-1986, however, \nthe general philosophy. Introduced a new dimension \n\nInto \n\nEnvironmental policy was to be motivated by the fact that the \n\nenvironment itself contains the I imits to further economic and \n\nsocial development. This Action Programme stressed the need \n\nfor a greater awareness of the environmental dimension \n\nin the \n\narea of transport. Vehicle emissions, \n\naircraft noise and the \n\nenvironmental \n\nimpact assessment of \n\ninfrastructure projects \n\nwere earmarked as priorities. 5. It is only in the fourth Action Programme for 1987-1992 that \nthe interaction between transport and the environment Is duly \n\nrecognised as being of a wide-ranging nature. This new approach was the result of the Single Act which \n\nin \n\nArticle 130 R \n\nprovides \n\nthat \n\nenvironmental \n\nprotection \n\nrequirements sha 11 be a component of \n\nthe Community's other \n\npolicies. This approach was endorsed in the Declaration by the \n\nEuropean Counci I of June 1990, which stresses the need for \n\nsustainable and environmentally sound development as advocated \n\nin the 1987 Report \"Our Common Future\" by the World Commission \n\non Environment and Development (the Brundtland Report). 6. A more specific response \n\nin this direct ion was given by the \n\nCommission \n\nin April 1989, when \n\nit was deemed necessary \n\nto \n\nreflect on the relationship between environmental policy and \nthe field of \nother Community pol lcies, \n\nin particular \n\nin \n\nthe \nthis exercise provided \ntransport. The \nguide I ines for \nto \nin \nexamine the impact of transport on the environment in a global \n\noutcome of \nfurther work \n\nthis area with a view \n\nand coherent framework. 7. This Green Paper \n\nis \n\nthe \n\nlogical \n\nfollow-up \n\nto that \n\ninitial \n\nresponse as well as to the world-wide concern about a number \n\nof g loba I env i ronmenta I \nissues. The Community posit ion on \n'global warming' as reflected in the Conclusions of the Joint \n\nEnergy and Environment Council of 29 October 1990 on Climate \nChange Policy and its commitment to the stabilisation of co2 \n\n\f-\n\n4 -\n\nemissions by the year 2000 and the possibility of reductions \n\nthereat ter confirms \n\nthis concern as we 11 as \n\nthe need for \n\naction. This Green Paper is also in line with the guidelines on urban \n\ntransport policy set out in the Commission Green Paper on the \n\nUrban environmentC1) and takes account of the need to create \n\nnew opportunities for the peripheral regions so that they may \nshare fully in the prosperity of the Single Market as set out \nin the Commission Communication 'Europe 2000\u2022. (2) \n\nIt \n\nis also a \n\nresponse \n\nto \n\nthe Resolution adopted by \n\nthe \n\nEuropean Parliament \n\nin September 1991, which calls upon \"the \n\nCommission to submit to the Council a framework programme for \n\noptimum environmental protection \nmarket. 11 <3> \n\nin \n\nthe European \n\ntransport \n\n8. This Paper \n\nis also in line with the forthcoming Fifth Action \nProgramme on the Environment \"Towards Sustalnabi I ity\", which \noutlines a new pol Icy and strategy for the protection of the \n\nenvironment and natural \n\nresources and \n\nthe achievement of \n\nsustainable development. The approach adopted differs \n\nfundamentally \n\nfrom \n\nthat of \n\nprevious Environmental Action Programmes, since it focuses on \nthe agents and activities which deplete natural resources and \n\ndamage the environment. Its objective Is to initiate changes \nin current trends and practices which are detrimental to the \n\nenvironment, so as to ensure socio-economic we I I-being and \n\ngrowth for present and future generations. Such changes are to \n\nbe achieved \n\nthrough shared responsibi I ity, \n\ninvolving pub I ic \n\nadministrations, public as wel I as private enterprise and the \n\ngeneral \n\npub I i c, \n\nin \n\naccordance with \n\nthe principle of \n\nsubsidiarity. (1) [COM(90)218 final of 27 June 1990] \n(2) [COM (91) 452 final of 7 November 1991] \n(3) PE 145. 075/end of September 1991 \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nThe Fifth Action Programme \n\nfocuses on \n\nfive main economic \n\n\"target\" sectors, including the transport sector, and includes \n\nactions designed for the protection of the environment as wel I \n\nas for the benefit and sustainable development of the sectors \n\nthemselves. Th is Paper converts and adapts \n\nthe objectives and \n\ntargets \n\nincluded \n\nin \n\nthe Fifth Action Progranune \n\ninto a global and \n\ncoherent strategy for the transport sector. 9. This Green Paper provides an assessment of the over a I I impact \n\nof transport on the environment and presents a Common strategy \n\nfor \"sustainable mobility\u2022 which should enable transport to \n\nfulfil \n\nits economic and social \n\nrole while containing \n\nits \n\nharmful effects on the environment. The purpose of the Paper is to initiate a public debate on how \n\nto achieve the objectives of such a strategy which \n\nis to be \n\nsubseQuently fully integrated into the forthcoming White Paper \n\non \n\nthe \n\nfuture development of \n\ntransport policy \n\nin \n\nthe \n\nCommunity. The principle of subsidiarity will play an \n\nimportant part \n\nin \n\nensuring \n\nthat \n\nthe strategy \n\nis given \n\nits \n\nful I effect by \n\nappropriate national, regional and local initiatives. Clearly, many of the areas discussed in this Paper are areas \n\nin which the Community's contribution wil I not be legislative \n- but may be in the research field, in standard setting, or in \n\nthe definition of objectives. The legislative role may \ncases \nauthorities. The purpose of \n\nto Member States, or \n\nlocal or \nto \nis \n\nthis Paper \n\nfall \n\nto \n\nin such \nregional \ninitiate \n\ndiscussion, rather \n\nthan \n\nto programme a series of Community \n\nlegislative acts. - 6 -\n\n11. PROBLEMS AND \n\nISSUES \n\na. Current Issues \n\n10. The \n\n1989 \n\nand \n\n1990 \n\nScientific Assessments \n\nof \n\nthe \n\nI ntergovernmenta I Pane I on CI imate Change \n\n(I PCC) has drawn \n\nwor Id-wide attention to the causes and consequences of \n\nthe \n\n\"greenhouse effect\". Although scientific evidence is not yet \n\nconclusive as to the scale of the problem, there is general \n\nagreement \n\nthat \n\nthe \n\nhigh \n\natmospheric \n\nconcentrations of \n\n\"greenhouse gases\" wi I I have an effect on the earth's climate, \n\ncausing the \"warming\" of the globe and the ensuing rise in the \n\naverage sea levels. Energy-generation, industry and transport have been identified \n\nas the major sources of carbon dioxide, which is the main man \n\nmade \"greenhouse gas\". 11. The depletion of the ozone layer, which reduces the protection \n\nof the earth against ultra-violet radiation from the sun, \n\nis \n\ncaused by emissions of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halons. The direct contribution of transport to this phenomenon is due \n\nmainly \n\nto \n\nthe \n\nrefrigerated \n\ntransport of goods and air \n\nconditioned vehicles. No \n\nless \n\nimportant but more restricted \n\nin \n\nits geographical \n\nrange is the phenomenon of \"acid rain\", which affects animal \n\nand plant \n\nI ife and corrodes bui I ding materials. Transport \n\ncontributes to \"acid rain\" through sulphur and nitrogen oxide \nemissions. 12. Other current \n\nissues \n\nin \nthe \norganic \ncompounds and nitrogen oxides, with harmful effects on human \n\nthe bu i Id-up of ozone \nthe emission of volatile \n\ntroposphere, caused \n\ninc I ude \nby \n\nhealth \n\nand \n\nanimal \n\nlife. Transport contributes \n\nto \n\nthis \n\nphenomenon. - 7 -\n\n13. Al I \n\nthese \n\ncur rent \n\nissues \n\nconcern different \n\nforms \n\nof \n\natmospheric pollution. Another current \n\nissue \n\nis that of \n\nthe damage \n\nto which \n\nthe \n\nurban environment \none of the root causes of present urban degradation. is exposed. Transport \n\nis considered to be \n\nb. The role of transport \n\n14. For \n\nthe purpose of this Green Paper \n\ntransport \n\nincludes the \n\ncarriage of goods and persons by any mode of transport -\n\nroad, \n\nrail, inland waterways, sea and air-, private or public, for \nthe purpose - private or \npayment or not, \ncommercial. Traffic \nthe physical \ntransport. irrespective of \nrepresents \n\nresu It of \n\nTransport ls vital to both our economic and social wel I being. It is vital to the production and distribution of goods and \nservices as wel I as to trade and regional development. 15. Since the beginning of the 1950's transport has made a major \n\ncontribution \n\nto \n\neconomic \n\ngrowth \n\nand \n\nhas \n\nenabled \n\nthe \n\nachievement of economies of scale \n\nin production and, by \n\nincreasing competition in hitherto protected markets, has led \n\nto a wider \n\nrange of choice for both \n\nthe producer and \n\nthe \n\nconsumer with direct and \n\nindirect effects on the qua I ity of \n\nIi fe. Transport has also contributed to the significant growth of \ntourism, which accounts for over 5 X of GDP and provides over \n8 million Jobs. 16. In \n\nthe \n\nCommunity \n\ncontributes \napproximately 7% to the Gross Domestic Product and represents \nto 10X and 9X \n7% of employment<1>. These \n\nfigures go up \n\ntransport \n\nsector \n\nthe \n\nrespectively, if \n\ntransport for own account of both goods and \n\npersons as we 11 as \n\nthe product ion of \n\ntransport means and \n\ninfrastructure are included<2>. (1) Group Transport 2000 Plus, op. cit, p. 5. (2) E. Jacobs, Le marche europeen unique : un defi pour \n\nla pol itique \n\ndes transports, 1990, p. 4-5. - 8 -\n\nthe \n\nto OECD \n\nestimates \n\nAccording \nincluding pollution, congestion and accidents -\nin the case of \nroad transport could, however, be as high as 5% of Gop(1). This estimate does not represent \nthe ful I external cost of \ntransport since it does not cover all forms of environmental \n\nsocio-economic cost \n\nimpact - namely the cost of the \"greenhouse effect\" - and is \n\nI imited to only one transport sector. 17. Technological developments since the beginning of the 1950's \n\nhave enabled people to travel more Quickly, more often and \n\nover \n\nlonger \n\ndi stances, breaking \n\ndown \n\neconomic, \n\nsoc i a I, \n\nnational, ethnic and geographical barriers. These developments have led to the mass movement of people and \n\nhave greatly affected behaviour patterns and the general way \n\nof I ife, particularly in industrialised countries. The advent \n\nof \n\nthe motor \n\ncar \n\nand \n\nits widespread availabi I ity have \n\nencouraged a way of \n\nI ife where people \n\nfeel entitled \n\nto \n\nmob i I i ty and the absence of a private means of transport \n\nis \n\noften felt as a handicap since it reduces access to available \n\namenities. c. Impact of transport on the environment \n\n18. For the purpose of this paper environment includes the QUal ity \n\nof \n\nIi fe, \n\nIi vi ng conditions of human beings and the natura I \n\nenvironment with su i tab I e habitats for an ima Is and p I ants. The Qua I i ty of \n\navai labi I ity \n\nIi fe \n\nlong-term \nin sufficient Quantity and of adeQuate Qua I ity \n\ndetermined \n\nthe \n\nby \n\nis \n\nof resources such as water, air, land and space in general as \n\nwel I as \n\nraw materials. It also \n\nincludes \n\nthe natural and \n\ncultural heritage. 19. Apart \n\nfrom \n\ninitiatives \n\nin \n\nthe shipping sector \n\nto prevent \n\ndamage to the marine environment, the \n\nimpact of transport on \n\nthe environment was, unti I recently, viewed mainly in terms of \n\natmospheric pollution and noise emissions. (1) OECD (1988) \n\nTransports et Environnement, Paris, 1988, p. 11. - 9 -\n\nEfforts to control atmospheric pollution caused by transport \n\nconcentrated only on emissions of certain pot lutants emitted \n\nby motor vehicles. Emission standards were \n\nintroduced \n\nin \n\nIndustrialised \n\ncountries \n\nfor \n\ncarbon monoxide \n\n(CO), \n\nhydrocarbons \n\nCHC), \n\nnitrogen \n\noxides \n\nCNOx> \n\nand \n\ndiesel \n\nparticulates. The Community adopted \n\nlegislation \n\nto \n\nreduce \n\nvehicle emissions as wet I as to encourage the use of unleaded \n\npetro I. Community standards have been regu I ar I y adapted to \n\ntechnological progress. 20. In \n\nthe case of noise emissions, \n\nintroduced \ncycles and aircraft. The Community adopted \n\nindustrialised countries \nfor cars, buses, goods vehicles, motor \nI imits on noise \n\nI imits \n\nemissions for goods and passenger veh i c I es, as we I I as for \n\nmotorcycles, and introduced legislation for the phasing out of \n\nthe noisiest aircraft. No \n\nI imits were \n\nintroduced for noise \n\nemissions from railways. 21. This approach was one-sided, since these measures were I imited \n\nlargely to vehicle emissions and, thus, were confined to only \n\none aspect of the impact of a single transport sector on the \n\nenvironment. However, a 11 power-driven transport affects the environment \n\nand generates pollution. The \n\nimpact \n\nis not \n\nI imited \n\nto \n\natmospheric pollution and varies in scale and range according \n\nto the mode of transport. 22. Thus, in order to ensure the widest possible assessment of the \n\nimpact of transport on the environment the analysis \n\nin this \n\nGreen Paper \n\nis based on a number of criteria related to the \n\nqua I i ty of the environment as defined above. These er i ter i a \nimpact of transport on air, water and \ninclude the operational \n\nsoil as well as the qua I ity of life, the impact of transport \n\ninfrastructure on space, \n\nthe consequences of congest ion as \n\n\f- 10 -\n\ninherent \n\nthe risks \n\ntransport of dangerous \nwel I as \ngoods. The analysis also provides an assessment of \nthe \nspecific problems caused by transport and traffic in the urban \nenvironment. the \n\nto \n\n\f- 11 -\n\nIll. ENVIROt<MENTAL \n\nIMPACT \n\n23. Since transport has a wide-ranging impact on the environment, \n\nthe present analysis is based as stated above on a number of \n\ner i ter i a re I ated to \n\nthe qua Ii ty of \n\nthe environment. These \n\ninclude operat iona I pollution, \nrisks inherent to the transport of dangerous goods. land-use, congest ion and \n\nthe \n\na. Operational pollution \n\n24. Operational pollution \n\nis caused by \n\nthe actual use of \n\nthe \n\ndifferent means of transport. It affects the air, water and \n\nsoil and produces noise and vibrations. The effects in many \n\ninstances are long-term and cumulative, although those caused \n\nby noise and vibrations are of an \n\nimmediate and \n\ntransient \n\nnature. \"Air\" \n\n25. \"Air pollution\" \n\nis caused by \n\nthe emission of \n\nchemical \n\nsubstances \n\ninto the atmosphere which alter its composition, \n\nwith harmful effects for human health, animal and plant life. The effects of some pollutants remain within the vicinity of \nthus have \nthe source, where concentrations are highest, and \nlead emissions. The \nmainly a \n\nimpact as in the case of \n\nlocal \n\nvicinity of \n\nthe source, as \n\neffects of other pollutants are suffered wel I beyond \n\nthe \nthe case of so 2 emissions, \nwhich contribute to \"acid rain\". Pollutants can, however, also \nthe case of co 2 and other \nthe whole \nthe climate of \n\nhave a \"global\". impact as \n\nin \n\nin \n\ngreenhouse gases, which affect \np I anet. - 12 -\n\n26. Emissions from \n\ntransport sources \n\ninclude \n\nthe fol lowing air \n\npo I I utants:. carbon dioxide cco2 > emitted by \n\nthe combustion of fossil \n\nfuel \n\ncarbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC) and volatile organic \n\ncompounds (VOC), resulting from incomplete combustion. nitrogen \n\noxides \n\n(NOx> \n\ngenerated \n\nat \n\nhigh \n\ncombustion \n\ntemperatures \nlead \n\n(Pb), ethylene dibromide and dichloride added. to \n\ngasoline to attain the desired octane rating and greater \n\nvolati I ity of combustion by-products. sulphur dioxide cso2> due to the higher sulphur content of \n\ndiesel. fine particles present in diesel. formaldehyde and other aldehydes \n\nCarbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide contribute directly \n\nto \n\nthe \"greenhouse ef feet\" whereas nitrogen oxides, carbon \n\nmonoxide and hydrocarbons contribute indirectly. Sulphur dioxide \n\nand nitrogen oxides contribute \n\nto \n\nthe \n\nphenomenon of \"acid rain\". voes and nitrogen oxides contribute to the build-up of ozone \nconcentrations in the troposphere. Hydrocarbons, voes, \n\nI ead, a I dehydes, ethy I ene di bromide and \n\ndichloride have potential carcinogenic effects, whereas lead, \n\ncarbon monoxide and diesel particles are general IY detrimental \n\nto human health. 27. Air pollution caused by \n\nthe \n\ntransport sector \n\nexclusively related \n\nto \n\nthe consumption of \n\nis almost \n- mostly non \n\nenergy. According to Eurostat figures for 1988 \nrenewable -\nenergy \nreached \ntransport \n211. 53 MTOE (1) <- 29. 8% of total final energy consumption). consumption \n\nsector \n\nthe \n\nin \n\n(1) Mi I I ions of tonnes of oi I eQuivalent. - 13 -\n\nThis is comparable to the energy consumption of industry which \n\nrepresents one \n\nthird of \n\nfinal energy consumption \n\nin \n\nthe \n\nCommunity. Within the transport sector 84. 4 X was used by road, 11. 1% by \n\naviation, 2. 5% by \n\nrailways and 2. 0% by \n\ninland waterways. Therefore, \n\nit \n\nis usefu I \n\nto compare energy consumption for \n\ndifferent means of transport. 28. Although \n\nthe results of comparative research \n\nin this field \n\nshould be \n\ninterpreted with caution, they nevertheless give a \n\nindication of the energy \"greediness\" of the different \nclear \nmeans of transport as shown for passenger transport in table 1 \n\nand figure 1. In \n\nfact \n\nin \n\nthe passenger sector \n\nthey reflect mainly \n\nthe \n\ndifferent basic assumptions concerning \n\ni. a. the \n\ntype of \n\nvehicle/train/aircraft \n\ntaken \n\nas \n\nreference, \n\nthe driving \n\ncircumstances in the case of road vehicles, the average speed, \n\nthe average energy consumption, the total passenger capacity, \n\nthe occupancy rate, the production structure of electricity \n\nfor electric powered trains. It \n\nis clear \n\nthat \n\nthe average occupancy rate, which varies \n\nlargely from one mode to another, Is one of the key variables \n\ni ntermoda I comparisons. Therefore, \n\nin \ngive a comparison of \n\ntab I e 2 and figure 2 \nfor \n\nthe specific energy consumption \n\ndifferent transport modes at different occupancy rates, namely \n\n25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. 29. In order to make a fair comparison, the energy intensiveness -\n\nalso referred to as specific energy consumption -\nin megajoules of primary energy, \n\ntaking into account \n\nis measured \nlosses \n\noccurring during the production and transmission process, per \n\npassenger-km. - 14 -\n\nThe main concluslons on the basis of table 2 and f lgures 1 \n\nand 2 are that. for \n\nthe private motor vehicle \n\nthere \n\nis a considerable \n\ndifference between smal I and large vehicles; \n\nwithin each mode \n\nthe energy effectiveness \n\nis commensurate \n\nwith the occupancy rate; \n\nof all modes the specific energy consumption is the highest \n\nfor airplanes; \n\ncompared to high speed trains energy consumption is twice as \nhigh for aviation;. at \n\nfull \n\ncapacity \n\nrailways and buses have \n\nthe \n\nlowest \n\nconsumption. 30. The latter is particularly important in the case of rush-hour \n\ntraffic where the occupancy rate of cars is very \n\nlow (between \n\n1 and 1. 2 passenger/car), the driving circumstances and hence \n\nthe real energy consumption due to congestion very unfavorable \n\nthe occupancy \n\nand \ntrains and buses very high \n(sometimes exceeding 100% of seating capacity). Although there \n\nrate of \n\nis no significant difference \nin energy consumption between \nra i I ways and buses operating at fu I I capacity, qua Ii tat i ve \ntime and \naspects such as seating comfort, \nrel iabi I ity are usually an advantage for the railways. speed, \n\ntravel \n\n31. For \n\nfreight \n\ntransport \n\nthe \n\nsame considerations \n\nregarding \n\nintermodal comparisons hold as \nthe case of passenger \ntransport. Nevertheless the results give an indication of the \n\nin \n\nscale of energy greediness. Moreover \nactivities, \nrefrigerator by van to the customer's home \n\ntransport \nfrom \n\nfreight \ngoing \n\ndoor-to-door \n\ncovers \n\na \n\nheterogeneous \na \nde Ii very of \nin the city centre, \n\nvery \n\n\f- 15 -\n\nover \n\nlong distance transport of steel coi Is by 40 tonnes 5-\n\nax le art I cu lated \n\nlorry to \n\nintercont lnental \n\ntransport of cut \n\nflowers by air. Table 3 and figure 3 give an indication of the \n\nenergy consumption for different means of \nunder different circumstances. inland transport \n\n32. Railways \n\nand \n\ninland waterways \n\nhave \n\nthe \n\nlowest \n\nenergy \n\nconsumption at around 0. 6 MJ/tonne-km. For 4 and 5-axle articulated heavy goods vehicles (with a ful I \n\nload on \n\nthe return Journey) \n\nthe energy consumption would \n\nappear to be only slightly higher than for railways and inland \n\nwaterways \n\n(0. 7 MJ/tonne-km). However, \n\nthe present market \n\norganization gives rise \n\nin practice \n\nto considerable empty \n\nrunning and a load factor between 50% and 70% would be a more \n\nrealistic basis for an \nthese \nconditions energy consumption is significantly higher for road \n\nintermodal comparison. Under \n\nhaulage. Removal of existing restrict ions on market access \ncould greatly contribute to energy efficiency. In the case of light goods vehicles the specific high energy \n\nconsumption (between 4 and 8 MJ/tonne-km at ful I \nto the high value/high volume/low weight nature of the goods. load) is due \n\n33. The total amount of co2 released into the atmosphere by the \ntransport sector in 1986 reached about 577 Mtons or 22. 5% of \ntotal co2 emissions in the Community (1) \n\nThe breakdown of this total output according to the different \nmeans of transport reflects the share of each means \nin the \ntotal energy consumption of the transport sector. (1) CEC, Energy \n\nin Europe, Energy for a new century \n\nthe European \n\nperspective, special issue, July 1990, p. 228. - 16 -\n\nMeans of transport \n\nShare in total C02 emissions \nby transport sector \n\n1. Road: total \n\n- private car \n-\n-\n\ngoods vehicles \nbuses + coaches \n\n2. Aviation \n\n3. Ra i I ways: total \n\n-\n-\n\npassengers \ngoods \n\n4. Inland waterways \n\n5. Other transport \n\n55. 4% \n22. 7% \n1. 6% \n\n2. 8% \n1. 1% \n\n79. 7% \n\n10. 9% \n\n3. 9% \n\n0. 7% \n\n4. 3% \n\nSource: Consultant TNoC1) \n\nThe private car alone accounts for more than 55% of the total \nco2 emissions of the transport sector. Almost \n\nthree quarters of \n\nroad and rail have their origin in passenger transport. the total co2 emissions for both \n(See \n\nfigure 4). \"The other pollutantsn \n\n34. Within \n\nthe context of \n\nthe CORINAIR programme a detailed \n\nanalysis on a Community-wide basis is available for NOx, voe \nand so2 emissions by road transport. Only partial data are \navailable for railways and none for inland waterways, shipping \n\nand aviation. The share of road transport \nNOx, 27. 1% for voe and 2. 9% for so2. (See table 4) \n\nin total emissions is 53. 6% for \n\nThe share of private cars and \n\nlight commercial vehicles for \n\nthe \n\ntotal emissions by \n\nroad \n\ntransport \n\nis 55. 6% \n\nfor NOx, \n\n66. 9% for VOC and 49. 5% for S02. (See table 4) \n\n( 1) \n\nTNO Pol icy Research, Possible \nLimiting co2 Emissions \nthe \nAugust 1991, p. 6-7. in \n\nCommunity Measures Aiming at \nTransportation Sector, Delft, \n\n\f- 17 -\n\nThe share of road transport in total CO emissions is estimated \n\nat around 74%. Data for Germany and the Netherlands show that \n\nwel I over 80% is attributable to the private car<1>. 35. For particulates \n\nand \n\nlead, \n\ncomprehensive data are not \n\navailable. Data for Germany show that transport is responsible \n\nfor 13% of total particulate emissions, for \n\nthe Netherlands \n\nthe share is as high as 22%, of which\u00b1 30% is attributable to \nthe private car<1>. As far as lead is concerned data for the Netherlands attribute \n\nto road transport a share of 87% of tot a I \n\nI ead emissions, of \n\nwhich 94% is caused by the private car<1>. 36. With \n\nregard to \n\nthe specific problems related to the urban \n\nenvironment, \n\nit \n\nis worth mentioning that of al I pollutants \n\nreleased into the atmosphere by road transport a \n\nlarge part \n\n(26% for NOx, 61% for VOC) \n\nis emitted on urban roads, as \n\ndata for the Netherlands and Germany show<1>. (See table 5). This is not surprising, since energy consumption and emissions \n\nof pollutants differ according to the driving circumstances. As shown \n\nin table 6 for the different means of road transport \n\nenergy consumption and emission are significantly higher in an \n\nurban context. 37. - No comprehensive Community data are available for the share of \n\nthe other means of transport in the emissions of the different \n\npollutants. However, figures for the UK show that 97% of non \nmethane voe is caused by road transport, 2% by rai I and 1% by \ntransport , 3% by \nshipping; 95% of NOx \n\nis caused by \n\nroad \n\nrai I, 1% by air and 1% by shipping<2>. For aviation it is not \n\nspecified whether \n\nthe NOx \n\nemissions \n\ninclude \n\ntropospheric \n\npollution, which \n\nis an area where research \n\nis still \n\nin an \n\n(1) Prognos, Evaluation of External Costs related to Road Transport : \nHeavy Goods Veh i c I es (HGV) of Minimum 12 Tonnes Gross Veh i c I e \nWeight (GVW), Basel, January 1991, tables. Engineers, \n\nInstitution \n\nof Civil \n\nPollution \n\n(2) The \n\nand \n\nits \n\nContainment, London, 1990, p. 46. - 18 -\n\nearly stage. Aircraft emissions are becoming a matter of growing concern, \n\nparticularly those produced \n\nin the mid to upper troposphere. It \n\nis \n\nthought \n\nthat \n\nthe \n\nimpact of \n\n\"greenhouse gases\", \n\nparticularly NOx\u2022 \n\nis much greater than If produced at ground \n\nlevel. 38. The social costs of atmospheric pollution take \n\ninto account \n\nthe cost of health problems: effects on \nthe respiratory \nsystem, toxicity due to lead accumulation, the loss of human \n\nproductivity due to morbidity and mortality and the damage to \n\nbui I dings. Although results vary, probably because of differences in the \n\nmethods of estimation, an average cost of 0. 3 to 0. 4X of GDP \n\nseems to emerge. According to a German study 91X of the costs \ncan be attributed to road, 4% to rail, 3X to inland waterways \n\nand 2% to air<1>. 'Water\" \n\n39. \"Water pollution\" \n\nis caused by \n\nthe direct or \n\nIndirect \n\ndischarge \n\ndangerous \nbiological agents and genetically modified organisms and \n\nsubstances, \n\nincluding \n\nchemical \n\nof \n\nmicro-organisms, into the aQuatic environment resulting in the \n\na Iteration of the qua Ii ty or nature of the water ecosystems \n\nwith detrimental effects on human health or animal and plant \n\nIi fe. Transport contributes Indirectly to ground water pollution \nthrough vehicle emissions and aircraft emissions at take-off \n\nand \n\nlanding. Transport accidents \n\ninvolving dangerous or \n\npolluting goods can have direct or \nwater ecosystem. indirect effects on the \n\n(1) Group Tran~port 2000 Plus, op. cit. , \n\nfigure \n\n16, quoting \n\n\u00b7Frau. enhofer Institute Kar 1\u00b7. ,r,uhe. - 19 -\n\nTransport contributes directly \n\nto surface water pollution \n\nthrough operational discharges from barges and other vessels \nthrough accldental discharges of \ndangerous or \n\nas \n\nas wel I \npolluting \n\ngoods carried by inland waterways. 40. \"Marine pollution\" Is caused by the discharge -\n\nintentional or \n\naccidental \n\nof chemical \n\nsubstances, \n\nincluding dangerous \n\nbiological agents and genetically modified organisms and \n\nmicro-organisms, \n\ninto \n\nthe sea or estuaries with harmful \n\neffects for \n\nthe marine ecosystems resulting \n\nin hazards \n\nto \n\nhuman health and to animal and plant I ife. Sea \n\ntransport \n\naffects \n\nthe marine \n\nenvironment \n\nthrough \n\noperational pollution in the form of intentional and routine \nloading and \ndischarges caused by operational fall out and \n\nunloading of cargo as well as through discharges of dangerous \n\nor polluting goods \n\nin the case of accidents at sea and \n\nin \n\nports. Eighty percent of all oil pollution of \n\nthe marine \n\nenvironment is caused by operational pollution. \"Soll\" \n\n41. \"Soi I pollution\" consists of a change In the qua I ity or nature \n\nof the soi I or its general degradation, caused by chemical or \n\nphysical interference. Since the soi I acts both as a reservoir \n\nand filter for water and provides storage of primary mineral \n\nwater, its contamination by harmful substances or the general \n\ndegradation of \n\nits physical or chemical structure can have \n\nfar-reaching direct as well as indirect effects on human I ife \nas wel I as plant and animal I ife. The close interaction between the ecosystems of soil, air and \n\nincreases the vulnerability of the soil and widens the \n\nwater \nrange of the potential effects of soi I pollution. - 20 -\n\n42. Transport contributes \n\nindirectly \n\nto soil pollution \n\nthrough \n\noperational discharges and directly In the case of accidental \n\ndischarges of \n\ndangerous or polluting goods. Transport \n\ninfrastructure can affect the ecological balance of the soil \n\nwith repercussions for the ecosystems of water and air. \"Noise\" \n\n43. \"Noise\" consists of a number of tonal components which have a \n\nharmful effect on human beings and can be more or \n\nless \n\nintolerable due to the discomfort, fatigue, disturbance and, \n\nin some cases, pain it may cause. Depending on its intensity \n\nand nature, \n\nthe effects of noise can \n\nrange \n\nfrom mere \n\ndiscomfort to various psychological and pathological reactions \n\nand vary according to the \n\ninformation \n\nimparted by \n\nthe noise \n\nsignal and the nervous state and activity of the receiver. Over the last two decades noise has increased considerably due \n\nto the growing spread of urbanization, the greater mobi I ity of \n\ngoods and persons and the far-reaching mechanization of most \n\nhuman activities. 44. Noise emissions and their \n\nimpact differ from one transport \n\nmode to another. The overal I noise \n\nlevel of road traffic can be broken down \n\ninto engine noise, rolling noise (from tyres on the road) and \n\nother intermittent noise. Under normal traffic conditions the \n\npresence of lorries significantly increases average levels of \n\nboth noise and \nPsycho-sociological studies have shown \n\nthe number and \n\nintensity of noise peaks. the noise of a \n\nthat \n\nsingle lorry is equivalent to that of six passenger cars \nterms of perceived annoyance. in \nintermittent \n\nOn roads with \n\ntraffic the equivalence can be as high as 10 to 15 cars for \n\n\f- 21 -\n\none \n\nlorryC1>. Depending upon traffic conditions for a single \n\nlorry the \"drive-by\" noise, which increases with the speed of \n\nthe vehicle, \n\nis between 6 and 12d B (A) (1)(2) higher \n\nthan \n\nthat of a single car. The annoyance is generally qualified in \n\nterms of the population exposed to noise \n\nlevels exceeding a \n\ncertain desirable \n\nI imit value -\n\n55 leq dB (A) (2) for new \n\nresidential areas and 65 leq dB (A) \n\nin general. <3> \n\n45. In the Community, according to OECD figures, the percentage of \n\npopulation \n\nexposed \n\nto \n\nroad \n\ntransport \n\nnoise \n\nabove \n\n55 leq dB (A) varies from 34% (Denmark) \n\nto 74% (Spain) and \n\nfor levels above 65 leq dB (A) from 4,1% (Netherlands) to 23% \n\n(Spain). The degree of urbanization, \n\nthe population density \n\nand \n\nthe structure and density of \n\nthe \n\nroad network are \n\nimportant elements which influence the annoyance level. 46. Noise emissions from trains are caused by wheel/rai I contact, \nroute and \n\nthe engine, aerodynamics, structures along \n\nthe \n\nground vibrations. The noise \n\nfrom wheel/rai I \n\ninteraction \n\nincreases with speed. In the case of highspeed trains another \n\nimportant source of noise is the contact between the overhead \n\ncatenary and \n\nthe train pantograph. Although only a \n\nI imited \n\nnumber of OECD data are aval lable on \n\nrailway noise, \n\nthe \n\npercentage of population exposed to railway noise above 55 leq \n\nd B (A) \nin the Netherlands (no figures available for \nother Member States) and above 65 leq dB (A) varies from \n\nis 6% \n\n(1) DELSEY, J. , (INRETS), Nuisances from Heavy Goods Vehicles, ECMT, \n\nParis, January 1991, p. 2. ( 2) d B (A): dee i be I , A-weighted: unit of measurement of sound \n\nwhich greater emphasis \nfrequencies to which the human ear \nThe d B (A) measure is the most usual \nand control activities. is givon \n\nin \nto medium and high \nis most sensitive. in noise abatement \n\nLeq: \n\n\"equ i va I ent sound I eve I \" , gives the aver age sound I eve I \nover a given period e. g. a full day or during daytime \nfrom 8. 00 to 20. 00. (3) ECMT, Transport Pol icy and the Environment, Paris, 1990, p. 23. - 22 -\n\n0. 3% (United Kingdom) to 1,7% (Germany). The proportion of the \n\npopulation exposed to railway noise depends on the Importance \n\nof ra i I ways \n\nin re I at ion \n\nto other modes of \n\ntransport, \n\nthe \n\ndensity of the railway network and topographical factors. 47. The main source of aircraft noise are the sound emissions from \n\nthe \n\nreactors, which at \n\ntake-off can exceed 120 dB (A). According \n\nto OECD \n\nfigures, \n\nthe percentage of population \n\nexposed to aircraft noise above 55 leq db CA) varies from 36% \n\n(Netherlands) to 1. 7% (Denmark) and above 65 leq dB from 1% \n\n(Germany) to 0. 3% (Denmark). The annoyance caused by aircraft \n\nnoise depends mainly on the siting of the airport and on air \ntraff lc density. 48. There are no data available for noise emissions from ships and \n\nbarges since the annoyance factor is virtually neg I igeable. 49. In calculating the social cost of noise for \n\ninland transport, \n\nloss of productivity, health care, effects on property values \n\nand \n\nloss of psychological wellbeing are taken \n\ninto account. Estimates for \n\nthe tot a I soc i a I cost hover around O. 1% of \n\nGDP, 64% of which \n\nis attributable to road traffic, 26% \n\nto \n\naviation and 10% to rai 1<1>. Overall \n\nroad has the biggest impact on the qua I ity of I ife in \n\nterms of noise emissions. \"Vi brat Ions\" \n\n50. \"Vibrations\" consist of \n\nlow frequency movements of physical \n\nmatter. The effects on humans and fauna are broadly similar \n\nto those of noise. Vibrations also have harmful effects on \n\nsoi I, buildings and infrastructure, which can range from mere \n\ncracks to structural damage. (1) Group Transport \n\n2000 Plus, op. cit. , \n\nfigure 16, quoting \n\nFrauenhofer Institute Karlsruhe. - 23 -\n\n51. Road vibrations are caused almost exclusively by heavy goods \nvehicles driving on roads which are structurally or in lay-out \nunsuitable for such vehicles. These are mainly roads which are \nnot motorways, giving access to or passing through large and \nsmall \nthus, of particular \ntowns and v t I I ages, where streets, bu i Id i ngs and \nconcern \nunderground services are vulnerable \nto damage. Vibrations \nbecome worse as the state of the road deteriorates. conurbations. Vibrations are, \n\nin \n\n52. Railway vibrations are determined by \n\nthere \n\nthe train. Thus, \n\nlocal ground conditions, \nthe track bedding system as wel I as the weight \n, suspension \nis a major difference \nand speed of \nbetween passenger and freight trains. Passenger trains with \ntheir I ighter axle loads and sophisticated suspension systems, \neven at high \nthat are \nperceptible at a distance of 25 m from the track side. Freight \nloads and simple suspension \ntrains, however, with high axle \nsystems are the major cause of railway vibrations. cause vibrations \n\nrarely \n\nspeed, \n\n53. Vibrations caused by aircraft on the ground have not \n\nled to \nis overpowered by \n\nmajor concern since this type of nuisance \nthe noise emissions of the engine. 54. There are no standards yet for acceptable levels of vibration \nfor any of the modes of transport, which makes it difficult to \nassess the scale of the problem. Reduction of operational pollution \n\n55. In order \n\nto \n\nreduce \n\nthe different aspects of operational \npollution, the \"best avai I able technology\" should be appl led \nto al I transport means including fuel quality and alternatives \nas well as to infrastructure. This will require stricter gaseous emission standards for al I \nfuel \ntypes, for motor vehicles, (cars, commercial vehicles, \nbuses and coaches), motorcycles, aircraft, ships and barges, \nvehicles, \nstricter noise \n\nfor motor \n\nstandards \n\nemission \n\n\f- 24 -\n\nmotorcycles, trains and aircraft, stricter standards for fuel \nquality and blo-fuels, stricter energy efficiency requirements \nfor motor engines, aircraft engines, motorcycle engines, ship \nand barge engines as we I I as new noise design \nrequirements \nfor roads, railways and runways. 56. The \"best available \n\nreduce atmospheric \ntechnology\" should \npollution, noise emissions, vibrations, fuel consumption and, \nthus contribute to the reduction of operational pollution by \nmaking the various \ntransport means more environment-friendly, \nparticularly in the road, sea and aviation sectors. The wide-spread use of electric vehicles for both goods and \npassenger transport and of hybrid (fuel/electricity) buses in \ncities and towns should affect atmospheric and noise pollution \n\nin the urban environment. On a more global scale a switch to \nelectric vehicles should affect dependancy on oi I supplies. 57. In \n\nfor \n\nI imits \n\nthe case of road transport environment-fr i end I y and safe \ntype of \nspeed \nvehicle, \ntraffic environment wl II \ncontribute to the reduction of noise and vibrations as well as \nfuel consumption and gaseous emissions, particularly co2. road vehicles according \n\nthe specific \n\nroad and \n\nthe \n\nto \n\n58. Effective \n\nimplementation and enforcement of these standards \nwi I I require continuous periodical checking in order to ensure \nthat they are not infringed. the \n\nintroduction of env I ronmenta I \nTh Is can be achieved by \ncriteria in road and air worthiness testing of all vehicles, \nincluding motorcycles, and aircraft as wel I as \nthe use of \ntechnical devices, such as speedl imiters, to ensure compliance \nwith imposed speed I imits. - 25 -\n\nThese standards wl II also require continuous updating in order \nto ensure that they keep up with technological and technical \nthe ob J ect i ve of \"best \nprogress and \navailable technology\". thus cont i nue \n\nto meet \n\n59. furthered by \nthe \nthe \n\nThis WI 11 be \nfor \ndevelopment \nperformance \nof \ninfrastructure as wel I as \ntechnologies \nvehicles. This \nfunding and providing f i sea I \nprojects. such \nIn \n\nimprovement \ndifferent \n\nthe \n\nthe promotion of \nof \ntransport modes \n\nresearch and \nenvironmental \nand \nenergy \nelectricity-driven \nencouraging \ni ncent i ves for specif i c R & D \n\nthe promotion of new \n\nachieved by \n\nand \n\nbio-energy \n\nas \nturn can be \n\n60. The \n\nnew \n\nand \n\nstandards \n\ndead I Ines \n\nintroduction of \n\nfor \nto present \nimplementation should provide \ntime \n\"target\" values and dates for \nfiscal \nincentives should encourage the user and the operator \nto opt for the technically most environment-friendly vehicle, \nthe \naircraft, vessel, motorcycle, \n\"target date. \" \n\nthe opportunity \nindustry. At \n\nfuel before \n\ntrain and \n\nthe same \n\nincentive for \n\n\"Targets\" can be set in such a way that legislation provides \nan \nindustry to keep up with technological and \nscientific progress, while the \"guided\" choice of the user \nthese \nand operator can put pressure on \n\nindustry \n\nto meet \n\n\"targets\". b. Land-use and Intrusion \n\n61. Transport \n\ninfrastructure \n\nhas \n\nimpact on the environment \n\nirreversible \nland \nand \nto the scare i ty of I and. Thus, \n\nintrusion. The \n\nimpact of \n\na \n\nand \n\npermanent \n\nin terms of \n\nof ten \nland-use \nland-use varies according \ninfrastructure w i I I not have \n\n\f- 26 -\n\nthe same \n\nimpact \n\nin the urban environment as it does \n\nin less \n\ndensely populated rural areas. In highly populated areas infrastructure can cause obstacles \n\nto the mobility of pedestrians, isolate physically as well as \n\nsocially sections within the larger urban area, create visual \n\nbarriers, \n\nexacerbate \n\nexisting \n\ntraffic \n\nnuisances \n\nand \n\ndisturbances and disrupt day-to-day social and commercial \n\nactivities. 62. Transport \n\ninfrastructure also determines the development of \n\nthe urban and suburban \n\nlandscape, \n\ninfluences the social and \n\narchitectural \n\nhomogeneity of cities \n\nand \n\ntowns, \n\nreduces \n\navailable I iving space and \"green\" belts. Transport infrastructure encroaches on the landscape : it can \n\ndisrupt or destroy natural habitats as wel I as cause permanent \n\ndamage \n\nto areas of high \n\nlandscape value, \n\nleading \n\nto a \n\ndeterioration \n\nin \n\nthe ecological balance with particular \n\nsignificance for the wildlife. 63. There are no comprehensive data available on the \n\nland taken \n\nup by the infrastructure of the different modes of transport \n\nin the Community. However, on the basis of the length of the \n\ndifferent infrastructure networks, it is nevertheless possible \n\nto work out a broad estimate of \n\nthe \n\nland-use<1> \n\nfor each \n\ntransport mode. According \n\nto Eurostat \n\nin 1986 \n\nthe Community \n\nroad network \n\nconsisted of 30,237 km of motorways and 2,549,907 km of other \n\nroads, the rai I network of 70,911 km of single track I ines and \n\n54,918 km of double \nnetwork (including natural waterways) consisted of 21,634 km. inland waterway \n\nI ines and \n\ntrack \n\nthe \n\n(1) Assumptions concerning the average width of \n\n- Roads \n- Railway lines \nForward Studies Unit, Transport and \np. 24. 11. 22m \n5. 61m \n\nthe Environment, op. cit. , \n\n\f- 27 -\n\n64. The Community road network would thus \n\ntake up a surface area \n\nof 28,949 km2 or 1. 3% of \n\nthe \n\ntotal \n\nland area of \n\nthe \n\nCommunity. This does not \n\ninc I ude \n\nthe surf ace area used for \n\nintersections and Junctions nor car parks. The parking space \n\nfor a single car \n\nin purpose-built ground level car parks can \n\nbe as much as 17 m2(1) \n\n(including \n\nthe space needed \n\nfor \n\nturning and driving). 65. For \n\nthe Community \n\nrailway network the corresponding figures \n\nare 706 \n\nkm2 or 0. 03% of \n\nthe \n\ntotal \n\nland area of \n\nthe \n\nCommunity. These figures do not take \nfor \ncomparison for commuter \n\nI and used \nrailway stations and marshal ling yards. A capacity \nthe rush hour shows \ntraffic during \n\ninto account \n\nthat a double track railway line can move the same number of \npeople (\u00b1 6500 passengers) per hour as a motorway. C2) \n\n66. It \n\nis not possible \n\nto estimate \n\nthe \n\nland-use \n\nfor \n\ninland \n\nwaterways since there are no data available for the average \n\nwidth of the different types of canals and the inland waterway \n\nnetworks \n\nin \n\nthe Community also \n\nincludes natural waterways \n\nsuch as rivers and streams. There are no global \navailable on \n\nfigures \nthe Community. for airports \n\nland-use \n\nthe \n\nin \n\nHowever, the land-use for an airport can range from 200 to 400 \n\nha for the smallest regional airports to 1500 to 2000 ha and \nover for hubsC3>. A few examples ii lustrate this : Paris-Orly \n\n1500 ha. Brussels-Zaventem 1600 ha, Amsterdam-Schiphol 1800 ha \nand Paris-Roissy 3100 ha. Ll\u2022ltatlon of land Intrusion \n\n67. In order to I imit \n\nland intrusion of infrastructure it wil I be \n\nnecessary \n\nto ensure \n\nful I use of existing \n\ninfrastructure \n\ncapacity as well as plan strategically expansion of existing \n\n( 1) \n\n(2) \n\n(3) \n\nCEC. Pol icy and Provision \n1989, Annexe 2, p. 20. Fondation Roi Baudouin, \nBruxelles, Janvier 1991, \nMens en Ruimte, Etude \ndecembre 1989, p. 19. for Cyclists in Europe, Brussels, \n\nMobilite, \np. 86. thematique du proJet TGV, Bruxelles, \n\ntransport et environnement, \n\n\f- 28 -\n\ninfrastructure networks. It will also be necessary to limit \nin \nthe \n\nparticularly \n\ntransport \n\nincrease \n\ndemand, \n\nin \n\nencumbered sectors. 68. This can be achieved by. efficient and optimal use of existing transport capacity. traffic management schemes which spread more evenly the flow \nof traffic, particularly in the road and aviation sectors. coordination of \n\nregional \ndevelopment, taking account of the impact on the environment \n\ninfrastructure \n\nplanning \n\nand. strict \n\nimplementation and \n\nthe environmental \nimpact assessment of new projects, policies, plans and \nprogrammes which affect transport demand \n\nfollow-up of. conversion of relinquished \n\ninfrastructure for \n\nthe use of \n\n\"soft\" transport. 69. Market organisation should al low for efficient and optimal use \nof existing transport capacity and thus encourage a shift from \nencumbered sectors to sectors where there is excess capacity, \nparticularly from road to rail, combined transport and inland \nwaterways \nto collective \nInfrastructure planning should be \ntransport \ncoordinated in order to contribute to that objective. for goods and \nfor persons. from private car \n\n70. Ful I implementation of the freedom to provide services and the \nelimination and prevention of distortions of competition, \nin \naccordance with the objectives of the Treaty, \ntogether with \nthe introduction of environmental charges or taxes related to \noperational pollution should contribute to a more balanced \nthe \ndistribution of \nreduce \ndifferent \nexisting pressure on \nthe most \nencumbered sectors. the existing volume of traffic between \n\ntransport sectors. This \n\ninfrastructure capacity \n\nturn should \n\nin \n\nin \n\n\f- 29 -\n\nc. Congestion \n\n71. \"Congestion\" Is a recurrent temporary phenomenon of variable \ndurat Ion, caused by an \nlmba I ance between the demand for and \nsupply of transport infrastructure capacity, which results In \nis \nan \ncharacteristic of urban \nrecently of air \ntraffic. capacity. Congestion \n\ntraffic and more \n\noverburdening \n\nexisting \n\nof \n\nimportant \n\nconsequences of \nThe most \nreduction of capacity and mobility, \nconsumption and operational pol lutlon, \ntime. wellbeing, a drop in Income, production or leisure. congestion \ninclude \nincrease of energy \ninefficient use of \nloss of comfort and personal \n\nIt can also cause a \n\n72. Available data on \n\nthe social and economic cost of \n\ncongestion indicate a cost of \u00a310 to 15 billion per year \nGreat Brlta1n<O \nNether I ands. By \nuse, the cost of congest ion \nhigh as 4 bill ion gui lders<2>. road \nin \nthe \nin car \nin the Nether I ands cou Id be as \n\nthe year 201 o, w I th a 70X \n\n1 billion guilders \n\nincrease \n\nand of \n\nfor \n\nfor \n\nthe costs of congestion \n\nin Europe have been \nIn aviation \nestimated at us $1 ,510 mi I I ion \nthe year 1988. These \nfigures include for the airlines increased operating expenses \nfor crew and other personnel, \nfuel, salaries \n(additional \nmaintenance, excess interest,. > and \nincreased f I eet size \ncost as we 11 as the costs to air 11 ne passengers in terms of \ntime<3>, with considerable repercussions for \nvalue of \nthe tourist industry. lost \n\n(1) PIARC-Technical Committee on Roads \n\nin Urban Areas, Reduction of \nCar Traffic in City Centres, Pre-Congress Report, Marrakesh 1991, \np. 8. (2) Second Chamber of the States-General, Session 1989-1990, Second \nTransport Structure Plan, part d : Government Decision, Transport \nin a Sustainable Society, p. 5. (3) PlaningsbUro Luftraumnutzer \n\nciation, The crisis of European air traffic control \nSolutions, p. 26-27. : The German Airspace Users Asso \n: Costs and \n\n\f- 30 -\n\nconsumption \n\nto \nthe aviation \nFuel \ntechnology and flying conditions (load factor, flight prof I le, \n\nsector \n\nlinked \n\nis \n\nin \n\nweather conditions, congestion). As shown \nin figure 5 fuel \nconsumption is mainly determined by flying conditions of which \nwaiting before take-off, ho Id i ng before I anding and tax 11 ng \nafter arrival are due to congestion. 73. A supply-side solution to the problem of congestion does not \nnecessarily restore the medium and long term capacity balance \nand does not, therefore, necessarily reduce the effects of the \nthe road sector, for example, can \nphenomenon. Congest ion \ntool of dissuasion, since the available \nrepresent a useful \ntime-budget of the road user might \nlead him/her to seek more \nefficient alternatives in the form of collective transport. In \n\nReduction of congestion \n\n74. Traffic and congestion are interrelated phenomena. Changes in \n\nthe volume of traffic wl I I affect congestion. reQuire a drop \n\ntransport demand \nimp roved occupancy. This can be achieved by a more \ntowards mob 11 I ty for both \nin the mobi I ity \n\nTraffic reduction will \nand/or \nenv i ronmenta 11 y rat iona I approach \ngoods and persons and wi 11 \npatterns of users and operators \n\nreQuire changes \n\nin \n\nindustrial planning can contribute to changes \npatterns \n\nin \nUrban and \nmobility \nof \ntelecommunications. Emphasis on proximity and accessibility \nshould contribute to traffic reduction and encourage the use \nof so-cal led \"soft\" means of transport, cycling and walking. the wide-spread \n\nuse \n\ncan \n\nas \n\n75. The \n\nroad and aviation sectors are \n\nthe most sensitive \n\nto \n\ncongestion. - 31 -\n\nthe road sector \n\nI arge conurbations and access routes to \nIn \nlarge conurbations are most affected by excessive traffic, \nparticularly dur Ing so-cal led peak times. Congest ion can be \nreduced by. adequate collective transport systems. high occupancy rate. traff lc management schemes. road pricing. reduced accessibi I ity to congested areas \n\nfor motorcars. a \n\nshift \n\nencourage \n\nimprovement of \n\n76. Such measures should contribute to the reduction of the volume \nof traffic as well as to the \nits fluidity. Their effects can be reinforced by transport policy measures \ntransport, \nwhich \nparticularly \ntraffic and more \nspecifically during certain periods of \nthe day and certain \ntimes of the week and year. This shift will be made easier by \na proper \nlink-up of the different stages of a Journey : from \npoint of departure (home/office) to metro/bus stop to train \nstation/airport to metro/bus stop to final destination. for urban and \n\ninter-urban \n\ncollective \n\ntowards \n\n77. In \n\nthe aviation sector hubs are particularly sensitive to \n\nexcessive traffic. Congestion can be alleviated by \n\nefficient air traffic control systems. regional distribution of traffic. seasonal distribution of holiday travel. rational use of aviation and airport capacity. best-in-class performance of airports. The availability of highspeed train services can serve as an \nalternative to short haul flights and, \nthus, contribute to \nreducing airport congestion. - 32 -\n\n78. A reduct ion \n\nIn traff le wi 11 contr lbute to the reduct Ion of \nits side \noperational pollution as wel I as congestion and \nthe pressure on existing \neffects. infrastructure capacity, particularly in the road and aviation \nsectors. I ts ef fee ts w i 11 be most far-reaching for the urban \nenv I ronment. It will also \n\nreduce \n\nincrease \n\n79. In the case of congestion, particularly in urban and suburban \nareas, infrastructure planning should not necessarily seek to \nin certain instances \nin capacity, since \npromote an \nin \ntransport demand and \nthis might boost \nlong-term \nthe case of road \nIn \nexacerbate \ntransport. the \nlink-ups \nthe different modes might \ninfrastructure \nIn certain \ncontribute to solving the problem of congest Ion \ninstances by making alternative transport more accessible. the problem, particularly \n\nadequate \nof \n\nnetworks \n\nHowever, \n\nbetween \n\nthe \n\nd. Risks Inherent to the transPort of dangerous goods \n\n80. The release of certain chemical substances can cause air, \nwater and soi I pollution with extremely harmful effects for \nhuman life as well as animal and plant life. The carriage of \nsuch goods, thus, represents a risk for the environment. involving dangerous or polluting goods, \nA transport accident \nIncluding dangerous biological agents, genetlcal ly modified \norganisms or micro-organisms, can cause major env I ronmenta I \ndamage if these goods are discharged into the environment. The \ndamage wi I I depend upon the nature, characteristics and volume \nof the substances thus released. 81. Transport accidents involving dangerous or polluting goods can \nterm \n\naffect the ecosystem of water, soil and air with \ndirect and Indirect effects for human, plant and animal I lfe. long \n\n\f- 33 -\n\nTechnical \n\nfal lure \n\nIn a vehicle can have out-of-proportion \n\neffects as was illustrated in 1983, when due to brake fa I lure, \n\na 10t \n\nlorry carrying a \n\nload of dangerous chemicals crashed \n\ninto several vehicles in the vicinity of Huy (Belgium). This \n\ncaused the discharge of corrosive liquids into the environment \nInjured, four burnt cars and \nand resulted in five deaths, 21 \n\nextensive damage to buildings and the environment. 82. Ace i dents at sea, such as those of the Amoco Cadiz and the \n\nTorry canyon, can \n\nlead \n\nto major disasters for \n\nthe marine \n\nenvironment. The Exxon-Valdez accident in 1989 resulted \n\nin a \n\nsp i I I of 1O. 8 mi I I ion ga I Ions or 35, 000 tonnes of o I I with \n\nmajor and \n\nlong I ast i ng effects on the marine environment as \n\nwell as on plant and animal life along the coast. The actual \n\ndamage to fisheries, water, wildlife and land is estimated by \nAmerican sources between 2. 5 and 5 bi II ion u. s. s. Other dangerous goods can have equally damaging effects, \n\nparticularly in the case of toxic, explosive or radioact Ive \n\nmaterials. Reduction end prevention of risks Inherent to the transport of \ndangerous goods \n\n83. In order \n\nto prevent and reduce \n\nthe risks \n\ninherent \n\nto the \n\ntransport of dangerous goods, \n\nit wl 11 be necessary to make \n\nthis \n\ntype of \n\ntransport safer and al low \n\nfor \n\nimmediate and \n\nappropriate intervention in the case of accidents. This will require. Minimum requirements for the safe carriage of all types of \n\ntransport of dangerous goods. Spec i a I training requirements for \n\nthose \n\nin charge of the \n\ntransport of the goods. - 34 -. Un I form marking of a I I dangerous goods for a I I \n\ntypes of \n\ntransport. Introduction and use of telematics for transport management \n\nof dangerous goods. Comprehensive safety instruct ions for \n\nthe hand Ii ng of the \n\ngoods during their transport. General safety reQuirements for the packaging of dangerous \n\ngoods and for the means of transport. General transport safety measures, particularly in the road \nand maritime sectors, \nfor \ncommercial vehicles carrying dangerous goods as well as the \nuse of speed I imiters. including safe speed \n\nI imits \n\nSuch measures should prevent risks and reduce or contain the \npotential harmful effects in the case of transport accidents. e. Conclusions of assessment \n\nto \ninfrastructure on \n\n84. The assessment of the impact of transport on the environment \nimpact of \nits operational pollution, \nthe \naccording \ntransport \nconseQuences of \nthe \ncongestion and the risks linked to the carriage of dangerous \nimpact differs \u00b7for each transport \ngoods has shown \nsector. that the \n\nspace,. Operational pollution is the key component for al I transport \nthe road, sea and air \n\nsectors, but more particularly for \nsectors. Land-use \n\nranks as second, particularly \n\nin \n\nthe \n\nroad and \n\nra i I way sectors. - 35 -. Congestion, although \n\nimportant, constitutes a \n\nsecondary \nfactor which exacerbates operational pollution and puts \nis \npressure on \nparticularly important in the case of road and air transport \n\ninfrastructure \n\ncapacity. existing \n\nIt \n\nand In the case of road transport the effects are heightened \nin the urban environment. The \n\nto \n\nrisks \n\ninherent \n\nthe carriage of dangerous goods \nconstitute an important potential impact on the environment. This aspect of \nthe volume of \ndangerous goods carried by a particular transport sector. linked \n\nimpact \n\nthe \n\nto \n\nis \n\n85. The \n\nimpact of al I \n\ntransport sectors \n\nincludes \n\nin different \n\ndegrees these four components. Operational pollution, \n\ncongestion \ninherent to the transport of dangerous goods \n\nland-use, \n\nrisks \nand \ntogether as \n\nwell as Individually rank highest for road transport. Land-use \n\nin \n\nthe case of sea and air \n\nis of a \ntotally different nature to that of road and rai I transport. This in turn affects the nature of congestion and the way it \ncan be control led. transport \n\n\f- 36 -\n\nIV. ECQNQMIC TRENDS \n\na. Trends and forecasts \n\n86. The size and scale of \n\nthe \nenvironment Is a function of the volume of transport and the \ntransport \nactivities of \nIs \nthe factors which determine transport \nessential \n\neach \nto analyze \n\nsector. Therefore, \n\ntransport on \n\nimpact of \n\nthe \n\nIt \n\ndemand. both \nTransport demand \ngeneral reflects the level of economic activity. freight and passengers \n\nfor \n\n-\n\nin \n\n87. s i nee 1970 the annua I economic growth \n\nin the Community has \n\naveraged 2. 6% \n\nin rea I terms. Economic forecasts expect th Is \n\ntrend to continue until at least the end of the century. For the period 1970-1988 the overall annual growth \nin Inland \ntransport averaged 3. 1X for passengers and 2. 3X for goods. This growth was not spread evenly between \nthe different \nsectors. Thus, the increase in road transport both in absolute \n\nand relative terms has been much higher \ninland \n\ntransport sectors \n\n(see figure 6). Since 1980 \n\nthe other \nthe \n\nthan for \n\nin a Ir passenger transport has been highest of a I I \nincrease \nwith an average growth rate of 6. 1X per year. (see tables 7 \n\nand 8). The growth in tourism has contributed to this trend. 88. The completion of the Single Market together with the creation \n\nthe European Economic Area. of \ndevelopments \nMonetary Union wl 11 \nactivity in the Community \n\nthe po I it i ca I and economic \nin Eastern Europe as wel I as Economic and \nlevel of socio-economic \nin the short and medium as well as \n\ninfluence \n\nthe \n\nthe long term. The expected increase in economic activity, as \nwel I as \nis I ikely to \nboost transport demand. (see Table 9) \n\nintra-Community and external \n\ntrade \n\nin \n\n\f- 37 -\n\n89. In \n\nthe \"business as usua I\" scenar lo < 1 > road \n\ntransport \n\nin \n\nthe Community will continue to increase significantly. Road haulage is expected to Increase by 42X between 1990 and \n2010, from 805 to 1. 139 billion tons-km by 2010, whereas rail \nsame \nincrease by \ntransport \nperiod. (1) \n\nshould only \n\n33X during \n\nthe \n\n90. Although \n\nthe year 2010, demand \n\nthe total populat Ion of \n\nthe Community wl 11 \nfor passenger \n\nremain \nstab le unt i I \ntransport \nwill be influenced by changes in the demographic environment, \nthe share of female \nthe workforce, \nincluding \nthe size and number of \nparticipation \nhouseholds, \nlengthening of active \nretirement. the size of \nin \n\nthe age structure, \n\nthe workforce, \n\nthe \n\nThe stock of private cars should \nincrease by 45X from 115 \nleading to a car \nmi I I Ion \nownership of 503 cars per 1000 inhabitants by 2010 against 381 \nat present. Cl) \n\nin 1987 to 167 mi 11 ion by 2010, \n\n91. The specific fuel consumption of cars should Improve from 9. 3 \nto 7. 8 1/100 km by 2010. The average \n1/100 km at present \nannual mileage per car should decrease from 14,400 km/year in \nthe total car mileage \n1990 to 13,400 km/year by 2010, but \nfrom 1,727 \nincrease by 25X between 1990 and 2010, \nshould \nbll lion km in 1990 to 2,166 bi Ilion km in 2010. <1> \n\nIn the same scenario passenger transport by air is expected to \nincrease by 74X between 1990 and 2010. <1> \n\n(1) Energy \n\nfor a New Century. The European \nPerspective, Special Issue, Brussels, July 1990, Technical Annex. In Europe, Energy \n\n\f- 38 -\n\nb. Structural changes \n\nof major structural \n\n92. over the I ast two decades the economy has been undergoing a \nnumber \nfar-reaching \nconsequences for transport demand. Transport prices, which so \nfar have not reflected all external and internal costs, have \ncontributed to these changes. changes, with \n\nfrom \n\nbasic \n\nthe structure of \n\nindustrial production has been \n93. Firstly, \nshifting \nhigh-technology \nindustry \nproduction of high value/low volume goods. Moreover high \na \nindustry \ntechnology \ngeographical shift \nindustrial \nspaces\" in Southern Europe. the Community \n\nthe so-cal led \n\nundergoing \n\ntowards \n\ntowards \n\n\"new \n\nis \n\nin \n\n94. The ever growing importance of the service industry is another \nmajor structural change. The service sector represented 58% of \nin the Community in 1985. This share is expected to \ntotal GDP \ngo up to 66% by the year 2000. The trend is to concentrate new \nservice activities in the core regions of the Community, where \nthey wi I I put \nthe already congested \ntransport networks. further pressure on \n\n95. Manufacturing technology is also undergoing rapid and radical \ninventory management \nchanges. The \"Just-in-time\" methods of \nto sma I I er and more frequent shipments, shorter \nare I ead i ng \nI ead \nin door-to-door de I i ver i es. The \nmore versatile customer-orientated production methods also \nfrequent deliveries of smaller shipments. in more \nresult \nTransport demand \nthus, becoming more sophisticated and \nis, \nmore special lsed. t i mes and an \n\nincrease \n\n96. The \n\nimprovement of communication networks has in turn lead to \na wider geographical dispersal of economic activity a~d more \nsophisticated and more versatile production systems. The trend \n\n\f- 39 -\n\ntowards sub-production, as \n\nfor example \n\nin \n\nthe motor-car \n\nindustry, is leading to a large number of interplant flows of \n\ncommodities and personnel. Data convnunications make it further \npossible to separate the so-cal led \"back-office\" routine work \nfrom central management activities. 97. These structural changes have furthered the changes \n\nin scale \n\nand size of undertakings, in the siting, the range and nature \n\nof operations, which in turn have resulted in a concentration \n\nof production in the most favourable locations. Al I \n\nthese factors affect \n\nthe demand \n\nfor goods \n\ntransport, \n\nthe emphasis from volume \ntonnage, \ntotal \n\nto frequency and speed, \nshifting \nshipment \nand \nboosting \nfrequency as wel I as speed, but \nreducing average shipment \nsize. The qua I itative aspects - speed, rel iabi I ity, frequency, \nf lexibl I ity - are thus gaining in importance. average distances \n\nc. The user\u2022s choice \n\n98. The analysis by a consultantC1) of \n\nthe different factors \n\nwhich determine \n\nthe choice of \n\ntransport mode \n\nand \n\ntheir \n\nrelative \n\nimportance provides the fol lowing evidence on \n\nthe \n\nuser's choice of transport mode. \"Frelght\" \n\n99. For \n\nthe transport of goods the user's choice is based on a \n\nnumber of criteria, including. the value/weight ratio of the commodity. the cost of transport including terminal, transshipment and \n\nI ine-haul costs. the speed and reliability of delivery \n\n(1) Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Factors Influencing Mode Choice, \n\nfinal report, Rotterdam, September 1991. - 40 -. the qua I ity of service, \n\nIncluding safe transport of \n\nthe \n\ngoods. the \n\nadministrative \n\nand \ninformation on the whereabouts of goods \n\nefficiency \n\navailability \n\nof. the distance and door-to-door \n\nJourney \n\nt i me \n\nC I nc I ud I ng \n\nloading/unloading time). the available alternatives. avallabi lity of and access to infrastructure. the \n\nrelated \n\nof \n\nservices \n\navailability \ndistribution,. ). (packaging, \n\n100. The \n\ntransport of goods, however, needs to be viewed as an \nintegral part of \nthe production and \nlogistics of \ndistribution process. The logistics may vary for the different \nstages in the goods flow, depending primarily upon the nature \nof the goods. the \n\n(I) \n\ntransport \n\nraw materials, \n\nis usually \"point \n\nto \nFor \npoint\", generally between a I imited number of suppliers \nis predominantly by road and Inland \nand customers. It \nwaterways, \nthe \nmarket. Transport costs constitute \nthe determining \nfactor in the user's choice. ra i I taking up on I y a sma I I share of \n\n(ii) For \n\nis \n\nproducts, \n\ntransport \n\nsemi-finished \n\n\"convergent\", generally between \nsupp I i ers and a sma I I number of \ntransport \nlogistics being \nreliability of delivery are \nchoice of mode. usual IY \nlarge number of \na \nI arge customers. The \nthe \nthose of \"Just-In-time\". Speed and \nthe \n\nthe key elements \n\npredominantly \n\nservice \n\nroad, \n\nby \n\nin \n\nIs \n\n(iii) For finished products, transport is usually \"divergent\", \nbetween a large number of suppliers and customers. It Is \nto a lesser extent by air. A \npredominantly by road and \n\n\f- 41 -\n\ncombination of quality of service, speed and reliability \nas well \nrelated services \ndetermine the choice of mode. the availability of \n\nas \n\n(iv) For \n\n, \n\nconsumer \n\ngoods, \nbetween a \n\ntransport \n\"very \nI arge number of supp I i ers and \ndivergent 11\ncustomers. The service is predominantly by road. Speed \nand re Ii ab i Ii ty are the key factors \nin the cho Ice of \nmode. is usually \n\n\"Passengers\" \n\n101. The user's choice \n\nin \n\nthe case of passenger \n\nis \ninfluenced by three sets of factors : the characteristics of \nthe \nthe different modes, \ndecision-maker, the nature of the Journey. socio-economic status of \n\ntransport \n\nthe \n\n(i) \n\nThe characteristics of the different modes Include the \ntravel time and the monetary cost. *The travel time Is usually divided into two components \n: in-vehicle time and out-of-vehicle time. The out-of \nis often \ntime spent on waiting and walking \nvehlcle \nrated as more uncomfortable and inconvenient than in \nvehicle time. * The monetary cost \n\nIs usua I I y the out-of-pocket cost \n(fare for pub I ic transport, petrol costs, tolls and \nparking charges for private cars). Fixed costs such \nas depreciation and \ninsurance, \nannual road tax appear to have little or no effect on \nthe user's short-term choice. interest charges, \n\nOther determining characteristics are \nthe \npunctua I i ty. physical \n\nsystem, \n\ncomfort, safety, \n\ntransparency of \nstatus, \n\n\f- 42 -\n\nCi i) \n\nI lfecycle stage of \n\nthe household, \nIncome, age, sex, \nI I cence, \noccupa t I on, educa t I on, possess I on of dr Iv i ng \ncar ownership and \nresidence are the main elements of \nthe socio-economic status of the decision-maker which \nInfluence his/her choice. ind iv i dua Is may be more sens It i ve \n\nFor physical, economic or social reasons, certain groups \nof \nthan others to \nthe transport mode. Thus, \nspecific characteristics of \nlow income agents respond more readily to \ntravel costs, \nworking mothers to travel time, etc. (iii) The nature of the Journey is characterised by the travel \npurpose (work, study, shopping, social visit, holiday,. ), distance, time of departure and arrival, day of \nthe week, \nyear. Certain \ncharacteristics of the mode of transport may be more \nimportant for certain types of Journeys : for work and \nbusiness Journeys travel \ntime and reliability are more \nimportant \n\nthan monetary costs. season, \n\ntime \n\nthe \n\nof \n\nis subject \nto a number of \n102. The user's choice, however, \nconstraints of which the most \nimportant are the availability \nof specific modes and the awareness of alternatives. The key \nbe \nelement \nthe \nthe \nlack of \naval I ibl i I ity of \n\ndecision \na motor vehicle. Habit \n\nto \nand \n\nappears \n\nprocess \n\nin \n\nfrom private car \n\ninformation about alternative modes may prevent a person from \nto rail, bus or underground, \nswitching \nsuggests \nespecially \nreliable \nthat \ninformation about collective \nthe \nuser's choice In the long term. the short-term. Evidence, however, \nand \ninfluence \n\nthe wide availiblllty of effective \ntransport can \n\nIn \n\nIt is also important to note that the availability of a motor \nin terms of \nvehicle affects the mobility pattern of the user \nthe frequency and distance of the Journeys : users with easy \naccess to cars cover more than four times the mileage of those \nwithout cars. - 43 -\n\nV. A COMMON STRATEGY \n\na. A global approach \n\n103. The \n\nassessment \n\nnever \nenvironmentally neutral. Thus, since existing trends indicate \n\ntransport \n\nshown \n\nthat \n\nhas \n\nis \n\nthat transport and traffic, particularly in the road sector, \n\nwi 11 cont lnue \n\nto grow over \n\nthe next decades and \n\nthat \n\nthe \n\ndemand for transport services, al I things being equal, wi 11 \n\nincrease, \n\nthe \n\nimpact of \n\ntransport on \n\nthe environment wi 11 \n\nbecome more significant. It is, therefore, essential that the \n\nCommunity adopt a Common strategy, which aims to reduce or at \n\nleast contain \nthe overall \nenvironment in a global and coherent manner. impact of \n\ntransport on \n\nthe \n\n104. Such a strategy wi 11 \n\nrequire a global approach \n\nin order to \n\nensure that \n\ntransport cont i nues to fu If i I \n\nits economic and \n\nsocial \n\nfunctions under \n\nthe most \n\nfavourable environmental \n\nconditions, while safeguarding the freedom of choice for the \n\nuser. A global \n\napproach \n\nshould \n\nalso \n\nensure \n\nthat \n\nit \n\ncontributes to social and economic cohesion in the Community \nand to the prosperity of the peripheral regions. Moreover, a g loba I approach shou Id ensure that \n\nthe strategy \n\ncovers \n\na I I \n\naspects of \n\nthe \n\nimpact \n\nand, \n\nthus, \n\nreduces \n\nopera t i ona I \n\npo I I u t ion, \n\ns I ows \n\ndown \n\nunnecessary \n\ntransport \n\ndemand, reduces traffic and congestion and promotes efficient \n\nuse of existing \n\ntransport \n\nand \n\ninfrastructure capacity, \n\nguarantees safer \n\ntransport of dangerous goods and \n\nreduces \n\npressure on the infrastructure capacity of the most encumbered \n\nsectors. 105. A strategy based on \n\na global \n\napproach would \n\npromote \n\n'sustainable mobility' by \n\nintegrating \n\ntransport \n\ninto an \n\noveral I pattern of sustainable development which would seek to \n\"meet \nthe \nability of future generations to meet their own needs\"C1) and \n\nthe present without compromising \n\nthe needs of \n\n(1) The World Commission on Environment and Development, \"Our Common \n\nFuture\", 1990, p 43. - 44 -\n\nwould, thus, be In line with the objectives and targets of the \nforthcoming Fifth Action Programme \nA new Strategy for \nEnvironment and Development - \"Towards Sustainability\". 106. The Commission \n\nis aware \n\nthat adequate protection of \n\nthe \n\nenvironment is not possible by reliance only on technological \n\nprogress and technical measures. Evidence of this is given by \n\nthe Commission Communication of September 1991, \"A Community \nImprove \nStrategy to Limit Carbon Dioxide Emissions and \nEnergy Efficiency\"Cl>. to \n\nstrategy presents \n\nand \na wide \nThis \ninitiatives, including the need to study the possibility of a \n\nrange of measures \n\nnew \n\nfiscal \n\ninstrument \n\nin \n\nthe \n\nform of a co2/energy \n\ntax \n\napplicable to all non-renewable energy. Given the \n\nlow price \n\nelasticity of demand for private road transport the proposed \nco21energy \nadditional pol icy measures, both regulatory and economic. tax wi 11 \n\ntransport \n\nrequire \n\nsector \n\nthe \n\nIn \n\n107. The same approach is adopted for urban transport in the Green \nPaper on the Urban Envlronment<2> where it Is recognised that \nenvironment-friendly vehicles would bring some relief, but \nthat It is also necessary to initiate a significant shift in \nfavouring public over \nthe balance between transport modes, \nimpact of motor \nprivate transport and reducing the level and \n\ntraffic in inner cities. 108. A strategy based on a global approach wi I I \n\ndifferent kinds of \n\ninitiatives \n\nthus require \nstandardization, market \n\norganization and cost-charging measures as we I I as research \n\nInitiatives. (1) SEC (91) 1744 final \n(2) \n\n[Com(90)218 f lnal of 27 June 1990] \n\n\f- 45 -\n\nb. Balance sheet of Community action \n\n109. The Community has already to a large extent been guided by the \n\nprinciples of 'sustainable moblllty'. (I) \u00b7standardisation. easures\u00b7 \n\n110. A large number of standardisation measures have already been \nadopted in order to ensure a better environmental performance \nof the different transport means as wel I as the safer carriage \nof dangerous goods. They include. gaseous emission standards for petrol and diesel engines. noise standards \n\nfor aircraft, motor vehicles and motor \n\ncycles. standards for sulfur content of diesel fuel. air qua I ity I imit values and guide values for sulfur dioxide \nand suspended part i cu I ates and air qua Ii ty standards for \nlead and nitrogen dioxide. harmonisation of weights and dimensions for heavy goods \n\nvehicles. int roduct ion of ABS systems for heavy goods veh i c I es and \n\ntrailers. introduction of speed I imiters for certain types of heavy \n\ngoods vehicles and buses \n\nrequirements \n\nfor drivers of \n\ntraining \ndangerous goods \nnotification procedure for ships carrying dangerous goods in \nbulk \n\nlorries carrying. notification procedure for \n\nthe \n\ntransfrontier shipment of \n\nhazardous wastes within the Community \n\n\f- 46 -. mandatory environmental \n\nimpact assessment for infrastructure \n\nprojects \n\nmandatory avai labi I ity of unleaded fuel. 111. The Commission \n\nhas \n\nsupplemented \n\nthe existing Community \n\nlegislation with additional proposals. These include \n\nupdating of gaseous and noise emission standards for motor \nvehicles \nstandards for railway noise \n\nchecking of gaseous emissions in road worthiness test. extension of environmental \n\nimpact assessment. extension \n\nof notification procedure \n\nto ships \n\ncarrying \n\ndangerous \n\nand polluting goods \n\nin containers, \n\ntankers, \n\ntanker-lorries. obligation to designate a risk prevention officer for \n\nthe \n\ntransport of dangerous goods. (II) \u00b7Market organisation. easures\u00b7 \n\n112. The Community \n\nhas \n\na number of market \norganisation measures which \nintroduce the freedom to provide \nservices in the transport sector as wel I as measures which aim \n\nalready \n\nadopted \n\nto eliminate or prevent distortions of competition in order to \n\nachieve a better uti I isation of existing transport capacity. These include \n\nintra-Community road hau I age and road passenger. access to \ntransport \nI imlted cabotage in the road sector. cabotage in the inland navigation sector. I imited access to railway infrastructure and market. access to regional airports \n\nreduced constraints on access, fares and capacity \n\nin \n\nthe \n\naviation sector \n\n\f- 47 -. coordination of scrapping schemes for inland navigation. freedom to provide maritime services. state aid measures for combined transport. Community financing of infrastructure projects. 113. The Commission has submitted to the Council additional market \n\norganisation measures. These Include \n\nextension of cabotage \nsector \n\nin maritime transport and \n\nthe road. further reduction of constraints on access, capacity and \n\nfares in the aviation sector. improvement of competitive position of railways. (Ill) \u00b7cost-charging. easures\u00b7 \n\n114. The Commission has already proposed measures which take better \n\naccount of the external costs of transport. These include. infrastructure charging for heavy goods vehicles. harmonisation of excise duties on mineral oi Is. Also, the 1991 Commission Communication \"A Community strategy \nto Limit Carbon Dioxide Emissions and \nImprove Energy \nEfficiency\" includes a chapter on fiscal measures which refers \nto \n\nto. the possible use of tax differentiation for vehicle taxation \nso as to take account of the impact of motor vehicles on the \nenvironment (gaseous emissions, noise,. ) \n\nthe possible \nintroduction of a \nthe use of non-renewable energy \nthe reduction of the \"greenhouse effect\". tax on co2 emissions and \nin order to contribute to \n\n\f- 48 -\n\n(Iv) \u00b7Research Initiatives\u00b7 \n\n115. A number of act ions and research projects covering certain \nimpact of transport have already \n\naspects of the environmental \n\nbeen initiated. These include \n\n* BRITE/EURAM \n\nin \n\n(Basic Research \n\nIndustrial Technology for \nEurope & European Research \n: R & D \nprogramme to strengthen the competitiveness of the European \nmanufacturing industry in world markets and to establish the \nthe development of new \nnecessary \n\ntechnological base for \n\nin Advanced Mater i a Is) \n\nproducts and processes. * CORINE CCoord i nation of Information on \n\nthe Env I ronment) \n\nprogramme to collect information on the levels and sources, \nincluding road transport, of air pollution. *COST (European Cooperation \n\ntechnical research) \nincluding \nprojects \n(COST 302, 303) \n\nin the field of scientific and \nframework for research cooperation, \nvehicles \non \n\nenvironment-friendly \n\n* DRIVE (Dedicated Road Infrastructure for Vehicle Safety \n\nin \n: R & D programme to develop and validate tools and \nEurope) \nstrategies for demand management, to reduce congestion, to \nthe \nimprove \nroad safety, \nthe \nimpact \nenvironmental \nappl lcation of transport telematics. transport efficiency and \nthrough \nroad \n\nroad \nof \n\ntransport \n\n* EURET \n\n(Specif lc Research \n\nand Technological Development \nProgramme in the field of Transport) : research programme to \noptimize network exploitation and transport logistics and to \nreduce harmful externalities. - 49 -\n\nsupply) \n\n*JOULE (Joint Opportunities for Unconventional or Long Term \nR & D programme \nEnergy \nto develop energy \ntechnologies that take account of new and renewable energy \nsources, to increase security of supp I y and reduce energy \nimports and \nto environmental protection, \nincluding reduction of co2 emissions. to contribute \n\n* SAST \n\n(Strategic Analysis \n\nin Science and Technology) \n\nprogramme to identify, amongst others, the extent to which \ntechnological development can contribute to the reduction of \nthe impact of transport on the environment. *SAVE \n\n(Specific Action of Vigorous Energy Efficiency) \n\nprogramme of energy conservation measures, amongst others, \nin the transport sector. *STEP (Science and Technology for Environmental Protection) : \nR & D programme \ntechnological \nsupport for the environmental pol icy of the Community and to \npromote the Quality of environmental research. to provide scientific and \n\n* THERMIE \n\n(Promotion of European Energy Technologies) \n\nto \n\npromote \n\ntechnologies, \ninnovative \nprogramme \ndissemination and market penetration of energy technologies, \nto encourage greater use of new and renewable energy sources \nenvironmetal \nand \nprotection. efficiency \n\nimprove \n\nenergy \n\nenergy \n\nand \n\nto \n\nc. \u00b7sustainable llOblllty\u2022 and future transport development \n\n116. These measures and initiatives go some way \n\ntowards resolving \nthe areas of conflict between transport and the environment. However, on \nin \nin view of \ntransport demand and traffic, they wi I I not suffice. the expected growth \n\ntheir own, \n\n\f- 50 -\n\nthrough \n\nthe \nThe gains achieved \nfreedom to provide services and the elimination of distortions \nthe overall \nof competition are \nincrease in mob ii ity due to the growth in economic activity. technical standardisation, \n\nto be overtaken by \n\nlikely \n\n117. Even \n\nthe \n\nthe \n\n'acquis' were \n\nto be \n'best available \n\nthe \nsupplemented by \nif \nthe \nand \ntechnology' \nintroduction of \nfor noise and \nstrictest possible environmental \nand \ngaseous \na I ternat i ves as we I I as measures to enforce and check their \nimplementation, the gains thus achieved could easily be offset \nin traffic and congestion as illustrated under \nby the growth \npoint 91. fuel Quality \n\nefficiency, \n\nemissions, \n\nstandards \n\nfuel \n\n118. A Common strategy for \nadditional initiatives. \u00b7sustainable mob/ I lty' wi 11 \n\nrequire \n\nSuch initiatives should focus on. market organisation measures which further \n\nthe freedom to \nprovide services and \nthe elimination of distortions of \ncompetition, while aiming more specifically at encouraging \nthe more environment-friendly modes as wel I as efficient use \nof existing capacity. additional risk prevention measures In order to ensure safer \n\ncarriage of dangerous goods \n\ntraffic management \ncongestion and \nthe \nimprove efficiency of transport operations \n\nto \nschemes \nintroduction of advanced telematics to \n\nin areas most vulnerable \n\nthe use of fiscal \ninfluence \nthe user \ntechnology \ncleaner \ntransport modes. instruments \n\nand economic \nand operator's choice \nthe more \nand \n\nto \nfavour of \nenvironment-fr i end I y \n\nin order \n\nin \n\n\f- 51 -\n\n119. In order \n\ninvestment should be guided \n\nto reinforce these Initiatives pub I le and private \ntransport, \n\ntowards col lectlve \n\nwhereas urban, industrial and commercial as well as regional \n\ndevelopment p Ianni ng shou Id be geared \n\ntowards reduc Ing \n\nthe \n\nneed for mobility. At \n\nthe same time infrastructure planning \n\nshould be made subject to \n\nrestrictions on \n\nland intrusion as \n\nwe 11 as to strict env i ronmenta I \n\nimpact assessment procedures \n\nat both the strategic and project stages, including evaluation \n\nof alternative options. 120. Coordination of such measures and intiatives wi I I be essential \nthe \n\nthe characteristics of \n\ntheir adaptation \n\nas wl II \n\nto \n\ndifferent transport sectors. At the same time it wil I also be \n\nto ensure \n\nnecessary \nthe effects \nresulting from the different measures should remain compatible \neconomic \nwith \n\nthe overall objective while allowing \n\ninteraction of \n\nthat any \n\nfor \n\neff iclency and commercial viabi I ity of \n\ntransport and \n\nthe \n\nfreedom of choice of the user and operator. It will also be \n\nnecessary to take due account of the possible effects on smal I \n\nand medium size undertakings. Equally \n\nimportant will be the \n\nneed \n\nto ensure \n\nthat \n\nthe peripheral \n\nregions share \n\nin \n\nthe \n\nprosperity of the Single Market. \"The role of the user and operator\u2022 \n\n121. A key element in any strategy which is to prove effective wi I I \n\nbe the behaviour of the user and operator. the dominance of \n\nGiven \nthe \nimpact on \nits \nthe vo I ume of road \nenvironment and \ntraffic, it will be essential to influence the behaviour of \n\nroad \nthe expected growth \n\ntransport, \nin \n\nthe road user, particularly the private car owner. As shown above the key factor \n\nin the decision-maker's choice \n\nof mode is the availability of a motor vehicle, which \n\nin turn \n\naffects the mobi I ity pattern of the user. This becomes al I the \n\n\f- 52 -\n\nmore important in view of the expected growth in car ownership \n\nwhich could be as high as one car for every two citizens in \n\nthe Community by the year 2010. 122. A strategy which seeks to influence human behaviour \n\ntowards \n\nmob i I i ty w I I I need \n\nto focus on \n\nthe attitude of \n\nthe user \n\ntowards the car. The user \nan \nenvironment-friendly and energy efficient vehicle, alternative \n\nencouraged \n\nto opt \n\nshould, \n\nthus, \n\nfor \n\nbe \n\nmodes of transport, \n\nincluding \"soft\" means of transport, as \n\nwel I as a rational use of the motor car. 123. This could be achieved by fiscal \n\nincent Ives, efficient and \naccessible collective transport, restricted vehicle access, \n\nI imited parking faci I it ies \n\nin city centres but strategically \n\nplaced car parks al lowing for adequate I ink-up with collective \n\ntransport. integrated \n\nurban \n\nand \n\nsuburban planning \n\nand \n\nimproved facl I ltles for \"soft\" users. Such actions would be more effective \n\nif \n\nreinforced by \n\ninformation, public education and publ le awareness campaigns. 124. The user is also a consumer and as consumer should be given \n\nadequate and accurate \n\ninformation about \n\nthe environmental \n\nperformance of veh i c I es so that an env i ronmenta 11 y rat iona I \n\nchoice is possible. 125. As \n\nseen above \n\nthe user's choice, when \n\nIt comes \n\nto \n\nthe \n\ntransport of goods, \n\nis influenced by a number of criteria of \n\nwhich \n\nin the majority of cases speed and reliability are the \n\nmost \n\nimportant. This to a \n\nlarge extent determines the user's \n\nchoice of operator. In order to encourage more environment-friendly transport of \n\ngoods It will be necessary to off-load the increase in demand \nthe road onto other sectors by providing alternatives \nfrom \n\nequal IY attractive to road haulage. - 53 -\n\nThis wi 11 \nrequire more efficient rai I services for goods, \nbetter access to combined transport and improved transshipment \n\nfacilities, improved quality of service and reliable door-to \ndoor travel time for inland navigation and coastal shipping. to opt \n\n126. At the same time the operator should be encouraged and in some \ninstances compel led \n\"clean\" \nvehicle, aircraft, barge, ship and train and make full use of \nInfrastructure capacity. Fiscal and \nexisting transport and \neconomic \nselective \nrestrict ions on access to \ninfrastructure can contribute to \nthis, as wel I as reduce the demand for transport. as general \n\ntechnically \n\nincentives \n\nas well \n\nand \n\nthe \n\nfor \n\nd. A new framework \n\n127. Although the Community has recognised the need for a coherent \nthe \nthe \nand global \nenvironment, \nfor a Common \nis as yet no \nstrategy aimed at 'sustainable mobility' in the Community. approach \nthere \n\ntransport on \n\nimpact of \n\nframework \n\nto \n\nSuch a framework wi I I require coordinated examination of. measures \n\nlaying down strict environmental standards for \nmotor vehicles, motorcycles, aircraft, barges, ships, trains \nand fue I qua Ii ty as we I I as measures to enforce and check \ntheir implementation \n\nenvironmental measures \nlaying down strict air and water \nqua I ity standards as wel I as strict limit values for air and \nwater pollutants supplemented by measures \nto check and \nenforce their implementation. transport policy measures which \n\nimplement the objectives of \nthe Treaty as well as Community policies adopted to fulfil \nthese objectives and ensure efficient and optimal use of \nexisting transport capacity for the different modes, allow \n\n\f- 54 -\n\nenvironment-friendly modes, such as railways, inland and sea \n\nnavigation and combined transport, \n\naviation and ensure \n\nthat \n\ntransport contributes \n\nto compete with road and \nto co2 \n\nstabi I isation in the Convnunity. an overall action plan for the transport of dangerous goods \n\nwhich wi I I ensure that these goods are carried in the safest \npossible manner throughout the Community. fiscal and economic instruments and a framework for the use \nin the transport \nto promote environment-fr i end I y transport \n\nof such \nsector \n\nthe Member States \n\ninstruments by \n\nin order \n\nand ensure that external costs are included in the price of \ntransport. guidelines for \n\nthe development and assessment of Community \n\ninfrastructure projects which would discourage unnecessary \n\ntransport \n\ndemand \n\nand \n\nencourage where \n\nappropriate \n\nthe \n\ndevelopment of alternatives \n\nto \n\nroad \n\ntransport, \n\nsuch as \n\nrailway, \nurban and inter-urban collective transport \n\ninland waterways and combined transport as well as \n\nguidelines for the conversion and upgrading of relinquished \n'soft' \ninfrastructure, particularly \n\nthe purpose of \n\nfor \n\ntransport \n\nguide I ines for the development of urban transport which give \n'soft' transport and to adequate \npriority to collective and \n\nI ink-up between the different stages of urban \n\njourneys as \n\nwel I as to easy access to and from inter-urban transport. guldel ines \n\nfor \n\n'soft' \n\ntourism which promote \n\nthe use of \n\nenvironment-friendly transport. guide I ines \nprogrammes \ntransport \nfriendly \n\nthe \n\nfor \nwhich \n\npromote \n\ntechnology and \n\ndevelopment of Community \n\nthe \n\ndeve I opment \n\nresearch \n'c I ean' \nthe marketing of environment \nrape seed \n(ethanol, \n\nof \n\nfuels, \n\nsuch as bio-fuels \n\n\f- 55 -\n\ndlester, etc. ), natural gas \nincluding hybrid (fuel/electricity) buses as wel I as \n\nand electric vehicles, \nthe \n\ndevelopment of eff iclent traffic management schemes. minimum consumer \n\ninformation \n\nrequirements concerning \n\nthe \n\nenvironmental performance of motor vehicles. guidelines for \n\ninformation campaigns on the environmentally \nrational use of the private car which draws the attention of \nthe user \nsuch as \nto environment-friendly alternatives \ncollective and 'soft' transport. 128. The results of this examination should provide the framework \nfor a Common strategy of 'sustalnable moblllty', which should \nthe environment, while \ntransport on \ncontain \n\nImpact of \n\nthe \n\ntransport \n\nto fulfi I \n\nto continue \n\nallowing \nits economic and \nsocial functions, particularly in the context of the Single \nMarket, and thus ensure the long term development of transport \nin \nIt should also contribute to social and \neconomic cohesion in the Community and to the creation of new \nopportunities for the peripheral regions. the Community. the user, this \nWhile safeguarding the freedom of choice for \nframework should identify, in accordance with the principle of \nsubsidiarity, the responsibi I ity which \nthe different actors \nin order to achieve the objective of the \nwill have to assume \nstrategy. 129. The purpose of this Green Paper is to initiate a public debate \non the Issue of transport and the environment and the proposed \nstrategy for \"sustainable mob/ I /ty\". This should \ninvolve the \nviews of the Council of Ministers, the European Par I iament and \nthe \nthe Economic and Social Committee as wel I as those of \nfrom \nsocial partners. The debate should also draw views \n\n\f- 56 -\n\ninternational organizations and associations and a response \nfrom the general public, \nincluding industry, transport users \nand operators, environmental protection groups, regional and \nlocal authorities. The outcome of the debate should provide an insight into the \nway \nin which it will be possible to achieve the objectives of \n\"sustainable mobility\" and how, according to the principle of \nsubsidiarity, the different actors are to contribute to the \nstrategy. the \nforthcoming White Paper on the Future Development of Transport \nPol icy. should also provide \n\na blueprint \n\nfor \n\nIt \n\n* \n\n* \n\n* \n\n\fIA8LE 1 \n\nPASSENGER TRANSPORT \n\nPRIMARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR DIFFERENT TRANSPORT UODES \n\nMode \n\nTotal seating \ncapacity \nper unit \n\nEnergy use \n\nf lnal energy \nper 100 km \n(1) \n\nIn MJ primary \nenergy/ \nvehicle km \n\n1. Gasol lne car \n\n< 1. 1. 4 - 2. 0 \n> 2. 0 \n\n2. Dlesel car \n< 1. 4 \n1. 4 - 2. 0 \n> 2. 0 \n\n3. Ra I I ways \n\nIntercity \nSuper sprinter \nSuburban electrical llne \nHigh speed train 300 km/h \ntype: Brussels-Paris \nHigh speed train 300 km/h \ntype: London-Paris. Bus/car \n\nDouble decker \nBus \nMinibus \nExpress car \n\n5. Air \n\nBoeing 727 \n\n6. \u2022soft\u2022 transport \n\neye I Ing \nwalk Ing. 4 \n\n4 \n4 \n4 \n\n563 \n147 \n300 \n\n375 \n\n700 \n\n100 \n48 \n20 \n46 \n\n167 \n\n1 \n1 \n\n7. 5 I \n8. 6 I \n13. 4 I \n\n5. 9 I \n7. 2 I \n9. 6 I \n\n1. 527. 7 kwh \n459. 6 kwh \n749. 1 kwh \n\n2. 500 kwh. -. 150 kwh \n\n45. 6 I \n36. 7 I \n18. 5 I \n29. 9 I \n\n2. 61 \n2. 98 \n4'. 65 \n\n2. 26 \n2. 76 \n3. 65 \n\n160. 9 \n48. 4 \n78. 9 \n\n268. 65 \n\n4'37. 08 \n\n17. 0 \n14. 02 \n7. 08 \n11 \u2022. -3 \n\n760. 7 I \n\n242. 82 \n\n0. 06 \n0. 16 \n\nSource:\u00b7OECD. Rapport final sur les defall lances du March' et de 1\u00b71nterventlon des \n\npouvolrs publics dans la gestlon des transports. Paris. Novembre 1990; and \nMens en Rulmte. op. cit \u2022\u2022 \n\n(1) Conversion coeff lclents \n\n1 MJ primary energy\u2022 \n\nused: \n\n0. 0287356 \n0. 026178 \n0. 031328 \n0. 0949487 \n\npetrol \ndiesel \nkerosene \n\nkwh \n\n\fIA8LE 2 \n\nPASSENGER TRANSPORT \n\nSPECIFIC ENERGY CONSlAIPTION FOR DIFFERENT TRANSPORT. x>ES \nAT DIFFERENT OCCUPANCY RATES \n\n(In MJ primary energy/passenger-km) \n\nMODE \n\nOCCUPANCY RATE \n\n25X \n\nSOX \n\n75X \n\n100X \n\n1. Gaso 11 ne car \n\n< 1. -4 \n1. -4 - 2. 0 \n> 2. 0 \n\n2. Diesel car \n\n< 1. -4 \n1. -4 - 2. 0 \n> 2. 0 \n\n3. Ra I lways \n\nIntercity \nSuper sprinter \nSuburban electrical I lne \nHigh speed train 300 km/h \ntype: Brussels-Paris \nHigh speed train 300 km/h \ntype: London-Paris. Bus/car \n\nDouble decker \nBus \nMinibus \nExpress car \n\n2. 61 \n2. 98 \n4. 65 \n\n2. 26 \n2. 76 \n3. 65 \n\n1. 14 \n1. 31 \n1. 05 \n\n2. 86 \n\n2. 50 \n\n0. 70 \n1. 17 \n1. 42 \n0. 95 \n\n1. 31 \n1. -49 \n2. 33 \n\n1. 13 \n1. 38 \n1. 83 \n\n0. 57 \n0. 66 \n0. 59 \n\n1. -43 \n\n1. 25 \n\n0. 35 \n0. 58 \n0. 71 \n0. 50 \n\n0. 87 \n0. 99 \n1. 55 \n\n0. 75 \n0. 92 \n1. 22 \n\n0. 38 \no. c. c \n0. 35 \n\n0. 96 \n\n0. 83 \n\n0. 23 \n0. 39 \nO \u2022. C7 \n0. 33 \n\n0. 82 \n0. 75 \n1. 16 \n\n0. 57 \n0. 69 \n0. 91 \n\n0. 29 \n0. 33 \n0. 26 \n\n0. 72 \n\n0. 62 \n\n0. 17 \n0. 29 \n0. 35 \n0. 25 \n\n5. Air \n\nBoeing 727 \n\n6. \u2022soft\u2022 transport \n\neye I Ing \nwalk Ing \n\n5. 78 \n\n2. 89 \n\n1. 9. C \n\n1. -45 \n\n0. 06 \n0. 16 \n\nsource: Computation based on table 1 \n\n\fTA&LE 3; \n\nFREIGHT TRANSPORT \n\nENERGY CONSUMPTION. FOR DIFFERENT MEANS OF TRANSPORT \n\nVehicle characteristics Gross \nweight \ntonne \n\nFuel consumption \n1/100 km \nCa 1 lowlng for part \nload and empty \nrunning) \n\nSpecific energy consumption \n\nMJ/tonne km \n\n1). B. 21. sl \n5- Axle articulated \n4- Axle articulated \n3- Axle articulated \n4- Axle rigid \n3- Axle rigid \nHeavy box van \nMedium van city traffic \n\n2) Ra I lways \nBulk freight traff lc \nWagon load traff lc \n(Including, collection. delivery to terminals \nand marshal I Ing) \n\n38 \n32 \n20 \n20 \n16 \n3. 5 \n1. 75 \n\nn. a. n. a \n\n43. 5 \n35. 3 \n29. 5 \n28. 5 \n23. 5 \n18. 5 \n15. 5 \n\nn. a. n. a \n\n5M(2l \n1. 38 \n1. 35 \n1. 50 \n3. 11 \n1. 80 \n8. 11 \n16. 00 \n\n70S(2l \n0. 99 \n0. 96 \n1. 07 \n2. 22 \n1. 28 \n5. 80 \n11. 43 \n\ntOMC2l \n0. 69 \n0. 67 \n0. 75 \n1. 55 \n0. 90 \n4. 06 \n8. 00 \n\n0. 6 \n1. 0 \n\n3) lnl1n~ !!lllCDYI \n\nn. a. n. a. 0. 6 \n\n( 1) \n\nSource \n\nDr. M. Waters. Review of TRRL and other Research. U. K. Road Transport \nContribution to Greenhouse Gasses, 1990 and for (1), Fondatlon Roi Baudouin, \nop. cit \u2022. (2) load factor \n\n\fTAQLE 1 \n\nEMISSIONS OF voe. S02 AND NOx BY ROAD TRANSPORT \n\nFOR THE YEAR 1985 \n\nCATEGORY \n\nI \n\nI \n\nvoe \n\nS02 \n\nIn X of total by road transport) \n\nNOx \n( \n\n\u2022 Automobiles~ light duty vehicles \n\u2022 Motorcycles \n\u2022 Heavy duty vehlcles and buses \n\u2022 Other (deposits of llquld fuels. service \n\nstations evaPoratlon> \n\n55. 6 \n0. 2 \n14. 2 \no. o \n\n66. 9 \n9. 9 \n8. 2 \n15. 0( 1) \n\nII \n\n19. 5 \n0. 8 \n49. 5 \n0. 2 \n\nTOTAL \n\nIn tonne/year \n\nIn X of total emissions by all activities \n\n5,328,952 \n5. 592. 104 \n------ ------- -------\n27. 1 \n\n394,776 \n\n53. 6 \n\n2. 9 \n\nsource CORINAIR, 20-11-90 \n\n(1) of which evaporation alone accounts for 6,BX of total emissions by road \n\ntransport. TAQLE 5 \n\nPOLLUTION BY ROAD TRANSPORT ON DIFFERENT ROAD CATEGORIES \n\nPollutant \n\nGERMANY <cars only) \n\nIn X on \n\nNETHERLANDS (all vehlcles) \n\nIn X on \n\nurban roads motor ways Other \n\nnon-urban \n\nurban roads motor ways Other \n\nnon-urban \n\nco \n\nN02 \n\nS02 \n\nvoe \n\n43. 7 \n\n21. 7 \n\n35. 9 \n\n59. 8 \n\nParticulates \n\n33. 8 \n\n25. 9 \n\n410. 6 \n\n28. 2 \n\n15. 2 \n\n32. 4 \n\n30. 4 \n\n37. 7 \n\n35. 9 \n\n25. 0 \n\n33. 8 \n\n53. 8 \n\n26. 3 \n\n410. 7 \n\n60. 8 \n\n57. 5 \n\n17. 9 \n\n416. 7 \n\nn. a. 14. 9 \n\n20. 0 \n\n28. 3 \n\n27. 0 \n\n; \n\nn. a. 24. 3 \n\n22. 5 \n\nSource \n\nPROGNOS. op. cit. TA8LE 6 \n\nENERGY DEMAND AND EMISSION INDICATORS IN \n\nROAD TRANSPORT UNDER DIFFERENT DRIVING CIRCUMSTANCES \n\nType of vehicle \n\nSpecif le \nconsumption \n1/100 km \n\nEmission of pollutants (In g/vehlcle km) \n\nco \n\nNOx \n\nHC \n\nC02 \n\nS02 \n\nParticulates \n\n- Private car \n\nPetrol \n\nDlesel \n\n- Bus \n\nurban \nnon-urban \n\nurban \n\nnon-urban \n\nurban \nnon-urban \n\n- Delivery van \n\nurban \n\nnon-urban \n\n-lleavy goods vehicle \n\n- ]rf:Jtorcycle \n\nurban \n\nnon-urban \n\nurban \nnon-urban \n\nSource \n\nDG XVI I \n\n11. 6 \n5. 3 \n\n9. 4 \n5. 8 \n\n33. 0 \n32. 0 \n\n16. 0 \nn. a. n. a. 33. 0 \n\n6. 0 \n3. 5 \n\n45. 0 \n12. 5 \n\n1. 7 \n0. 7 \n\n1. 2 \n1. 6 \n\n0. 8 \n1. 7 \n\n6. 4 \n1. 3 \n\n0. 5 \n1. 0 \n\n315 \n160 \n\n331 \n201 \n\n18. 0 \n3. 8 \n\n15. 5 12. 0 1158 \n2. 7 1123 \n15. 0 \n\n-\n-\n0. 08 \n0. 06 \n\n1. 70 \n1. 50 \n\n55. 4 \nn. a. 3. 0 \nn. a. 498 \n6. 0 \nn. a. n. a. 0. 18 \nn. a. n. a. 8. 0 \n\nn. a. 17. 5 \n\nn. a. n. a. 2. 8 1158 \n\nn. a. 1. 59 \n\n15. 6 \n8. 5 \n\n0. 1 14. 0 \n4. 7 \n0. 2 \n\n163 \n106 \n\n-\n-\n\n-\n-\n0. 40 \n0. 23 \n\nn. a. n. a. n. a. n. a. n. a. n. a. -\n-\n\n\fTAQLE 7 \n\nGAS TURBINE AERO-ENGINE EMISSION \n\nEmissions (grams per kilogram of kerosene) \n\nOperation phase \n\nEngine power CX) \n\nIdle \n\nApproach \n\nCruise \n\nTake-off \n\n5 \n\n30 \n\n60 \n\n100 \n\nco \n\n5 \n\n5 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\nHC \n\nNOx \n\n20 \n\n2 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n?l \n\n5 \n\n10 \n\n20 \n\n40 \n\nSource \n\nAir-Line Business. The Magaslne for Alrllne Management \u2022 October 1990, p. 27. IA8LE 8: \n\nEVOLUTION OF TRANSPORT IN THE COt&IUNITY \n\n1970-1988 \n\nTransport In blll. tonne-km or pass-km \n\nYearly growth \nIn S \n\nMarket share In \ntonne-km or pass-km \n\n1970 \n\n1988 \n\n1970-1988 \n\n1970 \n\n1988 \n\n1. INLAND \n\nFrelght \n\n\u2022 Road. Inland waterways \n\u2022 Ra 11 \n\n389. 1 \n103. 1 \n207. 0 \n\n772. 6 \n103. 2 \n176. 6 \n\nTotal \n\n699. 2 \n\n1,052. 4 \n\nPassengers \n\n\u2022 Road: \n\n\u2022 Rall \n\nprivate car/bus \n\n1,590. 6 \n181. 1 \n\n2,826. 3 \n229. 7 \n\nTotal \n\n1,772. 9 \n\n3,055. 7 \n\n3. 9 \n0 \n-0. 9 \n\n2. 3 \n\n3. 2 \n1. 3 \n\n3. 1 \n\n55. 7 \n14. 7 \n29. 6 \n\n73. 4 \n9. 8 \n16. 8 \n\n100. 0 \n\n100. 0 \n\n89. 7 \n10. 3 \n\n92. 5 \n7. 5 \n\n100. 0 \n\n100. 0 \n\n2. A!. B. Frelght \n\nPassengers \n\n3. MARIIIME \n\nFreight \n\nPassengers \n\n-\n\n-\n\n117. 9 \n\n2s4. a< n \n\n-\n4_7(2) \n\n55(3) \n\n100(4) \n\n1. 2(5) \n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n-\n\n-\n-\n\n-\n-\n\n-\n-\n\nSource: CEMT, Consultants. (1) Figure for the year 1985 \n(2) Figure for the period 1970-1985 \n(3) Figure for the year 1975 \n(4) Figure tor the year 1989 \n(5) Figure for the period 1975-1989 \n\n\fTAQLE 9: EVOLUTION OF ROAD VEHIQ. ES AND ROAD TRAFFIC IN THE COt&IUNITY \n\n1970-1987 \n\n1970 \n\n1987 \n\nYearly growth \n1970-1987 \nIn X \n\n- Passenger cars In use \n\n(In thousand) \n\n- Goods vehicles In use \n\n(In thousand) \n\n57. 459 \n\n116. 947 \n\n4. 3 \n\n7. 419 \n\n12,881 \n\n3. 3 \n\n- Vehicle-km passenger cars \n\nC In bll I Ion> \n\n760. 5 \n\n1,399 \n\n3. 7 \n\n- Vehicle-km goods vehicles \n\nC In bll 1 Ion) \n\n157. 6 \n\n275. 4 \n\n3. 3 \n\nsource: OECD, Environmental data, compendlwn 1989. TAQLE 10 \n\nFORECASTS FOR THE TRANSPORT SECTOR IN THE cnAIUNITY \n\nUP TO 1995 \n\n1995 \n( I n b I I I I on) \ntonne-km or \npassenger-km \n\nForecast \nyearly growth \n1989-1995 \nIn X \n\nTotal \n\nTotal \n\n1. INLAND \n\nFreight \n\n\u2022 Road. Inland waterways. Ra 11 \n\nPassengers \n\n\u2022 Road \n\u2022 Rall \n\n2. A. lB. Freight \n\nPassengers \n\n3. MARITIME \n\nFreight \n\nPassengers \n\n1. 002 \nn. a. 210 \n\nn. a. 3. 712 \n295 \n\n4'. 007 \n\n20. 5 \n\n4'53. 4' \n\nn. a. n. a. 3. 8 \nn. a \u2022 \n2. 2 \n\nn. a. 2. 9 \n3. 3 \n\n2. 9 \n\n5. 5 \n\n5. 2 \n\nn. a. n. a. Source: Europe In 1995. Economic outlook by sector. April 1991. Figure 1 \n\nSPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF DIFFERENT MEANS OF TRANSPORT \n\nPassengers \n\nMJ \nprimary \nenergy/ \npassenger-km \n(100 X occupancy) \n\n1. 5. 1 \n\n0. 5. 1. 4'5 \n\n0. 75 \n\n0. 69 \n\n0. 62 \n\n0. 29 \n\n0. 29 \n\nlnter \nc I ty \ntrain \n\nbus \n\ndiesel \n\nhigh \nspeed car \ntrain \n\ngaso-\n1 I ne \ncar \n\naircraft \n\n\fFigure 2 \n\nSPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF THE DIFFERENT MEANS OF TRANSPORT AT DIFFERENT \nOCCUPANCY RATES \n\nPassengers \n\nMJ primary \nenergy/passenger-km \n\n\\ \n\\ \n\n6 \n\n5 \n\n3 \n\n2 \n\n1 \n\n\\ \n\\ \n\\ \n\\ \n\\ \n\n\\ \n\n\\ \n\n\\ \n\n\\ \n\\ \n'. ' \n\n,_. _ \n\n25 \n\n50 \n\n75 \n\n100 \n\noccupancy \nrate (in X) \n\naircraft \ngaso I i ne car \ndiesel car \nra i I ways \nhighspeed train \nbus \n\n- Boeing 727 \n2. o cc \n- 1. 4 -\n- 1. 4 - 2. 0 cc \n-\nintercity \n- London - Paris model \nbus with 48 seats. 1 \n\nI \n\nft \n\nI \n\nI \n\nt \n\nI \n\n\fFigure 3 \n\nSPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF THE DIFFERENT MEANS OF TRANSPORT \n\n\u00b7Freight \n\nMJ primary \nenergy/tonne-km \n\n2. 5 \n\n2. 1 \n\n2. 22 \n\n1. 55 \n\n0. 99 \n\n1. 0 \n\n0. 6 \n\n0. 6 \n\n0. 69 \n\nrall \nbulk \n\nland \nwater-\nways \n\nartlcu- artlcu-\nlated \nlorry \n100 x \nload \n\nlated \nlorry \n70 x \nload \n\nra 11 \nwagon \nload \n\nrigid \nlorry \n100 x \nload \n\nrigid \nlorry \n70 x \nload \n\n[articulated lorry - 5 axle articulated 38 tons] \n\n[rigid lorry \n\n- ~axle rigid 20 tons] \n\n\fFigure 4 \n\nCONTRIBUTION OF THE DIFFERENT MEANS OF TRANSPORT TO THE TOTAL \n\nC02 OUTPUT-< 1 ) OF THE TRANSPORT SECTOR \n\nIN THE CCU. CUN I TY \n\nPassengers and Freight \n\nX of total \nco2 output \nof transport sector \n\n55. ~ \n\n50. 40. 30 \n\n20 -\n\n10 -\n\nprivate \ncar \n\n-\n\n22. 7 \n\n1. 6 \n\nI \nI \nbuses \n\ngoods \nvehicles + \n\ncoaches \n\n10. 9 \n\navla-\ntlon \n\n1. 1 \n\n4. 3 \n\nI 2. s I \n\nI \n\n0. 7. Inland \ntrains water-\n\nI I \npassen- freight \nger \ntrains \n\nways \n\nother \ntrans-\nport \n\n( 1 ) \n\nco2 OUTPUT OF THE TRANSPORT SECTOR \nTOTAL C02 EMISSIONS IN THE COMMUNITY. IN 1986 \u2022 557 MTONS OR 22 \u2022 5 X OF \n\n\fFi 9ure 5 \n-----\n\nFUEL CONSUMPTION if JET-AIRCRAFT \n\n8000 \nin Ki lo-\ngramm \n\nIdeal Conditions: \n\n7000 \n\n- no load \n- no waiting before takeoff \n- no headwind \n- no taxiing after arrival \n- optimal flight profile \n\n6000 \n\nLeast ideal conditions: \n\n- max. load \n- 30 min. waiting before \n\n5000 \n\ntakeoff \n\n- strong headwind \n- 30 min. holding before landing \n-\n\ntong taxiing \n\nModern technology: \n\nAirbus 310 or 320 \nMD-80, Boeing 7371300 \n\nOutdated technology: \n\nBoeing 707, DC-8, \nBoeing 727, Boeing 7371100, \nDC-9/30 \n\nL. 000 \n\n3000 \n\n2000 \n\n10000 \n\n6000 \n4000 \n2000 \n\nI \nI \nI \n\nI \nI I \n\nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \n,. \u00b7. -I \n- \"/-\n/ \n/ /. _. ;' \n\n/ \n\n/. > e/. /()()0 \n\n~. _, ~\" \n/ v \n'~r \u2022ocl! \n\nllf!W'7 \n\nsaStJO \n\n1\nI \nI \nI \n\n,, 'If/JOO \n\nI \nI \nI \n\nI \nI \n\nI \n\nI \n\nI \n\n\"']Oo \n\n~~ ooo \n\nBRU-LON \n\nBRU-ATH \n\nBRU-NYC \n\nideal conditions \n\nleast ideal cond1 t ions ___ _. _. _ - ---\n\nmodern technology \n\noutdated technology \n\nP_M_/7_1_1991 \n\n\fFigure 6 \n\nEVOLUTION OF THE MARKET SHARES OF THE DIFFERENT. INLAND TRANSPORT SECTORS \n\nFreight \n\nMarket share \nIn X \n\n100 ~ \n\n50 ~ \n\n73 \u2022. C. :55. 7: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n:. :29. 6: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n: \n\n16. 8 \n\nI \n\nI \nROAD \n\nI \n\nI \nRAIL \n\nmarket share In 1970 \n\n-------market share In 1988. :1. C. 7: \n: \n: \n\ni \n\nI \n\n,9. 8 \n\nI \n\nINLAND \nWATERWAYS \n\n\f\f\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 46 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n14 07 \n\nCatalogue number: Cl:J. (~0-92-062-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-41382-4 \n\nOffice fo\u2022. O!fidal Publications of the Buropean C. oill. lllwilllet; \nL-2985 I ;nxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19e06755-b175-4898-a10b-85485d7517af", "title": "Arbeitskosten 1988 : Ergebnisse nach Gr\u00f6\u00dfenklassen und nach Regionen.,Costo della manodopera 1988 : risultati per classe di ampiezza e per regione.,Co\u00fbt de la main d'oeuvre 1988 : r\u00e9sultats par classe de taille et par r\u00e9gion.,Labour costs 1988 : results by size classes and by regions.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "bank,cost analysis,domestic trade,insurance,labour force,statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA8391002", "eurovoc_concepts": ["bank", "cost analysis", "domestic trade", "insurance", "labour force", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19e06755-b175-4898-a10b-85485d7517af", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/17aedd96-5ea3-43ec-bc94-95cf2f659582", "title": "RESOLUTION on the return to democracy in Haiti", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Socialist Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Haiti,democracy,human rights,international sanctions,terms for aid", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0502", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Haiti", "democracy", "human rights", "international sanctions", "terms for aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/17aedd96-5ea3-43ec-bc94-95cf2f659582", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5709e064-02fc-4104-9906-6b06c65c76ed", "title": "Commission Decision No 1006/92/ECSC of 9 April 1992 on the extension of readaptation aid to workers retired on bridging pensions who free jobs not covered by the ECSC Treaty and are replaced by workers hitherto employed by the same undertaking in sectors of activity not covered by the Treaty", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision_ecsc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "ECSC aid,early retirement,industrial restructuring,job cuts,vocational retraining", "workIds": "celex:31992S1006,oj:JOL_1992_106_R_0008_015", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ECSC aid", "early retirement", "industrial restructuring", "job cuts", "vocational retraining"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5709e064-02fc-4104-9906-6b06c65c76ed", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/038b1808-f9e8-4d46-af1e-795aaa791b6a", "title": "RESOLUTION on the peace process in the Middle East", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group for the European United Left,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Left Unity,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group,Socialist Group in the European Parliament,The Green Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Israel,Middle East,occupied territory,peacekeeping,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0487", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Israel", "Middle East", "occupied territory", "peacekeeping", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/038b1808-f9e8-4d46-af1e-795aaa791b6a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dadaeb67-4432-48d8-9a08-5361be47a577", "title": "RESOLUTION on the crisis in Kosovo", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Yugoslavia,human rights,rights of minorities,violence", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0528", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Yugoslavia", "human rights", "rights of minorities", "violence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dadaeb67-4432-48d8-9a08-5361be47a577", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52b19ced-286e-11ef-a195-01aa75ed71a1", "title": "Dictionary of acronyms for European Community action plans and programmes : with decoded details plus indexes.,Dictionnaire des sigles relatifs aux programmes et plans d'action communautaires : avec d\u00e9codage et indexage.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DG X \u2013 Information, Communication, Culture and Audiovisual Media", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "EU policy,EU programme,action programme,dictionary of abbreviations,documentary tool", "workIds": "genpub:3000.0036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "EU programme", "action programme", "dictionary of abbreviations", "documentary tool"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52b19ced-286e-11ef-a195-01aa75ed71a1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9255a7aa-69ab-4566-935c-f7465b1048ac", "title": "RESOLUTION on the need to take international action against the SLORC (State Law and Order Restoration Council)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group for the European United Left,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group,The Green Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Myanmar/Burma,arms trade,human rights,international sanctions,political prisoner,rights of minorities", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0486", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Myanmar/Burma", "arms trade", "human rights", "international sanctions", "political prisoner", "rights of minorities"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9255a7aa-69ab-4566-935c-f7465b1048ac", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0c984ff2-d114-462c-bbb0-080ef2cffa9a", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) introducing specific measures for the Azores and Madeira concerning certain agricultural products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Azores,Madeira,agricultural product,aid system,supply", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0143,comnat:COM_1992_0143_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Azores", "Madeira", "agricultural product", "aid system", "supply"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0c984ff2-d114-462c-bbb0-080ef2cffa9a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN CCBVIMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 143 final \n\nBrussels, 9 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nIntroducing specific Measures for the Azores and Madeira \n\nconcerning certain agricultural products \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f- 1 -\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nOn 26 June 1991 the Council adopted a programme of options specific to the \n\nremote and insular nature of Madeira and the Azores (Poseima) (Decision \n\n91/315/EEC). This proposal constitutes the initial implementation of Poseima and \n\nestablishes a framework regulation for agricultural measures financed by \n\nthe EAGGF Guarantee Section. The purpose of Poseima is to reduce the cost of supplies and encourage the \n\neconomic and social development of Madeira and the Azores, which have an \n\nexceptional geographic situation and are structurally very backward in \n\nrelation to other regions in the Community. In view of the specific problems of these islands and the imminent \n\ncompletion of the internal market, the proposal provides for a series of \n\nmu111 annua I, mult{sectoral measures to facilitate supply and help to \n\nimprove the production and marketing of the agricultural produce of the \n\nregions. -*\\ -6^0 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCTfNCIl REGULATION (EEC) \n\nintroducing specific Measures for the Azores and Madeira \n\nconcerning certain agricultural products \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nand In particular Article 43 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty of Accession of Spain and Portugal, and in \n\nparticular Article 234(3) thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, \n\nWhereas Council Decision 91/315/EEC of 26 June 1991 setting up a programme \n\nof options specific to the remote and insular nature of Madeira and the \nAzores (Poseima)1 outlines the options to be implemented to take account \n\nof the specific problems and constraints faced by these very remote \n\nregions; \n\nWhereas the exceptional geographical situation of these regions in relation \n\nto the sources of supply of products used as inputs for the everyday \n\nconsumption or manufacture of certain essential foodstuffs in the islands \n\nimposes costs which constitute a severe handicap to the sectors concerned; \n\nwhereas this natural handicap can be remedied by exemption from levies \n\nand/or customs duties on the products in question imported directly from \n\nthird countr ies; \n\n1 OJ No L 171, 29. 6. 1991, p. 10. - 2 -\n\nWhereas, to maintain the competitiveness of the above products of Community \n\norigin in the islands, both in order to achieve the Poseima objective of \n\nreducing prices by promoting competition between sources of supply and to \n\nprevent disruption of traditional trade flows, provision should be made for \n\nthe supply to these regions of products originating in the rest of the \n\nCommunity on terms equivalent for the end user to exemption from the levy \n\nand/or customs duties on products originating in third countries, based on \n\nthe prices applied to exports to third countries; \n\nWhereas the quantities of products benefiting from the specific supply \n\narrangements must be determined within the framework of periodic forecast \n\nsupply balances, which may be adjusted during the year on the basis of the \n\nessential requirements of the local market and taking account of local \n\nproduction and traditional trade flows; \n\nWhereas the arrangements in question are intended to reduce production \n\ncost8 and consumer prices; whereas their actual impact should therefore be \n\nmonitored; \n\nWhereas, to avoid any deflection of trade, products covered by the specific \n\nsupply arrangements may not be redispatched to other parts of the Community \n\nor re-exported to third countries; whereas, however, an exception to this \n\nprinciple should be made for products traditionally processed in the \n\nislands and redispatched or re-exported, within the limits of usual trade \n\nfIows; \n\nWhereas the specific conditions of agriculture in the Azores and Madeira \n\nrequire special attention and whereas measures are necessary both for \n\nstockfarming and animal products and for crop products; \n\n\f- 3 -\n\nWhereas, to promote the development of traditional stockfarming in the \n\nislands, assistance should be given for genetic improvement through the \n\npurchase of pure-bred breeding animals and supplementary premiums should be \n\ngranted for the fattening of adult male bovine animals and for the \n\nmaintenance of suckler herds, and the consumption of locally produced fresh \n\nmilk products should be promoted; whereas, with regard to the Azores, the \n\nmajor role played by cattle farming and milk production in the economy of \n\nthe islands should be taken into account and the above-mentioned measures \n\nshould be supplemented with aid for the maintenance of the dairy herd and \n\nprivate storage aid for cheeses traditionally manufactured in the region; \n\nWhereas, in the fruit, vegetables, plants and floricultural sector, \n\nmeasures should be taken to increase production and to improve farm \n\nproductivity and product quality; whereas measures should also be taken to \n\nimprove the marketing of tropical products from these regions; \n\nWhereas the creation and promotion of a graphic symbol can also facilitate \n\nthe marketing of specific quality products; \n\nWhereas, in order to help support local production and satisfy consumer \n\nhabits, provision should be made for aid for certain crops and specific \n\nproducts; \n\nWhereas, in the case of Madeira, such measures must, in particular, concern \n\nthe production of potatoes for human consumption and sugar cane and the \n\nprocessing of sugar cane into sugar syrup and agricultural rum; whereas \n\nassistance should also be given to the manufacture of the island's liqueur \n\nwines using traditional methods by facilitating the purchase of \n\nconcentrated must and vinous alcohol from the rest of the Community and by \n\ngranting aid for the ageing of these wines; \n\n\f- A \n\n-\n\nWhereas, in the case of the Azores, such measures must, in particular, help \n\nto improve the conditions in which sugarbeet is produced and the \n\ncompetitiveness of local sugar manufacturing, within the limit of \n\ndetermined quantities; whereas they must also concern specific crops such \n\nas seed potatoes, endives and pineapple; \n\nWhereas, with the same objectives in mind, intervention measures under the \n\nmarket organization for wine and grubbing premiums should not be applied in \n\nthese regions and aid should be granted for vines producing quality wines \n\npsr which meet the requirements laid down in the Community rules; \n\nWhereas the plant health of agricultural crops in these islands is subject \n\nto particular problems associated with the climate and the inadequacy of \n\nthe control measures hitherto applied there; whereas programmes should be \n\nimplemented to combat harmful organisms and the Community's financial \n\ncontribution towards such programmes should be specified; \n\nWhereas farms in the Azores and Madeira present major structural weaknesses \n\nfrom which specific difficulties derive; whereas a derogation is therefore \n\nnecessary from the rules which restrict or prohibit the grant of certain \n\nforms of structural aid; \n\nWhereas certain structural measures essential for the development of \n\nagriculture in these regions are financed under Community support \n\nframeworks to promote the development and structural adjustment of regions \n\nwhose development is lagging behind (Objective 1) pursuant to Articles 130a \n\nand 130c of the Treaty; whereas the Commission has approved an initiative \n\n(Regis) to encourage the economic development of the remotest regions, \n\nproviding for the diversification of agricultural production, the upgrading \n\nof traditional products and measures to reduce the risks associated with \n\nnatural disasters; \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nWhereas banana cultivation is of fundamental importance to the economy of \n\nMadeira; whereas all the problems relating to banana production are the \n\nsubject of a Community study under way and appropriate measures will be \n\ntaken on conclusion of the study, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThis Regulation lays down specific measures to remedy, in respect of \n\ncertain agricultural products, the difficulties caused by the remote and \n\ninsular nature of the Azores and Madeira. TITLE I \n\nSPECIFIC SUPPLY ARRANGEMENTS \n\nArticle 2 \n\nFor each marketing year, forecast supply balances shall be established for \n\nthe agricultural products necessary for human consumption and processing \n\nlisted in Annex I for the Azores and Annex II for Madeira. These balances \n\nmay be revised during the year on the basis of trends in the regions' \n\nrequirements. Separate forecasts may be made to assess the requirements of \n\nthe processing and packaging industries regarding products for the local \n\nmarket or traditionally dispatched to the rest of the Community. Art icle 3 \n\n1. Levies and/or customs duties shall not apply to direct imports into the \n\nAzores and Madeira from third countries of products covered by the \n\nspecific supply arrangements, within the limit of the quantities \n\ndetermined in the supply balances. - 6 -\n\n2. To ensure coverage of the requirements referred to in Article 2 in terms \n\nof quantity, price and quality, with a view to ensure that the \n\nproportion of products supplied by the Community is preserved, supplies \n\nto these regions shall also be effected through the mobilization of \n\nCommunity products held in intervention storage or available on the \n\nCommunity market, on terms equivalent, for the end user, to the \n\nadvantage resulting from exemption from import duties on imports of \n\nproducts from third countries. The terms of supply shall be fixed with reference to the costs of \n\nvarious sources of supply and the prices applied to exports to third \n\ncountries. 3. The arrangements provided for in this Article shall be implemented in \n\nsuch a way as to take account, without prejudice to paragraph 4, in \n\nparticular, of: \n\n- \n\nthe specific requirements of the regions concerned and, in the case \n\nof products intended for processing, the specific quality \n\nrequirements; \n\n- \n\ntraditional trade flows with the rest of the Community; \n\n4. In the case of the supply of raw sugar to the Azores, requirements shall \n\nbe assessed taking account of the development of local sugarbeet \n\nproduction. The quantities covered by the supply arrangements shall be \n\ndetermined in such a way that the total annual volume of sugar refined \n\nin the Azores does not exceed 10 000 tonnes. Article 9 of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 1785/81 shall not apply to the Azores with regard to raw sugar. Art icle 4 \n\n1. Aid shall be granted for the supply to the Azores and Madeira of the \n\nfollowing products of Community origin: \n\n(a) pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species falling within CN \n\ncode 0102 10 00, \n\n\f- 7 -\n\n(b) pure-bred breeding swine falling within CN code 0103 10 00, \n\n(c) pure-bred breeding sheep and goats falling within CN codes \n\n0104 10 10 and 0104 20 10, \n\n(d) multiplier or breeding chicks falling within CN code ex 0105 11 00, \n\n(e) hatching eggs, other, for the production of multiplier or breeding \n\nchicks falling within CN code ex 0407 00 19. 2. The aid terms shall take account of the requirements of the Azores and \n\nMadeira with regard to the start-up of production, in particular for the \n\nbreeds most suited to conditions in these regions. The aid shall be paid for the delivery of animals and products which \n\nfulfil the requirements specified in Community rules. 3. The aid shall be determined having regard to the following factors: \n\n(a) the conditions of supply to the Azores and Madeira resulting from \n\ntheir geographical situation; \n\n(b) the price of animals and products on the Community market and on \n\nthe worId market; \n\n(c) whether or not customs duties and/or levies are charged on imports \n\nfrom third countries; \n\n(d) the economic aspect of the aid envisaged. Art icle 5 \n\n1. During the 1992/93 to 1995/96 marketing years for beef and veal: \n\na) the customs duties and/or levies referred to in Article 9 of \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common \norganization of the market in beef and veal1 shall not be applied \n\nto direct imports, for fattening purposes, of bovine animals from \n\nthird countries for consumption in Madeira; \n\n1 0J No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 24 \n\n\f- 8 -\n\nb) \n\naid shall be granted for the supply to Madeira, on equivalent \n\nterms, of animals as referred to at 1 originating in the rest of \n\nthe Community. 2. The number of animals concerned by the measures referred to in this \n\nArticle shall be based on a periodic supply balance and determined \n\ndegressive Iy to take account of the development of local production. 3. Not later than 6 months before the end of the 1995/96 marketing year, \n\nthe Commission shall submit to the Council an assessment of the measures \n\nprovided for in this Article, together with any appropriate proposals. Article 6 \n\nThe accession compensatory amounts referred to in Article 240 of the 1985 \n\nAct of Accession shall not apply, in the context of the specific supply \n\narrangements introduced in this Title, to products from the rest of the \n\nCommunity and products directly imported from third countries. Article 7 \n\nApplication of the supply arrangements provided for in Articles 2 and 3 \n\nshall be subject to the advantage derived from exemption from the levy \n\nand/or customs duty or, in the case of supply from the rest of the \n\nCommunity, from the Community aid being actually passed on to the end user. Article 8 \n\nThe products covered by the specific supply arrangements provided for in \n\nthis Title may not be re-exported to third countries or redispatched to the \n\nrest of the Community. Where the products in question are processed in the Azores and Madeira, the \n\naforesaid prohibition shall not apply to traditional exports or shipments \n\nto the rest of the Community. - 9 -\n\nArt icle 9 \n\nProducts covered by the specific supply arrangements provided for in this \n\nTitle and products processed therefrom shall not be eligible for refunds on \n\nexportation from the Azores and Madeira. Article 10 \n\nThe Commission shall adopt detailed rules for the application of this Title \n\nin accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26 of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2727/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organization of the \nmarket in cereals1 or the corresponding Articles of the Regulations on the \n\ncommon organization of the markets in the sectors concerned. They shall \n\ncover in particular: \n\n- the establishment of and, where applicable, amendments to, the periodic \n\nbalances, \n\n- the amount of aid granted for supply from the rest of the Community, \n\n- the provisions to ensure, where necessary, that the advantages are \n\nactually passed on to the end user. in the case of products covered by Regulation (EEC) No 827/68 of 28 June \n\n1968 on the common organization of the market in certain products listed in \nAnnex II to the Treaty2, these measures shall be adopted in accordance \n\nwith the procedure laid down in Article 27 of Regulation (EEC) No 805/68. 1 OJ No L 281, 1. 11. 1975, p. 1. 2 OJ No L 151, 30. 6. 1968, p. 16. - 10 -\n\nTITLE II \n\nMeasures to support products of the Azores and Madeira \n\nSubtitle I \n\nMeasures common to both regions \n\nArticle 11 \n\n1. Aid per hectare shall be granted to producers and producer groups and \n\norganizations which undertake a programme of initiatives, approved by \n\nthe competent authorities, with a view to the development and \n\ndiversification of production and/or the improvement of the quality of \n\nthe fruit, vegetables, flowers and live plants listed in Chapters 6, 7 \n\nand 8 and the tea in Chapter 9 of the combined nomenclature. Such \n\nprogrammes shall, in particular, concern tropical products. The eligible initiatives shall seek in particular to develop production \n\nand product quality, particularly through varietal conversion and \n\ncultural improvements. These initiatives shall form an integral part of \n\nprogrammes conducted over at least three years. The aid shall be granted for programmes covering a minimum area of \n\n0. 3 ha. 2. The amount of Community aid shall be at most ECU 500/ha. This amount \n\nshall be paid where the Member State provides official financing of at \n\nleast ECU 300/ha and the contribution of the individual producer or \n\ngroup amounts to at least ECU 200/ha. If the contributions of the \n\nMember State and the producers are less than the amounts specified, the \n\nCommunity aid shall be reduced proportionately. The aid shall be paid each year of execution of the programme, for a \n\nperiod not exceeding three years. - 11 -\n\n3. The aid shall be increased by ECU 100/ha where the programme of \n\ninitiatives is submitted and carried out by a producer group or \n\norganization and where, for its implementation, recourse to technical \n\nassistance is envisaged. The additional aid shall be granted in respect \n\nof programmes involving a minimum area of 2 ha. 4. This measure shall not apply to the production in Madeira of potatoes \n\nfor human consumption falling within CN codes 0701 90 51, 0701 90 59 and \n\n0701 90 90 nor to production in the Azores of seed potatoes falling \n\nwithin CN code ex 0701 10 00 or pineapples. In addition, this measure \n\nshall not apply to banana production in Madeira pending the conclusions \n\nrelating to the treatment of all the problems connected with such \n\nproduction, in accordance with the objectives stated in point 13 of the \n\nDecision on Poseima. 5. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 33 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) n\" 1035/72, of 31. 5. 1972, on the common organization of \n\nthe market in fruit and vegetables^1). Article 12 \n\n1. Community aid shall be granted for the conclusion of annual contracts \n\nconcerning the marketing of tropical products included in the products \n\nreferred to in Article 11 \n\nand harvested in these regions. This aid \n\nshall be paid up to a limit of a volume of trade of 3 000 tonnes per \n\nproduct per year for each of the two regions. The contracts shall be concluded between individual producers or \n\nproducer groups or associations and natural or legal persons established \n\nin the rest of the Community. 2. The amount of. the aid shall be 10% of the value of the production \n\nmarketed, free at destination. (1) \n\n0J n* L 118 of 20. 5. 1972, p. 1 \n\n\f- 12 -\n\n3. The aid shall be granted to purchasers who undertake to market the \n\nAzores or Madeira products under the contracts referred to in paragraph \n\n1. 4. Where the measures provided for in paragraph 1 are undertaken by joint \n\nventures constituted, with the aim of marketing products harvested in \n\nthe regions concerned, by producers or producer groups or associations \n\nin these regions and natural or legal persons established in the rest of \n\nthe Community, and where the partners undertake to pool the knowledge \n\nand know-how required to achieve the objective of the Joint venture over \n\na minimum period of three years, the amount of the aid specified in \n\nparagraph 2 shall be increased to 13% of the value of the annual \n\nproduct ion marketed Jointly. 5. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 33 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) n' 1035/72. Article 13 \n\n1. The Community shall contribute up to a maximum of ECU 100 000 towards \n\nthe financing of an economic analysis and forward study of the fruit and \n\nvegetable processing industry in the two regions, with particular \n\nreference to tropical products. The study shall produce an economic and technical assessment of the \n\nsector. It shall pay particular attention to supply data and processing \n\ncosts and examine the conditions and scope for development and sales at \n\nregional and international level, having regard to competition on the \n\nworId market. 2. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 22 of Council Regulation \n\n(EEC) n\" 426/86, of 24. 2. 1986, on the common organization of the market in \n\nproducts processed from fruit and vegetables^1). (1) \n\n0J n- L 49 of 27. 2. 1986, p. 1 \n\n\f- 13 -\n\nArticle 14 \n\n1. A graphic symbol shall be introduced with a view to ensuring greater \n\nawareness and consumption of quality processed and unprocessed \n\nagricultural products specific to the Azores and Madeira as remote \n\nregions. 2. The graphic symbol shall be chosen on the basis of an invitation to \n\ntender published by the Commission in the Official Journal of the \n\nEuropean Communities. 3. The conditions of utilization of the symbol shall be proposed by the \n\ntrade organizations. The competent authorities shall forward such \n\nproposals, with their opinion, to the Commission for approval. The utilization of the symbol shall be monitored by an official \n\nauthority or a body approved by the competent authorities. 4. The Community shall finance the production of the graphic symbol and its \n\npromotion. 5. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, as \n\nnecessary, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 33 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1035/72 or the corresponding Articles of other \n\nRegulations on the common organization of the markets. Subtitle II \n\nMeasures to support products of Madeira \n\nArt icle 15 \n\nAid shall be granted in support of traditional activities connected with \n\nbeef and veal production and measures to improve product quality, within \n\nthe limits of the consumption needs of the island as assessed in the \n\ncontext of a periodic supply balance. This balance shall also take account \n\n\fof breeding animals supplied pursuant to Article 4 and animals covered by \n\nthe supply arrangements referred to in Article 5. - 14 -\n\n1. Fattening aid for male bovine animals shall represent a supplement of \n\nECU 40 per head to the special premium provided for in Article 4a of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 805/68. The supplement may be granted in respect of \n\nan animal of a minimum weight to be determined in accordance with the \n\nprocedure referred to in point 3. 2. A supplement to the premium for maintaining suckler cows provided for in \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 1357/801 shall be paid to beef and veal \n\nproducers. The amount of this supplement shall be ECU 40 per suckler \n\ncow held by the producer on the day on which the application is \n\nsubmitted. 3. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, as \n\nnecessary, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 27 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 805/68. 1 0J No L 140, 5. 6. 1980, p. 1. - 15 -\n\nArticle 16 \n\n1. Aid shall be granted for the human consumption of locally produced fresh \n\ncows' milk products, within the limits of the consumption needs of the \n\nisland as assessed periodically. The aid shall amount to ECU 5 per 100 kg of whole milk. The amount of \n\nthe aid shall be adjusted in accordance with the procedure laid down in \n\nparagraph 2 in order to ensure the regular disposal of the \n\naforementioned products on the local market. The aid shall be paid to the dairies. Payment shall be subject to the \n\nbenefit therefrom being actually passed on to the consumer. 2. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 30 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of \nthe market in milk and milk products1. Article 17 \n\n1. Aid per hectare shall be granted annually for the cultivation of \n\npotatoes for human consumption falling within CN codes 0701 90 51, \n\n0701 90 59 and 0701 90 90. The aid shall be paid in respect of areas cultivated and harvested up to \n\na maximum of 2 000 hectares per year. 2. The amount of the annual aid shall be ECU 500/ha. 3. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 2358/71 of 26 October 1971 on the common \norganization of the market in seeds1. 1 0J No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13. 1 0J No L 246, 5. 11. 1971, p. 1. - 16 -\n\nArticle 18 \n\n1. Aid at a flat rate per hectare shall be granted for sugar cane \n\nproduction within the framework of a restructuring plan submitted by the \n\nPortuguese authorities for the improvement of plantations. 2. The aid shall be paid to individual planters, planter groups or \n\norganizations. From the sixth year of application, the aid shall be \n\npaid exclusively to producer groups or organizations. 3. The Community shall finance the aid at the rate of 60% of eligible \n\nexpenditure where the official contribution of the Member State is at \n\nleast 15%. If the latter is less, the Community aid shall be reduced \n\naccordingly. Article 19 \n\n1. Aid shall be granted for the direct processing of sugar cane into sugar \n\nsyrup (\"mel de cana\") or agricultural rum as defined in Article 1(4)(a) \n\nof Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89 of 29 May 1989 laying down \n\ngeneral rules on the definition, description and presentation of spirit \n\ndr inks1. The aid shall be paid as applicable to the sugar syrup manufacturer or \n\nto the distiller on condition that he has paid to the sugar cane \n\nproducer a minimum price to be determined. 2. The aid shall be granted for the production of a maximum annual quantity \n\nof 250 tonnes of sugar syrup and 2 500 hectolitres of agricultural rum \n\nwith a strength of 71\". 8. 1 0J No L 160, 12. 6. 1989, p. 1. - 17 -\n\nArticle 20 \n\nThe amount of the aid provided for in Articles 18 and 19, the minimum price \n\nto be paid to the producer and detailed rules for the application of the \n\naforementioned Articles shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure \n\nlaid down in Article 41 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 on the \ncommon organization of the markets in the sugar sector1. Article 21 \n\nTitle III of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the \ncommon organization of the market in wine2 and Council Regulation (EEC) No \n\n1442/88 of 24 May 1988 on the granting, for the 1988/89 to 1995/96 wine \nyears, of permanent abandonment premiums in respect of winegrowing areas3 \n\nshall not apply to Madeira. Article 22 \n\nAid shall be granted to assist the manufacture of Madeira liqueur wines \n\nwithin the limits of the requirements corresponding to traditional methods \n\nin the region. 1. Aid shall be granted for the purchase in the rest of the Community of \n\nconcentrated rectified must for use in winemaking for the purpose of \n\nsweetening the liqueur wines in question. The aid shall be determined having regard to the following factors: \n\n(a) the conditions, in particular the cost, of supply to Madeira \n\nresulting from its geographical situation; \n\n(b) the price of products on the Community market and on the world \n\nmarket; \n\n(c) the economic aspect of the aid envisaged. 1 0J No L 177, 1. 7. 1981, p. 4. 2 0J NO L 84, 27. 3. 1987, p. 1. 3 0J No L 132, 28. 5. 1988, p. 3. - 18 -\n\n2. Aid shall be granted for the purchase from intervention agencies of \n\nvinous alcohol obtained by distillation pursuant to Articles 35 et seq. of Regulation (EEC) No 822/87. The amount of the aid shall be determined by tendering procedure. The terms adopted for this specific disposal shall be such that the \n\nmarket in alcohol and spirit drinks in the Community is not disturbed. 3. Exports from Madeira of must and vinous alcohol shall not be eligible \n\nfor refunds. 4. Aid shall be granted for the ageing of Madeira liqueur wine up to a \n\nmaximum annual quantity of 20 000 hectolitres. This aid shall be paid \n\nin respect of liqueur wines which age for not less than five years. It \n\nshall be paid for each lot for three marketing years. The amount of the aid shall be ECU 0. 009 per hectolitre per day. Article 23 \n\n1. A flat-rate aid per hectare shall be granted for the continued \n\ncultivation of vines for the production of quality wines psr in the \n\ntraditional production zones. Aid shall be paid in respect of areas: \n\n(a) planted to varieties included in the list of vine varieties \n\nsuitable for the production of each of the quality wines psr \n\nproduced and belonging to the recommended or authorized categories \n\nreferred to in Article 13 of Regulation (EEC) No 822/87; \n\n(b) and on which the yield per hectare is below a maximum limit fixed \n\nby the Member State, expressed in quantities of grapes, grape must \n\nor wine, subject to the conditions of Article 11 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 823/87 of 16 March 1987 laying down special \n\nprovisions relating to quality wines produced in specified \n\nregions1. 1 0J No L 84, 27. 3. 1987, p. 59. - 19 -\n\n2. The aid shall amount to ECU 400 per hectare. From the beginning of the \n\n1997/98 marketing year, the aid shall be paid exclusively to producer \n\ngroups or organizations. Article 24 \n\nDetailed rules for the application of Articles 22 and 23 shall be adopted \n\nin accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 83 of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 822/87. Subtitle 111 \n\nMeasures to support products of the Azores \n\nArticle 25 \n\nAid shall be granted in support of traditional activities connected with \n\nbeef and veal and milk production in the Azores. 1. A supplement to the special premium provided for in Article 4a of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 805/68 shall be granted for the fattening of male \n\nbovine animals. The supplement may be granted in respect of an animal \n\nof a weight to be determined. The supplement shall be ECU 40 per head. 2. A supplement to the premium for maintaining suckier cows provided for in \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 1357/80 shall be paid to beef and veal \n\nproducers. The amount of this supplement shall be ECU 40 per suckier cow held by \n\nthe producer on the day on which the application is submitted. 3. A specific premium shall be granted for the maintenance of the dairy \n\nherd, up to a maximum of 78 000 head. - 20 -\n\nThis premium shall be paid to the producer. It shall amount to ECU 80 \n\nper cow held by the producer on the day on which the application is \n\nsubmitted. 4. Aid shall be granted for the private storage of traditionally \n\nmanufactured cheeses: \n\n- St Jorge, at least three months old; \n\n- Ilha, at least 45 days old. The amount of the aid shall be fixed in accordance with the procedure \n\nreferred to in paragraph 5. 5. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, as \n\napplicable, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 27 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 805/68 or that laid down in Article 30 of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 804/68. Article 26 \n\n1. Aid at a flat rate per hectare shall be granted for the development of \n\nsugarbeet production within the limit of an area corresponding to the \n\nproduction of 10 000 tonnes of white sugar per year. The amount of the \n\naid shall be ECU 500 per hectare sown and harvested. 2. Special aid shall be granted for the processing of sugarbeet harvested \n\nin the Azores into white sugar, within the limit of a total annual \n\nproduction of 10 000 tonnes of refined sugar. The amount of the aid shall be ECU 10 per 100 kilograms of refined \n\nsugar. This amount may be adjusted in accordance with the procedure \n\nreferred to in paragraph 3. 3. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 41 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1785/81. - 21 -\n\nArticle 27 \n\n1. A supplement to the premium provided for in Article 3 of Council \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 727/70 of 21 April 1970 on the common organization \n\nof the market in raw tobacco1 shall be granted for the collection of \n\nleaf tobacco of the Bur ley P. variety, up to a maximum of 250 tonnes. This premium shall be paid to purchasers as defined in the \n\naforementioned provision. The amount of the supplement shall be ECU 0. 2 per kilogram of leaf \n\ntobacco. In the absence of specific provisions to the contrary, the provisions \n\nadopted for the application of the premium scheme laid down in \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 727/70 shall apply to the supplementary premium. 2. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted as \n\nnecessary in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 727/70. Article 28 \n\n1. Aid shall be granted for the production of seed potatoes falling within \n\nCN code ex 0701 10 00 up to a maximum area of 200 hectares. The amount of the aid shall be ECU 500 per hectare. 2. Aid shall be granted for the production of endives falling within CN \n\ncode 1212 99 10 up to a maximum area of 400 hectares. The amount of the aid shall be ECU 500 per hectare. 3. Aid shall be granted for the conclusion of annual contracts concerning \n\nthe marketing of potatoes as referred to in paragraph 1, in the \n\nconditions laid down in Article 12. 1 0J No L 94, 28. 4. 1970, p. 1. - 22 -\n\n4. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 11 of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2358/71. Article 29 \n\nTitle III of Regulation (EEC) No 822/77 and Regulation (EEC) No 1442/88 \n\nshall not apply to the Azores. Article 30 \n\n1. A flat-rate aid per hectare shall be granted for the continued \n\ncultivation of vines for the production of quality wines psr in the \n\ntraditional production zones. Aid shall be paid in respect of areas which meet the conditions laid \n\ndown in Article 23(1). 2. The aid shall amount to ECU 400 per hectare. From the beginning of the \n\n1997/98 marketing year, the aid shall be paid exclusively to producer \n\ngroups or organizations. 3. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted, as \n\nnecessary, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 83 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 822/87. Article 31 \n\nAid shall be granted for the production of pineapples falling within CN \n\ncode 0804 30 00, up to a maximum quantity of 2 000 tonnes per year. The aid shall amount to ECU 1 per kilogram. Detailed rules for the application of this Article shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 33 of Regulation (EEC) \n\nNo 1035/72. - 23 -\n\nTITLE III \n\nSpecific measures \n\nSubtitle I \n\nDerogations applicable to structural measures \n\nArticle 32 \n\n1. Notwithstanding Articles 5, 6, 7 and 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) No \n\n2328/91 of 15 July 1991 on improving the efficiency of agricultural \nstructures1, investment aid for agricultural holdings in the Azores and \n\nMadeira shall be granted on the following conditions: \n\n(a) the authorization concerning the keeping of simplified accounts \n\nprovided for in Article 5(1)(d) shall apply beyond 31 December \n\n1991; \n\n(b) pig production shall not be subject to the conditions, laid down in \n\nArticle 6(4); \n\n(c) with regard to eggs and poultry production, the prohibition \n\nreferred to in Article 6(6) shall not apply to family farms in so \n\nfar as their size is in proportion to the need to ensure balanced \n\ndevelopment in these regions; \n\n(d) notwithstanding Article 7(1), expenditure relating to initial \n\npurchases of pigs and poultry may be eligible under the system of \n\ninvestment aid referred to in Article 6(1); \n\n(e) with regard to property investment, the value of the aid referred \n\nto in Article 7(2) may apply to other types of investment; \n\n(f) notwithstanding the fifth subparagraph of Article 7(2), the maximum \n\nvalue of the investment aid shall continue to be increased by 10% \n\nafter 31 December 1991. 1 0J L 218, 6. 8. 1991, p. 1 \n\n\f- 24 -\n\nPoints (b), (c) and (d) of the first subparagraph shall apply only in so \n\nfar as livestock production is undertaken in a manner compatible with \n\nanimal welfare and environmental protection requirements and provided \n\nthat production is for the domestic market of the regions. 2. Notwithstanding Article 17 of Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91, the \n\ncompensatory allowance referred to in Article 19 of that Regulation may \n\nbe granted in the Azores and Madeira for all crops, provided they are \n\ncultivated in a manner compatible with environmental protection \n\nrequirements and subject to a maximum income per holding to be \n\ndetermined. In addition, cows whose milk is intended for the domestic market of \n\nthese regions may be taken into consideration for the calculation of the \n\ncompensatory allowance in all areas thereof specified in Article 3(4) \n\nand (5) of Council Directive 75/268/EEC of 28 April 1975 on mountain and \nhill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas1, up to a \n\nmaximum of 20 livestock units. 3. Notwithstanding the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2328/91, the compensatory allowance may be granted to farmers \n\nin these regions with at least half a hectare of utilized agricultural \n\narea. 4. Notwithstanding Article 37(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91, the Azores \n\nand Madeira are hereby authorized not to apply the schemes provided for \n\nin Article 37(1) beyond 31 December 1994. 5. The Commission, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 29 \n\nof Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88, \n\n(a) shall adopt the conditions for applying this Article; \n\n1 0J No L 128, 19. 5. 1975, p. 1. - 25 -\n\n(b) may authorize the Republic of Portugal to apply, for the purposes \n\nof fixing the reference income within the meaning of Article 5(3) \n\nof Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91, a correction coefficient to the \n\ngross average wage of non-agricultural workers, which may not, \n\nhowever, exceed 1. 7; \n\n(c) may authorize the Republic of Portugal to apply Article 9(1) to (4) \n\nof Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91 to group-operated holdings of which \n\nonly two thirds of the members meet the condition referred to in \n\nArticle 5(D(a) of that Regulation; \n\n(d) may decide, on a reasoned request by the Portuguese authorities, \n\n- to modify the investment ceiling referred to in Article 8 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 2328/91; \n\n- notwithstanding Article 12(1) and the second indent of Article 13 \n\nof Regulation (EEC) No 866/90 and from the corresponding \n\nprovisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 867/90 of 29 March 1990 \n\non improving the processing and marketing conditions for forestry \nproducts1 to extend the coverage of these measures to essential \n\nimports from third countries, provided that the products \n\nprocessed and/or marketed are intended exclusively for the \n\ndomestic market in the Azores and Madeira; \n\n- notwithstanding Article 12(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 866/90 to \n\nextend the coverage of these measures to agricultural rum falling \n\nwithin CN code 2208 40 and to liqueurs produced from subtropical \n\nfruits falling within CN code 2208 90 55 in Madeira and the \n\nAzores. 1 0J No L 91, 6. 4. 1990, p. 7. - 26 -\n\nSubtitle II \n\nVeterinary and plant health measures \n\nArticle 33 \n\nThe following is added to the end of the last sentence of Article 24(1) of \n\nCouncil Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the \nveterinary field1: \"as well as to the Portuguese regions of the Azores and \n\nMadeira\". Article 34 \n\n1. The competent authorities shall submit to the Commission programmes for \n\nthe control of organisms harmful to plants or plant products. The \n\nprogrammes shall specify in particular the objectives to be achieved, \n\nthe measures to be carried out, their duration and their cost. The \n\nprogrammes submitted pursuant to this Article shall not concern \n\nprotective measures for bananas. 2. The Community shall contribute to the financing of such programmes on \n\nthe basis of a technical analysis of the regional situation. 3. The financial contribution of the Community and the amount of the aid \n\nshall be decided in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article \n16a of Directive 77/93/EEC2. The measures eligible for Community \n\nfinancing shall be defined in accordance with the same procedure. 4. Such contribution may cover up to 75% of the eligible expenditure. Payment shall be made on the basis of documentation supplied by the \n\ncompetent authorities. If necessary, investigations may be organized by \n\nthe Commission and conducted on its behalf by experts as referred to in \n\nArticle 19a of Directive 77/93/EEC. 1 0J No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 19. 2 0J No L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 20. - 27 -\n\nTITLE IV \n\nGENERAL PROVISIONS \n\nArticle 35 \n\nThe measures provided for in this Regulation, excluding Articles 32 to 34, \n\nshall constitute intervention designed to stabilize the agricultural \n\nmarkets within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No \n729/701. Article 36 \n\n1. The Commission shall submit to the Council and to Parliament an annual \n\nreport on the implementation of the measures provided for in this \n\nRegulation, accompanied where appropriate by proposals concerning any \n\nadjustment measures which may prove necessary in order to achieve the \n\nobjectives of the programme. 2. At the end of the third year of application of the scheme the Commission \n\nshall submit to the Council and to Parliament a general report on the \n\neconomic situation of the Azores and Madeira showing the impact of the \n\nmeasures taken pursuant to this Regulation. In the light of the report's conclusions, the Commission shall submit, \n\nwherever this proves necessary, appropriate adjustments. Article 37 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1992. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in \n\na I I Member States. 1 OJ No L 94, 28. 4. 1970, p. 13 \n\n\f~ 2 Z-\n\nANNEX I \n\nAZORES \n\nLIST OF PRODUCTS COVERED BY THE SPECIFIC SUPPLY ARRANGEMENTS PROVIDED FOR \nIN ARTICLE 3 FOR THE AZORES REGION \n\nDESCRIPTION OF THE PRODUCTS \n\nCN CODE \n\n- CEREALS. wheat. barley. maize. malt \n\n- RICE \n\n1001 \n1003 \n1005 \n1107 \n\n1006 \n\n- RAH SUGARBEET \n\n1701 12 10 \n\n\f- \n\n- 2^ \n\n, \n\nMADEIRA \n\nANNEX II \n\nLIST OF PRODUCTS COVERED BY THE SPECIFIC SUPPLY ARRANGEMENTS PROVIDED FOR \nIN ARTICLE 3 FOR THE MADEIRA REGION \n\nDESCRIPTION OF THE PRODUCTS \n\nCN CODE \n\n- CEREALS. wheat. barley. maize. malt \n\n- HOPS \n\n- RICE \n\n- VEGETABLE OILS \n\n- SUGAR \n\n- CONCENTRATED FRUIT JUICE \n\n(raw materials) \n\n- BEEF/VEAL. fresh or chilled. frozen \n\n- PIGMEAT \n\n- MILK PRODUCTS. liquid milk. milk powder. butter. cheese \n\n1001 \n1003 \n1005 \n1107 \n\n1210 \n\n1006 \n\nex (1507 to 1516) \n\n1701 \n1702 \n\n2007 99 \n2008 \n\n0201 \n0202 \n\n0203 \n\n0401 \n0402 \n0405 \n0406 \n\nFOR THE 1992/93 to 1995/96 MARKETING YEARS \n\n- SEED POTATOES \n\n0701 10 00 \n\n\f- 30 -\n\nUl 1 L I IU; PC. IJH. Financial Statement \n\nD a te : \u2022\u2022HL. OT: 1*9C \n\n1. BUDGET H E A D I NG : 183, 2 5 1, 381 \n\nA P P R O P R I A T I O NS : ECU 4 5. 2 1 , 20 m i l l i on \n\n2. TITLE : \n\nC o u n c il R e g u l a t i on i n t r o d u c i ng specific m e a s u r es in respect of c e r t a in a g r i c u l t u r al p r o d u c ts \nfor t he b e n e f it of the A z o r es and M a d e i ra \n\n3. LEGAL B A S IS : A r t i c le 43 of the Treaty \n\n4. A I MS \n\nI m p l e m e n t a t i on in the agricultural sector of t he C o u n c il D e c i s i on s e t t i ng up P o s e i ma \n\n5. FINANCIAL I M P L I C A T I O NS \n\nPERIOD OF 12 MONTHS \n\nCURRENT FINANCIAL YEAR \n\n( 1992 ) \n\nFOLLOWING FINANCIAL YEAR \n\n( \n\n1993 ) \n\n5. 0 E X P E N D I T U RE \n\n- CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET \n\n(INTERVENTIONS) \n\n- N A T I O N AL A U T H O R I T I ES \n\n- O T H ER \n\n5. 1 R E V E N UE \n\n- OWN RESOURCES OF THE EC \n(LEVIES/CUSTOMS DUTIES) \n\n\u2022 NATIONAL \n\np. m. ECU 54. 5 mi I I ion \n\np. m. - ECU 7. 4 million. 0. 1 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE. 1. 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE \n\nECU 55. 1 million \n-ECU 7. 4 million \n\nECU 55. 4 million \n-ECU 7. 4 million \n\nECU 53. 7 million \n-ECU 7. 4 million \n\nECU 53. 0 million \n-ECU 7. 4 million \n\n1994. 1995 \n\n1996. 1997. 2 METHOD OF CALCULATION \n\nFor detailed calculation for the Azores and Madeira, see Annex. The double rate used is 1. 145 \n\n6. 0 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM APPROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET ? \n\n6. 1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF THE CURRENT BUDGET ? \n\n6. 2 WILL A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET BE NECESSARY ? \n\n6. 3 WILL FUTURE BUDGET A P P R O P R I A T I O NS BE NECESSARY ? \n\nC O M M E N TS : \n\nY E S /W \n\nYES/E& \n\n-W\u00bb/N0 \n\nYESAHUi \n\n\f1 Regulation \n1 Article \n\n1 Product \n\n1 Type \n1 of aid \n\nBUDGET \nITEM \n\n1 1993 \n\n1 \n1 \n\n191)4 \n\n1995 \n\nI \n\n1996 I \n\n1997 I \n\n1998 I \n\n1999 \n\nI tdtAL I \n\nAZORES - AGRICULTURAL SECTION : 0051 Of T>\u20ac PROPOSAL \n\n(ECU million (A)) \n\nper \n\ntonne \n\n183 \n\n1 \n\n1 12. 9 \n\n12. \u00bb \n\n12. 9 \n\n12. 9 \n\n12. 9 \n\n1 \n\n12. 9 \n\nI \n\n12. 9 \n\nI90. 6 \n\nI \n\nper \n\ntonne \n\n183 \n\nI \n\n1 2. 9 \n\n2. !5 \n\n2. 0 \n\n1. 4 \n\n1. 0 \n\nper \n\nhead \n\n251 \n\nI \n\n1 0. 5 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 5 \n\np. m. 110. 2 \n\nt \n\np. m. 1 2. 7 \n\n1 \n\n1 2 & 3 \n\n1 3 ft 5 \n\n1 \n\n4 \n\n1 11 \n12 \nI \n13 \nI \n\n1 \n\n14 \n\n1 Permanent \n1 supply \n\n1 Temporary \n1 supply \n\n1 Pure-bred \n1 animals \n\n1 Fruit and \n1 vegetables \n\n1 logo \n\nper ha \nby value \nfixed rate \n\nFixed rate \n\n1 25 - 1 ft 2 \n\n1 Bovine animals \n\nper \n\nhead \n\nI 25 - 3 \n\n1 Dairy cows \n\n1 25 - 4 \n\n1 Cheese \n\n1 26 - 1 \n1 26 - 2 \n\n1 Sugar \n\n1 \n\n27 \n\n1 Tobacco \n\nper \n\nhead \n\nper \n\ntonne \n\nper \n\nha \ntonne \n\nper \n\ntonne \n\nI 28 - 1 \nI 28 - 3 \n\n1 Seed potatoes \n\nper \n\nha \nha \n\nper \n\nha \n\nper \n\nha \n\n1 Pineopple \n\nper \n\ntonne \n\nI 28 - 2 \n\n1 Endives \n\nI \n\n30 \n\nI 31 \n\n1 Vines \n\n1TOTAL \nICrop product \nlAnimalt \nlOther \n\nsi \n\n1 TOTAL EXCLUDING SUPPLY \n1 \n1 \n1 \n\ncrop products \nanimalt \nother \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 5 \n\np. m. 1. 0 \n0. 0 \n\n-\n\n1. 7 \n\n6. 2 \n\n0. 8 \n\n0. 7 \n0. 9 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1 \n\n2. 0 \n\n0. 0 \n1. 0 \n0. 0 \n\n-\n\n1. 7 \n\n6. 2 \n\n0. 8 \n\n0. 8 \n1. 0 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 6 \n0. 5 \n0. 0 \n\n0. 5 \n\n1. 7 \n\n6. 2 \n\n0. 8 \n\n0. 4 \n0. 5 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n2. 0 \n\n0. 2 \n0. 7 \n0. 0 \n\n0. 3 \n\n1. 7 \n\n6. 2 \n\n0. 8 \n\n0. 5 \n0. 6 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1 \n\n2. 0 \n\n0. 1 \n0. 9 \n0. 0 \n\np. m. 1. 7 \n\n6. 2 \n\n0. 8 \n\n0. 6 \n0. 7 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1 \n\n2. 0 \n\n1 1. 8 \n1 4. 5 \nI 0. 1 \n\n1 1. 6 \n\n111. 8 \n\n143. 4 \n\n1 5. 5 \n\n1 3. 2 \n1 4. 2 \n\n1 \n1 \n1 \n\nI \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n1 \n\nIO-* \n\n] \n\ni \n\nI \n\n1 0. 6 \n1 0. 5 \n\n1 1. 1 \n\n1 0. 8 \n\n1 \n1 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n1 2. 0 \n\n114. 0 \n\n28. 9 \n\n19. 3 \n9. 1 \n0. 5 \n\n14. 0 \n4. 4 \n9. 1 \n0. 5 \n\n28. 2 \n\n18. 8 \n9. 1 \n0. 3 \n\n13. 8 \n4. 4 \n9. 1 \n0. 3 \n\nI 27. 8 \nI 18. 7 \n9. 1 \nI \n1 p. m. 1 13. 9 \n1 \n1 \nI p. m. 4. 8 \n9. 1 \n\n27. 7 \nI 18. 6 \n9. 1 \n\n1 26. 9 \n1 18. 3 \n8. 7 \n\n1 14. 2 \n5. 1 \n1 \n9. 1 \nI \n\n1 14. 0 \nI \nI \n\n5. 3 \n8. 7 \n\n1196. 8 \n1 \n1 131. 9 1 \n1 63. 3 1 \nI \n1. 6 \nI \n\n1 \n1 96. 0 \n1 31. 1 \n1 \n1 63. 3 1 \nI \n1. 6 \n1 \n\n183 \n183 \n183 \n\n381 \n\n251 \n\n251 \n\n251 \n\n183 \n183 \n\n183 \n\n183 \n183 \n\n183 \n\n183 \n\n183 \n\n183 \n251 \n381 \n\n183 \n251 \n381 \n\n1 \nI \n1 \n\n1 0. 4 \n1 0. 1 \n1 0. 1 \n\n1 \n\nI 0. 3 \n\n1 \n\nI 1. 7 \n\nt \n\n1 6. 2 \n\n1 \n\n1 0. 8 \n\n1 \nI \n\n1 0. 2 \n1 0. 2 \n\n1 \n\n1 0. 1 \n\n1 \n1 \n\n1 0. 1 \n1 0. 0 \n\nI \n\n1 0. 1 \n\n1 \n\nI 0. 1 \n\nI \n\n1 2. 0 \n\n1 28. 6 \n1 19. 1 \n9. 1 \n1 \n0. 3 \nI \n\n1 \nI \n1 \n\nI 12. 7 \n3. 3 \nI \n9. 1 \nI \n0. 3 \n1 \n\nI \n1 \n1 \n\n0. 5 \n0. 3 \n0. 0 \n\n0. 5 \n\n1. 7 \n\n6. 2 \n\n0. 6 \n\n0. 3 \n0. 3 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\n2. 0 \n\n28. 8 \n\n19. 2 \n9. 1 \n0. 5 \n\n13. 4 \n3. 8 \n9. 1 \n0. 5 \n\n\f- 3 * ,-\n\nA Z O R ES \n\n(Financial statement for Poseima) \n\nI. Loss of levy \n\nIn principle no levy will be lost because supply will be from the EEC \nonly. II. Supply aid \n\nThe figures are indicative and based on the quantities currently \nimported from the rest of the Community. They will have to be \nreviewed annually in accordance with Articles 2, 3 and 10. The aid is equivalent to the current level of refunds. Permanent aid \n\nCEREALS \n\n(Article \n\n2 and Annex \n\nI) \n\nQuantity \n\n(t) \n\nAid \n\n(ECU/t) \n\nCost (ECU m \n\n(A)) \n\nCommon wheat \nFeed wheat \nMaize/bar \nDurum wheat \nRice \nMalt \n\nley \n\n34. 000 \n10. 000 \n62. 000 \n3. 000 \n4. 200 \n1. OOO \n\n106 \n104 \n105 \n167 \n275 \n104 x 1,33 \n\nTOTAL \n\n114. 200 \n\n-\n\n3,604 \n1,040 \n6,510 \n0,501 \n1,155 \n0,138 \n\n12,948 \n\nTemporary \n\naid \n\n(Article \n\n3(4)) \n\n\u2022 \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\nImports \n\n(t) \n\n8. 000 \n\n6. 800 \n\n5. 400 \n\n4. 000 \n\n2. 700 \n\nAid \nSpecial \n(ODs, \n\n(refunds) \naid \nPortugal) \n\n425 \n63 \n\n- \n\n425 \n63 \n\n- \n\n425 \n63 \n\n- \n\n425 \n63 \n\n- \n\n425 \n63 \n\n- \n\n1. 400 \n\n425 \n63 \n\n- \n\nTotal \n\n362 \n\n362 \n\n362 \n\n362 \n\n362 \n\n362 \n\nCost \n\n(ECU m \n\n(A)) \n\n2,896 \n\n2,462 \n\n1 ,955 \n\n1 ,448 \n\n0,977 \n\n0,507 \n\n\fBREEDING ANIMALS \n\n- 3 3-\n4) \n\n(Artlcle \n\nNumber/year \n\n150 \n100 \n400 \n2. 500 \n550. 000 \n\nAmount \n(ECU/head) \n\n1. 300 \n410 \n380 \n150 \n\n0,25 \n\nanimals \n(male) \n(female) \ngoats \n\nBovine \nSwine \nSwine \nSheep, \nChicks \n\nTOTAL \n\nThe EEC bears 50% of \n\nthe cost - ECU 450 000 \n\n(A) \n\nCost \n\n(ECU \n\n(A)) \n\n195. 000 \n41. 000 \n152. 000 \n375. 000 \n137. 500 \n\n900. 500 \n\n\u2022 \n\nAbolition \n\n(Article \n\n6) \n\ntoken entry - under \n- under \n\nexpenditure \nreceipts. I l l. Product \n\naids \n\nFRUIT AND VEGETABLES \n\n1. Fresh \nProgramme of \n\nfruit \n\nand vetetables \n\n(Article \n\n11) \n\nInitiatives \n\n(see Annex) \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1st \n2nd \n3rd \n\nInstalment \nInstalment \nInstalment \n\n0,4 \n\n0,4 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 4 \n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n0. 1 \n\n0. 1 \n\nTotal \n(ECU \n\nexpenditure \nmillion) \n\n0. 4 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 6 \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 1 \n\np. m. 2. Fresh \nMarketing \n\nfruit \n\nand vetetabless \n- annual contract \n\n(Article \n(See Annex) \n\n12) \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\nExpenditure \n\n(ECU m) \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 3 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 7 \n\n0. 9 \n\n1. 0 \n\nProcessed \nECU 100 000 \n\nfruit \nIn \n\nand vegetables \n1993. (Article \n\n13) \n\nGraphic \n\nsymbol \n\n(Article \n\n14) \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\nExpenditure \n\n(ECU m) \n\n0. 3 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0. 3 \n\np. m. - * t-\n\nMILK PRODUCTS/BEEF & VEAL \n\n- Male bovine animals (Article 25 (1)) \n\nSupplement to premium \n\n40 000 head x ECU 40/head = ECU 1. 6 million \n\n- Suckler cows (Article 25(2)) \n\nSupplement to premium \n2 000 head x ECU 40/head = ECU 0. 08 million \n\n- Dairy cows (Article 25(3)) \n\nDairy cow premium \n78 000 head x ECU 80/head = ECU 6. 2 million \n\n- private storage aid for cheese (Article 25(4)) \n\nS Jorge: 1 500 t x ECU 2. 8/t/day x 90 days = ECU 0. 38 million \nILHA \n\n: 1 600 t x ECU 2. 8/t/day x 90 days = ECU 0. 40 million. Aid per hectare \n\n(Article \n\n26(1)) \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1999 \n\nArea \n\n(ha) \n\nAid \n\n(ECU/ha) \n\n300 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n700 \n\n900 \n\n1. 100 \n\n1. 300 \n\n1. 500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\nCost (ECU m (A)) \n\n0,15 \n\n0,25 \n\n0. 35 \n\n0. 45 \n\n0. 55 \n\n0. 65 \n\n0. 75 \n\nAid per tonne \n\n(Article \n\n26(2)) \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1999 \n\nQuantity \n\n(tonnes) \n\n2. 000 \n\n3. 200 \n\n4. 600 \n\n6. 000 \n\n7. 300 \n\n8. 600 \n\n10. 000 \n\nAid \n\n(ECU/t) \n\n100 \n\n100 \n\n100 \n\n100 \n\n100 \n\n100 \n\n100 \n\nCost (ECU m (A)) \n\n0. 2 \n\n0. 3 \n\n0,5 \n\n0,6 \n\n0,7 \n\n0,9 \n\n1. 0 \n\nTOBACCO \n\nAid per tonne (Article \n\n27) \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1999 \n\nQuantity \n\n(tonnes) \n\nAid \n\n(ECU/t) \n\n250 \n\n200 \n\n250 \n\n200 \n\n250 \n\n200 \n\n250 \n\n200 \n\n250 \n\n200 \n\n250 \n\n200 \n\n250 \n\n200 \n\nCost \n\n(ECU m \n\n(A)) \n\n0,05 \n\n0,05 \n\n0,05 \n\n0,05 \n\n0,05 \n\n0,05 \n\n0. 05 \n\n\f- 3 5-\n\nSEED POTATOES \n\n1. Ald per hectare \n\n(Article \n\n28(1)) \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1999 \n\nQuantity \n\n(ha) \n\n100 \n\n120 \n\n150 \n\n180 \n\n200 \n\n200 \n\n200 \n\nAld/ha \n\n(ECU/ha) \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\n500 \n\nCost (ECU million (A)) \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 06 \n\n0. 08 \n\n0. 09 \n\n0. 10 \n\n0. 10 \n\n0. 10 \n\n2. Marketing \n\nald \n\n(Article \n\n28(3)) \n\nAld per \n\ntonne \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1999 \n\nQuantity \n\nexported \n\n900 \n\n1. 300 \n\n1. 650 \n\n2. 000 \n\n2. 350 \n\n2. 700 \n\n3. 000 \n\nMarketed \n(ECU/t) \n\nvalue \n\nAid - 13% of \nmarketed \n\nvalue \n\n288 \n\n288 \n\n288 \n\n288 \n\n288 \n\n288 \n\n288 \n\n0. 03 \n\n0. 05 \n\n0. 06 \n\n0. 07 \n\n0. 09 \n\n0. 10 \n\n0. 11 \n\nENDIVES \n\n(Article 28(2)) \n\nAld per \n\nhectare \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1999 \n\nQuantity \n\n(ha) \n\nAld/ha \n\nCost \n\n200 \n\n500 \n\n230 \n\n500 \n\n270 \n\n500 \n\n300 \n\n500 \n\n330 \n\n500 \n\n370 \n\n500 \n\n400 \n\n500 \n\n0. 10 \n\n0. 12 \n\n0,14 \n\n0. 15 \n\n0. 17 \n\n0. 19 \n\n0. 20 \n\n(Article \n\n30) \n\nAld per \n200 ha x ECU 400/ha - \u00a3C(7 0. 12 million \n\nhectare \n\n(A) \n\nPI NEAPPLE \n\n(Article \n\n31) \n\nAld oer \n\ntonne \n\nECU 1. 000/t \n\nx 2. 000 \n\nt - ECU 2 million \n\n(A) \n\n\fAZORES: PLANT PRODUCTS SECTION (FRUIT, VEGETABLES, FLORICULTURE) \n\n1) PROGRAM* OF INITIATIVES \n\nPRODUCT \n\n1 \n] \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\nCURRENT \nAREA \n^yyi; (ho) 1 \n\n| \n1 \n\n0) \n\n1 \n\nESTIMATED \nAREA \n\n(ho) \n\n(2) \n\n| \nAVOCADO \n| \nSUGAR APPLE \n| \nPASSION FRUIT \n1 \nPASSION FRUIT \n1 \nMANGO \n1 \nCITRUS FRUIT \n1 \nOTHER FRUIT \nVEGETABLES \n1 \nEXOTIC FLOWERS : \nORNAMENTAL PLANTS' \u2022 \n\nTOTAL \n\n1 \n\n4 \n55 \n\n20 \n0 \n260 \n200 \n205 \n0 \n0 \n\n744 \n\n1 \n1 \n\n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n\n1 \n\n3) ANNUAL CONTRACTS \n\nI MAXIMUM \nI AID \n1 \n\n(ECU/ho) \n\nINITIAL. COST \nI (ECU m). ESTIMATED , \n\nCOST * \n\u20221 (ECU m) \n\n1 \n\n1 \n1 \n\n500 \n500 \n\n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \ni : 500 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n\n(3) \n\nI \n\n(4)-(3) \n\n1 \n\n(5>-(3)l \n\n0. 002 \n0. 028 \n\n1 0. 030 1 \n1 0. 050 1 \n\nI 0. 010 \n1 0. 000 \n1 0. 130 \n1 0. 100 \n1 0. 103 \nI 0. 000 \nI 0. 000 \n\n1 0. 060 1 \n1 0,075 1 \n1 0. 130 1 \n1 0. 150 1 \n1 0. 131 1 \n1 \n1 0. 006 \n1 0. 005 1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 372 \n\n1 \n\n0. 636 1 \n\n60 \n100 \n\n120 \n150 \n260 \n300 \n262 \n11 \n9 \n\n1272 \n\n1 \n\nPRODUCT \n\n| \n\nACTUAL \n, \n1 \nQUANTITY \n(1991) (T) 1 \n\nESTIMATED , \nQUANTITY \n(T) \n\n1 SELLING PRICE \n(ECU/T) \n1 \n\nI INITIAL \n1 COST \n\n(ECU m) \n\n\u00ab ESTIMATE*. 1 COST \" 1 \n>'(ECUm) \n\n)t \n\nAVOCADO \nSUGAR APPLE \n\nI \n| \n\nPASSION FRUIT \nMANGO \nCITRUS FRUIT \nOTHER FRUIT \nVEGETABLES \u2022 \nEXOTIC FLOWERS \nORNAMENTAL PLANTS , \n\n| \n| \n, \n, \n| \n\n(D \n\n40 \n600 \n\n80 \n0 \n\n0 \n0 \n\nTOTAL \n\n1 \n\n720 \n\n\u00bb \n\nI \nI \n\nI \nI \n\nI \nI \n\n1 \n\n(2) \n\n700 \n1500 \n\n500 \n900 \n\n93 \n100 \n\n3793 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n1 \n\nI \n1 \n\n1 \n1 \n\nI \n\n(3) \n\n1 \n\n(4)-(3) \n\n1 \n\n(5)-(3)l \n\n2257 \n1438 \n\n1198 \n2257 \n\n9314 \n1152 \n\n1 0. 090 \n0. 863 \n\n1 1. 580 1 \n1 2. 157 1 \n\n0. 096 \n1 0. 000 \n0. 000 \n1 0. 000 \n1 0. 000 \n0. 000 \n1 \n0. 000 \n1 \n\n1 0. 599 \n1 \n1 2. 031 1 \n1 0. 000 1 \n1 0. 000 1 \n1 0. 000 1 \n1 0. 866 1 \n1 0. 115 1 \n\n1. 05 \n\n1 \n\n7. 35 1 \n\nThe EAGGF contribution is 13% of the commercial value. Community aid amounts to ECU 0. 1 million in the first year and will reach \nECU 1. 0 million in the final year. I \n\nI \n\n\fMADEIRA - AGRICULTURAL SECTION: COST OF THE PROPOSAL \n\n(ECU million (A)) \n\nITEM \n183 \n251 \n183 \n251 \n251 \n\n1 BUOGET nTTO 1 1994 \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \n! \n\nI \nI 6. 5 \nI 8. 1 \nI 0. 1 \nI 0. 3 \nI 0. 3 \n'I \nl~ol I 0. 8 \n\nI I MA \nI \nI 6. 5 \nI 8. 1 \nI 0. 1 \nI 0. 2 \nI 0. 3 \n\nI i*96 \nj \nI 6. 5 \nI 8. 1 \nI 0. 0 \nI 0. 1 \nI 0. 3 \n\nI 1997 \n\nI 1998 \n\nI 1999 \n\nI 6. 5 \nI 8. 1 \nI 0. 0 \nI 0. 0 \nI 0. 3 \n\nI 6. 5 \nI 8. 1 \nI 0. 0 \n\n0. 0 \nI 0. 3 \n\nI 0. 4 \nI \nI 0. 0 \nI 0. 5 \nI 0. 1 \n\nI 0. 7 \nI \nI 0. 0 \nI 0. 5 \nI 0-1 \n\nI 0. 1 \n\nI 0. 1 \n\nI 1. 0 \n\\. I 0. 0 \nI 0. 3 \n\u00bb 0-1 \n\n!\n\n\u00ab\n\nI 1. 3 \n\u00bb\n!\nI 0. 0 \nI p. m. } \u00b0-1 \n\nI 0. 0 \n1. 6 \n\n-\u00bb \nI 0-0 \nI - \nj 0-1 \n\nII \nII 6. 5 \nII 8. 1 \nII 0. 2 \nII 0. 4 \nII 0. 3 \nII \nI |\"T5 \nII 0. 1 \nII \nII 0. 1 \nII 0. 3 \nII 0. 1 \n\nI TOTAL. I \nI \nI \nI 45. 3 \nI \n56. 9 \nI \nI 0. 4 \nj I-1 \nj \nI \nI 1. 8 \n\n\u2022 \nI 2. 6 \n6. 7 \n\nI \nI \n\nI A < \n\nI \n\n0'1 \nj 1 \u2022e \n} \u00b0 -8 \n\nI 6. 5 \n8. 1 \nI 0. 0 \nj CO \nI p. m. I 0. 0 \n1. 6 \n\n* A \n\n0-\u00b0 \nI - \n} 0t1 \n\nII 0. 4 \n\nI 0. 4 \n\nI 0. 4 \n\nI 0. 4 \n\nI 0. 4 \n\nI 0. 4 \n\nI 0. 4 \n\n1 2. 5 \n\nII 1. 0 \n\nI 1. 0 \n\nI LO \n\nI 1. 0 \n\n| 1*0 j 1-\u00b0 \n\n[ u0 \n\n| 7'\u00b0 \n\nj \n\nIper ha \n\nI \n\n183 \n\n\\\\~) \n\nI (1) \n\nI (1) \n\nj 0) \n\n\\ 0) \n\nj 0) \n\nj 01 \n\n| 0> \n\n| \n\nI \n! \nI \nI \n\nJ \nI \nI \nI \n\nI \nI \nI \nI \n\n183 \n0) \n183 \n183 \n\n183 \n251 \n381 \n\n183 \n251 \n381 \n\nII 0. 2 \n\\\\~) \n0. 1 \nII \nII 0. 5 \n\nII 19. 0 \nII 9. 3 \nII 9. 3 \nII 0. 3 \n\nI 0. 2 \nj 0) \n0. 1 \nI \nI 0. 5 \n\nI 0. 2 \nj 0) \n0. 1 \nI \nI 0. 5 \n\nI 0. 2 \nj 0) \n0. 1 \nI \nI 0. 5 \n\nI 0. 2 \nj 0) \n0. 1 \nI 0. 5 \n\n0. 2 \nJO) \n0. 1 \nI 0. 5 \n\nI 0. 2 \njO) \n0. 1 \n0. 5 \n\n1 0. 2 \n[ 0. 0 \n0. 5 \n3. 6 \n\nI 19. 3 \nI 9. 6 \nI 9,2 \nI 0,5 \n\nI 19. 5 \nI 9. 9 \nI 9. 1 \nI 0. 5 \n\nI 18. 7 \nI 9. 4 \nI 9. 0 \nI 0. 3 \n\nI 18. 5 \nj 9. 6 \n8. 9 \n\nI 18. 8 \nI 9. 9 \n8. 9 \nI p. m. 1 - \n\nI 18. 5 \nI 9. 9 \n8. 6 \n- \n\n1131. 1 \n\n66. 4 \n63. 1 \n1. 6 \n\nI \nI \nI \n\nI \n\n11 3. 8 \nII 2. 7 \n11 \n0. 8 \nII 0. 3 \n\nI 4. 6 \nI 4. 2 \nI 3. 3 \nI 3. 0 \nI \nI 0. 8 \n0. 8 \nI 0. 5 I 0. 5 \n\nI 4. 0 \n2. 9 \n0. 8 \nI 0. 3 \n\nI 3. 9 \n3. 2 \n0. 8 \nI p. m. I \n\nI 4. 2 \n3. 4 \n0. 8 \n- \n\nI 3. 9 \n3. 4 \n0. 5 \n- \n\nI \n\nI 27. 4 \n20. 7 \n5. 1 \n1. 6 \n\n4 \n\nI Regulation I Product \nI Article \nI 2 *3 \nI \nI 3ft 5 \n| \nI \nI \n! \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \n\nI \n! Permanent \n| 8 Upp|y \n! Temporary \n|. upply \nI Pure-bred \nI animal. I \nI Fruit and \nI vegetable. I \nI logo \nI Bovine animal. Iper head \n\nr t y pl \nI of old \nIper tonne \ni \nIper tonne \nI \nIper head \nI \nIper ha \nIby conroercial \nlvalue \nI \nIflxed rate I \nIflxed rate I \nI \n\n13 \nu \n15 \n\nn \n12 \n\nI \n\nI \n\n16 \n\n17 \n\nl~ \nI 19 \nI1TH \n1 2 2 -4 \nI 23 \n\n| Milk \n\nIper tonne \n\nI Potatoes \n\nIper ha \n\nI \n\nI \n\nI Sugar cane \nI RUT! \n[mZ \nI \nI \n\nIper hi \nIpTrThl \nIper hi \nIper ha \n\n183 \n183 \n\n183 \n381 \n251 \n\n251 \n\n183 \n\nI T O T AI \nI. S op product. ! \nI \nlAnlmol. I \nlOther \n\nI TOTAL EXCLUDING SUPPLY \nI \nI \nI \n\nCrop product. Animal. other \n\n(1) Data not available \n\n! \nI \nI \nI \n\nI \nI \nI \nI \n\n{ \n| \n} \n\n| \n\ni \n\n\f- 5 S-\n\nLoss of own resources \n\nM A D E I RA \n\nThe indicative figures in Annex I show that lost levies amount to \nECU 6. 5 million (A) on the basis of the available information. This \namount will have to be reviewed annually on the basis of the annual \nsupply balances and the levels of the levies and customs duties in \nforce in accordance with Articles 2, 3 and 10. II. Supply aid \n\nThe figures are indicative and based on the quantities currently \nimported from the rest of the Community. They will have to be \nreviewed annually in accordance with Articles 2, 3 and 10. The aid is calculated on the current level of refunds. Permanent aid \n\nThe figures in Annex I show that supply aid amounts to \nECU 14. 6 million (A). Temporary aid \n\nSeed potatoes (Article 3 and Annex II) \n\n19 9 3 \n\n19 9 4 \n\n19 9 5 \n\n19 9 6 \n\nQuantity (tonnes) \n\n1. 500 \n\n1. 200 \n\nAid \n\n(ECU/t) \n\n100 \n\n100 \n\n800 \n\n100 \n\n400 \n\n100 \n\nCost (ECU mi II ion) \n\n0. 15 \n\n0,12 \n\n0. 08 \n\n0. 04 \n\nBovine animals for fattening (Article 5) \n\n19 9 3 \n\n19 9 4 \n\n19 9 5 \n\n19 9 6 \n\nQuantity \n\n(head) \n\n3. 000 \n\n2. 250 \n\n1. 500 \n\nAid \n\n(ECU/head) \n\n144 \n\n144 \n\n144 \n\n750 \n\n144 \n\nCost (ECU mill ion) \n\n0. 43 \n\n0. 32 \n\n0. 22 \n\n0,11 \n\n\f- J S-\n\nSupply of breeding animals (Article 4) \n\nType \n\nNumber/year \n\nAmount \n(ECU/head) \n\nCost \n(ECU (A)) \n\nCattle \n\nMa 1e sw i ne \nFemale swine \n\nEggs \nChicks \n\nT O T AL \n\n200 \n\n100 \n500 \n\n160. 000 \n360. 000 \n\n1. 300 \n\n410 \n380 \n\n0,05 \n0. 25 \n\n260. 000 \n\n41. 000 \n190. 000 \n\n8. 000 \n90. 000 \n\n589. 000 \n\nThe EEC bears 50% of the cost - ECU 295 000 (A) \n\nAbo Iition (Article 6) \n\ntoken entry - under expenditure \n\n- under receipt. III. Product aid \n\nFruit and vegetables \n\n1. Programme of Initiatives (Article 11) (See Annex) \n\nECU mi I I ion (A) \n\nExpenditure \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n1st instalment \n2nd Instalment \n3rd instalment \n4th instalment \n\n0,74 \n\n0. 74 \n0. 05 \n\n0,74 \n0. 05 \n0. 04 \n\n0,05 \n0,04 \n0,04 \n\n0,04 \n0,04 \n\n0. 04 \n\nT O T AL \n\n0. 74 \n\n0. 79 \n\n0,83 \n\n0. 13 \n\n0,08 \n\n0,04 \n\n2. Market I no - Annual contract (Article 12) \n\n(see Annex) \n\nECU mi I I ion (A) \n\nExpenditure \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n1998 \n\n0. 1 \n\n0. 4 \n\n0. 7 \n\n8,0 \n\n1. 3 \n\n1. 6 \n\n3. Processed fruit and vegetables (Article 13) \n\nECU 100. 000 (A) in 1993 for a study. -Ho-\n\nGraphic symbol (Article 14) \n\nECU mi I I Ion (A) \n\nExpenditure \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n1997 \n\n0. 3 \n\n0. 5 \n\n0,5 \n\n0,3 \n\np. m. Beef/veal (Article 15) \n\nFattening aid (Article 15(1)) \nSupplement \n3 000 head x ECU 40/head = ECU 0. 12 million (A) \n\nAid for suckler cows (Article 15(2)) \nSupplement \n100 head x ECU 40/head - ECU 4 000 (A) \n\nMilk products (Article 16) \n\nConsumption aid: 7 000 t x ECU 50/t = ECU 0. 35 million (A) \n\nPotatoes (Article 17) \n\nAid per hectare: 2 000 ha x ECU 500/ha * ECU 1. 0 million (A) \n\nSugar cane (Article 18) \n\nAid per hectare: 120 ha x ECU \n\n/ha x 60% - ECU \n\nmillion (A) \n\nThe EEC will reimburse 60% of the expenditure for three years. Mel de cana and rum (Article 19) \n\nAid per tonne or per hectolitre \nMel de cana: 250 t x ECU 75/t = ECU 18 750 (A) \nRum: 2 500 hi x ECU 70/hl \u00ab ECU 175 000 (A) \n\nWine (Articles 22 and 23) \n\nAid to purchase concentrated must (Article 22(1)) \n46 000 hi x ECU (l)/hl = ECU. million (A) \n\nAid to purchase vinous alcohol (Article 22(2)) \ntoken entry \n\nAid for ageing of wines (Article 22(3)) \nRestricted to three years \n20 000 hi x ECU 0. 009/hl/day x 365 days \u00bb ECU 65 700 (A) \n\nAid per hectare (Article 23) \n1 300 ha x ECU 400/ha = ECU 0. 52 million (A) \n\n\f- W1 -\n\nA N N E X \n\nI \n\nS U P P LY \n\nTO \n\nM A D E I RA \n\nFrom EEC \n\nFrom \n\nthird countri \n\nes \n\nP R O D U CT \n\nQuantity \n\nAid \n\nCost \n\nQuantity \n\nLevy \n\n(tonnes) \n\n(ECU(A)/t) \n\n(ECU m (A)) \n\n(tonnes) \n\n(ECU(A)/t) \n\nLost \nlevies \n(ECU m (A)) \n\nCereals \n\nCommon wheot \nFeed wheot \nDurum wheot \nMaize \nBarley \nMolt \n\nRice \n\nSugar \n\n11. 000 \n4. 000 \n3. 000 \n2. 000 \n3. 000 \n2. 000 \n\n106 \n104 \n167 \n105 \n105 \n104 x 1. 33 \n\n1. 17 \n0. 42 \n0. 50 \n0. 21 \n0. 32 \n0. 28 \n\n11. 000 \n4. 000 \n3. 000 \n18. 000 \n3. 000 \n\n145 \n145 \n195 \n130 \n135 \n135 x 1. 33 \n\n1. 60 \n0. 58 \n0. 58 \n2. 34 \n0. 41 \n\n3. 500 \n\n275 \n\n0. 96 \n\n500 \n\n370 \n\n0. 19 \n\n6. 000 \n\n425 \n\n2. 55 \n\nHops (cones) \n\n10 \n\n0. 00 \n\nMilk products \n\nSkimmed milk powder \nWhole milk powder \nButter \nCheese \nFresh products \n\n800 \n600 \n500 \n600 \n6. 000 \n\n800 \n1. 120 \n1. 760 \n1. 110 \n160 \n\n0. 64 \n0. 67 \n0. 88 \n0. 66 \n0. 96 \n\n425 \n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\nBeef/veal \n\nChilled \nFrozen \n\n1. 100 \n1. 800 \n\n1. 800 \n1. 100 \n\n1. 98 \n1. 98 \n\n100 \n200 \n\n2. 500 \n1. 800 \n\n0. 25 \n0. 36 \n\nPlgmeat \n\n1. 200 \n\n300 \n\n0. 36 \n\n300 \n\n650 \n\n0. 20 \n\nVegetable olIs \n\n1. 800 \n\n33. 5 \n(2) \n\n0. 06 \n\n200 \n\n33. 5 \n(2) \n\n0. 01 \n\nFruit iuice \nPuree CN 20-07-49 \nOther CN 20-08 \n\nT O T AL \n\n1 \n\n120 \n\n(3) \n\n(3) \n\n14. 60 \n\n6. 52 \n\n( 1) Ropeseed \n\nSunflower \n\n- \n\n- \n\n$410 / \n\nt \n\n) \n\n$480 / \n\nt ) \u00bb4 45 / \n\n* \n\n- ECU 3 35 \n\n( A ) /t \n\n( 2) Customs d u t i es \n\n- \n\n10 X \n\n( 3) D a ta n ot a v al l a b i \u00e9. 1) PROGRAMS OF INITIATIVES \n\nMADEIRA: PLANT PRODUCTS SECTION \n\n( F R U IT & VEGETABLES, F L O R 1 C U L l U N t; \n\nPRODUCT \n\n, \n| \nI \n\nI \n\nCURRENT \nAREA; \n(1991) (ho) \n\n, ESTIMATED \n| \nAREA \nI \n\n(ho) \n\n, MAXIMUM \nAID \n1 \n(ECU/ho) \n1 \n\n, INITIAL \n1 \nCOST \n1 (ECUm) \n\n, ESTIMATED. , \n1 COST \nj \nt (ECUm) \\i \n\n(D \n\nI \n\n(2) \n\n(3) \n\n1 \n\n(4)-(3) \n\n1 \n\n(5)-(3)l \n\n| \n| \nI \ni \n\nAVOCADO \nSUGAR APPLE \nPAPAYA \nOTHER TROPICAL \nSEED FRUITS \nI \nCITRUS FRUIT \nVEGETABLES \nI \nORNAMENTAL PLANTS ;l \nI \nEXOTIC FLOWERS \nI \n\n-I \n\n40 \n60 \n10 \n12 \n300 \n75 \n932 \n4 \n52 \n\nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \nI \n\n70 \n150 \n15 \n50 \n300 \n85 \n975 \n10 \n80 \n\n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n1 \n500 \n1 ! 500 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n500 \n1 \n\n1 0. 020 \n1 0. 030 \n1 0. 005 \n1 0. 006 \n1 0. 150 \n1 0. 038 \n1 0. 466 \n1 0. 002 \n1 0. 026 \n\n1 0. 035 1 \n1 0. 075 1 \n1 0. 008 1 \n1 0. 025 1 \n1 0. 150 1 \n1 0. 043 1 \n1 0. 488 1 \n1 0. 005 1 \n1 0. 040 1 \n\nTOTAL \n\n1485 \n\n1735 \n\n1 \n\n1 \n\n0. 74 \n\n1 \n\n0. 87 1 \n\n2) ANNUAL CONTRACTS \n\nPRODUCT. , \n\nCURRENT \nQUANTITY \n(1991) (T) \n\nESTIMATED \nQUANTITY \n(T) \n\nSELLING PRICE \n(ECU/T) \n\nINITIAL \nCOST \n(ECUm) \n\n, ESTIMATED \n, COST \n\u2022 (ECUm) \n\nj \n\nAVOCADO \nSUGAR APPLE \nPAPAYA \nOTHER TROPICAL. SEED FRUITS \nCITRUS FRUIT \nVEGETABLES \nORNAMENTAL PLANTS \nEXOTIC FLOWERS \nEXOTIC FLOWERS \n\nTOTAL \n\n(D \n\n62 \n50 \n0 \n0 \n\n10 \n10 \n100 \n\n232 \n\n(2) \n\n(3) \n\n(4)-(3) I \n\n(5)-(3) \n\n1000 \n2000 \n200 \n900 \n\n50 \n150 \n200 \n\n4500 \n\n1925 \n2166 \n2166 \n1925 \n\n4331 \n14437 \n7218 \n\n0. 119 \n0. 108 \n0. 000 \n0. 000 \n0. 000 \n0. 000 \n0. 000 \n0. 043 \n0. 144 \n0. 722 \n\n1. 925 \n4. 331 \n0. 433 \n1. 732 \n0. 000 \n0. 000 \n0. 000 \n0. 217 \n2. 166 \n1. 444 \n\n1. 14 \n\nI \n\n12. 25 \n\nThe EAGGF contribution is 1 3% of the commercial v a l u e. Community aid amounts to ECU 0. 1 million in teh first year and will reach \nECU 1. 6 million in t he final y e a r. i \n\nI \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 143 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-159-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43020-6 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ccff5e24-568b-4f99-bde9-dc7de0b179f9", "title": "RESOLUTION on the results of the referendum and human rights violations in South Africa", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group for the European United Left,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Left Unity,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group,Socialist Group in the European Parliament,The Green Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "South Africa,democratisation,human rights,referendum", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0500", "eurovoc_concepts": ["South Africa", "democratisation", "human rights", "referendum"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ccff5e24-568b-4f99-bde9-dc7de0b179f9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24856a73-7cc5-4897-9530-a4b361afa8bf", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 904/92 of 9 April 1992 fixing Community producer prices for carnations and roses for the application of the import arrangements for certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan and Morocco", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Israel,Jordan,Morocco,floriculture,producer price", "workIds": "celex:31992R0904,oj:JOL_1992_096_R_0014_021", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Israel", "Jordan", "Morocco", "floriculture", "producer price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24856a73-7cc5-4897-9530-a4b361afa8bf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2b13e2b0-91a1-400d-986e-fba6409aa7db", "title": "RESOLUTION on the drought in Portugal", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group of the European Democratic Alliance,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Left Unity,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group,Rainbow Group in the European Parliament,Socialist Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "EU aid,Portugal,drought,interest rate subsidy", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0504", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Portugal", "drought", "interest rate subsidy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2b13e2b0-91a1-400d-986e-fba6409aa7db", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/217e8bb9-458b-4488-80ee-a23940560be0", "title": "RESOLUTION on the situation of the Kurds in Turkey", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group,Socialist Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Kurdistan question,T\u00fcrkiye,protection of minorities,rights of minorities,violence", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0488", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Kurdistan question", "T\u00fcrkiye", "protection of minorities", "rights of minorities", "violence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/217e8bb9-458b-4488-80ee-a23940560be0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/55ed608f-4dfc-414e-bb58-8c6485915010", "title": "RESOLUTION on the situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group of the European People\u2019s Party", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "diplomatic relations,human rights,national independence,violence", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0532", "eurovoc_concepts": ["diplomatic relations", "human rights", "national independence", "violence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/55ed608f-4dfc-414e-bb58-8c6485915010", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/343a12e9-8f36-45d1-ac54-2bf2cf5fc2a3", "title": "RESOLUTION on the ma agement, utilization and evaluation of Community research and technological development activities", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Budgetary Control,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "European Court of Auditors,Joint Research Centre,administrative formalities,decentralisation,management techniques,organisation chart,research and development,technology", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0047", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Court of Auditors", "Joint Research Centre", "administrative formalities", "decentralisation", "management techniques", "organisation chart", "research and development", "technology"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/343a12e9-8f36-45d1-ac54-2bf2cf5fc2a3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/985b3499-b3d8-4f25-822a-0fef0e1cde04", "title": "RESOLUTION on the f rthcoming general elections in the Philippines", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Socialist Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Philippines,human rights,national election", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0503", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Philippines", "human rights", "national election"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/985b3499-b3d8-4f25-822a-0fef0e1cde04", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0cb88416-4e64-4d40-b09a-19cb14516aa7", "title": "RESOLUTION on human rights in Malawi", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Socialist Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Malawi,freedom of expression,freedom of opinion,human rights,political prisoner", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0501", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Malawi", "freedom of expression", "freedom of opinion", "human rights", "political prisoner"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0cb88416-4e64-4d40-b09a-19cb14516aa7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/983755d0-63fd-4a5b-ba4a-a232b6451349", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 928/92 of 9 April 1992 on the supply of various consignments of cereals as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Haiti,cereal flakes,cereal flour,food aid,rice", "workIds": "celex:31992R0928,oj:JOL_1992_100_R_0011_012", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Haiti", "cereal flakes", "cereal flour", "food aid", "rice"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/983755d0-63fd-4a5b-ba4a-a232b6451349", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d5f69c03-6167-4701-911e-08f4bb768943", "title": "RESOLUTION on nuclear safety in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Industry, Research and Energy,European Parliament,Group for the European United Left,Group of the European Democratic Alliance,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group,The Green Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,environmental risk prevention,nuclear power station,nuclear safety,safety standard", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0581", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "environmental risk prevention", "nuclear power station", "nuclear safety", "safety standard"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d5f69c03-6167-4701-911e-08f4bb768943", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ff972951-c9b8-446f-8d99-3127e6bdf795", "title": "Arbeitskosten 1988 : wichtige Ergebnisse. Band I.,Costo della manodopera 1988 : risultati principali. Volume I.,Co\u00fbt de la main d'oeuvre 1988 : r\u00e9sultats principaux. Volume I.,Labour costs 1988 : principal results. Volume I.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "bank,cost analysis,domestic trade,insurance,labour force,statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA8391001", "eurovoc_concepts": ["bank", "cost analysis", "domestic trade", "insurance", "labour force", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ff972951-c9b8-446f-8d99-3127e6bdf795", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/92b24a83-536a-4a12-9486-ccca402d252f", "title": "RESOLUTION on famine in Africa and Sudan", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group of the European Democratic Alliance,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Left Unity,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group,The Green Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Africa,Sudan,drought,food aid,food shortage,humanitarian aid,hunger,terms for aid,transfer of population", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0489", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Africa", "Sudan", "drought", "food aid", "food shortage", "humanitarian aid", "hunger", "terms for aid", "transfer of population"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/92b24a83-536a-4a12-9486-ccca402d252f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/521a0321-a747-4423-8d21-b19ab336cb80", "title": "RESOLUTION on the guidelines for the preparation of the 1993 budget", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Budgets,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Community budget,EU policy,EU research policy,European political cooperation,Structural Funds,budget estimate,budget policy,cooperation policy,drawing up of the budget,financial year,interinstitutional relations", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0147", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "EU policy", "EU research policy", "European political cooperation", "Structural Funds", "budget estimate", "budget policy", "cooperation policy", "drawing up of the budget", "financial year", "interinstitutional relations"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/521a0321-a747-4423-8d21-b19ab336cb80", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b84b06e8-6ffd-4b31-baa2-86bb0c77f0d6", "title": "RESOLUTION on water pollution in the Meuse", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group of the European Democratic Alliance,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Socialist Group in the European Parliament,The Green Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Belgium,France,Netherlands,North Sea,application of EU law,environmental risk prevention,pollution control measures,pollution of waterways", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0541", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgium", "France", "Netherlands", "North Sea", "application of EU law", "environmental risk prevention", "pollution control measures", "pollution of waterways"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b84b06e8-6ffd-4b31-baa2-86bb0c77f0d6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ec8aa1e7-efb7-4775-bf43-0ea5e4056bb3", "title": "RESOLUTION on the earthquake disaster in Erzincan, Turkey", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,The Green Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "EU aid,T\u00fcrkiye,environmental risk prevention", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0555", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "T\u00fcrkiye", "environmental risk prevention"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ec8aa1e7-efb7-4775-bf43-0ea5e4056bb3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/967324f5-7c08-4c3e-b44e-0b9f237f1db0", "title": "RESOLUTION on Sunday working", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group of the European People\u2019s Party", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Sunday working,arrangement of working time,labour law", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0591", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Sunday working", "arrangement of working time", "labour law"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/967324f5-7c08-4c3e-b44e-0b9f237f1db0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a7cfa6b-cd41-47c9-a654-8f34acc6da74", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 927/92 of 9 April 1992 on the supply of various consignments of cereals as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "cereal flour,common wheat,developing countries,food aid,maize", "workIds": "celex:31992R0927,oj:JOL_1992_100_R_0005_011", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cereal flour", "common wheat", "developing countries", "food aid", "maize"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a7cfa6b-cd41-47c9-a654-8f34acc6da74", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d19d0123-10bc-46c5-9b1c-6a14a7c191e2", "title": "RESOLUTION on the plight of street children in Guatemala", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Guatemala,child,homicide,poverty", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0527", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Guatemala", "child", "homicide", "poverty"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d19d0123-10bc-46c5-9b1c-6a14a7c191e2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c44c179c-3ff0-44fd-94b1-650318cd629d", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council recommendation concerning the promotion of employee participation in profits and enterprise results (including equity participation)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Employment and Social Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "profit sharing,shareholding,wage earner,worker participation,workers' stock ownership", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0136", "eurovoc_concepts": ["profit sharing", "shareholding", "wage earner", "worker participation", "workers' stock ownership"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c44c179c-3ff0-44fd-94b1-650318cd629d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cebe6f54-170d-47fe-a0fc-c0ab34177892", "title": "RESOLUTION on Peru", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group for the European United Left,Group of the European People\u2019s Party,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group,Socialist Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Peru,human rights,terms for aid,terrorism,violence", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0497", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Peru", "human rights", "terms for aid", "terrorism", "violence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cebe6f54-170d-47fe-a0fc-c0ab34177892", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6aca73ef-1e50-4f0c-824a-a1bc8cd74e96", "title": "Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, 1992 (Helsinki Convention revised in 1992)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "fmx4,html,pdfa1b,print,xhtml", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Czechoslovakia,Denmark,Estonia,European Economic Community,Finland,Germany,Latvia,Lithuania,Norway,Poland,Russia,Sweden,Ukraine", "date": "1992-04-09", "subjects": "Baltic Sea,environmental protection,international convention,international cooperation,marine pollution,pollution control measures,waste disposal", "workIds": "celex:21994A0316(02),oj:JOL_1994_073_R_0020_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Baltic Sea", "environmental protection", "international convention", "international cooperation", "marine pollution", "pollution control measures", "waste disposal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6aca73ef-1e50-4f0c-824a-a1bc8cd74e96", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["fmx4", "html", "pdfa1b", "print", "xhtml"], "text": "L_1994073EN. 01002001. xml\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n16. 3. 1994\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\nEN\n\n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities\n\n\nL 73/20\n\n\n\n\n\nCONVENTION\non the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, 1992\nTHE CONTRACTING PARTIES,\nCONSCIOUS of the indispensable values of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area, its exceptional hydrographic and ecological characteristics and the sensitivity of its living resources to changes in the environment;\nBEARING in mind the historical and present economic, social and cultural values of the Baltic Sea area for the well-being and development of the peoples of that region;\nNOTING with deep concern the still ongoing pollution of the Baltic Sea area;\nDECLARING their firm determination to assure the ecological restoration of the Baltic Sea, ensuring the possibility of self-regeneration of the marine environment and preservation of its ecological balance;\nRECOGNIZING that the protection and enhancement of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area are tasks that cannot effectively be accomplished by national efforts alone but by close regional cooperation and other appropriate international measures;\nAPPRECIATING the achievements in environmental protection within the framework of the 1974 Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, and the role of the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission therein;\nRECALLING the pertinent provisions and principles of the 1972 Declaration of the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment and the 1975 Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE);\nDESIRING to enhance cooperation with competent regional organizations such as the International Baltic Sea Fishery Commission established by the 1973 Gdansk Convention on Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources in the Baltic Sea and the Belts;\nWELCOMING the Baltic Sea Declaration by the Baltic and other interested States, the European Economic Community and cooperating international financial institutions assembled at Ronneby in 1990, and the Joint Comprehensive Programme aimed at a joint action plan in order to restore the Baltic Sea area to a sound ecological balance;\nCONSCIOUS of the importance of transparency and public awareness as well as the work by non-governmental organizations for successful protection of the Baltic Sea area;\nWELCOMING the improved opportunities for closer cooperation which have been opened by the recent political developments in Europe on the basis of peaceful cooperation and mutual understanding;\nDETERMINED to embody developments in international environmental policy and environmental law into a new convention to extend, strengthen and modernize the legal regime for the protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area;\nHAVE AGREED as follows:\nArticle 1\nConvention area\nThis Convention shall apply to the Baltic Sea area. For the purposes of this Convention the \u2018Baltic Sea area\u2019 shall be the Baltic Sea and the entrance to the Baltic Sea bounded by the parallel of the Skaw in the Skagerrak at 57o44,43'N. It includes the internal waters, i. e, for the purpose of this Convention waters on the landward side of the base lines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured up to the landward limit according to the designation by the Contracting Parties. A Contracting Party shall, at the time of the deposit of the instrument of ratification, approval or accession inform the depositary of the designation of its internal waters for the purposes of this Convention. Article 2\nDefinitions\nFor the purposes of this Convention:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. \u2018pollution\u2019 means introduction by man, directly or indirectly, of substances or energy into the sea, including estuaries, which are liable to create hazards to human health, to harm living resources and marine ecosystems, to cause hindrance to legitimate uses of the sea including fishing, to impair the quality for use of sea water, and to lead to a reduction of amenities;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. \u2018pollution from land-based sources\u2019 means pollution of the sea by point or diffuse inputs from all sources on land reaching the sea waterborne, airborne or directly from the coast. It includes pollution from any deliberate disposal under the sea bed with access from land by tunnel, pipeline or other means;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3. \u2018ship\u2019 means a vessel of any type whatsoever operating in the marine environment and includes hydrofoil boats, air-cushion vehicles, submersibles, floating craft and fixed or floating platforms;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n4. (a)\n\n\n\u2018dumping\u2019 means:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nany deliberate disposal at sea or into the sea bed of wastes or other matter from ships, other man-made structures at sea or aircraft;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nany deliberate disposal at sea of ships, other man-made structures at sea or aircraft;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\n\u2018dumping\u2019 does not include:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nthe disposal at sea of wastes or other matter incidental to, or derived from the normal operations of ships, other man-made structures at sea or aircraft and their equipment, other than wastes or other matter transported by or to ships, other man-made structures at sea or aircraft, operating for the purpose of disposal of such matter or derived from the treatment of such wastes or other matter on such ships, structures or aircraft;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nplacement of matter for a purpose other than the mere disposal thereof, provided that such placement is not contrary to the aims of the present Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n5. \u2018incineration\u2019 means the deliberate combustion of wastes or other matter at sea for the purpose of their thermal destruction. Activities incidental to the normal operation of ships or other man-made structures are excluded from the scope of this definition;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n6. \u2018oil\u2019 means petroleum in any form including crude oil, fuel oil, sludge, oil refuse and refined products;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n7. \u2018harmful substance\u2019 means any substance, which, if introduced into the sea, is liable to cause pollution;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n8. \u2018hazardous substance\u2019 means any harmful substance which due to its intrinsic properties is persistent, toxic or liable to bio-accumulate,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n9. \u2018pollution incident\u2019 means an occurrence or series of occurrences having the same origin, which results or may result in a discharge of oil or other harmful substances and which poses or may pose a threat to the marine environment of the Baltic Sea or to the coastline or related interests of one or more Contracting Parties, and which requires emergency actions or other immediate response;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n10. \u2018regional economic integration organization\u2019 means any organization constituted by sovereign States, to which their member States have transferred competence in respect of matters governed by this Convention, including the competence to enter into international agreements in respect of these matters;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n11. the \u2018Commission\u2019 means the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission referred to in Article 19. Article 3\nFundamental principles and obligations\n1. The Contracting Parties shall individually or jointly take all appropriate legislative, administrative or other relevant measures to prevent and eliminate pollution in order to promote the ecological restoration of the Baltic Sea area and the preservation of its ecological balance. 2. The Contracting Parties shall apply the precautionary principle, i. e. , to take preventive measures when there is reason to assume that substances or energy introduced, directly or indirectly, into the marine environment may create hazards to human health, harm living resources and marine ecosystems, damage amenities or interfere with other legitimate uses of the sea even when there is no conclusive evidence of a causal relationship between inputs and their alleged effects. 3. In order to prevent and eliminate pollution of the Baltic Sea area the Contracting Parties shall promote the use of best environmental practice and best available technology. If the reduction of inputs, resulting from the use of best environmental practice and best available technology, as described in Annex II, does not lead to environmentally acceptable results, additional measures shall be applied. 4. The Contracting Parties shall apply the polluter-pays principle. 5. The Contracting Parties shall ensure that measurements and calculations of emissions from point sources to water and air and of inputs from diffuse sources to water and air are carried out in a scientifically appropriate manner in order to assess the state of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area and ascertain the implementation of this Convention. 6. The Contracting Parties shall use their best endeavours to ensure that the implementation of this Convention does not cause transboundary pollution in areas outside the Baltic Sea area. Furthermore, the relevant measures shall not lead either to unacceptable environmental strains on air quality and the atmosphere or on waters soil and ground water, to unacceptably harmful or increasing waste disposal, or to increased risks to human health. Article 4\nApplication\n1. This Convention shall apply to the protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area which comprises the water-body and the sea bed including their living resources and other forms of marine life. 2. Without prejudice to its sovereignty each Contracting Party shall implement the provisions of this Convention within its territorial sea and its internal waters through its national authorities. 3. This Convention shall not apply to any warship, naval auxiliary, military aircraft or other ship and aircraft owned or operated by a State and used, for the time being, only on government non-commercial service. However, each Contracting Party shall ensure, by the adoption of appropriate measures not impairing the operations or operational capabilities of such ships and aircraft owned or operated by it, that such ships and aircraft act in a manner consistent, so far as is reasonable and practicable, with this Convention. Article 5\nHarmful substances\nThe Contracting Parties undertake to prevent and eliminate pollution of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area caused by harmful substances from all sources, according to the provisions; of this Convention and, to this end, to implement the procedures and measures of Annex I. Article 6\nPrinciples and obligations concerning pollution from land-based sources\n1. The Contracting Parties undertake to prevent and eliminate pollution of the Baltic Sea area from land-based sources by using, inter alia, best environmental practice for all sources and best available technology for point sources. The relevant measures to this end shall be taken by each Contracting Party in the catchment area of the Baltic Sea without prejudice to its sovereignty. 2. The Contracting Parties shall implement the procedures and measures set out in Annex III. To this end they shall, inter alia, as appropriate cooperate in the development and adoption of specific programmes, guidelines, standards or regulations concerning emissions and inputs to water and air, environmental quality, and products containing harmful substances and materials and the use thereof. 3. Harmful substances from point sources shall not, except in negligible quantities, be introduced directly or indirectly into the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area, without a prior special permit, which may be periodically reviewed, issued by the appropriate national authority in accordance with the principles contained in Annex III, Regulation 3. The Contracting Parties shall ensure that authorized emissions to water and air are monitored and controlled. 4. If the input from a watercourse, flowing through the territories of two or more Contracting Parties or forming a boundary between them, is liable to cause pollution of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area, the Contracting Parties concerned shall jointly and, if possible, in cooperation with a third State interested or concerned, take appropriate measures in order to prevent and eliminate such pollution. Article 7\nEnvironmental impact assessment\n1. Whenever an environmental impact assessment of a proposed activity that is likely to cause a significant adverse impact on the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area is required by international law or supranational regulations applicable to the Contracting Party of origin, that Contracting Party shall notify the Commission and any Contracting Party which may be affected by a transboundary impact on the Baltic Sea area. 2. The Contracting Party of origin shall enter into consultations with any Contracting Party which is likely to be affected by such transboundary, impact, whenever consultations are required by international law or supranational regulations applicable to the Contracting Party of origin. 3. Where two or more Contracting Parties share transboundary waters within the catchment area of the Baltic Sea, these Parties shall cooperate to ensure that potential impacts on the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area are fully investigated within the environmental impact assessment referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. The Contracting Parties concerned shall jointly take appropriate measures in order to prevent and eliminate pollution including cumulative deleterious effects. Article 8\nPrevention of pollution from ships\n1. In order to protect the Baltic Sea area from pollution from ships, the Contracting Parties shall take measures as set out in Annex IV. 2. The Contracting Parties shall develop and apply uniform requirements for the provision of reception facilities for ship-generated wastes, taking into account, inter alia, the special needs of passenger ships operating in the Baltic Sea area. Article 9\nPleasure craft\nThe Contracting Parties shall, in addition to implementing those provisions of this Convention which can appropriately be applied to pleasure craft, take special measures in order to abate harmful effects on the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area caused by pleasure craft activities. The measures shall, inter alia, deal with air pollution, noise and hydrodynamic effects as well as with adequate reception facilities for wastes from pleasure craft. Article 10\nProhibition of incineration\n1. The Contracting Parties shall prohibit incineration in the Baltic Sea area. 2. Each Contracting Party undertakes to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Article by ships:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nregistered in its territory or flying its flag;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nloading, within its territory or territorial sea, matter which is to be incinerated; or\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nbelieved to be engaged in incineration within its internal waters and territorial sea. 3. In case of suspected incineration the Contracting Parties shall cooperate in investigating the matter in accordance with Regulation 2 of Annex IV. Article 11\nPrevention of dumping\n1. The Contracting Parties shall, subject to exemptions set forth in paragraphs 2 and 4 of this Article, prohibit dumping in the Baltic Sea area. 2. Dumping of dredged material shall be subject to a prior special permit issued by the appropriate national authority in accordance with the provisions of Annex V. 3. Each Contracting Party undertakes to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Article by ships and aircraft:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nregistered in its territory or flying its flag;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nloading, within its territory or territorial sea, matter which is to be dumped; or\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nbelieved to be engaged in dumping within its internal waters and territorial sea. 4. The provisions of this Article shall not apply when the safety of human life or of a ship or aircraft at sea is threatened by the complete destruction or total loss of the ship or aircraft, or in any case which constitutes a danger to human life, if dumping appears to be the only way of averting the threat and if there is every probability that the damage consequent upon such dumping will be less than would otherwise occur. Such dumping shall be so conducted as to minimize the likelihood of damage to human or marine life. 5. Dumping made under the provisions of paragrah 4 of this Article shall be reported and dealt with in accordance with Annex VII and shall be reported forthwith to the Commission in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 4 of Annex V. 6. In case of dumping suspected to be in contravention of the provisions of this Article the Contracting Parties shall cooperate in investigating the matter in accordance with Regulation 2 of Annex IV. Article 12\nExploration and exploitation of the sea bed and its subsoil\n1. Each Contracting Party shall take all measures in order to prevent pollution of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area resulting from exploration or exploitation of its part of the sea bed and the subsoil thereof or from any associated activities thereon as well as to ensure that adequate preparedness is maintained for immediate response actions against pollution incidents caused by such activities. 2. In order to prevent and eliminate pollution from such activities the Contracting Parties undertake to implement the procedures and measures set out in Annex VI, as far as they are applicable. Article 13\nNotification and consultation on pollution incidents\n1. Whenever a pollution incident in the territory of a Contracting Party is likely to cause pollution to the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area outside its territory and adjacent maritime area in which it exercises sovereign rights and jurisdiction according to international law, this Contracting Party shall notify without delay such Contracting Parties whose interests are affected or likely to be affected. 2. Whenever deemed necessary by the Contracting Parties referred to in paragraph 1, consultations should take place with a view to preventing, reducing and controlling such pollution. 3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall also apply in cases where a Contracting Party has sustained such pollution from the territory of a third State. Article 14\nCooperation in combating marine pollution\nThe Contracting Parties shall individually and jointly take, as set out in Annex VII, all appropriate measures to maintain adequate ability and to respond to pollution incidents in order to eliminate or minimize the consequences of these incidents to the marine environment of the Baltic Sea Area. Article 15\nNature conservation and biodiversity\nThe Contracting Parties shall individually and jointly take all appropriate measures with respect to the Baltic Sea area and its coastal ecosystems influenced by the Baltic Sea to conserve natural habitats and biological diversity and to protect ecological processes. Such measures shall also be taken in order to ensure the sustainable use of natural resources within the Baltic Sea area. To this end, the Contracting Parties shall aim at adopting subsequent instruments containing appropriate guidelines and criteria. Article 16\nReporting and exchange of Information\n1. The Contracting Parties shall report to the Commission at regular intervals on:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nthe legal, regulatory, or other measures taken for the implementation of the provisions of this Convention, of its Annexes and of recommendations adopted thereunder;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nthe effectiveness of the measures taken to implement the provisions referred to in subparagraph (a) of this paragraph; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nproblems encountered in the implementation of the provisions referred to in subparagraph (a) of this paragraph. 2. On the request of a Contracting Party or of the Commission, the Contracting Parties shall provide information on discharge permits, emission data or data on environmental quality, as far as available. Article 17\nInformation to the public\n1. The Contracting Parties shall ensure that information is made available to the public on the condition of the Baltic Sea and the waters in its catchment area, measures taken or planned to be taken to prevent and eliminate pollution and the effectiveness of those measures. For this purpose, the Contracting Parties shall ensure that the following information is made available to the public:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\npermits issued and the conditions required to be met;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nresults of water and effluent sampling carried out for the purposes of monitoring and assessment, as well as results of checking compliance with water-quality objectives or permit conditions; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nwater-quality objectives. 2. Each Contracting Party shall ensure that this information shall be available to the public at all reasonable times and shall provide members of the public with reasonable facilities for obtaining, on payment of reasonable charges, copies of entries in its registers. Article 18\nProtection of information\n1. The provisions of this Convention shall not affect the right or obligation of any Contracting Party under its national law and applicable supra-national regulation to protect information related to intellectual property including industrial and commercial secrecy or national security and the confidentiality of personal data. 2. If a Contracting Party nevertheless decides to supply such protected information to another Contracting Party, the Party receiving such protected information shall respect the confidentiality of the information received and the conditions under which it is supplied, and shall use that information only for the purposes for which it was supplied. Article 19\nCommission\n1. The Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, referred to as \u2018the Commission\u2019, is established for the purposes of this Convention. 2. The Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, established pursuant to the Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area of 1974, shall be the Commission. 3. The chairmanship of the Commission shall be given to each Contracting Party in turn in alphabetical order of the names of the Contracting Parties in the English language. The chairman shall serve for a period of two years, and cannot during the period of chairmanship serve as a representative of the Contracting Party holding the chairmanship. Should the chairman fail to complete his term, the Contracting Party holding the chairmanship shall nominate a successor to remain in office until the term of that Contracting Party expires. 4. Meetings of the Commission shall be held at least once a year upon convocation by the chairman. Extraordinary meetings shall, upon the request of any Contracting Party endorsed by another Contracting Party, be convened by the chairman to be held as soon as possible, however, not later than 90 days after the date of submission of the request. 5. Unless otherwise provided under this Convention, the Commission shall take its decisions unanimously. Article 20\nThe duties of the Commission\n1. The duties of the Commission shall be:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nto keep the implementation of this Convention under continuous observation;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nto make recommendations on measures relating to the purposes of this Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nto keep under review the contents of this Convention including its Annexes and to recommend to the Contracting Parties such amendments to this Convention including its Annexes as may be required including changes in the list of substances and materials as well as the adoption of new Annexes;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\nto define pollution control criteria, objectives for the reduction of pollution, and objectives concerning measures, particularly those described in Annex III;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\nto promote in close cooperation with appropriate governmental bodies, taking into consideration subparagraph (f) of this Article, additional measures to protect the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area and for this purpose:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nto receive, process, summarize and disseminate relevant scientific, technological and statistical information from available sources; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nto promote scientific and technological research; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(f)\n\n\nto seek, when appropriate, the services of competent regional and other international organizations to collaborate in scientific and technological research as well as other relevant activities pertinent to the objectives of this Convention. 2. The Commission may assume such other functions as it deems appropriate to further the purposes of this Convention. Article 21\nAdministrative provisions for the Commission\n1. The working language of the Commission shall be English. 2. The Commission shall adopt its rules of procedure. 3. The office of the Commission, known as \u2018the secretariat\u2019, shall be in Helsinki. 4. The Commission shall appoint an executive secretary and make provisions for the appointment of such other personnel as may be necessary, and determine the duties, terms and conditions of service of the executive secretary. 5. The executive secretary shall be the chief administrative official of the Commission and shall perform the functions that are necessary for the administration of this Convention, the work of the Commission and other tasks entrusted to the executive secretary by the Commission and its rules of procedure. Article 22\nFinancial provisions for the Commission\n1. The Commission shall adopt its financial rules. 2. The Commission shall adopt an annual or biennial budget of proposed expenditures and consider budget estimates for the fiscal period following thereafter. 3. The total amount of the budget, including any supplementary budget adopted by the Commission shall be contributed by the Contracting Parties other than the European Economic Community, in equal parts, unless unanimously decided otherwise by the Commission. 4. The European Economic Community shall contribute no more than 2,5 % of the administrative costs to the budget. 5. Each Contracting Party shall pay the expenses related to the participation in the Commission of its representatives, experts and advisers. Article 23\nRight to vote\n1. Except as provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article, each Contracting Party shall have one vote in the Commission. 2. The European Economic Community and any other regional economic integration organization, in matters within their competence, shall exercise their right to vote with a number of votes equal to the number of their member States which are Contracting Parties to this Convention. Such organizations shall not exercise their right to vote if their member States exercise theirs, and vice versa. Article 24\nScientific and technological cooperation\n1. The Contracting Parties undertake directly, or when appropriate through competent regional or other international organizations, to cooperate in the fields of science, technology and other research, and to exchange data and other scientific information for the purposes of this Convention. In order to facilitate research and monitoring activities in the Baltic Sea area the Contracting Parties undertake to harmonize their policies with respect to permission procedures for conducting such activities. 2. Without prejudice to Article 4 (2) of this Convention the Contracting Parties undertake directly, or when appropriate, through competent regional or other international organizations, to promote studies and to undertake, support or contribute to programmes aimed at developing methods assessing the nature and extent of pollution, pathways, exposures, risks and remedies in the Baltic Sea area. In particular, the Contracting Parties undertake to develop alternative methods of treatment, disposal and elimination of such matter and substances that are likely to cause pollution of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area. 3. Without prejudice to Article 4 (2) of this Convention the Contracting Parties undertake directly, or when appropriate through competent regional or other international organizations, and, on the basis of the information and data acquired pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article, to cooperate in developing inter-comparable observation methods, in performing baseline studies and in establishing complementary or joint programmes for monitoring. 4. The organization and scope of work connected with the implementation of tasks referred to in the preceding paragraphs should primarily be outlined by the Commission. Article 25\nResponsibility for damage\nThe Contracting Parties undertake jointly to develop and accept rules concerning responsibility for damage resulting from acts or omissions in contravention of this Convention, including, inter alia, limits of responsibility, criteria and procedures for the determination of liability and available remedies. Article 26\nSettlement of disputes\n1. In case of a dispute between Contracting Parties as to the interpretation or application of this Convention, they should seek a solution by negotiation. If the Parties concerned cannot reach agreement they should seek the good offices of or jointly request mediation by a third Contracting Party, a qualified international organization or a qualified person. 2. If the Parties concerned have not been able to resolve their dispute through negotiation or have been unable to agree on measures as described above, such disputes shall be, upon common agreement, submitted to an ad hoc arbitration tribunal, to a permanent arbitration tribunal, or to the International Court of Justice. Article 27\nSafeguard of certain freedoms\nNothing in this Convention shall be construed as infringing upon the freedom of navigation, fishing, marine scientific research and other legitimate uses of the high seas, as well as upon the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea. Article 28\nStatus of Annexes\nThe Annexes attached to this Convention form an integral part of this Convention. Article 29\nRelation to other Conventions\nThe provisions of this Convention shall be without prejudice to the rights and obligations of the Contracting Parties under existing and future treaties which further and develop the general principles of the law of the sea underlying this Convention and, in particular, provisions concerning the prevention of pollution of the marine environment. Article 30\nConference for the revision or amendment of the Convention\nA conference for the purpose of a general revision of or an amendment to this Convention may be convened with the consent of the Contracting Parties or at the request of the Commission. Article 31\nAmendments to the Articles of the Convention\n1. Each Contracting Party may propose amendments to the Articles of this Convention. Any such proposed amendment shall be submitted to the depositary and communicated by it to all Contracting Parties, which shall inform the depositary of either their acceptance or rejection of the amendment as soon as possible after receipt of the communication. A proposed amendment shall, at the request of a Contracting Party, be considered in the Commission. In such a case Article 19 (4) shall apply. If an amendment is adopted by the Commission, the procedure in paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply. 2. The Commission may recommend amendments to the Articles of this Convention. Any such recommended amendment shall be submitted to the depositary and communicated by it to all Contracting Parties, which shall notify the depositary of either their acceptance or rejection of the amendment as soon as possible after receipt of the communication. 3. The amendment shall enter into force 90 days after the Depositary has received notifications of acceptance of that amendment from all Contracting Parties. Article 32\nAmendments to the Annexes and the adoption of Annexes\n1. Any amendment to the Annexes proposed by a Contracting Party shall be communicated to the other Contracting Parties by the depositary and considered in the Commission. If adopted by the Commission, the amendment shall be communicated to the Contracting Parties and recommended for acceptance. 2. Any amendment to the Annexes recommended by the Commission shall be communicated to the Contracting Parties by the depositary and recommended for acceptance. 3. Such amendment shall be deemed to have been accepted at the end of a period determined by the Commission unless within that period any one of the Contracting Parties has, by written notification to the depositary, objected to the amendment. The accepted amendment shall enter into force on a date determined by the Commission. The period determined by the Commission shall be prolonged for an additional period of six months and the date of entry into force of the amendment postponed accordingly, if, in exceptional cases, any Contracting Party informs the depositary before the expiration of the period determined by the Commission that, although it intends to accept the amendment, the constitutional requirements for such an acceptance are not yet fulfilled. 4. An Annex to this Convention may be adopted in accordance with the provisions of this Article. Article 33\nReservations\n1. The provisions of this Convention shall not be subject to reservations. 2. The provision of paragraph 1 of this Article does not prevent a Contracting Party from suspending for a period not exceeding one year the application of an Annex to this Convention or part thereof or an amendment thereto after the Annex in question or the amendment thereto has entered into force. Any Contracting Party to the 1974 Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, which upon the entry into force of this Convention, suspends the application of an Annex or part thereof, shall apply the corresponding Annex or part thereof to the 1974 Convention for the period of suspension. 3. If after the entry into force of this Convention a Contracting Party invokes the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article it shall inform the other Contracting Parties, at the time of the adoption by the Commission of an amendment to an Annex, or a new Annex, of those provisions which will be suspended in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article. Article 34\nSignature\nThis Convention shall be open for signature in Helsinki from 9 April until 9 October 1992 by States and by the European Economic Community participating in the Diplomatic Conference on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area held in Helsinki on 9 April 1992. Article 35\nRatification, approval and accession\n1. This Convention shall be subject to ratification or approval. 2. This Convention shall, after its entry into force, be open for accession by any other State or regional economic integration organization interested in fulfilling the aims and purposes of this Convention, provided that this State or organization is invited by all the Contracting Parties. In the case of limited competence of a regional economic integration organization, the terms and conditions of its participation may be agreed upon between the Commission and the interested organization. 3. The instruments of ratification, approval or accession shall be deposited with the Depositary. 4. The European Economic Community and any other regional economic integration organization which becomes a Contracting Party to this Convention shall in matters within their competence, on their own behalf, exercise the rights and fulfill the responsibilities which this Convention attributes to their member States. In such cases, the member States of these organizations shall not be entitled to exercise such rights individually. Article 36\nEntry into force\n1. This Convention shall enter into force two months after the deposit of the instruments of ratification or approval by all signatory States bordering the Baltic Sea and by the European Economic Community. 2. For each State which ratifies or approves this Convention before or after the deposit of the last instrument of ratification or approval referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, this Convention shall enter into force two months after the date of deposit by such State of its instrument of ratification or approval or on the date of the entry into force of this Convention, whichever is the latest date. 3. For each acceding State or regional economic integration organization this Convention shall enter into force two months after the date of deposit by such State or regional economic integration organization of its instrument of accession. 4. Upon entry into force of this Convention the Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, signed in Helsinki on 22 March 1974 as amended, shall cease to apply. 5. Notwithstanding paragraph 4 of this Article, amendments to the Annexes of the said Convention adopted by the Contracting Parties to the said Convention between the signing of this Convention and its entry into force, shall continue to apply until the corresponding Annexes of this Convention have been amended accordingly. 6. Notwithstanding paragraph 4 of this Article, recommendations and decisions adopted under the said Convention shall continue to be applicable to the extent that they are compatible with, or not explicitly terminated by this Convention or any decision adopted thereunder. Article 37\nWithdrawal\n1. At any time after the expiry of five years from the date of entry into force of this Convention any Contracting Party may, by giving written notification to the depositary, withdraw from this Convention. The withdrawal shall take effect for such Contracting Party on the 30th day of June of the year which follows the year in which the depositary was notified of the withdrawal. 2. In case of notification of withdrawal by a Contracting Party the depositary shall convene a meeting of the Contracting Parties for the purpose of considering the effect of the withdrawal. Article 38\nDepositary\nThe Government of Finland, acting as depositary, shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nnotify all Contracting Parties and the Executive Secretary of:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nthe signatures;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nthe deposit of any instrument of ratification, approval or accession;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(iii)\n\n\nany date of entry into force of this Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(iv)\n\n\nany proposed or recommended amendment to any Article or Annex or the adoption of a new Annex as well as the date on which such amendment or new Annex enters into force;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(v)\n\n\nany notification, and the date of its receipt, pursuant to Articles 31 and 32;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(vi)\n\n\nany notification of withdrawal and the date on which such withdrawal takes effect;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(vii)\n\n\nany other act or notification relating to this Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\ntransmit certified copies of this Convention to acceding States and regional economic integration organizations. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Convention. Done at Helsinki, this ninth day of April one thousand nine hundred and ninety-two in a single authentic copy in the English language which shall be deposited with the Government of Finland. The Government of Finland shall transmit certified copies to all Signatories. For the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic\n\n\nFor the Kingdom of Denmark\n\n\nFor the Republic of Estonia\n\n\nFor the Republic of Finland\n\n\nFor the Federal Republic of Germany\n\n\nFor the Republic of Latvia\n\n\nFor the Republic of Lithuania\n\n\nFor the Kingdom of Norway\n\n\nFor the Republic of Poland\n\n\nFor the Russian Federation\n\n\nFor the Kingdom of Sweden\n\n\nFor Ukraine\n\n\nFor the European Economic Community\n\n\n\n\nANNEX I\nHARMFUL SUBSTANCES\nPART 1:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0GENERAL PRINCIPLES\n1. 0. Introduction\n\nIn order to fulfil the requirements of relevant parts of this Convention the following procedure shall be used by the Contracting Parties in identifying and evaluating harmful substances, as defined in Article 2 (7). 1. 1. Criteria on the allocation of substances\n\nThe identification and evaluation of substances shall be based on the intrinsic properties of substances, namely:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\npersistency,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntoxicity or other noxious properties,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntendency to bio-accumulation,\n\n\n\n\nas well as on characteristics liable to cause pollution, such as:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe ratio between observed concentrations and concentrations having no observed effect,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nanthropogenically caused risk of eutrophication,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntransboundary or long-range significance,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nrisk of undesirable changes in the marine ecosystem and irreversibility or durability of effects,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nradioactivity,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nserious interference with harvesting of sea-foods or with other legitimate uses of the sea,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ndistribution pattern (i. e. quantities involved, use pattern and liability to reach the marine environment),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nproven carcinogenic, teratogenic or mutagenic properties in or through the marine environment. These characteristics are not necessarily of equal importance for the identification and evaluation of a particular substance or group of substances. 1. 2. Priority groups of harmful substances\n\nThe Contracting Parties shall, in their preventive measures, give priority to the following groups of substances which are generally recognized as harmful substances:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nheavy metals and their compounds;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\norganohalogen compounds;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\norganic compounds of phosphorus and tin;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\npesticides, such as fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, slimicides and chemicals used for the preservation of wood, timber, wood pulp, cellulose, paper, hides and textiles;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\noils and hydrocarbons of petroleum origin;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(f)\n\n\nother organic compounds especially harmful to the marine environment;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(g)\n\n\nnitrogen and phosphorus compounds;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(h)\n\n\nradioactive substances, including wastes;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\npersistent materials which may float, remain in suspension or sink;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(j)\n\n\nsubstances which cause serious effects on taste and/or smell of products for human consumption from the sea, or effects on taste, smell, colour, transparency or other characteristics of the water. PART 2:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0BANNED SUBSTANCES\nIn order to protect the Baltic Sea area from hazardous substances, the Contracting Parties shall prohibit, totally or partially, the use of the following substances or groups of substances in the Baltic Sea area and its catchment area. 2. 1. Substances banned for all final uses, except for drugs\n\nDDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis-(chlorophenyl)-ethane) and its derivatives DDE and DDD. 2. 2. Substances banned for all uses, except in existing closed system equipment until the end of service life or for research, development and analytical purposes\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nPCB's (polychlorinated biphenyls);\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nPCT's (polychlorinated terphenyls). 2. 3. Substances banned for certain applications\n\nOrganotin compounds for antifouling paints for pleasure craft under 25 m and fish net cages. PART 3:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0PESTICIDES\nIn order to protect the Baltic Sea area from hazardous substances, the Contracting Parties shall endeavour to minimize and, whenever possible, to ban the use of the following substances as pesticides in the Baltic Sea area and its catchment area:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCAS-number\n\n\n\n\n\nAcrylonitrile\n\n\n107131\n\n\n\n\nAldrin\n\n\n309002\n\n\n\n\nAramite\n\n\n140578\n\n\n\n\nCadmium compounds\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\n\n\nChlordane\n\n\n57749\n\n\n\n\nChlordecone\n\n\n143500\n\n\n\n\nChlordimeform\n\n\n6164983\n\n\n\n\nChloroform\n\n\n67663\n\n\n\n\n1,2-Dibromoethane\n\n\n106934\n\n\n\n\nDieldrin\n\n\n60571\n\n\n\n\nEndrin\n\n\n72208\n\n\n\n\nFluoroacetic acid and derivatives\n\n\n7664393, 144490\n\n\n\n\nHeptachlor\n\n\n76448\n\n\n\n\nIsobenzane\n\n\n297789\n\n\n\n\nIsodrin\n\n\n465736\n\n\n\n\nKelevan\n\n\n4234791\n\n\n\n\nLead compounds\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\n\n\nMercury compounds\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\n\n\nMorfamquat\n\n\n4636833\n\n\n\n\nNitrophen\n\n\n1836755\n\n\n\n\nPentachlorophenol\n\n\n87865\n\n\n\n\nPolychlorinated terpenes\n\n\n8001501\n\n\n\n\nQuintozene\n\n\n82688\n\n\n\n\nSelenium compounds\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\n\n\n2,4,5-T\n\n\n93765\n\n\n\n\nToxaphene\n\n\n8001352\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nANNEX II\nCRITERIA FOR THE USE OF BEST ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE AND BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY\nREGULATION 1:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0GENERAL PROVISIONS\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. In accordance with the relevant parts of this Convention the Contracting Parties shall apply the criteria for best environmental practice and best available technology described below. 2. In order to prevent and eliminate pollution the Contracting Parties shall use best environmental practice for all sources and best available technology for point sources, minimizing or eliminating inputs to water and air from all sources by providing control strategies. REGULATION 2:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0BEST ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. The term \u2018best environmental practice\u2019 is taken to mean the application of the most appropriate combination of measures. In selecting for individual cases, at least the following graduated range of measures should be considered:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nprovision of information and education to the public and to users about the environmental consequences of choosing particular activities and products, their use and final disposal,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe development and application of codes of good environmental practice covering all aspects of activity in the product's life,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nmandatory labels informing the public and users of environmental risks related to a product, its use and final disposal,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\navailability of collection and disposal systems,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nsaving of resources, including energy,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nrecycling, recovery and reuse,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\navoiding the use of hazardous substances and products and the generation of hazardous waste,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\napplication of economic instruments to activities, products or groups of products and emissions,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\na system of licensing involving a range of restrictions or a ban. 2. In determining in general or individual cases what combination of measures constitute best environmental practice, particular consideration should be given to:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe precautionary principle,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe ecological risk associated with the product, its production, use and final disposal,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\navoidance or substitution by less polluting activities or substances,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nscale of use,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\npotential environmental benefit or penalty of substitute materials or activities,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nadvances and changes in scientific knowledge and understanding,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntime limits for implementation,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nsocial and economic implications. REGULATION 3:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. The term \u2018best available technology\u2019 is taken to mean the latest stage of development (state of the art) of processes, of facilities or of methods of operation which indicate the practical suitability of a particular measure for limiting discharges. 2. In determining whether a set of processes, facilities and methods of operation constitute the best available technology in general or individual cases, special consideration should be given to:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ncomparable processes, facilities or methods of operation which have recently been successfully tried out,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntechnological advances and changes in scientific knowledge and understanding,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe economic feasibility of such technology,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntime limits for application,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe nature and volume of the emissions concerned,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nnon-waste/low-waste technology,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe precautionary principle. REGULATION 4:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS\nIt therefore follows that \u2018best environmental practice\u2019 and \u2018best available technology\u2019 will change with time in the light of technological advances and economic and social factors, as well as changes in scientific knowledge and understanding. ANNEX III\nCRITERIA AND MEASURES CONCERNING THE PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM LAND-BASED SOURCES\nREGULATION 1:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0GENERAL PROVISIONS\nIn accordance with the relevant parts of this Convention the Contracting Parties shall apply the criteria and measures in this Annex in the whole catchment area and take into account best environmental practice (BEP) and best available technology (BAT) as described in Annex II. REGULATION 2:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. Municipal sewage water shall be treated at least by biological or other methods equally effective with regard to reduction of significant parameters. Substantial reduction shall be introduced for nutrients. 2. Water management in industrial plants should aim at closed water systems or at a high rate of circulation in order to avoid waste water wherever possible. 3. Industrial waste waters should be separately treated before mixing with diluting waters. 4. Waste waters containing hazardous substances or other relevant substances shall not be jointly treated with other waste waters unless an equal reduction of the pollutant load is achieved compared to the separate purification of each waste water stream. The improvement of waste water quality shall not lead to a significant increase in the amount of harmful sludge. 5. Limit values for emissions containing harmful substances to water and air shall be stated in special permits. 6. Industrial plants and other point sources connected to municipal treatment plants shall use best available technology in order to avoid hazardous substances which cannot be made harmless in the municipal sewage treatment plant: or which may disturb the processes in the plant. In addition, measures according to best environmental practice shall be taken. 7. Pollution from fish farming shall be prevented and eliminated by promoting and implementing best environmental practice and best available technology. 8. Pollution from diffuse sources, including agriculture, shall be eliminated by promoting and implementing best environmental practice. 9. Pesticides used shall comply with the criteria established by the Commission. REGULATION 3:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0PRINCIPLES FOR ISSUING PERMITS FOR INDUSTRIAL PLANTS\nThe Contracting Parties undertake to apply the following principles and procedures when issuing the permits referred to in Article 6 (3) of this Convention:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. The operator of the industrial plant shall submit data and information to the appropriate national authority using a form of application. It is recommended that the operator negotiates with the appropriate national authority concerning the data required for the application before submitting the application to the authority (agreement on the scope of required information and surveys). At least the following data and information shall be included in the application:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\n\nGeneral information\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nname, branch, location and number of employees. Actual situation and/or planned activities\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nsite of discharge and/or emission,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntype of production, amount of production and/or processing,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nproduction processes,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntype and amount of raw materials, agents and/or intermediate products,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\namount and quality of untreated waste water and raw gas from all relevant sources (e. g. process water, cooling water),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntreatment of waste water and raw gas with respect to type, process and efficiency of pre-treatment and/or final treatment,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntreated waste water and raw gas with respect to amount and quality at the outlet of the pre-treatment and/or final treatment facilities,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\namount and quality of solid and liquid wastes generated during the process and the treatment of waste water and raw gas,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntreatment of solid and liquid wastes,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ninformation about measures to prevent process failures and accidental spills,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\npresent status and possible impact on the environment. Alternatives and their various impacts concerning, e. g. ecological, economic and safety aspects, if necessary\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nother possible production processes,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nother possible raw materials, agents and/or intermediate products,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nother possible treatment technologies. 2. The appropriate national authority shall evaluate the present status and potential impact of the planned activities on the environment. 3. The appropriate national authority issues the permit after comprehensive assessment with special consideration of the abovementioned aspects. At least the following shall be laid down in the permit:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ncharacterizations of all components (e. g. production capacity) which influence the amount and quality of discharge and/or emissions,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nlimit values for amount and quality (load and/or concentration) of direct and indirect discharges and emissions,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ninstructions concerning:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nconstruction and safety,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nproduction processes and/or agents,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\noperation and maintenance of treatment facilities,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nrecovery of materials and substances and waste disposal,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntype and extent of control to be performed by the operator (self-control),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nmeasures to be taken in case of process failures and accidental spills,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nanalytical methods to be used,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nschedule for modernization, retrofitting and investigations done by the operator,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nschedule for reports of the operator on monitoring and/or self-control, retrofitting and investigation measures. 4. The appropriate national authority or an independent institution authorized by the appropriate national authority shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ninspect the amount and quality of discharges and/or emissions by sampling and analysing,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ncontrol the attainment of the permit requirements,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\narrange monitoring of the various impacts of waste-water discharges and emissions into the atmosphere,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nreview the permit when necessary. ANNEX IV\nPREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM SHIPS\nREGULATION 1:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0COOPERATION\nThe Contracting Parties shall, in matters concerning the protection of the Baltic Sea area from pollution by ships, cooperate:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nwithin the International Maritime Organization, in particular in promoting the development of international rules, based, inter alia, on the fundamental principles and obligations of this Convention which also includes the promotion of the use of best available technology and best environmental practice as defined in Annex II;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nin the effective and harmonized implementation of rules adopted by the International Maritime Organization. REGULATION 2:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0ASSISTANCE IN INVESTIGATIONS\nThe Contracting Parties shall, without prejudice to Article 4 (3) of this Convention, assist each other as appropriate in investigating violations of the existing legislation on anti-pollution measures, which have occurred or are suspected to have occurred within the Baltic Sea area. This assistance may include but is not limited to inspection by the competent authorities of oil record books, cargo record books, log books and engine log books and taking oil samples for analytical identification purposes. REGULATION 3:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0DEFINITIONS\nFor the purposes of this Annex:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. \u2018administration\u2019 means the government of the Contracting Party under whose authority the ship is operating. With respect to a ship entitled to fly a flag of any State, the administration is the government of that State. With respect to fixed or floating platforms engaged in exploration and exploitation of the sea bed and subsoil thereof adjacent to the coast over which the coastal State exercises sovereign rights for the purposes of exploration and exploitation of their natural resources, the administration is the government of the coastal State concerned;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. (a)\n\n\n\u2018discharge\u2019, in relation to harmful substances or effluents containing such substances, means any release howsoever caused from a ship and includes any escape, disposal, spilling, leaking, pumping, emitting or emptying:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\n\u2018discharge\u2019 does not include:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\ndumping within the meaning of the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter done at London on 29 December 1972; or\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nrelease of harmful substances directly arising from the exploration, exploitation and associated off-shore processing of sea-bed mineral resources; or\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(iii)\n\n\nrelease of harmful substances for purposes of legitimate scientific research into pollution abatement or control;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3. the term \u2018from the nearest land\u2019 means from the baseline from which the territorial sea of the territory in question is established in accordance with international law;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n4. the term \u2018jurisdiction\u2019 shall be interpreted in accordance with international law in force at the time of application or interpretation of this Annex;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n5. the term \u2018Marpol 73/78\u2019 means the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto. REGULATION 4:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0APPLICATION OF THE ANNEXES TO MARPOL 73/78\nSubject to Regulation 5 the Contracting Parties shall apply the provisions of the Annexes to Marpol 73/78. REGULATION 5:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0SEWAGE\nThe Contracting Parties shall apply the provisions of paragraphs A to D and F and G of this Regulation on discharge of sewage from ships while operating in the Baltic Sea area. A. Definitions\n\nFor the purposes of this Regulation:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. \u2018sewage\u2019 means:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\ndrainage and other wastes from any form of toilets, urinals, and WC scuppers;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\ndrainage from medical premises (dispensary, sick bay, etc. ) via wash basins, wash tubs and scuppers located in such premises;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\ndrainage from spaces containing living animals; or\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\nother waste waters when mixed with the drainages defined above;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. \u2018holding tank\u2019 means a tank used for the collection and storage of sewage. B. Application\n\nThe provisions of this Regulation shall apply to:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nships of 200 tonnes gross tonnage and above;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nships of less than 200 tonnes gross tonnage which are certified to carry more than 10 persons;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nships which do not have a measured gross tonnage and are certified to carry more than 10 persons. C. Discharge of sewage\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. Subject to the provisions of paragraph D of this Regulation, the discharge of sewage into the sea is prohibited, except when:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nthe ship is discharging comminuted and disinfected sewage using a system approved by the administration at a distance of more than four nautical miles from the nearest land, or sewage which is not comminuted or disinfected at a distance of more than 12 nautical miles from the nearest land, provided that in any case the sewage that has been stored in holding tanks shall not be discharged instantaneously but at a moderate rate when the ship is en route and proceeding at not less than four knots; or\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nthe ship has in operation a sewage treatment plant which has been approved by the administration, and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nthe test results of the plant are laid down in a document carried by the ship;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nadditionally, the effluent shall not produce visible floating solids in, nor cause discolouration of the surrounding water. 2. When the sewage is mixed with wastes or waste water having different discharge requirements, the more stringent requirements shall apply. D. Exceptions\n\nParagraph C of this Regulation shall not apply to:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nthe discharge of sewage from a ship necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship and those on board or saving life at sea; or\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nthe discharge of sewage resulting from damage to a ship or its equipment if all reasonable precautions have been taken before and after the occurrence of the damage for the purpose of preventing or minimizing the discharge. E. Reception facilities\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. Each Contracting Party undertakes to ensure the provision of facilities at its ports and terminals of the Baltic Sea area for the reception of sewage, without causing undue delay to ships, adequate to meet the needs of the ships using them. 2. To enable pipes of reception facilities to be connected with the ship's discharge pipeline, both lines shall be fitted with a standard discharge connection in accordance with the following table:\n\nStandard dimensions of flanges for discharge connections\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nDescription\n\n\nDimension\n\n\n\n\nOutside diameter\n\n\n210 mm\n\n\n\n\nInner diameter\n\n\nAccording to pipe outside diameter\n\n\n\n\nBolt circle diameter\n\n\n170 mm\n\n\n\n\nSlots in flange\n\n\nFour holes 18 mm in diameter equidistantly placed on a bolt circle of the above diameter, slotted to the flange periphery. The slot width to be 18 mm\n\n\n\n\nFlange thickness\n\n\n16 mm\n\n\n\n\nBolts and nuts:\nquantity and diameter\n\n\nFour, each of 16 mm in diameter and of suitable length\n\n\n\n\nThe flange is designed to accept pipes up to a maximum internal diameter of 100 mm and shall be of steel or other equivalent material having a flat face. This flange, together with a suitable gasket, shall be suitable for a service pressure of 6 kg/cm2. For ships having a moulded depth of five meters and less, the inner diameter of the discharge connection may be 38 millimetres. F. Surveys\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. Ships which are engaged in international voyages in the Baltic Sea area shall be subject to surveys as specified below:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nan initial survey before the ship is put into service or before the certificate required pursuant to paragraph G of this Regulation is issued for the first time including a survey of the ship which shall be such as to ensure that:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nwhen the ship is equipped with a sewage treatment plant the plant shall meet operational requirements based on the standards and test methods recommended by the Commission and shall be approved by the administration;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nwhen the ship is fitted with a system to comminute and disinfect the sewage, such system shall meet operational requirements based on the standards and test methods recommended by the Commission and shall be approved by the administration;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(iii)\n\n\nwhen the ship is equipped with a holding tank the capacity of such tank shall be to the satisfaction of the administration for the retention of all sewage, having regard to the operation of the ship, the number of persons on board and other relevant factors. The holding tank shall meet operational requirements based on the standards and test methods recommended by the Commission and shall be approved by the administration; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(iv)\n\n\nthe ship is equipped with a pipeline to discharge sewage to a reception facility. The pipeline should be fitted with a standard shore connection in accordance with paragraph E, or for ships in dedicated trades, alternatively with other standards which can be accepted by the administration such as quick connection couplings. This survey shall be such as to ensure that equipment, fittings, arrangements and materials fully comply with the applicable requirements of this Regulation. The administration shall recognize the \u2018certificate of type test\u2019 for sewage treatment plants issued under the authority of other Contracting Parties;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nperiodical surveys at intervals specified by the administration but not exceeding five years which shall be such as to ensure that the equipment, fittings, arrangements and materials fully comply with the applicable requirements of this Regulation. 2. Surveys of the ship as regards enforcement of the provisions of this Regulation shall be carried out by officers of the administration. The administration may, however, entrust the surveys either to surveyors nominated for the purpose or to organizations recognized by it. In every case the administration concerned fully guarantees the completeness and efficiency of the surveys. 3. After any survey of the ship has been completed, no significant change shall be made in the equipment, fittings, arrangements, or material covered by the survey without the approval of the administration, except the direct replacement of such equipment or fittings. G. Certificate\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. A sewage pollution prevention certificate shall be issued to ships certified to carry more than 50 persons which are engaged in international voyages in the Baltic Sea area, after survey in accordance with the provisions of paragraph F of this Regulation. 2. Such certificate shall be issued either by the administration or by any person or organization duly authorized by it. In every case the administration assumes full responsibility for the certificate. 3. The sewage prevention certificate shall be drawn up in a form corresponding to the model given in the appendix to Annex IV to Marpol 73/78. If the language is not English, the text shall include a translation into English. 4. A sewage pollution prevention certificate shall be issued for a period certified by the administration, which shall not exceed five years. 5. A certificate shall cease to be valid if significant alterations have taken place in the equipment, fittings, arrangements or materials required without the approval of the administration except the direct replacement of such equipment or fittings. ANNEX V\nEXEMPTIONS FROM THE GENERAL PROHIBITION OF DUMPING OF WASTE AND OTHER MATTER IN THE BALTIC SEA AREA\nREGULATION 1\nIn accordance with Article 11 (2) of this Convention the prohibition of dumping shall not apply to the disposal at sea of dredged materials provided that:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nthe dumping of dredged material containing harmful substances indicated in Annex I is only permitted according to the guidelines adopted by the Commission; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nthe dumping is carried out under a prior special permit issued by the appropriate national authority, either:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nwithin the area of internal waters and the territorial sea of the Contracting Party; or\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\noutside the area of internal waters and the territorial sea, whenever necessary, after prior consultations in the Commission. When issuing such permits the Contracting Party shall comply with the provisions in Regulation 3 of this Annex. REGULATION 2\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. The appropriate national authority referred to in Article 11 (2) of this Convention shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nissue the special permits provided for in Regulation 1 of this Annex;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nkeep records of the nature and quantities of matter permitted to be dumped and the location, time and method of dumping;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\ncollect available information concerning the nature and quantities of matter that has been dumped in the Baltic Sea area recently and up to the coming into force of this Convention, provided that the dumped matter in question could be liable to contaminate water or organisms in the Baltic Sea area, to be caught by fishing equipment, or otherwise to give rise to harm, and information concerning the location, time and method of such dumping. 2. The appropriate national authority shall issue special permits in accordance with Regulation 1 of this Annex in respect of matter intended for dumping in the Baltic Sea area:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nloaded in its territory;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nloaded by a ship or aircraft registered in its territory or flying its flag, when the loading occurs in the territory of a State which is not a Contracting Party to this Convention. 3. Each Contracting Party shall report to the Commission, and where appropriate to other Contracting Parties, the information specified in subparagraph 1 (c) of Regulation 2 of this Annex. The procedure to be followed and the nature of such reports shall be determined by the Commission. REGULATION 3\nWhen issuing special permits according to Regulation 1 of this Annex the appropriate national authority shall take into account:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nthe quantity of dredged material to be dumped;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nthe content of harmful substances as referred to in Annex I;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nthe location (e. g. coordinates of the dumping area, depth and distance from the coast) and its relation to areas of special interest (e. g. amenity areas, spawning, nursery and fishing areas, etc. );\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\nthe water characteristics, if dumping is carried out outside the territorial sea, consisting of:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nhydrographic properties (e. g. temperature, salinity, density, profile);\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nchemical properties (e. g. pH, dissolved oxygen, nutrients);\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(iii)\n\n\nbiological properties (e. g. primiary production and benthic animals);\n\n\n\n\nthe data should include sufficient information on the annual mean levels and seasonal variation of the properties mentioned in this paragraph; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\nthe existence and effects of other dumping which may have been carried out in the dumping area. REGULATION 4\nReports made in accordance with Article 11 (5) of this Convention shall include the information to be provided in the reporting form to be determined by the Commission. ANNEX VI\nPREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM OFFSHORE ACTIVITIES\nREGULATION 1:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0DEFINITIONS\nFor the purposes of this Annex:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. \u2018offshore activity\u2019 means any exploration and exploitation of oil and gas by a fixed or floating offshore installation or structure including all associated activities thereon;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. \u2018offshore unit\u2019 means any fixed or floating offshore installation or structure engaged in gas or oil exploration, exploitation or production activities, or loading or unloading of oil;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3. \u2018exploration\u2019 includes any drilling activity but not seismic investigations;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n4. \u2018exploitation\u2019 includes any production, well testing or stimulation activity. REGULATION 2:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0USE OF BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY AND BEST ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE\nThe Contracting Parties undertake to prevent and eliminate pollution from offshore activities by using the principles of best available technology and best environmental practice as defined in Annex II. REGULATION 3:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. An environmental impact assessment shall be made before an offshore activity is permitted to start. In case of exploitation referred to in Regulation 5 the outcome of this assessment shall be notified to the Commission before the offshore activity is permitted to start. 2. In connection with the environmental impact assessment the environmental sensitivity of the sea area around a proposed offshore unit should be assessed with respect to the following:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nthe importance of the area for birds and marine mammals;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nthe importance of the area as fishing or spawning grounds for fish and shellfish, and for aqua-culture;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nthe recreational importance of the area;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\nthe composition of the Sediment measured as: grain size distribution, dry matter, ignition loss, total hydrocarbon content, and Ba, Cr, Pb, Cu, Hg and Cd content;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\nthe abundance and diversity of benthic fauna and the content of selected aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons. 3. In order to monitor the consequent effects of the exploration phase of the offshore activity studies, at least those referred to in subparagraph (d), shall be carried out before and after the operation. 4. In order to monitor the consequent effects of the exploitation phase of the offshore activity studies, at least those referred to in subparagraphs (d) and (e), shall be carried out before the operation, at annual intervals during the operation, and after the operation has been concluded. REGULATION 4:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0DISCHARGES ON THE EXPLORATION PHASE\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. The use of oil-based drilling mud or muds containing other harmful substances shall be restricted to cases where it is necessary for geological, technical or safety reasons and only after prior authorization by the appropriate national authority. In such cases appropriate measures shall be taken and appropriate installations provided in order to prevent the discharge of such muds into the marine environment. 2. Oil-based drilling muds and cuttings arising from the use of oil-based drilling muds should not be discharged in the Baltic Sea area but taken ashore for final treatment or disposal in an environmentally acceptable manner. 3. The discharge of water-based mud and cuttings shall be subject to authorization by the appropriate national authority. Before authorization the content of the water-based mud must be proven to be of low toxicity. 4. The discharge of cuttings arising from the use of water-based drilling mud shall not be permitted in specifically sensitive parts of the Baltic Sea area such as confined or shallow areas with limited water exchange and areas characterized by rare, valuable or particularly fragile ecosystems. REGULATION 5:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0DISCHARGES ON THE EXPLOITATION PHASE\nIn addition to the provisions of Annex IV the following provisions shall apply to discharges:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nall chemicals and materials shall be taken ashore and may be discharged only exceptionally after obtaining permission from the appropriate national authority in each individual operation;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nthe discharge of production water and displacement water is prohibited unless its oil content is proven to be less than 15 rng/1 measured by the methods of analysis and sampling to be adopted by the Commission;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nif compliance with this limit value cannot be achieved by the use of best environmental practice and best available technology the appropriate national authority may require adequate additional measures to prevent possible pollution of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area and allow, if necessary, a higher limit value which shall, however, be as low as possible and in no case exceed 40 mg/l; the oil content shall be measured as provided in subparagraph (b);\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\nthe permitted discharge shall not, in any case, create any unacceptable effects on the marine environment;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\nin order to benefit from the future development in cleaning and production technology, discharge permits shall be regularly reviewed by the appropriate national authority and the discharge limits shall be revised accordingly. REGULATION 6:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0REPORTING PROCEDURE\nEach Contracting Party shall require that the operator or any other person having charge of the offshore unit shall report in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 5 (1) of Annex VII to this Convention. REGULATION 7:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0CONTINGENCY PLANNING\nEach offshore unit shall have a pollution emergency plan approved in accordance with the procedure established by the appropriate national authority. The plan shall contain information on alarm and communication systems, organization of response measures, a list of prepositioned equipment and a description of the measures to be taken in different types of pollution incidents. REGULATION 8:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0DISUSED OFFSHORE UNITS\nThe Contracting Parties shall ensure that abandoned, disused offshore units and accidentally wrecked offshore units are entirely removed and brought ashore under the responsibility of the owner and that disused drilling wells are plugged. REGULATION 9:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION\nThe Contracting Parties shall continuously exchange information through the Commission on the location and nature of all planned or accomplished offshore activities and on the nature and amounts of discharges as well as on contingency measures that are undertaken. ANNEX VII\nRESPONSE TO POLLUTION INCIDENTS\nREGULATION 1:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0GENERAL PROVISIONS\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. The Contracting Parties undertake to maintain the ability to respond to pollution incidents threatening the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area. This ability shall include adequate equipment, ships and manpower prepared for operations in coastal waters as well as on the high sea. 2. (a)\n\n\nIn addition to the incidents referred to in Article 13 the Contracting Party shall also notify without delay those pollution incidents occuring within its response region, which affect or are likely to affect the interests of other Contracting Parties. (b)\n\n\nIn the event of a significant pollution incident other Contracting Parties and the Commission shall also be informed as soon as possible. 3. The Contracting Parties agree that subject to their capabilities and the availability of relevant resources, they shall cooperate in responding to pollution incidents when the severity of such incidents so justify. 4. In addition the Contracting Parties shall take other measures to:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nconduct regular surveillance outside their coastlines; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\notherwise cooperate and exchange information with other Contracting Parties in order to improve the ability to respond to pollution incidents. REGULATION 2:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0CONTINGENCY PLANNING\nEach Contracting Party shall draw up a national contingency plan and in cooperation with other Contracting Parties, as appropriate, bilateral or multilateral plans for a joint response to pollution incidents. REGULATION 3:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0SURVEILLANCE\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. In order to prevent violations of the existing regulations on prevention of pollution from ships the Contracting Parties shall develop and apply individually or in cooperation, surveillance activities covering the Baltic Sea area in order to spot and monitor oil and other substances released into the sea. 2. The Contracting Parties shall undertake appropriate measures to conduct the surveillance referred to in. paragraph 1 by using, inter alia, airborne surveillance equipped with remote sensing systems. REGULATION 4:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0RESPONSE REGIONS\nThe Contracting Parties shall as soon as possible agree bilaterally or multilaterally on those regions of the Baltic Sea area in which they shall conduct surveillance activities and take action to respond whenever a significant pollution incident has occurred or is likely to occur. Such agreements shall not prejudice any other agreements concluded between Contracting Parties concerning the same subject. Neighbouring States shall ensure the harmonization of different agreements. Contracting Parties shall inform other Contracting Parties and the Commission about such agreements. REGULATION 5:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0REPORTING PROCEDURE\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. (a)\n\n\nEach Contracting Party shall require masters or other persons having charge of ships flying its flag to report without delay any event on their ship involving a discharge or probable discharge of oil or other harmful substances. (b)\n\n\nThe report shall be made to the nearest coastal State and in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 and Protocol I of the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 related thereto (Marpol 73/78). (c)\n\n\nThe Contracting Parties shall request masters or other persons having charge of ships and pilots of aircraft to report without delay and in accordance with this system on significant spillages of oil or other harmful substances observed at sea. Such reports should as far as possible contain the following data: time, position, wind and sea conditions, and kind, extent and probable source of the spill observed. 2. The provisions of paragraph 1 (b) shall also be applied with regard to dumping made under the provisions of Article 11 (4) of this Convention. REGULATION 6:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0EMERGENCY MEASURES ON BOARD SHIPS\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. Each Contracting Party shall require that ships entitled to fly its flag have on board a shipboard oil pollution emergency plan as required by and in accordance with the provisions of Marpol 73/78. 2. Each Contracting Party shall request masters of ships flying its flag or, in case of fixed or floating platforms operating under its jurisdiction, the persons having charge of platforms to provide, in case of a pollution incident and on request by the proper authorities, such detailed information about the ship and its cargo or in case of platform its production which is relevant to actions for preventing or responding to pollution of the sea, and to cooperate with these authorities. REGULATION 7:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0RESPONSE MEASURES\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. The Contracting Party shall, when a pollution incident occurs in its response region, make the necessary assessments of the situation and take adequate response action in order to avoid or minimize subsequent pollution effects. 2. (a)\n\n\nThe Contracting Parties shall, subject to subparagraph (b), use mechanical means to respond to pollution incidents. (b)\n\n\nChemical agents may be used only in exceptional cases and after authorization, in each individual case, by the appropriate national authority. 3. When such a spillage is drifting or is likely to drift into a response region of another Contracting Party, that Party shall without delay be informed of the situation and the actions that have been taken. REGULATION 8:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0ASSISTANCE\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. According to the provisions of paragraph 3 of Regulation 1:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\na Contracting Party is entitled to call for assistance by other Contracting Parties when responding to a pollution incident at sea; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nContracting Parties shall use their best endeavours to bring such assistance. 2. Contracting Parties shall take necessary legal or administrative measures to facilitate:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nthe arrival and utilization in and departure from its territory of ships, aircraft and other modes of transport engaged in responding to a pollution incident or transporting personnel, cargoes, materials and equipment required to deal with such an incident; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nthe expeditious movement into, through, and out of its territory of personnel, cargoes, materials and equipment referred to in subparagraph (a). REGULATION 9:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0REIMBURSEMENT OF COST OF ASSISTANCE\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall bear the costs of assistance referred to in Regulation 8 in accordance with this Regulation. 2. (a)\n\n\nIf the action was taken by one Contracting Party at the express request of another Contracting Party, the requesting Party shall reimburse to the assisting Party the costs of the action of the assisting Party. If the request is cancelled the requesting Party shall bear the costs already incurred or committed by the assisting Party. (b)\n\n\nIf the action was taken by a Contracting Party on its own initiative, this Party shall bear the costs of its action. (c)\n\n\nThe principles laid down above in subparagraphs (a) and (b) shall apply unless the Parties concerned otherwise agree in any individual case. 3. Unless otherwise agreed, the costs of the action taken by a Contracting Party at the request of another Party shall be fairly calculated according to the law and current practice of the assisting Party concerning the reimbursement of such costs. 4. The provisions of this Regulation shall not be interpreted as in any way prejudicing the rights of Contracting Parties to recover from third parties the costs of actions taken to deal with pollution incidents under other applicable provisions and rules of international law and national or supra-national regulations. REGULATION 10:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0REGULAR COOPERATION\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. Each Contracting Party shall provide information to the other Contracting Parties and the Commission about:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nits organization for dealing with spillages at sea of oil and other harmful substances;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nits regulations and other matters which have a direct bearing on preparedness and response to pollution at sea by oil and other harmful substances;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nthe competent authority responsible for receiving and dispatching reports of pollution at sea by oil and other harmful substances;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\nthe competent authorities for dealing with questions concerning measures for mutual assistance, information and cooperation between the Contracting Parties according to this Annex; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\nactions taken in accordance with Regulations 7 and 8 of this Annex. 2. The Contracting Parties shall exchange information on research and development programmes, results concerning ways in which pollution by oil and other harmful substances at sea may be dealt with and experiences in surveillance activities and in responding to such pollution. 3. The Contracting Parties shall on a regular basis arrange joint operational combating exercises as well as alarm exercises. 4. The Contracting Parties shall cooperate within the International Maritime Organization in matters concerning the implementation and further development of the International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Cooperation. REGULATION 11:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HELCOM COMBATING MANUAL\nThe Contracting Parties agree to apply, as far as practicable, the principles and rules included in the Manual on Cooperation in Combating Marine Pollution, detailing this Annex and adopted by the Commission or by the Committee designated by the Commission for this purpose"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cb1c7ace-702f-4642-b35c-d248a24e44d5", "title": "92/248/EEC: Decision of the European Parliament of 8 April 1992 granting discharge to the Management Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training in respect of the implementation of its budget for the 1990 financial year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Cedefop,Community budget,budgetary discharge", "workIds": "celex:31992D0248,oj:JOL_1992_127_R_0013_026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Cedefop", "Community budget", "budgetary discharge"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cb1c7ace-702f-4642-b35c-d248a24e44d5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9fbc6207-3c91-4d29-82f7-bb82d20bfe61", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87 laying down the procedure for the application of the rules on competition to undertakings in the air transport sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Transport and Tourism,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "air transport,competition", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0140", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air transport", "competition"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9fbc6207-3c91-4d29-82f7-bb82d20bfe61", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1a35e57c-3d95-4fef-a980-ebb88af893ba", "title": "The elimination of frontier controls : control of goods, control of individuals, value-added tax, excise duties. volume 2.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "VAT,abolition of customs duties,excise duty,free movement of capital,free movement of goods,free movement of persons,single market,tax on consumption", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CO6291002", "eurovoc_concepts": ["VAT", "abolition of customs duties", "excise duty", "free movement of capital", "free movement of goods", "free movement of persons", "single market", "tax on consumption"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1a35e57c-3d95-4fef-a980-ebb88af893ba", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/90691e8b-92fd-4b89-b09c-48aa6b5b9f0b", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council directive on infant formulae and follow-on formulae intended for export to third countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "advertising,baby food,consumer information,consumer protection,export (EU),foodstuffs legislation,public health", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0105", "eurovoc_concepts": ["advertising", "baby food", "consumer information", "consumer protection", "export (EU)", "foodstuffs legislation", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/90691e8b-92fd-4b89-b09c-48aa6b5b9f0b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/670233cb-ca1c-4e48-ad49-12611d5cad72", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation on access for air carriers to intra- Community air routes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Transport and Tourism,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "air transport,airline,carrier,civil aviation,intra-EU transport,market access,trade licence,transport company,transport market", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0142", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air transport", "airline", "carrier", "civil aviation", "intra-EU transport", "market access", "trade licence", "transport company", "transport market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/670233cb-ca1c-4e48-ad49-12611d5cad72", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2f858e33-b45e-4cd9-9fc4-a57e6453b288", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 887/92 of 8 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "agricultural product,export refund", "workIds": "celex:31992R0887,oj:JOL_1992_095_R_0020_029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural product", "export refund"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2f858e33-b45e-4cd9-9fc4-a57e6453b288", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8deae6e2-746c-421b-8f83-87795669b592", "title": "RESOLUTION -on the report of the Court of Auditors on the accounts of the European Coal and Steel Community at 31 December 1990 -on the report (annexed to the annual ECSC report for the 1990 financial year) of the Court of Auditors on the management of the accounts and the financial management of the ECSC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#document_budget_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Budgetary Control,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Community budget,ECSC loan,ECSC operating budget,budgetary control,budgetary discharge,closing of accounts,financial analysis,financial management,financial year,implementation of the budget,management accounting", "workIds": "celex:51992BP0089", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "ECSC loan", "ECSC operating budget", "budgetary control", "budgetary discharge", "closing of accounts", "financial analysis", "financial management", "financial year", "implementation of the budget", "management accounting"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8deae6e2-746c-421b-8f83-87795669b592", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b0ed9adb-159e-4d6c-bce5-9b516874676a", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading) embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council directive on the manufacture and placing on the market of certain substances used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "administrative cooperation,approximation of laws,chemical industry,committee (EU),dangerous substance,exchange of information,marketing,narcotic,offence,pharmaceutical product", "workIds": "celex:51991AP0357", "eurovoc_concepts": ["administrative cooperation", "approximation of laws", "chemical industry", "committee (EU)", "dangerous substance", "exchange of information", "marketing", "narcotic", "offence", "pharmaceutical product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b0ed9adb-159e-4d6c-bce5-9b516874676a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4f44aaec-ef0e-4ca6-877e-fd45b1597d5a", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation on fares and rates for air services", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Transport and Tourism,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "air freight rate,air transport,carrier,civil aviation,competition,freight rate,intra-EU transport,transport company,transport price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0142(01)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air freight rate", "air transport", "carrier", "civil aviation", "competition", "freight rate", "intra-EU transport", "transport company", "transport price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4f44aaec-ef0e-4ca6-877e-fd45b1597d5a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d6223078-6017-44da-b700-e321db63b959", "title": "RESOLUTION on the Eighth Annual Report to the European Parliament on Commission monitoring of the application of Community law -1990", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Legal Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "EU law,activity report,application of EU law,case-law (EU),environmental policy,free service,higher education,judgment of the Court (EU),national law,offence,preliminary ruling procedure,single market", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0143", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "activity report", "application of EU law", "case-law (EU)", "environmental policy", "free service", "higher education", "judgment of the Court (EU)", "national law", "offence", "preliminary ruling procedure", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d6223078-6017-44da-b700-e321db63b959", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e4999274-fcdc-46b4-9bcc-23e4dd5b44b3", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council resolution on the marketing practices for breast- milk substitutes in developing countries by Community-based manufacturers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "baby food,consumer protection,developing countries,export (EU),public health", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0105(01)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["baby food", "consumer protection", "developing countries", "export (EU)", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e4999274-fcdc-46b4-9bcc-23e4dd5b44b3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6df3fda5-7699-4fc6-92b6-50c8033a9f9a", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 898/92 of 8 April 1992 laying down detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fresh, chilled or frozen beef provided for in the Interim Association Agreements between the Community and the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Hungary and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Czechoslovakia,Hungary,Poland,import licence,import policy", "workIds": "celex:31992R0898,oj:JOL_1992_095_R_0044_040", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Czechoslovakia", "Hungary", "Poland", "import licence", "import policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6df3fda5-7699-4fc6-92b6-50c8033a9f9a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3c9c7d27-111d-4cc6-bc3b-8cdd48eaa3d0", "title": "Comptes nationaux SEC : tableaux entr\u00e9es-sorties du Danemark 1985 : volume 1.,National accounts ESA : input-output tables for Danemark 1985 : volume 1.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Denmark,export,export tax,import,statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA8491001", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "export", "export tax", "import", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3c9c7d27-111d-4cc6-bc3b-8cdd48eaa3d0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed330615-ca53-41d8-8856-042acecf8e15", "title": "92/250/ECSC: Decision of the European Parliament of 8 April 1992 granting a discharge to the Commission in respect of the European Coal and Steel Community accounts for the financial year 1990", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "ECSC,ECSC operating budget", "workIds": "celex:31992D0250,oj:JOL_1992_127_R_0017_022", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ECSC", "ECSC operating budget"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed330615-ca53-41d8-8856-042acecf8e15", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0657770d-bb0c-4e98-b873-ccbb2c0e778c", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading) embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation concerning the affixing and use of the CE mark of conformity on industrial products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "EU trade mark,European standard,approval,audiovisual equipment,boiler,electric cable,electrical equipment,harmonisation of standards,labelling,marketing,peripheral,product design,product safety,quality label,standardisation,technical regulations,technical standard,telecommunications", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0121", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU trade mark", "European standard", "approval", "audiovisual equipment", "boiler", "electric cable", "electrical equipment", "harmonisation of standards", "labelling", "marketing", "peripheral", "product design", "product safety", "quality label", "standardisation", "technical regulations", "technical standard", "telecommunications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0657770d-bb0c-4e98-b873-ccbb2c0e778c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e6f66c27-4a56-4870-ae0b-24ed3f0ebd6c", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 910/92 of 8 April 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products of category 156 (order No 42.1560), originating in China, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "clothing,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R0910,oj:JOL_1992_096_R_0027_027", "eurovoc_concepts": ["clothing", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e6f66c27-4a56-4870-ae0b-24ed3f0ebd6c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c427034e-1877-4562-815f-ef5cd6f6e2f3", "title": "92/244/EEC: Commission Decision of 8 April 1992 concerning the import of live pigs, fresh pigmeat and pigmeat products from Czechoslovakia and amending Decisions 82/425/EEC and 91/449/EEC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Czechoslovakia,health certificate,import restriction,pigmeat,swine", "workIds": "celex:31992D0244,oj:JOL_1992_124_R_0040_040", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Czechoslovakia", "health certificate", "import restriction", "pigmeat", "swine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c427034e-1877-4562-815f-ef5cd6f6e2f3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7c7972a-123f-4374-8fef-b0a2ae58d057", "title": "DECISION grant ng discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Parliament for the financial year 1990", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#document_budget_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Budgetary Control,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Community budget,European Parliament,administrative expenditure,balance-sheet analysis,budgetary control,budgetary discharge,closing of accounts,financial analysis,financial management,financial year,general budget (EU),implementation of the budget,management accounting", "workIds": "celex:51992BP0116", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "European Parliament", "administrative expenditure", "balance-sheet analysis", "budgetary control", "budgetary discharge", "closing of accounts", "financial analysis", "financial management", "financial year", "general budget (EU)", "implementation of the budget", "management accounting"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b7c7972a-123f-4374-8fef-b0a2ae58d057", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c80c7063-b9a4-4c80-9e3c-85637b5fd020", "title": "92/249/EEC: Decision of the European Parliament of 8 April 1992 granting discharge to the Administrative Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions in respect of the implementation of its budget for the 1990 financial year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Community budget,Eurofound", "workIds": "celex:31992D0249,oj:JOL_1992_127_R_0015_027", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "Eurofound"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c80c7063-b9a4-4c80-9e3c-85637b5fd020", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98d6c9db-9464-40c7-ba60-457ba2eec664", "title": "92/251/EEC: Decision of the European Parliament of 8 April 1992 granting discharge to the Commission in respect of the financial management of the fourth European Development Fund for the 1990 financial year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Community budget,EDF,European Commission", "workIds": "celex:31992D0251,oj:JOL_1992_127_R_0024_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "EDF", "European Commission"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98d6c9db-9464-40c7-ba60-457ba2eec664", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8092a8c9-f0dc-4ea1-8cc8-05d9d424f043", "title": "A common market for services : banking, insurance, transactions in securities, transport services, new technologies and services, capital movements, free movement of labour and the professions. volume 1.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "capital movement,financial institution,free movement of workers,insurance,liberal profession,new technology,single market,tertiary sector,transport policy", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CO6291001", "eurovoc_concepts": ["capital movement", "financial institution", "free movement of workers", "insurance", "liberal profession", "new technology", "single market", "tertiary sector", "transport policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8092a8c9-f0dc-4ea1-8cc8-05d9d424f043", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/746ffda5-0765-4040-9363-95be854c2b43", "title": "RESOLUTION on postonement of the discharge to be granted to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Communities for the 1990 financial year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#document_budget_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Budgetary Control,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "budgetary control,budgetary discharge,financial control,financial year,general budget (EU)", "workIds": "celex:51992BP0148", "eurovoc_concepts": ["budgetary control", "budgetary discharge", "financial control", "financial year", "general budget (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/746ffda5-0765-4040-9363-95be854c2b43", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e396b209-8938-44a9-a0ef-81e46f67f485", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading) embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 70/157/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the permissible sound level and the exhaust system of motor vehicles", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "European standard,air quality,approximation of laws,combustion gases,environmental protection,harmonisation of standards,motor vehicle,noise,noise level,nuisance,technical regulations,vehicle parts", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0081", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "air quality", "approximation of laws", "combustion gases", "environmental protection", "harmonisation of standards", "motor vehicle", "noise", "noise level", "nuisance", "technical regulations", "vehicle parts"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e396b209-8938-44a9-a0ef-81e46f67f485", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/183b57a4-dac3-4370-a6f9-c338056c5015", "title": "RESOLUTION on the measures taken by the Commission in the light of the comments contained in the resolution accompanying the decision granting discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Communities for the 1989 financial year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#document_budget_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Budgetary Control,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,Community budget,EAGGF Guarantee Section,EP resolution,balance-sheet analysis,budgetary control,budgetary discharge,closing of accounts,development aid,financial analysis,financial management,financial year,general budget (EU),implementation of the budget,management accounting,structural policy", "workIds": "celex:51992BP0055", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "Community budget", "EAGGF Guarantee Section", "EP resolution", "balance-sheet analysis", "budgetary control", "budgetary discharge", "closing of accounts", "development aid", "financial analysis", "financial management", "financial year", "general budget (EU)", "implementation of the budget", "management accounting", "structural policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/183b57a4-dac3-4370-a6f9-c338056c5015", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/010e0898-2fb0-40ee-b909-2e53d81544d7", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading) embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council directive on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources of household appliances", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Industry, Research and Energy,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "approximation of laws,consumer information,energy consumption,household electrical appliance,labelling,marketing,product design,standardisation", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0137", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "consumer information", "energy consumption", "household electrical appliance", "labelling", "marketing", "product design", "standardisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/010e0898-2fb0-40ee-b909-2e53d81544d7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/afe50ba3-7921-482f-960c-1bef38019255", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation on licensing of air carriers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Transport and Tourism,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "air transport,civil aviation,transport licence", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0138", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air transport", "civil aviation", "transport licence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/afe50ba3-7921-482f-960c-1bef38019255", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1e337a01-e390-4e60-add0-ba981999c3cd", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 899/92 of 8 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 847/92 on an export sale to Russia under Council Regulation (EEC) No 599/91", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "USSR,beef,export,intervention stock,sale", "workIds": "celex:31992R0899,oj:JOL_1992_095_R_0048_041", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "beef", "export", "intervention stock", "sale"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1e337a01-e390-4e60-add0-ba981999c3cd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63b89c1c-9cc7-11eb-b85c-01aa75ed71a1", "title": "Aussenhandel : allgemeines Pr\u00e4ferenzsystem (APS) Einfuhren 1990 : Band 1.,Buitenlandse handel : stelsel van algemene tariefpreferenties (SAP) Invoer 1990 : Deel 1.,Comercio exterior : sistema de preferencias arancelarias generalizadas (SPG) Importaciones 1990 : Volume 1.,Comercio externo : sistema de prefer\u00eancias pautais generalizadas (SPG) Importa\u00e7\u00f5es 1990 : Volume 1.,Commerce ext\u00e9rieur : syst\u00e8me de pr\u00e9f\u00e9rences tarifaires g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9es (SPG) Importations 1990 : Volume 1.,Commercio estero : sistema delle preferenze tariffarie generalizzate (SPG) Importazioni 1990 : Volume 1.,External trade : system of generalized tariff preferences (GSP) Imports 1990 : Volume 1.,Udenrigshandel : ordningen med generelle toldpr\u00e6ferencer (GSP) Import 1990 : Bind 1.,\u0395\u03be\u03c9\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf \u03b5\u03bc\u03c0\u03bf\u03c1\u03b9\u03bf : \u03a3\u03cd\u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03bc\u03b1 \u03b3\u03b5\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03b5\u03c5\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03c9\u03bd \u03b4\u03b1\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03b9\u03ba\u03ce\u03bd \u03c0\u03c1\u03bf\u03c4\u03b9\u03bc\u03ae\u03c3\u03b5\u03c9\u03bd (\u03a3\u0393\u03a0) \u0395\u03b9\u03c3\u03b1\u03b3\u03c9\u03b3\u03ad\u03c2 1990' : \u03a4\u03cc\u03bc\u03bf\u03c2 1.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "common commercial policy,economic statistics,foreign trade,generalised preferences,import (EU),tariff preference", "workIds": "1992.0999", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common commercial policy", "economic statistics", "foreign trade", "generalised preferences", "import (EU)", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63b89c1c-9cc7-11eb-b85c-01aa75ed71a1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0ea2812a-b39d-435b-9c32-c44df9c8f894", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 888/92 of 8 April 1992 amending for a second time Regulation (EEC) No 1327/89 authorizing Spain not to apply in certain areas the measures provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1442/88 on the granting, for the 1989/90 to 1995/96 wine years, of permanent abandonment premiums in respect of wine-growing areas", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Spain,cessation of farming,grubbing premium,viticulture", "workIds": "celex:31992R0888,oj:JOL_1992_095_R_0022_030", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "cessation of farming", "grubbing premium", "viticulture"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0ea2812a-b39d-435b-9c32-c44df9c8f894", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f85b095a-8b0d-44a9-b5fe-94824870d77a", "title": "RESOLUTION on the implementation of European Community environmental legislation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "action for failure to fulfil an obligation,application of EU law,environmental law,environmental protection,free service,offence", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0001", "eurovoc_concepts": ["action for failure to fulfil an obligation", "application of EU law", "environmental law", "environmental protection", "free service", "offence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f85b095a-8b0d-44a9-b5fe-94824870d77a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bbe84567-8c92-4b4e-9925-6a96d1366779", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 886/92 of 8 April 1992 on the arrangements on imports of barley of brewery quality originating in Czechoslovakia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Czechoslovakia,barley,import levy,import licence,malt", "workIds": "celex:31992R0886,oj:JOL_1992_095_R_0018_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Czechoslovakia", "barley", "import levy", "import licence", "malt"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bbe84567-8c92-4b4e-9925-6a96d1366779", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3b8c7ea9-2aca-4c57-9db3-9b8178c9f268", "title": "Comptes nationaux SEC : tableaux entr\u00e9es-sorties de l'Italie 1985.,National accounts ESA : input-output tables for Italy 1985.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-08", "subjects": "Italy,export,export tax,import,statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA8491003", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "export", "export tax", "import", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3b8c7ea9-2aca-4c57-9db3-9b8178c9f268", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a396229c-37c5-4966-a6db-187d17a5f65c", "title": "RESOLUTION on the results of the intergovernmental conferences", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Constitutional Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "Economic and Monetary Union,European Parliament,Treaty on European Union,institutional cooperation,interinstitutional relations,legislative power,power of decision,power of initiative,powers of parliament,summit meeting,supervisory power", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0123(01)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Economic and Monetary Union", "European Parliament", "Treaty on European Union", "institutional cooperation", "interinstitutional relations", "legislative power", "power of decision", "power of initiative", "powers of parliament", "summit meeting", "supervisory power"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a396229c-37c5-4966-a6db-187d17a5f65c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b98d089b-a007-47d4-90a4-90b8b562c635", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directive 79/112/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "approximation of laws,consumer information,foodstuff,labelling,marketing,product designation", "workIds": "celex:51991PC0536,comnat:COM_1991_0536_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_122_R_0012_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "consumer information", "foodstuff", "labelling", "marketing", "product designation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b98d089b-a007-47d4-90a4-90b8b562c635", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\n111 \n\nC0M(9>1 ) 536 final - SYN 380 \n\nBrussels, 7 ApriI 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCLINCH DIRECTIVE \n\namending DirectIve 79/112/EEC on the \n\napproximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling \npresentation and advertising of foodstuffs \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\ni'hh * \n\n\f- 2 \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. INTRODUCTION \n\nThe aim of this proposal for a directive is three-fold: \n\nto fiI I a gap with regard to the labelling of foodstuffs consisting of \na single ingredient; \nto reconsider the labelling of alcoholic beverages; and \nto make it compulsory to indicate the content of certain ingredients \nor constituents, \nto supplement the provisions concerning the name under which the \nproduct is sold. With this in mind, it sets out the amendments which need to be made to \nArticles 3, \nof \n18 December 1978 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States \nrelating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs, as \nlast amended by Directive 91/72/EEC. 2 \n\nDirective 79/112/EEC1 \n\nCouncil \n\nand \n\n5, \n\nof \n\n6 \n\n7 \n\nThese amendments were set out in the Commission communication of 1989 on \nthe free movement of foodstuffs within the Community,3 paragraph 18 of \nwhich states that: \n\n\"The Commission is therefore shortly to put forward a proposal aimed at \nmaking It mandatory to indicate the quantity of ingredients that are \nessential to the characteristics of a foodstuff, specifying the cases in \nwhich foodstuffs composed of a single ingredient do not need to bear a list \nof ingredients and making it mandatory to indicate the ingredients in \nbeverages with an alcoholic strength of more than 1. 2% by volume, etc. \". 2. Name under which the product is sold \n\nArticle 5 of Directive 79/112/CEE now states that In the absence of \nCommunity or national regulations determining the name under which a \nproduct is sold, the manufacturer could use the name customary in the \nMember State where the product Is sold to the ultimate consumer or to \nmass caterers. This territorial limit to the concept of customary names does in \npractice create some obstacles to the free movement of goods. In the framework of the completion of the Internal Market, it is \nappropriate to allow also the use of the name customary in the Member \nState where a product is manufactured in the case of products which \nwill be sold in another Member State provided this does not have the \npurchaser. effect \n\nmisleading \n\nthe \n\nof \n\n1 OJ L 33, 8. 2. 1979. 2 OJ L 42, 15. 2. 1991. 3 OJ C 271, 24. 10. 1989. - 3 -\n\n3. Foodstuffs consisting of a single ingredient \n\nArticle 6(2)(c) of Directive 79/112/EEC states that Ingredients need \nnot be listed in the case of: \n\n- \"(c) products consisting of a single ingredient\". ingredient. This \n\nSince the Directive was introduced, practice has shown that this \nprovision does not always make it possible to ensure that the consumer \ninformation as to the nature of the \nis provided with correct \nwith \nconstituent \nfoodstuffs marketed under the generic name of \"pasta\", which is used \nto designate products obtained from both common wheat and durum wheat. These products were the subject of the judgment of 14 July 1988 in \nCase 90/86, and it should be stressed that in this Case the Court \nupheld the listing of Ingredients in accordance with the provisions of \nthe Council Directive on the labelling and presentation of foodstuffs \n(ground 1 7 ). in particular \n\nis the case \n\nIt is therefore necessary to restrict the scope of the derogation \nprovided for \nin Article 6(2)(c) exclusively to cases in which \nindicating the single ingredient would appear to be superfluous \nbecause the ingredient already appears in the name under which the \nproduct is sold or where this name enables the consumer to make his \nchoice according to the nature of the ingredient. 4. Labelling of alcoholic beverages \n\nThe original version of Article 6(3) of Directive 79/112/EEC stated \nthat: \n\n\"In the case of beverages containing more than 1. 2% by volume of \nalcohol, the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, shall, \nbefore the expiry of a period of four years following notification of \nthis Directive, determine the rules for labelling and, possibly, \nindicating the alcoholic strength. \" \n\nIn accordance with this provision, the Commission, in October 1982, \nproposed an amendment to this Directive to make it compulsory to state \nIn the labelling of alcoholic beverages: \n\n- the alcoholic strength \n- the list of ingredients. However, this proposal was only partly adopted in Directive 86/197/EEC \non alcoholic strength. 1 As the second part on the compulsory listing \nof ingredients is still before the Council, it should be reactivated \nand appropriate consequences drawn in the light of the Judgment of \n12 March 1987 (Beer Purity Law) in Case 178/84. If the listing of \ningredients were made compulsory, there would be no need to mention \nany particular ingredient alongside the name under which the product \nis sold which could discredit the product. OJ L 144, 29. 5. 1986. - 4 -\n\nQuantitative statement of ingredients or constituents \n\nThe purpose of stating the content of certain ingredients is to \nprovide essential \ninformation with regard to the composition of \nfoodstuffs. It enables the consumer to make a better choice from \namong the large number and variety of products on the market, in \nparticular those which are similar in appearance but differ more or \nless substant ially. This additional information therefore helps to achieve the mutual \nrecognition of national regulations and standards on the names and \ncomposition of foodstuffs and provides producers with extra protection \nagainst unfair competition. indication \n\ncompulsory \n\nThe \nor \nconstituents should therefore be introduced in Article 3 of the \nlabelling Directive and Article 7 should be amended to specify the \ncases in which this indication Is required and the procedures \napplicable. the content \n\ningredients \n\nof \n\nof \n\nThe Commission takes the view that the measures proposed should be \nadopted as they derive from the principles evolved \n\nin particular \n\n- on the one hand, by the Court of Justice, which has had to state \nits opinion on this subject on several occasions. The judgments \nconcerned \n(Purity \nrequirements for beer) in Case 178/84 and 14 July 1988 (Pasta) in \nCase 90/86, In which it upheld that the \"compulsory affixing of \nsuitable labels giving the nature of the product sold\" was the most \nsuitable means of providing the consumer with information about the \ncomposition of the products as it appeared to constitute the least \nobstacle to the Importation of products lawfully manufactured and \nmarketed in other Member States. are those of \n\n12 March 1987 \n\n- on the other hand, in the two Commission communications entitled \nlegislation on \nthe \n\n\"Completion of the internal market: Community \nfoodstuffs\"1 \nCommun 11 y\". 2 \n\nfoodstuffs \n\nmovement \n\nwithin \n\n\"Free \n\nand \n\nof \n\n1 \n2 \n\nCOM(85)603 final. OJ C 271, 24. 10. 1989 \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nProposal for a Council directive amending Directive 79/112/EEC on the \n\napproximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, \n\npresentation and advertising of foodstuffs \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nand in particular Article 100a thereof, \n\nHaving regard to Council Directive 79/112/EEC of 18 December 1978 on the \n\napproximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, \n\npresentation and advertising of foodstuffs,1 last amended by Directive \n\n91/72/EEC2 and in particular Article 6(2)(c) and (3) and Article 7. Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,3 \n\nIn cooperation with the European Parliament,4 \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee,5 \n\nWhereas the measures aimed at the gradual establishment of the internal \n\nmarket must be adopted by 31 December 1992; whereas the internal market \n\nconsists of an area without internal frontiers within which the free \n\nmovement of goods, persons, services and capital is guaranteed; \n\nWhereas, in the context of the single Market, the use of the name customary \n\nin the Member State In which the product is manufactured should also be \n\nallowed In the case of products which will be sold in another Member State; \n\nWhereas with the two aims of providing the consumer with better information \n\nand ensuring fair trade the labelling rules as regards the exact nature and \n\ncharacteristics of products need to be further improved; \n\n1 OJ L 33, 08. 2. 1979, p. 1. 2 OJ L 42, 15. 2. 1991. 3 \n4 \n5 \n\n\f- 6 -\n\nWhereas the Court of Justice has delivered several judgements in which it \n\nrecommends detailed labelling, in particular the compulsory affixing of \n\nsuitable labels giving the nature of the product sold;4 whereas this \n\ncourse of action enables the consumer to make his choice in full knowledge \n\nof the facts and is the most appropriate since it creates the least \n\nobstacles to free trade; \n\nWhereas it is for the Community legislator to adopt measures deriving from \n\nthis case-1aw ; \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nDirective 79/1 if/EEC shall be amended as fellows: \n\n1. The following shall be added to Article 3(1): \n\n\"2a. the <tuantity of certain Ingredients or categories of ingredients;\" \n\n2. Article 5(1) shall be replaced by the following: \n\n1. The name under which a product is sold is \n\n(a) the name provided for in the laws, regulations or \n\nadministrative provisions applicable to it; \n\n(b) failing that, one and/or another of the following names: \n\n- the name customary in the Member State where the product is \n\neither manufactured or sold to the final consumer or mass \n\ncaterers. 4 \n\nJudgement of 9 December 1981 in Case 193/80 [1981] 3019 \nJudgement of 12 March 1987 In Case 178/84 [1987] 1262 \nJudgement of 14 July 1988 In Case 90/86 [1988] \n\n\f\f- 7 -\n\n- a description of the foodstuff and, if necessary, of its use \n\nwhich is clear enough to let the purchaser know its exact \n\nnature and to distinguish It from other products with which \n\nit could be confused. The name chosen in accordance with this point must not misleadthe \n\npurchaser. 3. Article 6 2c) shall be replaced by the following: \n\nH(c) products consisting of a single ingredient \n\nwhere the name under which the product is sold and the ingredient \n\nare the same or \n\nwhere the name under which the product is sold enables the nature \n\nof the ingredient to be clearly identified. \" \n\n4. Article 6(3) shall be replaced by the following: \n\n\"3. The rules for labelling the ingredients of drinks containing more \n\nthan 1. 2% alcohol by volume shall be determined \n\n(a) in the case of : \n\n- wines5 including sparkling wines,6 liqueur wines and \n\nsemi-sparkIing wines offered for sale to the consumer; \n\n- partially fermented grape must;6 \n\n- spirituous beverages;7 \n\n- aromatized wines8 \n\nby the specific Community provisions applicable to them. \" \n\n5 Council Regulation No 2392/89, OJ L 149, 14. 6. 91, p. 1. 6 Council Regulation No 3309/85, OJ L 320, 29. 11. 85, p. 9. 7 Council \n8 Council \n\n1576/89, OJ \n1601/91, OJ \n\nRegulation \nRegulation \n\nNo \nNo \n\nL 160, 12. 6. 89, p. 1. 14. 6. 91, p. 1. L 149, \n\n\f- 8 -\n\n(b) In the case of other products, in accordance with the procedure \n\nprovided for in Article 17. For all these products, the list of ingredients shall be \n\npreceded by the following: \"prepared with\". 5. Article 7 shall be replaced by the following: \n\n\"Article 7 \n\n1. The quantity of an ingredient or category of ingredients used in the \n\nmanufacture or preparation of a foodstuff shall be stated In accordance \n\nwith this Article. 2. This indication shall be compulsory where the ingredient or category of \n\ningredients concerned: \n\n(a) appears in the name under which the foodstuff is sold or is derived \n\nimplicitly therefrom; \n\n(b) Is emphasized on the labelling; \n\n(c) is essential to characterize a foodstuff and to distinguish it from \n\nproducts with which it might be confused. 3. Points (a) and (b) of paragraph 2 shall not apply \n\n(a) to an Ingredient: \n\n- which itself alone constitutes a foodstuff and Is sold as such; \n\n- the drained net weight of which is Indicated in accordance with \n\nArticle 8(4); \n\n- which is used in small quantities only as a flavouring. (b) in the cases referred to In the fourth and fifth indents of \n\nArticle 6(5)(a); \n\n(c) \\n all other cases determined in accordance with the procedure laid \n\ndown in Article 17. - s -\n\n4. The rules governing the application of point 2(c) shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17. 5. The quantity indicated is that used in the manufacture of the product \n\nexpressed as a percentage of a given quantity of the finished product \n\nin the units of measurement laid down in the first paragraph of \n\nArticle 8 ( 1 ). 6. In accordance with the procedure laid down In Article 17, it may be \n\ndecided, for certain foodstuffs, to make it compulsory to indicate the \n\nquantities of certain constituents contained therein. 7. Community provisions or, where there are none, national provisions may \n\nstipulate for certain foodstuffs that quantities of certain ingredients \n\nmust be indicated in absolute terms or as percentages and that, where \n\nappropriate, mention should be made of any alteration in the quantities \n\nof these ingredients. The procedure laid down in Article 16 shall apply to any such national \n\nprovisions. The Community provisions referred to in this paragraph shall be adopted \n\nin accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17. 8. This Article shall apply without prejudice to Community rules on \n\nnutrition labelling for foodstuffs. \" \n\nArticle 2 \n\n1. The Member States \n\nshall, where \n\nappropriate, \n\namend \n\ntheir \n\nlaws, \n\nregulations and administrative provisions in order to: \n\nallow trade in products conforming to this Directive no later than \n\n30 June 1993; \n\n\f- 10 -\n\nprohibit trade in products not conforming to this Directive no \n\nlater than 30 June 1994. However, trade in products not conforming \n\nto this Directive and labelled before that date is permitted until \n\nstocks are fully depleted. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. When the Member States adopt these provisions, the latter shall contain \n\na reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference \n\non the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making \n\nsuch a reference shaI I be laid down by the Member States. Article 3 \n\nThis Directive Is addressed to the Member States \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\n\f*~/<f-\n\nImpact statement \n\nImpact of the proposal on businesses and on small and medium-sized \nenterprises in particular \n\nTitle of the proposal: \n\nDraft proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 79/112/EEC on the \napproximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, \npresentation and advertising of foodstuffs \n\nReference of document: \n\nIl1/9081 Rev. 3 \n\nThe proposa I : \n\n1. Bearing in mind the principle of subsidiarity, why is Community \n\nlegislation In this field necessary, and what are its main aims? \n\nThe labelling of foodstuffs is already the subject of Community \nharmonization (Directive 79/112/EEC). The draft proposal is designed to \nfurther improve consumer information and promote the free movement of \ngoods. This Is to be achieved mainly by Introducing the principle of \nindicating the quantities of certain ingredients. In addition, the \nproposal alms to make it mandatory to give a list of ingredients of \nalcoholic beverages and to specify the cases In which products composed of \na single ingredient do not need to display a list of Ingredients. Impact on businesses: \n\n2. Who will be affected by the proposal? \n\n- which sectors of business? \n- what size of businesses (proportion of SMEs)? \n- are these businesses located in specific areas of the Community? \n\nThe rules governing the labelling of foodstuffs apply to all \nagri-foodstuffs businesses, whether multinationals or SMEs. The businesses \nare spread throughout the Community. However, one part of the draft \nconcerns producers of alcoholic beverages more particularly. 3. What measures will businesses have to take to comply with the \n\nproposal? \n\nBusinesses will have to modify the labelling of their products to include \nthe additional information required by the new directive. -il \n\n4. What are the likely economic effects of the proposal: \n\n- on employment? \n- on investment and the creation of new businesses? \n- on the competitiveness of businesses? \n\nOne of the principles underlying the adoption of Community legislation on \nlabelling Is that of fair trading. The adoption of these new rules should \nfurther boost trade within the Community, which Is likely to have a \nfavourable impact on the competitiveness of businesses. 5. Does the proposal include measures to take account of the specific \nsituation of small and medium-sized enterprises (less stringent or \ndifferent requirements, etc. )? \n\nNo, since accurate consumer information is necessary for products \nmanufactured by both large businesses and SMEs. Consultation \n\n6. List of organisations which have been consulted on the proposal and \nhave broadly defined their position \n\nThe Advisory Committee on Foodstuffs, which includes representatives from \ntrade, industry, agriculture, consumers' organizations and trade unions, \nwas consulted on the draft. Its position was favourable by and large, \nalthough representatives of the wine industry and agriculture expressed \nreservations concerning the inclusion of a list of ingredients for wine and \nother alcoholic beverages. ISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(91)536 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n10 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-91-589-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-78845-3 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/75a57001-6b8d-4617-8a49-1a3fd5e36f19", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 875/92 of 7 April 1992 determining the loss of income and the premium applicable per ewe and per female goat for the 1991 marketing year in the Member States", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "goat,production aid,sheep,slaughter premium", "workIds": "celex:31992R0875,oj:JOL_1992_093_R_0008_016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["goat", "production aid", "sheep", "slaughter premium"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/75a57001-6b8d-4617-8a49-1a3fd5e36f19", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b8828cd1-c8bb-4828-bb3b-a74657e43998", "title": "The finances of Europe : the budgetary and financial law of the European Communities.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "Community budget,ECSC,EU financing,European Investment Bank,European Monetary System,budget authorisation,financial autonomy,financing of the EU budget,public finance", "workIds": "PUB_CM6090280", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "ECSC", "EU financing", "European Investment Bank", "European Monetary System", "budget authorisation", "financial autonomy", "financing of the EU budget", "public finance"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b8828cd1-c8bb-4828-bb3b-a74657e43998", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5e13ac50-3b8c-4e37-98a2-2f77beb460a8", "title": "RESOLUTION on the C mmunication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament ' Towards Trans-European Networks -For a Community Action Programme'", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "data transmission,energy policy,financing method,telecommunications,transmission network,transport infrastructure,transport network", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0125", "eurovoc_concepts": ["data transmission", "energy policy", "financing method", "telecommunications", "transmission network", "transport infrastructure", "transport network"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5e13ac50-3b8c-4e37-98a2-2f77beb460a8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0fe3ec57-1efb-4814-9d92-5ce683224ee0", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 2727/75 on the common organization of the market in cereals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "EU aid,agricultural production,aid to agriculture,cereal-growing,reform of the CAP", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0133(02)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "agricultural production", "aid to agriculture", "cereal-growing", "reform of the CAP"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0fe3ec57-1efb-4814-9d92-5ce683224ee0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19729710-c85e-11e6-a6db-01aa75ed71a1", "title": "Au\u00dfenhandel nach Verkehrszweigen.,Commerce ext\u00e9rieur par mode de transport.,External trade by mode of transport.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "air transport,foreign trade,mode of transport,originating product,statistics,trade by group of countries", "workIds": "PUB_CA7291487", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air transport", "foreign trade", "mode of transport", "originating product", "statistics", "trade by group of countries"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19729710-c85e-11e6-a6db-01aa75ed71a1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ac759ff7-4fe6-47ba-900b-960abdc6dbcd", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation fixing the target price for milk and the intervention prices for butter, skimmed-milk powder and Grana Padano and Parmigiano Reggiano cheeses for three annual periods from 1 July 1993 to 30 June 1996", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "butter,common agricultural policy,fixing of prices,hard cheese,intervention price,milk,skimmed milk powder,target price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0131", "eurovoc_concepts": ["butter", "common agricultural policy", "fixing of prices", "hard cheese", "intervention price", "milk", "skimmed milk powder", "target price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ac759ff7-4fe6-47ba-900b-960abdc6dbcd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b082b761-7c9a-4210-9cfb-e5d578df33bd", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation on the common organization of the market in cereals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "EU aid,agricultural production,aid to agriculture,cereal-growing,reform of the CAP", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0133", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "agricultural production", "aid to agriculture", "cereal-growing", "reform of the CAP"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b082b761-7c9a-4210-9cfb-e5d578df33bd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fbc51878-ef55-49b6-9d80-a31d3563010d", "title": "Au\u00dfenhandel - Warenverzeichnis : gegen\u00fcberstellungen KN 1991; J\u00e4hrliche Evolution KN (1990-1991)KN 1991:SITC Rev,3; CAT.TEXT; NACE/CLIO(D); AGRI.REGL; B.M.SITC Rev.3; B.M.; NACE/CLIO(D); CAT.TEXT; AGRI.REGL:KN 1991; J\u00e4hrliche Evolution KN (1991-1992).,Commerce ext\u00e9rieur - nomenclature des marchandises: tables de concordances NC 1991; \u00c9volution annuelle de la NC (1990-1991)CN 1991:SITC Rev:3; CAT.TEXT; NACE/CLIO(D); AGRI.REGL; S.U.SITC Rev.3; S.U.NACE/CLIO(D); CAT.TEXT; AGRI.REGL:CN 1991; \u00c9volution annuelle de la NC (1991-1992).,External trade - nomenclature of goods : correlation tables CN 1991; Yearly evolution of CN(1991-1992)CN 1991:SITC Rev.3;CAT.TEXT; NACE/CLIO(D); AGRI.REGL; S.U.SITC Rev.3; S.U.; NACE/CLIO(D)CAT.TEXT; AGRI.REGL:CN 1991; Yearly evolution of CN(1991-1992).", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "foreign trade,free movement of goods,statistical nomenclature,statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA7291213", "eurovoc_concepts": ["foreign trade", "free movement of goods", "statistical nomenclature", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fbc51878-ef55-49b6-9d80-a31d3563010d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c4281015-e2c1-4926-97c3-83be7ca2a9bb", "title": "Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters on the provisional application of the Protocol establishing, for the period from 3 May 1990 to 2 May 1992, the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the people's Republic of Angola on fishing off Angola", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Angola,European Economic Community", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "Angola,agreement (EU),fishing agreement,fishing industry", "workIds": "celex:21990A0807(05)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Angola", "agreement (EU)", "fishing agreement", "fishing industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c4281015-e2c1-4926-97c3-83be7ca2a9bb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d2150a91-7a0f-4a2a-9c76-eec02a611d9a", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "EU aid,agricultural production,aid to agriculture,cereal-growing,reform of the CAP", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0133(01)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "agricultural production", "aid to agriculture", "cereal-growing", "reform of the CAP"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d2150a91-7a0f-4a2a-9c76-eec02a611d9a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7a8aa996-1f5e-4621-b1a1-7c927505bc8c", "title": "92/295/EEC: Commission Recommendation of 7 April 1992 on codes of practice for the protection of consumers in respect of contracts negotiated at a distance (distance selling)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#recommendation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "consumer information,consumer protection,distance selling,professional association,sales promotion,supplier", "workIds": "celex:31992H0295,oj:JOL_1992_156_R_0021_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["consumer information", "consumer protection", "distance selling", "professional association", "sales promotion", "supplier"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7a8aa996-1f5e-4621-b1a1-7c927505bc8c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c898f72f-5b03-406c-a837-c91480dc4c03", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation instituting a dairy cow premium", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-07", "subjects": "common agricultural policy,dairy cow", "workIds": "celex:51991AP0131(01)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common agricultural policy", "dairy cow"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c898f72f-5b03-406c-a837-c91480dc4c03", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06b5be4a-cedb-42ae-8413-ea85636a1f3e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 794/92 by Mr Jean-Pierre RAFFARIN to the Commission. Joint coastal management", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,RAFFARIN", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Mediterranean region (EU),Structural Funds,coastal protection,coastal region,environmental policy,pollution control measures", "workIds": "celex:91992E000794", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Mediterranean region (EU)", "Structural Funds", "coastal protection", "coastal region", "environmental policy", "pollution control measures"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06b5be4a-cedb-42ae-8413-ea85636a1f3e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/28fff2c3-fdf0-4f52-9166-a507efd80f4f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 749/92 by Mrs Mary BANOTTI to the Commission. European Nutrition Year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANOTTI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Treaty on European Union,health policy,nutrition", "workIds": "celex:91992E000749", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Treaty on European Union", "health policy", "nutrition"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/28fff2c3-fdf0-4f52-9166-a507efd80f4f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34c2f0cb-bab3-41ef-99dd-0fca467d760d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 754/92 by Mr James NICHOLSON to the Commission. Milk superlevy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,NICHOLSON", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "agricultural levy,dairy production,marketing", "workIds": "celex:91992E000754", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural levy", "dairy production", "marketing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34c2f0cb-bab3-41ef-99dd-0fca467d760d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/45a29608-acb8-44d1-be44-1299b63c28cd", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 775/92 by Mr Filippos PIERROS to European Political Cooperation. Exodus of nuclear scientists from the former USSR", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PIERROS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "USSR,international organisation,military research,nuclear industry,peaceful use of energy,research body,research staff,vocational retraining", "workIds": "celex:91992E000775", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "international organisation", "military research", "nuclear industry", "peaceful use of energy", "research body", "research staff", "vocational retraining"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/45a29608-acb8-44d1-be44-1299b63c28cd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/94c469dd-252f-4c5b-a7f5-f2883b34b344", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 720/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Water supply for Attica from the province of Boeotia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Central Greece,Integrated Mediterranean Programmes,Structural Funds,engineering structure,environmental impact,hydrology,impact study,water supply", "workIds": "celex:91992E000720", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "Integrated Mediterranean Programmes", "Structural Funds", "engineering structure", "environmental impact", "hydrology", "impact study", "water supply"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/94c469dd-252f-4c5b-a7f5-f2883b34b344", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ce3ddba-4950-449f-9eab-444f529e6e59", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 766/92 by Mrs Ursula SCHLEICHER to the Commission. Commission communication on a Community strategy to limit carbon dioxide emissions and improve energy efficiency", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCHLEICHER", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "anhydride,energy consumption,energy policy,energy supply,energy use,pollution control measures,price of energy,tax system", "workIds": "celex:91992E000766", "eurovoc_concepts": ["anhydride", "energy consumption", "energy policy", "energy supply", "energy use", "pollution control measures", "price of energy", "tax system"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ce3ddba-4950-449f-9eab-444f529e6e59", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7972c787-8f13-4ea8-af68-32312e3caddb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 762/92 by Mr Alonso PUERTA to the Commission. Quarries in the municipality of Oviedo (Asturias, Spain) and their negative impact on the environment", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PUERTA", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Principality of Asturias,environmental impact,environmental protection,impact study,mining extraction,mining operation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000762", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Principality of Asturias", "environmental impact", "environmental protection", "impact study", "mining extraction", "mining operation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7972c787-8f13-4ea8-af68-32312e3caddb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe8336dc-2899-49eb-b04f-98b3bd84bef1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 769/92 by Mr Christopher JACKSON to the Commission. Mutual recognition of teachers' qualifications", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,JACKSON CHRISTOPHER", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU national,France,administrative competition,migrant worker,professional qualifications,recognition of diplomas,teacher", "workIds": "celex:91992E000769", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "France", "administrative competition", "migrant worker", "professional qualifications", "recognition of diplomas", "teacher"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe8336dc-2899-49eb-b04f-98b3bd84bef1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/737c51d3-93fb-4382-b273-a33de9e8f12d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 774/92 by Mr Giulio FANTUZZI to the Council. Situation in the Italian wine-growing sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FANTUZZI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Italy,common organisation of markets,distillation,natural disaster,stock,table wine,viticulture,wine", "workIds": "celex:91992E000774", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "common organisation of markets", "distillation", "natural disaster", "stock", "table wine", "viticulture", "wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/737c51d3-93fb-4382-b273-a33de9e8f12d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7552bd19-cd73-4a78-8f79-d367d5c79c68", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 721/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Road safety in Greece", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Greece,fuel tax,public works,research report,road safety,traffic signs", "workIds": "celex:91992E000721", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "fuel tax", "public works", "research report", "road safety", "traffic signs"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7552bd19-cd73-4a78-8f79-d367d5c79c68", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/28332de2-04e1-410a-a47c-44c25a29d271", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION APROVING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION IN DEALING WITH POLLUTION OF THE NORTH SEA BY OIL AND OTHER HARMFUL SUBSTANCES, AS SIGNED IN BONN ON 13 SEPTEMBER 1983", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "North Sea,amendment,cooperation agreement,dangerous substance,oil pollution,pollution control measures", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0133,comnat:COM_1992_0133_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_114_R_0013_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["North Sea", "amendment", "cooperation agreement", "dangerous substance", "oil pollution", "pollution control measures"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/28332de2-04e1-410a-a47c-44c25a29d271", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 133 final \n\nBrussels, 6 April 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nAPPROVING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS \nTO THE AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION \nIN DEALING WITH POLLUTION \nOF THE NORTH SEA BY OIL \nAND OTHER HARMFUL SUBSTANCES, \nAS SIGNED IN BONN ON 13 SEPTEMBER 1983 \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fe \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. The Council decided on 28 June 1984 to approve, on behalf of the \nEuropean Economic Community, the Agreement for cooperation In dealing \nwith pollution of the North Sea by oil and other harmful substances,1 \nwhich was signed in Bonn on 13 September 1983. This Agreement provides for various ways of cooperation which apply \nwhenever the presence or the prospective presence of oil or other \nharmful subst. -ices polluting or threatening to pollute the sea within \nthe North Sea area presents a grave and imminent danger to the coast or \nrelated Interests of one or more Contracting Parties. 2. At the Second International Conference for the Protection of the North \nSea in London on 24 and 25 November 1987 the Ministers responsible for \nthe protection of the North Sea of the governments of the Member States \non the North Sea, and the Member of the Commission of the European \nCommunities responsible for environmental protection agreed to: \n\n\"use airborne surveillance, when appropriate with bilateral or \nmultilateral cooperation, as an aid to enforcing anti-poMution \nregulatIons; \n\n\"take appropriate action with the aim of improving and, where necessary, \nextending in other suitable frameworks, international cooperation on \nairborne surveillance of the North Sea which has been initiated in the \nBonn Agreement-\n\n'continue to use the Bonn Agreement as the appropriate framework for the \nexchange of Information on developments In the technology of remote \nsensing and for exchanging Information about the results of cooperation \ntrials to evaluate the technique-\ncontinue to exploit the capability of airborne survel Nance for \nproviding information about levels of oil pollution in the sea'; \n\nn continue to gain experience In the use of remote sensing devices with a \nview to improving the enforcement of existing regulations, particularly \nwith respect to the prosecution of offenders\". 2 \n\nActive participation in this Conference was mentioned among the main \nobjectives of Community measures in the field of protection of the \nmarine environment in the fourth European Community Action Programme on \nthe envIronment. 3 \n\n1 Decision 84/358/EEC, OJ L 188, 16. 7. 1984, p. 7. 2 Paragraphs 46 to 50 of the Ministerial Declaration adopted at the Second \n\nInternational Conference for the Protection of the North Sea. 3 OJ C 328, 7. 12. 1987. 3 \n\n3. The Agreement signed In Bonn on 13 September 1983 merely sets out rules \nand regulations regarding cooperation between the Contracting Parties In \nthe event of critical situations - In particular when their coastlines \nor related Interests are In danger. In other words, It contains no \nprovisions for activities designed to prevent pollution caused by the \ndischarge of oil and other harmful substances or to prosecute offenders \nwho are In breach of anti-pollution regulations. Implementation of the decisions adopted at the Second International \nConference for the Protection of the North Sea thus requires that the \n1983 Bonn Agreement be amended and new provisions concerning \nsurvelI I lance Incorporated, both as an Instrument for better monitoring \nof the application of existing regulations and as a means of more rapid \ndetection of the presence of the abovementloned substances. 4. Pursuant to Article 16(1) of the Agreement, therefore, the Contracting \n19 to \nParties, at \nfirst meeting held \n22 September 1989, endorsed a proposal for an amendment designed to \nestablish an appropriate legal framework for Intensifying cooperation on \npollution surveillance in the North Sea. in Bonn \n\ntheir \n\nfrom \n\n5. In addition, the Contracting Parties decided to amend the demarcation \nzone of the Skagerrak, as set out in Article 2(a) of the Agreement, in \norder to rectify a material error which had been pointed out by the \nDanish authorities. 6. The amendments can enter Into force only when they have been approved by \n\nall the Contracting Parties In accordance with Article 16(2). 7. Accordingly, the Commission is forwarding the attached proposal for a \nDecision for adoption by the Council, approving the amendments to the \nBonn Agreement adopted by the Contracting Parties at their first \nmeetIng. y \n\nProposal for a CPUnc 11 Pec Is Ion approving certain amendments to the \nAgreement for cooperation In dealing with pollution of the North Sea by oil \nand other harmful substances, as signed In Bonn on 13 September 1983 \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \nand In particular Article 130s thereof, \n\nHaving regard U the proposal from the Commission,1 \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,2 \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee,3 \n\nWhereas the Council of the European Communities decided on 28 June 1984 to \nconclude the Agreement for cooperation In dealing with pollution of the \nNorth Sea by oil and other harmful substances signed In Bonn on \n13 September 1983;4 \n\nWhereas the Contracting Parties to this Agreement, at their first meeting \nheld in Bonn from 19 to 22 September 1989, agreed on a number of amendments \ndesigned to include in the Agreement provisions concerning pollution \nsurveillance activities, in order to ensure implementation of Paragraphs 46 \nto 50 of the Ministerial Declaration adopted at the Second International \nConference for the Protection of the North Sea held In London on 24 and \n25 November 1987; \n\nWhereas the Contracting Parties also decided to amend the demarcation zone \nof the Skagerrak, as set out in Article 2(a) of the Agreement; \n\nWhereas the amendments can come Into force only when they have been \napproved by all the Contracting Parties, In accordance with Article 16(2), \n\nHAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nArtIcle 1 \n\nThe amendments to the Agreement for cooperation in dealing with pollution \nof the North Sea by oil and other harmful substances, agreed upon by the \nContracting Parties at their first meeting held in Bonn from 19 to \n22 September 1989, are hereby approved on behalf of the European Economic \nCommun11 y. 1 \n2 \n3 \n4 Decision 84/358/EEC, OJ L 188, 16. 7. 1984. ^ \n\nThe text of the amendments Is attached to this Decision \n\nArticle 2 \n\nThe President of the Council shall notify the Depositary Government \nreferred to In Article 16(2) of the Agreement of the adoption of this \nInstrument of approval. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the CounciI \nThe President \n\n\fc \n\nDECISION \n\nOF 22 SEPTEMBER 1989 \n\nCONCERNING AMENDMENTS \n\nOF THE AGREEMENT \n\nTHE CONTRACTING PARTIES \nin Dealing with Pollution of \nthe North Sea by Oil and Other Harmful Substances, done at Bonn on 13 September 1983 \n(hereinafter referred to as \"the Agreement\"); \n\nfor Co-operation \n\nthe Agreement \n\nto \n\n1 of \n\nthe Agreement \n\nRECALLING Article \nthe \nNorth Sea by Oil and Other Harmful Substances, done at Bonn on 13 September 1983, \nthe prospective \nshall apply whenever \nthe Agreement \naccording \npresence of oil or other harmful \nsea \nsubstances polluting or \nwithin \nrelated \ninterests of one or more Contracting Parties; \n\nthe North Sea presents a grave and \n\nthe presence \nthreatening \n\nin Dealing with Pollution of \n\npollute \ncoast or \n\nfor Co-operation \n\nto which \n\nimminent \n\ndanger \n\nthe \n\nthe \n\nor \n\nto \n\nto \n\nRECALLING paragraph XVI, subparagraphs 46 \nSecond \n24-25 November 1987; \n\nInternational Conference on \n\nto 50 of \n\nthe Ministerial Declaration of \n\nthe Protection of \n\nthe North Sea, held \n\nin London \n\nthe \nfrom \n\nRECOGNIZING \ns u r v e i l l a n ce \nanti-pollution regulations; \n\nthat \n\nan \n\nas \n\nthe Agreement does not contain provisions \n\na id \n\nto \n\nd e t e c t i ng \n\np o l l u t i on \n\na nd \n\nto \n\nreferring \np r e v e n t i ng \n\nthe use of \n\nto \nv i o l a t i o ns \n\nof \n\nDESIRING to extend the scope of the Agreement to such activities; \n\nRECOGNIZING ALSO \ndefined in Article 2 of the Agreement; \n\nthe need \n\nto adjust \n\nthe southern geographical \n\nlimit of \n\nthe Skagerrak as \n\nHAVE AGREED to amend the Agreement as follows: \n\nArticle I \n\nArticle 1 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: \n\n\"This Agreement shall apply: \n\n^i) \n\n(2) \n\np r e s e n ce \n\nw h e n e v er \nsubstances \nas defined \nthe coast or related interests of one or more Contracting Parties, and \n\nt he \npolluting \nin Article 2 of \n\nor me prospective \nto pollute \n\np r e s e n ce \nthe \n\nthreatening \n\nor \n\nthis Agreement, presents a grave and \n\nsea within \n\noil \n\noi \n\nor \n\nother \n\nharmtul \nthe North Sea area, \nto \nimminent danger \n\nsurveillance \n\nc o n d u c t ed \n\nin \n\ns u ch \n\np o l l u t i on \n\nto \nc o m b a t i ng \nregulations. \" \n\nthe North Sea area \na nd \n\np r e v e n t i ng \n\nto \n\nan \n\nas \nv i n i. i t i o ns \n\naid \n\nto \n\ndetecting and \n\nof \n\na n t i - i; D i l u t i on \n\n\fArticle 2 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: \n\nArticle II \n\n-7 \n\nthe purpose \n\n\"For \nthis Agreement \nsouthwards of latitude 61 \u00b0 N. together with: \n\nof \n\nthe North Sea area means \n\nthe North Sea \n\nproper \n\n(a) \n\n(b) \n\nthe Skagerrak, \nlatitude 5 7\u00b0 44' 43\"N; \n\nthe southern \n\nlimit of which \n\nis determined east of \n\nthe Skaw by \n\nthe \n\nthe English Channel \nmiles to the west of a line joining the Scilly isles and Ushant. \" \n\nits approaches eastwards \n\nand \n\nof \n\na \n\nline drawn \n\nfifty \n\nnautical \n\nArticle 3 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: \n\nArticle III \n\nThe Contracting Parties \n\n\"(1) \nAgreement call for active co-operation between them. consider \n\nthat \n\nthe matters \n\nreferred \n\nto \n\nin Article \n\n1 of \n\nthis \n\nThe C o n t r a c t i ng Parties \n\n(2) \np r a c t i c a l, \no p e r a t i o n al \nsurveillance as referred to in Article 6A. \" \n\na nd \n\nt e c h n i c al \n\nshall \n\njointly develop \n\nand \nj o i nt \n\nestablish \na c t i on \n\nguidelines \n\nfor \n\nthe \n\na nd \n\nc o - o r d i n a t ed \n\na s p e c ts \n\nof \n\nArticle IV \n\nArticle 4 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: \n\n\"Contracting Parties undertake to inform the other Contracting Parties about: \n\ntheir national \n\n(a) \nArticle 1 paragraph 1 of this Agreement, and for enforcing anti-pollution regulations; \n\nfor dealing with pollution \n\norganisation \n\nthe \n\nof \n\nkind \n\nreferred \n\nto \n\nin \n\nthe \n\n(b) \npollution and \nco-ordinated surveillance between Contracting Parties; \n\ndealing with questions \n\ncompetent \nfor \n\nresponsible \n\nauthorities \n\nfor \n\nreceiving and dispatching \n\nreports of \nof mutual assistance \n\nsuch \nand \n\nconcerning measures \n\ntheir national means \n\n(c) \nmade available for international assistance; \n\nfor avoiding or dealing with \n\nsuch \n\npollution, which might \n\nbe \n\nnew ways \n\n(d) \ndeal with it; \n\nin which such pollution may be avoided and about new effective measures \n\nto \n\n(e) \n\nmajor pollution incidents of this kind dealt with; \n\n(f) \n\nnew developments in the technology of conducting surveillance, \n\ntheir experience \n\n(g) \nof \nthe \nuse in co-operation with other Contracting Parties; \n\nthe use of surveillance means and \nviolations \n\nprevention \n\np o l l u t i on \n\na nd \n\nof \n\nof \n\nin \n\ntechniques \n\nin \n\nthe \n\na n t i - p o l l u t i on \n\nr e g u l a t i o n s, \n\ndetection \ni n c l u d i ng \n\n(h) \n\ninformation of mutual interest derived from their surveillance activities; \n\ntheir \n\n(i) \nwith other Contracting Parties. \" \n\nn a t i o n al \n\np r o g r a m m es \n\nfor \n\nsurveillance, \n\ni n c l u d i ng \n\nc o - o p e r a t i ve \n\na r r a n g e m e n ts \n\n\fA new Article 6A shall be added to the Agreement as follows: \n\nArticle V \n\nZ \n\nof \n\nbe \nshall \nresponsibility \n\n\"Surveillance \nzone \njoint \nAgreement. The Contracting Parties may \nfor co-operation \non or make arrangements \nor part of the zones of the Parties concerned. \" \n\ncarried \nor \n\nzones \n\nof \n\nout. as appropriate, \n\nby \nresponsibility \nbilaterally \nin \n\nthe C o n t r a c t i ng Parties \nto \nreferred \nor multilaterally \nthe organisation of surveillance \n\nin Article \nc o n c l u de \n\ntheir \nin \n6 of \nthis \nagreements \nthe whole \n\nin \n\nArticle 8 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: \n\nArticle VI \n\nThe provisions \na nd \n\n\"(1) \nthe \nin the field of the prevention and combating of marine pollution. this Agreement shall not be \n\nc \nobligations \n\nthe Contracting Parties \n\nrights \n\nof \n\ninterpreted as \nunder \n\nin any w ay \n\ninternational \n\nlaw. prejudicing \nespecially \n\nIn no case shall \n\nthe division \n\ninto zones \n\nreferred \n\nto \n\nas a \n\np r e c e d e nt \n\nor a r g u m e nt \n\nin a ny matter \n\nin Article 6 of \nc o n c e r n i ng \n\nthis Agreement \nor \n\nsovereignty \n\n(2) \nbe \njurisdiction. i n v o k ed \n\nThe division \n\n(3) \nrestrict \nlaw surveillance activities beyond the limits of their zones. \" \n\nrights of Contracting Parties \n\ninto zones \n\nreferred \n\nin Article 6 of \nout \ncarry \n\nthe \n\nto \n\nto \n\nthis Agreement \nshall \nin accordance with \n\nin no way \ninternational \n\nArticle 9 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: \n\nArticle VII \n\nof \n\nIn \n\nthe \n\nabsence \n\n\"(1) \nactions \nb i l a t e r al \nC o n t r a c t i ng Parties \npollution in accordance with subparagraph (a) or subparagraph (b) below: \n\nto deal with pollution which might \nor on \nthe \n\nof Contracting Parties \nbasis \n\nthe o c c a s i on \ntheir \n\nof \na \nrespective \n\nor multilateral \n\nan agreement \n\nconcerning \n\nfinancial \n\ncosts \n\nshall \n\nj o i nt \n\nbear \n\nthe \n\nof \n\narrangements \n\nbe \n\nc o n c l u d ed \n\ngoverning \non a \no p e r a t i o n, \ndealing with \n\nc o m b a t i ng \n\nactions \n\nin \n\n(a) \n\n(b) \n\nIf \nthe action was \nContracting Party, \nto the assisting Contracting Party the costs of its action; \n\ntaken by one Contracting Party at \nthe Contracting Party \n\nrequesting \n\nthe express \nsuch assistance \n\nrequest of another \nreimburse \n\nshall \n\nt he. If \nContracting Party shall bear the costs of its action. a c t i on w as \n\nt a k en \n\nby a C o n t r a c t i ng Party \n\nThe Contracting Party \nit \n\n(2) \nin \nContracting Party. case \n\nshall \n\nthat \n\nbear \n\nrequesting assistance may cancel \nor \n\ncosts already \n\nincurred \n\nthe \n\non \n\nits \n\no wn \n\ni n i t i a t i v e, \n\nthis \n\nits \ncommitted \n\nrequest at any \nthe \n\nby \n\ntime, but \nassisting \n\nUnless \n\n(3) \notherwise \neach Contracting Party \naccordance with Article 6A. \" \n\nspecified \nshall bear \n\nin bilateral \n\nor multilateral \n\nagreements \n\nor \n\nthe \n\ncosts of \n\nits \n\nsurveillance \n\nactivities \n\nArticle VIII \n\narrangements, \nin \n\nout \n\ncarried \n\nThe Contracting Parties shall notify \nthe Depositary Government \namendments in accordance with Article 16, paragraph 2 of the Agreement. of \n\ntheir approval of \n\nthese \n\n\f5 \n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 133 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n14 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-147-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-42756-6 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c7c1ae5d-9b5e-463d-a6b1-0ac93501ca7b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 747/92 by Mrs Mary BANOTTI to the Commission. Directive on liability for construction services", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANOTTI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "BEUC,EC Directive,building industry,consumer movement,damage,guarantee,liability,maintenance", "workIds": "celex:91992E000747", "eurovoc_concepts": ["BEUC", "EC Directive", "building industry", "consumer movement", "damage", "guarantee", "liability", "maintenance"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c7c1ae5d-9b5e-463d-a6b1-0ac93501ca7b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4b9d9a29-368e-45b0-ace3-358579af3ca4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 750/92 by Mary BANOTTI to the Commission. Cot Death Syndrome", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANOTTI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "early childhood,infant mortality,medical research,research programme", "workIds": "celex:91992E000750", "eurovoc_concepts": ["early childhood", "infant mortality", "medical research", "research programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4b9d9a29-368e-45b0-ace3-358579af3ca4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/887ba3c5-630a-4a55-a391-8aef64240ff6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 735/92 by Mr Luigi MORETTI to the Commission. Failure by Italy to provide notification of national measures to implement directives on transport policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORETTI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,Italy,access to a profession,application of EU law,carrier,market access,recognition of diplomas,right of establishment,transport policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000735", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "Italy", "access to a profession", "application of EU law", "carrier", "market access", "recognition of diplomas", "right of establishment", "transport policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/887ba3c5-630a-4a55-a391-8aef64240ff6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5dd1edbb-760f-437a-8f20-270bf1221f7f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 780/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Protection of ecosystems from the natural gas pipeline", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Greece,Structural Funds,degradation of the environment,ecosystem,environmental impact,environmental protection,gas pipeline,impact study,protected area", "workIds": "celex:91992E000780", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "Structural Funds", "degradation of the environment", "ecosystem", "environmental impact", "environmental protection", "gas pipeline", "impact study", "protected area"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5dd1edbb-760f-437a-8f20-270bf1221f7f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/407bcc7e-4c60-41a6-9484-d132db8b5519", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 767/92 by Mrs Eva-Maria QUISTORP to the Commission. Environmental education", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,QUISTORP", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "European cooperation,dissemination of information,environmental protection,exchange of information,new educational methods,report,teacher training,teaching curriculum,university research", "workIds": "celex:91992E000767", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "dissemination of information", "environmental protection", "exchange of information", "new educational methods", "report", "teacher training", "teaching curriculum", "university research"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/407bcc7e-4c60-41a6-9484-d132db8b5519", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b42d55ac-4acf-4c21-b44e-94dbdbc180f1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 729/92 by Mr Luigi MORETTI to the Commission. Violent incidents at the border between Albania and Greece", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORETTI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Albania,Greece,cooperation agreement,democratisation,frontier region,national election,national minority,violence", "workIds": "celex:91992E000729", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Albania", "Greece", "cooperation agreement", "democratisation", "frontier region", "national election", "national minority", "violence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b42d55ac-4acf-4c21-b44e-94dbdbc180f1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f95bb794-dbe2-4ad5-ba1f-08f695dc2189", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 778/92 by Mr Diego de los SANTOS L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Application in Spain of the directive on insider dealing", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LOS SANTOS LOPEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EC Directive,Spain,application of EU law,confidentiality,international criminal law,stock-exchange transaction", "workIds": "celex:91992E000778", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "Spain", "application of EU law", "confidentiality", "international criminal law", "stock-exchange transaction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f95bb794-dbe2-4ad5-ba1f-08f695dc2189", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/257e57e4-9fb1-4b65-bb96-71b433cd796b", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 915/92 of 6 April 1992 amending Regulations (EEC) No 3877/91 and (EEC) No 3878/91 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for certain hand made products and certain handwoven fabrics, pile and chenille (1992)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "tariff quota,textile product", "workIds": "celex:31992R0915,oj:JOL_1992_098_R_0003_015", "eurovoc_concepts": ["tariff quota", "textile product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/257e57e4-9fb1-4b65-bb96-71b433cd796b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a37718ab-6370-4f1c-84d4-690f412156e2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 770/92 by Mr William NEWTON DUNN to the Commission. State-owned schools and fees from abroad", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,NEWTON DUNN William Francis", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "anti-discriminatory measure,competence of the Member States,public education,school fees,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E000770", "eurovoc_concepts": ["anti-discriminatory measure", "competence of the Member States", "public education", "school fees", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a37718ab-6370-4f1c-84d4-690f412156e2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/812a5526-6dd9-4d26-ba28-d26e67a92fc8", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 713/92 by Mr David MARTIN to the Commission. Underfunding of TIDE (Technology for the Socio- Economic Integration of Disabled and Elderly People)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MARTIN DAVID", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU financing,disabled person,elderly person,social integration,technology,telecommunications,telematics", "workIds": "celex:91992E000713", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "disabled person", "elderly person", "social integration", "technology", "telecommunications", "telematics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/812a5526-6dd9-4d26-ba28-d26e67a92fc8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f5843406-e20c-49e1-b640-d9a6801ed432", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 784/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The environment of Stratoni in Chalkidiki", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Macedonia,chemical industry,metal pollution,toxic substance,waste disposal", "workIds": "celex:91992E000784", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Macedonia", "chemical industry", "metal pollution", "toxic substance", "waste disposal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f5843406-e20c-49e1-b640-d9a6801ed432", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fc491965-f87a-47c7-a985-f9e638899658", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 789/92 by Mr Hemmo MUNTINGH to the Commission. Compliance with the MARPOL Convention", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MUNTINGH", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "International Maritime Organisation,hydrocarbon,international convention,marine pollution,polluter pays principle", "workIds": "celex:91992E000789", "eurovoc_concepts": ["International Maritime Organisation", "hydrocarbon", "international convention", "marine pollution", "polluter pays principle"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fc491965-f87a-47c7-a985-f9e638899658", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8943218b-910b-4821-9866-46da17ca6f25", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 791/92 by Mr Alexandros ALAVANOS to the Commission. Measures to safeguard shipyards and ' Piraikis -Patraikis' in Syros", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ALAVANOS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Aegean Islands,Integrated Mediterranean Programmes,State aid,Structural Funds,report,shipbuilding", "workIds": "celex:91992E000791", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Aegean Islands", "Integrated Mediterranean Programmes", "State aid", "Structural Funds", "report", "shipbuilding"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8943218b-910b-4821-9866-46da17ca6f25", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c64b984d-3d9f-40aa-b9d3-d6d9ad4ffdeb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 744/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO to the Commission. Delay by the Spanish Government in paying Community grants", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GIL-ROBLES GIL-DELGADO", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "European Social Fund,Spain,Structural Funds,free service,regional development,school-industry relations,small and medium-sized enterprises,use of aid,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E000744", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Fund", "Spain", "Structural Funds", "free service", "regional development", "school-industry relations", "small and medium-sized enterprises", "use of aid", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c64b984d-3d9f-40aa-b9d3-d6d9ad4ffdeb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c82bc197-4bef-492c-9752-31ec932e50ee", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 718/92 by Bartho PRONK to the Commission. Pollution of the Schelde and Meuse rivers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PRONK", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Belgium,France,Netherlands,application of EU law,dangerous substance,decontamination,drinking water,environmental monitoring,health risk,pollution of waterways", "workIds": "celex:91992E000718", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgium", "France", "Netherlands", "application of EU law", "dangerous substance", "decontamination", "drinking water", "environmental monitoring", "health risk", "pollution of waterways"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c82bc197-4bef-492c-9752-31ec932e50ee", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c36408bc-a026-47fe-b3ff-9085bc3f5f9c", "title": "Council Directive 92/30/EEC of 6 April 1992 on the supervision of credit institutions on a consolidated basis", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "banking,consolidated account,credit institution,financial institution,management audit", "workIds": "celex:31992L0030,oj:JOL_1992_110_R_0052_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["banking", "consolidated account", "credit institution", "financial institution", "management audit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c36408bc-a026-47fe-b3ff-9085bc3f5f9c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a4a227c8-c98e-4917-a44f-9888e80f5fb3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 790/92 by Mr Hemmo MUNTINGH to the Commission. Compliance with the MARPOL Convention", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MUNTINGH", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "International Maritime Organisation,hydrocarbon,international convention,marine pollution,polluter pays principle", "workIds": "celex:91992E000790", "eurovoc_concepts": ["International Maritime Organisation", "hydrocarbon", "international convention", "marine pollution", "polluter pays principle"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a4a227c8-c98e-4917-a44f-9888e80f5fb3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e09dbb5a-5a21-443f-8d62-28343e96207a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 760/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 HAPPART to the Commission. Regional disparities: revision of geographical zones", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,HAPPART", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Belgium,Structural Funds,Walloon region (Belgium),aid system,gross domestic product,regional disparity", "workIds": "celex:91992E000760", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgium", "Structural Funds", "Walloon region (Belgium)", "aid system", "gross domestic product", "regional disparity"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e09dbb5a-5a21-443f-8d62-28343e96207a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a45925b9-9c75-4206-a6cb-2722356851d0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 788/92 by Mr Madron SELIGMAN to the Commission. Noise pollution from road surfaces", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SELIGMAN", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "applied research,commercial vehicle,floor coverings,indemnification,motor vehicle,noise level,noise pollution,noise protection,road network", "workIds": "celex:91992E000788", "eurovoc_concepts": ["applied research", "commercial vehicle", "floor coverings", "indemnification", "motor vehicle", "noise level", "noise pollution", "noise protection", "road network"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a45925b9-9c75-4206-a6cb-2722356851d0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b35f57b9-0805-4af5-b51b-0a09820f2390", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 728/92 by Mr Luigi MORETTI to the Commission. Irregularities in the administration of agricultural funds", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORETTI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EAGGF Guarantee Section,European Commissioner,Italy,State aid,agricultural quota,closing of accounts,financial management,fraud,legal action,private stock", "workIds": "celex:91992E000728", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF Guarantee Section", "European Commissioner", "Italy", "State aid", "agricultural quota", "closing of accounts", "financial management", "fraud", "legal action", "private stock"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b35f57b9-0805-4af5-b51b-0a09820f2390", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8c0b2964-3a68-40b3-b6f4-2a8bdaae4790", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 732/92 by Luigi MORETTI to the Commission. Failure by Italy to provide notification of national measures to implement directives on social and employment policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORETTI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "European social policy,Italy,application of EU law,employment policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000732", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European social policy", "Italy", "application of EU law", "employment policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8c0b2964-3a68-40b3-b6f4-2a8bdaae4790", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87975547-19ef-4210-adee-14bf56e44321", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 737/92 by Alexander LANGER to the Commission. Destruction of trees in, and cooperation with, Albania:", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LANGER", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Albania,deforestation,development aid,energy policy,fuel wood,technical cooperation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000737", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Albania", "deforestation", "development aid", "energy policy", "fuel wood", "technical cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87975547-19ef-4210-adee-14bf56e44321", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/57b29448-6e2a-4bad-9698-a82ff52ebe5d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 764/92 by Mrs Ursula SCHLEICHER to the Commission. Aschaffenburg model (response to heart attacks)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCHLEICHER", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "cardiovascular disease,dissemination of information,health education,jute,medical computing,medical research,public health", "workIds": "celex:91992E000764", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cardiovascular disease", "dissemination of information", "health education", "jute", "medical computing", "medical research", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/57b29448-6e2a-4bad-9698-a82ff52ebe5d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4b654dd0-e68e-431f-8990-08a92326443d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 783/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Protection of Lake Trichonida", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EC Directive,Greece,application of EU law,drinking water,surface water,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E000783", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "Greece", "application of EU law", "drinking water", "surface water", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4b654dd0-e68e-431f-8990-08a92326443d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dcd60c94-f03f-4d43-8696-a8aa35850476", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 773/92 by Mr Giulio FANTUZZI to the Commission. Situation in the Italian wine-growing sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FANTUZZI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Italy,State aid,common organisation of markets,distillation,market stabilisation,marketing year,supply balance sheet,table wine", "workIds": "celex:91992E000773", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "State aid", "common organisation of markets", "distillation", "market stabilisation", "marketing year", "supply balance sheet", "table wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dcd60c94-f03f-4d43-8696-a8aa35850476", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5f7c937e-b343-406a-983d-7d321c8cf395", "title": "92/237/EEC: Commission Decision of 6 April 1992 imposing a fine pursuant to Article 19 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 (IV/32.448 and IV/32.450) - Ukwal (Only the English text is authentic) (Only the English text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "United Kingdom,competition,fine,maritime transport,restrictive trade practice", "workIds": "celex:31992D0237,oj:JOL_1992_121_R_0045_039", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "competition", "fine", "maritime transport", "restrictive trade practice"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5f7c937e-b343-406a-983d-7d321c8cf395", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/415e0dab-b2ca-4ebf-a671-bad8d6de43c6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 793/92 by Mrs Leyla ONUR to the Commission. Job placement monopoly of the German Federal Employment Agency", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ONUR", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Germany,International Labour Organisation,State monopoly,application of EU law,employment policy,employment service,freedom to provide services,socioprofessional category", "workIds": "celex:91992E000793", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "International Labour Organisation", "State monopoly", "application of EU law", "employment policy", "employment service", "freedom to provide services", "socioprofessional category"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/415e0dab-b2ca-4ebf-a671-bad8d6de43c6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a6cc15c-8d83-49a9-b025-a97217f3927b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 708/92 by Mr Ian WHITE to the Commission. Victims of Crime", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,WHITE", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU national,European cooperation,competence of the Member States,crime against individuals,damages,indemnification,offence,victim", "workIds": "celex:91992E000708", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "European cooperation", "competence of the Member States", "crime against individuals", "damages", "indemnification", "offence", "victim"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a6cc15c-8d83-49a9-b025-a97217f3927b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fff29483-1e02-4649-8610-912cbded719d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 755/92 by Mr Freddy BLAK to the Commission. Protecting the rights of assault victims", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BLAK,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Denmark,case-law (EU),crime against individuals,foreign national,marriage,position of women,removal,residence permit,secondary legislation,violence", "workIds": "celex:91992E000755", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "case-law (EU)", "crime against individuals", "foreign national", "marriage", "position of women", "removal", "residence permit", "secondary legislation", "violence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fff29483-1e02-4649-8610-912cbded719d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a1c48c0-f44c-4bcb-ba54-1c614913b01a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 756/92 by Mr Freddy BLAK to the Council. Protecting the rights of assault victims", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BLAK,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Denmark,competence of the Member States,foreign national,married person,removal,residence permit,victim,violence", "workIds": "celex:91992E000756", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "competence of the Member States", "foreign national", "married person", "removal", "residence permit", "victim", "violence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a1c48c0-f44c-4bcb-ba54-1c614913b01a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e41f3ff-2068-48de-878c-477aa4f6fb78", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 716/92 by Mrs Raymonde DURY to the Commission. Data network linking national employment agencies", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DURY,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EURES,dissemination of information,employment service,free movement of workers,information system,job application,job vacancy,labour mobility,living conditions,working conditions", "workIds": "celex:91992E000716", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EURES", "dissemination of information", "employment service", "free movement of workers", "information system", "job application", "job vacancy", "labour mobility", "living conditions", "working conditions"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6e41f3ff-2068-48de-878c-477aa4f6fb78", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/00a9bb38-e8ca-47c3-b7e7-fb5ae8e6dabe", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 745/92 by Lord INGLEWOOD to the Commission. Compensation for victims of crime", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,INGLEWOOD", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU national,European cooperation,competence of the Member States,crime against individuals,damages,indemnification,offence,victim", "workIds": "celex:91992E000745", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "European cooperation", "competence of the Member States", "crime against individuals", "damages", "indemnification", "offence", "victim"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/00a9bb38-e8ca-47c3-b7e7-fb5ae8e6dabe", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1aed8de7-0099-451c-9783-809248ffe3e7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 705/92 by Mr Juan de la C\u00c1MARA MART\u00cdNEZ to the Commission. Reforestation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU financing,Spain,action programme,afforestation,desertification,environmental protection,fire protection,rural development", "workIds": "celex:91992E000705", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "Spain", "action programme", "afforestation", "desertification", "environmental protection", "fire protection", "rural development"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1aed8de7-0099-451c-9783-809248ffe3e7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/264451c8-2db9-49aa-a897-0a31ea1e76cb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 703/92 by Mr Juan de la C\u00c1MARA MART\u00cdNEZ to the Commission. European craft industries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "craft business,culture,exchange of information,handicrafts,innovation,social and cultural anthropology,standardisation,technology transfer,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E000703", "eurovoc_concepts": ["craft business", "culture", "exchange of information", "handicrafts", "innovation", "social and cultural anthropology", "standardisation", "technology transfer", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/264451c8-2db9-49aa-a897-0a31ea1e76cb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/441fd04a-853e-4860-bc39-926b4155149d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 741/92 by Mr Pierre BERNARD-REYMOND to the Commission. Work done for local authorities in the Civil Engineering and Agriculture Departments for local authorities", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BERNARD-REYMOND,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "France,civil servant,competition,fixing of prices,payable service,private sector,public contract,public service,regional and local authorities", "workIds": "celex:91992E000741", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "civil servant", "competition", "fixing of prices", "payable service", "private sector", "public contract", "public service", "regional and local authorities"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/441fd04a-853e-4860-bc39-926b4155149d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/793e18e3-267e-46f9-a6f3-beb77c75e012", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 758/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 HAPPART to the Commission. Reform of the CAP", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,HAPPART", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "agricultural market,agriculture-industry relationship,agriculture-trade relationship,competitiveness,processing industry,reform of the CAP", "workIds": "celex:91992E000758", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural market", "agriculture-industry relationship", "agriculture-trade relationship", "competitiveness", "processing industry", "reform of the CAP"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/793e18e3-267e-46f9-a6f3-beb77c75e012", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c797967-8d93-4569-93d0-39705284bd18", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 914/92 of 6 April 1992 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for an agricultural product and an industrial product (Third series 1992)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "processing industry,recording equipment,sea fish,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:31992R0914,oj:JOL_1992_098_R_0001_014", "eurovoc_concepts": ["processing industry", "recording equipment", "sea fish", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c797967-8d93-4569-93d0-39705284bd18", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7198e18b-7378-43af-82c3-0b1a1f10e80d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 715/92 by Mrs Raymonde DURY to the Commission. CARTOON programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DURY,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,artistic profession,audiovisual co-production,audiovisual production,child,television", "workIds": "celex:91992E000715", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "artistic profession", "audiovisual co-production", "audiovisual production", "child", "television"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7198e18b-7378-43af-82c3-0b1a1f10e80d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c45487d2-541e-4a77-adae-e578a28f836b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 777/92 by Mr Florus WIJSENBEEK to the Council. Excessively lengthy legal procedures in Italy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,WIJSENBEEK", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Italy,competence of the Member States,indemnification,insurance claim,insurance indemnity,insurance law,judicial proceedings", "workIds": "celex:91992E000777", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "competence of the Member States", "indemnification", "insurance claim", "insurance indemnity", "insurance law", "judicial proceedings"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c45487d2-541e-4a77-adae-e578a28f836b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/67989754-08e7-4cac-8752-c46a762d6052", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 702/92 by Mr Juan de la C\u00c1MARA MART\u00cdNEZ to the Council. Wetlands in the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "coastal region,ecological balance,economic aid,environmental protection,humid zone,protected area,research and development", "workIds": "celex:91992E000702", "eurovoc_concepts": ["coastal region", "ecological balance", "economic aid", "environmental protection", "humid zone", "protected area", "research and development"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/67989754-08e7-4cac-8752-c46a762d6052", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3b7ef871-6b00-4e1e-afda-384d73f8d68b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 785/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Lake Koumoundourou", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EC Directive,Peloponnese,application of EU law,dangerous substance,environmental protection,offence,oil pollution,surface water,waste disposal,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E000785", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "Peloponnese", "application of EU law", "dangerous substance", "environmental protection", "offence", "oil pollution", "surface water", "waste disposal", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3b7ef871-6b00-4e1e-afda-384d73f8d68b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a66ab0f7-5b3a-4568-baed-eb51675c56c4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 738/92 by Mr Henry McCUBBIN to the Commission. Europe Against Cancer Programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MCCUBBIN", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "European cooperation,action programme,association,cancer,jute,management,medical research,public health", "workIds": "celex:91992E000738", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European cooperation", "action programme", "association", "cancer", "jute", "management", "medical research", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a66ab0f7-5b3a-4568-baed-eb51675c56c4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe33b16a-7d89-45db-9abd-dcf84ba67940", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 739/92 by Mr David MARTIN to the Commission. The use of the CE mark", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MARTIN DAVID", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EC Directive,EU trade mark,application of EU law,approximation of laws,construction equipment,electro-magnetic equipment,market supervision,product safety,religion,toy industry", "workIds": "celex:91992E000739", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "EU trade mark", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "construction equipment", "electro-magnetic equipment", "market supervision", "product safety", "religion", "toy industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe33b16a-7d89-45db-9abd-dcf84ba67940", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/053711fd-d68a-47be-a2b1-ae236a4e9bbb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 731/92 by Mr Luigi MORETTI to the Commission. Failure by Italy to provide notification of national measures to implement directives on consumer policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORETTI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Italy,application of EU law,consumer protection,opinion", "workIds": "celex:91992E000731", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "application of EU law", "consumer protection", "opinion"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/053711fd-d68a-47be-a2b1-ae236a4e9bbb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8f4b8640-dfe5-4546-8cd8-78ca422e6854", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 714/92 by Mr Diego de los SANTOS L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Disposal of radioactive nuclear waste in El Cabril (Andalusia)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LOS SANTOS LOPEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Andalusia,nuclear safety,radioactive effluent,radioactive pollution,radioactive waste,storage of waste", "workIds": "celex:91992E000714", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Andalusia", "nuclear safety", "radioactive effluent", "radioactive pollution", "radioactive waste", "storage of waste"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8f4b8640-dfe5-4546-8cd8-78ca422e6854", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/115d31d8-144d-4e3e-b522-fd3507d5dbcb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 726/92 by Mr Alexandros ALAVANOS to the Commission. Infringement by the Italian Government of freedom of maritime transport", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ALAVANOS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Italy,application of EU law,carriage of passengers,maritime transport,restriction on competition", "workIds": "celex:91992E000726", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "application of EU law", "carriage of passengers", "maritime transport", "restriction on competition"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/115d31d8-144d-4e3e-b522-fd3507d5dbcb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/586db9bc-df13-4893-85f0-b65f255aaf92", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 771/92 by Mr S\u00e9rgio RIBEIRO to the Commission. Multinational policy with serious social repercussions (DIALAP-PORTUGAL)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,RIBEIRO", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Portugal,collective dismissal,job security,precious stones,supplier", "workIds": "celex:91992E000771", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "collective dismissal", "job security", "precious stones", "supplier"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/586db9bc-df13-4893-85f0-b65f255aaf92", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/633525b1-1fec-4bf8-b79a-21dbf93e95c3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 701/92 by Mr Juan de la C\u00c1MARA MART\u00cdNEZ to the Commission. Wetlands in the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EC Directive,EC Regulation,EU financing,environmental protection,humid zone,nature reserve,wildlife", "workIds": "celex:91992E000701", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "EC Regulation", "EU financing", "environmental protection", "humid zone", "nature reserve", "wildlife"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/633525b1-1fec-4bf8-b79a-21dbf93e95c3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed26ef1d-b652-46db-b296-036ddb3a37cc", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 736/92 by Mr Luigi MORETTI to the Commission. Failure by Italy to provide notification of national measures to implement directives on agricultural policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORETTI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,EC opinion,Italy,application of EU law,common agricultural policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000736", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "EC opinion", "Italy", "application of EU law", "common agricultural policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed26ef1d-b652-46db-b296-036ddb3a37cc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1114d874-cd84-4dbf-b67b-e53cdf14e167", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 876/92 of 6 April 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products of category 20 (order No 40.0200), originating in Bulgaria and Thailand, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Thailand,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference,textile product", "workIds": "celex:31992R0876,oj:JOL_1992_093_R_0011_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Thailand", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference", "textile product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1114d874-cd84-4dbf-b67b-e53cdf14e167", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1efa7412-bc56-49d6-a8de-857018a6ee77", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 710/92 by Mr Paul STAES to the Commission. ERDF project in Belgium", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STAES", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "European Regional Development Fund,Province of Antwerp,co-financing,financing method,leisure park,local authority finances,public contract,sport,tourism policy,tourist infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:91992E000710", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Regional Development Fund", "Province of Antwerp", "co-financing", "financing method", "leisure park", "local authority finances", "public contract", "sport", "tourism policy", "tourist infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1efa7412-bc56-49d6-a8de-857018a6ee77", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/904de381-ddcd-44db-ad84-c89de15f1c74", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 742/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Current situation concerning the European Financial Engineering Company (EFEC)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "European company,corporate finance,economic analysis,economic development,liquidation,private sector,small and medium-sized enterprises", "workIds": "celex:91992E000742", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European company", "corporate finance", "economic analysis", "economic development", "liquidation", "private sector", "small and medium-sized enterprises"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/904de381-ddcd-44db-ad84-c89de15f1c74", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9adcd991-3efe-4860-bbcd-32be0247e916", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 734/92 by Mr Luigi MORETTI to the Commission. Failure by Italy to provide notification of national measures to implement directives on the internal market", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORETTI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,Italy,application of EU law,judgment of the Court (EU),single market", "workIds": "celex:91992E000734", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "Italy", "application of EU law", "judgment of the Court (EU)", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9adcd991-3efe-4860-bbcd-32be0247e916", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/485f7918-9829-48e8-a5c3-fbde62313cb8", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 761/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 HAPPART to the Commission. Reform of the CAP and redeployment of agricultural workers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,HAPPART", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU aid,European Social Fund,agricultural labour force,early retirement,employment policy,reform of the CAP,rural region,unemployed person,vocational retraining,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E000761", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "European Social Fund", "agricultural labour force", "early retirement", "employment policy", "reform of the CAP", "rural region", "unemployed person", "vocational retraining", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/485f7918-9829-48e8-a5c3-fbde62313cb8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/64167538-ea27-44a8-9576-de43333d4946", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 748/92 by Mrs Mary BANOTTI to the Commission. EC-Vietnam Relations", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANOTTI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU aid,EU relations,Viet Nam,aid to refugees,diplomatic relations,repatriation grant,return migration,social rehabilitation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000748", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "EU relations", "Viet Nam", "aid to refugees", "diplomatic relations", "repatriation grant", "return migration", "social rehabilitation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/64167538-ea27-44a8-9576-de43333d4946", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87fadab4-09c8-4903-a250-ae859a1e51d9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 704/92 by Mr Juan de la C\u00c1MARA MART\u00cdNEZ to the Council. European craft industries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "cultural heritage,economic support,handicrafts,heritage protection", "workIds": "celex:91992E000704", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cultural heritage", "economic support", "handicrafts", "heritage protection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87fadab4-09c8-4903-a250-ae859a1e51d9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46bbc3b3-a425-448c-a7d6-819293c1c49a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 730/92 by Mr Luigi MORETTI to the Commission. Failure by Italy to provide notification of national measures to implement directives on the right of establishment and freedom to supply services", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORETTI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,Italy,application of EU law,freedom to provide services,right of establishment", "workIds": "celex:91992E000730", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "Italy", "application of EU law", "freedom to provide services", "right of establishment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/46bbc3b3-a425-448c-a7d6-819293c1c49a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4c0b5377-62a5-47ab-be74-07f5f7517e90", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 719/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Protection of the Greek shoreline from erosion", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Greece,Structural Funds,coastal protection,coastal region,engineering structure,environmental policy,erosion,pollution control measures,ports policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000719", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "Structural Funds", "coastal protection", "coastal region", "engineering structure", "environmental policy", "erosion", "pollution control measures", "ports policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4c0b5377-62a5-47ab-be74-07f5f7517e90", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/872c767b-7310-4bfb-8c9a-d4126dc06d9d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 723/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Reinforcing the Community Cohesion Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Structural Funds,distribution of aid,environmental policy,poverty,transport policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000723", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Structural Funds", "distribution of aid", "environmental policy", "poverty", "transport policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/872c767b-7310-4bfb-8c9a-d4126dc06d9d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1d588474-a12e-46bc-a444-050eee17de91", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 711/92 by Mr Enrique SAPENA GRANELL to the Commission. Research into high-speed vessels", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SAPENA GRANELL", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU financing,maritime shipping,new technology,research and development,shipbuilding", "workIds": "celex:91992E000711", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "maritime shipping", "new technology", "research and development", "shipbuilding"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1d588474-a12e-46bc-a444-050eee17de91", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8e98d9e2-9012-4301-914a-3a9165d182fd", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 706/92 by Mr Juan de la C\u00c1MARA MART\u00cdNEZ to the Council. Reforestation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LA CAMARA MARTINEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU financing,afforestation,desertification,environmental protection,forest conservation,management of resources,natural resources,soil protection", "workIds": "celex:91992E000706", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "afforestation", "desertification", "environmental protection", "forest conservation", "management of resources", "natural resources", "soil protection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8e98d9e2-9012-4301-914a-3a9165d182fd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bc3fa83b-2e44-479b-8b1e-81c2f656d136", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 717/92 by Mr Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric ROSMINI to the Commission. Structural Fund appropriations for Marseilles", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROSMINI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU financing,European Regional Development Fund,European Social Fund,Provence-Alpes-C\u00f4te d'Azur,Structural Funds,economic activity", "workIds": "celex:91992E000717", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "European Regional Development Fund", "European Social Fund", "Provence-Alpes-C\u00f4te d'Azur", "Structural Funds", "economic activity"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bc3fa83b-2e44-479b-8b1e-81c2f656d136", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1b4db030-261b-4e7a-a07f-60091af50d6c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 757/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 HAPPART to the Commission. Uruguay Round and agricultural proposals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,HAPPART", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "GATT,reform of the CAP,support policy,trade agreement", "workIds": "celex:91992E000757", "eurovoc_concepts": ["GATT", "reform of the CAP", "support policy", "trade agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1b4db030-261b-4e7a-a07f-60091af50d6c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5eba75d-bc63-40f8-ae86-72669b29adbe", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 787/92 by Mr Georgios ROMEOS to the Commission. Community support for customs employees", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROMEOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "European Social Fund,competence of the Member States,customs,job cuts,reintegration into working life,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E000787", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Social Fund", "competence of the Member States", "customs", "job cuts", "reintegration into working life", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5eba75d-bc63-40f8-ae86-72669b29adbe", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/23dadd8f-ccbe-4e0e-a2f3-07b63963316a", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 877/92 of 6 April 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products of category 37 (order No 40.0370), originating in Indonesia, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Indonesia,man-made fibre,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference,textile fibre", "workIds": "celex:31992R0877,oj:JOL_1992_093_R_0012_018", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Indonesia", "man-made fibre", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference", "textile fibre"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/23dadd8f-ccbe-4e0e-a2f3-07b63963316a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/047e67bc-6f54-4782-a9d7-06588c2fab8d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 779/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The wetlands of Kerkini", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Macedonia,engineering structure,environmental impact,impact study,physical environment,protected area,protection of animal life,stagnant water", "workIds": "celex:91992E000779", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Macedonia", "engineering structure", "environmental impact", "impact study", "physical environment", "protected area", "protection of animal life", "stagnant water"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/047e67bc-6f54-4782-a9d7-06588c2fab8d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98b5ba20-226d-40d5-8ddd-0da4bb732a2b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 786/92 by Mr Georgios ROMEOS to the Commission. Protection of copyright for European products in the USA", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROMEOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU production,United States,administrative formalities,audiovisual production,copyright,film production", "workIds": "celex:91992E000786", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU production", "United States", "administrative formalities", "audiovisual production", "copyright", "film production"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98b5ba20-226d-40d5-8ddd-0da4bb732a2b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bfe91b25-2e04-47fb-8e01-a9c4be047145", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 772/92 by Mr S\u00e9rgio RIBEIRO to the Council. Multinational policy with serious social repercussions (DIALAP-PORTUGAL)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,RIBEIRO", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Portugal,collective dismissal,competition policy,jewellery and goldsmith's articles,lockout,precious stones,transnational corporation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000772", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "collective dismissal", "competition policy", "jewellery and goldsmith's articles", "lockout", "precious stones", "transnational corporation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bfe91b25-2e04-47fb-8e01-a9c4be047145", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/481704da-e190-4546-a90a-db805f04c818", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 763/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Spain' s failure to comply with a Council directive on the internal market", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,award of contract,public contract,single market", "workIds": "celex:91992E000763", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "award of contract", "public contract", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/481704da-e190-4546-a90a-db805f04c818", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/22c263d7-cfa2-4b65-bb5d-facde75eb4a9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 725/92 by Mr Alexandros ALAVANOS to the Commission. Water pollution in Thessaly", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ALAVANOS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Thessaly,dangerous substance,industrial pollution,inland waterway,waste disposal,water analysis,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E000725", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Thessaly", "dangerous substance", "industrial pollution", "inland waterway", "waste disposal", "water analysis", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/22c263d7-cfa2-4b65-bb5d-facde75eb4a9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/29c12939-bbfe-4881-8bcc-63379c80b95c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 759/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 HAPPART to the Commission. GATT negotiations and reform of the CAP", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,HAPPART", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "GATT,reform of the CAP,support policy,trade agreement", "workIds": "celex:91992E000759", "eurovoc_concepts": ["GATT", "reform of the CAP", "support policy", "trade agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/29c12939-bbfe-4881-8bcc-63379c80b95c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b96d7048-45f9-42ee-9ba9-9e806461782c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 722/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Natural disasters on the Greek mainland and in Euboea", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Central Greece,EU aid,atmospheric conditions,harvest,natural disaster,olive-growing,policy on agricultural structures", "workIds": "celex:91992E000722", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "EU aid", "atmospheric conditions", "harvest", "natural disaster", "olive-growing", "policy on agricultural structures"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b96d7048-45f9-42ee-9ba9-9e806461782c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/978b162a-620c-45bd-84e8-ff87a940b1c8", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 712/92 by Mrs Cristiana MUSCARDINI to the Council. Kuwaiti prisoners in Iraq", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MUSCARDINI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EP resolution,Iraq,Kuwait,UN resolution,prisoner of war", "workIds": "celex:91992E000712", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EP resolution", "Iraq", "Kuwait", "UN resolution", "prisoner of war"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/978b162a-620c-45bd-84e8-ff87a940b1c8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5a182956-2941-4adb-9c5f-e10f8bc2bb67", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 781/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The delta of the River Axios", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Macedonia,application of EU law,ecosystem,environmental protection,protected area,water pollution,watercourse", "workIds": "celex:91992E000781", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Macedonia", "application of EU law", "ecosystem", "environmental protection", "protected area", "water pollution", "watercourse"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5a182956-2941-4adb-9c5f-e10f8bc2bb67", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7e0f47dd-f52e-4022-8e8d-69c52b3e9068", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 743/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Details concerning Community aid to least- favoured regions and assessment of economic and social cohesion", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU aid,EU statistics,Single European Act,Structural Funds,less-favoured region,regional aid,structural policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E000743", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "EU statistics", "Single European Act", "Structural Funds", "less-favoured region", "regional aid", "structural policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7e0f47dd-f52e-4022-8e8d-69c52b3e9068", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3ec38142-b9e3-403f-b3a9-a043fea9438a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 792/92 by Mr Arthur NEWENS to the Commission. Comparative state pensions in European Community countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,NEWENS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EU statistics,one person household,pay,pension scheme,research and development,statistical method", "workIds": "celex:91992E000792", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU statistics", "one person household", "pay", "pension scheme", "research and development", "statistical method"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3ec38142-b9e3-403f-b3a9-a043fea9438a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c46f8ffc-ce34-49d7-af09-cbf953f7f6dc", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 782/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The aquatic environment of Lake Kastoria", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Macedonia,chemical fertiliser,environmental impact,industrial pollution,pollution from agricultural sources,waste disposal,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E000782", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Macedonia", "chemical fertiliser", "environmental impact", "industrial pollution", "pollution from agricultural sources", "waste disposal", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c46f8ffc-ce34-49d7-af09-cbf953f7f6dc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4c6e3ae8-23f0-4d68-85d6-6e9db34def0d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 768/92 by Mr Leen van der WAAL to the Council. Failure by French and Spanish customs offices to increase their opening hours", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VAN DER WAAL", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "France,Spain,application of EU law,carriage of goods,cross-border transport,customs formalities,transit", "workIds": "celex:91992E000768", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "Spain", "application of EU law", "carriage of goods", "cross-border transport", "customs formalities", "transit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4c6e3ae8-23f0-4d68-85d6-6e9db34def0d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/293b4576-03eb-45fa-ad31-e363ee22c464", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 727/92 by Mr Peter CRAMPTON to the Commission. Border controls after 1992", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CRAMPTON,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EEC Treaty,customs inspection,fight against crime,interpretation of the law,migration control,police checks", "workIds": "celex:91992E000727", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EEC Treaty", "customs inspection", "fight against crime", "interpretation of the law", "migration control", "police checks"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/293b4576-03eb-45fa-ad31-e363ee22c464", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ee9d26d3-03f0-46cc-9de4-6541bf36c41a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 740/92 by Mr Pierre BERNARD-REYMOND to the Commission. Regulations governing the profession of engineering consultant", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BERNARD-REYMOND,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "competence of the Member States,engineer,freedom to provide services,higher education,recognition of diplomas,right of establishment,self-employed person", "workIds": "celex:91992E000740", "eurovoc_concepts": ["competence of the Member States", "engineer", "freedom to provide services", "higher education", "recognition of diplomas", "right of establishment", "self-employed person"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ee9d26d3-03f0-46cc-9de4-6541bf36c41a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7407fef1-3ffb-4d0e-92be-f0f10c2d323a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 776/92 by Mr Filippos PIERROS to the Commission. Problems of harmonizing civil law", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PIERROS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Intergovernmental Convention (EU),approximation of laws,civil law,indemnification,judicial proceedings,jurisdiction,single market", "workIds": "celex:91992E000776", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Intergovernmental Convention (EU)", "approximation of laws", "civil law", "indemnification", "judicial proceedings", "jurisdiction", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7407fef1-3ffb-4d0e-92be-f0f10c2d323a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0b1e740d-fa69-4b9f-89c8-f5fc5f579670", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 707/92 by Mr Dieter ROGALLA to the Commission. Technical aid for customs administrations", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROGALLA", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,European cooperation,Western Balkans,customs,customs regulations,technical cooperation,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E000707", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "European cooperation", "Western Balkans", "customs", "customs regulations", "technical cooperation", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0b1e740d-fa69-4b9f-89c8-f5fc5f579670", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ca1e0418-a566-4a66-9470-4fea89a191d8", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 733/92 by Mr Luigi MORETTI to the Commission. Failure by Italy to provide notification of national measures to implement directives on environment policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORETTI", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "EC Directive,Italy,application of EU law,environmental policy,industrial pollution,industrial waste", "workIds": "celex:91992E000733", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "Italy", "application of EU law", "environmental policy", "industrial pollution", "industrial waste"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ca1e0418-a566-4a66-9470-4fea89a191d8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f10f3c4a-4ae7-4e2f-a10f-f5eb4a2452c0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 765/92 by Mrs Ursula SCHLEICHER to the Commission. Uniform EC approval of disinfectants and antiseptics", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCHLEICHER", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "dangerous substance,harmonisation of standards,marketing standard,medical institution,pharmaceutical product,preparation for market,public health", "workIds": "celex:91992E000765", "eurovoc_concepts": ["dangerous substance", "harmonisation of standards", "marketing standard", "medical institution", "pharmaceutical product", "preparation for market", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f10f3c4a-4ae7-4e2f-a10f-f5eb4a2452c0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fcfe108a-c72a-421e-a175-6943a8be5dea", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 709/92 by Mr Alman METTEN to the Commission. Greek boycott of products from other Member States", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,METTEN", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Greece,application of EU law,economic sanctions,intra-EU trade,private media,tourism policy,trade restriction", "workIds": "celex:91992E000709", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "application of EU law", "economic sanctions", "intra-EU trade", "private media", "tourism policy", "trade restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fcfe108a-c72a-421e-a175-6943a8be5dea", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5cbcf4c-fc5d-4020-b3c2-9fda7a7a6f68", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 724/92 by Karmelo LANDA MENDIBE to the Commission. Construction of a new port in the outer Bilbao estuary", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LANDA-MENDIBE", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Basque Country,EU financing,application of EU law,environmental impact,harbour installation,impact study,large-scale construction,port traffic", "workIds": "celex:91992E000724", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Basque Country", "EU financing", "application of EU law", "environmental impact", "harbour installation", "impact study", "large-scale construction", "port traffic"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5cbcf4c-fc5d-4020-b3c2-9fda7a7a6f68", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ab1c0ba-313f-406d-8a7f-2aee39cdc8f4", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) n\u00b0 2245/85 laying douwn certain technical measures for the conservation of fish stocks in the Antarctic", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Antarctica,authorised catch,conservation of fish stocks,fishery resources,fishing regulations,fishing rights", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0134,comnat:COM_1992_0134_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Antarctica", "authorised catch", "conservation of fish stocks", "fishery resources", "fishing regulations", "fishing rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ab1c0ba-313f-406d-8a7f-2aee39cdc8f4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMDNITIES \n\nCOM(90) 134 final \n\nBrussels, 6 ApriI 1990 \n\nProposai for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION fEECl \n\n\u2122^^t^ (EEC) n. 2245/85 ^ \n\n^ \u0153rtain tecfeni \n\u00abeasures for the conservation of fish stocks in the Antarctic \n\n(pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e! by the Commission) \n\npip \n\nFi- J-VL-'\u00cf' \n\nm \n\n1s \n\nH*'-, \nssst ,\u2022 \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nOn 5 November 1991 the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic \n\nMarine Living Resources (CCAMLR) notified Contracting Parties of the \n\nconservation measures adopted at the 1991 Annual Meeting held in Hobart \n\nin the period 22 October-2 November 1991. These conservation measures which are based on the scientific advice \n\nsubmitted by CCAMLR's Scientific Committee, reflect conservation measures \n\nadopted by CCAMLR in previous years. They involve, notably, the fixing \n\nof TACs for the species Euphausia \n\nsuperba, \n\nDissostichus \n\neleglnoldes \n\nand \n\nelectron* \n\ncarlsbergi \n\nfor the 1991/92 fishing season. Other measures \n\nrelate to mesh sizes, closed seasons, prohibition on directed fisheries \n\nfor certain stocks catch reporting systems and the introduction of \n\nprocedures whereby Members notify CCAMLR when they are considering \n\ninitiating a new fishery. The measures concern essentially FAO \n\nAntarctic sub-area 48. 3 i. e. the waters around South-Georgia, where the \n\nmajor concentrations of fish stocks occurs. Pursuant to Article IX(6)(b) of the Convention on the Conservation of \n\nAntarctic Marine Living Resources, these measures will become binding on \n\nall the Contracting Parties on 5 May 1992, as they were accepted by all \n\nMembers of the CCAMLR before 5 February 1992. In view of the agreement between the members of CCAMLR and the importance \n\nof these conservation measures for this fish stocks concerned, the \n\nCommunity is called upon to apply these measures to Community fishermen \n\nimmediately. The purpose of this Regulation is to implement these recommendations by \n\namending the existing Regulation laying down certain technical measures \nfor the conservation of fish stocks in the Antarctic. i \n\n\f-s-\n\nPROPOSAL FOR A \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \nof \n\namending Regulation (EEC) n\u00b0 2245/85 laying down certain technical \nmeasures for the conservation of fish stocks in the Antarctic \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EEC) N\u00b0 170/83 of 25 January 1983 \nestablishing a Community system for the conservation and management of \nfishery resourcesC1), as amended by the Act of Accession of Spain and \nPortugal, and in particular Article 11 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas, pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) N\u00b0 170/83, the \nconservation measures necessary to achieve the aims set out in Article 1 \nof that Regulation are to be formulated in the light of the available \nscientific advice; \n\nWhereas the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living \nResources, hereinafter called \"the ConventionM, was approved by Council \nDecision 81/691/EEc(2); whereas it entered into force for the C3cmmunity \non 21 May 1982; \n\nWhereas the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living \nResources (CCAMLR), established by the Convention, adopted, on the \nrecxxnmendation of its Scientific Committee, certain conservation measures \napplicable in particular to the fish stocks occuring in the waters off \nSouth Georgia as well as notification procedures to be followed by \nmembers of CCAMLR considering initiating a new fishery; \n\nWhereas these conservation measures were notified to the members of the \nCCAMLR on 5 November 1991; whereas, in the absence of objections to the \nmeasures, they become binding on 4 May 1992 under Article IX (6) of the \nConvention; \n\n(1) \n(2) \n\nOJ N\u00b0 L 24 Of 27. 1. 1983, p. 1 \nOJ N\u00b0 L 252 of 5. 9. 1981, p. 26 \n\n\f-Jl-\n\nWhereas the members of the CCAMLR stated that they intended to apply \nthese conservation measures on a provisional basis, without waiting \nuntil they became binding, in view of the fact that certain of the \nconservation measures related to a fishing season which commenced on 1 \nJuly 1991; \n\nWhereas, therefore, the necessary provisions should now be laid down to \nensure that the conservation measures adopted by the CCAMLR are applied \nto Community fishermen; \n\nWhereas, pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) N\u00b0 170/83, it is for \nthe Council to establish the TAG per stock or group of stocks, the share \navailable to the Community, and the specific conditions under which \ncatches have to be taken; \n\nWhereas the fishing activities referred to in this Regulation are \nsubject to the control measures provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) \nN\u00b0 2241/87 of 23 July 1987 establishing certain control measures for \nfishing activities C1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) N\u00b0 3483/88 (2); \n\nWhereas Regulation (EEC) N\u00b0 2245/85 (3), as last amended by Regulation \n(EEC) N\u00b0 2810/91 (4), should be amended accordingly, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nRegulation (EEC) N\u00b0 2245/85 is hereby ammended as follows : \n\n1. Articles 2, 2a, and 2b shall be replaced by the following : \n\n\"Article \n\n2 \n\nProhibition on fishing (*) \n\n1. Directed fishing for Champsocephalus gunnari, Patagonotothen \nbrevicauda guntheri, Nbtothenia rossii, Notothenia gibberifrons, \nChaenocephalus aceratus, Pseudochaenichthys georgianus and \nNotothenia squamifrons in FAD Antarctic sub-area 48. 3 (South \nGeorgia) shall be prohibited from 2 November 1991 to 6 November \n1992, except for scientific research purposes. (1) \n(2) \n(3) \n(4) \n\nOJ N\u00b0 L 207 of 29. 7. 1987, p. 1 \nOJ N\u00b0 L 306 of 11. 11. 1988, p. 2 \nOJ N\u00b0 L 210 Of 7. 8. 1985, p. 2 \nOJ N\u00b0 L 271, 27. 9. 1991, p. 1 \n\nmtfi/CCAMLR/REGLEM. /ccarot r. en \n\n\f2. 3. Directed fishing for finfish in FAO Antarctic sub-areas 48. 1 and \n48. 2 shall be prohibited in the 1990/91 season except for \nscientific research purposes. Directed fishing for Notothenia squamifrons in FAO statistical \ndivision 58. 4. 4 (Ob and Lena Banks) shall be prohibited in the \nperiod 2 November 1991 to 6 November 1992. Article \n\n2a \n\nCatch limitations (*) \n\n1. The total catch of Electrona carlsbergi in the period 2 November \n1991 to 6 November 1992 shall be limited to 245 000 tonnes in FAO \nAntarctic subarea 48. 3. In addition, the total catch of Electrona carlsbergi in the same \nperiod shall be limited to 53 000 tonnes in the Shag Rocks \nregion, defined as the area bounded by 52\u00b030'S, 40\u00b0W; 52\u00b030,S, \n44\u00b0W; 54\u00b030\u00bbS, 40\u00b0W and 54\u00b030\u00abS, 44\u00b0W. 2. In the course of fishing in FAO Antarctic sub-area 48. 3, by-\ncatches of Notothenia rossii, Notothenia squamifrons, \nChaenocephalus aceratus and Pseudochaenichthys georgianus shall \nbe limited to 300 tonnes for each species and by-catches of \nNotothenia gibberifrons shall be limited to 500 tonnes. 3. Fishing in FAO Antarctic sub-area 48. 3 shall be terminated if by-\ncatches of one of the species listed in paragraph 2 reach the by-\ncatch limits foreseen or if total catches of Electrona carlsbergi \nreaches 245 000 tonnes, whichever happens first. 4. The fishery in the Shag Rocks region shall close if the by-catch \nof any of the species named in paragraph 2 above reaches their \nby-catch limit or if the total catch of Electrona carlsbergi \nreaches 53 000 tonnes, whichever comes first. 5. Catches of Dissostichus Eleginoides taken in the FAO Antarctic \nsub-area 48. 3 in the period 2 November 1991 to 6 November 1992 \nshall be limited to a TAC of 3 500 tonnes. 6. Catches of Euphausia superba taken in FAO Antarctic Area 48 shall \nbe limited to 1. 5 million tonnes in the period 1 July 1991 to \n30 June 1992. 7. The date on which the catches taken by QDmmunity vessels or the \nother vessels concerned are deemed to have exhausted the TAC \nspecified in paragraphs 1 to 6 shall be fixed by the Commission \npursuant to Article 11 (3) of Regulation (EEC) N\u00b0 2241/87 as \nsoon as the required information is received from the OCAMLR. nrtt/CTAM R/RFft FM. /craml r. en \n\n\f-\n\n/-\n\n8. With effect from the date fixed pursuant to paragraph 7, all \nfishing for the species concerned shall be prohibited in FAO \nAntarctic sub-area 48. 3 and Community vessels shall cease to \nretain on board, tranship or land any catches of this fish taken \nin that sub-area after that date. Article \n\n2b \n\nCatch reports (*) \n\n1. Catches of Patagonotothen tarevicauda guntheri, Champsocephalus \ngunnari, Dissosthicus Elegenoides, Notothenia rossii, Notothenia \nPseudochaenichthys \ngibber ifrons, \ngeorgianus, Electrona carlsbergi in FAO Antarctic sub-area 48. 3 \nand Eunhasia superba in FAO Antarctic area 48 shall be the \nsubject of reports in accordance with this Article, without \nprejudice to the application of Articles 5 to 9 of Regulation \n(EEC) N\u00b0 2241/87. Chaenocephalus \n\naoeratus, \n\n2. Total catches, broken down by vessels, which were made by \nCommunity vessels in the period between 1 July 1991 and the end \nof the first month following the month in which this Regulation \nenters into force shall, within 10 days of the end of that \nperiod, be notified to the Commission by the Member States in \nwhich the vessels concerned are registered or whose flag they \nfly. 3. For the purposes of reporting the catches taken after the period \nreferred to in paragraph 2, each calendar month shall be divided \ninto six reporting periods designated by the letters A, B, C, D, \nE and F and running from day 1 to day 5, day 6 to day 10, day 11 \nto day 15, day 16 to day 20, day 21 to day 25 and day 26 to the \nlast day of the month, respectively. At the latest within three days of each reporting period, each \nMember State shall notify the (Commission of the total catches, \nbroken down by vessels, that the vessels flying its flag or \nregistered in its territory have made in the preceding reporting \nperiod, specifying the month and reporting period concerned. 4. On the basis of the information received pursuant to paragraphs 2 \nand 3, the Commission shall, at the end of each reporting period, \ninform the CCAMLR of the total catches made by the CJommunity \nvessels in the preceding reporting period. \" \n\n(*) \n\nThe FAD zones mentioned in this Regulation are defined in \nCommission cx\u00bbrariunication 85/C335/02, (OJ N\u00b0 C335, 24. 12. 1985, \np. 2) \n\n\f- 9-\n\n2. The following Article is inserted : \n\n\"Article \n\n2c \n\nNotification of New Fisheries \n\n^ \n\n1. For the purposes of the present Article a new fishery is a \nfishery on a species using a particular fishing method in a \nstatistical subarea for which : \n\n(a) \n\nor \n(b) \n\nor \n(c) \n\ninformation on distribution, abundance, demography, \npotential yield and stock identity from comprehensive \nresearch/surveys or exploratory fishing have not been \nsubmitted to CCAMLR; \n\ncatch and effort data have never been submitted to \nCCAMLR; \n\ncatch and effort data from the two most recent seasons in \nwhich fishing occured have not been submitted to CCAMLR. 2. The exercise of a new fishery in the CCAMLR Convention Area shall \nbe prohibited as long as it has not been authorized in accordance \nwith paragraph 6. 3. Any operator of a fishing vessel who intends to develop a new \nfishery in the CCAMLR Convention Area shall inform the competent \nauthorities of the Member State whose flag the vessel flies or in \nwhose territory it is registered of that intention and shall \nsubmit to those authorities as much of the information defined in \nparagraph 4 as he is able to provide. 4. A Member State who has been informed of the intention to develop \na new fishery in the CCAMLR Convention Area with vessels flying \nits flag or registered in its territory shall notify the \nCommission without delay and not less than six months in advance \nof the next regular meeting of CCAMLR. The notification shall be accompanied by as much of the following \ninformation as the Member State is able to provide : \n\n(a) \n\nthe nature of the proposed fishery including target \nspecies, methods of fishing, proposed region and any \nminimum level of catches that would be required to \ndevelop a viable fishery; \n\nm*\\ /PTAMI \u00a9 /PFCI CM / r r a ml r on \n\n\f-p-\n\n(b) \n\n(c) \n\n(d) \n\nbiological information from comprehensive research/survey \ncruises, such as distribution, abundance, demographic \ndata and information on stock identity; \ndetails of dependent and associated species and the \nlikelihood of them being affected by the proposed \nfishery; \ninformation from other fisheries in the region or similar \nfisheries elsewhere that may assist in the valuation of \npotential yield. 5. The Commission shall forward to CCAMLR for consideration the \ninformation provided in accordance with paragraph 4, together \nwith any other relevant information. 6. As soon as CCAMLR has completed its consideration of the proposed \nnew fishery, a decision on the authorization of the new fishery \nshall be taken \n- by the Commission, in case CCAMLR has not adopted any \n\nconservation measures with regard to the new fishery \n\n- by the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal \n\nfrom the Commission, in all other cases. Article 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its \npublication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable \nin all Member States. Done at \n\nFor the Council \nThe President \n\nn\u00b1> /CCAMLR/REGLEM. /ccamlr. en \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 134 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-149-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-42774-4 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n1^2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2f179068-bebe-4ef7-854a-c659f40169c4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 746/92 by Mr Christos PAPOUTSIS to the Commission. Second instalment of Community loan to Greece", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPOUTSIS", "date": "1992-04-06", "subjects": "Community loan,Greece,activity report,economic policy,economic stabilisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E000746", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community loan", "Greece", "activity report", "economic policy", "economic stabilisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2f179068-bebe-4ef7-854a-c659f40169c4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/acb3f6c8-7346-4c63-82e7-3da789c1134d", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 855/92 of 3 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 19/82 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 2641/90 with regard to imports of sheepmeat and goatmeat products originating in certain non-member countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-03", "subjects": "goatmeat,import licence,sheepmeat,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992R0855,oj:JOL_1992_089_R_0019_025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["goatmeat", "import licence", "sheepmeat", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/acb3f6c8-7346-4c63-82e7-3da789c1134d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae632a95-b925-4d90-9edf-0230038d5017", "title": "Resolution of the Consulative Committee of the European Coal and Steel Community concerning the Commission communication to the Council on a Community strategy to limit carbon dioxyde emissions and to improve energy efficiency (CO2/energy tax)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_legislative_other_oj_c,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Consultative Committee of the European Coal and Steel Community", "date": "1992-04-03", "subjects": "energy policy,environmental monitoring,environmental protection,environmental tax,greenhouse gas", "workIds": "celex:31992Y0519(01),oj:JOC_1992_127_R_0002_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["energy policy", "environmental monitoring", "environmental protection", "environmental tax", "greenhouse gas"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae632a95-b925-4d90-9edf-0230038d5017", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/247a4085-0008-437a-85d2-d456cad77262", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of an interim Agreement on trade and customs union between the European Economic Community and the Republic of San Marino", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-03", "subjects": "San Marino,agreement (EU),customs union,trade cooperation", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0114,comnat:COM_1992_0114_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_114_R_0007_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["San Marino", "agreement (EU)", "customs union", "trade cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/247a4085-0008-437a-85d2-d456cad77262", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92)114 final \n\nBrussels, 3 ApriI 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL PECISION \n\non the conclusion of an interim Agreement \non trade and customs union \nbetween the European Economic Community \nand the Republic of San Marino \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\nSifejisiiJiV;' v \n\nmw\u00b1 \n\nSvH';;'\"-. jfe*%\" \n\n\f1 -\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nOn the 16 December 1991, the Community and its Member States and \n\nthe Government of the Republic of San Marino signed a cooperation and \ncustoms union agreement between the EBC and San Marino. Given the mixed nature of this agreement, it needs to be submitted \nfor ratification by National Parliament, which will hold up its entry into \nforce. The Republic of San Marino therefore wishes to conclude an interim \nagreement which can ensure the rapid implementation of the trade provisions \nof the agreement signed last 16 December. /Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AOCl-a* \n\n\fProposal for a \nCOUNCIL DECISION \non the conclusion of an interim Agreement \non trade and customs union \nbetween the European Economic Community \nand the Republic of San Marino \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \nand in particular Articles 113 and 235 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, \n\nConsidering that while waiting for the entry into force of the cooperation \nand customs union agreement signed in Brussels on the 16th December 1991 \nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of San Marino, the \nCommunity should approve the interim agreement on trade and customs union; \n\nHAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe interim Agreement on trade and customs union between the European \nEconomic Community and the Republic of San Marino, including the \ndeclaration it incorporates, is hereby approved on behalf of the Community. The texts of the interim agreement are attached to this Decision. The President of the Council shall give the notification provided for in \nArticle 19 of the Agreement. 1 \n\nArt icle 2 \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\nFor the Counci \nThe President \n\n1 The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the \nOfficial Journal of the European Communities by the General Secretariat \nof the CounciI. THE CDDNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN OOMMONITXES, \n\n- 2 -\n\nTHE REPUBLIC OF SAN MARINO, \n\nof the one hand, \n\nof the other hand, \n\nCONSIDERING the agreement on cooperation and customs union signed on the \n16th of December 1991 between the European Community and the Republic of \nSan Marino; \n\nCONSIDERING THAT, given the fact that this agreement requires, besides \napproval by the Community, the ratification by the National Parliaments, \nwhich shall delay its enforcement; \n\nCONSIDERING the importance that the Parties attach to the strengthening and \nto the development of their relations, notably in the commercial and \neconomic field; \n\nCONSIDERING that the commercial and customs provisions of this Agreement \nshould be rapidly implemented by means of a temporary agreement; \n\nHAVE AGREE) AS KXIONS: \n\nTITLE I \n\nCUSTOMS UNION \n\nArticle 1 \n\nA customs union is hereby established between the European Economic \nCommunity and San Marino for products covered by Chapters 1 to 97 of the \nCommon Customs Tariff. 1. The provisions of this Title shall apply to: \n\nArticle 2 \n\n(a) \n\ngoods produced in the Community or in San Marino, including those \nobtained wholly or in part from products which come from third \ncountries and are in free circulation in the Community or in San \nMarino; \n\n(b) \n\ngoods which come from third countries and are in free circulation \nin the Community or in San Marino. 2. Products coming from third countries shall be considered to be in free \ncirculation in the Community or in San Marino if the iinport formalities \nhave been complied with and any customs duties or charges having equivalent \neffect which are payable have been levied, and there has been no total or \npartial drawback of such duties or charges in respect of the said products. /Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AccI-EN \n\nV \n\n\f- 3 -\n\nArticle 5 \n\nThe provisions of this Title shall also apply to goods obtained or produced \nin the Community or in San Marino, in the manufacture of which were used \nproducts coming from third countries and not in free circulation either in \nthe Community or in San Marino. These provisions shall, however, apply to \nthose goods only if the exporting Contracting Party levies the customs \nduties laid down In the Community for third country products used in their \nmanufacture. Article 4 \n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall refrain from introducing themselves any \nnew customs duties on imports or exports or charges having equivalent \neffect. 2. The Republic of San Marino also undertakes not to adjust duties referred \nto in paragraph 1 as applied to imports from the Community on 1 January \n1991, without prejudice to existing commitments between San Marino and \nItaly pursuant to the exchange of letters of 21 December 1972. Article 5 \n\n1. Trade between the Ctammunity and San Marino sha. 11 be exempt from all \nimport and export duties and charges having equivalent effect, subject to \nthe provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3. 2. In order that the charges having equivalent effect currently applied to \nimports from the Community may be abolished on 1 January 1996, the Republic \nof San Marino undertakes to introduce, within six months of the entry into \nforce of this Agreement, a supplementary tax corresponding to that \ncurrently levied on imported goods, to be chargeable on domestic products \nintended for home consumption. The supplementary tax will apply in full on \nthe above date. It shall be applicable as a countervailing measure and \nshall be calculated on the added value of domestic products at rates equal \nto those applied to imported goods of a similar kind. 3. (a) On the entry into force of the Agreement, the Oammunity, with the \n\nexception of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic, \nshall admit imports from the Republic of San Marino exempt from \ncustoms duty. (b) From the entry into force of the Agreement the Kingdom of Spain and \nthe Portuguese Republic shall apply the same customs duties in \nrespect of the Republic of San Marino as they apply in respect of \nthe Community as constituted on 31 December 1985. 4. In trade in agricultural products between the Community and San Marino, \nthe Republic of San Marino undertakes to adopt Ganraunity veterinary, plant \nhealth and quality regulations where necessary for the proper functioning \nof the Agreement. /Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AocI-EN \n\n\f4 -\n\nArticle 6 \n\n1. From the entry into force of the Agreement San Marino shall apply in \nrespect of countries not members of the Community: \n\nthe Common Customs Tariff; \n\nlaws, regulations and administrative provisions applicable to \ncustoms matters in the Community and necessary for the proper \nfunctioning of the customs union; \n\nthe common cammercial policy of the Community; \n\nCommunity regulations on trade in agricultural products covered by \nAnnex II to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, with the exception of refunds and compensatory amounts \naccorded for exports; \n\nCommunity veterinary, plant health and quality regulations where \nnecessary for the proper functioning of the Agreement. The provisions referred to in this paragraph shall be those applicable \n\nat the time in the Community. 2. The provisions referred to in the second to fifth indents of paragraph 1 \nshall be determined in greater detail by the Cooperation Committee. 3. By way of derogation from the first indent of paragraph 1 publications, \nwo^ks of art, scientific or teaching materials offered to the San Marino \ngo/ernment, inrdgnias, medals, stamps, printed matter and other similar \nobir-ots or paper destined for use by the government shall be exempt from \ncustoms duties. Article 7 \n\nid ) Over a period of five years from the entry into force of the. agreement, and beyond that period if no agreement can be reached in \naccordance with 1(b), San Marl no shall authorize the Canmunity, \nacting on behalf of and for San Marino, to carry out customs \nclearaw^e formalities, in particular release for free circulation \nof products sent from third countries to San Marino. Such \nformalities will effected by the Community customs offices listed \nin the Annex. At the end of this period, and under Article 16, San Marino may \nexercise its right to carry out customs clearance formalities, \nfollowing agreement of the Contracting Parties. 2. Wiere import duties are payable on goods pursuant to paragraph 1, these \nduties shall be levied on behalf of San Marino. San Marino shall undertake \nnot to refund these sums directly or indirectly to the parties concerned, \nsubject to the provisions of paragraph 4. /Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AccI-EN \n\n\f- 5 -\n\n3. The Cooperation Committee shall decide on: \n\n(a) possible changes to the list of the customs offices competent to \nclear the goods referred to in paragraph 1 and the procedure for \nforwarding the said goods to San Marino; \n\n(b) the arrangements for assigning to the San Marino Exchequer the \namounts collected in accordance with paragraph 2, and the \npercentage to be deducted by the European Economic Community to \ncover administrative costs in accordance with the relevant \nregulations in force within the Community; \n\n(c) any other arrangements necessary for the proper implementation of \n\nthis Article. 4. The taxes and levies on imports of agricultural products may be used by \nSan Marino for aiding production or exports. San Marino undertakes, \nhowever, not to accord higher export refunds or compensatory amounts than \nthose accorded by the European Economic Community for exports to third \ncountries. Article 8 \n\nQuantitative restrictions on imports and exports and all measures having \nequivalent effect between the Community and San Marino shall be prohibited \nfrom the entry into force of the Agreement. Article 9 \n\nThe Agreement shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on imports, \nexports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public morality, public \npolicy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, \nanimals or plants; the protection of national treasures possessing \nartistic, historic or archaeological value; the protection of industrial or \ncommercial property; or controls relating to gold and silver. Such \nprohibitions or restrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of \narbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between the \nContracting Parties. Article 10 \n\nThe Contracting Parties shall refrain from any domestic tax measure or \npractice leading directly or indirectly to discrimination between the \nproducts of one Contracting Party and si mi 1 ar products from the other \nContracting Party. Products sent to the territory of one of the Contracting Parties shall not \nbe eligible for a refund of domestic charges which is higher than the \ncharges which have been levied directly or indirectly. /Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AocI-EN \n\n\u2022i \n\n\f6 -\n\nArticle 11 \n\n1. If serious disturbances arise in any sector of the economy of one of the \nContracting Parties, the Contracting Party concerned may take the necessary \nsafeguard measures in accordance with the procedures, and subject to the \nconditions, of the paragraphs below. 2. In the case referred to in paragraph 1, before taking the measures \nprovided for therein or, in the cases covered by paragraph 3, as soon as \npossible, the Contracting Party in question shall provide the Cooperation \nCommittee with all relevant information required for a detailed examination \nof the situation with a view to seeking a solution acceptable to the \nContracting Parties. At the request of the other Contracting Party, \nconsultations shall take place within the Cooperation Committee before the \nContracting Party concerned takes appropriate measures. 3. Where exceptional cnjcumstances require immediate action making prior \nexamination Impossible, the Contracting Party cxDncerned may apply forthwith \nsuch precautionary measures as are strictly necessary to remedy the \nsituation. 4. In the selection of measures priority must be given to those which least \ndisturb the functioning of the Agreement. Such measures must not exceed \nthe limits of what is strictly necessary to counteract the difficulties \nthat have arisen. The safeguard measures must be notified immediately to the Cooperation \nCommittee, which shall hold, regular consultations on them, particularly \nwith a view to their abolition as soon as (Circumstances permit. Article 12 \n\n1. In addition to the cooperation provided for in Article 13(8), the \nadmi ni strative authorities of the Contracting Parties responsible for \nimplementing the provisions of this Agreement shall assist each other in \nother cases so as to ensure compliance with the provisions. 2. Procedures for the application of paragraph 1 shall be laid down by the \nCooperation Committee. TITLE II \n\nGENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS \n\nArticle 15 \n\n1. A Cooperation Committee is hereby set up with responsibility for \nadministering the Agreement and ensuring that it is properly implemented. /Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AocI-EN \n\n\f- 7 \n\nTo that end it shall formulate recommendations. It shall take decisions in \nthe cases provided for in the Agreement. The decisions shall be executed \nby the Contracting Parties in accordance with their own regulations. 2. With a view to the proper linplementation of the Agreement, the \nContracting Parties shall carry out exchanges of information and, at the \nrequest of either Party, shall consult together in the Cooperation \nCommittee. 3. The Cooperation Committee shall draw up its own rules of procedure. 4. The Cooperation Committee shall be ccmposed, on the one hand, of \nrepresentatives of the Commission, assisted by delegates of the Member \nStates and, on the other, of representatives of San Marino. 5. The Cooperation Committee shall take decisions by common accord. 6. The Cooperation Committee shall be chaired by each of the Contracting \nParties in turn in accordanoe with the arrangements to be established in \nits rules of procedure. 7. The Cooperation Committee shall meet at the request of either of the \nContracting Parties, to be lodged at least one month before the date of the \nintended meeting. Where the Committee is convened under Article 11, it \nshall meet within eight working days from the date on which the date is \nlodged. 8. In accordance with the procedure laid down in paragraph 1, the \nCooperation Committee shall establish methods of administrative cooperation \nfor the purposes of applying Articles 2 and 3, taking as a basis the \nmethods adopted by the Community in respect of trade between the Member \nStates. Article 14 \n\n1. Any disputes arising between the Contracting Parties over the \ninterpretation of the Agreement shall be put before the Cooperation \nCommittee. 2. If the Cooperation Committee does not succeed in settling the dispute at \nits next meeting, each Party may notify the other of the designation of an \narbitrator; the other Party shall then be required to designate a second \narbitrator within two months. The Cooperation Committee shall designate a third arbitrator. The arbitrators' decisions shall be taken by majority vote. Each Party in the dispute shall be required to take the measures needed to \nensure the application of the arbitrators' decision. /Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AccI-EN \n\n\f- 8 -\n\nArticle 15 \n\nIn trade covered by the Agreement: \n\n- the arrangements applied by San Marino in respect of Community may not \n\ngive rise to any discrimination between the Member States, their \nnationals, or their (xaonpanies; \n\n- the arrange. 3nts applied by the Community in respect of San Marino may \nnot give rir. to any discrimination between San Marino nationals or \ncompanies. Article 16 \n\nThis Agreement is concluded for an unlimited duration. Within no more than \nfive years of its entry into force, the two Parties shall begin \nconsultations to examine the results of its application and, if necessary, \nopen negotiations on its amendment in the light of that examination. Article 17 \n\nEither Contracting Party may denounce this Agreement by notifying the other \nContracting Party in writing. In that case, the Agreement sha. 11 cease to \nhave effect six months after the date of such notification. Article 18 \n\nThe Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which the \nTreaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under \nthe conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other, to the territory \nof San Marino. Article 19 \n\nThis Agreement will be approved by the Contracting Parties in accordance \nwith their own procedures. This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the second month \nfollowing notification that procedures referred to in the first \nsubparagraph have been complied with. It will cease being applicable once the cooperation and customs union \nagreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic San \nMarino comes into operation. /Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AccI-EN \n\n/)\u20ac\u2022 \n\n\f- 9 -\n\nArticle 20 \n\nThe Annex to this Agreement shall form an integral part thereof. Article 21 \n\nThis Agreement is drawn up in two originals in the Danish, Dutch, \n\nEnglish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish languages, \neach text being equally authentic. /Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AccI-EN \n\n\f10 \n\nANNEX \n\nList of customs offices referred to in Article 7(1)(a) \n\nLIVORNO \n\nRAVENNA \n\nRIMINI \n\nPORLI (CESENA) \n\nTRIESTE \n\n/Au/ads/BH/SMAC/AccI-EN \n\n\f- 11 \n\nDECLARATION Ef THE COMMUNITY \n\nWhere the scale of trade flows so warrants, the Community is prepared to \nnegotiate on behalf of and for the Republic of San Marino with countries \nwith which it has concluded preferential agreements for an appropriate form \nof recognition of equivalent treatment for products originating in \nSan Marino and products originating in the Community; \n\n/Au/ads/HH/SMAC/AccI-EN \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-147 \n\nCOM(92)114fina \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n1102 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-145-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-42738-8 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9320b76e-bc61-454e-bbcc-321c9e6ed293", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 859/92 of 3 April 1992 laying down detailed rules governing imports of 'baby- beef' originating in the Republics of Croatia and Slovenia and the Yugoslav Republics of Bosnia- Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-03", "subjects": "USSR,Yugoslavia,beef,import levy,import licence,republic", "workIds": "celex:31992R0859,oj:JOL_1992_089_R_0026_029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "Yugoslavia", "beef", "import levy", "import licence", "republic"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9320b76e-bc61-454e-bbcc-321c9e6ed293", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/03b5509f-0b9f-48fd-9c5f-7a3dc2415d87", "title": "92/227/EEC: Commission Decision of 3 April 1992 amending certain decisions authorizing Germany to restrict the marketing of seed of certain varieties of agricultural plant species (Only the German text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-03", "subjects": "Germany,maize,marketing restriction,seed", "workIds": "celex:31992D0227,oj:JOL_1992_108_R_0055_058", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "maize", "marketing restriction", "seed"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/03b5509f-0b9f-48fd-9c5f-7a3dc2415d87", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/03c3b8f9-dcfd-4597-ba9c-0d8e769f1e06", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) establishing a special scheme for raspberries intended for processing", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-03", "subjects": "EAGGF Guarantee Section,EU aid,food processing,producer organisation,soft fruit", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0129,comnat:COM_1992_0129_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_113_R_0008_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF Guarantee Section", "EU aid", "food processing", "producer organisation", "soft fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/03c3b8f9-dcfd-4597-ba9c-0d8e769f1e06", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b61e60d6-6163-44ea-8e59-a52ba1e92207", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 852/92 of 3 April 1992 on the definitive application of the guarantee limitation arrangements for sheepmeat and goatmeat for the 1991 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-03", "subjects": "goatmeat,guarantee,sheepmeat", "workIds": "celex:31992R0852,oj:JOL_1992_089_R_0010_022", "eurovoc_concepts": ["goatmeat", "guarantee", "sheepmeat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b61e60d6-6163-44ea-8e59-a52ba1e92207", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6fae9485-248d-49ee-babd-e34fadbe03bd", "title": "European administrative law.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-02", "subjects": "constitutional law,legal doctrine,legislation,national law", "workIds": "PUB_CM7291786", "eurovoc_concepts": ["constitutional law", "legal doctrine", "legislation", "national law"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6fae9485-248d-49ee-babd-e34fadbe03bd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cff8d3f3-ac91-49c1-9531-c5132c82768c", "title": "Question No 57 by Mr BONDE (H-0266/92) to the Commission: Lending rights", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary_question_time,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BONDE,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-02", "subjects": "Denmark,Treaty on European Union,copyright,cultural policy,literary and artistic property,public library", "workIds": "celex:91992H000266", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "Treaty on European Union", "copyright", "cultural policy", "literary and artistic property", "public library"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cff8d3f3-ac91-49c1-9531-c5132c82768c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f25ea6bc-3d35-48f6-b6a8-63e835453f64", "title": "The Community legal order.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Human Resources and Security,European Commission", "date": "1992-04-02", "subjects": "EU law,EU legal system,European treaties,direct applicability,international law,primacy of EU law,secondary legislation", "workIds": "PUB_CB5689392", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "EU legal system", "European treaties", "direct applicability", "international law", "primacy of EU law", "secondary legislation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f25ea6bc-3d35-48f6-b6a8-63e835453f64", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1ce24d7f-c3f3-4a29-bca5-5c026fdef57d", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 841/92 of 2 April 1992 amending Regulations (EEC) No 1727/70, (EEC) No 1728/70, (EEC) No 2603/71, (EEC) No 410/76 and (EEC) No 2501/87 as regards certain varieties of tobacco and (EEC) No 2468/72 as regards the collection and processing and storage centres", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-02", "subjects": "agro-industry,storage,tobacco", "workIds": "celex:31992R0841,oj:JOL_1992_088_R_0031_040", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agro-industry", "storage", "tobacco"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1ce24d7f-c3f3-4a29-bca5-5c026fdef57d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a77d9137-db79-4916-b44a-037041ed3aa4", "title": "Manual on economic accounts for agriculture and forestry.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission,Eurostat", "date": "1992-04-02", "subjects": "agricultural market,agricultural situation,forest,installation allowance,land mobility,statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA5689934", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural market", "agricultural situation", "forest", "installation allowance", "land mobility", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a77d9137-db79-4916-b44a-037041ed3aa4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/32bf7ad7-64b9-409c-8598-ca887cb2e758", "title": "Question No 22 by Mrs TAZDAIT (H-0323/92) to European Political Cooperation: Libya", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary_question_time,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,TAZDAIT", "date": "1992-04-02", "subjects": "France,International Court of Justice,Libya,UN resolution,United Kingdom,United States,extradition,international convention,international sanctions,peacekeeping,penalty,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:91992H000323", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "International Court of Justice", "Libya", "UN resolution", "United Kingdom", "United States", "extradition", "international convention", "international sanctions", "peacekeeping", "penalty", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/32bf7ad7-64b9-409c-8598-ca887cb2e758", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/75485440-961c-4a1c-a29b-e668b5ffa907", "title": "Question No 48 by Mr BOISSIERE (H-0374/92) to the Commission: Proposal for a Council regulation (EEC) on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary_question_time,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BOISSIERE,European Parliament", "date": "1992-04-02", "subjects": "OECD,waste,waste management,waste recycling", "workIds": "celex:91992H000374", "eurovoc_concepts": ["OECD", "waste", "waste management", "waste recycling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/75485440-961c-4a1c-a29b-e668b5ffa907", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/837ec5de-82fb-46b9-a9fa-44d592c20637", "title": "Question No 21 by Mrs VALENT (H-0322/92/rev. ) to European Political Cooperation: Libya", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary_question_time,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALENT", "date": "1992-04-02", "subjects": "France,International Court of Justice,Libya,UN resolution,United Kingdom,United States,extradition,international convention,international sanctions,peacekeeping,penalty,terrorism", "workIds": "celex:91992H000322", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "International Court of Justice", "Libya", "UN resolution", "United Kingdom", "United States", "extradition", "international convention", "international sanctions", "peacekeeping", "penalty", "terrorism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/837ec5de-82fb-46b9-a9fa-44d592c20637", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/74c5dcd6-a7f3-4030-9f72-9cf2e97aff9d", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 847/92 of 2 April 1992 on the sale by the provedure laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 2539/84 of beef held by certain intervention agencies and intended for export to Russia under Council Regulation (EEC) No 599/91 and amending Regulation (EEC) No 569/88", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-04-02", "subjects": "USSR,beef,export,intervention stock,sale", "workIds": "celex:31992R0847,oj:JOL_1992_088_R_0049_046", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "beef", "export", "intervention stock", "sale"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/74c5dcd6-a7f3-4030-9f72-9cf2e97aff9d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}