diff --git "a/36_years1992-05.jsonl" "b/36_years1992-05.jsonl"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/36_years1992-05.jsonl"
@@ -0,0 +1,496 @@
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5bd32ca9-fcdf-4742-9b9d-b343a8904fb9", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1432/92 of 1 June 1992 prohibiting trade between the European Economic Community and the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "Yugoslavia,economic sanctions,republic,trade restriction", "workIds": "celex:31992R1432,oj:JOL_1992_151_R_0004_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Yugoslavia", "economic sanctions", "republic", "trade restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5bd32ca9-fcdf-4742-9b9d-b343a8904fb9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2e90dc43-dbac-45af-a901-f149fc69b56f", "title": "Re-examined proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE modifying Directives 65/65/EEC, 75/318/EEC and 75/319/EEC relating to medicinal products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "approximation of laws,marketing standard,medicinal product,pharmaceutical legislation,pharmacology,public health", "workIds": "celex:51993PC0220(01),comnat:COM_1993_0220(01)_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "marketing standard", "medicinal product", "pharmaceutical legislation", "pharmacology", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2e90dc43-dbac-45af-a901-f149fc69b56f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0MC93) 220 final - SYN 310,311 \n\nBrussels, 1 June 1993 \n\nJEW \n\nRe-examined proposal for a \n\nSYN 310 \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\nmodifying Directives 65/65/EEC, 75/318/EEC and 75/319/EEC \n\nrelating to medicinal products \n\nRe-examined proposal for a \n\nSYN 311 \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\nmodifying Directives 81/851/EEC and 81/852/EEC \n\non the approximation of the laws of the Member States \n\nrelating to veterinary medicinal products \n\n(presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 149(2)(d) \n\nof the EEC Treaty) \n\n\f- 2 \n\nOn 21 April 1993 the European Parliament examined three Common Positions \nreached by the Council on 17 December 1992 relating to the following proposals of \nthe Commission: \n\nproposal for a Council Directive modifying Directives 65/65/EEC, 75/318/EEC \nand 75/319/EEC relating to medicinal products (SYN 310); \n\nproposal for a Council Directive modifying Directives 81/851/EEC and \n81/852/EEC on the approximation of laws of the Member States relating to \nveterinary medicinal products (SYN 311); \n\nproposal for a Council Directive repealing Directive 87/22/EEC on the \napproximation of national measures relating to the placing on the market of high \ntechnology medicinal products, particularly those derived from biotechnology \n(SYN 312). The parliament has, during the second reading of the co-operation procedure, adopted \n13 amendments to the first proposal, 4 amendments to the second proposal and no \namendments to the third proposal. In accordance with Article 149(2)(d) of the Treaty, the Commission has re-examined \nthe first two proposals, having it in mind to take up some of the amendments of the \nparliament, as described hereafter. The Commission wishes, meanwhile, to remind the Parliament and the Council that \nthe decentralised procedure for the authorisation of medicinal products for human and \nveterinary use instituted by these Directives will not be able to function in the absence \nof the European Medicines Evaluation Agency. Consequently, the Commission hopes that the Parliament will be prepared rapidly to \ngive its opinion on the change envisaged by the Council in the legal base of the \nproposal for a Regulation laying down Community procedures for the authorisation \nand the supervision of medicines for human and veterinary use, and establishing an \nEuropean Agency for the evaluation of medicinal products (SYN 309). As far as this \nis concerned, the Commission recalls it preference for article 100A as the legal base \nfor the Regulation. - 3 -\n\nREVISED PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DIRECTIVE (SYN 310) \n\nMODIFYING DIRECTIVES \nRELATING TO MEDICINAL PRODUCTS \n\n65/65/EEC, \n\n75/318/EEC AND \n\n75/319/EEC \n\nIn accordance with Article 149(2)(d) of the Treaty, the Commission has re-examined \nthe above proposal, having it in mind to take up 5 of the 13 amendments of the \nParliament, as detailed in annex 1. The amendments rejected by the Commission can \nbe found in annex 2. i Amendments accepted by the Commission \n\nThe CoML^esio:- if. i\\. ady to accept the amendments whi. h \u2022 ! tr-d already \n\"-. di^g, but which the Council has ;'\u2022\u2022_ \u00bb. i\"ed h: ils \n'-;c?\"tfd \\\\i the I:-\" \nC?. '\u2022\u2022 >m:r- r \n\n'^i*;\"\u00bbn \n\n1 \n\n-' \n\ni \n\n\u2022. -. ,. '\n\n'\u2022 \n\nia\u00bbion oi \n\nrelating \n\nf\u00f4/65/FEC \nTwo amendments \nartiele 10 (\u00ce) and 75/319/EEC article 29g) have the merit ;. -i introducing a \ngreater coherence with the corresponding text of articles 46 and 47 of the \nRegulation. to pharmacovigi!anc\\. \" \n\n(Direcih:. 2. Amendments rejected by the Commission \n\nThe Commission is not prepared to accept the other eight amendments for the \nfollowing reasons: \n\nConcerning the amendment of article 7 (2) of Directive 65/65/EEC, the text of \nthe common position is preferable because it defines in a more detailed manner \nthe mechanism of co-ordination between the Member States when they receive \nsimultaneously the same file, and moreover clarifies which documents should be \nexchanged, and what should be the time limits. - 4 \n\ninto the field of \nintroduce concepts and terminology \nFour amendments \npharmacovigilance incompatible with those practised by the Community and \nrecommended by the World Health Organisation. The amendments concerned \nare those to article 10(2) of Directive 65/65/EEC, as well as those to articles 29a, \n29b and 29d of Directive 75/319/EEC. The amendment of article 13(1) third sub-paragraph (a) new of Directive \n75/319/EEC aims to establish a right to indemnity when national authorities \ninitiate hastily the supplementary period of 90 days which is allowed for in order \nto examine conflicts in decisions between Member States. The Commission \nconsiders that it falls to the national courts to sanction possible abuses in line \nwith national law, without having to create a new right of damages under \nCommunity law. The amendment of article 14 (4) of directive 75/319/EEC calls into doubt again \nthe unity of the market and of the Community examination criteria, since it \npermits a medicinal product, considered through a Community arbitration \nprocedure not to be efficacious, to remain authorised in the country of origin. It \nshould be remembered that a traditional medicinal product, of which the efficacy \nrecognised only by a single Member State, is not affected by the Community \narbitration procedure, unless the firm which markets it itself decides to have it \nrecognised by other countries, thus taking the risk of seeing it rejected. The amendment to article 29f first paragraph (a) new of Directive 75/319/EEC \nrisks creating a system of press censorship. The Commission does not think it \nappropriate that national or community authorities should institute a system of \nprior authorisation for any information, which concerns medicinal products, even \nif it is alarmist. - 5 \n\nANNEX 1 AMENDMENTS ACCEPTED BY THE COMMISSION \n\nCommon position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nThird recital \n\nrelating \n\nWhereas in the interests of public \nhealth it is necessary that decisions \non the authorization to place \nmedicinal products on the market be \nexclusively based on the criteria of \nquality, safety and efficacy; whereas \nthese criteria have been extensively \nharmonized by Council Directive \n65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the \napproximation of provisions laid down \nby law, regulation or administrative \naction \nmedicinal \nproducts, by Council Directive \n75/319/EEC, and by Council Directive \n75/318/EEC of 20 May 1975 on the \napproximation of the laws of the \nMember States relating to analytical, \npharmacotoxicological and clinical \nstandards and protocols in respect of \nthe testing of medicinal products; \nwhereas, however, Member States \nshould exceptionally be able to \nprohibit the use on their territory \nof medicinal products which infringe \nobjectively defined concepts of \npublic order or public morality; \n\nto \n\nWhereas in the interests of public \nhealth and consumers of medicinal \nproducts it is necessary that \ndecisions on the authorization to \nplace medicinal products on the \nmarket be exclusively based on the \ncriteria of quality, safety and \nefficacy; whereas these criteria have \nbeen extensively harmonized by \nDirective 65/65/EEC of 26 January \n1965 on the approximation of \nprovisions laid down by law, \nregulation or administrative action \nrelating to medicinal products, by \nDirective 75/319/EEC, and by Council \nDirective 75/318/EEC of 20 May 1975 \non the approximation of the laws of \nthe Member States relating to \nanalytical, \npharmaco-toxicological \nand clinical standards and protocols \nin respect of the testing of \nmedicinal products; whereas, however, \nMember States should exceptionally be \nable to prohibit the use on their \nterritory of medicinal products which \ninfringe objectively defined concepts \nof public order or public morality; \n\n\f- 6 -\n\nCommon position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nARTICLE 1(4) \nArticle 4b, second paragraph a (new) (Directive 65/65/EEC) \n\nthe market \n\nBefore a medicinal product is placed \non \nthe competent \nauthorities shall forward to the \nEuropean Aaencv for the Evaluation of \nMedicinal Products a copy of the \ndecision together with the summary of \nthe product characteristics referred \n\u00c7o in this Article. The Aaencv shall \ngive the authorized medicinal product \na European Register number which \nshall be marked on the packaging; the \nregister number shall be preceded bv \nthe initials of the Member States in \nwhich \nbeen \nproduct \nthe \nauthorized. has \n\nARTICLE 1(6) \nArticle 7(1) (Directive 65/65/EEC) \n\n1. Member States shall take all \nappropriate measures to ensure that \nthe procedure for granting an \nauthorization to place a medicinal \nproduct on the market is completed \nwithin 2JL9_ days of the submission of \na valid application. 1. Member States shall take all \nappropriate measures to ensure that \nthe procedure for granting an \nauthorization to place a medicinal \nproduct on the market is completed \nwithin V40 days of the date the \napplication is submitted. ARTICLE 1(9) \nArticle 10(1) (Directive 65/65/EEC) \n\n1. Authorization shall be valid for \nfive years and shall be renewable for \nfive-year periods, on application by \nthe holder at least three months \nbefore the expiry date and after \nconsideration of a dossier updating \nthe information previously submitted. 1. Authorization shall be valid for \nfive years and shall be renewable for \nfive-year periods, on application by \nthe holder at least three months \nbefore the expiry date and after the \ncompetent authority has considered a \ndossier \nup-to-date \npharmacovigilance data and the other \ninformation \nthe \nsupervision of the medicinal product. containing \n\nrelevant \n\nto \n\n\f- 7 -\n\nCommon position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nARTICLE 3(3) \nArticle 29g (Directive 75/319/EEC) \n\na b o ut \n\ni n f o r m a t i on \n\nIn order to facilitate the exchange \nof \nthe \npharmacovigilance \nCommunity, \nin \nconsultation with the Agency, Member \nStates and interested parties, shall \ndraw up guidance on the collection, \nverification and presentation of \nadverse reaction reports. within \nCommission, \n\nthe \n\nwithin \n\nab ou t \n\ni n f o r m a t i on \n\nIn order to facilitate the exchange \nof \nthe \npharmacovigilance \nCommunity, \nin \nconsultation with the Agency, Member \nStates and interested circles, shall \ndraw up guidance on the collection, \nverification and presentation of \nadverse reaction reports. the Commission, \n\nSuch guidance shall take into account \nthe work carried out bv the WHO on \nthe harmonization of terminology and \nclassification in the field of \nIt shall also \npharmacovigilance, \nestablish the arrangements for use of \nthe data-processing network between \nthe competent authorities in the \nevent of an alert concerning a \nmanufacturing fault or serious \nundesirable reactions, and other \npharmacovigilance information on \nmedicinal products marketed in the \nCommunity. - 8 -\n\nANNEX 2 AMENDMENTS REJECTED BY THE COMMISSION \n\nCommon position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nARTICLE 1(6) \nArticle 7(2) (Directive 65/65/EEC) \n\nfor \n\n2. Where a Member State notes that an \napplication \nauthorization \nsubmitted after 1 January 1995 is \nalready under active examination in \nanother Member State in respect of \nthat medicinal product, the Member \nState concerned mav decide to suspend \nthe detailed examination of the \napplication in order to await the \nassessment report prepared by the \nother Member State in accordance with \nArticle 4b. 2. In assessing applications for \ncompetent \nauthorization. the \nshall assist \nmarketing authorities \nentrust one \neach Qtfrer an\u00e2 ffi\u00e2y_ \nanother with assessments of all or \npart of the dossier. The competent authorities of the \nMember States shall notify the Agency \nand the other Member States of any \napplications \nmarketing \nauthorization thev receive. for \n\nA Member State that receives \nnotification shall. if the same \napplication for authorization has \nbeen submitted in another Member \nState, contact the latter with a view \nto coordinating their action and \nissuing \nreport \njointly. assessment \n\nthe \n\nIf the Member States with an interest \nin the application do not reach \nagreement, they mav. once all other \npossibilities have been exhausted, \nhave recourse to the procedure laid \ndown in Chapter III of Directive \n75/319/EEC. The\" Member State concerned shall \ninform the other Member State and the \napplicant of its decision to suspend \nthe \nderailed - examination \napplication in question. As soon as \nit has completed the examination of \nthe' application and reached a \ndecision, the other Member State \nshall forward a copy of its \nassessment report to the Member State \nconcerned. of \n\nWithin 90 davs of the receipt of the \nassessment report, the Member State \nconcerned shall either recognize the \ndecision of the other Member State \nand the summary of the product \ncharacteristics as approved bv it. or. if it considers that there are \ngrounds for supposing that the \nauthorization of the medicinal \nproduct concerned mav present a risk \nto public health, it shall apply the \nprocedures set out in Articles 10 to \n14 of Directive 75/319/EEC. - 9 \n\nCommon position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nARTICLE 1(9) \nArticle 10(2), first subparagraph (Directive 65/65/EEC) \n\n2. In exceptional circumstances, and \nfollowing consultation with the \napplicant, an authorization may be \ngranted subject to certain specific \nobligations, including: \n\nand \n\nexceptional \n\n2. In \nduly \nsubstantiated circumstances, and \nfollowing consultation with the \napplicant, an authorization may be \ngranted subject to certain specific \nobligations, defined and reviewed \nannually bv the Agency, to: \n\nthe carrying out of further \nstudies following the granting of \nauthorization; \n\nconduct further studies following \nthe granting of authorization; \n\n- the notification of adverse \nthe medicinal \n\nto \n\nreactions \nproduct. - report \n\nside-effects \n\nof \n\nmedicinal product. the \n\n\fC o m m on position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nARTICLE 3 d) \nArticle 13(1), third subparagraph a (new) \n(Directive 75/319/EEC) \n\nAnv delays arising in the marketing \nof a medicinal product because this \nprocedure has been initiated hastily \nor with the sole intention of causing \na delay mav entitle the applicant to \ndemand compensation in accordance \nwith the legislation applicable in \nthe Member State in question. *\u00abV \n\nArticle 3(1) \nArticle 14(4) (Directive 75/319/EEC) \n\nA decision adopted in accordance with \nthis Article shall be addressed to \nthe Member States concerned by the \nmatter and to the person responsible \nfor marketing. The Member States \nshall either grant or withdraw \nmarketing authorization, or make any \nadjustment to the terms of a \nmarketing authorization which may be \nnecessary to comply with the decision \nwithin 30 days of its notification. They shall inform the Commission and \nthe Committee thereof. A decision adopted in accordance with \nthis Article shall be addressed to \nthe Member States concerned by the \nmatter and to the person responsible \nfor marketing. The Member States \nshall either grant or withdraw \nmarketing authorization, or make any \nadjustment to the terms of a \nmarketing authorization which may be \nnecessary to comply with the decision \nwithin 30 days of its notification. In adopting its decision, the Member \nState in which the authorization was \noriginally granted shall take into \naccount experience with the medicinal \nproduct in question. An existing \nnational authorization may be upheld, \neven in the event of a prior negative \nDecision in accordance with this \nArticle, if the medicinal product is \nharmless and of high gualitv. They \nshall inform the Commission and the \nCommittee thereof. 11 -\n\nCommon position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nARTICLE 3(3) \nArticle 29a (Directive 75/319/EEC) \n\nIn order to ensure the adoption of \nappropriate regulatory decisions \nconcerning the medicinal products \nauthorized within the Community, \nhaving regard to information obtained \nabout adverse reactions to medicinal \nproducts under normal conditions of \nuse, the Member States shall \nestablish a pharmacovigilance system. This system shall be used to collect \nthe \ninformation \nsurveillance of medicinal products, \nwith particular reference to adverse \nreactions in human beings, and to \nevaluate \nscientifically. information \n\nuseful \n\nsuch \n\nin \n\nIn order to ensure the adoption of \nappropriate regulatory decisions \ncontinued \nthe \nc o n c e r n i ng \nauthorization of medicinal products \nwithin the Community, having regard \nto information obtained about the \nside-effects of medicinal products \nunder normal conditions of use, \nMember States shall establish a \npharmacovigilance \nfor \ncollecting information about the \nside-effects of medicinal products in \nhuman beings and for the scientific \nevaluation of such information, such \nthat the information about side-\neffects is systematically related to \nthe information on the consumption of \nmedicinal products. system \n\nARTICLE 3(3; \nArticle 29b, indents (Directive 75/319/EEC) \n\n\"adverse \nmeans a \nreaction\" \nreaction which is harmful and \nunintended and which occurs at \ndoses normally used in man for the \nprophylaxis, \nor \ntreatment of disease or the \nmodification of physiological \nfunction; \n\ndiagnosis \n\n\"serious adverse reaction\" means \nan adverse reaction which is \n1 i f e - t h r e a t e n i n g, \nfatal, \ndisabling, incapacitating, or \nwhich results in or prolongs \nhospitalization; \n\n\"unexpected adverse reaction\" \nmeans an adverse reaction which is \nnot mentioned in the summary of \nproduct characteristics; \n\nserious \n\nunexpected \n\nadverse \nreaction\" means \nadverse \nreaction which is both serious and \nunexpected. an \n\n\"side-effects\" means a reaction \nwhich is harmful and unintended \nand which occurs at doses normally \nused in man for the prophylaxis, \ndiagnosis or treatment of disease \nor \nof \nphysiological function; \n\nmodification \n\nthe \n\n\"serious side-effects\" means an \nunfavourable reaction which is \nf a t a l, \n1i f e - t h r e a t e n i n g, \ndisabling, incapacitating, or \nwhich results in hospitalization \nor prolonged hospitalization; \n\n\"unexpected side-effects\" means an \nunfavourable reaction which is not \nmentioned in the summary of \nproduct characteristics; \n\n\"serious unexpected side-effects\" \nmeans an unfavourable reaction \nwhich is both serious and \nunexpected. Common position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nARTICLE 3(3) \nArticle 29d(1)(Directive 75/319/EEC) \n\n1. The person responsible for placing \nthe medicinal product on the market \nshall be required to record and to \nreport all suspected serious adverse \nreactions which are brought to his \nattention \ncare \na \nprofessional \ncompetent \nauthorities immediately, and in any \ncase within 15 days of their receipt \nat the latest-\n\nhealth \n\nthe \n\nby \n\nto \n\n1. The person responsible for \nplacing the medicinal product on the \nmarket shall be required to record \nand to report all suspected serious \nunexpected side-effects which are \nbrought to his attention by a \nqualified health care professional to \nthe \nauthorities \nimmediately, and in any case within \n15 days of their receipt. competent \n\nARTICLE 3(3) \nArticle 29f, first paragraph a (new) (Directive 75/319/EEC) \n\nThe Member States shall take steps to \nensure that pharmacovigilance data \nwhich is not officially confirmed and \nwhich mav give rise to unnecessary \nalarm is not disseminated. The \ndissemination of data which has not \nbeen officially confirmed, if it \nproves to be inaccurate, mav be the \nsubject of compensation in accordance \nwith the legislation of each Member \n\n\f- 13 -\n\nREVISED PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DIRECTIVE SYN 311 \n\nMODIFYING DIRECTIVES \n81/852/EEC ON THE \nAPPROXIMATION OF LAWS OF THE MEMBER STATES RELATING TO \nVETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS \n\n81/851/EEC AND \n\nIn accordance with Article 149(2)(d) of the Treaty, the Commission has re-examined \nthe above proposal, in order to assimilate three of the four amendments from the \nparliament, as detailed in annex 1. The amendment rejected can be found in annex 2. 1. Amendments accepted by the Commission \n\nThe Commission is prepared to accept the amendments which it had already \naccepted during the first reading, but which the Council did not retain in its \ncommon position. The role given to the European Agency (Directive 81/851/EEC, article 5b, third \nparagraph new) in attributing European number to each medicinal product which \nis authorised in the Community in the future will contribute to a greater \ntransparency of the market. The present wording of this amendment envisages \nthat the countries which have authorised the medicine should be mentioned, \nwhich will avoid any risk of confusion with the numbers attributed to community \nauthorisations. The reduction of the duration of the national examination procedure from 210 \ndays to 140 (Directive X1/85 l/EEC, article 8( I )) takes account of the fact that, as \na general rule, the national procedure concerns conventional medicines, and not \nhigh-technology medicines dealt with under the centralised procedure, the \nexamination of which requires a longer time-limit, of the order of 210 days. The amendment relating to pharmacovigilance (Directive 81/851/EEC article \n42g) has the merit of introducing a greater coherence with the corresponding text \nof articles 46 and 47 of the Regulation. 2. Amendments rejected by the Commission \n\nThe Commission is not prepared to accept the amendment of article 15(1) of \nDirective 81/851/EEC, because it introduces into the five yearly re-examination \nof the authorization of a veterinary medicinal product concepts which are not \nclear and which appear to move away from \nthe customary criteria of \nauthorization (quality, security and efficacy). AjsiNRy t AMENDMENTS ACCEEEEDBYJTHE_COMMISSION \n\n- 14 -\n\nCommon position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nARTICLE 1(5) \nArticle 5b, third paragraph (new) \n(Directive 81/851/EEC) \n\nthe \n\nthe \n\nmarket \n\nBefore a medicinal product is placed \non \ncompetent \nauthorities shall forward to the \nEuropean Agency for the Evaluation of \nMedicinal Products a copy of the \ndecision together with the summary of \nthe product characteristics referred \nto in this Article. The Agency shall \nveterinary \nauthorized \ngive \nmedicinal product a European Register \nnumber which shall be marked on the \npackaging; the registration number \nshall be preceded by the initials of \nthe Member State in which the \nproduct's use has been authorized. the \n\nARTICLE 1(6) \nArticle 8(1) \n(Directive 81/851/EEC) \n\n1. Member States shall take all \nappropriate measures to ensure that \nthe procedure for granting an \nauthorization to place a veterinary \nmedicinal product on the market is \ncompleted within 210 days of the \nsubmission of a valid application. 1. Member States shall take all \nappropriate measures to ensure that \nthe procedure for granting an \nauthorization to place a medicinal \nproduct on the market is completed \nwithin 140 days of the date the \napplication is submitted. ARTICLE 1(12) \nArticle 42g \n(Directive 81/851/EEC) \n\na b o ut \n\ni n f o r m a t i on \n\nIn order to facilitate the exchange \nof \nthe \npharmacovigilance \nCommunity, \nin \nconsultation with the Agency, Member \nStates and interested parties, shall \ndraw up guidance on the collection, \nverification and presentation of \nadverse reaction reports. within \nCommission, \n\nthe \n\nthe \n\na b o ut \n\nverification \n\ni n f o r m a t i on \n\nwithin \nCommission, \n\nIn order to facilitate the exchange \nof \nthe \npharmacovigilance \nCommunity, \nin \nconsultation with the Agency, Member \nStates and interested circles, shall \ndraw up detailed guidance on the \ncollection, \nand \npresentation of adverse reaction \nreports. Such guidance shall take \ninto account the work carried out bv \nthe WHO on the harmonization of \nterminology and classification in the \nfield of pharmacovigilance, where \nthis can be used in connection with \nveterinary medicinal products. The \nguidance shall also establish the \narrangements for the use of the \ninformation \nnetwork \nthe \ncompetent\u201eau_thori tips in the__event_pf \nJLQ-JLU\\lJL^QI?gf-LU3Jnq a nianuf acturinq \nfault or serious adverse reactions, \nas well as other pharmacovigilance \ninformation on veterinary medicinal \nproducts marketed in the Community. among \n\n\f- 15 -\n\nANNfiX 2 AMENDMENTS REJECT*vn KV Jim COMMISSION \n\nCommon position of the Council \n\nAmendments \n\nARTICLE 1(9) \nArticle 15(1) \n(Directive 81/851/EEC) \n\n1. Authorization shall be valid for \nfive years and shall be renewable for \nfive-year periods, on application by \nthe holder at least three months \nbefore the expiry date and after \nconsideration of a dossier updating \nthe information previously submitted. 1. Authorization shall be valid for \nfive years and shall be renewable for \nfive-year periods, on application by \nthe holder at least three months \nbefore the expiry date and after the \ncompetent body has considered a \ndossier \ncontaining _ updated \npharmacovigilance data and the other \nthe \ninformation \nmonitoring of the product. relevant \n\nto \n\nWhen delivering its ' opinion the \nresponsible body shall take account \noff any new information available on \nside-effects \nmedicinal \nproduct, its efficacy and its olacs \nin its therapeutic class. of. ,. ^3 \n\n\f\fM \n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(93) 220 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n05 03 06 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-93-247-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-55872-. ' \n\nOffice for Officiai Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a30d19f1-bca5-484c-a509-42cb63c6d610", "title": "92/285/ECSC: Decision of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council of 1 June 1992 prohibiting trade between the European Coal and Steel Community and the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision_representatives_member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "ECSC,Yugoslavia,republic,trade restriction", "workIds": "celex:41992D0285,oj:JOL_1992_151_R_0020_025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ECSC", "Yugoslavia", "republic", "trade restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a30d19f1-bca5-484c-a509-42cb63c6d610", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/476d7801-a246-4d4b-9b75-2bdfa0360a6f", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1427/92 of 1 June 1992 laying down detailed rules governing the grant of private storage aid for Pecorino Romano cheese", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "aid to agriculture,private stock,sheep's milk cheese", "workIds": "celex:31992R1427,oj:JOL_1992_150_R_0008_016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["aid to agriculture", "private stock", "sheep's milk cheese"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/476d7801-a246-4d4b-9b75-2bdfa0360a6f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/44ef0331-2617-4d98-a28c-7d6c2cf29bfa", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1426/92 of 1 June 1992 laying down detailed rules for the granting of private storage aid for long-keeping cheeses", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "hard cheese,private stock", "workIds": "celex:31992R1426,oj:JOL_1992_150_R_0005_015", "eurovoc_concepts": ["hard cheese", "private stock"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/44ef0331-2617-4d98-a28c-7d6c2cf29bfa", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/932962cb-fb5d-40aa-b61c-4f1ff395bd76", "title": "Conclusions of the Council and the Ministers of Education meeting within the Council of 1 June 1992 on the development of environmental education", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_other_oj_l,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union,Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "EU national,environmental protection,mass education,public awareness campaign,teacher training,young person", "workIds": "celex:41992X0616(01),oj:JOC_1992_151_R_0002_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "environmental protection", "mass education", "public awareness campaign", "teacher training", "young person"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/932962cb-fb5d-40aa-b61c-4f1ff395bd76", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f201a16d-f90c-44e3-aa29-246c9ead4f81", "title": "Conclusions of the Council of 1 June 1992 on the assessment of new Community programmes concerning education and training", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_legislative_other_oj_c,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "EU programme,education policy,project evaluation", "workIds": "celex:31992Y0616(01),oj:JOC_1992_151_R_0003_02", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU programme", "education policy", "project evaluation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f201a16d-f90c-44e3-aa29-246c9ead4f81", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a015f393-b03d-40e1-9074-d7d1475deaae", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1465/92 of 1 June 1992 amending for the twelfth time Regulation (EEC) No 3094/86 laying down certain technical measures for the conversion of fishery resources", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "conservation of fish stocks,fishery management,fishing net", "workIds": "celex:31992R1465,oj:JOL_1992_155_R_0001_021", "eurovoc_concepts": ["conservation of fish stocks", "fishery management", "fishing net"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a015f393-b03d-40e1-9074-d7d1475deaae", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68f922c4-1d09-4b25-a6c5-5e5cb2b8baba", "title": "Conclusions of the Council and the Ministers of Education meeting within the Council of 1 June 1992 on the development of open and distance learning in the European Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_other_oj_l,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union,Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "EU programme,apprenticeship,distance learning,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:41992X0616(02),oj:JOC_1992_151_R_0003_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU programme", "apprenticeship", "distance learning", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68f922c4-1d09-4b25-a6c5-5e5cb2b8baba", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f4426a83-0da3-4ae3-ada0-63d3b70bdf9d", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION for a monitoring mechanism of Community CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_decision_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "EU programme,climate,climate change,combustion gases,greenhouse effect,greenhouse gas,pollution control measures,stratospheric pollution", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0181,comnat:COM_1992_0181_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU programme", "climate", "climate change", "combustion gases", "greenhouse effect", "greenhouse gas", "pollution control measures", "stratospheric pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f4426a83-0da3-4ae3-ada0-63d3b70bdf9d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nANNULE ET REHPLACE LE \nDOC. SEC (92) 854 final \n\nCOM(92) 181 final \n\nBrussels, 1 June 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nfor n \u2022onltorlnn ^ h. r , !^ \n\nftf flfflmmHy ffl^ \n\nand other greenhouse g\u00bb\u00bb M I M I AM \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nThe European Counc 11 held in Dub 11 n on June 1990 recognized the \nglobal dimension of the greenhouse effect and urged all countries to \nadopt as soon as possible targets and strategies for limiting \nemissions of greenhouse gases. 2. The Joint Council of Energy and Environment Ministers agreed at their \nmeeting on 29 October 1990 to take actions aiming at reaching \nstabilization of total C02 emissions by the year 2000 at 1990 \nI eve Is. 3. The Commission's communication on \"A Community Strategy to Limit \nCarbon Dioxide emissions and to improve energy efficiency\" of 14 \nOctober 1991 recognized that a moni tor ino mechanism should be set up \nto follow whether the C02 stabilization target of the Community is \nbeing reached. 4. In this context the Joint Council of Energy and Environment Ministers \nagreed at their meeting of 13 December 1991 that it is necessary, \nwithin the Community strategy, to formulate national programmes \nincluding strategies and targets for limiting their C 02 emissions \nas well as national programmes for limiting other greenhouse gases \nemissions. In addition the Commission is required by the Council to make an \nassessment of national action taken as a whole in relation to the \noverall Community stabilization objective. 5. On the basis of the expressed political commitments, the Commission \nsubmits this proposal for a Decision for a monitoring mechanism of \nCommunity C02 and progressively other greenhouse gas emissions. The main purpose of this proposal is to ensure at Community level as \nappropriate the achievement of the stabilization of C02 emissions \nby the year 2000 at their 1990 level and the limitation of other \ngreenhouse gas emissions. This will be done through the evaluation \nof Community and national actions. The proposal is based on four key elements; the national programmes \nthat should be drawn up by the Member States-, their evaluat ion by the \nCommission in the light of the EC stabilization agreement; the \nfollow-up of the national programme implementation through a data \nreporting system and the establishment of an inventory concerning \ngreenhouse gas emissions; and taking into account the equitable \nburden shar ing. Apart from that the proposal has a special provision for the setting-\nup of a Consultative Committee of Member States representatives. - 2 -\n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard^to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, and in particular Article 130s thereof. Having regard to the proposal of the Commission. Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliaments ) \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social \nCommittee. ( ) \n\nWhereas the 1973<1>, 1977<2>, 1983<3> European Communities \naction programmes on the environment stress the importance of the \nreduction and prevention of atmospheric pollution, and in addition \nthe 1987<4) action programme emphasizes the importance for \nCommunity action to concentrate as a priority on the reduction at \nsource of air pollution; \n\nWhereas the Council Resolution of 16 September 1986(5) calls for a \nsearch for balanced solutions as regards energy and the \nenv i ronment; \n\nWhereas the European Council of 21 June 1989( 6) declares that the \nCommunity and its Member States should take proper account in \nfuture policy decision of the problem of potential climatic change \nlinked to the greenhouse effect; \n\nWhereas the European Council held at Dublin in June 1990 urged for \nthe adoption as soon as possible of targets and strategies for \nlimiting emissions of greenhouse gases; \n\nWhereas the Council of Energy and Environment Ministers agreed at \ntheir meeting on 29 October 1990 that the Community as a whole \nshould stabilize C 02 emissions in general by the year 2000 at \n1990 level; \n\nWhereas C 02 emissions arise primarily from the burning of fossil \nfueIs; \n\nWhereas the Commission has underlined, in the framework of a \nCommunity Strategy to limit carbon dioxide emissions and to improve \nenergy ef f iciency(7), the need to set up a mechanism of monitoring \nand evaluation, in order to ensure that the Community stabilization \ntarget is met for the year 2000; \n\nWhereas the Council of Energy and Environment Ministers at their \nmeeting on 13 December 1991 invited the Commission to propose \nconcrete measures arising from the Community strategy and required \nthat such measures should take into account the concept of \nequitable burden sharing-, \n\n(1) O. J. No. C 112, 20. 12. 1973, p. 1 \nC. 139. 13. 06. 1977. p. (2) O. J. No. C 46, 17. 02. 1983. p. 1 \n(3) O. J. No. C. 328, 7. 12. 1987, p. 1 \n(4) O. J. No. C 241/1, 25. 09. 1986 \n(5) O. J. No. C 183/4. 20. 07. 1989 \n(6) O. J. No. (7) SEC (91) 1744 Final, 14. 10. 1989 \n\n\f- 3 -\n\nWhereas Member States need to develop national gross energy related \nC 02 emission objectives, in order to ensure the achievement of \nthe Community stabilization target; \n\n\u00bb\u2022\u00bb\u00bb \n\nWhereas the Commission needs to evaluate whether through the \nnational emission objectives and their evolution the Community \nstabilization target will be achieved; \n\nWhereas such monitoring and evaluation should be integrated as \nclosely as possible in the existing reviews of energy programmes of \nMember States, as mentioned in the Council resolution concerning \nnew Community energy policy objectives for 1995( 8 ); \n\nWhereas the Commission may propose additional Community or national \nactions for the achievement of the Community stabilization target, \nfor which a simplified procedure should apply. (8) Resolution 86/C 241/01 of 16. 09. 1986 \n\n\f- A \n\n-\n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nEC MONITORING MECHANISM \n\nThis Decision establishes a monitoring mechanism of C 02 emissions in \nthe Member States, in order to ensure at Community level the \nachievement of the stabilization of C02 emissions by the year 2000 at \ntheir 1990 level and provide for the progressive establishment of a \nmonitoring mechanism for other greenhouse gases as policies with regard \nto these develop. - 5 -\n\nArticle 2 \n\nDEFINITIONS \n\nFor the purpose of this Decision: \n\na. \"COg emission\" means: \n\nb. \"Community COg stabilization \n\ntarget\" means: \n\nc. \"national COg emissions \nob Iect i ves\" means: \n\nThe discharge of C 02 into the \natmosphere resulting from the \nburning of fuels. The stabilization of the total \nC02 emissions by 2000 at 1990 \nlevels in the Community as a \nwho Ie. is \n\nexpected \n\nThe maximum quantity of C02 \nthat \nbe \ndischarged into the atmosphere \nduring a calendar year, by a \nMember State, according to the \nprovisions of \nnational \nprogramme. the \n\nto \n\nd. \"national programme\" means \n\nall the measures envisaged or \nalready taken at a national \nlevel to reduce C 02 emissions, \nand to limit other greenhouse \ngas emissions. e. \"other greenhouse gas \n\nemissions\" means: \n\nof \n\noxide, \n\ndischarge \n\nmethane, \nThe \nnitrous \nhalocarbons, \ntropospheric ozone precursors \nnitrogen \nmonoxide. (carbon \norganic \nvolatile \noxides, \ncompounds) into the atmosphere \nfrom all human activities. - 6 -\n\nArticle 3 \n\nNATIONAL PROGRAMMES \n\nI. National COg emissions programmes \n\na. The Member States shall draw up national \n\nC 02 emissions \nprogrammes, including strategies and national C 02 emissions \nobjectives for limiting their C 02 emissions, in order to \ncontribute to the achievement of the Community C 02 stabilization \ntarget. b. The Member States shall establish and communicate to the \nCommission, before the end of 1994, national C 02 emissions \nobjectives covering the years 1996, 1998 and 2000. c. The national programmes shall comprise as far as possible : \n\n- the use of national instruments and actions aiming at \n\nIncreasing energy efficiency and conservation; \n\n- the use of national instruments and actions aiming at fuel \n\nswitching towards low or no-carbon containing fuels; \n\n- the implementation of possible Community legislation and \n\npolicy, including economic and fiscal instruments; \n\n- an assessment of the economic impact of the above measures-, \n\n11. Additional national programmes \n\nMember States shall also report on policies and measures in \norder to increase the sequestration of C 02 emissions and on \nactions taken to limit the emissions of other greenhouse gases \n(apart from C 02), and evaluate the impact of these measures. - 7 -\n\nArticle 4 \n\nFIRST EVALUATION OP NATIONAL PROGRAMMES \n\nI. REPORTING AND EVALUATION \n\na. Member States shall forward to the Commission the national \nprogrammes described in Article 3 to start one year after the \nentry into force of this Decision. b. The Commission shall forward to the other Member States the \nnational programmes received within three months of their \nreception. c. The Commission shall evaluate these programmes in order to examine \nwhether they, in conjunction with the Community action, secure \ncompliance with the Community C02 stabilization target, and as \nappropriate the limitation of other greenhouse gases. d. The Commission shall report to the Council and the European \nParliament the results of its assessment of the national programmes \nin relation to the overall Community C02 stabilization target \nand, as appropriate, the limitation of other greenhouse gases \nwithin 6 months after the reception of the programmes. II. ADDITIONAL MEASURES \n\nDepending on the results of the evaluation the Commission may, if \nnecessary, and with due regard to burden sharing, make all \nappropriate proposals for required additional actions with a view \nto ensuring the attainment of the Community's C02 stabilization \ntarget and the limitation of other greenhouse gas emissions. The \nCouncil shall take a decision on these proposals by qualified \nmajority after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic \nand Social Committee. - 8 -\n\nArt icle 5 \n\nINVENTORY AND DATA-REPORTING \n\na. With the entry into force of this Decision, Member States will \nreport to the Commission their 1990 base year C 02 emissions on \nthe basis of fuel consumption statistics and Community wide agreed \nC02 emissions factors. b. The Commission in cooperation with the Member States shall \nestablish an inventory of C02 and other greenhouse gas emissions \nin the Community. It will be developed on the basis of existing \nCommunity and Member State inventories and take into account \nprogress made on international methods for emissions accounting. c. The procedures and methods for the development of the inventory for \nestimating and reporting C02 emissions shall be determined by the \nCommission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article \n8. d. Member States shall each year, not later than (31 July) (from \n19. ), report to the Commission the data concerning C 02 emissions \nof the previous year and emissions of other greenhouse gases, as \nreliable data and methodology become available. e. The Commission shall establish within 6 months of reception a \ncomprehensive report of the data to be transmitted to the Member \nStates. f. Member States shall submit to the Commission each year all \nappropriate information about the implementation of the national \nprogrammes, including costs, and inform the Commission at the \nearliest opportunity of any substantcial alteration in their \nnational programmes. - 9 -\n\nArticle 6 \n\nEVALUATION OF PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL PROGRAMMES \n\na. The Commission shall establish procedures and methods for the \nevaluation of the progress made in the implementation of the \nnational programmes in accordance with the procedure referred to in \nArticle 8. This evaluation will be made primarily \nreceived under Article 3 and article 5. on the basis of data \n\nThe Commission shall report every three years on its own \nresponsablIity in the light of the information received under \nArticle 3 and 5 to the Council and the European Parliament on the \nstate of application of this Decision. This report shall address a \nsurvey of the progress made and problems encountered in each Member \nState and in the Community as a whole. - 10 -\n\nArticle 7 \n\nCOg EMISSION MONITORING AND NATIONAL ENERGY POLICIES REVIEW \n\nThe data reporting as deeribed in Article 5, as well as the actions \nforeseen under Articles 4 and 6 shall be integrated as closely as \npossible to the review process of national energy policies as defined \nin Council Resolution 86/C 241/01 of 16 September 1986. \\ \n\n\f- 11 -\n\nArticle 8 \n\nCONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE \n\n1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee of an advisory \nnature composed of representatives of the Member States and chaired \nby a representative of the Commission. 2. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee \na draft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver \nIts opinion on the draft within a time limit which the chairman may \nlay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by \ntaking a vote. 3. The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition, each \nMember State shall have the right to ask to have its position \nrecorded in the minutes. 4. The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion \ndelivered by the committee. It shall inform the committee of the \nmanner in which its opinion has been taken into account. - 12 -\n\nArt icle 9 \n\nThis Decision is addressed to the Member States \n\nDone at. For the Counci \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 181 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n12 14 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-252-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44836-9 \n\nOfSce for OfiSdaJ Publications of the European Communities \nL\u00bb2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f381a59a-0268-45e2-8d05-94b896ce14ce", "title": "Research and technology development in the field of communications technologies : RACE.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for the Information Society and Media,European Commission", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "information technology,research programme", "workIds": "PUB_CD7391360", "eurovoc_concepts": ["information technology", "research programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f381a59a-0268-45e2-8d05-94b896ce14ce", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4bcb0078-a3cb-4413-a9b5-2537d0ff9ad4", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1433/92 of 1 June 1992 amending, with regard to the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro, Regulations (EEC) No 3587/91, (EEC) No 545/92, (EEC) No 546/92 and (EEC) No 547/92", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "Yugoslavia,agricultural product,economic support,generalised preferences,republic", "workIds": "celex:31992R1433,oj:JOL_1992_151_R_0007_018", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Yugoslavia", "agricultural product", "economic support", "generalised preferences", "republic"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4bcb0078-a3cb-4413-a9b5-2537d0ff9ad4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a8fe50d-bb49-44f7-9437-10a4b0ea37c4", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1428/92 of 1 June 1992 on the sale by the procedure laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 2539/84 of beef held by certain intervention agencies and intended for export after processing, amending Regulation (EEC) No 569/88 and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2911/91", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-06-01", "subjects": "award of contract,beef,food processing,intervention agency,sale", "workIds": "celex:31992R1428,oj:JOL_1992_150_R_0011_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["award of contract", "beef", "food processing", "intervention agency", "sale"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a8fe50d-bb49-44f7-9437-10a4b0ea37c4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1d33f61b-43da-4363-8457-aa5666fa0da9", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1422/92 of 27 May 1992 reducing the basic price and buying-in price for peaches and nectarines for the 1992/93 marketing year following the overrun of the intervention threshold for 1991/92", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "purchase price,stone fruit", "workIds": "celex:31992R1422,oj:JOL_1992_148_R_0019_012", "eurovoc_concepts": ["purchase price", "stone fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1d33f61b-43da-4363-8457-aa5666fa0da9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/978d9028-027d-4f6d-b472-ed9687f3fea2", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1403/92 of 27 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3518/91 on the country nomenclature for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "foreign trade,intra-EU trade,statistical nomenclature,statistics", "workIds": "celex:31992R1403,oj:JOL_1992_146_R_0048_053", "eurovoc_concepts": ["foreign trade", "intra-EU trade", "statistical nomenclature", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/978d9028-027d-4f6d-b472-ed9687f3fea2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86be3d6f-70ab-4408-b7f8-727ae9c407d8", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1405/92 of 27 May 1992 establishing the value of the advance payments to be made to producers of soya beans, rape seed, colza seed and sunflower seed for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "oleaginous plant,production aid,regional aid", "workIds": "celex:31992R1405,oj:JOL_1992_146_R_0056_055", "eurovoc_concepts": ["oleaginous plant", "production aid", "regional aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86be3d6f-70ab-4408-b7f8-727ae9c407d8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68553306-e6c2-4d12-b61f-c1344892157c", "title": "The EC programme \"Comparability of vocational training qualifications\" : aims, working methods, evaluation.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Cedefop,European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "Cedefop,free movement of workers,labour market,professional qualifications,skilled worker,vocational training", "workIds": "PUB_HX7391675", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Cedefop", "free movement of workers", "labour market", "professional qualifications", "skilled worker", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68553306-e6c2-4d12-b61f-c1344892157c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/964185f1-ef8b-49f8-94bb-e7be74580174", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) opening and providing for the administation of Community tariff quotas for quality wines produced in the specified regions of Jerez, Malaga, Jumilla, Priorato, Rioja and Valdepe\u00f1as (2nd half of 1992)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "Spain,tariff quota,wine of superior quality", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0224,comnat:COM_1992_0224_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "tariff quota", "wine of superior quality"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/964185f1-ef8b-49f8-94bb-e7be74580174", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN CQMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 224 final \n\nBrussels, 27 May 1992 \n\nProposai for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nopening and providing for the administration of Cararounity tariff quotas \n\nfor quality wines produced in the specified r\u00e9gions of Jerez, \n\nMalaga, Jumilla, Priorato, Rioja and Valdepefias \n\n(2nd half of 1992) \n\n(pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e! by the Commission) \n\nm; \n\nm Mi' \n\nU?U: \n\n^^ \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nz \n\n1. Pursuant to articles 30 and 75 of the Act of Accession, the duties \n\napplicable to imports into the Community, as constituted on 31 December \n\n1985, of agricultural products originating in Spain shall be \n\nprogressively abolished. Consequently, these provisions are applicable \n\nto duties to be levied in the framework of the following Community \n\nCustoms quotas: \n\n358 120 hi sherry, in containers holding two litres or less, of CN-\n\ncodes ex2204 21 41 and ex2204 21 51, \n\n435 000 hi sherry, in containers holding more than two litres, of \n\nCN-oodes ex2204 29 41 and ex2204 29 51, \n\n22 008 hi wines from Jumilla, Priorato, Rioja and Valdepeftas, in \n\ncontainers holding two litres or less, of CN-codes ex2204 21 21, \n\nex2204 21 23, ex2204 21 31, ex2204 21 33 and ex2204 21 49, \n\nand \n\n15 000 hi Malaga wines in containers holding two litres or less, of \n\nCN-codes ex2204 21 49 and ex2204 21 59. These quotas shall be open until 30 June 1992. In compliance with Article 75 (1) of the Act of Accession, the duties \n\napplicable to the wines in question shall be reduced to 12,5% of the \n\nbasic duties on 1 January 1992 and to 0% of the basic duties on 1 \n\nJanuary 1993. By derogation from Article 30 of the abovementioned act, \n\nRegulation (EEC) No. 4161/87 lays down, consequent on the entry into \n\nforce of the Combined Nomenclature, the basic duties to be adopted \n\nwithin the Ctamraunity, as constituted on 31 December 1985, for the \n\npurpose of calculating the successive reductions provided for in the Act \n\nof Accession of Spain and Portugal. These tariff measures are not applicable in Portugal because Regulation \n\n(EEC) 3792/85, laying down the arrangements applying to trade in \n\nagricultural products between Spain and Portugal, provide for \n\nparticular provisions on the subject. Pursuant to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2573/90 of 5 September 1990, \n\ntotally suspending certain customs duties applicable by the Coramunity of \n\nTen to imports from Spain and Portugal, the said duties, as concerns the \n\nproducts referred to in Annex II to the Treaty, are totally suspended, \n\nonce they reach a level of 2% or less. It is necessary, therefore, to \n\napply a duty equal to zero when the value of the specified customs \n\nduties does not exceed 2% ad valorem. Given that, from 1 January 1993, the duties in question shall be \n\nabolished, the quota-period should be set at six months, from 1 July to \n\n31 December 1992, and the abovementioned tariff quotas should be opened \n\npro rata temporis, in the Community as constituted on 31 December 1985, \n\nat duties calculated according to the provisions provided for on the \n\nsubject. Such is the purpose of the annexed proposal for a Regulation. 2. It is proposed that the whole of the quota volumes be held as Community \n\nreserves, to which all Member States will have access, in accordance \n\nwith the procedure provided for in Article 3 of the proposal for a \n\nRegulation. Proposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\n/ 92 \n\nof \n\nopening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for \nin the specified regions of Jerez, Malaga, Jumilla, \nquality wines produced \n\nPriorato, Rioja and Valdepenas \n\n(2nd h a lf of 1 9 9 2) \n\nV \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and \nPortugal, and in particular Articles 30 and 75 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas, pursuant to Articles 30 and 75 of the Act of \nAccession, the duties applicable on the import into the \nCommunity, as constituted on 31 December 1985, of the \nfollowing quality wines from Spain shall be progressively \nabolished within the limits of|Community tariff quotas : \n\nannual \n\n\u2014 358 120 hectolitres quality wines produced in the \nspecified region of Jerez in containers holding two \nlitres or less, falling within CN codes ex 2204 2141 \nand ex 2204 21 51, \n\n\u2014 435 000 hectolitres quality wines produced \n\nin the \nspecified region of Jerez in containers holding more \nthan two litres falling within CN codes ex 2204 29 41 \nand ex 2204 29 51, \n\n\u2014 15 000 hectolitres quality wines produced \n\nthe \nspecified region of Malaga in containers holding two \nlitres or less, falling within CN codes ex 2204 21 49 \nand. ex 2204 21 59, and \n\nin \n\n\u2014 22 008 hectolitres quality wines produced \n\nthe \nspecified \nregions of Jumilla, Priorato, Rioja and \nValdepenas, in containers holding two litres or less, \nfalling within CN codes ex 2204 21 21, ex 2204 21 23, \nex 2204 21 31, ex 2204 21 33 and ex 2204 21 49; \n\nin \n\nWhereas, however, with regard \nto the quality wines \nproduced in the specified region of Jerez, in order to \nfulfil better the requirements of the common market, a \nsingle overall tariff quota \nshould be \nopened; whereas by Regulation (EEC) n\u00b0 1516/91 (1) \n\nthese quotasshall be open. until 3UJune 1v92; \n\n,. Wnereas these duties are reduced to -p 5%\u00b0' t ne Dasic \nyo of the basic \n\nduties on 1 January 199 2 and to 0 \ndu'ies on 1 January 1993; \n\nwheseaS, in consequence, the volume of the \nabovementioned quotas should be reduced, pro rata \ntemporis , to cover only the period from 1 July \nto 31 December 1992; \n\nwhereas, by way of derogation \nfrom Article 30 of the Act of Accession, Regulation (EEC) \nNo 4161/87(2 lays down consequent on the entry into \nforce of the combined nomenclature, the basic duties to \nbe adopted within the Community as constituted on 31 \nDecember 1985 for \nthe \nsuccessive reductions provided for in the Act of Accession \nof Spain and Portugal ; whereas, therefore, to establish the \nduties applicable on \nthese wines \nCommunity tariff quotas should be opened for the period \nfrom 1 July 1991 to 30 June 1992 for the abovemen-\ntioned wines at duties as shown in the list in Article 1 ; \n\nthe purpose of calculating \n\nimports of \n\n-he \n\nWhereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 3792/85 of 20 \nDecember 1985 laying down the arrangements applying \n\n(1) OJ Nb L 142, 6. 6. 1991, p. QJ 0J to L395, 31. 12. 1987, \n\n4. 1. to trade \nin agricultural products between Spain and \nPortugal 3) provides for particular rules for the import \ninto Portugal of the products in question coming from \nSpain; whereas, consequently, \ntariff \nquotas are only applicable \nthe Community as \nconstituted on 31 December 1985; \n\nthe Community \n\nin \n\nWhereas, pursuant to Commission Regulation (EEC) No \n2573/90 of 5 September 1990 totally suspending certain \ncustoms duties applicable by the Community of Ten to \nimports from Spain and Portugal (ft, the said duties are, as \nconcerns the products referred to in Annex II to the \nTreaty, totally suspended once they reach a level of 2 % \nor less; whereas it is therefore necessary to apply a duty \nequal to zero where the value of the specific customs \nduties does not exceed 2 % ad valorem; \n\nWhereas equal and continuous access to the quotas \nshould be ensured for all Community importers and the \nrates laid down for the quotas should be applied consis \ntently to all imports of the products in question into all \nMember States until the quotas are exhausted ; whereas \nthey should not be allocated among the Member States, \nwithout prejudice \nthe quota \nvolumes of such quantities as they may need, under \nconditions and according to a procedure laid down in \nArticle 3 ; whereas this method of administration requires \nclose cooperation between the Member States and the \nCommission ; \n\nthe drawing against \n\nto \n\nWhereas, since the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of \nthe Netherlands and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg \nare united within and jointly represented by the Benelux \nEconomic Union, any operation concerning the adminis \ntration of the contingents may be carried out by any one \nof its members. HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION \n\nArticle 1. 31 December 1992, \nto \n\nFrom 1 July \nthe customs duties \napplicable on the following quality wines produced in the \nspecified regions shall, in the Community as constituted \non 3! December 1985, be partially suspended at the levels \nand within the limits of the Community tariff quotas \nindicated for each of them : \n\nr?\\0} No L 367, 31. 12. 19S5. p. 7. ( / ) OJ No L 243, 6. 9. 1990, p. 19. Order \nNo \n\nCN codes \n\n09. 0317 \n\nf ex 2204 21 41 \nI ex 2204 21 51 \nfex 2204 29 41 \n[ ex 2204 29 51 \n\nDescription \n\nSherry \n\n09. 0310 \n\nex 2204 21 49 \nex 2204 21 59 \n\nWine from Malaga \n\n09. 0312 \n\nex 2204 21 21 1 \nex 2204 21 23 J \nex 2204 21 31 \nex 2204 21 33 \nex 2204 21 49 \n\nWine from Jumilla, Priorato, Rioja, \nValdepenas \n\n} \n\n} \n\nRate (ECU/hl) \n\nfrom 1 July to \n31 December 19$>(-) \n\n1 3,8 \n3,8 \n3,8 \n0/9 \n\n1/2 \n1'4 \n\n1,4 \n1/8 \n\nJ\" \n\nQuota \nvolume \n(hectolitres) \n\nJ \n\n396 560 \n\n7 500 \n\n11 004 \n\n{ \n\nI \n\nJ \n\n(') See Taric codes in Annex. (2) These specific customs duties are collected only when their value is greater than 2 % ad valorem. Article 2 \n\ntariff quotas referred \n\nThe \nin Article 1 shall be \nadministered by the Commission, which may take all \nappropriate administrative measures in order to ensure \neffective administration thereof. to \n\nArticle 3 \n\nfree circulation, \n\nincluding a request \nfor a product covered by \n\nIf an importer presents in a Member State a declaration of \nfor \nentry \ninto \nthis \npreferential benefit \nRegulation and if this declaration is accepted by the \ncustoms authorities, the Member States concerned shall \nthe Commission and draw an amount corres \ninform \nponding \nthe corresponding \namount. its requirements from \n\nto \n\nThe drawing requests, with indication of the date of \nacceptance of the said declarations, must be transmitted \nto the Commission without delay. The drawings are granted by \nthe Commission by \nreference to the date of acceptance of the declarations of \nentry into free circulation by the customs authorities of \n\nthe Member States concerned \navailable balance so permits. to the extent that the \n\nIf a Member State does not use the quantities drawn, it \nshall return them as soon as possible to the corresponding \nquota amount. If the quantities requested are greater than the available \nbalance of the quota amount, allocation shall be made on \na pro rata basis with respect to the requests. Member \nStates shall be informed by the Commission of the \ndrawings made. Article 4 \n\nEach Member State shall ensure that importers of the \nproducts in question have equal and continuous access to \nthe quotas for as long as the balance of the relevant quota \nvolumes so permits. Article 5 \n\nThe Member States and the Commission shall cooperate \nclosely to ensure that this Regulation is complied with. Article 6 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1992 \n\nThis Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f^j\u00efwpvafc #\u2022\u2022\u2022- ~ \"\u00ef-\"- -^p^Xi p^c -*& \n\n\"*\"?**?. *\". * !' \n\n\" \n\n'\"5\u00cf] \n\nG \n\nANNEX \n\nTarie codes \n\nOrder No \n\nCN code \n\nTaric code \n\n09. 0317 \n\nex \nex \nex \nex \n\n2204 21 41 \n2204 21 51 \n2204 29 41 \n2204 29 51 \n\n2204 21 41*10 \n2204 21 51*10 \n2204 29 41*10 \n2204 29 51*10 \n\n09. 0310 \n\nex \nex \n\n2204 21 49 \n2204 21 59 \n\n2204 21 49*12 \n2204 21 59*12 \n\n09. 0312 \n\nex \nex \nex \nex \nex \n\n2204 21 21 \n2204 21 23 \n2204 21 31 \n2204 21 ii \n2204 21 49 \n\n2204 21 21*10 \n2204 21 23*10 \n2204 21 31*10 \n2204 21 33*10 \n2204 21 49*21 \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 224 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-234-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44510-6 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nLr2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/16c1a299-627e-40d6-b2c3-c37c753a1ea2", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1412/92 of 27 May 1992 fixing for the 1992/93 marketing year the Community offer prices for lemons applicable with regard to Spain and Portugal", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "Portugal,Spain,offer price", "workIds": "celex:31992R1412,oj:JOL_1992_146_R_0069_062", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "Spain", "offer price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/16c1a299-627e-40d6-b2c3-c37c753a1ea2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e8d2e1a2-4e36-4e5f-a622-dbe7a403bda6", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending for the twelfth time Regulation (EEC) No 3094/86 laying down certain technical measures for the conservation of fishery resources", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "conservation of fish stocks,fishery management,fishing net", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0225,comnat:COM_1992_0225_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["conservation of fish stocks", "fishery management", "fishing net"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e8d2e1a2-4e36-4e5f-a622-dbe7a403bda6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0MC92) 225 final \n\nBrussels, 27 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending for the twelfth time Regulation (EEC) No. 3094/86 \nlaying down certain technical measures \nfor the conservation of fishery resources \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n2 \n\nThe aim of the present proposal is to postpone the date of \nimplementation of certain technical measures for the conservation of \nfishery resources. Under the terms of Regulation (EEC) No. 3094/86 of 7 October 1986, as \nlast amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 345/92 of 27 January 1992, \nthe minimum mesh size applicable in Regions 1 and 2 except Skagerrak and \nKattegat is 40 mm for certain pelagic species and prawns and 80 mm for \nsole, with effect from 1 June 1992. Several Member States have pointed out that there are practical \ndifficulties in implementing these dispositions on the given date; the \nnet manufacturers have found themselves unable to satisfy the sudden \nheavy demand before this date. Considering that the resources in question are not in immediate danger, \npostponing the date of entry into force of the 40 mm minimum mesh size \nfor pelagic species and Nordic prawns and the 80 mm minimum mesh size \nfor sole in Regions 1 and 2 until 1 January 1993 would resolve the \nabovementioned difficulties, without imperilling the stocks concerned. COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No. /92 \n\nPROPOSAL FOR A \n\namending for the twelfth time Regulation (EEC) No. 3094/86 \nlaying down certain technical measures \nfor the conservation of fishery resources \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \n\nCommunity, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No. 170/83 of 25 January 1983 \n\nestablishing a Community system for the conservation and management of \n\nfishery resources!1), as amended by the Act of Accession of Spain and \n\nPortugal, and in particular Article 11 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas Annex I of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3094/86^2), as last \n\namended by Regulation (EEC) No. 345/92^3), lays down a minimum mesh \n\nsize of 40 mm for directed fisheries for certain pelagic species and for \n\nprawns \n\n(Pandalus \n\nspp. excluding Pandalus \n\nmontagui), \n\nand a minimum mesh \n\nsize of 80 mm for the sole fishery, in Regions 1 and 2 except Skagerrak \n\nand Kattegat; \n\nWhereas under the terms of the aforementioned Regulation these measures \n\nenter into force on 1 June 1992; \n\nWhereas, on the one hand, unforeseen delays have occurred in the supply \n\nof new codends and, on the other, a postponement of the date of \n\nimplementation would not adversely affect the survival of the stocks \n\nconcerned; \n\nWhereas Regulation (EEC) No. 3094/86 should accordingly be modified to \n\nthis effect; \n\n(1) O. J. No. L 24, 27. 1. 1983, p. 1. (2) O. J. No. L 288, 11. 10. 1986, p. 1. (3) O. J. No. L 42, 18. 02. 1992, p. 15. y \n\nHAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nTwo footnotes are added to Annex I of Regulation (EEC) No. 3094/86, as \n\nfollows: \n\ni) Footnote no. 10 in the \"Minimum mesh size\" column after the \n\nfigure \"40\" for Regions 1 and 2; \n\nii) Footnote no. 11 in the \"Minimum mesh size\" column after the \n\nfigure \"80\" for Regions 1 and 2, authorized target species \n\n\"Sole (Solea \n\nvulgaris)\". The text of the new footnotes is as follows: \n\n\"(10) The use of 32 mm mesh is authorized until 31 December 1992. \" \n\n\"(11) The use of 75 mm mesh by vessels of 221 kw or less is \n\nauthorized until 31 December 1992. \" \n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in \n\nthe Official Journal of the European Communities. It shall enter into force on 1 June 1992. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable \n\nin all Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 S \n\nCOM(92) 225 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-235-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44519-X \n\nOfBce for Official Publications of the European Communities \nLr2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3dfb6470-940a-4927-9cd9-5fd0f5c9110f", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE the report 1991 from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Common Fisheries Policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "common fisheries policy,fisheries policy,fishing industry", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0638,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0030_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common fisheries policy", "fisheries policy", "fishing industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3dfb6470-940a-4927-9cd9-5fd0f5c9110f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19c4e3b8-9a31-4fea-a784-28228fe33014", "title": "Bulletin of the European Communities. No 1/2-1992, Volume 25.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Secretariat-General", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "ECSC,EU activity,EU competition policy,EU energy policy,EU policy,EU publication,EU regional policy,EU research policy,Economic and Monetary Union,European Community,European social policy,common agricultural policy,common fisheries policy,common strategy,common transport policy,competition policy,deepening of the European Union,enlargement of the Union,international relations", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CMAA92002", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ECSC", "EU activity", "EU competition policy", "EU energy policy", "EU policy", "EU publication", "EU regional policy", "EU research policy", "Economic and Monetary Union", "European Community", "European social policy", "common agricultural policy", "common fisheries policy", "common strategy", "common transport policy", "competition policy", "deepening of the European Union", "enlargement of the Union", "international relations"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19c4e3b8-9a31-4fea-a784-28228fe33014", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/27064ad4-77bc-4345-b4fb-dd228d05808d", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1411/92 of 27 May 1992 fixing the level of the intervention threshold for cauliflowers, peaches, nectarines and lemons for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "fruit,guarantee threshold,vegetable", "workIds": "celex:31992R1411,oj:JOL_1992_146_R_0067_061", "eurovoc_concepts": ["fruit", "guarantee threshold", "vegetable"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/27064ad4-77bc-4345-b4fb-dd228d05808d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ce0d8256-f05c-4546-8514-f156215fb12e", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1406/92 of 27 May 1992 laying down certain indicative ceilings and certain additional detailed rules for the application of the supplementary trade mechanism to trade in fruit and vegetables between Portugal and the other Member States", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "Portugal,supplementary trade mechanism,vegetable", "workIds": "celex:31992R1406,oj:JOL_1992_146_R_0057_056", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "supplementary trade mechanism", "vegetable"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ce0d8256-f05c-4546-8514-f156215fb12e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ce5f8f6e-9afd-4288-8006-be4d302fd898", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1404/92 of 27 May 1992 laying down detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements provided for by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1158/92 in the beef and veal sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "certificate of origin,import policy,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:31992R1404,oj:JOL_1992_146_R_0050_054", "eurovoc_concepts": ["certificate of origin", "import policy", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ce5f8f6e-9afd-4288-8006-be4d302fd898", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed3c51cb-c8af-4033-bde7-3041266507e8", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1423/92 of 27 May 1992 fixing the minimum purchase price for lemons delivered for processing and the amount of the financial compensation after processing of such lemons for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "food processing,indemnification,minimum price,purchase price", "workIds": "celex:31992R1423,oj:JOL_1992_148_R_0021_013", "eurovoc_concepts": ["food processing", "indemnification", "minimum price", "purchase price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed3c51cb-c8af-4033-bde7-3041266507e8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06517f25-8132-481e-9352-b8dd3c2b25cb", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1414/92 of 27 May 1992 extending the validity of certain export licences for cereals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "export licence,intervention stock,wheat", "workIds": "celex:31992R1414,oj:JOL_1992_146_R_0073_064", "eurovoc_concepts": ["export licence", "intervention stock", "wheat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06517f25-8132-481e-9352-b8dd3c2b25cb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/da572745-b5f1-4969-88d7-ba042aaf81a5", "title": "Energy in Europe : Annual energy review 1991.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Energy,European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "EU Member State,EU statistics,energy market", "workIds": "PUB_CMBR91001", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "EU statistics", "energy market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/da572745-b5f1-4969-88d7-ba042aaf81a5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2233075a-9d61-4a09-9e35-6afa4e0bf564", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1413/92 of 27 May 1992 fixing for the 1992/93 marketing year the reference prices for lemons", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-27", "subjects": "reference price", "workIds": "celex:31992R1413,oj:JOL_1992_146_R_0071_063", "eurovoc_concepts": ["reference price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2233075a-9d61-4a09-9e35-6afa4e0bf564", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/37ffdbf8-a73a-47fc-8c22-3b448e8a2240", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) laying down provisions with regard to possession of and trade in specimens of species of wild fauna and flora", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "export monitoring,marketing,protected species,protection of animal life,protection of plant life,trade restriction", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0632,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0019_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["export monitoring", "marketing", "protected species", "protection of animal life", "protection of plant life", "trade restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/37ffdbf8-a73a-47fc-8c22-3b448e8a2240", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ad999be6-80cc-4767-9807-90e14bb59503", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the communication from the Commission to the Council on the Supplementary Social Security Schemes: The Role of Occupational Pension Schemes in the Social Protection of Workers and their Implications for Freedom of Movement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "freedom of movement,social security,supplementary pension,worker (EU)", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0630,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0013_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["freedom of movement", "social security", "supplementary pension", "worker (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ad999be6-80cc-4767-9807-90e14bb59503", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52fe9a75-a8be-406d-9ed3-3eb8adaa90ab", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive on excise duties on motor fuels from agricultural sources", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "common agricultural policy,energy policy,environmental protection,excise duty,substitute fuel", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0627,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0001_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common agricultural policy", "energy policy", "environmental protection", "excise duty", "substitute fuel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52fe9a75-a8be-406d-9ed3-3eb8adaa90ab", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c3d5b6a7-8f69-462a-b6d5-d08526a70ebb", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1349/92 of 26 May 1992 on the adjustment of certain export refunds fixed in advance in the cereals sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "cereals,export refund", "workIds": "celex:31992R1349,oj:JOL_1992_145_R_0040_060", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cereals", "export refund"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c3d5b6a7-8f69-462a-b6d5-d08526a70ebb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aef68ffe-4079-459a-b5e3-312e0bb981a8", "title": "Congresterminologie.,Kongre\u00dfgesch\u00e4ft-Terminologie.,Meeting industry terminology.,M\u00f8de-og konferenceterminologi.,Terminologia congressuale.,Terminologia da Ind\u00fastria de Congressos.,Terminologie de l'industrie des congr\u00e8s.,Terminolog\u00eda de Congresos.,\u039f\u03c1\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03b3\u03af\u03b1 \u03b4\u03b9\u03bf\u03c1\u03b3\u03ac\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b5\u03b4\u03c1\u03af\u03c9\u03bd.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "communications industry,consultation of information,documentation centre,interpreting,terminology", "workIds": "PUB_CM7392982", "eurovoc_concepts": ["communications industry", "consultation of information", "documentation centre", "interpreting", "terminology"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aef68ffe-4079-459a-b5e3-312e0bb981a8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/afbf5ed8-9b9f-4ec9-8563-ed05234f76a2", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on the export of cultural goods", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "administrative cooperation,cultural object,cultural relations,export,export licence,heritage protection", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0629(02),oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0010_02", "eurovoc_concepts": ["administrative cooperation", "cultural object", "cultural relations", "export", "export licence", "heritage protection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/afbf5ed8-9b9f-4ec9-8563-ed05234f76a2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a43f1f36-8c60-422f-b233-3e12986117cb", "title": "ADDITIONAL OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the Commission communication on ' New Challenges for Maritime Industries'", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "EU industrial policy,environmental policy,fisheries policy,shipping policy", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0639,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0036_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU industrial policy", "environmental policy", "fisheries policy", "shipping policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a43f1f36-8c60-422f-b233-3e12986117cb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d466d2af-8bf2-4f29-8edd-52b7c21f8816", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive on the Hygiene of Foodstuffs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "approximation of laws,consumer protection,dangerous substance,foodstuff,foodstuffs legislation,health control,human nutrition,marketing,solvent", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0631,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0016_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "consumer protection", "dangerous substance", "foodstuff", "foodstuffs legislation", "health control", "human nutrition", "marketing", "solvent"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d466d2af-8bf2-4f29-8edd-52b7c21f8816", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1979e271-b912-406d-8f1b-bf4124cf5ef0", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on the Statute for a European Cooperative Society", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "European company,company law,cooperative,inter-company cooperation,joint subsidiary,legal status,shareholding", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0640(01),oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0042_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European company", "company law", "cooperative", "inter-company cooperation", "joint subsidiary", "legal status", "shareholding"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1979e271-b912-406d-8f1b-bf4124cf5ef0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a3c7eb7d-0253-4334-b3d3-a6c1ac04c89c", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive complementing the Statute for a European Cooperative Society with regard to the Involvement of Employees", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "approximation of laws,association,labour law", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0640(02),oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0042_02", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "association", "labour law"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a3c7eb7d-0253-4334-b3d3-a6c1ac04c89c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ebd84052-2c85-4206-b957-bdf42673e4c7", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1351/92 of 26 May 1992 laying down detailed rules for applying the supplementary trade mechanism (STM) to imports of cereals into Portugal during the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "Portugal,common wheat,maize,supplementary trade mechanism", "workIds": "celex:31992R1351,oj:JOL_1992_145_R_0047_062", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "common wheat", "maize", "supplementary trade mechanism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ebd84052-2c85-4206-b957-bdf42673e4c7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3dea3b03-c83d-4c0f-8fb1-f1d4b7f8832e", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on transit statistics and storage statistics relating to the trading of goods between Member States", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "Union transit,customs document,customs warehouse,statistics,trading operation", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0628,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0006_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Union transit", "customs document", "customs warehouse", "statistics", "trading operation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3dea3b03-c83d-4c0f-8fb1-f1d4b7f8832e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb01077d-ec13-4c19-befa-e88b3c267e9d", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) laying down Community procedures for contaminants in food", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "food contamination,food standard,foodstuff,human nutrition,public health,toxic substance", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0634,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0024_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["food contamination", "food standard", "foodstuff", "human nutrition", "public health", "toxic substance"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb01077d-ec13-4c19-befa-e88b3c267e9d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/88583885-82fc-41e3-a6df-dd94ed61a60d", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1352/92 of 26 May 1992 applying a special intervention measure for maize in France at the end of the 1991/92 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "intervention buying,maize,purchase price,tied sales outlet", "workIds": "celex:31992R1352,oj:JOL_1992_145_R_0049_063", "eurovoc_concepts": ["intervention buying", "maize", "purchase price", "tied sales outlet"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/88583885-82fc-41e3-a6df-dd94ed61a60d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/509113a6-c3d4-46ec-a992-806987ad8116", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1380/92 of 26 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1678/85 fixing the conversion rates to be applied in agriculture", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "primary sector,representative rate", "workIds": "celex:31992R1380,oj:JOL_1992_147_R_0015_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["primary sector", "representative rate"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/509113a6-c3d4-46ec-a992-806987ad8116", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1aed910f-58c3-45e4-b1cb-caae2f676827", "title": "Regions : Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics: NUTS: March 1992.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission,Eurostat", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "EU Member State,regional and local authorities,regional statistics,statistical nomenclature", "workIds": "PUB_CA7291512", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "regional and local authorities", "regional statistics", "statistical nomenclature"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1aed910f-58c3-45e4-b1cb-caae2f676827", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dc5c1e5d-7402-458f-a439-f7336b519c9b", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1429/92 of 26 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 on the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and on the relevant methods of analysis", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "analytical chemistry,food inspection,marketing standard,olive oil", "workIds": "celex:31992R1429,oj:JOL_1992_150_R_0017_018", "eurovoc_concepts": ["analytical chemistry", "food inspection", "marketing standard", "olive oil"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dc5c1e5d-7402-458f-a439-f7336b519c9b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4185113d-530b-4608-978e-f2a80b0c8fb0", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1431/92 of 26 May 1992 temporarily suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties on a number of agricultural products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "CCT duties,suspension of customs duties", "workIds": "celex:31992R1431,oj:JOL_1992_151_R_0001_016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["CCT duties", "suspension of customs duties"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4185113d-530b-4608-978e-f2a80b0c8fb0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3ec235b3-256d-47e8-9a36-81a3eb05eec4", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive amending for the first time Council Directive 88/344/EEC of 13 June 1988 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to extraction solvents used in the production of foodstuffs and food ingredients", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "approximation of laws,food additive,foodstuff,solvent", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0633,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0023_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "food additive", "foodstuff", "solvent"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3ec235b3-256d-47e8-9a36-81a3eb05eec4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d13739b2-95bd-4c23-bdfb-986cec49c1c3", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on the Statute for a European Association", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "association", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0642(01),oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0052_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["association"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d13739b2-95bd-4c23-bdfb-986cec49c1c3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ede762b-1cee-49c5-8b54-ca951401538a", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 in respect of the definitive anti-dumping duty on certain imports of video cassettes originating in Hong Kong", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "Hong Kong,anti-dumping duty,export price,free-at-frontier price,trading margin,video cassette", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0208,comnat:COM_1992_0208_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Hong Kong", "anti-dumping duty", "export price", "free-at-frontier price", "trading margin", "video cassette"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ede762b-1cee-49c5-8b54-ca951401538a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "iCGMt/IISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 208 final \n\nBrussels, 26 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL PF^ULATION (EEC) \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 in respect of the definitive \n\nanti-dumping duty on certain Imports of video cassettes \n\noriginating in Hong Kong \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\u00bb\n\n*\n\n*\n\n!\n\n#\n\n&\n\n*\u2022 \n\n\"W^SSS^JFr\u2014*-\n\naSSF^-:--\n\n\f- 2 -\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. By Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89, the Council imposed a definitive \n\nanti-dumping duty of 21. 9% on imports of VHS video tape in cassettes \n\noriginating in Hong Kong. 2. By a notice published on 12 October 1991 the Commission initiated a \n\nreview of the anti-dumping duty concerned as regards a Hong Kong \n\ncompany, Bico Magnetics Ltd. 3. The investigation showed that Bico Magnetics Ltd had never exported \n\nown-produced video cassettes to the European Community and was about \n\nto begin such exports. 4. Normal value was determined on the basis of constructed value of the \n\nmodels concerned. Since Bico Magnetics Ltd had not exported video cassettes to the \n\nCommunity, no export price could be established. 5. In these circumstances, the anti-dumping duty to be imposed should \n\nbe a variable duty equal to the difference between the normal value \n\nand the net price free-at-Community-frontier. 6. In conclusion, it is proposed that the Council amend its Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 1768/89, exempt Bico Magnetics Ltd from the definitive \n\nanti-dumping duty imposed on VHS video tapes in cassettes \n\noriginating in Hong Kong and impose instead the above variable duty \n\nfor the models meant to be exported to the Community. - 3 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 in respect of the definitive \n\nanti-dumping duty on certain imports of video cassettes \n\noriginating in Hong Kong \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on \n\nprotection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not \nmembers of the European Economic Community1, and in particular Article \n14 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after \n\nconsultation within the Advisory Committee as provided for under the \n\nabove Regulat ion, \n\nWhereas: \n\nI - PREVIOUS PROCEDURE \n\n1. By Regulation (EEC) No 1768/892, as amended by Regulation (EEC) \nNo 3522/903, the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of \n21. 9% on imports of VHS video tape in cassettes (hereafter \"video \n\ncassettes\") falling within code ex 8523 13 00 and originating in \nHong Kong, with the exception of imports from several exporters \n\nespecially mentioned which were subject to a lesser rate of duty or \n\nexempt from duty. 1 \n2 \n3 \n\nOJ No L 209, 2. 8. 1988, p. 1. 0J No L 174, 22. 6. 1989, p. 1 \nOJ No L 343, 7. 12. 1990, p. 1 \n\n\f- 4 -\n\n2. In recital 43 of Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89, concerning companies \n\nwhich started or will start exporting own-produced video cassettes \n\nto the Community after the investigation period (newcomers), the \n\nCouncil noted that the Commission is ready to initiate without delay \n\na review proceeding \n\nif the exporting company can show the \n\nCommission, and supply sufficient evidence, that it did not export \n\nthe products concerned to the Community during the period of \n\ninvestigation. The company also has to demonstrate that it started \n\nor will start those exports after the said period and that it is not \n\nrelated to or associated with any of the companies subject to the \n\ninvest igat ion. II - REVIEW \n\n3. By a notice published on 12 October 19914, the Commission, after \n\nconsultation within the Advisory Committee and in accordance with \n\nArticle 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 initiated a review of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1768/89 as it concerned a Hong Kong company, \n\nBico Magnetics Ltd. This company had submitted that it did not \n\nexport the products subject to the anti-dumping duty during the \n\nprevious period of investigation (1 January - 30 November 1987). In addition, it submitted that it was not related with any of the \n\ncompanies subject to the previous investigation for which dumping \n\nwas found. In addition, no evidence was found that it had ever \n\nexported video cassettes to the Community. Accordingly, the \n\nCommission commenced an investigation in order to verify that Bico \n\nMagnetics Ltd could be considered as a newcomer and to establish a \n\ndumping margin, if any, for this company. OJ No C 266, 12. 10. 1991, p. 7 \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nNewcomer \n\n4. The investigation showed that Bico Magnetics Ltd had not previously \n\nexported or produced video cassettes which were exported to the \n\nCommunity and was now about to begin such exports. In addition, it \n\nwas found that this company had no link of any sort with the \n\nexporters involved in the previous procedure and for which dumping \n\nwas found. The Council confirms that it should accordingly be \n\nconsidered as a newcomer and that a partial review of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 1768/89, inasmuch as it concerned Bico Magnetics Ltd, was \n\nwarranted. Ill - RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION \n\n1. Normal value \n\n5. Since Bico Magnetics Ltd did not sell any video cassettes on the \n\ndomestic market during the investigation period for this review \n\n(from 1 January to 30 June 1991), normal value was determined on the \n\nbasis of the constructed value of the product concerned in \n\naccordance with Article 2(3)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88. This constructed value was computed on the basis of all costs, both \n\nfixed and variable, in the country of origin of materials and \n\nmanufacture for the models destined for export to the Community plus \n\na reasonable amount for selling, administrative, other general \n\nexpenses and profit. 6. As far as selling, administrative and general expenses were \n\nconcerned, they were calculated by reference to such expenses as \n\nthey were stated in the audited accounts of Bico. These costs \n\ncorresponded to such costs incurred by other Hong Kong manufacturers \n\nfor their sales of video cassettes on the domestic market, as \n\nestablished during previous investigations concerning video \n\ncassettes from Hong Kong. - 6 -\n\nAs far as profit was concerned, it was found appropriate to apply a \n\nprofit rate of 8% on turnover; this rate was used in Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 1768/89 for the Hong Kong video cassette manufacturers and, \n\naccording to the information available to the Commission, can still \n\nbe regarded as the profit which Hong Kong companies can normally \n\nachieve on their domestic market. The Council confirms these \n\nf indings. 7. On this basis, normal value was established for the models produced \n\nand destined for export to the Community by Bico Magnetics Ltd, \n\nnamely normal grade. 2. Measures \n\n8. Since it was found that Bico Magnetics Ltd had not exported video \n\ncassettes to the Community, no export price could be established for \n\nthe product under consideration, and no dumping margin could be \n\ncalculated. 9. However, it is clear that if the export prices of the various models \n\nof video cassettes sold for export to the Community by Bico \n\nMagnetics Ltd at least equal the normal value for the corresponding \n\nmodels, these products would not be dumped. 10. In addition, this normal value is less than the target price \n\ndetermined for the Community industry in Regulation (EEC) No \n\n1768/89. - 7 -\n\n11. In these circumstances, it is considered that the measures to be \n\nimposed in respect of the imports to the Community of video \n\ncassettes produced by Bico Magnetics Ltd, should guarantee that the \n\nproducts are not sold to the Community at less than their normal \n\nvalue. IV - AMENDMENT OF THE REVIEWED MEASURES \n\n12. Accordingly, it is considered appropriate that Regulation (EEC) No \n\n1768/89 should be amended and that Bico Magnetics Ltd be exempted \n\nfrom the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on VHS video tapes in \n\ncassettes originating in Hong Kong in respect of the models E60, \n\nE90, E120, E180, E195 and E240, in so far as these models will be \n\nsubject to a duty equal to the difference between minimun price set \n\nout for each of these models and their net price free-at-Community-\n\nfrontier before customs clearance. The minimum price corresponds to \n\nthe normal value duly adjusted to bring it to CIF level. 13. Bico Magnetics Ltd was informed of the essential facts and \n\nconsiderations on the basis of which the imposition of the anti \n\ndumping duties were proposed, and was given an opportunity to \n\ncomment on such proposal. No comments were made by the exporting \n\nproducer concerned. 14. The complainants were informed of the considerations and main facts \n\non the basis of which the Council intented to amend Regulation (EEC) \n\nNo 1768/89 and had no comment to make. 15. Since this review is only limited to one Hong Kong producer, it does \n\nnot prolong the validity of Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 in regard to \n\nArticle 15(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88, \n\n\fHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\n- 8 \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe following subparagraph is hereby added to Article 1(3) of Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 1768/89: \n\n\"The duty specified in paragraph 2(b) shall not apply to models of video \n\ntapes in cassettes E60-E90-E120, E180-E195-E240 in normal grade produced \n\nand sold for export to the Community by Bico Magnetics Ltd, Hong Kong \n\n(Taric additional Code 8292); these models shall be subject to an anti \n\ndumping duty equal to the difference between the price mentioned \n\nhereunder for each of the models concerned and their net price, free-at-\n\nCommunity-frontier, not cleared through customs: \n\nE60 \n\nE90 \n\nE120 \n\nE180 \n\nE195 \n\nE240 \n\nECU 0. 70 \n\nECU 0. 83 \n\nECU 0. 96 \n\nECU 1. 22 \n\nECU 1. 29 \n\nECU 1. 48 \n\n\f- 9 -\n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its \n\npublication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable \n\nin all Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 208 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\nli 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-221-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44294-8 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4286e557-d8df-43bb-b3d6-6a9f21150162", "title": "The Council of the European Community : An introduction to its structures and activities.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "General Secretariat of the Council", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,European Council", "workIds": "PUB_BX7392877", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "European Council"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4286e557-d8df-43bb-b3d6-6a9f21150162", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1fec0dac-18b4-4f42-b2a6-c69c5cdd0a18", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive supplementing the Statute for a European Mutual Society with regard to the Involvement of Employees", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "European social policy,labour law,mutual assistance scheme", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0641(02),oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0048_02", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European social policy", "labour law", "mutual assistance scheme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1fec0dac-18b4-4f42-b2a6-c69c5cdd0a18", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/18ed1073-ffeb-490e-a91a-cdff091bf1c5", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the Commission opinion on an equitable wage", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "equal pay,equal treatment,labour market,pay", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0643,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0057_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["equal pay", "equal treatment", "labour market", "pay"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/18ed1073-ffeb-490e-a91a-cdff091bf1c5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3d879e74-ab13-40eb-bd5c-919cb0981ec2", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 89/392/EEC on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States relating to Machinery", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "hoisting equipment,industrial hazard,machinery,occupational safety,product safety,quality label", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0644,oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0060_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["hoisting equipment", "industrial hazard", "machinery", "occupational safety", "product safety", "quality label"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3d879e74-ab13-40eb-bd5c-919cb0981ec2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0f8f418f-48af-48b0-b178-052b463cb609", "title": "OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on the Statute for a European Mutual Society", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion_eesc,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic and Social Committee", "date": "1992-05-26", "subjects": "European social policy,mutual assistance scheme", "workIds": "celex:51992AC0641(01),oj:JOC_1992_223_R_0048_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European social policy", "mutual assistance scheme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0f8f418f-48af-48b0-b178-052b463cb609", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/67d27fbd-5528-4547-a2df-a7e5ffce80ef", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Economic Community and the United States of America on trade in large civil aircraft", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-25", "subjects": "GATT,United States,aeronautical industry,agreement (EU),aircraft,trade agreement", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0222,comnat:COM_1992_0222_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["GATT", "United States", "aeronautical industry", "agreement (EU)", "aircraft", "trade agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/67d27fbd-5528-4547-a2df-a7e5ffce80ef", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OP THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 222 final \n\nBrussels, 25 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nconcerning the conclusion of an Agreement between \nthe European Economic Community and \nthe United States of America \non trade in large civil aircraft \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nBy decision of 4 February 1991, the Council authorised the \nCommission to open negotiations both with the United States of \nAmerica and with other Parties to the 6ATT Agreement on Trade in \nCivil Aircraft in order to conclude new arrangements governing \ntrade in civil aircraft. 2. In accordance with this decision and with the detailed negotiating \ndirectives adopted by the Council and in consultation with the 113 \nCommittee, the Commission held negotiations with the United States \nwhich on 31 March 1992 resulted in the enclosed agreement. The enclosed agreement corresponds closely with all points in the \nnegotiating directives. In particular the scope of the agreement \nhas been limited to large civil aircraft. In this regard, since it \nwas not possible to reach a satisfactory definition in terms of \nseating capacity, explicit reference is made to aircraft produced \nin the Community by the Airbus consortium. Moreover, the \nCommission considers that a balanced set of disciplines has been \nintroduced covering both indirect and direct support. In Article 12 of the Agreement, both the United States and the \nCommunity re-affirm their determination to achieve revision of the \nGATT Civil Aircraft Agreement. As foreseen in the above-mentioned \nCouncil decision, the Commission now expects this multilateral \nprocess to be launched immediately in conjunction with the United \nStates Government. PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DECISION \n\nconcerning the conclusion of an Agreement between \nthe European Economic Community \nand the Government of the United States of America \non trade in large civil aircraft \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, and in particular Article 113 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas the Agreement negotiated between the European Economic \nCommunity and the Government of the United States of America on trade \nin large civil aircraft in Brussels on 31 March 1992 should be \napproved, \n\nHAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nGovernment of the United States of America on trade in large civil \naircraft is hereby approved on behalf of the Community. The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision. Article 2 \n\nThe President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the \nperson empowered to sign the above Agreement in order to bind the \nCommunity. Done at Brussels \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fAGREEMENT \nCONCERNING THE APPLICATION \nOF THE GATT AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN CIVIL AIRCRAFT \n\nBetween the European Economic Community (hereinafter \nreferred to as \"the EC\") and the Government of the United \nStates of America (hereinafter referred to as \"the US\") on \ntrade in large civil aircraft, \n\nRecognising the need to promote a more favourable \nenvironment for international trade in large civil aircraft \nand to reduce trade tensions in the area, \n\nRecognising that the disciplines in the GATT Agreement on \nTrade in Civil Aircraft should be strengthened with a view \nto progressively reducing the role of government support, \n\nRecalling the principles and objectives agreed upon by \nrepresentatives of the US and of the EC at their meeting \nheld in London on 27 October 1987, \n\nIn pursuit of their common goal of preventing trade \ndistortions resulting from direct or indirect government \nsupport for the development and production of large civil \naircraft and of introducing greater disciplines on such \nsupport and of encouraging the adoption of such disciplines \nmultilaterally within the GATT, \n\nNoting their intention to act without prejudice to their \nrights and obligations under the GATT and under other \nmultilateral agreements negotiated under the auspices of the \nGATT, \n\nTHE EC AND THE US HAVE AGREED: \n\n\fArticle 1 \n\nGovernment-Directed Procurement, Mandatory Sub-contracts and \nInducements \n\nWith respect to issues concerning Article 4 of the GATT \nAgreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft (\"Aircraft Agreement\"), \nthe Parties agree to act in conformity with the \ninterpretative note to Article 4 of the Aircraft Agreement \ncontained in Annex I of this Agreement. Article 2 \n\nPrior Government Commitments \n\nGovernment support to current large civil aircraft \nprogrammes, committed prior to the date of entry into force \nof this Agreement, is not subject to the provisions of this \nAgreement except as otherwise provided below. The terms and \nconditions on which such support is granted shall not be \nmodified in such a manner as to render it more favourable to \nthe recipients; however, de minimis modifications shall not \nbe deemed inconsistent with this provision. Article 3 \n\nProduction Support \n\nAs of entry into force of this Agreement, Parties shall not \ngrant direct government support other than what has already \nbeen firmly committed for the production of large civil \naircraft. This prohibition shall apply both to existing and \nto future programmes. Article 4 \n\nDevelopment Support \n\n4. 1 Governments shall provide support for the development \nof a new large civil aircraft programme only where a \ncritical project appraisal, based on conservative \nassumptions, has established that there is a reasonable \nexpectation of recoupment, within 17 years from the \ndate of first disbursement of such support, of all \ncosts as defined in Article 6(2) of the Aircraft \nAgreement, including repayment of government supports \non the terms and conditions specified below. 4. 2 As of entry into force of this Agreement, direct \ngovernment support committed by a party for the \ndevelopment of a new large civil aircraft programme or \nderivative shall not exceed: \n\na) 25 per cent of that programme's total development \ncost as estimated at the time of commitment (or of \nactual development costs, whichever is lower); \nroyalty payments on this tranche shall be set at \nthe time of commitment of the development support \nso as to repay this support at an interest rate no \nless than the cost of borrowing to the government \nwithin no more than 17 years from first \ndisbursement, plus \n\nb) 8 per cent of that programme's total development \ncost as estimated at the time of commitment (or of \nactual development costs, whichever is lower); \nroyalty payments on this tranche shall be set at \nthe time of commitment of the development support \nso as to repay such support at an interest rate no \nless than the cost of borrowing to the government \nplus 1 per cent within no more than 17 years from \nfirst disbursement. These calculations shall be made on the basis of the \nforecast of aircraft deliveries in the critical project \nappraisal. 4. 3 Royalty payments per aircraft shall be calculated at \nthe time of commitment of the development support to be \nrepaid on the following basis: \n\na) 20 per cent of aggregate payments calculated in \naccordance with Article 4. 2 above are payable on \nthe basis of the delivery of a number of aircraft \ncorresponding to 40 per cent of forecast \ndeliveries; \n\nb) 70 per cent of aggregate payments calculated in \naccordance with Article 4. 2 above are payable on \nthe basis of the delivery of a number of aircraft \ncorresponding to 85 per cent of forecast \ndeliveries. Article 5 \n\nIndirect Government Support \n\n5. 1 Parties shall take such action as is necessary to \nensure that indirect government support neither confers \nunfair advantage upon manufacturers of large civil \naircraft benefiting from such support nor leads to \ndistortions in international trade in large civil \naircraft. 5. 2 As of entry into force of the Agreement, identifiable \nbenefits to the development or production of any of the \nproducts covered by this Agreement, net of recoupment, \nderived from indirect support shall not exceed in any \none year: \n\na) 3 per cent of the annual commercial turnover of the \ncivil aircraft industry in the Party concerned for \nthe products covered by this Agreement, or \n\nb) 4 per cent of the annual commercial turnover of any \none firm in the Party concerned for the products \ncovered by this Agreement. 5. 3 Benefits from indirect support shall be deemed to arise \nwhen there is an identifiable reduction in costs of \nlarge civil aircraft resulting from government-funded \nresearch and development in the aeronautical area \nperformed after the entry into force of this Agreement. Where it can be demonstrated that the results of \nresearch and development have been made available on a \nnon-discriminatory basis to large civil aircraft \nmanufacturers of the Parties, benefits deriving from \nsuch technologies shall be excluded \nfrom the \ncalculation in paragraph 5. 2. However, identifiable \nbenefits may result when large civil aircraft \nmanufacturers are responsible for, or have early access \nto, the conduct or results of such research. If a Party has reason to believe that other indirect \nsupports provided by a government are resulting in \nidentifiable reductions in the costs of large civil \naircraft, the Parties shall consult with a view towards \nquantifying such reductions and including them in the \ncalculation described above. Benefits from indirect support resulting from the \ntechnology obtained through government-funded research \nand development or through other government programmes \nshall normally be calculated in terms of the reduction \nin the cost of research and development and in the \nreduction in the cost of the production equipment or \nproduction process technology. Article 6 \n\nGeneral Purpose Loans \n\nParties shall assume no liability for specific loans that \naircraft manufacturers make or make available, through \ndirect loans, guarantees, or otherwise, to airlines, other \nthan through official export credit financing consistent \nwith the Large Aircraft Sector Understanding of the OECD \nUnderstanding on Official Export Financing. Article 7 \n\nEquity Infusions \n\nEquity infusions are excluded from the scope of this \nAgreement. Equity infusions will not, however, be provided \nin such a manner as to undermine the disciplines in the \nAgreement. Article 8 \n\nTransparency \n\n8. 1 To the extent \n\nnecessary \n\nto ensure effective \nimplementation of this Agreement, Parties shall \nexchange on a regular, systematic basis, all public \ninformation of a kind governments make available to \ntheir respective national elected assemblies relating \nto matters covered by this Agreement and its Annexes. Such public information will include at minimum the \ntotal amount of government support for new development \nprojects and its share of total development costs, \naggregate data on disbursements and repayments relating \nto direct government supports for commercial aircraft \nprogrammes, the annual commercial turnovers of the \ncivil aircraft industry as specified in Article 8. 5 b \nand the aggregate amounts of identifiable indirect \naircraft \nbenefits \nmanufacturers. received \n\ncivil \n\nlarge \n\nby \n\n\f8. 2 Furthermore, \n\nto \n\nwith \n\nprior \n\nregard \n\ngovernment \ncommitments for large civil aircraft programmes \ndescribed in Article 2, a complete list of such \ncommitments by the Parties to this Agreement already \ndisbursed or committed shall be separately provided, \nincluding information on the type of repayment \nobligation and the planned period of repayment. Annual \ndisbursements and repayments relating to these \nprogrammes on an aggregate basis shall also be notified \nto the other Party for each government providing these \nsupports. In addition, a Party shall notify the other \nParty to this Agreement of any changes which render the \nterms and conditions of such support commitments more \nfavourable to the recipient, including: changes in the \nrepayment period; failure to repay the support; or \nreduction of the scheduled repayments. 8. 3 Furthermore, with regard to future large civil aircraft \nprogrammes, Parties shall provide, at the time of \ngovernment \nspecific \ninformation in relation to development support for each \nof the governments providing such support: \n\ncommitment, \n\nfollowing \n\nthe \n\nthe total amount of government support; \n\nthe share of government support as a percentage of \nestimated total development cost; \n\n- \n\nthe anticipated return to the government; \n\nthe planned period of repayment of government \n\nsupport; and \n\nthe forecast number of planes on which the \ncalculations made in accordance with Article 4. 2 \nare based. 8. 4 In the course of the consultations provided for under \nArticle 11 of this Agreement, Parties shall exchange \ninformation on government commitments and support for \neach of the governments providing such support \nincluding but not limited to: \n\n- any changes which render the terms and conditions \nmore favourable to the recipient, including: changes \nin the repayment period; failure to repay the \nsupport; or reduction of the scheduled repayments; \nand \n\n\f- annual disbursements and repayments on a per \nprogramme basis for new programmes launched in \naccordance with Article 4. Such information will be \nprovided at the first regular consultation taking \nplace at least twelve months after the end of the \nyear in which the disbursements and repayments are \nmade. 8. 5 In the course of consultations under Article 11, \n\na) Parties will on an annual basis provide \ninformation on new government-funded research and \ndevelopment undertaken or initiated during the \nprevious year and on ongoing research and \ndevelopment projects in the aeronautical area, \nincluding per programme details on those projects \nin which large civil aircraft manufacturers \nparticipate. This shall include information on \nthe area of activity and the amount of government \nfunding for such projects. b) Parties will provide information on identifiable \nbenefits derived from indirect supports for each \nlarge civil aircraft programme. This will include recoupment per programme received \nfrom large civil aircraft manufacturers. The following \nspecific information will be provided on an annual \nbasis for each of the governments providing such \nsupport: \n\n1) the annual commercial turnover of the civil \naircraft industry in the Party concerned in \nrelation to products covered by the Agreement; \n\n2) the annual commercial turnover in relation to \nproducts covered by the Agreement of each firm \nin the Party concerned which manufacturers \nproducts covered by the Agreement; and \n\n3) the total amount of indirect benefits as \ndefined in Article 5. 2 for the civil aircraft \nindustry in relation to the products covered \nby the Agreement and for each firm involved in \nthe manufacture of such products. 8. 6 If a Party considers that additional information \ndirectly relevant to the implementation of the \nprovisions of this Agreement is necessary, such \ninformation will be provided upon duly motivated \nrequest. 8. 7 Parties shall upon duly motivated request provide at \n\nthe time of commitment of new development support non \nproprietary information on the critical project \nappraisal in so far as this relates to the provisions \nof Article 4. 1. the \n\ninformation, \n\n8. 8 Any information not in the public domain, which a Party \nmay provide, shall at the request of the Party \nproviding \nas \nbe \nproprietary. A recipient government shall take all \nmeasures necessary to ensure that information thus \ndesignated not be disclosed to anyone outside that \ngovernment even after expiry or termination of the \npresent \nproprietary \nIn \ninformation shall not be used in possible trade \ndisputes except for the purposes of confidential \ninternal government discussion and decisions in \nrelation to the implementation of the Agreement. Agreement. considered \n\naddition, \n\n8. 9 Parties shall, unless otherwise indicated, exchange the \ninformation specified above on an annual basis. Any \ndisagreement concerning information to be provided \npursuant to this Article shall be resolved through \nconsultations under Article 11. 8. 10 Parties shall provide information on new infusions of \nequity or changes in equity positions by governments \ninto firms engaged in \ncivil aircraft production, \nincluding the amount and type of equity provided. 8. 11 Parties will encourage firms engaged in the manufacture \nof large civil aircraft to increase the public \ndisclosure of disaggregated financial results of their \ncivil aircraft operations through the separation of \nreporting on military and civilian aircraft operations \nand the adoption of lines of business financial \nreporting. These disaggregated financial results would \nat a minimum be expected to include information on \nsources and uses of \nspecific \ninformation on revenue, operating income, net assets, \ncapital investment and government equity infusions. funds including \n\n8. 12 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require \nany contracting Party to furnish any information the \ndisclosure of which it considers contrary to its \nessential security interests. Article 9 \n\nExceptional Circumstances \n\n9. 1 Where, as a result of an unforeseen, exceptional \nsituation, the survival of a significant proportion of \nthe civil aircraft manufacturing activities in one of \nthe Parties1 and the continued financial viability of \nthe company or the division of a company responsible \nfor such civil aircraft manufacture are put in \njeopardy, that Party may derogate temporarily from the \ndisciplines laid down in this Agreement. In this \ncontext, the disaggregated financial results of civil \naircraft operations will be reported publicly by that \ncompany or division2. This derogation may not be \ninvoked, however, in respect to the disciplines \napplying to the launch of new civil aircraft programmes \nas specified in Article 4. 9. 2 The Party concerned shall provide notice of its \nintentions to the other Party and an opportunity for \nprior consultations unless it is prevented from doing \nso for legal reasons and shall in any event notify the \nother Party immediately of its reasons for invoking \nthis Article and fully disclose the specific measures \nwhich it has taken, including the amount and nature of \nthe measures, and their expected duration. 9. 3 Specific measures taken by a Party in accordance with \n\nthis Article: \n\na) shall be limited in scope and duration to the \nthe \n\nextent \ndifficulties referred to in paragraph 1; \n\nnecessary \n\nstrictly \n\nremedy \n\nto \n\nb) shall be designed to return as quickly as possible \n\nthe beneficiary company to commercial viability; \n\nc) shall \n\ntake due account of the \n\npossible \nimplications for other large civil aircraft \nmanufacturers and shall avoid depressing prices on \nthe world market for civil aircraft by the \nmanufacture of inventory for which no firm order \nexists. 1 For the purposes of this paragraph, \"Parties\" shall be deemed to include any of the individual Member \nStates of the EC. 2 These disaggregated financial results would at a minimum include information on sources and uses of \nfunds including specific information on revenue, operating income, net assets, capital investment and \ngovernment equity infusions. 10 \n\n9. 4 If, after consultations pursuant to Article 11, a Party \ndetermines that the action taken under this Article \nsignificantly undermines the objectives of this \nAgreement, it shall have the right to suspend some or \nall of the provisions of this Agreement or to terminate \nit within 15 days of the conclusion of consultations. Article 10 \n\nAvoidance of Trade Conflicts and Litigation \n\n10. 1 Parties shall seek to avoid any trade conflict on \n\nmatters covered by the present Agreement3. 10. 2 They will not self-initiate action under their national \ntrade laws with respect to government supports granted \nin conformity with this Agreement for as long as this \nHowever, nothing in this \nAgreement is in force. paragraph shall prevent a Party from abrogating this \nAgreement on grounds of non-compliance by the other \nParty. 10. 3 In order to avoid trade conflict they will strongly \nencourage private parties to request the use of the \nprovisions of Article 11 to resolve any disputes on \nmatters covered by this Agreement. If, however, \nprivate petitioners request that action be taken under \nnational laws on matters covered by this Agreement, the \npetitioners' government will immediately inform the \nother Party and offer to enter into consultations in \naccordance with Article 11. The Party against whom \nsuch action is brought shall have the right either to \nsuspend the application of some or all the provisions \nof the present Agreement or to terminate the Agreement \n15 days after the conclusion of consultations. 10. 4 In the conduct of any investigations of trade \nallegations concerning products covered by this \nAgreement that have been initiated under national trade \nlaws as the result of private petitions, Parties shall, \nconsistent \nof \nrepresentations concerning compliance with the terms of \nthis Agreement. account \n\ntheir \n\nwith \n\ntake \n\nlaw \n\n? Action with respect to \"matters covered by the present Agreement\" refers to trade actions relating to \ndirect and indirect government support as defined by this Agreement. It does not include actions relating \nto dumping, intellectual property protection, or anti-trust or competition laws. 11 \n\nArticle 11 \n\nConsultations \n\n11. 1 Parties shall consult regularly and, in any case, at \nleast twice a year, to ensure correct functioning of \nthe Agreement. 11. 2 A Party may request consultations on any development \nrelated to the functioning of the present Agreement. Such consultations shall be held not later than 30 days \nfollowing the date on which the request is received. 11. 3 Parties agree to seek to resolve any disputes within \nthree months of the date of the initial request for \nconsultations. Consultations will not be deemed to be \nconcluded for the purposes of Articles 8 and 9 of this \nAgreement before this three-month period has expired. Article 12 \n\nGATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft \n\n12. 1 The Parties shall propose jointly to other signatories \nof the Aircraft Agreement that disciplines along the \nlines of those laid down in the present Agreement and \nthe interpretative note given in Annex I be \nincorporated into the aforementioned GATT Agreement. The Parties shall also propose that the improved \ndispute settlement provisions agreed in the Uruguay \nRound be used to resolve any dispute arising out of the \nimplementation of the new Aircraft Agreement. 12. 2 The Parties shall make their utmost efforts to ensure \nthat these or similar disciplines are incorporated into \nthe Aircraft Agreement or adopted by key signatories at \nthe earliest possible date, and also to expand the \ncoverage of the disciplines provided by this Agreement \nto all of the products covered in the Aircraft \nAgreement. 12. 3 If multilateralisation has not been achieved in one \nyear, the Parties shall review the question of the \ncontinued application of this bilateral Agreement. 12 \n\nArticle 13 \n\nFinal Provisions \n\n13. 1 This Agreement shall enter into force on the date of \n\nits acceptance by both Parties. 13. 2 This Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the \nParties to take into account any new situation which \nmay arise including possible amendments to the Aircraft \nAgreement. 13. 3 One year after the entry into force of this Agreement, \neither party may withdraw from the Agreement. If a \nParty wishes to withdraw from the present Agreement it \nshall notify the other Party in writing of its \nintentions. The withdrawal shall take effect 12 months \nafter the date on which the notification was received. 13 \n\nANNEX I \n\nINTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 4 OF THE \nGATT AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN CIVIL AIRCRAFT \nBY SIGNATORIES OF THE AGREEMENT \n\nArticle 4 of the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft \n(\"the Agreement\") deals with three specific issues: \n\ngovernment^directed procurement (paragraph 2) \n\nmandatory sub-contracts (paragraph 3) \n\ninducements (paragraph 4) \n\nARTICLE 4-1 \n\nParagraph 4. 1 states the general principle, applicable \nthroughout Article 4, that purchasers of civil aircraft4 \nshould be free to select suppliers on the basis of \ncommercial and technological factors. ARTICLE 4. 2 (Government-Directed Procurement) \n\nThis paragraph states that \"signatories shall not require \nairlines, aircraft manufacturers, or other entities engaged \nin the purchase of civil aircraft, nor exert unreasonable \npressure on them, to procure civil aircraft from any \nparticular source, which would create discrimination against \nsuppliers from any signatory\". This means that signatories must abstain from imposing \npreference policies in favour of or against the suppliers of \none or more signatories. Unreasonable government pressure relating to the selection \nof suppliers by airlines, aircraft manufacturers or other \nentities engaged in the purchase of civil aircraft \n(\"purchasers\") is also prohibited. \"Unreasonable pressure\" \nis any action favouring products or suppliers, or which \ninfluences procurement decisions in a manner which creates \ndiscrimination against suppliers from any other signatory. 4 For the purpose of the Annex, \"civil aircraft\" is defined as in Article 1 of the GATT Agreement on \nTrade in Civil Aircraft. 14 \n\nThe signatories agree that the following are examples of \npractices which are not considered as exerting unreasonable \npressure: \n\nthe participation of government or former government \nrepresentatives on the boards of wholly or partly \ngovernment-owned purchasers but only if they act in the \nbest commercial interest of the purchaser concerned, \nand do not influence procurement decisions in a manner \nwhich creates discrimination against suppliers from any \nother signatory. government \nenvironmental considerations. decisions \n\nconcerning \n\nsafety \n\nand \n\nARTICLE 4. 3 (Mandatory Sub-Contracts) \n\nThe first sentence states that \"signatories agree that the \npurchase of products covered by the Agreement should be made \nonly on a competitive price, quality and delivery basis\". This means that signatories will not intervene to obtain \nfavoured treatment for particular firms and that they will \nnot interfere with the selection of vendors in a situation \nwhere vendors of different signatories are competing. By emphasising that the only factors which should be \ninvolved in purchase decisions are price, quality and \ndelivery terms, the signatories agree that Article 4. 3 does \nnot permit Government-mandated offsets. Further, they will \nnot require that other factors, such as subcontracting, be \nmade a condition or consideration of sale. Specifically, a \nsignatory may not require that a vendor must provide offset, \nspecific types or volumes of business opportunities, or \nother types of industrial compensation. Signatories shall not therefore impose conditions requiring \nsubcontractors or suppliers, to be of a particular national \norigin. The second sentence of this paragraph states that \"in \nconjunction with the approval or awarding of procurement \ncontracts for products covered by this Agreement a signatory \nmay. require that its qualified firms be provided with \naccess to business opportunities on a competitive basis and \non terms no less favourable than those available to the \nfirms of other signatories. \" This means that a signatory \nmay require that the manufacturer not discriminate against \nthe signatory's qualified firms with respect to any bid \nopportunities and to the evaluation of any competitive bids \nmade by those firms. 15 \n\nArticle 4. 4 (Inducements) \n\nThis paragraph states that \"signatories agree to avoid \nattaching inducements of any kind to the sale or purchase of \ncivil aircraft from any particular source which would create \ndiscrimination against suppliers from any signatory\". This means that signatories shall refrain from the use of \nnegative or positive linkages between the sale or purchase \nof civil aircraft and other government decisions or policies \nwhich might influence such sale or purchase whenever there \nis a competition between suppliers of signatories. The \nfollowing is an agreed illustrative, non-exhaustive list of \nsuch prohibited inducements: \n\n- \n\n- \n\nrights and restrictions relating to the airline \nindustry such as landing or route rights. general economic programmes and policies, such as \nimport policies, measures aiming at changes in \nbilateral trade imbalances, policies on alien workers \nor debt rescheduling. development assistance programmes and policies, such as \ngrant aid, loans and infrastructure financing; it is \nunderstood that the use of such assistance for the \npurchase of civil aircraft does not fall under this \ncategory to the extent that the granting of these funds \nis not conditional on such purchase taking place. - \n\ndefence and national security policies and programmes. Without prejudice to Article 4. 3, this also means that \nsignatories shall not intervene in any way, nor exert any \ndirect or indirect pressure on other governments or any \nentity involved in procurement decisions, including the \nestablishment of any link of a negative or positive \ncharacter between decision concerning the procurement of \ncivil aircraft and any other issue or action in any other \narea which might affect the interest of the importing \ncountry. ARTICLE 4. 2 and 4. 4 (Political Representations) \n\nAll participants of signatories in the domestic political \ndecision-making process shall not take any action, including \nbut not limited to political representations, pressure or \ninducements to other governments or foreign airlines, which \nwould be contrary to Article 4 as interpreted in this Annex. Signatories shall draw the participants' attention to this \ninterpretation of Article 4, and shall also use their best \nefforts to assure that the participants do not take such \naction. 16 \n\nANNEX II \n\nFor the purposes of the present Agreement the following \ndefinitions shall apply: \n\n1. \"large civil aircraft\" \n\nWith respect to such aircraft produced in the US by \nexisting manufacturers of large civil aircraft and in \nthe European Community by the Airbus consortium, or \ntheir successor entities, all aircraft, as defined in \nArticle 1 of the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil \nAircraft, except engines as defined in Article 1. 1(b) \nof the Aircraft Agreement, that are designed for \npassenger or cargo transportation and have 100 or more \npassenger \ncargo \nits \nconfiguration. equivalent \n\nseats \n\nin \n\nor \n\n2. \"derivative\" means an aircraft model the major design \nelements of which are derived from a prior aircraft \nmodel. 3. \"total development cost\" as referred to in Article 4. 2. The following cost items, incurred prior to the date of \ncertification, are those which may be taken into \naccount in assessing the \"total development cost\" \nreferred to in Article 4. 2. preliminary design \n\nengineering design \n\nwind-tunnel, structural, system and \nlaboratory tests \n\n- \n\nengineering simulators \n\nequipment development work, except for work \ndirectly financed by equipment and engine \nmanufacturers \n\nflight tests, including associated ground support, \nand analysis necessary to obtain certification \n\ndocumentation required for certification \n\n\f17 \n\n- \n\nthe cost of manufacture of prototypes and test \naircraft, including spares and such modifications \nas may be necessary to obtain certification, less \nthe estimated fair market value of flight aircraft \nafter refurbishment \n\n- \n\njigs and tools, except machine tools, for use \non specific programmes. 4. \"production\" \n\nAll manufacturing, marketing and sales activities other \nthan those described under point 3 above with the \nexception \nfinancing \nconsistent with the Large Aircraft Sector Understanding \nof the OECD Understanding on Official Export Financing. of official \n\ncredit \n\nexport \n\n5. \"indirect government support\" \n\nFinancial support provided by a government or by any \npublic body within the territory of a Party for \naeronautical applications, including research and \ndevelopment, demonstration projects and development of \nmilitary aircraft, which provide an identifiable \nbenefit to the development or production of one or more \nspecific large civil aircraft programmes. 6. \"direct government support\" means any financial support \nprovided by a government or by any public body within \nthe territory of a Party which is provided: \n\n(1) for specific large civil aircraft programmes or \n\nderivatives or \n\n(2) to specific companies to the extent that large \ncivil aircraft programmes or derivatives directly \nbenefit. 7. \"royalty payment\" means repayment of a certain \npredetermined amount of development support per \naircraft delivered. ISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 222 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n07 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-232-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44492-4 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n1^2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3028ef5d-819c-4145-8087-6c1d7bc56a74", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1330/92 of 25 May 1992 on the supply of various consignments of cereals as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-25", "subjects": "cereals,developing countries,food aid", "workIds": "celex:31992R1330,oj:JOL_1992_144_R_0005_012", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cereals", "developing countries", "food aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3028ef5d-819c-4145-8087-6c1d7bc56a74", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a37dd53c-f06f-443a-bc2a-62f3d3adedf3", "title": "Amendment to the proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the manufacture and the placing on the market of certain substances used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-25", "subjects": "administrative cooperation,chemical product,customs document,customs inspection,marketing,narcotic", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0218,comnat:COM_1992_0218_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_157_R_0013_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["administrative cooperation", "chemical product", "customs document", "customs inspection", "marketing", "narcotic"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a37dd53c-f06f-443a-bc2a-62f3d3adedf3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 218 final-SYN316 \n\nBrussels, 25 May 1992 \n\nJ \n\nAmendment to the proposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non the manufacture and the placing on the market of \n\ncertain substances used In the Illicit manufacture \n\nof narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances \n\n(presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 149(3) \nof the EEC-Treaty) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nAt its meeting In April 1992 the European Parliament delivered an opinion \n\non the Commission proposal set out In C0M(90) 597 final of 18 December \n\n1990. This proposal takes account of the amendments desired by the European \n\nParliament, Insofar as the Commission has been able to accept them. <1\u00ab \n\n\f- 1 -\n\nAMENDMENT TO THE PROPOSAL FOR A \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non the manufacture and the placing on the market of \n\ncertain substances used in the illicit manufacture \n\nof narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances \n\nPursuant to the opinion delivered on a first reading by the European \n\nParliament1^ in the framework of the cooperation procedure on the proposal \n\nfor a Council Directive on the manufacture and the placing on the market of \n\ncertain substances used In the Illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and \n\npsychotropic substances, transmitted to the Council by the Commission, the \n\nCommission has decided the amend the abovementioned proposal as follows: \n\n1. The following Is added to recital 3: \n\n\"(In consequence of the adoption of Council Regulation (EEC)) \n\nNo 3677/90 of 13 December 1990 laving down measures to be taken to \n\ndiscourage ins diversion of certain substances to ilis ) 11 \u00bbclt \n\nmanufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances\"(2) \n\n(2) OJ No L 357, 20. 12. 1990. p. 1. 1) OJ No \n\n/l*> \n\n\f- 2 -\n\n2. Recital 5 is amended as follows: \n\n\"Whereas the provisions of Article 12 of the Convention are based on a \nsystem of monitoring trade In the substances in question; whereas most \ntrade in these substances Is fully legitimate-, whereas documentation. \" (the rest Is u n c h a n g e d ). 3. Recitals 5a, 5b, 5c and 5d, with the following wording, are added: \n\n\"whereas the methods of diversion are constantly changing and it Ls. level that t he p r o c e d u r es e s t a b l i s h ed by \nc o n s i d e r ed at I n t e r n a t i o n al \nU l felt \nArticle 12 of the 1988 United Nations Convention against \ntraffic \nbe_ \ndrugs and psychotropic \nstrengthened to combat effectively the diversion of the substances \nconcerned:\" \n\nsubstances must \n\nIn narcotic \n\n\"whereas the Commission and seven Member States have participated In \nthe work of the Action Group on chemical substances set UP fry\u2014the G7 \nHouston Economic Summit on 10 July 1990 to develop effective procedures \nJLOi preventing the diversion of precursors and chemical substances \nrequired for the Illicit manufacture of drugs: and whereas throughout \nthis worK there has been coordination at Community level and,,close \nconsultation with representatives of trade and Industry. \" \n\n\"whereas the final report of the Action Group on chemical substances \nwas approved bv the G7 London Economic Summit on 15 July 1991:\" \n\n\f- 3 -\n\n\"whereas the final report, while recognizing inaJ, \nIllicit traffic LD narcot lc drugs and \nNations Convention against \npsychotropic substances is the basic instrument f_or International \ncooperation In this area, contains a number of recommendations designed \ninfi baMs \nto strengthen national \nthereof;\" \n\nInternational \n\nmeasures on \n\nIhQ 1988_ iLn. 11 fid. and \n\n4. Recital 8 Is amended as follows: \n\n\"Whereas the licit trade in scheduled substances In Table I of the \nrestricted to the manufacture of medicinal \nAnnex \nproducts; whereas It Is necessary to ensure that the manufacture or use \n\nis in general \n\nscheduled \n\nsubstances \n\nQl \nan \nsubject \nauthorization granted by the competent national authorities: whereas it \nis possible. \" (the rest unchanged) \n\npossession \n\nthe \n\nLS \n\nto \n\nof \n\n5. The wording of the Introductory sentence to Article 2(1) Is amended as \n\nfollows: \n\n\"all transactions leading to the placing on the market of scheduled \nsubstances in Tables I and 11 shall be properly documented. \" \n\n6. Article 2(1)(b) Is amended as follows: \n\n(b) the documentation must furthermore contain a declaration from the \ncustomer which shows the specific uses and which confirms that \nthese substances are not used for the Illicit manufacture of \n\n\f- 4 -\n\nnarcotic drugs or psychotropic substances; a regular customer obtaining \n\nfrom a supplier a substance listed in Table U may provide a single \n\ndeclaration covering all transactions Involving that substance over a \n\nperiod of one year; \n\n7. Article 2(2) Is amended as follows: \n\n\"2. Whenever operators apply labels to scheduled substances in order to \n\nplace them on the market such labels shall mention the names of these \n\nsubstances as stated In Tables I and II of the Annex. Operators may In \n\naddition apply their customary labelling. \" \n\n8. A new Article 2(4a) is created: \n\n\"4a. As far as compounds and mixtures of Table II substances are \n\nconcerned, the conditions concerning the documentation, record keeping \n\nand labelling requirements as laid down in this article shall be \n\nadopted, as necessary, by the Commission on the basis of a proposal \n\nsubmitted to the committee provided for under Article 9a. \" \n\n9. Article 3, first paragraph, Is amended as follows: \n\n\" \u2014, Member States shall designate competent author Itles. \" (the rest \n\nunchanged). - 5 -\n\n10. Article 4 Is amended as follows: \n\n\"Additional requirements - Substances of Tables I and II of the Annex \n\n1. Member States shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that the \nmanufacturing or putting Into free circulation In the community of \nsubstances specified In Table I fil the Annex Is subject to the \npossession of an authorization granted by the competent authorities \ndesignated under Article 3. 2. Member States shall take all the appropriate measures to ensure that \nan operator holding the authorization referred to in paragraph 1 shall \nonly make available scheduled substances specified In Table I of the \nAnnex to: \n\n(a) an operator who reoulres a Table I substance for the ma. nufacture \nof a medicinal product and who has been authorized to manufacture \nthat product by an authorization granted In accordance with \nArticle 16 of Directive 75/319/EEC: or \n\n(b) a registered pharmacist: or \n(c) a person who Is In charge of a laboratory. the. r ecogn i sed \n0f \nactivities ol which consist La. PI include. the conduct \nscientific education or research. and Which \n!_\u00a7 attached to a \nuniversity or a hospital or to any other institution approved for \nthe purpose by the competent authority designated under Article 3;_ \nox \n\n(d) any. other person, who has been authorized by the competent \n\nauthor I ty UoyJariatotf undoi. Ar tJelo \nsubstance for the purposes of the manufacture of non-medlclixaJ \nproducts or other special purposes. \" \n\nJ to UVVWJ'J \n\na idMe I \n\n\f6 -\n\n2a. Operators involved In the manufacture and placing on the market of \n\nscheduled substances listed in Table II shall be reouired to \n\nnotify the competent authorities of their activities In this \n\ntrade. \" \n\n11. In Article 5(2) the words \"for example\" are Inserted after the words \n\n\"persons who suspect, as a result of Information obtained\". 12. Article 6(1), first paragraph, Is amended as follows: \n\n1. In order to ensure the correct application of Articles 2, 4 and 5, \n\neach Member State shall adopt within the framework of Its domestic \n\nlaw the measures necessary to enable the competent authorities: \n\n(a) to obtain Information on any orders for or operations Involving \n\nscheduled substances; \n\n(b) to enter operators' business premises In order to obtain evidence \n\nof Irregularities;\" (the rest unchanged) \n\n13. Article 9(2) is amended as follows: \n\n\"2. The Commission, on the basis of the communications made pursuant \n\nto paragraph 1, shall, In consultation with Member States, draw up an \n\nannual t npor t to bo mitomlUod to the International Narcotist Cntiliol \n\nBoard. ThoCommJssJoa-SliiiLL^rinua-LLy. iicdate tDe Annex. lo this report,\" \n\n\f- 7 -\n\n14. An Article 9a with the following wording is added: \n\n\"The Commission shall be assisted by a consultative committee made up \n\nof the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the \n\nrepresentative of the Commission. The representative of the Commission shall present the committee with a \n\ndraft of the measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver an \n\nopinion on this draft within a period which the Chairman can set In \n\naccordance with the urgency of the matter, If necessary by taking a \n\nvote. The opinion shall be entered In the minutes; In addition, each Member \n\nState shall have the right to ask for Its position to be recorded In \n\nthe minutes. The Commission shall take account of the opinion delivered by the \n\nCommittee. It shall Inform the committee as to how It has taken \n\naccount of the opinion. \" \n\n15. Article 10 Is amended as follows: \n\n(D Member states shall bring Into force the laws. regulations and \n\nadministrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive \n\nbefore 1 July 1992. When Member States adopt these measures, the latter shall contain \n\na reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such \n\nreference on the occasion of their official publication. The \n\nmethods of making such a reference shall be laid down by the \n\nMember States. - 8 -\n\n(2) Member States shall communicate to the Commission the provisions \n\nof national iaw which they adopt in the field governed by this \n\nDirect ive. \" \n\n16. The text of the Annex Is replaced by the following \n\nTABLE I \n\nSubstance \n\nEphedr ine \n\nErgometrIne \n\nErgotamine \n\nLysergic acid \n\n1-phenyI-2-propanone \n\nPseudoephedrIne \n\nAcetYianthranlIic acid N \n\nMethYlenedloxyphenvl 3. 4-oropanone 2 \n\nSH Code \n\n2939 4Q 1Q \n\n2939 60 10 \n\n2939 60 30 \n\n2939 60 50 \n\n2914 30 10 \n\n2939 4Q 30 \n\n2924 29 50 \n\n2932 90 77 \n\nThe salts of the substances I Isted La this category whenever the \n\npresence of such salts is possible. 9 -\n\nTABLE I I \n\nAcetic anhydride \n\nAnthranlIic acid \n\nPhenylacetIc acid \n\nPiper idlne \n\nIsosafrole (cls+trans) \nPlperonal \nSafrole \n\nSH Code \n\n2915 24 00 \n\nOX 2922 49 90 \n\n2916 33 QO \n2933 39 30 \n\n2932 90 73 \n\n2932 90 75 \n2932 90 71 \n\nThe salts of the substances listed In this category whenever the \n\nexistence of such salts is possible. TABLE 11(a) \n\nAcetone \n\nEthyl ether \n\nMethyl ethvi ketone (MEK) \n\nToluene \nPotassium permanganate \nSulphuric acid \n\nHydrochloric acid \n\nSH Code \n\n2914 11 QQ \n2909 11 00 \n2914 12 00 \n\n2902 30 10/90 \n\n2841 60 10 \n\n2807 00 10 \n\n28Q6 _10_QJQ \n\n\f- 10 -\n\nTABLE III \n\nAcetle anhydrIde \n\nAnthranilic acid and its salts \n\nPhenylacet le acid and its salts \n\nPiper Id\u00eene and its salts \n\nIsosafrole (cls+trans) \n\nPlperonal \nSafrole \n\nThreshold \n\n11 \n\n100 g \n\n200 g \n\n0. 25 I \n\n500 ml/g \n\nsoo m i/o \nsoo mi/g \n\n\fCommission's position on the amendments not adopted \n\nANNEX \n\nAmendment No 9: adds the following paragraph to Article 5(2): \n\n\"The disclosure of such Information in good faith to the competent \n\nauthorities shall not involve for the persons concerned any civil or \n\ncriminal liability of any kind. \" \n\nCommission's position \n\nThe Commission cannot approve this amendment since it lays down civil or \n\npenal provisions which go beyond the scope of a directive based on Article \n\n100A and which, furthermore, remain within the competence of the Member \n\nStates. The Commission's Initial proposal is Justified on the grounds that the \n\ndistortion of competition which motivates this proposal Is that which might \n\nresult from the actual or potential differences between national rules on \n\nthe control of substances. The notification of suspicious circumstances \n\nforms part of these rules, but nothing beyond that. Amendment No 11: adds the following provisions to Article 8: \n\n\"The Commission shall ask Member States to apply a graduated scale of \n\nsanctions distinguishing between oversights in registration, failure to \n\nkeep a register, fraudulent registration of quantities and deliberate \n\nconcealment of Important information. Member States shall ensure that victims who suffer injury resulting \n\ndirectly from a false declaration made In good faith are compensated. Commission's position \n\nThis amendment elicits the same comments as amendment No 9, and the \n\n(jomml uu Ion I r. t h o r o f o ro u n a h ln to iircnpl It. /!A \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 218 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n05 10 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-227-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44348-0 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n1^2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98d08d45-383e-40a2-ae7d-39ff27934cf7", "title": "92/347/Euratom: Commission Opinion of 25 May 1992 concerning the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste of the storage facility at El Cabril in the Sierra Albarrana (Spain) in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#opinion,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-25", "subjects": "Andalusia,nuclear safety,public health,radioactive effluent,storage of waste", "workIds": "celex:31992A0347,oj:JOL_1992_189_R_0040_054", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Andalusia", "nuclear safety", "public health", "radioactive effluent", "storage of waste"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98d08d45-383e-40a2-ae7d-39ff27934cf7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66da52ad-6d7d-4bf9-917d-78c4670f78d4", "title": "92/307/EEC: Commission Decision of 25 May 1992 approving measures to set up pilot projects for the control of rabies with a view to its eradication or prevention presented by the Kingdom of Belgium (Only the French and Dutch texts are authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-25", "subjects": "Belgium,health control,rabies,veterinary legislation", "workIds": "celex:31992D0307,oj:JOL_1992_162_R_0026_042", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgium", "health control", "rabies", "veterinary legislation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66da52ad-6d7d-4bf9-917d-78c4670f78d4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/521cb0ed-8729-4296-ac0c-e995a9092389", "title": "Amended draft COUNCIL RESOLUTION on the marketing practices for breast-milk substitutes in third countries by Community- based manufacturers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-25", "subjects": "extra-EU trade,marketing,mother's milk", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0210(02),comnat:COM_1992_0210(02)_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_155_R_0019_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["extra-EU trade", "marketing", "mother's milk"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/521cb0ed-8729-4296-ac0c-e995a9092389", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 210 final \n\nBrussels, ZS May 1992 \n\nwm->. ;\u2022 \n\nf Jn!*f^j''Si \u2022'\u2022 \n\nAmended proposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non infant formulae and follow-on formulae \n\nintended for export to third countries \n\nAmended draft \n\nCOUNCIL RESOLUTION \n\non the marketing practices for breast-milk substitutes in \n\nthird countries by Community-based manufacturers \n\n(presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 149(3) \n\nof the EEC Treaty) \n\nSi \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nExplanatory Note \n\nIn November 91 the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for a \nCouncil Directive on infant formulae and follow-on formulae Intended for \nexport to third countries and a draft Council Resolution on the marketing \npractices for breast-milk substitutes In developing countries by Community-\nbased manufacturers*1). These proposals were based on article 113 of the Treaty which did not \nforesee consultation of the European Parliament. However the latter was \nconsulted and delivered its opinion on the subject*2*. It approved the \nCommission proposals subject to a number of amendments. Concerning the directive the Commission accepted the principle of \namendments 1 and 14 to ensure that no products other than infant formulae \nexported to third countries should be represented as suitable for infants \nof 4-6 months of age and parts of amendment 4 to ensure that the labelling \nshould be in an appropriate language and should be such as to avoid \nconfusion between Infant formulae and follow-on formulae. It could not \naccept amendment 2 which was not in agreement with the advice of the \nScientific Committee for Food and amendment 3 and parts of amendment 4 \nwhich proposed additional labelling requirement already covered by \nCommunity legislation. It also rejected amendment 15 because It could not \nlegislate on practices taking place In the territory of third countries and \namendment 16 which referred to products not regulated at Community level. Concerning the proposal for a Resolution it accepted amendments 6, 7 and 9 \nwith some drafting modifications to extend the application of the proposed \nResolution to all non-Community countries and to strengthen the Community \ncommittment. The Commission did not accepted amendments 8 and 10 referring \nto voluntary agreements between Member States and Industry over which It \nwould have no control, amendment 11 in order to preserve Its independence \nand freedom of action, amendment 12 because it would not be appropriate \ninstitutionally and amendment 13 because It would Impose unnecessary burden \nfor the limited Commission resources. In response to this opinion the Commission has decided to amend both Its \nabovementloned proposals. For practical reasons consolidated texts are presented where the amendments \nare under Iined. (1) \n(2) \n\n\f- 3 -\n\nAmended proposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non Infant formulae and follow-on formulae \n\nintended for export to third countries. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community \n\nand in particular Article 113 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission*1*, \n\nWhereas Community rules concerning infant formulae and follow-on formulae \n\nare lald-down In Commission directive 91/321/EEC*2* ; \n\nWhereas given the nature of the products In question It is desirable that \n\nCommunity rules or International standards relating to their composition \n\nare made applicable to such products intended for export to third \n\ncountries \u2022, \n\nWhereas In order to prevent Inappropriate use of these products which could \n\nprejudice the health of Infants it Is also desirable to extend the \n\napplication of the Community rules on labelling of infant formulae and \n\nfollow-on formulae to those products Intended for export to third \n\ncountrles, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE : \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThis Directive concerns infant formulae and follow-on formulae, as defined \n\nby article 1. 2. c. and d of Directive 91/321/EEC, Intended for export to \n\nthird countries. (1) \n\n(2) O. J. N\u00b0 L 175 Of 4. 7. 1991, p. 35 \n\n\f- 4 -\n\nArticle 2 \n\n1. Member States shall ensure that the products referred to In article 1 \n\nmay be exported from the Community only If they are In conformity with \n\nthis directIve. 2. No product other than Infant formulae may be represented as suitable \n\nfor satisfying by Itself the nutritional requirements of normal \n\nhealthy Infants during the first four to six months of life. 3. In addition the products referred to In article 1 must be In \n\nconformity : \n\na) with the provisions of articles 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Directive \n\n91/321/EEC or with relevant applicable world standards established \n\nby Codex Alimentarius ; \n\nb) with the provisions of article 7 paragraphs 2 to 6 of Directive \n\n91/321/EEC \n\nunless otherwise requested or stipulated by provisions established by \n\nthe importing country. 4. They shall be labelled in an appropriate language and in such a way as \n\nto avoid any risk of confusion between Infant formulae and follow-on \n\nformulae. Article 3 \n\nMember States shall take the necessary measures to comply with this \n\nDirective. They shall forthwith Inform the Commission thereof. Those \n\nmeasures shall be applied in such a way as to : \n\npermit exports of products complying with this Directive, by 1 \n\nDecember 1992 ; \n\nprohibit exports of products which do not comply with this Directive, \n\nwith effect from 1 June 1994. - 5 -\n\nWhen Member States adopt these provisions, they shall contain a reference \n\nto this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of \n\ntheir official publication. The procedure for such reference shall be \n\nadopted by the Member States. Article 4 \n\nThis Directive Is addressed to the Member States. Done at \n\nFor the Council \n\n\f- 6 -\n\nAmended draft \n\nrnitMf. ll RESOLUTION \n\non the marketing practices for breast-milk substitutes in \n\nthird countrles by Community-based manufacturers. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nWhereas Council Directive. /. /EEC on infant formulae and follow-on \n\nformulae Intended for export to third countries renders applicable to such \n\nproducts a number of Community provisions relating to the composition and \n\nthe labelling of infant formulae and follow-on formulae; \n\nWhereas in May 1981 the 34th World Health Assembly adopted as a \n\nrecommendation the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk \n\nSubst itutes; \n\nWhereas a considerable volume of these products are sold to thIrd countrles \n\nby Community-based manufacturers; \n\nWhereas It is considered very Important that marketing practices In third \n\ncountries should not discourage mothers from breastfeeding; \n\nWhereas the application of the International Code provides without doubt an \n\nexcellent way to achieve this In these countries; \n\nWhereas the Community cannot legislate for these countries; whereas It is \n\nnevertheless necessary to encourage compliance with the International Code \n\nof Marketing of Breast-Milk substitutes when these products are placed on \n\nsale In export markets, Insofar as this does not conflict with the \n\nprovisions In force In the countries concerned; \n\nWhereas the Community can offer an effective support to the competent \n\nauthorities of these countries in their efforts to apply the International \n\nCode in their territory, \n\n\f- 7 -\n\nHAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION : \n\n1. The Community will contribute to the application of appropriate \n\nmarketing practices for breast-milk substitutes in third countries. 2. For the implementation of point 1, the Commission will instruct its \n\ndelegations In third countrles to serve as contact points for the \n\ncompetent authorities. Any complaints or critlsisms with respect to \n\nthe marketing practices of a manufacturer based in the Community could \n\nbe notified to them. 3. The Commission will be ready to examine such cases and to assist in \n\nthe search for a satisfactory solution for all parties concerned. 4. This resolution shall be communicated by the Commission to the \n\ncountries concerned through the official channels. -z-\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 210 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\nil 03 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-223-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44312-X \n\nOffice for Officiai Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ec4074af-1f7a-4698-ad67-e19072ea08ad", "title": "Proposal for a Council Directive providing for changes to the Seventh Council Directive on aid to shipbuilding of 21 December 1990", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#staff-working-document,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-25", "subjects": "Germany,State aid,industrial restructuring,regional development,shipbuilding,unification of Germany", "workIds": "celex:51992SC0991,comnat:SEC_1992_0991_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_155_R_0020_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "State aid", "industrial restructuring", "regional development", "shipbuilding", "unification of Germany"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ec4074af-1f7a-4698-ad67-e19072ea08ad", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07c10b34-46c7-4130-a775-f75726568027", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1355/92 of 25 May 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code 8516 50 00, originating in Thailand, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-25", "subjects": "Thailand,furnace,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1355,oj:JOL_1992_145_R_0057_066", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Thailand", "furnace", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07c10b34-46c7-4130-a775-f75726568027", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/930b42f0-577e-4e42-b9f4-5cb56961c109", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) on the arrangements applicable to the importation into the Community of sheepmeat and goatmeat products originating in the Republics of Bosnia- Herzegovina, Croatia and Slovenia and the Yugoslav Republics of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-25", "subjects": "Yugoslavia,goatmeat,import licence,market supervision,republic,sheepmeat", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0221,comnat:COM_1992_0221_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Yugoslavia", "goatmeat", "import licence", "market supervision", "republic", "sheepmeat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/930b42f0-577e-4e42-b9f4-5cb56961c109", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 221 final \n\nBrussels, 25 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\non the arrangements applicable to the importation into \nthe Community of sheepmeat and goatmeat products originating \nin the Republics of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia and Slovenia \nand the Yugoslav Republics of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n\u20221 \n\n< \n\nIn 1981 the Community concluded a voluntary restraint Agreement with the \nSocialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on trade in live animals and \nsheepmeat and goatmeat. The normal and balanced administration of the Agreement has proved to be \nimpossible on account of the changes which have taken place since 1991 in \nthat Republic and the creation of new Republics. In order to maintain a pattern of trade to the Community which has \ntraditionally existed, the Commission is proposing to suspend the system of \nadministering the Agreement and to provide temporarily for its exclusive \nadministration by the Community. The attached proposal for a Regulation has as its subject matter such \nmeasures. The proposal has no consequences for small and medium-sized undertakings. proposal for GL \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No. on the arrangements applicable to the importation into \nthe Community of sheepmeat and goatmeat products originating \nin the Republics of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia and Slovenia \nand the Yugoslav Republics of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia \n\n~} \nJS \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \nand in particular Article 113 thereof \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas the normal and balanced administration of the 1981 Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the Socialist Federal Republic \nof Yugoslavia on trade in the sheepmeat and goatmeat sector, which entered \ninto force on 1 January 1 9 8 1 t1), as adjusted by the 1990 Agreement which \nentered into force on 1 January 1 9 8 9 ^ ), has proved to be impossible on \naccount of the changes which have taken place since 1991 in that Republic; \nwhereas the creation of new Republics, some of which are recognized by the \nCommunity, represents a profound change in the conditions under which the \nsaid Agreement has been administered until now; \n\nWhereas, in order to avoid a disruption of the pattern of trade which has \ntraditionally existed under the said Agreement, it would be appropriate, \nwhile maintaining the substance of the Agreement, to suspend its system of \nadministration and provide, on a temporary basis, for the exclusive \nadministration of the agreed arrangements by the Community; whereas in \nthis respect the issue of an import licence should no longer be conditional \non the submission of a Yugoslav export licence and steps should be taken to \nensure the fair distribution of the quantities agreed among the various \nRepublics; \n\n(1) OJ No L 137, 23. 5. 1981, p. 29. (2) OJ No L 95, 12. 4. 1990, p. 1. Whereas, in order to ensure this fair distribution of imports among the \nRepublics in question, rules should be laid down for checking the origin of \nthe products imported; \n\nWhereas this Regulation is without prejudice to Council Directive \n72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems \nupon importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat from third \ncountries^2), as last amended by Directive 89/227/EEC(3), \n\n7 \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe administration of the import arrangements laid down in points 9 and 10 \nof the 1981 Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nSocialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on trade in the sheepmeat and \ngoatmeat sector and in points 2 and 3 of the 1990 adjustment Agreement is \nhereby suspended and replaced by the following arrangements. Article 2 \n\n1. In order to comply with the Agreement referred to in Article 1 and in \nparticular the quantities specified therein, the importation of any of \nthe products specified in the Agreement shall be conditional on the \nsubmission of an import licence as provided for in Article 15 of \nRegulation (EEC) No 3013/89(4). The issue of such licence shall be \nconditional on the provision of a security as a guarantee that \nimportation will be effected during the period of validity of the \nlicence. The security shall be wholly or partially forfeit if the \noperation is not carried out, or is only partially carried out, within \nthis time limit. (2) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28. (3) OJ No L 93, 6. 4. 1989, p. 25. (4) OJ No L 289, 7. 10. 1989, p. 1. 5 \n\n2. Applications for an import licence shall be accompanied by a document \n\nsetting out the name of the Republic in which the products concerned \noriginate. 3. On the issue of import licences for the products referred to in the 1981 \n\nAgreement, care must be taken to ensure a fair distribution of the \nlicences among the various Republics with particular attention being \ndevoted to the distribution of production among those Republics. Article 3 \n\n1. Detailed rules for the application of this Regulation shall be adopted \n\nby the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article \n30 of Regulation (EEC) No 3013/89. 2. The detailed rules shall concern in particular: \n\n(a) the issue of import licences on the basis of the criterion referred \n\nto in Article 2(3) and, where necessary, the adoption of rules on \nthe origin of the products concerned; \n\n(b) the suspension for the remainder of the year of imports originating \n\nin the various Republics if during that period: \n\n- \n\n- \n\nthe imports originating in the various Republics exceed the \nquantities referred to in the 1981 Agreement, or \n\nthe individual imports from one of those Republics exceed \nthe quantities arising from the fair distribution referred \nto in Article 2(3) of this Regulation; \n\n(c) the monitoring, on the basis of the monthly price average, of the \nprices at which lamb carcases and live animals originating in the \nRepublics referred to in this Regulation are imported; \n\n\f<r \n\n(d) the determination of the measures to be taken, if necessary, in \n\ncases where a drop in the prices for lamb carcases and/or live \nanimals imported from the Republics is observed in a Member State \nand is indicative of a problem; \n\n(e) the temporary measures necessary to facilitate the introduction of \n\nthe import arrangements provided for in this Regulation. Article 4 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the \nOfficial Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in \nall Member States. Done at \n\nFor the Council \nThe President \n\n\f3-\n\nKSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 221 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-231-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44483-5 \n\nOffice for Officiai Publications of the European Communities \n1X2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8d1482ee-dbed-4fba-b579-fefbe833c81a", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 3687/91 on the common organization of the market in fishery products and amending Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "common customs tariff,fish product,protein products,tariff nomenclature", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0213,comnat:COM_1992_0213_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_158_R_0021_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common customs tariff", "fish product", "protein products", "tariff nomenclature"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8d1482ee-dbed-4fba-b579-fefbe833c81a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 213 final \n\nBrussels, 22 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 3687/91 on the common organization \n\nof the market in fishery products and amending Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature \n\nand on the Common Customs Tariff \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nSurimi is a protein gel made out of minced meat from fish with a low \n\ncontent of fat. Its main characteristics - a lack of taste, odour and \n\ncolour - makes it extremely suitable for the production of seafood \n\nanalogues - with the correct use of additional ingredients these \n\npreparations of surimi replaces a large number of seafoods in short \n\nsupply. The demand for surimi and preparations of surimi has in the recent \n\nyears been steadily increasing in the Community. The Community's own \n\nprocessing industry has not yet succeeded in producing a suitable \n\nsurimi as raw material, but certain companies in the EEC have started \n\nup production of preparations of surimi. Information obtained from the industry and the traders indicate that \n\nthe Community now has become a major net-importer of these products. However, as neither surimi nor preparations of surimi have separate \n\npositions in the Combined Nomenclature, the Commission is unable to \n\nevaluate the trade and the development in the market prices. This lack \n\nof information makes it impossible to make the two products separately \n\nsubject to the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy. The present proposal aims at a separate inclusion of surimi and \n\npreparations of surimi in the CFP, by creating specific positions for \n\nthese products in the relevant part of the Combined Nomenclature, which \n\nis annexed to R 3687/91 on the common organization of the market in \n\nfishery products. (PH/REQ/surimi/ex. en- fn) \n\n\fCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\n/92 \n\nof \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 3687/91 on the common organization \n\nof the market in fishery products and amending Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature \n\nand on the Common Customs Tariff \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \n\nCommunity, and in particular Article 43 thereof. Having regard to the proposal from the Comroission(^), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(^)r \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(^), \n\nWhereas the Community demand for and imports of surimi, which is a \n\nwashed and stabilised protein gel made from minced fish, and \n\npreparations of surimi, which are destined for direct consumption, have \n\nbeen steadily increasing during recent years; \n\nWhereas the Community production of surimi and preparations of surimi \n\nhas grown in importance concurrently with international trends; \n\nWhereas experience has shown that although several different species of \n\nfish with a low fat content may be used as raw material for the \n\nproduction of surimi, a specific identification of the raw material \n\nused is not easily feasible due to the final specifications of surimi \n\nand preparations of surimi; \n\nWhereas at present neither surimi nor preparations of surimi are \n\nseparately identified as products subject to the rules of the common \n\nfisheries policy in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3687/91 of 28 November \n\n1991 on the common organization of the market in fishery products^4); \n\n(1) OJ No C \n(2) OJ No C \n(3) OJ No C \n(4) OJ No. L 354, 23. 12-1991, p. 1 \n\n(PH/REG/sur i/en- fn) \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nWhereas, for that reason, the Community is not able to monitor trade in \n\nthese products or the trend in market prices; whereas therefore that \n\nRegulation should be amended so as to include these products; \n\nWhereas the tariff nomenclature resulting from the application of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 3687/91 is included in the Common Customs Tariff; \n\nwhereas consequently an amendment should be made to the Common Customs \n\nTariff adopted by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87<5), as last \n\namended by Regulation (EEC) No \n\n(6)# \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nAnnex VII to Regulation (EEC) No 3687/91 is hereby amended in \n\naccordance with the Annex hereto. Article 2 \n\nAnnex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 is hereby amended in accordance \n\nwith the Annex hereto. Article 3 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 1993. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly \n\napplicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\n( 5) OJ No L 2 5 6, 7. 9. 1 9 8 7, p. ( 6) OJ No L \n\n(PH/REG/stri/en-fn) \n\n\fSubheadings 0304 90 and 1604 20 are replaced by the following \n\nANNEX \n\nCNoxfc \n\nDescription \n\n0304 90 \n\n- Otherr \n\n030\u00bb\u00bb 90 05 \n\ns u r i ni \n\no t h er \n\n: \n\n0304 9010 \n\n- Of frwnwarer fish \n\n- Other: \n\nOf hniiog (Ctupea barengus. Chtpaa palLs\u00eb): \n\n0304 90 21 \n\n0304 90 25 \n\n0304 90 31 \n\n- \u2014 \u2014 R om 15 Fcbnxary to 15 Jutie \n\n- \n\nFrom 16 Jane to 14 Fcbruaiy \n\n- \u2014 Of rcdfish (Setxnrn \n\nspp. ) \n\n0304 90 35 \n\n0304 90 38 \n\ni \ni \n\u00ef\u2014 \ni. } \u2014\u2022 \ni \n\n0304 90 39 \n\nj H-\n\n0304 90 41 \n\n0304 90 45 \n\n\u2014 Of oad (G\u00e0dusmorbue. Gadus ogac, Gadus macrocephclus) and of fish \n\nof the species Boreogadus solda: \n\n\u2014 \u2014 Of cod of the species Gadus macrocep. iatus \n\n\u2014 \u2014 \u2014 O f c o d o f t hc spedes Gadus morbua \n\n\u2014 \u2014 \u2014 Other \n\n\u2014 \u2014 Of rpalfKh (PoUachius virera) \n\n\u2014 \u2014 Of haddock (Mclanogram\u0153us aegUfimes) \n\n\u2014 \u2014 Of hake (Mahtc\u00e0us \n\nspp. , Uropbycis spp. )-. 0304 90 47 \n\ni \n\n\u2014 \u2014 \u2014 Of hakc of the genu\u00ee \u00cfAeriucdus \n\n0304 90 49 \n\n0304 90 51 \n\n0304 90 SS \n\n0304 90 57 \n\n0304 90 $9 \n\n0304 90 61 \n\n0304 90 65 \n\n0304 90 9 \u00f9 \n\n\u2014 \u2014 \u2014 Of hakc of the genus Uropbycis \n\nOf megrim (Lepidorbombus \n\nspp. ) \n\n\u2014 \u2014 Of Ray*s bream (Brama spp. ) \n\n\u2014 \u2014 Of monkfi\u00eeh (Laphius spp. ) \n\nOf blue whi\u00e2ag (Microrr^sistius pou\u00eeassou Or Gcdur poutassou) \n\nOf Alaska pollack (TheTTcgn: chclcogra. nma) \n\n\u2014 \u2014 Of swordfish (X\u00eephias glad\u00eeus) \n\nOther \n\nRaccof ouvy \n\neoaweDrioaal \n\nSuppleraentary \nunir \n\n(%) \nor \nlevy \n(AGR) \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\nFrce \n\n20 <>) \n\n15 \n\nFrec \n\n15 (\u00bb) (\u2022) \n\n8 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n1S \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n12 \u00ab \n\n15 (*) \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 (\u00ab) \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n15 \n\n(') Sabjccr to co\u0153plwna: with^be refetxnee pric=. A counceraHing w \n(*} ^ \u00ef \u00ef f ^ ^ T ^ ^1^ ^ffii* w f e h m s t A ^ d i n ss 0302 40 9 0. 0 3 03 50 90. 03(K J 0 9 3, 0504 10 98 \u00abd 03<K 90 25 wr*m the Umte of a global a c n oJ \n\nis pzov de\u00e0 for fa tac c^c of non-coapluir. ee w*u> the n^otnec p n o. c m\u00bb qooea oT 3A 000 tonnes to be Bnmocd by tbc compercat CommonJcy -ntkonries i td subject TO c o m p l i ce wiA \u00e0x rcfcrencr price. {*) SobjeCE to l\u00eerntn iad conditions to be dctexzaincd by tbc coaipctcot \u00bbodjorii jet. axmual eanff qnoca of 2 0 00 tonnes to be sramed by dvc cnnipetccr Convaioicy \u00abutLoaries. CN oodir \n\n1 \n\nDescription \n\n2 \n\n1604 20 \n\n\u2014 Other prepared or preserved fish: \n\nRace o \n\nf doty \n\n\u2022 auconotnous \n(%) \n\nlevy \n(AGRJ \n\n3 \n\ncue vcorio naJ \n(%) \n\nSupplemcntAry \nunit \n\n4 \n\n5 \n\n160\u00abt 20 05 \n\n_ \n\nP r e p a r a t i o ns of \n\ns u r i mi \n\n25 \n\n20 \n\n\u2014 \u2014 O t h er \n\n: \n\n1604 20 10 \n\n\u2014 \u2014 \u2014 Of salmon \n\n1604 20 30 \n\n'\u2014 \u2014 \u2014. Of Salmboidae, other d un salmon \n\n1604 20 40 \n\n\u2014 : \u2014 \u2014 Of anchovies \n\n1604 20 50 \n\n\u2014 \u2014 \u2014 Of sardines, boniro. markrrH of the Spirit?. Scomber icombrus and \nScotttber japOTuats. fish of the species Crrcyncr. ysis urdcolor \n\n1604 20 70 \n\n\u2014 \u2014 \u2014 Of tunas, skipjack or other fish of the genus L'uthynnus \n\n1604 20 SO \n\n_ \n\nOf other fish \n\n20 \n\n20 \n\n25 \n\n25 \n\n25 \n\n25 \n\nSJ \n\n7 \n\n\u2014 \n\n25 \n\n24 \n\n20 \n\n\u2014 \n\n\u2014 \n\n\u2014 \n\n\u2014 \n\n\u2014 \n\u2014 \n\n\u2014 \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 213 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-226-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44339-1 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nLr2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/50521e03-5cab-458d-b20f-24433cdcd88b", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1319/92 of 22 May 1992 establishing a system for the surveillance of imports of fresh sour cherries originating in the Republics of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia and Slovenia and the Yugoslav Republics of Macedonia and Montenegro", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "Yugoslavia,import licence,market supervision,stone fruit,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1319,oj:JOL_1992_140_R_0012_023", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Yugoslavia", "import licence", "market supervision", "stone fruit", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/50521e03-5cab-458d-b20f-24433cdcd88b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5726fd6-43e6-4d46-8f66-f7e784e419d9", "title": "92/305/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 May 1992 approving the programme for the eradication of enzootic bovine leukosis presented by Portugal and fixing the level of the Community' s financial contribution (Only the Portuguese text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "Portugal,animal leucosis,cattle,health control", "workIds": "celex:31992D0305,oj:JOL_1992_162_R_0024_040", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "animal leucosis", "cattle", "health control"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5726fd6-43e6-4d46-8f66-f7e784e419d9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b1509626-bfaa-4799-b6fc-765304bbf891", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1320/92 of 22 May 1992 laying down further transitional measures to support the market for beef in Spain", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "Spain,beef,carcase,intervention buying,tied sales outlet", "workIds": "celex:31992R1320,oj:JOL_1992_140_R_0014_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "beef", "carcase", "intervention buying", "tied sales outlet"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b1509626-bfaa-4799-b6fc-765304bbf891", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b5f8a96e-7f3b-4e62-870c-c2ca1eb28b95", "title": "92/302/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 May 1992 approving measures to set up pilot projects for the control of rabies with a view to its eradication or prevention presented by Luxembourg (Only the French text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "Luxembourg,health control,rabies,veterinary legislation", "workIds": "celex:31992D0302,oj:JOL_1992_162_R_0021_037", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Luxembourg", "health control", "rabies", "veterinary legislation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b5f8a96e-7f3b-4e62-870c-c2ca1eb28b95", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1af4b16e-e253-4b71-8f6f-fa269d768769", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1340/92 of 22 May 1992 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "chemical product,common customs tariff,tariff nomenclature", "workIds": "celex:31992R1340,oj:JOL_1992_145_R_0013_051", "eurovoc_concepts": ["chemical product", "common customs tariff", "tariff nomenclature"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1af4b16e-e253-4b71-8f6f-fa269d768769", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/44284946-f85b-4d42-ba0d-048ae2ad8b21", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1318/92 of 22 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3061/84 laying down detailed rules for the application of the system of production aid for olive oil", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "agricultural region,olive oil,olive-growing,production aid", "workIds": "celex:31992R1318,oj:JOL_1992_140_R_0011_022", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural region", "olive oil", "olive-growing", "production aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/44284946-f85b-4d42-ba0d-048ae2ad8b21", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb2288ec-dc3c-4a4c-a2e7-ae65b7c32475", "title": "92/299/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 May 1992 approving the programme for the eradication of bovine tuberculosis presented by Portugal and fixing the level of the Community' s financial contribution (Only the Portuguese text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "EU aid,Portugal,animal tuberculosis,cattle,veterinary legislation", "workIds": "celex:31992D0299,oj:JOL_1992_162_R_0017_034", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Portugal", "animal tuberculosis", "cattle", "veterinary legislation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fb2288ec-dc3c-4a4c-a2e7-ae65b7c32475", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b333b778-f4a1-41db-9037-00f28fa34771", "title": "92/300/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 May 1992 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3185/91 adopting measures for the import of fruit and vegetables from certain countries affected by cholera", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "South America,fruit,health control,import licence,tropical disease,vegetable", "workIds": "celex:31992D0300,oj:JOL_1992_162_R_0018_035", "eurovoc_concepts": ["South America", "fruit", "health control", "import licence", "tropical disease", "vegetable"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b333b778-f4a1-41db-9037-00f28fa34771", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3b849e5a-df1a-46bb-9b37-9401de574b58", "title": "92/304/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 May 1992 approving measures to set up pilot projects for the control of rabies with a view to its eradication or prevention presented by France (Only the French text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "France,health control,rabies,veterinary legislation", "workIds": "celex:31992D0304,oj:JOL_1992_162_R_0023_039", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "health control", "rabies", "veterinary legislation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3b849e5a-df1a-46bb-9b37-9401de574b58", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed11b1a4-7864-455f-8237-d5dae6f09fef", "title": "92/303/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 May 1992 approving measures to set up pilot projects for the control of rabies with a view to its eradication or prevention presented by the Federal Republic of Germany (Only the German text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "Germany,health control,rabies,veterinary legislation", "workIds": "celex:31992D0303,oj:JOL_1992_162_R_0022_038", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "health control", "rabies", "veterinary legislation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed11b1a4-7864-455f-8237-d5dae6f09fef", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c0ff052a-26d8-4b4c-8644-de36c34508b3", "title": "92/301/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 May 1992 approving the programme for the eradication of bovine brucellosis presented by Portugal and fixing the level of the Community's financial contribution (Only the Portuguese text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-22", "subjects": "EU aid,Portugal,brucellosis,cattle,veterinary legislation", "workIds": "celex:31992D0301,oj:JOL_1992_162_R_0020_036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Portugal", "brucellosis", "cattle", "veterinary legislation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c0ff052a-26d8-4b4c-8644-de36c34508b3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/76616c49-92eb-4a14-ba37-495d51723eb9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1198/92 by: Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Ursula SCHLEICHER, Hedwig KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT, Honor FUNCK, Ingo FRIEDRICH, Georg JARZEMBOWSKI, Reinhold BOCKLET and Brigitte LANGENHAGEN to the Commission. Incorporation into meat products of starch or proteins of animal or vegetable origin and the maximum permissible percentages from a technological viewpoint", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BOCKLET,European Parliament,FLORENZ,FRIEDRICH INGO,FUNK,JARZEMBOWSKI,KEPPELHOFF-WIECHERT,LANGENHAGEN,SCHLEICHER", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EC Directive,animal protein,health control,intra-EU trade,labelling,meat product,starch,vegetable protein", "workIds": "celex:91992E001198", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "animal protein", "health control", "intra-EU trade", "labelling", "meat product", "starch", "vegetable protein"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/76616c49-92eb-4a14-ba37-495d51723eb9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/efabf653-a8cf-4a53-b757-3f9a973bad54", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1224/92 by Mr Virginio BETTINI to the Commission. Building of a shooting range and protection of internationally important species at Madonna del Tonnaro in Sicily (Italy)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BETTINI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Sicily,application of EU law,fraud,hunting,protected species,protection of animal life,wildlife", "workIds": "celex:91992E001224", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Sicily", "application of EU law", "fraud", "hunting", "protected species", "protection of animal life", "wildlife"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/efabf653-a8cf-4a53-b757-3f9a973bad54", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ff6e2328-0fd9-481d-bc6a-b5d4afd48ab1", "title": "92/298/EEC: Commission Decision of 21 May 1992 approving measures to set up pilot projects for the control of rabies with a view to its eradication or prevention presented by Italy (Only the Italian text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Italy,health control,rabies,veterinary legislation", "workIds": "celex:31992D0298,oj:JOL_1992_162_R_0016_033", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "health control", "rabies", "veterinary legislation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ff6e2328-0fd9-481d-bc6a-b5d4afd48ab1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/18bc7409-08c0-4e7f-a831-6fc1acb63909", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1244/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Subsidiarity", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European Commissioner,economic support,federalism,power of decision,terms for aid", "workIds": "celex:91992E001244", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commissioner", "economic support", "federalism", "power of decision", "terms for aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/18bc7409-08c0-4e7f-a831-6fc1acb63909", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9182bddd-6cc7-4ab7-a39d-6c1122014227", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1212/92 by: Gene FITZGERALD, Patrick LALOR, Niall ANDREWS, James FITZSIMONS, Mark KILLILEA and Patrick LANE to the Commission. Regional policy and the Cohesion Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ANDREWS,European Parliament,FITZGERALD,FITZSIMONS,KILLILEA,LALOR,LANE", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Structural Funds,Treaty on European Union,economic development,regional policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E001212", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Structural Funds", "Treaty on European Union", "economic development", "regional policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9182bddd-6cc7-4ab7-a39d-6c1122014227", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/eba97dab-efe5-4270-90ea-06806e92c913", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1373/92 of 21 May 1992 fixing the target price for milk and the intervention prices for butter, skimmed-milk powder and Grana Padano and Parmigiano Reggiano cheeses for the 1992/93 milk year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "hard cheese,intervention price,milk,skimmed milk powder,target price", "workIds": "celex:31992R1373,oj:JOL_1992_147_R_0001_010", "eurovoc_concepts": ["hard cheese", "intervention price", "milk", "skimmed milk powder", "target price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/eba97dab-efe5-4270-90ea-06806e92c913", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1938ff61-e889-4f07-9868-441c8d795a88", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1216/92 by Mr James FORD to the Council. British and Irish Protocols to the Maastricht Agreement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Ireland,Protocol (EU),Treaty on European Union,United Kingdom", "workIds": "celex:91992E001216", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ireland", "Protocol (EU)", "Treaty on European Union", "United Kingdom"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1938ff61-e889-4f07-9868-441c8d795a88", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b42cab0f-88d3-42e6-acdf-a656af63c9c0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1233/92 by Mr Christos PAPOUTSIS to the Commission. Presence of asbestos in a primary school building in Thessaloniki", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPOUTSIS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Greece,Macedonia,asbestos,building materials,chemical pollution,dangerous substance,educational institution,health policy,public health,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E001233", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "Macedonia", "asbestos", "building materials", "chemical pollution", "dangerous substance", "educational institution", "health policy", "public health", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b42cab0f-88d3-42e6-acdf-a656af63c9c0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f7e50c7d-abb0-450e-b28c-f22b02d8e259", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1241/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Pension funds", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European Commission,United Kingdom,approximation of laws,consumer protection,fraud,free movement of workers,freedom to provide services,management audit,pension scheme,proposal (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E001241", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "United Kingdom", "approximation of laws", "consumer protection", "fraud", "free movement of workers", "freedom to provide services", "management audit", "pension scheme", "proposal (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f7e50c7d-abb0-450e-b28c-f22b02d8e259", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f5b78f3b-6738-42fc-bd13-75912f6f12ab", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1234/92 by: Karla PEIJS, Ingo FRIEDRICH and Filippos PIERROS to the Commission. Establishment of a separate crafts and trades department in the Commission", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FRIEDRICH INGO,PEIJS,PIERROS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "action programme,handicrafts,institutional structure,single market,small and medium-sized enterprises", "workIds": "celex:91992E001234", "eurovoc_concepts": ["action programme", "handicrafts", "institutional structure", "single market", "small and medium-sized enterprises"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f5b78f3b-6738-42fc-bd13-75912f6f12ab", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d91cefe5-916f-46ed-a7cf-98fdde788bf2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1235/92 by Mr Ben FAYOT to the Commission. Voting rights for European citizens", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FAYOT", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU national,Treaty on European Union,local election,proposal (EU),residence,right to stand for election,right to vote", "workIds": "celex:91992E001235", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU national", "Treaty on European Union", "local election", "proposal (EU)", "residence", "right to stand for election", "right to vote"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d91cefe5-916f-46ed-a7cf-98fdde788bf2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/54912be1-153a-4d50-be1b-c3494ac6ba7c", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the approval of the additional Protocol to the Convention on the international Commission for the Protection of the Elbe", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Czechia,Germany,Slovakia,environmental protection,protocol to an agreement,watercourse", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0212,comnat:COM_1992_0212_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_185_R_0014_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Czechia", "Germany", "Slovakia", "environmental protection", "protocol to an agreement", "watercourse"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/54912be1-153a-4d50-be1b-c3494ac6ba7c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 212 final \n\nBrussels, 21 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nconcerning the approval of the additional Protocol \nto the Convention on the International Commission \nfor the Protection of the Elbe \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\u2022*!i^K2s \n\n\f<? \n\nProposal for a Council Decision concerning the approval of the additional \nProtocol to the Convention on the International Commission for the \nProtection of the Elbe \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. The Convention on the International Commission for the Protection of the \nElbe was signed in Magdeburg (Germany) on 8 October 1990 by the Federal \nRepublic of Germany, the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic and the \nEuropean Economic Community. 2. The Convention was ratified by the Council on 18 November 1991. 1 \n\n3. The International Commission for the Protection of the Elbe needs legal \n\ncapacity in order to carry out the tasks assigned to it under the \nConvent ion. 4. To this end an additional Protocol to the Convention was signed in \n\nMagdeburg on 9 December 1991 by the Federal Republic of Germany, the \nCzech and Slovak Federal Republic and the Community. 5. The Commission proposes that the Council adopt the attached proposal for \na Decision concerning the approval, on behalf of the Community, of the \nadditional Protocol to the Convention on the International Commission \nfor the Protection of the Elbe. 1 0J L 321, 23. 11. 1991 \n\n\f? \n\nProposal for a Council Decision concerning the approval of the additional \nProtocol to the Convention on the International Commission for the \nProtection of the Elbe \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \nand in particular Article 130s thereof. Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,1 \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,2 \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Commit tee, 3 \n\nWhereas, by Council Decision 91/598/EEC of 18 November 1991,4 the \nCommunity approved the Convention on the International Commission for the \nProtection of the Elbe; \n\nWhereas it is essential that the International Commission established by \nthat Convention be given legal personality and capacity in order that it \nmay carry out its tasks; \n\nWhereas, to this end, an additional Protocol to the Convention was adopted \nin Magdeburg on 9 December 1991; whereas the Protocol has been signed on \nbehalf of the Community; \n\nWhereas it is therefore necessary that the Community approve the Protocol, \n\nHAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nArt icle 1 \n\nThe additional Protocol to the Convention on the International Commission \nfor the Protection of the Elbe is hereby approved on behalf of the European \nEconom i c Commun i t y. The text of the Protocol is attached hereto. 1 SEC(90)1399 final. 2 \n3 \n4 OJ L 321, 23. 11. 1991, p. 24 \n\n\fArt icle 2 \n\nThe President of the Council will, on behalf of the European Economic \nCommunity, inform the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany, in its \ncapacity as depositary State, that the preconditions for the entry into \nforce of the Protocol have been fulfilled as far as the Community is \nconcerned, in accordance with Article 2 of the Protocol. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fS \n\nProtokoll \n\nzu der Vereinbarung vom 8. Oktober 1990 \n\nzwischen den Regierungen der \n\nBundesrepublik Deutschland, \n\nder Tschechischen und Slowakischen \n\nF\u00f4derativen Republik und \n\nder Europ\u00e2ischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft \n\niiber die Internationale Kommission \n\nzum Schutz der Elbe. Die Regierungen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, der \n\nTschechischen und Slowakischen Foderativen Republik \n\nund die Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft \n\nunter Bezugnahme auf die Vereinbarung vom \n\n8. Oktober 1990 iiber die Internationale Kommission \n\nzum Schutz der Elbe \n\nhaben folgendes vereinbart: \n\nArtikel 1 \n\nZur Erfiillung der ihr in der Vereinbarung zuge-\n\nwiesenen Aufgaben besitzt die Kommission Rechts-\n\nund Geschaftsfahigkeit nach dem am Sitz ihres \n\nSekretariats geltenden Recht. Sie besitzt insbeson-\n\ndere die Fahigkeit, die fur die Erfiillung ihrer \n\naufgaben notwendigen Vertrage zu schlieflen, unbe-\n\nwegliches und bewegliches Vermogen zu erwerben und \n\nzu verauflern, sowie vor Gericht aufzutreten. Zu \n\ndiesem Zweck wird die Kommission von ihrem Prasi-\n\ndenten vertreten. Der Prasident kann nach MaBgabe \n\nder Geschaftsordnung seine Vertretung regeln. f \n\nArtikel 2 \n\nDieses Protokoll tritt 30 Tage nach dem Tag in \n\nKraft, an dem alle Unterzeichner der Regierung der \n\nBundesrepublik Deutschland als Verwahrer mitgeteilt \n\nhaben, dafl die nach eigenem Recht jeweils erforder-\n\nlichen innerstaatlichen Voraussetzungen fur das \n\nInkrafttreten erfiillt sind. Geschehen zu Hdod^hLirO \n\nam 09 ]Z \n\n1991 \n\nin einer Urschrift in deutscher und \n\ntschechischer Sprache, wobei jeder Wortlaut \n\ngleichermaflen verbindlich ist. Fur die Regierung der \n\nBundesrepublik Deutschland \n\nS'l \n\n/ \n\n' / /. \u2022 \n\n>y \n\nFiir d ie Regierung d er \n\nT s c h e c h i s c h en und S l o w a k i s c h en F o d e r a t i v en R e p u b l ik \n\n/ku^r^frtilei/ \n\nFiir die Europaische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaf t \n\n\f\fg \n\nISSN 0254-1505 \n\nCOM(92)212def. DOCUMENTI \n\nIT \n\n14 \n\nN. di catalogo : CB-CO-92-225-IT-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44332-4 \n\nUfBcio delle pubblicazioni ufficiali delle ComunM europee \nL-2985 Lussemburgo"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71126529-bcdf-47db-b060-3e616d6364a8", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) reducing the variable components applicable to certain goods originating in Hungary resulting from the processing of agricultural products referred to in the Annex to Regualtion (EEC) No 3033/80 (1992)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Hungary,fixing of prices,import price,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0214,comnat:COM_1992_0214_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Hungary", "fixing of prices", "import price", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71126529-bcdf-47db-b060-3e616d6364a8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 214 final \n\nBrussels, 21 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nreducing the variable components applicable to \n\ncertain goods originating In Hungary resulting from \n\nthe processing of agricultural products referred to in the Annex to \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 3033/80 (1992) \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fExplanatory memorandum \n\nProtocols No 3 to the Agreements with Poland and Hungary provide for \n\nreductions In the variable components from 1 May within the limits of \n\nquotas laid down therein. in the case of Poland, the quota concerns reductions in the variable \n\ncomponents only, whereas in the case of Hungary the fixed components \n\npreviously applicable are also reintroduced when the quota is exceeded. The reductions In the variable components for 1992 are 10% for each \n\nbasic product, except for those for which reduced levies are provided \n\nfor in the case of importation in the unaltered state, in which case \n\nthe reduction applicable to the basic product is 20%. Article 2(2) of Protocol No 3 to the Agreement with the Czech and \n\nSlovak Federal Republic provides that \"in determining the agricultural \n\ncomponent to be levied, account shall be taken of the measures adopted \n\npursuant to Article 14 of the (interim) Agreement\". The arrangements necessary for the establishment of a quota for dairy \n\nproduce used in the manufacture of Imported goods could not be \n\nfinalized with the Czechoslovak authorities, so a reduction in the \n\nvariable components similar to those contained in the two other \n\nAgreements is proposed for the application of this paragraph of the \n\nAgreement with the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic. & \n\n\fProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nreducing the variable components applicable to \n\ncertain goods originating in Hungary resulting from \n\nthe processing of agricultural products referred to in the Annex to \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 3033/80 (1992) \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \n\nCommunity, and in particular Article 113 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 3033/80 of 11 November 1980 laying \n\ndown the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from \nthe processing of agricultural products,1 as last amended by \nRegulation (EEC) No 1436/90,2 which establishes the method of \n\ncalculation of variable components applicable to goods referred to in \n\nits annex, \n\nWhereas Article 4(3) of Protocol No 3 to the Interim Agreement between \n\nthe European Economic Community and the European Coal and Steel \n\nCommunity of the one part and the Republic of Hungary of the other part \n\nprovides for reductions In the variable components for certain goods \n\nreferred to in Annex 2 within the limit of quotas fixed in Annex 1 to \n\nthe said Protocol; \n\n1 0J No L 323, 29. 11. 1980, p. 1 \n\n2 0J No L 138, 31. 5. 1990, p. 9. A\u00b1> \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nWhereas under Article 1(2) of Protocol No 3 the Joint Committee can \n\nextend the lists of processed agricultural products covered by the \n\nProtocol ; \n\nWhereas Council Regulation N\u00b0 521/92 of 27 February 1992 relative to \n\nthe opening and method of administration of Community tariff quotas and \n\ntariff ceilings for certain Industrial and agricultural products, \n\noriginating in Hungary, Poland and the Czech and Slovak Federal \nRepublic (CSFR) (1992)3, establishes the rules necessary to administer \n\nthe quotas referred to by the present Regulation; \n\nWhereas Council Regulation N\u00b0 519/92 of 27 February 19924 adopted \n\ndetailed rules of application of articles 24 and 25 of the Interim \n\nAgreement between the European Economic Community and the European Coal \n\nand Steel Community of the one part and the Republic of Hungary of the \n\nother part on trade and trade related matters, whereas these measures \n\nneed to be made applicable to the transformed agricultural products not \n\ncovered by Annex I I of the Treaty referred to by the present \n\nRegulatIon; \n\nWhereas article 8 of Protocol N\u00b0 3 provides for the application of \n\nreduced variable components from 1 May 1992. HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\n3 OJ No L 56, 29. 02. 1992, p. 12 \n4 OJ N\u00b0 L 56, 29. 02. 1992, p. 6 \n\n\f- 3 -\n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. From 1 May to 31 December 1992, goods originating In Hungary listed \n\nIn annex shall be subject to a reduced variable component \n\ndetermined In accordance with Article 2 within the limits of the \n\nquotas referred to In Annex ll to Regulation (EEC) No 521/92. 2. For the purposes of this Regulation, goods meeting the conditions \n\nestablished by Protocol No 4 to the Agreement are considered to be \n\n\"originating goods\". ArtIcle 2 \n\nThe reduced variable components applicable for the three-monthly \n\nperiods 1 May to 31 July, 1 August to 31 October and the period \n\n1 November 1992 to 31 December 1992 shall be calculated as follows. The difference, established \n\nIn accordance with Article 6(2) of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 3033/80, between the average threshold price and \n\nthe average elf price or free-at-frontier price for each basic product \n\nshall be reduced by 10%, except that the difference established for \n\ncommon wheat shall be reduced by 20%. The amounts thus obtained shall apply to the quantities of basic \n\nproducts considered to have been used in the manufacture of the goods \n\nconcerned pursuant to Article 4(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3033/80. - 4 -\n\nArticle 3 \n\nThe variable components applicable to goods listed In the Annex to \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 3033/80 but not listed in the annex to this \n\nRegulation and to goods listed In that Annex for quantities exceeding \n\nthe quotas fixed In Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 521/92 shall be \n\nthose established directly pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) \n\nNo 3033/80. The quotas are administered In conformity with the dispositions of \n\nRegulation (EEC) N\u00b0 521/92. Article 4 \n\nFor the application of safeguard measures to goods referred to In the \n\nannex pursuant to the dispositions of articles 24 and 25 of the \n\nAgreement articles 5 and 6 of Regulation (EEC) N\u00b0 519/92 are applicable \n\nnotwithstanding the terms of Its article 8. Article 5 \n\nIf the Joint Committee decides to add new goods to the annexes of \n\nProtocol N\u00b0 3 pursuant to Article 1(2) of Protocol N\u00b0 3, the Council, \n\nacting by a qualified majority, shall take the measures necessary for \n\nthe Implementation of such decisions. - 5 -\n\nArticle 6 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter Into force the day of Its publication In \n\nthe Official Journal of the European Communities. it shall apply from \n\n1st May 1992. This Regulation Shall be binding \n\nIn Its entirety \n\nand \n\ndirectly \n\napplicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the CouncI I \n\n\f/ J <-J \n\nANNEX \n\nDescription \n\nSweet corn (uncooked or cooked by steaming or boiling in water), frozen \n\nSweet corn provisionally preserved (for example, by sulphur dioxide gas. in brine, in \nsuiohur water or in other preservative solutions), but unsuitable in that state for imme \ndiate consumption \n\nSugar confectionery (including white chocolate), not containing cocca ; excluding \nliquorice extract containing more than 10 % by weight of sucrose but not containing \nother added substances, falling within subheading No 1704 90 10 \n\nJW) \n\nChocolate and other food preparations containing cocoa <kj \n\nMalt extract: food preparations of flour, meal, starch or malt extract, not containing \ncocoa powder or containing cocoa powder in a proportion by weight of less than SO \u00b0/o, \nnot elsewhere specified or included ; food preparations of goods of heading Nos 0401 \nto 0404, not containing cocoa powder or containing cocoa powder in a proportion by \nweight of less than 10 %, not elsewhere specified or included \n\nPasta, whether or not cooked or otherwise prepared excluding stuffed pasta falling \nwithin subheadings 1902 20 10 and 1902 20 30 % COUSCOUS, w h e t h er or \nnot nrepared \nTapioca* and substitutes therefor, prepared trom starcn in cne torm of Makes, grains, \npearls, sittings or similar forms \n\n,. , ,. ' \n\nPrepared foods obtained by the swelling or roasting of cereals or cereal products (for \nexample corn flakes); cereais, other than maize (corn), in grain form, pre-cooked or \notherwise prepared \n\nBread, pastry, cakes, biscuits and other bakers'wares. whether or not containing cocca, \ncommunion wafers, empty cachets of a kind suitable for pharmaceutical use, sealing \nwafers, nee paper and similar products \n\nCN code \n\n0710 40 00 \n\n0711 90 30 \n\nex 1704 \n\n1806 \n\n1901 \n\nex 1902 \n\n1903 \n\n1904 \n\n1905 \n\n2001 90 30 \n\nSweet corn prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid \n\n2004 90 10 \n\n2005 30 00 \n\n2008 99 85 \n\n2101 10 99 \n\n2 1 01 20 90 \n\n2I01 30 19 \n\n2101 30 99 \n\n2105 \n\nex 2I06 \n\n2202 90 91 \n2202 90 95 \n2202 90 99 \n\nSweet corn prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid ; frozen \n\nSweet corn (Zea mays var. saccharata) prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar \nor acetic acid ; not frozen \n\nSweet corn, otherwise prepared or preserved, not containing added spirit or added sugar \n\nPreparations with a basis of extracts,essences \nand concentrates of coffee or with a basis of \ncoffee, other than those of subheading C-A 2101 10 91 \n\nextracts, essences and concentrates of tea or rr. ate \nand preparations with a basis of these extracts, or \nwith a basis of taa or mate, other than those of \nsubheading CN 2101 20 10 \n\nRoasted coffee substitutes excluding roasted chicory \n\nExtracts, essences and concentrates of roasted coffee substitutes excluding those of \nroasted chicory. *. Ice cream and other edible ice. whether or not containing cocoa \nFood preparations not elsewhere specif. ed or included other than those falling w i ^n \nsubheadings 2106 10 10 and 2106 90 91 and other than flavoured or coloured sue-ar \nsyrups \n\niky \n\nNon-alcoholic beverages, not including fruit or vegetable juices of heading No 2009 \ncontaining products of Nos 0401 to 0404 or obtained from products of hcadinc Nos \n0401 to 0404 \n\n* \n\n' \n\n) Other than goods of subheadings CN 170^+ 90 51, 1704 90 CQ \n\n1806 20 80, 1806 20 95, 1806 90 90 and 2106 90 00 containing \n70 ?i or more by weigh* of sucrose (including invert sugar \nexpressed as sucrose) \n\n\u20ac \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92)214final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-228-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44357-X \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nLr2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9993785f-3f4e-487a-878e-cc2ed8853b99", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1231/92 by Mr Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Aquaculture in the gulf of Amvrakikos", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPAYANNAKIS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,Greece,application of EU law,aquaculture,gulf,protected area,protected species,protection of animal life,wildlife", "workIds": "celex:91992E001231", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "Greece", "application of EU law", "aquaculture", "gulf", "protected area", "protected species", "protection of animal life", "wildlife"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9993785f-3f4e-487a-878e-cc2ed8853b99", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b0ee3f83-e9c8-4834-a2bb-d7382b1e2be0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1197/92 by Arturo ESCUDER CROFT to the Commission. Participation of the European Parliament in the Community' s EXPO 92 Pavilion and the quincentenary events", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ESCUDER CROFT,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "America,Andalusia,EU institution,action programme,commemoration,cultural event", "workIds": "celex:91992E001197", "eurovoc_concepts": ["America", "Andalusia", "EU institution", "action programme", "commemoration", "cultural event"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b0ee3f83-e9c8-4834-a2bb-d7382b1e2be0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f8012385-c47f-4379-a40f-330d38b08c40", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1237/92 by Mrs Maria SANTOS to the Commission. Directive on the limitations of emissions of certain pollutants from large combustion plants in Portugal and Spain", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SANTOS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EC Directive,Portugal,Spain,application of the law,chemical process,distribution of aid,fund (EU),physical environment,pollution,transport infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:91992E001237", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "Portugal", "Spain", "application of the law", "chemical process", "distribution of aid", "fund (EU)", "physical environment", "pollution", "transport infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f8012385-c47f-4379-a40f-330d38b08c40", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d8d015e7-a8b3-47ab-9545-54629c4d98e5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1225/92 by Mr Gijs de VRIES to the Commission. Netherlands' public procurement policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE VRIES,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Netherlands,application of EU law,public authorities,public contract,public institution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001225", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Netherlands", "application of EU law", "public authorities", "public contract", "public institution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d8d015e7-a8b3-47ab-9545-54629c4d98e5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c8ed831b-1028-4844-9025-565b76ebe7be", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1378/92 of 21 May 1992 fixing, for the 1992/93 marketing year, certain prices and other amounts applicable in the fruit and vegetables sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "fruit,purchase price,vegetable", "workIds": "celex:31992R1378,oj:JOL_1992_147_R_0007_015", "eurovoc_concepts": ["fruit", "purchase price", "vegetable"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c8ed831b-1028-4844-9025-565b76ebe7be", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ff7f5bc8-f15c-4d45-b3e1-c5771d849bc4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1243/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Lobbyists in Brussels", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Belgium,European Commission,code of conduct,directory,dissemination of information,interest group", "workIds": "celex:91992E001243", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgium", "European Commission", "code of conduct", "directory", "dissemination of information", "interest group"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ff7f5bc8-f15c-4d45-b3e1-c5771d849bc4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/64252fd2-3142-4d59-823b-317eb3ab3c8e", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1375/92 of 21 May 1992 fixing the threshold prices for certain milk products for the 1992/93 milk year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "threshold price", "workIds": "celex:31992R1375,oj:JOL_1992_147_R_0004_012", "eurovoc_concepts": ["threshold price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/64252fd2-3142-4d59-823b-317eb3ab3c8e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c13fc54c-86d8-4809-838c-76183117c2c5", "title": "Council Directive 92/42/EEC of 21 May 1992 on efficiency requirements for new hot-water boilers fired with liquid or gaseous fuels", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EC conformity marking,boiler,energy saving,gas,technical specification", "workIds": "celex:31992L0042,oj:JOL_1992_167_R_0017_007", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC conformity marking", "boiler", "energy saving", "gas", "technical specification"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c13fc54c-86d8-4809-838c-76183117c2c5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/470d402d-7cef-4b2e-b35f-bcd590753f05", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1222/92 by Mrs Concepci\u00f3 FERRER to the Commission. Lack of cooperation between the Commission and the European Parliament during the Winter Olympics in Albertville", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FERRER", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU publication,European Commission,European Parliament,Olympic games,cultural event,dissemination of information,information centre,institutional cooperation", "workIds": "celex:91992E001222", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU publication", "European Commission", "European Parliament", "Olympic games", "cultural event", "dissemination of information", "information centre", "institutional cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/470d402d-7cef-4b2e-b35f-bcd590753f05", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cd913c64-4282-4de8-b99e-8d7013aae6e5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1230/92 by Mr Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. Cross-border impact of irrigation projects in Spain", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPAYANNAKIS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,environmental impact,water management in agriculture", "workIds": "celex:91992E001230", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "environmental impact", "water management in agriculture"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cd913c64-4282-4de8-b99e-8d7013aae6e5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4a9180a7-bd02-4045-a674-0c3bbfd7f74d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1223/92 by Mr Freddy BLAK to the Commission. Information campaign on sexual harassment", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BLAK,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EC recommendation,EU publication,anti-discriminatory measure,credit policy,dissemination of information,information,publishing,sexual violence,workplace", "workIds": "celex:91992E001223", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC recommendation", "EU publication", "anti-discriminatory measure", "credit policy", "dissemination of information", "information", "publishing", "sexual violence", "workplace"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4a9180a7-bd02-4045-a674-0c3bbfd7f74d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/965ca485-408f-4e82-85d3-ef570767d4f7", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the conclusion of the Framework Agreement for cooperation between the European Economic Community and the Federative Republic of Brazil", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Brazil,cooperation agreement (EU),economic cooperation,economic development,economic relations,poverty", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0209,comnat:COM_1992_0209_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_163_R_0011_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Brazil", "cooperation agreement (EU)", "economic cooperation", "economic development", "economic relations", "poverty"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/965ca485-408f-4e82-85d3-ef570767d4f7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68350d49-60c4-463b-9624-102d26970b40", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1226/92 by Mrs Annemarie GOEDMAKERS to the Commission. Evasion of import levies on beef from Poland", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GOEDMAKERS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Netherlands,Poland,administrative cooperation,agricultural levy,beef,cattle,fraud,own resources,tax evasion", "workIds": "celex:91992E001226", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Netherlands", "Poland", "administrative cooperation", "agricultural levy", "beef", "cattle", "fraud", "own resources", "tax evasion"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68350d49-60c4-463b-9624-102d26970b40", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a8c378c-874c-4e0a-b47c-e26f671c4faf", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1379/92 of 21 May 1992 fixing the guide-price for dried fodder for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "fodder,norm price,production aid", "workIds": "celex:31992R1379,oj:JOL_1992_147_R_0014_016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["fodder", "norm price", "production aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a8c378c-874c-4e0a-b47c-e26f671c4faf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1cb2d333-fb8f-4752-aa94-68c8b12474e9", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1973/92 of 21 May 1992 establishing a financial instrument for the environment (LIFE)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU environmental policy,EU financial instrument,co-financing,environmental protection,interest rate subsidy,quality of the environment", "workIds": "celex:31992R1973,oj:JOL_1992_206_R_0001_004", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU environmental policy", "EU financial instrument", "co-financing", "environmental protection", "interest rate subsidy", "quality of the environment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1cb2d333-fb8f-4752-aa94-68c8b12474e9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f75af632-2481-425e-ab04-762e78234e1c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1242/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Mauritania", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU aid,EU relations,Mauritania,democratisation,presidential election", "workIds": "celex:91992E001242", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "EU relations", "Mauritania", "democratisation", "presidential election"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f75af632-2481-425e-ab04-762e78234e1c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/092ce5b5-da52-4ec2-b5e2-6688969d85c6", "title": "Report of the Commission of the European Communities to the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development : Rio de Janeiro: June 1992.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Environment,European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European Community,atmosphere,conservation of resources,environmental policy,prevention of pollution,waste recycling,water analysis", "workIds": "PUB_CR7291916", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Community", "atmosphere", "conservation of resources", "environmental policy", "prevention of pollution", "waste recycling", "water analysis"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/092ce5b5-da52-4ec2-b5e2-6688969d85c6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9f18af7c-3a39-4591-837b-8f3d9bde344e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1218/92 by Mr Arthur NEWENS to the Council. Structural Fund reform", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,NEWENS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European Regional Development Fund,Structural Funds,structural policy,urban area", "workIds": "celex:91992E001218", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Regional Development Fund", "Structural Funds", "structural policy", "urban area"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9f18af7c-3a39-4591-837b-8f3d9bde344e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ee0c8cbd-87a7-4eb7-b7b4-b7e37c535097", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1209/92 by Mr Joaquim MIRANDA DA SILVA to the Council. Effects of the internal market on customs workers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MIRANDA DA SILVA", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "civil servant,customs,drug traffic,fight against crime,single market,vocational retraining,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E001209", "eurovoc_concepts": ["civil servant", "customs", "drug traffic", "fight against crime", "single market", "vocational retraining", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ee0c8cbd-87a7-4eb7-b7b4-b7e37c535097", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9f3ee9fa-726d-4d3c-b397-3751d6e4a85f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1219/92 by Mr Arthur NEWENS to the Commission. Structural Fund reform", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,NEWENS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU aid,South East (England),Structural Funds,structural unemployment,urban area", "workIds": "celex:91992E001219", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "South East (England)", "Structural Funds", "structural unemployment", "urban area"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9f3ee9fa-726d-4d3c-b397-3751d6e4a85f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d7370d6e-51d9-4d76-a807-1c82be05257d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1238/92 by Mr Thomas MAHER to the Commission. Consultancy firms", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MAHER", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European Commission,database,nationality,organisation,public contract,self-employed person", "workIds": "celex:91992E001238", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "database", "nationality", "organisation", "public contract", "self-employed person"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d7370d6e-51d9-4d76-a807-1c82be05257d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1120bacf-5833-47b2-a600-53584340414a", "title": "92/308/EEC, Euratom, ECSC: Commission Decision of 21 May 1992 adjusting the weightings applicable from 1 August 1991 to the remuneration of officials of the European Communities serving in non-member countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European official,exchange rate,pay,pay rise,regulations for civil servants,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992D0308,oj:JOL_1992_163_R_0017_025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European official", "exchange rate", "pay", "pay rise", "regulations for civil servants", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1120bacf-5833-47b2-a600-53584340414a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/90bbd37e-0412-40bf-986c-d3e06016a830", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1245/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Access of the individual to the European Court of Justice", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Court of Justice of the European Union,appeals by private individuals,application of EU law,institutional activity,legal aid,legal expenses,preliminary ruling procedure", "workIds": "celex:91992E001245", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Court of Justice of the European Union", "appeals by private individuals", "application of EU law", "institutional activity", "legal aid", "legal expenses", "preliminary ruling procedure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/90bbd37e-0412-40bf-986c-d3e06016a830", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a10af6d-5448-45f3-b0ba-7e693e61f356", "title": "92/310/EEC, Euratom, ECSC: Commission Decision of 21 May 1992 adjusting the weightings applicable from 1 October 1991 to the remuneration of officials of the European Communities serving in non-member countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European official,exchange rate,pay,pay rise,regulations for civil servants,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992D0310,oj:JOL_1992_163_R_0021_027", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European official", "exchange rate", "pay", "pay rise", "regulations for civil servants", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a10af6d-5448-45f3-b0ba-7e693e61f356", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/226d5e34-b115-4d2f-a54c-d66aa5385fda", "title": "Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "biodiversity,biotope,conservation of resources,protected area,protected species,protection of animal life,protection of plant life", "workIds": "celex:31992L0043,oj:JOL_1992_206_R_0007_006", "eurovoc_concepts": ["biodiversity", "biotope", "conservation of resources", "protected area", "protected species", "protection of animal life", "protection of plant life"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/226d5e34-b115-4d2f-a54c-d66aa5385fda", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d48b0438-3c73-493d-ba17-63b1d58950c2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1208/92 by Mr Joaquim MIRANDA DA SILVA to the Commission. Effects of the internal market on customs workers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MIRANDA DA SILVA", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "competence of the Member States,customs,domestic market,job cuts,job security,labour law,reintegration into working life,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E001208", "eurovoc_concepts": ["competence of the Member States", "customs", "domestic market", "job cuts", "job security", "labour law", "reintegration into working life", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d48b0438-3c73-493d-ba17-63b1d58950c2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/59da25ba-72e8-43d9-b8b3-a7f02382a46a", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1374/92 of 21 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1079/77 in respect of the co-responsibility levy on milk and milk products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "milk,milk product,producer co-responsibility", "workIds": "celex:31992R1374,oj:JOL_1992_147_R_0003_011", "eurovoc_concepts": ["milk", "milk product", "producer co-responsibility"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/59da25ba-72e8-43d9-b8b3-a7f02382a46a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae8acc42-0440-4a55-970a-43ee03a43b67", "title": "92/312/EEC, Euratom, ECSC: Commission Decision of 21 May 1992 adjusting the weightings applicable from 1 December 1991 to the remuneration of officials of the European Communities serving in non-member countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European official,exchange rate,pay,pay rise,regulations for civil servants,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992D0312,oj:JOL_1992_163_R_0025_029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European official", "exchange rate", "pay", "pay rise", "regulations for civil servants", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ae8acc42-0440-4a55-970a-43ee03a43b67", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2073a88-5ade-4a1b-9bca-d0edb44b0ab0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1228/92 by Mrs Annemarie GOEDMAKERS to the Commission. Fraud involving the export to Poland of cattle for slaughter", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GOEDMAKERS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Community budget,Netherlands,Poland,breeding animal,cattle,export refund,fraud,slaughter animal", "workIds": "celex:91992E001228", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "Netherlands", "Poland", "breeding animal", "cattle", "export refund", "fraud", "slaughter animal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2073a88-5ade-4a1b-9bca-d0edb44b0ab0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/72c6c65a-b21c-4735-958c-9c225e57c6b0", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1308/92 of 21 May 1992 fixing the estimated production of olive oil and the amount of the unit production aid that may be paid in advance for the 1991/92 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "olive oil,production aid", "workIds": "celex:31992R1308,oj:JOL_1992_139_R_0045_040", "eurovoc_concepts": ["olive oil", "production aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/72c6c65a-b21c-4735-958c-9c225e57c6b0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5a167bc6-45bb-43ac-990d-d38ab1d274aa", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1239/92 by Mr Gary TITLEY to the Commission. Definition of workers' representatives and de- recognition of trade unions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,TITLEY", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "United Kingdom,application of EU law,collective dismissal,labour law,occupational safety,trade union,transfer of businesses,worker consultation,workers' representation", "workIds": "celex:91992E001239", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "application of EU law", "collective dismissal", "labour law", "occupational safety", "trade union", "transfer of businesses", "worker consultation", "workers' representation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5a167bc6-45bb-43ac-990d-d38ab1d274aa", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/15d8be96-fd57-4de5-9708-dc0d8a529807", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1227/92 by Mrs Annemarie GOEDMAKERS to the Commission. Cheese fraud", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GOEDMAKERS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Andorra,Netherlands,cheese,common agricultural policy,export refund,fraud", "workIds": "celex:91992E001227", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Andorra", "Netherlands", "cheese", "common agricultural policy", "export refund", "fraud"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/15d8be96-fd57-4de5-9708-dc0d8a529807", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ba5678d7-47e2-46fa-a3c2-82c9257f0c55", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1221/92 by Mr Biagio DE GIOVANNI to the Commission. Statement by an Italian Minister, Mr Formica, on the employment of traffickers in civil service posts", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE GIOVANNI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Italy,fight against crime,fraud,public administration,recruitment", "workIds": "celex:91992E001221", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "fight against crime", "fraud", "public administration", "recruitment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ba5678d7-47e2-46fa-a3c2-82c9257f0c55", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f08e5024-1e06-45a4-93d7-590d3238dd69", "title": "92/309/EEC, Euratom, ECSC: Commission Decision of 21 May 1992 adjusting the weightings applicable from 1 September 1991 to the remuneration of officials of the European Communities serving in non-member countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European official,exchange rate,pay,pay rise,regulations for civil servants,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992D0309,oj:JOL_1992_163_R_0019_026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European official", "exchange rate", "pay", "pay rise", "regulations for civil servants", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f08e5024-1e06-45a4-93d7-590d3238dd69", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ccbb939-2801-454e-ba41-7f127888bfe0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1204/92 by: S\u00e9rgio RIBEIRO , Joaquim MIRANDA DA SILVA , Maria BELO , Margarida SALEMA O. MARTINS , Ant\u00f3nio COIMBRA MARTINS , Marijke VAN HEMELDONCK , Marie- Claude VAYSSADE , Pedro CANAVARRO , Christine CRAWLEY , Maria SANTOS , Maartje van PUTTEN , Artur da CUNHA OLIVEIRA , Mireille ELMALAN , Teresa DOMINGO SEGARRA , Kirsten JENSEN , Jos\u00e9 V\u00c1ZQUEZ FOUZ and Barbara D\u00dcHRKOP D\u00dcHRKOP to the Commission. Discrimination against women in recruitment in the Banco Comercial Portugu\u00eas", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BELO,CANAVARRO,COIMBRA MARTINS,CRAWLEY,DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA,DOMINGO SEGARRA,DUEHRKOP DUEHRKOP,ELMALAN,European Parliament,JENSEN KIRSTEN,MIRANDA DA SILVA,RIBEIRO,SALEMA,SANTOS,VAN HEMELDONCK,VAN PUTTEN,VAYSSADE,VAZQUEZ FOUZ", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Portugal,bank,employment policy,equal treatment,gender equality,job access,recruitment,sexual discrimination", "workIds": "celex:91992E001204", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "bank", "employment policy", "equal treatment", "gender equality", "job access", "recruitment", "sexual discrimination"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ccbb939-2801-454e-ba41-7f127888bfe0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3bae883f-f8c5-4b5e-822b-6bf19d73aeb4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1210/92 by Mr Jaak VANDEMEULEBROUCKE to the Council. The new Treaty, with particular reference to Article 8c of the section on Citizenship of the Union", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VANDEMEULEBROUCKE", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European Movement,European Parliament,European Union,European party,Treaty on European Union", "workIds": "celex:91992E001210", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Movement", "European Parliament", "European Union", "European party", "Treaty on European Union"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3bae883f-f8c5-4b5e-822b-6bf19d73aeb4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d11e985c-bbfa-4261-9ea9-4e81a17f7072", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1217/92 by Mr James FORD to European Political Cooperation. Mordechai Vanunu", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EP resolution,Israel,confidentiality,cruel and degrading treatment,human rights,imprisonment,nuclear weapon,political kidnapping,prison system,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E001217", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EP resolution", "Israel", "confidentiality", "cruel and degrading treatment", "human rights", "imprisonment", "nuclear weapon", "political kidnapping", "prison system", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d11e985c-bbfa-4261-9ea9-4e81a17f7072", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63b9a450-5a9b-451f-8c85-ab182263e444", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1202/92 by Mr Henry SABY to the Council. Human rights and democracy as an aspect of Community development policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SABY", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "cooperation policy,democratisation,development policy,human rights,ministerial meeting,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E001202", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cooperation policy", "democratisation", "development policy", "human rights", "ministerial meeting", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63b9a450-5a9b-451f-8c85-ab182263e444", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3bed74a3-d028-40e8-9025-8fa88be6d4e5", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) on a second emergency measure to supply foodstuffs to the people of Albania", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Albania,emergency aid,foodstuff,intervention stock,supply", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0146,comnat:COM_1992_0146_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Albania", "emergency aid", "foodstuff", "intervention stock", "supply"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3bed74a3-d028-40e8-9025-8fa88be6d4e5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 146 final \n\nBrussels, 21 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\non a second emergency measure to supply foodstuffs \nto the people of Albania \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f\u2022? \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nAt its meeting of 16 and 17 December 1991, the Council expressed its \nappreciation of the great efforts made by certain Member States to assist the \npeople of Albania and adopted an initial regulation on an emergency measure for \nAlbania on 23 December 1991. However, it was concerned to note that the situation regarding food supply in \nthat State remains critical. The Commission accordingly proposes that products \nshould be delivered from intervention stocks. Practical steps are to be taken soon for Albania to receive this aid quickly \nand the Commission hopes that this text will be adopted without delay by the \nCouncil. This proposal therefore forms the second measure contemplated by the Council in \nDecember 1991, on the basis of budget funds available and in the light of the \nadditional measures considered necessary. COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\non a second emergency measure to supply foodstuffs \nto the people of Albania \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2727/75 of 29 October 1975 on the \n\ncommon organization of the market in cereals^1), as last amended by Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 3577/90(2), and in particular Articles 7(5) and 8 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common \n\norganization of the market in milk and milk products^3), as last amended by \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1630/91<4>, in particular Articles 6(6) and 7(4) thereof, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common \n\norganization of the market in beef and veal(5), as last amended by Regulation \n\n(EEC) No 1628/91<6), and in particular Articles 6(5) and 7(2) thereof, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 of 18 May 1972 on the common \n\norganization of the market in fruit and vegetables(7), as last amended by \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 1623/91<8), and in particular Article 35 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\n(1 \n(2 \n(3 \n(4 \n(5 \n(6 \n(7 \n(8 \n\nOJ No L 281, 1. 11. 1975, p. l. OJ No L 359, 17. 12. 1990, p. 23 \nOJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13. OJ No L 150, 15. 6. 1991, p. 19. OJ No L 148, 29. 6. 1968, p. 24. OJ No L 150, 15. 6. 1991, p. 16. OJ No L 118, 20. 5. 1972, p. 1. OJ No L 150, 15. 6. 1991, p. 8. - 2 -\n\n4 \n\nWhereas the market for certain agricultural products may feature production \n\nsituations which make it possible to dispose of such products on special terms; \n\nWhereas provision should be made for a second measure to continue the supply of \n\nfoodstuffs to the people of Albania in order to improve the very critical \n\nconditions of supply in that country; whereas the community has intervention \n\nstocks of agricultural products; whereas such products should be used to \n\nimplement the measure in question; whereas, in the case of some of these \n\nproducts, the measures required could be adopted by the Commission itself, \n\npursuant to the Regulations in force; \n\nWhereas it is for the Commission to lay down the detailed rules for the \n\napplication of this measure, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nAn emergency measure is hereby adopted, under the conditions laid down below, for \n\nfree supply to the people of Albania of certain foodstuffs, to be determined, \n\nfrom intervention stocks. Expenditure on this measure shall be limited to ECU \n\n(budgetary) 45 million. Article 2 \n\n1. The products may be supplied unprocessed or in processed form. 2. The measure may also relate to foodstuffs mobilized through exchange of \n\nproducts from intervention storage against goods belonging to the same group \n\nof products. - 3 -\n\nJ\" \n\n3. The supply costs, including transport and, where applicable, processing, \n\nshall be determined by invitation to tender or, on account of the urgency of \n\nthe situation, by direct-agreement procedure. 4. The costs shall be reimbursed to the operators concerned in respect of \n\nproducts for which proof is provided that they have reached the delivery \n\nstage laid down. 5. Products consigned pursuant to this Regulation shall not qualify for export \n\nrefunds and shall not be subject to the arrangements concerning monetary \n\ncompensatory amounts. Article 3 \n\nThe detailed rules for the application of this Regulation shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 26 of Regulation (EEC) No \n\n2727/75 or, as the case may be, in the corresponding Articles in the other \n\nRegulations on the organization of the agricultural markets in question. Article 4 \n\nThe Commission shall be responsible for verifying the delivery operations and for \n\nthe application of the criteria adopted when the aid is distributed to the people \n\nconcerned. - 4 -\n\nArticle 5 \n\nc \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the \n\nOfficial Journal of the European communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all \n\nMember states. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f4 \n\nFINANCIAL STATEMENT \n\n1. BUDGET HEADING: B 1 - 189 \n\nDATE: \n\nAPPROPRIATIONS: \n\n2. TITLE: \n\nCouncil Regulation on a second emergency measure to supply foodstuffs to the people of Albania \n\n3. LEGAL BASIS: \n\nRegulations (EEC) Nos. 2727/75, 804/68, 805/68 and 1035/72 \n\n4. AIMS OF PROJECT: \n\nTo provide food aid to Albania. Period of 12 months \n\nECU mill ion \n\nCurrent Financial Year \n1992 \nECU mill ion \n\nFollowing Financial Year \n\n1993 \nECU mill ion \n\n45 \n\n45 \n\n1991 \n\n1992 \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n5. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\n5. 0 EXPENDITURE \n\n- CHARGED TO THE EC BUDGET \n- (REFUNDS/INTERVENTION) \n- NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION \n- OTHER \n\n5. 1 REVENUE \n\n- OWN RESOURCES OF THE EC \n(LEVIES/CUSTOMS DUTIES) \n\n- NATIONAL \n\n5. 0. 1 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE \n5. 1. 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE \n\n5. 2 METHOD OF CALCULATION: \n\n6. 0 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED FROM APPROPRIATIONS ENTERED IN THE RELEVANT CHAPTER OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n/NO \n\n6. 1 CAN THE PROJECT BE FINANCED BY TRANSFER BETWEEN CHAPTERS OF THE CURRENT BUDGET? \n\n6. 2 IS A SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET NECESSARY? \n\n6. 3 WILL FUTURE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS BE NECESSARY? \n\nOBSERVATIONS: \n\nYES/ \n\n/NO \n\n/NO \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 146 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\nil \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-163-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43101-6 \n\nOffice for Officiai Publications of the European Communities \nI. -2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2815b84-e969-49e6-8ae0-1459a88ff804", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1236/92 by Mrs Maria SANTOS to the Commission. Cohesion fund and the environment", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SANTOS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "application of EU law,environmental protection,impact study,protected area,transport infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:91992E001236", "eurovoc_concepts": ["application of EU law", "environmental protection", "impact study", "protected area", "transport infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2815b84-e969-49e6-8ae0-1459a88ff804", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8cefccd5-41d6-43c6-a7ef-180d5e0af596", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1213/92 by: Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ, Gerardo FERN\u00c1NDEZ-ALBOR, Joaqu\u00edn SIS\u00d3 CRUELLAS, Carmen LLORCA VILAPLANA, Concepci\u00f3 FERRER, Fernando SU\u00c1REZ GONZ\u00c1LEZ and Jos\u00e9 ESCUDERO to the Commission. Progress in implementing the White Paper", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ESCUDERO,European Parliament,FERNANDEZ ALBOR,FERRER,SISO CRUELLAS,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU Member State,EU policy,application of EU law,report,single market", "workIds": "celex:91992E001213", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "EU policy", "application of EU law", "report", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8cefccd5-41d6-43c6-a7ef-180d5e0af596", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19c98e3e-e5f8-48e3-b16b-def42349f3c0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1207/92 by Mr Jaak VANDEMEULEBROUCKE to the Council. Establishment of the Committee of the Regions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VANDEMEULEBROUCKE", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European Economic and Social Committee,Treaty on European Union,parliamentary scrutiny,region,regional government", "workIds": "celex:91992E001207", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic and Social Committee", "Treaty on European Union", "parliamentary scrutiny", "region", "regional government"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19c98e3e-e5f8-48e3-b16b-def42349f3c0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d91689f7-8d75-4e09-8433-2b77afe884b9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1229/92 by Mrs Annemarie GOEDMAKERS to the Commission. Fraud involving the export to Poland of dairy cattle and cattle for slaughter", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GOEDMAKERS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Community budget,Netherlands,Poland,beef,breeding animal,cattle,export refund,fraud,slaughter animal", "workIds": "celex:91992E001229", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "Netherlands", "Poland", "beef", "breeding animal", "cattle", "export refund", "fraud", "slaughter animal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d91689f7-8d75-4e09-8433-2b77afe884b9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed09cfb5-c45b-4673-8a3d-aa0e210c2274", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1214/92 by: Maria CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI, Otto HABSBURG, Nicole FONTAINE, Rosaria BINDI and Rapha\u00ebl CHANTERIE to the Commission. Racism and xenophobia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BINDI,CASSANMAGNAGO CERRETTI,CHANTERIE,European Parliament,FONTAINE,HABSBURG", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU policy,competence of the Member States,foreign national,integration of migrants,migrant worker,racism,rights of minorities,violence,xenophobia", "workIds": "celex:91992E001214", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "competence of the Member States", "foreign national", "integration of migrants", "migrant worker", "racism", "rights of minorities", "violence", "xenophobia"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ed09cfb5-c45b-4673-8a3d-aa0e210c2274", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/57935e6b-99a0-48b4-8aa8-b0aabc1cea34", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1211/92 by: Gene FITZGERALD, Patrick LALOR, Niall ANDREWS, James FITZSIMONS, Mark KILLILEA and Patrick LANE to the Council. Regional policy and the Cohesion Fund", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ANDREWS,European Parliament,FITZGERALD,FITZSIMONS,KILLILEA,LALOR,LANE", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU regional policy,Greece,Ireland,Portugal,Single European Act,Spain,development policy,fund (EU),ratification of an agreement", "workIds": "celex:91992E001211", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU regional policy", "Greece", "Ireland", "Portugal", "Single European Act", "Spain", "development policy", "fund (EU)", "ratification of an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/57935e6b-99a0-48b4-8aa8-b0aabc1cea34", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1f337955-e67a-4214-96cb-4a1a9fdefddf", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1220/92 by Mr David MORRIS to the Commission. United States Marine Mammal Protection Act", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MORRIS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "GATT,United States,environmental protection,fishing regulations,marine mammal,national law", "workIds": "celex:91992E001220", "eurovoc_concepts": ["GATT", "United States", "environmental protection", "fishing regulations", "marine mammal", "national law"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1f337955-e67a-4214-96cb-4a1a9fdefddf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fbbd04af-58fc-43a5-ba82-f293baa253bb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1203/92 by: Francisco LUCAS PIRES, John CUSHNAHAN, Panayotis LAMBRIAS and Leopoldo ORTIZ CLIMENT to the Commission. Cohesion Funds", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CUSHNAHAN,European Parliament,LAMBRIAS,LUCAS PIRES,ORTIZ CLIMENT", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU situation,Single European Act,Structural Funds,Treaty on European Union,structural policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E001203", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU situation", "Single European Act", "Structural Funds", "Treaty on European Union", "structural policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fbbd04af-58fc-43a5-ba82-f293baa253bb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7e889364-7cb5-414d-b2be-28ef8486d62b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1206/92 by Mr Jaak VANDEMEULEBROUCKE to the Commission. Establishment of the Committee of the Regions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VANDEMEULEBROUCKE", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EC opinion,European Economic and Social Committee,Treaty on European Union,committee (EU),competence of the Member States,democracy,elective office,power to appoint,region,representative of local or regional authority", "workIds": "celex:91992E001206", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC opinion", "European Economic and Social Committee", "Treaty on European Union", "committee (EU)", "competence of the Member States", "democracy", "elective office", "power to appoint", "region", "representative of local or regional authority"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7e889364-7cb5-414d-b2be-28ef8486d62b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ea042c9a-6f2f-4c59-ad40-63344353b699", "title": "92/311/EEC, Euratom, ECSC: Commission Decision of 21 May 1992 adjusting the weightings applicable from 1 November 1991 to the remuneration of officials of the European Communities serving in non-member countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "European official,exchange rate,pay,pay rise,regulations for civil servants,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992D0311,oj:JOL_1992_163_R_0023_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European official", "exchange rate", "pay", "pay rise", "regulations for civil servants", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ea042c9a-6f2f-4c59-ad40-63344353b699", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aa833ad3-3c3f-4a8a-af40-4ef0ac79f166", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1240/92 by Mr Alfred LOMAS to the Commission. Rights of transsexuals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LOMAS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU Member State,dismissal,equal treatment,marriage,right to justice,sexual discrimination,sexual minority,social rights", "workIds": "celex:91992E001240", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "dismissal", "equal treatment", "marriage", "right to justice", "sexual discrimination", "sexual minority", "social rights"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aa833ad3-3c3f-4a8a-af40-4ef0ac79f166", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ca0928ea-fbb9-4e10-ae85-285e7258a756", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1205/92 by: S\u00e9rgio RIBEIRO , Joaquim MIRANDA DA SILVA , Maria BELO , Margarida SALEMA O. MARTINS , Ant\u00f3nio COIMBRA MARTINS , Marijke VAN HEMELDONCK , Marie- Claude VAYSSADE , Pedro CANAVARRO , Christine CRAWLEY , Maria SANTOS , Maartje van PUTTEN , Artur da CUNHA OLIVEIRA , Mireille ELMALAN , Teresa DOMINGO SEGARRA , Kirsten JENSEN , Jos\u00e9 V\u00c1ZQUEZ FOUZ and Barbara D\u00dcHRKOP D\u00dcHRKOP to the Council. Discrimination against women in recruitment in the Banco Comercial Portugu\u00eas", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BELO,CANAVARRO,COIMBRA MARTINS,CRAWLEY,DA CUNHA OLIVEIRA,DOMINGO SEGARRA,DUEHRKOP DUEHRKOP,ELMALAN,European Parliament,JENSEN KIRSTEN,MIRANDA DA SILVA,RIBEIRO,SALEMA,SANTOS,VAN HEMELDONCK,VAN PUTTEN,VAYSSADE,VAZQUEZ FOUZ", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Portugal,application of EU law,bank,equal treatment,gender equality,job access,recruitment", "workIds": "celex:91992E001205", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "application of EU law", "bank", "equal treatment", "gender equality", "job access", "recruitment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ca0928ea-fbb9-4e10-ae85-285e7258a756", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/83c7f6d8-d72c-4666-bf05-c197ea5cff95", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1309/92 of 21 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1009/86 establishing general rules applying to production refunds in the cereals and rice sector on account of the introduction of the combined nomenclature", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "cereals,production refund,starch,tariff nomenclature", "workIds": "celex:31992R1309,oj:JOL_1992_139_R_0047_041", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cereals", "production refund", "starch", "tariff nomenclature"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/83c7f6d8-d72c-4666-bf05-c197ea5cff95", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71a4a39e-df71-49fd-911a-99b4b6548caf", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1215/92 by Mr James FORD to the Commission. Racism and xenophobia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FORD", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU policy,competence of the Member States,foreign national,integration of migrants,migrant worker,racism,rights of minorities,violence,xenophobia", "workIds": "celex:91992E001215", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "competence of the Member States", "foreign national", "integration of migrants", "migrant worker", "racism", "rights of minorities", "violence", "xenophobia"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71a4a39e-df71-49fd-911a-99b4b6548caf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71f612fa-2505-41a0-b5b3-17c4cf4ca954", "title": "Shared cost action - Reactor safety programme 1988-1991 : chemistry studies in support of Phebus-FP : multicomponent aerosol behaviour. Volume I : Experiments.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Research and Innovation,Joint Research Centre \u2013 Ispra", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "nuclear research,nuclear safety,research report", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CDNA14005", "eurovoc_concepts": ["nuclear research", "nuclear safety", "research report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71f612fa-2505-41a0-b5b3-17c4cf4ca954", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a667583-7716-4a37-8bc2-217845c3bb11", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1377/92 of 21 May 1992 fixing the guide-price and the intervention price for adult bovine animals for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "guide price,intervention price", "workIds": "celex:31992R1377,oj:JOL_1992_147_R_0006_014", "eurovoc_concepts": ["guide price", "intervention price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a667583-7716-4a37-8bc2-217845c3bb11", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5e7dec3e-d171-4308-b8b8-48be2b56e5f5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1232/92 by Mr Mihail PAPAYANNAKIS to the Commission. National Athens-Delphi high road through Arakhova", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PAPAYANNAKIS", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "Central Greece,architectural heritage,environmental impact,heritage protection,impact study,road building,road network", "workIds": "celex:91992E001232", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "architectural heritage", "environmental impact", "heritage protection", "impact study", "road building", "road network"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5e7dec3e-d171-4308-b8b8-48be2b56e5f5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7a290468-9cb4-47e3-a176-e7b148ede28b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1247/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Car prices", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU Member State,motor car,price list,purchase price,report,restriction on competition,selective distribution agreement", "workIds": "celex:91992E001247", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "motor car", "price list", "purchase price", "report", "restriction on competition", "selective distribution agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7a290468-9cb4-47e3-a176-e7b148ede28b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/13ceec8e-7f56-4d7b-ba6f-f007c60af53d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1248/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Enforcement and implementation of EC legislation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU law,EU law - national law,European Commission,European Community,application of EU law,committee report,rights of aliens,sanction (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E001248", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "EU law - national law", "European Commission", "European Community", "application of EU law", "committee report", "rights of aliens", "sanction (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/13ceec8e-7f56-4d7b-ba6f-f007c60af53d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c9364da5-0de7-442e-bca1-a61779c5ca21", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1246/92 by The Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Drafting of EC legislation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "EU law,carry-over of appropriations,general budget (EU),proposal (EU),self-employed person,staff", "workIds": "celex:91992E001246", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "carry-over of appropriations", "general budget (EU)", "proposal (EU)", "self-employed person", "staff"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c9364da5-0de7-442e-bca1-a61779c5ca21", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ef1339b5-a7b3-4cb9-8645-0a6b52ffc47e", "title": "Shared cost action - Reactor safety programme 1988-1991 : chemistry studies in support of Phebus-FP: Multicomponent aerosol behaviour. Volume II : Analyses.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Research and Innovation,Joint Research Centre \u2013 Ispra", "date": "1992-05-21", "subjects": "nuclear research,nuclear safety,research report", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CDNB14005", "eurovoc_concepts": ["nuclear research", "nuclear safety", "research report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ef1339b5-a7b3-4cb9-8645-0a6b52ffc47e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e4cb61cf-bb78-45cc-925a-2fec17f9dee7", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1297/92 of 20 May 1992 re- establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN codes 8527, 8528 and 8529, originating in Malaysia, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-20", "subjects": "Malaysia,electronic equipment,radio equipment,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference,television equipment", "workIds": "celex:31992R1297,oj:JOL_1992_139_R_0012_029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Malaysia", "electronic equipment", "radio equipment", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference", "television equipment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e4cb61cf-bb78-45cc-925a-2fec17f9dee7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/725f6755-16e4-485f-a406-d147635339b5", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1298/92 of 20 May 1992 on the supply of tomato concentrate as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-20", "subjects": "food aid,third country,vegetable product", "workIds": "celex:31992R1298,oj:JOL_1992_139_R_0014_030", "eurovoc_concepts": ["food aid", "third country", "vegetable product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/725f6755-16e4-485f-a406-d147635339b5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/294b06c1-d851-4db9-ac48-611d4f881b77", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1296/92 of 20 May 1992 concerning the stopping of fishing for cod by vessels flying the flag of a Member State", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-20", "subjects": "EU Member State,Norway,fishing area,sea fishing", "workIds": "celex:31992R1296,oj:JOL_1992_139_R_0011_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "Norway", "fishing area", "sea fishing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/294b06c1-d851-4db9-ac48-611d4f881b77", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/495dafc8-387b-47ba-90a6-535bfb5870ae", "title": "92/271/EEC: Commission Decision of 20 May 1992 concerning the importation into the Community of live animals and animal products originating in or coming via the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-20", "subjects": "Yugoslavia,animal product,health control,import restriction,live animal,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:31992D0271,oj:JOL_1992_138_R_0039_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Yugoslavia", "animal product", "health control", "import restriction", "live animal", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/495dafc8-387b-47ba-90a6-535bfb5870ae", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2bfa9977-c972-4cf8-bce6-0f49f9b5c6e9", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the protection of consumers in respect of contracts negotiated at a distance (distance selling)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-20", "subjects": "EU Member State,approximation of laws,consumer information,consumer protection,distance selling,provision of services", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0011,comnat:COM_1992_0011_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_156_R_0014_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "approximation of laws", "consumer information", "consumer protection", "distance selling", "provision of services"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2bfa9977-c972-4cf8-bce6-0f49f9b5c6e9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COR/MISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 11 final - SYN 411 \n\nBrussels, 20 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non the protection of consumers in respect of contracts \n\nnegotiated at a distance (distance selling) \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f_ 1 _ \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nI GENERAL SITUATION \n\na) Community policy background \n\nThe Community decided in 1972 to institute a specific policy for \nconsumer protection. The section relating to protection of consumers' economic interests \nin the preliminary Community programme in this field (Council \nResolution of 14 April 1975) already mentioned that the consumer \nhad to be protected \"against demands for payment for unsolicited \ngoods and against high-pressure selling methods\". The second programme (Council Resolution of 19 May 1981) \nincorporated the same wording, adding that a study should also be \nmade of the economic implications for the consumer of \"the use of \nnew data-processing and telecommunications technology\". Ttie third programme, referred to as \"A New Impetus for Consumer \nProtection Policy\" (Council Resolution of 23 June 1986) stated in \nsection 29 that: \"If the common market is to be fully effective, it \nmust be made easier for consumers to buy goods in other countries\" \nand indicated that the Commission would submit proposals for the \nnew systems (videotex, television, telephone) which enable \nconsumers to place orders with their suppliers from their homes. The fourth Community programme, known as the \"Three-year action \nplan 1990-1992\" (C0M(90)98 of 3 May 1990) states that: \n\n\"To achieve full benefit from the internal market, it is \nnecessary that its citizens be prepared to use that market by \npurchasing goods and services available anywhere in it. \"Cross-frontier selling by electronic means using television \nand new communications technology, in addition to existing \nmail-order business, will stimulate demand for cross-frontier \npurchasing. \" \n\n\f2 -\n\nIn the section describing the action to be taken, this fourth \nprogramme therefore includes the \n\n\"Proposal of a directive on distance selling ( 1 9 9 0 ) \". The present text is such a proposal. This problem has since been discussed in another Community \ntext, the communication (C0M(91)41 final) \"Towards a single \nmarket in distribution\". Section 3. 2 is headed: \"Providing a \nnew set of rules for new forms of distribution \nwithout \nfrontiers\". It is stated that: \n\n\"An area of obvious potential importance is the small but \ngrowing multinational market in distance selling based on \nnew techniques of multilingual publishing, broadcasting and \nadvert is ing\". b) \n\nThe economic phenomenon \n\nNew technologies \n\nSelling at a distance increasingly involves the use of new \ntechnologies for soliciting custom or for obtaining the consent \nof the consumer. The forms of media used in soliciting custom are as follows : \n\nWr i tten med ia \n\nUnaddressed printed matter \nAddressed printed matter \nStandard letter \nPress advert is ing \nFax \n\nAuditory media \n\nTelephone with human intervention \nTelephone \nmach ine) \nRadio \n\nwithout \n\nhuman \n\nintervention \n\n(automatic \n\ncalling \n\nVisual media \n\nTeletext \nHome computer \nMinitel, Bi Idschirmtext \n\n\f3 -\n\nAudiovisual media \n\nTelev is ion \nVideo cassette or video record reader \nPicture phone (videophone) \n\nSome of these methods, which are interactive, may be used to \nrecord orders. The most recent innovation is the telephone \nwithout a human caller: this is a speech computer which records \nthe consumer's enquiry. Table No 1 in Annex 1 shows the \ntechnologies. Over 95% of households \ntelevision set. prevalence of certain \nin the Community own a \n\nA marketing technique may \ninvolve the use of several \ntechnologies. Thus in television selling, the order is placed \nby computer, telephone or mail but cannot (as yet) be conveyed \nvia the medium used to disseminate the offer. Similarly, a \nsolicitation may make use of several media: a catalogue is \noften followed by a mail shot and sometimes a telephone call. Consumers' use of the various methods of ordering is changing \nvery quickly. The representative of the French trade association, for \nexample, estimates that by 1995 only 25% of orders in his \ncountry will be placed by mail. La Redoute, the leading French distance seller, received 21 \nmillion orders in 1990. 27% were made by post; 45% by \ntelephone and 14% by Minitel. The attached table also shows that there are considerable \ndifferences between countries. Percentage turnover by method of ordering in major distance-selling \nfirms \n\n1990 \n\nBelgium \n\nFrance \n\nSpa in \n\nJapan \n\nMai I \nTelephone \nMinitel \nOthers \n\n89 \n\n8. 7 \n\n2. 3 \n\n61. 8 \n22. 3 \n9. 5 \n6. 4 \n\n75 \n13 \n\n12 \n\n39. 4 \n56. 7 \n\n3. 9 \n\n\f- 4 -\n\nAttention should also be drawn to the increasing importance of \ncredit in distance selling. The attached table shows that in \nFrance more than 25% of sales involve credit. In Belgium, the \nfigure is also 25%. Percentage turnover on distance selling in France from cash and \ncredit sales \n\n1980 \n\n1982 \n\n1984 \n\n1986 \n\n1988 \n\n1990 \n\n82. 8 \n\n82. 8 \n\n79. 5 \n\n78. 9 \n\n75. 1 \n\n73. 9 \n\n17. 2 \n\n17. 2 \n\n20. 5 \n\n21. 1 \n\n24. 9 \n\n26. 1 \n\nCash \nsales \n\nCredit \nsa les \n\n(Source SVPCD October 1991) \n\nStructure of the market : \n\nThe attached table shows the level of sales by mail-order \nin certain Member States. These figures are provided by \nthe European Mail-Order Traders Association. The firms belonging to these associations do not represent \nthe \nthe \nAssociation des Entreprises de Vente a Distance (AEVD) \nestimates that it represents 75% of the market. market. In \n\nexample, \n\nBelgium, \n\nentire \n\nfor \n\nC o u n t ry \n\nTurnover 1 9 90 \n(mill. E C U) \n\nShare of \ntrade 1990 \n\nShare of non \nfood trade \n\nG e r m a ny \nF r a n ce \nGreat B r i t a in \nItaly \nS w e d en \nSwi tzerland \nAustr ia \nNether lands \nBe Ig i urn \nD e n m a rk \nF inland \nS p a in \n\n14 278 \n5 921 \n5 204 \n1 026 \n1 024 \n1 021 \n962 \n823 \n580 \n532 \n460 \n393 \n\n4. 2 (1) \n2. 5 \n2. 8 \n0. 5 \n2. 8 \n2. 6 \n3. 9 \n1. 6 \n1. 1 \n2. 8 (1) \n1. 5 \n0. 005 \n\n4. 3 \n5. 1 \n4. 6 \n1. 4 \n4. 8 \n5. 0 \n-\n2. 7 \n1. 8 \n4. 8 \n2. 5 \n-\n\n(1) 1989 \n\nSource: EMOTA \n\nThis table shows that 80% of distance selling of products takes \nplace in only three of the Community countries. For these \nthree countries, this type of sale represents between 4 and 5% \nof all non-food trade. - 5 -\n\nThe largest distance selling companies in the world are \nEuropean. As can be seen from the attached table, European and \nAmerican firms Jostle for position in this market. Ranking of the 13 largest mail-order firms in the world in 1990 \n\nFirm \n\nCountry \n\nOtto Versand ** \nQue I Ie \nGreat Universal stores \n\n(GUS) \nSears, Roebuck & Co \nUnited Automobile \nAssociation Services \nJ. C. Penney \nTime Warner \nTele-Communicat ions \nReader's Digest \nLa Redoute* \nBertelsmann* \nGEICO \nNeckermann \n\nFRG \nFRG \nGB \n\nUSA \n\nUSA \nUSA \nUSA \nUSA \nUSA \nFrance \nFRG \nUSA \nFRG \n\nTurnover in \n1 I ion \n$ \n\nm \n\nSector \n\nof activity \n\n7 \n6 \n4 \n\n415 \n350 \n685 \n\nGeneral \nGeneral \nGeneral \n\nm e r c h a n d i se \nm e r c h a n d i se \nm e r c h a n d i se \n\n4 \n\n300 \n\nGeneral \n\nm e r c h a n d i se \n\n4 \n3 \n2 \n2 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n\n291 \n315 \n784 \n602 \n757 \n642 \n600 \n572 \n484 \n\nm e r c h a n d i se \ning \n\nInsurance \nGenera I \nPub Iish \nC a b le \nPub Iish \nGeneral \nPub Iish \nInsurance \nGenera I merchand ise \n\ning \nm e r c h a n d i se \ning \n\nTurnover 1989 \n\n* \n** Spiegel turnover included (American subsidiary) \n\nSource: Marketing Logistics INC. 1990 \n\nThe distance selling firms have already largely taken on a \nEuropean character. An analysis of the subsidiaries (Table No \n2 in Annex 1) of the Otto-Versand and La Redoute groups clearly \nreveals strategies of establishment throughout the entire \nCommunity. Even some of the smaller firms succeed in \nestablishing a presence in virtually all the Member States \n(Yves Rocher-Damart). to \n\nmay \n\ngive \n\nrise \n\nproblems \n\nIn the long term, strategies of establishment by means of \nsubsidiaries \nmarket \ncompartmentalisation. A recent study carried out for the \nConsumer Policy Service showed that some firms were extremely \nreluctant to send their catalogues to consumers across national \nfrontiers. It is essential to the functioning of the internal \nmarket that the consumer should be able to order from a firm \noutside his country even if that firm has a subsidiary in the \ncountry where the consumer is resident. However, only very \nlarge firms can pursue a policy of establishing subsidiaries in \nall the Member States. of \n\n\fc) Necessity for Community legislative action \n\n- 6 -\n\n- \n\nPosition of the consumer in this type of transaction : \n\nMarketing at a distance is typically a three-stage operation: \n\nthe consumer receives an offer of a product or service: a \nwritten, visual or oral description, an indication of the price \nand terms etc. ; \non this basis, he places an order; \nsubsequently, he receives the product or service. The offer has been conveyed to the consumer by a means of \ncommunication at a distance. The consumer has also used such a \nmeans of communication to make contact with the trader. As a result of this two-fold use of remote communication, the \nconsumer and trader are not physically in each others' \npresence. The different types of sale may be summarised in the following \ntable: \n\nSimultaneous presence \nof consumer/trader \n\nNo simultaneous presence \nof consumer/trader \n\nCommercial \npremises \n\nConventional selling \n\nAutomated commercial \npremises \n\nConsumer's home \n\nDoor-to-door selling \n\nDistance selling \n\nSome analysts have tried to break down distance selling into \nseveral sub-categories: mail-order selling based on an offer \nissued using a written medium, telephone selling in which all \nphases of the selling process are carried out by telephone, \nselling by television etc. Others have taken the view that the \nuse of certain methods such as the telephone or television \nbrings these forms of sale closer to doorstep selling than to \nma iI-order selIing. - 7 -\n\nDetailed study of the problems encountered by consumers shows \nthat the difficulties arising from door-to-door selling are \nquite different from those involved in distance selling. Selling by television, for example, cannot be compared with \ndoorstep selling, since the consumer can always switch off his \nset. While mail remained the principal method of ordering, the order \ntook several days to be conveyed. A mail-order purchase is one \nwhich is contemplated for some time beforehand, and by the time \ndelivery is made by the postman, several weeks will have elapsed. Having regard to these delays, the time spent filling out the order \nform assumes little importance. Today, purchasing at a distance is much more in the nature of an \nimpulsive purchase, and the customers' demand for speed is much \ngreater. The act of purchasing is clearly instigated by the product itself \nand its presentation in the catalogue. However, the method of \nmaking an order must not be seen as impeding the process. Legislative pressure in the Member States \n\nIt is evident from an analysis of the legal provisions of the \nMember States with regard to contracts negotiated at a distance \nthat there has been strong pressure since 1987 to take legislative \naction. 1987 was also the year that television shopping arrived in \nEurope. It may be observed that the notion of \"distance selling\" appears \nfor the first time in the Member States' texts in 1987. While this \nnotion had never previously been used \nlegislative \ninstrument, it then appeared simultaneously in a Danish text \n(Chapter 4 of the Law of 23. 12. 1987) and in a French text (Decree \nof 3. 12. 1987). In the same year, Portugal adopted a general law \ndealing with \"mail-order selling\", which in fact covers all forms \nof distance selIing. in any \n\n\f- 8 -\n\nBe IgIurn \n\nIn August 1991, Belgium adopted a law concerning \"distance \nselling\". Its definition is very close to that used by the present \nproposal. It covers goods and services as well as all the means of \ncommunication at a distance. The public authorities can, by way of \nroyal decree, take many forms of action for the purpose of its \napplicat ion. Denmark \n\nDenmark introduced legislation concerning \"distance selling\" in \n1987. In particular, this text provided for a cooling-off period \nof seven days. It also prohibited telephoning the consumer without \nhis prior consent. A law enacted in June 1990 provided for the \ndisplay of prices in distance selling. Germany \n\nIn Germany, only the use of Bi Idschirmtext is covered by a specific \nlaw. which \n\nOn the other hand, there have been major court rul ings on telephone \nthe \nmarketing, \nBundesgerichtshof \nof \nunaddressed advertising through letterboxes is prohibited by the \ncase law (BGH Judgment of 10. 12. 1988), if the consumer has made his \nobject ion known. prohibited. (Decisions \n\n1970-1989-1990). The \n\ndistribution \n\nof \n\nof \n\nis \n\nGreece \n\nGreece regulated mail-order selling by a ministerial decision \nadopted in July 1990. This text was amended in September 1991. Spa in \n\nNo national legislation exists in Spain concerning this area, but \nseveral regions have legislated in the area of distance selling \n(Aragon/1989 - Galicia/1988 - Valencia/1986). There are proposals \nin other regions (Catalonia). France \n\nThere is no general text on distance selling in French law, but \nregulatory provisions are to be found in several laws, decrees and \norders. Thus all types of distance selling are regulated in \ndifferent ways. (Law No 88/21 of 7. 1. 1988. Law No 89/421 of \n23. 6. 1989, Law No 87/1008 of 31. 12. 1989). There is also a law \ndealing specifically with television shopping. - 9 -\n\nIreland \n\nNo specific provision exists in Ireland for distance selling. The \nonly relevant provision is the prohibition of inertia selling (Sale \nof Goods Act 1980). Italy \n\nThe Law of 29. 12. 1990 implements the Community directive in the \nmatter of door to door selling but extends its field of application \nto mail-order selling and particularly to sales by television. Italy is in fact the country where this form of selling is most \npractised. The implementing decree is still under discussion. Luxembourg \n\nSelling by correspondence Is regulated by the Law of 25. 8. 1983, \nwhich provides for a cooling-off period of 15 days after receipt of \nthe goods. Telephone marketing is prohibited by the law on door to \ndoor selling. A Grand-Ducal regulation on videotex was adopted in \nFebruary 1991. The Nether lands \n\nNo specific law on distance selling exists in the Netherlands. The \nNew Civil Code comes into force in January 1992. Inter alia, it \nmakes it illegal to demand more than 50 % of the purchase price of \na product in advance. Portugal \n\nPortugal was the first Member State to legislate in general terms \nfor all forms of distance selling : by Decree-Law No 272/87 of \n3. 7. 1987. This text is very close to the Belgian text. It also \nprovides that the consumer cannot be required to make any payment \nin advance. United Kingdom \n\nNo legislative provision exists except \ninertia selling \n(Unsolicited Goods and Services Acts 1971-1975). All distance \nselling is regulated by codes of conduct adopted under the \nauthority of the Office of Fair Trading. There are also several \nother voluntary provisions relating to the protection of deposits \n(Mail Order Protection Scheme). for \n\n\fI I AIMS \n\n- 10 -\n\nMarketing at a distance will be one of the areas in which the \noperation of the completed internal market will be most obvious and \ntangible to consumers. Free movement of products is virtually complete and the consumer \nbuys the products he finds on traders' shelves. The consumer \nbenefits from free movement of products but is not actively engaged \nin the process. Free movement of services is developing much more slowly. The \ngeneral introduction of mutual recognition is a prerequisite for \ncross-frontier activity. Distance selling restores the initiative in cross-frontier \npurchasing to the consumer. It is the consumer who, on the basis \nof a cross-frontier proposal, takes the initiative and approaches a \nfirm located in a country other than his own. Opening of the frontiers in this field means for example the \nopportunity for a French consumer to purchase from a German \ncatalogue via Minitel, for a Spanish consumer to purchase by mail \norder on the basis of an advertisement in the Portuguese press or \nfor a Luxembourg consumer to make a purchase by telephone from a \nBritish teleshopping programme. in certain trade circles, it is asserted that, of all the \ndistribution systems, distance selling is that which can benefit \nmost from open frontiers. The major firms active in this sector \nhave long since understood what is at stake and their development \nstrategy is entirely geared to all the countries in the Community. The major innovation in this market is the widespread use of new \ntechnologies both to offer products or services and to obtain the \nconsumer's order. Among the means used to disseminate the offer \nare the telephone (telephone canvassing), radio, television and \nhome computers (Minitel, BiIdschirmtext). All the interactive technologies are used to obtain the consumer's \nagreement: telephone, teletext, computers, audiotext. - 11 -\n\nAn analysis of the use of these new technologies shows that there \nis a specific form of commercial selling, distance selling, which \nis descended from the traditional mail-order trade. Those engaged \nin this sector have been very much aware of this development and \nseveral of the national trade associations have changed theij; names \nin recent years to include the idea of \"distance\". There are two basic trends: \n\ndistance selling is being used for products or services which \nwere formerly not sold in this way (foodstuffs, services); \nmore and more firms are marketing their products or services \ndirectly by these new methods. Many Member States have reacted to this technological explosion and the \nrelative insecurity to which it gives rise in legal terms, by enacting \nrules. A State-by-State analysis of the situation clearly shows that \nthere were scarcely any legislative provisions for this field until \n1987 but that the number of texts has increased sharply since. It is \nthe Commission's Job to avoid such fragmentation. The Directive \ntherefore proposes a general framework for contracts negotiated at a \ndistance, to be supplemented by self-regulatory measures as proposed by \nthe Recommendation. The first aim is to provide legal safeguards for the consumer. Today, \nthe consumer may place an order by telephone and be answered by a \n\"voice-response computer\". The consumer is hardly aware that he is not \ncommunicating with a human being but with a machine. What kind of \ncontract has Just been concluded? With whom has the consumer made a \ncontract? What information does the consumer receive7 What proofs are \nthere in the event of litigation? What law applies to the contract? \nWhat replaces the signature? These legal safeguards will also allow \nfirms to develop their activities throughout the community within an \nhomogeneous framework. The second aim is to safeguard the consumer's right of choice. The \nright of choice first of all means that it must be possible not to \nreceive certain types of solicitation of custom such as automatic \ntelephone calls or faxes. There are various ways of establishing the \nconsumer's right to freedom from intrusion and respect for his privacy. The right of choice also encompasses the quality of the information the \nconsumer receives before the transaction and while it is being carried \nout. The basic principle is that the use of new technologies must not \nlead to a reduction in the information provided. - 12 -\n\nSince the famous mail-order catalogue \"Bon-Marche\" was first published \nin 1865, certain traders have allowed the consumer the right to cancel \nthe contract when he receives the goods. The comparative study shows \nthat this practice is more or less generally followed throughout the \nCommunity, on a mandatory basis in seven Member States and on a \nvoluntary basis in the other five (see Table No 3 of Annex 1 ). A further aspect of the right of choice is the prohibition of inertia \nselling and the principle that failure of a consumer to reply to a \nsolicitation does not constitute agreement. The third aim is to ensure repayment to the consumer in the case if \nnon-performance of the contract. Consumers who pay in advance for a \nproduct or service must be sure that they will recover their money if \nthe product is not delivered or the service not rendered. The American \ndistance selling market currently suffers from widespread fraudulent \npractice of this type, to such a degree that consumers in the United \nStates have set up a league to combat fraud in telephone selling. On \nthe European market, too, there is malpractice by a number of firms \nwhich take advantage of the fact that different regulations apply in \ndifferent Member States. The risk is particularly important when the \nfirm is difficult to identify and locate. These practices harm the \nconsumer, but also the trade as a whole. The directive therefore \nincludes a provision relating to certain types of payment by card. The \nRecommendation urges the trade to seek ways of guaranteeing consumers' \ndeposits if advance payment is required. III REACTIONS \n\n- 13 -\n\nThe proposal which is presented is the result of several months of \ndiscussion. It has largely taken account of remarks and criticisms \nmade in response to previous versions. Therefore all the opinions \nreceived are based on these older projects. In April 1991, a discussion document was drawn up under the title \n\"Discussion paper for a directive on distance selling\". This text \nwas disseminated by two channels: \n\nto the trade, via the Committee on Commerce and Distribution, a \nconsultative body which advises DG XXIII; \nto consumers, via the Consumers' Consultative Council, which \nadvises the Consumer Policy Service. In the light of all the comments received, a preliminary draft \nproposal was drawn up in July 1991. The Committee on Commerce and Distribution and the Consumers' \nConsultative Council were once again consulted. In its opinion of 13 September 1991 relating to the discussion \ndocument distributed in April 1991, the Committee of Commerce and \nDistribution argued that the text should be either a recommendation \nor a \n\n\"(limited) framework directive, leaving sufficient room for \nmanoeuvre for traders and their professional associations to work \nout self-regulatory provisions\". In it's final opinion of 16th January 1992 concerning the proposal \nof July 1991, the CCD stated clearly that \n\"after careful \nconsideration and discussion of the reasoning behind the draft \nproposal, the CCD is not convinced about the need for such an all \nembracing directive. and rejects the Commission's arguments\" \nand maintains it's opinion of 13th September 1991. With regard to the Articles, several of which were criticised by \nthe Committee, particularly the provisions concerning the guarantee \nfund, the national observers, the legal and administrative means of \nrecourse, and the inclusion within the scope of the application of \nthe directive of services such as the reservation of hotel rooms, \nrestaurant tables and other equivalent services. In it's opinion dated the 16th January 1992, the CCD stated that it \nwas in favour of a European code of good practice. Numerous associations and professional organisations have made \ntheir opinions known. Among others, CECD/FEWITA/GEDIS representing \nthe European trade note that a recommendation in the matter of \ndistance selling is sufficient and that a directive seems \npremature. Moreover, the European Association of Mail order \nconsidered that the proposed Directive should be abandoned and that \nrecommendation supplemented by self-regulatory rules would be \nsufficient. - 14 -\n\nOn the other hand, the European Direct Selling Federation hoped for a \nmaximum amount of harmonisation and welcomed the fact \"that the \nCommission had drafted a text designed to protect consumers in respect \nof contracts negotiated at a distance\". The Eurochambres and the Comite des Associations Europeennes du \nCommerce de Detail also stated that they were against the draft \ndirective and that they supported CCD's opinion. Several distance \nselling firms also conveyed their commentaries on the draft \ndirective, criticising several provisions of the draft. \"Mail Order Protection Scheme\", which \n\nis an \nThe British \norganisation set up by the advertising profession in Britain for \nthe purpose of safeguarding advance payments, \"totally supports \nthe principle of this Directive\". In a very detailed opinion (19 pages) unanimously adopted at its \nplenary meeting on October 1991, the Consumers' Consultative \nCouncil gave full support to the initiative, even though it thought \nit inadequate in certain respects (lotteries and other promotional \ntechniques were not covered). The opinion particularly emphasised \nthe practical problems encountered by consumers in the conclusion \nand execution of contracts negotiated at a distance and stressed \nthe existence of cross-frontier fraud. It welcomed the broad approach of the proposal, which it described \nas \"the only answer for a sector which is constantly changing\". It \nsupported the principle of rules applicable to all contracts \nnegotiated at a distance, together with some specific rules \napplicable to certain types of contract. Finally, the opinion \nstates that \n\n\"Experience has shown repeatedly that the adoption of non-\ncompelling measures, such as recommendations, does not afford \nconsumers any guarantee of compliance with the consumer \nprotection \nself-regulatory \ninitiative can only take place in the context of pre-existing \nregulations and it is precisely this regulatory framework that \nshould be provided by the Directive\". contain. Any \n\nprinciples \n\nthey \n\nThe opinion of the CCC is nevertheless critical of the guarantee \nfund. The prohibition or restriction of payments in advance \nappears to it to be a formula which is more protective of \nconsumers. The experts from the Member States consulted at the end of August \nall favoured the idea of a Commission initiative in this field, but \nsubstantial differences of view emerged, since some States thought \nthe Commission's text did not afford sufficient protection to \nconsumers, while others thought virtually everything could be \nregulated by codes of good practice. IV COMMENTARY ARTICLE BY ARTICLE (Directive and Recommendation) \n\n- 15 -\n\nThe aims of these instruments (legal safeguards, financial \nsafeguards and right of choice) were discussed in section II. A general definition of the concept of a \"contract negotiated at a \ndistance\" is given in the section on the position of the consumer \nin this type of transaction (Ic). In view of the range of problems \narising, it would have been possible to envisage enacting a \nspecific instrument for each means of communication (one instrument \nfor television sales, one for Minitel-type home computers etc. ) or \nInstruments for the various types of product or service. On further consideration, this was seen to be a fragmented \napproach: it is much simpler to lay down general rules for all \nforms of distance selling, even if adjustments are required for \ncertain specific cases. The Directive is therefore structured as follows: \n\nObject and definitions (3 articles) \n\nRules governing solicitation (4 articles) \nThese are general rules applying to all types of solicitation \n\nof custom irrespective of the means of communication used. Rules governing contracts (4 articles) \n\nLitigation and contract law (3 articles) \n\nFinal provisions (2 articles) \nStandard clauses common to all directives \n\nSince this text is directly linked with the operation of the \ncompleted \nin distance \nselling), the legal basis chosen is Article 100a. internal market (the internal market \n\nThis section of the memorandum is a simple presentation of each \narticle in turn. Article 1; Oblect \n\n- 16 -\n\nThis article briefly indicates the scope of the instrument. The \nvarious terms used are defined in Article 2. Preparatory acts are all \nthe commercial techniques used to convey the solicitation of custom to \nthe consumer. This does not include games and lotteries, although they \nare frequently used in distance selling, since they are not specific to \nthis form of sale and will probably be regulated separately. Nonetheless, the Recommendation encourages the trade to develop its own \nrules in this field. Article 2: Definitions \n\n- A contract negotiated at a distance has three distinctive features, \n\nthe third being a logical consequence of the first two: \n\nsolicitation of custom by a means of communication at a \ndistance; \n\na response by the consumer using a means of communication at a \ndistance; \n\nthe fact that the trader and the consumer are not physically in \neach other's presence. If a consumer receives a catalogue but goes to the supplier's \npremises in order to form a contract, the contract is not concluded \n\"at a distance\". When the consumer signs a long-term contract which is performed in \nstages, such as subscription to a book club, only the initial \ncontract is covered and not the operations involved in performing \nit. The definitions of the \"consumer\" and \"supplier\" are the same as in \nthe directive on contracts negotiated away from business premises \n(door-to-door selling). These definitions have been validated by \nvarious Judgements of the Court of Justice, the most recent being \nthe Judgement in the Di Pinto case on 14 March 1991. - A list of the means of communication at a distance which may be \nused is attached as Annex 1, since a reader who has only the \ndocument published in the Official Journal must be able to find out \nquickly what is to be understood by a means of communication. \"Classified advertising\" is not included in this list since as a \ngeneral rule it concerns only relations between consumers. The concept of an \"operator\" covers television channels, \nnewspapers, postal or telephone services. - 17 -\n\nThe \"solicitation\" is made by the supplier. This term has been \nchosen because of the differences in the meaning of the term \n\"offer\" (invitation to treat) in national law. The solicitation is one element of an organised selling process. With the information provided by the trader, the consumer must be \nable to order the product or the service at a distance. For \nexample, a communication designed to set up a meeting or direct a \nconsumer to a shop is not a solicitation within the meaning of this \ntext. For a contract negotiated at a distance to arise, the \nresponse from the consumer (the order) must constitute a \ncontractual arrangement. The range of advertising techniques used \nby small and medium sized enterprises to make themselves known to \ntheir consumers are not therefore solicitations within the meaning \nof this text. Article 3: Exemptions \n\nAs explained in the economic analysis section, the concept of \"distance \nselling\" covers sales away from business premises. It is therefore \nnecessary to exclude automatic vending machines located in business \npremises. The most common example is that of ticket machines in \nstations or airports. All vending machines which immediately dispense \nthe product to consumers also give rise to a different set of problems. It has been considered necessary to exclude certain products or \nservices from the scope of this Directive although they may be marketed \nby distance selling. As a general rule, orders for made-to-measure \nproducts represent a considered decision by the consumer. Services involving a reservation, i. e. a fixed date of performance, are \na special case since the trader must make arrangements for execution on \nthe specified date (air tickets, hotel rooms, etc. ). A list is \nattached as Annex 2 to the Directive. The directive concerning door-to-door sales provides for a derogation \nfor contracts for \"foodstuffs or drinks or other goods of current \nhousehold consumption\" (Article 3. 2. b). This derogation is repeated \nhere, and is particularly aimed towards home supplies made by small \ntraders. It is extended to services of current consumption. The idea \nof this exception is to not introduce a supplementary constraint on the \nsuppliers of services who are not obliged by their national \nlegislation to convey to the consumer a written document containing all \nthe indications provided for by Article 10: house maintenance \n(repairs), personal services (medical services,. ). This exception \nonly of course concerns cases where there is a contract : simply making \nan appointment with a hairdresser or a doctor is not a contract \nnegociated at a distance in the sense of this text. - 18 -\n\nArticle 4: Restrictions on the use of certain means of communication at \na distance \n\nAs stated in recital 8 and in this Article, soliciting of custom must \nbe carried out with due regard for the privacy of the consumer. This constraint may take two different forms: prior consent or refusal. Prior consent means that the consumer has given his agreement to the \nsupplier in advance, either directly or using another means of \ncommunicat ion. A major retail outlet may wish to bring its special offers to the \nattention of its regular customers at intervals using an automatic \ncalling machine. In such cases, on some occasion when the customer \nmakes a purchase, the supplier will ask him to fill out a form with his \ntelephone number indicating that he agrees to receive this sort of \ntelephone call. If a customer should complain, the trader will have no \ndifficulty in proving that the consumer had given his agreement. Refusal means that it is possible for the consumer to indicate that he \nno longer wishes to receive certain types of solicitation. Such \narrangements exist for mail: the \"Mail Preference Service\" in the \nUnited Kingdom or \"Stop Pubiicite\" in France. The consumer conveys his \nwishes to these bodies. Firms which send material by post consult \nthese lists in order to delete the names of such consumers from their \nown lists. In March 1991, the representatives of five such national \nbodies signed an agreement with a view to placing the various systems \non a Community-wide basis. The choice between \"prior consent\" and a \n\"statement of refusal\" will depend on the degree of nuisance or \nintrusion suffered by the consumer. This question of course arises only \nwith regard to solicitations of custom on an individual basis : a \nconsumer can always turn off his radio, change the television channel \nor not buy a newspaper. Since systems for refusal already exist and are managed by the trades \nconcerned, such an option is feasible. Article 5: Presentation \n\nThe first two paragraphs of this Article are modeled on part of Article \n2 of the Direct Marketing Code of the International Chamber of \nCommerce, adopted on 1 October 1991. This article, under the heading \n\"Integrity and honesty\" states that no direct marketing offer should be \nrepresented to the consumer as being a form of market research. The requirement to indicate that the consumer must pay does not mean \nthat the exact price must be stated. It is not possible to know the \ncost of a telephone call in advance. On the other hand, it is possible \nfor the consumer to be told whether a call Is free, local, long \ndistance, international or at an added value. - 19 -\n\nArticle 6: Content of solicitations \n\nThis Article lists the details which a consumer must be given in order \nto make a fully informed decision to place an order. Certain media \n(television, computer, radio) do not enable the consumer to keep a \nrecord of the information. This Article is to be read in conjunction \nwith Article 10, concerning information on the content of the contract. Article 7: \n\nThis Article provides for specific rules on : \"direct offers to the \npublic for the sale, purchase or rental of products or for the \nprovision of services in return for payment\" (Directive 89/552/CEE of \n3rd October 1989, Article 1. 6). This directive of 1989 provides for a general rule on the duration of \nbroadcasts for sales by television (Article 1 8 ). On the other hand, it \ndoes not take a position on the nature of this type of broadcast \nadvertising or television broadcast. By reason of this fact, all of \nthe rules concerning advertising provided for by the text do not apply \nto solicitations for television sales. This directive contains 2 \narticles relating to the protection of minors : Article 16 in the case \nof advertising. Article 22 in the case of broadcasts. Article 7 chooses Article 22 in order to respect the choice of the \nCommunity legislator when it decided in 1989 not to assimilate \nadvertising and sales by television. Article 8; Inertia selIinq \n\nVirtually all the Member States have specific provisions forbidding \n\"inertia selling\" \"sending of unsolicited goods and services\" etc. (See the analysis of the situation in the various Member States. ) \nNonetheless, such practices exist and it is therefore necessary to make \nthe national rules more precise to ensure that the consumer can keep \nthe product received. In many Member States, techniques have appeared for selling products or \nservices to the consumer on the basis of a failure to reply: \n\n\"If we receive no reply from you, we shall assume that you agree to \nour proposal\". In order to ensure that consent is not extorted in this way, the \nArticle states that failure by the consumer to reply shall not \nconstitute consent. Article 9: Performance \n\nThis Article Is intended to provide a general rule for delivery periods \nwhen these are not stipulated. The thirty-day period is customary \npractice in Europe. In the United States, this provision is included \nin the federal law on mail-order trading. The laws of the Member \nStates determine the legal consequences of failure to comply with this \nrule. - 20 \n\nArticle 10: Information on the content of the contract \n\nUntil the time of performance, the transaction may have taken place \nwithout any written document. it is therefore important that the consumer should be properly Informed \nof his rights at the time of performance, and this is the purpose of \nthis Article. This information must be provided in writing. Unlike many other \nCommunity instruments, this text stipulates that the language used \nshall not be that of the country in which the consumer is resident but \nthat in which his custom was solicited. A French consumer replying to an advertisement in an English-language \nnewspaper or a German-language teleshopping programme cannot expect to \nreceive all the information in the language of the country in which he \nis resident. If the medium is disseminated outside its own language \narea and the consumer decides to place an order, the language rule must \nnot be an obstacle to this type of cross-frontier contract. Certain services can be supplied at a distance (information, banking \ndata,. ). The consumer does not receive any written document. The \ninvoicing is done by an intermediary of the telecommunication operator. Article 9(2) deals with this particular type of service. Article 11: Right of withdrawal \n\nIn all Member States, there is a period for withdrawal from contracts \nnegotiated at a distance, sometimes referred to as a \"money back \nguarantee\". In seven Member States, this period is required by law \n(see Table No 3 of Annex 1 ), while in the other five it is left to the \ndiscretion of the traders. This practice is widespread in conventional \nmail-order selling, but not always in the other sectors using the new \ntechnologies (television, telephone), and the practice must therefore \nbe made the general rule. Provision must, of course, be made for the \ncases in which this measure cannot apply, and this is done in section \n4. Article 12: Payment by telephone \n\nA method of payment which is increasingly used in transactions \nconcluded at a distance is payment by quoting the number of a payment \nor credit card, e. g. over the telephone. (This could be referred to as \n\"cardless payment by card\". ) This practice Is very convenient for the \nconsumer and should not therefore be prevented. It is also the most \npromising method of payment at a distance. It is, however, necessary for clear rules to be laid down for \nliabilities in the event of litigation. Since this is not an \nelectronic method of payment, it is not covered by the Recommendation \nof November 1988 on electronic payment systems. The text therefore takes over a provision which is already to be found \nin the interbank rules of the major card payment systems: the risk of \nfraud is not borne by the consumer. - 21 -\n\nArticle 13: Judicial or administrative redress \n\nThis Article is based on the Directive on misleading advertising \n(84/450/EEC). However, one point has been added, for the reasons \nindicated in recital 15: the possibility of cross-frontier legal action \nby bodies competent to take action against unfair competition or for \nthe protection of consumers. This is the only way of putting an end to \nmalpractice by firms which engage in no activity in their country of \norigin but operate by making use of the freedom to provide services. While the Brussels Convention (1968) recognises that any consumer who \nis the victim of malpractice may take action against a firm before the \ncourt at the place where the firm has its registered office, this does \nnot happen, since the consumer does not have the necessary financial \nresources or expertise given the small amount of money at issue. The \nright to bring an action must therefore also be given to the \nrepresentatives of consumers' interests and the interests of \ncompetitors. These are the only bodies which can act to put an end to \nmalpractice on behalf of the small consumer or small competitor. Nevertheless, certain Member States do not allow this possibility to \ntheir associations. That is why this possibility is only available \nwhen the State from where the litigation originates (location of the \nfirm) allows this procedure. Article 14: Contract law \n\nThis Article is identical with Article 6 of the Directive on contracts \nnegotiated away from business premises (85/577/EEC). Article 1$: Community rules \n\nThe purpose of this Article is to stipulate that where there is a \nspecific instrument which gives more extensive rights to the consumer, \nthat text will apply. For life insurance, Community legislation \nprovides for a cooling-off period of 30 days. This Article indicates \nthat it is the 30-day period provided for in the specific text, and not \nthe seven-day period prescribed in the general text, that applies. On the other hand, the instruments regulating non-life insurance do not \nprovide for a cooling-off period. In principle, the general rule \napplies and the consumer is entitled to the cooling-off period \nmentioned in Article 10. Under paragraph 4 of that Article, however, \nthere is no cool ing-off period if the contract has to be performed \nimmediately. Articles 16 and 17 \n\nThe usual provisions on transposition. - 22 -\n\nThe Recommendation consists of four sections and an annex \n\nThe first section contains a proposal that the minimum set of basic \nrules represented by the Directive should be supplemented by codes of \npractice. The Directive lays down general rules applying to all \nproducts and services, and for all means of communication. These \ngeneral rules need to be adapted, in particular to the various means of \ncommunication. This can be done by self-regulation in the form of codes \nof practice. The text stipulates that codes should be drawn up by \n\"trade organisations\". This will ensure a high degree of uniformity \nand wide application of the codes. The second section sets out the subjects which the Commission thinks \nshould be covered by such codes. In the third section, the trade associations are asked to ensure proper \ncompliance with these codes by all their members, to reinforce the \ncredibility of this type of code. In the fourth section, the trade associations are asked to inform the \nCommission of the existence and content of such codes. This does not \nimply that the Commission in any way endorses the various codes, but \nprovides the Commission with information on how its Recommendation is \nbeing implemented. The Commission will afterward evaluate the impact of \nthis step and will present if necessary new initiatives. - 23 -\n\nPREVALENCE OF TECHNOLOGIES \n\nANNEX 1 \nTABLE 1 \n\n1 \n| COUNTRY \n| \n| \n|| \n|| \n\nj AUSTRIA \n\nj BELGIUM \n\nj DENMARK \n\n1 \n1 \n| NUMBER OF \n| \n| HOUSEHOLDS IN | \n| IN MILLIONS \n\n| TELEVISION \n\n, \n| \n\n|| \n|| \n\nCASSETTE \nREADER \n\nI OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH \n\nVIDEO \nj INTERACTIVE \nj OR NOT \n\n1 \n| TELETEXT \nj \nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n2. 8 \n\n3. 9 \n\n2. 3 \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n99 \n\n98 \n\n96 \n\nj \n\n| \n\nj \n\n42 \n\n46 \n\n43 \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n15 \n\n17 \n\n30 \n\nI \n\n| \n1 \n| \n\nCABLE \n\n20 \n\nj \n\n86 \n\nj \n\n36 \n\nj \n\n1 \nj \nj \nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n| \n\n| FINLAND \n\nj \n\n1. 9 \n\nj \n\n95 \n\nj \n\n52 \n\nj \n\n26 \n\nj \n\n35 \n\nj \n\nj FRANCE \n\nj \n\n21. 1 \n\nj GERMANY \n\nj GREECE \n\nj IRELAND \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n32. 8 \n\n3. 2 \n\n1. 03 \n\nj ITALY \n\n| \n\n19. 1 \n\nj LUXEMBOURG j \n\n0. 14 \n\nj NETHERLANDS j \n\n5. 8 \n\nj NORWAY \n\n| \n\n1. 9 \n\nj PORTUGAL \n\nj \n\n3. 1 \n\n| SPAIN \n\nj \n\n11. 0 \n\nj SWEDEN \n\n| \n\n3. 9 \n\n| SWITZERLAND j \n\n2. 5 \n\n| U. K. j \n\n22. 1 \n\nj \n\n| \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n| \n\nj \n\n96 \n\n96 \n\n94 \n\n95 \n\n97 \n\n98 \n\n97 \n\n95 \n\n94 \n\nj \n\n| \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n47 \n\n47 \n\n38 \n\n53 \n\n25 \n\n59 \n\n49 \n\n57 \n\n31 \n\n98 \n\nj \n\n45 \n\n| \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n| \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n19 \n\n14 \n\n6 \n\n15 \n\n9 \n\n32 \n\n37 \n\n5 \n\n| \n\nj \n\nj \n\nj \n\n| \n\n| \n\nj \n\nj \n\nI \n\n| \n\n2 \n\nj \n\n31 \n\nj \n\n- \n\nj \n\n35 \n\nj \n\n- \n\nj \n\n71 \n\nj \n\n81 \n\nj \n\n26 \n\n| \n\n- \n\nI \n\n- \n\nj \n\n97 \n\nj \n\n68 \n\nj \n\n39 \n\nj \n\n38 \n\n| \n\n94 \n\n97 \n\nj \n\nj \n\n51 \n\n67 \n\nj \n\nj \n\n25 \n\n32 \n\nj \n\nj \n\n65 \n\nj \n\n2 \n\nj \n\n(-: none or less than 0. 5%). Source: CIT Research 199) (1991 figures) \nreproduced frou SPECTRUM, revle* of the \"Independant Television CowHsslon\". Autuan 1991 \n\n\f- 24 -\n\nSUBSIDIARIES OF THE FOUR LARGEST EUROPEAN GROUPS \n\nANNEX 1 \nTABLE 2 \n\n1 \n| \n\nCountry \n\n1 \n| \n\nN\u00b0 1 In Europe \nOTTO VERSAND (FRG) \n\n1 \n| \n\nN\u00b0 2 In Europe \nLA REDOUTE (FR) \n\ni \n\nI \nN* 3 In Europe | \nQUELLE (FRG) \n\nl \nN\u00b0 4 In Europe | \nj \n\nGUS (GB) \n\n| Austria \n\nKarsten n\u00b0 3 \nOhler n\u00b0 6 \n3 Pagen \nModen \nMuller n\u00b0 1 \n\nQuelle n\u00b0 2 \n\nGus n\u00b0 1 \n\n| \n\n| Belgium \n\n3 Suisse n\u00b0 1 \nUnlgro n\u00b0 4 \n\nRedoute Benelux n\u00b0 5 \n\nQuelle n\u00b0 3 \n\n| France \n\n| Germany \n\nj Italy \n\n| Portugal \n\n| Spain \n\nj United \n| Kingdom \n\n3 Suisse n\u00b0 2 \nBlanche Porte n\u00b0 4 \nBecquet n\u00b0 10 \nVItrine Magique n\u00b0 15 \n\nLa Redoute n\u00b0 1 \nDuscon n\u00b0 7 \nMalson de Valerie n\u00b0 8 \nVert Baudet n\u00b0 12 \nCyrlllus n\u00b0 25 \n\nQuelle n\u00b0 5 \n\nOtto n\u00b0 2 \nSchwab n\u00b0 6 \nHeine n\u00b0 9 \n3 Pagen n\u00b0 15 \n\nCIA n\u00b0 5 \nUno Nova \nHelvetica n\u00b0 3 \n\nNenta \nCatalogo n\u00b0 1 \n\n| Rainbow Home \n| Shopping \nJ_ \n\nQuelle n\u00b0 1 \nSchbpftIn n\u00b0 7 \nPeter Holm n\u00b0 2 \n\n| La Redoute n\u00b0 1 \n\nj Empire Stores n\u00b0 2 \n\n| Gus n\u00b0 1 \n\n| \n\nSource: Libre Service ActualIte, 7 June 1990. The table is to be read as follows: \nRows - the various countries with the rankings; \nColumns - subsidiaries of the four largest groups. Example: Ohler N\u00b0 6 on the Austrian market Is a subsidiary of OTTO-VERSAND. COOLING-OFF PERIOD \n\nANNEX 1 \nTABLE 3 \n\nNATURE \n\nMandatory \n\nVoluntary \n\nLENGTH \n\nBASIS \n\nBelgium \n\nDenmark \n\nFrance \n\nGermany \n\nGreece \n\nre I and \n\nItaly \n\nLuxembourg \n\nNetherlands \n\nPortuga \n\nSpain \n\nUnited Kingdom \n\nM \n\nM \n\nM \n\nM \n\n7 working \ndays \n\nLaw of 14. 7. 1991 (Moniteur beige, 29. 8. 1991) \nArt. 79 9 2 \n\n7 days \n\nLaw n* 886, 23. 12. 1987 - Art. 11 9 2 \n\n7 days \n\nLaw 88. 21, 6. 1. 1988 - Art. 1 \n\n14 days \n\n7 working \ndays \n\nLaw 1961/91, 3. 9. 1991 - Art. 31 (7 days from \nconfirmation of order or delivery) \n\nto \n\n15 days \n\nLaw of 25. 8. 1983 - Art. 7 \n\n8 days \n\n7 working \ndays \n\n14 days \n\nDecree-Law n' 272/87, 3. 7. 1987 - Art. 11 \n\nspecific provisions in certain regions \n\n\f- 26 -\n\nANNEX 2 \n\nTHE SITUATION IN THE MEMBER STATES \n\nBelgium \n\nA \"Law on trade practices and on consumer information and protection\" \nwas published in the Moniteur Beige of 29 August 1991. The text \nconsists of 124 Articles and will enter into force on 29 Feburary 1992. Articles 77 to 83 form Section 9 under the heading \"Distance selling\". Article 77 starts by defining distance selling : \n\n\". Distance selling is selling which occurs without the seller and \nthe consumer being physically in each other's presence and \nfollowing an offer of sale made as part of a sales system employing \na means of communication at a distance\". This definition is very general, covering both products and services \nand all means of communication at a distance. Nonetheless, the rules \nlaid down In Articles 78 to 82 relate only to sales of products. Provision is made for a Royal Decree on services : \n\n\"Article 83 (1) - The king may :. 3) Determine the services or categories of service to be subject \nto this sect ion\". The extent of which the provisions are to apply to services is thus \nleft to the discretion of the government. Since the law is very recent, \nno implementing decree has yet been enacted in this area. Article 78 institutes a cooling-off period of seven working days from \nthe time of delivery and stipulates that the contract is not complete \nuntil this period has expired. Seven days must therefore elapse after \ndelivery before the contract is concluded. This is perhaps the most \ndistinctive feature of Belgian law, since it gives the consumer a great \ndeal of latitude: as long as the contract has not been concluded, the \nconsumer can cancel the purchase at any time. - 27 -\n\nSimilarly, since the contract has not been concluded, no deposit or \npayment of any kind may be demanded of the consumer. This point was \ndiscussed at length during the preparatory work, since the initial text \nprohibited the accepting of advance payments. This prohibition has been \nrelaxed to the extent that payments may be collected by the postman on \ndelivery. Under Belgian law, the trader thus cannot require advance \npayment or even the payment of a deposit. The consumer is not obliged \nto pay until seven days after receipt of the goods. Article 79 (1) deals with the content of the \"distance selling offer\". Paragraph 2 lists the information to be contained in the document \nsupplied to the consumer at the time of delivery. There are special \nprovisions for the withdrawal clause, which must be printed: \n\n\"In bold characters in a box separate from the text on the front of \nthe first page\". If this clause is not complied with, the case is regarded as one in \nwhich the goods or services are unsolicited, i. e. a case of \"inertia \nselling\". The consumer is \"not obliged to pay for the product supplied, \nnor to return it\". Article 80 states that the burden of proof in disputes is to be borne \nby the seller, and such proof may not consist of presumptive evidence. Article 81 seeks to regulate a number of practical problems : \n\nIf the seller cannot supply the product within the agreed period he \nmust inform the consumer in writing before the period has expired. Products are always sent at the seller's risk. If the consumer withdraws from the contract, no costs or \ncompensation may be demanded except for any costs of collection or \nlack of \nreturn. However, In certain cases (late delivery, \ninformation, product not in conformity with the description), such \ncosts may have to be borne by the seller. - 28 -\n\nArticle 76 of the same law on trade practices deals with \"inertia \nselling\". The wording of the text is as follows : \n\nSect ion 8 \nInertia selIing \nArticle 76 \n\n\"It is forbidden to supply any product to a person without prior \nrequest and to ask him to purchase this product against payment of \nits price or alternatively to return it to the sender, even free of \ncharge. \"It is also forbidden to render any service to a person without \nprior request and to ask him to accept this service against payment \nof its price. for charitable purposes. The number \n\n\"The Minister may grant exemptions from these prohibitions for \noffers made \nthe \nauthorisation granted and a statement to the effect that \"The \nrecipient is under no obligation either to pay for the goods or to \nreturn them\" must be legibly, conspicuously and unambiguously \nmarked on the documents relating to the offer. of \n\n\"In no event shall the addressee be obliged to pay for the service \nrendered or the product sent nor to return the product sent, even \nif it has been stated that tacit acceptance of the service or \npurchase will be assumed. \" \n\nThere are no rules for canvassing by telephone, fax or other means. It \nshould merely be mentioned that the law on doorstep canvassing applies \neven if the caller has obtained the consumer's agreement in advance by \nan \"offer to call made by telephone\". The question of television selling has been investigated and the \nConseil national de la Consommation has rendered an opinion. Under \nArticle 83 of the section on distance selling in the trade practices \nlaw, the public authorities can, if they so wish, issue a decree \nregulating this type of sale. - 29 -\n\nDenmark \n\nThe regulations relating to distance selling in Denmark are laid down \nin the amended Consumer Contract Act, which Is published as the \nLovbekendtgtfrelse n' 886 dated 23 December 1987, and which deals with \nthe regulation of doorstep selling, distance selling and the continuous \nprovision of services, and Bekendtgtfrelse n* 887, concerning the \nprovision of information on the right to cancel contracts concluded \naway from business premises. Neither of these instruments is available \nin an authorised translation. The translations made for the purposes \nof this review thus have no official standing. Fundamental principle of the Danish Act \n\nThe Danish legislation is based on the fundamental principle that a \ntrader may not, without prior request, contact a consumer in person or \nby telephone at his residence, place of work, or other place not \naccessible to the general public, for the purpose of obtaining, \nimmediately or at a later date, an offer or acceptance with a view to \nthe conclusion of a contract, see \u00a7 2, subsection 1. The effect of breaching the principle is that the consumer is not bound \nby the contract, \u00a73. Effective protection against receiving unsolicited goods is provided by \n\u00a7 4, which stipulates that where a supplier sends or delivers a product \nto a consumer without his prior request and where this is not due to an \nerror, the consumer may keep the product free of charge. There are some exceptions in subsection 2 to the principle laid down in \n\u00a7 2, subsection 1. There is no prohibition on the making of unsolicited \noffers in person or by telephone regarding the ordering of books, \nsubscriptions to newspapers, magazines and periodicals and the taking \nout of an insurance policy or subscriptions to rescue or ambulance \nservices. It is also permitted to peddle certain natural products. The Consumer Contract Act was amended for the purpose of implementing \nCouncil Directive 85/577/EEC, and Chapter 4 of the Act, which related \nto the right to cancel mail-order contracts, was also amended. This \namendment was proposed by certain opposition parties. The amendment \nwhich was included under this Chapter of the Act refers to offers made \nand contracts concluded by means of electronic media devices. The \nregulations were also expanded to cover orders made as a result of \nlawful contacts by telephone. With this background in mind, the term \n\"mail-order selling\" was changed to \"distance selling\". In the well \nrespected Danish Law Commentary : Karnovs Lovsamling, 12th edition, \np 3754, note n\" 102, relating to the term \"distance selling\" states \nthat \"electronic media data\" should be taken to include tele-tv, \nteledata and cable services etc. - 30 -\n\nThe right of cancellation in relation to distance selling contracts \n\nChapter 4, \u00a7 10, subsection 1, sentence 1, of the Consumer Contract Act \nregulates a consumer's right to renounce a contract for goods ordered \non the basis of a catalogue or an advertisement, in circumstances where \nthe supplier has offered to deliver the goods which were ordered by the \nconsumer by telephone, letter or other method in writing. The provisions relating to distance selling also apply if the supplier \nhas, without previous request, contacted the consumer by telephone and \nthe consumer has, during or as a result of this call, ordered goods, or \ntaken out a subscription or insurance policy, see \u00a7 10, subsection 1, \nsentence 2. The scope of the regulations is restricted to the above situations. Subsection 2 provides that the consumer has the right to renounce the \ncontract in accordance with the specific regulations in \u00a7\u00a7 11-13. Exceptions to the right to cancel \n\nAccording to \u00a710, subsection 3, the right to cancel does not apply to \nthe purchase of \n1. goods which are manufactured or tailored to the individual needs of \n\nthe purchaser, and \n\n2. foodstuffs or other goods for consumption in the household. Execution of the right to cancel \n\nIn \u00a7 11, first subsection, it is stated when, how and against whom the \npurchaser of goods may invoke this right to cancel the contract. The \ngeneral rule is that the purchaser may within one week of receipt of \nthe goods, or the first batch of the goods, cancel the contract by \nreturning the goods to the supplier. \u00a7 11, subsection 1, also provides \nfor some exceptions to this general rule, see also \u00a7 17. Subsection 2 lays down certain conditions relating to the condition and \nquantity of the goods at the time they are returned to the supplier, \nwhich must be complied with by the purchaser in order for him to \nmaintain his right of cancellation. Subsection 3 relates to \ncircumstances where the seller is obliged to return payment, if any, to \nthe purchaser once the latter has cancelled the contract. Subsection 4 \nstates that costs relating to the return of the goods lie with the \npurchaser. - 31 -\n\n\u00a7 12 states when, how and to whom the purchaser must notify a \ncancellation of a contract in circumstances where the supplier has \naccepted responsibility for collecting the goods. It is provided that \nspecial regulations (some of them stemming from Chapter 3 of the Act \nrelating to contracts concluded away from a trader's business premises) \napply to these situations. \u00a7 12(a) stipulates when the consumer is entitled to cancel in a \nsituation where he takes out a subscription or an insurance policy, see \n\u00a7 10, subsection 1, sentence 2. The general rule is that the consumer \nmay, within one week from receipt of the conditions of insurance, the \nsubscription contract or the first delivery, cancel the contract, see \nalso \u00a7 17. It is also provided that special regulations (stemming from \nChapter 3 of the Act relating to contracts concluded away from a \ntrader's business Dremises) apply to these situations. Obligation of the trader to provide information regarding the r jcjh t Jto \ncance I \n\n\u00a7 13, first subsection, provides that the supplier must, at the time of \nthe delivery of the goods to the purchaser, give clear information in \nwriting on the right to cancel the contract. Subsection 2 provides in \nrelation to the taking out of a subscription or an insurance policy \nthat within three days at the latest after receiving an order by \ntelephone, the supplier must send written confirmation of the contract \nto the purchaser which must include clear information on the right of \ncanceI I at ion. Subsection 3 provides that if the abovementioned items of information \nare not given in accordance with subsections 1 and 2 the consumer is \nnot bound by the contract. Subsection 4 empowers the Minister of \nJustice to make regulations relating to the form and content of the \ninformation. This power has been exercised by the issuing of the \naforementioned BekendtgdreIse n\" 887, which lays down the technical \naspects of when and how the information relating to the cancellation of \nthe contract should be given by the supplier to the consumer. \u00a7 1 , \u00a7\u00a7 \n4-9 and Annexes 3-6 (prescribing the texts to be used by the supplier \nin different types of distance selling contracts) are particularly \nrelevant in this regard. \u00a7 16 of the Act states that the foregoing rules cannot be deviated from \nin a manner which would be detrimental to the consumer's interests. \u00a7 9 of the BekendtgcJre Ise should also be referred to in this regard. (Note : this paragraph contains a typographical error resulting in the \nomission of \u00a7 6 of the BekendtgdreIse as the text mentions only \u00a7 1-5. ) \n\n\f- 32 -\n\nFederal Republic of Germany \n\nDistance selling does not yet form a legal category under German law \nand the term thus has no particular meaning. In practice four areas are of major concern to consumers: \n\nThe mail-order business \nUnsolicited sending of goods and advertising \nBiIdschirmtext (BTX) and \nTeleshopping \n\nThe mail-order business is well established. It is built into the \ncivil law system and benefits from consumer protection rules on the \nclauses of consumer credit contracts. A voluntary right to return the \nproducts within 14 days compensates for the lack of a mandatory \ncooling-off period. Advertising law: \n\ncomplaints \n\nUnsoIi c i ted send i ng of goods and advertising is an endless source of \nconsumer \nthe \napplicability of the German advertising law arise. Criminal law may \ncome into play in cases where the firms operate outside Germany, \nalthough usually in vain. litigation. Here \n\nquestions \n\nand \n\non \n\nNo special rules in this area are laid down in German law, so solutions \nhave to be found in civil law rules and rules on unfair marketing \npractices. The sending of unsolicited goods is unlawful in principle. There is an exception only if two prerequisites are fulfilled. The \nfirst is that the addressee is informed that he has no duty to send the \ngoods back, and secondly, that the goods only have an insignificant \nvalue. With regard to direct mail advertising, the Jurisprudence is based on \nthe general clauses of the act prohibiting unfair competition (UWG). By virtue of this, the courts are in a position to deal with social \nchanges without the intervention of the legislator. - 33 -\n\nThere are two general clauses enacted in the UWG: \n\ns. 1: the \"major\" general clause, which prohibits unfair \npract ices and, \ns. 3: the \"minor\" general clauses, prohibiting misleading \nadvert ising. However, the UWG can only be invoked by the firms and organisations \nconcerned. In 1965, the scope was extended to consumer organisations \nand businesses which have the right to seek injunctions. As mentioned above, the application of the UWG means the application of \nthe case law based on the general clauses of the UWG. In one case concerning direct mail advertising, the Bundesgerichtshof \n(Federal High Court) made a decision in which it took a very critical \napproach with regard to mailbox advertising. Mailbox advertising is \nunlawful when a person fixes a label to his letterbox which reads that \nhe wishes to receive no advertisements or leaflets, and that those \nfailing to respect his wishes will be prosecuted. The BGH gave the claimant in this case the right to seek an injunction \nagainst a firm whose distributors had engaged in direct mailbox \nadvertising despite a label on the mailbox to the contrary. Whilst it \nwas, however, considered that such case law would not be applicable to \nthe distribution of mass advertising by the postal service, the \nsituation has also changed in this respect since 1 July 1991. The new \n\"General conditions of supply of service\" of Deutsche Bundespost, \nadopted under an act amending the Poststrukturgesetz, provide that the \npostal service will henceforth respect \nlabels\" on \nmaiI boxes. \"opting-out \n\nAccording to the Federal High Court (BGH) in the Telefonwerbung cases \nl-lll (Telefonwerbung I, BGH 19/6/1970 NJW 1970, 1738/Telefonwerbung \nII, BGH 8/6/1989 NJW 19899, 2820/Telefonwerbung III, 8/4/1989 NJW 1990, \n359) it is quite clear that advertising by telephone is unlawful, \nbecause it is considered to be unfair competition if it is made without \nthe prior consent of the recipient of the telephone call. The decision was based on the general right to privacy. The stricter \napproach taken for telephone advertising rather than for mailbox \nadvertising is Justified by the fact that printed matter can be thrown \naway without being read, whereas a telephone advertisement must at \nleast be partially heard, before the person called is able to decide \nwhether he wishes to continue the telephone call or not. This is the \nbasis of the decisions: the freedom to make one's own decision and not \nthe extent to which one takes note of a particular advertisement. - 34 -\n\nBiIdschirmtext (BTX): \n\nThe most important new technique of distance selling in Germany is BTX, \nbecause it permits direct communication between the contracting parties \nin contrast with teleshopping, where the consumer must use the \ntelephone or write a letter. In the field of BTX, a new piece of legislation has been enacted, the \nStaatsvertrag fur BiIdschirmtext (18 March 1983, revised version 1 9 9 1 ). With regard to the applicability of the Staatsvertrag a distinction \nmust be made between mass communication and individual communication. Individual \nMass communication is mainly subject to the Staatsvertrag. communication is subject to the rules of German civil law. So long as \nan individual supplier and an individual consumer have not entered into \ncontractual negotiations, all the rules of the BTX-Staatsvertrag apply, \nwhich means that the supplier is obliged to indicate his name and \naddress on the screen, to show whether he \nsupplying \ninformation or advertising, and to clearly state at which point in time \nthe consumer is entering into individual communication for which he \nmust pay (Article 5 ). is merely \n\nThe Staatsvertrag obliges suppliers from outside Germany to indicate in \ntheir title the name and the address of a BTX-agent. This BTX-agent \nmust however be domiciled in the Federal Republic of Germany. The \nStaatsvertrag therefore puts the BTX-agent on an equal footing with the \nsupplier. This is an approach which could place the BTX-agent in a \ndifficult situation if he is held responsible for a service which the \nsupplier has provided from abroad. This obligation to be domiciled in the Federal Republic does however \ncreate difficulties under EC law, because under EC law, a supplier is \ngiven a right to choose whether he wants to make use of his right of \nestablishment and settle in another Member State, or whether he relies \non his freedom to provide services, and supplies his service from \noutside the Federal Republic (Article 59 EEC T r e a t y ). of \n\nservices \n\nhas access \n\nThe German Staatsvertrag regulates the conditions under which a \nsupplier \nfacilities. The \nStaatsvertrag is of importance for distance selling because it lays \ndown rules on the admissibility of advertising which must be observed \nby the suppliers. The principle of separation between broadcasting and \nadvertising is laid down in section 8 of the Staatsvertrag. It is also \npart of the federal law on unfair competition (case law based on \nsection 1 U W G ). to television \n\n\f- 35 -\n\nIn one case concerning BTX, it arose that a provision in the \nStaatsvertrag, under which advertising had to be labelled \"W\" did not \napply to the electronic mailbox. A user had to actually see the advertisement on the screen, before he \nwas able to decide whether he wished to take note of i t or not. This \nsituation has since changed. An advertisement can now be deleted, \nwithout first being seen on the screen. Under these circumstances it \nis doubtful whether advertising in a BTX system still constitutes \nunfair competition. To use the \"delete\" button of a computer is the \nthe technical equivalent of throwing away paper. Therefore in principle, the filling of an electronic mailbox with \nadvertising may be lawful where the user is able to block his \nelectronic mailbox from advertising (the equivalent of a label on a \nmaiI box). Teleshopp ing \n\nSimilar problems with regard to access to television facilities for BTX \narose when teleshopping was introduced as a method of distance selling. A decision had to be made as to whether the television set could be and \nshould be used as a marketing instrument. Teleshopping is not yet subject to new legislation. It is regulated by \nthe existing telecommunications law, thereby widening the meaning of \nthe term \"broadcasting\" in the context of Article 5 of the German Basic \nLaw. Article 5 covers the information element of broadcasting but does not \ncover teleshopping. Similarly, information reports have the benefit of \nconstitutional protection whereas advertising does not. In practice, \nthe constitution has been interpreted in a manner which adapts Article \n5 to the needs of the broadcasting stations. With regard to limits on the freedom to broadcast, the question arises \nwhether teleshopping can be regarded as a permitted form of \nbroadcasting. Advertising and information broadcasting must be kept \nseparate. Teleshopping should therefore bear a label which makes it easy to \ndistinguish it from other broadcasting services. - 36 -\n\nThe LSnder have not pursued this path. They treat teleshopping as a \npermitted programme form and place It within the concept of \nadvertising. The limits on the extent of permitted shopping are taken \nfrom the relevant Lander \nlegislation \nlegislation, the Federal \n(section 1 UWG), the Staatsvertrag and the EEC Directive. The following rules apply: \"Advertising must be kept separate from the \nrest of the programme and must be identified by way of an acoustical \nsignal and an optic label. Advertising must not exert influence on the \nrest of the programme, only block advertising is allowed and it may \nconstitute no more than 20% of the daily broadcasting time\". Exceptions to the rules are provided for where particular broadcasting \nservices are sponsored. In practice, however, labelling has not proved \nto be very efficient (a solution could be to devote a specific channel \nto teleshopping in order to exclude any overlapping with permitted \nbroadcast ing). However, as currently practised, teleshopping creates problems because \nit violates the principles of separation by mixing editorial and \nadvertising elements. Legal aspects of distance selling \n\nThe crucial element to be noted with regard to new communication \ntechniques using the television screen as a medium between a seller and \na purchaser lies in its transformation as a marketing instrument. The consumer has to rely on the statements presented to him by the \nsupplier to advertise the product. However, the presentation of the \nproduct is generally interpreted as an \"invitatio ad offerendum\" i. e. an invitation to treat which does not bind the supplier. With regard to the conclusion of the contract, different problems arise \nwhere both parties are not present at the same time. The moment of \nreceipt is important because from that moment the offer becomes \neffective and it also defines the deadline in respect of which the \nconsumer may be entitled to withdraw his offer. Therefore, as long as \nthe offer has not reached the supplier, the consumer has an opportunity \nto withdraw. - 37 -\n\nThe Landgerlcht Bielefeld in 1990 insisted that the supplier of \nstandard contract terms is under a legal obligation to inform the \nconsumer of the costs of the product or service he wishes to order. This decision has given rise to the criticism that it was excessive to \nrequire a supplier to give full information on the costs in his \nstandard contract terms. A recent amendment of the Staatsvertrag \nfollows the interpretation made by the Landgerlcht. A further question of liability arises where a consumer telephones the \nnumber on the screen and engages in direct telephone contact with the \nbroadcasting station which is working on behalf of the supplier. If \nsuch a person leads the consumer to believe that he is authorised to \ngive competent information concerning the product but in fact is not, \nthe supplier will be bound to the consumer on the basis of what has \nbeen negotiated between the consumer and the broadcasting station. Another delicate question is whether the broadcasting station can be \nheld liable in the case of the supplier being declared bankrupt or \nsuch I ike. German law contains the right to withdraw from doorstep selling \ncontracts. There has been some discussion on the applicability of this \nlaw to the new techniques of communication. An extension of the \ndoorstep selling law in this respect was rejected in a parliamentary \ndebate, because the law was deemed to regard legal transactions \nconcluded by phone as less dangerous for consumers. Mail-order firms and the teleshopping industry have conferred on \nconsumers a voluntary 14 days' right to withdraw from contracts. However, this has been found not to work very well in practice. The \nsituation could only be clarified by a statutory obligation, as in \nAustria, where a seven-day cooling-off period is under considation. - 38 -\n\nGreece \n\nThe principal form of distance selling currently practised in Greece is \nmail-order by advertisement and direct marketing. No form of \nteleshopping exists in Greece as yet, but a public videotex system will \nshortly commence operating. Greece transposed the Community Directive concerning \ncontracts \nnegotiated away from business premises into domestic law by Ministerial \nDecision F159 of 16 July 1990, which included some provisions on \ndistance selling, and which has now been repealed and replaced by Law \nNo 1961/91 dated 2 September 1991. This law is of horizontal effect, \nproviding for the general protection of consumers' interests, and \nrepresents the first legislative attempt to provide such general \nprotection in Greece. The text of the Ministerial Decision concerning contracts negotiated \naway from business premises and contracts negotiated at a distance has \nbeen repeated in the new Law of 1S91 in an amended form. Chapter 6 of \nthe Law deals with such agreements concludec \"outside the trading \nplace\" specifically in Article 31: \n\n\"in the case that a contract has been concluded from a distance (by \ncorrespondence, telephone, telegram or in another way) the supplier \nis aiso obliged to compile the documents provided for in Article 29 \nand send them together with the contract renunciation form to the \nconsumer. The renunciation time-limit provided for in Article 30 \nruns from the time the consumer has received the document\". The documents referred to in Article 29 are as follows: \n\na) a copy of the contract, which must contain the full name, trading \nname and address of the supplier (a box number is insufficient); \nthe date and place of contracting; a description of the goods; \ndelivery and payment terms; the rate of real interest and maximum \ninterest (where applicable); the tax registration number of the \nsuppIier, and \n\nb) a specimen contract renunciation form. - 39 -\n\nIn addition, Article 29 provides that any such contract which fails to \ninform the consumer of his right to renounce a contract is rendered \ninvalid. The text also provides that the provisions of the Chapter do not apply \nto a contract the price of which does not exceed 12 000 drachmas \n(53 ecus), nor to contracts relating to property, the supply of food or \nother goods for current domestic consumption which are frequently or \nregularly supplied. Article 30 reinforces the right to renounce the contract within the \ncoollng-off period and provides that such right may be exercised by \nsending notice to the supplier within 10 working days from receipt of \nthe contract unless a longer period is provided for. It may be observed that the new Law does not make any provision with \nregard to the sending of unsolicited goods, although there had been an \nimplicit provision in the previous Ministerial Decision to the effect \nthat if the goods were sent to the consumer without previous request, \nthe contract would be \"declared in favour of the consumer\", indicating \nthat he need not pay the price. There are also no provisions in the \nlaw regarding the sending of unsolicited mail and the right of refusal, \nnor for a mail-order bonding scheme. There are no mailing or telephone \npreference services operating in Greece at present. Spain \n\nSince the Constitution was adopted in 1978, the division of legislative \npowers between the State and the Autonomous Regions has given rise to a \ngreat deal of discussion and case law. In the field of consumer protection in respect of distance selling, the \nsituation is roughly as follows. When a region has enacted legislation, that legislation applies to \nthe extent that it is in conformity with the national legal \nprovisions. When a region has no specific legislation, national legislation \napplies. It is therefore necessary to study both the regional and the national \nlegislat ion. 3) \n\n\f- 40 -\n\nSpain consists of 17 regions (15 mainland regions plus the Canary and \nBalearic Islands). - \n\nSix regions have specific legislation for consumer protection, and \nof these four use the expression \"distance selling\". The definitions given in these four laws are of interest: \n\nAragon \n\nArticle 31 of the Law of 5 October 1989 regulating commercial activity \n(Law No 9/1989) gives the following definition: \n\n\"Distance selling transactions are those in which the offer is made \nby the seller to the buyer using any means of communication, the \nbuyer being asked to place his order at a distance, using the same \nor another means of communication, and in general terms all types \nof sale which do not involve the presence of the buyer and seller. \" \n\nArticle 32 - Among the provisions for distance selling is the \nrequirement that offers must be clear and complete, containing at least \n\n- \n\ninformation making it possible to identify the firm making the \noffer; \n\n- \n\na description of the product or service offered; \n\nthe prices and terms of payment; \n\nthe guarantees, time limits for dispatch, and any costs to be borne \nby the consumer. Catalonia \n\nArticle 11 of the preliminary draft law regulating domestic trade, \npublished in July 1991, is worded as follows: \n\n\"Distance selling means all sorts of commercial retail selling \naccomplished by an order initally conveyed between two persons by \nany means of communication without their being physically in each \nother's presence, or by any means of social communication and \nelectronic transmission which indicates how consumers should place \ntheir orders\". - 41 -\n\nArticle 12 - All distance selling offers must contain the following \ninformation in a clear and unambiguous form. b) The product or service offered must be described in quantitative \nand qualitative terms, as must the mode of use, so that it can be \neasily ident if led. c) The total price to be paid must be in conformity with Article 8 of \nthis law, the expenditure must be shown separately from the costs \nof carriage, if these are borne by the consumer, and the refund \narrangements must be indicated. d) The cooling-off period within which the consumer may return the \nproduct and recover the deposit he has paid must not be less than \nseven days. Art icle 13 \n\n13. 2 - The sale of a product or the rendering of a service which has \nnot been previously requested by the consumer or user is prohibited in \nall cIrcumstances. Article 32 of the Law of 20 July 1988 regulating commercial activities \n(Law No 10/88) defines distance selling as follows: \n\nGaI icia \n\n\"Distance selling means all forms of retail selling in which the \ntrader offers consumers an opportunity to place orders by mail, \ntelephone or any other means of \naudiovisual \ncommunication for products offered for sale in catalogues, \nmagazines, \nof \nnewspapers \ncommun icat ion. \" \n\nperiodicals, \n\ngraphic or \n\nmeans \n\nother \n\nor \n\nVa lencia \n\nDistance selling is defined by Article 23(1) of the Law of 29 December \n1986 regulating trade and commercial establishments: \n\n\"For the purposes of this Law, distance selling means the system of \ndistribution consisting in offering products for sale by mail and \nasking the consumer to order by mail, telephone or another means of \ncommunIcat ion. \" \n\n\f- 42 -\n\nSection 4 of the same Article states that: \n\n\"Products or samples may not be sent for commercial purposes to the \nhome of any person who is not a trader without proof of a request \nby that person. If items are so sent, the recipient shall be under \nno obligation to pay for, keep or return them. \" \n\nAt national level, there is a business ethics code for distance \nselIing. It includes the following provisions: \n\nChapter IV: arrangements for performance of orders \n\n\"In order to ensure maximum customer satisfaction with the manner \nin which their orders are fulfilled, firms must comply with the \nfollowing rules: \n\n'4. 5 \n\nReturn and refund \n\n\"Conditions for the return of the ordered items for exchange or refund \nmust be stated in the offer and in the delivery order showing the \nstandard terms of sale or by all other means convenient to the firm. \" \n\nFrance \n\nThe concept of a \"contract negotiated at a distance\" entered French law \nby virtue of a Ministerial Order of 3 December 1987 on price \ninformation for the consumer. Article 14 of this text is worded as follows: \n\nArt icle 14 \n\n\"The price of any product or service proposed to the consumer using \na means of communication at a distance must be precisely indicated \nto the consumer, by any means admissible as proof, before the \ncontract is concluded. \"Means of communication at a distance within the meaning of this \nOrder are all means enabling the consumer to order a product or \nrequest a service while at a place other than those in which \ncustomers are normally received. \"Means of communication at a distance include, in particular, \nelectronic data transmission, telephone, video transmission, mail \nand the distribution of printed matter. \" \n\nDistance selling is regulated by Law No 88-21 of 6 January 1988. This \ntext was originally concerned with television selling but also contains \ngeneral provisions applying to all distance selling. - 43 -\n\nThe trade association of mail-order and distance selling traders \n(SVPCD) has drawn up a \"code of practice\" setting out the main ethical \nrules by which firms engaging in this type of distributive trade are \nexpected to be guided. I Contract formation \n\nThe concept of distance is difficult to define. The distance referred \nto in the Law of 6 January 1988 is geographical distance, and telephone \nselling is thus included. 1. The catalogue \n\nThe catalogue must be written in French even if it relates only to \nforeign products (Article 1 of the Law of 31 December 1975 on the \nuse of the French language). It must contain a description of the product and a definition of the \nnature of the contract. The price must be stated before the contract is \nconcluded (Order of 3 December 1987 on the provision of price \ninformation to the consumer). If the firm offers a discount, both \nprices must be indicated. For credit sales, the offer must comply with \nLaw No 78-22 of 10 January 1978. The catalogue must also state what stocks are available. 2. Inert ia selIing \n\nInertia selling is prohibited. The consumer must keep the object \nwith a view to returning it, but is not obliged to send it back \n(Article R 40-12 of the Penal Code). The text is worded as follows. -\n\nArt icle R. 40 \n\n\"The following shall be punished by imprisonment for a period \nof ten days to one month and a fine of FF 1 200 to FF 3 000 or \nby one of these penalties only: \n\n12 (Decree No 61-138 of 9 February 1961, Article 1) \n\n\" \n'Persons who, without any prior request from the addressee, \nhave sent him any object accompanied by an intimation that he \nmay accept it on payment of a stipulated price or return it to \nthe sender, even if the object can be returned without cost to \nthe addressee'\". - 44 \n\nTelephone canvassing \n\nTelephone canvassing is regulated by Article 1-11 of the Law of \n23 June 1989. It is incorporated as Article 2 bis into Law No 72-\n1137 of 22 December 1972 (on consumer protection in respect of \ncanvassing and doorstep selling). This article is worded as follows. Art icle 2 bis \n(Law No 89-421 of 23 June 1989, Article 1-11) \n\n\"Following an approach by telephone or by any comparable \ntechnical means, the trader must provide the consumer with \nconfirmation of the offer made. The consumer shall not be bound \nexcept by his signature. He then benefits from Articles 1 and \n3, paragraph I, of Law No 88-21 of 6 January 1988 on the \noperations consisting of television advertising with an offer \nof sale and known as 'teleshopping'\". Any firm using this technique must send the consumer confirmation \nof the offer it has made him. 4. Mail \n\nThere is no legislation regulating the distribution of advertising \nmaterial via letterboxes. The consumer may use the \"Stop publicite\" \nsystem: to do so, he need only write to the trade association of \nmail-order and distance selling traders. He can also ask the post \nand telecommunications service to remove his name from the lists \nderived from the telephone directories which are marketed by France \nTelecom. He will then be placed on a suppression list - the \"orange \nI ist\". 5. Advert is ing by fax \n\nThe same type of list exists for fax and is known as the \"saffron \nlist\". This list is provided for by Article 10 of Law No 89-1008 of \n31 December 1989. This text contains the following provisions: \n\nArt icle 10 \n\n\"Natural or legal persons may indicate that they do not wish to \nbe canvassed by telex or fax by having their names placed on a \npublic register of persons who are unwilling to receive such \ncommunications. Inscription in this register shall be free of \ncharge. - 45 -\n\n\"Arrangements for the organisation and operation of the register \nmentioned in the preceding paragraph and for the penalties for \nfailure to comply with this Article shall be laid down by decree\". 6. Teleshopping (television selling) \n\nIn French law, the expression \"teleshopping\" (teleachat) is used \nfor selling by television. France is the only Community country to have a special law in this \narea: Law No 88-21 of 6 January 1988. Article 2 of this Law relates \nspecifically to teleshopping and stipulates: \n\n\"In the month following enactment of this Law, the Conseil \nSuperieur de I'Audiovisuel shall make rules for the scheduling, \nby the radio and television broadcasting services authorised \nunder the terms of Law No 86-1067 of 30 September 1986 on \nfreedom of communication, of broadcasts wholly or partly \ndevoted to the presentation or promotion of objects, products \nor services offered directly for sale. \" \n\nThe scheduling rules were therefore laid down by a decision of the \nindependent audiovisual media authority on 4 February 1988. These \nrules apply to television broadcast by radio waves. Although \nbroadcast by radio waves, the channel CANAL + is not covered by \nthese regulations but is covered by the Law. Programmes of this \ntype are prohibited on the two public channels (A2 and FR3). The minimum length of such a programme is 15 minutes, the maximum \nduration being 90 minutes per week. The programmes must be broadcast \nwithin specified times (between 8. 30 and 11. 30 a. m. and at night, once \nthe channel's other programmes have ended). Art icle 2 \n\n\"Teleshopping programmes on television services distributed by \nterrestrial broadcasting or satellite shall last not less than \n15 minutes and in total shall not exceed 90 minutes per week. They may be broadcast only between 8. 30 and 11. 30 a. m. or at \nnight after the end of the other programmes of the channel, and \nmay not be broadcast on Sundays. \" \n\nThe programme presentation and content are also regulated (special \nannouncement, no interruption by advertising spots). - 46 -\n\nArt icle 4 \n\n\"Teleshopping programmes shall be clearly announced as such \nand, on television, shall be programmed in dedicated screens, \nwithout any possibility of interruption, in particular by \nadvertising screens. They shall be so presented that they \ncannot be confused with other programmes and may not be the \nsubject of trailers or preparatory programmes. \" \n\nTeleshopping practice differs from catalogue selling in that the \nmake and name of the manufacturer may not be mentioned on the air. At most, they may be indicated on the contract. Article 7 \n\n\"The make, the name of the manufacturer or distributor of an \nobject or product and the name of the party rendering a service \noffered for sale shall not be shown, mentioned or indicated on \nthe airwaves or be advertised or published in connection with \nthe programme by any other means. The make, if appropriate, \nshall be stated at the time of the order, as must the name of \nthe manufacturer or the distributor providing the guarantee. \" \n\nInfringement of any of these rules is punished by a fine of between \nFF 6 000 and FF 500 000. Article 3-11 (Law of 6 January 1988) \n\n\"II. Any de Jure or de facto manager of a radio or television \nservice as defined in Article 2 of this Law who schedules a \nprogramme infringing the rules made pursuant to this same \nArticle and has it broadcast or distributed shall incur a fine \nof FF 6 000 to FF 500 000. \" \n\nAutomatic calling machines \n\nNew regulations for this means of communication are under \nconsiderat ion. The working party of the Conseil National de la Consommation has \ndelivered an opinion and made recommendations on automatic calling \nmachines (on 15 March 1990). The recommendations are as follows. - 47 -\n\n\"Conclusion \n\n\"The Working Party, being aware of \n\nthe need to follow closely the development of these \nsystems; \nthe immediate European environment and the discrepancies in \nthe regulations applying within it; \nthe limitations of self-regulatory measures, which cannot \nbe'applied to potential 'cowboys', \n\nrecommends that the Government should devise regulatory \nmeasures in this area with the aim of: \n\ngiving the consumer a right of refusal; \nimposing a strict framework on the use of such techniques: \ncontent of the messages, identification, liability etc. ; \nencouraging self-regulatory measures to fill out the \ndetails of this framework. \"It also urges the Government to promote discussion of these \nmatters at Community level. \" \n\nThe texts were submitted for opinion to the members of the CNC at \nits plenary meeting on 3 July 1990 and were unanimously approved by \nboth sections. 8. SelIing by Minitel \n\nSelling by Minitel is covered by Article 43 of the Law of \n30 September 1986, which instituted a system of prior announcement. Article 43 \n\n\"The requirement for prior announcement applies to the \nfollowing:. Advertising material distributed by the services mentioned \nin this Article must be presented as such. \"The service supplier is required to make known to the users: \n\n1. The items mentioned in Article 37 of this Law \n\n2. The rates applying if there a charge for the service \n\n\f- 48 \n\nSection V. 2 of the Circular of 17 February 1988 (implementing \nArticle 43 of the Law) regulates Minitel sales advertising: \n\n\"Under the terms of Article 43 of the Law of 30 September 1986, \nadvertising material shall be presented as such, i. e. announced \nby a visual or audible signal. \"It shall comply with the laws, regulations and trade practices \napplying. \" \n\nApart from this text, there is no specific regulation of selling by \nMinitel. 11 Performance of the contract \n\nA distinction must be made between the order and the obligations of the \npart ies. A \n\nThe order \n\nThe order pertains both to contract formation and to contract \nperformance. The contract is formed on the date of the order. If the order is sent by post, the relevant date is that on which \nthe consumer posts it. If the order is placed by telephone or by electronic data \ntransmission, the sale is concluded at the moment of the call. If the customer hands in the order at a catalogue station, the \nrelevant date is the date on which he does so. The order form must contain certain information, especially with \nregard to price. It must indicate whether or not the delivery costs \nare included in the price. If the consumer is a minor, the order form must be signed by his \nlegal guardian. Once the sale has been concluded, obligations arise for the \npart ies. Obiigat ions \n\n1. Seller's obligations \n\nThe seller must deliver an object which corresponds to that ordered \nby the customer. If the object does not correspond to the order, \nthe consumer may demand a new delivery, an exchange or cancellation \nof the order and the refund of any moneys paid. The seller must deliver the object ordered within a reasonable \nperiod. If delivery does not take place in good time, the buyer may \navail himself of Article 1610 of the Civil Code: \n\n\f- 49 -\n\nArticle 1610 \n\n\"If the seller fails to deliver within the time agreed between \nthe parties, the purchaser may, at his own discretion, apply \nfor rescission of the sale or an order for possession, if the \ndelay is caused solely by the seller. \" \n\nA court ruling of 13 December 1973 introduced the concept of a \n\"reasonable period\" within which delivery must take place (civ 3e, \n10 avril: Bull III, n 274, p. 198). In the event of non-delivery, the seller must reimburse the buyer \nif stocks are exhausted. If the package was dispatched but not \ndelivered, he must provide proof that this is the case and send a \nsecond package if he cannot provide such proof. The seller must respect the buyer's right to return the goods. Article 1 of the Law of 6 January 1988 grants the buyer the right \nto return goods within seven clear days. Article 1 \n\n\"In all distance selling transactions, the buyer of a product \nshall have a period of seven clear days from delivery of the \norder within which he may return the product to the seller for \nexchange or reimbursement, without incurring any penalty other \nthan the cost of return. \" \n\nAny seller who refuses a buyer this right incurs a fine, which is \nlaid down in Article 1 of Decree No 88-539 of 5 May 1988. Buyer's obligations \n\nThe buyer must take delivery of the item and pay for it. Payment \nmay be made at different times. The buyer has a choice of various \nmodes of payment. The two modes which give rise to problems are payment \"cash on \ndelivery\" (he may be obliged to pay for the entire order when he \nhas received only part) and payment by credit or debit card (risk \nof theft, use of the number without the owner's consent, in which \ncase the seller must reimburse the customer). The customer may also pay by cheque or charge card, in which case \nhe does not benefit from the seven-day period prescribed by the \ninstrument on consumer credit. The place of contract formation is regulated by Article 46 of the \nCivil Procedures Code. It is either the place of delivery or the buyer's place of \nresidence. Ireland \n\n- 50 -\n\nThe practice of distance selling operates in Ireland on a significantly \nlesser scale than in the United Kingdom and there are no methods of \ndistance selling existing in Ireland which do not exist in the United \nKingdom. There is also a great deal of similarity between Irish and \nBritish law, particularly in the area of contract law, which is the \narea most central to distance selling. Little legislation has been \nenacted on contract law and the rules and principles which comprise and \nshape contract law in Ireland do not in the main radically differ from \nthose developed by the English Judiciary at Common Law. There are the \nsame Judge-made requirements as to formation of contract, notice and \nother such rules on interpretation of ambiguous clauses as exist in the \nlaw of the United Kingdom, together with the acceptance of the doctrine \nof fundamental breach. Substantive rules as a means of protecting consumers are now contained \nin three pieces of legislation, the Consumer Information Act 1978, Sale \nof Goods Act 1980 and the Data Protection Act 1988, each of which \nmirrors similar legislative provisions in the United Kingdom. The 1980 Act contains the only provision in Irish law which relates \nspecifically to distance selling. Section 47 of Part VI of the Act \ndeals with the subject of the sending of unsolicited goods, or \"inertia \nselling\", and essentially states that a person who receives such goods \nmay keep them without payment in the following circumstances : \n\na) at the end of six months, provided the consumer has not \nunreasonably prevented the supplier from collecting them (during \nthis period the consumer should not use the goods and should take \nreasonable care of them); or \n\nb) 30 days after the consumer gives written notice to the sender of \nthe fact that goods are unsolicited, the name and address of the \nconsumer and the place where the goods can be collected. It may be an offence to demand payment for unsolicited goods in such a \nway as to imply that the sender has a right to payment. It is also an \noffence to threaten legal action or other dire consequences without \nreasonable cause. The 1980 Act also lays down certain mandatory provisions relating to \nconsumer transactions and defines the fairness and reasonableness of \ncontract terms by reference to certain criteria in the Act's schedule. - 51 -\n\nThe Consumer Information Act 1978 provides protection for consumers \nagainst deceptive sales practices and renders it an offence of strict \nliability to apply a false trade description to any goods. The Act \nalso contains a general clause prohibiting advertisements in relation \nto the supply or provision of goods, services or facilities in the \ncourse of or for the purposes of a trade, profession or business if it \nIs likely to mislead and thereby cause loss, damage or injury to \nmembers of the public to a material degree. The 1978 Act also established the Office of Director of Consumer \nAffairs, who has certain supervisory, informative and enforcement \nresponsibilities in respect of both the 1978 Act and the 1980 Act. The \nDirector may take action by way of prosecution or otherwise in respect \nof contracts which infringe the legislative rules. Consumers will now \nhave a more effective means of enforcing their legislative rights under \na new small claims courts system recently established by the Courts \nActs 1991 on the lines of that operating in the United Kingdom, albeit \non a pilot scheme basis for the time being. The Data Protection Act 1988, giving effect to the Council of Europe \nData Protection Convention, is very similar in scheme to that of the \n1984 UK legislation. The Act gives a right to every individual \nirrespective of nationality or residence to establish the existence of \npersonal data, to have access to any such data relating to him and to \nensure that the data kept are collected fairly, are accurate and up-to-\ndate, are kept for lawful purposes and are not used or disclosed in any \nmanner incompatible with those purposes. The Act also requires both data controllers and processors to protect \nthe data they keep, and imposes on them a special duty of care in \nrelation to the data subjects. For the purposes of the Act, the word \ndata means information in a form in which it can be processed \nautomatically, and applies to data regarding an individual only and not \na corporation. The Act does not extend to personal information kept on \nmanual files but does apply to information kept on every kind of \ncomputer. The Act establishes the office of Data Protection Commissioner, who is \nappointed by the Government and whose essential function is to \nsupervise and monitor the working of the Act. The Irish Act opts for a \nsystem of selective registration under which only certain selected \ncategories of persons have to register. The particulars to be included \nin the register include the purposes for which the personal data is \nkept or used, description of the data and the persons to whom the data \nmay be disclosed. - 52 -\n\nAs regards specific provisions in the legislation relating to distance \nselling, the following points should be noted: \n\n1) \n\n2) \n\n3) \n\nIn the definitions, direct marketing is defined as including \ndirect maiIing. In relation to subject rights, an individual has the right to \nhave his details removed on written request from a direct \nmarketing list within 40 days. There is no mailing preference service available in Ireland as \nyet, but such a service is being actively considered by the \nindustry. In relation to registration, those whose business consists \nwholly or mainly of direct marketing are among those who have \nto register their particulars in the public register described \nabove. The Irish Act envisages self-regulation through the development of \nsectoral codes of practice and there Is provision in the Act for such \ncodes to be given the force of law. No such codes have yet been \nadopted but the Data Protection Commissioner has selected direct \nmarketing as one of two sectors for initial attention in this regard \nand has had a number of preliminary meetings with the Irish Direct \nMarketing Association to discuss the possibility of their adopting such \na code of practice in their sector. Italy \n\nThe Law of 29 December (\"Community Law 1990\"), passed by the Parliament \nin order to clear \"the backlog in the implementation of Community law\" \nfrom which Italy still suffers, provided for powers to be delegated to \nthe government to implement a large number of Directives within a year \nby means of \"decreti delegati\" (ministerial orders). In the field of consumer protection, Article 41 is concerned with \nimplementation of Directive 84/450/EEC (misleading advertising) and \nArticle 42 provides for an order implementing Council Directive \n85/577/EEC, stipulating that this order is to regulate not only \ncontracts negotiated away from business premises but also certain forms \nof distance selling (\"selling by television or other means of \naudiovisual communication\"). With a view to exercising these delegated powers, the government has \nprepared a preliminary draft order, which was discussed at a meeting \nwith the trade and consumer organisations on 13 June 1991. The purpose \nof this preliminary draft, as formulated in Article 1, is to regulate \ncontracts negotiated away from business premises and mail-order sales, \nbut Article 8 provides that: \n\n\f- 53 -\n\n\"The right of withdrawal shall also apply to sales by television or \nby other means of audiovisual communication, including sales by \nmeans of data processing and electronic data transmission systems\". (Doorstep selling and certain forms of distance selling are thus \ndealt with together in the same text. ) This right obtains for a \nperiod of seven days (Article 5 ). The concern of the Italian Parliament and government is all the more \nunderstandable since there has been an upsurge in selling by television \nin Italy, which is unmatched in any other European country. There are \nseveral hundred commercial television stations, most of which are small \nstations with a local audience, operating entirely without supervision. (This \"Wild West\" was not brought under control and a full inventory \nordered until Law No 233 - the \"MAMMI Law\" - was enacted on \n9 August 1990. The Inventory should be complete by the end of 1991, but \nthe rules do not include any provisions for television selling. ) \n\nThere has so far been no follow-up to the Government's preliminary \ndraft: there is thus no specific regulation at present for distance \nselling. The provisions applying are therefore those of the Civil Code \nand case law. They may be outlined as follows. 1. Def ini t ions \n\nThe Civil Code does not refer to the \"consumer\" but only to the \n\"buyer\". However, the difference between a purchase made in the course \nof an occupational activity and a purchase made for a use unconnected \nwith such activity may be very important in court rulings when the \npoint at issue is the application of the rules of good faith in the \nnegotiation (Article 1337), the interpretation (Article 1336) and the \nperformance (Article 1375) of contracts. The \"contract negotiated at a distance\" is also undefined, even though \ndistance may be important as a source (or contributory cause) of \nfactual error, thereby rendering the contract void under certain \nconditions (Articles 1427 et seq. ). - 54 -\n\n2. Solicitation \n\nWith regard to soliciting for the sale of securities, Law No 216 of \n7 June 1974 (which set up the National Stock Exchange Supervisory \nCommission - CONSOB) and Law No 77 of 23 March 1983 (which introduced \ninvestment trusts to Italy) provided for rules governing all \"public \nsolicitation for saving\" (including advertising). All contract solicitation Is covered by Article 1337 of the Civil Code, \nwhich is worded as follows: \n\n\"During the negotiation and formation of the contract, the \ncontracting parties must act \nin good faith\". (This \"pre-\ncontractual\" responsibility may give rise to liability for damages \nand interest. ) \n\nOn the other hand, there are no rules in the Civil Code to safeguard \nthe consumer's privacy against solicitation by telephone or by means of \ndata transmission systems, and Article 660 of the Penal Code, which \ncreates an offence of \"Molestie Telefoniche\" (creating a nuisance by \ntelephone) could apply only in extreme cases. 3. Right of withdrawal \n\nWith regard to the sale of securities, Article 18 of Law No 216/1974 \nstipulates that: \n\n\"The validity of contracts signed as a result of canvassing is \nsuspended for a period of five days. During this period, the \nconsumer, without incurring any penalty, may intimate by \ntelegram that he is withdrawing from the contract. \" \n\nFor any other sale, there is the possibility of \"annullamento\" or \n\"risoluzione\" (voidance or rescission), but there is no right of \n\"ripensamento\" (withdrawal). Under Article 1427 of the Civil Code, \nthe buyer may ask for a contract which has already been concluded \nto be declared void if there has been an \"essential\" error: \naccording to Article 1428 (sections 2 and 3) errors are \"essential\" \nif they concern the quality of the object to which the contract \nrelates or the identity or status of the seller (these are \nconditions which may well be satisfied in distance selling). It \nshould be emphasised that, in this connection, Article 1431 refers \nto contract \"circumstances\" and to the \"status of the contracting \nparties\" as a basis for establishing whether the seller could be \n\"aware of the error\". Court rulings may thus attach great \nimportance to the (non-occupational) \"status\" of the buyer/consumer \nand to the place where the contract was concluded (distance \nselling) in order to establish that the error was an essential one \nand that the seller could be aware of it. - 55 -\n\nIt should also be mentioned that, given the lack of legislative rules, \ncertain trade bodies have established voluntary supervision systems. The AIDIM (Italian Direct Marketing Association) has established a \n\"Code\" for telemarketing. The ANVED (Italian Distance Selling Association) has drawn up a \n\"Code of business ethics for distance and mail-order selling\", \ninfringement of which may in theory lead to expulsion (following a \ndecision by a disciplinary b o a r d ). This Code also provides for a \nright of withdrawal, within a period of seven days from receipt of \nthe product. The IAP (Self-Regulatory Advertising Standards Institute) includes \nin its \"Self-regulating code for the advertising industry\" specific \nrules requiring fuller information (Article 18) for advertising in \nconnection with mail-order selling and prohibits all advertising in \nconnection with the sending of unsolicited goods (Article 1 9 ). The \n\"Codes\" and supervisory \nare \nobviously binding in civil law on their members only. procedures of the trade bodies \n\nLuxembourg \n\nLuxembourg law contains one legislative provision concerning distance \nselling. This is Article 7 of the Law of 25 August 1983 on legal \nprotection of the consumer, and is worded as follows: \n\n\"Article 7 - In contracts concluded by correspondence between a \nsupplier who is a trader and a final consumer who is a private \nindividual, the latter may, within seven days of the order or the \ncommitment to purchase and within fifteen days of receipt of the \ngoods, withdraw from the contract by means of a registered letter \nwith a form for advice of receipt. Any clause in the contract by \nvirtue of which the customer renounces his right of withdrawal \nshall be null and void. \"in the event of any dispute with regard to the date of order or \ncommitment to purchase or of the date of receipt of the goods, the \nburden of proof shall be borne by the supplier/trader\". distinctive \n\nThe \ninstitution of two periods for withdrawal from the contract: \n\nthe Luxembourg \n\nlegislation \n\nfeature \n\nof \n\nis \n\nthe \n\n7 days from the order or commitment to purchase; \n15 days from receipt of the goods. - 56 -\n\nThis withdrawal must be notified in writing by means of a registered \nletter with a form for advice of receipt. Under Luxembourg law, the \ncontract is formed when the consumer returns the order form, but the \nsale is finalised when the second cooling-off period has expired. The text also states that any contract clause which would have the \neffect of invalidating the right to withdrawal, even with the \nconsumer's consent, is null. Finally, the text reverses the burden of proof in ail matters \nconcerning the dates of the order, the commitment to purchase or \nreceipt of the goods. When this bill was under discussion, the government was considering a \nsystem of administrative authorisation of traders seeking orders by \ncorrespondence. This proposal has been dropped. Canvassing by telephone is prohibited, but the manner in which this \nprohibition is imposed is somewhat indirect. Article 8 of the Law of \n5 March 1970 on hawking states that: \n\n\"It is prohibited to solicit retail or wholesale orders from \npersons who do not trade in goods. \". Solicitation by telephone, and apparently also the use of fax to \napproach consumers, are not permitted. \"Article 14-1 - Contracts concluded in contravention of this Law \nare null. However, only a final consumer who is a private \nindividual may avail himself of this provision. \" \n\nIt may thus be deduced that a contract concluded as a result of a \ntelephone call (solicitation) from the trader may be rendered void if \nthe consumer so requests. Article 16 nonetheless lays down penal sanctions for infringement of \nArticle 8 (one to seven days' imprisonment and a fine of Lfrs 2 000 to \nLfrs 30 000). The Law of 25 August 1983 does not define the terms \"contracts \nconcluded by correspondence\" (Article 7) and \"contracts concluded by \nhome canvassing\" (Article 8 ). It may be deduced that a contract \nconcluded by a call made on the trader's initiative is covered by \nArticle 8 and a contract concluded by a call made at the consumer's \ninitiative is covered by Article 7. Luxembourg law has no provisions for inertia selling. The Law of 27 November 1986 \"regulating certain trade practices and \npenalties for unfair competition\" includes provisions which make it \npossible to bring actions against unfair advertising and render all \nintermediaries involved in its dissemination responsible. Article 18 \nreads as follows: \n\n\f- 57 -\n\n\"Article 18 - Al I commercial advertising promoting an act which is \nto be regarded as an act of unfair competition within the meaning \nof this Law is prohibited. \"Only the advertiser may be held responsible for this infringement. \"However, if the latter is not domiciled in the Grand Duchy, the \ninjunction proceedings may also be brought against the publisher, \nprinter or distributor of the disputed material and against any \nperson who contributes to its effects. \" \n\nLuxembourg also has detailed regulations on videotex (Grand-Ducal \nRegulation of 29 October 1986 on the public videotex service) dating \nfrom 8 November 1986. This text also covers electronic mailboxes. In \nthis context, it is possible to establish \"closed groups of users\" \n(Article 5. 3). Article 5. 3. 32 states that \"before including a user in \nhis closed group or groups, the supplier must, however, have obtained \nthat user's explicit consent\". The Netherlands \n\nI Selling by telephone (telemarketing) \n\nThere are no specific legal provisions with regard to distance selling \nby telephone in the Netherlands. The Industry itself, however, has adopted a code concerning \ntelemarketing, the so-called \"Telemarketing Code\". This code contains \nrules regarding the use of telephones, protecting consumers against \nmisleading information provided over the telephone. For example: \n\n\"The person who initiates the phonecall must introduce himself and \nsay on whose behalf he is calling. He must also mention the reason \nfor the conversation. \"When the call is not convenient for the consumer at that \nparticular time, the conversation must be ended immediately. - 58 -\n\n\"Information about the goods and services offered by phone has to \nbe clear and exact and the consumer has to be informed of his \nrights and obligations. \"The agreement made over the telephone has to be confirmed in \nwriting and the consumer has the right to cancel the transaction \nwithin seven days after the receipt of the confirmation. \" \n\nCompanies which belong to the Dutch \"Postorderbond\" are bound by their \nmembership to the rules of the \"Telemarketing Code\". Telemarketing is a \"booming business\" in the Netherlands. Last year \n(1990) total sales in telemarketing reached a level of 2. 2 billion \nDutch guiIders. Selling by telefax is not yet practised on a large scale. Selling \nbetween business and consumer is rare, mainly because most consumers do \nnot own a telefax. In business to business communication the use of \ntelefax is growing. However, there have been complaints about the \nmisuse of the telefax, especially concerning unsolicited junkmail. I I Selling by videotex (videoshopping) \n\nIn the Netherlands there have been some experiments with videotex. Since 1980 it has been possible to shop from home. The best-known system is Videotex Nederland (Videotex N L ). It was \nestablished in 1988. It is the first large-scale open videotex system \nwhich is operational all over the Netherlands. It has been established \nto function as an umbrella organization for all videotex systems in the \nfuture and is therefore partly financed by the Dutch Department of \nEconomic Affairs. In March 1991 the total number of consultations was \n411 000, four times as many as in March 1990. There is also no specific legislation concerning videoshopping in the \nNetherlands, probably because it has so far not taken place on a very \nlarge scale, and in practice there has therefore been no demand for \nlegislat ion as yet. The Dutch \"Postorderbond\", however, has developed a code concerning \nadvertising by way of videotex. This code contains a rule which \nguarantees that the consumer has the right to return the goods within \nseven days after the transaction without any further obligations. 59 -\n\nI I I Selling by television \n\nThe \"Mediawet 1987\" is the law concerning radio and television \nprogrammes. Some of its rules concern advertisement on TV (Dutch \nadvertising code). For example: \"The advertisements may not take \nlonger than 5% of the total transmission time. Commercials must be \nrecognisable and separated from the other programmes. They may not \ninterrupt a programme and are prohibited on Sundays\". The national broadcasters are not allowed to send out commercials, only \nthe \"Stichting Etherreclame\", a separate legal person, has this right. Cable suppliers are not allowed to send out commercials which do not \ncomply with the above-mentioned conditions, unless the messages are not \nspecifically meant for the Dutch public. Neither the \"Stichting Etherreclame\" nor the cable suppliers can be \nheld responsible for delivery or guality of the products. The \"Direct Marketing Institute\" in the Netherlands expects television \nselling to become an important selling tool over the next years. IV \n\nSelIing by ma iI \n\nNowadays consumers can use all kinds of new media to order goods from a \nmail-order company, for example telephone, personal computer, etc. , but \nalso by way of direct response advertising by mail, which means that \nthe advertisement is published in the paper and the consumer can call a \ntelephone number or send back a coupon. Another form is \"direct mail\", \ni. e. all mail that tries to attract the attention of the addressees. in Holland there are about 350 mail-order houses. Most of them still \nuse the catalogue but a few houses have introduced new ordering systems \nsuch as automatic voice-response computers or videotex services. Most \ndistance selling transactions concern non-food sales, however at \npresent about 15 000 to 20 000 households in the Netherlands buy \nfoodstuffs at a distance and this figure is expected to rise quickly in \nthe coming years as well as the volume of direct response advertising \nby mail and direct mail. - 60 -\n\nV \n\nLegal aspects and distance selling in summary \n\nAt present, no specific legal provisions are available with regard to \ndistance selling in the Netherlands. In principle, the existing rules \nfor legal transactions and sales contracts based on the more classical \nform of sale are applicable to distance selling methods. Rules of Dutch contract law are laid down in Books 3 and 6, Title 5 of \nthe New Civil Code, which will replace the old books of the Civil Code \non 1 January 1992. Consensus between the contracting parties is essential for a contract, \nwhich has to be declared in a written, verbal or electronic way. The \ncontract is concluded once the offerer acknowledges the acceptance, or \ncould reasonably have acknowledged the acceptance. Legal conditions for the establishment of a valid contract under Dutch \nlaw are: \n\n- \n\n- \n\nhaving the capacity to conclude a contract \na defined subject \na lawful case \nconsensus between the contracting parties. When dealing with distance selling it is not always easy to determine \nwhether these conditions are fulfilled. Selling by telephone, television, videotex or mail-order means that an \nagreement is made between seller and consumer to deliver goods or to \nrender a service. The distinctive features of most distance selling methods are that the \ntransaction is paperless and that the parties are not physically \npresent during the process of concluding the contract. Nevertheless, \nthe contract can be agreed upon and legally exists, according to the \nrules of contracting law, without parties being physically in each \nother's presence. The consumer, having less knowledge of a product or service, is \nentitled to be correctly informed about the contents of the product or \nservice. The new section of the New Civil Code seeks to protect the consumer, \nas the weaker party in the process of contracting. The provisions \ncover matters such as delivery, price, risk and time and place of \ndelivery. In consumer sales, the risk will transfer from the seller to \nthe consumer at the moment of delivery \"de facto\". - 61 -\n\nArticle 26 of the New Civil Code contains a provision about payment in \nadvance. Normally the payment has to be made at the time and place of \ndelivery. In consumer transactions there can be a request for payment \nin advance. This however can never be more than 50% of the total price \nof any goods. The Netherlands is the only Member State which has such \na provision in its Civil Code. A derogation in standard terms which is disadvantageous for the \nconsumer is regarded as unfair and can be annulled. There is also a \nlist of standard terms which are definitely regarded as unfair to the \nconsumer (black list) and a list of terms presumed to be unfair (grey \nIist). Another form of protection of the consumer concerns unsolicited goods. A consumer who receives these goods has the right to keep them or to \nreturn the goods at the expense of the seller. It is very difficult for a consumer to prove that, for example, the \nwrong quantity of goods has been delivered. Similarly, the problem of \nproving that the product has not been delivered is not an easy one to \nsolve. To determine who bears the burden of proof, Dutch law applies the \nprinciple: \"The party who asserts a fact has to prove it\" (Article 177 \nof the Code of Civil Procedure [RV]). This provision, however, also \nallows the Judge the option of disregarding this rule. If its effects \nare unfair, parties are in principle free to stipulate who bears the \nburden of proof. For the consumer who uses distance selling methods, \nit means that he will have the burden of proof when he disputes a \ndelivery which was not ordered, unless the supplier and the consumer \nhave agreed otherwise, which will not often be the case. The fact that the consumer as contracting party has no influence at all \non the outcome of the electronic transaction makes it even more \ndifficult to provide evidence. He may actually be right, but since he \nbears the burden of proof, he may be unable to produce the required \nevidence and may therefore fail in his legal action. In January 1992, rules on consumer sales (Section 7. 5 of the New Civil \nCode) and general conditions laid down in the NCC will give the \nconsumer some means of protection. Articles 6: 236-238 (black and grey \nlist) are only applicable to contracts with the consumer as contracting \nparty. These provisions were specifically drawn up to give the \nconsumer more protection. In some cases the Supreme Court has already \npre-empted these articles by applying Section 6. 5. 3. - 62 -\n\nGeneral rules on misleading advertising are set out in the New Civil \nCode, which is adjusted to the restrictions and prohibitions laid down \nin the minimum EEC Directive on misleading advertising, which gives a \nminimum standard of protection. Member States are entitled to have a \nhigher standard of consumer protection in their national legislation. Selling by telephone is not regulated under Dutch law. In order to \nprotect the consumer against aggressive sales methods the law on door-\nto-door sales came into force in 1975. On 3 July 1989 this law was \nchanged due to the obligations laid down in the EEC Directive on \ncontracts negotiated away from business premises. One of the essential \nelements of this law is the fact that the agreement concluded between \nboth parties has to be in writing and that each party has to receive a \ncopy. If this condition is not fulfilled, the contract will not be \nvaI id. The consumer is also entitled to a cooling-off period of eight days in \nwhich he can decide whether or not to undo the bargain. During the adjustments to the directive, selling by telephone was not \nincluded in the rules. The legislator thought that the pressure put on \nthe consumer to buy goods or services in the case of selling by \ntelephone was less than for door-to-door sales. The telemarketing \nindustry, however, has developed a code of conduct for telephone \ncontracts. In order to control the use of personal data and its registration, \nmovement and storage, the Privacy Act (Wet Persoons Registratie) came \ninto being in the Netherlands in 1990. It gives the individual the \nright to inspect and correct the data registered about him and the \nright to know to which persons or organisations data are given. It is \nforbidden to make use of this data for purposes other than that for \nwhich they were registered. Control of the proper implementation of \nthe Act is the responsibility of an independent institute, the \n\"Registratiekamer\" (Registration Chamber). Portugal \n\nPortugal appears to have been the first Member State of the Community \nto introduce general regulations for all forms of distance selling. The \nbasic text on protection of Portuguese consumers is Law No 29/81 of \n22 August 1981. An instrument implementing this text has been enacted: Decree-Law \nNo 272/87 of 3 July 1987 on doorstep selling (Chapter I), mail-order \nselling (Chapter II) and inertia selling (Chapter 111). I. Mai 1-order selIIno \n\n- 63 -\n\nChapter II of the Decree covers not only mail-order selling but also \nall forms of distance selling. This Chapter consists of five articles with the following content. 1) Definition \n\nArticle 8 of the Decree seeks both to define distance selling and \nto delimit the scope of the instrument. The first paragraph of the text is worth reproducing in full. Article 8 \n\nDefinition and scope \n\n\"1. For the purposes of this text, mail-order selling means the \nmode of retail distribution in which the consumer is offered \nthe facility of placing an order by post, telephone or any \nother means of communication for goods or services presented in \ncatalogues, magazines, newspapers, printed matter or via any \nother graphic or audiovisual media. \" \n\n2) Content of the offer \n\nArticle 9 emphasises the need for the offer to be clear and to contain \ncertain items. It contains a list of items which it is mandatory to include in the \noffer made to the consumer. Article 9 \n\nContent of the offer \n\nOffers for mail-order sales shall be clear, complete and so \nworded that there can be no doubt as to the nature, \ncharacteristics and price of the goods or services or about the \nterms of payment. In accordance with the foregoing paragraph, the offer shall \ninclude: \n\na) a description of the goods or services, indicating those \ncharacteristics which are necessary to enable them to be \nfully identified; \n\nb) the price of the goods or services and the mode and terms \n\nof payment; \n\nc) any other charge to be borne by the consumer; \n\nd) the period within which the goods will be dispatched or \nperformance of the service begun, from the date of receipt \nby the seller of the consumer's request; \n\ne) the guarantee and after-sales \n\nservice arrangements, when \n\nJustified by the nature of the goods; \n\n\f- 64 -\n\nf) the name, address and details permitting identification of \nthe selling firm and an indication of the place to which \nthe consumer \nfor \ninformation; indication of a post-office box alone or any \nother indication which does not allow the seller or his \nrepresentatives to be immediately located is not permitted. address orders or \n\nrequests \n\nmay \n\n\"3. For the purposes of the foregoing paragraphs, general \nadvertising which does not include any specific proposal for \nthe purchase of goods or the rendering of a service is not \nregarded as an offer of sale. \" \n\n3) Form and content of the contract \n\nArticle 10 requires the seller to give the consumer a document \ncontaining the items mentioned in Article 9 (section 1 ). This document is not required when the order form is an integral part \nof the medium used for the sales offer (section 2 ). The contract must be in writing when the sum to be paid is Esc 9 000 or \nmore (section 3 ). This figure was increased to Esc 20 000 (i. e. 115 \necus) by an Order of 20 June 1991. Article 10 \n\nForm, content and value of the contract \n\n\"1. Once the consumer has notified the seller of his acceptance of \nthe offer, the latter shall, either before or at the time of \ndispatch of the goods or rendering of the service, provide him \nwith a document containing the items mentioned in the foregoing \nArticle. These items must correspond with the terms of the \ninitial offer. \"2. The document mentioned in the preceding paragraph is not \nrequired when the order form is an integral part of the medium \nused for the sales offer. \"3. In mailorder sales, contracts in the sum of Esc 20 000 or more \n\nshall always be made in writing. \" \n\n4) Withdrawal from the contract and obligation to provide information \n\nThis right and obligation are regulated in Articles 11 and 12. Article \n11 gives the consumer the right to withdraw from the contract subject \nto certain conditions. Article 11 \n\nRight to withdraw from the contract \nand obligation to provide information \n\n1. The consumer may withdraw from the contract within seven \n\nworking days following receipt of the goods. - 65 -\n\n\"2. Before conclusion of the contract, the consumer must be \ninformed in writing by the other contracting party of the right \nmentioned in the preceding paragraph. \"3. The time limit mentioned in paragraph 1 may be extended by \n\nagreement between the parties. \"4. Mail-order sales are subject to the provisions of Article 4 (4) \nto the effect that the right to withdraw from the contract \ncannot be renounced and that the exercise of this right may not \ngive rise to penalties, and to the provisions of Article 6 \nstating that advance payment may not be demanded and \nstipulating the nature of any such payment. \" \n\nArt icle 4 \n\n\"4. Clauses by which the right stipulated in the preceding \nparagraph are renounced shall be void, as shall clauses \nproviding for indemnities or penalties of whatever nature in \nthe event of the consumer's exercising his rights. \" \n\nArticle 4 (4) makes it virtually impossible for the buyer to \nrenounce this right. Article 6 \n\nAdvance payment \n\n\"1. No payment may be demanded from the consumer before receipt of \n\nthe goods or performance of the service. \"2. Any sum paid by the consumer before expiry of the periods \nmentioned in Article 4 is regarded as proof of the contract and \nas an instalment on the agreed price. \" \n\nArticle 12 \n\nMode of withdrawal from the contract \n\n\"Subject to agreement between the parties as to the mode and \nconsequences of exercising the right to withdraw from the contract, \nthe provisions of Article 5 apply, mutatis mutandis, to mail-order \nsales. \" \n\n11. Inert ia selIing \n\nTwo articles of the Decree regulate this type of practice. 1) Article 14 defines and prohibits inertia selling. Article 14 \n\nDefinition and prohibition of inertia selling \n\n\"1. Trade practices in which a consumer's failure to reply to an \noffer or proposal made to him are considered as tacit \nacceptance may not be used to promote retail distribution of \ngoods or services. - 66 -\n\n\"2. The consumer shall in no case incur any obligation as a result \nof the practices mentioned in the preceding paragraph even if \nthe offers or proposals expressly stated that failure to \nrespond within a certain time would be regarded as tacit \nacceptance. \" \n\n2) Article 15 is concerned with non-solicited goods. A consumer who \nreceives a product which he has not ordered or requested may keep \nit free of charge. If he returns it, he is entitled to reimbursement of the costs of \ndoing so. Article 15 \n\nUnsolicited goods \n\n\"1. Without prejudice to Article 62 of Decree-Law No 28/84 of \n20 January 1984, the addressee receiving a product which has \nnot been requested or ordered or which does not represent the \nperformance of some valid contract is not required to return it \nor pay for it but may keep it free of charge. \"2. If, notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, \nthe addressee returns the product, he is entitled to \nreimbursement of the return costs within 30 working days of his \ndo i ng so. \" \n\nUnited Kingdom \n\nCurrent distance selling practices in the United Kingdom reflect an \nincreasingly large proportion of sales of goods and services taking \nplace at a distance. Whilst traditional distance selling techniques \nsuch as mail-order remain popular, the industry is taking advantage of \nmodern technology to develop new selling methods, and the use of \nvideotex and teleshopping is becoming more prevalent. It is of interest \nto note that the turnover of the catalogue mail-order trade constitutes \nmore than 3 X of the total retail trade in the UK. It is also relevant \nto note that the growth of distance selling transactions has. been \nencouraged by the increased availability of credit cards and debit \ncards. Legal regulation of distance selling transactions in the UK consists in \nthe main of the basic principles of English contract law at common law. Consumer transactions are also generally subject to legislative rules \nparticularly in the area of consumer credit and financial services, but \nthe notable feature of the current regulation of distance selling is \nthe amount of \"soft\" law in the form of self-regulatory codes of \npractice which dominate this field. The matter is further complicated \nby the large number of organisations involved in the self-regulatory \nprocess. - 67 -\n\nAn important point to note in respect of these codes of practice is \nthat some are issued subject to specific statutory authority and have \nthe force of law, although most of them are non-binding, but may well \nbe referred to by the courts as representing good practice. Many of the \ncodes have been introduced in co-operation with the Director-General \nfor Fair Trading, who has a duty under the Fair Trading Act 1973 to \nencourage trade associations to prepare and disseminate codes of \npractice. Part 3 of the 1973 Act gives the Director-General of Fair \nTrading a general power to act against any person carrying on business \nwho persists in conduct detrimental to the interests of, or is unfair \nto, consumers. The Director-General has powers of investigation, and \nmay seek assurances from businesses that they will refrain from the \nconduct giving rise to the complaints, and he may ultimately bring \nproceedings in the restrictive practices court or in the county court, \nas may be required. The traders' associations operating codes of \npractice which where drawn up in consultation with the Office of Fair \nTrading will generally report to the Director-General on an annual \nbasis on the operation and effectiveness of the codes. Consumer distance selling contracts at common law require for their \nvalidity the basic components of offer, acceptance, consideration and \nintention of the parties to contract. Advertisements by distant sellers \nare in fact classified as invitations to treat, which invite offers. When a consumer places an order, he is making an offer to the supplier \nwho, in the context of distance selling techniques, usually accepts the \noffer by the act of dispatching the goods. The terms of the contract \nare normally agreed between the parties but there are some terms \nimplied by Statute. The Sale of Goods Act 1979 implies conditions into \nconsumer contracts that the seller has the right to sell the goods; \nthat the goods must, if they are sold by description, correspond with \nthat description; that the goods are merchantable and fit for the \npurpose as is reasonable to expect having regard to their description \nand circumstances of the case; that the goods must be reasonably fit \nfor a required purpose which had been made known to the seller; and \nthat where goods are sold by sample, they must correspond with that \nsample. Goods can only be rejected by the consumer after delivery if any of the \naforementioned conditions have been broken or if there is an express \nright to do so in the contract. The Code of Practice of the Mail-order \nTraders' Association recommends its members to supply goods on approval \nfor 14 days, and in general, consumers are given the benefit of this \nrecommendation subject to their returning the goods undamaged. - 68 -\n\nThe Consumer Credit Act 1974 provides for a five-day cooling-off period \nin respect of consumer credit agreements and the Consumer Protection \n(cancellation of contracts concluded away from business premises) \nRegulations 1987 provides for a seven-day cooling-off period for other \ncontracts but only where the contract was preceded by oral \nrepresentations made in the debtor's presence, thus not applying to \n\"pure\" distance sales. The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 restricts the effectiveness of \ncontract terms which seek to exclude or limit liability for breach of \ncontract or negligence. Liability for personal injury or death caused \nby negligence can never be excluded and liability for other loss \nsimilarly caused can only be excluded if it is reasonable to do so. A \nsupplier who deals under standard written contract terms is not \nentitled to restrict or exclude liability for breach of terms, for \nexample, by changing the mode of performance of the contract in a \ndistance sales transaction. Advertising as an important feature of distance selling is regulated \nboth by legislation and codes of practice. The Trade Descriptions Act \n1968 renders it an offence of strict liability in the course of a trade \nor business to apply a materially false trade description to goods. The \nConsumer Protection Act. 1987 prohibits misleading price indications in \nadvertisements and requires consumers to be provided with the aggregate \nsum required to be paid by them including ail ancillary charges. Codes of Practice in this area such as the British Code of Advertising \nPractice 1988 contain a general rule that advertisements should be \nlegal, decent, honest and truthful as well as non-exploitative of \nconsumers' lack of knowledge and experience. The British Code of Sales \nPromotion Practice 1990 applies the same rule to promotional goods. The consumer is required to be given accurate details of price, \nquality, and terms of business, as well as facilities to enquire and \ninspect goods. Direct marketing by mail and telephone are two particularly common \nmethods of distance selling in the UK. The Unsolicited Goods & Services \nActs 1971 and 1975 provide that a person who receives unsolicited goods \ncan treat them as an unconditional gift at the expiration of six months \nfrom their receipt when the seller has made no attempt to retrieve \nthem, or when a period of 30 days has expired from the date on which \nthe consumer notified the supplier that they are unsolicited goods. It \nis a criminal offence to demand payment for such goods. The relevant \ncodes of practice require mailing lists to be accurate, up-to-date, and \n\n\f- 69 -\n\nconfidential. A mailing preference service exists whereby members of \nthe public can submit personal applications indicating their wish to be \nincluded or excluded from current mailing lists. This \"MPS Consumer \nFile\" is maintained and applied by members of the service to all \nconsumer lists. Those persons who wish to have their names excluded are \nplaced on a suppression list as opposed to having their names deleted \nent irely. There is little provision in UK law regulating the marketing of goods \nand services through unsolicited telephone calls except in the area of \nthe financial services industry. Under \u00a7 56 Financial Services Act \n1986, there are restrictions amounting in effect to a ban on cold \ncalling whether by telephone or personal visit. Investment agreements \nmade as a result of such solicitations are rendered unenforceable, but \nthere are exceptions to the rule. The Branch Systems General Licence \nCondit ions under which private telephone systems operate in the UK \nprovide that a subscriber must comply with a written request from a \nperson who wishes not to receive further marketing calls. No telephone preference service as yet exists but it is being actively \nconsidered by the industry at present. The direct marketing industry's \ncodes of practice have provisions regarding telephone marketing to the \neffect that calls should be honestly made and within reasonable hours, \nthat no high pressure sales tactics should be used nor should \nsolicitation occur under the guise of a survey or research. The \nidentity of the caller and purpose of the call should be made clear and \na seven-day cooling-off period should apply to oral contracts formed in \nthis manner. The recipient of the call should be entitled to terminate \nthe call at any point. The issue of payments in distance sales transactions has also been the \nsubject of self-regulatory control. In the UK, there has been a \nconsiderable increase in the use of credit cards and direct debit \npayment cards. The Mail-Order Protection Scheme Code of Practice \nprohibits \"forward trading\", that is, the use of prepayments to finance \nother orders received. The scheme may require from advertisers an \nindemnity in the form of a stakeholders account until the goods are \ndispatched, or a bank guarantee. The scheme also offers an indemnity to \nconsumers who lose their money through the insolvency of the seller and \nwhere the advertisement required payment in advance. In relation to \npayment by credit card, such method of payment creates a three-way \ncontract between consumer, supplier and card issuer: under 575 \nConsumer Credit Act 1974. a consumer can equally claim against the card \nissuer in the event of a breach of contract, which is particularly \nuseful in the case of the suppliers' insolvency. However, liability in \nsuch a case is limited to cases where each single item exceeds \u00a3 100. - 70 -\n\nThe general rule at common law regarding delivery of goods is that \nunless a time is agreed upon in the contract, there is an implied term \nthat delivery should take place within a reasonable time. The Mail \nOrder Protection Scheme requires advertisers to state the delivery \nperiod, which should not exceed 28 days, and that in the case of undue \ndelay, the consumer should be notified of this fact and be given the \nright to cancel the contract. Risk of damage or loss of goods should \nusually rest on the seller according to the Mail Order Traders' \nAssociation Code of Practice. Various mechanisms exist for the handling of complaints by consumers \nrelating to distance selling. Formal litigation is possible immediately \nbut the contracts may provide that settlement by arbitration or \notherwise must first be attempted. The Consumer Arbitration Agreements \nAct 1988 provides that an arbitration agreement is enforceable only If \nthe consumer agrees to submit to arbitration after the dispute has \narisen. Usually disputes are adjudicated in the County Courts. Claims \nwith a value of less than \u00a3 1 000 fall within the Jurisdiction of the \nSmall Claims Court, which operates informal procedures. Generally, the industry's codes of practice contain provisions for the \nindependent investigation of complaints of breaches of codes of \npractice. The advertiser will usually be asked to amend, or withdraw \nthe offending advertisement. Formal reprimands may be issued and, \nultimately, a member expelled. - 71 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non the protection of consumers in respect of contracts \n\nnegotiated at a distance (distance selling) \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \n\nCommunity, and in particular Article 100a thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission1, \n\nIn cooperation with the European Parliament2, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee3, \n\n1. Whereas measures must be taken for the gradual establishment of the \n\ninternal market by 31 December 1992; whereas the internal market is to \n\nbe an area without internal frontiers within which the free movement of \n\ngoods, persons, services and capital is assured; \n\n2. Whereas cross-frontier distance selling could be one of the main \n\ntangible results of the completion of the internal market for \n\nconsumers, as noted inter alia in the Communication from the Commission \n\nentitled \"Towards a single market in distribution\"4; \n\n3. Whereas the development of new technologies is multiplying the \n\nmeans available to consumers to have knowledge of the offers being made \n\neverywhere in the Community and for placing orders-, whereas there is a \n\nneed to introduce a minimum set of common rules, before each Member \n\nState takes different or diverging measures to protect consumers, with \n\nnegative repercussions on competition between businesses in the single \n\nmarket; \n\n1 \n2 \n3 \n4 \n\nCOM(91) 41, 11. 3. 1991 \n\n\f- 72 -\n\n4. Whereas paragraphs 18 and 19 of the Annex to the Council Resolution \n\nof 14 April 1975 on a preliminary programme of the European Economic \nCommunity for a consumer protection and information policy5 point to \n\nthe need to protect the purchasers of goods or services against demands \n\nfor payment for unsolicited goods and against high-pressure selling \n\nmethods; \n\n5. Whereas the Communication from the Commission to the Council \n\nentitled \"A new impetus for consumer protection policy\" and approved by \nthe Council Resolution of 23 June 19866 states in paragraph 33 that \n\nthe Commission will present proposals regarding the use of new \n\ninformation technologies enabling consumers to place orders with \n\nsuppliers from their homes; \n\n6. Whereas the Council Resolution of 9 November 1989 on future \npriorities for relaunching consumer protection policy7 calls upon the \n\nCommission to give priority to the areas referred to in the Annex to \n\nthe Resolution; whereas that Annex refers to \"new technologies \n\ninvolving teleshopping\"; whereas the Commission has responded to this \n\nResolution by adopting a three-year action plan for consumer protection \npolicy in the EEC (1990-92)8; and whereas that plan provides for the \n\nadoption of a Directive; \n\n7. Whereas contracts negotiated at a distance involve the use of one \n\nor more means of communication at a distance and whereas the ongoing \n\nevolution of these means of communication does not allow an exhaustive \n\nlist to be compiled but requires the definition of principles valid \n\neven for those that are still little used; whereas it is necessary to \n\nestablish clearly the difference between advertising and solicitation; \n\nwhereas there is solicitation from the time the consumer possesses the \n\nelements necessary to contract; \n\n5 OJ No C 92, 25. 4. 1975, p. 1. 6 OJ No C 167, 5. 7. 1986, p. 1. 7 0J No C 294, 22. 11. 1989, p. 1. 8 COM(90) 98, 3. 5. 1990. - 73 -\n\n8. Whereas the principles set out in Articles 8 and 10 of the European \n\nConvention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms \n\nof 4 November 1950 apply; whereas all matters relating to the \n\ncollection, storage and processing of personal data fall under Council \n\nDirectives No. and No. of \n\n[on the protection of \n\nindividuals in relation to the processing of personal data and the \n\nprotection of privacy]9; whereas the consumer's right to freedom from \n\nintrusion should be recognized and provision made for possible \n\nrestrictions on the use of certain means of communication and in \n\nparticular restrictions deriving from the above Directives; \n\n9. Whereas the consumer's custom is solicited via a variety of means \n\nof communication; whereas such solicitations must be clearly identified \n\nas commercial propositions; whereas this information must comply with \n\nthe \n\nother \n\nrelevant \n\nCommunity \n\nrules, \n\nin \n\nparticular \n\nCouncil \n\nDirective 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation \n\nof the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member \n\nStates concerning misleading advertising10; \n\n10. Whereas the use of such technologies must not lead to a reduction \n\nin the information provided to the consumer; whereas It is therefore \n\nnecessary to determine the information that is required to be sent to \n\nthe consumer whatever the means of communication used; \n\n11. Whereas the promotional technique involving the sending of a \n\nproduct or the provision of a service to the consumer in return for \n\npayment may not be permitted without a prior request from or the \n\nexplicit agreement of the consumer; \n\nWhereas it is necessary to prescribe a time limit for performance if \n\nthis is not specified at the time of ordering; \n\n9 \n10 OJ No L 250, 19. 9. 1984, p. 17. - 74 -\n\n12. Whereas information disseminated by certain electronic technologies \n\noften has an ephemeral character insofar as it is not received on a \n\npermanent medium; whereas the consumer must therefore receive written \n\nnotice of the content of the contract and of all Information necessary \n\nto its proper performance, not later than at the time of the delivery \n\nof the good or the supply of the service; \n\n13. Whereas the consumer is not able to see in concreto the product or \n\nascertain the service provided at the moment when his custom is \n\nsolicited; whereas the consumer should be permitted to cancel the \n\ncontract after receiving the product or service; whereas, if this right \n\nis to be more than formal, the costs borne by the consumer when making \n\nuse of it must be limited to the charges for return; whereas Council \n\nDirective 85/577/EEC of 20 December 1985 to protect the consumer in \nrespect of contracts negotiated away from business premises11 is to be \namended later to ensure harmonization, in particular of the method for \n\ncalculating the period during which the contract may be cancelled; \n\n14. Whereas this Directive should not prejudice the free movement of \n\nradio and television broadcasts, as guaranteed by Articles 59 and 60, \n\nthird paragraph, of the EEC Treaty, nor the application of the rules \n\nof Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination \n\nof certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative \n\naction in Member States, concerning the pursuit of television \nbroadcasting activities12; \n\n15. Whereas non-compliance with this Directive may harm not. only \n\nnumerous consumers but also competitors; whereas there is therefore a \nneed for provisions permitting trade and consumer organizations to \n\nmonitor its application in transborder transactions; whereas to the \n\nextent authorized by the legislation of the Member States concerned, \n\nthese organizations should also be allowed to act in the State from \n\nwhere the conflict originates, \n\n11 0J No L 372, 31. 12. 1985, p. 31. 12 0J No L 298, 17. 10. 1989, p. 23. HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE \n\n- 75 -\n\nArticle 1 \n\nObject \n\nThe object of this Directive is to approximate the laws, regulations \n\nand administrative provisions of the Member States concerning contracts \n\nnegotiated at a distance between consumers and suppliers and the \n\nsoliciting of custom and preparatory acts with a view to such \n\ncontracts. Art icle 2 \n\nDef ini t ions \n\nFor the purposes of this Directive: \n\n\"Contract negotiated at a distance\" means any contract concerning a \n\nproduct or service concluded after solicitation of custom by the \n\nsupplier: \n\nwithout the supplier and the consumer being simultaneously \n\npresent and \n\nusing a means of communication at a distance to convey the \n\ncontract solicitation and the order. This concept does not include arrangements, orders, agreements or \n\nindividual acts of performance within an overall contract, in \n\nparticular a contract to be performed by a series of separate \n\noperations over a period of time. - 76 -\n\n\"Consumer\" means a natural person who, in transactions covered by \n\nthis Directive, is acting for purposes which can be regarded as \n\noutside his trade or profession. \"SUPDIier\" means a natural or legal person who, for the transaction \n\nin question, acts in his commercial or professional capacity, and \n\nanyone acting in the name or on behalf of a supplier. \"Means of communication at a distance\" means any method permitting \n\nthe exchange of the information required for the negotiation and \n\nconclusion of a contract between a consumer and a supplier not in \n\nthe presence of one another; a non-exhaustive list of the means \n\ncovered by this Directive is contained in Annex 1. \"Operator of a means of communication\" means any public or private \n\nnatural or legal person making the various means of communication \n\nat a distance available to suppliers and/or consumers. \"Contract solicitation\" means any communication at a distance \n\nincluding all the necessary elements to enable the recipient to \n\nenter directly into a contractual commitment, simple advertising \n\nbeing excluded. \"Order\" means the expression by the consumer of his intention to \n\nenter into a contractual commitment. - 77 -\n\nArticle 3 \n\nExempt ions \n\nThis Directive shall not apply to: \n\nautomatic vending machines, \n\nautomated commercial premises, \n\n- \n\nmade-to-measure products, \n\nservices with reservation (a list of the services in question \n\nis attached as Annex 2 ), \n\ncontracts for the supply of: \n\nfoodstuffs, beverages or other goods intended for current \n\nconsumption in the household; \n\nservices for current consumption; \n\nArticle 4 \n\nRestrictions on the use of certain means \n\nof communication at a distance \n\nMember States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that means of \n\ncommunication at a distance are used to solicit custom from consumers \n\nonly under conditions of fair competition and with due regard for the \n\nconsumer's privacy, particularly pursuant to Article 17 of Directive. /. /. [concerning the protection of individuals in relation to the \n\nprocessing of personal data and privacy in the context of the public \n\ndigital telecommunications networks]. Article 5 \n\nPresentation \n\n(1) Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that all \n\ncontract solicitations shall be designed and presented in such a \n\nway as to comply with the principles of good faith in commercial \n\ntransactions, and those for the protection of minors. - 78 -\n\n(2) All contract solicitations shall make their commercial purpose \n\nclear. (3) Where the cost of using a means of communication at a distance to \n\nplace the order or perform the service must be borne by the \n\nconsumer, he shall be informed of this fact if it is not evident. Art icle 6 \n\nContent of contract solicitations \n\nAt the time when his custom is solicited, the consumer shall be \n\nprovided with clear and unambiguous information in any way appropriate \n\nto the means of communication, comprising in particular: \n\nthe identity of the supplier; \n\nthe main characteristics of the product or service; \n\nthe price and quantity of any transport charges if not included; \n\nthe payment, delivery and performance arrangements; \n\nthe period for which the solicitation remains valid. Art icle 7 \n\nContract solicitation by television \n\nIn the case of solicitation by television: \n\nthe presentation within the meaning of Article 5 of this Directive \n\nmust exclusively observe the provisions relating to the protection \n\nof minors in Article 22 of Directive 89/552/EEC; \n\nthe supplier must ensure that the information set out in Article 6 \n\nis conveyed in writing no later than the moment when direct contact \n\nis made between the supplier and the consumer. - 79 -\n\nArt icle 8 \n\nInert ia selIing \n\n(1) Member States shall take appropriate steps to ensure that consumers \n\nare not supplied with products or services which they have not \n\nordered beforehand and asked either to purchase them or to return \n\nthem, even at no cost. (2) These steps shall at least include a provision to the effect that \n\nif products or services have been so supplied the consumer shall \n\nhave the right to do as he pleases with them unless there has been \n\nan obvious mistake, in which case he shall merely hold them at the \n\ndisposal of the supplier for a reasonable period and provided \n\ntheir nature so permits. (3) Failure to reply shall not constitute consent. (4) This Article shall not apply to the sending of samples or \n\npromotional gifts provided it is made clear that they are \n\ncompletely free of charge with no obligation for the consumer. Art icle 9 \n\nPerformance \n\nIf no time limit for performance is stipulated in the contract \n\nsolicitation, the order shall be performed not more than thirty days \n\nafter it is received by the supplier. Article 10 \n\nInformation on the content of the contract \n\n(1) Not later than at the time of delivery, the consumer shall receive \n\nthe following information in writing and in the language used in \n\nthe contract solicitation: \n\n\f- 80 -\n\nthe identity of the supplier and the address of one of his \n\nplaces of business; \n\nmain features of the product or service; \n\nprice and quantity; \n\npayment arrangements, including credit terms, or terms for \n\npayment by instalments; \n\nright of withdrawal within the meaning of Article 11; \n\narrangements for exercising this right. Where a contract is open-ended, and in particular if it is to be \n\nperformed by means of repeated operations, the conditions under \n\nwhich it can be terminated must be indicated. (2) Paragraph 1 shall not apply to services supplied directly by \n\ntelematic means, precisely the performance of which is effected by \n\nthe use of means of communication at a distance, when they are \n\nsupplied only on one occasion. Nevertheless, the operator of a \n\ntechnique of communication shall be obliged to indicate to the \n\nconsumer, on demand, the location of the supplier. Article 11 \n\nRight of withdrawal \n\n(1) For any contract negotiated at a distance, the consumer shall have \n\na period of not less than seven days starting from the receipt of \n\nthe product or service in which he may cancel the contract without \n\npenalty. The only costs payable shall be the direct return \n\ncharges, if appropriate. For services, this period shall begin when the consumer receives \n\ndocumentation expressing the explicit agreement of the supplier. - 81 \n\n(2) The consumer must be able to provide a document as evidence of \n\nreturn. (3) Where a product or service is purchased on credit, Member States \n\nshall provide for cancellation of credit agreements concluded with \n\nthe supplier when the right of return is exercised; if the credit \n\nhas not been provided directly by the supplier, Article 11 of \n\nCouncil Directive 87/102/EEC13 on consumer credit shall apply. (4) The present Article shall not apply to: \n\nservices, if an essential part of performance is begun or \n\nshould have begun before the end of the seven day period; \n\ntransactions concerning securities and other products or \n\nservices the price of which is dependent on fluctuations in the \n\nfinancial market which cannot be controlled by the supplier; \n\ncontracts concluded in the form of an authenticated document; \n\nunless otherwise stipulated, to products: \n\nwhich can be immediately reproduced; \n\nfor personal hygiene; \n\nwhich by reason of their nature cannot be returned. Article 12 \n\nPayment by card \n\nIf the owner of a payment card questions the validity of any operation \n\nin which the number of the card has been recorded without presentation \n\nor electronic identification of the means of payment, the operation \n\nshall thereby be cancelled. The supplier's bank account shall then be \n\ndebited and the \n\nowner's account shall be recredited as quickly as \n\npossible, without prejudice to any claim for damages in the event of an \n\noperation's being disputed improperly. 13 OJ No L 42, 12. 2. 1987, p. 48 \n\n\f- 82 -\n\nArticle 13 \n\nJudicial or administrative redress \n\n(1) Member States shall ensure that adequate and effective means exist \n\nto enforce compliance with this Directive in the interests of \n\nconsumers and competitors. (2) To this end, Member States shall make provision, among others, for \n\ntrade and consumer organizations which can, according to their \n\nnational legislation, demonstrate a legitimate interest in the \n\nmatter, to be entitled, if it is recognized by the Member State of \n\nthe conflict, to take legal action and/or bring complaints before a \n\ncompetent administrative body. (3) Member States shall, as necessary, empower the courts and/or \n\nadministrative authorities, in the event of litigation, to require \n\nthe supplier to provide proof, in particular of the content of the \n\nsolicitation, the existence of a prior request, the consumer's \n\nconsent and compliance with time limits. (4) This Directive shall not exclude voluntary supervision of \n\ncompliance with its provisions by self-regulatory bodies and \n\nrecourse to such bodies by the persons or organizations referred to \n\nin paragraph 2, if procedures involving such bodies exist in \n\naddition to the court or administrative procedures referred \n\n\\f> in \n\nthis Art icle. Article 14 \n\nBinding nature \n\nThe consumer may not waive the rights conferred on him by this \n\nDirect ive. - 83 -\n\nArticle 15 \n\nCommunity rules \n\nNothing in this Directive shall preclude the application of provisions \n\nspecific to techniques, products or services under other Community \n\ninstruments. Article 16 \n\nImplementat ion \n\nMember States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and \n\nadministrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not \n\nlater than 31 December 1994. When Member States adopt these measures, these shall contain a \n\nreference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference \n\non the occasion of their official publication. The procedure for such \n\nreference shall be laid down by Member States. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the \n\nprovisions of national law which they adopt in the field governed by \n\nthis Direct ive. Article 17 \n\nThis Directive is addressed to the Member States \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f- 84 -\n\nANNEX 1 \n\nExamples of means of communication at a distance covered by this \n\nDirect ive: \n\nunaddressed printed matter \n\naddressed printed matter \n\nstandard letter \n\npress advertising with order form \n\ncatalogue \n\ntelephone with human intervention \n\ntelephone without human intervention (automatic calling machine, \n\naudiotext) \n\nradio \n\nvideophone (telephone with screen) \n\nvideotex (microcomputer and television screen, with keyboard or \n\ntouch screen) \n\nelectronic ma iI \n\nfax (facsimile machine) \n\ntelevision (teleshopping) \n\n\f- 85 -\n\nANNEX 2 \n\nServices with reservation within the meaning of Article 3 \n\ntransport; \n\naccommodat ion; \n\ncater ing-, \n\nentertainment. - 86 \n\n-\n\nIMPACT ASSFFfMEwr TTBM \n\nTHE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL ON BUSINESS \n\nwith special reference to small and medium-sized \n\nenterprises (SMEs) \n\nTitle of proposal: Protection of consumers In respect of contracts \n\nnegotiated at a distance (distance selling) \n\nReference number: \n\nSPC/171/91 Rev. 4 \n\nThe proposal \n\n1. Taking account of the principle of subsidiarity, why is Community \n\nlegislation necessary in this area and what are its main alms? \n\nTraditional mail-order selling involves the use of a catalogue to \n\npresent the products and a letter to order them. The proliferation \n\nof new technologies (telephone, television, computer) has \n\ncompletely transformed this activity, which will in future \n\nincreasingly be conducted on a cross-frontier basis. It is \n\nnecessary to establish a minimum Community base before each Member \n\nState adopts its own legislation, which might hinder the \n\nfunctioning of the internal market. The Communication \"Towards a single market in distribution has \n\nalready stated (p. 17): \n\n\"Because of the multinational character of the market the principle \n\nof subsidiarity may lead to the conclusion that if some sort of \n\nregulatory framework is needed, then it should from the outset be \n\nat Community level. \" \n\n\f- 87 -\n\nIn this communication , the Commission advocates the development of \n\nself-regulatory systems provided they are accepted by all parties \n\nconcerned. Consequently, the proposal \n\nfor \n\na directive \n\nis \n\naccompanied by a Recommendation which is specifically aimed at \n\nestablishing codes of practice. The main aims are to ensure legal safeguards for the consumer and \n\nhis right of choice in contracts negotiated at a distance. The impact on business \n\n2. Who will be affected by the proposal? \n\nFirms which market products and services using means of \n\ncommunication at a distance and the operators of such means of \n\ncommun i cat ion. Traditional mail-order selling is carried out by a fairly limited \n\nnumber of firms. New technologies could give rise to the creation \n\nof new firms specialised \n\nin certain of these \n\ntechniques \n\n(television, Minitel) or enable small producers to market their \n\nproducts directly (particularly by home delivery). 3. What will businesses have to do to comply with the proposal? \n\nSix Member States already have general laws covering all forms of \n\ndistance selling (Portugal, Greece, Denmark, Belgium, Luxembourg \n\nand France). In the other Member States, there are provisions giving partial \n\ncoverage. The provisions of the present text mirror provisions contained in \n\nnational laws. In certain Member States, some of these provisions \n\nor similar provisions are found in the codes of conduct of trade \n\nassociations. These codes apply only to the members of the \n\nassociat ions. - 88 -\n\nThe directive fixes certain minimum conditions regarding the \n\npresentation, the content of a solicitation and the written \n\ninformation on the contract which must follow. The directive fixes \n\nthe period for delivery at 30 days, unless otherwise agreed, and \n\nprovides for a period of at least 7 days within which the right of \n\nwithdrawal may be exercised. The directive also provides that \n\nprofessional and consumer organisations will, if it is allowed by \n\nthe Member State of the conflict be able to take legal action to \n\nensure the correct implementation of the directive, and that the \n\nreversal of the burden of proof will be possible in appropriate \n\ncases. 4. What economic effects is the proposal likely to have? \n\n- on employment \n\n- on investment and creation of new businesses \n\n- on the competitive position of businesses \n\nThe text establishes Community rules which will have particular \n\neffects on the use of new technologies in distance selling. This \n\nmay lead to these techniques being used more often by consumers in \n\nthe internal market and consequently may have the effect of \n\nincreasing employment and investment in these activities. The \n\ntransborder \n\npossibilities \n\nmay \n\nlead \n\nto \n\nan \n\nintensified \n\ncompetitiveness in retail business. 5. Does the proposal contain measures to take account of the specific \n\nsituation of small and medium-sized firms (reduced or different \n\nrequirements etc. )? \n\nThere is no differentiation according to the size of the business. However, some activities which are excluded from the scope of the \n\ndirectives' application, particularly the supply of day-to-day \n\nhousehold goods and services, are usually engaged in by small \n\nbusinesses. - 89 -\n\nConsultation \n\n6. List the organisations which were consulted about the proposal and \n\noutline their main views. In April 1991 a discussion document was drawn up under the title \n\n\"Discussion paper for a Directive on distance selling\". This text \n\nwas disseminated by two channels : \n\nto the trade, via the Committee on Commerce and Distribution, a \n\nconsultative body which advises DG XXIII; \n\nto consumers, via the Consumers' Consultative Council, which \n\nadvises the Consumer Policy Service. In the light of all the comments received, a preliminary draft \n\nproposal was drawn up in July 1991. This text was disseminated \n\nthrough the same channels. In its opinion of 13 September 1991 on the discussion paper, the \n\nCommittee of Commerce and Distribution argued that the text should \n\nbe either a recommendation or a : \n\n\"(limited) framework Directive leaving sufficient room for traders \n\nand their professional associations to work out self-regulatory \n\nprovisions\". The CCD in it's opinion of 16 January 1992 based on the draft \n\nproposal for a directive of July 1991, criticised several articles \n\nand stated clearly that : \n\n\" \n\nthe CCD \n\nis not \n\nconvinced \n\nabout \n\nthe need \n\nfor \n\nsuch an \n\nail \n\nembracing \n\ndirective. and \n\nrejects \n\nthe \n\nCommission's \n\narguments\". 90 -\n\nSeveral professional associations, including CECD/FEWITA/GEDIS, \n\nEurochambres, European Association of Mail order and the Liaison \n\nCommittee of Retail Trade Associations expressed themselves as not \n\nbeing in favour of the proposed directive, based on the texts \n\npresented during the second half of 1991. This was also the \n\nopinion of the other professional associations in the trade sector \n\nand of individual trade firms, particularly those In distance \n\nselling, who maintained that the provisions of the text should \n\nsimply be contained in codes of practice. The SPC received about 50 opinions on the two documents (Discussion \n\nDocument and Draft Directive, 1991 versions). These opinions came \n\nfrom consumer associations, professional associations other than \n\nthose involved in distance selling, different operators of means of \n\ncommunication (televisions, newspapers, etc. ), the banks and firms \n\nin the tourism sector. The large majority of those opinions recognised the necessity of \n\ncommunity action in the matter of contracts negotiated at a \n\ndistance and were not totally opposed to the draft directive. The \n\nprinciple criticism rested on the financial safeguard systems \n\n(guarantee funds), a subject which is now dealt with by the \n\nrecommendat ion. Taking account of the discussions and comments, following the \n\ndistribution of the first draft of July 1991, the Commission also \n\npresents the text of a recommendation, which is intended to promote \n\ncodes of practice in the matter of distance selling and indicate \n\nthe points which can be dealt with by these codes. ISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 11 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\nio \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-238-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44593-9 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n1^2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a9e48bce-ca46-4182-aa7e-1ff9c78f0e30", "title": "Information from the Commission - Community guidelines on State aid for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_legislative_other_oj_c,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-20", "subjects": "EU aid,distribution of aid,economic development,job creation,small and medium-sized enterprises,terms for aid", "workIds": "celex:31992Y0819(01),oj:JOC_1992_213_R_0002_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "distribution of aid", "economic development", "job creation", "small and medium-sized enterprises", "terms for aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a9e48bce-ca46-4182-aa7e-1ff9c78f0e30", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5905f21a-e625-460c-8f66-be51755c80eb", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 2200/90 by imposing an additional anti-dumping duty on imports of silicon metal originating in the People' s Republic of China", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-20", "subjects": "China,anti-dumping duty,dumping,semi-metal", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0200,comnat:COM_1992_0200_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["China", "anti-dumping duty", "dumping", "semi-metal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5905f21a-e625-460c-8f66-be51755c80eb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 200 final \n\nBrussels, 20 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 2200/90 by imposing an additiona \n\nanti-dumping duty on imports of silicon metal originating in \n\nthe People's Republic of China \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. By Council Regulation (EEC) No 2200/90, an anti-dumping duty of \n\nECU 198 per tonne was imposed on imports of silicon metal originating in \n\nthe People's Republic of China. 2. Subsequently, the Commission received a complaint lodged by the Liaison \n\nCommittee of Ferroalloy Industries in the European Community. Since this \n\ncomplaint contained sufficient evidence that the duty had been borne by \n\nthe exporter, the Commission announced the \n\ninitiation of an \n\ninvestigation, provided for in Article 13(11) of Regulation (EEC) \n\nNo 2423/88, in a notice published in the Official Journal of the \n\nEuropean Communities on 18 October 1991. 3. In the absence of satisfactory cooperation from both exporters and \n\nCommunity importers, the Commission was obliged to reach its findings on \n\nthe basis of the facts available. In this case, customs statistics were \n\nconsidered to be the fairest source of facts and the prices revealed by \n\nthe relevant statistics were corroborated by the information obtained \n\nfrom those Community \n\nimporters who cooperated \n\nand \n\nfrom the \n\nrepresentative of user industries. 4. It would appear that, by reducing their prices for export to the \n\nCommunity after imposition of an anti-dumping duty, exporters of silicon \n\nmetal originating in the People's Republic of China have borne the \n\nanti-dumping duty. 5. The amount of absorption of duty was calculated on the basis of the \n\ndifference between the import price of silicon metal originating in the \n\nPeople's Republic of China during the period of the original \n\ninvestigation and the import price during the period following \n\nimposition of the anti-dumping duty. This came to a figure of 178%. 6. Given that the imposition of this duty had been considered to be in the \n\nCommunity's interest, it follows that a measure aimed at restoring the \n\neffect of the duty concerned is in the Community's interest. - 3 -\n\n7. In this case, since the decrease in the import price as a percentage of \n\nthe amount of the ant i-dumping duty had been calculated at 178%, the \n\nanti-dumping duty has been borne completely. An additional anti-dumping \n\nduty of an amount equal to the existing duty (ECU 198 per tonne) must \n\ntherefore be imposed. 8. It is therefore proposed that the Council amend Regulation (EEC) No \n\n2200/90 and impose a duty of ECU 396 per tonne on imports of silicon \n\nmetal originating in the People's Republic of China. - 4 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\namending Regulation (EEC) No 2200/90 by imposing an additional \n\nanti-dumping duty on imports of silicon metal originating in \n\nthe People's Republic of China \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on \n\nprotection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members \n\nof the European Economic Community1, and in particular Articles 12 and \n\n13(11) thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after \n\nconsultation within the Advisory Committee as provided for under the \n\nabovementioned Regulation, \n\nWhereas: \n\nA. PROCEDURE \n\n1. By Council Regulation (EEC) No 2200/902, a definitive anti-dumping \n\nduty of ECU 198 per tonne was imposed on imports of silicon metal \n\noriginating in the People's Republic of China. 2. The Commission received a complaint lodged by the Liaison Committee \n\nof Ferroalloy Industries in the European Community on behalf of all \n\nCommunity producers of silicon metal alleging that all or part of \n\nthe anti-dumping duty had been borne by the exporters concerned. 1 OJ No L 209, 2. 8. 1988, p. 1. 2 OJ No L 198, 28. 7. 1990, p. 57. - 5 -\n\n3. Since the complaint contained sufficient evidence of absorption of \n\nanti-dumping duty by an exporter, the Commission announced the \n\ninitiation of an investigation provided for in Article 13(11) of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 2423/88, in a notice published in the Official \n\nJournal of the European Communities^. 4. The Commission officially advised the exporters and importers known \n\nto be concerned and gave the parties concerned the opportunity to \n\nmake their views known in writing. 5. None of the exporters and only three of the importers concerned, \n\naccounting for a fraction of the total imports, made their views \n\nknown in wr i t ing. 6. Only one organization representing user industries made comments. 7. None of the interested parties requested the Commission to review \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 2200/90. Moreover, on the basis of the \n\ninformation available, the Commission did not find that changed \n\ncircumstances justified the need for such a review on the \n\nCommission's initiative. 8. The investigation into absorption of the anti-dumping duty by the \n\nexporters was concerned with the comparison between the period \n\n1 January 1988 to 31 December 1988, which had been taken into \n\naccount for calculation of the anti-dumping duty, and the period \n\nstarting from imposition of a provisional anti-dumping duty until \n\npublication of the notice of initiation of an investigation, i. e. from 1 April 1990 to 30 September 1991. 3 0J No C 273, 18. 10. 1991, p. 20 \n\n\f- 6 -\n\nB. PRODUCT \n\n9. The product under consideration is silicon metal falling within \n\nCN code 2804 69 00, as in the original procedure. C. ABSORPTION OF THE ANT I-DUMPING DUTY BY THE EXPORTER \n\nI. Existence of absorption of duty \n\n10. In the absence of satisfactory cooperation from either exporters or \n\nCommunity importers, the Commission based its findings on the facts \n\navailable in accordance with Article 7(7)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No \n\n2423/88. II. A valid assessment of the import price of a raw material, such as \n\nthe product concerned, can generally be made on the basis of \n\ncustoms statistics. In this case, moreover, the prices revealed by \n\nthe statistics were corroborated by the information obtained from \n\nthose Community \n\nimporters \n\nwho \n\ncooperated \n\nand \n\nfrom \n\nthe \n\nrepresentative of user industries. 12. That information shows clearly that, following the imposition of a \n\nprovisional anti-dumping duty on silicon metal originating in the \n\nPeople's Republic of China \n\nby \n\nCommission \n\nRegulation (EEC) \n\nNo 720/904, the import price at Community borders (the cif price \n\nbefore payment of customs duties and anti-dumping duty) of silicon \n\nmetal originating in the People's Republic of China fell \n\nconsiderably. 4 OJ No L 80, 27. 3. 1990, p. 9. - 7 -\n\n13. In these circumstances, it would appear that, by reducing their \n\nprices for export to the Community after imposition of an \n\nanti-dumping duty, the exporters of silicon metal originating in \n\nthe People's Republic of China have borne the anti-dumping duty \n\neither completely or partially. 11. Amount of absorption of duty \n\n14. The amount of absorption of duty is calculated on the basis of the \n\ndifference between the import price of silicon metal originating in \n\nthe People's Republic of China during the period 1 January 1988 to \n\n31 December 1988, the period of the initial investigation, and the \n\nimport price during the period following imposition of a \n\nprovisional anti-dumping duty, from 1 April 1990 to 30 September \n\n1991. 15. Expressed as a percentage of the amount of duty, the amount of \n\nabsorption as defined above came to an average monthly figure of \n\n178% for the period from 1 April 1990 to 30 September 1991. In view of the extent of absorption, the effect of a possible \n\nvariation in the cif costs (cost, insurance, freight) need not be \n\ntaken into account. D. OTHER FACTORS \n\n16. The Commission has examined two additional factors which might have \n\nhad a bearing on the evolution of the export price of silicon metal \n\noriginating in the People's Republic of China. - 8 -\n\n17. Firstly, the organization representing user industries alleged that \n\nthe quality of the product concerned justified a price lower than \n\nthat of the same product originating in other countries. Since this \n\ndoes not constitute a new fact in relation to the situation at the \n\ntime of the original investigation, the alleged difference in \n\nquality cannot justify the considerable decrease in the export \n\nprice of silicon metal originating in the People's Republic of \n\nChina following the imposition of an anti-dumping duty. In \n\naddition, it has been established that the difference between the \n\nexport price to the Community of silicon metal originating in the \n\nPeople's Republic of China and of the same metal originating in \n\nother countries increased during the investigation period. 18. Secondly, the organization representing user industries suggested \n\nthat the decrease in the import price of silicon metal originating \n\nin the People's Republic of China could be linked to an overall \n\ntrend in the market for imports of the product concerned into the \n\nCommunity. However, examination of the customs statistics clearly \n\nreveals a considerable fall \n\nin the price of silicon metal \n\noriginating in the People's Republic of China while the import \n\nprice of the metal from other countries remained stable over the \n\nsame period. E. COMMUNITY INTEREST \n\n19. The purpose of the additional anti-dumping duty provided for in \n\nArticle 13(11) of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 is to compensate for \n\nthe amount of the anti-dumping duty borne by the exporter. 20. The Commission has no reason to believe that the findings \n\nconcerning Community interest expressed in recitals 18 to 21 of \n\nRegulation (EEC) No 2200/90 need to be amended. - 9 -\n\n21. Moreover, given, firstly, that the absorption of an anti-dumping \n\nduty by the exporter cancels out the effect of the anti-dumping \n\nduty and therefore prevents the removal of the injury suffered by \n\nthe Community industry, and, secondly, that the imposition of this \n\nduty had been considered to be in the Community's interest, a \n\nmeasure aimed at restoring the effect of the said duty is therefore \n\nin the Community's interest. F. ADDITIONAL ANT I-DUMPING DUTY \n\n22. Article I3(11)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 limits the \n\nadditional amount to strict compensation for the amount of \n\nanti-dumping duty borne by the exporter which cannot, logically, be \n\ngreater than the amount of the anti-dumping duty concerned. 23. In this case, since the decrease in the import price as a \n\npercentage of the amount of anti-dumping duty has been calculated \n\nat 178%, the ant i-dumping duty has been borne completely. An \n\nadditional anti-dumping duty of an amount equal to the existing \n\nduty (ECU 198 per tonne) must therefore be imposed. 24. Since the anti-dumping duty currently in force is fixed at ECU 198 \n\nper tonne, an additional duty for the same amount must be imposed. For practical reasons, the imposition of this additional duty takes \n\nthe form of an amendment to Regulation (EEC) No 2200/90. This does \n\nnot constitute a modification of the anti-dumping duty within the \n\nmeaning of Article 15(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 and, \n\ntherefore, the expiry date of the anti-dumping duty, including the \n\nadditional duty, remains unchanged. The total amount of the \n\nanti-dumping duty imposed on imports of silicon metal originating \n\nin the People's Republic of China must, therefore, be ECU 396 per \n\ntonne, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\n\f- 10 -\n\nArticle 1 \n\nArticle 1(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2200/90 is hereby replaced by the \n\nfollowing: \n\n\"2. The duty shall be ECU 396 per tonne of the imported product. \" \n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its \n\npublication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in \n\na I I Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f- 11 -\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 200 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\nil 02 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-214-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44042-2 \n\nOffice for Officiai Publications of the Euxopean Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/48bd73a9-17b2-4a24-bdab-9489877c5d98", "title": "92/292/EEC: Commission Decision of 19 May 1992 on specific financial contributions from the Community for the eradication of avian plague in the United Kingdom (Only the English text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-19", "subjects": "EU financing,United Kingdom,animal plague,decontamination,poultry,slaughter of animals", "workIds": "celex:31992D0292,oj:JOL_1992_152_R_0041_044", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "United Kingdom", "animal plague", "decontamination", "poultry", "slaughter of animals"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/48bd73a9-17b2-4a24-bdab-9489877c5d98", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/84177f8b-7588-438c-9264-93fe927bddfc", "title": "Agriculture in Europe : Development, constraints and perspectives.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-19", "subjects": "EAGGF,EU Member State,GATT,agricultural situation,common agricultural policy", "workIds": "PUB_CM6090418", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF", "EU Member State", "GATT", "agricultural situation", "common agricultural policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/84177f8b-7588-438c-9264-93fe927bddfc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/671295f8-a5bf-44d1-a850-518c8a83b558", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1270/92 of 19 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1609/88 as regards the latest date by which butter must have been taken into storage in order to be sold under Regulations (EEC) No 3143/85 and (EEC) No 570/88", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-19", "subjects": "discount sale,storage", "workIds": "celex:31992R1270,oj:JOL_1992_137_R_0006_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["discount sale", "storage"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/671295f8-a5bf-44d1-a850-518c8a83b558", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5ebac1f-115c-420f-a85c-0abf66ba9618", "title": "Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-19", "subjects": "EU financing,animal disease,health control,poultry farming,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:31992L0040,oj:JOL_1992_167_R_0001_006", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "animal disease", "health control", "poultry farming", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5ebac1f-115c-420f-a85c-0abf66ba9618", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c21d5cef-3b30-496f-b8c7-43e5e2f62117", "title": "Facts through figures : A statistical portrait of the EFTA in the European Economic Area.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission,Eurostat", "date": "1992-05-19", "subjects": "EFTA,economic statistics,education,employment statistics,population statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA7391473", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA", "economic statistics", "education", "employment statistics", "population statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c21d5cef-3b30-496f-b8c7-43e5e2f62117", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/126bfac7-bfb8-4711-9538-27ffa403b2fa", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1271/92 of 19 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 as regards the product nomenclature for export refunds on pig meat", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-19", "subjects": "agricultural product nomenclature,pigmeat", "workIds": "celex:31992R1271,oj:JOL_1992_137_R_0007_018", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural product nomenclature", "pigmeat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/126bfac7-bfb8-4711-9538-27ffa403b2fa", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a696e5e-2d36-47fd-9a3f-df946e606a61", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1269/92 of 19 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2315/76 on the sale of butter from public storage", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-19", "subjects": "butter,public stock,sale", "workIds": "celex:31992R1269,oj:JOL_1992_137_R_0005_016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["butter", "public stock", "sale"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a696e5e-2d36-47fd-9a3f-df946e606a61", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0fe9a485-e121-4606-b397-74c618d6a52e", "title": "Documents 1991.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Publications Office of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-19", "subjects": "EC opinion,EU act,catalogue,proposal (EU),regulation (EU)", "workIds": "PUB_JY7392554", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC opinion", "EU act", "catalogue", "proposal (EU)", "regulation (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0fe9a485-e121-4606-b397-74c618d6a52e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0c28cc5e-6e0a-4802-8bcf-441d3909f48d", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1334/92 of 18 May 1992 fixing the guideline figure for the 1992/93 milk year for the fat content of standardised whole milk imported into Ireland and the United Kingdom", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "Ireland,United Kingdom,marketing standard,milk fat,whole milk", "workIds": "celex:31992R1334,oj:JOL_1992_145_R_0005_045", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ireland", "United Kingdom", "marketing standard", "milk fat", "whole milk"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0c28cc5e-6e0a-4802-8bcf-441d3909f48d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63771998-6ace-46c6-bdb2-e64018db0a38", "title": "92/265/EEC: Commission Decision of 18 May 1992 concerning the importation into the Community of live pigs, porcine semen, fresh pigmeat and pigmeat products from Austria and repealing Decision 90/90/EEC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "Austria,fresh meat,import restriction,pigmeat,swine", "workIds": "celex:31992D0265,oj:JOL_1992_137_R_0023_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Austria", "fresh meat", "import restriction", "pigmeat", "swine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63771998-6ace-46c6-bdb2-e64018db0a38", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+null
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34330991-0af6-449d-a463-ea43b729e1d7", "title": "Conclusions of the Ministers of Culture meeting within the Council of 18 May 1992 concerning the choice of European Cities of Culture after 1996 and the European Cultural Month", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_other_oj_l,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "cultural cooperation,cultural event,cultural heritage,public awareness campaign", "workIds": "celex:41992X0616,oj:JOC_1992_151_R_0001_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cultural cooperation", "cultural event", "cultural heritage", "public awareness campaign"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34330991-0af6-449d-a463-ea43b729e1d7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/745261e7-aebf-4ca4-b806-e4cd0af91a07", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1265/92 of 18 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 898/92 laying down detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fresh, chilled or frozen beef provided for in the interim Association Agreements between the Community and the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Hungary and the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "CCT duties,Czechoslovakia,Hungary,Poland,import levy", "workIds": "celex:31992R1265,oj:JOL_1992_135_R_0006_012", "eurovoc_concepts": ["CCT duties", "Czechoslovakia", "Hungary", "Poland", "import levy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/745261e7-aebf-4ca4-b806-e4cd0af91a07", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b01f38cf-0497-4417-9b3f-747399acba11", "title": "92/278/EEC: Council Decision of 18 May 1992 confirming the consolidation of the EC-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "fmx4,html,pdfa1b,print,xhtml", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "EU relations,Japan,industrial cooperation,management training,research body,soft energy", "workIds": "celex:31992D0278,oj:JOL_1992_144_R_0019_019", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU relations", "Japan", "industrial cooperation", "management training", "research body", "soft energy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b01f38cf-0497-4417-9b3f-747399acba11", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["fmx4", "html", "pdfa1b", "print", "xhtml"], "text": "L_1992144EN. 01001901. xml\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n26. 5. 1992\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\nEN\n\n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities\n\n\nL 144/19\n\n\n\n\n\nCOUNCIL DECISION\nof 18 May 1992\nconfirming the consolidation of the EC-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation\n(92/278/EEC)\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 235 thereof,\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission\u00a0(1),\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament\u00a0(2),\nWhereas the EC-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation was founded in 1986 with a view to contributing to industrial cooperation between the Community and Japan;\nWhereas the Council in its conclusions of March 1987 noted with interest the launching of the Centre's pilot phase and welcomed industry's contribution towards its implementation;\nWhereas the Council on 26 November 1990 approved the conclusions of the Commission's communication on industrial policy in an open and competitive environment;\nWhereas the Commission was called on to continue its industrial policy work also bearing in mind:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe evolution of the economic situation and of the strategies of the major non-EEC industrialized countries and of the newly-industrialized countries,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe need for an appropriate use of the instruments available to the Community in order to strengthen the technological capabilities and the competitiveness of the European industrial system;\n\n\n\n\nWhereas the work of the EC-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation contributes to the Community's work in the field of industrial policy;\nWhereas the Centre is co-financed by the general budget of the European Communities, MITI and contributions from industry of both Parties;\nWhereas the Centre, so far run as a pilot project, has proved successful by providing mainly management training programmes for a growing number of business managers of Community undertakings, as well as information on the Japanese business environment;\nWhereas the Centre's supervisory board has concluded that the Centre's activities are promising, meriting strong backing by both major sponsors, the Commission and MITI, and that it should be consolidated;\nWhereas, therefore, this proposed consolidation should be confirmed and the Centre should be established as an EC-Japan common venture;\nWhereas the Treaty does not provide, for the adoption of this Decision, powers other than those of Article 235,\nHAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:\nArticle 1\nThe consolidation of the EC-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation and its establishment as a common venture between the Community and Japan are hereby confirmed on behalf of the European Economic Community. Article 2\nThe goal of the EC-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation is to contribute to industrial cooperation between the Community and Japan, notably by organizing management training programmes for European business executives, providing information on the Japanese business environment and opportunities, and offering programmes for European alternative-energy specialists. Article 3\nThe EC-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation is located in Tokyo, Japan. Article 4\nThe Centre is jointly financed by the Government of Japan, the Community and private sponsors. Article 5\nThis Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication. Done at Brussels, 18 May 1992. For the Council\n\n\nThe President\n\nArlindo MARQUES CUNHA\n\n\n\n\n(1)\u00a0\u00a0OJ No C 173, 4. 7. 1991, p. 4. (2)\u00a0\u00a0OJ No C 94, 3. 4. 1992"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ba6d6d1e-2fbf-47db-a263-8841a84734c6", "title": "92/529/EEC: Convention on the accession of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic to the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "fmx4,html,pdfa1b,print,xhtml", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "Intergovernmental Convention (EU),Portugal,Spain,consolidation of EU law,contract", "workIds": "celex:41992A0529,oj:JOL_1992_333_R_0001_004", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Intergovernmental Convention (EU)", "Portugal", "Spain", "consolidation of EU law", "contract"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ba6d6d1e-2fbf-47db-a263-8841a84734c6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["fmx4", "html", "pdfa1b", "print", "xhtml"], "text": "L_1992333EN. 01000101. xml\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n18. 11. 1992\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\nEN XM ES ES ES XM PT PT PT\n\n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities\n\n\nL 333/1\n\n\n\n\n\nCONVENTION\non the accession of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic to the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980\n(92/529/EEC)\nTHE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY,\nCONSIDERING that the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic, in becoming Members of the Community, undertook to accede to the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980,\nHIS MAJESTY THE KING OF THE BELGIANS:\nMelchior WATHELET,\nDeputy Prime Minister, Minister for Justice and Economic Affairs\nHER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF DENMARK:\nMichael BENDIK,\nMinister for Justice\nTHE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY:\nWolfgang HEYDE,\nMinisterial Director in the Federal Ministry for Justice\nTHE PRESIDENT OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC:\nMichalis PAPACONSTANTINOU,\nMinister for Justice\nHIS MAJESTY THE KING OF SPAIN:\nTom\u00e1s DE LA QUADRA-SALCEDO Y FERN\u00c1NDEZ DEL CASTILLO,\nMinister for Justice\nTHE PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC:\nMichel VAUZELLE,\nKeeper of the Seals, Minister for Justice\nTHE PRESIDENT OF IRELAND:\nP\u00e1draig FLYNN,\nMinister for Justice\nTHE PRESIDENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC:\nGiovanni BATTISTINI,\nAmbassador in Lisbon\nHIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE GRAND DUKE OF LUXEMBOURG:\nCharles ELSEN,\nFirst Councillor of the Government\nHER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE NETHERLANDS:\nE. M. H. HIRSCH BALLIN,\nMinister, for Justice\nTHE PRESIDENT OF THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC:\n\u00c1lvaro Jos\u00e9 BRILHANTE LABORINHO L\u00daCIO,\nMinister for Justice\nHER MAJESTY THE QUEEN OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND:\nJohn Mark TAYLOR,\nParliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Lord Chancellor's Department\nHAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:\nArticle 1\nThe Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic hereby accede to the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980. Article 2\nThe Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations is hereby amended as follows:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. Article 22 (2), Article 27 and the second sentence of Article 30 (3) shall be deleted;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. the following shall be substituted for Article 31 (d):\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2018(d)\n\n\ncommunications made in pursuance of Articles 23, 24, 25, 26 and 30\u2019. Article 3\nThe Secretary-General of the Council of the European Communities shall transmit a certified copy of the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Irish and Italian languages to the Governments of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic. The text of the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations in the Portuguese and Spanish languages is set out in Annexes I and II to this Convention. The texts drawn up in the Portuguese and Spanish languages shall be authentic under the same conditions as the other texts of the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations. Article 4\nThis Convention shall be ratified by the Signatory States. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Communities. Article 5\nThis Convention shall enter into force, as between the States which have ratified it, on the first day of the third month following the deposit of the last instrument of ratification by the Kingdom of Spain or the Portuguese Republic and by one State which has ratified the Convention on the Law applicable to Contractual Obligations. This Convention shall enter into force for each Contracting State which subsequently ratifies it on the first day of the third month following the deposit of its instrument of ratification. Article 6\nThe Secretary-General of the Council of the European Communities shall notify the signatory States of:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nthe deposit of each instrument of ratification\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nthe dates of entry into force of this Convention for the Contracting States. Article 7\nThis Convention, drawn up in a single original in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Irish, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish languages, all texts being equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Communities. The Secretary-General shall transmit a certified copy to the Government of each Signatory State. En fe de lo cual, los plenipotenciarios abajo firmantes suscriben el presente Convenio. Til bekr\u00e6ftelse heraf har undertegnede befuldm\u00e6gtigede underskrevet denne konvention. Zu Urkund dessen haben die unterzeichneten Bevollm\u00e4chtigten ihre Unterschriften unter dieses \u00dcbereinkommen gesetzt. \u0395\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03c4\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u03c4\u03c9\u03bd \u03b1\u03bd\u03c9\u03c4\u03ad\u03c1\u03c9, \u03bf\u03b9 \u03c5\u03c0\u03bf\u03b3\u03b5\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03bc\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 \u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u03b5\u03be\u03bf\u03cd\u03c3\u03b9\u03bf\u03b9 \u03ad\u03b8\u03b5\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd \u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c5\u03c0\u03bf\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03c6\u03ad\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03cc\u03bd \u03c0\u03c1\u03c9\u03c4\u03cc\u03ba\u03bf\u03bb\u03bb\u03bf. In witness whereof the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Convention. En foi de quoi, les pl\u00e9nipotentiaires soussign\u00e9s ont appos\u00e9 leurs signatures au bas de la pr\u00e9sente convention. D\u00e1 fhian\u00fa sin, chuir na L\u00e1nchumhachtaigh th\u00edos-s\u00ednithe a l\u00e1mh leis an gCoinbhinsi\u00fan seo. In fede di che, i plenipotenziari sottoscritti hanno apposto le loro firme in calce alla presente convenzione. Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekende gevolmachtigden hun handtekening onder dit Verdrag hebben gesteld. Em f\u00e9 do que, os plenipotenci\u00e1rios abaixo assinados apuseram as suas assinaturas no final da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o. Hecho en Funchal, el dieciocho de mayo de mil novecientos noventa y dos. Udf\u00e6rdiget i Funchal, den attende maj nitten hundrede og tooghalvfems. Geschehen zu Funchal am achtzehnten Mai neunzehnhundertzweiundneunzig. \u0388\u03b3\u03b9\u03bd\u03b5 \u03c3\u03c4\u03bf \u03a6\u03bf\u03cd\u03bd\u03c3\u03b1\u03bb, \u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03b4\u03ad\u03ba\u03b1 \u03bf\u03ba\u03c4\u03ce \u039c\u03b1\u0390\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c7\u03af\u03bb\u03b9\u03b1 \u03b5\u03bd\u03bd\u03b9\u03b1\u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03b5\u03bd\u03b5\u03bd\u03ae\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1 \u03b4\u03cd\u03bf. Done at Funchal on the eighteenth day of May in the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-two. Fait \u00e0 Funchal, le dix-huit mai mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-douze. Arna dh\u00e9anamh i Funchal, an t-ocht\u00fa l\u00e1 d\u00e9ag de Bhealtaine, m\u00edle naoi gc\u00e9ad n\u00f3cha d\u00f3. Fatto a Funchal, add\u00ec diciotto maggio millenovecentonovantadue. Gedaan te Funchal, de achttiende mei negentienhonderd twee\u00ebnnegentig. Feito em Funchal, em dezoito de Maio de mil novecentos e noventa e dois. Pour Sa Majest\u00e9 le Roi des Belges\nVoor Zijne Majesteit de Koning der Belgen\n\n\n\n\n\nFor Hendes Majest\u00e6t Danmarks Dronning\n\n\n\n\n\nF\u00fcr den Pr\u00e4sidenten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland\n\n\n\n\n\n\u0393\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03bf\u03bd \u03a0\u03c1\u03cc\u03b5\u03b4\u03c1\u03bf \u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae\u03c2 \u0394\u03b7\u03bc\u03bf\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u03b1\u03c2\n\n\n\n\n\nPor Su Majestad el Rey de Espa\u00f1a\n\n\n\n\n\nPour le pr\u00e9sident de la R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise\n\n\n\n\n\nThar ceann Uachtar\u00e1n na h\u00c9ireann\nFor the President of Ireland\n\n\n\n\n\nPer il presidente della Repubblica italiana\n\n\n\n\n\nPour Son Altesse Royale le Grand-Duc de Luxembourg\n\n\n\n\n\nVoor Hare Majesteit de Koningin der Nederlanden\n\n\n\n\n\nPelo Presidente da Rep\u00fablica Portuguesa\n\n\n\n\n\nFor Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nANEXO I / BILAG I / ANHANG I / \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a1\u03a4\u0397\u039c\u0391 I / ANNEX I / ANNEXE I / IARSCR\u00cdBHINN I / ALLEGATO I / BIJLAGE I / ANEXO I\n\u00a0\n\nCONVENIO\nSobre la ley aplicable a las obligaciones contractuales abierto a la firma en Roma el 19 de junio de 1980\n\nPRE\u00c1MBULO\n\nLAS ALTAS PARTES CONTRATANTES DEL TRATADO CONSTITUTIVO DE LA COMUNIDAD ECON\u00d3MICA EUROPEA,\nPREOCUPADAS por proseguir, en el \u00e1mbito del Derecho internacional privado, la obra de unificaci\u00f3n jur\u00eddica ya emprendida en la Comunidad, especialmente en materia de competencia judicial y de ejecuci\u00f3n de resoluciones judiciales,\nDESEANDO establecer unas normas uniformes relativas a la ley aplicable a las obligaciones contractuales,\nHAN CONVENIDO LAS DISPOSICIONES SIGUIENTES:\nT\u00cdTULO I\n\n\u00c1MBITO DE APLICACI\u00d3N\n\nArt\u00edculo 1\n\u00c1mbito de aplicaci\u00f3n\n1. Las disposiciones del presente Convenio ser\u00e1n aplicables, en las situaciones que impliquen un conflicto de leyes, a las obligaciones contractuales. 2. No se aplicar\u00e1n:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nal estado civil y a la capacidad de las personas f\u00edsicas, sin perjuicio de lo dispuesto en el art\u00edculo 11;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\na las obligaciones contractuales relativas a:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nlos testamentos y sucesiones;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nlos reg\u00edmenes matrimoniales;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nlos derechos y deberes derivados de relaciones de familia, de parentesco, de matrimonio o de afinidad, incluidas las obligaciones de dar alimentos respecto a los hijos no matrimoniales;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nc)\n\n\na las obligaciones derivadas de letras de cambio, cheques y pagar\u00e9s, as\u00ed como de otros instrumentos negociables en la medida en que las obligaciones surgidas de estos otros instrumentos se deriven de su. car\u00e1cter negociable;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nd)\n\n\na los convenios de arbitraje y de elecci\u00f3n de foro;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ne)\n\n\na las cuestiones pertenecientes al Derecho de sociedades, asociaciones y personas jur\u00eddicas, tales como la constituci\u00f3n, la capacidad jur\u00eddica, el funcionamiento interno y la disoluci\u00f3n de las sociedades, asociaciones y personas jur\u00eddicas, as\u00ed como la responsabilidad personal legal de los socios y de los \u00f3rganos por las deudas de la sociedad, asociaci\u00f3n o persona jur\u00eddica;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nf)\n\n\na la cuesti\u00f3n de saber si un intermediario puede obligar frente a terceros a la persona por cuya cuenta pretende actuar, o si un \u00f3rgano de una sociedad, de una asociaci\u00f3n o una persona jur\u00eddica puede obligar frente a terceros a esta sociedad, asociaci\u00f3n o persona jur\u00eddica;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ng)\n\n\na la constituci\u00f3n de trusts, a las relaciones que se creen entre quienes lo constituyen, los trusts y los beneficiarios;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nh)\n\n\na la prueba y al processo, sin perjuicio del art\u00edculo 14. 3. Las disposiciones del presente Convenio no se aplicar\u00e1n a los contratos de seguros que cubran riesgos situados en los territorios de los Estados miembros de la Comunidad Econ\u00f3mica Europea. Para determinar si un riesgo est\u00e1 situado en estos territorios, el juez aplicar\u00e1 su ley interna. 4. El apartado precedente no se refiere a los contratos de reaseguro. Art\u00edculo 2\nCar\u00e1cter universal\nLa ley designada por el presente Convenio se aplicar\u00e1 incluso si tal ley es la de un Estado no contratante. T\u00cdTULO II\n\nNORMAS UNIFORMES\n\nArt\u00edculo 3\nLibertad de elecci\u00f3n\n1. Los contratos se regir\u00e1n por la ley elegida por las partes. Esta elecci\u00f3n deber\u00e1 ser expresa o resultar de manera cierta de los t\u00e9rminos del contrato o de las circunstancias del caso. Para esta elecci\u00f3n, las partes podr\u00e1n designar la ley aplicable a la totalidad o solamente a una parte del contrato. 2. Las partes podr\u00e1n, en cualquier momento, convenir que se rija el contrato por una ley distinta de la que lo reg\u00eda con anterioridad bien sea en virtud de una elecci\u00f3n anterior seg\u00fan el presente art\u00edculo, o bien en virtud de otras disposiciones del presente Convenio. Toda modificaci\u00f3n relativa a la determinaci\u00f3n de la ley aplicable, posterior a la celebraci\u00f3n del contrato, no obstar\u00e1 a la validez formal del contrato a efectos del art\u00edculo 9 y no afectar\u00e1 a los derechos de terceros. 3. La elecci\u00f3n por las partes de una ley extranjera, acompa\u00f1ada o no de la de un tribunal extranjero, no podr\u00e1 afectar, cuando todos los dem\u00e1s elementos de la situaci\u00f3n est\u00e9n localizados en el momento de esta elecci\u00f3n en un solo pa\u00eds, a las disposiciones que la ley de ese pa\u00eds no permita derogar por contrato, denominadas en lo sucesivo \u00abdisposiciones imperativas\u00bb. 4. La existencia y la validez del. consentimiento de las Partes en cuanto a la elecci\u00f3n de la ley aplicable se regir\u00e1n por las disposiciones establecidas en los art\u00edculos 8, 9 y 11. Art\u00edculo 4\nLey aplicable a falta de elecci\u00f3n\n1. En la medida en que la ley aplicable al contrato no hubiera sido elegida conforme a las disposiciones del art\u00edculo 3, el contrato se regir\u00e1 por la ley del pa\u00eds con el que presente los v\u00ednculos m\u00e1s estrechos. No obstante, si una parte del contrato fuera separable del resto del contrato y presenta una vinculaci\u00f3n m\u00e1s estrecha con otro pa\u00eds, podr\u00e1 aplicarse, con car\u00e1cter excepcional, a esta parte del contrato la ley de este otro pa\u00eds. 2. Sin perjuicio del apartado 5, se presumir\u00e1 que el contrato presenta los v\u00ednculos m\u00e1s estrechos con el pa\u00eds en que la parte que deba realizar la prestaci\u00f3n caracter\u00edstica tenga, en el momento de la celebraci\u00f3n del contrato, su residencia habitual o, si se tratare de una sociedad, asociaci\u00f3n o persona jur\u00eddica, su administraci\u00f3n central. No obstante, si el contrato se celebrare en el ejercicio de la actividad profesional de esta parte, este pa\u00eds ser\u00e1 aqu\u00e9l en que est\u00e9 situado su establecimiento principal o si, seg\u00fan el contrato, la prestaci\u00f3n tuviera que ser realizada por un establecimiento distinto del establecimiento principal, aqu\u00e9l en que est\u00e9 situado este otro establecimiento. 3. No obstante lo dispuesto en el apartado 2, en la medida en que el contrato tenga por objeto un derecho real inmobiliario o un derecho de utilizaci\u00f3n de un inmueble, se presumir\u00e1 que el contrato presenta los v\u00ednculos m\u00e1s estrechos con el pa\u00eds en que estuviera situado el inmueble. 4. El contrato de transporte de mercanc\u00edas no estar\u00e1 sometido a la presunci\u00f3n del apartado 2. En este contrato, si el pa\u00eds en el que el transportista tiene su establecimiento principal en el momento de la celebraci\u00f3n del contrato fuere tambi\u00e9n aqu\u00e9l en que est\u00e9 situado el lugar de carga o de descarga o el establecimiento principal del expedidor, se presumir\u00e1 que el contrato tiene sus v\u00ednculos m\u00e1s estrechos con este pa\u00eds. Para la aplicaci\u00f3n del presente apartado, se considerar\u00e1n como contratos de transporte de mercanc\u00edas los contratos de fletamento para un solo viaje u otros contratos cuyo objeto principal sea el de realizar un transporte de mercanc\u00edas. 5. No se aplicar\u00e1 el apartado 2 cuando no pueda determinarse la prestaci\u00f3n caracter\u00edstica. Las presunciones de los apartados 2, 3 y 4 qu\u00e9dan excluidas cuando resulte del conjunto de circunstancias que el contrato presenta v\u00ednculos m\u00e1s estrechos con otro pa\u00eds. Art\u00edculo 5\nContratos celebrados por los consumidores\n1. El presente art\u00edculo se aplicar\u00e1 a los contratos que tengan por objeto el suministro de bienes muebles corporales o de servicios a una persona, el consumidor, para un uso que pueda ser considerado como ajeno a su actividad profesional, as\u00ed como a los contratos destinados a la financiaci\u00f3n de tales suministros. 2. Sin perjuicio de lo dispuesto en el art\u00edculo 3,1a elecci\u00f3n por las partes de la ley aplicable no podr\u00e1 producir el resultado de privar al consumidor de la protecci\u00f3n que le aseguren las disposiciones imperativas de la ley del pa\u00eds en que tenga su residencia habitual:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nsi la celebraci\u00f3n del contrato hubiera sido precedida, en ese pa\u00eds, por una oferta que le haya sido especialmente dirigida o por publicidad, y si el consumidor hubiera realizado en ese pa\u00eds los actos necesarios para la celebraci\u00f3n del contrato, o\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nsi la otra parte contratante o su representante hubiera el encargo del consumidor en ese pa\u00eds, o\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nsi el contrato fuera una venta de mercanc\u00edas y el consumidor se hubiera desplazado de este pa\u00eds a un pa\u00eds extranjero y all\u00ed hubiera realizado el encargo, siempre que el viaje hubiera sido organizado por el vendedor con la finalidad de incitar al consumidor a concluir una venta. 3. No obstante lo dispuesto en el art\u00edculo 4, y en defecto de elecci\u00f3n realizada conforme al art\u00edculo 3, estos contratos se regir\u00e1n por la ley del pa\u00eds en que el consumidor su residencia habitual, si concurrieran las circunstancias descritas en el apartado 2 del presente art\u00edculo. 4. El presente art\u00edculo no se aplicar\u00e1:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\na los contratos de transporte;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\na los contratos de suministro de servicios cuando los servicios deban prestarse al consumidor, exclusivamente, en un pa\u00eds distinto de aqu\u00e9l en que tenga su residencia habitual. 5. No obstante lo dispuesto en el apartado 4, el presente art\u00edculo se aplicar\u00e1 a los contratos que, por un precio global, comprendan prestaciones combinadas de transporte y alojamiento. Art\u00edculo 6\nContracto individual de trabajo\n1. No obstante lo dispuesto en el art\u00edculo 3, en el contrato de trabajo, la elecci\u00f3n por las partes de la ley aplicable no podr\u00e1 tener por resultado el privar al trabajador de la protecci\u00f3n que le proporcionen las disposiciones imperativas de la ley que ser\u00eda aplicable, a falta de elecci\u00f3n, en virtud del apartado 2 del presente art\u00edculo. 2. No obstante lo dispuesto en el art\u00edculo 4 y a falta de elecci\u00f3n realizada de conformidad con el art\u00edculo 3, el contrato de trabajo se regir\u00e1:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\npor la ley del pa\u00eds en que el trabajador, en ejecuci\u00f3n del contrato, realice habitualmente su trabajo, aun cuando, con car\u00e1cter temporal, haya sido enviado a otro pa\u00eds, o\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nsi el trabajador no realiza habitualmente su trabajo en un mismo pa\u00eds, por la ley del pa\u00eds en que se encuentre el establecimiento que haya contratado al trabajador,\n\n\n\n\na menos que, del conjunto de circunstancias, resulte que el contrato de trabajo tenga v\u00ednculos m\u00e1s estrechos con otro pa\u00eds, en cuyo caso ser\u00e1 aplicable la ley de este otro pa\u00eds. Art\u00edculo 7\nLeyes de polic\u00eda\n1. Al aplicar, en virtud del presente Convenio, la ley de un pa\u00eds determinado, podr\u00e1 darse efecto a las disposiciones imperativas de la ley de otro pa\u00eds con el que la situaci\u00f3n presente un v\u00ednculo estrecho, si y en la medida en que, tales disposiciones, seg\u00fan el derecho de este \u00faltimo pa\u00eds, son aplicables cualquiera que sea la ley que rija el contrato. Para decidir si se debe dar efecto a estas disposiciones imperativas, se tendr\u00e1 en cuenta su naturaleza y su objeto, as\u00ed como las consecuencias que se derivar\u00edan de su aplicaci\u00f3n o de su inaplicaci\u00f3n. 2. Las disposiciones del presente Convenio no podr\u00e1n afectar a la aplicaci\u00f3n de las normas de la ley del pa\u00eds del juez que rijan imperativamente la situaci\u00f3n, cualquiera que sea la ley aplicable al contrato. Art\u00edculo 8\nConsentimiento y validez de fondo\n1. La existencia y la validez del contrato, o de cualquiera de sus disposiciones, estar\u00e1n sometidas a la ley que ser\u00eda aplicable en virtud del presente Convenio si el contrato o la disposici\u00f3n fueran v\u00e1lidos. 2. Sin embargo, para establecer que no ha dado su consentimiento, cualquiera de las partes podr\u00e1 referirse a la ley del pa\u00eds en que tenga su residencia habitual si de las circunstancias resulta que no ser\u00eda razonable determinar el efecto del comportamiento de tal parte seg\u00fan la ley prevista en el apartado precedente. Art\u00edculo 9\nForma\n1. Un contrato celebrado entre personas que se encuentren en un mismo pa\u00eds ser\u00e1 v\u00e1lido en cuanto a la forma si re\u00fane las condiciones de forma de la ley que lo rija en cuanto al fondo en virtud del presente Convenio o de la ley del pa\u00eds en el que se haya celebrado. 2. Un contrato celebrado entre personas que se encuentren en pa\u00edses diferentes ser\u00e1 v\u00e1lido en cuanto a la forma si re\u00fane las condiciones de forma de la ley que lo rija en cuanto al fondo en virtud del presente Convenio o de la ley de uno de estos pa\u00edses. 3. Cuando se celebre el contrato por medio de un representante, el pa\u00eds en el que se encuentre el representante en el momento de actuar ser\u00e1 el que se considere para la aplicaci\u00f3n de los apartados 1 y 2. 4. Un acto jur\u00eddico unilateral relativo a un contrato celebrado o por celebrar ser\u00e1 v\u00e1lido en cuanto a la forma si re\u00fane las condiciones de forma de la ley que rija o regir\u00e1 el fondo del contrato en virtud del presente Convenio o de la ley del pa\u00eds en el que se efect\u00fae dicho acto. 5. Las disposiciones de los apartados precedentes no se aplicar\u00e1n a los contratos que entren en el \u00e1mbito de aplicaci\u00f3n del art\u00edculo 5 celebrados en las circunstancias descritas en su apartado 2. La forma de estos contratos se regir\u00e1 por la ley del pa\u00eds en el que tenga su residencia habitual el consumidor. 6. No obstante lo dispuesto en los cuatro primeros apartados del presente art\u00edculo, todo contrato que tenga por objeto un derecho real inmobiliario o un derecho de utilizaci\u00f3n de un inmueble estar\u00e1 sometido, en cuanto a la forma, a las normas imperativas de la ley del pa\u00eds en que el inmueble est\u00e9 sito, siempre que seg\u00fan esta ley sean aplicables independientemente del lugar de celebraci\u00f3n del contrato y de la ley que lo rija en cuanto al fondo. Art\u00edculo 10\n\u00c1mbito de la ley del contrato\n1. La ley aplicable al contrato en virtud de los art\u00edculos 3 a 6 y del art\u00edculo 12 del presente Convenio regir\u00e1 en particular:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nsu interpretaci\u00f3n;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nel cumplimiento de las obligaciones que genere;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nc)\n\n\ndentro de los l\u00edmites de los poderes atribuidos al tribunal por sus leyes procesales, las consecuencias del incumplimiento total o parcial de estas obligaciones, incluida la evaluaci\u00f3n del da\u00f1o en la medida en que la gobiernen normas jur\u00eddicas;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nd)\n\n\nlos diversos modos de extinci\u00f3n de las obligaciones, as\u00ed como la prescripci\u00f3n y la caducidad basadas en la expiraci\u00f3n de un plazo;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ne)\n\n\nlas consecuencias de la nulidad del contrato. 2. En lo que se refiere a las modalidades del cumplimiento y a las medidas que debe tomar al acreedor en caso de cumplimiento defectuoso, se tendr\u00e1 en cuenta la ley del pa\u00eds donde tenga lugar el cumplimiento. Art\u00edculo 11\nIncapacidad\nEn los contratos celebrados entre personas que se encuentren en un mismo pa\u00eds, las personas f\u00edsicas que gocen de capacidad de conformidad con la ley de ese pa\u00eds s\u00f3lo podr\u00e1n invocar su incapacidad resultante de otra ley si, en el momento de la celebraci\u00f3n del contrato, la otra parte hubiera conocido tal incapacidad o la hubiera ignorado en virtud de imprudencia por su parte. Art\u00edculo 12\nCesi\u00f3n de cr\u00e9dito\n1. Las obligaciones entre el cedente y el cesionario de un cr\u00e9dito se regir\u00e1n por la ley que, en virtud del presente Convenio, se aplique al contrato que les ligue. 2. La ley que rija el cr\u00e9dito cedido determinar\u00e1 el car\u00e1cter transferible del mismo, las relaciones entre el cesionario y el deudor, las condiciones de oponibilidad de la cesi\u00f3n al deudor y el car\u00e1cter liberatorio de la prestaci\u00f3n hecha por el deudor. Art\u00edculo 13\nSubrogaci\u00f3n\n1. Cuando, en virtud de un contrato, una persona, el acreedor, tenga derechos con respecto a otra persona, el deudor, y un tercero tenga la obligaci\u00f3n de satisfacer al acreedor o haya satisfecho, de hecho, al acreedor en ejecuci\u00f3n de esa obligaci\u00f3n, la ley aplicable a esta obligaci\u00f3n del tercero determinar\u00e1 si \u00e9ste puede ejercer en su totalidad o en parte los derechos que el acreedor ten\u00eda contra el deudor seg\u00fan la ley que rija sus relaciones. 2. La misma regla se aplicar\u00e1 cuando varias personas est\u00e9n obligadas por la misma obligaci\u00f3n contractual y el acreedor haya sido satisfecho por una de ellas. Art\u00edculo 14\nPrueba\n1. La ley que rija el contrato en virtud del presente Convenio se aplicar\u00e1 en la medida en que, en materia de obligaciones contractuales, establezca presunciones legales o reparta la carga de la prueba. 2. Los actos jur\u00eddicos podr\u00e1n ser acreditados por cualquier medio de prueba admitido bien por la ley del foro, o bien por cualquiera de las leyes contempladas en el art\u00edculo 9, conforme a la cual el acto sea v\u00e1lido en cuanto a la forma, siempre que tal medio de prueba pueda ser empleado ante el tribunal que est\u00e9 en conocimiento del asunto. Art\u00edculo 15\nExclusi\u00f3n del reenv\u00edo\nCuando el presente Convenio prescriba la aplicaci\u00f3n de la ley de un pa\u00eds, se entender\u00e1 por tal las normas jur\u00eddicas en vigor en ese pa\u00eds, con exclusi\u00f3n de las normas de Derecho internacional privado. Art\u00edculo 16\nOrden p\u00fablico\nNo podr\u00e1 excluirse la aplicaci\u00f3n de una disposici\u00f3n de la ley designada por el presente Convenio salvo cuando sea manifiestamente incompatible con el orden p\u00fablico del foro. Art\u00edculo 17\nAplicaci\u00f3n en el tiempo\nEl Convenio se aplicar\u00e1 en cada Estado contratante a los contratos celebrados despu\u00e9s de su entrada en vigor en tal Estado. Art\u00edculo 18\nInterpretaci\u00f3n uniforme\nPara la interpretaci\u00f3n y la aplicaci\u00f3n de las reglas uniformes que preceden, se tendr\u00e1n en cuenta su car\u00e1cter internacional y la conveniencia de conseguir que se interpreten y apliquen de manera uniforme. Art\u00edculo 19\nSistemas no unificados\n1. Cuando un Estado comprenda varias unidades territoriales y cada una de ellas tenga sus propias normas en materia de obligaciones contractuales, cada unidad territorial se considerar\u00e1 como un pa\u00eds para la determinaci\u00f3n de la ley aplicable seg\u00fan el presente Convenio. 2. Un Estado cuyas diferentes unidades territoriales tengan sus propias normas jur\u00eddicas en materia de obligaciones contractuales no estar\u00e1 obligado a aplicar el presente Convenio a los conflictos de leyes que interesen \u00fanicamente a esas unidades territoriales. Art\u00edculo 20\nPrioridad del Derecho comunitario\nEl presente Convenio se entiende sin perjuicio de la aplicaci\u00f3n de las disposiciones que, en materias espec\u00edficas, regulen los conflictos de leyes en materia de obligaciones contractuales y que est\u00e9n o estar\u00e1n contenidas en los actos derivados de las instituciones de las Comunidades Europeas o en las legislaciones nacionales armonizadas en ejecuci\u00f3n de estos actos. Art\u00edculo 21\nRelaciones con otros convenios\nEl presente Convenio no afectar\u00e1 a la aplicaci\u00f3n de los convenios internacionales de los que un Estado contratante sea o pase a ser parte. Art\u00edculo 22\nReservas\n1. Cualquier Estado contratante, en el momento de la firma, de la ratificaci\u00f3n, de la aceptaci\u00f3n o de la aprobaci\u00f3n, podr\u00e1 reservarse el derecho de no aplicar:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nel apartado 1 del art\u00edculo 7;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nla letra e) del apartado 1 del art\u00edculo 10. 2. Cualquier Estado contratante podr\u00e1 hacer igualmente, notificando una ampliaci\u00f3n del Convenio de conformidad con el apartado 2 del art\u00edculo 27, una o varias de estas reservas con efecto limitado a los territorios o a ciertos territorios mencionados en la ampliaci\u00f3n. 3. Cualquier Estado contratante podr\u00e1 retirar, en cualquier momento, una reserva que hubiera efectuado; el efecto de la reserva cesar\u00e1 el primer d\u00eda del tercer mes natural siguiente a la notificaci\u00f3n de la retirada. T\u00cdTULO III\n\nCL\u00c1USULAS FINALES\n\nArt\u00edculo 23\n1. Si un Estado contratante, despu\u00e9s de la fecha de entrada en vigor del presente Convenio con respecto a \u00e9l, desease adoptar una nueva norma de conflicto de leyes para una categor\u00eda espec\u00edfica de contratos que entren en el \u00e1mbito de aplicaci\u00f3n del convenio, comunicar\u00e1 su intenci\u00f3n a los dem\u00e1s Estados signatarios por medio del secretario general del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas. 2. En un plazo de seis meses a partir de la comunicaci\u00f3n hecha al secretario general, cualquier Estado signatario podr\u00e1 solicitar a \u00e9ste que organice unas consultas entre Estados signatarios con el fin de llegar a un acuerdo. 3. Si, en este plazo, ning\u00fan Estado signatario hubiera solicitado la consulta, o si, en los dos a\u00f1os siguientes a la comunicaci\u00f3n hecha al secretario general, no se hubiere llegado a ning\u00fan acuerdo como consecuencia de las consultas, el Estado contratante podr\u00e1 modificar su derecho. La medida tomada por este Estado se pondr\u00e1 en conocimiento de los dem\u00e1s Estados signatarios por mediaci\u00f3n del secretario general del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas. Art\u00edculo 24\n1. Si un Estado contratante, despu\u00e9s de la fecha de entrada en vigor del presente Convenio con respecto a \u00e9l, deseare formar parte de un convenio multilateral cuyo objeto principal, o uno de los objetos principales, fuera una regulaci\u00f3n de Derecho internacional privado en una de las materias regidas por el presente Convenio, se aplicar\u00e1 el procedimento previsto en el art\u00edculo 23. No obstante, el plazo de dos a\u00f1os, previsto en el apartado 3 del art\u00edculo 23, se reducir\u00e1 a un a\u00f1o. 2. No se seguir\u00e1 el procedimiento previsto en el apartado precedente si un Estado contratante o una de las Comunidades Europeas ya fueran parte del convenio multilateral o si el objeto de \u00e9ste fuera revisar un convenio del que fuera ya parte el Estado interesado o si se tratase de un convenio celebrado en el marco de los Tratados constitutivos de las Comunidades Europeas. Art\u00edculo 25\nCuando un Estado contratante considere que la unificaci\u00f3n realizada por el presente Convenio se ve comprometida por la celebraci\u00f3n de acuerdos no previstos en el apartado 1 del art\u00edculo 24, este Estado podr\u00e1 solicitar al secretario general del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas que organice una consulta entre los Estados signatarios del presente Convenio. Art\u00edculo 26\nCualquier Estado contratante podr\u00e1 solicitar la revisi\u00f3n del presente Convenio. En tal caso, el presidente del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas convocar\u00e1 una conferencia de revisi\u00f3n. Art\u00edculo 27\n1. El presente Convenio se aplicar\u00e1 en el territorio europeo de los Estados contratantes, comprendida Groenlandia, y en la totalidad del territorio de la Rep\u00fablica Francesa. 2. No obstante lo dispuesto en el apartado 1:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nel presente Convenio no se aplicar\u00e1 a las islas Feroe, salvo declaraci\u00f3n en contrario del Reino de Dinamarca;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nel presente Convenio no se aplicar\u00e1 a los territorios europeos situados fuera del Reino Unido y cuyas relaciones internacionales hubiera asumido \u00e9ste, salvo declaraci\u00f3n en contrario del Reino Unido para tal territorio;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nc)\n\n\nel presente Convenio se aplicar\u00e1 a las Antillas neerlandesas, si el Reino de los Pa\u00edses Bajos hiciese una declaraci\u00f3n en ese sentido. 3. Estas declaraciones podr\u00e1n efectuarse en cualquier momento, mediante notificaci\u00f3n al secretario general del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas. 4. Los procesos de apelaci\u00f3n interpuestos en el Reino Unido contra resoluciones de los tribunales situados en uno de los territorios mencionados en la letra b) del apartado 2 ser\u00e1n considerados como procesos que se desarrollan ante estos tribunales. Art\u00edculo 28\n1. El presente Convenio estar\u00e1 abierto a partir del 19 de junio de 1980 a la firma de los Estados partes del Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Econ\u00f3mica Europea. 2. El presente Convenio ser\u00e1 ratificado, aceptado o aprobado por los Estados signatarios. Los instrumentos de ratificaci\u00f3n, de aceptaci\u00f3n o de aprobaci\u00f3n se depositar\u00e1n ante la Secretar\u00eda General del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas. Art\u00edculo 29\n1. El presente Convenio entrar\u00e1 en vigor el primer d\u00eda del tercer mes siguiente al dep\u00f3sito del s\u00e9ptimo instrumento de ratificaci\u00f3n, de aceptaci\u00f3n o de aprobaci\u00f3n. 2. El Convenio entrar\u00e1 en vigor, para cada Estado signatario que lo ratifique, acepte o apruebe con posterioridad, el primer d\u00eda del tercer mes siguiente al dep\u00f3sito de su instrumento de ratificaci\u00f3n, de aceptaci\u00f3n o de aprobaci\u00f3n. Art\u00edculo 30\n1. El Convenio tendr\u00e1 una vigencia de diez a\u00f1os a partir de la fecha de su entrada en vigor conforme al apartado 1 del art\u00edculo 29, incluso para los Estados para los que entrase en vigor con posterioridad. 2. El Convenio ser\u00e1 renovado t\u00e1citamente por per\u00edodos de cinco a\u00f1os, salvo denuncia. 3. La denuncia ser\u00e1 notificada, al menos seis meses antes de la expiraci\u00f3n del plazo de diez a\u00f1os o de cinco a\u00f1os, seg\u00fan los casos, al secretario general del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas. Podr\u00e1 limitarse esta denuncia a uno de los territorios a los que se hubiera extendido el Convenio en aplicaci\u00f3n del apartado 2 del art\u00edculo 27. 4. La denuncia s\u00f3lo tendr\u00e1 efectos para el Estado que la hubiere notificado. El Convenio permanecer\u00e1 vigente para los dem\u00e1s Estados contratantes. Art\u00edculo 31\nEl secretario general del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas notificar\u00e1 a los Estados partes del Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Econ\u00f3mica Europea:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nlas firmas;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nel dep\u00f3sito de cualquier instrumento de ratificaci\u00f3n, aceptaci\u00f3n o aprobaci\u00f3n;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nc)\n\n\nla fecha de entrada en vigor del presente Convenio;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nd)\n\n\nlas comunicaciones realizadas en aplicaci\u00f3n de los art\u00edculos 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 y 30;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ne)\n\n\nlas reservas y retiradas de reservas mencionadas en el art\u00edculo 22. Art\u00edculo 32\nEl Protocolo anexo al presente Convenio forma parte integrante del mismo. Art\u00edculo 33\nEl presente Convenio, redactado en un ejemplar \u00fanico en lenguas alemana, danesa, francesa, inglesa, irlandesa, italiana y neerlandesa, dando fe por igual todos los textos, se depositar\u00e1 en los archivos de la Secretar\u00eda General del Consejo de las Comunidades Europeas. El secretario general remitir\u00e1 una copia autenticada conforme a cada uno de los Gobiernos de los Estados signatarios. Til bekr\u00e6ftelse heraf har undertegnede beh\u00f8rigt befuldm\u00e6gtigede underskrevet denne konvention. Zu Urkund dessen haben die hierzu geh\u00f6rig befugten Unterzeichneten ihre Unterschriften unter dieses \u00dcbereinkommen gesetzt. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Convention. En foi de quoi, les soussign\u00e9s, d\u00fbment autoris\u00e9s \u00e0 cet effet, ont sign\u00e9 la pr\u00e9sente convention. D\u00e1 fhian\u00fa sin, sh\u00ednigh na daoine seo th\u00edos, arna n-\u00fadar\u00fa go cu\u00ed chuige sin, an Coinbhinsi\u00fan seo. In fede di che, i sottoscritti, debitamente autorizzati a tal fine, hanno firmato la presente convenzione. Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekenden, daartoe behoorlijk gemachtigd, hun handtekening onder dit Verdrag hebben geplaatst. Udf\u00e6rdiget i Rom, den nittende juni nitten hundrede og firs. Geschehen zu Rom am neunzehnten Juni neunzehnhundertachtzig. Done at Rome on the nineteenth day of June in the year one thousand nine hundred and eighty. Fait \u00e0 Rome, le dix-neuf juin mil neuf cent quatre-vingt. Arna dh\u00e9anamh sa R\u00f3imh, an nao\u00fa l\u00e1 d\u00e9ag de Mheitheamh sa bhliain m\u00edle naoi gc\u00e9ad ocht\u00f3. Fatto a Roma, add\u00ec diciannove giugno millenovecentottanta. Gedaan te Rome, de negentiende juni negentienhonderd tachtig. Pour le royaume de Belgique\nVoor het Koninkrijk Belgi\u00eb\n\n\nP\u00e5 Kongeriget Danmarks vegne\n\n\nF\u00fcr die Bundesrepublik Deutschland\n\n\nPour la R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise\n\n\nThar ceann na h\u00c9ireann\n\n\nPer la Repubblica italiana\n\n\nPour le grand-duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg\n\n\nVoor het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden\n\n\nFor the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland\n\n\n\nPROTOCOLO\nLas Altas Partes Contratantes han acordado la disposici\u00f3n que sigue, que se incorporar\u00e1 como Anexo al Convenio:\nNo obstante lo dispuesto en el Convenio, Dinamarca podr\u00e1 conservar la disposici\u00f3n incluida en el art\u00edculo 169 de la \u00abS\u00f8lov\u00bb (legislaci\u00f3n mar\u00edtima) relativo a la ley aplicable a las cuestiones sobre transporte mar\u00edtimo de mercanc\u00edas y podr\u00e1 modificar esta disposici\u00f3n sin atenerse al procedimiento previsto en el art\u00edculo 23 del Convenio. Til bekr\u00e6ftelse heraf har undertegnede beh\u00f8rigt befuldm\u00e6gtigede underskrevet denne protokol. Zu Urkund dessen haben die hierzu geh\u00f6rig befugten Unterzeichneten ihre Unterschriften unter dieses Protokoll gesetzt. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Protocol. En foi de quoi, les soussign\u00e9s, d\u00fbment autoris\u00e9s \u00e0 cet effet, ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent protocole. D\u00e1 fhian\u00fa sin, sh\u00ednigh na daoine seo th\u00edos, arna n-\u00fadar\u00fa go cu\u00ed chuige sin, an Pr\u00f3tacal seo. In fede di che, i sottoscritti, debitamente autorizzati a tal fine, hanno firmato il presente protocollo. Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekenden, daartoe behoorlijk gemachtigd, hun handtekening onder dit Protocol hebben geplaatst. Udf\u00e6rdiget i Rom, den nittende juni nitten hundrede og firs. Geschehen zu Rom am neunzehnten Juni neunzehnhundertachtzig. Done at Rome on the nineteenth day of June in the year one thousand nine hundred and eighty. Fait \u00e0 Rome, le dix-neuf juin mil neuf cent quatre-vingt. Arna dh\u00e9anamh sa R\u00f3imh, an nao\u00fa l\u00e1 d\u00e9ag de Mheitheamh sa bhliain m\u00edle naoi gc\u00e9ad ocht\u00f3. Fatto a Roma, add\u00ed diciannove giugno millenovecentottanta. Gedaan te Rome, de negentiende juni negentienhonderd tachtig. Pour le royaume de Belgique\nVoor het Koninkrijk Belgi\u00eb\n\n\nP\u00e5 Kongeriget Danmarks vegne\n\n\nF\u00fcr die Bundesrepublik Deutschland\n\n\nPour la R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise\n\n\nThar ceann na h\u00c9ireann\n\n\nPer la Repubblica italiana\n\n\nPour le grand-duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg\n\n\nVoor het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden\n\n\nFor the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland\n\n\n\n\nDECLARACI\u00d3N COM\u00daN\nEn el momento de proceder a la firma del Convenio sobre la ley aplicable a las obligaciones contractuales, los Gobiernos del Reino de B\u00e9lgica, del Reino de Dinamarca, de la Rep\u00fablica Federal de Alemania, de la Rep\u00fablica Francesa, de Irlanda, de la Rep\u00fablica Italiana, del Gran Ducado de Luxemburgo, del Reino de los Pa\u00edses Bajos, del Reino Unido de Gran Breta\u00f1a e Irlanda del Norte,\n\n\n\n\n\n\nI. PREOCUPADOS por evitar, en toda la medida de lo posible la dispersi\u00f3n de las normas de conflictos de leyes en una multiplicidad de instrumentos y las divergencias entre tales reglas, desean que las instituciones de las Comunidades Europeas, en el ejercicio de sus competencias sobre la base de los Tratados que las han constituido, se esfuercen, cuando proceda, por adoptar normas de conflictos que, en lo posible, est\u00e9n en armon\u00eda con las del Convenio;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nII. DECLARAN su intenci\u00f3n de proceder, desde la firma del Convenio y a la espera de quedar vinculadas por el art\u00edculo 24 del Convenio, a consultas rec\u00edprocas en el caso de que uno de los Estados firmantes desease formar parte de un convenio a que debiera aplicarse el procedimiento previsto en el citado art\u00edculo;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIII. CONSIDERANDO la contribuci\u00f3n del Convenio sobre la ley aplicable a las obligaciones contractuales a la unificaci\u00f3n de las normas de conflictos en el seno de las Comunidades Europeas, expresan la opini\u00f3n de que cualquier Estado que se convierta en miembro de las Comunidades Europeas deber\u00eda adherirse a este Convenio. Til bekr\u00e6ftelse heraf har undertegnede beh\u00f8rigt befuldm\u00e6gtigede underskrevet denne f\u00e6lleserkl\u00e6ring. Zu Urkund dessen haberi die hierzu geh\u00f6rig befugten Unterzeichneten ihre Unterschriften unter diese gemeinsame Erkl\u00e4rung gesetzt. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Joint Declaration. En foi de quoi, les soussign\u00e9s, d\u00fbment autoris\u00e9s \u00e0 cet effet, ont sign\u00e9 la pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9claration commune. D\u00e1 fhian\u00fa sin, sh\u00ednigh na daoine seo th\u00edos, arna n-\u00fadar\u00fa go cu\u00ed chuige sin, an Dearbh\u00fa Comhpha\u00edrteach seo. In fede di che, i sottoscritti, debitamente autorizzati a tal fine, hanno firmato la presente dichiarazione comune. Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekenden, daartoe behoorlijk gemachtigd, hun handtekening onder deze Verklaring hebben geplaatst. Udf\u00e6rdiget i Rom, den nittende juni nitten hundrede og firs. Geschehen zu Rom am neunzehnten Juni neunzehnhundertachtzig. Done at Rome on the nineteenth day of June in the year one thousand nine hundred and eighty. Fait \u00e0 Rome, le dix-neuf juin mil neuf cent quatre-vingt. Arna dh\u00e9anamh sa R\u00f3imh, an nao\u00fa l\u00e1 d\u00e9ag de Mheitheamh sa bhliain m\u00edle naoi gc\u00e9ad ocht\u00f3. Fatto a Roma, add\u00ec diciannove giugno millenovecentottanta. Gedaan te Rome, de negentiende juni negentienhonderd tachtig. Pour le gouvernment du royaume de Belgique\nVoor de Regering van het Koninkrijk Belgi\u00eb\n\n\nP\u00e5 Kongeriget Danmarks vegne\n\n\nF\u00fcr die Regierung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland\n\n\nPour le gouvernement de la R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise\n\n\nThar ceann Rialtas na h\u00c9ireann\n\n\nPer il governo della Repubblica italiana\n\n\nPour le gouvernement du grand-duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg\n\n\nVoor de Regering van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden\n\n\nFor the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nANEXO II / BILAG II / ANHANG II / \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a1\u03a4\u0397\u039c\u0391 II / ANNEX II / ANNEXE II / IARSCR\u00cdBHINN II / ALLEGATO II / BIJLAGE II / ANEXO II\n\u00a0\n\nCONVEN\u00c7\u00c3O\nSobre a lei aplic\u00e1vel \u00e0s obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais aberta \u00e0 assinatura em Roma em 19 de Junho de 1980\n\nPRE\u00c2MBULO\n\nAS ALTAS PARTES CONTRATANTES NO TRATADO QUE INSTITUI A COMUNIDADE ECON\u00d3MICA EUROPEIA,\nPREOCUPADAS em prosseguir, no dom\u00ednio do direito internacional privado, a obra de unifica\u00e7\u00e3o jur\u00eddica j\u00e1 empreendida na Comunidade, nomeadamente em mat\u00e9ria de compet\u00eancia judici\u00e1ria e de execu\u00e7\u00e3o de decis\u00f5es,\nDESEJANDO estabelecer regras uniformes relativamente \u00e0 lei aplic\u00e1vel \u00e0s obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais,\nACORDARAM NO SEGUINTE:\nT\u00cdTULO I\n\n\u00c2MBITO DE APLICA\u00c7\u00c3O\n\nArtigo 1\u1ecd\n\n\u00c2mbito de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o\n1. O disposto na presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e9 aplic\u00e1vel \u00e0s obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais nas situa\u00e7\u00f5es que impliquem um conflito de leis. 2. N\u00e3o se aplica:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nAo estado e \u00e0 capacidade das pessoas singulares, sem preju\u00edzo do artigo 11\u1ecd;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\n\u00c0s obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais relativas a:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntestamentos e sucess\u00f5es por morte,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nregimes de bens no matrim\u00f3nio,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ndireitos e deveres decorrentes de rela\u00e7\u00f5es de fam\u00edlia, de parentesco, de casamento ou de afinidade, incluindo obriga\u00e7\u00f5es alimentares relativamente aos filhos nascidos fora do casamento;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nc)\n\n\n\u00c0s obriga\u00e7\u00f5es decorrentes de letras, cheques, livran\u00e7as, bem como de outros t\u00edtulos negoci\u00e1veis, na medida em que as obriga\u00e7\u00f5es surgidas desses outros t\u00edtulos resultem do seu car\u00e1cter negoci\u00e1vel;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nd)\n\n\n\u00c0s conven\u00e7\u00f5es de arbitragem e de elei\u00e7\u00e3o do foro;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ne)\n\n\n\u00c0s conven\u00e7\u00f5es respeitantes ao direito das sociedades, associa\u00e7\u00f5es e pessoas colectivas, tais como a constitui\u00e7\u00e3o, a capacidade jur\u00eddica, o funcionamento interno e a dissolu\u00e7\u00e3o das sociedades, associa\u00e7\u00f5es e pessoas colectivas, bem como a responsabilidade pessoal legal dos associados e dos \u00f3rg\u00e3os relativamente \u00e0s d\u00edvidas da sociedade, associa\u00e7\u00e3o ou pessoa colectiva;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nf)\n\n\n\u00c0 quest\u00e3o de saber se um intermedi\u00e1rio pode vincular, em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a terceiros, a pessoa por conta da qual pretende agir ou se um \u00f3rg\u00e3o de uma sociedade, de uma associa\u00e7\u00e3o ou de uma pessoa colectiva pode vincular, em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a terceiros, essa sociedade, associa\u00e7\u00e3o ou pessoa colectiva;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ng)\n\n\n\u00c0 constitui\u00e7\u00e3o de \u00abtrusts\u00bb e \u00e0s rela\u00e7\u00f5es entre os constituintes, os \u00abtrustees\u00bb e os benefici\u00e1rios;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nh)\n\n\n\u00c0 prova e ao processo, sem preju\u00edzo do artigo 14\u1ecd\n\n\n\n\n\n3. O disposto na presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o se aplica a contratos de seguro que cubram riscos situados nos territ\u00f3rios dos Estados-membros da Comunidade Econ\u00f3mica Europeia. Para determinar se um risco se situa nestes territ\u00f3rios, o tribunal aplicar\u00e1 a sua lei interna. 4. O n\u00famero anterior n\u00e3o se aplica aos contratos de resseguro. Artigo 2\u1ecd\n\nCar\u00e1cter universal\nA lei designada nos termos da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e9 aplic\u00e1vel, mesmo que essa lei seja de um Estado n\u00e3o contratante. T\u00cdTULO II\n\nREGRAS UNIFORMES\n\nArtigo 3\u1ecd\n\nLiberdade de escolha\n1. O contrato rege-se pela lei escolhida pelas partes. Esta escolha deve ser expressa ou resultar de modo inequ\u00edvoco das disposi\u00e7\u00f5es do contrato ou das circunst\u00e2ncias da causa. Mediante esta escolha, as partes podem designar a lei aplic\u00e1vel \u00e0 totalidade ou apenas a uma parte do contrato. 2. Em qualquer momento, as partes podem acordar em sujeitar o contrato a uma lei diferente da que antecedentemente o regulava, quer por for\u00e7a de uma escolha anterior nos termos do presente artigo, quer por for\u00e7a de outras disposi\u00e7\u00f5es da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o. Qualquer modifica\u00e7\u00e3o, quanto \u00e0 determina\u00e7\u00e3o da lei aplic\u00e1vel, acorrida posteriormente \u00e0 celebra\u00e7\u00e3o do contrato, n\u00e3o afecta a validade formal do contrato, na acep\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto no artigo 9\u1ecd, nem prejudica os direitos de terceiros. 3. A escolha pelas partes de uma lei estrangeira, acompanhada ou n\u00e3o da escolha de um tribunal estrangeiro, n\u00e3o pode, sempre que todos os outros elementos da situa\u00e7\u00e3o se localizem num \u00fanico pa\u00eds no momento dessa escolha, prejudicar a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o das disposi\u00e7\u00f5es n\u00e3o derrog\u00e1veis por acordo, nos termos da lei desse pa\u00eds, e que a seguir se denominam por \u00abdisposi\u00e7\u00f5es imperativas\u00bb. 4. A exist\u00eancia e a validade do consentimento das partes, quanto \u00e0 escolha da lei aplic\u00e1vel, s\u00e3o reguladas pelo disposto nos artigos 8\u1ecd 9\u1ecde 11\u1ecd\n\nArtigo 4\u1ecd\n\nLei aplic\u00e1vel na falta de escolha\n1. Quando a lei aplic\u00e1vel ao contrato n\u00e3o tiver sido escolhida nos termos do artigo 3\u1ecd, o contrato \u00e9 regulado pela lei do pa\u00eds com o qual apresente uma conex\u00e3o mais estreita. Todavia, se uma parte do contrato for separ\u00e1vel do resto do contrato e apresentar uma conex\u00e3o mais estreita com um outro pa\u00eds, a essa parte poder\u00e1 aplicar-se, a t\u00edtulo excepcional, a lei desse outro pa\u00eds. 2. Sem preju\u00edzo do disposto no n\u1ecd 5, presume-se que o contrato apresenta uma conex\u00e3o mais estreita com o pa\u00eds onde a parte que est\u00e1 obrigada a fornecer a presta\u00e7\u00e3o caracter\u00edstica do contrato tem, no momento da celebra\u00e7\u00e3o do contrato, a sua resid\u00eancia habitual ou, se se tratar de uma sociedade, associa\u00e7\u00e3o ou pessoa colectiva, a sua administra\u00e7\u00e3o central. Todavia, se o contrato for celebrado no exerc\u00edcio da actividade econ\u00f3mica ou profissional dessa parte, o pa\u00eds a considerar ser\u00e1 aquele em que se situa o seu estabelecimento principal ou, se, nos termos do contrato, a presta\u00e7\u00e3o dever\u00e1 ser fornecida por estabelecimento diverso do estabelecimento principal, o da situa\u00e7\u00e3o desse estabelecimento. 3. Quando o contrato tiver por objecto um direito real sobre um bem im\u00f3vel, ou um direito de uso de um bem im\u00f3vel, presume-se, em derroga\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto no n\u1ecd 2, que o contrato apresenta uma conex\u00e3o mais estreita com o pa\u00eds onde o im\u00f3vel se situa. 4. A presun\u00e7\u00e3o do n\u1ecd 2 n\u00e3o \u00e9 admitida quanto ao contrato de transporte de mercadorias. Presume-se que este contrato apresente uma conex\u00e3o mais estreita com o pa\u00eds em que, no momento da celebra\u00e7\u00e3o do contrato, o transportador tem o seu estabelecimento principal, se o referido pa\u00eds coincidir com aquele em que se situa o lugar da carga ou da descarga ou do estabelecimento principal do expedidor. Para efeitos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o do presente n\u00famero, s\u00e3o considerados como contratos de transporte de mercadorias os contratos de fretamento relativos a uma \u00fanica viagem ou outros contratos que tenham por objecto principal o transporte de mercadorias. 5. O disposto no n\u1ecd 2 n\u00e3o se aplica se a presta\u00e7\u00e3o caracter\u00edstica n\u00e3o puder ser determinada. As presun\u00e7\u00f5es dos n\u1ecds 2, 3 e 4 n\u00e3o ser\u00e3o admitidas sempre que resulte do conjunto das circunst\u00e2ncias, que o contrato apresenta uma conex\u00e3o mais estreita com outro pa\u00eds. Artigo 5\u1ecd\n\nContratos celebrados por consumidores\n1. O presente artigo aplica-se aos contratos que tenham por objecto o fornecimento de bens m\u00f3veis corp\u00f3reos ou de servi\u00e7os a uma pessoa, o \u00abconsumidor\u00bb, para uma finalidade que pode considerar-se estranha \u00e0 sua actividade profissional, bem como aos contratos destinados ao financiamento desse fornecimento. 2. N\u00e3o obstante o disposto no artigo 3\u1ecd, a escolha pelas partes da lei aplic\u00e1vel n\u00e3o pode ter como consequ\u00eancia privar o consumidor da protec\u00e7\u00e3o que lhe garantem as disposi\u00e7\u00f5es imperativas da lei do pa\u00eds em que tenha a sua resid\u00eancia habitual:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nse a celebra\u00e7\u00e3o do contrato tiver sido precedida, nesse pa\u00eds, de uma proposta que lhe foi especialmente dirigida ou de an\u00fancio publicit\u00e1rio e se o consumidor tiver executado nesse pa\u00eds todos os actos necess\u00e1rios \u00e0 celebra\u00e7\u00e3o do contrato ou\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nse a outra parte ou o respectivo representante tiver recebido o pedido do consumidor nesse pa\u00eds ou\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nse o contrato consistir numa venda de mercadorias e o consumidor se tiver deslocado desse pa\u00eds a um outro pa\u00eds e a\u00ed tiver feito o pedido, desde que a viagem tenha sido organizada pelo vendedor com o objectivo de incitar o consumidor a comprar. 3. N\u00e3o obstante o disposto no artigo 4\u1ecd e na falta de escolha feita nos termos do artigo 3\u1ecd, esses contratos ser\u00e3o regulados pela lei do pa\u00eds em que o consumidor tiver a sua resid\u00eancia habitual, se se verificarem as circunst\u00e2ncias referidas no n\u1ecd 2 do presente artigo. 4. O presente artigo, n\u00e3o se aplica:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nAo contrato de transporte;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nAo contrato de presta\u00e7\u00e3o de servi\u00e7os quando os servi\u00e7os devidos ao consumidor devam ser prestados exclusivamente num pa\u00eds diferente daquele em que este tem a sua resid\u00eancia habitual. 5. Em derroga\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto no n\u1ecd 4, o presente artigo aplica-se ao contrato que estabele\u00e7a, por um pre\u00e7o global, presta\u00e7\u00f5es combinadas de transporte e de alojamento. Artigo 6\u1ecd\n\nContrato individual de trabalho\n1. Sem preju\u00edzo do disposto no artigo 3\u1ecd, a escolha pelas partes da lei aplic\u00e1vel ao contrato de trabalho, n\u00e3o pode ter como consequ\u00eancia privar o trabalhador da protec\u00e7\u00e3o que lhe garantem as disposi\u00e7\u00f5es imperativas da lei que seria aplic\u00e1vel, na falta de escolha, por for\u00e7a do n\u1ecd 2 do presente artigo. 2. N\u00e3o obstante o disposto no artigo 4\u1ecd e na falta de escolha feita nos termos do artigo 3\u1ecd, o contrato de trabalho \u00e9 regulado:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nPela lei do pa\u00eds em que o trabalhador, no cumprimento do contrato, presta habitualmente o seu trabalho, mesmo que tenha sido destacado temporariamente para outro pa\u00eds, ou\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nSe o trabalhador n\u00e3o prestar habitualmente o seu trabalho no mesmo pa\u00eds, pela lei do pa\u00eds em que esteja situado o estabelecimento que contratou o trabalhador,\n\n\n\n\na n\u00e3o ser que resulte do conjunto das circunst\u00e2ncias que o contrato de trabalho apresenta uma conex\u00e3o mais estreita com um outro pa\u00eds, sendo em tal caso aplic\u00e1vel a lei desse outro pa\u00eds. Artigo 7\u1ecd\n\nDisposi\u00e7\u00f5es imperativas\n1. Ao aplicar-se, por for\u00e7a da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o, a lei de um determinado pa\u00eds, pode ser dada preval\u00eancia \u00e0s disposi\u00e7\u00f5es imperativas da lei de outro pa\u00eds com o qual a situa\u00e7\u00e3o apresente uma conex\u00e3o estreita se, e na medida em que, de acordo com o direito deste \u00faltimo pa\u00eds, essas disposi\u00e7\u00f5es forem aplic\u00e1veis, qualquer que seja a lei reguladora do contrato. Para se decidir se deve ser dada preval\u00eancia a estas disposi\u00e7\u00f5es imperativas, ter-se-\u00e1 em conta a sua natureza e o seu objecto, bem como as consequ\u00eancias que resultariam da sua aplica\u00e7\u00e3o ou da sua n\u00e3o aplica\u00e7\u00e3o. 2. O disposto na presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o pode prejudicar a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o das regras do pa\u00eds do foro que regulem imperativamente o caso concreto, independentemente da lei aplic\u00e1vel ao contrato. Artigo 8\u1ecd\n\nExist\u00eancia e validade substancial\n1. A exist\u00eancia e a validade do contrato ou de uma disposi\u00e7\u00e3o deste, est\u00e3o sujeitas \u00e0 lei que seria aplic\u00e1vel, por for\u00e7a da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o, se o contrato ou a disposi\u00e7\u00e3o fossem v\u00e1lidos. 2. Todavia, um contraente, para demonstrar que n\u00e3o deu o seu acordo, pode invocar a lei do pa\u00eds em que tenha a sua resid\u00eancia habitual, se resultar das circunst\u00e2ncias que n\u00e3o seria razo\u00e1vel que o valor do comportamento desse contraente fosse determinado pela lei prevista no n\u00famero anterior. Artigo 9\u1ecd\n\nRequisitos de forma\n1. Um contrato celebrado entre pessoas que se encontram no mesmo pa\u00eds \u00e9 formalmente v\u00e1lido desde que preencha os requisitos de forma prescritos pela lei reguladora da subst\u00e2ncia, aplic\u00e1vel por for\u00e7a da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o ou da lei do pa\u00eds em que foi celebrado. 2. Um contrato celebrado entre pessoas que se encontram em pa\u00edses diferentes \u00e9 formalmente v\u00e1lido, desde que preencha os requisitos de forma prescritos pela lei reguladora da subst\u00e2ncia, aplic\u00e1vel por for\u00e7a da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o ou da lei de um desses pa\u00edses. 3. Quando o contrato \u00e9 celebrado por um representante, o pa\u00eds a tomar em considera\u00e7\u00e3o para efeitos de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o dos dos n\u1ecds 1 e 2, \u00e9 o pa\u00eds em que os poderes representativos s\u00e3o exercidos. 4. Um acto jur\u00eddico unilateral relativo a um contrato celebrado ou a celebrar \u00e9 formalmente v\u00e1lido, desde que preencha os requisitos de forma prescritos pela lei que regular a subst\u00e2ncia do contrato, aplic\u00e1vel por for\u00e7a da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o ou da lei do pa\u00eds em que esse acto \u00e9 praticado. 5. O disposto nos n\u00fameros anteriores n\u00e3o se aplica aos contratos que caem no \u00e2mbito de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o do artigo 5\u1ecd, celebrados nas circunst\u00e2ncias enunciadas no n\u1ecd 2 desse artigo. A forma desses contratos \u00e9 regulada pela lei do pa\u00eds em que o consumidor tem a sua resid\u00eancia habitual. 6. Em derroga\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto nos n\u1ecds 1 a 4, qualquer contrato que tenha por objecto um direito real sobre um im\u00f3vel ou um direito de uso de um im\u00f3vel est\u00e1 sujeito, quanto \u00e0 forma, \u00e0s disposi\u00e7\u00f5es imperativas da lei do pa\u00eds em que o im\u00f3vel est\u00e1 situado, desde que, nos termos desta lei, essas regras se apliquem independentemente do lugar de celebra\u00e7\u00e3o e da lei reguladora da subst\u00e2ncia do contrato. Artigo 10\u1ecd\n\n\u00c2mbito de aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da lei do contrato\n1. A lei aplic\u00e1vel ao contrato por for\u00e7a dos artigos 3\u1ecd a 6\u1ecd e do artigo 12\u1ecd da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o, regula, nomeadamente:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nA sua interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nO cumprimento das obriga\u00e7\u00f5es dele decorrentes;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nc)\n\n\nNos limites dos poderes atribu\u00eddos ao tribunal pela respectiva lei do processo, as consequ\u00eancias do incumprimento total ou parcial dessas obriga\u00e7\u00f5es, incluindo a avalia\u00e7\u00e3o do dano, na medida em que esta seja regulada pela lei;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nd)\n\n\nAs diversas causas de extin\u00e7\u00e3o das obriga\u00e7\u00f5es, bem como a prescri\u00e7\u00e3o e a caducidade fundadas no decurso de um prazo;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ne)\n\n\nAs consequ\u00eancias da invalidade do contrato. 2. Quanto aos modos de cumprimento e \u00e0s medidas que o credor deve tomar no caso de cumprimento defeituoso, atender-se-\u00e1 \u00e0 lei do pa\u00eds onde \u00e9 cumprida a obriga\u00e7\u00e3o. Artigo 11\u1ecd\n\nIncapacidade\nNum contrato celebrado entre pessoas que se encontram no mesmo pa\u00eds, uma pessoa singular considerada capaz segundo a lei desse pa\u00eds s\u00f3 pode invocar a sua incapacidade que resulte de uma outra lei se, no momento da celebra\u00e7\u00e3o do contrato, o outro contraente tinha conhecimento dessa incapacidade ou a desconhecia por imprud\u00eancia da sua parte. Artigo 12\u1ecd\n\nCess\u00e3o de cr\u00e9ditos\n1. As obriga\u00e7\u00f5es entre o cedente e o cession\u00e1rio de um cr\u00e9dito s\u00e3o reguladas pela lei que, por for\u00e7a da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o, for aplic\u00e1vel ao contrato que os liga. 2. A lei que regula o cr\u00e9dito cedido determina a natureza ced\u00edvel deste, as rela\u00e7\u00f5es entre o cession\u00e1rio e o devedor, as condi\u00e7\u00f5es de oponibilidade da cess\u00e3o ao devedor e a natureza liberat\u00f3ria da presta\u00e7\u00e3o feita pelo devedor. Artigo 13\u1ecd\n\nSub-roga\u00e7\u00e3o\n1. Sempre que, por for\u00e7a de um contrato, uma pessoa, o \u00abcredor\u00bb, tenha direitos relativamente a outra pessoa, o \u00abdevedor\u00bb e um terceiro tenha a obriga\u00e7\u00e3o de satisfazer o direito do credor, ou ainda, se o terceiro tiver realizado a presta\u00e7\u00e3o devida em cumprimento dessa obriga\u00e7\u00e3o, a lei aplic\u00e1vel a esta obriga\u00e7\u00e3o do terceiro determina se este pode exercer, no todo ou em parte, os direitos do credor contra o devedor, segundo a lei que regula as suas rela\u00e7\u00f5es. 2. A mesma regra aplica-se quando v\u00e1rias pessoas est\u00e3o adstritas \u00e0 mesma obriga\u00e7\u00e3o contratual e o credor tenha sido satisfeito por uma delas. Artigo 14\u1ecd\n\nProva\n1. A lei que regula o contrato, por for\u00e7a da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o, aplica-se na medida em que, em mat\u00e9ria de obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais, estabele\u00e7a presun\u00e7\u00f5es legais ou reparta o \u00f3nus da prova. 2. Os actos jur\u00eddicos podem ser provados mediante qualquer meio de prova admitido, quer pela lei do foro quer por uma das leis referidas no artigo 9\u1ecd, segundo a qual o acto seja formalmente v\u00e1lido, desde que a prova possa ser produzida desse modo no tribunal a que a causa foi submetida. Artigo 15\u1ecd\n\nExclus\u00e3o do reenvio\nPor aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da lei de um pa\u00eds determinado pela presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o entende-se a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o das normas de direito em vigor nesse pa\u00eds, com exclus\u00e3o das normas de direito internacional privado. Artigo 16\u1ecd\n\nOrdem p\u00fablica\nA aplica\u00e7\u00e3o de uma disposi\u00e7\u00e3o da lei designada pela presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o s\u00f3 pode ser afastada se essa aplica\u00e7\u00e3o for manifestamente incompat\u00edvel com a ordem p\u00fablica do foro. Artigo 17\u1ecd\n\nAplica\u00e7\u00e3o no tempo\nA conven\u00e7\u00e3o aplica-se num Estado contratante aos contratos celebrados ap\u00f3s a sua entrada em vigor nesse Estado. Artigo 18\u1ecd\n\nInterpreta\u00e7\u00e3o uniforme\nNa interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o e aplica\u00e7\u00e3o das regras uniformes que antecedem, deve ser tido em conta o seu car\u00e1cter international e a conveni\u00eancia de serem interpretadas e aplicadas de modo uniforme. Artigo 19\u1ecd\n\nOrdenamentos jur\u00eddicos plurilegislativos\n1. Sempre que um Estado englobe v\u00e1rias unidades territoriais, tendo cada uma as suas regras pr\u00f3prias em mat\u00e9ria de obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais, cada unidade territorial \u00e9 considerada como um pa\u00eds, para fins de determina\u00e7\u00e3o da lei aplic\u00e1vel por for\u00e7a da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o. 2. Um Estado, em que diferentes unidades territoriais tenham as suas regras de direito pr\u00f3prias em mat\u00e9ria de obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais, n\u00e3o ser\u00e1 obrigado a aplicar a presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o aos conflitos de leis que respeitem exclusivamente a essas unidades territoriais. Artigo 20\u1ecd\n\nPrimado do direito comunit\u00e1rio\nA presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o prejudica a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o das disposi\u00e7\u00f5es que, em mat\u00e9rias especiais, regulam os conflitos de leis em mat\u00e9ria de obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais e que s\u00e3o ou venham a ser estabelecidas em actos das institui\u00e7\u00f5es das Comunidades Europeias ou nas legisla\u00e7\u00f5es nacionais harmonizadas em execu\u00e7\u00e3o desses actos. Artigo 21\u1ecd\n\nRela\u00e7\u00f5es com outras conven\u00e7\u00f5es\nA presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o prejudica a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o das conven\u00e7\u00f5es internacionais de que um Estado contratante seja ou venha a ser parte. Artigo 22\u1ecd\n\nReservas\n1. Qualquer Estado contratante pode, no momento da assinatura, da ratifica\u00e7\u00e3o, da aceita\u00e7\u00e3o ou da aprova\u00e7\u00e3o reservar-se o direito de n\u00e3o aplicar:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nO n\u1ecd 1 do artigo 7\u1ecd;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nO n\u1ecd 1, al\u00ednea e), do artigo 10\u1ecd\n\n\n\n\n\n2. Qualquer Estado contratante pode igualmente, ao notificar a extens\u00e3o da Conven\u00e7\u00e3o, nos termos do n\u1ecd 2 do artigo 27\u1ecd, fazer uma ou v\u00e1rias destas reservas, com efeito limitado aos territ\u00f3rios ou a alguns dos territ\u00f3rios abrangidos pela extens\u00e3o. 3. Qualquer Estado contratante pode, em qualquer momento, retirar uma reserva que tenha feito; o efeito da reserva cessar\u00e1 no primeiro dia do terceiro m\u00eas do calend\u00e1rio ap\u00f3s a notifica\u00e7\u00e3o da retirada da reserva. T\u00cdTULO III\n\nDISPOSI\u00c7\u00d5ES FINAIS\n\nArtigo 23\u1ecd\n\n1. Se um Estado contratante, ap\u00f3s a data de entrada em vigor da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o no que a ele se refere, desejar adoptar unia nova norma de conflito de leis relativamente a uma categoria especial de contratos abrangidos pela conven\u00e7\u00e3o, comunicar\u00e1 a sua inten\u00e7\u00e3o aos outros Estados signat\u00e1rios, atrav\u00e9s do secret\u00e1rio-geral do Conselho das Comunidades Europeias. 2. No prazo de seis meses a contar da data da comunica\u00e7\u00e3o feita ao secret\u00e1rio-geral, qualquer Estado signat\u00e1rio pode pedir \u00e0quele que organize consultas entre os Estados signat\u00e1rios de modo a chegarem a um acordo. 3. Se, nesse prazo, nenhum Estado signat\u00e1rio tiver pedido consultas ou se, nos dois anos seguintes \u00e0 comunica\u00e7\u00e3o feita ao secret\u00e1rio-geral, n\u00e3o se tiver chegado a nenhum acordo no seguimento das consultas, o Estado contratante pode modificar o seu direito. As medidas tomadas por esse Estado ser\u00e3o levadas ao conhecimento dos outros Estados signat\u00e1rios, atrav\u00e9s do secret\u00e1rio-geral do Conselho das Comunidades Europeias. Artigo 24\u1ecd\n\n1. Se um Estado contratante, ap\u00f3s a data de entrada em vigor da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o no que a ele se refere, desejar ser parte numa conven\u00e7\u00e3o multilateral, cujo objecto principal ou um dos objectos principais seja o estabelecimento de normas de direito internacional privado relativamente a uma das mat\u00e9rias reguladas pela presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o, aplicar-se-\u00e1 o procedimento previsto no artigo 23\u1ecd Todavia, o prazo de dois anos, previsto no n\u1ecd 3 do artigo 23\u1ecd, ser\u00e1 reduzido para um ano. 2. N\u00e3o \u00e9 necess\u00e1rio observar o procedimento previsto no n\u00famero anterior s\u00e9 um Estado contratante ou uma das Comunidades Europeias j\u00e1 for parte na conven\u00e7\u00e3o multilateral ou se o seu objecto for a revis\u00e3o de uma conven\u00e7\u00e3o de que o Estado interessado seja parte ou se se tratar de uma conven\u00e7\u00e3o conclu\u00edda na \u00e2mbito dos Tratados que instituem as Comunidades Europeias. Artigo 25\u1ecd\n\nSe um Estado contratante considerar que a unifica\u00e7\u00e3o realizada pela presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e9 comprometida pela conclus\u00e3o de acordos n\u00e3o previstos no n\u1ecd 1 do artigo 24\u1ecd, esse Estado pode pedir ao secret\u00e1rio-geral do Conselho das Comunidades Europeias que organize consultas entre os Estados signat\u00e1rios da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o. Artigo 26\u1ecd\n\nQualquer Estado contratante pode pedir a revis\u00e3o da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o. Nesse caso, ser\u00e1 convocada uma confer\u00eancia de revis\u00e3o pelo presidente do Conselho das Comunidades Europeias. Artigo 27\u1ecd\n\n1. A presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o aplica-se ao territ\u00f3rio europeu dos Estados contratantes, incluindo a Gronel\u00e2ndia, e a todo o territ\u00f3rio da Rep\u00fablica Francesa. 2. Em derroga\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto no n\u1ecd1:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nA presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o s\u00e9 aplica \u00e0s ilhas Faro\u00e9, salvo declara\u00e7\u00e3o em contr\u00e1rio de Reino da Dinamarca;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nA presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o se aplica aos territ\u00f3rios europeus situados fora do Reino Unido e cujas rela\u00e7\u00f5es internacionais sejam asseguradas pelo Reino Unido, salvo declara\u00e7\u00e3o em contr\u00e1rio do Reino Unido em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a qualquer um desses territ\u00f3rios;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nc)\n\n\nA presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o se aplica \u00e0s Antilhas Neerlandesas, se o Reino dos Pa\u00edses Baixos fizer uma declara\u00e7\u00e3o nesse sentido. 3. Estas declara\u00e7\u00f5es podem ser feitas em qualquer momento mediante notifica\u00e7\u00e3o ao secret\u00e1rio-geral do Conselho das Comunidades Europeias. 4. Os processos de recurso interpostos no Reino Unido de decis\u00f5es proferidas por tribunais situados num dos territ\u00f3rios indicados na al\u00ednea b) do n\u1ecd 2 ser\u00e3o considerados como processos pendentes nesses tribunais. Artigo 28\u1ecd\n\n1. A presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o estar\u00e1 aberta \u00e0 assinatura dos Estados partes no Tratado que institui a Comunidade Econ\u00f3mica Europeia, a partir de 19 de Junho de 1980. 2. A presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o ser\u00e1 ratificada, aceite ou aprovada pelos Estados signat\u00e1rios. Os instrumentos de ratifica\u00e7\u00e3o, de aceita\u00e7\u00e3o ou de aprova\u00e7\u00e3o ser\u00e3o depositados junto do Secretariado-Geral do Conselho das Comunidades Europeias. Artigo 29\u1ecd\n\n1. A presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o entrar\u00e1 em vigor no primeiro dia do terceiro m\u00eas seguinte ao do dep\u00f3sito do s\u00e9timo instrumento de ratifica\u00e7\u00e3o, de aceita\u00e7\u00e3o ou de aprova\u00e7\u00e3o. 2. A presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o entrar\u00e1 em vigor relativamente a cada Estado signat\u00e1rio que a ratifique, aceite ou aprove posteriormente, no primeiro dia do terceiro m\u00eas seguinte ao do dep\u00f3sito do seu instrumento de ratifica\u00e7\u00e3o, de aceita\u00e7\u00e3o ou de aprova\u00e7\u00e3o. Artigo 30\u1ecd\n\n1. A presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o ter\u00e1 um per\u00edodo de vig\u00eancia de dez anos a partir da data da sua entrada em vigor, nos termos do n\u1ecd 1 do artigo 29\u1ecd, mesmo relativamente aos Estados em que entre posteriormente em vigor. 2. A conven\u00e7\u00e3o ser\u00e1 renovada tacitamente de cinco em cinco anos, salvo den\u00fancia. 3. A den\u00fancia deve ser notificada, pelo menos, seis meses antes de decorrido o prazo de dez anos ou de cinco anos, conforme o caso, ao secret\u00e1rio-geral do Conselho das Comunidades Europeias. A den\u00fancia pode ser limitada a um dos territ\u00f3rios a que a conven\u00e7\u00e3o se tenha tornado extensiva, por aplica\u00e7\u00e3o do n\u1ecd 2 do artigo 27\u1ecd\n\n4. A den\u00fancia s\u00f3 ter\u00e1 efeito em rela\u00e7\u00e3o ao Estado que a tenha notificado. A conven\u00e7\u00e3o manter-se-\u00e1 em vigor relativamente aos outros Estados contratantes. Artigo 31\u1ecd\n\nO secret\u00e1rio-geral do Conselho das Comunidades Europeias notificar\u00e1 os Estados partes no Tratado que institui a Comunidade Econ\u00f3mica Europeia:\n\n\n\n\n\n\na)\n\n\nDas assinaturas;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nb)\n\n\nDo dep\u00f3sito de qualquer instrumento de ratifica\u00e7\u00e3o, de aceita\u00e7\u00e3o ou de aprova\u00e7\u00e3o;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nc)\n\n\nDa data de entrada em vigor da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nd)\n\n\nDas comunica\u00e7\u00f5es feitas em aplica\u00e7\u00e3o dos artigos 23\u1ecd, 24\u1ecd, 25\u1ecd, 26\u1ecd, 27\u1ecd e 30\u1ecd;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\ne)\n\n\nDas reservas e das retiradas de reservas referidas no artigo 22\u1ecd\n\n\n\n\n\nArtigo 32\u1ecd\n\nO protocolo anexo \u00e0 presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o faz dela parte integrante. Artigo 33\u1ecd\n\nA presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o, redigida num \u00fanico exemplar nas l\u00ednguas alem\u00e3 dinamarquesa, francesa, inglesa, irlandesa, italiana e neerlandesa, fazendo f\u00e9 qualquer dos textos, ser\u00e1 depositada nos arquivos do Secretariado-Geral do Conselho das Comunidades Europeias. O secret\u00e1rio-geral remeter\u00e1 uma c\u00f3pia autenticada da presente conven\u00e7\u00e3o a cada um dos Governos dos Estados signat\u00e1rios. Til bekr\u00e6ftelse heraf har undertegnede beh\u00f8rigt befuldm\u00e6gtigede underskrevet denne konvention. Zu Urkund dessen haben die hierzu geh\u00f6rig befugten Unterzeichneten ihre Unterschriften unter dieses \u00dcbereinkommen gesetzt. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Convention. En foi de quoi, les soussign\u00e9s, d\u00fbment autoris\u00e9s \u00e0 cet effet, ont sign\u00e9 la pr\u00e9sente convention. D\u00e1 fhian\u00fa sin, sh\u00ednigh na daoine seo th\u00edos, arna n-\u00fadar\u00fa go cu\u00ed chuige sin, an Coinbhinsi\u00fan seo. In fede di che, i sottoscritti, debitamente autorizzati a tal fine, hanno firmato la presente convenzione. Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekenden, daartoe behoorlijk gemachtigd, hun handtekening onder dit Verdrag hebben geplaatst. Udf\u00e6rdiget i Rom, den nittende juni nitten hundrede og firs. Geschehen zu Rom am neunzehnten Juni neunzehnhundertachtzig. Done at Rome on the nineteenth day of June in the year one thousand nine hundred and eighty. Fait \u00e0 Rome, le dix-neuf juin mil neuf cent quatre-vingt. Ama dh\u00e9anamh sa R\u00f3imh, an nao\u00fa l\u00e1 d\u00e9ag de Mheitheamh sa bhliain m\u00edle naoi gc\u00e9ad ocht\u00f3. Fatto a Roma, add\u00ec diciannove giugno millenovecentottanta. Gedaan te Rome, de negentiende juni negentienhonderd tachtig. Pour le royaume de Belgique\nVoor het Koninkrijk Belgi\u00eb\n\n\nP\u00e5 Kongeriget Danmarks vegne\n\n\nF\u00fcr die Bundesrepublik Deutschland\n\n\nPour la R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise\n\n\nThar ceann na h\u00c9ireann\n\n\nPer la Repubblica italiana\n\n\nPour le grand-duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg\n\n\nVoor het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden\n\n\nFor the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland\n\n\n\nPROTOCOLO\nAs altas partes contratantes acordaram na disposi\u00e7\u00e3o seguinte que vem anexa \u00e0 conven\u00e7\u00e3o. Em derroga\u00e7\u00e3o do disposto na conven\u00e7\u00e3o, a Dinamarca pode manter em aplica\u00e7\u00e3o o disposto no artigo 169\u1ecd da \u00abSoloven\u00bb (legisla\u00e7\u00e3o mar\u00edtima) respeitante \u00e0 lei aplic\u00e1vel em mat\u00e9ria de transporte de mercadorias por via mar\u00edtima e pode modificar esta disposi\u00e7\u00e3o sem ter de observar o procedimento previsto no artigo 23\u1ecd da conven\u00e7\u00e3o. Til bekr\u00e6ftelse heraf har undertegnede beh\u00f8rigt befuldm\u00e6gtigede underskrevet denne protokol. Zu Urkund dessen haben die hierzu geh\u00f6rig befugten Unterzeichneten ihre Unterschriften unter dieses Protokoll gesetzt. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Protocol. En foi de quoi, les soussign\u00e9s, d\u00fbment autoris\u00e9s \u00e0 cet effet, ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent protocole. D\u00e1 fhian\u00fa sin, sh\u00ednigh na daoine seo th\u00edos, ama n-\u00fadar\u00fa go cu\u00ed chuige sin, an Pr\u00f3tacal seo. In fede di che, i sottoscritti, debitamente autorizzati a tal fine, hanno firmato il presente protocollo. Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekenden, daartoe behoorlijk gemachtigd, hun handtekening onder dit Protocol hebben geplaatst. Undf\u00e6rdiget i Rom, den nittende juni nitten hundrede og firs. Geschehen zu Rom am neunzehnten Juni neunzehnhundertachtzig. Done at Rome on the nineteenth day of June in the year one thousand nine hundred and eighty. Fait \u00e0 Rome, le dix-neuf juin mil neuf cent quatre-vingt. Arna dh\u00e9anamh sa R\u00f3imh, an nao\u00fa l\u00e1 d\u00e9ag de Mheitheamh sa bhliain m\u00edle naoi gc\u00e9ad ocht\u00f3. Fatto a Roma, add\u00ed diciannove giugno millenovecentottanta. Gedaan te Rome, de negentiende juni negentienhonderd tachtig. Pour le royaume de Belgique\nVoor het Koninkrijk Belgi\u00eb\n\n\nP\u00e5 Kongeriget Danmarks vegne\n\n\nF\u00fcr die Bundesrepublik Deutschland\n\n\nPour la R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise\n\n\nThar ceann na hEireann\n\n\nPer la Repubblica italiana\n\n\nPour le grand-duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg\n\n\nVoor het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden\n\n\nFor the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland\n\n\n\n\nDECLARA\u00c7\u00c3O COMUM\nAquando da assinatura da Conven\u00e7\u00e3o sobre a lei aplic\u00e1vel \u00e0s obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais os governos do Reino da B\u00e9lgica, do Reino da Dinamarca, da Rep\u00fablica Italiana, do Gr\u00e3o-Ducado do Luxemburgo, do Reino dos Pa\u00edses Baixos e do Reino Unido da Gr\u00e3-Bretanha e da Irlanda do Norte,\n\n\n\n\n\n\nI. PREOCUPADOS em evitar, tanto quanto poss\u00edvel, a dispers\u00e3o das normas de conflitos de leis entre m\u00faltiplos instrumentos e as diverg\u00eancias entre estas normas, desejam que as institui\u00e7\u00f5es das Comunidades Europeias, no exerc\u00edcio das suas compet\u00eancias, com base nos Tratados que as instituiu, se esforcem, sempre que necess\u00e1rio, por adoptar normas de conflitos que estejam, tanto quanto poss\u00edvel, em concord\u00e2ncia com as da conven\u00e7\u00e3o;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nII. DECLARAM a sua inten\u00e7\u00e3o de proceder, imediatamente ap\u00f3s a assinatura da conven\u00e7\u00e3o e enquanto n\u00e3o est\u00e3o vinculados pelo artigo 24\u1ecd da conven\u00e7\u00e3o, a consultas rec\u00edprocas no caso de um dos Estados signat\u00e1rios desejar ser parte numa conven\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 qual se aplicaria o procedimento previsto no referido artigo;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIII. CONSIDERANDO a contribui\u00e7\u00e3o da Conven\u00e7\u00e3o sobre a lei aplic\u00e1vel \u00e0s obriga\u00e7\u00f5es contratuais para a unifica\u00e7\u00e3o das normas de conflitos nas Comunidades Europeias, expressam a opini\u00e3o de que qualquer Estado que se torne membro das Comunidades Europeias deveria aderir a esta conven\u00e7\u00e3o. Til bekr\u00e6ftelse heraf har undertegnede beh\u00f8rigt befuldm\u00e6gtigede underskrevet denne f\u00e6lleserkl\u00e6ring. Zu Urkund dessen haben die hierzu geh\u00f6rig befugten Unterzeichneten ihre Unterschriften unter diese gemeinsame Erkl\u00e4rung gesetzt. In witness whereof the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed this Joint Declaration. En foi de quoi, les soussign\u00e9s, d\u00fbment autoris\u00e9s \u00e0 cet effet, ont sign\u00e9 la pr\u00e9sente d\u00e9claration commune. D\u00e1 fhian\u00fa sin, sh\u00ednigh na daoine seo th\u00edos arna n-\u00fadar\u00fa go cu\u00ed chuige sin, an Dearbh\u00fa Comhpha\u00edrteach seo. In fede di che, i sottoscritti, debitamente autorizzati a tal fine, hanno firmato la presente dichiarazione comune. Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekenden, daartoe behoorlijk gemachtigd, hun handtekening onder deze Verklaring hebben geplaatst. Udf\u00e6rdiget i Rom, den nittende juni nitten hundrede og firs. Geschehen zu Rom am neunzehnten Juni neunzehnhundertachtzig. Done at Rome on the nineteenth day of June in the year one thousand nine hundred and eighty. Fait \u00e0 Rome, le dix-neuf juin mil neuf cent quatre-vingt. Arna dh\u00e9anamh sa R\u00f3imh, an nao\u00fa l\u00e1 d\u00e9ag de Mheitheamh sa bhliain mile naoi gc\u00e9ad ocht\u00f3. Fatto a Roma, add\u00ec diciannove giugno millenovecentottanta. Gedaan te Rome, de negentiende juni negentienhonderd tachtig. Pour le gouvernment du royaume de Belgique\nVoor de Regering van het Koninkrijk Belgi\u00eb\n\n\nP\u00e5 Kongeriget Danmarks vegne\n\n\nF\u00fcr die Regierung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland\n\n\nPour le gouvernement de la R\u00e9publique fran\u00e7aise\n\n\nThar ceann Rialtas na hEireann\n\n\nPer il governo della Repubblica italiana\n\n\nPour le gouvernement du grand-duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg\n\n\nVoor de Regering van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden\n\n\nFor the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bdef5343-e62e-4fcf-9d7f-ece6d7df2a1e", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1292/92 of 18 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/89 with regard to a definitive anti- dumping duty on imports of video cassettes originating in Hong Kong", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "Hong Kong,anti-dumping duty,export price,free-at-frontier price,trading margin,video cassette", "workIds": "celex:31992R1292,oj:JOL_1992_139_R_0001_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Hong Kong", "anti-dumping duty", "export price", "free-at-frontier price", "trading margin", "video cassette"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bdef5343-e62e-4fcf-9d7f-ece6d7df2a1e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9543abdf-b8a8-11ed-8912-01aa75ed71a1", "title": "European Community Directives in the field of consumer protection and public health. Volume 1, Foodstuffs and related legislation.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "consumer protection,foodstuffs legislation,public health,single market", "workIds": "genpub:1991.1536", "eurovoc_concepts": ["consumer protection", "foodstuffs legislation", "public health", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9543abdf-b8a8-11ed-8912-01aa75ed71a1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/817ac02c-e128-4607-94e3-fbad6140fbfe", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1264/92 of 18 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 429/90 on the granting by invitation to tender of an aid for concentrated butter intended for direct consumption in the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 on the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "butter,discount sale,preparation for market", "workIds": "celex:31992R1264,oj:JOL_1992_135_R_0005_011", "eurovoc_concepts": ["butter", "discount sale", "preparation for market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/817ac02c-e128-4607-94e3-fbad6140fbfe", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bea8e719-2042-4fe8-a3f4-3160034dffc1", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1333/92 of 18 May 1992 on the system of minimum import prices for certain soft fruits originating in Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "Hungary,Poland,import price,minimum price,soft fruit", "workIds": "celex:31992R1333,oj:JOL_1992_145_R_0003_044", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Hungary", "Poland", "import price", "minimum price", "soft fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bea8e719-2042-4fe8-a3f4-3160034dffc1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/070eeadf-91dd-4f05-95b7-a836cdaa426c", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 1332/92 of 18 May 1992 introducing specific measures for table olives", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-18", "subjects": "EAGGF Guarantee Section,EU financing,market intervention,olive,producer organisation,sales promotion", "workIds": "celex:31992R1332,oj:JOL_1992_145_R_0001_043", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF Guarantee Section", "EU financing", "market intervention", "olive", "producer organisation", "sales promotion"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/070eeadf-91dd-4f05-95b7-a836cdaa426c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e33c230e-f753-400d-be39-fd3e1d4eae77", "title": "NOTICE - COMMON POSITION ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COOPERATION PROCEDURE LAID DOWN IN ARTICLE 149 (2) OF THE EEC TREATY: PROPOSAL FOR A Council Directive amending Directive 70/156/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#position_council,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-16", "subjects": "approximation of laws,commercial vehicle,marketing standard,motor vehicle,technical standard,vehicle registration", "workIds": "celex:51992AG0516(05)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "commercial vehicle", "marketing standard", "motor vehicle", "technical standard", "vehicle registration"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e33c230e-f753-400d-be39-fd3e1d4eae77", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aff3efcd-003b-4caa-9de7-c8c0944e0f39", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1158/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Conciliation meetings with MEPs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "European Parliament,access to information,archives,conciliation,institutional cooperation,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E001158", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Parliament", "access to information", "archives", "conciliation", "institutional cooperation", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aff3efcd-003b-4caa-9de7-c8c0944e0f39", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b33b6a6e-a632-4c6d-bf68-51bfef6b7dd6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1183/92 by Mr Diego de los SANTOS L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Miramundo waste plant (C\u00e1diz)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LOS SANTOS LOPEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Andalusia,European Regional Development Fund,environmental impact,impact study,industrial building,waste disposal", "workIds": "celex:91992E001183", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Andalusia", "European Regional Development Fund", "environmental impact", "impact study", "industrial building", "waste disposal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b33b6a6e-a632-4c6d-bf68-51bfef6b7dd6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/daaba4ee-eecc-4791-81a1-04e730dd8629", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1193/92 by Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Protection of the antiquities of Pilos", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EC Directive,Greece,application of EU law,architectural heritage,cultural heritage,environmental impact,heritage protection,mining operation", "workIds": "celex:91992E001193", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "Greece", "application of EU law", "architectural heritage", "cultural heritage", "environmental impact", "heritage protection", "mining operation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/daaba4ee-eecc-4791-81a1-04e730dd8629", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/604b05d8-99f1-451e-9edb-c06ad0c7c5ef", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1180/92 by Mr Juan BANDR\u00c9S MOLET to the Commission. Construction of an incineration plant in the Horta district (Valencian Autonomous Community)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANDRES MOLET,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Community of Valencia,European Regional Development Fund,air quality,application of EU law,domestic waste,environmental impact,impact study,industrial building,industrial pollution,waste disposal", "workIds": "celex:91992E001180", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community of Valencia", "European Regional Development Fund", "air quality", "application of EU law", "domestic waste", "environmental impact", "impact study", "industrial building", "industrial pollution", "waste disposal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/604b05d8-99f1-451e-9edb-c06ad0c7c5ef", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/58340d7e-49a2-4550-a982-1032da8fbcaf", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1171/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Contribution of EEC Member States to the Third World", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "North-South relations,aid system,competence of the Member States,developing countries,development aid,economic development,emergency aid,gross domestic product,industrialised country,member country", "workIds": "celex:91992E001171", "eurovoc_concepts": ["North-South relations", "aid system", "competence of the Member States", "developing countries", "development aid", "economic development", "emergency aid", "gross domestic product", "industrialised country", "member country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/58340d7e-49a2-4550-a982-1032da8fbcaf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1455dc18-0121-41e5-bd1f-c10a23ceab1d", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the modification of the proposal for a Council directive on the charging of infrastructure costs to heavy goods vehicles", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Transport and Tourism,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "axle tax,charges for use of infrastructure,commercial vehicle,fuel tax,road transport,tax harmonisation,toll,transport infrastructure,vehicle tax", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0083", "eurovoc_concepts": ["axle tax", "charges for use of infrastructure", "commercial vehicle", "fuel tax", "road transport", "tax harmonisation", "toll", "transport infrastructure", "vehicle tax"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1455dc18-0121-41e5-bd1f-c10a23ceab1d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a6e96c88-0b4d-4fb5-bffc-ee7a81bc4887", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1154/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Council of the regions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,Member of Parliament,Treaty on European Union,appointment of staff,committee (EU),region,regional and local authorities", "workIds": "celex:91992E001154", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "Member of Parliament", "Treaty on European Union", "appointment of staff", "committee (EU)", "region", "regional and local authorities"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a6e96c88-0b4d-4fb5-bffc-ee7a81bc4887", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/29651b7e-4179-4507-8c95-923ed5ee94f2", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1259/92 of 15 May 1992 fixing for the 1991/92 marketing year the special levy applicable to imports of olive oil originating in Tunisia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Tunisia,olive oil", "workIds": "celex:31992R1259,oj:JOL_1992_131_R_0029_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Tunisia", "olive oil"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/29651b7e-4179-4507-8c95-923ed5ee94f2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9875b0f6-02ae-4100-991b-83f0624ce252", "title": "Conclusions of the Council and the Ministers for Health of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 15 May 1992 on toxicology for health protection", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_other_oj_l,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union,Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "European Commission,action programme,disease prevention,dissemination of EU information,health policy,toxicology", "workIds": "celex:41992X0612,oj:JOC_1992_148_R_0001_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "action programme", "disease prevention", "dissemination of EU information", "health policy", "toxicology"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9875b0f6-02ae-4100-991b-83f0624ce252", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2b9e4fff-9e4c-4523-ae1a-44fdee926a37", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1168/92 by Mr Luigi VERTEMATI to the Commission. Entry into force of directive on motor vehicle noise", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERTEMATI", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "application of the law,approval,approximation of laws,combustion gases,environmental impact,motor vehicle,motor vehicle pollution,noise level,noise pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001168", "eurovoc_concepts": ["application of the law", "approval", "approximation of laws", "combustion gases", "environmental impact", "motor vehicle", "motor vehicle pollution", "noise level", "noise pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2b9e4fff-9e4c-4523-ae1a-44fdee926a37", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98f089cc-2c75-405f-a1e0-c39715a05fd5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1188/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Council. Summary of the Council of Environment Ministers meeting held on 23 March 1992", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Council of Ministers,confidentiality,environmental policy,limited circulation,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E001188", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of Ministers", "confidentiality", "environmental policy", "limited circulation", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98f089cc-2c75-405f-a1e0-c39715a05fd5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0dc0d212-bca8-486d-9de7-324a256b64da", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation relating to the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the Islamic Federal Republic of the Comoros on fishing off the Comoros for the period from 20 July 1991 to 19 July 1994", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Comoros,authorised catch,co-financing,fishing agreement,fishing fleet,fishing licence,fishing vessel,protocol to an agreement,scientific cooperation", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0165", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Comoros", "authorised catch", "co-financing", "fishing agreement", "fishing fleet", "fishing licence", "fishing vessel", "protocol to an agreement", "scientific cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0dc0d212-bca8-486d-9de7-324a256b64da", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9a7c953f-8988-49b7-b3a3-13ee104ba000", "title": "Conclusions of the Council and the Ministers for Health of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 15 May 1992 on hereditary illnesses", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_other_oj_l,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union,Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "disease prevention,epidemiology,health policy,illness,medical research,research programme", "workIds": "celex:41992X0612(02),oj:JOC_1992_148_R_0003_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["disease prevention", "epidemiology", "health policy", "illness", "medical research", "research programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9a7c953f-8988-49b7-b3a3-13ee104ba000", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cb64511e-7d75-45de-ad30-120717cf1a58", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1192/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Environmental protection of the Amvrakikos Gulf", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Epirus,application of EU law,environmental protection,fish farming,gulf,protected area,protection of animal life,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001192", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Epirus", "application of EU law", "environmental protection", "fish farming", "gulf", "protected area", "protection of animal life", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cb64511e-7d75-45de-ad30-120717cf1a58", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ba35cb4-75cf-4f18-963a-c3f704ffb796", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1194/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Lake Lagadas", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Greece,application of EU law,dyestuffs industry,environmental protection,industrial waste,offence,protected area,protection of animal life,surface water,water pollution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001194", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "application of EU law", "dyestuffs industry", "environmental protection", "industrial waste", "offence", "protected area", "protection of animal life", "surface water", "water pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ba35cb4-75cf-4f18-963a-c3f704ffb796", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/188e82c1-35f3-45d2-b060-c30cf462084a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1155/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Legislative Council meetings", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,European Council,legislative power,legislative procedure,parliamentary debate,right to information", "workIds": "celex:91992E001155", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "European Council", "legislative power", "legislative procedure", "parliamentary debate", "right to information"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/188e82c1-35f3-45d2-b060-c30cf462084a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a4578195-299f-4225-9911-da73d09e1e28", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1179/92 by Florus WIJSENBEEK to the Commission. Notification of decisions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,WIJSENBEEK", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "ACP-EU Council of Ministers,EU act,livestock,meat", "workIds": "celex:91992E001179", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ACP-EU Council of Ministers", "EU act", "livestock", "meat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a4578195-299f-4225-9911-da73d09e1e28", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9d475800-011b-40c7-ba5f-0a2112904c91", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1187/92 by Mr Yves VERWAERDE to the Council. Common agricultural policy -application of the POSEIDOM programme for the benefit of the French overseas departments", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERWAERDE", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "French overseas department and region,aid to agriculture,cereals,farm development plan,livestock farming,overseas department (France),plant health legislation,supply", "workIds": "celex:91992E001187", "eurovoc_concepts": ["French overseas department and region", "aid to agriculture", "cereals", "farm development plan", "livestock farming", "overseas department (France)", "plant health legislation", "supply"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9d475800-011b-40c7-ba5f-0a2112904c91", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cf42d3b0-1e30-47ee-a380-15867b954c43", "title": "RESOLUTION on the c clusion of a cooperation agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Paraguay", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on External Economic Relations,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Paraguay,afforestation,cooperation agreement,democratisation,drug addiction,human rights,terms for aid,trading operation", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0167", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Paraguay", "afforestation", "cooperation agreement", "democratisation", "drug addiction", "human rights", "terms for aid", "trading operation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cf42d3b0-1e30-47ee-a380-15867b954c43", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c6afa526-ac51-445c-8c4d-95206f18b35a", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council directive on the appointment of an officer for the prevention of the risks inherent in the carriage of dangerous goods in undertakings which transport such goods, and on the vocational qualification of such officers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Transport and Tourism,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "professional qualifications,transport accident,transport company,transport of dangerous goods,transport safety", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0158", "eurovoc_concepts": ["professional qualifications", "transport accident", "transport company", "transport of dangerous goods", "transport safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c6afa526-ac51-445c-8c4d-95206f18b35a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1847e661-f286-4224-961c-a9fe1364cae6", "title": "RESOLUTION on beekeeping in the European Community: problems and requirements", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU market,apiculture,economic support,environmental impact,honey,international market,production cost", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0154", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU market", "apiculture", "economic support", "environmental impact", "honey", "international market", "production cost"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1847e661-f286-4224-961c-a9fe1364cae6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0aaa0ec7-4810-4dda-9fa1-2a0c3bd9d7ac", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together with the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European Communities and their Member States and the Republic of Hungary and to the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Hungary as well as exchanges of letters replacing the exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States and the Republic of Hungary and with the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Hungary", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Hungary,agreement (EU),land transport,transit,transport infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0203(01),comnat:COM_1992_0203(01)_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Hungary", "agreement (EU)", "land transport", "transit", "transport infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0aaa0ec7-4810-4dda-9fa1-2a0c3bd9d7ac", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 203 final \n\nBrussels, 15 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nconcerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of \nletters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together \nwith the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European \nCommunities and their Member States and the Republic of Hungary and to \nthe Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nRepublic of Hungary as well as exchanges of letters replacing the \nexchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member \nStates and the Republic of Hungary and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Hungary \n\nProposal for a \nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nconcerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of \nletters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together \nwith the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European \nCommunities and their Member States and the CSFR and to \nthe Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nCSFR as well as exchanges of letters replacing the \nexchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member \nStates and the CSFR and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the CSFR \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fExplanatory memorandum \n\n1. The annexed draft proposals constitute the legal instrument for \nmodifying the existing exchanges of letters on transit between the \nEuropean community on the one hand and the CSFR and Hungary on the \nother hand and replacing the existing exchanges of letters on \ninfrastructure between the European Community on the one hand and \nthe CSFR and Hungary on the other hand. 2. The above mentioned existing exchanges of letters were signed on \n16 December 1991 upon the signature (on 16 December 1991) of the \nAssociation Agreements between the Communities and their member \nStates on the one hand and the CSFR and Hungary on the other hand \nas well as upon the signature (on 16 December 1991) of the Interim \nAgreement between the European Economic Community on the one hand \nand the CSFR and Hungary on the other hand. The Europe Agreement \nhas not yet come into force. The interim Agreement entered into \nforce on 1 March last. Since the signatures of the above mentioned exchanges of letters, \nboth the CSFR and Hungary increased the fee for taxable transit \npermits which led to discussions between the Community and the \ncountries concerned. These discussions resulted in a mutually \nacceptable reduction in the transit fees as well as in a clearer \nundertaking from the community to explore with both Hungary and \nthe CSFR, within the framework of the existing financial \nmechanisms, financing possibilities for the improvement of land \ntransport infrastructure in these two countries. The parties \ntherefore consider it necessary to modify the above mentioned \nexisting exchanges of letters on transit and to replace the \nexisting exchanges of letters on infrastructure. 3. The Council concludes the agreement on behalf of the EEC by \n\nadopting the decisions mentioned under (I). 4. 5. In view of the above considerations the Commission requests the \nCouncil to adopt the proposals mentioned under (I). In view of the urgency of the matter the Commission, Hungary and \nthe CSFR agree that the exchanges of letters can be signed by the \nambassadors of these two countries and by a director of the \nDirectorate-General for External Relations of the Commission. r \n\nANNEX I \n\nDraft Council decisions concerning the amendment of the existing \nExchanges of Letters on transit between the EEC on the one hand and the \nCSFR and Hungary on the other hand and replacing the existing Exchanges \nof Letters on infrastructure between the EEC on the one hand and the \nCSFR and Hungary on the other hand. AGREEMENT \n\nin the form of exchanges of letters modifying the exchanges of letters \non transit signed together with the Association Agreement on 16 December \n1991 between the European Communities and their Member States and the \nRepublic of Hungary, and with the Interim Agreement between the European \nEconomic Community and Hungary(*); and exchanges of letters replacing \nthe exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member \nStates and the Republic of Hungary, and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Hungary. COUNCIL DECISION \n/92 \n(EEC) N\u00b0 \n\nOF \n\n1992 \n\nConcerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of \nletters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together \nwith the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European \nCommunities and their Member States and the Republic of Hungary and to \nthe Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nRepublic of Hungary as well as exchanges of letters replacing the \nexchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member \nStates and the Republic of Hungary and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Hungary. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, and in particular Article 113 there of, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal of the Commission, \n\nWhereas the exchanges of letters on transit signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement and with the Interim Agreement on 16 December 1991 \nshould be amended ; whereas the exchanges of letters on infrastructure \nsigned together with the Association Agreement and with the Interim \nAgreement on 16 December 1991 should be replaced ; whereas the \nAgreements in the form of exchanges of letters agreed to this effect \nshould be concluded. (1) OJ NO \n\n, 1992 \n\nI'. -l. -pli^n. \u2022: \n\ni l l r ed \n\nllri. - 2). -xch. wje- 2 JS. 1 1. 11 \n\nIVir-x \u2022 OMt. U U 2 1 B 7 1 \n\nT- l<\u00bbqi vif. h i c. I. K ' H - S\u00bb \n\n/ A u 4 / i i it \u00bbr-;l. /WA/c<j-in. d\u00bb-r(l )m) \n\n\fHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION : \n\n- 2 -\n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters amending the \nexchanges of letters on transit signed together with the Association \nAgreement between the European Communities and their Member States on \nthe one hand and Hungary on the other hand and with the Interim \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of \nHungary and replacing the exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed \ntogether with the Association Agreement between the European Communities \nand their Member States on the one hand and Hungary on the other hand \nand with the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community \non the one hand and Hungary on the other hand are hereby approved on \nbehalf of the Community. The texts of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters are \nannexed to this decision. The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the \nperson empowered to sign the Agreements in order to bind the Community. Article 2 \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\n1992 \n\nFor the Council \nThe President \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters amending the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") \nand Hungary concerning transit \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nA. Letter from the Community \n\nSir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December 1991 of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and Hungary \nand of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade related matters between \nthe European Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal \nand Steel Community and Hungary Agreements in the form of Exchanges of \nletters between the Community and Hungary concerning transit were \nsigned. The Europe Agreement has not yet come into force. The Interim \nAgreement came into force on 1st March 1992. Since the signatures of the Exchanges of letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters, to \namend the relevant provisions of the Exchanges of letters signed on 16th \nDecember 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 be amended as follows : \n\nThe part of Paragraph 2 (a) beginning with the words \". Hungary hereby \ngrants. \" shall be replaced by the following text : \n\n\"(i) Hungary hereby grants in 1992, in place of the existing \nquotas granted pursuant to the bilateral agreement between \nGreece and Hungary for 1991 permits in the following way : \n\n1992 \n\nuntaxed \n\ntaxable \n\nthird country (1)(2) \n\n10. 000 \n\n14. 000 with a tax rate of 1 Forint per \nton/km. 1. 200 with a tax rate of 3 Forint per \nton/km. 600 \n\n\f(1) \n\n(2) \n\nAll above existing and additional third country permits may \nbe exchanged for transit permits in the ratio 1:2 \n(1 third country permit for 2 transit permits) \nThe Community shall grant 600 third country permits to \nHungary for use only in traffic to or from Greece. All untaxed and taxable permits are of a round-trip character. For \n1993 and 1994 the total number of untaxed and taxable permits will \nbe increased annually by five percent so that the permits amount in \n1993 to 10. 500 untaxed and 14. 700 and 1. 260 taxable permits and in \n1994 to 11. 025 untaxed and 15. 435 and 1. 323 taxable permits. The \nnumber of third country permits remains 600 in each of the years \n1993 and 1994. The rates of tax of 1 Forint and 3 Forint per ton-kilometer shall \nbe adjusted for 1993 so as to maintain an exchange rate for the \nForint to the ECU equal to the average of such rate obtaining in \nthe period from 6th February to 31st December 1992 and for 1994 so \nas to maintain an average rate equal to the average obtaining in \nthe period from 1st January to 31st December 1993. (ii) The Community hereby grants to Hungary in 1992 12. 000 \n\nuntaxable permits for use only on the territory of Greece. If the transit situation on the territory of the republics which formed \npart of Yugoslavia in 1991 is not normalised the Community and Hungary \nshall jointly examine before 31st December 1992 the possible changes \nconcerning the arrangements set out in this paragraph 2. a. Changes in the above provisions can, until the end of 1994 or, if this \nhappens at an earlier date, until the conclusion of a bilateral \ntransport agreement between the Community and Hungary, be made by common \nagreement between the parties. The Community takes note of the Hungarian understanding that discussions \nwill take place with the Commission and the Member States most directly \nconcerned on other transportation questions such as aviation and third \ncountry road permits. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute an amendment to the Exchange of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community, \n\nc \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters amending the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") \nand Hungary concerning transit \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nB. Letter from Hungary \n\nSir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December 1991 of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and Hungary \nand of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade related matters between \nthe European Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal \nand Steel Community and Hungary Agreements in the form of Exchanges of \nletters between the Community and Hungary concerning transit were \nsigned. The Europe Agreement has not yet come into force. The Interim \nAgreement came into force on 1st March 1992. Since the signatures of the Exchanges of letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters, to \namend the relevant provisions of the Exchanges of letters signed on 16th \nDecember 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 be amended as follows : \n\nThe part of Paragraph 2 (a) beginning with the words \". Hungary hereby \ngrants. \" shall be replaced by the following text : \n\n\"(i) Hungary hereby grants in 1992, in place of the existing \nquotas granted pursuant to the bilateral agreement between \nGreece and Hungary for 1991 permits in the following way : \n\n1992 \n\nuntaxed \n\ntaxable \n\nthird country (1)(2) \n\n10. 000 \n\n14. 000 with a tax rate of 1 Furint p*-r \nton/km. 1. 200 with a tax rate of 3 Forint per \nton/km. 600 \n\n1 \n\n\f(1) \n\n(2) \n\nAll above existing and additional third country permits may \nbe exchanged for transit permits in the ratio 1:2 \n(1 third country permit for 2 transit permits) \nThe Community shall grant 600 third country permits to \nHungary for use only in traffic to or from Greece. All untaxed and taxable permits are of a round-trip character. For \n1993 and 1994 the total number of untaxed and taxable permits will \nbe increased annually by five percent so that the permits amount in \n1993 to 10. 500 untaxed and 14. 700 and 1. 260 taxable permits and in \n1994 to 11. 025 untaxed and 15. 435 and 1. 323 taxable permits. The \nnumber of third country permits remains 600 in each of the years \n1993 and 1994. The rates of tax of 1 Forint and 3 Forint per ton-kilometer shall \nbe adjusted for 1993 so as to maintain an exchange rate for the \nForint to the ECU equal to the average of such rate obtaining in \nthe period from 6th February to 31st December 1992 and for 1994 so \nas to maintain an average rate equal to the average obtaining in \nthe period from 1st January to 31st December 1993. (ii) The Community hereby grants to Hungary in 1992 12. 000 \n\nuntaxable permits for use only on the territory of Greece. If the transit situation on the territory of the republics which formed \npart of Yugoslavia in 1991 is not normalised the Community and Hungary \nshall jointly examine before 31st December 1992 the possible changes \nconcerning the arrangements set out in this paragraph 2. a. Changes in the above provisions can, until the end of 1994 or, if this \nhappens at an earlier date, until the conclusion of a bilateral \ntransport agreement between the Community and Hungary, be made by common \nagreement between the parties. The Community takes note of the Hungarian understanding that discussions \nwill take place with the Commission and the Member States most directly \nconcerned on other transportation questions such as aviation and third \ncountry road permits. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute an amendment to the Exchange of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that Hungary is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of Hungary, \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchange of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and Hungary \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the Community. Sir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Interim \nAgreement on trade and trade related matters between the European \nEconomic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal and Steel \nCommunity and Hungary an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters \nbetween \ntransport \ninfrastructure was signed. The Interim Agreement came into force on \n1st March 1992. the Community \n\nand Hungary \n\nconcerning \n\nland \n\nSince the signature of the Exchange of Letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters to amend \nthe relevant provisions of the Exchange of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems \nHungary is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the \nframework of the financial mechanisms provided for, provide, as \ntransport \nappropriate, financing \ninfrastructure, including roads, railways, inland waterways and combined \ntransport. for the improvement \n\nland \n\nof \n\nIn this context, I take note of Hungary's explanation of the urgent \nneed for financial assistance to enable Hungarian infrastructure to \ncope with the increased transit traffic in Hungary and of the wish \nexpressed by Hungary to consider projects related to transit traffic \nthrough Hungary, such as the modernization and construction of railway \nlines and motorways between Hegyeshalom and Budapest, and that between \nBudapest and Kelebia as priority, since these represent major corridors \nfor Community transit. 6 \n\nThe Commission agrees to start to examine with Hungary possible ways to \ncontribute to the improvement of such infrastructure in Hungary, paying \nspecial attention to environmental aspects, inter alia combined \ntransport, transit motorways, waterways transport, without prejudice to \nappraisal of projects according to existing procedures. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of Letters signed on \n16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community. Agreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchange of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and Hungary \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from Hungary. Sir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Interim \nAgreement on trade and trade related matters between the European \nEconomic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal and Steel \nCommunity and Hungary an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters \nbetween \ntransport \nHungary \ninfrastructure was signed. The Interim Agreement came into force on \n1st March 1992. the Community \n\nconcerning \n\nland \n\nand \n\nSince the signature of the Exchange of Letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters to amend \nthe relevant provisions of the Exchange of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems \nHungary is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the \nframework of the financial mechanisms provided for, provide, as \nappropriate, financing \ntransport \ninfrastructure, including roads, railways, inland waterways and combined \ntransport. for the improvement \n\nland \n\nof \n\nIn this context, I take note of Hungary's explanation of the urgent \nneed for financial assistance to enable Hungarian infrastructure to \ncope with the increased transit traffic in Hungary and of the wish \nexpressed by Hungary to consider projects related to transit traffic \nthrough Hungary, such as the modernization and construction of railway \nlines and motorways between Hegyeshalom and Budapest, and that between \nBudapest and Kelebia as priority, since these represent major corridors \nfor Community transit. X1--' \n\n\fThe Commission agrees to start to examine with Hungary possible ways to \ncontribute to the improvement of such infrastructure in Hungary, paying \nspecial attention to environmental aspects, inter alia combined \ntransport, transit motorways, waterways transport, without prejudice to \nappraisal of projects according to existing procedures. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of Letters signed on \n16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that Hungary is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of Hungary, \n\n& \n\n/ ?i \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchange of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and Hungary \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the Community. Sir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and Hungary an \nAgreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Community \nand Hungary concerning land transport infrastructure was signed. The \nEurope Agreement has not yet come into force. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters, to \namend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of letters signed on 16th \nDecember 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems \nHungary is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the \nframework of the financial mechanisms provided for in the Europe \nAgreement, provide, as appropriate, financing for the improvement of \nland transport infrastructure, including roads, railways, inland \nwaterways and combined transport. In this context, I take note of Hungary's explanation of the urgent \nneed for financial assistance to enable Hungarian infrastructure to \ncope with the increased transit traffic in Hungary and of the wish \nexpressed by Hungary to consider projects related to transit traffic \nthrough Hungary, such as the modernization and construction of railway \nlines and motorways between Hegyeshalom and Budapest, and that between \nBudapest and Kelebia as priority, since these represent major corridors \nfor Community transit. A\\ \n\n\fThe Commission agrees to start to examine with Hungary, on the basis of \nthis Exchange of Letters and referring to Article 81 in the Europe \nAgreement, possible ways to contribute to the improvement of such \ninfrastructure in Hungary, paying special attention to environmental \naspects, inter alia combined transport, transit motorways, waterways \ntransport, without prejudice to appraisal of projects according to \nexisting procedures. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of Letters signed on \n16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the' date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from the entry into force of the \nEurope Agreement. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community. ^4 \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchange of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and Hungary \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nB. Letter from Hungary \n\nSir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and Hungary an \nAgreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Community \nand Hungary concerning land transport infrastructure was signed. The \nEurope Agreement has not yet come into force. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters, to \namend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of letters signed on 16th \nDecember 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems \nHungary is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the \nframework of the financial mechanisms provided for in the Europe \nAgreement, provide, as appropriate, financing for the improvement of \nland transport infrastructure, including roads, railways, inland \nwaterways and combined transport. In this context, I take note of Hungary's explanation of the urgent \nneed for financial assistance to enable Hungarian infrastructure to \ncope with the increased transit traffic in Hungary and of the wish \nexpressed by Hungary to consider projects related to transit traffic \nthrough Hungary, such as the modernization and construction of railway \nlines and motorways between Hegyeshalom and Budapest, and that between \nBudapest and Kelebia as priority, since these represent major corridors \nfor Community transit. The Commission agrees to start to examine with Hungary, on the basis of \nthis Exchange of Letters and referring to Article 81 in the Europe \nAgreement, possible ways to contribute to the improvement of such \ninfrastructure in Hungary, paying special attention to environmental \naspects, inter alia combined transport, transit motorways, waterways \ntransport, without prejudice to appraisal of projects according to \nexisting procedures. \" \n\n71 \n\nX'y \n\n\fIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of Letters signed on \n16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from the entry into force of the \nEurope Agreement. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that Hungary is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of Hungary, \n\nu \n\n/c \n\n\fAGREEMENT \n\nin the form of exchanges of letters modifying the exchanges of letters \non transit signed together with the Association Agreement on 16 December \n1991 between the European Communities and their Member States and the \nCzech and Slovak Federal Republic (CSFR), and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the CSFR(^); and exchanges \nof letters replacing the exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed \ntogether with the Association Agreement between the European Communities \nand their Member States and the CSFR, and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the CSFR (2). COUNCIL DECISION \n/92 \n(EEC) N\u00b0 \n\nOF \n\n1992 \n\nConcerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of \nletters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together \nwith the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European \nCommunities and their Member States and the CSFR and to the Interim \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and the CSFR as well \nas exchanges of letters replacing the exchanges of letters on \ninfrastructure signed together with the Association Agreement between \nthe European Communities and their Member States and the CSFR and with \nthe Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nCSFR. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, and in particular Article 113 there of, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal of the Commission, \n\nWhereas the exchanges of letters on transit signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement and with the Interim Agreement on 16 December 1991 \nshould be amended ; whereas the exchanges of letters on infrastructure \nsigned together with the Association Agreement and with the Interim \nAgreement on 16 December 1991 should be replaced ; whereas the \nAgreements in the form of exchanges of letters agreed to this effect \nshould be concluded. (1) OJ NO \n\n, 1992 \n\nTel r p h o n e: d i r e ct \n/ A u 4 / I n r l e 2 b / w A / c o u n. d e c ( 1) m) \n\nl i ne 21 \n\ne \u00ab c h a n ge 2 1 5. 1 1. 11 \n\n\u2022 T e l ex COMEU B 21877 \n\n- T e l e g r a p h ic. l d d i e sa \n\ni-jMtUK & i , \n\n^f \n\n\fHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION : \n\n- 2 \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters amending the \nexchanges of letters on transit signed together with the Association \nAgreement between the European Communities and their Member States on \nthe one hand and the CSFR on the other hand and with the Interim \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and the CSFR and \nreplacing the exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together \nwith the Association Agreement between the European Communities and \ntheir Member States on the one hand and the CSFR on the other hand and \nwith the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community on \nthe one hand and the CSFR on the other hand are hereby approved on \nbehalf of the Community. The texts of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters are \nannexed to this decision. The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the \nperson empowered to sign the Agreements in order to bind the Community. Article 2 \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\n1992 \n\nFor the Council \nThe President \n\n\fA g r e e m e nt in t he f o rm of an \nExchanrje of l\u00ab\u00bbtterr, a m e nd incj t he \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") \nand the CSFR concerning transit \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the Community \n\nSir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signatures on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and the CSFR \nand of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade related matters between \nthe European Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal \nand Steel Community and the CSFR Agreements in the form of Exchanges of \nletters between the Community and the CSFR concerning transit were \nsigned. The Europe Agreement has not yet come into force. The Interim \nAgreement came into force on 1st March 1992. Since the signature of the Exchanges of letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This decision had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchanges \nof letters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 be amended as follows : \n\nIn paragraph 2) the following sentence shall be inserted after the first \nsentence of the first alinea: \"The fee per taxable permit is 18. 500 \nCzechoslovak crowns. \" \n\nThe following alineas shall be added after the second alinea of \nparagraph 2) : \"Both sides agreed that if the transit situation on the \nterritory of former Yugoslavia is not normalized they will jointly \nexamine before the end of the year the possible changes concerning the \nabove mentioned arrangements. \" \"Changes in the above provisions can be \nmade by common agreement between the parties. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute an amendment to the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 15th March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On Ix'h. il f ol U n- O i m m u n i t y, \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters amending the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") \nand the CSFR concerning transit \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nB. Letter from the CSFR \n\nSir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signatures on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and the CSFR \nand of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade related matters between \nthe European Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal \nand Steel Community and the CSFR Agreements in the form of Exchanges of \nletters between the Community and the CSFR concerning transit were \nsigned. The Europe Agreement has not yet come into force. The Interim \nAgreement came into force on 1st March 1992. Since the signature of the Exchanges of letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This decision had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchanges \nof letters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 be amended as follows : \n\nIn paragraph 2) the following sentence shall be inserted after the first \nsentence of the first alinea: \"The fee per taxable permit is 18. 500 \nCzechoslovak crowns. \" \n\nThe following alineas shall be added after the second alinea of \nparagraph 2) : \"Both sides agreed that if the transit situation on the \nterritory of former Yugoslavia is not normalized they will jointly \nexamine before the end of the year the possible changes concerning the \nabove mentioned arrangements. \" \"Changes in the above provisions can be \nmade by common agreement between the parties. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute an amendment to the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 15th March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that the CSFR is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of the CSFR, \n\n2' \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the CSFR \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nA. Letter from the Community. Sir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Interim \nAgreement on trade and trade related matters between the European \nEconomic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal and Steel \nCommunity and the CSFR an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of \nLetters between the Community and the CSFR concerning land transport \ninfrastructure was signed. The Interim Agreement came into force on \n1st March 1992. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This law had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of \nletters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems the \nCSFR is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the framework \nof the financial mechanisms provided for, provide, as appropriate, \nfinancing for the improvement of land transport infrastructure, \nincluding combined transport. In this context, -I take note- of the CSFR's explanation of the urgent \nneed \ntransport \ninfrastructure to cope with the increased transit traffic in the CSFR. financial assistance to enable CSFR \n\nland \n\nfor \n\nThe parties agree to seek, in the context of the existing Trade and \nCooperation Agreement, possible ways and means to contribute to the \nimprovement of such infrastructure in the CSFR, paying special attention \nto border crossings and nearby areas, combined transport, transit \nmotorways, waterways transport and environmental aspects, without \nprejudice to appraisal of projects according to existing procedures. The parties further agree to start, at their earliest convenience, \ndiscussions about possible Community financial assistance. The CSFR will consider further reducing the rate of taxable permits for \nCommunity hauliers according to progress in the above discussions. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR , I have the honour to \npropose that this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that \neffect, shall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of letters \nsigned on 16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date \nof Your Excellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community. 11 \n\n\fAgreement in the^ formjof an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the CSFR \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the CSFR. Sir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Interim \nAgreement on trade and trade related matters between the European \nEconomic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal and Steel \nCommunity and the CSFR an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of \nLetters between the Community and the CSFR concerning land transport \ninfrastructure was signed. The Interim Agreement came into force on \n1st March 1992. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This law had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of \nletters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems the \nCSFR is facing in the area of. transport and shall, within the framework \nof the financial mechanisms provided for, provide, as appropriate, \nfinancing for the improvement of land transport infrastructure, \nincluding combined transport. In this context, I take note of the CSFR's explanation of the urgent \ntransport \nneed \ninfrastructure to cope with the increased transit traffic in the CSFR. to enable i\\SFK land \n\nfinancial assistance \n\nfor \n\nThe parties agree to seek, in the context of the existing Trade and \nCooperation Agreement, possible ways and means to contribute to the \nimprovement of such infrastructure in the CSFR, paying special attention \nto border crossings and nearby areas, combined transport, transit \nmotorways, waterways transport and environmental aspects, without \nprejudice to appraisal of projects according to existing procedures. V, \n\n\fThe parties further agree to start, at their earliest convenience, \ndiscussions about possible Community financial assistance. The CSFR will consider further reducing the rate of taxable permits for \nCommunity hauliers according to progress in the above discussions. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR , I have the honour to \npropose that this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that \neffect, shall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of letters \nsigned on 16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date \nof Your Excellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept. Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that the CSFR is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of the CSFR, \n\n?\u2022>\" \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the CSFR \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the Community. Sir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and the CSFR \nan Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Community \nand the CSFR concerning land transport infrastructure was signed. The \nEurope Agreement has not yet come into force. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This law had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of \nletters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems the \nCSFR is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the framework \nof the financial mechanisms provided for in the Europe Agreement, \nprovide, as appropriate, financing for the improvement of land transport \ninfrastructure, including combined transport. In this context, I take note of the CSFR's explanation of the urgent \nneed \ntransport \ninfrastructure to cope with the increased transit traffic in the CSFR. financial assistance \n\nto enable \n\nCSFR \n\nland \n\nfor \n\nThe parties agree to seek, on the basis of this Exchange of Letters and \nreferring to Article 81 in the Europe Agreement, possible ways and means \nto contribute to the improvement of such infrastructure in the CSFR, \npaying special attention to border crossings and nearby areas, combined \ntransport, transit motorways, waterways transport and environmental \naspects, without prejudice to appraisal of projects according to \nexisting procedures. The parties further agree to start, at their earliest convenience, \ndiscussions about possible Community financial assistance. The CSFR will consider further reducing the rate of taxable permits for \nCommunity hauliers according to progress in the above discussions. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR , I have the honour to \npropose that this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that \neffect, shall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of letters \nsigned on 16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date \nof Your Excellency's reply and be applicable as from the entry into \nforce of the Europe Agreement. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community. )1 \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the CSFR \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nB. Letter from the CSFR. Sir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and the CSFR \nan Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Community \nand the CSFR concerning land transport infrastructure was signed. The \nEurope Agreement has not yet come into force. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This law had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to' amend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of \nletters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems the \nCSFR is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the framework \nof the financial mechanisms provided for in the Europe Agreement, \nprovide, as appropriate, financing for the improvement of land transport \ninfrastructure, including combined transport. In this context, I take note of the CSFR's explanation of the urgent \ntransport \nneed \ninfrastructure to cope with the increased transit traffic in the CSFR. financial assistance to enable CSFR \n\nland \n\nfor \n\nThe parties agree to seek, on the basis of this Exchange of Letters and \nreferring to Article 81 in the Europe Agreement, possible ways and means \nto contribute to the improvement of such infrastructure in the CSFR, \npaying special attention to border crossings and nearby areas, combined \ntransport, transit motorways, waterways transport and environmental \naspects, without prejudice to appraisal of projects according to \nexisting procedures. The parties further agree to start, at their earliest convenience, \ndiscussions about possible Community financial assistance. The CSFR will consider further reducing the rate of taxable permits for \nCommunity hauliers according to progress in the above discussions. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR , I have the honour to \npropose that this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that \neffect, shall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of letters \nsigned on 16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date \nof Your Excellency's reply and be applicable as from the entry into \nforce of the Europe Agreement. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that the CSFR is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. For the Government of the CSFR, \n\n\"1 \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 203 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\nli \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-217-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44258-1 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06c808ef-ecda-462f-870b-c32eaa0f4984", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1190/92 by Kenneth STEWART to the Commission. Danger of hydrofluoric acid from scrap vehicles", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STEWART KENNETH", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "inorganic acid,motor car,motor vehicle industry,occupational safety,product safety,public health,toxic substance", "workIds": "celex:91992E001190", "eurovoc_concepts": ["inorganic acid", "motor car", "motor vehicle industry", "occupational safety", "product safety", "public health", "toxic substance"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06c808ef-ecda-462f-870b-c32eaa0f4984", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f75153c-89fe-4698-b8a0-d28d734b3a2e", "title": "RESOLUTION on the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development (UNCED)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Industry, Research and Energy,Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "European standard,UN Conference,air quality,anhydride,environmental protection", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0661", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "UN Conference", "air quality", "anhydride", "environmental protection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f75153c-89fe-4698-b8a0-d28d734b3a2e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c4a7d15-6da4-438e-9d59-526e12d8bb92", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1153/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Council of the regions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU regional policy,appointment of staff,committee (EU),regional cooperation,representative of local or regional authority", "workIds": "celex:91992E001153", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU regional policy", "appointment of staff", "committee (EU)", "regional cooperation", "representative of local or regional authority"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9c4a7d15-6da4-438e-9d59-526e12d8bb92", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d993ba4d-6a7c-48a0-af75-9a0c5f4a211b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1181/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Varieties of apple", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "United Kingdom,agricultural quota,marketing,pip fruit", "workIds": "celex:91992E001181", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "agricultural quota", "marketing", "pip fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d993ba4d-6a7c-48a0-af75-9a0c5f4a211b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cdd12249-7d2a-4f9d-8d49-18ccd576fcd1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1173/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 LAFUENTE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Harmonization of Community quality certificate standards", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LAFUENTE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "European standard,approval,competitiveness,free movement of goods,international trade,intra-EU trade,product quality,quality label,quality standard", "workIds": "celex:91992E001173", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "approval", "competitiveness", "free movement of goods", "international trade", "intra-EU trade", "product quality", "quality label", "quality standard"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cdd12249-7d2a-4f9d-8d49-18ccd576fcd1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5564f5c-bce6-40d5-bf36-3a39bf037e41", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1157/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Nature of the role of the Presidency of the European Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EU competence,European Community,administration of the Institutions,member country,political power,president of an institution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001157", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EU competence", "European Community", "administration of the Institutions", "member country", "political power", "president of an institution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a5564f5c-bce6-40d5-bf36-3a39bf037e41", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d78394cb-99ed-4789-8918-7f9079fc4bc2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1184/92 by Mrs Brigitte ERNST de la GRAETE to the Commission. Abandoned and forcibly conscripted children in Chad", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ERNST DE LA GRAETE,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Chad,UN Development Programme,Unicef,armed forces,child,schooling", "workIds": "celex:91992E001184", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Chad", "UN Development Programme", "Unicef", "armed forces", "child", "schooling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d78394cb-99ed-4789-8918-7f9079fc4bc2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f9567ad2-15cf-4a04-ae27-561d915f67a2", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council decision concerning the establishing of a network of high-speed trains", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Transport and Tourism,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "high-speed transport,rail network,rail transport,transport infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0151", "eurovoc_concepts": ["high-speed transport", "rail network", "rail transport", "transport infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f9567ad2-15cf-4a04-ae27-561d915f67a2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c3e2b49-41ac-4927-8763-ca24692725f9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1166/92 by Mr James MOORHOUSE to the Commission. Value added tax on telephone services", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MOORHOUSE", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "VAT,postal and telecommunications services,private sector,public service,restriction on competition,tax collection,tax exemption,telecommunications,telephone", "workIds": "celex:91992E001166", "eurovoc_concepts": ["VAT", "postal and telecommunications services", "private sector", "public service", "restriction on competition", "tax collection", "tax exemption", "telecommunications", "telephone"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c3e2b49-41ac-4927-8763-ca24692725f9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cefd283b-daf2-4742-bdd0-82739ac4110a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1186/92 by Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. The Community' s position vis-\u00e0-vis the Jand\u00eda wind-farm", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Canary Islands,EU financing,European Regional Development Fund,environmental impact,nature reserve,power plant,protected area,protection of animal life,soft energy,wind energy", "workIds": "celex:91992E001186", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Canary Islands", "EU financing", "European Regional Development Fund", "environmental impact", "nature reserve", "power plant", "protected area", "protection of animal life", "soft energy", "wind energy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cefd283b-daf2-4742-bdd0-82739ac4110a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ef75fd85-1315-4e80-8ecf-a83f38e986ab", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 77/l43/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers (exhaust emissions)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Transport and Tourism,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "approximation of laws,combustion gases,commercial vehicle,harmonisation of standards,motor vehicle,roadworthiness tests,standardisation", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0156", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "combustion gases", "commercial vehicle", "harmonisation of standards", "motor vehicle", "roadworthiness tests", "standardisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ef75fd85-1315-4e80-8ecf-a83f38e986ab", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ebdef94-9d23-4790-bdce-694691fd6952", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1177/92 by Mr Panayotis ROUMELIOTIS to the Commission. Problems involving road transport through Hungary", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROUMELIOTIS", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Czechoslovakia,Greece,Hungary,association agreement (EU),road transport,transit", "workIds": "celex:91992E001177", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Czechoslovakia", "Greece", "Hungary", "association agreement (EU)", "road transport", "transit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ebdef94-9d23-4790-bdce-694691fd6952", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c061aaba-0e70-4f5c-8553-f5566553934c", "title": "92/277/EEC: Council Decision of 15 May 1992 on support measures in the form of a grant to an import programme for Albanian industry", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Albania,donation,financing method,import credit,industrial product,raw material", "workIds": "celex:31992D0277,oj:JOL_1992_144_R_0018_018", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Albania", "donation", "financing method", "import credit", "industrial product", "raw material"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c061aaba-0e70-4f5c-8553-f5566553934c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68978a24-8059-4a89-bcda-84450c154dc4", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1174/92 by Mr Gerardo FERN\u00c1NDEZ-ALBOR to the Commission. The words of the European anthem", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FERNANDEZ ALBOR", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Council of Europe,EU institution,European Movement,music", "workIds": "celex:91992E001174", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of Europe", "EU institution", "European Movement", "music"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68978a24-8059-4a89-bcda-84450c154dc4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/570f0efe-a43c-4c81-ba47-a2ffaf0c6523", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1151/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Location of the European Parliament", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "European Parliament,competence of the Member States,seat of institution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001151", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Parliament", "competence of the Member States", "seat of institution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/570f0efe-a43c-4c81-ba47-a2ffaf0c6523", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e0613a19-1d62-40bd-9f3c-a75bfffb750f", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Framework Agreement for cooperation between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Paraguay", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on External Economic Relations,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Paraguay,agreement (EU),cooperation agreement,economic cooperation,framework agreement,industrial cooperation,political cooperation", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0166", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Paraguay", "agreement (EU)", "cooperation agreement", "economic cooperation", "framework agreement", "industrial cooperation", "political cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e0613a19-1d62-40bd-9f3c-a75bfffb750f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe49cdf4-6c96-46cf-868d-80815fd6a6d3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1169/92 by Mrs Guadalupe RUIZ-GIM\u00c9NEZ AGUILAR to the Commission. Structural funds and the environment", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,RUIZ-GIMENEZ AGUILAR", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EAGGF Guidance Section,EU regional policy,European Regional Development Fund,European Social Fund,Structural Funds,environmental protection,quality of the environment,report,technical cooperation", "workIds": "celex:91992E001169", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF Guidance Section", "EU regional policy", "European Regional Development Fund", "European Social Fund", "Structural Funds", "environmental protection", "quality of the environment", "report", "technical cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fe49cdf4-6c96-46cf-868d-80815fd6a6d3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0859cd6c-8036-44d6-801d-d2c6870952de", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "livestock farming,protection of animals", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0192,comnat:COM_1992_0192_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_156_R_0011_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["livestock farming", "protection of animals"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0859cd6c-8036-44d6-801d-d2c6870952de", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 192 final \n\nBrussels, 15 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\nconcerning the protection of animals kept for \n\nfarming purposes \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nThe European Convention for the Protection of Animals kept for Farming \n\nPurposes was approved on behalf of the Community by Council Decision \n\n78/923/EEC1. In 1988, after all Member States had ratified the \n\nConvention, the Community became a contracting party. The Standing \n\nCommittee established by the Convention, on which the Community votes \n\nfor the Member States, makes Recommendations on the farming of various \n\ntypes \n\nof \n\nanimals. Contracting \n\nparties must \n\nimplement \n\nthese \n\nRecommendations by law or administrative act. The aim of the attached proposal is to implement the requirements of \n\nthe Convention by adopting harmonized rules for the housing, treatment \n\nand care of farm animals, and providing a legal basis for adoption of \n\nthe Council of Europe Recommendations by a Commission procedure. Chapter I of the proposal sets out the scope, which is the same as as \n\nthe Convention, and gives definitions. Chapter II lays down welfare principles concerning the responsibilities \n\nof owners or persons in charge, the planning, construction and \n\noperation of accomodation and facilities, and the treatment, feeding, \n\nand breeding of animals. Chapter III includes the responsibilities of Member States concerning \n\ninspection and enforcement, and the possibility for the Commission to \n\nmake on-the-spot inspections. An advisory Committee procedure is \n\nproposed for the adoption of obligatory Recommendations of the Standing \n\nCommittee of the European Convention and for adaptation of the \n\nDirective to technical progress. 1 OJ No L 323, 17. 11. 1978, p. 12. - 3 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\nconcerning the protection of animals kept for \n\nfarming purposes \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \n\nCommunity, and in particular Article 43 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament^, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee^, \n\nWhereas all Member States have ratified the European Convention for the \n\nProtection of Animals kept for Farming Purposes; whereas the Community \n\nhas also approved this Convention by Decision 78/923/EEC3 and has \n\ndeposited its instrument of approval; \n\nWhereas it is necessary for the Community, as a contracting party to \n\nthe European Convention for the Protection of Animals kept for Farming \n\nPurposes, to implement Recommendations of the Standing Committee \n\nestablished by the Convention; whereas it is desirable to make \n\nprovision for those parts of the Recommendations which are obligatory \n\nto be adopted by a Commission procedure in collaboration with the \n\nMember States; \n\n1 \n\n2 \n\n3 OJ No L 323, 17. 11. 1978, p. 12. - 4 -\n\nWhereas the European Parliament, in its Resolution of 20 February 1987 \n\non animal welfare policy4, called on the Commission to make proposals \n\nfor Community rules covering general aspects of the rearing of farm \n\nlivestock; \n\nWhereas animals are included in the list of products set out in \n\nAnnex II to the Treaty; \n\nWhereas the keeping of animals for farming purposes is an integral part \n\nof agriculture; whereas it constitutes a source of revenue for part of \n\nthe agricultural population; \n\nWhereas differences which may distort conditions of competition \n\ninterfere with the smooth running of the organization of the common \n\nmarket in animals and animal products; \n\nWhereas there is therefore a need to establish common minimum standards \n\nfor the protection of animals kept for farming purposes in order to \n\nensure rational development of production and to facilitate the \n\ncompletion of the internal market in animals and animal products; \n\nwhereas it is necessary to take account of animal welfare provisions \n\nalready laid down in Community rules, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\nCHAPTER I \n\nGeneral Provisions \n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. This Directive lays down minimum standards for the protection of \n\nanimals bred or kept for farming purposes. OJ No C 76, 23. 3. 1987, p. 185. - 5 -\n\n2. It shall apply without prejudice to Community rules laid down \n\nelsewhere for the protection of certain types of animals. Article 2 \n\nFor the purpose of this Directive the following definitions shall \n\napply: \n\n1. animal; an animal bred or kept for the production of food, wool, \n\nskin or fur or for other farming purposes, including animals \n\nproduced as a result of genetic modifications or novel genetic \n\ncombinat ions; \n\n2. owner or keeper: any person or persons, either natural or legal, \n\nhaving ownership of the animals, or charged with keeping the said \n\nanimals, whether or not for financial reward; \n\n3. intensive farming system; a method of husbandry in which animals are \n\nkept in such numbers or density, or in such conditions, or at such \n\nproduction levels, that their welfare depends upon frequent human \n\nattention. CHAPTER II \n\nThe welfare of animals \n\nArticle 3 \n\nMember States shall ensure that animals are not caused unnecessary \n\npain, suffering or distress. Article 4 \n\nMember States shall ensure that: \n\n1. the owner or keeper of an animal shall be responsible for and shall \n\ntake reasonable steps to ensure its welfare; \n\n\f- 6 -\n\n2. animals shall be cared for by a sufficient number of personnel with \n\nadequate theoretical and practical knowledge of the animals and of \n\nthe husbandry system used. Article 5 \n\nMember States shall ensure that animals shall be housed and provided \n\nwith food, water and care in a manner which, having regard to their \n\nspecies and to their degree of development, adaptation and \n\ndomestication, is appropriate to their physiological and ethological \n\nneeds in accordance with established experience and scientific \n\nknowledge. Article 6 \n\nMember States shall ensure that natural or artificial breeding or \n\nbreeding procedures which cause, or are likely to cause, suffering or \n\ninjury to any of the animals involved are not practised; no animal \n\nshall be kept for farming purposes unless it can be reasonably \n\nexpected, on the basis of its genotype or phenotype, that it can be \n\nkept without detrimental effects on its health or welfare. Article 7 \n\nMember States shall ensure that: \n\n1. the freedom of movement appropriate to an animal, having regard to \n\nits species and in accordance with established experience and \n\nscientific knowledge, shall not be restricted in such a manner as to \n\ncause it unnecessary suffering or injury; \n\n2. where an animal is continuously or regularly tethered or confined, \n\nit shall be given the space appropriate to its physiological and \n\nethological needs in accordance with established experience and \n\nscientific knowledge. - 7 -\n\nArticle 8 \n\nMember States shall ensure that the lighting, temperature, humidity, \n\nair circulation, ventilation, and other environmental conditions such \n\nas gas concentration or noise intensity in the place in which an animal \n\nis housed shall, having regard to its species and to its degree of \n\ndevelopment, adaptation and domestication, conform to its physiological \n\nand ethological needs in accordance with established experience and \n\nscientific knowledge. Article 9 \n\nMember States shall ensure that no animal shall be provided with food \n\nor liquid in a manner, nor shall such food or liquid contain any \n\nsubstance, which may cause unnecessary suffering or injury. No other substance with the exception of those given for therapeutic or \n\nprophylactic purposes shall be administered to an animal unless it has \n\nbeen demonstrated by scientific studies of animal welfare or \n\nestablished experience that the effect of the substance is not \n\ndetrimental to the health or welfare of the animal. Article 10 \n\nMember States shall ensure that the condition and state of health and \n\nwelfare of animals shall be thoroughly inspected at intervals \n\nsufficient to avoid unnecessary suffering and in the case of animals \n\nkept in intensive stock-farming systems at least once a day. Article 11 \n\nMember States shall ensure that when an animal is to be killed on the \n\nfarm, this shall be done competently and in any case without causing \n\nunnecessary pain or distress to the animal or to other animals. - 8 \n\nArticle 12 \n\nMember States shall ensure that technical equipment used in intensive \n\nfarming systems is thoroughly inspected at least once daily, and that \n\nany defect discovered is remedied with the least possible delay. When a \n\ndefect cannot be remedied forthwith, all temporary measures necessary \n\nto safeguard the welfare of the animals shall be taken immediately. CHAPTER III \n\nFinal provisions \n\nArticle 13 \n\nMeasures necessary for the application of obligatory Recommendations of \n\nthe Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of \n\nAnimals kept for Farming Purposes, and any specific rules necessary for \n\nthe application of this Directive, shall be adopted in accordance with \n\nthe procedure laid down in Article 17. Article 14 \n\nMember States shall arrange for inspections to be made by the competent \n\nauthority to ensure compliance with this Directive. Such inspections, which may be carried out on the occasion of checks \n\nmade for other purposes, shall cover a statistically-representative \n\nsample of the farming systems in each Member State each year. Article 15 \n\nCommission veterinary experts may, to the extent necessary for uniform \n\napplication of this Directive, carry out on-the-spot inspections in \n\ncollaboration with the competent authorities of the Member States. The \n\nCommission shall inform the Member States of the outcome of such \n\ninspections. - 9 -\n\nThe Member State on whose territory the inspections are carried out \n\nshall provide the experts with all the assistance required for the \n\naccomplishment of their task. Article 16 \n\nThe Commission shall be assisted by the Standing Veterinary Committee \nset up by Council Decision 68/361/EEC5 hereinafter referred to as \n\n\"the Committee\". Article 17 \n\nWhere the procedure laid down in this Article is to be used, the \n\nfollowing rules shall apply: \n\nThe representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a \n\ndraft of the measures to be taken. The Committee shall deliver its \n\nopinion on the draft within a time limit which the Chairman may lay \n\ndown according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a \n\nvote. The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes. In addition, each Member \n\nState shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the \n\nminutes. The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered \n\nby the Committee. It shall inform the Committee of the manner in which \n\nits opinion has been taken into account. Article 18 \n\nMember States shall take the appropriate specific measures to penalize \n\ninfringements of this Directive. OJ No L 255, 18. 10. 1968, p. 23. - 10 -\n\nArticle 19 \n\nMember States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and \n\nadministrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive no \n\nlater than 1 January 1993. They shall forthwith inform the Commission \n\nthereof. When Member States adopt these provisions, these shall contain a \n\nreference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference \n\nat the time of their official publication. The procedure for such \n\nreference shall be adopted by Member States. Article 20 \n\nThis Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f- 11 -\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 192 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-211-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44015-5 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a5d6bd8-b042-415c-a33e-b58943ce3622", "title": "Council Directive 92/41/EEC of 15 May 1992 amending Directive 89/622/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the labelling of tobacco products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "approximation of laws,illness,labelling,public health,tobacco", "workIds": "celex:31992L0041,oj:JOL_1992_158_R_0030_036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "illness", "labelling", "public health", "tobacco"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a5d6bd8-b042-415c-a33e-b58943ce3622", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/092688b9-345f-4762-855b-39a985b233e2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1195/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Schools in Thessaloniki", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Greece,Macedonia,asbestos,building materials,chemical pollution,dangerous substance,educational institution,health policy,public health,public safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E001195", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "Macedonia", "asbestos", "building materials", "chemical pollution", "dangerous substance", "educational institution", "health policy", "public health", "public safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/092688b9-345f-4762-855b-39a985b233e2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cecf6640-d25f-4766-88fb-eb241e64e0f4", "title": "Reports of Commission decisions relating to competition : Articles 85, 86 and 90 of the EEC Treaty, Regulation No 4064/89 : 1989-1990.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Competition", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "competition,decision (EU),dominant position,economic concentration,merger", "workIds": "PUB_CV7392772", "eurovoc_concepts": ["competition", "decision (EU)", "dominant position", "economic concentration", "merger"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cecf6640-d25f-4766-88fb-eb241e64e0f4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/217751e8-63d6-45a3-9b21-7ac184901a19", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1159/92 by Mr Dimitrios NIANIAS to European Political Cooperation. Respect for human rights of Greek minority by the Turkish Government", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,NIANIAS", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Greece,T\u00fcrkiye,human rights,national minority,rights of minorities", "workIds": "celex:91992E001159", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "T\u00fcrkiye", "human rights", "national minority", "rights of minorities"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/217751e8-63d6-45a3-9b21-7ac184901a19", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/58d3b988-0ef3-4d4a-825c-179d5db5bf44", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1411/71 laying down additional rules on the common market organization in milk and milk products for drinking milk", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "common organisation of markets,drinking milk,food consumption,human nutrition,intra-EU trade,marketing,milk,milk fat,whole milk", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0171", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common organisation of markets", "drinking milk", "food consumption", "human nutrition", "intra-EU trade", "marketing", "milk", "milk fat", "whole milk"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/58d3b988-0ef3-4d4a-825c-179d5db5bf44", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8fe65c69-d7a5-4987-9c23-8b0d43f7b86e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1172/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 LAFUENTE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Community citizens' identity card", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LAFUENTE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU law - national law,EU national,European passport,Treaty on European Union,identity document,nationality", "workIds": "celex:91992E001172", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law - national law", "EU national", "European passport", "Treaty on European Union", "identity document", "nationality"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8fe65c69-d7a5-4987-9c23-8b0d43f7b86e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87bb66ae-be5f-4a77-a93b-426d7bb0fdd5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1163/92 by Mrs Mary BANOTTI to the Commission. Acheloos river diversion, Greece", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANOTTI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Central Greece,EU financing,Integrated Mediterranean Programmes,environmental impact,hydraulic works,impact study,watercourse", "workIds": "celex:91992E001163", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "EU financing", "Integrated Mediterranean Programmes", "environmental impact", "hydraulic works", "impact study", "watercourse"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87bb66ae-be5f-4a77-a93b-426d7bb0fdd5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d7549047-bf38-4d5b-97ce-e4bd646a501b", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1196/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The new main roads in Athens", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Central Greece,EU financing,Structural Funds,co-financing,environmental impact,impact study,road network,self-financing", "workIds": "celex:91992E001196", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "EU financing", "Structural Funds", "co-financing", "environmental impact", "impact study", "road network", "self-financing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d7549047-bf38-4d5b-97ce-e4bd646a501b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/817a10d7-5167-442e-b089-489cef9ab189", "title": "RESOLUTION on ed cation and training policy in the run up to 1993", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Culture and Education,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,EU policy,European integration,continuing education,cultural transmission,education policy,equal treatment,professional qualifications,recognition of diplomas,single market,vocational retraining,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0139", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "EU policy", "European integration", "continuing education", "cultural transmission", "education policy", "equal treatment", "professional qualifications", "recognition of diplomas", "single market", "vocational retraining", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/817a10d7-5167-442e-b089-489cef9ab189", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8511d12c-8720-46ac-b518-5dd90c1ce4e7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1176/92 by Gerardo FERN\u00c1NDEZ-ALBOR to the Commission. New legal and financial framework for Community film societies", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FERNANDEZ ALBOR", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "cinema,cultural policy,cultural transmission,film industry", "workIds": "celex:91992E001176", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cinema", "cultural policy", "cultural transmission", "film industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8511d12c-8720-46ac-b518-5dd90c1ce4e7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3b21c34a-5e2a-4f28-b70b-7e6ab1260602", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together with the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European Communities and their Member States and the CSFR and to the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the CSFR as well as exchanges of letters replacing the exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States and the CSFR and with the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the CSFR", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Czechoslovakia,agreement (EU),land transport,transit,transport infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0203(02),comnat:COM_1992_0203(02)_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Czechoslovakia", "agreement (EU)", "land transport", "transit", "transport infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3b21c34a-5e2a-4f28-b70b-7e6ab1260602", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 203 final \n\nBrussels, 15 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nconcerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of \nletters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together \nwith the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European \nCommunities and their Member States and the Republic of Hungary and to \nthe Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nRepublic of Hungary as well as exchanges of letters replacing the \nexchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member \nStates and the Republic of Hungary and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Hungary \n\nProposal for a \nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nconcerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of \nletters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together \nwith the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European \nCommunities and their Member States and the CSFR and to \nthe Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nCSFR as well as exchanges of letters replacing the \nexchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member \nStates and the CSFR and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the CSFR \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fExplanatory memorandum \n\n1. The annexed draft proposals constitute the legal instrument for \nmodifying the existing exchanges of letters on transit between the \nEuropean community on the one hand and the CSFR and Hungary on the \nother hand and replacing the existing exchanges of letters on \ninfrastructure between the European Community on the one hand and \nthe CSFR and Hungary on the other hand. 2. The above mentioned existing exchanges of letters were signed on \n16 December 1991 upon the signature (on 16 December 1991) of the \nAssociation Agreements between the Communities and their member \nStates on the one hand and the CSFR and Hungary on the other hand \nas well as upon the signature (on 16 December 1991) of the Interim \nAgreement between the European Economic Community on the one hand \nand the CSFR and Hungary on the other hand. The Europe Agreement \nhas not yet come into force. The interim Agreement entered into \nforce on 1 March last. Since the signatures of the above mentioned exchanges of letters, \nboth the CSFR and Hungary increased the fee for taxable transit \npermits which led to discussions between the Community and the \ncountries concerned. These discussions resulted in a mutually \nacceptable reduction in the transit fees as well as in a clearer \nundertaking from the community to explore with both Hungary and \nthe CSFR, within the framework of the existing financial \nmechanisms, financing possibilities for the improvement of land \ntransport infrastructure in these two countries. The parties \ntherefore consider it necessary to modify the above mentioned \nexisting exchanges of letters on transit and to replace the \nexisting exchanges of letters on infrastructure. 3. The Council concludes the agreement on behalf of the EEC by \n\nadopting the decisions mentioned under (I). 4. 5. In view of the above considerations the Commission requests the \nCouncil to adopt the proposals mentioned under (I). In view of the urgency of the matter the Commission, Hungary and \nthe CSFR agree that the exchanges of letters can be signed by the \nambassadors of these two countries and by a director of the \nDirectorate-General for External Relations of the Commission. r \n\nANNEX I \n\nDraft Council decisions concerning the amendment of the existing \nExchanges of Letters on transit between the EEC on the one hand and the \nCSFR and Hungary on the other hand and replacing the existing Exchanges \nof Letters on infrastructure between the EEC on the one hand and the \nCSFR and Hungary on the other hand. AGREEMENT \n\nin the form of exchanges of letters modifying the exchanges of letters \non transit signed together with the Association Agreement on 16 December \n1991 between the European Communities and their Member States and the \nRepublic of Hungary, and with the Interim Agreement between the European \nEconomic Community and Hungary(*); and exchanges of letters replacing \nthe exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member \nStates and the Republic of Hungary, and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Hungary. COUNCIL DECISION \n/92 \n(EEC) N\u00b0 \n\nOF \n\n1992 \n\nConcerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of \nletters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together \nwith the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European \nCommunities and their Member States and the Republic of Hungary and to \nthe Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nRepublic of Hungary as well as exchanges of letters replacing the \nexchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member \nStates and the Republic of Hungary and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Hungary. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, and in particular Article 113 there of, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal of the Commission, \n\nWhereas the exchanges of letters on transit signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement and with the Interim Agreement on 16 December 1991 \nshould be amended ; whereas the exchanges of letters on infrastructure \nsigned together with the Association Agreement and with the Interim \nAgreement on 16 December 1991 should be replaced ; whereas the \nAgreements in the form of exchanges of letters agreed to this effect \nshould be concluded. (1) OJ NO \n\n, 1992 \n\nI'. -l. -pli^n. \u2022: \n\ni l l r ed \n\nllri. - 2). -xch. wje- 2 JS. 1 1. 11 \n\nIVir-x \u2022 OMt. U U 2 1 B 7 1 \n\nT- l<\u00bbqi vif. h i c. I. K ' H - S\u00bb \n\n/ A u 4 / i i it \u00bbr-;l. /WA/c<j-in. d\u00bb-r(l )m) \n\n\fHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION : \n\n- 2 -\n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters amending the \nexchanges of letters on transit signed together with the Association \nAgreement between the European Communities and their Member States on \nthe one hand and Hungary on the other hand and with the Interim \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of \nHungary and replacing the exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed \ntogether with the Association Agreement between the European Communities \nand their Member States on the one hand and Hungary on the other hand \nand with the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community \non the one hand and Hungary on the other hand are hereby approved on \nbehalf of the Community. The texts of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters are \nannexed to this decision. The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the \nperson empowered to sign the Agreements in order to bind the Community. Article 2 \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\n1992 \n\nFor the Council \nThe President \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters amending the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") \nand Hungary concerning transit \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nA. Letter from the Community \n\nSir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December 1991 of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and Hungary \nand of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade related matters between \nthe European Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal \nand Steel Community and Hungary Agreements in the form of Exchanges of \nletters between the Community and Hungary concerning transit were \nsigned. The Europe Agreement has not yet come into force. The Interim \nAgreement came into force on 1st March 1992. Since the signatures of the Exchanges of letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters, to \namend the relevant provisions of the Exchanges of letters signed on 16th \nDecember 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 be amended as follows : \n\nThe part of Paragraph 2 (a) beginning with the words \". Hungary hereby \ngrants. \" shall be replaced by the following text : \n\n\"(i) Hungary hereby grants in 1992, in place of the existing \nquotas granted pursuant to the bilateral agreement between \nGreece and Hungary for 1991 permits in the following way : \n\n1992 \n\nuntaxed \n\ntaxable \n\nthird country (1)(2) \n\n10. 000 \n\n14. 000 with a tax rate of 1 Forint per \nton/km. 1. 200 with a tax rate of 3 Forint per \nton/km. 600 \n\n\f(1) \n\n(2) \n\nAll above existing and additional third country permits may \nbe exchanged for transit permits in the ratio 1:2 \n(1 third country permit for 2 transit permits) \nThe Community shall grant 600 third country permits to \nHungary for use only in traffic to or from Greece. All untaxed and taxable permits are of a round-trip character. For \n1993 and 1994 the total number of untaxed and taxable permits will \nbe increased annually by five percent so that the permits amount in \n1993 to 10. 500 untaxed and 14. 700 and 1. 260 taxable permits and in \n1994 to 11. 025 untaxed and 15. 435 and 1. 323 taxable permits. The \nnumber of third country permits remains 600 in each of the years \n1993 and 1994. The rates of tax of 1 Forint and 3 Forint per ton-kilometer shall \nbe adjusted for 1993 so as to maintain an exchange rate for the \nForint to the ECU equal to the average of such rate obtaining in \nthe period from 6th February to 31st December 1992 and for 1994 so \nas to maintain an average rate equal to the average obtaining in \nthe period from 1st January to 31st December 1993. (ii) The Community hereby grants to Hungary in 1992 12. 000 \n\nuntaxable permits for use only on the territory of Greece. If the transit situation on the territory of the republics which formed \npart of Yugoslavia in 1991 is not normalised the Community and Hungary \nshall jointly examine before 31st December 1992 the possible changes \nconcerning the arrangements set out in this paragraph 2. a. Changes in the above provisions can, until the end of 1994 or, if this \nhappens at an earlier date, until the conclusion of a bilateral \ntransport agreement between the Community and Hungary, be made by common \nagreement between the parties. The Community takes note of the Hungarian understanding that discussions \nwill take place with the Commission and the Member States most directly \nconcerned on other transportation questions such as aviation and third \ncountry road permits. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute an amendment to the Exchange of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community, \n\nc \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters amending the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") \nand Hungary concerning transit \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nB. Letter from Hungary \n\nSir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December 1991 of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and Hungary \nand of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade related matters between \nthe European Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal \nand Steel Community and Hungary Agreements in the form of Exchanges of \nletters between the Community and Hungary concerning transit were \nsigned. The Europe Agreement has not yet come into force. The Interim \nAgreement came into force on 1st March 1992. Since the signatures of the Exchanges of letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters, to \namend the relevant provisions of the Exchanges of letters signed on 16th \nDecember 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 be amended as follows : \n\nThe part of Paragraph 2 (a) beginning with the words \". Hungary hereby \ngrants. \" shall be replaced by the following text : \n\n\"(i) Hungary hereby grants in 1992, in place of the existing \nquotas granted pursuant to the bilateral agreement between \nGreece and Hungary for 1991 permits in the following way : \n\n1992 \n\nuntaxed \n\ntaxable \n\nthird country (1)(2) \n\n10. 000 \n\n14. 000 with a tax rate of 1 Furint p*-r \nton/km. 1. 200 with a tax rate of 3 Forint per \nton/km. 600 \n\n1 \n\n\f(1) \n\n(2) \n\nAll above existing and additional third country permits may \nbe exchanged for transit permits in the ratio 1:2 \n(1 third country permit for 2 transit permits) \nThe Community shall grant 600 third country permits to \nHungary for use only in traffic to or from Greece. All untaxed and taxable permits are of a round-trip character. For \n1993 and 1994 the total number of untaxed and taxable permits will \nbe increased annually by five percent so that the permits amount in \n1993 to 10. 500 untaxed and 14. 700 and 1. 260 taxable permits and in \n1994 to 11. 025 untaxed and 15. 435 and 1. 323 taxable permits. The \nnumber of third country permits remains 600 in each of the years \n1993 and 1994. The rates of tax of 1 Forint and 3 Forint per ton-kilometer shall \nbe adjusted for 1993 so as to maintain an exchange rate for the \nForint to the ECU equal to the average of such rate obtaining in \nthe period from 6th February to 31st December 1992 and for 1994 so \nas to maintain an average rate equal to the average obtaining in \nthe period from 1st January to 31st December 1993. (ii) The Community hereby grants to Hungary in 1992 12. 000 \n\nuntaxable permits for use only on the territory of Greece. If the transit situation on the territory of the republics which formed \npart of Yugoslavia in 1991 is not normalised the Community and Hungary \nshall jointly examine before 31st December 1992 the possible changes \nconcerning the arrangements set out in this paragraph 2. a. Changes in the above provisions can, until the end of 1994 or, if this \nhappens at an earlier date, until the conclusion of a bilateral \ntransport agreement between the Community and Hungary, be made by common \nagreement between the parties. The Community takes note of the Hungarian understanding that discussions \nwill take place with the Commission and the Member States most directly \nconcerned on other transportation questions such as aviation and third \ncountry road permits. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute an amendment to the Exchange of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that Hungary is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of Hungary, \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchange of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and Hungary \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the Community. Sir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Interim \nAgreement on trade and trade related matters between the European \nEconomic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal and Steel \nCommunity and Hungary an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters \nbetween \ntransport \ninfrastructure was signed. The Interim Agreement came into force on \n1st March 1992. the Community \n\nand Hungary \n\nconcerning \n\nland \n\nSince the signature of the Exchange of Letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters to amend \nthe relevant provisions of the Exchange of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems \nHungary is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the \nframework of the financial mechanisms provided for, provide, as \ntransport \nappropriate, financing \ninfrastructure, including roads, railways, inland waterways and combined \ntransport. for the improvement \n\nland \n\nof \n\nIn this context, I take note of Hungary's explanation of the urgent \nneed for financial assistance to enable Hungarian infrastructure to \ncope with the increased transit traffic in Hungary and of the wish \nexpressed by Hungary to consider projects related to transit traffic \nthrough Hungary, such as the modernization and construction of railway \nlines and motorways between Hegyeshalom and Budapest, and that between \nBudapest and Kelebia as priority, since these represent major corridors \nfor Community transit. 6 \n\nThe Commission agrees to start to examine with Hungary possible ways to \ncontribute to the improvement of such infrastructure in Hungary, paying \nspecial attention to environmental aspects, inter alia combined \ntransport, transit motorways, waterways transport, without prejudice to \nappraisal of projects according to existing procedures. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of Letters signed on \n16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community. Agreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchange of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and Hungary \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from Hungary. Sir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Interim \nAgreement on trade and trade related matters between the European \nEconomic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal and Steel \nCommunity and Hungary an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters \nbetween \ntransport \nHungary \ninfrastructure was signed. The Interim Agreement came into force on \n1st March 1992. the Community \n\nconcerning \n\nland \n\nand \n\nSince the signature of the Exchange of Letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters to amend \nthe relevant provisions of the Exchange of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems \nHungary is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the \nframework of the financial mechanisms provided for, provide, as \nappropriate, financing \ntransport \ninfrastructure, including roads, railways, inland waterways and combined \ntransport. for the improvement \n\nland \n\nof \n\nIn this context, I take note of Hungary's explanation of the urgent \nneed for financial assistance to enable Hungarian infrastructure to \ncope with the increased transit traffic in Hungary and of the wish \nexpressed by Hungary to consider projects related to transit traffic \nthrough Hungary, such as the modernization and construction of railway \nlines and motorways between Hegyeshalom and Budapest, and that between \nBudapest and Kelebia as priority, since these represent major corridors \nfor Community transit. X1--' \n\n\fThe Commission agrees to start to examine with Hungary possible ways to \ncontribute to the improvement of such infrastructure in Hungary, paying \nspecial attention to environmental aspects, inter alia combined \ntransport, transit motorways, waterways transport, without prejudice to \nappraisal of projects according to existing procedures. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of Letters signed on \n16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that Hungary is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of Hungary, \n\n& \n\n/ ?i \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchange of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and Hungary \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the Community. Sir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and Hungary an \nAgreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Community \nand Hungary concerning land transport infrastructure was signed. The \nEurope Agreement has not yet come into force. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters, to \namend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of letters signed on 16th \nDecember 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems \nHungary is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the \nframework of the financial mechanisms provided for in the Europe \nAgreement, provide, as appropriate, financing for the improvement of \nland transport infrastructure, including roads, railways, inland \nwaterways and combined transport. In this context, I take note of Hungary's explanation of the urgent \nneed for financial assistance to enable Hungarian infrastructure to \ncope with the increased transit traffic in Hungary and of the wish \nexpressed by Hungary to consider projects related to transit traffic \nthrough Hungary, such as the modernization and construction of railway \nlines and motorways between Hegyeshalom and Budapest, and that between \nBudapest and Kelebia as priority, since these represent major corridors \nfor Community transit. A\\ \n\n\fThe Commission agrees to start to examine with Hungary, on the basis of \nthis Exchange of Letters and referring to Article 81 in the Europe \nAgreement, possible ways to contribute to the improvement of such \ninfrastructure in Hungary, paying special attention to environmental \naspects, inter alia combined transport, transit motorways, waterways \ntransport, without prejudice to appraisal of projects according to \nexisting procedures. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of Letters signed on \n16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the' date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from the entry into force of the \nEurope Agreement. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community. ^4 \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchange of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and Hungary \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nB. Letter from Hungary \n\nSir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and Hungary an \nAgreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Community \nand Hungary concerning land transport infrastructure was signed. The \nEurope Agreement has not yet come into force. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, Hungary adopted law \nN\u00b0 LXXXII of 1991 on vehicle taxes. The parties consider it necessary \nto come to an agreement through the present Exchange of letters, to \namend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of letters signed on 16th \nDecember 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems \nHungary is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the \nframework of the financial mechanisms provided for in the Europe \nAgreement, provide, as appropriate, financing for the improvement of \nland transport infrastructure, including roads, railways, inland \nwaterways and combined transport. In this context, I take note of Hungary's explanation of the urgent \nneed for financial assistance to enable Hungarian infrastructure to \ncope with the increased transit traffic in Hungary and of the wish \nexpressed by Hungary to consider projects related to transit traffic \nthrough Hungary, such as the modernization and construction of railway \nlines and motorways between Hegyeshalom and Budapest, and that between \nBudapest and Kelebia as priority, since these represent major corridors \nfor Community transit. The Commission agrees to start to examine with Hungary, on the basis of \nthis Exchange of Letters and referring to Article 81 in the Europe \nAgreement, possible ways to contribute to the improvement of such \ninfrastructure in Hungary, paying special attention to environmental \naspects, inter alia combined transport, transit motorways, waterways \ntransport, without prejudice to appraisal of projects according to \nexisting procedures. \" \n\n71 \n\nX'y \n\n\fIf the foregoing is acceptable to Hungary, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of Letters signed on \n16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from the entry into force of the \nEurope Agreement. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof Hungary to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that Hungary is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of Hungary, \n\nu \n\n/c \n\n\fAGREEMENT \n\nin the form of exchanges of letters modifying the exchanges of letters \non transit signed together with the Association Agreement on 16 December \n1991 between the European Communities and their Member States and the \nCzech and Slovak Federal Republic (CSFR), and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the CSFR(^); and exchanges \nof letters replacing the exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed \ntogether with the Association Agreement between the European Communities \nand their Member States and the CSFR, and with the Interim Agreement \nbetween the European Economic Community and the CSFR (2). COUNCIL DECISION \n/92 \n(EEC) N\u00b0 \n\nOF \n\n1992 \n\nConcerning the conclusion of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of \nletters amending the exchanges of letters on transit signed together \nwith the Association Agreement on 16 December 1991 between the European \nCommunities and their Member States and the CSFR and to the Interim \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and the CSFR as well \nas exchanges of letters replacing the exchanges of letters on \ninfrastructure signed together with the Association Agreement between \nthe European Communities and their Member States and the CSFR and with \nthe Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nCSFR. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, and in particular Article 113 there of, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal of the Commission, \n\nWhereas the exchanges of letters on transit signed together with the \nAssociation Agreement and with the Interim Agreement on 16 December 1991 \nshould be amended ; whereas the exchanges of letters on infrastructure \nsigned together with the Association Agreement and with the Interim \nAgreement on 16 December 1991 should be replaced ; whereas the \nAgreements in the form of exchanges of letters agreed to this effect \nshould be concluded. (1) OJ NO \n\n, 1992 \n\nTel r p h o n e: d i r e ct \n/ A u 4 / I n r l e 2 b / w A / c o u n. d e c ( 1) m) \n\nl i ne 21 \n\ne \u00ab c h a n ge 2 1 5. 1 1. 11 \n\n\u2022 T e l ex COMEU B 21877 \n\n- T e l e g r a p h ic. l d d i e sa \n\ni-jMtUK & i , \n\n^f \n\n\fHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION : \n\n- 2 \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters amending the \nexchanges of letters on transit signed together with the Association \nAgreement between the European Communities and their Member States on \nthe one hand and the CSFR on the other hand and with the Interim \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and the CSFR and \nreplacing the exchanges of letters on infrastructure signed together \nwith the Association Agreement between the European Communities and \ntheir Member States on the one hand and the CSFR on the other hand and \nwith the Interim Agreement between the European Economic Community on \nthe one hand and the CSFR on the other hand are hereby approved on \nbehalf of the Community. The texts of the Agreements in the form of exchanges of letters are \nannexed to this decision. The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the \nperson empowered to sign the Agreements in order to bind the Community. Article 2 \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\n1992 \n\nFor the Council \nThe President \n\n\fA g r e e m e nt in t he f o rm of an \nExchanrje of l\u00ab\u00bbtterr, a m e nd incj t he \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") \nand the CSFR concerning transit \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the Community \n\nSir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signatures on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and the CSFR \nand of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade related matters between \nthe European Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal \nand Steel Community and the CSFR Agreements in the form of Exchanges of \nletters between the Community and the CSFR concerning transit were \nsigned. The Europe Agreement has not yet come into force. The Interim \nAgreement came into force on 1st March 1992. Since the signature of the Exchanges of letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This decision had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchanges \nof letters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 be amended as follows : \n\nIn paragraph 2) the following sentence shall be inserted after the first \nsentence of the first alinea: \"The fee per taxable permit is 18. 500 \nCzechoslovak crowns. \" \n\nThe following alineas shall be added after the second alinea of \nparagraph 2) : \"Both sides agreed that if the transit situation on the \nterritory of former Yugoslavia is not normalized they will jointly \nexamine before the end of the year the possible changes concerning the \nabove mentioned arrangements. \" \"Changes in the above provisions can be \nmade by common agreement between the parties. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute an amendment to the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 15th March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On Ix'h. il f ol U n- O i m m u n i t y, \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters amending the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") \nand the CSFR concerning transit \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nB. Letter from the CSFR \n\nSir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signatures on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and the CSFR \nand of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade related matters between \nthe European Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal \nand Steel Community and the CSFR Agreements in the form of Exchanges of \nletters between the Community and the CSFR concerning transit were \nsigned. The Europe Agreement has not yet come into force. The Interim \nAgreement came into force on 1st March 1992. Since the signature of the Exchanges of letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This decision had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchanges \nof letters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 be amended as follows : \n\nIn paragraph 2) the following sentence shall be inserted after the first \nsentence of the first alinea: \"The fee per taxable permit is 18. 500 \nCzechoslovak crowns. \" \n\nThe following alineas shall be added after the second alinea of \nparagraph 2) : \"Both sides agreed that if the transit situation on the \nterritory of former Yugoslavia is not normalized they will jointly \nexamine before the end of the year the possible changes concerning the \nabove mentioned arrangements. \" \"Changes in the above provisions can be \nmade by common agreement between the parties. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR, I have the honour to propose \nthat this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that effect, \nshall constitute an amendment to the Exchanges of letters signed on \n16th December 1991 which shall enter into force on the date of Your \nExcellency's reply and be applicable as from 15th March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that the CSFR is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of the CSFR, \n\n2' \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the CSFR \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nA. Letter from the Community. Sir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Interim \nAgreement on trade and trade related matters between the European \nEconomic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal and Steel \nCommunity and the CSFR an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of \nLetters between the Community and the CSFR concerning land transport \ninfrastructure was signed. The Interim Agreement came into force on \n1st March 1992. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This law had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of \nletters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems the \nCSFR is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the framework \nof the financial mechanisms provided for, provide, as appropriate, \nfinancing for the improvement of land transport infrastructure, \nincluding combined transport. In this context, -I take note- of the CSFR's explanation of the urgent \nneed \ntransport \ninfrastructure to cope with the increased transit traffic in the CSFR. financial assistance to enable CSFR \n\nland \n\nfor \n\nThe parties agree to seek, in the context of the existing Trade and \nCooperation Agreement, possible ways and means to contribute to the \nimprovement of such infrastructure in the CSFR, paying special attention \nto border crossings and nearby areas, combined transport, transit \nmotorways, waterways transport and environmental aspects, without \nprejudice to appraisal of projects according to existing procedures. The parties further agree to start, at their earliest convenience, \ndiscussions about possible Community financial assistance. The CSFR will consider further reducing the rate of taxable permits for \nCommunity hauliers according to progress in the above discussions. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR , I have the honour to \npropose that this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that \neffect, shall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of letters \nsigned on 16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date \nof Your Excellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community. 11 \n\n\fAgreement in the^ formjof an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the CSFR \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the CSFR. Sir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Interim \nAgreement on trade and trade related matters between the European \nEconomic Community (\"the Community\") and the European Coal and Steel \nCommunity and the CSFR an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of \nLetters between the Community and the CSFR concerning land transport \ninfrastructure was signed. The Interim Agreement came into force on \n1st March 1992. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This law had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of \nletters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems the \nCSFR is facing in the area of. transport and shall, within the framework \nof the financial mechanisms provided for, provide, as appropriate, \nfinancing for the improvement of land transport infrastructure, \nincluding combined transport. In this context, I take note of the CSFR's explanation of the urgent \ntransport \nneed \ninfrastructure to cope with the increased transit traffic in the CSFR. to enable i\\SFK land \n\nfinancial assistance \n\nfor \n\nThe parties agree to seek, in the context of the existing Trade and \nCooperation Agreement, possible ways and means to contribute to the \nimprovement of such infrastructure in the CSFR, paying special attention \nto border crossings and nearby areas, combined transport, transit \nmotorways, waterways transport and environmental aspects, without \nprejudice to appraisal of projects according to existing procedures. V, \n\n\fThe parties further agree to start, at their earliest convenience, \ndiscussions about possible Community financial assistance. The CSFR will consider further reducing the rate of taxable permits for \nCommunity hauliers according to progress in the above discussions. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR , I have the honour to \npropose that this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that \neffect, shall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of letters \nsigned on 16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date \nof Your Excellency's reply and be applicable as from 1st March 1992. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept. Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that the CSFR is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. For the Government of the CSFR, \n\n?\u2022>\" \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the CSFR \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nLetter from the Community. Sir, \n\nUpon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and the CSFR \nan Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Community \nand the CSFR concerning land transport infrastructure was signed. The \nEurope Agreement has not yet come into force. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This law had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to amend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of \nletters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems the \nCSFR is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the framework \nof the financial mechanisms provided for in the Europe Agreement, \nprovide, as appropriate, financing for the improvement of land transport \ninfrastructure, including combined transport. In this context, I take note of the CSFR's explanation of the urgent \nneed \ntransport \ninfrastructure to cope with the increased transit traffic in the CSFR. financial assistance \n\nto enable \n\nCSFR \n\nland \n\nfor \n\nThe parties agree to seek, on the basis of this Exchange of Letters and \nreferring to Article 81 in the Europe Agreement, possible ways and means \nto contribute to the improvement of such infrastructure in the CSFR, \npaying special attention to border crossings and nearby areas, combined \ntransport, transit motorways, waterways transport and environmental \naspects, without prejudice to appraisal of projects according to \nexisting procedures. The parties further agree to start, at their earliest convenience, \ndiscussions about possible Community financial assistance. The CSFR will consider further reducing the rate of taxable permits for \nCommunity hauliers according to progress in the above discussions. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR , I have the honour to \npropose that this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that \neffect, shall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of letters \nsigned on 16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date \nof Your Excellency's reply and be applicable as from the entry into \nforce of the Europe Agreement. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. On behalf of the Community. )1 \n\n\fAgreement in the form of an \nExchange of letters replacing the \n\nExchanges of letters between the \nEuropean Economic Community (\"the Community\") and the CSFR \non land transport infrastructure \n\nsigned in Brussels on 16th December 1991 \n\nB. Letter from the CSFR. Sir, \n\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date \nwhich reads as follows: \n\n\"Upon the occasion of the signature on 16th December of the Europe \nAgreement between the Communities and their Member States and the CSFR \nan Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the Community \nand the CSFR concerning land transport infrastructure was signed. The \nEurope Agreement has not yet come into force. Since the signature of the Exchange of Letters, the CSFR increased the \nfee for taxable transit permits. This law had consequences on the \narrangements made in December concerning transit and the parties \nconsider it necessary to come to an agreement through the present \nExchange of letters, to' amend the relevant provisions of the Exchange of \nletters signed on 16th December 1991 to take account thereof. Accordingly, I propose that the text of the Exchange of Letters signed \non 16th December 1991 be replaced by the following text: \n\n\"I have the honour of confirming to you herewith that the Community has \nfull understanding of the infrastructural and environmental problems the \nCSFR is facing in the area of transport and shall, within the framework \nof the financial mechanisms provided for in the Europe Agreement, \nprovide, as appropriate, financing for the improvement of land transport \ninfrastructure, including combined transport. In this context, I take note of the CSFR's explanation of the urgent \ntransport \nneed \ninfrastructure to cope with the increased transit traffic in the CSFR. financial assistance to enable CSFR \n\nland \n\nfor \n\nThe parties agree to seek, on the basis of this Exchange of Letters and \nreferring to Article 81 in the Europe Agreement, possible ways and means \nto contribute to the improvement of such infrastructure in the CSFR, \npaying special attention to border crossings and nearby areas, combined \ntransport, transit motorways, waterways transport and environmental \naspects, without prejudice to appraisal of projects according to \nexisting procedures. The parties further agree to start, at their earliest convenience, \ndiscussions about possible Community financial assistance. The CSFR will consider further reducing the rate of taxable permits for \nCommunity hauliers according to progress in the above discussions. \" \n\nIf the foregoing is acceptable to the CSFR , I have the honour to \npropose that this letter, together with Your Excellency's reply to that \neffect, shall constitute the replacement of the Exchange of letters \nsigned on 16th December 1991, which shall enter into force on the date \nof Your Excellency's reply and be applicable as from the entry into \nforce of the Europe Agreement. I should be obliged if you would confirm the agreement of the Government \nof the CSFR to the contents of this letter. Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration. \" \n\nI have the honour to confirm that the CSFR is in agreement with the \ncontents of this letter. For the Government of the CSFR, \n\n\"1 \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 203 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\nli \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-217-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44258-1 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e20fed69-b1bd-4468-8543-7cdb1811e33e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1189/92 by Mr Kenneth STEWART to the Commission. Illegal immigration by Third World seamen", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,STEWART KENNETH", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "approximation of laws,clandestine worker,crew,developing countries,foreign national,illegal migration,immigration,recruitment,residence permit", "workIds": "celex:91992E001189", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "clandestine worker", "crew", "developing countries", "foreign national", "illegal migration", "immigration", "recruitment", "residence permit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e20fed69-b1bd-4468-8543-7cdb1811e33e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e6fab4e-3930-478c-9b31-4abedf78ffa2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1164/92 by Mrs Mary BANOTTI to the Commission. Cohesion Fund and the environment", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANOTTI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "environmental protection,fund (EU),institutional cooperation,member country,transport infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:91992E001164", "eurovoc_concepts": ["environmental protection", "fund (EU)", "institutional cooperation", "member country", "transport infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e6fab4e-3930-478c-9b31-4abedf78ffa2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4693785f-5576-4bd0-b611-1d3e152201f9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1167/92 by Mr James MOORHOUSE to the Commission. European Coal and Steel Community grants to the UK coal industry", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,MOORHOUSE", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "ECSC aid,ECSC loan,United Kingdom,coal industry", "workIds": "celex:91992E001167", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ECSC aid", "ECSC loan", "United Kingdom", "coal industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4693785f-5576-4bd0-b611-1d3e152201f9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/782e8882-055f-46e1-8aa4-c4182b2c022e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1175/92 by Mr Gerardo FERN\u00c1NDEZ-ALBOR to the Commission. The development of rural tourism in the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FERNANDEZ ALBOR", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU aid,EU policy,action programme,regional development,rural region,rural tourism,tourism policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E001175", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "EU policy", "action programme", "regional development", "rural region", "rural tourism", "tourism policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/782e8882-055f-46e1-8aa4-c4182b2c022e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/977ba253-52af-4f9e-a3ff-706a4c9e9c90", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1178/92 by Mr Panayotis ROUMELIOTIS to the Commission. Problems involving air links between Asia and Europe", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROUMELIOTIS", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Asia,Europe,IATA,USSR,air transport,carriage of passengers,international transport", "workIds": "celex:91992E001178", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Asia", "Europe", "IATA", "USSR", "air transport", "carriage of passengers", "international transport"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/977ba253-52af-4f9e-a3ff-706a4c9e9c90", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b93eb9c3-e630-4288-a254-848c32854c3f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1170/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Draft Ibercomett programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Latin America,action programme,new technology,school-industry relations,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E001170", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Latin America", "action programme", "new technology", "school-industry relations", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b93eb9c3-e630-4288-a254-848c32854c3f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/01ada3c4-b4eb-40a4-b131-39e5976080d0", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1161/92 by Mrs Mary BANOTTI to the Commission. EC-funded aquaculture in the Gulf of Amvrakikos", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANOTTI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU aid,Epirus,Integrated Mediterranean Programmes,application of EU law,aquaculture,environmental protection,protected area,suspension of aid", "workIds": "celex:91992E001161", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "Epirus", "Integrated Mediterranean Programmes", "application of EU law", "aquaculture", "environmental protection", "protected area", "suspension of aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/01ada3c4-b4eb-40a4-b131-39e5976080d0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e627c99e-c460-4a4a-9f23-1c91c7f95759", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1182/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. European Commission manpower", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "European Commission,European official,local government,metropolis,report,servant (EU),working population", "workIds": "celex:91992E001182", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "European official", "local government", "metropolis", "report", "servant (EU)", "working population"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e627c99e-c460-4a4a-9f23-1c91c7f95759", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2e056949-2954-4d3c-a67f-bc3defb181f8", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation laying down the definitive system under which non-resident carriers may operate domestic road haulage services within a Member State", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Transport and Tourism,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "access to a profession,carriage of goods,carrier,commercial vehicle,freedom to provide services,market access,road cabotage,road transport,transport licence,transport market,transport regulations", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0157", "eurovoc_concepts": ["access to a profession", "carriage of goods", "carrier", "commercial vehicle", "freedom to provide services", "market access", "road cabotage", "road transport", "transport licence", "transport market", "transport regulations"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2e056949-2954-4d3c-a67f-bc3defb181f8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/507fe06c-6676-4583-bf88-991d1b196b98", "title": "Consumer prices in the EEC 1992.,Les prix \u00e0 la consommation dans la CEE 1990.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurostat", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU Member State,consumer price,consumption expenditure,household consumption,statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA7291423", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "consumer price", "consumption expenditure", "household consumption", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/507fe06c-6676-4583-bf88-991d1b196b98", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f17a426b-7eaf-472f-bea5-60e5bd9aefbe", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1160/92 by Mary BANOTTI to the Commission. Irrigation in Spain", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANOTTI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Extremadura,environmental impact,impact study,protected area,protection of animal life,water management in agriculture", "workIds": "celex:91992E001160", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Extremadura", "environmental impact", "impact study", "protected area", "protection of animal life", "water management in agriculture"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f17a426b-7eaf-472f-bea5-60e5bd9aefbe", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6ae52fd7-c303-41c3-947b-7b1a871b954a", "title": "RESOLUTION on the regional and social redevelopment plan and the Community support framework for the areas of the United Kingdom included in Objective 2", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Regional Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU policy,United Kingdom,industrial conversion,job creation,regional aid,regional development", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0111", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "United Kingdom", "industrial conversion", "job creation", "regional aid", "regional development"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6ae52fd7-c303-41c3-947b-7b1a871b954a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/36edd5be-1a7f-47e7-9af6-ebe5cd7f8c9f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1185/92 by Mrs Brigitte ERNST de la GRAETE to the Commission. Tropical forests in French Guyana", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ERNST DE LA GRAETE,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU aid,France,French Guiana,action programme,deforestation,environmental protection,forest conservation,forestry holding,forestry research", "workIds": "celex:91992E001185", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "France", "French Guiana", "action programme", "deforestation", "environmental protection", "forest conservation", "forestry holding", "forestry research"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/36edd5be-1a7f-47e7-9af6-ebe5cd7f8c9f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8fcec8ed-38c4-4571-82f9-03929abfc438", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1152/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. The Commission' s information offices", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "European Commission,access to information,budget appropriation,centralisation of information,dissemination of information,information centre", "workIds": "celex:91992E001152", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "access to information", "budget appropriation", "centralisation of information", "dissemination of information", "information centre"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8fcec8ed-38c4-4571-82f9-03929abfc438", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b06c3e7a-0b7b-479b-8109-4f404b154ecf", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1191/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. The environment at Vathi Avlidas", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Central Greece,air quality,dust,environmental protection,industrial pollution,marine pollution,public health,respiratory disease,shipbuilding,toxic substance", "workIds": "celex:91992E001191", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "air quality", "dust", "environmental protection", "industrial pollution", "marine pollution", "public health", "respiratory disease", "shipbuilding", "toxic substance"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b06c3e7a-0b7b-479b-8109-4f404b154ecf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/151b7331-929b-460e-a8e3-abb473d49a4c", "title": "Conclusions of the Council and the Ministers for Health of the Member States, meeting within the Council on 15 May 1992 on nutrition and health", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_other_oj_l,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union,Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU action,disease prevention,health policy,nutrition", "workIds": "celex:41992X0612(01),oj:JOC_1992_148_R_0002_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU action", "disease prevention", "health policy", "nutrition"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/151b7331-929b-460e-a8e3-abb473d49a4c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4790a4f5-ceff-49a3-a3b9-62e4039f6185", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1156/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Council. Alterations to draft legislation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Coreper,Council of the European Union,EU act,EU law,European Parliament,advisory power,amendment,exchange of information,government bill,legislative procedure", "workIds": "celex:91992E001156", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Coreper", "Council of the European Union", "EU act", "EU law", "European Parliament", "advisory power", "amendment", "exchange of information", "government bill", "legislative procedure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4790a4f5-ceff-49a3-a3b9-62e4039f6185", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3860d240-0e56-4aad-9f33-92b4daa49558", "title": "Declaration of the Council and the Ministers for Health of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 15 May 1992 on European Drug Prevention Week", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_other_oj_l,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union,Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "cultural event,drug addiction,narcotic,public awareness campaign", "workIds": "celex:41992X0612(03),oj:JOC_1992_148_R_0003_02", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cultural event", "drug addiction", "narcotic", "public awareness campaign"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3860d240-0e56-4aad-9f33-92b4daa49558", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4bd5ad69-02a4-464a-97e4-3934e214bcb6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1162/92 by Mrs Mary BANOTTI to the Commission. Imports of birds", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANOTTI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "Guyana,export licence,import,import licence,international convention,international trade,protection of animal life,wildlife", "workIds": "celex:91992E001162", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Guyana", "export licence", "import", "import licence", "international convention", "international trade", "protection of animal life", "wildlife"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4bd5ad69-02a4-464a-97e4-3934e214bcb6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/786dbe4c-a404-44e7-a886-021036f3197e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1165/92 by Mrs Brigitte LANGENHAGEN to the Commission. Undesirable environmental consequences in Khalkidiki", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,LANGENHAGEN", "date": "1992-05-15", "subjects": "EU financing,Macedonia,aquaculture,degradation of the environment,environmental impact,impact study,sea fish", "workIds": "celex:91992E001165", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "Macedonia", "aquaculture", "degradation of the environment", "environmental impact", "impact study", "sea fish"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/786dbe4c-a404-44e7-a886-021036f3197e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/542eb170-5682-4004-9dd2-3459c07c15c3", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the monthly increases in the activating threshold price and the guide price for peas and field beans for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,leguminous vegetable,norm price,threshold price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(32)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "leguminous vegetable", "norm price", "threshold price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/542eb170-5682-4004-9dd2-3459c07c15c3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/49ebfd10-feef-45e7-b18f-88a7ada43627", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 989/ 84 introducing a system of guarantee thresholds for certain processed fruit and vegetable products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,fruit product,guarantee threshold,vegetable product", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(44)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "fruit product", "guarantee threshold", "vegetable product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/49ebfd10-feef-45e7-b18f-88a7ada43627", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/feaa19dd-4b6e-48b1-bbc7-a74bcaeb7a5b", "title": "RESOLUTION on the situation of women and children in the developing countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "access to education,assistance in training,birth policy,child,child labour,contraception,debt reduction,developing countries,fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention,position of women,ratification of an agreement,woman", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0146", "eurovoc_concepts": ["access to education", "assistance in training", "birth policy", "child", "child labour", "contraception", "debt reduction", "developing countries", "fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention", "position of women", "ratification of an agreement", "woman"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/feaa19dd-4b6e-48b1-bbc7-a74bcaeb7a5b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2c7231f-2912-494b-a820-0aaf0baa60a9", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing certain sugar prices and the standard quality of beet for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,intervention price,root vegetable,sugar,sugar beet,target price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(13)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "intervention price", "root vegetable", "sugar", "sugar beet", "target price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f2c7231f-2912-494b-a820-0aaf0baa60a9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/814db3ab-25b4-4281-8219-619a8c8fca04", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1703/ 91 in respect of a temporary set-aside scheme for arable land", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "arable land,election campaign,farm prices,set-aside", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179", "eurovoc_concepts": ["arable land", "election campaign", "farm prices", "set-aside"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/814db3ab-25b4-4281-8219-619a8c8fca04", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/af3d5e28-97f9-4acf-85dd-a6f32b4182c9", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulations (EEC) Nos. 1035/72 and 1121/89 as regards the intervention thresholds mechanism for fresh fruit and vegetables", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,fresh fruit,fresh vegetable", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(43)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "fresh fruit", "fresh vegetable"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/af3d5e28-97f9-4acf-85dd-a6f32b4182c9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4628cbd4-1d0d-4855-a0e2-b5655464be08", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 2169/ 81 laying down the general rules for the system of aid for cotton", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "cotton,election campaign,farm prices,production aid", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(18)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cotton", "election campaign", "farm prices", "production aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4628cbd4-1d0d-4855-a0e2-b5655464be08", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/16027791-0666-4277-9c65-716ee349938e", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the guide price for flax seed for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,norm price,seed flax", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(25)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "norm price", "seed flax"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/16027791-0666-4277-9c65-716ee349938e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/02b6753f-6439-4f5f-9772-fdfc53805193", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the basic price and defining the standard quality for pig carcasses for the period 1 July 1992 to 30 June 1993", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "basic price,election campaign,farm prices,swine", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(41)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["basic price", "election campaign", "farm prices", "swine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/02b6753f-6439-4f5f-9772-fdfc53805193", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bcf72e38-1af8-4123-8c74-94bd9e4c5f33", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1678/ 85 fixing the conversion rates to be applied in agriculture", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "agricultural product,election campaign,farm prices,representative rate", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(51)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural product", "election campaign", "farm prices", "representative rate"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bcf72e38-1af8-4123-8c74-94bd9e4c5f33", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/21e226a2-ce21-457b-b81a-c3e0eb91bb44", "title": "RESOLUTION on the repercussions of the completion of the single market of 1992 for migrant workers from developing countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "anti-discriminatory measure,assistance in training,birth policy,brain drain,developing countries,human rights,migrant worker,migration policy,rights of aliens,single market,statistics", "workIds": "celex:51991IP0393", "eurovoc_concepts": ["anti-discriminatory measure", "assistance in training", "birth policy", "brain drain", "developing countries", "human rights", "migrant worker", "migration policy", "rights of aliens", "single market", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/21e226a2-ce21-457b-b81a-c3e0eb91bb44", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8c73a045-38f1-42fe-82fd-b46e3cbfa372", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation No. 136/66/EEC on the establishment of a common organization of the market in oils and fats", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "common organisation of markets,election campaign,farm prices,fats,intervention price,market prices,production aid,target price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(15)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common organisation of markets", "election campaign", "farm prices", "fats", "intervention price", "market prices", "production aid", "target price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8c73a045-38f1-42fe-82fd-b46e3cbfa372", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7c40af5d-ced4-479c-a27d-8e49c140501e", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 845/ 72 laying down special measures to encourage silkworm rearing", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,production aid,sericulture", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(28)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "production aid", "sericulture"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7c40af5d-ced4-479c-a27d-8e49c140501e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19b4e97b-9bfc-4d27-8c4f-3836338ce782", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation adjusting, for the second time, the system of aid for cotton introduced by Protocol 4 annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "Greece,agricultural quota,cotton,election campaign,farm prices,production aid", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(17)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "agricultural quota", "cotton", "election campaign", "farm prices", "production aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19b4e97b-9bfc-4d27-8c4f-3836338ce782", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ec94671-9b87-4432-9347-212fbf09340d", "title": "Commission Directive 92/39/EEC of 14 May 1992 amending Directive 90/128/EEC relating to plastics materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "chemical product,foodstuff,foodstuffs legislation,packaging product,plastics industry", "workIds": "celex:31992L0039,oj:JOL_1992_168_R_0021_025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["chemical product", "foodstuff", "foodstuffs legislation", "packaging product", "plastics industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ec94671-9b87-4432-9347-212fbf09340d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b6c012c4-834a-49ec-8aa6-f75781f5e14e", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the production aid for certain cereals sown in the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "aid per hectare,buckwheat,cereals,election campaign,farm prices,millet,production aid", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(06)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["aid per hectare", "buckwheat", "cereals", "election campaign", "farm prices", "millet", "production aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b6c012c4-834a-49ec-8aa6-f75781f5e14e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bcf5e395-7deb-446d-a6a2-d1a60fd9cdc7", "title": "RESOLUTION on the C mmunity' s environmental policy in relation to the developing countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "UN Conference,assistance in training,birth policy,developing countries,ecology,environmental protection,external debt,investment protection,poverty,stratospheric pollution", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0023", "eurovoc_concepts": ["UN Conference", "assistance in training", "birth policy", "developing countries", "ecology", "environmental protection", "external debt", "investment protection", "poverty", "stratospheric pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bcf5e395-7deb-446d-a6a2-d1a60fd9cdc7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/eb5820ea-6cfc-4c65-93c2-c291e69df8c5", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council decision on accession by the European Economic Community to the Protocol to the Geneva Convention on long- range transboundary air pollution on the reduction of emissions of nitrogen oxides or their transboundary fluxes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "air quality,degree of pollution,environmental monitoring,environmental protection,international convention,oxide,pollution control,pollution control measures,transfrontier pollution", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0106", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air quality", "degree of pollution", "environmental monitoring", "environmental protection", "international convention", "oxide", "pollution control", "pollution control measures", "transfrontier pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/eb5820ea-6cfc-4c65-93c2-c291e69df8c5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4acd9ff1-fafb-4107-b0ae-00b7e9d52489", "title": "RESOLUTION on measures to promote and support private investment in developing countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "assistance in training,cost of borrowing,developing countries,development aid,development policy,human rights,investment aid,investment protection,outflow of capital,private investment,terms for aid", "workIds": "celex:51991IP0204", "eurovoc_concepts": ["assistance in training", "cost of borrowing", "developing countries", "development aid", "development policy", "human rights", "investment aid", "investment protection", "outflow of capital", "private investment", "terms for aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4acd9ff1-fafb-4107-b0ae-00b7e9d52489", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d9786cd7-b1c0-41c4-a6f3-243d7b6ac7d0", "title": "RESOLUTION on a Eur pean Democracy Initiative", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Foreign Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "democratisation,financial aid,free service", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0045", "eurovoc_concepts": ["democratisation", "financial aid", "free service"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d9786cd7-b1c0-41c4-a6f3-243d7b6ac7d0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cf0eaf85-5e69-48f3-a5c1-0ddaf53763d7", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the guide price and the intervention price for adult bovine animals for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "cattle,election campaign,farm prices,guide price,intervention price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(39)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cattle", "election campaign", "farm prices", "guide price", "intervention price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cf0eaf85-5e69-48f3-a5c1-0ddaf53763d7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4910db0a-54f8-45af-9152-e8f56ac9133f", "title": "RESOLUTION on the new global partnership", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "GATT,Mediterranean region (EU),UNO,common commercial policy,coordination of aid,debt reduction,development aid,development policy,economic interdependence", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0149", "eurovoc_concepts": ["GATT", "Mediterranean region (EU)", "UNO", "common commercial policy", "coordination of aid", "debt reduction", "development aid", "development policy", "economic interdependence"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4910db0a-54f8-45af-9152-e8f56ac9133f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/093761aa-771f-45dd-882f-9769d80f3d41", "title": "RESOLUTION on the financial impact of completion of the single market on the developing countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "competitiveness,corruption,debt reduction,developing countries,external debt,investment,private investment,single market", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0021", "eurovoc_concepts": ["competitiveness", "corruption", "debt reduction", "developing countries", "external debt", "investment", "private investment", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/093761aa-771f-45dd-882f-9769d80f3d41", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f4cae93-fc11-4c4d-bee3-9c4014544e26", "title": "RESOLUTION on changes in East-West relations and the North- South relationship: role of the Community and the Twelve", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,East-West relations,European Investment Bank,GATT,Mediterranean region (EU),North-South relations,arms trade,debt reduction,development aid,fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention,human rights,immigration,peacekeeping,terms for aid,trading operation", "workIds": "celex:51991IP0392", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "East-West relations", "European Investment Bank", "GATT", "Mediterranean region (EU)", "North-South relations", "arms trade", "debt reduction", "development aid", "fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention", "human rights", "immigration", "peacekeeping", "terms for aid", "trading operation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7f4cae93-fc11-4c4d-bee3-9c4014544e26", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bccde941-85f7-49d8-8bce-1bc560ac2854", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the basic price and the seasonal adjustments to the basic price for sheepmeat for the 1993 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "basic price,election campaign,farm prices,sheepmeat", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(40)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["basic price", "election campaign", "farm prices", "sheepmeat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bccde941-85f7-49d8-8bce-1bc560ac2854", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b147aa2b-be5f-4c19-8c39-be3b051ffb6f", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 822/ 87 on the common organization of the market in wine", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "common organisation of markets,election campaign,farm prices,vineyard,viticulture", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(45)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common organisation of markets", "election campaign", "farm prices", "vineyard", "viticulture"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b147aa2b-be5f-4c19-8c39-be3b051ffb6f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98eed867-812c-4925-8fa9-ba3706f8783c", "title": "RESOLUTION on ways to achieve food security", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "Community budget,developing countries,distribution of aid,food aid,food shortage,non-governmental organisation,security of supply", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "developing countries", "distribution of aid", "food aid", "food shortage", "non-governmental organisation", "security of supply"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98eed867-812c-4925-8fa9-ba3706f8783c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/15bfde15-fbf8-4dfb-bb79-985f7dd7c1b1", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the target price for milk and the intervention prices for butter, skimmed-milk powder and Grana Padano and Parmigiano Reggiano cheeses for the 1992/93 milk year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "butter,cheese,election campaign,farm prices,hard cheese,intervention price,milk,skimmed milk powder", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(35)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["butter", "cheese", "election campaign", "farm prices", "hard cheese", "intervention price", "milk", "skimmed milk powder"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/15bfde15-fbf8-4dfb-bb79-985f7dd7c1b1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0fc5a380-22a5-453a-8a31-57b9d3e9e198", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing prices for rice for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,intervention price,rice,target price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(11)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "intervention price", "rice", "target price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0fc5a380-22a5-453a-8a31-57b9d3e9e198", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4b084dbf-d33e-4082-977c-23cff75630ab", "title": "The statistical concept of the town in Europe.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission,Eurostat", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "Europe,history of Europe,statistics,town,urban centre", "workIds": "PUB_CA7091758", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Europe", "history of Europe", "statistics", "town", "urban centre"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4b084dbf-d33e-4082-977c-23cff75630ab", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/de640e88-7e8c-4aa3-8030-d80a7168fdea", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the norm and intervention prices and the premiums granted to purchasers of leaf tobacco, the derived intervention prices for baled tobacco, the reference qualities and the production areas for the 1992 harvest", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,intervention price,norm price,tobacco", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(50)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "intervention price", "norm price", "tobacco"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/de640e88-7e8c-4aa3-8030-d80a7168fdea", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b5181270-b296-4d58-b1f5-c0301ddfa228", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation laying down special measures for certain varieties of raw tobacco from the 1992 harvest", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,intervention price,tobacco", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(49)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "intervention price", "tobacco"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b5181270-b296-4d58-b1f5-c0301ddfa228", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c922976b-bd67-42c9-b5e0-470566379bb9", "title": "RESOLUTION on the c mmercial impact of the single market on the developing countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "GATT,Lom\u00e9 Convention,common commercial policy,developing countries,import (EU),single market,trading operation,tropical fruit", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0040", "eurovoc_concepts": ["GATT", "Lom\u00e9 Convention", "common commercial policy", "developing countries", "import (EU)", "single market", "trading operation", "tropical fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c922976b-bd67-42c9-b5e0-470566379bb9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4085e766-1dca-4a14-adae-1045803553d8", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the activating threshold price for aid, the guide price and the minimum price for peas, field beans and sweet lupins for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,leguminous vegetable,minimum price,norm price,production aid,threshold price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(31)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "leguminous vegetable", "minimum price", "norm price", "production aid", "threshold price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4085e766-1dca-4a14-adae-1045803553d8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/62b45533-d3d5-4cf6-9007-9c012bc50327", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the monthly price increases for cereals, wheat and rye flour and wheat groats and meals for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "cereal flour,cereals,election campaign,farm prices,groat,intervention price,meal,purchase price,rye,target price,threshold price,wheat", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(05)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cereal flour", "cereals", "election campaign", "farm prices", "groat", "intervention price", "meal", "purchase price", "rye", "target price", "threshold price", "wheat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/62b45533-d3d5-4cf6-9007-9c012bc50327", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1a357123-5ae6-4eb4-939c-735e6aecd48e", "title": "Reform of the structural funds : A tool to promote economic and social cohesion.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "Andalusia,Basque Country,Macedonia,Mezzogiorno,Structural Funds,environmental protection,industrial conversion,reform of the CAP", "workIds": "PUB_C27392716", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Andalusia", "Basque Country", "Macedonia", "Mezzogiorno", "Structural Funds", "environmental protection", "industrial conversion", "reform of the CAP"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1a357123-5ae6-4eb4-939c-735e6aecd48e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5deb7acc-f32c-4446-add4-386c7e8b1aba", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1308/ 70 on the common organization of the market in flax and hemp", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "common organisation of markets,election campaign,farm prices,flax,hemp", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(22)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common organisation of markets", "election campaign", "farm prices", "flax", "hemp"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5deb7acc-f32c-4446-add4-386c7e8b1aba", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b76d0105-315e-4265-8555-09949dbf5ccf", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the derived intervention prices for white sugar, the intervention price for raw sugar, the minimum prices for A and B beet, the threshold prices, the amount of compensation for storage costs and the prices to be applied in Spain and Portugal for the 1992/ 93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "Ireland,Italy,Portugal,Spain,United Kingdom,election campaign,farm prices,intervention price,minimum price,raw sugar,root vegetable,sugar beet,threshold price,white sugar", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(14)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ireland", "Italy", "Portugal", "Spain", "United Kingdom", "election campaign", "farm prices", "intervention price", "minimum price", "raw sugar", "root vegetable", "sugar beet", "threshold price", "white sugar"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b76d0105-315e-4265-8555-09949dbf5ccf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/376bf0c0-3d36-4d66-8c44-7bfcdd413268", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the prices, aids and percentages of aid to be retained in the olive oil sector for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,intervention price,market prices,olive oil,production aid,target price,threshold price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(16)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "intervention price", "market prices", "olive oil", "production aid", "target price", "threshold price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/376bf0c0-3d36-4d66-8c44-7bfcdd413268", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a0c24bf9-42c8-4034-a2e9-df42138d571f", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1079/ 77 as regards the coresponsibility levy on milk and milk products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,milk,milk product,producer co-responsibility", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(36)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "milk", "milk product", "producer co-responsibility"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a0c24bf9-42c8-4034-a2e9-df42138d571f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/141a9892-e101-44ff-897d-b14c7033dcc0", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the co-responsibility levy on cereals for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "cereals,election campaign,farm prices,producer co-responsibility", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(02)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cereals", "election campaign", "farm prices", "producer co-responsibility"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/141a9892-e101-44ff-897d-b14c7033dcc0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7aa73fe8-1d6a-4d4d-b513-d945538b5e0f", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the minimum price for unginned cotton for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "cotton,election campaign,farm prices,minimum price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(21)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cotton", "election campaign", "farm prices", "minimum price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7aa73fe8-1d6a-4d4d-b513-d945538b5e0f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08122070-a6a6-454d-859a-289804578b3a", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 2046/ 89 laying down general rules for distillation operations involving wine and the by-products of wine-making", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "agricultural by-product,distillation,election campaign,farm prices,vinification,wine", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(47)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural by-product", "distillation", "election campaign", "farm prices", "vinification", "wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08122070-a6a6-454d-859a-289804578b3a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/39f0e115-3aae-4550-9be6-59e655cb83bb", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing certain prices and other amounts applicable in the fruit and vegetables sector for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "basic price,election campaign,farm prices,fruit,purchase price,vegetable", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(42)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["basic price", "election campaign", "farm prices", "fruit", "purchase price", "vegetable"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/39f0e115-3aae-4550-9be6-59e655cb83bb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98cdb699-58bd-4a16-b570-70775f0f099b", "title": "RESOLUTION on the r le of the non-governmental organizations in development cooperation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "Community budget,South Africa,democratisation,developing countries,development aid,fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention,non-governmental organisation", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "South Africa", "democratisation", "developing countries", "development aid", "fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention", "non-governmental organisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/98cdb699-58bd-4a16-b570-70775f0f099b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ee2e5020-ffcd-43ca-927a-711afea54b43", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the prices applicable to cereals for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "cereals,election campaign,farm prices", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(01)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cereals", "election campaign", "farm prices"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ee2e5020-ffcd-43ca-927a-711afea54b43", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5bc4fd8-a388-47da-9786-f6221261e824", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council Directive amending Annex II to Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "bird,degree of pollution,ecological balance,hunting,protection of animal life,protection of animals,wildlife", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0107", "eurovoc_concepts": ["bird", "degree of pollution", "ecological balance", "hunting", "protection of animal life", "protection of animals", "wildlife"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5bc4fd8-a388-47da-9786-f6221261e824", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5a578b87-3826-4ccd-9503-2a4497c222f8", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation amending Regulation (EEC) No. 358/ 79 as regards sparkling wines produced in the Community as defined in point 15 of Annex 1 to Regulation (EEC) No. 822/ 87 and Regulation (EEC) No. 4252/88 on the preparation and marketing of liqueur wines produced in the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "anhydride,election campaign,farm prices,fortified wine,sparkling wine", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(48)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["anhydride", "election campaign", "farm prices", "fortified wine", "sparkling wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5a578b87-3826-4ccd-9503-2a4497c222f8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ee325ee-9cc5-4ff9-8ce6-c426c326c81e", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the monthly price increases for paddy rice and husked rice for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,intervention price,purchase price,rice,target price", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(12)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "intervention price", "purchase price", "rice", "target price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ee325ee-9cc5-4ff9-8ce6-c426c326c81e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1464325a-c21e-412e-8531-fbb190b62480", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the overall amount of the aid granted to small producers under the co-responsibility arrangements in the cereals sector for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "cereals,election campaign,farm prices,producer co-responsibility,production aid", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(07)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cereals", "election campaign", "farm prices", "producer co-responsibility", "production aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1464325a-c21e-412e-8531-fbb190b62480", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c6d45ab3-9863-4424-8183-b95991bdd148", "title": "Council Resolution of 14 May 1992 on increased protection for copyright and neighbouring rights", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_legislative_other_oj_c,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "EU law,copyright,cultural heritage,industrial property", "workIds": "celex:31992Y0528(01),oj:JOC_1992_138_R_0001_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "copyright", "cultural heritage", "industrial property"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c6d45ab3-9863-4424-8183-b95991bdd148", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0ac5fad9-d1b4-48f8-b5da-f44a2ac07e90", "title": "RESOLUTION on structural adjustment in the developing countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "Japan,North-South relations,United States,corruption,debt reduction,democratisation,developing countries,development aid,external debt,human rights,interest,price reduction,protectionism,raw material,structural policy", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0059", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Japan", "North-South relations", "United States", "corruption", "debt reduction", "democratisation", "developing countries", "development aid", "external debt", "human rights", "interest", "price reduction", "protectionism", "raw material", "structural policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0ac5fad9-d1b4-48f8-b5da-f44a2ac07e90", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8835180b-ab3e-4ba2-aa11-41babcf44d58", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the burning behaviour of materials used in interior construction of certain categories of motor vehicle", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "bus,fire protection,inflammable product,motor vehicle,technical standard,transport safety", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0201,comnat:COM_1992_0201_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_154_R_0004_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["bus", "fire protection", "inflammable product", "motor vehicle", "technical standard", "transport safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8835180b-ab3e-4ba2-aa11-41babcf44d58", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 201 final - SYN 417 \n\nBrussels, 14 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non the approximation of the laws of the Member States \n\nrelating to the burning behaviour of materials used in \n\ninterior construction of certain categories of motor vehicle \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fz \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nThis proposal for a directive concerns the approximation of the laws of the \n\nMember states relating to the fire behaviour of materials used in interior \n\nconstruction of certain categories of motor vehicles. The historical background, justification and contents of this proposal are set \n\nout below. I. Historical Background \n\n1. The framework procedure governing the EEC type approval of motor vehicles \n\nand trailers at Community level, which is dealt with in Council Directive \n\n70/156/EEC of 6 February 19701) includes, inter alia, a point on special \n\nprovisions for public transport vehicles (point 12. 2 of Annex I I ). It requires the adoption of one or more separate Directives in which \n\ntechnical requirements and test methods will be determined which, in \n\nparticular, buses and coaches must fulfil in respect of their construction \n\nand equipment if EEC approval for these aspects or for these types of \n\nvehicle is applied for. 2. In 1985, the Commission invited its Working Group on Elimination of \n\nTechnical Barriers to Trade - Motor Vehicles to study inter alia the scope \n\nfor new Community measures to eliminate existing technical barriers while \n\nat the same time improving road safety. An ad-hoc group was formed with \n\nthe mandate to draft relevant proposals : ERGA - safety. 1) Q. J. L42, 23. 2. 1970, p. l \n\nT a l a p l i o n a: d i r. ct \n\nl i na \n\n21 \n\ns t a n d a rd 2 J S 11 11 T a l a x: CuHEU f\u00bb 21B77 Ta l eq i a p lu e a d d r a u s: CONCUR H m o it li \n\nRua da \n\nla L oi 2 0 0, H - 1049 B r u s s a l s. d a c r a / K B / D I R E C T / \u00ab 0 8 1 -9 0 a nl \n\n\fThis group presented its final report on September 1st, 1989 (Doc. 111/4257/89, ERGA s/190 final). It included the technical Annexes which \n\nhave been used to draft the present proposal for a directive. 3. European Parliament has repeatedly urged the commission to improve the \n\nsafety of buses and coaches, inter alia after a number of severe accidents \n\nwhere coaches caught fire and passengers were killed, in various Member \n\nstates. 4. While some Member States already operate relevant requirements, others \n\nnotified the Commission of plans to introduce them, under Directive \n\n83/189/EEC. Consequently, the Commission announced to submit a proposal \n\nfor a Directive to the Council, which is annexed. II Justification \n\nThe presently existing directives relating to motor vehicles do not cover \n\nthe fire behaviour of materials used inside the body work of buses and \n\ncoaches. Studies show that in accidents where the crash severity is rather \n\nlimited and not generally life threatening, the risk of fire in the \n\ninterior may be nevertheless important. This is especially a cause of \n\nconcern in buses and coaches where the number of passengers may cause \n\nrelatively long escape times. Apart from requirements on the number and size of doors and their \n\naccessability, with which the Commission intends to deal in a forthcoming \n\nproposal, the fire behaviour of the materials used for seat upholstery, \n\nroof linings, floor cover etc. need to be governed in order to allow for \n\nsufficient escape time for passengers. 7 \n\nThe experts concluded that such requirements are essentially needed for \n\nlarger buses and coaches which can carry more than 16 passengers while not \n\nbeing designed for standing passengers (urban use); urban buses are \n\nrequired to allow proper evacuation by their lay-out. III. Contents of the Proposal \n\n1. Enacting Terms. The enacting terms basically follow the same lines which are included in \n\nsimilar directives adopted for this sector. The only exception is in articles 5 and 6. Here, having regard to the \n\nprovisions of the Single Act which provide for a delegation of powers to \n\nthe Commission in order to proceed with the task of adaption to technical \n\nprogress, the proposal thus retains the Advisory Committee procedure and \n\nnot that of the Regulatory Committee. 2. Technical Annexes. The annexes to the proposed directive are designed to cover all materials \n\nused inside the bodywork of buses and coaches as far as their fire \n\nbehaviour is concerned (i. e. ignitability, behaviour, horizontal or \n\nvertical burning rate). The proposal is largely based on existing \n\nrequirements and standards, including well known test procedures, notably \n\nstemming from France, the F. R. of Germany and the United Kingdom, but \n\nincluding proposals coming from other Member states. -X \n\nAlthough article 1 refers to all \"M3\" vehicles (buses and coaches with more \n\nthan 8 passenger seats and a GVW over 5 tonnes), the scope in Annex I \n\nlimits the application of the annexes to vehicles for more than 16 \n\npassengers, and excludes vehicles designed for standing passengers. The \n\nreason for this exclusion is in the comparitively high escape rate (or \n\nshort evacuation time) and thus limited risk to occupants, proven by \n\naccident statistics. Three Annexes IV, V and VI outline different teste to be performed as \n\nprescribed in paragraph 5 of Annex I, depending on the typical use of the \n\nmaterial (e. g. roof lining, seat upholstery, curtains). Annex II gives a \n\nmodel for an EEC certificate, to become part of the vehicle type approval \n\ncertificate provided for in Directive 70/156/EEC. PROPOSAL FOR A \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the \n\nburning behaviour of materials used In interior construction of \n\nof certain categories of motor vehicle. THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in \n\nparticular Article 100 A thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission,1) \n\nin cooperation with the European Parliament,2) \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee3), \n\nWhereas it is important to adopt measures with the aim of progressively \n\nestablishing the internal market over a period expiring on 31 December 1992; \n\nWhereas the internal market shall comprise an area without internal frontiers in \n\nwhich the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured; \n\nWhereas the technical requirements which certain vehicle categories must satisfy \n\npursuant to national law relate, inter alia, to the burning behaviour of \ns \nmaterials used in interior construction of certain categories of motor vehicle; \n\nWhereas these requirements differ from one Member State to another; \n\n1) 0J N\u00b0 C. 2) 0J N\u00b0. 3) 0J N\u00b0. ? \n\nWhereas it is therefore necessary that all Member States adopt the same \n\nrequirements either in addition to or in place of their existing rules in order, \n\nIn particular, to allow the EEC type-approval procedure which was the subject of \n\nthe Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the \n\nlaws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and \n\ntheir trailers4), as last amended by Directive 87/403/EEC, to be introduced in \n\nrespect of each type of vehicle; \n\nWhereas, with a view to ensuring occupant and road safety, it is important that \n\nthe materials used in the cnstruction of the inside of bus - and coach -\n\nbodywork satisfy minimum requirements in order to avoid or at least retard \n\ndevelopment of flames such that it allows occupants to evacuate the vehicle in \n\ncase of fire; \n\nWhereas, for practical reasons, it is felt necessary to provide for different \n\nperiods of application for new type-approvals and for all new vehicles; \n\nWhereas the approximation of national laws relating to motor vehicles entails \n\nthe mutual recognition by Member States of the inspections carried out by each \n\nof them on the basis of common requirements, \n\n4) 0J N\u00b0 L 42, 23. 2. 1970, p. 1 \n\n\f3 \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE \n\nArticle 1 \n\nFor the purposes of this Directive \"vehicle\" means any motor vehicle in category \n\nM3, as defined in Annex I to Directive 70/156/EEC, designed for use on the \n\nroad and with a maximum design speed exceeding 25 km/h. Article 2 \n\nNo Member State may refuse to grant EEC type-approval or national type-approval \n\nin respect of a vehicle, or refuse or prohibit its sale, registration, entry \n\ninto service or use on grounds relating to the burning behaviour of materials \n\nused in interior construction of its bodywork if it satisfies the requirements \n\nset out in Annexes I, IV, V and VI. Article 3 \n\n1. With effect from 1 October 1993 Member States : \n\n- \n\nmay no longer issue the document provided for in Article 10 (1), third \n\nindent, of Directive 70/156/EEC in respect of a type of vehicle which does \n\nnot meet the requirements of this Directive, \n\n- \n\nmay refuse to grant national type-approval in respect of a type of vehicle \n\nwhich does not comply with the provisions of this Directive. 2. With effect from 1 October 1994 Member States may prohibit the first entry \n\ninto service of vehicles which do not comply with the provisions of this \n\nDirect ive. 3 \n\nArticle 4 \n\nA Member State which has granted EEC type-approval shall take the measures \n\nnecessary to ensure that it is informed of any modification to a part or \n\ncharacteristic referred to In the Annexes. The competent authorities of that \n\nMember State shall determine whether fresh tests should be carried out on the \n\nmodified type and a fresh report drawn up. Where such tests reveal that the \n\nrequirements of this Directive have not been complied with, the modification \n\nshall not be authorized. Article 5 \n\nAny amendments necessary in order to adapt the requirements of the Annexes to \n\nthis Directive so as to take account of technical progress shall be adopted by \n\nthe Commission in accordance wih the procedure laid down in Article 6. Article 6 \n\nThe Commission shall be assisted by the committee established under Article 12 \n\nof Directive 70/156/EEC. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the committee a draft of \n\nthe measures to be taken. The committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft \n\nwithin a time-limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of \n\nthe matter, if necessary by taking a vote. The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition, each Member State \n\nshall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes. The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the \n\ncommittee. It shall inform the committee of the manner in which its opinion has \n\nbeen taken into account. -7o \n\nArticle 7 \n\n1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and \n\nadministrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive not later \n\nthan 1 October 1992. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. 2. When Member States adopt these provisions, these shall contain a reference \n\nto this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of \n\ntheir official publication. The procedure for such reference shall be \n\nadopted by Member States. This Directive is addressed to the Member States. Article 8 \n\nDone at \n\nFor the CounciI \n\nThe President \n\n\fContents \n\n1A \n\nAnnex I: SCOPE, DEFINITIONS, APPLICATION FOR EEC APPROVAL. EEC CERTIFICATE, SPECIFICATIONS. TESTS. CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION. 1. Scope \n\n2. Definitions \n\n3. Application for EEC approval \n\n4. EEC certificate \n\n5. Specifications \n\n6. Modification of the vehicle type \n\n7. Conformity of production \n\n8. Penalties for non-conformity of production \n\nAnnex II : Information Document \n\nAnnex III MODEL EEC TYPE-APPROVAL CERTIFICATE \n\nAnnex IV \n\nTEST TO DETERMINE THE HORIZONTAL BURNING RATE \n\nOF MATERIALS \n\n1. Principle \n\n2. Apparatus \n\n3. Samples \n\n4. Procedure \n\n5. Calculation \n\nAnnex V : TEST TO DETERMINE THE MELTING BEHAVIOUR OF MATERIALS \n\n1. Principle \n\n2. Apparatus \n\n3. Samples \n\nA. Procedure \n\n5. Results \n\nAnnex V I L E ST TO DETERMINE THE VERTICAL BURNING RATE OF \n\nMATERIALS \n\n1. Principle \n\n2. Apparatus \n\n3. Samples \n\nA. Procedure \n\n5. Results \n\n\fAnnex I \n\nSCOPE, DEFINITIONS, APPLICATION FOR EEC APPROVAL, EEC APPROVAL, \n\nSPECIFICATIONS, TESTS, CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION. 1. SCOPE \n\nThis Directive applies to the burning behaviour (ignitability and burning \n\nrate) of interior materials used in vehicles of category M-j having more \n\nthan 16 passengers, not being either designed for standing passengers or \n\nintended for urban use. 2. DEFINITIONS \n\nFor the purpose of this Directive; \n\n2. 1. \"Approval of a vehicle\" means the approval of a vehicle type with regard \n\nto the burning behaviour of the interior materials used in the passenger \n\ncompartment. 2. 2. \"Vehicle type\" means a category of power-driven vehicles which do not \n\ndiffer in such essential respects as: \n\n2. 2. 1. The interior materials used in the passenger compartment. 2. 2. 2. The mass of the interior materials used, in so far as they have an \n\neffect on the performance prescribed in this Directive. 2. 2. 3. The optional arrangements or fittings in so far as they have no detrimen \n\ntal effect on the performance prescribed in this Directive. 2. 3. \"Passenger compartment\" means the space for occupant accommodation \n\n(including bar, kitchen, toilet, etc. ), bounded by: \n\n- the roof, \n\n- the floor, \n\n- the sidewalls, \n\n- the doors, \n\n- the outside glazing, \n\n- the rear compartment bulkhead, or the plane of the rear seatback \n\nsupport, \n\n\f- at the driver's side of the longitudinal vertical median plane of the \n\nvehicle, the vertical transversal plane through the driver's \n\nR-point * ), \n\n\u2014 at the near side of the longitudinal vertical plane of the vehicle, the \n\nfront bulkhead. 2-4- \"Seat** means a structure which may or may not be integral with the \n\nvehicle structure complete with trim, intended to seat one adult person. The term covers both an individual seat or part of a bench seat intended \n\nto seat one adult person. 2. 5- \"Group of seats'* means either a bench-type seat, or seats which are \n\nseparate but side by side (i. e. with the foremost anchorages of one seat \n\nin line with or forward of the rearmost anchorages and in line with or \n\nbehind the foremost anchorages of another seat) and which accommodate one \n\nor more seated adult persons. 2-6- \"Bench seat\" means a structure complete with trim, intended to seat more \n\nthan one adult person. 2-7- \n\n\"Burning rate\" The quotient of the burnt distance measured according to \n\nannex III (or V) to this Directive and the time taken to burn this \n\ndistance. It is expressed in millimetres per minute. 2-8- \"Composite material\" A material composed of several layers of similar or \n\ndifferent materials intimately held together at their surfaces by \n\ncementing, bonding, cladding, welding, etc. When different materials are connected together intermittently (for \n\nexample, by sewing, high-frequency welding, riveting), 6uch materials \n\nshall not be considered as composite materials. 2. 9- \"Exposed face\" The side of a material which Is facing towards the passen \n\nger compartment when the material is mounted in the vehicle. 2. 10. \"Upholstery\" The combination of Interior padding and surface, finish mate \n\nrial which together constitute the cushioning of the seat frame. 2. 11- \"Interior lining(s)\" Material(s) that (together) constitute(s) the sur \n\nface finish and substrate of a roof, wall or floor. ) See Annex IV of 74/60/EEC, AS \n\nO. \\^{U^\\<L\\. |J \ni \n\n\fA^f \n\n3. APPLICATION FOR EEC APPROVAL \n\n3. 1. The application for EEC approval of the vehicle type with regard to the \n\nburning behaviour of the materials used in the passenger compartment \n\nshall be submitted by the vehicle manufacturer or by his duly accredited \n\nrepresentative. 3. 2. It shall be accompanied by the undermentioned documents in triplicate \n\nand the following particular. *: \n\n3. 2. 1. A detailed description, including at least a colour photography, of each \n\ninterior material used in the passenger compartment of the vehicle type \n\nwith respect to its location in the vehicle, to its composition and to \n\nits colour, if applicable, each component being separately described. 3. 3. From the interior materials used in the vehicle, which is representative \n\nof the type to be approved, samples shall be submitted to the technical \n\nservice responsible for conducting the approval tests. 4. EEC CERTIFICATE \n\n4. 1. A vehicle shall be type approved if the interior materials used in the \n\npassenger compartment of the vehicle, as mentioned in paragraphs 5. 2, \n\n5. 3, and 5. 4 to this annex, meet the requirements respectively mentioned \n\nin paragraphs 5. 2. 1, 5. 3. 1, and 5. 4. 1 to this annex. 1s \n\n5. SPECIFICATIONS \n\n5. 1. The interior materials of the passenger compartment used In the \n\nvehicle to be type approved shall be submitted to one or more of the \n\ntests mentioned in annexes JV, V and VI to this Directive. 5. 2. From the following material(s) 5 samples in the case of an isotropic \n\nmaterial or 10 samples In the case of a non-isotropic material (5 for \n\neach direction), shall be submitted to the test described in Annex iv \n\nto this Directive: \n\n- aaterial(s) used for the upholstery of any seat and its accessories \n\n(including the driver's seat); \n\n- material(s) used for the interior lining of the roof; \n\n- material(s) used for the interior lining of the side and rear vails, \n\nincluding separation walls; \n\n- materials with thermal and/or acoustic function; \n\n- material(s) used for the interior lining of the floor; \n\n- material(s) used for the interior lining of luggage - racks, heating \n\nand ventilation pipes; \n\n- material(s) used for the luminaries. Furthermore, one sample shall be submitted to the competent authority \n\nfor future reference purposes. 5. 2. 1. The result of the test shall be considered satisfactory if, taking the \n\nworst test results into account, the horizontal burning rate is not \n\nmore than 100 mm/min or if the flame extinguishes before reaching the \n\nlast measuring point. 5. 3. From the following material(s) 4 samples, for both faces (If they are \n\nnot identical), shall be submitted to the test described in Annex IV \n\nto this Directive: \n\n- material(s) used for the interior lining of the roof; \n\n- material(s) used for the interior lining of the luggage-racks, heating \n\nand ventilation pipes situated in the roof; \n\n- material(s) used for the luminaries situated in the luggage-racks \n\nand/or roof. Furthermore, one sample shall be submitted to the competent authority \n\nfor future reference purposes. 5. 3. 1. The result of the test, described in Annex IV to this Directive, shall \n\nbe considered satisfactory if, taking the worst test results into ac \n\ncount, no drop is formed which ignites the cotton wool. 1G \n\n5. 4- \n\n3 samples in the case of an Isotropic material, or 6 samples in the case \n\nof a non-isotropic material, of the material(s) used for the curtains \n\nand blinds (and/or other hanging materials) shall be submitted to the \n\ntest described in annex V to this Directive. Furthermore, one sample shall be submitted to the competent authority \n\nfor future reference purposes. 5-4. 1. The result of the test, described in annex V to this Directive, shall \n\nbe considered satisfactory if, taking the worst test results Into \n\naccount, the vertical burning rate is not more than 100 mm/min. 5-5- \n\nMaterials which are not to be submitted to the test described in the \n\nannexes IV to VI ire: \n\n5-5-1. parts made of metal or glass; \n\n5-5-2- \n\neach individual seat accessory with a mass of non metallic material \n\nless than 200 g. If the total mass of these accessories exceeds 400 g \n\nof non metallic material per seat, then each material must be tested; \n\n5. 5. 3. elements of which the surface area or the volume does not exceed \n\nrespectively: \n\n2 \n\n3 \n\n5. 5. 3-1- 100 cm or 40 cm for the elements which are connected to an indivi \n\ndual seating place; \n\n2 \n\n3 \n\n5. 5. 3. 2. 300 cm or 120 cm per seat row and, at a maximum, per linear metre of \n\nthe interior of the passenger compartment for these elements which are \n\ndistributed in the vehicle and which are not connected to an individual \n\nseating place; \n\n5-5. 4. electric cables; \n\n5. 5. 5. elements for which it Is not possible to extract a sample in. the \n\nprescribed dimensions as specified in par. 3. 1 of Annex IV , par. 3 of \n\nAnnex V and par. 3-1 of AnnexVI. 6. MODIFICATION OF THE VEHICLE TYPE \n\n6. 1. Any modification to the materials used within the Interior of the pas \n\nsenger compartment shall be brought to the notice of the administrative \n\ndepartment granting approval. The department may then either: \n\n6-1. 1. Consider that the modifications made are unlikely to have an \n\nappreciable adverse effect and that in any case the vehicle still \n\ncomplies with the requirements; or \n\n6-1-2. Require the technical service responsible for conducting the tests \n\nto submit the new materials to the test(s), which is/are applicable \n\ndescribed in the annexes to this Directive. 6. 2- \n\nConfirmation or refusal of approval, specifying the alterations, \n\nshall be communicated to the Member States, by the form specified \n\nin annex III. 7. CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION \n\n7. 1. Every vehicle prescribed under this Directive shall conform to the \n\napproved vehicle type, more particularly as regards features \n\naffecting the burning behaviour of Interior materials, and shall \n\nmeet the requirements of paragraph 5 of this annex. 7-2- \n\nThe manufacturer shall carry out production inspections, tests or \n\nany checks which he deems necessary on components or pieces of \n\nequipment so as to ensure the conformity required in paragraph 7. 1. above. 7. 2. 1. The results of these checks and tests shall be kept at the disposal \n\nof the administrative department which granted the approval. In case \n\nof doubt, the department may: \n\n7. 2. 1. 1. Require the repetition of 6ome of the tests or checks already \n\ncarried out by the' manufacturer; or \n\n7. 2-1. 2. Require the carrying out of: \n\n7. 2-1. 2-1. a test, depending on the application of the Interior material, in \n\ncomformity with annexes IV, V and VI. ^\u00a3 \n\n7. 2-1-2-2- a test defined by the technical service on one or several components \n\nor pieces of equipment. 7-2. 2- \n\nIf after the above checks It still appears that conformity is not \n\ncertain, the administrative department may require a complete test, \n\nas required for approval of the vehicle type, to be carried out. 8- \n\nPENALTIES FOR NON-CONFORMITY OF PRODUCTION \n\n8. 1- \n\nThe approval granted in respect of a vehicle type pursuant to this \n\nDirective may be withdrawn if the requirement laid down in paragraph \n\n7-1- above is not complied with or if the vehicle or vehicles selec \n\nted have failed to pass the checks prescribed in paragraph 7. 2. above. 8. 2- \n\nIf a Member State withdraws an approval it has previously granted, \n\nit shall forthwith so notify the other Member States, by means of \n\na copy of the approval form bearing at the end in large letters the \n\nsigned and dated statement \"APPROVAL WITHDRAWN\". 1 <3) \n\nAnnex 11 \n\nInformat ion document No \n\npursuant to Annex I of Council Directive 70/156/EEC \n\nrelating to EEC type Approval of a vehicle with respect to the \n\nburning behaviour of materials used in interior construction of coaches \n\n0. GENERAL \n\n0. 1 \n\nMake (trade name of manufacturer): \n\n0. 2 \n\nType and commercial description(s): \n\n0. 3 \n\nMeans of identification of type, if marked on the vehicle^) \n\n0. 4 \n\nCategory of vehicle (see Annex II of 70/156/EEC): \n\n0. 5 \n\nName and address of manufacturer: \n\n1. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE VEHICLE \n\n1. 1 \n\nPhotographs and/or drawings of a representative vehicle \n\n1. 1. 1 Photographs of the interior equipment and materials used in coaches \n\n2. 8 \n\nTechnically permissible maximum laden mass stated by the manufacturer \n\n(max. and min. for each version): \n\n2. 8. 1 Distribution of this mass among the axles and, in the case of a semi \n\ntrailer, load on the fifth wheel coupling pin (max. and min. for each \n\nversion): \n\n\f13. Burning behaviour of materials used in interior construction of coaches \n\n2o \n\n13. 1 Material(s) used for the interior lining of the roof \n\nType, marking and colour : \n\nComposite/single1* material, number of layers *1* \n\nType of coat Ing*1*: \n\nMaximum/minimum thickness \n\nmm \n\n13. 2 Material(s) used for the rear and side walls \n\nType, marking and colour : \n\nComposite/single*1* material, number of layers*1* \n\nType of coat Ing*1* \n\nMaximum/minimum thickness \n\nmm \n\n13. 3 Material(s) used for the floor \n\nType, marking and colour : \n\nComposite/single*1* material, number of layers*1* \n\nType of coating*1* \n\nMaximum/minimum thickness \n\nmm \n\n13. 4 Material(s) used for the upholstery of the seats \n\nType, marking and colour : \n\nComposite/single*1* material, number of layers*1* \n\nType of coating*1* \n\nMax imum/minimum thickness \n\nmm \n\n13. 5 Materia I(s) used for luggage racks, heating and ventilation pipes \n\nType, marking and colour : \n\nComposite/single*1* material, number of layers*1* \n\nType of coat ing*1* \n\nMax imum/minimum thickness \n\nmm \n\nDate, File \n\n1) if applicable \n\n\fANNEX I II \n\nM O D EL \n(maximum f o r m a t: A4 ( 2 10 x 2 9 7 )) \n\nEEC TYPE-APPROVAL CERTIFICATE \n\ne \n\nC o m m u n i c a t i on c o n c e r n i ng \n\nt he \n\n- type-approval(1) \n- extension of type-approval(1) \n- refusal of type-approval0} \n\n- withdrawal of type approval(1> \n\nof a type of a vehicle with regard to Directive \n\nType-approval number (2) \n\nReason for extension: \n\nSECTION I \n\n0. 1 \n0. 2 \n0. 3 \n\n0. 3. 1 \n0. 4 \n0. 5 \n\nMake (trade name of manufacturer): \nType and commercial description(s): \nMeans of identification of type if marked on the \nvehicle (3): \nLocation of that marking: \nCategory of vehicle: \nName and address of manufacturer: \n\nSECTION II \n\n1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Additional information (where applicable) : See \nAppendix I \nTechnical service responsible for carrying out the \ntests: \nDate of test report: \nNumber of test report: \nRemarks (if any): See Appendix I \nPlace: \nDate: \nSignature: \nThe index to the information package lodged with the \ncompetent authority that has granted type approval, \nwhich may be obtained on request, is attached. c1> Delete where not applicable \n\n\f2e \n\n( 2} In the case of components the EEC type-approval number \n\nappearing on this document shall consist of all sections \noutlined in Annex VII to Directive 70/156/EEC, as last \namended by Directive. /. /EEC. The component itself shall \nbe marked as prescribed in the relevant separate Directive. ( 3) If the means of identification of type contains characters \n\nnot relevant to describe the vehicle, component or separate \ntechnical unit types covered by this information document/ \ntype-approval certificate such characters shall be \nrepresented in the documentation by the symbol: \n\"?\" (e. g. ABC??123??). <?3 \n\nAppend i x I \n\nto EEC type-approval certificate no \n\nconcerning the type approval of a vehicle with regard to \n\nDirective. /. EEC \n\n1. Additional information \n\n1. 1. Burning behaviour of materials used In interior construction of coaches \n\n1. 2. Material(s) used for the interior lining of the roof \n\nType, mark i ng and coIour : \n\nComposite/single1* material, number of layers *1* \n\nType of coat ing*1*: \n\nMax imum/minimum th ickness \n\nmm \n\nBurning rate : \n\nmm/min \n\n1. 3. Materia I(s) used for the rear and side walls \n\nType, mark i ng and coIour \n\nComposite/single*1* material, number of layers*1* \n\nType of coat ing*1*: \n\nMax imum/minimum thickness \n\nmm \n\nBurning rate : \n\nmm/min \n\n1. 4. Material(s) used for the floor \n\nType, mark ing and coIour \n\nComposite/single*1* material, number of layers*1* \n\nType of coating*1* \n\nMax imum/m i n i mum th i ckness \n\nBurning rate : \n\nmm \n\nmm/min \n\n1. 5. Material(s) used for the upholstery of the seats \n\nType, marking and colour \n\nComposite/single*1* material, number of layers*1* \n\nType of coat ing*1* \n\nMaximum/minimum thickness \n\nBurning rate : \n\nmm \n\nmm/min \n\n1) if applIcable \n\n\fw7 \n\n1. 6. Material(s) used for luggage racks, heating and ventilation pipes \n\nType, marking and colour \n\nComposite/single*1* material, number of layers*1* \n\nType of coat Ing*1* \n\nMaximum/minimum thickness \n\nBurning rate : \n\nmm/min \n\n1. 7. Maximum authorized mass, of the vehicle : \n\nt \n\n1. 8. Number of passenger seats : \n\n5. Remarks : \n\n\f^s \n\nAnnex IV \n\nTEST TO DETERMINE THE HORIZONTAL BURNING RATE OF MATERIALS \n\n1. PRINCIPLE \n\nA sample Is held horizontally In a U-shaped holder and Is exposed to \n\nthe action of a defined low-energy flame for 15 s. in a combustion \n\nchamber, the flame acting on the free end of the sample. The test \n\ndetermines if and when the flame extinguishes or the time in which \n\nthe flame passes a measured distance. 2. APPARATUS \n\n2. 1. Combustion chamber (figure 1), preferably of stainless steel and \n\nhaving the dimensions given in figure 2. The front of the chamber \n\ncontains a flame-resistant observation window, which may cover the \n\nfront and which can be constructed as an access panel. The bottom of the chamber has vent holes, and the top has a vent \n\nslot all around. The combustion chamber is placed on four feet, \n\n10 mm high. The chamber may have a hole at one end for the introduction of the \n\nsample holder containing the sample; in the opposite end, a hole is \n\nprovided for the gas line. Melted material is caught in a pan (see \n\nfigure 3) which is placed on the bottom of the chamber between vent \n\nholes without covering any vent hole area. ^ \n\n\fM \n\n\f2. 2. Sample holder, consisting of two U-shaped metal plates or frames of \n\ncorrosion-proof material. Dimensions are given in figure 4. ^ \n\nThe lower plate is equipped with pins, the upper one w i th corres \n\nponding holes in order to ensure a consistent h o l d i ng of the sample. The pins also serve as the measuring points at the beginning and end \n\nof the burning distance. A support shall be provided in the form of 0. 25 mm diameter heat \n\nresistant wires spanning the frame at 25 mm intervals over the \n\nbottom U-shaped frame (see figure 5 ). The plane of the lower side of samples shall be 178 mm above the \n\nfloor plate. The distance of the front edge of the sample holder \n\nfrom the end of the chamber shall be 22 mm; the distance of the \n\nlongitudinal sides of the sample holder from the sides of the \n\nchamber shall be 50 mm (all inside d i m e n s i o n s ). (See figures 1 and 2 ). first measuring \n\nlast measuring \n\npoint \n\npoint \n\nOl\u00bb*\u00ab*\u00abw<oni In mflllmatra* \n\nS * 4 5* \n\n/- C ow plata \n\n\\ \nn \n1 ' ' \n\nJL \n\njaa. ^ \n\ns \n\n8 A \n\n38 \n\n127 \u00b1 o. a \n\n254 1 0. 2 \n\n(356) \n\n361 \n\nF I G U * \u00a3 4 - t a a m a l i a *i \n\n\f^3 \n\n\f3 \n\n2. 3. Gas burner. The small ignition source is provided by a Bunsen burner \n\nhaving an inside diameter of 9. 5 + 0. 5 mm. It is located in the \n\ntest cabinet so that the centre of its nozzle is 19 mm below the \n\ncentre of the bottom edge of the open end of the sample (see figure \n\n2 ). 2. 4. Test gas. The gas supplied to the burner shall have a calorific \n\nvalue near 38 MJ/m^ (for example natural gas). 2. 5. Metal comb, at least 110 mm in length, with seven to eight smooth \n\nrounded teeth per 25 mm. 2. 6. Stop-watch, accurate to 0. 5 s. 2. 7. Fume cupboard. The combustion chamber may be placed in a fume cup \n\nboard assembly provided that the internal volume is at least 20 \n\ntimes, but not more than 110 times, greater than the volume of the \n\ncombustion chamber and provided that no single height, width, or \n\nlength dimension of the fume cupboard is greater than 2 1/2 times \n\neither of the other two dimensions. Before the test, the vertical velocity of the air through the fume \n\ncupboard shall be measured 100 mm in front of and behind the final \n\nposition where the combustion chamber will be located. It shall be \n\nbetween 0. 10 and 0. 30 m/s in order to avoid possible discomfort, by \n\ncombustion products, to the operator. It is possible to use a fume \n\ncupboard with a natural ventilation and an appropriate air velocity. SAMPLES \n\n3. 1. Shape and dimensions \n\n3. 1. 1. The shape and dimensions of samples are given in figure 6. The thickness of the sample corresponds to the thickness of the \n\nproduct to be tested. It shall not be more than 13 mm. When taking \n\nthe sample permits, the sample shall have a constant section over \n\nits entire length. 31 \n\n38 \n\n254. \" \n\nDimamlont In mUMmatrat \n\n127 \n\no \n\u00a3 \n\n-J k \n\n4-\n\nh \n\n\u2022 1 \" \n\n-4-\n\nO \n\ns \n\n-4- \n\n-\n\n3S6 \n\nFIGURE 0 -\n\n3. 1. 2. If the shape and dimensions of a product do not permit taking a \n\nsample of the given size, the following minimum dimensions shall be \n\nmaintained: \n\na) For samples having a width of 3 to 60 mm, the length shall be \n\n356 mm. In this case the material is tested in the product's \n\nwidth. b) For samples having a width of 60 to 100 mm, the length shall be \n\nat least 138 mm. In this case the potential burning distance \n\ncorresponds to the length of the sample, the measurement starting \n\nat the first measuring point. 3. 2- \n\nSampling \n\n3^ \n\nThe samples shall be taken from the material under test. In materials having different burning rates in different material \n\ndirections, each direction has to be tested. The samples are to be \n\ntaken and placed in the test apparatus so that the highest burning \n\nrate will be measured. When the material is supplied in widths, a length of at least 500 mm \n\nshall be cut covering the entire width. From this the samples shall \n\nbe taken so as to be at least 100 mm from the material edge and \n\nequidistant from each other. Samples shall be taken in the same way from finished products, when \n\nthe shape of the product permits. When the thickness of the product \n\nis more than 13 mm, it shall be reduced to 13 mm by a mechanical \n\nprocess applied to the side which does not face the occupant \n\ncompartment. If it is Impossible, the test shall be carried out, in \n\naccordance with the Technical Service, on the initial width of the \n\nmaterial which shall be mentioned in the test report. Composite materials (see 2. 8. of annex 1) shall be tested as if they \n\nwere of uniform construction. In the case of materials made of superimposed layers of different \n\ncomposition which are not composite materials, all the layers of \n\nmaterial included within a depth of 13 mm from the surface facing \n\ntowards the passenger compartment shall be tested individually. 3. 3* \n\nConditioning \n\nThe samples shall be conditioned for at least 24 h but not more than \n\n7 days at a temperature of 23 + 2\u00b0C and a relative, humidity of \n\n50 + 5Z and shall be maintained under these conditions until \n\nImmediately prior to testing. 4. PROCEDURE \n\n4. 1. Place samples with napped or tufted surfaces on a flat surface and \n\ncomb twice against the nap using the comb (2. 5. )* \n\n\f2a \n\n4. 2. Place the sample in the sample holder (2. 2. ) so that the exposed \n\nside will be downwards to the flame. 4. 3. Adjust the gas flame to a height of 38 mm using the mark in the \n\nchamber, the air intake of the burner being closed. Before starting \n\nthe first test, the flame shall burn at least for 1 min for stabi \n\nlization. 4. 4. Push the sample-holder into the combustion chamber so that the end \n\nof the sample is exposed to the flame, and after 15 s cut off the \n\ngas flow. 4. 5. The measurement of the burning time starts at the moment when the \n\nfoot of the flame passes the first measuring point. Observe the \n\nflame propagation on the side burning faster than the other \n\n(upper or lower side). 4. 6. Measurement of burning time is completed when the flame has come to \n\nthe last measuring point or when the flame extinguishes before \n\ncoming to the last measuring point. If the flame does not reach the \n\nlast measuring point, measure the burnt distance up to the point \n\nwhere the flame extinguished. Burnt distance is the decomposed part \n\nof the sample, which is destroyed on its surface or in the interior \n\nby burning. 4. 7. In so far as the sample does not ignite or does not continue burning \n\nafter the burner has been extinguished, or when the flame extingui \n\nshes before reaching the first measuring point, so that no burning \n\ntime is measured note in the test report that the burning rate is \n\n0 mm/min. 4. 8. When running a series of tests or repeat tests, ensure that the \n\ncombustion chamber and sample holder have a maximum temperature of \n\n30*C before starting the next test. 2V \n\nCALCULATION \n\nThe burning rate, B*t in millimetres per minute, is given by the \n\nformula. where \n\ns \nB - - x 60 \nt \n\ns is the burnt distance, in millimetres; \n\nt is the time, in seconds, to burn distance s \n\n* The burning rate (B) for each sample is only calculated in the case \n\nwhere the flame reaches the last measuring point or the end of the \n\nsample \n\n\fAnnex V \n\nTEST TO DETERMINE THE MELTING BEHAVIOUR OF MATERIALS \n\nPRINCIPLE. A sample Is placed in a horizontal position and Is exposed to an \n\nelectric radiator. A receptacle is positioned under the specimen \n\nto collect the resultant drops. Some cotton wool is put in this receptacle in order to verify if \n\nar. y drop is flaming. APPARATUS. The apparatus shall consist of (figure 1) \n\na) an electric radiator \n\nb) a support for the sample with grill \n\nc) a receptacle (for resultant drops) \n\nd) a support (for the apparatus) \n\n2. 1. The source of heat is an electric radiator with a useful output of \n\n500 W. The radiating surface must be made of a transparent quartz \n\nplate with a diameter of 100 + 5 mm. The radiated heat from the apparatus, measured on a surface which is \n\nsituated parallel to the surface of the radiator at a distance of \n\n30 mm, shall be 3 W/cm^. 2. 2. Calibration. For calibration of the radiator, a heat flux meter (radiometer) of \n\nthe Gardon (foil) type with a design range not exceeding 10 W/cra^ \n\nshall be used. The target receiving radiation, and possibly to a small extent \n\nconvection, shall be flat, circular, not more than 10 mm In diameter \n\nand coated with a durable matt black finish. The target shall be \n\ncontained within a watercooled body the front face of which shall be \n\nof highly polished metal, flat, coinciding with the plane of the \n\ntarget and circular, with a diameter of about 25 mm. 3C \n\nRadiation shall not pass through any window before reaching the \n\ntarget. The instrument shall be robust, simple to set up and use, \n\ninsensitive to draughts, and stable in calibration. The instrument \n\nshall have an accuracy of within + 3 % and a repeatability within \n\n0. 5 %. The calibration of the heat flux meter shall be checked whenever a \n\nrecalibration of the radiator is carried out, by comparison with an \n\ninstrument held as a reference standard and not used for any other \n\npurpose. The reference standard instrument shall be fully calibrated \n\nat yearly Intervals in accordance with a national standard. 2. 2. 1. Calibration check. The irradiance produced by the power input which the initial \n\ncalibration has shown to correspond to an irradiance of 3 W/cm^ shall \n\nbe frequently checked (at least once every 50 operating hours) and \n\nthe apparatus shall be recalibrated if such a check reveals a \n\ndeviation greater than 0. 06 W/cm^. 2. 2. 2. Calibration procedure. The apparatus shall be placed in an environment essentially free of \n\nair currents (not more than 0. 2 m/s). Place the heat flux meter in the apparatus in the specimen position \n\nso that the target of the heat flux meter is located centrally within \n\nthe radiator surface. Switch on the electricity supply and establish the power Input of the \n\ncontroller required to produce irradiance at the center of the \n\nradiator surface of 3 W/cm^. Adjustment to the power unit to record \n\n3 W/cm^ should be followed by a 5 min. period without further \n\nadjustment to ensure equilibrium. 2. 3- \n\nThe support for the samples shall be a metallic ring (Fig \n\nOn top of this support a grill, made of stainless steel-wire, is \n\n2} \n/. 1 ). placed with the following dimensions: - interior diameter: 118 mm \n\n- dimension of the holes: \n\n2. 10 mm square \n\n- diameter of the 6teel-wire \n\n0. 70 mm \n\n2. 4. The receptacle shall consist of a cylindrical tube with an interior \n\ndiameter of 118 mm and a depth of 12 mm. The receptacle shall be filled with cotton wool. 2. 5- \n\nA vertical column shall support the items specified in paragraph \n\n2. 1, 2. 3 and 2. 4. The radiator is placed on top of the support in a manner such that the \n\nradiating surface is horizontal and the radiation is downwards. A lever/pedal shall be provided in the column to lift the support of \n\nthe radiator slowly. It shall also be provided with a catch in order \n\nto ensure that the radiator can be brought back in its normal posi \n\ntion. In their normal position, the axes of the radiator, the support \n\nfor the sample and the receptacle must coincide. 3. SAMPLES. The test samples shall measure: 70 mm x 70 mm. Samples shall be taken In the 6ame way from finished products, when \n\nthe shape of the product permits. When the thickness of the product \n\nis more than 13 mm, it shall be reduced to 13 mm by a mechanical \n\nprocess applied to the side which does not face the occupant \n\ncompartment. If It is impossible, the test shall be carried out, in \n\naccordance with the Technical Service, on the initial width of the \n\nmaterial which shall be mentioned in the test report. Composite materials (see 2. 8 of Annex 1) shall be tested as If they \n\nwere of uniform contructlon. 1 3 \n\nIn the case of materials made of superimposed layers of different \n\ncomposition which are not composite materials, all the layers of \n\nmaterial included within a depth of 13 mm from the surface facing \n\ntowards the passenger compartment shall be tested Individually. The total mass of the sample to be tested shall be at least 2 g. If the mass of one sample is less, a sufficient number of samples \n\nshall be added. If the two faces of the material differ, both faces must be tested, \n\nwhich means that 8 samples are to be tested. The samples and the cotton wool shall be conditioned for at least \n\n24 h at a temperature of 2 3 +2 \u00b0C and a relative humidity of \n\n50 + 5% and shall be maintained under these conditions until \n\nimmediately prior to testing. 4. PROCEDURE \n\nThe sample is placed on the support and the latter Is so positioned \n\nthat the distance between the surface of the radiator and the \n\nupperside of the sample Is 30 mm. The receptacle, including the cotton wool, is placed beneath the \n\ngrill of the support at a distance of 300 mm. The radiator is put aside, so that it can not radiate on the \n\nsample, and switched on. When it is on full capacity it is positio \n\nned above the sample and timing is started. If the material melts or deforms, the height of the radiator is \n\nmodified to maintain the distance of 30 mm. If the material ignites, the radiator is put aside 3 s. afterwards. It is brought back in position when the flame has extinguished and \n\nthe same procedure is repeated as frequently as necessary during the \n\nfirst 5 minutes of the test. 23 \n\nAfter the fifth minute of the test: \n\n(1) If the sample has extinguished (whether or not it has ignited \n\nduring the first 5 minutes of the test) leave the radiator in \n\nposition even if the sample reignites. (ii) If the material is flaming, await extinction before bringing \n\nthe radiator into position again. In either case, the test must be continued for an additional \n\n5 minutes. RESULTS. Observed phenomena shall be noted In the test-report, such as: \n\n- the fall of drops, If any, whether flaming or not, \n\n- if ignition of the cotton wool has taken place. M v3 \n\nDimensions in millimeters \n\n1 : Radiator \n\n2 : Sample \n\n3 : Grill (for the support of the sample) \n\n4 : Cotton wool \n\n5 : Receptacle \n\n8 \n\nGrill \n\n^ \n\nMobile metallic ring \n\nMetallic ring j J ^ \ni '. \u00ab\u2014 \n\n(fixed) \n\nii e \nT22_ \noc \n\nS> \n\u2022 i \n- I \n\nDetail of the metallic rings for the \nsupport of the sample \n\n~7/ /\n\n/\n\n/\n\n/\n\n/\n\n/, \n\n/ \n\n/ \n\ns \n\n/ \n\n/ \n\n/ \n\n/ \n/ \n\n/ \n\n' \n/ \n\n\u2022' \n\n/ \n\n/ \n\nFIGURE 1 \n\n\fMi \n\nAnnex VI \n\nTEST TO DETERMINE THE VERTICAL BURNING RATE OF MATERIALS \n\nPRINCIPLE \n\nThis test consists of exposing samples, held in a vertical position, \n\nto a flame and determining the speed of propagation of the flame over \n\nthe material to be tested. 2. APPARATUS \n\nThe apparatus shall consist of: \n\na) a specimen holder \n\nb) a burner \n\nc) a ventilation system to extract gas and combustion products \n\nd) a template \n\ne) marker threads of white mercerized cotton threads having a maximum \n\nlinear density of 50 tex. 2. 1. The specimen holder shall consist of a rectangular frame 560 mm high \n\nand shall have two rigidly connected parallel rods spaced 150 mm \n\napart on which pins shall be fitted for mounting the test specimen \n\nwhich is located in a plane at least 20 mm from the frame. The \n\nmounting pins shall be not greater than 2 mm diameter and at least \n\n27 mm long. The pins shall be located on the parallel'rods at loca \n\ntions shown in figure 1. The frame shall be fitted onto a suitable \n\nsupport to maintain the rods in a vertical orientation during \n\ntesting. (For the purpose of locating the specimen on the pins in a \n\nplane away from the frame, spacer stubs 2 mm diameter may be provi \n\nded adjacent to the pins). 2. 2. The burner Is described in figure 3. The gas supplied to the burner can be either commercial propane gas \n\nor commercial butane gas. V u \n\nThe burner shall be positioned in front of, but below, the specimen \n\nsuch that it lies In a plane passing through the vertical centreline \n\nof the specimen and perpendicular to its face (see figure 2), such \n\nthat the longitudinal axis is inclined upwards at 30* to the vertical \n\ntowards the lower edge of the specimen. The distance between the tip \n\nof the burner and the lower edge of the specimen shall be 20 mm. 2. 3. The test apparatus may be placed in a fume cupboard assembly provided \n\nthat the internal volume is at least 20 times, but not more than 110 \n\ntimes, greater than the volume of the test apparatus and provided \n\nthat no single height, width, or length dimension of the fume cup \n\nboard is greater than 2 1/2 times either of the other two dimensions. Before the test, the vertical velocity of the air through the fume \n\ncupboard shall be measured 100 mm in front of and behind the final \n\nposition where the test apparatus will be located. It shall be \n\nbetween 0. 10 and 0. 30 m/s in order to avoid possible discomfort, by \n\ncombustion products, to the operator. It is possible to use a fume \n\ncupboard with a natural ventilation and an appropriate air velocity. 2. 4. A flat rigid template made of suitable material and of a size corres \n\nponding to the size of the specimen shall be used. Holes \n\napproximately 2 mm diameter shall be drilled in the template and \n\npositioned so that the distances between the centres of the holes \n\ncorrespond to the distances between the pins on the frames (see \n\nfigure 1). The holes shall be located equidistant about the vertical \n\ncentrelines of the template. 3. SAMPLES \n\n3. 1. The samples dimensions are: 560 x 170 mm. 3. 2. The samples shall be conditioned for at least 24h at a temperature \n\nof 23 + 2*C and a relative humidity of 50 + 5% and shall be \n\nmaintained under these conditions until immediately prior to \n\ntesting. 4. PROCEDURE \n\n13 \n\n4. 1. The test shall be carried out in an atmosphere having a temperature \n\nbetween 10\u00b0 and 30\u00b0 C and a relative humidity between 15% and 80Z. 4. 2. The burner shall be preheated for 2 min. The flame height 6hall be \n\nadjusted to 40 + 2 mm measured as the distance between the top of the \n\nburner tube and the tip of the yellow part of the flame when the bur \n\nner is vertically oriented and the flame Is viewed in dim light. 4. 3* \n\nThe specimen shall be placed on the pins of the test frame, making \n\ncertain that the pins pass through the point6 marked off from the \n\ntemplate and that the specimen is at least 20 mm removed from the \n\nframe. The frame shall be fitted on the support so that the specimen \n\nis vertical. 4. 4. The marker threads shall be attached horizontally in front of the \n\nspecimen at the locations shown in figure 1. At each location, a loop \n\nof thread shall be mounted so that the two segments are spaced 1 mm \n\nand 5 mm from the plane of the front of the specimen. Each loop shall be attached to a suitable timing device. Sufficient \n\ntension shall be Imposed to the thread to maintain its position re \n\nlative to the specimen. 4. 5- \n\nThe flame shall be applied to the specimen for 5 s. Ignition shall be \n\ndeemed to have occurred if flaming of the specimen continues for 5 s \n\nafter removal of the Igniting flame. If ignition does not occur, the \n\nflame shall be applied for 15 s to another conditioned specimen. 4. 6. If any result in any set of three specimens exceeds the minimum \n\nresult by 50Z, another set of three specimens shall be tested for \n\nthat direction or face. If one or two specimens in any set of three \n\nspecimens fail to burn to the top marker thread, another set of three \n\nspecimens shall be tested for that direction or face. 4. 7. The following time6, in seconds, shall be measured: \n\na) from the start of the application of the Igniting flame to the \n\nseverance of the first marker thread (tl); \n\nb) from the start of the application of the igniting flame to the \n\nseverance of the second marker thread (t2); \n\nc) from the start of the application of the igniting flame to the \n\nseverance of the third marker thread (t3). V V \n\nRESULTS \n\nThe observed phenomena shall be written down in the test-report, \n\nto include: - the durations of combustion: \n\nti, to end to in seconds \n\n- the corresponding burnt distances: \n\nd-i , do and do in mm. The burning rate V\\ and the rates V\u00ab and V3, if applicable, shall be \n\ncalculated (for each sample if the flame reaches at least the first \n\nmarker thread) as follows: \n\ndi \n\nV^ - \n\nx 60 ( mm/min. ) \n\nThe highest burning rate of V^, V2 and V3 shall be taken into \naccount. IS \n\nDimensions in millimetres \n\n1 5 \ny \n\nh \n\n\u00b1r \n\nI \n\n* \n\n\u2022 \n\n4 \n\n* \n\n150 \n\nFigure 1 \u2014 Specimen holder \n\n\f% \n\nBurner* \n\nEdge ignition \n\nFigure 2 \u2014 Burner ignition location \n\n\f*H \n\nDimensions in millimetres \n\nGas jet-\n\nFitted in \n\nduring - a* \n\nassembly \n\n05 \n\nrM_Js \n\nBurner tube \n\n-Reme stabilizer \n\n7 \n\nChoke tube \n\n\u2022Notch \n\na) Gas burner arrangement \n\n- 10 \n\n,, \n\nSum i \n\nI \n\nL. 0. 8 \n\nA-A \n\nc) R a ma stabilizer \n\nb) Gas Jet \n\n0410,05^ \n\n) Pitch Circle Diameter: 4,4 mm \n\nir\u00bb \n\n65*0,05^ \n\n40 \n\nd) Burner tuba \n\nF i g u re 3 \u2014 G as b u r n er \n\ni) \n\n1) The burner may be obtained from Dr. -Ing Georg Wazau, Mess- und Pruftechnik, \n\nKeplerstr. 12, D-1000 Berlin 10, Germany. v? \n\nIMPACT STATEMENT ON COMPETITIVENESS AND JOBS \n\nProposal for a Council Directive on the approximation of the laws of the \nMember states relating to the burning behaviour of materials used in interior \nconstruction of certain categories of motor vehicles \n\nI. What is the main justification of the measure? \n\n- \n- \n- \n\nCompletion of the EEC type-approval procedure for coaches \nHarmonization of national laws \nImprovements to road safety. II. Characteristics of the companies involved \n\nMore particularly: \n\n- \n- \n\nDo they include a large number of SME? : No \nAre there any significant concentrations? : No \nAre they eligible for regional aid from the MS? : No \nAre they eligible for aid from the ERDF? : No \n\nIII. What obligations are imposed on those companies? \n\nMerely the obligation to comply with what the Directive lays down with \nregard to type approval of coaches. IV. What obligations are likely to be 'imposed indirectly upon those \ncompanies via the local authorities? \n\nNo additional obligation. V. Do any special measures apply to SME? No \nWhat are they? \n\nVI. What is the foreseeable impact on: \n\ncompany productivity? \n\nNo foreseeable impact. - \n\njobs? No foreseeable impact. VII. Have both sides of industry been consulted? Yes \n\nOpinion of both sides of industry: no objections \n\n\fc)9 \n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 201 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n07 06 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-215-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44051-1 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b88059d1-9214-41a7-98a6-d17ecca3b748", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council recommendation on common criteria concerning sufficient resources and social assistance in the social protection systems", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Employment and Social Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "European social policy,aid to disadvantaged groups,exchange of information,poverty,social assistance,social security,social-security benefit,subsistence level income,welfare", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0180", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European social policy", "aid to disadvantaged groups", "exchange of information", "poverty", "social assistance", "social security", "social-security benefit", "subsistence level income", "welfare"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b88059d1-9214-41a7-98a6-d17ecca3b748", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0af93f10-c71d-4814-8c06-3483aeae2744", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the minimum price for potatoes to be paid by potato-starch manufacturers to potato producers for the 1992/93 cereal marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,minimum price,potato", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(10)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "minimum price", "potato"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0af93f10-c71d-4814-8c06-3483aeae2744", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/925e9e22-e84b-4fac-86c0-4d9aee330d70", "title": "RESOLUTION on the ndebtedness of developing countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "ACP countries,Africa,Stabex,Sysmin,aid programme,brain drain,capital transfer,commodity price,corruption,debt reduction,developing countries,environmental protection,external debt,fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention,interest rate subsidy,private investment", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ACP countries", "Africa", "Stabex", "Sysmin", "aid programme", "brain drain", "capital transfer", "commodity price", "corruption", "debt reduction", "developing countries", "environmental protection", "external debt", "fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention", "interest rate subsidy", "private investment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/925e9e22-e84b-4fac-86c0-4d9aee330d70", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24af0651-06ae-4d37-a526-02c05317d7cd", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal to the Council for a regulation fixing the guide prices for wine for the 1992/93 wine year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "election campaign,farm prices,guide price,wine", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0179(46)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["election campaign", "farm prices", "guide price", "wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24af0651-06ae-4d37-a526-02c05317d7cd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/392f9129-6079-4769-8aaf-7c522d0aef6e", "title": "RESOLUTION on the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Group for the European United Left,Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group,Socialist Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,administrative formalities,banking,coordination of aid,economic cooperation", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0660", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "administrative formalities", "banking", "coordination of aid", "economic cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/392f9129-6079-4769-8aaf-7c522d0aef6e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5ff6377-5917-47e6-b6c3-c6c19e78f781", "title": "92/290/EEC: Commission Decision of 14 May 1992 concerning certain protection measures relating to bovine embryos in respect of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in the United Kingdom", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-14", "subjects": "United Kingdom,animal disease,biology,cattle,health certificate,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:31992D0290,oj:JOL_1992_152_R_0037_042", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "animal disease", "biology", "cattle", "health certificate", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c5ff6377-5917-47e6-b6c3-c6c19e78f781", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a80f678f-5ea8-44ad-b839-440e55c2491c", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) temporarily the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duty on a number of industrial products (in the chemical and allied sectors)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "crop yield,olive,olive oil", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0199,comnat:COM_1992_0199_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["crop yield", "olive", "olive oil"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a80f678f-5ea8-44ad-b839-440e55c2491c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92)19^ final \n\nBrussels, 15 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\ntemporarily suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff \nduty on a number of industrial products (in the chemical and \nal I ied sectors) \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUN \n\n1. In the first quarter of this year, the Commission, with the \nassistance of the Economic Tariff Questions Group, examined all \nrequests, submitted by Member States, for temporary suspension of \ncommon customs tariff duties, including the requests for prolongation \nof the suspensions currently in force. The attached proposal concerns a number of industrial products in the \nchemical and allied sectors. 2. 3. The proposals for Regulations temporarily suspending the autonomous \ncommon customs tariff duties on agricultural products and on other \nindustrial products, have been presented already to the Council. Requests for suspension relating to the above products were examined \nin the light of the criteria defined in the Commission communication \nto the Council and the Member States, concerning autonomous tariff \nsuspensions (cf. O. J. no. C 235 of 13. 9. 89, p. 2 ). As a result of this examination, the Commission deems it justifiable \nto suspend the duty on those products listed in the Annex to the \nattached draft Regulation. 4. As stated in Article 1 of the aforementioned draft Regulation, the \nproposed period of validity is 6 months or 12 months, depending on \nthe case. proposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\nI9Z \n\nof \n\n1992 \n\ntemporarily suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duty on \n\nindustrial \n\nproducts (in the chemical and allied sectors) \n\nS \n, \nr \na. number o r \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nfixing their period of validity by reference to the interests of \nCommunity production, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European \nEconomic Community, and \nin particular Article 28 \nthereof, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nArticle 1 \n\nWhereas production of the products referred to in this \nRegulation is at present inadequate or non-existent within \nthe Community and producers are thus unable to meet the \nneeds of user industries in the Community; \n\nWhereas it is in the Community's interest in certain cases to \nsuspend the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties \nonly partially, particularly because of the existence of \nCommunity production, and in other cases to suspend \nthem completely; \n\nThe autonomous Common Customs Tariff duties for the \nproducts listed in the tables appearing in the Annexes shall \nbe suspended at the level indicated in respect of each of \nthem. These suspensions shall apply: \n\n\u2014 from 1 July to 31 December 1992 for the products \n\nlisted in the table apearing in Annex I, \n\nCJ992 \n\n\u2014 from 1 July* to 30 June 1993 for the products listed in \n\nthe table appearing in Annex II. Whereas, taking account of the difficulties involved in \naccurately assessing the development of the economic \nsituation in the sector concerned in the near future, these \nsuspension measures should be taken only temporarily, by \n\nArticle 2 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1992. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at \n\n1992. For the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fCN coda \n\nTABIC \n\nDescription \n\nKale of eulonoaous duty (X) \n\nANNEX \n\nI \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n3. 7 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n9 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n4 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n2. 7 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n4 8x27129898 \n\n\u00bb26 \n\nBland of 1-alkanaa containing by -eight 88X or oora of \nl-alkanes of a chain-langth of 24 carbon atoaa or sore but not \nexceeding 28 cerbon atoas \n\n31 8x29835999 \n\n(28 \n\nHexachlorocyclopantadiene \n\n38 \n\n0x29942699 \n\n49 \n\n6x29851698 \n\n61 \n\n8x29146988 \n\n\u2022 48 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\n2-NiIropropana \n\nOclan-2-ol \n\n\u2022 48 \n\nIdabanone (INN) \n\n78 \n\n8x29162886 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nMethyl \n3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-diaalhylcyclopropanecarboxylate \n\n72 \n\n8x29163966 \n\n\u2022 28 \n\n3,5-Oichlorobenzoyl chloride \n\n168 \n\n8x29221966 \n\n\u2022 58 \n\nTulobulerol hydrochloride (INNM) \n\n117 \n\n8x29251996 \n\n136 \n\nex29291999 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\n\u2022 48 \n\nl-Phenylaalaiaida \n\n(rens-(Cyclohex-l,4-ylena diisocyanata), for the \naanufactura of tharaoplastic polyurathana alaaloaars (a) \n\n14S \n\n8x29318888 \n\n\u2022 48 \n\nChlorodiphanylphosphina \n\n143 \n\n8x29318696 \n\n179 \n\nex29333988 \n\n184 \n\n6x29333988 \n\n172 \n\n8x29333986 \n\n\u202258 \n\n\u2022 13 \n\n\u2022 19 \n\n\u202222 \n\nBis(2-chloroethyl) 2-chloroethylphosphonete \n\n4,4'-Bia(hydroxyiainoaethyl)-lll'-(oxydieathylene)dipyrid in \niua dichloride \n\nBbidoxiae chloride (INN) \n\nNicorendil (INN) \n\n176 \n\n8x29333986 \n\n\u2022 23 \n\n5-Hethyl-2-pyridylaaine \n\n236 \n\n8x29371618 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nSarua gonadotrophin (INN) \n\n256 \n\n8x29413666 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nMinocycline (INN) and its silts \n\n254 \n\n8x29419988 \n\n\u2022 83 \n\nAaphotaricin B (INN) \n\n265 \n\n8x29419668 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nLataaoxaf (INN) end its salts and eeters \n\n271 \n\n8x29419668 \n\n\u202225 \n\n8iaoaicin sulphate (INNM) \n\n286 \n\n8x29419666 \n\n287 \n\n8x29419886 \n\n368 \n\n8x38633988 \n\n\u2022 41 \n\n\u2022 42 \n\nPirarubicin (INN) \n\nSokilaaycin (INN) \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nMixture of oestrogens of equine origin, in the fore of ponder \n\n365 \n\n6x38649699 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nCarboplatin (INN) aixed aith aannitol \n\n312 8x32874896 \n\n\u00bb18 \n\nGlass, in the fora of flakes of a length of 6. laa or aore but \nnot exceeding 3,5ea and of a thickness of 2 aicroaetres or \neore but not exceeding 5 Bicroaalres \n\n315 8x32888818 \n6x39119899 \n\n338 ex38151168 \n\n<28 \n*86 \n\n<18 \n\nCopolyaer of p-cresol end divinylbenzene, in the fore of a \nsolution in A^JV-diaethyleceteaide conteining by aeight 48X \nor eore of polyaer \n\nCatalyst, in the fore of granules, consisting of a aixture of \noxides on an aluainius oxide support and containing by aeight: \n- 12X or eore but not aore than 28X of nickel, \n- 5X or Bore but not aora than 16X of copper \n\nand \n\n- 8,SX or Bora but not aore than 1,SX of aangenese, \n\nof e pore voluaa of 6,2Sce3/g or aore but not exceeding \n8,95ce3/g and of an apparent specific gravity of 8,5 or \naore but not exceeding 1,25 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDaacription \n\nRete of Butonoaoua duty (X) \n\n355 6x38159686 \n\n\u202255 \n\n359 6x38159866 \n\n\u202285 \n\nCatalyst, in the fora of rodlets of e length of Saa or aora \nbut not exceeding Baa, conaialing of a aixture of oxides of \niron, aolybdanua and biaauth, for uaa in tha aanufacture of \nacrylic acid (a) \n\nCatalyst, conaialing of a aixture of titaniua, aagnesiua and \nsluainiua coapounda, in lha fora of a suspension in haxane, \ncontaining by waight: \n- 3X or aora but not aore than 6X of titaniua, \n- 1,5X or aora but not aora than 3X of aagnaaiua \n\nand \n\n- 8,3X or aora but not aora than 8,SX of sluainiua, \n\nfor uaa in the eanufactura of polyethylene of a apacific gravity \nof 8,936 or aora (a) \n\n6 \n\n366 8x38188816 \n\n\u202218 \n\nDoped silicon wafere, of Czochralaki technology, of a diaaeler \nof 78aa or aore, unpoliahad and containing 5x18 \naore of oxygen etoaa per ce3 \n\nor \n\n369 8x38239991 \n\n\u202299 \n\nInteraadiate products of the entibiolics aanufacluring process \noblainad froa tha faraentalion of Hicroaonospora \nahathar or not dried \n\ninyoansia, \n\n378 1x38239698 \n\n\u202214 \n\nReection producte of dibutyl dihydrogendiphosphata and \n1,2-apoxypropane, for tha aanufactura of non-rigid polyurelhane \n\n(8) \n\n481 6x39912966 \n\n\u202218 \n\n464 1x39819668 \n\n411 8x39839060 \n\n\u202292 \n\n\u202228 \n\nPolyethylene, in one of the fores sentioned in note 6(b) to \nChepter 38, of a apecific gravity of 8,945 or aora but not \nexceeding 8,985, for the aanufacture of typewriter ribbon or \neieilar ribbon (a) \n\nIonoeer resin consisting of s salt of a copolyaer of ethylene \nwith aelhecrylic ecid \n\nCopolyeer, entirely of styrBne with aaleic anhydride, or \nentirety of atyrene with aaleic anhydride end an acrylic \naonoeer, whether or not conteining a styrane-butadiana block \ncopolyaer, in one of the fores aentioned in note 6(b) to \nChepter 39 \n\n421 6x39659866 \n\n\u202297 \n\nCopolyaer of vinyl elcohol with ethylene (EVCH): \n- conteining 38 eoleX or eore but not aore than 46 aoleX of \n\nethylene \nand \n\n- of a selling-point of 168*C or aore but not exceeding \n\n18S*C, \n\nfor the aanufactura of biodegradable products conteining by \nweight 48X or eore of starch (e) \n\nCopolyeer, entirely of eethyl eethacrylele with slyrene and \naaleic anhydride, conteining by weight: \n- 36X or e on but not aora than 45X of aethyl salhacrylale, \n- not aora than 36X of styrene \n\nand \n\n- 28X or aore but not aore than 28X of aaleic anhydride, \n\nin one of the fores eentioned in note 6(b) to Chapter 39 \n\nReaction product of poly(oxyelkytene) polyol with a \npolycarboxylic ecid and eps/lon-caprolaclea \n\na-4-Hydroxybutyl-\u00ab-hydroxypoly(oxytetreaethy lone), \nconteining lees then lag/kg of halogen and of aetel, and of a \ncolour not exceeding 28 units on the Hazen scale \n\n428 6x39669868 \n\n\u202215 \n\n439 6x39672896 \n\n448 8x39672698 \n\n\u202256 \n\n\u2022 66 \n\n448 6x39119816 \n\n\u202218 \n\nPoly(oxy-l,4-phenylenesulphonyl-l,4-phenyleneoxy-l,4-phenylenei \nsopropylidene-l,4-phenylene), in one of the fores eentioned in \nnote 6(b) to Chapter 39 \n\n3. 5 \n\n458 6x39119898 \n\n\u202281 \n\nPolyaerizelion product of a (polybutadiene)polyol with two \nlecteas a1,*'-1 inked by the bivelenl ecyl radical of a \ndicarboxylic acid \n\n4-\n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\nRote of autonoaous duty (X) \n\n462 6x39199631 \n0x39266268 \n6x39219819 \n\n463 8x39199631 \n8x39266266 \n8x39266366 \n8x39296969 \n\n468 8x39281611 \n8x39219666 \n\n\u202238 \n\u202285 \n\u202268 \n\n\u2022 46 \n\u2022 13 \n\u2022 36 \n\u2022 38 \n\n\u2022 93 \n\nPolyethylene terephthalata file, dyad in the aaea, of a \nthickness not exceeding 25 aicroaatres and aalallized on one \naide \n\nReflecting polyeater sheeting eeboeeed in e regular pyraeidel \npattern, for the eanufactura of aafety stickers and badges, \nsefety clothing and accessorise thereof, or of echool eatchels, \nbags or aiailar conleinera (a) \n\nLeainated plaatic ahaet or strip, either: \n- of a width of 196aa or aore, conaieting of a layer of \n\nbiaxially-oriantatad polyaeide fila, coatad, on ona aide, with \npolyvinylidene chloride and, on tt\u00bb8 other sids, with s layer \nof polyethylene file, \n\n469 6x39281811 \n6x39281619 \n6x39219666 \n\n\u202294 \n\u202293 \n\u202226 \n\n486 ex39286288 \n\n499 \n\n6x39269160 \n\n51S \n\n6x48239996 \n\n563 \n\n8x78199919 \n\n- of a width not exceeding 15ae, consisting of a layer of \nbiaxially-orionteted polyaaida fila and-two layere of \npolyethylene file \n\nLaaineted sheet or strip consisting of a fila coaposed of a \nblend of a copolyaer of ethylene with vinyl ecetate and a \naodified ethylene-propylene-elsstoasr (EPM) or a aodifiad \nelhylene-propylene-diene elestosar (EPDH), coated or covered on \nboth eides with e file of a copolyaer of ethylene with vinyl \necetate \n\nPolyethylene lerephlhelale fila, of a thickness of 188 \neicroselres or aore but not exceeding 158 aicroeetres, for the \neanufactura of photopolyaer printing plates (e) \n\n\u2022 91 \n\nPolyvinyl butyral file having a gradueled coloured band \n\n\u2022 12 \n\n\u2022 11 \n\nStrips of paper glued to one enother to fore e honeycoab of a \nheight not exceeding 13ca, for agriculturel purposes (a) \n\nNon-textile glees fibres in which fibres of \u2022 disaster of less \nthen 3,5 eicroaelree pradoeinate \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n564 6x74162186 \n\n\u202218 \n\n8haet or plate of polyletrefluoroathylane, with eluainiua \noxida or titaniua dioxide as s filler or reinforced with \nglaas-fibra febric. lasinsted on both sides with copper foil, \nor sheet of poluieide. leeineted on one eide or on both eides \nwith copper foil \n\n572 ex81129930 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nAlloy of niobiue (coluabiua) and titaniua, in the fore of bora \nand roda \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDeecription \n\nRete of eutonoeoue duty (X) \n\nANNEX II \n\n1 6x27879911 \n\n\u202218 \n\nCrude light oils conteining by weight: \n- 18X or aora of vinyltoluanee, \n- 18X or aora of indane \n\nand \n\n- IX or aore but not aora than 5X of nephlhalane \n\n3 \n\n1x27122888 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nSynthetic pereffin wex of a eoleculer weight of 468 or aore but \nnot exceeding 1566 \n\nS \n\n6x26842966 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nHeliue \n\n6 \n\n6x28853616 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nAlloy of ceriua and other rere 6arlh aatala, containing by \nweight 47X or aora of cariua \n\n7 \n\n1x28180808 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nDiboron trioxida \n\n8 \n\n6x28111966 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\n8ulphaaidic acid \n\n9 \n\n6x28112996 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nTalluriua dioxide \n\n16 \n\n6x28183686 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nAluainiua hydroxide oxide in the fore of psaudo-boeheite \n\n11 \n\n6x28199868 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nChroaiua dioxide \n\n12 \n\n6x28268866 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nHanganass oxida containing by waight 77X or aora of aanganese \n\n13 \n\n6x28276866 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nTitaniua tatreiodide \n\nIS 6x28369166 \n\n\u202228 \n\n16 \n\n28461168 \n28462818 \n\n17 0x28481968 \n\n18 6x28418686 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\n\u202218 \n\nLithiua carbonate, in tha fora of powder end containing one or \neore of tha following iapuritiae et tha concentrations \nindicstad: \n- 2ag/kg or aore of areenic \n- 288ag/kg or aore of celciue \n- 288ag/kg or aora of chlorides \n- 28ag/kg or aore of iron \n- 156ag/kg or aora of aagnasiua \n- 28eg/kg or aora of heavy aalela \n- 386ag/kg or aore of potaaaiue \n- 388ag/kg or aore of eodiue \n- 268ag/kg or aore of aulphatee, \n\ndatereined eccording to the eethode specified in the Europeen \nPharaacopeiB \n\nBorates of aodiue, anhydrous \n\nDieodiuo tetreborate pantahydrete \n\nCalciua tungatate (aolfraeete), for the aanufacture of \nferro-elloya or deceaeBoniuB-41-oxododecBwolfraaete (aaaoniua \nperalungststa) (a) \n\n26 1x28439090 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nCarbopletin (INN) \n\n21 \n\n28451868 \n\n22 \n\n28459610 \n\nHeevy weter (deuteriue oxide) \n\n(Euraloa) \n\nDeuteriue and coepounda thereof; hydrogen and coapounds \nthereof, enriched in deuteriue; eixturee and solutions \ncontsining thess products \n\n(Euratoa) \n\n24 0x29629696 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nVinyltoluenes \n\n26 6x29629696 \n\n\u2022 46 \n\np-Cyeena \n\n27 6x29629696 \n\n23 6x29829698 \n\n\u202260 \n\n\u202270 \n\n1,3-D i isopropyIbanzene \n\n1,2,4,5-Tetreeelhylbenzene (durene) \n\n28 0x29833618 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\nCarbon tetrefluoride (telrefluoroeelhene) \n\n29 6x29633638 \n\n32 0x29635966 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\nDibroeoaalhana \n\nl,6,7. 8,9,14,15,16,17,17,18,18-Dodecechloropentacyclo[12. 2. 1. 1 \n\u2022\u20229. 0i'\u00bb3. 8\"'i e]ocladeca-7,15-diane, for uae in the \naanufecture of polyaiida, polyethylene^ eynthetic rubber or \npolustgrene (a) \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n4 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\nRate of out \n\nonoaous duty (X) \n\n33 \n\n6x28636988 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nDi- or \nlelrechlorolricyclo[8. 2. 2. 24'T)hexedece-l(12),4,6,18,13, \n15-haxaana, aixad iaoaara \n\n35 \n\n6x29942896 \n\n36 \n\n6x29642896 \n\n37 \n\n6x29942698 \n\n41 \n\n6x29851916 \n\n42 \n\n0x29653996 \n\n43 \n\n8x29853998 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 26 \n\n\u2022 36 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 26 \n\nNilroaathana \n\nNilroathona \n\n1-Nitropropana \n\nPolaasiua (er(-buloxide \n\n8ulena-l,3-diol \n\n2,4,7,9-TelrBaethyldac-5-yne-4,?-diol \n\n44 \n\n6x29655696 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n2,2-Bis(broBoaathyl)propanadiol \n\n45 \n\n29661168 \n\n46 \n\n6x29861966 \n\n48 \n\n6x29672996 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u202226 \n\nMenthol \n\nLebd-14-ene-8,13-diol \n\n6,6' ,6\"-Tri-(ar(-bulyl-4,4',4\"-(l-Belhylpropen-l-\ny l - 3 - y U d e n e H r i - a - c r e s o l, whether or not conteining toluene \nof crystallization \n\n49 \n\n0x29691966 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n1,2-6is(2-chloroethoxy)athane \n\n56 \n\n6x26893638 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\n2-Broao-6-aelhoxynaphlhalane \n\n51 \n\n6x29693038 \n\n\u202226 \n\nl,2-6i8(2,4,6-lribroBophenoxy)elhenejB for the eenufecture of \necrylonitrile-butediene-styrene (AB8) (e) \n\n52 \n\n6x29694919 \n\n\u202226 \n\n2-(2-Chloroathoxy)ethenol \n\n54 \n\n6x29199666 \n\n55 \n\n6x29189968 \n\n\u2022 36 \n\n2,3-Epoxypropan-l-ol \n\n(glycidol) \n\n\u2022 46 \n\nParfluoroopoxypropana \n\n57 \n\n6x29141999 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n5-Hethylhexan-2-one \n\n58 \n\n6x29144966 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nlif,17,21-Trihydroxy-166-aelhylpregne-lt4-diene-3,28-diono \n\n62 \n\n6x29146966 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\n1,4-Naphlhoquinone \n\n63 \n\n0x29146966 \n\n\u202236 \n\nUbidecerenone (INN) (coenzyee Oi e) \n\n64 \n\n6x29156616 \n\n65 \n\n6x29159699 \n\n66 \n\n6x29161266 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nl-lBopropyl-2l2-dieethyltrieethylene diisobutyrste \n\n\u202228 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nTriaethyl orthoecetete \n\n2-lert-8ulyl-6-(3-ter(-bulyl-2-hydroxy-5-eelhylbenzyl)-\n4-eethylphenyl acrylele \n\n67 \n\n6x29161486 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\n2,3-Epoxypropyl aethacrylete \n\n68 \n\nex29161996 \n\n\u202228 \n\nButyl perchlorocrolonete \n\n69 \n\nex29161998 \n\n71 \n\n6x29163966 \n\n73 \n\nex29171398 \n\n75 \n\n6x29171996 \n\n\u2022 38 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\n\u202228 \n\nCrotonic ecid \n\nMethyl 3-chlorobenzoete \n\nAzelaic acid and sabacic acid \n\nSodius 1,2-biB(cyclohBxyloxycBrbonyl)ethene8ulphonate \n\n74 \n\n6x29171996 \n\n\u2022 36 \n\nDocusate sodiue (INN) \n\n76 \n\n8x29172996 \n\n\u202226 \n\n8,9,19-Trinorborn-5-Bne-2l3-dicerboxylic onhydrida \n\n77 \n\n8x29173919 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nEster or anhydride of letrebroBophthslic acjd \n\n78 \n\n8x29173996 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nBenzano-l,2,4-tricarboxylic acid \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTAR1C \n\nDescription \n\nRote of eutonoeouB duty (X) \n\n79 \n\nex29173999 \n\n86 \n\n6x29173996 \n\n81 \n\n0x29173996 \n\n82 \n\n6x28173996 \n\n\u2022 28 \n\n\u202236 \n\n\u202258 \n\n\u2022 70 \n\n6enzene-l,2,4-lricerboxylic ecid 1,2-enhydride \n\nTetrechlorophthalic anhydride \n\nBanzane-1,2,4-tricarbonyl trichloride \n\n8odiua 3,S-bie(aethoxycorbonyl)benzeneeulphonata \n\n83 \n\n1x28181910 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\nDL-Nalic acid \n\n84 \n\n6x29181999 \n\n85 \n\n1x29181998 \n\n86 6x29181999 \n\n\u202220 \n\n\u202230 \n\n\u202246 \n\n2,2-6ia(hydroxyaathyl)propionic acid \n\nDinoproet (INN), for the eanufaclura of huaen eediceaenla of \nheeding No 3684 (a) \n\nAaaoniua \n(3f,5f)-7-[(16\\26\\6f,8Maf)-8-(2,2-\ndiBelhylbutyryloxy)-l,216,7,8,8e-haxahydro-2,6-diaethyl-l-naphlh \nyl]-3,5-dihydroxyhaptanoate \n\n87 \n\nex29181999 \n\n\u202256 \n\nPrevaatetin aodiue (INNN) \n\n99 \n\n0x29189966 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nDinoprostone (INN) \n\n91 \n\n6x29189688 \n\n\u2022 36 \n\nAlprostadil (INN) \n\n92 \n\n6x29189086 \n\n\u202256 \n\n2,6-Dioethoxybenzoic acid \n\n, 83 \n\n8x29189868 \n\n\u2022 66 \n\nTrepibutone (INN) \n\n94 \n\nex29299919 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\nDiethyl eulphate \n\n95 \n\n8x29269088 \n\n96 \n\n6x29289686 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\n\u202238 \n\n0,0'-Dioctadecyl penteerythritol bis(phosphite) \n\n0l0'-Bis(2,4-di-(\u00abr(-butylphenyl)pentearythritol \nbis(phosphite) \n\n97 \n\nex29211999 \n\n\u202228 \n\n1,1,3,3-Tetraeethylbulylaetne \n\n98 \n\n6x29211998 \n\n\u2022 38 \n\nTriellyleeine \n\n99 \n\n6x29212908 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\nJV, JV(*\",*''-TetrabutylhBxaaalhylenedieBine \n\n191 \n\n6x29213090 \n\n162 \n\n6x29214910 \n\n184 \n\n1x29215998 \n\n185 \n\n6x29215966 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u202226 \n\n\u202236 \n\nCyclohex-l,3-ylenedioaine \n\n(1,3-diaeinocyclohexene) \n\na',a',t'-Trifluoro-2,3-xylidine \n\na-Phenylenebie(ielhyleeine) \n\n2,2'-Dichloro-4,4'-ealhylanedieniline \n\n186 \n\n6x26221968 \n\n\u2022 28 \n\nDinoproet (INN), troeelaaol (INN) sill \n\n167 \n\n1x29221986 \n\n\u202236 \n\nl-Daoxy-t-(octylaeino)-0-glucilol \n\n169 \n\n6x29224996 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nTrenexeeic ecid (INN) \n\n116 \n\n6x29224996 \n\n\u202228 \n\n6-Alenine \n\n111 \n\n6x29225688 \n\n112 \n\n6x29225660 \n\n113 \n\n6x29241968 \n\n\u202226 \n\n\u202268 \n\n\u202226 \n\nNetiprenolol (INN) \n\nNadolol (INN) \n\n2-Acrylaaido-2-aathylpropanasulphonic acid and ita aodiua or \neeaoniua salta \n\n114 \n\n6x29242980 \n\n\u202266 \n\nIovereol (INN) \n\n115 \n\n8x29251186 \n\n\u202228 \n\n8occhorin and ita aodiua aalt \n\n116 \n\n29251918 \n\n3,3',4,4',S,5',6,6'-0ctabroao-ir,ir'-ethylinidiphth \naliaide \n\n118 \n\nex29269999 \n\n\u202228 \n\n2-(3-Phenoxyphanyl)propiononitrite \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n8 \n\n3. 5 \n\n3. 5 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n0 \n\n8 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n8 \n\n0 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n0 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\n119 \n\n0x29269898 \n\n126 \n\n0x29269896 \n\n121 \n\nex29269999 \n\n\u2022 36 \n\n\u2022 66 \n\n\u2022 76 \n\nleophlholonilrile \n\nEtocrilene (INN) \n\nOctocrilene (INN) \n\n122 \n\n0x29269698 \n\n\u202268 \n\n2-Cyenoecotaaidl \n\n123 \n\nex29269899 \n\n124 \n\n0x29279668 \n\n125 \n\n0x29288666 \n\n126 \n\n0x29286668 \n\n127 \n\n8x29286888 \n\n128 \n\n8x29286668 \n\n129 \n\n9x29291868 \n\n131 \n\n8x29291986 \n\n132 \n\n8x29291666 \n\n133 \n\n8x29291686 \n\n\u2022 85 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 38 \n\n\u2022 46 \n\n\u202256 \n\n\u202266 \n\n\u2022 26 \n\n\u2022 56 \n\n\u2022 68 \n\n\u202278 \n\nEthyl cyenoecetata \n\n2,2'-Dieothyl-2,2'-azodipropionaaidina dihydrochtoride \n\nRobenidine hydrochloride (INNN) \n\nl. tf-Diothylhydroxylailna \n\n313'-Bis(315-di-lar<-bulul-4-hudro*uphanyl)-t',\u00bb\"-bl \npropioneeida \n\n2,4,6-Trichlorophonylhydrexine \n\nNethylenedicyclohtsyl diiaocyeneta, eixed iaoaare \n\n3,3'-DieBlhylblphanyl-4,4'-dlyl diioocyenete \n\na-isopropsnyl-t,\u00ab-diBsthylbenzyl ieocyenete \n\no-Phenylenediisopropylidone diieocyenete \n\n134 \n\n8x29369919 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nCileetatin aodiua (INNN) \n\n13S \n\n8x29399688 \n\n136 \n\n8x29369986 \n\n137 \n\n8x29389686 \n\n138 \n\n8x29386988 \n\n\u202261 \n\n\u202284 \n\n\u202285 \n\n\u202286 \n\n2,2'-Thiodiethyl \nbis[3-(3,S-dl-(\u00abr(-butyl-4-hydroxyphonyl)propioneta) \n\nThiophenol \n\nProbucol (INN) \n\nEthoprephos (180) \n\n139 \n\n8x29389688 \n\n\u2022 67 \n\nNetobiiin (INN) \n\n149 \n\n8x28399686 \n\n141 \n\n1x29399866 \n\n142 \n\n6x28389986 \n\n144 \n\n0x29316889 \n\n146 \n\nex29321189 \n\n147 \n\n0x29321386 \n\n148 \n\nex29321999 \n\n\u202289 \n\n\u2022 11 \n\n\u2022 13 \n\n\u2022 30 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\n\u2022 19 \n\n\u2022 49 \n\n3,3-Dieelhyl-l-eelhylthiebutenone ox lee \n\nThiophonala-eilhyl (180) \n\nMixture of isoaers consisting of \n4-eBthyl-2,8-bis(salhyllhie)-o-phenylenodieoine end \n2-Bethyl-4,6-ble(eBthylthlo)-a-phenylenedieeine \n\n2-0iphonylphoepMnobenioic acid \n\nTotrahydrafuran, containing not aore than 48ag par litre in \ntotal of tetrohydro-2-eethylfuren and telrehydro-|-eelhylfuran, \nfor the aanufactura of \n\u2022-4-hydroxybutyl-a-hydroxypoly(oxytatraaethylene) (a) \n\nTelrahydrofurfuryt alcohol \n\nFuran of a purity by weight of 981 or eoro \n\n156 \n\nox29322999 \n\n\u2022 19 \n\nClucuroleclene (INN) \n\n151 \n\n0x29322999 \n\n152 \n\n8x29322999 \n\n\u2022 IS \n\n\u2022 29 \n\n2'-Anilino-l'-Ielhyl(i8apantyl)aeino]-3'-eelhylepirotieob \nenzofuren-l(J//),9'-xenthonI-3-8ne \n\nI-Hydroxy-4-[l-(4-hydrexy-3-oolhoxycerbenyl-1*nephlhyl)-3-exe-l \nH, 3n'-banzo(d\u00abliaochrooen-1-yl]-6-octedacylexy-2-naph \nthoic acid \n\n153 \n\nax29322999 \n\n\u202225 \n\n2'-Chloro-6'-(diethyleoino)-!'-eelhylspirelisobimofwran-\nl O W. O ' - i e n t h e n j - S - e ne \n\n154 \n\n8x29322996 \n\n\u2022 36 \n\n!3,14,!S,16-Tilronerlabdane-!2,9a-tectena \n\nRote of outonoeoue duty (X) \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n9 \n\n9 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n3. 8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTAR1C \n\nDeecription \n\nRote of eutonoaoua duty (X) \n\n155 \n\n6x29322996 \n\n158 \n\n0x29322996 \n\n157 6x29322999 \n\n\u202235 \n\n\u2022 46 \n\n\u20224S \n\n2'-Anilino-6'-[ethyl(tetrohydrofurfuryl)oflino]-3'-aathyla \npiro(i8obenzofuran-1(3/0,9'-xanthen]-3-one \n\n3'-Chloro-6'-cyclohexylaaino8piro(iaobenzofuren-l(3n'),9 \n*-xenthen]-3-one \n\n2'-Anilino-6'-diethylooino-3'-aathylapiro[ieobenzofuron-1 \n(3/0,9'-xBnthen]-3-one \n\n159 \n\n1x29322996 \n\n\u202255 \n\n2'-(2-Chloroenilino)-6'-dibutyleainospiro[isobanzofuran-l(3 \n//),9'-xenthen]-3-one \n\n168 \n\n1x29322999 \n\n161 \n\n1x29322998 \n\n162 \n\n1x28322888 \n\n163 \n\nax29322998 \n\n164 \n\n1x29329079 \n\n165 \n\n1x29329979 \n\n166 \n\n0x29329679 \n\n\u2022 60 \n\n\u20226S \n\n\u202270 \n\n6'-(JV-Ethyl-p-toluidino)-2'-aothylspiro[isobonzofur \non-1(3/0,9'-xenlhon]-3-one \n\nLoveetatin (INN) \n\n2'-Anilino-6'-(\u00ab,-elhyl-p-loluidino)-3'-eelhylapir \no[isobenzofursn-l(3n')l9'-xBnthen]-3-one \n\n\u2022 80 \n\nEtoposide (INN) \n\n\u2022 30 \n\nGlucosaeine hydrochloride (INNN) \n\n\u202260 \n\n\u202270 \n\n(25f)-8pirosl-5-en-38-ol (diosgenin) and its eetere \n\nBindiocsrb (180) \n\n167 \n\n6x29332188 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\nHydentoin \n\n168 \n\n1x29332996 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\nEnoxieone (INN) \n\n169 \n\n8x29333988 \n\n174 \n\n0x29333986 \n\n177 \n\n6x28333986 \n\n178 \n\n6x29333986 \n\n\u202281 \n\n\u202266 \n\nCarpipraaina dihydrochloride (INNN) \n\n2,3,5,6-Tetrachloropyridine \n\n\u2022 11 \n\n3,6-Dichloropyridine-2-cerboxylic acid \n\n\u2022 12 \n\n2-Hydroxyethyloaaoniua 3,6-dichloropyridine-2-cerboxylele \n\n188 \n\n1x29333980 \n\n\u2022 14 \n\n(fS)-l-[2-(4-Chlorobenzhydryloxy)elhyl]piperidine and its \nsslts \n\n181 \n\n1x29333986 \n\n182 \n\n6x29333986 \n\n\u2022 IS \n\n2-Butoxyethyl (3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyloxy)ecelale \n\n\u2022 17 \n\n3,5-Dichloro-2,4,6-lrifluoropyridine \n\n183 \n\n0x29333986 \n\n\u202218 \n\nPyridine-2,3-dicerboxylic acid \n\nI8S \n\n1x29334090 \n\n186 \n\n\u2022x2933S999 \n\n187 \n\n8x29335996 \n\n188 \n\nex2933S999 \n\n189 \n\nex29336999 \n\n199 \n\n6x29336996 \n\n191 \n\nex26336999 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nQuinapril hydrochloride (INNN) \n\n\u2022 20 \n\n1,4-Diezabicyclo[2. 2. 2]octana (trialhylinidieiini) \n\n\u202230 \n\n\u202270 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\n\u202220 \n\n\u2022 38 \n\nAaproliue hydrochloride (INNN) \n\nl-Elhyl-6-fluoro-l,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7-piperezin-l-yl-l,8-nephlhy \nridine-3-carboxylic ecid and ila ealts and aelira \n\n2,6-Di-(ar(-bulyl-4-[4,6-bie(octylthio)-1,3,5-lriazin-2-yla \nainolphenol \n\nll3lS-TriB(4-(ari-bulyl-3-hydroxy-2,6-diiathylbenzyl)-l,3,5 \n-triezine-2,4,6(lA\\3W,Sn*)-lrione \n\nl,3,5-Trie[(3,5-di-ter(-butyl-4-hydroxyphanyl)aethylM,3,5 \n-triazina-2,4,6(lM,3/f,5r7)-trione \n\n192 \n\n6x29337996 \n\n\u202226 \n\nCarteolol hydrochloride (INNN) \n\n194 \n\n6x29339996 \n\n195 \n\nex29339999 \n\n196 \n\n6x29339999 \n\n\u2022 11 \n\n\u2022 12 \n\n\u2022 13 \n\nOctrizole (INN) \n\nDroeetrizole (INN) \n\n(2i,)-l-(3-Acalytlhio-2-aathyl-l-oxopropyl)-L-proline \n\n9 \n\n8 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n4 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n6 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n6 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n0 \n\n8 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n10 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\nRata of aulonoaous duty (X) \n\n197 \n\n8x29339699 \n\n\u2022 15 \n\n2,4-Di-(ar(-butyl-6-(S-chlorobenzolriezol-2-yl)phenol \n\n198 \n\n8x29339696 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nCeptopril (INN) \n\n199 \n\n8x29339696 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nTryptophan, of e purity by weight not exceeding 88, \nthe ainufaclura of goods of heeding No 2388 (e) \n\n,SX, for \n\n299 \n\n8x29339696 \n\n291 \n\n8x29339896 \n\n262 \n\n8x29339696 \n\n293 \n\n8x29339896 \n\n264 \n\n0x29339696 \n\n285 8x29339898 \n\n\u202221 \n\n\u202223 \n\n\u202224 \n\n\u202225 \n\n\u202226 \n\n\u202227 \n\n6,6'-Di-2W-benzotriazol-2-yl-4,4'-biB(l,l,3,3-letreaeth \nylbutyl)-2,2'-eethylenediphenol \n\n2-(2n,-6enzotriozol-2-yl)-4,6-di-(er(-bulylphenol \n\n2-(2//-8anzotriezot-2-yl)-4,6-di-fart-pentylphenol \n\neueetrizole (INN) \n\nEthacridina lactate (INNN) \n\n2-(2//-Benzotriezol-2-yl)-4,6-bie(l-aethyl-l-phenylethyl)phe \nnol \n\n267 0x29349666 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nClotiBzepeB (INN) \n\n269 \n\n6x29349966 \n\n\u2022 38 \n\nTeniposide (INN) \n\n219 \n\n6x29349668 \n\n\u2022 49 \n\nEtizoleB (INN) \n\n211 \n\n6x29349666 \n\n\u202256 \n\nTiquiziua broaide (INN) \n\n212 \n\n6x29349678 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nOfloxecin (INN) \n\n213 \n\n6x29349878 \n\n\u202236 \n\nPirenoxine sodius (INNM) \n\n216 6x29349899 \n\n\u2022 11 \n\nZotepine (INN) \n\n217 6x29349999 \n\n218 0x29349699 \n\n216 ax29349899 \n\n\u2022 13 \n\n\u2022 14 \n\n\u202216 \n\nl-Ethyl-l,4-dihydro-4-oxo[l,3]dioxolo[4,5-o]cinnolinB-3-csr \nbonitrile \n\n2-Chlorodibenz[of][l,4]oxezepin-ll(ie//)-one \n\n(6f,7f)-3-Aceloxyoethyl-7-[(f)-2-foreyloxy-2-phenyl \necetaeido1-8-oxo-S-thie-l-ezebicyclo[4. 2. 81oct-2-ene-2-cerboxyli \nc acid and i ls aelts and esters \n\n226 \n\n8x29349899 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nAdenosine phosphate (INN) \n\n224 \n\n0x29349899 \n\n\u202231 \n\np-Methoxybenzyl \n3-chloroaethy 1-7-(2-phenyloco leeido)-3-cephea-4-carboxylate \n\n226 \n\n0x29349899 \n8x36649999 \n\n231 \n\nex29359999 \n\n232 \n\n8x29359668 \n\n\u202234 \n\u2022 15 \n\n\u202238 \n\n\u202256 \n\n2',3'-Dideoxyinoeine \n\nSulfalhiazola (INN) and ita salts \n\n3-tl-(7-H8xedec8ne-l-sulphonoBidoindol-3-yl)-3-oxo-lr7,3// \n-banz[o*e]isochroeen-l-yl]indole-7-cerboxy lie ecid \n\n233 6x29358666 \n\n\u202266 \n\nSulfsdiaelhoxine (INN) end ils eodiue sait \n\n234 \n\n0x29362466 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nDexpenthenol (INN) \n\n235 \n\nex29362919 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nFolic ecid (INN) \n\n237 \n\nex29371998 \n\n238 6x29372996 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nProtirelin tertrete (INNN) \n\nHethylprednisolone (INN) and ita salis and aelere \n\n236 6x29372996 \n\n\u2022 28 \n\nMoaatasone furoato (INNN) \n\n246 6x29372996 \n\n241 8x29379968 \n\n242 ex29379999 \n\n\u2022 36 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 29 \n\nAlcloaatasons 17,21-dipropionste (INNN) \n\nCalcilonin (INN) (porcine) \n\nCalcitonin (INN) (salaon), and ita aalta \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n4 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n3. 3 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n0 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nOeecription \n\nRata of autonoeoue duty (X) \n\n243 6x29379990 \n\n\u202239 \n\nDee-l-alanine-[125-sarinaj> interleuki \n\nn-2 (huaen) \n\n24S 29393966 \n\nCaffeine end ite ealte \n\n246 1x29499999 \n\n\u2022 30 \n\nRiboee \n\n248 i \n\n1x26411996 \n1x30641016 \n\n\u202220 \n\u2022 10 \n\nPiperacillin aodiua (INNN) \n\n249 i \n\n1x28411666 \n\n\u2022 36 \n\nPiparacillln (INN) \n\n2S1 i \n\n1x29415000 \n\n252 i \n\n1x29419000 \n\n253 i \n\n1x29419606 \n1x30042699 \n\n255 i \n\n1x29419000 \n\n256 i \n\n1x29419000 \n\n257 i \n\n1x29419000 \n\n259 i \n\n1x29419906 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\n\u202201 \n\n\u202202 \n\u2022 10 \n\n\u202204 \n\n\u202205 \n\n\u202206 \n\n\u202268 \n\nClarithroeycin (INN) \n\nCefaclor (INN) and ita hydratae, ealt \n\ns and \n\n\u2022stirs \n\nAaikacin (INN) and ita aalta \n\nClindaaycin (INN) end ite sslts end esters \n\nLincoaycin (INN) and ita aelte end es \nof aadiceeente of heading No 3883 or \n\ntare, \n3664 \n\nfor the aanufecturi \n(\u2022) \n\nTobraaycin (INN) and ita silts \n\nNonenein (INN) and ita aalta \n\n266 i \n\n1x29419900 \n\n\u2022 89 \n\n8pectinoeycin dihydrochlorida INNN), \n\npentehydrela \n\n261 \u2022 \n\n1x29419990 \n\n\u2022 13 \n\nNidacaaycin (INN) and ita acatetea \n\n282 i \n\n1x29419000 \n\n\u2022 14 \n\nCefoxitin aodiuo (INNN) \n\n263 i \n\n1x29419999 \n\n\u2022 15 \n\nCefradine (INN) \n\n264 \u00ab \n\n1x29419000 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nKitesaaycin (INN) and ite terti \n\nate \n\n266 i \n\n1x29419000 \n\n\u2022 19 \n\nJosaeycin (INN) \n\n267 i \n\n1x29419668 \n\n\u202226 \n\nJoeaaycin propionate (INNN) \n\n268 i \n\n1x29419900 \n1x30042090 \n\n269 i \n\n1x29419090 \n1x30042090 \n\n278 i \n\n1x29419900 \n\n272 \n\n1x29419000 \n\n273 \n\n1x29419999 \n\n274 i \n\n1x29419900 \n\n27S \n\n1x29419900 \n\n276 \n\n1x29419000 \n\n277 \n\n1x29419968 \n\n278 \n\n1x29419000 \n\n279 \n\n1x29419000 \n\n286 \n\n1x29419900 \n\n281 \n\n1x29419000 \n\n282 \n\n1x29419990 \n\n283 < \n\n1x29419900 \n1x30042099 \n\n\u202221 \n\u202236 \n\n\u202223 \n\u202220 \n\n\u202224 \n\n\u202226 \n\n\u202227 \n\n\u202228 \n\n\u202229 \n\n\u202231 \n\n\u202232 \n\n\u202233 \n\n\u202234 \n\n\u20223S \n\n\u202238 \n\n\u202237 \n\n\u2022 38 \n\u202258 \n\nNitoaycin (INN) \n\nBlaoeycin sulphati (INNN) \n\nDibskscin sulphste (INNN) \n\n8pectinoeycin sulphati (INNN) \n\nNitilaicin sulphate (INNN) \n\nRiboeteeycin sulphate (INNN) \n\nNeoeycin eulphete (INNN) \n\nAztraonaa (INN) \n\nlaipanaa (INN) \n\nCefoteten (INN) \n\nCeftizoxiaa eodiui (INNN) \n\nKaneeycin sulphste (INNN) \n\nCefotiaa dihydrochloride (INNN) \n\nCefeenoxiaa heeihydrochlorida \n\n[INNN) \n\nVancoaycin (INN) and its aalta \n\nend ea \n\ntare \n\n6 \n\n4. 1 \n\n0 \n\n3. 6 \n\n4. 1 \n\n2. 7 \n\n6 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n2. 7 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n2. 7 \n\n2. 7 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n/J \n\n\fCN coda \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\nRata of autonomous duty (X) \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n3. 2 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n3. 2 \n\n6 \n\n284 ax2941 \n\n288 8x29419888 \n\n289 8x39621616 \n\n288 \n\n8x38621818 \n\n291 \n\n0x36621816 \n\n292 \n\n0x38621891 \n\n\u2022 39 \n\n\u2022 43 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u202229 \n\n\u202268 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nCafixiaa (INN) \n\nCeftibuten (INN) \n\nTatanus-iaaunoglobulin \n\nAnti-tetanus iaaunoplasaa \n\nRabies iaaunoplasaa \n\nAnti-haaaophilie globulin end enti-Rh (D)-globulin derived \nfroe huaan blood \n\n293 \n\nex39921991 \n\n\u202228 \n\nGaaaa globulin, in eolulion, derived froe huaan blood \n\n294 \n\nex39921991 \n\n29S \n\nex39921999 \n\n298 \n\n1x38631868 \n\n381 \n\n1x38834686 \n\n392 \n\n0x36639999 \n\n\u2022 38 \n\nLyophilized gaaaa globulin derived froe huaan blood \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nUnatsrila blood eerue obtoined froe the blood of o bovine \nfoetue or non-ieeunized newly born celf \n\nMixture of piperacillin (INN) and tazobocteo (INN) \n\nGrenulee conteining by weight 48X or eore but not aore than \n58X of theophylline \n\nGrenulee conteining by weight 8,7X or aore but not aore than \n1,2X of glycerol trinitrate \n\n363 8x36843896 \n\n\u202218 \n\nPreparation contoining dee-l-Blenine-(12S-eerine) interleukin-2 \n(huean), obtoined froe genelicelly-eenipulatad \nco Li \n\nEscherichia \n\n364 8x36649919 \n\n\u202219 \n\nPurified collagen dispersed in e phoepete physiological ssline \nsolution, whether or not conlsining lidocaine (INN) \n\n366 6x38651868 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nSelf-adhesive plastic fila, coated or covered on one side with \nglycerol trinitrete aixad with on acrylic edhesive, containing \n4eg/ca2 or e on of glycerol trinitrete, protected by \u2022 \nrelease sheet, not put up in fores or packings for retail sale \n\n367 \n\n32812006 \n\nTanning axtrscts of wottle (eieoee) \n\n368 \n\nex32619999 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nTanning extracts of eucalyptus \n\n368 \n\n6x32618888 \n\n\u2022 28 \n\nTenning axtrscts derived froa gaibiar end ayrobalan fruits \n\n316 0x32664996 \n\n\u202216 \n\nBlack preparation of iron-oxide pigeents, in liquid fore, with \ne oexieuo perticle-aiza not exceeding 28 nanoaetres and \ncontaining by weight 25X or aori of iron evaluated as \nFe20_, for the aanufactura of goods of heeding No 3364 \nor 9668 (a) \n\n313 8x32874898 \n\n\u202226 \n\nGloss, in the fore of powder or granules, conlsining by weight \n99X or eore of silicon dioxide \n\n314 0x32989816 \n0x39895888 \n\n\u202216 \n\u202218 \n\nPolyurelhsns of 2,2'-((er(-bulyliaino)dialhanol and \n4,4'-aelhylenedicyclohaxyl diiaocyanete, in the fora of a \nsolution in w^JV-diaelhyleceleeide contoining by weight 48X \nor eore of polyeer \n\n316 0x34821186 \n\n\u202218 \n\nAqueoue solution contoining by weight 38X or sore but not \neore then 58X of dieodiue alkyl [oxydi(benzene8ulphonats)l \n\n317 8x34629616 \n\n318 6x35840688 \n\n\u202226 \n\n\u202218 \n\nMixture of docusate eodiue (INN) end sodiue benzoete \n\nPurified entigene obtained froe geneticBlly-eenipuleted \nyaast-calle, for the aanufactura of dataclion-lasts for \nhepatitis-C \n\n(a) \n\n319 8x35851656 \n\n\u2022 26 \n\n0-(2-Hydroxyethyl) derivative of hydrolyeed wexy \nBaize-starch \n\n328 8x35879668 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nBromelains (INN) \n\n\fCN coda \n\nTARIC \n\nOaacriplion \n\nRata of autonomous duty (X) \n\n8 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n1. 7 \n\n6 \n\n322 \n\n8x35879088 \n\n323 \n\nox3S979999 \n\n324 \n\n0x35979988 \n\n32S \n\n0x35879866 \n\n327 ax37919909 \n\n\u202246 \n\n\u2022 56 \n\n\u202266 \n\n\u202270 \n\n\u202210 \n\nLipoprotein tipisa \n\n8arrapeptaaa (INN) \n\nAspergillus alkaline protease \n\nEnzyaatic preparation booed on thereolyeine \n\nPlete of quertz or of glees, covered with e file of chromium \nand cooled with e photo-sansiliva or electron-sensitive resin, \nfor tho aanufaclura of masks for integretod circuits (s) \n\n328 0x37623186 \n\n\u202218 \n\nColour nogetive fila: \n- of o width of 7Seo or aore but not exceeding 185aa \n\nend \n\n- of o length of 188o or aore, \n\nfor the aanufecture of \n\ninstant-picture film-packs (a) \n\n336 \n\n38851699 \n\n331 \n\n38652666 \n\n333 \n\n8x38669668 \n\n334 8x38699199 \n\n335 6x38112168 \n\n336 0x38122886 \n\n337 8x38123686 \n\n338 0x38151266 \n\n\u202228 \n\n\u202219 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\n\u202218 \n\n\u202218 \n\n\u202218 \n\n341 8x38151988 \n\n\u202261 \n\n8ulphete turpentine \n\nPine oil \n\nHydroebietyl olcohol \n\nMixture of \n(S-elhyl-2-Bathyl-2-oxo-l,3,2X6-dioxaphosphoron-5-yleathyl \n) aathyl aathylphoephonele and \nbie(5-ethyl-2-Bathyl-2-oxo-1,3,2X6-dioxophosphoran-5-ylaet \nhyl) BethylphosphonstB \n\nSalts of dinonylnaphthalenesulphonic ocid, in the fora of a \nsolution in einerol oils \n\nReection mixture containing benzyl \n3-iBobutyryloxy-l-iaopropyl-2,2-dieethylpropyl phthalata and \nbenzyl 3-isobutyryloxy-2,2,4-trieethylpentyl phthalata \n\nTetrealuainiuB nonoeegneaiua dicsrbonete hexocoeehydroxide \nheptshydrete, cooled with a surface activa agent \n\nCatalyst, in the form of gronules or rings of e diaaeter of \n3ee or eora but not exceeding 18mm, consisting of silver on \nen elueiniua oxide eupport end containing by weight 8X or mora \nbut not eora than 28X of silver \n\nCatalyst, in the fore of groins of which 88X or aore by \nweight have a particle size not exceeding 18 eicroaetres, \nconsisting of s aixlure of oxides on s aagnesiua silicate \neupport, containing by weight: \n- 28X or eore but not eore than 35X of copper \n\nand \n\n- 2X or eore but not aore than 3X of bissuth, \n\nand of en apperent specific gravity of 8,2 or aore but not \n\u2022xceeding 1,8 \n\n343 8x38151988 \n\n\u202203 \n\nCetelyst, consisting of chroeiuo trioxide or dichrooiua \ntrioxido fixed on e silicon dioxide eupport, of a pore voluee, \nas deterained by tha nitrogen absorption aelhod, of 2ca /g \nor eore \n\n345 0x38151966 \n\n\u202211 \n\nCatalyst consisting of chromium oxides end litaniua dioxide \nfixed on o support of silicon dioxide, aluainiua oxide or \nolueiniue phosphate \n\n346 ex38151( \n\n\u202213 \n\nCatalyst consisting of litaniua tetrachloride supported on \naagnesiua dichlorido, in the fore of a suspension in ainerol \noil, for us8 in tha aanufaclura of polypropylene Co) \n\n347 0x38151966 \n\n\u202214 \n\nCatelyst, in tha fore of spheres of o dieeeter of 4,2ea or \neore but not exceeding 9ea, consisting of a eixture of oxides \nof oolybdonue, tungsten, venediua, copper end slrontiua, on o \nsupport of silicon dioxide end/or elueiniue oxide, for use in \nthe aanufaclura of ocrylic ocid (a) \n\n)k \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDeecription \n\nRote of autonomous duty (X) \n\n348 0x38151996 \n\n\u202215 \n\nCatalyst coneisting of organo-aelallic coapounds of tilaniua, \naagnesiua and aluainiua on o eupporl of eilicon dioxide, in the \nfore of a suaponeion in tatrohydrofuren \n\n9 \n\n349 8x38159000 \n\n\u202215 \n\n3S6 1x38159960 \n\n\u202220 \n\n3S1 8x38159686 \n\n\u202225 \n\n352 0x38159999 \n\n\u202235 \n\nCatalyst, in the fore of rodlata of a diaaater of 4aa or aora \nbut not exceeding 6 B B, coneisting of a aixture of oxidee \ncontoining by weight aora than 96X of oxidee of aolybdenua, \nvenediua, nickel end entieony, for uaa in tha aanufactura of \nacrylic acid (o) \n\nCotelyst, in powder fore, coneisting of o oixture of tilaniua \ntrichloride end eluainiua chloride, containing by weight: \n- 28X or oore but not eore then 38X of titeniue \n\n\u2022nd \n\n- 55X or eore but not oore then 72X of chlorine \n\nCotelyst, in the form of rodlete of o diaeeter of 4aa or aore \nbut not exceeding Baa, consisting of o aixture of oxidee \ncontoining by weight eore then 96X of oxidee of oolybdenue, \nbisauth, nickal, iron and silicon, for uss in tha aanufactura of \necryleldehyde (e) \n\nCatalyst, in tha fore of o oueponeion in oil, coneieting of \ntiteniue trichloride end aluainiua trichloride, containing by \nweight (on on oil-free beeis): \n- 15X or eore but not aore then 30X of titoniua \n\nand \n\n- 49X or aore but not eore then 72X of chlorine \n\n353 8x38159900 \n\n\u202240 \n\nCatalyst consisting of elhyltriphenylphosphoniua ecelote in the \nfore of e eolution in oethenol \n\n3S6 0x38159999 \n\n\u202266 \n\nCotolyet, in the fore of petiole, coneieting of eixad vanadium \nand phoaphorua oxidee, containing by weight not oore than 8,SX \nof one of tho following eteeenla: lithiue, potoasiua, aodiua, \ncadaiue or zinc, for use in the eenufacture of esleic enhydride \nfroo butono (a) \n\n357 8x38159686 \n\n\u202270 \n\nCatalyat contoining titeniue trichloride, in the fore of e \nsuspsnsion in hexene containing by weight, in the hexono-free \n\u2022oteriel, 14X or eore but not e on then 25X of titeniue \n\n358 6x38159880 \n\n\u202288 \n\n361 1x38220008 \n\n362 6x38238620 \n\n\u202210 \n\n\u202210 \n\n363 0x38239691 \n\n\u202281 \n\nCatelyet, in the fore of rodlete, consisting of on ecid \nelueinosilicsts (zeolite): \n- with \u2022 eole ratio of silicon dioxide : dialueiniue trioxide of \n\nnot lees then 508 : 1 \n\nand \n- contoining by weight 8,2X or e on but not aore than 6,8X \n\nof pletinue \n\nLyophilized extract of the blood cells of \npolyphaaua \n\n(Liaulue aaoebocyle lysate) \n\nLiauLus \n\nAcid elueinosilicalo (artificial zeolite of the V type) in the \nsodiua fore, containing by weight not oore than 1IX of sodiue \nevaluated as sodiua oxide, in the fore of rodlete \n\nIntereediate products of the entibiotics aanufacturing process \nobtained froa the fereenletion of Slraploayces \nwhether or not dried, for uss in the eenufacture of huosn \nsedicsaents of No 3094 (a) \n\nlanabrarius, \n\n364 6x38239891 \n\n\u202262 \n\nIntereediate products of the antibiotics oenufocturing process \nobtoined froe the fereentetion of Hicroaonospora \nwhether or not dried \n\npurpurea, \n\n365 \n\n1x38238691 \n\n366 \n\n0x38239991 \n\n367 \n\n1x38239991 \n\n\u2022 93 \n\n\u202294 \n\n\u202295 \n\nCholic acid and 3e,12a-dihydroxy-56-cholan-24-oic acid \n(deoxycholic ecid), crude \n\nProducts obteined by the JV-alhylelion of eieoeycin (INN) \n\nIntereediete products froe the eenufecture of eonenein sells \n\n368 \n\n0x38239691 \n\n\u202296 \n\nCrude bile scids \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n0 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDeecription \n\nRote of autonomous duly (X) \n\n372 sx38239991 \n\n\u00ab1S \n\nRaaidusa of eenufocture contoining by weight 46X or mora of \nlie,17,28,21-tatrahydroxy-6-aathylpragna-l,4-dian-3-one-21-ace \nlata \n\n373 \n\n8x38239891 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n4-(2-Aainoethyllhiooethyl)-1l3-thiezol-2-yleethyldieelhylaeinal \nin the form of e solution in toluene \n\n376 \n\n8x39239698 \n\n\u202268 \n\nColloidal dianliaony pantaoxide \n\n377 \n\n8x38238888 \n\n\u2022 13 \n\nMixture of nitroaathana and 1,2-apoxybutana \n\n388 \n\n8x38239098 \n\n\u2022 17 \n\nTetrokie(2-chloroothyl)ethylene bis(phosphata), not chaaically \ndefined \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n0 \n\n5 \n\n381 \u2022x38239998 \n\n<18 \n\n382 0x38239698 \n\n119 \n\nGrains, consisting of e eixture of dielueiniua trioxide end \nzirconiua dioxide, containing by waight: \n- 78X or aoro but not oore then 78X of dielueiniua trioxide \n\nend \n\n- 19X or oore but not oore than 26X of zirconiua dioxide \n\n5. 2 \n\nGrains, consisting of e eixture of dielueiniua trioxide end \nzirconiua dioxide, containing by weight: \n- 54X or aoro but not eora than 62X of dialuainiua trioxide \n\nend \n\n- 36X or oore but not oore then 44X of zirconiua dioxide \n\n5. 2 \n\n383 ex38239898 \n\n384 6x38239898 \n\n<21 \n\n*23 \n\nCrude lithiua hypochlorite \n\nMixture of 2-(perfluoroelkyUethonethiole of e perfluoroelkyl \nchain-length of 6 or oore carbon atoBS but not axceeding 28 \ncerbon otoes \n\n385 1x38238698 \n\n*2S \n\nMixed oxides of bariua, bismuth, lead and titaniua, in the fora \nof powder, contoining by weight: \n- SX or oore of bariua \n\nand \n\n- 15X or oore of titoniue, \n\nfor uss as dielectric aaterials in ths asnufacturs of multilayer \ncereeic capacitors (s) \n\n386 \n\nex38239998 \n\n387 \n\n6x39239688 \n\n\u202226 \n\n\u202227 \n\nLithiua niobote wafers, undoped \n\nPreperation, in the fore of powder, conteining by weight 75X \nor eore of zinc bis[3,5-bis(l-phenylethyl)Belicylate] \n\n388 \n\n6x38238688 \n\n\u202231 \n\nFile consisting of the oxides of bariua, calciua and aither \nlitaniue or zirconiue, aixad with binding aaterials \n\n389 \n\n6x38239698 \n\n\u202232 \n\nMixture of oeinee derived froe diaerized fatly acids, of an \neverage aoleculer weight of S26 or eore but not exceeding 558 \n\n388 6x38239888 \n\n*34 \n\n391 ex38239698 \n\n\u00ab35 \n\nPreperetion consisting eeeentielly of alkaline asphalt \nsulphonsts, of: \n- s specific gravity of 8,8 or oore but not exceeding 1,5 \n\nend \n\n- B solubility in weter of 78X by weight or eore \n\nAnti-corrosion preperetions consisting of sslls of \ndinonylnephthelenesulphonic acid, either: \n- on e eupport of einerel wax, whether or not oodified \n\ncheoically, \n\nor \n- in the fora of e solution in an organic solvent \n\n392 ex38239998 \n\n<36 \n\nMixture of lithiue diisopropylsside (lithiue salt of \ndiisopropylBaina) and aagnesius bis(diisopropylsside) \n(oagnssiua sslt of diieopropyleeine), in the fore of e solution \nin orgsnic solvents \n\n393 ex38239998 \n\n\u00bb37 \n\nCalcined bauxite (refractory grade) \n\n394 ex38239098 \n\n<38 \n\nHognatissbls iron oxide, in the fore of powder, containing by \nweight: \n- 38X or aore but not eore then 38X of bivelent iron in \n\nrelation to the total iron \nand \n\n- IX or oore but not eore than 4X of cobalt \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\nIt \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDoecription \n\nRate of autonomous duty (X) \n\n395 1x38239998 \n\n\u202239 \n\n8penl cetelyst, in the fore of rodlete of dioeeter of laa or \neore bul not exceeding 3me, contoining e mixtura of sulphides \nof tungsten and of nickel on o eupport of zeolite, contoining by \nweight not wore then 19X of lungetan and not mora than 18X \nof nickel, for regeneretion ee o cetelyet for \nhydrocarbon-cracking (a) \n\n8 \n\n396 8x38239698 \n\n\u202249 \n\nNixtura containing by weight: \n- 7X or aore but not aore than 9X of 2-eethyl-l,3-phenylene \n\n397 8x38239699 \n\n398 ex38238999 \n\n399 ex38239098 \n\n486 ex38239998 \n\n374 \n\n0x38239888 \n\n37S \n\nex38239999 \n\n462 \n\n0x39812866 \n\n\u2022 42 \n\n\u202243 \n\n\u2022 44 \n\n\u202245 \n\n\u202248 \n\n\u202248 \n\n\u202228 \n\n463 8x39912666 \n\n\u202246 \n\ndi ieocyoneto, \n\n- 31X or eore but not eore then 34X of \n4-aethyl-l,3-phenylene di iaocyenate, \n- 19X or aore but not aore then 13X of \n2,4'-eethylenediphenyl di iaocyanale, \n- 46X or aore but not a on than 49X of \n4,4'-eethylinodiphenyl di ieocyoneto \n\n3-(l-Elhyl-l-aalhylpropyl)ieoxazol-5-yleaina, in the fore of o \nsolution in toluene \n\nMixture of aagnssiua broaida 2-oxoporhydroozepin-l-ide end \napai(on-caprotectee \n\nMixture of dieodiue /V-benzyloxycorbonyl-L-eeperlata and \naodiua chloride, in the fore of o solution in weter \n\nDieodiue 8,19-dihydro-9,19-dioxoonthrocene-2,7-diBulphonete, \ncontoining by weight 18X or aora but not eore than 28X of \neodiue eulphata \n\nEutectic olloy wholly of potasaiua and aodiua, conteining by \nweight 77X or aore but not aore then 78X of potassium \n\nBland of terephtheloyl dichlorido end ieophlheloyl dichloride \n\nPolyethylene, conteining by weight 35X or aore but not aore \nthen 45X of eica \n\nPolyethylene, in one of the fores aentioned in nolo 6(b) to \nChopter 38, of a apecific gravity of 8,858 or aore et 23*C, \ncontaining: \n- 58eg/kg or lees of olueiniue, \n- 2eg/kg or teee of colciue, \n- 2eg/kg or less of chroeiue, \n- 2eg/kg or less of iron, \n- 2eg/kg or less of nickel, \n- 2eg/kg or less of litoniue \n\nand \n\n- 8ag/kg or less of venediuo, \n\nfor the l a n u f a c t un of chloroaulphonated polyethylene \n\n(a) \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n485 6x39819888 \n\n499 8x39629668 \n\n416 0x38838688 \n\n412 0x39639688 \n\n\u202293 \n\n\u202296 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u202238 \n\nlonoeer reein consisting of e eelt of o terpolyaer of ethylene \nwith ieobutyl acrylale end oelhocrylic acid \n\nPolybut-1-im, e copolyeer of b u t - 1 - im with ethylene \ncontaining by weight 19X or less of ethylene, or e blend of \npolybut-1-ene with polyethylene end/or polypropylene containing \nby weight 18X or less of polyethylene and/or 2SX or less of \npolypropylene, in one of the forae aentioned in note 6(b) to \nChapter 39 \n\nCopolyeer, solely of styrene with ellyl alcohol, of an acetyl \nvalue of 175 or eore \n\nBroeinetad polyatyrene, contoining by weight 58X or eore but \nnot aore then 71X of broeine, in one of the fores aentioned in \nnote 6(b) to Chepter 39 \n\n413 8x39939966 \n\n\u202248 \n\nCopolyeer of etyreno with 2-ethylhexyl acrylale or with \nn-butyl ocrylete, contoining: \n- 18 eoleX or aore but not aore than 16 eoleX of acrylale, \n- 8,2eg/kg or less of sodiue \n\nend \n\n- 8,lag/kg or less of colciue \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDeecription \n\nRote of eutonoeoue duty (X) \n\n414 1x39639868 \n6x39951900 \n\n41S ex39944999 \n\n\u2022SO \n\u202220 \n\n\u202291 \n\nBlock copolyoer of etyrene and vinyl acetata, containing by \nweight 5X or aore but not eora than S5X of vinyl ecelate \n\nCopolyaer of vinyl chloride with vinyl ecolete and vinyl \nalcohol, conloining by weight: \n- 97X or lore but not eore then 92X of vinyl chloride, \n- 2X or e on but not eore then 9X of vinyl ocetele \n\nend \n\n- IX or eore but not eore then 8X of vinyl olcohol, \n\nin one of the fores eentioned in nota 6 (a) or (b) to Chaptar 39 \n\n9 \n\n416 8x36945666 \n\n\u202291 \n\nCopolyoer of vinylidene chloride with ecrylonilrilo, in the \nfora of expeneibla baads of o dieeetor of 4 microaalras or wore \nbut not aero than 29 aicroBatraa \n\n417 8x39645888 \n\n\u202292 \n\n418 ex39646966 \n\n\u202291 \n\n419 ex39946999 \n\n429 0x39846996 \n\n424 0x39959686 \n\n\u202293 \n\n\u202295 \n\n\u202283 \n\nCopolyoer of vinylidene chloride with vinyl chloride, \nconteining by weight 79,SX or aora of vinylidene chloride, in \none of the foree eentioned in note 6 (a) or (b) to Chepter 39, \nfor the eonufoctura of fibres, monofilament or atrip (a) \n\nCopolyaar of ethylene with chlorotrifluoroethylena and \nhexafluoro(2-eethylpropene), in one of the fores eentioned in \nnote 6(b) to Chepter 39 \n\nPolyvinyl fluoride, in one of the forae aentionad in note \n6(b) to Chepter 39 \n\nCopolyaer of ethylene with chlorotrifluoroethylena, in one of \nthe foros aantionad in note 6(b) to Chepter 39 \n\nPoly(vinyl foraal), in one of the foree eentioned in note \n6(b) to Chepter 39, of e eoleculer weight of 19688 or aore \nbut not exceeding 48888 ond conteining by weight: \n- 9,5X or eore but not eore then 13X of ecetyl groups \n\navaluated ae vinyl acatate \nand \n\n- 5X or aore but not eore then 6,5X of hydroxy groups \n\nsvalusted ae vinyl alcohol \n\n425 1x39861866 \n\n\u202216 \n\nPolyaathyl aalhacrylala, in the fore of oxpeneible baads \nconteining 2-aalhylpantana aa blowing agent \n\n427 8x39969666 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nPoly[iV-(3-hydroxyieino-l,l-dioethyIbutyDecrylaaide] \n\n429 6x39869696 \n\n\u202228 \n\nCopolyoer of 2-diisopropyleeinoethyl aethecrylate with dacyl \n\u2022ethecrylete, in the fore of e solution in \nJV,A'-dieethyleceteBide conteining by weight 5SX or eore of \ncopolyoer \n\n430 1x39969966 \n\n\u202230 \n\nCopolyoer of acrylic ecid with 2-ethylhexyl ecrytale, \nconteining by weight 10X or eore but not eore than 11X of \n2-ethylhexyl ecrylate \n\n431 6x39969860 \n\n432 8x39969900 \n\n\u202248 \n\n\u202250 \n\nCopolyoer of acrylonitrile with eethyl acrylate, eodified with \npolybutadiene-ecrylonitrile (NBR) \n\nPolyaarizetion product of ocrylic ecid with elkyl sethacrylate \nand ssall quantities of other aonoeere, for use es e thickener \nin the aanufacture of textile printing postee (a) \n\n433 0x39669999 \n\n\u202268 \n\nCopolyaer of aathyl acrylate with ethylene end e eonoeer \ncontaining o non-tereinel carboxy group as a substituent, \nwhether or not coepounded with silica \n\n434 1x39869966 \n\n\u202278 \n\nPolyeerizetion product of acrylic acid with saall quantities of \na polyunsstureted eonoeer, for use ae s thickener in textile \npigeent printing peslee or in the eenufecture of aediceeente of \nheading No 3863 or 3884 (a) \n\n435 ax39969999 \n\n\u202280 \n\nPolyeorizetion product of ocrylic ecid with saall quantities of \na polyunsstureted aonoeer, for use es s stabilizer in eaulsions \nor dispersions with s pH of eore than 13 (a) \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDeecription \n\nRote of eutonoBous duly (X) \n\n437 8x39972896 \n\n438 0x38672898 \n\n441 0x39872996 \n\n442 0x39972666 \n\n\u202220 \n\n\u202248 \n\n\u202279 \n\n\u202286 \n\nPoly(oxypropylene) having alkoxysilyl end-groups \n\n6 \n\nPoly[oxy-l,4-phonylonei8opropylidene-l,4-phonyleneoxy-(2-hydrox \nytrieethylene)], of en overage eoleculor weight of ooro than \n26888, in one of the foroo eontioned in note 6(b) to Chopler \n39 \n\nHooopolyoer of ]-chloro-2,3-epoxypropono \n\n(apichlorohydrin) \n\nCopolyaar of l-chloro-2,3-epoxypropone with ethylene oxida \n\n443 \n\nax39979199 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nDiallyI phthalata prapolyeer \n\n444 \n\n8x39879999 \n\n445 \n\n8x39689966 \n\n\u202236 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n447 0x36994666 \n\n\u202218 \n\nPoly(oxy-l,4-phenylonacarbonyl), in tha fore of powder \n\nPoly(iainoaalhylana-1,3-phanyleneaethyleneiminoadipoyl), \nof the foraa eentioned in note 6(b) to Chepter 38 \n\nin one \n\nPolycondeneelion product of phenol with fonaldahyda, in tha \nfore of hollow epheroe of e dieoeler of loeo then 158 \naicroeetree \n\n449 \n\n8x39119616 \n\n\u2022 26 \n\nPolyfurfuryl olcohol \n\n4S2 \n\n8x38121166 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nNon-ploeticizad cellulose triocetote, in the fora of flakes, \nfor the aanufactura of cellulose Iriacetale yarn (a) \n\n453 \n\n8x36123916 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nElhylcalluloaa, not ploeticized \n\n454 \n\n8x39123998 \n\n45S \n\nax39123999 \n\n456 \n\nax39123999 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u202226 \n\n\u2022 46 \n\nCellulose, both hydroxyethyleted end elhyloted, insoluble in \nwetor \n\nHydroxypropylcolluloee \n\nCellulose, both hydroxyothyletad and alkylated with olkyl \nchoin-longthe of 3 or ooro cerbon atoms \n\n457 0x39129616 \n\n\u202228 \n\nCallaburete (INN), non-ploeticized, in the fore of powder: \n- with o butyryl content by weight of 25% or eore, as \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\ndeteroined by the A8TN 0 817-72 eethod \nend \n\n- of e viscosity not exceeding 57 poise, as deterained by the \n\nA8TN D 817-72 method, \n\nfor U8B as 8 binding agant in tha aanufactura of peinte or \nlacquers for c an and aircraft, or for the aanufactura of \nheat-tranefer printing inks (e) \n\n458 0x39149688 \n\n\u2022 28 \n\nColestipol hydrochloride (INNH) \n\n459 6x39159093 \nex39159999 \n\n461 6x39199631 \n6x39266268 \nex392l9619 \n\n464 6x38199856 \n\n\u202219 \n\u202216 \n\n\u202218 \n\u202211 \n\u202278 \n\n\u202292 \n\n467 8x39261611 \n\n\u202292 \n\n476 8x39261819 \n8x39261698 \n8x39289956 \n\n473 0x39261896 \n\n\u202282 \n\u202282 \n\u202233 \n\n\u202293 \n\nVests end ecrap of photogrephic (including cineeetogrephic) end \nX-rey fila \n\nReflecting laainatad eheeting, metallized, consisting of one \nsheet of polyester snd at least snother sheet of polyester or \nother plestic aetarisl and cootod on one side with en adhesive, \nwhether or not protected by s releeea sheet \n\nPolyvinyl chloride sheeting, of e thickness of lees then lee, \ncoated with an adhaeive in which are embedded hollow gloss balls \nof e dieoeter not exceeding 198 eicroaatraa \n\nPolyethylene file, of a thickness of 29 aicroeetres or eore but \nnot exceeding 48 aicroeetres, for the production of photo-resist \nfile ueed in the aanufactura of seaiconductors or printed \ncircuits (a) \n\nFila, of e thickness not exceeding lee, of o copolymer of \nvinyl alcohol with ethylene, containing no other polyaerization \nproducts or copolyaerizetion products, with sn extension at \nbreak (longitudinal or transversal) of 65X or eore \n\nSynthetic paper pulp, in the fore of aoisl sheets, eade from \nunconnected finely branched polyethylene fibrils, whether or not \nblended with cellulose fibres in s quantity not exceeding 15X, \ncontaining polyvinyl alcohol dissolved in water ss the \neoistening agent \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\nRate of aulonoeous duty (X) \n\n466 0x39291899 \n\n\u202295 \n\n475 0x39292998 \n\n\u202291 \n\n477 0x39283666 \n0x39219060 \n\n\u202220 \n\u202227 \n\n478 1x39294211 \nax39294291 \n\n479 ex39294291 \n\n486 0x38265899 \n\n482 8x39286266 \n\n\u202292 \n\u202292 \n\n\u202293 \n\n\u202219 \n\n\u202283 \n\n483 0x39296266 \n\n\u202284 \n\n484 8x39286208 \n8x38266368 \nax39219919 \n\n487 8x38286999 \n8x39219919 \n\n488 8x38266886 \n\n\u202287 \n\u202258 \n\u202228 \n\n\u2022 49 \n\u2022 IS \n\n\u202258 \n\n489 8x39266696 \n\n\u202279 \n\n481 1x39269288 \n\n\u202219 \n\n482 0x38289298 \n\n\u202221 \n\nFile of a thicknsss not exceeding 8,20ae, of o blend of \npolyethylene ond a copolyeer of ethylene with oct-1-ene, \n\u2022ebossid in \u2022 ngular rhoaboidol pettern, for coating both aides \nof o layor of unvulcanizod rubber (a) \n\n8ynthatic poper pulp, in the fora of ooiot ehoela, aade froa \nunconnected finely brenched polypropylene fibrils, whether or \nnot blended with cilluloeo fibres in a quantity not exceeding \n15%, contoining polyvinyl alcohol dieeolvod in woter as lha \naoietening egent \n\nLaainatad s h ut or strip, consisting of o file of e thickness of \n108 sicroaelres or aora but not exceeding 200 eicroeetroB, \ncoopooed of o blond of o thoreoplostic ilaatoeer (TPE) of \notyrene-butidieno-atyrini (888) with polyelhylane or \npolypropylene, cooled or covered on both oidee with o file of \npolypropylene of o thickneee not exceeding 28 aicroaatres \n\nReflacting eheeting, conaiating aolely of o einglo leyer of \npolyvinyl chloride, wholly aibossad on one side in e regular \npyraaidal pattern \n\nShaeling of polyvinyl chloride, stabilized against ullrsviolel \nrays, without ony holoe, oven oicroecopic, of o thickness of 68 \n\u2022icroeetree or more but not excaading 88 aicroaatras, contoining \n38 or aore but not oore then 48 parts of ploelicizar to 188 \nparts of polyvinyl chloride \n\nCopolyeer of acrylic and aelhacrylic asters, in the fora of \nfile of o thickneee not exceeding 159 aicroaatres \n\nPolyethylene torophtholeio fila, of e thickness of 72 \naicroaatras or aore but not exceeding 78 aicroaatras, for lha \naanufactura of flexible eognetic disks (floppy dieke) (o) \n\nPolyethylene teriphthelete fila, of o thickness of less than 18 \naicroaatras, for the aanufactura of video cessettas with a \nplaying liaa of 388 ainutoe at a tapa speed of 24eo per second \n\n(a) \n\nPolyeeter file of e thickneee not exceeding 78 aicroaatree, \ncooled on one aide with a substance which becoeee coloured in \nthe presencs of aalicyclic acid at a taaparatura nol exceeding \n186'C \n\nIrideecent fila of polyeeter end polyeethyl aethacrylate \n\nPolycondensation product of lerephthalic acid with a aixtura of \ncyclohex-t,4-ylenediaalhanol and ethona-1,2-diol, in the fore of \na file \n\nFile of o copolyeer of ethana-1,2-diol ond \nnophthelene-2,6-dicorboxylic acid, of a thickness of less then \n18 eicrooatrea, for the aanufactura of video-cassettes with e \nplaying-tiaa of 388 ainutes at a tapa-speed of 24aa par aecond \n\n(a) \n\nFila conaiating of poly(opsi(on-ceprolectea) blended with: \n- either 19% or loss by weight of polyethylene \n- or 18% or loss by wsighl of othylone-vinyl ocetete copolyeer \n\nPolydps/(on-caprolactaa) fila: \n- of a softening point of 299*C or e on \n\nand \n\n- containing 138ag/kg or eore but not oore then 178og/kg of \n\ncopper, \n\n9 \n\n8 \n\n6 \n\n8 \n\nfor use during the bonding together, under heet and vacuus, of \ncooponents of cooposite articles (a) \n\n8 \n\n493 ax39299919 \n6x39219650 \n\n\u202210 \n\u202220 \n\nPolyioide ahaal and atrip, uncoeted, or cooled or covered solely \nwith plastic \n\n^\u20ac \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDoecription \n\nRate of eutonoeous duty (X) \n\n494 8x39269958 \n\n495 ex39269956 \n8x39219668 \n\n496 8x39269956 \n\n\u2022 21 \n\n\u2022 22 \n\u20222S \n\n\u202223 \n\nPolyvinyl fluoride sheet \n\nIon-exchenge ooobronoo of fluorineted pleetic aaterial, for use \nin chlor-elkeli electrolytic cells (a) \n\nBiaxially-orianlatad polyvinyl olcohol fila, containing by \nwaight 67X or oora of polyvinyl alcohol, uncosled, of a \nthickness not exceeding lea \n\n497 6x39269956 \n\n\u202224 \n\nFila entirely of polyvinyl olcohol, of s thickness not \nsxceeding laa and contoining by weight: \n- 2X or I O BB of unhydrolyeed ecetole groupe evaluated as vinyl \n\nacetate \nand \n\n- 5X or aoro but not ooro than 25X of glycorol as \n\nplasticizer, \n\nfor the eonufocturo of roof-windows \n\n(s) \n\nPolyd-chloroirif luoroeihyleno) f i la \n\nFila of o aixturo of polyvinylidene fluoride with en ecrylic \npolyaer, of o thickness of 48 aicroaelres or aora but not \nexcaeding 68 aicroaalras \n\nFile end sheet of o copolymer of ethylene with \nchlorotrifluoroeihyleno, of s thickness of 12 aicroaelres or \naora but not exceeding 486 aicroaelres \n\nSheet of e thicknoes of laa or ooro but not exceeding 3mm, \nconsieting of o copolymmr of ethylene with \nchlorotrifluoroothylene, whether or not becked with o woven \nglees-fibre febric \n\nFila entirely of polyvinyl olcohol, of a thickness not \nexcaading laa and of a width of 2,28a or aoro, with an \nexteneion ot brook, in the transversa direction, of 358X or \naore \n\nBiaxiatly-orienled fila of polyvinyl alcohol, coated on both \neidee, of o totol thickness of less than lae \n\nIridescent file of polyester, polyethylene end on athylene-vinyl \necetete copolyoer \n\nTranslucent laainated sheet consisting of e polyester file \ncooled on one surface with eatal and aetal oxidee, and covered \non both aidee with a fila of polyvinyl butyrol \n\nReflecting shsating or tope, consisting of a facing atrip of \npolyvinyl chloride oeboooed in a regular pyraaidal pattern, heal \nseeled in psrsllsl linss or o grid pattern to o becking strip of \npleetic eeteriel, or of knitted or woven febric covered on one \nside with plastic aaterial \n\nLeather of East Indis kip, wholo, whothor or not the heeds and \nlags hava been reeoved, ooch of o net waight exceeding 4,5kg \nbut not exceeding 8kg, not further prepared then \nvegateble-tanned, whether or not having undergone certain \ntreatsents, but obviously unsuilsble for ioeediete use for the \noenufecture of leather articles \n\n8hesp or loeb ekin leother, without wool on, tonned or retanned \nbut not further preparad, whether or not split, other then \nleother of heeding No 4188 or 4168 \n\nGoet or kid ekin leather, without heir on, tonned or retanned \nbut not further prepored, whether or not split, other then \nleathar of heading No 4188 or 4189 \n\nLeother of other anieals, without hair on, not further prepared \nthan tanned, other than leather of heading No 4168 or 4189 \n\n498 8x39269956 \n\n496 8x39269956 \n\n\u2022 26 \n\n\u202227 \n\n586 8x39269956 \n\n\u2022 28 \n\n581 8x39269958 \n0x39219866 \n\n\u202232 \n\u202222 \n\n562 8x39209958 \n\n\u202236 \n\n583 8x39269956 \n\n584 8x39289958 \n8x39219666 \n\n585 0x39218666 \n\n\u2022 37 \n\n\u202238 \n\u202229 \n\n\u202228 \n\n566 ex39269891 \n\n\u202228 \n\n567 8x41841891 \n0x41642166 \n\n\u202218 \n\u202218 \n\n588 41651191 \n41851199 \n41651216 \n41651299 \n41651919 \n41651999 \n\n569 41861186 \n41861266 \n41661866 \n\n518 \n\n41671618 \n41672916 \n41679918 \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\nRale of autonooous duty (X) \n\n511 1x44166696 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nUsed casks and bsrnls of osk, whether ssseablod or not; their \nstaves and heads \n\nS12 \n\n45011000 \n\nNatural cork, raw or aiaply prepared \n\n514 1x48112100 \n\n\u202216 \n\n516 \n\n56620806 \n\n517 \n\n0x56646618 \n0x50640699 \n\n518 \n\n0x59956618 \n0x56856896 \n\nS18 0x53861811 \n0x53661631 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\u2022 16 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\u2022 16 \n\n\u202218 \n\u202218 \n\nIapragnatad papar cooiid or covered with o pressure-sensitive \nsalf-edheeiva layar, the whole: \n- of o laneila of 2796N/0 or ooro but not exceeding \n\n3788N/B in the eachina direction (aa detereined by the \nD TN S3112 aethod), \n\n- of o etretch fictor of 1. 5% or aora but not exceeding \n\n3. 0% in the oechina direction (aa datirainid by lha DIN \n53112 aethod) \nand \n\n- of odhooivily on atoinleee stall (aa detereined by the PIN \n\n38646 eethod) of 58N/a or ooro but not exceeding \n22SN/B, at a reoporelure of 23*C (i3'C) and a rotative \nhuaidity of 58% (l5X) \n\nRaw ailk (not thrown) \n\nVorn opun entinly froo oilk, not put up for retail amlm \n\n8 \n\n2. 5 \n\nVorn epun intinly froo oilk woata (noil), not put up for retail \nsala \n\n8 \n\nUnblaechad flax yarn (other than tow yorn) aeoeuring 333,3 \ndscitox or ooro (not exceeding 38 ealric nuaber), for the \naanufaciun of aultiplo or cobled yorn of the footwear industry \nor for whipping coblee (o) \n\n1. 8 \n\n528 0x54623919 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nToxlurizod yorn of polypropylene, iapragnatad with \nsilicone-besed walir-npallanl \n\n521 8x54824118 \n\n\u202218 \n\n522 8x54824138 \n1x54624199 \n\n524 1x54624999 \n1x54626999 \n\n525 0x54824899 \n\n526 1x54624899 \n1x54625999 \n1x54626998 \n\n527 0x54024999 \nax54926999 \n\n523 0x54624999 \n\n\u202218 \n\u202216 \n\n\u2022 19 \n\u202229 \n\n\u202239 \n\n\u2022SO \n\u202220 \n\u202240 \n\n\u202286 \n\u2022 18 \n\n\u202279 \n\nPolyooido yorn, not textured, untwisted or with e twist not \nexceeding 22 turns par aatra, of criapabla bicooponenl filaaents \nconsisting of poly(hoxoeothylene odipooido) with o copolyooida, \nfor the aanufactura of: \n- knee-longth stockinga of oubheedinge 81152811 end \n\n61158336, \n\n- woaen'a stockings of oubheedinge 81152819 end \n\n61158381, \nor \n\n- ponty hosa (tights) of subhaading 61151188 \n\n(a) \n\nVarn of synthetic textile fibres solely of oroeatic polyeeidoe \nobtoinod by the polycondenaation of a-phenylenedieaine and \niaophlhalic acid \n\nVarn of polytetrefluorooihylene \n\nVarn of a copolyair of glycollic ecid with lactic acid, for tha \naanufactura of aurgical outuna (a) \n\nNon-textured filaaent yarn of polyvinyl alcohol, for the \naanufaciun of slssves for printing rollers (a) \n\nVarn wholly of polyglycollic acid \n\n8ynthetic filaaani yarn, aingle, conloining by weight 85X or \nooro of ocrylonitrila, in the fora of a wick containing 1888 \ncontinuoua filaeente or ooro but not ooro than 2S888 \ncontinuous fitseente, of \u2022 weight per aalre of 8,12g or oore \nbut not exceeding 3,75g and of o length of 1 8 8B or aora, for \nthe aanufaciun of carbon-fibre yorn (a) \n\n528 6x54841890 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\nNonofilaaent of polytetrefluoroethylene \n\nAS. CN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\nRata of autonomous duly (X) \n\n8 \n\n9 \n\n6 \n\n5 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n529 6x54641696 \n\n536 exS4841898 \n\n531 6x54649698 \n\n532 8x54677166 \n\n533 8x54677166 \n0x59939699 \n\n\u202226 \n\n\u2022 38 \n\n\u202218 \n\n\u202218 \n\n\u202229 \n\u202219 \n\nMonofiloeent of poly(l,4-dioxenone) \n\nNonofileeenl of o copolyeer of 1,3-dioxan-2-one with \nl,4-dioxon-2,5-dione, for the eenufecture of surgicsl suluras \n(a) \n\nStrip of polytetrafluoroelhylene, with an extension at break \nnot exceeding 2SX \n\nWoven fobrice of polyvinyl alcohol fibree, for eechine \neabroidary \n\nWoven polytetrafluoroelhylene fibre fabric, coatad or covered on \none aide with a copolyeer of letrofluoroelhylene end \ntrifluoroethylono having perfluorinated alkoxy oide choins \nsnding in carboxylic acid or sulphonic acid groups in ths \npotoBsiua or aodiua Bait fora, whether or not coated on the same \naids with a aatallic inorgonic coopound \n\n534 ex55931919 \n\n\u202218 \n\n535 8x55631618 \n\n\u202239 \n\n536 8x55639916 \n8x55639698 \n\n537 0x55639698 \n\n538 0x55639696 \n0x56613886 \n\n539 0x55638696 \n\n546 0x55641666 \n\n542 0x56636616 \n0x56836691 \n0x56636693 \n\n543 0x56636616 \n0x56636693 \nex5683669S \n6x56636699 \n\n544 6x56636693 \n6x56636665 \n\n545 6x59631696 \n0x59632696 \nexS9839899 \n\n546 0x59676866 \n\n\u202218 \n\u202238 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\n\u2022 26 \n\u2022 18 \n\n\u2022 46 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u202219 \n\u202218 \n\u202218 \n\n\u00ab28 \n\u00ab38 \n\u00ab38 \n\u00bb18 \n\n(46 \n(16 \n\n\u2022 19 \n\u2022 16 \n\u202228 \n\n\u202218 \n\n547 0x59111666 \n\n\u202216 \n\nTextile fibres exclusivsly of aromatic polyoaidas obleined by \nthe polycondensstion of a-phenytenedieeine end isophthslic \nacid, for usss othor then the manufacture of gooda of Chapters \n68 to 65 or of oatarials used in the aanufactura of ouch gooda \n(a) \n\nTextile fibres contoining by weight: \n- 1% or eore but not ooro then 15% of fibree of \n\npoly(p-phenyleno tarephthslaaida) \nand \n\n- 85% or ooro of fibree of orooetic polyooidea obleined by Ihe \n\npolycondenoolion of a-phonylenediooine and ieophtholic \nocid \n\nAcotalized, aulticoaponanl spun fibres with a matrix fibril \nstructure, consisting of ooulsion-polyoerizod polyvinyl olcohol \nand polyvinyl chlorida \n\nTextile fibree of polytetrofluoroelhylene \n\nPolyvinyl elcohol fibres, whether or not acatolizad \n\nFibree wholly of poly(lhio-l,4-phanyleno) \n\nFibree entirsly of eodel (180) \n\nPolyvinyl olcohol nonwovene, in the piece or cut into \nrectangles: \n- of o IhicknooB of 286 aicroaalras or aoro but not exceeding \n\n286 eicroaelres \nand \n\n- of e weight of 28g/o2 or eore but not exceeding \n\n58g/e2 \n\nNonwovene of orooetic polyoeide f i b ne obtoined by \npolycondensalion of a-phenylenodioeina and isophthslic acid, \nin the piece or cut into rectangles \n\nNonwovene of polypropylene consisting of o malt-blown canlral \nlayer, looinoted on eoch oide with spun-bonded fibree, of a \nthickness not exceeding 556 eicrooetroe and of a weight not \nexceeding 86g/a2, in the piece or eioply cut into \nrectangular shape, not impregnated \n\nKnitted or woven fabrics, cooled or covered on one side with \nartificial plastic material in which are eabedded aicroepheres \n\nTextile fabrics, cooted with odheeive in which ore eabedded \nspheres of 8 diaaater not exceeding 75 micrometres, of B weight \nnot exceeding S58g/e2 \n\nNeedle-punched synthstic fibre felts on B woven synthetic fibre \nbase not contoining polyestar, coated or covered on one side \nwith polytetrefluoroelhylene file, for the BBnufscture of \nfiltretion producte (e) \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\nRate of sulonosous duty (X) \n\n8 \n\n0 \n\n549 \n\n6x59119996 \n\n\u2022 18 \n\nVorn and strip of iipngnatad polytetrofluoroolhyleno, whether \nor not oilod or grophited \n\n556 \n\n63851816 \n\nSSI 1x63059000 \n\n5S2 1x68159990 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\u202291 \n\u202293 \n\n\u2022 10 \n\n553 ax69932999 \n\n\u202218 \n\nSocks and begs, of \u2022 kind used for the packing of goods, used, \nof jute or of other toxtilo bosl fibres of hooding No 5383 \n\n8scks and bsgs, of a kind used for the packing of goods, used, \nof flax or of sisal \n\nH i c r o s p h m s: \n- of a diooetor of loss than 100 licroaoins, \n- of a rafractivo index of 2,1 or e on but not exceeding 2,4 \n\nend \n\n- containing by woight iora than 99X of bariua and titanium \n\nevaluated as bariua oxide and titaniua dioxida \n\nVarn of continuouo cineic filsaante, Bach filaaenl conloining \nby woight: \n- 12% or ooro of diboron trioxide, \n- 26% or laaa of silicon dioxido \n\nend \n\n- 68% or ooro of diolueiniue trioxida \n\nSS4 8x69891988 \n\n\u202220 \n\nPlata, of dialuainiue trioxide end titeniuo corbido, of \ndimensions not exceeding 49x48ea, or of e diooetor not \nexceeding 125oo, for the eanufaclura of aagnatic heads (a) \n\nSS5 8x69891988 \n\n\u202230 \n\nSupports for cotolyoio, consisting of porous cordiiriti or \naullite caraaic pieces, of on ovoroll voluee not exceeding \n65688ol, having, per 160aa2 of Iho croea-aaction, not \nleas than one continuouo channel which eoy bo open ot both ends \nor etoppod ot one and \n\n556 1x76112800 \n\n\u202210 \n\nGlosa anvelopoo for aonochroaa cathode-ray tubas: \n- of o diogonol ecroon aeesuraaanl of 3,8ca or ooro but not \n\n559 ax79191959 \n\n\u202216 \n\n568 1x78191659 \n\n\u202238 \n\n561 OX761818S9 \n\n\u202248 \n\nexceeding Slca, \n\nend \n- of o noainal nack-diaaater of 13aa, 28aa, 29mm or 37oo \n\nVarn of 33 lex or \u2022 oultiple thereof, x7,SX, obtainad froo \ncontinuouo opun gloaa filaaanla of o noainal diaaatar of 3,5 \naicroaotroa or of 4,5 oicroaalras, in which filaaanta of o \ndiooetor of 3 sicroaatraa or eore but not exceeding 5,2 \noicroootroo prodoeinata, other than thooo trioted oo os to \nioprovo their odhaaion to aloaloaan \n\nVarn of 22 lex x7,5X, obteinad froo continuouo apun glass \nfilaaanla of o noainal disaotar of S oicroootroo, in which \nfiloaente of o diooetor of 4,2 aicroootree or aoro but not \naxceeding 5,8 eicrooitreo prodooineto \n\nVorn of 33, 34 or 51 tox or o oultiple thereof, x7,SX, \nobtained froo continuouo apun gloaa filaaanla of o nooinel \ndiooetor of 6 oicroootroo, in which filoeente of o dieaeter of \n5,1 aicroeetroe or ooro but not exceeding 6,8 eicroaatraa \npredooinolo \n\n562 1x78193299 \n6x76163996 \n\n\u202218 \n\u202218 \n\nNon-woven product of non-textile gloss fibre, for the \neanufaclura of oir-filtoro or of air-filtration producte (e) \n\n565 \n\n76826618 \n\nWaata of atuainiua, othor (including factory rajects) \n\n566 1x81838816 \n\n\u202218 \n\nWire of unalloyed tantalua, of a diaeitir of 0,2oe or oora \nbut not exceeding 8,566, for the oanufacture of capacitors \n(a) \n\n567 0x81838899 \n\n\u202219 \n\nTubo solely of tantalua, or solely of on alloy of lonlalua with \ntungsten containing by woight 2,5X or loss of tungsten \n\n568 0x81649818 \n\n\u202218 \n\nGround and polishad oagnooiue shsats, of dieensions not \nexceeding lS88x2886ee, coeted on one aide with an epoxy \nresin inssnsitive to light \n\n&tf \n\n\fCN code \n\nTARIC \n\nDescription \n\nRata of outonoaoue duty (X) \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n8 \n\n569 \n\n0x81681816 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\nTitoniue sponge \n\n576 \n\n81881696 \n\n571 \n\n0x81118611 \n\n573 0x84199988 \n\n\u2022 16 \n\n\u202218 \n\n574 0x84218909 \n\n\u202281 \n\n575 8x84219988 \n0x59119996 \n\n\u202292 \n\u202239 \n\n576 6x84219968 \n\n\u202293 \n\nWaste and scrap titaniua \n\nElectrolytic aanganese of a purity by weight of 99,7% or \neore, for the cheoicel industry (a) \n\nlaaersion tubs (coils) bundles, consisting of on asseably of \nplestic tubes teroinoting ot eech end in a honeycoob structure \n(end-fitting) surrounded by s pips connector \n\nParte of oquipeont, for the purificetion of woter by reverse \noaaosis, consisting of a bundle of holloa fibres of artificial \nplsstic asterisl with psrssable walls, eebedded in s block of \nartificial plaatic aaterial at one end end passing through a \nblock of artificial plaatic aoteriel at the other end, whether \nor not housed in o cylinder \n\nPerls of equipoent for the purificetion of woter by reveres \noBBosis, consisting sssantislly of plaslic-bsssd Bsabranas, \nsupported internally by woven or non-woven textile ealerials \nwhich are wound round o perforeted tube, end enclosed in e \ncylindrical plastic casing of a wall-thickness not exceeding \n4ee, whether or not housed in e cylinder of e well-thickness \nof Sea or eore \n\nComponents of separators for the separation or purification of \ngases fros gas sixtures, consisting of s bundle of peroeable \nhollow fibres enclosed within a container, whether or not \nperforated, of on overell length of 388am or aore but not \nexceeding 3768ea and a diaaater not exceeding 588aa \n\n577 8x84399918 \n8x84399996 \n\n\u202218 \n\u202218 \n\nSuction roll shells, not drilled, in the fore of alloy steel \ntubes, of s length of 5287am or aore and an external \ndiaaeter of 754oe or eore, for use in aachinery for eeking \npepar or paperboerd (a) \n\n(a) Control of the uaa for thia apacial purpooe shall be cerriad out purouonl tc \n\nthe n l o v o nl Cooaunity provisions. FINANCIAL RECORD \n\nBudget line concerned : Chap. 12 Art. 120 \n\nTitle of the tariff measure concerned : Proposal for a Council \nRegulation, temporarily suspending the autonomous Common Customs \nTariff duty on a number of industrial products (in the chemical and \na I Iied sectors) \n\n3. Legal basis : Art. 28 of the Treaty \n\n4. Object ive : suspension of CCT duties on the abovementioned products \n\n5. Cost of this tariff-measure : to be borne by the EEC-budget : \n\n- \n\nfor the same exercise in 1991, the loss of own resources was \nexpected to be of the order of 341 850 000 ecus (cf P. E. E/517/91 \nC0M(91) 134 of 17. 4. 1991) \n\nfor the current exercise, based on the Community statistics \navailable, a reasonable estimate for the cost of the operation \nfor the period covered by the attached draft Regulation would be \nof the order of 360 000 000 ecus \n\nu \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 199 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n10 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-213-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44033-3 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aa5a1919-2088-4792-8e1a-2b2be6183bbc", "title": "RESOLUTION embodying the opinion of the European Parliament, in accordance with the procedure without report, on the proposal fromt the Commission of the European Commmunities to the Council for a Council Directive on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to labelling of the materials used in the main components of footwear for sale to the final consumer (Cooperation procedure: first reading)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "approximation of laws,consumer information,footwear industry,labelling,marketing,sale", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0118", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "consumer information", "footwear industry", "labelling", "marketing", "sale"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aa5a1919-2088-4792-8e1a-2b2be6183bbc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/16b9cba4-924d-462d-b042-0f27c2cc578d", "title": "DECISION (Cooperation procedure: second reading) on the common position established by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on sweeteners for use in foodstuffs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "consumer protection,food additive,foodstuff,foodstuffs legislation,human nutrition,sweetener", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0145", "eurovoc_concepts": ["consumer protection", "food additive", "foodstuff", "foodstuffs legislation", "human nutrition", "sweetener"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/16b9cba4-924d-462d-b042-0f27c2cc578d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cacefe4e-cb0d-40e6-9bdf-c8a7e0ea1453", "title": "DECISION (Cooperation procedure: second reading) on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth (ninth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Women\u2019s Rights and Gender Equality,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "arrangement of working time,female work,gender equality,labour law,maternity leave,motherhood,night work,occupational safety,pay,women's rights,working conditions,working time", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0169", "eurovoc_concepts": ["arrangement of working time", "female work", "gender equality", "labour law", "maternity leave", "motherhood", "night work", "occupational safety", "pay", "women's rights", "working conditions", "working time"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cacefe4e-cb0d-40e6-9bdf-c8a7e0ea1453", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/635bc4e5-9024-4bfd-8352-661520b6e5f2", "title": "RESOLUTION on education for health and drugs misuse in the Member States of the European Community and the Council of Europe", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Culture and Education,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "drug addiction,education policy,health education,health policy,narcotic,performance drugs,public health", "workIds": "celex:51991IP0341", "eurovoc_concepts": ["drug addiction", "education policy", "health education", "health policy", "narcotic", "performance drugs", "public health"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/635bc4e5-9024-4bfd-8352-661520b6e5f2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cd8ba9c2-f342-48dc-9927-8e24459ba576", "title": "Community social policy. volume 6.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "EU policy,European social policy,child protection,free movement of workers,living conditions,single market,social security,vocational training,worker participation,working conditions", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_CO6291006", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "European social policy", "child protection", "free movement of workers", "living conditions", "single market", "social security", "vocational training", "worker participation", "working conditions"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cd8ba9c2-f342-48dc-9927-8e24459ba576", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/456d42c1-352d-420a-b13f-8682cd502068", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading) embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council directive on medical devices", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "European standard,approval,approximation of laws,harmonisation of standards,labelling,medical computing,medical device,product design,product quality,trademark", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0178", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "approval", "approximation of laws", "harmonisation of standards", "labelling", "medical computing", "medical device", "product design", "product quality", "trademark"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/456d42c1-352d-420a-b13f-8682cd502068", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ecc66aa-7a93-4db1-a98d-acce99e40a90", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading) embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council directive concerning minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers in the extractive industries for the exploration and exploitation of minerals in mines and quarries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Employment and Social Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "health legislation,mining extraction,mining operation,occupational health,occupational safety,professional qualifications,public health,vocational training,worker consultation,worker information,worker participation,working conditions,workplace", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0163", "eurovoc_concepts": ["health legislation", "mining extraction", "mining operation", "occupational health", "occupational safety", "professional qualifications", "public health", "vocational training", "worker consultation", "worker information", "worker participation", "working conditions", "workplace"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ecc66aa-7a93-4db1-a98d-acce99e40a90", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9cd7a7b7-acf6-43ea-ba6b-c21a89a85e6e", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1226/92 of 13 May 1992 on communication by the Member States to the Commission of information on imports of certain products processed from fruit and vegetables", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "Belgo-Luxembourg Economic Union,Central and Eastern Europe,exchange of information,free circulation,soft fruit", "workIds": "celex:31992R1226,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0018_035", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Belgo-Luxembourg Economic Union", "Central and Eastern Europe", "exchange of information", "free circulation", "soft fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9cd7a7b7-acf6-43ea-ba6b-c21a89a85e6e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/911f2a71-30eb-4237-9840-0b929078da71", "title": "DECISION (Cooperation procedure: second reading) on the common position adopted by the Council on 3 February 1992 with a view to the adoption of a directive on the minimum requirements for the provision of safety and/or health signs at work (tenth individual directive within the meaning of article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Employment and Social Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "harmonisation of standards,occupational safety,standardisation,worker consultation,worker information,worker participation", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0135", "eurovoc_concepts": ["harmonisation of standards", "occupational safety", "standardisation", "worker consultation", "worker information", "worker participation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/911f2a71-30eb-4237-9840-0b929078da71", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/88d5b316-3bf7-46b1-a8a9-81504743bd53", "title": "RESOLUTION on the revision of the financial perspective and draft supplementary and amending budget No. 2/92", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#document_budget_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Budgets,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "Community budget,Southern Africa,amending budget,budget appropriation,budget estimate,emergency aid,financial year,food aid,general budget (EU),humanitarian aid,institutional cooperation,supplementary budget", "workIds": "celex:51992BP0181", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "Southern Africa", "amending budget", "budget appropriation", "budget estimate", "emergency aid", "financial year", "food aid", "general budget (EU)", "humanitarian aid", "institutional cooperation", "supplementary budget"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/88d5b316-3bf7-46b1-a8a9-81504743bd53", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/69c6b676-ab93-4dcd-bff2-c527528839b8", "title": "LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION (Cooperation procedure: first reading) embodying the opinion of the European Parliament on the Commission proposal for a Council directive on monitoring and controlling large exposures of credit institutions", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Legal Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "banking,banking supervision,committee (EU),consolidated account,credit control,credit guarantee,credit institution,credit policy,financial institution,financial solvency,management audit,parent company,subsidiary", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0174", "eurovoc_concepts": ["banking", "banking supervision", "committee (EU)", "consolidated account", "credit control", "credit guarantee", "credit institution", "credit policy", "financial institution", "financial solvency", "management audit", "parent company", "subsidiary"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/69c6b676-ab93-4dcd-bff2-c527528839b8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/48ed9642-75ba-4e40-8282-144a619fc671", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the legal protection of databases", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "copyright,data protection,database,free competition,intellectual property,national implementing measure", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0024,comnat:COM_1992_0024_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_156_R_0004_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["copyright", "data protection", "database", "free competition", "intellectual property", "national implementing measure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/48ed9642-75ba-4e40-8282-144a619fc671", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b6d280a5-49d9-4d73-93b9-37325e3a5bcb", "title": "DECISION (Cooperation procedure: second reading) on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and amending Directives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (third non-life assurance Directive)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Legal Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "approximation of laws,branch,freedom to provide services,head office,insurance,insurance company,insurance contract,insurance indemnity,insurance premium,insured risk,legal person,natural person,right of establishment", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0155", "eurovoc_concepts": ["approximation of laws", "branch", "freedom to provide services", "head office", "insurance", "insurance company", "insurance contract", "insurance indemnity", "insurance premium", "insured risk", "legal person", "natural person", "right of establishment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b6d280a5-49d9-4d73-93b9-37325e3a5bcb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/94c062f4-dec1-48f3-ac96-7de08cd752e0", "title": "RESOLUTION on the work of the Committee of Inquiry into Drugs Trafficking", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_initiative_own_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_other_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,Socialist Group in the European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "committee of inquiry,corruption,drug traffic,fight against crime,organised crime", "workIds": "celex:51992IP0668", "eurovoc_concepts": ["committee of inquiry", "corruption", "drug traffic", "fight against crime", "organised crime"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/94c062f4-dec1-48f3-ac96-7de08cd752e0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/44d15e44-17d9-4ca2-a66d-a3a38e7c18fa", "title": "DECISION (Cooperation procedure: second reading) on the common position established by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive on the implementation of minimum safety and health requirements at temporary or mobile construction sites (eighth individual directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resolution_legislative_ep,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Committee on Employment and Social Affairs,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-13", "subjects": "building industry,civil engineering,occupational safety,social legislation,working conditions", "workIds": "celex:51992AP0134", "eurovoc_concepts": ["building industry", "civil engineering", "occupational safety", "social legislation", "working conditions"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/44d15e44-17d9-4ca2-a66d-a3a38e7c18fa", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/942f8246-5716-4b4b-84a1-2eca5cc6032e", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1210/92 of 12 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2501/87 fixing the characteristics of each variety of tobacco grown in the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "agricultural guidance,agricultural quota,aid per hectare,crop yield,tobacco", "workIds": "celex:31992R1210,oj:JOL_1992_127_R_0005_016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural guidance", "agricultural quota", "aid per hectare", "crop yield", "tobacco"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/942f8246-5716-4b4b-84a1-2eca5cc6032e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/41580f96-6ae6-407a-b11c-febf6d339a1d", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1222/92 of 12 May 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code 6913, originating in China, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "decorative item,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1222,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0013_031", "eurovoc_concepts": ["decorative item", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/41580f96-6ae6-407a-b11c-febf6d339a1d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2bd828d4-1e01-43a1-8e0f-3299f46d4879", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1220/92 of 12 May 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN codes 6401 and 6402, originating in the Philippines, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "Philippines,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1220,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0011_029", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Philippines", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2bd828d4-1e01-43a1-8e0f-3299f46d4879", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dd4f8d97-bd0a-45bd-bdc4-cc27857a881c", "title": "RIESE : electronics Space Energy and Environment.,RIESE : elettronica, spazio, energia e ambiente.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for the Information Society and Media", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "European Community,invention,research", "workIds": "PUB_CA7291261", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Community", "invention", "research"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dd4f8d97-bd0a-45bd-bdc4-cc27857a881c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68442d31-ec30-4253-a1b2-fe84b7a2315f", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) opening and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for bulls, cows and heifers, other than those intended for slaughter, of certain Alpine breeds", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "bull,cow,heifer,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0194(02),comnat:COM_1992_0194(02)_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["bull", "cow", "heifer", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68442d31-ec30-4253-a1b2-fe84b7a2315f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0MC92) 194 final \n\nBrussels, 12 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nopening and providing for the administration of a Community \n\ntariff quota for heifers and cows, other than those \n\nintended for slaughter, of certain mountain breeds \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nopening and providing for the administration of a Community \n\ntariff quota for bulls, cows and heifers, other than those \n\nintended for slaughter, of certain Alpine breeds \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f^ \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. At the multilateral GATT negotiations, the European Economic \n\nCommunity undertook to open certain annual Community quotas \n\nincluding, in the agricultural sector, those set out below: \n\nOCT heading \n\nDescription of goods \n\nvolume \n\nQuota \n\nex 01. 02 A II Cows and heifers, not intended for \n\nslaughter, of the following mountain \nbreeds; grey, brown, yellow and \nmottled Simnental breed and Pinzgau \nbreed (conditions to be determined \nby the competent authorities of the \nMember State of destination) \n\n20 000 head \n\nex 01. 02 A II Bulls, cows and heifers, not intended \n\nfor slaughter, of the following breeds; \nmottled Simnental breed and Schwyz and \nFribourg breeds. If they are to come \nwithin the quota, animals of the breeds \nin question must satisfy the following \nrequirements: \n-bulls: pedigree \n-female animals: pedigree or certificate \nof registration in herdbook certifying \npurity of breed. 5 000 head \n\n6% \n\n4% \n\n2. The tariff quotas in question were first opened on 1 July 1970 in \n\nresponse to requests from the Swiss and Austrian authorities, and \n\ncover the period from 1 July in each year to 30 June in the following \n\nyear. 3. In an exchange of letters with Austria dated 21 July 1972, the \n\nCommunity undertook unilaterally to increase the size of the first \n\ntariff quota set out above from 20 00 to 30 000 head and to lower the \n\nquota duty from 6% to 4%. The quota volume was again unilaterally \n\nincreased to 38 000 head from the end of 1977. And under an agreement \n\nin the form of exchange of letters dated 14 July 1986 which was \n\n\f3 \n\nadopted by the council's Decision of 15 September 1986 (OJ No L 328 \n\nof 22 November 1986 p. 57), the volume of this tariff quota was once \n\nmore raised to 42 600 head, as from 1 July 1986. These quotas were \n\nopened most recently by Regulations (EEC) Nos 1894/91 and 1895/91 of \n\n26 June 1991 (OJ No L 169 of 29. 6. 1991), for the period from 1 July \n\n1991 to 30 June 1992. 4. In order to meet community obligations, it is therefore necessary to \n\nadopt Regulations on the opening and administration of the Community \n\ntariff quotas, for the period from 1 July 1992 to 30 June 1993. 5. Taking into account aspects peculiar to the trade in these animals, \n\nthe Commission proposes the extension of the system of administration \n\nof these quotas as applied during the period 1. 7. 91 to 30. 6. 92. 6. The interpretation to be given to the phrase \"not intended for \n\nslaughter\" has been subject of exchanges of views since 1974. It had been apparent from the discussions that, in the case of \n\nanimals whose importation was subject to submission of a breeding \n\ncertificate (certificate of pedigree or of registration in the \n\nherdbook), checking the purpose for which the animals are in fact \n\nused would be pointless in view of the high price of such animals. Where such a certificate is not required, a period of 4 months from \n\nthe day of importation would appear the minimum period after which \n\nimported animals could be considered not to be intended for \n\nslaughter. This solution was adopted by the Council on an \n\nexperimental basis for the period from 1 July 1974 to 30 June 1975 \n\nand then carried over for the following tariff periods. At discussions at Council level in 1978 and 1979 it was decided with \n\nthe agreement of the Swiss authorities to extend the checks on non-\n\nslaughter to animals imported with the abovementioned breeding \n\ncertificate under the second quota of 5 000 head. Proposal \n\nf or a \n\nC O U N C IL R E G U L A T I ON (EEC) No \n\n/9 2 \n\nof \n\no p e n i ng and providing for the administration of a C o m m u n i ty tariff q u o ta for \nheifers and c o w s, other than those intended for slaughter, of certain m o u n t a in \nbreeds \n\ny \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European \nin particular Article 113 \nEconomic Community, and \nthereof, \n\nHaving regard \nPortugal, \n\nto the Act of Accession of Spain and \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from \n\nthe Commission, \n\nthe \n\nthan \n\nthose \n\nframework of \n\nWhereas the European Economic Community undertook, \nwithin \nthe General Agreement on \nTariffs and Trade (GATT), to open an annual Community \ntariff quota of 20 000 head at a duty of 6 % for heifers \nand cows, other \nintended for slaughter, of \ncertain mountain breeds; whereas, in an Exchange of \nLetters with Austria dated 21 July 1972, the Community \ntariff \nundertook unilaterally to increase the size of the \nquota from 20 000 to 30 000 head and to lower the quota \nduty from 6 % to 4 % ; whereas, subsequently, this quota \nwas \nto 38 000 h e a d; whereas \naccording to the Agreement in the form of an Exchange \nof Letters between the European Economic Community \nand the Republic of Austria concerning agriculture of 14 \nJuly 1986, which was approved by Decision 86/555/ \nEEC ('), the volume of this \nto \n42 600 head as from 1 July 1986 ; whereas the abovemen-\nthe \ntioned tariff quota should therefore be opened for \nperiod 1 July 199 2to 30 J u ne 199 3 at a duty of 4 % for a \nquantity of 42 600 head ; \n\ntariff quota was raised \n\nincreased unilaterally \n\nwhereas a check should be carried out to ascertain \nthat \nthe imported animals have not been slaughtered within a \ncertain period ; \n\nimporters \n\nWhereas it is, in particular, necessary to ensure equal and \ncontinuous access for all Community \nto the \nabovementioned quota, and the uninterrupted application \nof the quota duties, to all imports of the animals in ques \ntion until the quota is exhausted ; whereas the necessary \nmeasures should be taken to ensure efficient administra \ntion of this tariff quota, taking into account the C o m m u \nnity nature of the quota and special factors in the trade in \nthe Commission \nto \nthese a n i m a l s; whereas \nshould assign to the Member States on request the quanti \nties needed to cover actual imports in accordance with an \nto be determined ; \neconomically appropriate procedure \n\nthis end \n\nWhereas, since the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of \nthe Netherlands and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg \nare united within and jointly represented by the Benelux \nEconomic Union, any measure concerning the adminis \ntration of the quantities levied by that economic union \nmay be carried out by any one of its members, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION : \n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. From 1 July 1992 to 30 J u ne 1993 the duty appli \ncable to the import into the Community of the animals \ndesignated hereafter shall be suspended at the level and \nwithin the limits of the Community tariff quota indicated. Order No \n\n09. 0001 \n\nCN code \n(a) \n\nDescription \n\nQuota \nvolume \n\nQuota duty \n<%) \n\nex 0102 90 10 \nex 0102 90 31 \nex 0102 90 33 \n\nCows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter, of \nthe following mountain breeds : grey, brown, yellow and \nmottled Simmental breed and mottled Pintzgau breed \n\n42 600 head \n\n(a) Taric c o d e s: 0102 90 10*20 and 40, \n\n0102 90 31 * 11, 19, 31 and 39, \n0102 90 33* 10 and 30. 2. Within the limits of this tariff quota, the Kingdom \nof Spain and the Portuguese Republic shall apply customs \nduties calculated in accordance with the relevant provi \nsions in the Act of Accession. Derogations may, however, be granted \nin the event of \nforce majeure duly attested by a local authority certificate \nsetting out the reasons for the slaughter. to \n\nFor the purposes of \n\n3. this Regulation, the animals \nin paragraph 1 shall be considered not \nreferred \nintended for slaughter if they are not slaughtered within \nfour months of the date of the acceptance of the entry for \nrelease for free circulation. (') OJ No L 328, 22. 11. 1986, p. 57. Article 2 \n\nT he quota v o l u me referred \n\nI \nto \nbe further divided into two parts. in Article 1 (1) shall \n\nThe first part, 8 0% of the total, i. e. 34. 080head, shall be \nreserved for established importers who are able to furnish \n\n\fproof of having imported animals of the breeds specified \nin the tariff quota in question during the previous three \nyears. With regard to Portugal, in the case of established impor \nto in \nters, account shall be taken of animals referred \nArticle 1 (1) in respect of which importers can prove, to \nthe satisfaction of the competent authorities, that \nthey \nwere imported and that they were not slaughtered within \nfour months following the date of the acceptance of the \nentry for release for free circulation. for \n\ni. e. 8. 2 5 0h e a d, shall be \nThe second part, of 2D %, \nreserved either \nimporters who undertake, when \nmaking an application, to keep the imported cattle in \npremises of which they have the use or for importers who \nhave been conducting business in live bovine animals for \na period of at least one year and are listed in a public \nregister of the Member State or who can provide proof, \nrecognized by the competent authority, of such conduct. The 3 4. 0 80 head shall be assigned to the various \n2. importers pro rata, in proportion \ntheir \nprevious imports over the three years under consideration \nthan \nor \nprevious imports while the 8. 2S0head shall be assigned \nto applicants pro rata, in proportion to the entitlement \napplied for by the importers. In the latter case : \n\nto the quantities applied for \n\nif they are less \n\nto the scale of \n\n(a) applications for quantities greater than 50 head shall \n\nbe automatically reduced to that number ; \n\n(b) applications which would give rise to a certificate of \nparticipation covering a quantity of less than five head \nshall not be taken into account; \n\n(c) quantities which have not been assigned, owing to the \nminimum five head limitation shall be assigned by \ndrawing lots (with a figure of five head). 3. Any quantities of one of the parts of the tariff quota \nreferred to in paragraph 1 not applied for shall be auto \nmatically transferred \n\nto the other part. Article 3 \n\n1. Applications to import under each part of the tariff \nquota, accompanied, where appropriate, by proof of \nprevious imports, shall be made to the competent authori \nties in the Member States, in accordance with the proce \ndures laid down and the deadline set by those authorities, \nby means of the document of release for free circulation, \nwhich shall be cancelled by the said authorities after \nbeing submitted as proof. These authorities shall transmit to the Commission, not \nlater than 10 July 199 2 the data thus collected, and in \nparticular : \n\n\u2014 the number of applicants and the number of head \n\napplied for by each category of \n\nimporter, \n\n\u2014 the average of previous \n\nimports furnished by each \napplicant in respect of the 36 210 head reserved for \nestabished \n\nimporters. ^ \n\n2. The Commission shall notify the Member States, by \n15 July 199\u00a3, of the quantities to be assigned to each \napplicant, in the form, where necessary, of a percentage of \nthe amount originally applied for, or of that applicant's \nprevious imports. On t he basis of the data referred to in paragraph 2, \n3. Member States shall \nissue applicants with certificates \nspecifying the number of head to which they are entitled. the certificates may not go \nThe period of validity of \nbeyond 30 J u ne 1 9 9 3. The entitlement certificates, a model of which is annexed \nto this Regulation, shall be issued upon provision of a \nsecurity of ECU 20 per head, which shall be released once \nthe certificates have been returned, complete with \nthe \ncustoms stamps acknowledging the import of the animals, \nto the issuing authority. An entitlement certificate shall not be transferable and \nshall entitle the bearer to benefit from \nthe tariff quota \nonly when made out in the same name as the entry for \nrelease for free circulation which accompanies it. licences and advance fixing certificates \n\nThe rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EEC) No \n3719/88 of 16 November 1988 laying down common \ndetailed rules for the application of the system of import \nand export \nfor \nagricultural products ('), as last amended by Regulation \n(EEC) No 1599/90 (2), for the release of the security for \nthe import certificates or its conversion into revenue shall \napply to the security referred to in the second subpara \ngraph. 4. Quantities which have not been the subject of the \nissue of entitlement certificates by 31 March 1993 shall be \nfinally reassigned under the procedure described in the \nforegoing paragraphs to importers who have applied for \ncertificates in respect of their whole entitlements. the data specified \n\nTo this end, Member States shall notify the Commission \nby 10 April 1993 of the quantities remaining unused on \n31 March 1993, and furnish \nthe \nsecond subparagraph of paragraph 1. The Commission \nin each \nshall set the new percentages for entitlements \ncategory and shall transmit \nthem by not later than 15 \nApril 1993 to the Member States, which shall then issue \nthe entitlement certificates \nthe \nconditions set out in paragraph 3, with a period of validity \nnot extending beyond 30 June 1993 \n\nto the applicants under \n\nin \n\nArticle 4 \n\n1. Member States shall take all measures necessary to \nensure \nis \nrestricted to cattle as specified \n\nin Article 1 (1). in question \n\ntariff quota \n\nthat access \n\nthe \n\nto \n\n(') OJ No L 331, 2. 12. 1988, p. 1. O OJ No L 151, 15. 6. 1990, p. 29. \u20ac \n\nThey shall ensure importers equal and continuous \n\n2. access to the tariff quota in question. Article 5 \n\nthe Commission shall cooperate \nMember States and \nclosely to ensure that the provisions of this Regulation are \nobserved. Depletion of the said quota shall be measured on \nimports submitted for customs clearance \n\n3. the basis of \nunder cover of entries for release for free circulation. This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1 9 9* \n\nArticle 6 \n\nThis Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at B r u s s e l s. -\n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fE U R O P E AN C O M M U N I TY \n\nE N T I T L E M E NT C E R T I F I C A TE No \n\nCOMMUNITY TARIFF QUOTAS FOR \n\u2014 Cows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter of certain mountain breeds \n\u2014 Bulls, cows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter of certain Alpine breeds \n\n1. Holder (Name, complete address and Member State) \n\n2. Issuing authority \n\n* \n\nANNEX \n\nNOTES \n\n3. This certificate is valid until and including \n\nday month year \n\nA. This certificate is valid in all Member States of the Community. B. This certificate must be attached to the entry for release for free \ncirculation, and the entry must itself be drawn up in the name of \nthe holder of this certificate. C. The customs office concerned should write off the quantities \nreleased for free circulation and return this certificate to the holder \nor the holders representative. 0. The holder must return this certificate to the issuing authority to \n\nobtain release of the guarantee. Place and date of issue \n\nSignature and stamp of issuing authority \n\n4. Description of animals \n\n5. CN code \n\n6. Number of head in figures \n\n7. Number of head in words \n\n8. WRITING OFF BY CUSTOMS OFFICES (in column 9, indicate in part 1 the quantity available, and in part 2 the quantity written off) \n\n9. Number of head \n\n10. Number of head in words for the \n\nin figures \n\nquantity written off \n\n11. Number and date of acceptance \nof the entry for release for free \ncirculation \n\n12. Name, Member State, \nsignature and stamp \nof the customs office \n\n1. 2. 1. 2. 1. 2. Proposal for a \n\nC O U N C IL R E G U L A T I ON (EEC) No \n\n/ 92 \n\nof \n\no p e n i ng a nd providing for the administration of a C o m m u n i ty tariff q u o ta for \nbulls, c o ws and heifers, other than those intended for slaughter, of c e r t a in A l p i ne \nbreeds \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European \nEconomic Community, and \nin particular Article 113 \nthereof, \n\nHaving regard \nPortugal, \n\nto \n\nthe Act of Accession of Spain and \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nthe framework of \n\nWhereas the European Economic Community undertook, \nthe General Agreement on \nwithin \nTariffs and Trade (GATT), to open an annual Community \ntariff quota of 5 000 head at a duty of 4 % for bulls, cows \nand heifers, other than those intended for slaughter, of \ncertain Alpine breeds ; whereas eligibility for such quota \nis subject to submission of the following documents : \n\n\u2014 bulls : a pedigree certificate, \n\u2014 female animals : a pedigree certificate or certificate or \nthe herdbook, certifying purity of \n\nin \n\nregistration \nbreed ; \n\nWhereas it is in particular necessary to ensure equal and \ncontinuous access for all Community \nimporters to the \nabovementioned quota, and the uninterrupted application \nof the quota duties, to all imports of the animals in ques \ntion until the quota is exhausted ; whereas the necessary \nmeasures should be taken to ensure efficient administra \ntion of this tariff quota, taking into account the Commu \nnity nature of the quota and special factors in the trade in \nthese a n i m a l s; whereas \nthe Commission \nto \nshould assign to the Member States on request the quanti \nties needed to cover actual imports in accordance with an \nto be determined : \neconomically appropriate procedure \n\nthis end \n\nWhereas, since the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom ol \nthe Netherlands and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg \nare united within and jointly represented by the Benelux \nEconomic Union, any measure concerning the adminis \ntration of the quantities levied by that economic union \nmay be carried out by any one of its members, \n\nWhereas the abovementioned \ntariff quota should there \nfore be opened for the period 1 July 1952 to 30 June \n199 3 at a duty of 4% ; \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION \n\nArticle 1 \n\nwhereas a check should be carried out to ascertain that \nthe imported animals have not been slaughtered within a \ncertain period ; \n\n1. From 1 July 1992 to 30 J u ne 199 3 the duty appli \ncable to the import into the Community of the animal; \ndesignated hereafter shall be suspended at the level anc \nindicated \nwithin the limits of Community tariff quota \n\nOrder No \n\n09. 0003 \n\nCN code \n(a) \n\nex 0102 90 10 \nex 0102 90 31 \nex 0102 90 33 \nex 0102 90 35 \n\nDescription \n\nQuota \nvolume \n\nQuota duty \n(%) \n\nfor \nBulls, cows and heifers, other \nslaughter, of the following breeds : mottled Simmental breed \nand the Schwyz and Fribourg breeds \n\nintended \n\nthose \n\nthan \n\n5 000 head \n\n(a) Taric c o d e s: 0102 90 10 ' 3 0, 40 and 50, \n\n0102 90 31 \" 2 1. 29. 31 and 39, \n0102 90 33 20 and 30, \n0102 90 3 5 ' 21 and 29. Within \nthe limits of this tariff quota, the Kingdom of \nSpain and the Portuguese Republic shall apply customs \nduties calculated in accordance with the relevant provi \nsions in the Act of Accession. Eligibility for this tariff quota shall be subject to the \n\n2. submission of : \n\n\u2014 in the case of bulls : a pedigree certificate, \n\u2014 in the case of female animals : a pedigree certificate or \ncertificate of registration in the herdbook, certifying \npurity of breed. to \n\nFor the purposes of \n\nthis Regulation, the animal \n3. referred \nin paragraph 1 shall be considered no \nintended for slaughter if they are not slaughtered withii \nfour months of the date of acceptance of the entry for fre \ncirculaion. in the event c \nDerogations may, however, be granted \nforce majeure duly attested by a local authority certificat \nsetting out the reasons for the slaughter. Article \n\n2 \n\nThe quota volume referred to in Article 1 (1) shall \n\n1. be further divided into two parts. 4. 000 \n\nhead, shall be \nThe first part, 3 0% of the total, i. e. f \nreserved for established importers who are able to furnish \nproof of having imported animals of the breeds specified \nin the tariff quota in question during the previous three \nyears. taken of animals referred \n\nWith regard to Portugal, in the case of established impor \nters, account shall be \nin \nArticle 1 (1) in respect of which importers can prove, to \nthey \nthe satisfaction of the competent authorities, that \nwere imported and that they were not slaughtered within \nfour months following the date of,the acceptance of the \nentry for release for free circulation. to \n\n1 0 00 \n\nhead, shall be reserved \nThe second part, of 20 %, i. e. J \neither for \nimporters who undertake, when making an \napplication, to keep the imported cattle in premises of \nwhich they have the use or for importers who have been \nconducting business in live bovine animals for a period of \nat least one year and are listed in a public register of the \nMember State or who can provide proof, recognized by \nthe competent authority, of such conduct. The 4. 0 00 head shall be assigned \n\nto the various \n2. importers pro rata, in proportion \ntheir \nprevious imports over the three years under consideration, \nor to the quantities applied for \nthan \nprevious imports while theflOOO head shall be assigned to \napplicants pro \nthe entitlement \nin proportion \napplied for by the importers. In the latter case : \n\nto the scale of \n\nthey are \n\nrata, \n\nless \n\nto \n\nif \n\n(a) applications for quantities greater than 50 head shall \n\nbe automatically reduced to that n u m b e r; \n\n(b) applications which would give rise to a certificate of \nparticipation covering a quantity of less than five head \nshall not be taken into a c c o u n t; \n\n(c) quantities which have not been assigned, owing to the \nm i n i m um five head limitation shall be assigned by \ndrawing lots (with a figure of five head). 3. Any quantities of one of the parts of the tariff quota \nreferred to in paragraph 1 not applied for shall be auto \nmatically transferred \n\nto the other part. Article \n\n3 \n\n1. Applications to import under each part of the tariff \nquota, accompanied, where appropriate, by proof of \nprevious imports, shall be made to the competent authori \nties in the Member States, in accordance with the proce \ndures laid down and the deadline set by those authorities, \nby means of the document of release for free circulation, \nwhich shall be cancelled by \nthe said authorities after \nbeing submitted as proof. 3 \n\nThese authorities shall transmit to the Commission, not \nlater than 10 July 199 2 the data thus collected, and in \nparticular : \n\n\u2014 the number of applicants and \n\nthe number of head \n\napplied for by each category of \n\nimporter, \n\n\u2014 the average of previous \n\nimports furnished by each \napplicant in respect of the 4 250 head reserved for \nestablished \n\nimporters. 2. The Commission shall notify the Member States, by \n15 July 1992 of the quantities to be assigned to each \napplicant, in the form, where necessary, of a percentage of \nthe amount originally applied for, or of that applicant's \nprevious imports. On the basis of the data referred to in paragraph 2, \n3. Member States shall \ncertificates \nspecifying the number of head to which they are entitled. The period of validity of \nthe certificates may not go \nbeyond 30 J u ne 1993. issue applicants with \n\nThe entitlement certificates, a model of which is annexed \nto this Regulation, shall be issued upon provision of a \nsecurity of ECU 20 per head, which shall be released once \nthe certificates have been returned, complete with \nthe \ncustoms stamps acknowledging the import of the animals, \nto the issuing authority. An entitlement certificate shall not be transferable and \nshall entitle the bearer to benefit from \nthe tariff quota \nonly when made out in the same as the entry for release \nfor free circulation which accompanies \n\nit. licences and advance fixing certificates \n\nThe rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EEC) No \nlaying down common \n3719/88 of 16 November 1988 \ndetailed rules for the application of the system of import \nand export \nfor \nagricultural products ('), as last amended by Regulation \n(EEC) No 1599/90 (2), for the release of the security for \nthe import certificates or its conversion into revenue shall \napply to the security referred to in the second subpara \ngraph. Quantities which have not been the subject of the \n4. issue of entitlement certificates by 31 March 1993 shall be \nfinally reassigned under the procedure described \nin the \nforegoing paragraphs to importers who have applied for \ncertificates in respect of their whole entitlements. To this end, Member States shall notify the Commission \nby 10 April 1993 of the quantities remaining unused on \n31 March 1993, and furnish \nthe \nsecond subparagraph of paragraph 1. The Commission \nshall set the new percentages for entitlements \nin each \ncategory and shall transmit \nthem by not later than 15 \nApril 199 3 to the Member States, which shall then issue \n\nthe data specified \n\nin \n\n(') OJ No L 331, 2. 12. 1988, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 151, 15. 6. 1990. p. 29. 4o \n\nthe entitlement certificates to the applicants under the \nconditions set out in paragraph 3, with a period of validity \nnot extending beyond 30 June 1995 \n\nDepletion of the said quota shall be measured on \nimports submitted for customs clearance \n\n3. the basis of \nunder cover of entries for release for free circulation. Article 4 \n\n1. Member States shall take all measures necessary to \nensure that access to the tariff quota \nis \nrestricted to cattle as specified in Article 1 (1). in question \n\nThey shall ensure importers equal and continuous \n\n2. access to the tariff quota in question. Article 5 \n\nMember States and \nshall cooperate \nclosely to ensure that the provisions of this Regulation are \nobserved. the Commission \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1992. Article 6 \n\nThis Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at B r u s s e l s. For the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fE U R O P E AN C O M M U N I TY \n\nE N T I T L E M E NT C E R T I F I C A TE No \n\nCOMMUNITY TARIFF QUOTAS FOR \n\u2014 Cows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter of certain mountain breeds \n\u2014 Bulls, cows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter of certain Alpine breeds \n\n1. Holder (Name, complete address and Member State) \n\n2 Issuing authority \n\n41 \n\nANNEX \n\nNOTES \n\n3. This certificate is valid until and including \n\nday month \n\nyear \n\nA. This certificate is valid in all Member States of the Community. B. This certificate must be attached to the entry for release for free \ncirculation, and the entry must itself be drawn up in the name of \nthe holder of this certificate. C. The customs office concerned should write off \n\nthe quantities \nreleased for free circulation and return this certificate to the holder \nor the holders representative. D. The holder must return this certificate to the issuing authority to \n\nobtain release of the guarantee. Place and date of issue : \n\nSignature and stamp of issuing authority: \n\n4. Description of animals \n\n5. CN code \n\n7. Number of head in words \n\n/ \n\n6. Number of head in figures \n\n8. WRITING OFF BY CUSTOMS OFFICES (in column 9, indicate in part 1 the quantity available, and in part 2 the quantity written off) \n\n9. Number of head \n\n10. Number of head in words for the \n\nin figures \n\nquantity written off \n\n11. Number and date of acceptance \nof the entry for release for free \ncirculation \n\n12 Name, Member State, \nsignature and stamp \nof the customs office \n\n\f1 <a, \n\nFINANCIAL RECORD \n\n1. Budget i ine concerned : Chap. 12 Art. 120 \n\n2. Legal basis : Art. 113 of the Treaty \n\n3. Title of the tariff measure concerned : Proposals for Council \nRegulations opening and providing for the administration of a \nCommunity tariff quota for heifers and cows, othe than those intended \nfor slaughter, of a certain mountain breeds and of a Community tariff \nquota for bulls, cows and heifers, other than those intended for \nslaughter, of certain Alpine breeds \n\n4. Oblect ive : Fulfilment of contractual obligations of the Community \n\n5. Method of calculation : \n\nQuota volumes: \nDuties to be applied: \nNormal duties: \n\n42 600 head \n\n4% \n\n16% + AGR \n\n5 000 head \n\n4% \n\n16% + AGR \n\n6. Duty-loss : \na) Customs duty losses \n\nValue of the 42 600 head: 29. 790. 180 ECU \nValue of the 5 000 head: 3. 948. 000 ECU \n\nLOSS: 12% - \n\nb) L ew losses \n\n33. 738. 180 ECU \n\n4. 048. 581 ECU \n\nWeight of the 42 600 head: 20. 661 T \nWeight of the 5 000 head: 2. 425 T \n\nLoss: 17,798 ECU/100 kg \n\n23. 086 T \n\ni. e. 177,98 ECU x 13. 086 T - \n\n4. 108. 846 ECU \n\n8. 157. 427 ECU \n\n7) \n\nCost of the operation (period 91/92): 9. 693. 317 ECU \nCost of the operation (period 92/93): 8. 157. 427 ECU \n\n\f12 \u2022-\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 194 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-206-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43970-X \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/198dcfb0-f885-45fe-b94e-8682ec55eeaa", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1225/92 of 12 May 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products of category No 36 order of 40.0360, originating in China, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "man-made fibre,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1225,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0016_034", "eurovoc_concepts": ["man-made fibre", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/198dcfb0-f885-45fe-b94e-8682ec55eeaa", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8d096c2b-e72f-4a6a-a3ab-e63b1689f480", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1211/92 of 12 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2190/90 on the sale at a price fixed in advance of unprocessed dried grapes to distillation industries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "Greece,distillation,dried product,price fixed in advance,sale", "workIds": "celex:31992R1211,oj:JOL_1992_127_R_0009_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "distillation", "dried product", "price fixed in advance", "sale"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8d096c2b-e72f-4a6a-a3ab-e63b1689f480", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c16b1f47-3256-486b-805b-2a8d98d691ba", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1224/92 of 12 May 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code 3923 21 00, originating in Thailand, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "Thailand,packaging product,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1224,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0015_033", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Thailand", "packaging product", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c16b1f47-3256-486b-805b-2a8d98d691ba", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/83c5b265-0062-4d28-b82b-849d41f1801b", "title": "Cities and the global environment : Proceedings of a European Workshop. The Hague, 5-7 December 1990.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Eurofound,European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "domestic waste,environmental research,urban centre,urban habitat,urban infrastructure", "workIds": "PUB_SY7291172", "eurovoc_concepts": ["domestic waste", "environmental research", "urban centre", "urban habitat", "urban infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/83c5b265-0062-4d28-b82b-849d41f1801b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3e323ba-c300-4baa-a6ac-cac1c8714841", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1223/92 of 12 May 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code 9503, originating in China, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "restoration of customs duties,tariff preference,toy industry", "workIds": "celex:31992R1223,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0014_032", "eurovoc_concepts": ["restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference", "toy industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3e323ba-c300-4baa-a6ac-cac1c8714841", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bc9ccb9f-1fd2-407a-8bb2-32d4c47818f7", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) opening and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for heifers and cows, other than those intended for slaughter, of certain mountain breeds", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "cow,heifer,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0194(01),comnat:COM_1992_0194(01)_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cow", "heifer", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bc9ccb9f-1fd2-407a-8bb2-32d4c47818f7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0MC92) 194 final \n\nBrussels, 12 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nopening and providing for the administration of a Community \n\ntariff quota for heifers and cows, other than those \n\nintended for slaughter, of certain mountain breeds \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nopening and providing for the administration of a Community \n\ntariff quota for bulls, cows and heifers, other than those \n\nintended for slaughter, of certain Alpine breeds \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f^ \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. At the multilateral GATT negotiations, the European Economic \n\nCommunity undertook to open certain annual Community quotas \n\nincluding, in the agricultural sector, those set out below: \n\nOCT heading \n\nDescription of goods \n\nvolume \n\nQuota \n\nex 01. 02 A II Cows and heifers, not intended for \n\nslaughter, of the following mountain \nbreeds; grey, brown, yellow and \nmottled Simnental breed and Pinzgau \nbreed (conditions to be determined \nby the competent authorities of the \nMember State of destination) \n\n20 000 head \n\nex 01. 02 A II Bulls, cows and heifers, not intended \n\nfor slaughter, of the following breeds; \nmottled Simnental breed and Schwyz and \nFribourg breeds. If they are to come \nwithin the quota, animals of the breeds \nin question must satisfy the following \nrequirements: \n-bulls: pedigree \n-female animals: pedigree or certificate \nof registration in herdbook certifying \npurity of breed. 5 000 head \n\n6% \n\n4% \n\n2. The tariff quotas in question were first opened on 1 July 1970 in \n\nresponse to requests from the Swiss and Austrian authorities, and \n\ncover the period from 1 July in each year to 30 June in the following \n\nyear. 3. In an exchange of letters with Austria dated 21 July 1972, the \n\nCommunity undertook unilaterally to increase the size of the first \n\ntariff quota set out above from 20 00 to 30 000 head and to lower the \n\nquota duty from 6% to 4%. The quota volume was again unilaterally \n\nincreased to 38 000 head from the end of 1977. And under an agreement \n\nin the form of exchange of letters dated 14 July 1986 which was \n\n\f3 \n\nadopted by the council's Decision of 15 September 1986 (OJ No L 328 \n\nof 22 November 1986 p. 57), the volume of this tariff quota was once \n\nmore raised to 42 600 head, as from 1 July 1986. These quotas were \n\nopened most recently by Regulations (EEC) Nos 1894/91 and 1895/91 of \n\n26 June 1991 (OJ No L 169 of 29. 6. 1991), for the period from 1 July \n\n1991 to 30 June 1992. 4. In order to meet community obligations, it is therefore necessary to \n\nadopt Regulations on the opening and administration of the Community \n\ntariff quotas, for the period from 1 July 1992 to 30 June 1993. 5. Taking into account aspects peculiar to the trade in these animals, \n\nthe Commission proposes the extension of the system of administration \n\nof these quotas as applied during the period 1. 7. 91 to 30. 6. 92. 6. The interpretation to be given to the phrase \"not intended for \n\nslaughter\" has been subject of exchanges of views since 1974. It had been apparent from the discussions that, in the case of \n\nanimals whose importation was subject to submission of a breeding \n\ncertificate (certificate of pedigree or of registration in the \n\nherdbook), checking the purpose for which the animals are in fact \n\nused would be pointless in view of the high price of such animals. Where such a certificate is not required, a period of 4 months from \n\nthe day of importation would appear the minimum period after which \n\nimported animals could be considered not to be intended for \n\nslaughter. This solution was adopted by the Council on an \n\nexperimental basis for the period from 1 July 1974 to 30 June 1975 \n\nand then carried over for the following tariff periods. At discussions at Council level in 1978 and 1979 it was decided with \n\nthe agreement of the Swiss authorities to extend the checks on non-\n\nslaughter to animals imported with the abovementioned breeding \n\ncertificate under the second quota of 5 000 head. Proposal \n\nf or a \n\nC O U N C IL R E G U L A T I ON (EEC) No \n\n/9 2 \n\nof \n\no p e n i ng and providing for the administration of a C o m m u n i ty tariff q u o ta for \nheifers and c o w s, other than those intended for slaughter, of certain m o u n t a in \nbreeds \n\ny \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European \nin particular Article 113 \nEconomic Community, and \nthereof, \n\nHaving regard \nPortugal, \n\nto the Act of Accession of Spain and \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from \n\nthe Commission, \n\nthe \n\nthan \n\nthose \n\nframework of \n\nWhereas the European Economic Community undertook, \nwithin \nthe General Agreement on \nTariffs and Trade (GATT), to open an annual Community \ntariff quota of 20 000 head at a duty of 6 % for heifers \nand cows, other \nintended for slaughter, of \ncertain mountain breeds; whereas, in an Exchange of \nLetters with Austria dated 21 July 1972, the Community \ntariff \nundertook unilaterally to increase the size of the \nquota from 20 000 to 30 000 head and to lower the quota \nduty from 6 % to 4 % ; whereas, subsequently, this quota \nwas \nto 38 000 h e a d; whereas \naccording to the Agreement in the form of an Exchange \nof Letters between the European Economic Community \nand the Republic of Austria concerning agriculture of 14 \nJuly 1986, which was approved by Decision 86/555/ \nEEC ('), the volume of this \nto \n42 600 head as from 1 July 1986 ; whereas the abovemen-\nthe \ntioned tariff quota should therefore be opened for \nperiod 1 July 199 2to 30 J u ne 199 3 at a duty of 4 % for a \nquantity of 42 600 head ; \n\ntariff quota was raised \n\nincreased unilaterally \n\nwhereas a check should be carried out to ascertain \nthat \nthe imported animals have not been slaughtered within a \ncertain period ; \n\nimporters \n\nWhereas it is, in particular, necessary to ensure equal and \ncontinuous access for all Community \nto the \nabovementioned quota, and the uninterrupted application \nof the quota duties, to all imports of the animals in ques \ntion until the quota is exhausted ; whereas the necessary \nmeasures should be taken to ensure efficient administra \ntion of this tariff quota, taking into account the C o m m u \nnity nature of the quota and special factors in the trade in \nthe Commission \nto \nthese a n i m a l s; whereas \nshould assign to the Member States on request the quanti \nties needed to cover actual imports in accordance with an \nto be determined ; \neconomically appropriate procedure \n\nthis end \n\nWhereas, since the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of \nthe Netherlands and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg \nare united within and jointly represented by the Benelux \nEconomic Union, any measure concerning the adminis \ntration of the quantities levied by that economic union \nmay be carried out by any one of its members, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION : \n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. From 1 July 1992 to 30 J u ne 1993 the duty appli \ncable to the import into the Community of the animals \ndesignated hereafter shall be suspended at the level and \nwithin the limits of the Community tariff quota indicated. Order No \n\n09. 0001 \n\nCN code \n(a) \n\nDescription \n\nQuota \nvolume \n\nQuota duty \n<%) \n\nex 0102 90 10 \nex 0102 90 31 \nex 0102 90 33 \n\nCows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter, of \nthe following mountain breeds : grey, brown, yellow and \nmottled Simmental breed and mottled Pintzgau breed \n\n42 600 head \n\n(a) Taric c o d e s: 0102 90 10*20 and 40, \n\n0102 90 31 * 11, 19, 31 and 39, \n0102 90 33* 10 and 30. 2. Within the limits of this tariff quota, the Kingdom \nof Spain and the Portuguese Republic shall apply customs \nduties calculated in accordance with the relevant provi \nsions in the Act of Accession. Derogations may, however, be granted \nin the event of \nforce majeure duly attested by a local authority certificate \nsetting out the reasons for the slaughter. to \n\nFor the purposes of \n\n3. this Regulation, the animals \nin paragraph 1 shall be considered not \nreferred \nintended for slaughter if they are not slaughtered within \nfour months of the date of the acceptance of the entry for \nrelease for free circulation. (') OJ No L 328, 22. 11. 1986, p. 57. Article 2 \n\nT he quota v o l u me referred \n\nI \nto \nbe further divided into two parts. in Article 1 (1) shall \n\nThe first part, 8 0% of the total, i. e. 34. 080head, shall be \nreserved for established importers who are able to furnish \n\n\fproof of having imported animals of the breeds specified \nin the tariff quota in question during the previous three \nyears. With regard to Portugal, in the case of established impor \nto in \nters, account shall be taken of animals referred \nArticle 1 (1) in respect of which importers can prove, to \nthe satisfaction of the competent authorities, that \nthey \nwere imported and that they were not slaughtered within \nfour months following the date of the acceptance of the \nentry for release for free circulation. for \n\ni. e. 8. 2 5 0h e a d, shall be \nThe second part, of 2D %, \nreserved either \nimporters who undertake, when \nmaking an application, to keep the imported cattle in \npremises of which they have the use or for importers who \nhave been conducting business in live bovine animals for \na period of at least one year and are listed in a public \nregister of the Member State or who can provide proof, \nrecognized by the competent authority, of such conduct. The 3 4. 0 80 head shall be assigned to the various \n2. importers pro rata, in proportion \ntheir \nprevious imports over the three years under consideration \nthan \nor \nprevious imports while the 8. 2S0head shall be assigned \nto applicants pro rata, in proportion to the entitlement \napplied for by the importers. In the latter case : \n\nto the quantities applied for \n\nif they are less \n\nto the scale of \n\n(a) applications for quantities greater than 50 head shall \n\nbe automatically reduced to that number ; \n\n(b) applications which would give rise to a certificate of \nparticipation covering a quantity of less than five head \nshall not be taken into account; \n\n(c) quantities which have not been assigned, owing to the \nminimum five head limitation shall be assigned by \ndrawing lots (with a figure of five head). 3. Any quantities of one of the parts of the tariff quota \nreferred to in paragraph 1 not applied for shall be auto \nmatically transferred \n\nto the other part. Article 3 \n\n1. Applications to import under each part of the tariff \nquota, accompanied, where appropriate, by proof of \nprevious imports, shall be made to the competent authori \nties in the Member States, in accordance with the proce \ndures laid down and the deadline set by those authorities, \nby means of the document of release for free circulation, \nwhich shall be cancelled by the said authorities after \nbeing submitted as proof. These authorities shall transmit to the Commission, not \nlater than 10 July 199 2 the data thus collected, and in \nparticular : \n\n\u2014 the number of applicants and the number of head \n\napplied for by each category of \n\nimporter, \n\n\u2014 the average of previous \n\nimports furnished by each \napplicant in respect of the 36 210 head reserved for \nestabished \n\nimporters. ^ \n\n2. The Commission shall notify the Member States, by \n15 July 199\u00a3, of the quantities to be assigned to each \napplicant, in the form, where necessary, of a percentage of \nthe amount originally applied for, or of that applicant's \nprevious imports. On t he basis of the data referred to in paragraph 2, \n3. Member States shall \nissue applicants with certificates \nspecifying the number of head to which they are entitled. the certificates may not go \nThe period of validity of \nbeyond 30 J u ne 1 9 9 3. The entitlement certificates, a model of which is annexed \nto this Regulation, shall be issued upon provision of a \nsecurity of ECU 20 per head, which shall be released once \nthe certificates have been returned, complete with \nthe \ncustoms stamps acknowledging the import of the animals, \nto the issuing authority. An entitlement certificate shall not be transferable and \nshall entitle the bearer to benefit from \nthe tariff quota \nonly when made out in the same name as the entry for \nrelease for free circulation which accompanies it. licences and advance fixing certificates \n\nThe rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EEC) No \n3719/88 of 16 November 1988 laying down common \ndetailed rules for the application of the system of import \nand export \nfor \nagricultural products ('), as last amended by Regulation \n(EEC) No 1599/90 (2), for the release of the security for \nthe import certificates or its conversion into revenue shall \napply to the security referred to in the second subpara \ngraph. 4. Quantities which have not been the subject of the \nissue of entitlement certificates by 31 March 1993 shall be \nfinally reassigned under the procedure described in the \nforegoing paragraphs to importers who have applied for \ncertificates in respect of their whole entitlements. the data specified \n\nTo this end, Member States shall notify the Commission \nby 10 April 1993 of the quantities remaining unused on \n31 March 1993, and furnish \nthe \nsecond subparagraph of paragraph 1. The Commission \nin each \nshall set the new percentages for entitlements \ncategory and shall transmit \nthem by not later than 15 \nApril 1993 to the Member States, which shall then issue \nthe entitlement certificates \nthe \nconditions set out in paragraph 3, with a period of validity \nnot extending beyond 30 June 1993 \n\nto the applicants under \n\nin \n\nArticle 4 \n\n1. Member States shall take all measures necessary to \nensure \nis \nrestricted to cattle as specified \n\nin Article 1 (1). in question \n\ntariff quota \n\nthat access \n\nthe \n\nto \n\n(') OJ No L 331, 2. 12. 1988, p. 1. O OJ No L 151, 15. 6. 1990, p. 29. \u20ac \n\nThey shall ensure importers equal and continuous \n\n2. access to the tariff quota in question. Article 5 \n\nthe Commission shall cooperate \nMember States and \nclosely to ensure that the provisions of this Regulation are \nobserved. Depletion of the said quota shall be measured on \nimports submitted for customs clearance \n\n3. the basis of \nunder cover of entries for release for free circulation. This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1 9 9* \n\nArticle 6 \n\nThis Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at B r u s s e l s. -\n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fE U R O P E AN C O M M U N I TY \n\nE N T I T L E M E NT C E R T I F I C A TE No \n\nCOMMUNITY TARIFF QUOTAS FOR \n\u2014 Cows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter of certain mountain breeds \n\u2014 Bulls, cows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter of certain Alpine breeds \n\n1. Holder (Name, complete address and Member State) \n\n2. Issuing authority \n\n* \n\nANNEX \n\nNOTES \n\n3. This certificate is valid until and including \n\nday month year \n\nA. This certificate is valid in all Member States of the Community. B. This certificate must be attached to the entry for release for free \ncirculation, and the entry must itself be drawn up in the name of \nthe holder of this certificate. C. The customs office concerned should write off the quantities \nreleased for free circulation and return this certificate to the holder \nor the holders representative. 0. The holder must return this certificate to the issuing authority to \n\nobtain release of the guarantee. Place and date of issue \n\nSignature and stamp of issuing authority \n\n4. Description of animals \n\n5. CN code \n\n6. Number of head in figures \n\n7. Number of head in words \n\n8. WRITING OFF BY CUSTOMS OFFICES (in column 9, indicate in part 1 the quantity available, and in part 2 the quantity written off) \n\n9. Number of head \n\n10. Number of head in words for the \n\nin figures \n\nquantity written off \n\n11. Number and date of acceptance \nof the entry for release for free \ncirculation \n\n12. Name, Member State, \nsignature and stamp \nof the customs office \n\n1. 2. 1. 2. 1. 2. Proposal for a \n\nC O U N C IL R E G U L A T I ON (EEC) No \n\n/ 92 \n\nof \n\no p e n i ng a nd providing for the administration of a C o m m u n i ty tariff q u o ta for \nbulls, c o ws and heifers, other than those intended for slaughter, of c e r t a in A l p i ne \nbreeds \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European \nEconomic Community, and \nin particular Article 113 \nthereof, \n\nHaving regard \nPortugal, \n\nto \n\nthe Act of Accession of Spain and \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nthe framework of \n\nWhereas the European Economic Community undertook, \nthe General Agreement on \nwithin \nTariffs and Trade (GATT), to open an annual Community \ntariff quota of 5 000 head at a duty of 4 % for bulls, cows \nand heifers, other than those intended for slaughter, of \ncertain Alpine breeds ; whereas eligibility for such quota \nis subject to submission of the following documents : \n\n\u2014 bulls : a pedigree certificate, \n\u2014 female animals : a pedigree certificate or certificate or \nthe herdbook, certifying purity of \n\nin \n\nregistration \nbreed ; \n\nWhereas it is in particular necessary to ensure equal and \ncontinuous access for all Community \nimporters to the \nabovementioned quota, and the uninterrupted application \nof the quota duties, to all imports of the animals in ques \ntion until the quota is exhausted ; whereas the necessary \nmeasures should be taken to ensure efficient administra \ntion of this tariff quota, taking into account the Commu \nnity nature of the quota and special factors in the trade in \nthese a n i m a l s; whereas \nthe Commission \nto \nshould assign to the Member States on request the quanti \nties needed to cover actual imports in accordance with an \nto be determined : \neconomically appropriate procedure \n\nthis end \n\nWhereas, since the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom ol \nthe Netherlands and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg \nare united within and jointly represented by the Benelux \nEconomic Union, any measure concerning the adminis \ntration of the quantities levied by that economic union \nmay be carried out by any one of its members, \n\nWhereas the abovementioned \ntariff quota should there \nfore be opened for the period 1 July 1952 to 30 June \n199 3 at a duty of 4% ; \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION \n\nArticle 1 \n\nwhereas a check should be carried out to ascertain that \nthe imported animals have not been slaughtered within a \ncertain period ; \n\n1. From 1 July 1992 to 30 J u ne 199 3 the duty appli \ncable to the import into the Community of the animal; \ndesignated hereafter shall be suspended at the level anc \nindicated \nwithin the limits of Community tariff quota \n\nOrder No \n\n09. 0003 \n\nCN code \n(a) \n\nex 0102 90 10 \nex 0102 90 31 \nex 0102 90 33 \nex 0102 90 35 \n\nDescription \n\nQuota \nvolume \n\nQuota duty \n(%) \n\nfor \nBulls, cows and heifers, other \nslaughter, of the following breeds : mottled Simmental breed \nand the Schwyz and Fribourg breeds \n\nintended \n\nthose \n\nthan \n\n5 000 head \n\n(a) Taric c o d e s: 0102 90 10 ' 3 0, 40 and 50, \n\n0102 90 31 \" 2 1. 29. 31 and 39, \n0102 90 33 20 and 30, \n0102 90 3 5 ' 21 and 29. Within \nthe limits of this tariff quota, the Kingdom of \nSpain and the Portuguese Republic shall apply customs \nduties calculated in accordance with the relevant provi \nsions in the Act of Accession. Eligibility for this tariff quota shall be subject to the \n\n2. submission of : \n\n\u2014 in the case of bulls : a pedigree certificate, \n\u2014 in the case of female animals : a pedigree certificate or \ncertificate of registration in the herdbook, certifying \npurity of breed. to \n\nFor the purposes of \n\nthis Regulation, the animal \n3. referred \nin paragraph 1 shall be considered no \nintended for slaughter if they are not slaughtered withii \nfour months of the date of acceptance of the entry for fre \ncirculaion. in the event c \nDerogations may, however, be granted \nforce majeure duly attested by a local authority certificat \nsetting out the reasons for the slaughter. Article \n\n2 \n\nThe quota volume referred to in Article 1 (1) shall \n\n1. be further divided into two parts. 4. 000 \n\nhead, shall be \nThe first part, 3 0% of the total, i. e. f \nreserved for established importers who are able to furnish \nproof of having imported animals of the breeds specified \nin the tariff quota in question during the previous three \nyears. taken of animals referred \n\nWith regard to Portugal, in the case of established impor \nters, account shall be \nin \nArticle 1 (1) in respect of which importers can prove, to \nthey \nthe satisfaction of the competent authorities, that \nwere imported and that they were not slaughtered within \nfour months following the date of,the acceptance of the \nentry for release for free circulation. to \n\n1 0 00 \n\nhead, shall be reserved \nThe second part, of 20 %, i. e. J \neither for \nimporters who undertake, when making an \napplication, to keep the imported cattle in premises of \nwhich they have the use or for importers who have been \nconducting business in live bovine animals for a period of \nat least one year and are listed in a public register of the \nMember State or who can provide proof, recognized by \nthe competent authority, of such conduct. The 4. 0 00 head shall be assigned \n\nto the various \n2. importers pro rata, in proportion \ntheir \nprevious imports over the three years under consideration, \nor to the quantities applied for \nthan \nprevious imports while theflOOO head shall be assigned to \napplicants pro \nthe entitlement \nin proportion \napplied for by the importers. In the latter case : \n\nto the scale of \n\nthey are \n\nrata, \n\nless \n\nto \n\nif \n\n(a) applications for quantities greater than 50 head shall \n\nbe automatically reduced to that n u m b e r; \n\n(b) applications which would give rise to a certificate of \nparticipation covering a quantity of less than five head \nshall not be taken into a c c o u n t; \n\n(c) quantities which have not been assigned, owing to the \nm i n i m um five head limitation shall be assigned by \ndrawing lots (with a figure of five head). 3. Any quantities of one of the parts of the tariff quota \nreferred to in paragraph 1 not applied for shall be auto \nmatically transferred \n\nto the other part. Article \n\n3 \n\n1. Applications to import under each part of the tariff \nquota, accompanied, where appropriate, by proof of \nprevious imports, shall be made to the competent authori \nties in the Member States, in accordance with the proce \ndures laid down and the deadline set by those authorities, \nby means of the document of release for free circulation, \nwhich shall be cancelled by \nthe said authorities after \nbeing submitted as proof. 3 \n\nThese authorities shall transmit to the Commission, not \nlater than 10 July 199 2 the data thus collected, and in \nparticular : \n\n\u2014 the number of applicants and \n\nthe number of head \n\napplied for by each category of \n\nimporter, \n\n\u2014 the average of previous \n\nimports furnished by each \napplicant in respect of the 4 250 head reserved for \nestablished \n\nimporters. 2. The Commission shall notify the Member States, by \n15 July 1992 of the quantities to be assigned to each \napplicant, in the form, where necessary, of a percentage of \nthe amount originally applied for, or of that applicant's \nprevious imports. On the basis of the data referred to in paragraph 2, \n3. Member States shall \ncertificates \nspecifying the number of head to which they are entitled. The period of validity of \nthe certificates may not go \nbeyond 30 J u ne 1993. issue applicants with \n\nThe entitlement certificates, a model of which is annexed \nto this Regulation, shall be issued upon provision of a \nsecurity of ECU 20 per head, which shall be released once \nthe certificates have been returned, complete with \nthe \ncustoms stamps acknowledging the import of the animals, \nto the issuing authority. An entitlement certificate shall not be transferable and \nshall entitle the bearer to benefit from \nthe tariff quota \nonly when made out in the same as the entry for release \nfor free circulation which accompanies \n\nit. licences and advance fixing certificates \n\nThe rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EEC) No \nlaying down common \n3719/88 of 16 November 1988 \ndetailed rules for the application of the system of import \nand export \nfor \nagricultural products ('), as last amended by Regulation \n(EEC) No 1599/90 (2), for the release of the security for \nthe import certificates or its conversion into revenue shall \napply to the security referred to in the second subpara \ngraph. Quantities which have not been the subject of the \n4. issue of entitlement certificates by 31 March 1993 shall be \nfinally reassigned under the procedure described \nin the \nforegoing paragraphs to importers who have applied for \ncertificates in respect of their whole entitlements. To this end, Member States shall notify the Commission \nby 10 April 1993 of the quantities remaining unused on \n31 March 1993, and furnish \nthe \nsecond subparagraph of paragraph 1. The Commission \nshall set the new percentages for entitlements \nin each \ncategory and shall transmit \nthem by not later than 15 \nApril 199 3 to the Member States, which shall then issue \n\nthe data specified \n\nin \n\n(') OJ No L 331, 2. 12. 1988, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 151, 15. 6. 1990. p. 29. 4o \n\nthe entitlement certificates to the applicants under the \nconditions set out in paragraph 3, with a period of validity \nnot extending beyond 30 June 1995 \n\nDepletion of the said quota shall be measured on \nimports submitted for customs clearance \n\n3. the basis of \nunder cover of entries for release for free circulation. Article 4 \n\n1. Member States shall take all measures necessary to \nensure that access to the tariff quota \nis \nrestricted to cattle as specified in Article 1 (1). in question \n\nThey shall ensure importers equal and continuous \n\n2. access to the tariff quota in question. Article 5 \n\nMember States and \nshall cooperate \nclosely to ensure that the provisions of this Regulation are \nobserved. the Commission \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1992. Article 6 \n\nThis Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at B r u s s e l s. For the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fE U R O P E AN C O M M U N I TY \n\nE N T I T L E M E NT C E R T I F I C A TE No \n\nCOMMUNITY TARIFF QUOTAS FOR \n\u2014 Cows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter of certain mountain breeds \n\u2014 Bulls, cows and heifers other than those intended for slaughter of certain Alpine breeds \n\n1. Holder (Name, complete address and Member State) \n\n2 Issuing authority \n\n41 \n\nANNEX \n\nNOTES \n\n3. This certificate is valid until and including \n\nday month \n\nyear \n\nA. This certificate is valid in all Member States of the Community. B. This certificate must be attached to the entry for release for free \ncirculation, and the entry must itself be drawn up in the name of \nthe holder of this certificate. C. The customs office concerned should write off \n\nthe quantities \nreleased for free circulation and return this certificate to the holder \nor the holders representative. D. The holder must return this certificate to the issuing authority to \n\nobtain release of the guarantee. Place and date of issue : \n\nSignature and stamp of issuing authority: \n\n4. Description of animals \n\n5. CN code \n\n7. Number of head in words \n\n/ \n\n6. Number of head in figures \n\n8. WRITING OFF BY CUSTOMS OFFICES (in column 9, indicate in part 1 the quantity available, and in part 2 the quantity written off) \n\n9. Number of head \n\n10. Number of head in words for the \n\nin figures \n\nquantity written off \n\n11. Number and date of acceptance \nof the entry for release for free \ncirculation \n\n12 Name, Member State, \nsignature and stamp \nof the customs office \n\n\f1 <a, \n\nFINANCIAL RECORD \n\n1. Budget i ine concerned : Chap. 12 Art. 120 \n\n2. Legal basis : Art. 113 of the Treaty \n\n3. Title of the tariff measure concerned : Proposals for Council \nRegulations opening and providing for the administration of a \nCommunity tariff quota for heifers and cows, othe than those intended \nfor slaughter, of a certain mountain breeds and of a Community tariff \nquota for bulls, cows and heifers, other than those intended for \nslaughter, of certain Alpine breeds \n\n4. Oblect ive : Fulfilment of contractual obligations of the Community \n\n5. Method of calculation : \n\nQuota volumes: \nDuties to be applied: \nNormal duties: \n\n42 600 head \n\n4% \n\n16% + AGR \n\n5 000 head \n\n4% \n\n16% + AGR \n\n6. Duty-loss : \na) Customs duty losses \n\nValue of the 42 600 head: 29. 790. 180 ECU \nValue of the 5 000 head: 3. 948. 000 ECU \n\nLOSS: 12% - \n\nb) L ew losses \n\n33. 738. 180 ECU \n\n4. 048. 581 ECU \n\nWeight of the 42 600 head: 20. 661 T \nWeight of the 5 000 head: 2. 425 T \n\nLoss: 17,798 ECU/100 kg \n\n23. 086 T \n\ni. e. 177,98 ECU x 13. 086 T - \n\n4. 108. 846 ECU \n\n8. 157. 427 ECU \n\n7) \n\nCost of the operation (period 91/92): 9. 693. 317 ECU \nCost of the operation (period 92/93): 8. 157. 427 ECU \n\n\f12 \u2022-\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 194 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 02 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-206-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43970-X \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b04a05ea-80e3-4070-9931-d964a8642f61", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1221/92 of 12 May 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code ex 4203, originating in India, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-12", "subjects": "India,leather,occupational safety,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R1221,oj:JOL_1992_128_R_0012_030", "eurovoc_concepts": ["India", "leather", "occupational safety", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b04a05ea-80e3-4070-9931-d964a8642f61", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c0ece9fa-e34a-48f5-baa4-56e17591f046", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1132/92 by Herman VERBEEK to the Commission. Postal consignments of genetically manipulated micro- organisms", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VERBEEK", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "biotechnology,environmental protection,environmental risk prevention,genetic engineering,packaging,postal service,transport of dangerous goods", "workIds": "celex:91992E001132", "eurovoc_concepts": ["biotechnology", "environmental protection", "environmental risk prevention", "genetic engineering", "packaging", "postal service", "transport of dangerous goods"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c0ece9fa-e34a-48f5-baa4-56e17591f046", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7c9baf13-39f1-4ab2-9958-0732d7835352", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1131/92 by Mrs Marianne THYSSEN to the Commission. Council Directive on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity including agriculture, in a self-employed capacity and on the protection of self-employed women during pregnancy and motherhood", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,THYSSEN", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "agricultural labour force,application of EU law,auxiliary worker,care of mothers and infants,equal treatment,family worker,gender equality,self-employed person,self-employment,social security", "workIds": "celex:91992E001131", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural labour force", "application of EU law", "auxiliary worker", "care of mothers and infants", "equal treatment", "family worker", "gender equality", "self-employed person", "self-employment", "social security"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7c9baf13-39f1-4ab2-9958-0732d7835352", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b12d8054-a515-4825-bd8f-48bd6b219401", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1145/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Dogs in pubs", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "United Kingdom,catering industry,domestic animal", "workIds": "celex:91992E001145", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "catering industry", "domestic animal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b12d8054-a515-4825-bd8f-48bd6b219401", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/70c736f5-a476-4200-a058-29aab44d1ae6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1144/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. European postage stamps", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European integration", "workIds": "celex:91992E001144", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European integration"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/70c736f5-a476-4200-a058-29aab44d1ae6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/61546105-7c12-4a71-80fa-7f11a44b3c06", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1122/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to the Council. The European Drugs Monitoring Centre", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European Commission,European organisation,narcotic,regulation (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E001122", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "European organisation", "narcotic", "regulation (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/61546105-7c12-4a71-80fa-7f11a44b3c06", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aee2797f-fd4f-4864-8b4b-4e3e9ec10c5d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1108/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. General rehabilitation centre in the region of Pendeli", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Central Greece,Integrated Mediterranean Programmes,Structural Funds,environmental protection,project evaluation,social facilities", "workIds": "celex:91992E001108", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "Integrated Mediterranean Programmes", "Structural Funds", "environmental protection", "project evaluation", "social facilities"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/aee2797f-fd4f-4864-8b4b-4e3e9ec10c5d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dfaff924-53c5-49a0-a871-3f176379525a", "title": "Council Directive 92/38/EEC of 11 May 1992 on the adoption of standards for satellite broadcasting of television signals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European standard,harmonisation of standards,high-definition television,satellite communications", "workIds": "celex:31992L0038,oj:JOL_1992_137_R_0017_026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "harmonisation of standards", "high-definition television", "satellite communications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dfaff924-53c5-49a0-a871-3f176379525a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2fcedf69-1e3a-4742-82b1-353f8b28d757", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1120/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to European Political Cooperation. Development aid for Burma", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European political cooperation,Myanmar/Burma,UN Development Programme,aid programme,development aid,human rights,humanitarian aid,military regime,suspension of aid", "workIds": "celex:91992E001120", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European political cooperation", "Myanmar/Burma", "UN Development Programme", "aid programme", "development aid", "human rights", "humanitarian aid", "military regime", "suspension of aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2fcedf69-1e3a-4742-82b1-353f8b28d757", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ade6f0a1-bc3b-4c1d-a228-5f82709346b3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1140/92 by Sir James SCOTT-HOPKINS to the Commission. Financial assistance for Hereford, Worcs. and West Glos.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCOTT-HOPKINS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EAGGF Guarantee Section,EIB loan,EU aid,European Regional Development Fund,European Social Fund,South West (England),West Midlands,county,development plan,regional development", "workIds": "celex:91992E001140", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF Guarantee Section", "EIB loan", "EU aid", "European Regional Development Fund", "European Social Fund", "South West (England)", "West Midlands", "county", "development plan", "regional development"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ade6f0a1-bc3b-4c1d-a228-5f82709346b3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/99e5d4e7-672f-4989-abc7-44280da21fbc", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1128/92 by Mr Juan BANDR\u00c9S MOLET to the Commission. Installation of sanitation facilities in Torreblanca y Torrenosa (La Plana Alta -Valencia)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANDRES MOLET,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Community of Valencia,bathing water,decontamination,environmental impact,impact study,wastewater,water analysis,water treatment", "workIds": "celex:91992E001128", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community of Valencia", "bathing water", "decontamination", "environmental impact", "impact study", "wastewater", "water analysis", "water treatment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/99e5d4e7-672f-4989-abc7-44280da21fbc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8c3ac873-9e8b-4c0c-b642-f169766d63c5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1125/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to the Council. Regulations on aid to Asia and Latin America", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Asia,Council of the European Union,EC Regulation,European Commission,Latin America,conciliation,development aid,management audit,power of implementation", "workIds": "celex:91992E001125", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Asia", "Council of the European Union", "EC Regulation", "European Commission", "Latin America", "conciliation", "development aid", "management audit", "power of implementation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8c3ac873-9e8b-4c0c-b642-f169766d63c5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52e6d475-7c21-4088-b216-a78d3c0203cb", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1142/92 by Sir James SCOTT-HOPKINS to the Commission. Financial assistance for Hereford, Worcs. and West Glos.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCOTT-HOPKINS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EAGGF,EIB loan,EU aid,South East (England),West Midlands,county,primary sector", "workIds": "celex:91992E001142", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF", "EIB loan", "EU aid", "South East (England)", "West Midlands", "county", "primary sector"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52e6d475-7c21-4088-b216-a78d3c0203cb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b08e19ef-67ed-4802-9371-2fd4b5b26c87", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1129/92 by Juan BANDR\u00c9S MOLET to the Commission. Thermal power station in Andorra", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANDRES MOLET,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Aragon,Community of Valencia,acid rain,air quality,anhydride,environmental policy,environmental protection,offence,pollution,power plant", "workIds": "celex:91992E001129", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Aragon", "Community of Valencia", "acid rain", "air quality", "anhydride", "environmental policy", "environmental protection", "offence", "pollution", "power plant"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b08e19ef-67ed-4802-9371-2fd4b5b26c87", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6d87bcd9-7d47-4055-b356-6394a73e8396", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1137/92 by: Maxime VERHAGEN and James JANSSEN van RAAY to the Commission. Tightening-up of external border controls", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,JANSSEN VAN RAAY,VERHAGEN", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European convention,free movement of persons,frontier,immigration,signature of an agreement,single market", "workIds": "celex:91992E001137", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European convention", "free movement of persons", "frontier", "immigration", "signature of an agreement", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6d87bcd9-7d47-4055-b356-6394a73e8396", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ac0d588d-cb88-4d32-9ad8-8a1650e8b506", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1127/92 by Mr Juan BANDR\u00c9S MOLET to the Commission. Introduction of a possible free-trade area between the European Community and the Maghreb countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BANDRES MOLET,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU market,Maghreb,Spain,agricultural product,free-trade area,transitional period (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E001127", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU market", "Maghreb", "Spain", "agricultural product", "free-trade area", "transitional period (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ac0d588d-cb88-4d32-9ad8-8a1650e8b506", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/17525d3e-f0b0-40a3-a07f-437aa185c9c2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1146/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Federalism", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU law,external competence (EU),federalism,interpretation of the law", "workIds": "celex:91992E001146", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "external competence (EU)", "federalism", "interpretation of the law"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/17525d3e-f0b0-40a3-a07f-437aa185c9c2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dad4338f-27f9-4835-a1f4-e3842ef13d2d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1149/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Allocation of portfolios in the Commission", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU policy,European Commission,European Commissioner,competence of the institution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001149", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "European Commission", "European Commissioner", "competence of the institution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/dad4338f-27f9-4835-a1f4-e3842ef13d2d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/59dd7b3c-73ef-41e3-b43b-97d6629b2752", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1143/92 by Sir Christopher PROUT to the Commission. Construction Products Directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PROUT", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "building materials,consumer protection,piping,standardisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E001143", "eurovoc_concepts": ["building materials", "consumer protection", "piping", "standardisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/59dd7b3c-73ef-41e3-b43b-97d6629b2752", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/53974be2-e901-4d85-a099-eeaba7ffae0b", "title": "Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Albania, on trade and commercial and economic cooperation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "fmx4,html,pdfa1b,print,xhtml", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Albania,European Economic Community", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Albania,cooperation agreement (EU),economic cooperation,trade agreement,trade agreement (EU),trade cooperation", "workIds": "celex:21992A1125(01)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Albania", "cooperation agreement (EU)", "economic cooperation", "trade agreement", "trade agreement (EU)", "trade cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/53974be2-e901-4d85-a099-eeaba7ffae0b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["fmx4", "html", "pdfa1b", "print", "xhtml"], "text": "L_1992343EN. 01000201. xml\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n25. 11. 1992\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\nEN\n\n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities\n\n\nL 343/2\n\n\n\n\n\nAGREEMENT\nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Albania, on trade and commercial and economic cooperation\nTHE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY\nhereinafter called the \u2018Community\u2019, of the one part, and\nTHE REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA\nhereinafter called \u2018Albania\u2019, of the other part,\nCONSIDERING the importance of establishing and expanding trade links between the Community and Albania;\nRECOGNIZING that following the recent political changes in the country, Albania wishes to stabilize and consolidate democracy and foster economic and social progress;\nDESIROUS of creating favourable conditions for a substantial and harmonious development and diversification of trade and the promotion of commercial and economic cooperation in areas of mutual interest on the basis of equality, non-discrimination, mutual benefit and reciprocity;\nAWARE of the particular importance of foreign trade and other forms of international economic cooperation for the economic and social development of each of the Contracting Parties;\nAWARE of the importance of giving full effect to all the provisions and principles of the CSCE process, and in particular those set out in the Helsinki Final Act, the concluding documents of the Madrid, Vienna and Copenhagen meetings, and those of the Charter of Paris for a new Europe, particularly with regard to the rule of law, democracy and human rights, as well as those of the Bonn CSCE Conference on Economic Cooperation;\nRECOGNIZING the importance of guaranteeing the rights of ethnic and national groups and minorities, in accordance with the undertakings made within the context of the CSCE;\nAWARE of the importance of strengthening their democratic institutions and of supporting the process of economic reform in Albania;\nBELIEVING that a further impetus should be given to the trading and economic relationship between the Community and Albania by establishing contractual links which will contribute to progress towards the objective of an association agreement in due course, when conditions are met, and to further development of relations between them;\nHAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as their Plenipotentiaries;\nTHE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY:\nJo\u00e3o de Deus PINHEIRO,\nMinister for Foreign Affairs of the Portuguese Republic, President-in-Office of the Council of the European Communities,\nFrans ANDRIESSEN,\nVice-President of the Commission of the European Communities,\nTHE REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA:\nGenc RULI,\nMinister for Finance and Economic Affairs,\nHAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:\nTITLE I\n\nGeneral\n\n\nArticle 1\n\nRespect for the democratic principles and human rights established by the Helsinki Final Act and the Charter of Paris for a new Europe inspires the domestic and external policies of the Community and Albania and constitutes an essential element of the present agreement. Article 2\nWithin the framework of their respective laws and regulations, the Contracting Parties undertake to facilitate and promote:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe harmonious development and diversification of trade between them,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe development of various types of commercial and economic cooperation. They therefore confirm their resolve to consider favourably, each for its own part, suggestions made by the other Party with a view to attaining these aims. TITLE II\n\nTrade and commercial cooperation\n\nArticle 3\n1. This Agreement shall apply to trade in all products originating in the Community and in Albania with the exception of products covered by the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and of the textiles and apparel covered by Section XI of the harmonized system. 2. The provisions of this Agreement may be supplemented if necessary by sectoral agreements or arrangements concluded between the Community and Albania. In particular, a separate agreement for textile products will be negotiated. Article 4\nUnless otherwise specified in this Agreement, trade and other commercial cooperation between the Contracting Parties shall be conducted in accordance with their respective regulations. Article 5\n1. The Contracting Parties shall accord each other most-favoured-nation treatment in all matters regarding:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ncustoms duties and charges of any kind imposed on or in connection with importation or exportation,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe method of levying such duties and charges,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nall rules and formalities in connection with importation and exportation, including provisions relating to customs clearance, transit, warehousing and transshipment,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntaxes and other internal charges levied directly or indirectly on imported products,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nmethods of payment and the transfer of such payments,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe regulations affecting the sale, purchase, transport, distribution and use of goods on the domestic market. 2. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply to:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nadvantages accorded to adjacent countries in order to facilitate frontier traffic;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nadvantages accorded with the aim of creating a customs union or a free-trade area or pursuant to the creation of such a union or area;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nadvantages accorded to particular countries in accordance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and other international arrangements in favour of developing countries. Article 6\nWithout prejudice to the rights and obligations stemming from international conventions on the temporary admission of goods which bind both sides, the Contracting Parties shall furthermore grant each other reciprocal exemption from import charges and duties on goods admitted temporarily, in the instances and according to the procedures stipulated by any other international convention on this matter binding only one of them. Account shall be taken of the conditions under which the obligations stemming from such a convention have been accepted by the Contracting Party in question. Article 7\nAlbania shall grant imports of products originating in the Community non-discriminatory treatment as regards the application of quantitative restrictions, the granting of licences and access to the foreign currency needed to pay for such imports. Article 8\n1. Without prejudice to Article 7, each of the Contracting Parties shall grant imports of products originating in the other the highest degree of liberalization generally extended to third countries. To that end, the specific quantitative restrictions applying in regions of the Community to imports from Albania shall be eliminated. 2. For the purposes of this Agreement, \u2018specific quantitative restrictions\u2019 shall mean those quantitative restrictions applied by the Community to imports originating in Albania under Regulation (EEC) No 3420/83, which concerns products other than those to which quantitative restrictions are applied under Regulation (EEC) No 288/82. Article 9\nThe Parties shall inform each other of any changes in their tariff or statistical nomenclature or of any decision taken in accordance with the procedures in force concerning the classification of products covered by this Agreement. Article 10\nGoods shall be traded between the Contracting Parties at market-related prices and on terms which neither cause nor threaten to cause injury to producers of like or directly competing products at a comparable stage of marketing. Article 11\n1. The Contracting Parties shall consult each other if any product is being imported into the territory of one of them in such increased quantities or on such terms as to cause or threaten to cause serious injury to domestic producers of like or directly competing products. 2. The Contracting Party claiming serious injury or threat thereof shall request consultations by notification in writing and shall provide the other Party with all the relevant information required for a detailed examination of the situation. 3. The consultations requested pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be held with a view to seeking mutually satisfactory solutions and with due regard for the fundamental aims of the Agreement; they shall be completed not later than 30 days from the date of notification of the request by the Party concerned, unless the Parties agree otherwise. 4. If, as a result of such consultations, it is agreed that the situation referred to in paragraph 1 exists, exports shall be limited or such other action taken, possibly with regard to the price at which these exports are sold, as will prevent or remedy the injury. 5. If, following action under paragraphs 1 to 4, agreement is not reached between the Contracting Parties, the Contracting Party which requested the consultations shall be free to restrict the imports of the products concerned to the extent and for such time as is necessary to prevent or remedy the injury. The other Contracting Party shall then be free to deviate from its obligations towards the first Party in respect of substantially equivalent trade. 6. In critical circumstances, where delay would cause damage difficult to repair, such preventive or remedial action may be taken provisionally without prior consultation, provided consultations are held immediately after such action is taken. 7. In the selection of measures under this Article, the Contracting Parties shall give priority to those which cause the least disturbance to the functioning of this Agreement. 8. Where necessary the Contracting Parties may hold consultations to determine when the measures adopted pursuant to paragraphs 4 to 6 shall cease to apply. Article 12\n1. This Agreement shall not preclude the adoption by each of the Contracting Parties of measures that it considers justified on grounds of public morality, public policy or public security, the protection of life and health of humans, animals or plants, the protection of industrial, commercial and intellectual property, or rules relating to gold or silver or imposed for the protection of national treasures of artistic, historic or archeological value. Such prohibitions and restrictions must not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or disguised restrictions on trade between the Contracting Parties. 2. This Agreement shall not preclude the taking of action justified on grounds of protection of essential security interests:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nrelating to fissionable materials or the materials from which they are derived;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nrelating to traffic in arms, ammunition and implements of war and to such traffic in other goods and materials as is carried on directly or indirectly for the purpose of supplying a military establishment;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\ntaken in time of war or other emergency in international relations or to allow it to comply with obligations it has accepted in connection with the maintenance of international peace and security. Article 13\n1. The Contracting Parties shall make every effort to promote, expand and diversify their trade on the basis of non-discrimination and reciprocity. In the spirit of this Article, the Joint Committee established under Title V of this Agreement will attach special importance to examining ways of encouraging the reciprocal and harmonious expansion of trade. 2. In furtherance of the aims of this Article and within the limits of their respective powers, the Contracting Parties agree on the necessity to improve favourable business regulations and facilities for each other's firms or companies on their respective markets, inter alia by taking steps:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto ensure the publication and facilitate exchanges of commercial and economic information on all matters which would assist the development of commercial and economic cooperation, for example:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\neconomic development plans or forecasts,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ngeneral and sectoral import arrangements,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\neconomic and commercial law, including regulations on markets, companies and investment,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nmacro-economic information and statistics, including production, consumption and foreign trade statistics,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto facilitate the establishment and operation of each other's companies,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto encourage trade promotion activities,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto provide natural and legal persons of the other Party with guarantees of their individual and property rights, such as non-discriminatory access for that purpose to courts and appropriate administrative bodies of the Community and Albania. 3. Albania will take measures guaranteeing an effective and adequate protection of intellectual, industrial and commercial property, at a level similar to that which exists in the Community, and will adhere to International Conventions on intellectual, industrial and commercial property. 4. The Contracting Parties undertake to facilitate, within the limits of their respective powers, administrative cooperation between the appropriate authorities in matters relating to customs, in particular in the following areas:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nvocational training,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nsimplification of customs documentation and procedures, and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nprevention and detection of infringements of the rules on customs matters, including the rules governing import quotas. 5. The Contracting Parties recognize that counter-trade practices may create distortions in international trade and that they should be regarded as temporary and exceptional. For this reason they agree not to impose countertrade requirements on companies established in Albania or the Community, or to compel them to engage in such trade practices. Nevertheless, where firms or companies decide to resort to counter-trade operations, the Contracting Parties shall encourage them to furnish all relevant information to facilitate the transaction. Article 14\nWithin the limits of their respective powers, the Contracting Parties:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nshall encourage the adoption of arbitration for the settlement of disputes arising out of commercial and cooperation transactions concluded by companies, enterprises or economic organizations of the Community and those of Albania,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nagree that when a dispute is submitted to arbitration, each party to the dispute may freely choose its own arbitrator, irrespective of nationality, and that the presiding third arbitrator or the sole arbitrator may be a citizen of a third State,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nshall encourage recourse to the arbitration rules developed by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (Uncitral) and to arbitration by any centre of a State signatory to the Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards concluded in New York on 10 June 1958. TITLE III\n\nEconomic Cooperation\n\nArticle 15\n1. In the light of their respective economic policies and objectives, the Contracting Parties, within the limits of their respective powers, shall foster economic cooperation on as broad a base as possible in all fields deemed to be in their mutual interest. The objectives of such cooperation shall be, inter alia:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto reinforce and diversify economic links between the Contracting Parties,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto contribute to the development of their respective economies and standards of living,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto open up new sources of supply and new markets,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto encourage cooperation between economic operators with a view to promoting joint ventures, licensing agreements, and other forms of industrial cooperation to develop their respective industries,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto encourage scientific and technological progress,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto support structural changes in the Albanian economy which will increase and diversify trade in goods and services with the Community,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nto encourage the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises in trade and industrial cooperation. 2. In order to achieve these objectives, the Contracting Parties shall make efforts to encourage and promote economic cooperation in areas of mutual interest, in particular in the following sectors:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nindustry, including light industry and craft industries,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nmining,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nagriculture, including agro-industry, and cooperation in animal and plant health,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nfisheries,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nconstruction and housing,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nscience and technology in areas in which the Contracting Parties are active and which they consider to be of mutual interest,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntelecommunications,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nenergy, including the development of new sources of energy,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nenvironmental protection, including protection from water and air pollution and industrial accidents, and the management of natural resources,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntransport, communications and the running of ports,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ntourism and other service activities,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\neconomic, monetary, banking, insurance and financial services,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\ndevelopment of human resources, vocational and management training,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nhealth,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\neconomic policy,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nstandards,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nstatistics. 3. To give effect to the objectives of economic cooperation and within the limits of their respective powers, the Contracting Parties shall encourage the adoption of measures aimed at creating favourable conditions for economic and industrial cooperation, including:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe facilitation of exchanges of commercial and economic information,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe development of a favourable climate for investment, notably by the extension by the Member States of the Community and Albania of arrangements for investment promotion and protection, in particular for the transfer of profits and the repatriation of invested capital, on the basis of non-discrimination and reciprocity, and also of agreements on the avoidance of double taxation,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nexchanges and contacts between persons and delegations representing commercial or other appropriate organizations,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe organization of seminars, fairs or exhibitions, symposia and business weeks,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nthe encouragement of activities involving the provision of technical competence in specific fields, notably commercialization. Article 16\nWithout prejudice to the relevant provisions of the Treaties establishing the European Communities, this Agreement and any action taken pursuant to it shall in no way affect the powers of the Member States of the Community to undertake. bilateral activities with Albania in the field of economic cooperation and to conclude, where appropriate, new economic cooperation agreements with Albania. TITLE IV\n\nAccession to international organizations and conventions\n\nArticle 17\nThe Community undertakes, within the limits of its powers, to support the accession of Albania to international organizations and conventions to which the Community is a party, in order to enable Albania to become more active in the world economic system. TITLE V\n\nJoint Committee\n\nArticle 18\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. (a)\n\n\nA Joint Committee shall be set up, comprising representatives of the Community, on the one hand, and representatives of Albania, on the other. (b)\n\n\nThe Joint Committee shall formulate recommendations by mutual agreement between the Contracting Parties. (c)\n\n\nThe Joint Committee shall, as necessary, adopt its own rules of procedure and programme of work. (d)\n\n\nThe Joint Committee shall meet once a year in Brussels and Tirana alternately. Special meetings may be convened by mutual agreement, at the request of either Contracting Party. The Joint Committee shall be chaired alternately by each of the Contracting Parties. Wherever possible, the agenda for meetings of the Joint Committee shall be agreed beforehand. (e)\n\n\nThe Joint Committee may decide to set up working parties to assist it in carrying out its duties. 2. (a)\n\n\nThe Joint Committee shall ensure the proper functioning of this Agreement and shall devise and recommend practical measures for achieving its objectives, keeping in view the economic and social policies of the Contracting Parties. (b)\n\n\nThe Joint Committee shall endeavour to find ways of encouraging the development of trade and commercial and economic cooperation between the Contracting Parties. In particular, it shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nexamine the various aspects of trade between the Parties, notably its overall pattern, rate of growth, structure and diversification, the trade balance and the various forms of trade and trade promotion,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nmake recommendations on any trade or economic cooperation problem of mutual concern,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nseek appropriate means of avoiding possible difficulties in the fields of trade and cooperation and encourage various forms of commercial and economic cooperation in areas of mutual interest,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nconsider measures likely to develop and diversify trade and economic cooperation, notably by improving import opportunities in the Community and in Albania,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nexchange information on macro-economic plans and forecasts for the economies of the two Parties which have an impact on trade and cooperation and, by extension, on the scope for developing complementarity between their respective economies and also on proposed economic development programmes,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nexchange information on amendments to and developments in the laws, regulations and formalities of the Contracting Parties in the areas covered by this Agreement,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nseek methods of arranging and encouraging the exchange of information and contacts in matters relating to economic cooperation between the Contracting Parties on a mutually advantageous basis, and work towards the creation of favourable conditions for such cooperation,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nexamine the situation concerning procedures for the award of contracts for supplying goods and services following an international invitation to tender,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nexamine favourably ways of improving conditions for the development of direct contacts between firms established in the Community and those established in Albania,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nformulate and submit to the authorities of both Contracting Parties recommendations for resolving any problems that arise, where appropriate by means of the conclusion of arrangements or agreements. TITLE VI\n\nGeneral and final provisions\n\nArticle 19\nSubject to the provisions of Article 16, the provisions of this Agreement shall replace the provisions of agreements concluded between Member States of the Community and Albania where the latter provisions are either incompatible with or identical to the former. Article 20\nThis Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the territory of the Republic of Albania. Article 21\nThis Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the second month following the date on which the Contracting Parties notify each other that the legal procedures necessary to this end have been completed. The Agreement is concluded for an initial period of 10 years. The Agreement shall be automatically renewed year by year provided that neither Contracting Party gives the other Party written notice of denunciation of the Agreement six months before it expires. However, the two Contracting Parties may amend the Agreement by mutual consent in order to take account of new developments, notably the situation which would arise from the accession of Albania to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. In the latter case, the Contracting Parties shall prepare together the amendments to this Agreement necessary to take account of the protocol of accession of Albania to the General Agreement. If the Parties are unable to agree on this subject they reserve the right to denounce this Agreement. The parties reserve the right to suspend this Agreement in whole or in part with immediate effect if a serious violation occurs of the essential provisions of the present Agreement. Article 22\nThis Agreement is drawn up in duplicate in the Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and Albanian languages, each text being equally authentic. En fe de lo cual, los plenipotenciarios abajo firmantes suscriben el presente Acuerdo. Til bekr\u00e6ftelse heraf har undertegnede befuldm\u00e6gtigede underskrevet denne aftale. Zu Urkund dessen haben die unterzeichneten Bevollm\u00e4chtigten ihre Unterschriften unter dieses Abkommen gesetzt. \u0395\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c0\u03af\u03c3\u03c4\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u03c4\u03c9\u03bd \u03b1\u03bd\u03c9\u03c4\u03ad\u03c1\u03c9, \u03bf\u03b9 \u03c5\u03c0\u03bf\u03b3\u03b5\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03bc\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 \u03c0\u03bb\u03b7\u03c1\u03b5\u03be\u03bf\u03cd\u03c3\u03b9\u03bf\u03b9 \u03ad\u03b8\u03b5\u03c3\u03b1\u03bd \u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03c5\u03c0\u03bf\u03b3\u03c1\u03b1\u03c6\u03ad\u03c2 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5\u03c2 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03c0\u03b1\u03c1\u03bf\u03cd\u03c3\u03b1 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bc\u03c6\u03c9\u03bd\u03af\u03b1. In witness whereof the undersigned Plenipotentiaries have signed this Agreement. En foi de quoi les pl\u00e9nipotentiaires soussign\u00e9s ont appos\u00e9 leurs signatures au bas du pr\u00e9sent accord. In fede di che, i plenipotenziari sottoscritti hanno apposto le loro firme in calce al presente accordo. Ten blijke waarvan de ondergetekende gevolmachtigden hun handtekening onder deze Overeenkomst hebben gesteld. Em f\u00e9 do que, os plenipotenci\u00e1rios abaixo assinados apuseram as suas assinaturas no final do presente Acordo. Ne bese te ciles p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuesit t\u00eb plot\u00ebfuqishmit e n\u00ebnshkruari kan\u00eb n\u00ebnshkruar k\u00ebt\u00eb marr\u00ebveshje. Hecho en Bruselas, el once de mayo de mil novecientos noventa y dos. Udf\u00e6rdiget i Bruxelles, den ellevte maj nitten hundrede og tooghalvfems. Geschehen zu Br\u00fcssel am elften Mai neunzehnhundertzweiundneunzig. \u0388\u03b3\u03b9\u03bd\u03b5 \u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u0392\u03c1\u03c5\u03be\u03ad\u03bb\u03bb\u03b5\u03c2, \u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03c2 \u03ad\u03bd\u03b4\u03b5\u03ba\u03b1 \u039c\u03b1\u0390\u03bf\u03c5 \u03c7\u03af\u03bb\u03b9\u03b1 \u03b5\u03bd\u03bd\u03b9\u03b1\u03ba\u03cc\u03c3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03b5\u03bd\u03bd\u03b5\u03bd\u03ae\u03bd\u03c4\u03b1 \u03b4\u03cd\u03bf. Done at Brussels on the eleventh day of May in the year one thousand nine hundred and ninety-two. Fait \u00e0 Bruxelles, le onze mai mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-douze. Fatto a Bruxelles, add\u00ec undici maggio millenovecentonovantadue. Gedaan te Brussel, de elfde mei negentienhonderd twee\u00ebnnegentig. Feito em Bruxelas, em onze de Maio de mil novecentos e noventa e doi\nDh\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb Bruksel m\u00eb nj\u00ebmb\u00ebdhjet\u00eb Maj nj\u00eb mij\u00eb e n\u00ebnd\u00ebqind e n\u00ebnd\u00ebdhjet\u00eb e dy. Por la Comunidad Econ\u00f3mica Europea\nFor Det Europ\u00e6iske \u00d8konomiske F\u00e6llesskab\nF\u00fcr die Europ\u00e4ische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft\n\u0393\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u0395\u03c5\u03c1\u03c9\u03c0\u03b1\u03ca\u03ba\u03ae \u039f\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u03bd\u03bf\u03bc\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u039a\u03bf\u03b9\u03bd\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03b1\nFor the European Economic Community\nPour la Communaut\u00e9 \u00e9conomique europ\u00e9enne\nPer la Comunit\u00e0 economica europea\nVoor de Europese Economische Gemeenschap\nPela Comunidade Econ\u00f3mica Europeia\nP\u00ebr Komunitetin ekonomik evropian\n\n\n\n\n\nPor la Rep\u00fablica de Albania\nFor Republikken Albanien\nF\u00fcr die Republik Albanien\n\u0393\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7 \u0394\u03b7\u03bc\u03bf\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03c2 \u0391\u03bb\u03b2\u03b1\u03bd\u03af\u03b1\u03c2\nFor the Republic of Albania\nPour la r\u00e9publique d'Albanie\nPer la Repubblica di Albania\nVoor de Republiek Albani\u00eb\nPela Rep\u00fablica da Alb\u00e2nia\nP\u00ebr Republik\u00ebn e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f0459679-2cec-4cb4-bb0c-6c9c719b144c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1111/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Letter to the President of the Hellenic Republic", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European Commission,Greece,Yugoslavia,diplomatic relations,exchange of information,official visit,president of an institution,republic", "workIds": "celex:91992E001111", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "Greece", "Yugoslavia", "diplomatic relations", "exchange of information", "official visit", "president of an institution", "republic"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f0459679-2cec-4cb4-bb0c-6c9c719b144c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5bd9f31e-208f-49df-b9d3-a278454aa9a6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1136/92 by Mr Rinaldo BONTEMPI to the Commission. The 'Quartiers en crise' Programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BONTEMPI,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU financing,European Regional Development Fund,decontamination,improvement of housing,social integration,urban habitat,urban renewal", "workIds": "celex:91992E001136", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "European Regional Development Fund", "decontamination", "improvement of housing", "social integration", "urban habitat", "urban renewal"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5bd9f31e-208f-49df-b9d3-a278454aa9a6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/abeb1105-ed86-41de-ba0a-ef5cf97f9023", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1135/92 by Mr Dimitrios NIANIAS to the Commission. Location of natural gas plant on the island of Revithousa", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,NIANIAS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Central Greece,contract,industrial hazard,island,location of industry,natural gas,seismology", "workIds": "celex:91992E001135", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central Greece", "contract", "industrial hazard", "island", "location of industry", "natural gas", "seismology"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/abeb1105-ed86-41de-ba0a-ef5cf97f9023", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52badc55-f645-472f-8868-3409d47741a3", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the conditions for granting and using authorizations for the prospection, exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "energy site,energy supply,exploitation of resources,hydrocarbon,management of resources,security of supply", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0110,comnat:COM_1992_0110_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_139_R_0012_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["energy site", "energy supply", "exploitation of resources", "hydrocarbon", "management of resources", "security of supply"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52badc55-f645-472f-8868-3409d47741a3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 110 final - SYN 412 \n\nBrussels, 11 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non the conditions for granting and using authorizations for \n\nthe prospection, exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\nIK \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nIntroduct ion \n\nWith the publication of the White Paper on completing the internal \nmarket in June 1985(D followed by the adoption of the Single \nEuropean Act in December 1985, completion of the internal market \nby the end of 1992 became one of the Community's fundamental \nobject ives. The Single European Act added to the Treaty a new Article 8a which \ndefines the internal market as \"an area without internal frontiers \nin which the free movement of goods, persons and capital is \nensured\". This definition applies equally to the energy market. Energy is such a vital component of all economic activity in the \nCommunity that completion of the internal market is inconceivable \nwithout an integrated energy market. The Community energy policy \nobjectives adopted by the Council in 1986 explicitly emphasized \nthe need for \"greater integration, free from barriers to trade, of \nthe internal energy market with a view to improving security of \nsupply, \neconomic \ncompet i t i veness\" S^ \n\nimproving \n\nreducing \n\ncosts \n\nand \n\nSubstantial progress has been, and still is being, made towards \nestablishment of an internal energy market. Following the first \nstage marked, notably, by the adoption of the Council Directives \non the transit of electricity(3), the transit of natural gas^4^ \nand the transparency of gas and electricity prices^5), the \nCommission has sent the Council two proposals for Directives \nlaying down common rules for the internal market in electricity \nand gas. (6) In the case of gas, the common rules proposed do \nnot apply to the production side of the industry. Consequently, \nfor the gas industry, this proposal is complementary to the \nsecond phase already in progress. At the same time it is \ndesigned to remove the last remaining major obstacles to \ncompletion of the internal market in oil, where few restrictions \nto competition in the downstream activities are left. ( 1) COM(85) 310 f i n a l, 1 4. 6. 1 9 8 5. ( 2) OJ No C 2 4 1, 2 5. 9. 1 9 8 6. ( 3) OJ No L 313, 1 3. 1 1. 1 9 9 0, p. 3 0. ( 4) OJ No L 147, 1 2. 6. 1 9 9 1, p. 3 7. ( 5) OJ No L 185, 1 7. 7. 1 9 9 0, p. 16. ( 6) COM ( 9 1) \n\n548 f i n a l, SYN 3 8 4 - 3 8 5, 2 1. 2. 1 9 92 \n\n\f- 3 -\n\n3. In practice, exploration for and extraction of oil and natural gas \nare part of one and the same activity which are subject to similar \nphysical, technical and legal conditions and must therefore be \ncovered by a common framework separate from the arrangements for \ndownstream activities and electricity generation. Within this \nframework, these activities remain subject to restrictions, \ngreater in some Member States than in others. Although these can \nbe explained by the importance of hydrocarbons to economic \nactivity and the traditional mining regulations, they are \nnevertheless incompatible with completion of the internal market, \nwhich, in particular, calls for harmonisation of the conditiofis \nfor access to and exercise of this activity, while respecting the \nMember \nconcerning \nrights \nadministration of their oil and gas resources. responsibilities \n\nStates' \n\nand \n\nGeneral context \n\nTheir wide range of end-uses (as fuels for electricity generation, \nheating or transport and as raw materials for the chemical and \npetrochemicals \nindustries) make hydrocarbons a fundamental \ncomponent of economic activity. The limited resources in the \nCommunity lend them added importance. More specifically, the \nCommunity produces only 24% of the oil which it consumes and 62% \nof the gas. In most Member States, oil and gas resources are owned by the \nState. In any event, they are administered by the public \nauthorities which usually perform this task with broader \nobjectives than efficient exploitation of individual production \nsi tes a lone , e. g. : \n\na) planned management of all available resources; \nb) national security of supply; \nc) revenue for the State budget; \nd) development of the national economy, notably: \n\nthe upstream industries (contractors, equipment suppIiers \nand providers of services); \n\n- national producers, particularly public undertakings; and \n\nthe \ndistribution, etc. ). downstream \n\nindustries \n\n(petrochemicals, \n\ngas \n\n6. To attain these objectives, the public authorities in the \nMember States sometimes place restrictions of varying degrees on \naccess to and exercise of oil and gas exploitation activities, the \nbiggest restrictions being: \n\npartial reservation of exploitation for national undertakings, \neither by granting direct concessions for certain zones, or by \nrequiring their participation in groups of undertakings \napplying for authorisation, \nexemption of public undertakings from some of the conditions \nimposed on private companies, \n\n- \n\n\f- 4 -\n\nrestriction of the undertakings' freedom of choice of \nsuppliers, customers, staff or means of transport. 7. Consequently, the control exerted by the public authorities over \noil and gas production covers not only compliance with, for \nexample, safety, environmental and land use standards, as for any \nother activity, but also: \n\nthe nationality and legal status (private or public) of the \nundertak ings; \nthe way in which they proceed or plan to proceed with \nexploi tat ion; \nthe end-use of the products. These restrictions can be imposed formally by law. Even when they \nare not, however, the public authorities' discretionary powers to \ngrant authorisations enable them to demand a commitment to the \nsame effect from the undertakings applying. At least some of the \nrestrictions of \nto the Treaty, \nparticularly its rules on free movement of goods and right of \nestablishment. type are contrary \n\nthis \n\n8. Finally, oil and gas exploitation activities have two other \nimportant characteristics: \n\nthe investments are a risk. Often the presence, and quantity, \nof hydrocarbons in a concession are not known until the \ncompletion of extremely costly work, particularly in the North \nSea; \n\naccess to the activities is limited by the availability of oil \nand gas. What is more, even at sites where resources are \nfound a proliferation of installations and operators is not \nalways either physically \nfeasible or \nor \ndesirable. economically \n\nThese features are good reason to reserve for entities exclusive \nrights over the areas which they are authorised to exploit, \naccompanied by a guarantee that they will be able to exercise \nthese rights long enough to secure an adequate return on their \nr isk capi taI. Current situation in the Community \n\n10. Three factors shape the general situation today in the individual \n\nMember States: \n\n(i) A trend towards liberalization of the sector. Over the last \ndecade or so a number of Member States have considerably \nrelaxed their rules de Jure or de facto. (ii) The maturity of the sector. As mentioned earlier, the \nCommunity's resources are limited. Most of these are \nprobably in the areas for which concessions have already been \ngranted. No major finds should be expected in the areas yet \nto be allocated. Nevertheless, substantial reserves remain. - D -\n\nNot all the areas for which concessions have been granted are \nyet in production and new technologies can be expected to \nallow exploitation of marginal fields which cannot yet be \nworked profitably. In turn, the relinquishment process, i. e. the obligation for authorisation holders to give up any parts \nof their concessions not exploited by the agreed dates, opens \nup the further possibility of new authorisations. (iii) Past agreements. Competition in this sector remains under \nthe shadow of conditions laid down in the past, given the \nextremely long term of the concessions, some of the richest \nof which are exempt from the abovementioned relinquishment \nrequ i rement. 11. At Community level, under Directive 90/531/EEC of 17 September \n1990, all supplies and works contracts concluded by undertakings in \nthis sector will have to be fully open to competition from \n1 January 1993 on in most Member States (a little later in Spain, \nPortugal and Greece). On 6 November 1991 the Commission adopted a \nproposal to bring service contracts under this Directive. In this \ncontext, the same Directive includes alternative arrangements for \noil, gas and solid fuel production. The principal condition is \nthat authorisations must be granted on a non-discriminatory, \ntransparent basis. Finally, on. the Commission adopted a communication to the \nCouncil on the approach, progress and guiding principles of the \nwork on technical harmonisation and standardisation in the energy \nfield. 12. Object ives \n\n1. The establishment of a single market without internal frontiers \nimplies equal access for undertakings to exploit oil and gas \nresources \nthe \nand \nMember States. free movement \n\nof such \n\nproducts \n\nbetween \n\n2. Despite the progress made in a number of Member States, all too \nprospecting, \nto \nsubject \nwith \nincompatible \n\noften access to and exercise of oil and gas \nextraction \nexploration \ndiscrimination, \nattainment of these objectives. restrictions \n\nactivities \n\nconditions \n\nare \n\nand \n\nor \n\n3. To remedy this situation, common rules must be established to \nensure that the authorisation procedures are non-discriminatory and \ntransparent and impose no conditions on access to or exercise of \nthese activities which are not technically and \neconomically \nwarranted by the objective of optimum exploitation. 4. In order fully to attain the stated objective, these rules must \nalso limit any restrictive effects of authorisations granted in \nthe past. To this end, undertakings should be released from any \nobligations which will no longer be allowed, while at the same \ntime steps must be taken, within reasonable limits, to give other \nundertakings access to areas reserved for a single undertaking \nunder discriminatory conditions in the past. - 6 -\n\nAttainment of these objectives will create a more competitive \nenvironment in this industry. It will contribute towards cutting \ncosts, stimulating exploration and production activities and, as a \nresult, making the Community more self-sufficient in oi I and gas \nand generally improving its security of energy supplies. This \nwill facilitate the free movement of oil and gas in the Community \nand thus complement the action taken by the Commission to \nliberalise the transmission and distribution stages of the gas \nmarket. General principles \n\n13. The proposal from the Commission \n\nis based on four general \n\npr inc iples: \n\n1. 2. 3. 4. Member States retain sovereignty over their oil and gas resources. In this respect, the proposal in no way prejudices the rights of \nlong-term management of these \nthe Member States concerning \nresources, \nshort-term \nadministration thereof. therefrom \n\nrevenue \n\nderived \n\nthe \n\nand \n\nIn line with the principle of subsidiarity, the Member States \nremain free to choose or maintain the rules most appropriate to \nnatural operating conditions and to the long-term policy for \nmanagement of these resources. Consequently, the aim of the proposal is not to establish detailed \nregulations but to lay down a framework for the general principles \nto which those rules must conform. The approach taken to this end is based on the specific conditions \nfor exploitation of such resources. Consequently, it is different \nfrom the approach in the proposal for a Directive concerning \ncommon rules for the internal electricity market and is based on \nthe line followed in the Directives concerning public procurement \ncontracts. Means \n\n14. All entities (possessing the requisite capabilities) must be \nensured non-discriminatory access to and rights to exercise \nprospecting, exploration and extraction activities. To this end, \nthe following provisions are proposed: \n\na) Henceforth exclusive rights to prospect, explore and extract \nthe basis of \n\nhydrocarbons will \nnon-discriminatory procedures open to all entities. be granted \n\nsolely on \n\nb) The authorisation procedures will be made more transparent and \n\nnon-discr iminatory: \n\n- by using procedures open to all undertakings concerned and \n\ngiving them the requisite publicity; \n\n- by laying down and publishing objective criteria on which \n\nthe decisions will be based; \n\n- by informing all parties concerned of the conditions to be \n\napplied for granting authorisations. - 7 \u2022-\n\nc) The conditions and obligations imposed on undertakings for \ngranting or using authorizations must be based exclusively on: \n\n- the need to ensure proper exploitation; \n- reasons in the public interest such as compliance with the \nstandards applicable to the environment, security and \npublic health, national defence or the resource management \npoIi cy; and \n\n- the royalties levied by the Member States on hydrocarbon \n\nproduct ion; \n\nand entities on which unjustified conditions and obligations \nwere imposed by authorisations granted in the past should be \nreleased therefrom. d) Where authorisations were granted in the past under a \nprocedure closed to competition, other entities must be \ngranted access to the as yet unexploited parts of the area \ncovered by the concession. COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSAL \n\nSubject matter and persons covered \n\n15. In essence, the Directive applies to the national legal frameworks \nfor exercising oil and gas prospecting, exploration and extraction \nactivities, i. e. to the authorisations defined in Article 1(3), \nwhich determines the subject matter covered by the Directive. This in turn determines the persons covered, namely the entities \n(Article 1(2)) which apply for or hold an authorisation and the \ncompetent authorities (Article 1(4)), i. e. the public authorities \n(Article 1(1)) which grant the authorisations. The important \npoints to note are that: \n\n(i) the definition of author isat ions does not cover: \n\n- contracts whereby the public authorities or an entity \nthe \nentrust \nactivities, in return for payment, in which case the \ncontract \nis covered by the Directives on public \nproceurement contracts; \n\nan(other) entity \n\nperformance \n\nwith \n\nof \n\n- authorisations which do not confer an exclusive right, as \n\nis generally the case with prospecting licences; \n\n(ii) with respect to the ent i t ies. no distinction is drawn between \n\npublic or private undertakings. Territory covered \n\n16. The Directive applies to the territory of the Member States and to \nthe other areas over which they exercise sovereignty under the \nconditions laid down in the Treaty. Timescale covered \n\n- 8 -\n\n17. Article 14 requires the Member States to comply with this \nDirective by 1 January 1993. The Directive applies only to \nauthorisations granted after this date. However, it could be \napplied in advance to authorisation procedures started before this \ndate. This can be justified by the need to prevent new \nauthorisations for the limited number of geographical areas still \nunexploited being granted under conditions incompatible with the \nDirective between the date of adoption and of entry into force \nthereof. 18. The Directive also applies to authorisations granted before its \n\napplication into force in two specific cases: \n\nif the authorisations impose on the entities conditions, \nobligations and requirements other than those authorised by \nArt icle 7; \n\nin the case provided for by Article 8 (see paragraph 26). In both these cases, the Directive in no way calls into question \nthe granting of these authorisations but simply limits certain \neffects to ensure that the Directive has a balanced, beneficial \nimpact on the individual Member States. It is provided that the \nlimitation of rights in these cases shall give rise to \ncompensation by the Member States concerned, according to their \nleg is I at ion. Objective of the Directive \n\n19. The objective of the Directive is to ensure non-discriminatory \naccess to and exercise of the activities concerned (Article 2 ). In another connection, Member States shall retain the right to \nforbid any activity in certain parts of their territory for \nreasons of public interest or to subject the exercise of such \nactivity to conditions connnected with the observance of such \nreasons (Article 3 ). Articles 4 to 8 lay down the rules designed \nto attain this objective. Rules for the granting of authorizations (Articles 4, 5, 6, 7 and \n8) \n\nBasic pr inciple \n\n20. Authorisations must be granted solely under the conditions laid \ndown in the Directive, i. e. by procedures open to all entities and \ntransparent and imposing on them only clearly defined conditions. Opening of procedures (Article 4) \n\n21. The procedures must be open to everyone and must be given the \nnecessary publicity (Article 4(1) and (2)). The Member States use \ntwo types of procedure: \n\nrounds opened at the initiative of the public authorities, \n\n\f- 9 -\n\nwhen there are a relatively large number of authorisations to \ngrant, as is generally the case with the North Sea fields; \nand \n\nprocedures opened following submission of an application by an \nent ity. This shall not apply to applications for authorisation formulated \nso as to take account of changes in the control of entities but \nwhich do not affect the rights and obligations established by the \ninitial authorisation (paragraph 3 ). Where there is a transfer to \nanother entity of all or some of the rights which an entity enjoys \nby virtue of an existing authorisation, it shall be for the Member \nStates to decide whether such a transfer requires the granting of \na new authorisation and consequently the application of the \nprocedures provided in Article 4(1) and ( 2 ). Duration and scope of authorisations (Article 5) \n\n22. Equal access for entities to activities implies that the scope of \nauthorisations and their duration should be limited in a manner \ncompatible with the economic and \nconditions for \nefficient exploitation, so as not to reserve for one entity, for \nan excessive length of time, the exploitation of a zone in which \nother operators could also exercise their activity. technical \n\nTransparency of procedures (Article 6) \n\n23. To keep the procedures transparent, they must satisfy three \n\ncondit ions: \n\nthe decisions must be based on objective, pre-established \ncriteria published in advance; \nall the general conditions and obligations imposed on the \nundertakings must be established and made available to the \nentities before submission of applications; \nthe criteria, conditions and obligations must be applied \nwithout discrimination. Conditions for granting and using authorisations (Article 7) \n\n24. Steps must be taken to avoid placing on the granting and use of \nauthorisations, conditions or obligations which are not directly \nlinked to optimum exploitation of the concession, such as those \nwhich would impose on undertakings the choice of their partners, \nof their employees, of their suppliers, of their customers or of \nmeans of transporting oil or gas. Only conditions compatible with this objective may be imposed on \nundertakings. The same applies to conditions and obligations \n\n\f- 10 -\n\nimposed for reasons in the public interest as mentioned in \nArticle 3 and \nthe \nMember States. obligations \n\nvis-a-vis \n\nfinancial \n\nto the \n\n25. In the light of the above, Member States shall not be able to \nimpose the participation in an entity's capital or revenues of a \nnational undertaking which would otherwise itself exercise the \nactivities covered by the Directive. In addition, this enterprise \nmust behave as a \"sleeping partner\". Existing authorisations (Article 8) \n\n26. As mentioned in paragraph 18, the Directive applies fully only to \nauthorisations granted after its date of application. This raises \nthe question of authorisations granting entities the exclusive \nright to exploit geographical areas after a procedure closed to \nother entities. Exclusive rights of this type conflict with the \nprinciple of equal access to resources. To remedy this situation, Article 8 provides for the return of \nsubareas not yet exploited to the Member States concerned so that \nthey can grant new authorisations for the subareas in question. In practice, this is a specific application of the relinquishment \nmethod already in use, particularly in the North Sea. Other provisions (Art icles 9. 10. 11. 13) \n\n27. Relations with third countries. Liberalisation of the sector will \nbring benefits for all entities established in the Community, \nincluding branches of non-Community companies. Companies from the \nin non-Community \nCommunity must enjoy equivalent \ncountries. Article 9 establishes a procedure for evaluating the \nsituation and initiating negotiations with third countries as the \nneed ar ises. advantages \n\n28. Directive 90/531/EEC on the procurement procedures of entities \n\noperating in the excluded sectors. by \n\nfor \n\nArticle 3 of this Directive establishes alternative arrangements \nfor entities exercising oil and gas exploration and extraction \nactivities. These are more flexible than the general arrangements \nprovided \nthese \nalternative arrangements shaI I be subject to two conditions : that \nthe granting of authorisations on the one hand, and procurement on \nthe other, shall be made under non-discriminatory, transparent \nconditions. In order to apply them, the Member State concerned \nmust send an application to the Commission, which will check that \nthese conditions are met. the Directive. The application \n\nof \n\nMember States requesting the application of the alternative \narrangements shall no longer be required to demonstrate that they \nfulfil the first of these conditions from the date on which they \n\n\f- 11 -\n\nshall have satisfied the requirements of this Directive. It \nshould be noted that the general rules of Directive 90/531/EEC \nshall become applicable to them should they subsequently fail to \nmeet their obligations under this Directive. Consequently, \nDirective 90/531/EEC Article 13 requires to be amended. It should be recalled that the Directive [on remedies in the \nexcluded sectors] also applies. 29. Finally, the Directive places on the Member States an obligation \nto publish an annual report on the authorisations granted (Article \n10) and to notify the Commission of the competent authorities with \na view to publication in the Official Journal (Article 11). No \ncomments need be made on these Articles. Legal basis \n\n30. A Directive based on Articles 57(2), 66, 100A and 113 of the \nTreaty is the most appropriate means of harmonising the Member \nStates' authorisation procedures. In addition, the Commission \nreserves the right to use all its powers under the Treaty against \nany national laws, regulations or administrative provisions \ndirectly conflicting with the provisions of the Treaty. CONCLUSION \n\nConsequently, the Commission proposes a Directive introducing common \nrules on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the \nprospecting, exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons, based on \nArticles 57(2), 66, 100a and 113 of the Treaty. - 12 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\non the conditions for granting and using authorizations for \n\nthe prospection, exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nand in particular Articles 57(2), 66, 100a and 113 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission^), \n\nIn cooperation with the European Parliament(2), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(^), \n\nWhereas measures must be adopted with the aim of progressively establishing \n\nthe internal market over a period expiring on 31 December 1992; \n\nwhereas the internal market consists of an area without internal frontiers \n\nin which the free movement of goods, services, persons and capital is \n\nensured; \n\nWhereas in its Resolution of 16 September 1986(*) the Council identified \n\nas an objective of the energy policy of the Community and the Member States \n\nthe greater integration, free from barriers to trade, of the internal \n\nenergy market with a view to improving security of supply, reducing costs \n\nand improving economic competitiveness; \n\nWhereas the Community depends on imports for its hydrocarbon supply; \n\nwhereas it is consequently advisable to encourage the best possible \n\nexploitation of the resources located in the Community; \n\n(1) OJ \n(2) OJ \n(3) OJ \n(4) OJ No C 241, 25. 9. 1986, p. 1. - 13 -\n\nWhereas steps must be taken to ensure the access to and pursuit of \n\nactivities relating to the prospection, exploration, and extraction of \n\nhydrocarbons under conditions which encourage greater competition in this \n\nsector and thereby to favour the best exploitation of Community resources \n\nand to reinforce the integration of the internal energy market; \n\nWhereas, for this purpose, it is necessary to set up common rules for \n\nensuring that the procedures for granting authorizations for the \n\nprospection, exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons must be open to all \n\nentities possessing the necessary capabilities; whereas authorizations must \n\nbe granted on the basis of objective, published criteria; whereas the \n\nconditions under which authorizations are granted must likewise be known in \n\nadvance by all entities taking part in the procedure; \n\nWhereas Member States must retain the option to limit the access to and the \n\nexercise of these activities for reasons justified by public interest and \n\nto subject the payment of a financial contribution or a contribution in \n\nhydrocarbons, the modalities of the said contribution having to be fixed in \n\nsuch a way as not to interfere in the management of entities; whereas this \n\noption must be used in a non-discriminatory way; whereas, with the \n\nexception of the obligations related to the use of this option, steps must \n\nbe taken to avoid imposing on entities conditions and obligations which are \n\nnot justified by the need to perform this activity properly; whereas the \n\nactivities of entities must be monitored only to the extent necessary to \n\nensure their compliance with these obligations and conditions; \n\nWhereas the extent of the areas covered by an authorization and the \n\nduration of the authorization must be limited with a view to preventing the \n\nreservation to a single entity of an exclusive right over an area which can \n\nbe exploited more efficiently by several entities; \n\nWhereas the grant of an exclusive right to exploit an area and exercise of \n\nthis right for the time specified in the authorization is fair compensation \n\nfor the risks taken by an entity; whereas this compensation surpasses the \n\nrisks taken if an entity holds exclusive rights for a very long or even an \n\nindefinite period over a geographical area without having given other \n\nentities the possibility of access to exploit the area, either at the time \n\n\f- 14 -\n\nof granting or at a later stage; whereas with a view to ensuring the \n\neffectiveness of this Directive, conditions must be established to remedy \n\nthis situation to the extent that the area is not entirely exploited; \n\nwhereas it is nevertheless necessary to take into account legally-protected \n\nsituations and to provide for entities to be compensated, if the need \n\narises, in accordance with the applicable national law; \n\nWhereas Member States' entities should enjoy in third countries a treatment \n\ncomparable to that enjoyed by third countries' entities in the Community by \n\nvirtue of this Directive; whereas it is necessary to lay down a procedure \n\nto this end; \n\nWhereas this Directive should apply to authorizations issued after the date \n\non which Member States apply it; whereas, however, entities holding \n\nauthorizations granted before that date should be released from any \n\nconditions and obligations which may no longer be imposed thereafter; \n\nwhereas it is nevertheless necessary to take into account legally-protected \n\nsituations and to provide that, if the need arises, entities and other \n\nparties concerned be compensated in accordance with the applicable national \n\nlaw; \n\nWhereas Council Directives 90/531/EEC<5) and \n\n(6) apply to the \n\nentities in the sector as regards their procurement of supplies, of works \n\n[and of services]; whereas the application of the alternative arrangements \n\nprovided for under Article 3 of Directive 90/531/EEC is subject in \n\nparticular to the condition that, in the Member State requesting the \n\napplication of these arrangements, authorizations be granted in a non \n\ndiscriminatory and transparent manner; whereas a Member State fulfils this \n\ncondition from the moment when and for as long as it complies with the \n\nrequirements of this Directive; whereas it is consequently necessary to \n\namend Directive 90/531/EEC, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nFor the purposes of this Directive, \n\n(5) OJ No L 297, 29. 10. 1990. (6) OJ \n\n\f- 15 -\n\n1. \"public authorities\" mean the public authorities defined in Article \n\n1(1) of Directive 90/531/EEC; \n\n2. \"entity\" means any legal or natural person or any group of such \n\npersons which applies for or holds an authorization; \n\n3. \"authorization\" means any law, regulation, administrative or \n\ncontractual provision by which the competent authorities of a \n\nMember State entitle an entity to exercise, on its own behalf and at \n\nits own risk, the exclusive right to exploit a geographical area with \n\nthe objective of prospecting or exploring for and/or extracting \n\nhydrocarbons; \n\n4. \"competent authorities\" means the public authorities which are \n\nresponsible for granting authorization and monitoring use thereof. Article 2 \n\n1. Member States shall ensure non-discriminatory access by entities to \n\nactivities relating to the prospecting and exploration for or \n\nextraction of hydrocarbons and non-discriminatory exercise of these \n\nactivities. 2. Member States may, for reasons related to the defence of the \n\nterritory, refuse the access to and the exercise of the activities \n\nreferred to in paragraph 1 in border areas to any entity which is \n\neffectively controlled by a third country and/or nationals of third \n\ncountries. 3. The option provided for in paragraph 2 shall be subject to prior \n\nauthorization by the Commission which shall ensure especially that its \n\nuse does not give rise to discrimination between entities other that \n\nthose referred to in paragraph 2. - 16 -\n\nArticle 3 \n\n1. Member States shall retain the option to prohibit exercise of the \n\nactivities set out in Article 2(1) to the extent justified by the \n\ndefence of the territory, public security, public health, security of \n\ntransport, protection of the environment, safety of installations and \n\nof workers or the planned management of hydrocarbon resources. For \n\nthe same reasons, they shall also retain the option of imposing \n\nconditions on the exercise of those activities. 2. Member States shall ensure that the use of the options provided for in \n\nparagraph 1 does not give rise to discrimination between entities. Article 4 \n\n1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that \n\nauthorizations are granted under a procedure in which all interested \n\nentities may submit applications. 2. These procedures shall be initiated: \n\n(a) either at the initiative of the competent authorities by means of \n\na notice published in the Official Journal of the European \n\nCommunities at least 90 days before the closing date for \n\napplications; \n\n(b) or following submission of an application by an entity. This \n\napplication shall be published by means of a notice in the \n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities. Other interested \n\nentities shall have a period of at least 90 days after the date \n\nof publication in which to submit an application. Notices shall specify the type of authorization, the geographical area \n\nor areas in respect of which an application has been or may be made \n\nand the planned date for granting authorization. - 17 -\n\n3. The grant of an authorization solely by reason of a change of name or \n\nownership of an entity holding an existing authorization or from a \n\nchange in the composition of such an entity shall not be considered as \n\nthe grant of an authorization within the meaning of paragraph 1. Article 5 \n\nMember States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that: \n\n(a) If the geographical areas are not delimited on the basis of a prior \n\ngeometric division of the territory, the extent of each area is \n\ndetermined so as to ensure the best possible exploitation of the areas \n\nfrom the technical and economic points of view. Objective criteria \n\nshall be established to this end and shall be made available to the \n\nentities prior to the submission of applications; \n\n(b) the duration of an authorization does not exceed the period necessary \n\nto carry out the activities for which the authorization is granted. However, the competent authority may prolong the authorization where \n\nthe exploitation has been subject to delays due to unforeseen \n\ncircumstances such as particular difficulties linked to the geological \n\nstructure of the specific area or where an unexpected discovery of \n\nhydrocarbons is to be developed and the stipulated duration is \n\ninsufficient to appraise and exploit such a discovery; \n\n(c) entities surrender as soon as possible to the competent authorities \n\nthe whole or part of the geographical area concerned which is not to \n\nbe exploited by those entities. Article 6 \n\nMember States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that: \n\n1. authorizations are granted on the basis of the technical and \n\nfinancial capability of the entities and of one or more other criteria \n\nconcerning: \n\n\f- i s-\n\nta) the way in which the entities propose to exploit the geographical \n\narea in question, \n\n(b) the efficiency and responsibility displayed by the applicants in \n\noperations under other authorizations, \n\n(c) if the authorization is put up for sale, the price which the \n\nentity is prepared to pay in order to obtain the authorization; \n\nthese criteria shall be drawn up and published in the official \n\njournals of the Member States in question and in the notice referred \n\nto in Article 4(2) before the start of the period for submission of \n\napplications; \n\n2. all conditions and requirements concerning the exercise or termination \n\nof the activity which apply to authorizations of the same type by \n\nvirtue of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions in force \n\nat the time of submission of the applications, whether contained in \n\nthe authorization or being one of the conditions to be accepted prior \n\nto the grant of such authorization are established and made available \n\nto interested entities at the start of the period allowed for \n\nsubmission of applications for authorization; \n\n3. all changes made to these conditions and requirements in the course of \n\nthe procedure are notified to all interested entities; \n\n4. the criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in this Article \n\nare applied in a non-discriminatory manner; \n\n5. any entity whose application for an authorization is unsuccessful is, \n\nif the entity so wishes, informed of the reasons for the decision. Article 7 \n\n1. Member States shall ensure that the conditions and requirements \n\nreferred to in Article 6(2) and the detailed obligations for use of a \n\nspecific authorization are justified exclusively by the need to ensure \n\n\f- 19 -\n\nproper exploitation of the geographical area for which an \n\nauthorization is requested, by the application of Article 3 and by the \n\npayment of a financial contribution or a contribution in hydrocarbons. The rules for payment of such contributions shall be fixed by Member \n\nStates in such a way as to ensure that the independence of management \n\nof entities is maintained. 2. Member States shall ensure that the monitoring of the activities in \n\nthe framework of an authorization is limited to the extent necessary \n\nto ensure the compliance with the conditions, requirements and \n\nobligations referred to in paragraph 1. In particular, they shall \n\ntake the measures necessary to ensure that no entity is compelled, by \n\nany law, regulation or administrative requirement, or by any agreement \n\nor undertaking, to provide information on its intended or actual \n\nsources of procurement, except at the request of the competent \n\nauthorities and exclusively with a view to the objectives set out in \n\nArticle 36 of the Treaty. Article 8 \n\n1. If, on 1 January 1993, an entity holds one authorization granted under \n\nconditions which precluded submission or consideration of applications \n\nfrom other entities, the Member State concerned shall take the \n\nnecessary measures to grant new authorizations in respect of the parts \n\nof this geographical area which are not yet exploited on the \n\nabovementioned date. 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the following shall be considered as \n\nnot yet exploited: the parts of the abovementioned geographical area \n\nwhich have not been explored or for which the agreement of the \n\ncompetent authorities to proceed to extraction has not been requested \n\nor, where such agreement is not required, in which extraction has not \n\nbegun: \n\nwithin the period fixed by the authorization, or failing that, \n\nwithin the period fixed by any legislation which may apply to \n\nother authorizations, or, where no such period is stated, \n\nwithin a period of five years after the granting of the \n\nauthorization. - 20 -\n\n3. The Member State concerned shall ensure that applications for the new \n\nauthorizations referred to in paragraph 1 may be submitted from \n\n1 January 1993. 4. Member States shall ensure that entities, whose rights have been \n\nlimited under paragraph 1, receive compensation of the same nature as \n\nthat provided for under national legislation for similar limitations \n\nof rights for reasons of public interest. Article 9 \n\n1. Member States shall inform the Commission of any general difficulty \n\nencountered, in law or in practice by entities in access to or \n\nexercise of the activities of prospecting, exploring for and producing \n\nhydrocarbons in third countries. 2 \n\nThe Commission shall report to the Council before 31 December 1993 and \n\nperiodically thereafter, on the situation of these entities in third \n\ncountries and on the state of possible negotiations undertaken under \n\nparagraph 3 with those countries or in the framework of international \n\norganizations. 3. Whenever the Commission establishes, either on the basis of the report \n\nreferred to in paragraph 2, or on the basis of other information, that \n\na third country does not grant to Community entities, as regards \n\naccess to and exercise of the activities referred to in paragraph 1, \n\ntreatment comparable to that granted by the Community to entities from \n\nthat country, the Commission shall initiate negotiations in order to \n\nremedy the situation. The case may be, it shall make an appropriate \n\nproposal to the Council. 4. In the circumstances described in paragraph 3, the Commission, \n\nfollowing a reasoned request by a Member State, may at any time and in \n\naddition to initiating negotiations, allow that Member State to refuse \n\nan authorization to an entity which is effectively controlled by the \n\nthird country concerned and/or by nationals of that third country. The \n\n\f- 21 -\n\nCommission authorization is deemed to be granted if the Commission has \n\nnot issued an unfavourable opinion within three months following the \n\nnotification of the request by this Member State. 5. Measures taken pursuant to this Article Bhall comply with the \n\nCommunity's obligations under any international agreement governing \n\nthe access to and the exercise of prospection, exploration and \n\nextraction of hydrocarbons. Article 10 \n\nEach Member State shall publish and communicate to the Commission an annual \n\nreport which shall include information on the geographical areas which have \n\nbeen opened to exploitation, the authorizations granted, the entities \n\nholding authorizations and the composition thereof and the estimated \n\nreserves contained in its territory. Article 11 \n\nMember States shall notify the Commission, no later than 1 November 1992, \n\nof the competent authorities. They shall notify the Commission without \n\ndelay of any subsequent changes. The Commission shall publish the list of \n\ncompetent authorities and any changes thereto in the Official Journal of \n\nthe European Communities. Article 12 \n\nThis Directive shall apply to authorizations granted from 1 January 1993. Article 7 shall also apply to authorizations granted before that date. Member States shall ensure that the entities and other parties concerned \n\nwhose rights are limited under this paragraph are compensated in the manner \n\nlaid down in national law for similar limitations of rights for reasons of \n\npublic interest. Article 13 \n\nThe following is hereby added to Article 3 of Directive 90/531/EEC: \n\n\f- 22 -\n\nAs regards the exploitation of geographical areas for the purpose of \n\nexploring for or extracting oil or gas, paragraphs 1 to 4 shall apply \n\nas follows from the date from which the Member State concerned has \n\ncomplied into the provisions of Council Directive. [of \n\non the \n\nconditions for granting and using authorizations for the prospection, \n\nexploration and extraction of hydrocarbons^*)]: \n\n(a) the conditions laid down in paragraph 1 shall be considered to be \n\nsatisfied with effect from that date without prejudice to \n\nparagraph 3; \n\n(b) with effect from that date, the Member State referred to in \n\nparagraph 4 shall be required to communicate only the provisions \n\nrelating to compliance with the conditions referred to in \n\nparagraphs 2 and 3. (*>OJ No L \n\nArticle 14 \n\nMember States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and \n\nadministrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive on \n\n1 January 1993. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof. When Member States adopt these provisions these shall contain a reference \n\nto this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference at the time of \n\ntheir official publication. The procedure for such reference shall be \n\nadopted by Member States. Article 15 \n\nThis Directive is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 110 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n12 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-181-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43592-5 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nLr2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/45ce94fb-ee7e-43df-9b3e-b6b73241b499", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1126/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to European Political Cooperation. The arrest of bishops in Malawi", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European political cooperation,Malawi,Red Cross,clergy,freedom of religious beliefs,human rights,imprisonment,penal institution,political rights,right to justice", "workIds": "celex:91992E001126", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European political cooperation", "Malawi", "Red Cross", "clergy", "freedom of religious beliefs", "human rights", "imprisonment", "penal institution", "political rights", "right to justice"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/45ce94fb-ee7e-43df-9b3e-b6b73241b499", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c4f51d55-8276-419e-ab01-29958f389bc1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1141/92 by Sir James SCOTT-HOPKINS to the Commission. Financial assistance for Hereford, Worcs. and West Glos.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCOTT-HOPKINS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EIB loan,EU aid,South East (England),West Midlands,county,transport infrastructure,urban infrastructure", "workIds": "celex:91992E001141", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EIB loan", "EU aid", "South East (England)", "West Midlands", "county", "transport infrastructure", "urban infrastructure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c4f51d55-8276-419e-ab01-29958f389bc1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87b841bd-ec5f-45d0-9daf-a4c4c6e082ef", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1119/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. The Maastricht agreements and investment in education", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Spain,Structural Funds,Treaty on European Union,higher education,less-favoured region,research and development,structural policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E001119", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "Structural Funds", "Treaty on European Union", "higher education", "less-favoured region", "research and development", "structural policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/87b841bd-ec5f-45d0-9daf-a4c4c6e082ef", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4f41825a-8033-4fca-8f34-7a8afdf89fcf", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1130/92 by Mr Ib CHRISTENSEN to the Commission. Article 235 of the Treaty of Rome", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CHRISTENSEN IB,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EEC Treaty,EU act,application of EU law,document retrieval,provision of documents", "workIds": "celex:91992E001130", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EEC Treaty", "EU act", "application of EU law", "document retrieval", "provision of documents"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4f41825a-8033-4fca-8f34-7a8afdf89fcf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07631d5c-bbb7-4b06-aacd-c26477ae67e3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1110/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Authorizations for mobile telephones in Greece", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Greece,award of contract,competition law,patents licence,radio telecommunications", "workIds": "celex:91992E001110", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "award of contract", "competition law", "patents licence", "radio telecommunications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07631d5c-bbb7-4b06-aacd-c26477ae67e3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9213d2b5-3be9-4ec9-bf5d-f64d6636be36", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1147/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. Social partners as a legislature", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European social policy,collective agreement,legislative procedure,social partners", "workIds": "celex:91992E001147", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European social policy", "collective agreement", "legislative procedure", "social partners"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9213d2b5-3be9-4ec9-bf5d-f64d6636be36", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f278eda3-7ba3-459d-a53b-f63e8c001a8d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1116/92 by Mr Kenneth COLLINS to the Commission. Definition of ' suspended particulates'", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "COLLINS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "air quality,atmosphere,dust,pollution control,quality of the environment,terminology", "workIds": "celex:91992E001116", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air quality", "atmosphere", "dust", "pollution control", "quality of the environment", "terminology"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f278eda3-7ba3-459d-a53b-f63e8c001a8d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7d57aaf3-f5e3-4285-98e6-8939b78b45fd", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1101/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with a Commission directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,fertiliser", "workIds": "celex:91992E001101", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "fertiliser"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7d57aaf3-f5e3-4285-98e6-8939b78b45fd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1c992d0d-1a12-4ca7-b794-2823906d9076", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1107/92 by Mr Ernest GLINNE to the Commission. Property fraud in Spain", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GLINNE", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Spain,building regulations,consumer protection,national law,property market,proposal (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E001107", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "building regulations", "consumer protection", "national law", "property market", "proposal (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1c992d0d-1a12-4ca7-b794-2823906d9076", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9a4b5fd8-b6bb-44db-8cd1-432d71f88321", "title": "Occupational profiles of vocational counsellors in Denmark.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Cedefop", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Denmark,educational guidance,vocational guidance,vocational training", "workIds": "PUB_HX7492370", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "educational guidance", "vocational guidance", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9a4b5fd8-b6bb-44db-8cd1-432d71f88321", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/47d9277d-a845-489d-b255-80b7f6ae216a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1109/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Merger of PYRKAL Ltd and EVO Ltd", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU law,Greece,company law,competition law,damage,economic concentration,merger,privatisation,public limited company,shareholder", "workIds": "celex:91992E001109", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "Greece", "company law", "competition law", "damage", "economic concentration", "merger", "privatisation", "public limited company", "shareholder"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/47d9277d-a845-489d-b255-80b7f6ae216a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5664c83d-3629-4868-ae13-e5293fecd826", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1121/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to the Commission. Information on the Community for young people", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European Community,action programme,information centre,regional and local authorities,young person", "workIds": "celex:91992E001121", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Community", "action programme", "information centre", "regional and local authorities", "young person"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5664c83d-3629-4868-ae13-e5293fecd826", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d78d6128-4069-4c77-8bed-77dfe1e50b8f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1150/92 by The Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. The role of the President of the Commission", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European Commission,institutional activity,president of an institution", "workIds": "celex:91992E001150", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "institutional activity", "president of an institution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d78d6128-4069-4c77-8bed-77dfe1e50b8f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a0deaffb-9469-4da6-8d05-d8add8076c76", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1134/92 by G\u00e9rard FUCHS to the Commission. Controlled use of asbestos", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FUCHS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "asbestos,marketing restriction,toxic substance", "workIds": "celex:91992E001134", "eurovoc_concepts": ["asbestos", "marketing restriction", "toxic substance"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a0deaffb-9469-4da6-8d05-d8add8076c76", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a3745342-f1af-4d0e-b5c1-baa173b41af9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1118/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Invasion of the Mediterranean by toxic seaweed", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Mediterranean Sea,algae,ecological balance,exchange of information,marine pollution,natural disaster,pollution control measures,toxic substance,tropical plant", "workIds": "celex:91992E001118", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Mediterranean Sea", "algae", "ecological balance", "exchange of information", "marine pollution", "natural disaster", "pollution control measures", "toxic substance", "tropical plant"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a3745342-f1af-4d0e-b5c1-baa173b41af9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ed6cf12-3b7a-43f8-8462-770ab9429098", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1124/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to the Council. Autonomy of the Iraqi Kurds", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Iraq,Kurdistan question,UN Security Council,autonomy,civilian victim,human rights,humanitarian aid,international sanctions,repression,settlement of disputes", "workIds": "celex:91992E001124", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Iraq", "Kurdistan question", "UN Security Council", "autonomy", "civilian victim", "human rights", "humanitarian aid", "international sanctions", "repression", "settlement of disputes"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ed6cf12-3b7a-43f8-8462-770ab9429098", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ced349a7-39d3-4289-922f-68e389ac4bd3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1102/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with a Commission directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,packaged product,pre-packaging", "workIds": "celex:91992E001102", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "packaged product", "pre-packaging"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ced349a7-39d3-4289-922f-68e389ac4bd3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9e90cc12-90e8-4b95-974c-1f7fe2524a4c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1104/92 by Mr Filippos PIERROS to European Political Cooperation. The treatment of the Greek minority in Imbros by the Turkish authorities", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PIERROS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European political cooperation,Greece,T\u00fcrkiye,government violence,human rights,island,national minority,prisoner", "workIds": "celex:91992E001104", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European political cooperation", "Greece", "T\u00fcrkiye", "government violence", "human rights", "island", "national minority", "prisoner"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9e90cc12-90e8-4b95-974c-1f7fe2524a4c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a59ff7d-b64a-45a6-a093-9cf1b985ebd8", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1123/92 by Mr V\u00edctor Manuel ARBELOA MURU to the Council. International convention on racism", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "ARBELOA MURU,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "international convention,racial discrimination,racism,ratification of an agreement,xenophobia", "workIds": "celex:91992E001123", "eurovoc_concepts": ["international convention", "racial discrimination", "racism", "ratification of an agreement", "xenophobia"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0a59ff7d-b64a-45a6-a093-9cf1b985ebd8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19ca25ff-e355-462a-b458-d0dd47950731", "title": "92/264/EEC: Council Decision of 11 May 1992 on the introduction of a standard international telephone access code in the Community", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU Member State,communications policy,standardisation,telephone", "workIds": "celex:31992D0264,oj:JOL_1992_137_R_0021_027", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "communications policy", "standardisation", "telephone"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/19ca25ff-e355-462a-b458-d0dd47950731", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/af2a1149-7694-4be7-9919-4b508e1e47ec", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1138/92 by Mrs Nel van DIJK to the Commission. European policy on DES (diethylstilbestrol)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VAN DIJK", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Decision,EC Directive,European Commission,free service,hormone,marketing standard,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:91992E001138", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Decision", "EC Directive", "European Commission", "free service", "hormone", "marketing standard", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/af2a1149-7694-4be7-9919-4b508e1e47ec", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06922ca1-ce34-4340-8e3a-0dfd1e7219d1", "title": "Occupational profiles of vocational counsellors in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Cedefop", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Luxembourg,educational guidance,vocational guidance,vocational training", "workIds": "PUB_HX7492378", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Luxembourg", "educational guidance", "vocational guidance", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/06922ca1-ce34-4340-8e3a-0dfd1e7219d1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a1e839d5-e708-4013-b8c0-93c440e06119", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1139/92 by Mr Diego de los SANTOS L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Cotton and the common agricultural policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LOS SANTOS LOPEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU aid,EU production,advisory committee (EU),cotton,production aid,reform of the CAP", "workIds": "celex:91992E001139", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU aid", "EU production", "advisory committee (EU)", "cotton", "production aid", "reform of the CAP"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a1e839d5-e708-4013-b8c0-93c440e06119", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1ed094a2-56fb-435b-8fb3-887be0021e1d", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1112/92 by Mr Sotiris KOSTOPOULOS to the Commission. Plan for storing nuclear waste in the State of Skopje", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,KOSTOPOULOS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU Member State,Greece,Yugoslavia,radioactive pollution,radioactive waste,republic,storage of waste,waste management", "workIds": "celex:91992E001112", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "Greece", "Yugoslavia", "radioactive pollution", "radioactive waste", "republic", "storage of waste", "waste management"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1ed094a2-56fb-435b-8fb3-887be0021e1d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/85f6670f-ec32-4e2b-8324-c45cdb100a3e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1106/92 by Mrs Doris PACK to the Commission. Pilot project to develop a system of joint controls on external trade", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PACK", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU statistics,customs inspection,data collection,database,exchange of information,extra-EU trade,foreign trade,information system,intra-EU trade,trade regulations", "workIds": "celex:91992E001106", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU statistics", "customs inspection", "data collection", "database", "exchange of information", "extra-EU trade", "foreign trade", "information system", "intra-EU trade", "trade regulations"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/85f6670f-ec32-4e2b-8324-c45cdb100a3e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4c8eb95b-b4af-4dab-bab2-b51c82055506", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1113/92 by Mr Neil BLANEY to the Commission. Impact of the Channel Tunnel", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BLANEY,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU regional policy,European Regional Development Fund,Ireland,cross-channel connection,economic consequence,impact study,tourism,transport network", "workIds": "celex:91992E001113", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU regional policy", "European Regional Development Fund", "Ireland", "cross-channel connection", "economic consequence", "impact study", "tourism", "transport network"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4c8eb95b-b4af-4dab-bab2-b51c82055506", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ddbc355-8dd3-4abb-a24e-855200f692d2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1105/92 by Mr Filippos PIERROS to European Political Cooperation. Educational problems experienced by the Greek minority in Istanbul", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PIERROS", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Greece,T\u00fcrkiye,education of foreigners,education policy,human rights,national minority,rights of minorities", "workIds": "celex:91992E001105", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "T\u00fcrkiye", "education of foreigners", "education policy", "human rights", "national minority", "rights of minorities"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ddbc355-8dd3-4abb-a24e-855200f692d2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ed1121c-2d54-40cf-ac03-a63d2529c5a9", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1117/92 by Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Drafting of the Fourth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development -obtaining a more complete picture of the views of the governments of the Member States", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "EU policy,Germany,United Kingdom,applied research,document,member country,research and development", "workIds": "celex:91992E001117", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "Germany", "United Kingdom", "applied research", "document", "member country", "research and development"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ed1121c-2d54-40cf-ac03-a63d2529c5a9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6705da56-862d-436d-bf01-77e21eb187f7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1103/92 by Mr Jos\u00e9 VALVERDE L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Failure of the Spanish Government to comply with a Commission directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,VALVERDE LOPEZ", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Spain,application of EU law,approximation of laws,harmonisation of standards,hoisting equipment,occupational safety,standardisation,trademark", "workIds": "celex:91992E001103", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Spain", "application of EU law", "approximation of laws", "harmonisation of standards", "hoisting equipment", "occupational safety", "standardisation", "trademark"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6705da56-862d-436d-bf01-77e21eb187f7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66c3ffba-ecff-4551-82ad-d2ee5885ea04", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1148/92 by Lord O' HAGAN to the Commission. The Commission as artistic sponsor", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,O'HAGAN", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "European Commission,Treaty on European Union,cultural policy,patronage,work of art", "workIds": "celex:91992E001148", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "Treaty on European Union", "cultural policy", "patronage", "work of art"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66c3ffba-ecff-4551-82ad-d2ee5885ea04", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/74a7a8d0-aa7b-41a6-a196-5d1d92ec39af", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1133/92 by Mr Klaus H\u00c4NSCH to the Commission. Payment of Portuguese pensions to EC citizens", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,HAENSCH", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Germany,Portugal,bank charges,free movement of workers,intra-EU payment,regulation (EU),social security,social-security harmonisation", "workIds": "celex:91992E001133", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "Portugal", "bank charges", "free movement of workers", "intra-EU payment", "regulation (EU)", "social security", "social-security harmonisation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/74a7a8d0-aa7b-41a6-a196-5d1d92ec39af", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/db740917-495a-49ee-921d-bfafbe50bcd1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1115/92 by Mr Kenneth COLLINS to the Commission. Drinking Alcohol in Public Places", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "COLLINS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "alcoholic beverage,alcoholism,consumption", "workIds": "celex:91992E001115", "eurovoc_concepts": ["alcoholic beverage", "alcoholism", "consumption"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/db740917-495a-49ee-921d-bfafbe50bcd1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/47e52905-2ee9-4bfe-8c22-adb7a4d21ed3", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 1114/92 by Mr George PATTERSON to the Commission. Entitlement to Unemployment Benefits after Working in another Member State", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PATTERSON", "date": "1992-05-11", "subjects": "Community migration,equal treatment,free movement of workers,social-security benefit,unemployment insurance,worker (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E001114", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community migration", "equal treatment", "free movement of workers", "social-security benefit", "unemployment insurance", "worker (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/47e52905-2ee9-4bfe-8c22-adb7a4d21ed3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/37519074-44e2-419c-ab77-a4460c2aba73", "title": "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change - Declarations", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "fmx4,html,print,xhtml", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Afghanistan,Algeria,Angola,Antigua and Barbuda,Argentina,Armenia,Australia,Austria,Azerbaijan,Bahamas,Bahrain,Bangladesh,Barbados,Belarus,Belgium,Belize,Benin,Bhutan,Bolivia,Bosnia and Herzegovina,Botswana,Brazil,Bulgaria,Burkina Faso,Burundi,Cabo Verde,Cameroon,Canada,Central African Republic,Chad,Chile,China,Colombia,Comoros,Congo,Cook Islands,Costa Rica,Croatia,Cuba,Cyprus,Czechia,C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire,Delegation to North Korea,Delegation to South Korea,Denmark,Djibouti,Dominican Republic,EU\u2013Korea Trade Committee,Ecuador,Egypt,El Salvador,Estonia,Eswatini,Ethiopia,European Community,Fiji,Finland,France,Gabon,Germany,Ghana,Greece,Grenada,Guatemala,Guinea,Guinea-Bissau,Guyana,Haiti,Honduras,Hungary,Iceland,India,Indonesia,Iran,Ireland,Israel,Italy,Jamaica,Japan,Jordan,Kazakhstan,Kenya,Kiribati,Latvia,Lebanon,Lesotho,Liberia,Libya,Liechtenstein,Lithuania,Luxembourg,Madagascar,Malawi,Malaysia,Maldives,Mali,Malta,Marshall Islands,Mauritania,Mauritius,Mexico,Micronesia,Moldova,Monaco,Mongolia,Morocco,Mozambique,Myanmar/Burma,Namibia,Nauru,Nepal,Netherlands,New Zealand,Nicaragua,Niger,Nigeria,North Korea,Norway,Oman,Pakistan,Panama,Papua New Guinea,Paraguay,Peru,Philippines,Poland,Portugal,Romania,Russia,Rwanda,Saint Kitts and Nevis,Saint Lucia,Samoa,San Marino,Senegal,Seychelles,Sierra Leone,Singapore,Slovakia,Slovenia,Solomon Islands,South Africa,South Korea,Spain,Sri Lanka,Sudan,Suriname,Sweden,Switzerland,S\u00e3o Tom\u00e9 and Pr\u00edncipe,Tanzania,Thailand,The Gambia,Togo,Trinidad and Tobago,Tunisia,Tuvalu,Uganda,Ukraine,United Kingdom,United States,Uruguay,Vanuatu,Venezuela,Viet Nam,Yemen,Yugoslavia,Zaire,Zambia,Zimbabwe", "date": "1992-05-09", "subjects": "UN Framework Convention on Climate Change,air quality,climate change,environmental cooperation,greenhouse gas,reduction of gas emissions,stratospheric pollution", "workIds": "celex:21994A0207(02)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["UN Framework Convention on Climate Change", "air quality", "climate change", "environmental cooperation", "greenhouse gas", "reduction of gas emissions", "stratospheric pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/37519074-44e2-419c-ab77-a4460c2aba73", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["fmx4", "html", "print", "xhtml"], "text": "L_1994033EN. 01001301. xml\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n7. 2. 1994\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\nEN\n\n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities\n\n\nL 33/13\n\n\n\n\n\nUNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE\nTHE PARTIES TO THIS CONVENTION,\nACKNOWLEDGING that change in the Earth's climate and its adverse effects are a common concern of humankind;\nCONCERNED that human activities have been substantially increasing the atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, that these increases enhance the natural greenhouse effect, and that this will result on average in an additional warming of the Earth's surface and atmosphere and may adversely affect natural ecosystems and humankind;\nNOTING that the largest share of historical and current global emissions of greenhouse gases has originated in developed countries, that per capita emissions in developing countries are still relatively low and that the share of global emissions originating in developing countries will grow to meet their social and development needs;\nAWARE of the role and importance in terrestrial and marine ecosystems of sinks and reservoirs of greenhouse gases;\nNOTING that there are many uncertainties in predictions of climate change, particularly with regard to the timing, magnitude and regional patterns thereof;\nACKNOWLEDGING that the global nature of climate change calls for the widest possible cooperation by all countries and their participation in an effective and appropriate international response, in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities and their social and economic conditions;\nRECALLING the pertinent provisions of the Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, adopted at Stockholm on 16 June 1972;\nRECALLING ALSO that States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental policies, and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction;\nREAFFIRMING the principle of sovereignty of States in international cooperation to address climate change;\nRECOGNIZING that States should enact effective environmental legislation, that environmental standards, management objectives and priorities should reflect the environmental and developmental context to which they apply, and that standards applied by some countries may be inappropriate and of unwarranted economic and social cost to other countries, in particular developing countries;\nRECALLING the provisions of General Assembly resolution 44/228 of 22 December 1989 on the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, and resolutions 43/53 of 6 December 1988, 44/207 of 22 December 1989, 45/212 of 21 December 1990 and 46/169 of 19 December 1991 on protection of global climate for present and future generations of mankind;\nRECALLING ALSO the provisions of General Assembly resolution 44/206 of 22 December 1989 on the possible adverse effects of sea level rise on islands and coastal areas, particularly low-lying coastal areas and the pertinent provisions of General Assembly resolution 44/172 of 19 December 1989 on the implementation of the Plan of Action to Combat Desertification;\nRECALLING FURTHER the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, 1985, and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1987, as adjusted and amended on 29 June 1990;\nNOTING the Ministerial Declaration of the Second World Climate Conference adopted on 7 November 1990;\nCONSCIOUS of the valuable analytical work being conducted by many States on climate change and of the important contributions of the World Meteorological Organization, the United Nations Environment Programme and other organs, organizations and bodies of the United Nations system, as well as other international and intergovernmental bodies, to the exchange of results of scientific research and the coordination of research;\nRECOGNIZING that steps required to understand and address climate change will be environmentally, socially and economically most effective if they are based on relevant scientific, technical and economic considerations and continually re-evaluated in the light of new findings in these areas;\nRECOGNIZING that various actions to address climate change can be justified economically in their own right and can also help in solving other environmental problems;\nRECOGNIZING ALSO the need for developed countries to take immediate action in a flexible manner on the basis of clear priorities, as a first step towards comprehensive response strategies at the global, national and, where agreed, regional levels that take into account all greenhouse gases, with due consideration of their relative contributions to the enhancement of the greenhouse effect;\nRECOGNIZING FURTHER that low-lying and other small island countries, countries with low-lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods, drought and desertification, and developing countries with fragile mountainous ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change;\nRECOGNIZING the special difficulties of those countries, especially developing countries, whose economies are particularly dependent on fossil fuel production, use and exportation, as a consequence of action taken on limiting greenhouse gas emissions;\nAFFIRMING that responses to climate change should be coordinated with social and economic development in an integrated manner with a view to avoiding adverse impacts on the latter, taking into full account the legitimate priority needs of developing countries for the achievement of sustained economic growth and the eradication of poverty;\nRECOGNIZING that all countries, especially developing countries, need access to resources required to achieve sustainable social and economic development and that, in order for developing countries to progress towards that goal, their energy consumption will need to grow taking into account the possibilities for achieving greater energy efficiency and for controlling greenhouse gas emissions in general, including through the application of new technologies on terms which make such an application economically and socially beneficial;\nDETERMINED to protect the climate system for present and future generations,\nHAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:\nArticle 1\nDefinitions\u00a0(1)\n\nFor the purposes of this Convention:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. \u2018adverse effects of climate change\u2019 means changes in the physical environment or biota resulting from climate change which have significant deleterious effects on the composition, resilience or productivity of natural and managed ecosystems or on the operation of socio-economic systems or on human health and welfare;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. \u2018climate change\u2019 means a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3. \u2018climate system\u2019 means the totality of the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere and geosphere and their interactions;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n4. \u2018emissions\u2019 means the release of greenhouse gases and/or their precursors into the atmosphere over a specified area and period of time;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n5. \u2018greenhouse gases\u2019 means those gaseous constituents of the atmosphere, both natural and anthropogenic, that absorb and re-emit infrared radiation;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n6. \u2018regional economic integration organization\u2019 means an organization constituted by sovereign States of a given region which has competence in respect of matters governed by this Convention or its Protocols and has been duly authorized, in accordance with its internal procedures, to sign, ratify, accept, approve or accede to the instruments concerned. 7. \u2018reservoir\u2019 means a component or components of the climate system where a greenhouse gas or a precursor of a greenhouse gas is stored;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n8. \u2018sink\u2019 means any process, activity or mechanism which removes a greenhouse gas, an aerosol or a precursor of a greenhouse gas from the atmosphere;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n9. \u2018source\u2019 means any process or activity which releases a greenhouse gas, an aerosol or a precursor of a greenhouse gas into the atmosphere. Article 2\nObjective\nThe ultimate objective of this Convention and any related legal instruments that the Conference of the Parties may adopt is to achieve, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Convention, stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Such a level should be achieved within a time frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner. Article 3\nPrinciples\nIn their actions to achieve the objective of the Convention and to implement its provisions, the parties shall be guided, inter alia, by the following:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. the Parties should protect the climate system for the benefit of present and future generations of humankind, on the basis of equity and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. Accordingly, the developed country parties should take the lead in combating climate change and the adverse effects thereof;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. the specific needs and special circumstances of developing country parties, especially those that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change, and of those parties, especially developing country parties, that would have to bear a disproportionate or abnormal burden under the Convention, should be given full consideration;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3. the parties should take precautionary measures to anticipate, prevent or minimize the causes of climate change and mitigate its adverse effects. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty should be used as a reason for postponing such measures, taking into account that policies and measures to deal with climate change should be cost-effective so as to ensure global benefits at the lowest possible cost. To achieve this, such policies and measures should take into account different socio-economic contexts, be comprehensive, cover all relevant sources, sinks and reservoirs of greenhouse gases and adaptation, and comprise all economic sectors. Efforts to address climate change may be carried out cooperatively by interested parties;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n4. the parties have a right to, and should, promote sustainable development. Policies and measures to protect the climate system against human-induced change should be appropriate for the specific conditions of each party and should be integrated with national development programmes, taking into account that economic development is essential for adopting measures to address climate change;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n5. the parties should cooperate to promote a supportive and open international economic system that would lead to sustainable economic growth and development in all parties, particularly developing country parties, thus enabling them better to address the problems of climate change. Measures taken to combat climate change, including unilateral ones, should not constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade. Article 4\nCommitments\n1. All parties, taking into account their common but differentiated responsibilities and their specific national and regional development priorities, objectives and circumstances, shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\ndevelop, periodically update, publish and make available to the Conference of the parties, in accordance with Article 12, national inventories of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of all greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol, using comparable methodologies to be agreed upon by the Conference of the parties;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nformulate, implement, publish and regularly update national and, where appropriate, regional programmes containing measures to mitigate climate change by addressing anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of all greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol, and measures to facilitate adequate adaptation to climate change;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\npromote and cooperate in the development, application and diffusion, including transfer, of technologies, practices and processes that control, reduce or prevent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol in all relevant sectors, including the energy, transport, industry, agriculture, forestry and waste management sectors;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\npromote sustainable management, and promote and cooperate in the conservation and enhancement, as appropriate, of sinks and reservoirs of all greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol, including biomass, forests and oceans as well as other terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystems;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\ncooperate in preparing for adaptation to the impacts of climate change; develop and elaborate appropriate and integrated plans for coastal zone management, water resources and agriculture, and for the protection and rehabilitation of areas, particularly in Africa, affected by drought and desertification, as well as floods;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(f)\n\n\ntake climate change considerations into account, to the extent feasible, in their relevant social, economic and environmental policies and actions, and employ appropriate methods, for example impact assessments, formulated and determined nationally, with a view to minimizing adverse effects on the economy, on public health and on the quality of the environment, of projects or measures undertaken by them to mitigate or adapt to climate change;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(g)\n\n\npromote and cooperate in scientific, technological, technical, socio-economic and other research, systematic observation and development of data archives related to the climate system and intended to further the understanding and to reduce or eliminate the remaining uncertainties regarding the causes, effects, magnitude and timing of climate change and the economic and social consequences of various response strategies;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(h)\n\n\npromote and cooperate in the full, open and prompt exchange of relevant scientific, technological, technical, socio-economic and legal information related to the climate system and climate change, and to the economic and social consequences of various response strategies;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\npromote and cooperate in education, training and public awareness related to climate change and encourage the widest participation in this process, including that of non-governmental organizations; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(j)\n\n\ncommunicate to the Conference of the parties information related to implementation, in accordance with Article 12. 2. The developed country parties and other parties included in Annex I commit themselves specifically as provided for in the following:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\neach of these parties shall adopt national\u00a0(2) policies and take corresponding measures on the mitigation of climate change, by limiting its anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases and protecting and enhancing its greenhouse gas sinks and reservoirs. These policies and measures will demonstrate that developed countries are taking the lead in modifying longer-term trends in anthropogenic emissions consistent with the objective of the Convention, recognizing that the return by the end of the present decade to earlier levels of anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol would contribute to such modification, and taking into account the differences in these parties' starting points and approaches, economic structures and resource bases, the need to maintain strong and sustainable economic growth, available technologies and other individual circumstances, as well as the need for equitable and appropriate contributions by each of these parties to the global effort regarding that objective. These parties may implement such policies and measures jointly with other parties and may assist other parties in contributing to the achievement of the objective of the Convention and, in particular, that of this subparagraph;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nin order to promote progress to this end, each of these parties shall communicate, within six months of the entry into force of the Convention for it and periodically thereafter, and in accordance with Article 12, detailed information on its policies and measures referred to in subparagraph (a) above, as well as on its resulting projected anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol for the period referred to in subparagraph (a), with the aim of returning individually or jointly to their 1990 levels of these anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol. This information will be reviewed by the Conference of the parties, at its first session and periodically thereafter, in accordance with Article 7;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\ncalculations of emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases for the purposes of subparagraph (b) above should take into account the best available scientific knowledge, including of the effective capacity of sinks and the respective contributions of such gases to climate change. The Conference of the parties shall consider and agree on methodologies for these calculations at its first session and review them regularly thereafter;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\nthe Conference of the parties shall, at its first session, review the adequacy of subparagraphs (a) and (b) above. Such review shall be carried out in the light of the best available scientific information and assessment on climate change and its impacts, as well as relevant technical, social and economic information. Based on this review, the Conference of the parties shall take appropriate action, which may include the adoption of amendments to the commitments in subparagraphs (a) and (b) above. The Conference of the parties, at its first session, shall also take decisions regarding criteria for joint implementation as indicated in subparagraph (a) above. A second review of subparagraphs (a) and (b) shall take place not later than 31 December 1998, and thereafter at regular intervals determined by the Conference of the parties, until the objective of the Convention is met;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\neach of these parties shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\ncoordinate as appropriate with other such parties, relevant economic and administrative instruments developed to achieve the objective of the Convention; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nidentify and periodically review its own policies and practices which encourage activities that lead to greater levels of anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol than would otherwise occur;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(f)\n\n\nthe Conference of the parties shall review, not later than 31 December 1998, available information with a view to taking decisions regarding such amendments to the lists in Annexes I and II as may be appropriate, with the approval of the party concerned;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(g)\n\n\nany party not included in Annex I may, in its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, or at any time thereafter, notify the Depositary that it intends to be bound by subparagraphs (a) and (b) above. The Depositary shall inform the other signatories and parties of any such notification. 3. The developed country parties and other developed parties included in Annex II shall provide new and additional financial resources to meet the agreed full costs incurred by developing country parties in complying with their obligations pursuant to Article 12 (1). They shall also provide such financial resources, including for the transfer of technology, needed by the developing country parties to meet the agreed full incremental costs of implementing measures that are covered by paragraph 1 of this Article and that are agreed between a developing country party and the international entity or entities referred to in Article 11, in accordance with that Article. The implementation of these commitments shall take into account the need for adequacy and predictability in the flow of funds and the importance of appropriate burden sharing among the developed country parties. 4. The developed country parties and other developed parties included in Annex II shall also assist the developing country parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting costs of adaptation to those adverse effects. 5. The developed country parties and other developed parties included in Annex II shall take all practicable steps to promote, facilitate and finance, as appropriate, the transfer of, or access to, environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other parties, particularly developing country parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In this process, the developed country parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country parties. Other parties and organizations in a position to do so may also assist in facilitating the transfer of such technologies. 6. In the implementation of their commitments under paragraph 2 above, a certain degree of flexibility shall be allowed by the Conference of the parties to the parties included in Annex I undergoing the process of transition to a market economy, in order to enhance the ability of parties to address climate change, including with regard to the historical level of anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol chosen as a reference. 7. The extent to which developing country parties will effectively implement their commitments under the Convention will depend on the effective implementation by developed country parties of their commitments under the Convention related to financial resources and transfer of technology and will take fully into account that economic and social development and poverty eradication are the first and overriding priorities of the developing country parties. 8. In the implementation of the commitments in this Article, the parties shall give full consideration to what actions are necessary under the Convention, including actions related to funding, insurance and the transfer of technology, to meet the specific needs and concerns of developing country parties arising from the adverse effects of climate change and/or the impact of the implementation of response measures, especially on:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nsmall island countries;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\ncountries with low-lying coastal areas;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\ncountries with arid and semi-arid areas, forested areas and areas liable to forest decay;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\ncountries with areas prone to natural disasters;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\ncountries with areas liable to drought and desertification;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(f)\n\n\ncountries with areas of high urban atmospheric pollution;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(g)\n\n\ncountries with areas with fragile ecosystems, including mountainous ecosystems;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(h)\n\n\ncountries whose economies are highly dependent on income generated from the production, processing and export, and/or on consumption of fossil fuels and associated energy-intensive products; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nland-locked and transit countries. Further, the Conference of the parties may take actions, as appropriate, with respect to this paragraph. 9. The parties shall take full account of the specific needs and special situations of the least developed countries in their actions with regard to funding and transfer of technology. 10. The parties shall, in accordance with Article 10, take into consideration in the implementation of the commitments of the Convention the situation of parties, particularly developing country parties, with economies that are vulnerable to the adverse effects of the implementation of measures to respond to climate change. This applies notably to parties with economies that are highly dependent on income generated from the production, processing and export, and/or consumption of fossil fuels and associated energy-intensive products and/or the use of fossil fuels for which such parties have serious difficulties in switching to alternatives. Article 5\nResearch and systematic observation\nIn carrying out their commitments pursuant to Article 4 (1) (g) the parties shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nsupport and further develop, as appropriate, international and intergovernmental programmes and networks or organizations aimed at defining, conducting, assessing and financing research, data collection and systematic observation, taking into account the need to minimize duplication of effort;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nsupport international and intergovernmental efforts to strengthen systematic observation and national scientific and technical research capacities and capabilities, particularly in developing countries, and to promote access to, and the exchange of, data and analyses thereof obtained from areas beyond national jurisdiction; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\ntake into account the particular concerns and needs of developing countries and cooperate in improving their endogenous capacities and capabilities to participate in the efforts referred to in subparagraphs (a) and (b) above. Article 6\nEducation, training and public awareness\nIn carrying out their commitments pursuant to Article 4 (1) (i) the parties shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\npromote and facilitate at the national and, as appropriate, subregional and regional levels, and in accordance with national laws and regulations, and within their respective capacities:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nthe development and implementation of educational and public awareness programmes on climate change and its effects;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\npublic access to information on climate change and its effects;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(iii)\n\n\npublic participation in addressing climate change and its effects and developing adequate responses; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(iv)\n\n\ntraining of scientific, technical and managerial personnel;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\ncooperate in and promote, at the international level, and, where appropriate using existing bodies:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nthe development and exchange of educational and public awareness material on climate change and its effects; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(ii)\n\n\nthe development and implementation of education and training programmes, including the strengthening of national institutions and the exchange or secondment of personnel to train experts in this field, in particular for developing countries. Article 7\nConference of the parties\n1. A Conference of the parties is hereby established. 2. The Conference of the parties, as the supreme body of this Convention, shall keep under regular review the implementation of the Convention and any related legal instruments that the Conference of the parties may adopt, and shall make, within its mandate, the decisions necessary to promote the effective implementation of the Convention. To this end, it shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nperiodically examine the obligations of the parties and the institutional arrangements under the Convention, in the light of the objective of the Convention, the experience gained in its implementation and the evolution of scientific and technological knowledge;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\npromote and facilitate the exchange of information on measures adopted by the parties to address climate change and its effects, taking into account the differing circumstances, responsibilities and capabilities of the parties and their respective commitments under the Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nfacilitate, at the request of two or more parties, the coordination of measures adopted by them to address climate change and its effects, taking into account the differing circumstances, responsibilities and capabilities of the parties and their respective commitments under the Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\npromote and guide, in accordance with the objective and provisions of the Convention, the development and periodic refinement of comparable methodologies, to be agreed on by the Conference of the parties, inter alia, for preparing inventories of greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks, and for evaluating the effectiveness of measures to limit the emissions and enhance the removals of these gases;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\nassess, on the basis of all information made available to it in accordance with the provisions of the Convention, the implementation of the Convention by the parties, the overall effects of the measures taken pursuant to the Convention, in particular environmental, economic and social effects as well as their cumulative impacts and the extent to which progress towards the objective of the Convention is being achieved;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(f)\n\n\nconsider and adopt regular reports on the implementation of the Convention and ensure their publication;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(g)\n\n\nmake recommendations on any matters necessary for the implementation of the Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(h)\n\n\nseek to mobilize financial resources in accordance with Article 4 (3), (4) and (5) and Article 11;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(i)\n\n\nestablish such subsidiary bodies as are deemed necessary for the implementation of the Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(j)\n\n\nreview reports submitted by its subsidiary bodies and provide guidance to them;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(k)\n\n\nagree upon and adopt, by consensus, rules of procedure and financial rules for itself and for any subsidiary bodies;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(l)\n\n\nseek and utilize, where appropriate, the services and cooperation of, and information provided by, competent international organizations and intergovernmental and non-governmental bodies; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(m)\n\n\nexercise such other functions as are required for the achievement of the objective of the Convention as well as all other functions assigned to it under the Convention. 3. The Conference of the parties shall, at its first session, adopt its own rules of procedure as well as those of the subsidiary bodies established by the Convention, which shall include decision-making procedures for matters not already covered by decision-making procedures stipulated in the Convention. Such procedures may include specified majorities required for the adoption of particular decisions. 4. The first session of the Conference of the parties shall be convened by the interim secretariat referred to in Article 21 and shall take place not later than one year after the date of entry into force of the Convention. Thereafter, ordinary sessions of the Conference of the parties shall be held every year unless otherwise decided by the Conference of the parties. 5. Extraordinary sessions of the Conference of the parties shall be held at such other times as may be deemed necessary by the Conference, or at the written request of any party, provided that, within six months of the request being communicated to the parties by the secretariat, it is supported by at least one-third of the parties. 6. The United Nations, its specialized agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency, as well as any State member thereof or observers thereto not party to the Convention, may be represented at sessions of the Conference of the parties as observers. Any body or agency, whether national or international, governmental or non-governmental, which is qualified in matters covered by the Convention and which has informed the secretariat of its wish to be represented at a session of the Conference of the parties as an observer, may be so admitted unless at least one-third of the parties present object. The admission and participation of observers shall be subject to the rules of procedure adopted by the Conference of the parties. Article 8\nSecretariat\n1. A secretariat is hereby established. 2. The functions of the secretariat shall be:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nto make arrangements for sessions of the Conference of the parties and its subsidiary bodies established under the Convention and to provide them with services as required;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nto compile and transmit reports submitted to it;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nto facilitate assistance to the parties, particularly developing country parties, on request, in the compilation and communication of information required in accordance with the provisions of the Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\nto prepare reports on its activities and present them to the Conference of the parties;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\nto ensure the necessary coordination with the secretariats of other relevant international bodies;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(f)\n\n\nto enter, under the overall guidance of the Conference of the parties, into such administrative and contractual arrangements as may be required for the effective discharge of its functions; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(g)\n\n\nto perform the other secretariat functions specified in the Convention and in any of its Protocols and such other functions as may be determined by the Conference of the parties. 3. The Conference of the parties, at its first session, shall designate a permanent secretariat and make arrangements for its functioning. Article 9\nSubsidiary body for scientific and technological advice\n1. A subsidiary body for scientific and technological advise is hereby established to provide the Conference of the parties and, as appropriate, its other subsidiary bodies with timely information and advice on scientific and technological matters relating to the Convention. This body shall be open to participation by all parties and shall be multidisciplinary. It shall comprise government representatives competent in the relevant field of expertise. It shall report regularly to the Conference of the parties on all aspects of its work. 2. Under the guidance of the Conference of the parties, and drawing upon existing competent international bodies, this body shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nprovide assessments of the state of scientific knowledge relating to climate change and its effects;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nprepare scientific assessments on the effects of measures taken in the implementation of the Convention;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nidentify innovative, efficient and state-of-the-art technologies and know-how and advise on the ways and means of promoting development and/or transferring such technologies;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\nprovide advice on scientific programmes, international cooperation in research and development related to climate change, as well as on ways and means of supporting endogenous capacity-building in developing countries; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(e)\n\n\nrespond to scientific, technological and methodological questions that the Conference of the parties and its subsidiary bodies may put to the body. 3. The functions and terms of reference of this body may be further elaborated by the Conference of the parties. Article 10\nSubsidiary body for implementation\n1. A subsidiary body for implementation is hereby established to assist the Conference of the parties in the assessment and review of the effective implementation of the Convention. This body shall be open to participation by all parties and comprise government representatives who are experts on matters related to climate change. It shall report to the Conference of the parties on all aspects of its work. 2. Under the guidance of the Conference of the parties, this body shall:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nconsider the information communicated in accordance with Article 12 (1) to assess the overall aggregated effect of the steps taken by the parties in the light of the latest scientific assessments concerning climate change;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nconsider the information communicated in accordance with Article 12 (2) in order to assist the Conference of the parties in carrying out the reviews required by Article 4 (2) (d); and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nassist the Conference of the parties, as appropriate, in the preparation and implementation of its decisions. Article 11\nFinancial mechanism\n1. A mechanism for the provision of financial resources on a grant or concessional basis, including for the transfer of technology, is hereby defined. It shall function under the guidance of, and be accountable to, the Conference of the parties, which shall decide on its policies, programme priorities and eligibility criteria related to this Convention. Its operation shall be entrusted to one or more-existing international entities. 2. The financial mechanism shall have an equitable and balanced representation of all parties within a transparent system of governance. 3. The Conference of the parties and the entity or entities entrusted with the operation of the financial mechanism shall agree upon arrangements to give effect to the above paragraphs, which shall include the following:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nmodalities to ensure that the funded projects to address climate change are in conformity with the policies, programme priorities and eligibility criteria established by the Conference of the parties;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nmodalities by which a particular funding decision may be reconsidered in light of these policies, programme priorities and eligibility criteria;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nprovision by the entity or entities of regular reports to the Conference of the parties on its funding operations, which is consistent with the requirement for accountability set out in paragraph 1 above; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\ndetermination in a predictable and identifiable manner of the amount of funding necessary and available for the implementation of this Convention and the conditions under which that amount shall be periodically reviewed. 4. The Conference of the parties shall make arrangements to implement the abovementioned provisions at its first session, reviewing and taking into account the interim arrangements referred to in Article 21 (3) and shall decide whether these interim arrangements shall be maintained. Within four years thereafter, the Conference of the parties shall review the financial mechanism and take appropriate measures. 5. The developed country parties may also provide and developing country parties avail themselves of, financial resources related to the implementation of the Convention through bilateral, regional and other multilateral channels. Article 12\nCommunication of information related to implementation\n1. In accordance with Article 4 (1) each party shall communicate to the Conference of the parties, through the secretariat, the following elements of information:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\na national inventory of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of all greenhouse gases not controlled by the Montreal Protocol, to the extent its capacities permit, using comparable methodologies to be promoted and agreed upon by the Conference of the parties;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\na general description of steps taken or envisaged by the party to implement the Convention; and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nany other information that the party considers relevant to the achievement of the objective of the Convention and suitable for inclusion in its communication, including, if feasible, material relevant for calculations of global emission trends. 2. Each developed country party and each other party included in Annex I shall incorporate in its communication the following elements of information:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\na detailed description of the policies and measures that it has adopted to implement its commitment pursuant to Article 4 (2) (a) and (b); and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\na specific estimate of the effects that the policies and measures referred to in subparagraph (a) immediately above will have on anthropogenic emissions by its sources and removals by its sinks of greenhouse gases during the period referred to in Article 4 (2) (a). 3. In addition, each developed country party and each other developed party included in Annex II shall incorporate details of measures taken in accordance with Article 4 (3), (4) and (5). 4. Developing country parties may, on a voluntary basis, propose projects for financing, including specific technologies, materials, equipment, techniques or practices that would be needed to implement such projects, along with, if possible, an estimate of all incremental costs, of the reductions of emissions and increments of removals of greenhouse gases, as well as an estimate of the consequent benefits. 5. Each developed country party and each other party included in Annex I shall make its initial communication within six months of the entry into force of the Convention for that party. Each party not so listed shall make its initial communication within three years of the entry into force of the Convention for that party, or of the availability of financial resources in accordance with Article 4 (3). Parties that are least developed countries may make their initial communication at their discretion. The frequency of subsequent communications by all parties shall be determined by the Conference of the parties, taking into account the differentiated timetable set by this paragraph. 6. Information communicated by parties under this Article shall be transmitted by the secretariat as soon as possible to the Conference of the parties and to any subsidiary bodies concerned. If necessary, the procedures for the communication of information may be further considered by the Conference of the parties. 7. From its first session, the Conference of the parties shall arrange for the provision to developing country parties of technical and financial support, on request, in compiling and communicating information pursuant to this Article, as well as in identifying the technical and financial needs associated with proposed projects and response measures pursuant to Article 4. Such support may be provided by other parties, by competent international organizations and by the secretariat, as appropriate. 8. Any group of parties may, subject to guidelines adopted by the Conference of the parties, and to prior notification to the Conference of the parties, make a joint communication in fulfilment of their obligations pursuant to this Article, provided that such a communication includes information on the fulfilment by each of these parties of its individual obligations pursuant to the Convention. 9. Information received by the secretariat that is designated by a party as confidential, in accordance with criteria to be established by the Conference of the parties, shall be aggregated by the secretariat to protect its confidentiality before being made available to any of the bodies involved in the communication and review of information. 10. Subject to paragraph 9 above, and without prejudice to the ability of any party to make public its communication at any time, the secretariat shall make communications by parties pursuant to this Article publicly available at the time they are submitted to the Conference of the parties. Article 13\nResolution of questions regarding implementation\nThe Conference of the parties shall, at its first session, consider the establishment of a multilateral consultative process, available to parties on their request, for the resolution of questions regarding the implementation of the Convention. Article 14\nSettlement of disputes\n1. In the event of a dispute between any two or more parties concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention, the parties concerned shall seek a settlement of the dispute through negotiation or any other peaceful means of their own choice. 2. When ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to the Convention, or at any time thereafter, a party which is not a regional economic integration organization may declare in a written instrument submitted to the depositary that, in respect of any dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention, it recognizes as compulsory ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any party accepting the same obligation:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nsubmission of the dispute to the International Court of Justice; and/or\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\narbitration in accordance with procedures to be adopted by the Conference of the parties as soon as practicable, in an annex on arbitration. A party which is a regional economic integration organization may make a declaration with like effect in relation to arbitration in accordance with the procedures referred to in subparagraph (b) above. 3. A declaration made under paragraph 2 above shall remain in force until it expires in accordance with its terms or until three months after written notice of its revocation has been deposited with the depositary. 4. A new declaration, a notice of revocation or the expiry of a declaration shall not in any way affect proceedings pending before the International Court of Justice or the arbitral tribunal, unless the parties to the dispute otherwise agree. 5. Subject to the operation of paragraph 2 above, if after 12 months following notification by one party to another that a dispute exists between them, the parties concerned have not been able to settle their dispute through the means mentioned in paragraph 1 above, the dispute shall be submitted, at the request of any of the parties to the dispute, to conciliation. 6. A conciliation commission shall be created upon the request of one of the parties to the dispute. The commission shall be composed of an equal number of members appointed by each party concerned and a chairman chosen jointly by the members appointed by each party. The commission shall render a recommendatory award, which the parties shall consider in good faith. 7. Additional procedures relating to conciliation shall be adopted by the Conference of the parties, as soon as practicable, in an annex on conciliation. 8. The provisions of this Article shall apply to any related legal instrument which the Conference of the parties may adopt, unless the instrument provides otherwise. Article 15\nAmendments to the Convention\n1. Any party may propose amendments to the Convention. 2. Amendments to the Convention shall be adopted at an ordinary session of the Conference of the parties. The text of any proposed amendment to the Convention shall be communicated to the parties by the secretariat at least six months before the meeting at which it is proposed for adoption. The secretariat shall also communicate proposed amendments to the signatories to the Convention and, for information, to the depositary. 3. The parties shall make every effort to reach agreement on any proposed amendment to the Convention by consensus. If all efforts at consensus have been exhausted, and no agreement reached, the amendment shall as a last resort be adopted by a three-quarter majority vote of the parties present and voting at the meeting. The adopted amendment shall be communicated by the secretariat to the depositary, who shall circulate it to all parties for their acceptance. 4. Instruments of acceptance in respect of an amendment shall be deposited with the depositary. An amendment adopted in accordance with paragraph 3 above shall enter into force for those parties having accepted it on the 90th day after the date of receipt by the depositary of an instrument of acceptance by at least three-quarters of the parties to the Convention. 5. The amendment shall enter into force for any other party on the 90th day after the date on which that party deposits with the depositary its instrument of acceptance of the said amendment. 6. For the purposes of this Article, \u2018parties present and voting\u2019 means parties present and casting an affirmative or negative vote. Article 16\nAdoption and amendment of Annexes to the Convention\n1. Annexes to the Convention shall form an integral part thereof and, unless otherwise expressly provided, a reference to the Convention constitutes at the same time a reference to any Annexes thereto. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 14 (2) (b) and (7), such Annexes shall be restricted to lists, forms and any other material of a descriptive nature that is of a scientific, technical, procedural or administrative character. 2. Annexes to the Convention shall be proposed and adopted in accordance with the procedure set forth in Article 15 (2), (3) and (4). 3. An Annex that has been adopted in accordance with paragraph 2 above shall enter into force for all parties to the Convention six months after the date of the communication by the depositary to such parties of the adoption of the Annex, except for those parties that have notified the depositary, in writing, within that period of their non-acceptance of the Annex. The Annex shall enter into force for parties which withdraw their notification of non-acceptance on the 90th day after the date on which withdrawal of such notification has been received by the depositary. 4. The proposal, adoption and entry into force of amendments to Annexes to the Convention shall be subject to the same procedure as that for the proposal, adoption and entry into force of Annexes to the Convention in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 above. 5. If the adoption of an Annex or an amendment to an Annex involves an amendment to the Convention, that Annex or amendment to an Annex shall not enter into force until such time as the amendment to the Convention enters into force. Article 17\nProtocols\n1. The Conference of the parties may, at any ordinary session, adopt Protocols to the Convention. 2. The text of any proposed Protocol shall be communicated to the parties by the secretariat at least six months before such a session. 3. The requirements for the entry into force of any Protocol shall be established by that instrument. 4. Only parties to the Convention may be parties to a Protocol. 5. Decisions under any Protocol shall be taken only by the parties to the Protocol concerned. Article 18\nRight to vote\n1. Each party to the Convention shall have one vote, except as provided for in paragraph 2 below. 2. Regional economic integration organizations, in matters within their competence, shall exercise their right to vote with a number of votes equal to the number of their member States that are parties to the Convention. Such an organization shall not exercise its right to vote if any of its member States exercises its right, and vice versa. Article 19\nDepositary\nThe Secretary-General of the United Nations shall be the depositary of the Convention and of protocols adopted in accordance with Article 17. Article 20\nSignature\nThis Convention shall be open for signature by States members of the United Nations or of any of its specialized agencies or that are Parties to the Statute of the International Court of Justice and by regional economic integration organizations at Rio de Janeiro, during the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, and thereafter at United Nations Headquarters in New York from 20 June 1992 to 19 June 1993. Article 21\nInterim arrangements\n1. The secretariat functions referred to in Article 8 will be carried out on an interim basis by the secretariat established by the General Assembly of the United Nations in its resolution 45/212 of 21 December 1990, until the completion of the first session of the Conference of the parties. 2. The head of the interim secretariat referred to in paragraph 1 above will cooperate closely with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to ensure that the Panel can respond to the need for objective scientific and technical advice. Other relevant scientific bodies could also be consulted. 3. The Global Environment Facility of the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Environment Programme and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development shall be the international entity entrusted with the operation of the financial mechanism referred to in Article 11 on an interim basis. In this connection, the Global Environment Facility should be appropriately restructured and its membership made universal to enable it to fulfil the requirements of Article 11. Article 22\nRatification, acceptance, approval or accession\n1. The Convention shall be subject to ratification, acceptance, approval or accession by States and by regional economic integration organizations. It shall be open for accession from the day after the date on which the Convention is closed for signature. Instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession shall be deposited with the depositary. 2. Any regional economic integration organization which becomes a party to the Convention without any of its member States being a party shall be bound by all the obligations under the Convention. In the case of such organizations, one or more of whose member States is a party to the Convention, the organization and its member States shall decide on their respective responsibilities for the performance of their obligations under the Convention. In such cases, the organization and the member States shall not be entitled to exercise rights under the Convention concurrently. 3. In their instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, regional economic integration organizations shall declare the extent of their competence with respect to the matters governed by the Convention. These organizations shall also inform the depositary, who shall in turn inform the parties, of any substantial modification in the extent of their competence. Article 23\nEntry into force\n1. The Convention shall enter into force on the 90th day after the date of deposit of the 50th instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. 2. For each State or regional economic integration organization that ratifies, accepts or approves the Convention or accedes thereto after the deposit of the 50th instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, the Convention shall enter into force on the 90th day after the date of deposit by such State or regional economic integration organization of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession. 3. For the purposes of paragraphs 1 and 2 above, any instrument deposited by a regional economic integration organization shall not be counted as additional to those deposited by States members of the organization. Article 24\nReservations\nNo reservations may be made to the Convention. Article 25\nWithdrawal\n1. At any time after three years from the date on which the Convention has entered into force for a party, that party may withdraw from the Convention by giving written notification to the depositary. 2. Any such withdrawal shall take effect upon expiry of one year from the date of receipt by the depositary of the notification of withdrawal, or on such later date as may be specified in the notification of withdrawal. 3. Any party that withdraws from the Convention shall be considered as also having withdrawn from any Protocol to which it is a party. Article 26\nAuthentic texts\nThe original of this Convention, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, being duly authorized to that effect, have signed this Convention. DONE at New York this ninth day of May one thousand nine hundred and ninety-two. (1)\u00a0\u00a0Titles of Articles are included solely to assist the reader. (2)\u00a0\u00a0This includes policies and measures adopted by regional economic integration organizations. ANNEX I\nAustralia\nAustria\nBelarus\u00a0(1)\n\nBelgium\nBulgaria\u00a0(1)\n\nCanada\nCzechoslovakia\nDenmark\nEuropean Community\nEstonia\u00a0(1)\n\nFinland\nFrance\nGermany\nGreece\nHungary\u00a0(1)\n\nIceland\nIreland\nItaly\nJapan\nLatvia\u00a0(1)\n\nLithuania\u00a0(1)\n\nLuxembourg\nNetherlands\nNew Zealand\nNorway\nPoland\u00a0(1)\n\nPortugal\nRomania\u00a0(1)\n\nRussian Federation\u00a0(1)\n\nSpain\nSweden\nSwitzerland\nTurkey\nUkraine\u00a0(1)\n\nUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland\nUnited States of America\n\n\n(1)\u00a0\u00a0Countries that are undergoing the process of transition to a market economy. ANNEX II\nAustralia\nAustria\nBelgium\nCanada\nDenmark\nEuropean Community\nFinland\nFrance\nGermany\nGreece\nIceland\nIreland\nItaly\nJapan\nLuxembourg\nNetherlands\nNew Zealand\nNorway\nPortugal\nSpain\nSweden\nSwitzerland\nTurkey\nUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland\nUnited States of America\n\n\n\nANNEX B\nDECLARATION BY THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 22 (3) OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE\nIn accordance with the relevant provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, the Community, alongisde its Member States, is competent to take action aiming at the protection of the environment. In relation to the matters covered by the Convention, the Community has adopted several legal instruments, both as part of its environment policy and in the framework of other sectoral policies, the most relevant of which are listed below:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 2008/90 of 29 June 1990 concerning the promotion of Energy Technology in Europe (Thermic programme) (OJ No L 185, 17. 7. 1990),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCouncil Decision 89/364/EEC of 5 June 1989 on a Community action programme for improving the efficiency of electricity use (OJ No L 157, 9. 6. 1989),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCouncil Decision 91/565/EEC of 29 October 1991 concerning the promotion of energy efficiency in the Community (SAVE programme) (OJ No L 307, 8. 11. 1991),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCouncil Regulation ECC No 1973/92 of 21 May 1992 establishing a financial instrument for the Environment (LIFE) (OJ No L 206, 22. 7. 1992),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCouncil Decision 89/625/EEC of 20 November 1989 on:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\na European Programme on Climatology and Natural Hazards (EPOCH),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\na European Programme on Science and Technology for Environment Protection (STEP) (OJ No L 359, 8. 12. 1989),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCouncil Decision 91/354/EEC of 7 June 1991 adopting a specific research and technological development programme in the field of the environment (1990 to 1994) (OJ No L 192, 16. 7. 1991),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCouncil Directive 92/6/EEC of 10 February 1992 on the installation and use of speed limitation devices for certain categories of motor vehicles in the Community (OJ No L 57, 2. 3. 1992),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 2080/92 of 30 June 1992 instituting a Community aid scheme for forestry measures in agriculture (OJ No L 215, 30. 7. 1992),\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCouncil Decision 93/389/EEC of 24 June 1993 for a monitoring mechanism of Community CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions (OJ No L 167, 9. 7. 1993). ANNEX C\nDECLARATION BY THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE\nThe European Economic Community and its Member States declare that the commitment to limit anthropogenic CO2 emissions set out in Article 4 (2) of the Convention will be fulfilled in the Community as a whole through action by the Community and its Member States, within the respective competence of each. In this perspective, the Community and its Member States reaffirm the objectives set out in the Council conclusions of 29 October 1990, and in particular the objective of stabilization of CO2 emissions by 2000 at the 1990 level in the Community as a whole. The European Economic Community and its Member States are elaborating a coherent strategy in order to attain this objective"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e1d073c0-60dc-4ec7-8dc5-1e37c67831e0", "title": "92/282/EEC: Commission Decision of 8 May 1992 approving the plan for the approval of establishments for the purposes of intra-Community trade in poultry and hatching eggs submitted by Portugal (Only the Portuguese text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-08", "subjects": "Portugal,agricultural building,egg,health control,intra-EU trade,live poultry", "workIds": "celex:31992D0282,oj:JOL_1992_150_R_0024_025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Portugal", "agricultural building", "egg", "health control", "intra-EU trade", "live poultry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e1d073c0-60dc-4ec7-8dc5-1e37c67831e0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86f1d486-6937-4f0c-9266-909393b05204", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1195/92 of 8 May 1992 on the supply of various lots of butteroil as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-08", "subjects": "butter oil,developing countries,food aid", "workIds": "celex:31992R1195,oj:JOL_1992_124_R_0017_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["butter oil", "developing countries", "food aid"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86f1d486-6937-4f0c-9266-909393b05204", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/be8ff002-6ba0-467e-8721-62adca65c742", "title": "92/281/EEC: Commission Decision of 8 May 1992 approving the plan for the approval of establishments for the purposes of intra-Community trade in poultry and hatching eggs submitted by the United Kingdom (Only the English text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-08", "subjects": "United Kingdom,agricultural building,egg,health control,intra-EU trade,live poultry", "workIds": "celex:31992D0281,oj:JOL_1992_150_R_0023_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "agricultural building", "egg", "health control", "intra-EU trade", "live poultry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/be8ff002-6ba0-467e-8721-62adca65c742", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6d87187a-03cb-46e9-a610-d38e21b48315", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1197/92 of 8 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1726/70 on the procedure for granting the premium for leaf tobacco", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-08", "subjects": "agricultural guidance,contract,tobacco", "workIds": "celex:31992R1197,oj:JOL_1992_124_R_0031_030", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural guidance", "contract", "tobacco"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6d87187a-03cb-46e9-a610-d38e21b48315", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e5207209-5ecb-4766-9137-0064580b5064", "title": "92/280/EEC: Commission Decision of 8 May 1992 concerning the importation by Member States of fresh meat from Nicaragua", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-08", "subjects": "Nicaragua,fresh meat,health control,import,import restriction", "workIds": "celex:31992D0280,oj:JOL_1992_144_R_0021_021", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Nicaragua", "fresh meat", "health control", "import", "import restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e5207209-5ecb-4766-9137-0064580b5064", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fd89ba56-0bf3-4c23-bc27-c3cfa373524a", "title": "92/283/EEC: Commission Decision of 8 May 1992 approving the plan for the approval of establishments for the purposes of intra-Community trade in poultry and hatching eggs submitted by the Netherlands (Only the Dutch text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-08", "subjects": "Netherlands,agricultural building,egg,health control,intra-EU trade,live poultry", "workIds": "celex:31992D0283,oj:JOL_1992_150_R_0025_026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Netherlands", "agricultural building", "egg", "health control", "intra-EU trade", "live poultry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fd89ba56-0bf3-4c23-bc27-c3cfa373524a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d5af7360-9019-4a83-8214-6472da8c7eef", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1238/92 of 8 May 1992 determining the Community methods applicable in the wine sector for the analysis of neutral alcohol", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-08", "subjects": "alcohol,distillation,food chemistry,wine", "workIds": "celex:31992R1238,oj:JOL_1992_130_R_0013_022", "eurovoc_concepts": ["alcohol", "distillation", "food chemistry", "wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d5af7360-9019-4a83-8214-6472da8c7eef", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/907c477f-9b5e-44c0-a268-882dbbb2dadc", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION authorizing the Netherlands to apply a measure derogating from Article 21 (1) (a) of the Sixth Directive (77/388/EEC) on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_decision_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-07", "subjects": "Netherlands,VAT,basis of tax assessment,clothing industry,subcontracting", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0184,comnat:COM_1992_0184_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Netherlands", "VAT", "basis of tax assessment", "clothing industry", "subcontracting"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/907c477f-9b5e-44c0-a268-882dbbb2dadc", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OP THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\n1 \n\n1 \nI \n\nC0M(92) 184 final \n\nBrussels, 7 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nauthorizing the Netherlands to apply a measure derogating from \n\nArticle 2 K D ( a) of the Sixth Directive (77/388/EEC) on the \n\nharmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to \n\nturnover taxes \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. By letter officially received on 11 February 1992 the \n\nNetherlands Government submitted to the Commission a request for a \nderogation pursuant to Article 27 of the sixth VAT Directive,1 to \n\nenable it to$ntroduce a scheme to combat evasion of VAT In the ready-\n\nto-wear clothing Industry. The scheme would be part of a package of \n\nmeasures concerning taxes and social security contributions, designed \n\nto combat VAT fraud in that Industry. The intention Is to extend to \n\nthe ready-to-wear clothing industry the tax-shiftIng scheme whereby \n\nliability for the payment of VAT is shifted from subcontractors to \n\ncontractors; the Council approved the Introduction of such a scheme In \n\nthe building, structural steelwork and shipbuilding industries by \ndecision of 20 June 1982. 2 \n\n2. In support of its request, the Netherlands Government points out that \n\nlarge stores often purchase clothes from ready-to-wear clothing firms, \n\nwhich themselves manufacture the clothes. However, these firms \n\nfrequently put the work out, as contractors, to small ready-to-wear \n\nworkshops (the subcontractors). The fraud takes place in the relationship between the workshop and the \n\nfirm. The former charges the latter VAT, but does not pay it over to \n\nthe tax authorities, while the latter deducts it. 1 \n2 \n\n0J No L 145, 13. 6. 1977. OJ No C 197, 31. 7. 1982. The Netherlands Government argues that this type of evasion, which Is \n\nnow very frequent In the ready-to-wear clothing industry, is difficult \n\nto combat under the current system of collecting VAT. Ready-to-wear \n\nworkshops are generally small firms which Just own their machinery and \n\nare established in rented business premises or In residential \n\nproperty. The statutory provisions concerning social security \n\ncontributions, taxation and working conditions are often disregarded. Many of these workshops change hands frequently. Under the \n\ncircumstances, if fraud Is discovered, the tax authorities have little \n\nchance of recovering the tax. The Netherlands Government takes the \n\nview that this fraud can be conclusively defeated only by applying the \n\ntax-shifting scheme to this Industry as well. 3. Under the tax-shifting scheme, the VAT normally payable by the \n\nsubcontractor by virtue of Article 21(1)(a) of the Sixth VAT Directive \n\nIs collected from the contractor. In the building, structural steelwork and shipbuilding industries, the \n\nauthorized tax-shifting scheme Is applied only when the subcontracted \n\nwork is carried out away from the subcontractor's place of business. However, when operating the scheme in the ready-to-wear clothing \n\nindustry, the Netherlands Government wishes to Include contract work \n\ncarried out on the subcontractor's business premises. The \n\nJustification given Is that In the ready-to-wear clothing Industry the \n\ntax authorities have less chance of recovering VAT than in the other \n\nsectors, for the reasons given In point 2 above. - 3 -\n\nThe Netherlands authorities consider that the scheme does not result \n\nIn a reduction in the amount of VAT payable at the final consumption \n\nstage or In the basis of assessment for VAT own resources. The authorization will remain In force until 31 December 1996; before \n\nthat date, the Commission Is to report to the CounciI on the \n\napplication of the authorization. In accordance with Article 27(3) of the Sixth VAT Directive, the other \n\nMember States were Informed by letter dated 10 March 1992 of the \n\nNetherlands' request. _ 4 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nauthorizing the Netherlands to apply a measure derogating from \n\nArticle 21(1)(a) of the Sixth Directive (77/388/EEC) on the \n\nharmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to \n\nturnover taxes \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) on the \n\nharmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes -\n\nCommon system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment,1 and in \n\nparticular Article 27 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas, under Article 27(1) of the Sixth Directive, the Council, acting \n\nunanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorize any \n\nMember State to introduce special measures for derogation from that \n\nDirective in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to \n\nprevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance; \n\nWhereas the Netherlands, by letter received by the Commission on \n\n11 February 1992, requested authorization to Introduce In the ready-to-wear \n\nclothJng industry a special measure for derogation from Article 2 K D ( a) of \n\nthe Sixth Directive; \n\nOJ No L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1. - 5 -\n\nWhereas the purpose of the measure Is to combat fraud occurring in the \n\nrelationship between ready-to-wear clothing firms worklr. y for large stores \n\non the one hand, and small workshops (subcontractors) to which those firms \n\nhave put the work out on the other; whereas this type of fraud, which \n\nconsists In the subcontractor Invoicing VAT to the contractor but not \n\npaying it over to the tax authorities, while the contractor deducts the \n\ntax, is difficult to combat under the present system of collecting VAT; \n\nWhereas the scheme planned by the Netherlands Involves, In the \n\nready-to-wear clothing industry, collecting from the contractor the VAT \n\nnormally due from the subcontractor under Article 21 of the Sixth VAT \n\nDirect ive; \n\nWhereas the derogation will not have a negative effect on the \n\nEuropean Community's own resources accruing from value added tax; \n\nWhereas the scheme will be temporary, which will permit an assessment of \n\nthe effects of the derogation after a period of application; \n\nWhereas the Commission will present a report to the Council before \n\n31 December 1996 on the application of this authorization, accompanied, \n\nwhere appropriate, by a proposal for a Decision to extend the said \n\nauthor izat ion; \n\nWhereas the other Member States were informed of the Netherlands' request \n\non 10 March 1992; \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: \n\n\f- 6 -\n\nArticle 1 \n\nBy way of derogation from Article 21(1)(a) of the Sixth Directive, \n\nthe Netherlands is hereby authorized to apply until 31 December 1996 in the \n\nready-to-wear clothing industry a scheme for shifting the obligation to pay \n\nover VAT to the tax authorities from the subcontractor to the clothing firm \n\n(the contractor). Article 2 \n\nIn the light of a report from the Commission on the application of the \n\nauthorization referred to In Article 1, accompanied, where appropriate, by \n\na proposal for a Decision extending the said authorization, the Council, \n\nacting on the basis of that proposal, shall decide, before \n\n31 December 1996, whether the said authorization is to be extended. Article 3 \n\nThis decision is addressed to the Netherlands. ~ \n\n-r \u2022 \u2014 \n\nTSSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92)184fine: \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n09 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-201-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43898-3 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\n1^2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a9b3975-22ca-4d07-8cce-5e55fcf90fc5", "title": "Protection of the environment.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Investment Bank", "date": "1992-05-07", "subjects": "development bank,environmental policy,environmental protection", "workIds": "PUB_IX5990217", "eurovoc_concepts": ["development bank", "environmental policy", "environmental protection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a9b3975-22ca-4d07-8cce-5e55fcf90fc5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a47c3ad2-cf34-475b-b5d1-741e91bb9f6a", "title": "Communications.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Investment Bank", "date": "1992-05-07", "subjects": "communications systems,telecommunications,transport infrastructure,transport policy", "workIds": "PUB_IX7091033", "eurovoc_concepts": ["communications systems", "telecommunications", "transport infrastructure", "transport policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a47c3ad2-cf34-475b-b5d1-741e91bb9f6a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/94a20fe6-765d-4e3d-b266-ac1f9c4a0f9c", "title": "Occupations in building rehabilitation and restoration in Belgium.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Cedefop", "date": "1992-05-06", "subjects": "Brussels region,Flanders (Belgium),Walloon region (Belgium),building,vocational training", "workIds": "PUB_HX7392845", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Brussels region", "Flanders (Belgium)", "Walloon region (Belgium)", "building", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/94a20fe6-765d-4e3d-b266-ac1f9c4a0f9c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7964aa28-4037-42cc-9389-ff66f4f8ada4", "title": "Occupational and qualification structures in the field of environmental protection in the public sector with reference to air pollution control : United Kingdom.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Cedefop", "date": "1992-05-06", "subjects": "air quality,environmental protection,public service,public service employee,vocational training", "workIds": "PUB_HX7492427", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air quality", "environmental protection", "public service", "public service employee", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7964aa28-4037-42cc-9389-ff66f4f8ada4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/28f0c9e2-f70e-4e61-8724-b38caa2c839d", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1170/92 of 6 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2630/81 on special detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences in the sugar sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-06", "subjects": "award of contract,export levy,import levy,white sugar", "workIds": "celex:31992R1170,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0027_044", "eurovoc_concepts": ["award of contract", "export levy", "import levy", "white sugar"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/28f0c9e2-f70e-4e61-8724-b38caa2c839d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24d7c9d3-2f94-4276-aa77-c245d7c0b1ca", "title": "Occupational profiles of vocational counsellors in the United Kingdom.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Cedefop", "date": "1992-05-06", "subjects": "United Kingdom,educational guidance,vocational guidance,vocational training", "workIds": "PUB_HX7492386", "eurovoc_concepts": ["United Kingdom", "educational guidance", "vocational guidance", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/24d7c9d3-2f94-4276-aa77-c245d7c0b1ca", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/996b1271-5148-443b-9881-e9de1b33ad8d", "title": "A business guide to the single financial market.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_stpl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-06", "subjects": "banking,documentary tool,monetary union,money market", "workIds": "PUB_CT7391861", "eurovoc_concepts": ["banking", "documentary tool", "monetary union", "money market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/996b1271-5148-443b-9881-e9de1b33ad8d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_stpl"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f49ceb8a-dd70-43dd-858b-5b7e2bacec62", "title": "Nature conservation in Austria, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament", "date": "1992-05-06", "subjects": "Austria,Bulgaria,Czechoslovakia,Finland,Sweden,Switzerland,USSR,environmental law,environmental monitoring,environmental protection", "workIds": "PUB_AX7191316", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Austria", "Bulgaria", "Czechoslovakia", "Finland", "Sweden", "Switzerland", "USSR", "environmental law", "environmental monitoring", "environmental protection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f49ceb8a-dd70-43dd-858b-5b7e2bacec62", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/346b514b-0b01-423b-a9c3-bebceafc9619", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1144/92 of 5 May 1992 repealing Regulation (EEC) No 3522/91 opening a standing invitation to tender for the export of 150 000 tonnes of common wheat held at Ghent by the French intervention agency", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "France,Province of East Flanders,common wheat,export,intervention stock", "workIds": "celex:31992R1144,oj:JOL_1992_121_R_0006_023", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "Province of East Flanders", "common wheat", "export", "intervention stock"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/346b514b-0b01-423b-a9c3-bebceafc9619", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d14a0e07-ca47-421f-bfa9-30ae0131da19", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1165/92 of 5 May 1992 re- establishing the levying of customs duties on products categories 1, 9 and 32 (order No 40.0010, 40.0090 and 40.0320), originating in Indonesia, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "restoration of customs duties,tariff preference,textile product", "workIds": "celex:31992R1165,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0019_039", "eurovoc_concepts": ["restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference", "textile product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d14a0e07-ca47-421f-bfa9-30ae0131da19", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/69f16801-a475-4434-a651-c30ee6c5a464", "title": "92/279/EEC: Commission Decision of 5 May 1992 approving the plan concerning infectious haemopoietic necrosis and viral haemorrhagic septicaemia presented by Germany (Only the German text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "EU financing,Germany,animal disease,epidemiology,fish farming", "workIds": "celex:31992D0279,oj:JOL_1992_144_R_0020_020", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "Germany", "animal disease", "epidemiology", "fish farming"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/69f16801-a475-4434-a651-c30ee6c5a464", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63a8a1f6-813c-4cae-a750-58603bc4a3ae", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION ON AN ACTION PLAN FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF ADVANCED TELEVISION SERVICES IN EUROPE", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "European standard,action programme,electronics industry,financing plan,high-definition television", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0154,comnat:COM_1992_0154_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_139_R_0004_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "action programme", "electronics industry", "financing plan", "high-definition television"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63a8a1f6-813c-4cae-a750-58603bc4a3ae", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 154 final \n\nBrussels, 5 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nON AN ACTION PLAN FOR THE INTRODUCTION \nOF ADVANCED TELEVISION SERVICES \nIN EUROPE \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fCONTENTS \n\nA. Explanatory Memorandum \n\n1) \n\n2) \n\n3) \n\nBackground and Strategic Context. The aim of the Proposal for a Decision and the Approach taken. Conclusion. B. Draft Proposal for a Council Decision on an Action Plan for the Introduction of \n\nAdvanced Television Services in Europe \n\nC. Annex - Action Plan Objective and Summary \n\n1) \n\nObjective \n\n2) \n\n3) \n\n4) \n\n5) \n\n6) \n\n7) \n\nApproach adopted \n\nOutline Description of the Service Chain and Preliminary Identification of \nPotential Sources of Costs \n\nTargets to be Achieved \n\nThe Funding Approach to be Adopted \n\nIndicative Internal Allocation of Funds \n\nPrinciples and Criteria for Implementation \n\n\f\fA. EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n- 2-\n\n1. BACKGROUND AND STRATEGIC CONTEXT \n\nOn the lOth February 1991, the Council unanimously adopted a Common Position on \na Council Directive on Standards for Satellite Broadcasting of Television Signals <*> \nfollowing a proposal from the Commission. The main points of the Directive may be summarized as follows: \n\ni) \n\nii) \n\niii) \n\niv) \n\nonly HD-MAC may be used for HDTV transmissions which are not fully digital; \n\nonly D2-MAC may be used for non-fully digital 625 line television transmissions \nby satellite in the 16:9 format; \n\nall 16:9 television receivers must incorporate a D2-MAC decoder and all other \ntelevision receiving equipment must incorporate at least a standardized socket; \n\nprovision is also made for the obligatory use of D2-MAC by 4:3 services starting \nafter 1 January 1995, subject to the adoption by Council of a Commission \nproposal on financial support for such services. This Directive, which sets the regulatory environment of standards for satellite \ntelevision broadcasting in Europe is one part of a two pronged approach by the \nCommunity to encourage the orderly transition in Europe to advanced television \nservices including HDTV. The other element is an agreement, enshrined in a Memorandum of Understanding \n(MOU) between the involved economic actors in this field - broadcasters, equipment \nmakers and cable and satellite operators - with a view to the provision in Europe of a \nwide range of advanced television services in the D2-MAC standard, particularly in its \n16:9 format, in the period to 1996. The strategic context is set by the recognition by the Community that it is in the best \ninterests of the European consumers to follow a path toward HDTV based on the \ncriteria of compatibility and evolution, together with the recognition that HD-MAC is \nthe appropriate HDTV transmission standard in this regard and that D2-MAC offers \nthe best available path towards the development of HDTV, with wide screen 16:9 D2-\nMAC as the main step in this direction. During its meeting of 18 and 19 December 1991, the Council of Telecommunications \nMinisters, in giving its assent to the common position on the Directive, expressed its \nconviction that only a global strategy including accompanying measures together with \nappropriate financial means, will assure the success of European advanced television. In this connection the Council took note of the intention of the Commission to submit \nto it and to the European Parliament, at the latest by 30th of April 1992, a set of \nmeasures, financial and otherwise, on the basis of an appropriate article of the Treaty \nin order to attain the objectives announced in articles 2 and 8 of the Directive. <\u00bb OJ. - 3-\n\nAt the same meeting the Council invited the Commission to intensify its negotiations \nin relation to the MOU with a view to having its signature simultaneously with the \nfinal adoption of the Directive. Also, at the above meeting the Council invited the Commission to take, without delay, \nthe necessary measures to facilitate the immediate implementation of the numerous \ninitiatives which had already been announced for the satellite broadcasting of \ntelevision programmes using D2-MAC 16:9. The European Parliament, in its deliberations on the proposal of the Commission for \nthe Directive also expressed its clear conviction that accompanying financial measures \nwould be required for the successful achievement of the objective. This present document incorporates a proposal for such a financial measure. 2. THE AIM OF THE PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION AND THE APPROACH \n\nTAKEN \n\nExhaustive consultations over an extended period of time with the concerned \neconomic actors: the broadcasters, the equipment makers, the operators of cable and \nsatellite infrastructure, and the programme makers, have identified a clear interest by \nmany parties to move at the earliest time to the provision of advanced television \nservices by satellite and cable in Europe using the D2-MAC standard, particularly in \nits 16:9 format, and the HD-MAC standard. The television service chain begins with origination and ends with reception by \nconsumers on their receivers. It is a complicated chain involving many creative and \ntechnical operations and several different industries. The approach must treat the \nwhole chain of operations, not individual functions out of context, because the \nconsumer commits to the outcome of the whole process, rather than any individual \naspect. This has led to the adoption of a service perspective, since services embody the \nsum of operations. A television service consists of a schedule of individual \nprogrammes under the editorial control of a broadcaster. 2. 1 Additional Costs \n\nThe above mentioned consultations have identified the additional costs to the parties \nwhich would be involved in the provision of these advanced services particularly in the \nstart-up phase. These costs include: \n\ni) \n\nCosts of Broadcaster's Operations including Studio Upgrading and Satellite \nTransmission. Broadcasters, who have not already done so, may need to upgrade their studio \nequipment to the requirements of the new service. Many operators, for commercial reasons, and in order to continue to serve their \nexisting customers who have equipment working on another standard, will wish, \nat least for an initial period, to simulcast the advanced service in parallel with \nthe conventional service. This will involve additional costs associated with \nsatellite transmission. Other sources of additional costs include D2-MAC \nencoding and encryption, conditional access and subscriber management for \nsubscription services. ii) \n\nCosts for Cable Redistribution. Operators of cable TV networks may wish to have the capability to offer \nadvanced television services to their customers. In order for cable systems to \nuse satellite received signals in this connection, the cable head-end must have \nadditional equipment (per channel) which is capable of receiving the MAC \nsatellite signal and transforming \nit in such a way as to be suitable for \nthe cable network. Special facilities for decrypting, \nthrough \ntransmission \nencrypting conditional access and subscriber management may also be required \nat the head-end. In addition certain upgrading of the cable network itself may \nbe necessary in order to allow the 16:9 D2-MAC signals to be distributed to \nviewers. There may therefore be additional capital costs for cable operators wishing to \noffer the advanced television services to their subscribers. iii) Cost of Programme Production and Conversion. The advanced services are capable of offering enhanced picture and sound \nquality compared with conventional services as well as the new wide-screen 16:9 \nformat. In order to ensure that the full potential of the new system is realized \ntherefore the advanced services will require to be fed with programme material \nof a higher quality in both picture and sound and in the new wide screen formal. In order to achieve this higher quality both for D2-MAC but more particularly \nfor HD-MAC transmissions, both in-house and independent production will \nhave to progressively upgrade, technically, over the coming decade, and \nprogramme production techniques will have to develop to take full advantage of \nthe potential of the new technical possibilities. Programme makers and as a consequence broadcasters will therefore face \nincreased costs, at least in the early stages, for original programme production \nor the conversion of existing material from another format. 2. 2 Proposed Approach \n\nThe conclusion reached, following the above mentioned consultations, is that (Aim to \nthe fact that the European television service provision industry is suffering significant \nfinancial pressures at the present time, the transition from conventional to advanced \nservices is likely to happen only slowly in the absence of a measure of financial \nincentive to cushion the start-up costs. The proposal now made therefore in to adopt an Action Plan covering the period up \nto the end of 1996 and having the objective of accelerating the development of the \nmarket for advanced television services by satellite and cable based on the D2-MAC \nstandard, particularly in its 16:9 format and the HD-MAC standard. Community \nfunds, in the amount of 850 million ECU, would be made available to provide \nincentives for the achievement of this objective. The funds would be directed towards covering part of the costs identified above, \nnamely: \n\ni) \n\ncosts relating to broadcasters's operations including studio upgrading and \nsatellite transmission \n\nii) \n\ncosts relating to cable redistribution \n\niii) \n\ncosts relating to programme production and conversion, and \n\n\f- 5-\n\nThe allocation of these funds will be governed by the principle of double degressivity in \nthe following sense: \n\na) \n\nb) \n\nIn order to encourage the early start-up of the targeted advanced services, those \nprojects starting earliest will receive the greatest levels of funding. In line with the policy that Community funding is to cushion the economic \nconsequences in the start-up phase, the funding allocated to projects will be \nprogressively reduced each year the incentive is in place. The Commission will be responsible for the execution of the Action Plan and for \nensuring that Community funds are correctly spent and are directed effectively and \nefficiently towards the stated objective. In this connection the Commission will establish close collaboration with the structure \nresulting from the signing by the market actors of the Memorandum of \nUnderstanding. A set of general principles and criteria which must govern the implementation of the \nAction Plan are included in the Annex to ensure that relevant Community policies are \nfollowed. It has also been considered appropriate to specify, in advance, indicative targets for \nthe impact of Community funds as a guide-line for the implementation. These targets \nwhich require the achievement by the end of 1996 of: \n\ni) \n\nii) \n\niii) \n\na critical mass of satellite television services, using the D2-MAC standard, \nparticularly in its 16:9 format, or the HD-MAC standard; \n\na significant and constantly increasing number of cable TV networks carrying \nhigh quality 16:9 D2-MAC services to their customers; \n\na significant and increasing volume of programming in the 16:9 format and with \nhigh technical quality both in picture and sound. Such programming to be \nbroadcast in the above mentioned services; \n\nare considered to be achievable following the detailed consultations already \nconducted. CONCLUSION \n\nThe attached Decision aims to prepare the way for the Europe-wide introduction of \nadvanced television services during the next five years. The proposals are based on \nextensive dialogue with all the relevant actors in this field. The Council is invited to \nadopt the attached Proposal for a Decision. 6-\n\nB. PROPOSAL FOR A COUNCIL DECISION \nON AN ACTION PLAN FOR THE INTRODUCTION \nOF ADVANCED TELEVISION SERVICES \nIN EUROPE \n\n\f\fPROPOSAL FOR A \nC O U N C IL D E C I S I ON \n\non an Action Plan for the Introduction \nof Advanced Television Services \nin Europe \n\nThe Council of the European Communities, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community and in \nparticular Article 235 thereof; \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission; \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (*>; \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee <2>; \n\nWhereas the Community, through Council Decision 89/337/EEC <3>, Council Decision \n89/630/EEC <4> and Council Directive <5> recognized the strategic importance of High \nDefinition Television (HDTV) for the European Consumer Electronics Industry and for \nthe European Television and film industries, and established the strategy framework for \nthe introduction of European HDTV; \n\nWhereas Council Directive P> set a regulatory framework of standards for satellite \ntelevision broadcasting including HDTV. Whereas it is in the best interest of European consumers to follow a path to HDTV, based \non the criteria of compatibility and evolution, in order to avoid discontinuities and \nduplication of investments; \n\nWhereas HD-MAC, which has been chosen as the European transmission standard for non \nfully digital HDTV, conforms to those criteria of compatibility and evolution and D2-MAC \noffers the best available path towards the development of HDTV, with wide screen 16:9 \nD2-MAC as the main step in that direction; \n\nWhereas article 8 of Council Directive <s> requires that that Directive be accompanied by \ncommercial measures based on the signing, by the parties concerned, of a Memorandum of \nUnderstanding (MOU) coordinating the actions of the various signatories and where \n\n<\u00bb O. J. <2> OJ. <3> O J. N\u00b0 L 142,25. 5. 89, p. 1 \n\n<4> O J. N\u00b0 L 363,13. 12. 89, p. 30 \n\n<5> OJ. - 8-\n\nappropriate by simultaneous measures designed to support the creation of a European \nmarket for the D2-MAC and HD-MAC standards; \n\nWhereas, following the widest possible consultation, a number of economic actors in the \ntelevision service provision market intend to sign a Memorandum of Understanding in \nwhich they make commitments to offer advanced television services throughout Europe \nusing D2-MAC in its 16:9 format; \n\nWhereas the objectives of the strategy for the introduction of HDTV in Europe are an \nintegral part of the Community audiovisual policy and whereas they must take into account \nother objectives of this policy within the perspective of the development of Europe's \naudiovisual capacity, which comprise structural objectives such as the development of the \nindependent production sector or the development of production in countries or regions \nwith more limited audiovisual capacity; \n\nWhereas in order to ensure the introduction of European advanced television articles 2 and \nrequire a global strategy including accompaning measures \n8 of Council Directive \ntogether with appropriate financial means and measures to encourage the production of \nprogrammes; \n\nWhereas financial incentives are initially required to ensure the accelerated development \nof the advanced television service market in conformity with the strategy indicated above, \nby contributing to the reduction of the additional start-up costs involved; \n\nWhereas it is appropriate to set targets for the impact of Community funding of the early \nmarket development of advanced television services; \n\nWhereas it is appropriate to specify certain basic principles which must underlie the \nimplementation of the Action Plan including criteria to be used in the selection of projects; \n\nWhereas the Treaty does not provide, for the action concerned, powers other than those of \nArticle 235; \n\n\fHAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: \n\n- 9-\n\nArticle 1 \n\nAn Action Plan to ensure the accelerated development of the market for advanced \ntelevision services by satellite and cable based on the D2-MAC standard, particularly in its \n16:9 format, and the HD-MAC standard, is adopted for a period commencing on the date \nof adoption of this decision and concluding on 31st December 1996. The targets set for the Action Plan are the achievement during the period mentioned above \nof: \n\ni) A critical mass of satellite television services, using the D2-MAC standard, \n\nparticularly in its 16:9 format, or the HD-MAC standard. ii) A significant and constantly increasing number of cable TV networks carrying high \n\nquality 16:9 D2-MAC services to their customers. iii) A significant and increasing volume of programming in the 16:9 format and with high \ntechnical quality both in picture and sound. Such programming to be broadcast in the \nabove mentioned services. Community funds will be directed towards the achievement of these targets by means of \nincentives covering parts of the additional costs incurred by broadcasters, programme \nmakers and cable TV network operators, in the provision of the above mentioned advanced \ntelevision services. A summary of the Action Plan and its implementation procedures is set out in the Annex \nwhich forms an integral part of this Decision. Article 2 \n\n1. The execution of the Action Plan will be undertaken by the Commission. In this \nconnection the Commission will establish close collaboration with the mechanisms \nresulting from the implementation of Article 8 of Council Directive <n. 2. Basic principles which must govern the implementation of the Action Plan including \ncriteria to be used in the selection of projects are given in the Annex which forms an \nintegral part of this Decision. 3. The Commission shall ensure, by means of appropriate control mechanisms, that the \nCommunity funds are properly allocated and are used to achieve Community \nobjectives as specified in this Action Plan. <\u00bb OJ. - 10-\n\nArticle 3 \n\nAn annual report will be submitted by the Commission to the European Parliament, to the \nCouncil and to the Economic and Social Committee, evaluating the implementation of the \nAction Plan and the allocation of Community funds. A final report, in the same terms, will be submitted to the above institutions at the \nconclusion of the Action Plan. Done in Brussels, (date) \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fC. ANNEX - SUMMARY OF THE ACTION PLAN AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION \n\n-11 -\n\nPROCEDURES \n\n1. OBJECTIVE \n\nThe objective of the Action Plan is to ensure the accelerated development of the \nmarket for advanced satellite and cable television services in Europe using the D2-\nMAC standard, particularly in its 16:9 format, and the HD-MAC standard. 2. APPROACH ADOPTED \n\ni) \n\nAccelerated development of the market for advanced satellite and cable \ntelevision services requires that all the elements necessary to bring those \nservices into consumers' or viewers' homes be in place. Television \nis a \ncomplicated medium, encompassing and merging many technical and creative \nfunctions, with both and cultural and commercial outcomes. Its functions are \ncontrolled by different sectors within the audiovisual, telecommunications or \nelectronics industries. Their endeavours form a service chain stretching from \norigination to the receiver in the home. Consumer commitment - whether of time or financial resources - is not to any \nof these individual functions or to the industries that support them, but to the \nend result, the services that are made possible by the chain of operations. These \nwill be of different types, in the case of a general interest service, or of similar \ntype if the service is a specialised, thematic one. They may be funded in \ndifferent ways: by licence fee, advertising or by subscription. The approach for accelerating the development of the market for advanced \nsatellite and cable television services must therefore have a service focus. It \nwould be misguided to adopt a piecemeal approach, addressing individual parts \nof the television service chain independently in ad hoc style. They must all be \naddressed within a service perspective; this will condition the approach adopted \nin the Action Plan. ii) \n\nProposals will be sought for offers to provide on the market television services \nin the D2-MAC standard, especially its 16:9 format, or the HD-MAC standard. To validate the service approach, proposals must include all the elements in the \nservice chain necessary to reach the consumer. They should embrace the \nfollowing: satellite distribution means; cable distribution means (if necessary); \naccess to suitable programme material and receiver availability in the target \nmarket. Proposals will therefore be integral service projects where all these \naspects have been taken into account. It is expected that each service proposal would be presented by a project \nconsortium and led by a broadcaster, since broadcasters have editorial control \nover services. Consortia would include some or all of the following actors: \nequipment \nsatellite \nmanufacturers. operators; \n\noperators; \n\ntelevision \n\nnetwork \n\ncable \n\nMembers of a consortium would be expected to have signed a project contract \nbetween themselves to provide the proposed service, subject to the availability \nof Community funds. The acquisition or commissioning of programmes from \n\n\f- 12-\n\nsources independent of the project broadcaster will be the object of separate \ncontracts between that broadcaster and the programme maker or rights holder. 3. OUTLINE DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICE CHAIN AND PRELIMINARY \n\nIDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL SOURCES OF COSTS \n\nThe introduction of advanced satellite and cable television services will impose \nadditional costs upon participants along the Service Chain. Many of these costs relate \nto transition. For instance, broadcasters may for commercial reasons need \nto \nsimulcast the advanced service in parallel with the conventional 4:3 PAL or SECAM \nservice in the early stages of market development. Programme production may \ninitially take longer or become more complicated, until staff adjust and improved \nequipment reaches the market. Despite their transitory nature, these costs are \nsignificant because they hold back market development. The costs have a collective \ndimension because of the complexity and interdependence implicit in the Service \nChain. The Service Chain and potential sources of additional costs are described under three \ngeneral headings: \n\n1. Broadcaster's operations including studio upgrading and satellite transmission \n\n2. Cable redistribution \n\n3. Programme production and conversion. 3. 1 Broadcaster's Operations including studio upgrading and satellite transmission \n\nIn order to provide a broadcast service, the broadcaster needs to put together a \nschedule of programmes. These programmes may be produced \nin-house or \ncommissioned or acquired externally (see section 3. 3 below). For in-house production, \nthe broadcaster may decide (if it has not already been done) to upgrade his studio to \nwork in components (either analogue or digital). Furthermore he may wish to upgrade \nhis equipment including cameras, recorders, telecines, etc. , to cope with 16:9 D2-MAC \nrequirements. He may in addition wish to upgrade, to a dual aspect ratio environment, his signal \nprocessing and post production equipment such as vision mixing, special effects, \nediting equipment, \"pan and scan\" facilities (to derive 4:3 from 16:9), standards \nconversion equipment, etc. Although there may well be \"learning\" costs due to the change of production practices \nin the transition from a 4:3 to a 16:9 environment, the broadcaster may find that once \nthe necessary capital investment has been made, his actual costs per programme for \nin-house production are no higher than for a PAL 4:3 service. This situation is \nhowever unlike to remain valid for HD-MAC services where the much higher picture \nquality levels will impose additional production costs. Assuming the existence of a programme, either live or recorded, this section describes \nthe additional processes the broadcaster and other relevant actor must employ in \ndelivering it to the viewer. i) \n\nii) \n\nThe signal must be encoded in D2-MAC using a dedicated encoder before \ntransmission. If necessary, for instance in the case of a subscription service, the signal is to be \nencrypted. This will occur at the encoder. - 13-\n\nThis encoder/encrypter may be located either adjacent to the broadcaster's \nstudios or at the satellite uplink station depending on practice. - 14-\n\niii) \n\niv) \n\nv) \n\nThe acquisition of an encoder/encrypter (per channel) is a necessary cost \nentailed in the broadcasting of D2-MAC services. For HD-MAC services HD-MAC encoders/encrypters will similarly be \nrequired. Regardless of where the encoder is located, in the case of distribution by \nsatellite, there will be costs incurred by the broadcaster in transporting the \nsignal from the studio to the satellite uplinking station and for uplinking it to \nthe satellite. Where the signal is to be distributed directly to the viewer by cable \nwithout the intermediate use of a satellite, these costs are for the transport \nbetween the studio and the cable head-end. In the case of satellite distribution the next step is the access to a satellite \ntransponder capable of delivering the uplinked signal either direct to the \nviewer's home for a DTH (direct to the home) service and/or to the cable head-\nends for cable redistribution to the viewer's home. The cost incurred is the \nrental of a satellite transponder. Assuming that he is not already equipped to receive satellite television, the \nviewer will have to acquire a suitable dish antenna to receive the 16:9 D2-MAC \nservices. He will also require either an add-on satellite tuner to convert the \nsignals into a form that his existing 4:3 TV set can display or a new 16:9 TV set \nthat is already suitable for DTH satellite reception. In both cases, decryption \nfacilities and possibly other new consumer equipment (e. g. a VCR) may also be \nneeded. 3. 2 Cable Re-distribution \n\nCable systems can receive D2-MAC signals at their head-ends either from satellites or \nin some cases directly from the broadcasters' studios. i) \n\nii) \n\niii) \n\nIn order for a cable system to distribute a signal broadcast by satellite to its \nsubscribers, the satellite signal will have to be received by a satellite dish at the \ncable head-end and normally demodulated from F. M. , which is the modulation \nsystem used in the satellite links, and subsequently remodulated to A. M. which \nis normally used on cable networks. In addition, depending on practice, it may \nbe necessary to decrypt and reencrypt a received encrypted signal prior to \nfor \ntransmission \nconditional access/subscriber management system at the cable head-end. The \nacquisition of the necessary head-end equipment required to perform the above \ntasks will be a cost to the cable operator. the cable. There may also be a requirement \n\nthrough \n\nEven when the television signals at the head-end (whether they come directly \nfrom the studio or via satellite), are prepared for distribution through the cable, \nthere may be a requirement for reconfiguring the cable system itself in order to \ndistribute the signals. This requirement, if any, will vary from cable system to \ncable system depending on the practices in operation and the technology used \nin the system. The costs of such reconfiguration, necessarily incurred in order to \ndistribute the D2-MAC signal, will correspondingly vary. The subscribers to cable TV networks distributing D2-MAC 16:9 signals will \nhave to acquire either an add-on adapter to convert these signals into a form \nthat their existing 4:3 TV set can display or a new 16:9 TV set that already has \nan input suitable for these signals. In both cases, decryption facilities and \npossibly other new consumer equipment (e. g. a VCR) may also be needed. 3. 3 Programme Production and Conversion \n\n- 15-\n\nThe broadcaster assembles a schedule of programmes to provide a service. This will \nconsist of programmes produced in-house, using the broadcaster's own facilities and \nprogrammes sourced externally. Externally produced programmes may be simple \nacquisitions of finished programmes or new programmes commissioned by the \nbroadcaster. All broadcasters will draw on these programme sources, with wide variation in the \nbalance between internal and external sources. Completing a programme schedule \nsuitable for a 16:9 D2-MAC service will present different cost implications to the \nbroadcaster, depending on whether the programme is produced in-house or sourced \nexternally. 3. 3. 1 Existing Programmes \n\nBroadcasters will have access to certain existing programmes which are already in a \nform suitable for a high quality 16:9 D2-MAC (e. g. post-1952 feature films made after \neffective introduction of wide screen aspect ratios in the cinema). The additional costs relate to copying the production in the 16:9 format on to video \ntape using a telecine machine (this is known as the \"re-mastering\" process). 3. 3. 2 New Programmes from External Sources \n\nWhere a broadcaster commissions an external (independent) programme maker to \nproduce a programme, there will initially be some additional costs incurred by \nproducing that programme in 16:9 and to a higher technical quality specifications. These will be transitional and relate to production techniques and practices, currently \nadapted to 4:3 production and exploitation. 3. 3. 3 New Programmes Produced In-house \n\nA broadcaster wanting to produce programmes in-house may, depending on the \nsophistication of his studio equipment, incur additional costs as above, on a \nprogramme by programme basis. 3. 4 Framework Conditions \n\nIt should be emphasized at this point that nothing in the above description of the \nService Chain, including its production element, should be taken as implying a prior \npreference, in the context of the Action Plan, between options available to \nbroadcasters. Broadcasters must themselves, in preparing projects to be incorporated \ninto the Action Plan, take their own decisions on the matter in the light of their own \nperception of requirements. There will, of course, be requirements of the Action Plan \nitself, apart from the overriding objective of launching a significant number of new \nadvanced services. These include: a high and growing amount of 16:9 programmes per \nservice, and high technical quality of picture and sound. But how the broadcasters \nachieve this is left to them. TARGETS TO BE ACHIEVED \n\n- 16-\n\nIn the context of the objective stated in paragraph 1 above, it is appropriate to set \nindicative targets for the impact of the Community funding which will be used to \naccelerate the market development, as follows: \n\nthe achievement during the life of the Action Plan of: \n\ni) \n\nii) \n\nA critical mass of satellite television services, using the D2-MAC standard, \nparticularly in its 16:9 format, or the HD-MAC standard. A significant and constantly increasing number of cable TV networks carrying \nhigh quality 16:9 D2-MAC services to their customers. iii) A significant and increasing volume of programming in the 16:9 format and with \nhigh technical quality both in picture and sound. Such programming to be \nbroadcast in the above mentioned services. 5. T HE FUNDING APPROACH TO BE ADOPTED \n\ni) \n\nii) \n\niii) \n\niv) \n\nThe funding will go to projects which will provide a complete service as \ndescribed in section 2 above. In other words, it is not intended to fund, \nseparately, individual elements of the Service Chain in the case where such \nelements are not an integral part of the complete chain. No funding will be made available for consumer equipment, either for satellite \nor cable reception. This is a matter for the market and it will be in the interests \nof equipment makers themselves to price their offerings sufficiently attractively \nto stimulate consumer demand. In relation to cable TV networks, the most obviously fundable element is the \nnecessary head-end equipment as described in section 3. 2 above. Certain other \nelements of cost in the reconfiguring of networks may also be included in the \nscope of the Action Plan provided that such investments are : \n\na) cost effective \n\nb) specifically required for the targeted advanced service, and \n\nc) where the impact of such investments is judged to be of major importance to \nthe achievement of the Action Plan objective \n\nindicated \n\nBroadcaster's costs as \nincluding \nin \nencoding/encryption, signal transport and up-linking and satellite transponder \nrental, are, in principle, included in the scope of the Action Plan. The amounts \nincurred by broadcasters \npaid will be a portion of the costs, additionally \nproviding the advanced services. section 3. 1 above and \n\n\f- 17-\n\nv) \n\nIn the case of in-house programme production it should be emphasized that \nwhereas the complete re-equipping of television studios is not included in the \nobjectives of the Action Plan, nevertheless, certain studio investments could be \nwithin its scope provided that they are : \n\na) cost effective \n\nb) specifically required by the broadcaster providing the advanced services for \nthe purpose of such service provision. c) where the impact of such investment is judged to be of major importance to \nthe achievement of the Action Plan objectives. Broadcasters with plans for \nto seek \nCommunity funds for the upgrading of their studio facilities to 16:9 working \nmust recognize that this choice will limit their scope to be funded for making \nindividual programmes. in-house production who choose \n\nvi) Concerning independent producers, the aim is to ensure they can respond \nadequately to broadcasters' requirements for a wide range of attractive \nprogrammes in adequate volume, made to the appropriate technical quality. Independent producers will in many cases incur additional costs to meet the \nbroadcasters' requirements for quality and format. These additional costs are \nwithin the scope of the Action Plan and a portion of such costs may be \nreimbursed. Some existing television programmes and most feature films are exploitable in \n16:9 but are currently available only in 4:3 versions. These must be converted to \n16:9 if they are to be acquired for widescreen D2-MAC transmissions by \nbroadcasters. These additional costs are within the scope of the Action Plan and \na portion of such costs may be reimbursed either to the rights holder, if he \nundertakes the task, or to the broadcaster. vii) \n\nSummarizing the above, the broad areas at which Community funding will be \ntargeted are identified to be: \n\na) Broadcaster's operations \ntransmission \n\nb) Cable Redistribution \n\nincluding \n\nstudio upgrading and \n\nsatellite \n\nc) Programme Production and Conversion \n\nviii) The allocation of these funds will be governed by the principle of double \n\ndegressivity in the following sense: \n\na) In order to encourage the early start-up of the targeted advanced services, \nthose projects starting earliest will receive the greatest levels of funding. b) In line with the policy that Community funding is to cushion the economic \nconsequences in the start-up phase, the funding allocated to projects will be \nprogressively reduced each year the incentive is in place. - 18-\n\n6. INDICATIVE INTERNAL ALLOCATION OF FUNDS \n\nThe indicative percentage breakdown of Community funding is as follows: \n\ni) \n\nBroadcaster's operations including \n\nstudio upgrading and satellite transmission \n\n60 - 70 % \n\nii) Cable Redistribution \n\n5 -15 % \n\niii) Programme Production and Conversion \nIt is intended to retain a certain level of flexibility to vary these percentages should the \nrequirements of the Action Plan, as it evolves, dictate it. 25 % \n\n7. PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA FOR IMPLEMENTATION \n\nProject proposals will be evaluated using procedures with an independent element \nwhich will take account, inter alia, of the following general and specific conditions. 7. 1. General Principles - Equitable Distribution \n\nThe set of successful projects must: \n\ni) \n\nii) \n\nshow a spread of projects between entities to avoid undue concentration or the \ncreation of monopolies or cartels; \n\nhave a wide geographic distribution in order to ensure the Community \ndimension; \n\niii) \n\ninvolve, to a reasonable degree, programme producers independent of the \nbroadcasters in the projects; \n\niv) \n\ncomply with Community competition rules. 7. 2. Specific Criteria for Selection \n\nOther things being equal, priority for Community funds should be given to \ncommercially viable projects which fulfil the following criteria: \n\ni) \n\nii) \n\na high percentage of 16:9 content; \n\na large audience; \n\niii) \n\nhigh technical quality levels; \n\niv) \n\nscope for transfrontier services; \n\nv) \n\nscope for the reasonable involvement of programme producers independent of \nthe broadcasters. 7. 3 Criteria for Programme Support \n\n- 19-\n\nBoth in-house production by broadcasters and external production are within the \nscope of the Action Plan. Community support for programme production and conversion will be closely linked \nto the new 16:9 services, but able to benefit the whole sector. To qualify for Community support on a programme by programme basis, producers of \nnew programmes, and rights holders of certain existing programmes exploitable in \n16:9 but requiring re-mastering, must have an order for the programme from at least \none of the broadcasters involved in implementing the Action Plan, who undertakes to \nbroadcast the programme in 16:9 D2-MAC or HD-MAC. The technical quality of \nthese programmes must be such as to allow their exploitation in 16:9 D2-MAC \nservices in the short term and also in HD-MAC services in the medium term. Flexible mechanisms will be set up to respond to the specific needs of different kinds \nof programmes, including additional production costs for \"stock\" programmes with an \nextended life (e. g. drama series; cultural events etc. ) and conversion or remastering of \nexisting programmes exploitable in 16:9. These will be open mechanisms which will operate on the general criteria set out \nabove together with specialised selection and funding criteria for each mechanism. The detail of these specialist criteria remains to be developed and will be published in \nthe Official Journal within three months of the adoption of the present decision. They \nwill function automatically and without any value judgements on the creative \napproach. Nothing in this Action Plan shall interfere with normal relationships \nprevailing between broadcasters and external rights holders on these matters. FINANCIAL STATEMENT \n\nFINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS \n\nHlk: \n\nHDTV - Action Plan for the introduction of \nadvanced television services in Europe. Budget article \n\nB6-8105 (part of) \nB6-8106 \nB3-3 \nPart A \n\n3. Legal basis: \n\nArticle 235 of EEC Treaty \n\n4. Description \n\n4. 1. Objectives \n\nThe objective of the Action Plan is to ensure the accelerated development of the market for advanced TV \nservices by satellite and cable based on the D2-MAC standard, particularly in its 16:9 format and the \nHD-MAC standard. Community funds will contribute within the period up to the end of 1996 to \nachieve the rapid transition from conventional services to a fully functioning market for advanced TV \nservices by covering parts of the additional costs incurred by broadcasters, programme makers and cable \nTV network operators in the provision of these advanced TV services. The general targets set for the Action Plan are the achievement during the above-mentioned period of: \n\ni) \n\nA critical mass of satellite television services, using the D2-MAC standard, particularly in its \n16:9 format, or the HD-MAC standard. ii) A significant and constantly increasing number of cable TV networks carrying high quality 16:9 \n\nD2-MAC services to their customers. iii) A significant and increasing volume of programming in the 16:9 format and with high technical \nquality both in picture and sound. Such programming to be broadcast in the above mentioned \nservices. The quantitative targets set per annum are \n\n1. Cumulative number of services \nby the end of each year \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n15 \n\n20 \n\n25 \n\n30 \n\n2. Cumulative hours of supported programming \n\nby the end of each year \n\n8,000 \n\n15,500 \n\n22,000 \n\n26,000 \n\nThe notion of a critical mass of services as mentioned above relates to the point in the market development \nfrom which one may expect rapid self sustaining growth. It is estimated that 15 services with wide audience \npotential could provide such a critical mass. 4. 2. Duration : From adoption of the present Decision to end of 1996. 4. 3. Economic operators (to whom the funds are directed) \n\nExhaustive consultations over an extended period of time with a number of economic actors in the \ntelevision service provision market - broadcasters, equipment and programme makers, cable and satellite \noperators - have identified additional costs to those parties which could be involved in the provision of \nthese advanced services based on D2-MAC, particularly in its 16:9 format and HD-MAC. 5. Classification of expenditure \n\n5. 1. Non compulsory expenditure (NCE) \n\n5. 2. Dissociated appropriations (DA) \n\n6. Nature of expenditure \n\n6. 1. Cofinancing \n\nCommunity financial incentives are intended to ensure the accelerated development of the advanced \ntelevision service market in conformity with the strategy set out in the Council Decision, by contributing \nIn other words, Community funding will \nto the reduction of the additional start-up costs involved. compensate a part of the additional costs incurred by the concerned economic actors to achieve this rapid \ntransition from conventional services to the advanced television services, using D2-MAC, particularly in \nits 16:9 format and HD-MAC. The economic operators launching new services will make large investments and will carry the entire \ncommercial risks associated. The philosophy governing Community financial involvement relates to \ncovering part of the additional costs incurred in connection with the new services, up to a ceiling per \narea of expenditure (see 7. 2 below). Ceilings are judged to be more appropriate than percentages due to \nthe wide variation of potential costs which in many cases could greatly exceed the Community resources \navailable. Furthermore, the principle of double degressivity (see 7. 1. below) will ensure that these \nceilings will progressively be reduced each year. It will be ensured that in each contract covering a project the amount of Community fundings will be \nclearly established together with the contribution of the project members in order to provide an adequate \nbasis for effective financial control. - 3-\n\n7. Estimate of financial implications and method of calculation \n\n7. 1. The Action Plan governing the allocation of Community funding is set for a period commencing on the \ndate of adoption of this Decision and concluding on 31st December 1996. Community funds during this \nperiod amount to 850 MECUS. Broad areas at which Community funding will be targeted are identified to be : \n\n(a) \n\nBroadcasters operations including studio upgrading and satellite transmission \n\n(b) Cable redistribution \n\n(c) \n\nProgramme production and conversion \n\nThe allocation of the funding will be governed by the principle of double degressivity in the following \nsense : \n\na) \n\nb) \n\nIn order to encourage the early start-up of the targeted advanced services, these projects starting \nearliest will receive the greatest level of funding. In line with the policy that Community funding is to cushion the economic consequences in the \nstart-up phase, the funding allocated to projects will be progressively reduced each year the \nincentive is in place. 7. 2. Indicative internal allocation of funds \n\na) Because of the expected great variation in requirements from project to project it is impossible to be \ndefinitive as to the necessary Community contribution required to meet the objective. The following \ntable provides an estimate of the ceilings for the Commission contribution to each element of cost \nidentified. AVERAGE UNIT COSTS FOR COMMUNITY \nFINANCE \n\n1992 \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\nStudio upgrading (MECU) \n\nTransponder cost/year (MECU) \n\nCable network upgrading (KECU) \n\n3 \n\n2,5 \n\n50/ \n500 \n\n3 \n\n6 \n\n3 \n\n5 \n\n50/ \n500 \n\n40/ \n400 \n\n2 \n\n5 \n\n40/ \n400 \n\n2 \n\n4 \n\n30/ \n300 \n\nThe wide range indicated with respect to cable is a reflection of the very large variation between different \ncable systems. For the programming element the following average lump sum support is relevant. -4 \n\nKEY FOR COMMUNITY FINANCE \n\n16:9 Production/hour (KECU) \n\nProgramme conversion/hour (KECU) \n\n1992 \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\n40 \n\n2. 2 \n\n35 \n\n1. 9 \n\n25 \n\n1. 5 \n\n22 \n\n1 \n\n18 \n\n1 \n\nb) \n\nTaking into account the quantitative targets set out in section 4. 1. above and the ceilings identified \nin 7. 2 a), together with the operation of the double degressivity principle the indicative \nbreakdown of the Community funding for the period of the Action Plan, in MECUS is : \n\n1992 : 33 (B6-8105 part of) presently in reserve BO-40 \n\n1993 : 145 (B6-8106) + 32. 5 (B3-3) \u00bb 177. 5 \n\n1994 : 175 (Bo-8106)^ + 70 (B3-3) = 245 \n\n1995 : 150 (Bo-SlOep + 59. 5 (B3-3) = 209. 5 \n\n1996 : 131 (B6-8106y) + 54 (B3-3) = 185 \n\nA detailed breakdown is given in Tables 1 and 2 below. c) \n\nIndicative percentage breakdown of Community funding between the areas : \n\ni) \n\nBroadcasters operations including studio upgrading \n\nand satellite transmission : 60 - 70 % \n\nCable redistribution : 5 - 15 % \n\nProgramme acquisition and production : 25 % \n\nii) \n\niii) \n\n<*> This activity must clearly be integrated into the Fourth Framework Programme in principle from 1994 as laid down in the \ncommunication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament : \"Research after Maastricht : an Assessment. A Strategy\" (DOC. SEC. (92)682 final, para 155). ACTION PLAN FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF ADVANCED TELEVISION SERVICES IN EUROPE \n\nDetailed quantitative targets and Community Support \n\nBroadcasting \n1. Transmission \n\nCumulative number of \n\nChannels \n\n2. Studio upgrades \n\nMECU \n\nStudios \n\nMECU \n\nProduction (Hours supported) \n3. Production of programmes \n4. Conversion of programmes \n\nRetransmission \n5. Cable networks \n\nTOTAL \n\nMECU \n\nMECU \n\n1992 \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\nSubtotal \n\nTotal \n\n10 \n\n25 \n\n1820 \n\n1820 \n4 \n\n4 \n\n33 \n\n15 \n\n90 \n\n8 \n\n24 \n\n6150 \n630 \n5520 \n\n32. 5 \n\n20 \n\n25 \n\n30 \n\n100 \n\n125 \n\n120 \n\n460 \n\n10 \n\n30 \n\n7580 \n2580 \n5000 \n70 \n\n2 \n\n6 \n\n6520 \n2520 \n4000 \n\n59. 5 \n\n~ \n\n3950 \n2950 \n1000 \n54 \n\n60 \n\n193 \n27 \n\n30 \n\n45 \n\n19 \n\n12 \n\n176. 5 \n\n245 \n\n209. 5 \n\n186 \n\nTable 1 \n\n520 \n\n220 \n\n110 \n\n850 \n\nThis table shows the result of a scenario developed in order to evaluate the financial needs for the Action Plan. Most of the figures represent average \nestimations and forecasts that may vary widely depending on the type of project and the evolution of the market. For this reason these figures are to be seen \nas purely indicative and should not be interpreted as constituting a commitment of the Commission. - 6-\n\nDETAILED BREAKDOWN OF PROGRAMME ELEMENT \n\n1st year \n\n2nd year \n\n3rd year \n\n4th year \n\n5th year \n\nTotal \n\n2200 \n\n1820 \n\n4250 \n\n43 \n\n4 \n\n700 \n\n0 \n\n0 \n\n1820 \n\n4950 \n\n37 \n\n4 \n\n1500 \n\n5000 \n\n7000 \n\n71 \n\n7,5 \n\n25 \n\n2580 \n\n7770 \n\n33 \n\n62,5 \n\n7580 \n\n14770 \n\n51 \n\n70 \n\n1900 \n\n5520 \n\n8000 \n\n70 \n\n10,5 \n\n35 \n\n630 \n\n3400 \n\n19 \n\n22 \n\n6150 \n\n11400 \n\n54 \n\n32,5 \n\nTable 2 \n\n1000 \n\n4000 \n\n4900 \n\n82 \n\n4 \n\n22 \n\n2520 \n\n11600 \n\n22 \n\n55,5 \n\n6520 \n\n16500 \n\n40 \n\n59,5 \n\n1000 \n\n1000 \n\n1600 \n\n62 \n\n1 \n\n18 \n\n2950 \n\n13800 \n\n21 \n\n53 \n\n3950 \n\n15400 \n\n26 \n\n54 \n\n17390 \n\n25750 \n\n67 \n\n27 \n\n8680 \n\n37270 \n\n> \n23 \n\n193 \n\n26070 \n\n63020 \n\n41 \n\n220 \n\nREFORMATTING : \n\nStandard amount (ECU/hr) \n\nHours supported \n\nHours required (15 services) \n\nPercentage requirements covered \n\nBudget expenditure (MECU) \n\nNEW PRODUCTS: \n\nStandard amount (KECU/hr) \n\nHours supported \n\nHours required (15 services) \n\nPercentage requirements covered \n\nBudget expenditure (MECU) \n\nTOTALS : \n\nHours supported \n\nHours required (15 services) \n\nPercentage requirements covered \n\nBudget expenditure \n\n\f- 7-\n\n7. 3. Commitments of the Economic Operators (as entered into in the Memorandum of Understanding) \n\ni) \n\nCommitments of Broadcasters \n\nTo launch on the market one or more television services using the D2-MAC standard, \nparticularly in its 16:9 format, or the HD-MAC standard, \nin conformity with \nCommunity policy. Ensure that where software is available in 16:9 (tape or film), broadcasts of this software \nshall, to the greatest extent practicable, be in 16:9 D2-MAC format. Ensure full exploitation in 16:9 D2-MAC of suitable existing programme material. Produce programmes or have programmes produced suitable for 16:9 D2-MAC \nbroadcasts. ii) \n\nCommitments of Industrial Manufacturing Companies \n\nEnsure the availability in the market of 16:9 D2-MAC receivers at such times and in \nsufficient quantities in order to meet the requirements of the new services. Ensure continued compatibility with existing transmission standards of the 16:9 D2-\nMAC receivers distributed. Ensure improved availability of programme production equipment suitable for 16:9 D2-\nMAC format. iii) Commitments of Satellite Operators \n\nMake available, on an equitable basis, transponder capacity according to the needs of the \nBroadcasters for their 16:9 D2-MAC services. iv) Commitments of Cable Network Operators \n\nRetransmit to subscribers 16:9 D2-MAC originated programmes in the 16:9 D2-MAC format. 8. Type of Control \n\nThe Commission will be responsible for the execution of the Action Plan. It will be assisted in this regard on \nthe technical aspects by the experts group mentioned in part 3 section 3. 2 ii). The administrative aspects will \nbe controlled by the administration departments of DG XIII and DG X. ISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 154 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n15 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-210-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-44006-6 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/04386238-140e-4519-b8fb-91eb549714ee", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1145/92 of 5 May 1992 on the supply of refined rapeseed oil to the people of Moscow and St Petersburg as urgent aid pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 330/92", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "USSR,award of contract,emergency aid,vegetable oil", "workIds": "celex:31992R1145,oj:JOL_1992_121_R_0007_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "award of contract", "emergency aid", "vegetable oil"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/04386238-140e-4519-b8fb-91eb549714ee", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e70b3705-c846-44c9-96c1-28359139f06c", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1167/92 of 5 May 1992 re- establishing the levying of customs duties on products of category 39 (order No 40.0390), originating in Pakistan, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "Pakistan,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference,textile product", "workIds": "celex:31992R1167,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0022_041", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Pakistan", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference", "textile product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e70b3705-c846-44c9-96c1-28359139f06c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d852565b-7dfd-445c-96ad-254c0e45b00b", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) concerning the identification and registration of animals", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "directory,exchange of information,extra-EU trade,intra-EU trade,live animal,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0148,comnat:COM_1992_0148_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_137_R_0007_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["directory", "exchange of information", "extra-EU trade", "intra-EU trade", "live animal", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d852565b-7dfd-445c-96ad-254c0e45b00b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMVttJNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 148 final \n\nBrussels, 5 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nconcerning the identification and \n\nregistration of animals \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nThe Council has adopted Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 19901, \n\nconcerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-\n\nCommunity trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the \n\ncompletion of the internal market. Article 3, paragraph (1)(c) of the Directive states that animals for \n\nintra-Community trade must be identified in accordance with the \n\nrequirements of Community rules and be registered in such a way that \n\nthe original or transit holding, centre or organization can be traced \n\nand, that before 1 January 1993, these identification and registration \n\nsystems shall be extended to the movements of animals within the \n\nterritory of each Member State; \n\nThe management of Community aid schemes, in particular concerning stock \n\nfarming of cattle, make it indispensable to be able to rely on \n\nidentification and registration rules applicable throughout the \n\nCommunity and satisfying the same minimum conditions. These \n\nrequirements will be of major importance in the near future, taking \n\ninto consideration the reform of the CAP as well as the foreseeable \n\neffect of the situation after 1992. From a pragmatic viewpoint the \n\nneeds to identify and to trace back animals for veterinary as well as \n\nmarket purposes must, in this respect, be combined. The proposed Regulation provides for minimum requirements, which means \n\nthat the Member States may extend the rules. The proposed measures aim to permit movements of animals to be traced \n\nrapidly and accurately. For this reason, animals must be identified by a mark and accompanied \n\nby a document throughout any movement. 1 OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29. -. 3 -\n\nFor the purpose of this Regulation an animal is identified as any \n\nbovine, ovine, caprine or porcine animal and any farmed deer kept on a \n\nho Id i ng. The mark shall bear an alphanumeric code which identifies the holding. For bovine animals the alpha numeric code shall in addition identify \n\neach individuai animal. The competent Authority may permit derogations from the requirements \n\nfor marks and documents in the case of animals moving directly from a \n\nfarm to a slaughterhouse, but these animals must in any case be \n\nidentified so that their farm of origin can be traced. The requirements for the mark and the document are laid down in an \n\nAnnex. In order to ensure an effective system of control, the owners or \n\nkeepers of holdings must maintain up-to-date records of the animals on \n\ntheir holdings and persons involved in the commerce of animals must \n\nkeep records of their dealings. The competent Authority will have \n\naccess to these records on request. Provision is made for a rapid and effective exchange of information \n\nbetween Member States. - 4 -\n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nconcerning the identification and \n\nregistration of animals \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \n\nCommunity, and in particular Article 43 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee, \n\nWhereas Article 3(1)(c) of Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 \n\nconcerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-\n\nCommunity trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the \n\ncompletion of the internal market1, as last amended by Directive \n\n91/496/EEC2, states that animals for intra-Community trade must be \n\nidentified in accordance with the requirements of Community rules and \n\nbe registered in such a way that the original or transit holding, \n\ncentre or organization can be traced, and that before 1 January 1993 \n\nthese identification and registration systems are to be extended to the \n\nmovements of animals within the territory of each Member State; \n\n1 0J No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29. 2 0J No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56. 5 -\n\nWhereas Article 14 of Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 \n\nlaying down the principles governing the organization of veterinary \n\nchecks on animals entering the Community from third countries and \n\namending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC states that \n\nfor animals entering \n\nthe Community \n\nfrom \n\nthird \n\ncountries \n\nthe \n\nidentification and registration provided for in Article 3(1)(c) of \n\nDirective 90/425/EEC must, except in the case of animals for slaughter \n\nand registered equidae, be carried out at the place of destination of \n\nthe animals; \n\nWhereas the management of certain Community aid schemes in the field of \n\nagriculture requires the individual identification of certain types of \n\nlivestock; whereas the identification and registration system must, \n\ntherefore, be suitable for the application and control of such \n\nmeasures; \n\nWhereas it is necessary to ensure the rapid and efficient exchange of \n\ninformation between Member States for the correct application of this \n\nRegulation; whereas Community provisions have been established by \n\nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 1468/81 of 19 May 1981 on mutual assistance \n\nbetween the administrative authorities of the Member States and \n\ncooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct \napplication of the law on customs or agricultural matters3, as amended \nby Regulation (EEC) No 945/874 and by Council Directive 89/608/EEC on \n\nmutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member \n\nStates and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure \n\nthe correct application of legislation on veterinary and zootechnical \n\nmatters^; \n\nWhereas owners or keepers of holdings must maintain up-to-date records \n\nof the animals on their holdings; whereas persons involved in the \n\ncommerce of animals must keep records of their dealings; whereas the \n\ncompetent authority must have access to these records on request; \n\n3 \n4 \n5 \n\nOJ NO L 144, 2. 6. 1981. p. 1. OJ No L 90, 2. 4. 1987, p. 3. OJ No L 351, 2. 12. 1989, p. 34. - 6 \n\nWhereas in order to permit movements of animals to be traced rapidly \n\nand accurately, animals must be identified by a mark and accompanied by \n\na document throughout any movement; whereas the form and content of the \n\nmark and, where another Community document is not required, the \n\ndocument, must be laid down on a Community basis; \n\nWhereas provision should be made for waiving the requirements for marks \n\nand documents in the case of animals moving directly from a farm to a \n\nslaughterhouse; whereas, however, these animals must in any case be \n\nidentified so that their farm of origin can be traced; \n\nWhereas in the case of animals in which the mark has been lost or \n\nbecome illegible, a new mark must be applied under the supervision of \n\nthe competent authority; \n\nWhereas this Regulation must not affect specific requirements contained \n\nin Commission Decision 89/153/EEC of 13 February 1989 concerning the \n\ncorrelation of samples taken for residue examination with animals and \n\ntheir farms of origin6, or any relevant applicatory rules established \n\nin accordance with Directive 91/496/EEC; \n\nWhereas provision must be made for a management committee procedure for \n\nthe adoption of any necessary implementing rules and for supplementing \n\nor amending the annexes, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nOJ No L 59, 2. 3. 1989, p. 33. - 7 -\n\nArt icle 1 \n\nThis Regulation sets out minimum requirements for the identification \n\nand registration of animals. It shall apply without prejudice to Decision 89/153/EEC and to \n\nimplementing rules laid down in accordance with Directive 91/496/EEC. Article 2 \n\nFor the purpose of this Regulation the following definitions shall \n\napply: \n\n(a) ho Id i no: any premises in which animals are kept or handled; \n\n(b) farm: an agricultural establishment other than the premises of a \n\ndealer or a market, in which the animals referred to in point (c) \n\nare regularly kept; \n\n(c) animal: any bovine, ovine, caprine, or porcine animal and any \n\nfarmed deer kept on a holding; \n\n(d) owner or keeper: any person or persons, either natural or legal, \n\nhaving ownership of the animals, or charged with keeping the said \n\nanimals, whether or not for financial gain; \n\n(e) competent authority: the co-ordinating public authority referred to \n\nin Article 3 or any authority to which it has delegated tasks in \n\napplication of this Regulation; \n\n(f) movement: the movement of an animal between holdings. - 8 -\n\nArt icle 3 \n\nMember States shall designate a coordinating public authority competent \n\nfor ensuring the application of the requirements of this Regulation and \n\nshall inform each other and the Commission of the identity of this \n\nauthority. This authority shall ensure that the inspection services of \n\nthe Commission and of its own Member State, responsible for veterinary \n\nor zootechnical matters or for implementing Community aid schemes, \n\nhave access to all information relating to this Regulation. Article 4 \n\n1. Each competent authority shall keep a list of all holdings in its \n\nterr itory. 2. An owner or keeper of a holding shall keep a permanent register of \n\nall animals on that holding and shall make that register available \n\nto the competent authority, upon request, at any time. 3. The register shall record all movements of animals to and from the \n\nholding and all births and deaths of animals on the holding, along \n\nwith the dates of these events. Art icle 5 \n\n1. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, before an animal leaves the \n\nholding on which it was born, it shall be identified by a mark in \n\naccordance with the requirements laid down in Annex A. 2. The mark shall bear an alphanumeric code, assigned by the competent \n\nauthority, which identifies the holding. 9 -\n\n3. For bovine animals, the alphanumeric code referred \n\nto in \n\nparagraph 2 shall in addition identify each individual animal. It \n\nshall be applied before the animal is 14 days old, and in any case \n\nbefore the animal leaves the holding on which it was born. The \n\ncodes supplied to a holding shall be applied in numerical order. 4. No mark shall be removed without the permission of the competent \n\nauthority. Where a mark has been lost or has become illegible, a \n\nnew mark in accordance with this Article shall be applied \n\nimmediately by, or under the supervision of, the competent \n\nauthority. The owner or keeper shall record the new mark in the \n\nregister referred to in Article 4(2). 5. An animal imported from a third country shall be given a mark in \n\naccordance with this Article within 14 days of its arrival at the \n\nholding of destination, except where that holding \n\nis a \n\nslaughterhouse. 6. Requirements for the permanent individual identification of certain \n\ntypes of animals in addition to bovine animals may be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 10. Art icle 6 \n\n1. Throughout any movement an animal shall be identified by a mark in \n\naccordance with Article 5, and accompanied by a completed movement \n\ndocument in accordance with the requirements laid down in Annex B. However, this movement document shall not be necessary in the case \n\nof animals accompanied by a certificate or document required by \n\nCommunity veterinary or zootechnical legislation laid down \n\nelsewhere. 2. The movement document shall be retained by the owner or keeper of \n\nthe animals at the holding of destination for at least 12 months \n\nfrom the date of arrival of the animal. - 10 -\n\nArt icle 7 \n\nThe competent authority may waive the requirements of Article 5(1), \n\nexcept in the case of bovine animals, and Article 6, in respect of \n\nanimals moving directly from a farm to a slaughterhouse, without \n\npassing through any other holding, if the farm and the slaughterhouse \n\nare situated on the territory of the same competent authority. In such \n\ncases, it shall ensure that the animals are identified in such a way as \n\nto enable their farm of origin to be traced rapidly. Art icle 8 \n\nAny owner or keeper, and any person engaged in the transport, marketing \n\nor slaughter of animals shall supply the competent authority, upon \n\nrequest of that authority, with information concerning the keeping or \n\nmovement of animals which they have owned, kept, transported, marketed \n\nor slaughtered and shall furnish all the details concerning such \n\ninformat ion. Art icle 9 \n\n1. Rules for the application of this Regulation may be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 10. 2. The provisions of the Annexes may be supplemented or amended in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 10. - 11 -\n\nArt icle 10 \n\n1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Standing Veterinary \n\nCommittee set up by Council Decision 68/361/EEC7, hereinafter \n\nreferred to as \"the committee\". 2. Where the procedure laid down in this Article is to be followed, \n\nthe following provisions shall apply. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a \n\ndraft of the measures to be taken. The Committee shall deliver its \n\nopinion on the draft within a time limit which the Chairman may lay \n\ndown according to the urgency of the matter. The opinion shall be \n\ndelivered by the majority laid down in Article 148(2) of the Treaty in \n\nthe case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a \n\nproposal from the Commission. The votes of the representatives of the \n\nMember States within the Committee shall be weighted in the manner set \n\nout in that Article. The Chairman shall not vote. The Commission shall adopt measures which shall apply immediately. However, if these measures are not in accordance with the opinion of \n\nthe Committee, they shall be communicated by the Commission to the \n\nCouncil forthwith. In that event the Commission may defer application \n\nof the measures which it has decided for a period of one month from the \n\ndate of communication; the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may \n\ntake a different decision within the time limit referred to in the \n\nfirst indent. OJ No L 255, 18. 10. 1968, p. 23 \n\n\f- 12 -\n\nArticle 11 \n\nMember States shall take the appropriate specific measures to penalize \n\nany infringement of this Regulation. Article 12 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the thirtieth day following \n\nthat of its publication in the Official Journal of the European \n\nCommun i t i es. It shall apply with effect from 1 January 1993. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly \n\napplicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f- 13 -\n\nANNEX A \n\nRequirements for marks \n\nA mark shall comply with at least the following requirements: \n\n1. It shall be an eartag or a tattoo. 2. It shall be tamperproof, easy to read and capable of being used \n\nonly once. 3. It shall be of such a quality as to remain on the animal and remain \n\nlegible \n\nduring \n\nthe \n\nlifetime of \n\nthe \n\nanimal \n\nunder \n\nnormal \n\ncircumstances. 4. It shall not be harmful to the animal. 5. The first letter on the mark shall identify the Member State thus: \n\nB Be Ig i urn \n\nD Denmark \n\nE Ireland \n\nF France \n\nG Germany \n\nH Greece \n\nI Italy \n\nL Luxembourg \n\nN Netherlands \n\nP Portugal \n\nS Spa i n \n\nU United Kingdom \n\n\f- 14 -\n\nANNEX B \n\nRequirements for movement documents \n\nA movement document shall provide at least the following information: \n\n1. Where applicable, the complete identification number on the mark. 2. The address of the place of departure and the name and address of \n\nthe owner or keeper of the animals. 3. The address of the place of destination and the name and address of \n\nthe owner or keeper of the animals. 4. The name and address of the transporter. 5. The registration number of the means of transport. 6. The date of transport. - 15 -\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 148 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-165-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43254-3 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/82891fed-fab8-40b8-881a-a03fac1e2572", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1166/92 of 5 May 1992 re- establishing the levying of customs duties on products of category 20 (order No 40.0200), originating in Indonesia, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "restoration of customs duties,tariff preference,textile product", "workIds": "celex:31992R1166,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0021_040", "eurovoc_concepts": ["restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference", "textile product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/82891fed-fab8-40b8-881a-a03fac1e2572", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8062199d-9a05-43c2-b837-307bd48b198e", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1143/92 of 5 May 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2213/76 on the sale of skimmed-milk powder from public storage", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "public stock,sale,skimmed milk powder", "workIds": "celex:31992R1143,oj:JOL_1992_121_R_0005_022", "eurovoc_concepts": ["public stock", "sale", "skimmed milk powder"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8062199d-9a05-43c2-b837-307bd48b198e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6f392edf-c7d4-4645-93f7-5fbc9834162a", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1164/92 of 5 May 1992 re- establishing the levying of customs duties on products of categories 9, 23 and 39 (order Nos 40.0090, 40.0230 and 40.0390), originating in India, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3832/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-05", "subjects": "restoration of customs duties,tariff preference,textile product", "workIds": "celex:31992R1164,oj:JOL_1992_122_R_0017_038", "eurovoc_concepts": ["restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference", "textile product"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6f392edf-c7d4-4645-93f7-5fbc9834162a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71bb4e5c-5397-4de1-b440-bb87264f2ab9", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1134/92 of 4 May 1992 fixing the minimum import price applicable to certain types of processed cherries during the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-04", "subjects": "Yugoslavia,food processing,import policy,minimum price,stone fruit", "workIds": "celex:31992R1134,oj:JOL_1992_120_R_0026_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Yugoslavia", "food processing", "import policy", "minimum price", "stone fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71bb4e5c-5397-4de1-b440-bb87264f2ab9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6037f9d7-534e-42d7-8ede-db120b82185e", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on computerization of veterinary import procedures (Shift project), amending Directives 90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 91/628/EEC and Decision 90/424/EEC and repealing Decision 88/192/EEC", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-04", "subjects": "animal product,database,import,live animal,third country,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0167,comnat:COM_1992_0167_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_140_R_0011_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["animal product", "database", "import", "live animal", "third country", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6037f9d7-534e-42d7-8ede-db120b82185e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 167 final \n\nBrussels, 4 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\non computerization of veterinary import procedures (Shift project), \n\namending Directives 90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 91/628/EEC and \n\nDecision 90/424/EEC and repealing Decision 88/192/EEC \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f/-\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORADUM \n\nThe attached proposal deals with computerization of veterinary import \n\nprocedures (Shift project) for live animals and animal products from third \n\ncountries. Its setting is the introduction of data transmission networks in \n\norder to enable the internal market to function smoothly. Since adoption of Council Decision 88/192/CEE of 28 March 1988 on a system for \n\nhealth control of imports from third countries at frontier inspection posts \n\n(Shift project)(1) considerable progress has been made on veterinary \n\nharmonization. In particular the Council has adopted Council Directive \n\n90/675/EEC of 10 December 1990 laying down the principles governing the \n\norganization of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from \n\nthird countries(2), Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down \n\nthe principles governing the organization of veterinary checks on animals \n\nentering the Community from third countries and amending Directives \n\n89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC<3) and Council Directive 91/628/EEC of \n\n19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport and amending \n\nDirectives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEc(4). The proposal adjusts these Directives to the requirements of the proposed new \n\narrangements. These cover: \n\n- the information procedure when a consignment is rejected \n\n- operation of data bases covering veterinary requirements for importation \n\nand veterinary inspection of imports \n\n- experimental computerized certification. The system-architecture principles are laid down. The Community will make a financial contribution under Council Decision \n\n90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field<5). The \n\nfinancial implications are set out in the attached statement. (1) OJ No L 89, 06. 04. 1988, p. 32 \n(2) OJ No L 373, 31. 12. 1990, p. 1. (3) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56. (4) OJ No L 340, 11. 12. 1991, p. 17. (5) OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 19. -1l^ o \n\nproposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nOf \n\non computerization of veterinary import procedures (Shift project), \n\namending Directives 90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 91/628/EEC and \n\nDecision 90/424/EEC and repealing Decision 88/192/EEC \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic community, and \n\nin particular Article 43 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission(*), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament^2), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee(3), \n\nWhereas since adoption of Council Decision 88/192/EEC of 28 March 1988 on a \n\nsystem for health control of imports from third countries at frontier \n\ninspection posts (Shift project)(4), considerable progress has been made on \n\nharmonization in the veterinary field; whereas in particular the Council has \n\nadopted Council Directive 90/675/EEC of 10 December 1990 laying down the \n\nprinciples governing the organization of veterinary checks on products \n\nentering the community from third countries^5), as amended by Directive \n\n91/496/EEC, Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the \n\nprinciples governing the organization of veterinary checks on animals entering \n\nthe Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, \n\n90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC<6), as amended by Directive 91/628/EEC, and Council \n\nDirective 91/628/EEC of 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during \n\ntransport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEc(7); \n\n(1) OJ No C \n(2) OJ NO C \n(3) OJ No C \n(4) OJ No L 89, 06. 04. 1988, p. 32 \n(5) OJ No L 373, 31. 12. 1990, p. 1. (6) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56. (7) OJ No L 340, 11. 12. 1991, p. 17. - 2-\n\nWhereas this progress makes it possible to lay down fresh provisions on \n\ncomputerization of veterinary import precedures and repeal Decision \n\n88/192/EEC; \n\nWhereas these fresh provisions must help protect public and animal health \n\nwhile permitting attainment of the internal market for animals and animal \n\nproducts; \n\nWhereas these new provisions are all the more necessary in that inspection at \n\ninternal frontiers is to be discontinued; \n\nWhereas computerization of import procedures must provide an efficient way for \n\nan official veterinarian rejecting a consignment at a border inspection post \n\nto pass on relevant information and also data bases detailing import \n\nrequirements and imports of animals and animal products; \n\nWhereas Directives 90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC and 91/628/EEC should be amended \n\naccordingly; \n\nWhereas Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the \n\nveterinary field<8), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3763/9l(9), \n\nshould be amended to allow the Community to contribute financially to \n\nimplementation of these new measures; \n\nWhereas the Commission should be charged with adoption of the necessary \n\nimplementing rules; \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: \n\n(8) OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 19. (9) OJ No L 356, 24. 12. 1991, p. 1 \n\n\f-3-\n\nArticle 1 \n\n1. Computerization of veterinary import procedures shall comprise: \n\n- \n\na procedure for passing on the relevant information when an official \n\nveterinarian at a border inspection post re-routes a consignment \n\n- \n\noperation of data bases covering the Community's import requirements \n\nfor animals and products \n\n- \n\noperation of data bases covering imports into the Community of \n\nanimals and products \n\n- \n\ncertificate issuing arrangements. 2. The computerization specified in paragraph 1 shall meet present and future \n\ninternational standards. Article 2 \n\nFor the purposes of this Decision the definitions given in Directives \n\n90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC and 91/628/EEC shall be applicable as required. Article 3 \n\n1. The information procedure referred to in the first indent of Article 1 \n\nshall cover border inspection posts, the central authorities of the Member \n\nStates and the Commission. 2. The information procedure referred to in the first indent of Article 1 \n\nshall operate as specified in Annex I hereto. - 4-\n\nArticle 4 \n\n1. The data bases referred to in the second indent of Article 1 shall contain \n\nfull details of requirements for importing animals and products into the \n\nCommunity, in particular lists of authorized third countries, approved \n\nestablishments, protective measures adopted and authorized specimen \n\ncertificates. 2. The data bases referred to in the second indent of Article 1 shall be \n\norganized and operated as specified in Annex II hereto. Article 5 \n\n1. The data bases referred to in the third indent of Article 1 shall contain \n\nfull information on each consignment of animals or products brought into \n\nthe community, covering in particular the conditions of transport of the \n\nanimals as specified in chapter III of Directive 91/628/EEC and the \n\noutcome of the checks carried out under Directives 90/675/EEC and \n\n91/496/EEC. 2. The data bases referred to in the third indent of Article 1 shall be \n\norganized and operated as specified in Annex III hereto. Article 6 \n\n1. Computerized certification as referred to in the fourth indent of Article \n\n1 shall be progressively introduced in cooperation with third countries on \n\nthe basis of experience derived from initial tests. 2. The tests indicated in paragragh 1 shall be organized as indicated in \n\nAnnex IV hereto. -5-\n\nArticle 7 \n\nThe equipment used at border inspection posts for the purposes of this \n\nDecision shall be that specified in Article 2(2) of Commission Decision \n\n91/998/EEC of 19 July 1991 on a computerized network linking veterinary \n\nauthorities (Animo)(^\u00ae). Decision 88/192/EEC is repealed. Article 8 \n\nArticle 9 \n\nDirective 90/675/EEC is amended as follows: \n\n1. The following indent is added to Article 4(1): \n\n\"- that no indication of rejection of the consignment has been given \n\nthrough the information procedure specified at the first indent of \n\nArticle 1 of Council Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC of \n\non computerization \n\nof veterinary import procedures (Shift project), amending Directives \n\n90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 91/628/EEC and Decision 90/424/EEC and \n\nrepealing Decision 88/192/EEC*\". * O J N OL \n\n2. The following point (d) is added to Article 8(2): \n\n\"(d) consult the data bases specified at the second indent of \n\nArticle 1 of Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC\". 3. The following sentence is added to Article 9(2)(iii): \n\n\"He shall ensure that all updating of the data bases indicated at the \n\nthird indent of Article 1 of Decision \n\n/ /EEC is carried out. \" \n\n(10) O J N OL 221, 9. 8. 1991, p. 30. -6-\n\n4. The first indent in Article 11(4)(b) is replaced by: \n\n\"- using the computerized network linking veterinary authorities \n\n(Animo), give the official veterinarian at the inspection post of the \n\nplace of destination notice of the passage of the products and of \n\ntheir probable date of arrival\". 5. The following sentence is added to Article 11(4)(b): \n\n\"In such cases the competent authority shall be informed through the \n\ncomputerized network linking veterinary authorities (Animo). \" \n\n6. In Article 16(1)(a) the first indent is replaced by: \n\n\"- \n\nactivate the information procedure indicated at the first indent of \n\nArticle 1 of Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC\". 7. In Article 16(1)(a) the third indent is deleted. 8. Article 16(5) is replaced by: \n\n\"5. The provisions of Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC shall apply. \" \n\nDirective 91/496/EEC is amended as follows: \n\nArticle 10 \n\n1. The following indent is added to Article 4(1): \n\n\"- \n\nthat no indication of rejection of the consignment has been given \n\nthrough the information procedure specified in the first indent of \n\nArticle \n\n1 \n\nof \n\nCouncil \n\nDecision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC \n\nof \n\non \n\ncomputerization of veterinary import procedures (Shift project), \n\namending Directives 90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 91/628/EEC and Decision \n\n90/424/EEC and repealing Decision 88/192/EEC*\" \n\n* OJ No L \n\n\f-7-\n\n2. In Article 4(2) the following point (e) is added: \n\n\"(e) the check must be made after reference to the data bases specified at \n\nthe second indent of Article 1 of Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC\". 3. In Article 6(2) the following sentence is added: \n\n\"The official veterinarian shall ensure that all updating of the data \n\nbases indicated at the third indent in Article 1 of Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC is \n\ncarried out. \" \n\n4. In Article 9(4)(d) the words \"referred to in the second subparagraph of \n\nArticle 12(4) are replaced by \"referred to in Article 20 of Directive \n\n90/425/EEC\". 5. In Article 12(1)(c) the first indent is replaced by: \n\n\"- \n\nactivate the information procedure indicated at the first indent of \n\nArticle 1 of Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC\". 6. In Article 12(1)(c) the third indent is deleted. 7. Article 12(4) is replaced by: \n\n\"4. The provisions of Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC shall apply. \" \n\n8. In the first subparagraph of Article 30(2) the words \"in the second \n\nsubparagraph of\" are deleted. - 8-\n\nArticle 11 \n\nIn Article 11 of Directive 91/628/EEC the following paragraph is added: \n\n\"5. The provisions of Council Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC of \n\non computerization \n\nof veterinary import procedures (Shift project), amending Directives \n\n90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 91/628/EEC and Decision 90/424/EEC and repealing \n\nDecision 88/192/EEC shall be applicable*. \" \n\n* OJ No L \n\nArticle 12 \n\nThe following Article is added to Decision 90/424/EEC: \n\n\"Article 37a \n\n1. Community financial assistance may be granted for computerization of \n\nimport procedures as specified in Council Decision \n\n/ \n\n/EEC of \n\non computerization of veterinary import procedures (Shift project), \n\namending Directives 90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 91/628/EEC and Decision \n\n90/424/EEC and repealing Decision 88/192/EEC*. 2. Organizational arrangements for financing under paragraph 1 and the level \n\nof the Community's contribution shall be determined in accordance with the \n\nprocedure laid down in Article 41. \" \n\n* OJ No L \n\nArticle 13 \n\nAny rules required for application of this Decision shall be adopted in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 14. -9-\n\nArticle 14 \n\n1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Standing Veterinary Committee set \nup by Council Decision 68/361/EEc(11), hereinafter referred to as \"the \n\nCommittee\". 2. Where reference is made to the procedure set out in this Article the \n\nfollowing provisions shall apply. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a draft \n\nof the measures to be taken. The Committee shall deliver its opinion on \n\nthe draft, within a time limit that the chairman may lay down according to \n\nthe urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a vote. The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition each Member \n\nState shall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the \n\nminutes. The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by \n\nthe committee. It shall inform the Committee of the manner in which its \n\nopinion has been taken into account. Article 15 \n\nThis Decision is addressed to the Member States \n\nDone at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\n(11) OJ No L 255, 18. 10. 1968, p. 23 \n\n\f- 10 -\n\nANNEX I \n\n1. The basic principle of the system is that each relevant authority (border \n\ninspection post, central authority of the Member state, Commission) will \n\nhave random access to a computerized file of consignments of animals or \n\nproducts re-dispatched under Article 12(1)(c) of Directive 91/496/EEC or \n\nArticle 16(1)(a) of Directive 90/675/EEC. 2. This file will be updated by the competent authorities of the Member \n\nStates. Information must be conveyed with all speed via the public packet-\n\nswitching network. 3. The Commission shall be responsible for the network. The operator shall be \n\nselected and the overall technical specifications of the network determined \n\nin accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 14. 4. The following cases of re-despatch are not to be entered in the file: \n\n- absence of veterinary certificates or document. The provisions of this paragraph may be amended in accordance with the \n\nprocedure laid down in Article 14. - 11 -\n\nANNEX II \n\n1. The Commission shall establish a data base of the Community requirements \n\nfor importation of live animals and products and shall make it available to \n\neach Member State and each border inspection post. 2. Each Member State shall establish a data base of national requirements (not \n\ncovered by paragraph 1) for importation of live animals and products into \n\nits territory. Each will make this available to the other Member states, \n\nthe Commission and all Community border inspection posts. 3. Each Member State shall determine how its border inspection posts are to \n\nhave access to the data bases indicated in paragraphs 1 and 2. 4. The Commission shall be responsible for updating the data base indicated in \n\nparagraph 1. The Member states shall be individually responsible for \n\nupdating the data bases indicated in paragraph 2. 5. The technical requirements for harmonization of the data bases and for \n\ntheir updating shall be determined in accordance with the procedure laid \n\ndown in Article 14. - 12 -\n\nANNEX III \n\n1. Each Member State shall set up a data base covering the animals and \n\nproducts brought into its territory. 2. Each Member state shall transmit to the Commission, at a frequency or \n\nfrequencies to be determined in accordance with the procedure laid down in \n\nArticle 14, information extracted from the data bases indicated in \n\nparagraph 1. 3. The technical requirements for harmonization of the data bases and for \n\ntransmission of information to the Commission shall be determined in \n\naccordance with the procedure laid down in Article 14. - 13 -\n\nANNEX IV \n\nComputerized certification will be introduced gradually as the technical \n\nfacilities available to third-country authorities permit. -ih-\n\nF I N A N C I AL \n\nS T A T E M E NT \n\ncovering: \n1'roposal fo\u00bb- a Council Decision on computerization of veterinary import procedures \n(Shift project), amending Directives 90/67S/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 91/628/EEC and Decision \n90/424/EEc and repealing Decision a8/192/EEC \n\nBudget heading; \n1992: \n1993: \n\nItem: \nB2-5101 \nB5-/22 \n\nDescription: \nOther measures \nExchanges of veterinary and plant health \ninformati c-. i \n\nI \n\n2. Legal basis: Article 43 of Treaty \n\nClassification: Non-compulsory expenditure \n\n4. Aim of measure and description: \n\nComputerization of veterinary import procedures (Shift project) for live animals and \nanimal products from third countries \n\n5. Calculation procedure: \n\n5. 1. Nature of expenditure: Setting up a computerized system \n\n5. 2. Comunity contribution: Purchase of necessary equipment; support and development work \n\nFrom 50% to 100%, variable in line with options selected \n\n5. 3. Calculation: (in million ECU) \n\n1992 \n\nDevelopment and setting up (including equipment) \n- of a computerized consignment rejection file \n\nsystem architecture \nsoftware development \ncomputer hardware and system software \ninstallation (centrally and in Member States) \n\n- of central databases covering Comunity import requirements \n\ndevelopment of software and entry of data \n\n- of national databases covering national import requirements \n\naid to Member States \nharmonization of technical requirements \n\n- of databases covering imports \n\nharmonization of technical requirements \n\nOutside assistance (upkeep and entry of data, software \ndevelopment, operational assistance, etc. ) \n\n199 3 \n\nAid to Member States, including hardware and interfaces \nHardware and software \nEquipment maintenance \nTraining and updating courses \nOutside assistance (maintenance and development work, data \nentry, operational assistance, etc. ) \n\n1994 and 1995: \n\nOutside assistance \nTraining and updating courses \nSystem development depending on needs \nand technical requirements \n\n( 0. 5 + 0. 5) \n( 0. 2 + 0. 2) \n\n0. 1 \n0. 3 \n0. 8 \n0. 4 \n\n0. 3 \n\n1. 2 \n0. 4 \n1. 6 \n\n0. 4 \n\n0. 2 \n4. 1 \n\n3. 0 \n0. 3 \n0. 2 \n0. 2 \n\n0. 5 \n4. 2 \n\n1. 0 \n0. 4 \n\npm \n\n6. Implications for operating appropriations \n\n6. 1. Timetable for appropriations (in million ECU) \n\n1992 \n1993 \n1994 \n199 5 \n\nC. Apps \n4. 1 \n4. 2 \n0. 7 (+ pm) \n0. 7 (+ pm) \n9. 7 \n\nP. Apps \n2. 5 \n4. 1 \n2. 4 \n0. 7 \n9. 7 \n\n6. 2 Financing during y\u00ab-. \u00bbr in course: \n\n4. 1 m ECU \n\n7. Remarks: \n\n(1) Presentation is based on working hypotheses and is subject to change in line with \n\n(2) \n\ntechnical and political choices made in course of realization \nIn 1992 part of the cost of development work will be covered by CADDIA (0. 6 m ECU) \n\n\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 167 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-183-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43610-7 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\ni --2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7dda0e0e-8a53-44ae-8107-962c7cc55212", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion by the European Economic Community of an Agreement between the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community and Lithuania on trade and commercial and economic cooperation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-04", "subjects": "USSR,agreement (EU),economic cooperation,republic,trade cooperation", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0179(01),comnat:COM_1992_0179(01)_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "agreement (EU)", "economic cooperation", "republic", "trade cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7dda0e0e-8a53-44ae-8107-962c7cc55212", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 179 final \n\nBrussels, 4 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\non the conclusion by the European Economic Community of an \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and the \nEuropean Atomic Energy Community and Lithuania on \ntrade and commercial and economic cooperation \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL PEC IS ION \n\napproving the Agreement between the European Economic Community \nand the European Atomic Energy Community \nand Lithuania for the purpose of final conclusion by \nthe Commission on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fz \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. The attached proposal for a Council Decision (I) is the legal \ninstrument for the conclusion of the Agreement on Trade and Commercial \nand Economic Cooperation between the European Economic Community and \nthe European Atomic Energy Community and the Republic of Lithuania. 2. The attached proposals Council (II) and Commission (III) Decisions \nconstitute the legal instrument for the conclusion of the Agreement on \nTrade and Commercial and Economic Cooperation between the European \nEconomic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community and the \nRepublic of Lithuania on behalf of the European Atomic Energy \nCommunity. 3. Exploratory talks between Commission and Lithuanian experts took \nplace between November 1991 and January this year in Brussels. 4. On the basis of directives adopted by the Council on 4 November 1991 \nthere were a number of informal meetings between Community and \nLithuanian representatives, which resulted in a formal negotiating \nsession in Brussels on 31 February this year, at which the Agreement \nwas initialled. Regarding the initialled text, which is attached to the proposal for a \nDecision, the following should be noted: \n\n(a) it contains no financial protocol or financial undertakings; \n(b) the respect for democratic principles and human rights is an \n\nessential aspect of the Agreement (Article 1 ); \n\n(c) ECSC products and textile and clothing products falling within \nSection XI of the Harmonized System are not covered by the \nAgreement (Article 3 ); \n\n(d) the Community and Lithuania reaffirm their undertaking to accord \n\neach other most-favoured-nation treatment under the GATT, and the \nCommunity also undertakes to abolish quantitative restrictions \nspecific to Lithuania (Article 8 ); \n\n(e) as regards commercial cooperation, Lithuania also undertakes to \nguarantee effective, suitable protection of intellectual and \ncommercial property and to accede to the relevant international \nconventions (Article 13(3)); \n\n(f) economic cooperation is focused on the sectors listed non-\n\nexhaustively in Article 15 with a view to establishing economic \nlinks and increasing trade between the two parties: it is also \ndesigned to support structural changes in the Lithuanian economy; \n\n(g) the Community undertakes to support Lithuania's applications to \n\naccede to international organizations and conventions \n(Article 17); \n\n(h) Article 18 sets up a Joint Committee and lays down its \n\nresponsibilities: the Committee will monitor the proper working of \nthe Agreement and recommend measures that it deems appropriate to \nachieve the aims of the Agreement. 3 \n\n- 2 -\n\n(i) the Agreement is concluded for an initial period of ten years, \n\ntacitly renewable each year: it may be denounced by means of the \nusual procedure, and suspended with immediate effect, totally or \npartially, should there be serious infringement of essential \nprovisions of the Agreement. 5. Since Articles 113 and 235 of the Treaty provide the legal basis for \nthe Agreement for the EEC, Parliament must be consulted. 6. The two Communities (EEC and EAEC) have different procedures for the \nconclusion and signing of agreements. Signing: The Council, acting for the EEC, authorizes the competent \npersons to sign the Agreement. The Commission of the European Communities, acting for the EAEC, \nauthorizes the competent persons to sign the Agreement. Conclusion: \n\nthe Council, having consulted Parliament, concludes the Agreement on \nbehalf of the EEC in accordance with Articles 113 and 235 of the EEC \nTreaty by adopting the Decision set out in I; \n\n- the Council approves the Agreement on behalf of the European Atomic \n\nEnergy Community in accordance with Article 101, second paragraph, \nof the EAEC Treaty (the Agreement then being concluded by the \nCommission) by adopting the Decision set out in II; \n\n7. It is proposed to sign a joint declaration on political dialogue \nwhen the Agreement is signed. 8. The Council is asked to adopt the attached proposals for \nCouncil Decisions on the conclusion of an Agreement on Trade and \nCommercial and Economic Cooperation between the Community and \nLithuania. U) \n\nPROPOSAL FOR A \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nof \n\non the conclusion by the European Economic Community of an \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and the \nEuropean Atomic Energy Community and Lithuania on \ntrade and commercial and economic cooperation \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, and in particular Articles 113 and 235 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, \n\nWhereas the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic \nCommunity and the European Atomic Energy Community and on trade and \ncommercial and economic cooperation is necessary for the achievement of \nthe Community's objectives in the field of external economic relations; \nwhereas this Agreement should be approved on behalf of the European \nEconomic Community; \n\nWhereas it appears that certain measures of economic cooperation \nprovided for by the Agreement exceed the powers of action provided for \nin the Treaty, and in particular those specified in the field of the \ncommon commercial policy, \n\nHAD DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe Agreement between the European Economic Community and the European \nAtomic Enegy Community and Lithuania on trade and commercial and \neconomic cooperation is hereby approved on behalf of the European \nEconomic Community. The text of that Agreement is attached to this decision. The President of the Council shall give the notification provided for in \nArticle 21 of the Agreement. Article 2 \n\n\fArticle 3 \n\nJ\" \n\nThe Commission assisted by representatives of the Member States, shall \nrepresent the Community in the joint committee set up by Article 18 of \nthe Agreement. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f( I I) \n\nProposal lor a Council Decision \napproving the Agreement between the European Economic Community \nand the European Atomic Energy Community \nand Lithuania for the purpose of final conclusion by \nthe Commission on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy \nCommunity, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101 \nthereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas the Commission has negotiated the Agreement between the European \nEconomic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, and \nLithuania in accordance with the directives of the Council, and proposes \nto conclude the said agreement on behalf of the European Atomic Energy \nCommunity. Whereas approval should be given for conclusion by the Commission of the \nsaid agreement on behalf of the said Community, \n\nHAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS : \n\nSole Article \n\nThe conclusion by the Commission of the Agreement between the European \nEconomic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, and \nLithuania on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community is hereby \napproved. The text of the agreement ir. attached to this Decision. Done at Brussels \n\nfor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f1 \n\n(-aO \n\nDraft \n\nCOLUISSION DECISION \n\nof \n\nconcerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Atomic Energy \nCommunity of the Agreement between the European Economic \nCommunity and the European Atomic Energy Community \nand Lithuania on trade and commercial and \neconomic cooperation \n\nTHE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, HAD DECIDED AS FOLLOWS \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy \nCommunity, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101 \nthereof, \n\nWhereas the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the \nEuropean Atomic Energy Community and Lithuania on trade and commercial \nand econom ic cooperat ion was signed on \n\nWhereas by Decision of \nthe Council approved the said \nAgreement for the purposes of conclusion by the Commission on behalf of \nthe European Atomic Energy Community; \n\nWhereas the said Agreement should be concluded on behalf of the European \nAtomic Energy Community. Article 1 \n\nThe Agreement between the European Economic Community and the European \nAtomic Energy Community and Lithuania on trade and commercial and \neconomic cooperation is hereby concluded on behalf of the European \nAtomic Enregy* Community. Article 2 \n\nif \n\nthe President of the Commission shall give the notification provided for \nin Article 21 of the Agreement on behalf of the European Atomic Energy \nCommunity. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Commission \n\nThe President \n\nJacques DELORS \n\n\fGROUPE \nEUROPE ORIENTALE \n\nDOC. SEANCE *itf \n\n_ 1 -\n\n9 \n\nBrussels, 31 January 199^ \n\nDRAFT AGREEMENT \n\nbetween the European Economic community and the Republic of Lithuania on \ntrade and commercial and economic cooperation \n\nTHE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY \n\nAND \n\nTHE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY, \n\nhereinafter together called the \"community\", of the one part, and \n\nTHE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA, \n\nhereinafter called \"Lithuania\", of the other part, \n\nCONSIDERING the importance of establishing and expanding trade links \nbetween the Community and Lithuania, \n\nDESIROUS of creating favourable conditions for a substantial and \nharmonious development and diversification of trade and the promotion of \ncommercial and economic cooperation in areas of mutual interest on the \nbasis of equality, non-discrimination, mutual benefit and reciprocity, \n\nAWARE of the particular importance of foreign trade and other forms of \ninternational economic cooperation for the economic and social \ndevelopment of each of the Contracting Parties, \n\nAWARE of the importance of giving full effect to all the provisions and \nprinciples of the CSCE process, and in particular those set out in the \nHelsinki Final Act, the concluding documents of the Madrid, Vienna and \nCopenhagen meetings, and those of the Charter of Paris for a new Europe, \nparticularly with regard to the rule of law, democracy and human rights, \nas well as those of the Bonn CSCE Conference on Economic Co-operation, \n\nRECOGNIZING the importance of guaranteeing the rights of ethnic and \nnational groups and -minorities, in accordance with the undertakings made \nwithin the context of the CSCE, \n\nAWARE of the importance of strengthening their democratic institutions \nand of supporting the. process of economic reform in Lithuania, \n\nBELIEVING that a further impetus should be given to the trading and \neconomic relationship between the Community and Lithuania by \nestablishing contractual links which will contribute to progress towards \nthe objective of an association agreement in due course, when conditions \nare met, and to further development of relations between them. TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the favourable implications for trade and economic \ncooperation between the Contracting Parties of reform under way in \nT,3. thuani* , \n\ni/ \n\n\f1 v3 \n\n-2-\n\nHAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as \ntheir Plenipotentiaries: \n\nTHE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY: \n\nTHE fcUKOPEAN ATOMIC bNERGY COMMUNITY: \n\nTHE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA: \n\nWHO, having exchanged their full powers, found in good and due form, \n\nHAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nTITLE I \n\nGeneral \n\nArticle 1 \n\nRespect for the democratic principles and human rights established by the, \nHelsinki. Final Act and the Charter of Paris for a New Europe inspire^the \ndomestic and external policies of the Community and Lithuania and^/0 \nconstitute^an essential element of the present agreement. 'vt/Ul \n\nArticle 2 \n\n& \n\nWithin the framework of their respective- laws and regulations, the \ncontracting Parties undertake to facilitate and promote: \n\n- the harmonious development and diversification of trade between them; \n\n- the development of various types of commercial and economic cooperation. They therefore confirm their resolve to consider favourably, each for its \nown part, suggestions made by the other Party with a view to attaining \nthese aims. 4 4 \n\n-3-\n\nTITLE II \n\nTrade and commercial cooperation \n\nArticle 3 \n\n1. This Agreement shall apply to trade in. all products originating in the \nCommunity and in Lithuania with the exception of products covered by the \nTreaty establishing the European coal and steel Community and of the \ntextiles and apparel covered by Section XI of the Harmonized System. 2. The provisions of this Agreement may be supplemented if necessary by \nsectoral agreements or arrangements concluded between the Community and \nLithuania. In particular, a separate agreement for textile products will be \nnegotiated. Article 4 \n\nUnless otherwise specified in this Agreement, trade and other commercial \ncooperation between the Contracting Parties shall be conducted in \naccordance with their respective regulations. Article 5 \n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall accord each other most-favoured-nation \ntreatment in all matters regarding: \n\n- customs duties and charges of any kind imposed on or in connection with \n\nimportation or exportation, \n\n- the method of levying such duties and charges, \n\n- all rules and formalities in connection with importation and \nexportation, including provisions relating to customs clearance, \ntransit, warehousing and transhipment, \n\n- taxes and other internal charges levied directly or indirectly on \n\nimported products, \n\n- methods of payment and the transfer of such payments, \n\n- the regulations affecting the sale, purchase, transport, distribution \n\nand use of goods on the domestic market. 2. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply to: \n\n(a) \n\n(b) \n\n;c) \n\nadvantages accorded to adjacent countries in order to facilitate \nfrontier traffic; \n\nadvantages accorded with the aim of creating a customs union or a \nfree trade area or pursuant to the creation of such a union or \narea; \n\nadvantages accorded to particular couutriot, i;i accordance with the \nGeneral Acr^er^nt on Tariffs and Tr?de ?v3 rt>or *nternation^l \narrangements in favour of developing countries. - 4, \n\nsi/I O. J f \n\n\f*L \n\n- 4-\n\nArticle 6 \n\nWithout prejudice to the rights and obligations stemming from international \nconventions on the temporary admission of goods which bind both contracting \nParties, the Contracting Parties shall furthermore grant each other \ni. ecipiocal extsiapcion from import charges and duties on goods admitted \ntemporarily, in the instances and according to the procedures stipulated by \nany other international convention on this matter binding only one of them. Account shall be taken of the conditions under which the obligations \nstemming from such a convention have been accepted by the Contracting Party \nin question. Article 7 \n\nLithuania shall grant imports of products originating in the Community \ntreatment which is non-discriminatory in relation to products originating \nin other countries, as regards the application of quantitative restrictions A iri \nthe granting of licences and access to the foreign currency needed to pay \nj~-j( \nfor such imports. \\J \n\nArticle 8 \n\n1. Without prejudice to Article *fcv each of the Contracting Parties shall-^V^L \ngrant imports of products originating in the other the highest degree of \nliberalization generally extended to third countries. To that end, the \nspecific quantitative restrictions applying to imports from Lithuania into \nthe Community shall be eliminated. 2. For the purposes of this Agreement, \"specific quantitative restrictions\" \nshall mean those quantitative restrictions applied by the Community to \nimports originating in Lithuania under Regulation (EEC) No 3420/83, which \nconcerns products other than those to which quantitative restrictions are \napplied under Regulation (EEC) No 288/82. Article 9 \n\nThe Parties shall inform each other of any changes in their tariff or \nstatistical nomenclature or of any decision taken in accordance with the \nprocedures in force concerning the classification of products covered by \nthis Agreement. Goods shall be traded between the Contracting Parties at market-related \nprices. Article 10 \n\nArticle 11 \n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall consult each other if any product is being \nimported into the territory of one of them in such increased quantities or \non such terms as to cause or threaten to cause serious injury to domestic \nproducers of like or directly competing products. AMP, J \n\n\f13> \n\n-5-\n\n2. The Contracting Party claiming serious injury or threat thereof shall \nrequest consultations by notification in writing and shall provide the \nother Party with all the relevant information required for a detailed \nexamination of the situation. 3. The consu. 1 tatjons requested pursu-nt tc *---r^c-or>h 3 r}^U be held ^-ith a \nview to seeking mutually satisfactory solutions and with due regard for the \nfundamental aims of the Agreement; they shall be completed not later than \n30 days from the date of notification of the request by the Party \nconcerned, unless the Parties agree otherwise. 4. If, as a result of such consultations, it is agreed that the situation \nreferred to in paragraph 1 exists, exports shall be limited or such other \naction taken, possibly with regard to the price at which these exports are \nsold, as will prevent or remedy the injury. 5. If, following action under paragraphs 1 to 4, agreement is not reached \nbetween the Contracting Parties, the Contracting Party which requested the \nconsultations shall be free to restrict the imports of the products \nconcerned to the extent and for such time as is necessary to prevent or \nremedy the injury. The other Contracting Party shall then be free to \ndeviate from its obligations towards the first Party in respect of \nsubstantially equivalent trade. 6. In critical circumstances, where delay would cause damage difficult to \nrepair, such preventive or remedial action may be taken provisionally \nwithout prior consultation, provided consultations are held immediately \nafter such action is taken. 7. In the selection of measures under this Article, the Contracting Parties \nshall give priority to those which cause the least disturbance to the \nfunctioning of this Agreement. 8. Where necessary the Contracting Parties may hold consultations to \ndetermine when the measures adopted pursuant to paragraphs 4 to 6 shall \ncease to apply. Article 12 \n\n1. This Agreement shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on \nimports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public \nmorality, public policy or public security, the protection of life and \nhealth of humans, animals or plants, the protection of industrial, \ncommercial and intellectual property, or rules relating to gold or silver \nor imposed-for the protection of national treasures of artistic, historic \nor archaeological value. such prohibitions and restrictions must not, however, constitute a means of \narbitrary discrimination or disguised restrictions on trade between the \ncontracting Parties. 2. This Agreement shall not preclude the taking of action justified on \ngrounds of protection of essential security interests: \n\n(a) \n\nrelating to fissionable materials or the materials from which they \nare derived; \n\nt \n\n/O AJP\u201e, \n\n\fiy \n\n-6-\n\n(b) \n\n(c) \n\nrelating to traffic in arms, ammunition and implements of war and \nto such traffic in other goods and materials as is carried on \ndirectly or indirectly for the purpose of supplying a military \nestablishment; \n\ntaken in time of war or other emergency in international relations \nor to allow it to comply with obligations it has accepted in \nconnection with the maintenance of international peace and \nsecurity. Article 13 \n\n1. The contracting Parties shall make every effort to promote, expand and \ndiversify their trade on the basis of non-discrimination and reciprocity. In the spirit of this Article, the Joint Committee established under \nTitle V of this Agreement will attach special importance to examining ways \nof encouraging the reciprocal and harmonious expansion of trade. 2. In furtherance of the aims of this Article and within the limits of \ntheir respective powers, the Contracting Parties agree on the necessity to \nimprove favourable business regulations and facilities for each other's \nfirms or companies on their respective markets, inter alia by taking steps: \n\nto ensure the publication and facilitate exchanges of commercial and \neconomic information on all matters which would assist the development \nof commercial and economic cooperation, for example: \n\n- \n\n- \n\n- \n\ngeneral and sectoral import arrangements, \n\neconomic and commercial law, including regulations on markets, \ncompanies and investment, \n\nmacroeconomic information and statistics, including production, \nconsumption and foreign trade statistics, \n\n- to facilitate the establishment and operation of each other's companies, \n\n- to encourage trade promotion activities, \n\n- to provide natural and legal persons of the other Party with guarantees \nof their individual and property rights, such as non-discriminatory \naccess for that purpose to courts and appropriate administrative bodies \nof the community and Lithuania. 1s \n\n-7-\n\n3. Lithuania will take measures guaranteeing an effective and adequate \nprotection of intellectual, industrial and commercial property, at a level \nsimilar to that which exists in the Community, and will adhere to \nInternational Conventions on intellectual, industrial and commercial \nproperty. 4. The Contracting Parties undertake to facilitate, within the limits of \ntheir respective powers, administrative cooperation between the appropriate \nauthorities in matters relating to customs, in particular in the following \nareas: \n\n- vocational training, \n\n- simplification of customs documentation and procedures, and \n\n- prevention and detection of infringements of the rules on customs \n\nmatters, including the rules governing import quotas. Article 14 \n\nwithin the limits of their respective powers, the Contracting Parties: \n\n- shall encourage the adoption of arbitration for the settlement of \ndisputes arising out of commercial and cooperation transactions \nconcluded by companies, enterprises or economic organizations of the \nCommunity and those of Lithuania, \n\n- agree that when a dispute is submitted to arbitration, each party to the \ndispute may freely choose its own arbitrator, irrespective of \nnationality, and that the presiding third arbitrator or the sole \narbitrator may be a citizen of a third State, \n\n- shall encourage recourse to the arbitration rules developed by the \nUnited Nations commission on International Trade Law (Uncitral) and to \narbitration by any centre of a State signatory to the Convention on \nRecognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards concluded in \nNew York on 10 June 1958. 1G \n\n-8-\n\nTITLE III \n\nEconomic cooperation \n\nArticle 15 \n\n1. In die light of v. heir respective economic policies ana objectives. ,, the \nContracting Parties, within the limits of their respective powers\\\\ioster \neconomic cooperation on as broad a base as possible in all fields deemed to \nbe in their mutual interest. The objectives of such cooperation shall be, inter alia: \n\n- to reinforce and diversify economic links between the Contracting \n\nParties, \n\n- to contribute to the development of their respective economies and \n\nstandards of living, \n\n- to open up new sources of supply and new markets, \n\n- to encourage cooperation between economic operators with a view to \npromoting joint ventures, licensing agreements, and other forms of \nindustrial cooperation to develop their respective industries, \n\n- to encourage scientific and technological progress, \n\n- to support structural changes in the Lithuanian economy which will \nincrease and diversify trade in goods and services with the Community, \n\n- to encourage the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises in \n\ntrade and industrial cooperation. 2. In order to achieve these objectives, the Contracting Parties shall make \nefforts to encourage and promote economic cooperation in areas of mutual \ninterest, in particular in the following sectors: \n\n- industry, \n\n- mining, \n\n- agriculture, including agro-industry, \n\n- fisheries, \n\n- science and technology in areas in which the Contracting Parties are \nactive and which they consider to be of mutual interest, including \nnuclear research, \n\n- telecommunications, \n\n- energy, including nuclear energy and nuclear safety (physical safety and \nradiation protection), the prevention and notification of accidents and \nthe management of radioactive waste. -9 \n\n^> \n\n- environmental protection, including protection from water and air \npollution and industrial accidents, and the management of natural. resources; also taking into account environmental requirements in other \n\npolicy areas such as industry, agriculture, energy, transport. - transport, communications and the running of ports, \n\n- tourism and other service activities, \n\n- economic, monetary, banking, insurance and financial services, \n\n- development of human resources and training, \n\n- health, \n\n- economic policy, \n\n- standards, \n\n- statistics. 3. To give effect to the objectives of economic cooperation and within the \nlimits of their respective powers, the Contracting Parties shall encourage \nthe adoption of measures aimed at creating favourable conditions for \neconomic and industrial cooperation, including: \n\n- the facilitation of exchanges of commercial and economic information, \n\n- the development of a favourable climate for investment, notably by the \nextension by the Member States of the Community and Lithuania of \narrangements for investment promotion and protection, in particular for \nthe transfer of profits and the repatriation of invested capital and \nalso of agreements on the avoidance of double taxation, \n\n- exchanges and contacts between persons and delegations representing \n\ncommercial or other appropriate organizations, \n\n- the organization of seminars, fairs or exhibitions, symposia and ^ \n__t_-^Jy. /^/jJCo, \n\nbusiness weeks. - \n\n\\he encouragement of activities contributing to technical competence \nspecific fields, notably commercialization. in'^-fc \n\nArticle 16 \n\nWithout prejudice to the relevant provisions of the Treaties establishing \nthe European communities, this Agreement and any action taken pursuant to \nit shall in no way affect the powers of the Member States of the community \nto undertake bilateral activities with Lithuania in the field of economic \ncooperation and to conclude, where appropriate, new economic cooperation \nagreements with Lithuania. -10-\n\nTITLE IV \n\n1? \n\nAccession to international organizations and conventions \n\nArticle 17 \n\nThe Community undertakes, within the limits of its powers, to support the \naccession of Lithuania to international organizations and conventions to \nwhich the Community is a party, in order to enable Lithuania to become more \nactive in the world economic system. TITLE V \n\nJoint Committee \n\nArticle 18 \n\n1. A Joint committee shall be set up, comprising representatives of th-\n\nCommunity, on the one hand, and representatives of Lithuania, on the \nother. The Joint Committee shall formulate recommendations by mutual agreement \nbetween the contracting Parties. The Joint Committee shall, as necessary, adopt its own rules of \nprocedure and programme of work. The Joint Committee shall meet once a year in Brussels and Vilnius \nalternately. Special meetings may be convened by mutual agreement, at \nthe request of either contracting Party. The Joint Committee shall be \nchaired alternately by each of the Contracting Parties. Wherever \npossible, the agenda for meetings of the Joint Committee shall be agreed \nbeforehand. The Joint Committee may decide to set up working parties to assist it in \ncarrying out its duties. 2. The Joint Committee shall ensure the proper functioning of this \nAgreement and shall devise and recommend practical measures for \nachieving its objectives, keeping in view the economic and social \npolicies of the Contracting Parties. 3. The Joint Committee shall endeavour to find ways of encouraging the \ndevelopment of trade and commercial and economic cooperation between the \nContracting Parties. In particular, it shall: \n\n- \n\nexamine the various aspects of trade between the Parties, \nnotably its overall pattern, rate of growth, structure and \ndiversification, the trade balance and the various fonr. s of \ntrade and trade promotion. *\n\n&-\n\n\f-ll-\n\n19 \n\nmake recommendations on any trade or economic cooperation \nproblem of mutual concern; \n\nseek appropriate means of avoiding possible difficulties in \nthe fields of trade and cooperation and encourage various \nforms of commercial and economic cooperation in areas of \nmutual interest; \n\nconsider measures likely to develop and diversify trade and \neconomic \nimport \nnotably \nopportunities in the Community and in Lithuania; \n\ncooperation, \n\nimproving \n\nby \n\nexchange information on macroeconomic plans and forecasts \nfor the economies of the two Parties which have an impact \non trade and cooperation and, by extension, on the scope \nfor developing complementarity between their respective \neconomies and also on proposed programmes of economic \nreform; \n\nexamine the situation concerning procedure^ f or the award (/T\\_\u00a3 \nof contracts for supplying goods and services following an \ninternational invitation to tender; \n\nexchange information on amendments to and developments in \nthe laws, regulations and formalities of the Contracting \nParties in the areas covered by this Agreement; \n\nexamine favourably ways of improving conditions for the \ndevelopment of direct contacts between firms established in \nthe Community and those established in Lithuania; \n\nformulate and submit to the authorities of both Contracting \nParties recommendations for resolving any problems that \narise, where appropriate by means of the conclusion of \narrangements or agreements. TITLE VI \n\nGeneral and final provisions \n\nArticle 19 \n\nSubject to the provisions of Article 16, the provisions of this Agreement \nshall replace the provisions of agreements concluded between Member States \nof the Community and Lithuania where the latter provisions are either \nincompatible with or identical to the former. Article 20 \n\nThis Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which \nthe Treaties establishing the European Economic Community and the European \nAtomic Energy Community are applied and under the conditions laid down in \nthose Treaties and, on the other, to the territory of the Republic of \nLithuania. V \n\n\f-12-\n\nArticle 21 \n\n2 \n\nThis Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the second month \nfollowing the date on which the Contracting Parties notify each other that \nthe legal procedures necessary to this end have been completed. The \nAgreement is concluded for an initial period of ten years. The Agreement \nshall be automatically renewed year by year provided that neither \nContracting Party gives the other Party written notice of denunciation of \nthe Agreement six months before it expires. However, the two Contracting Parties may amend the Agreement by mutual \nconsent in order to take account of new developments, notably the situation \nwhich would arise from the accession of Lithuania to the General Agreement \non Tariffs and Trade. In the latter case, the Contracting Parties shall \nprepare together the amendments to this Agreement necessary to take account \nof the protocol of accession of Lithuania to the General Agreement. if the \nParties are unable to agree on this subject they reserve the right to \ndenounce this Agreement. The parties reserve the right to suspend this Agreement^ with immediate \neffect /in whole or in part/if a serious violation occurs of the essenti \nprovisions of the present agreement. Article 22 \n\nThis Agreement is drawn up in duplicate in the Danish, Dutch, English, \nFrench, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and Lithuanian \nlanguages, each text being equally authentic. z^ \n\nFICHE D'INCIDENCE \n\nIMPACT DE LA PROPOSITION SUR LES P. M. E \nET SUR LE MARCHE DE L'EMPLOI \n\nL'incidence \u00e9conomique \u00e9ventuelle du pr\u00e9sent accord ne saurait \u00eatre \nqu'indirecte et tributaire des recommandations du Comit\u00e9 Mixte institu\u00e9 \ndans le cadre de celui-ci. Il n'est donc pas possible de proc\u00e9der \u00e0 une \n\u00e9valuation pr\u00e9cise des effets \u00e9conomiques de l'accord. FICHE FINANCIERE \n\nLe pr\u00e9sent accord n'a pas d'implications budg\u00e9taires directes. ^ \n\n<J \n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 179 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n02 11 \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-194-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43826-6 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a2367ad4-00f5-485d-a454-b20ecdeac1c3", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion by the European Community of an Agreement between the European Economic Community and Estonia on trade and commercial and economic cooperation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-04", "subjects": "USSR,agreement (EU),economic cooperation,republic,trade cooperation", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0177,comnat:COM_1992_0177_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "agreement (EU)", "economic cooperation", "republic", "trade cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a2367ad4-00f5-485d-a454-b20ecdeac1c3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 177 final \n\nBrussels, 4 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\non the conclusion by the European Economic Community of an \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and Estonia on \ntrade and commercial and economic cooperation \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\nmv \n\nr \ntk\" \n\nmt/-\n\n5K\u00a7rs \n\n\fd \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. The attached proposal for a Council Decision is the legal instrument \nfor the conclusion of the Agreement on Trade and Commercial and \nEconomic Cooperation between the European Economic Community and the \nEuropean Atomic Energy Community and the Republic of Estonia. 2. Exploratory talks between Commission and Estonian experts took place \nbetween November 1991 and February this year in Brussels. 3. On the basis of directives adopted by the Council on 4 November 1991 \nthere were a number of informal meetings between Community and Estonian \nrepresentatives, which resulted in a formal negotiating session in \nBrussels on 27 February this year, at which the Agreement was \ninitialled. Regarding the initialled text, which is attached to the proposal for a \nDecision, the following should be noted: \n\n(a) it contains no financial protocol or financial undertakings; \n(b) the respect for democratic principles and human rights is an \n\nessential aspect of the Agreement (Article 1 ); \n\n(c) ECSC products and textile and clothing products falling within \nSection XI of the Harmonized System are not covered by the \nAgreement (Article 3 ); \n\n(d) the Community and Estonia reaffirm their undertaking to accord \n\neach other most-favoured-nation treatment under the GATT, and the \nCommunity also undertakes to abolish quantitative restrictions \nspecific to Estonia (Article 8 ); \n\n(e) as regards commercial cooperation, Estonia also undertakes to \n\nguarantee effective, suitable protection of intellectual and \ncommercial property and to accede to the relevant international \nconventions (Article 13(3)); \n\n(f) economic cooperation is focused on the sectors listed non-\n\nexhaustively in Article 15 with a view to establishing economic \nlinks and increasing trade between the two parties: it is also \ndesigned to support structural changes in the Estonian economy; \n\n(g) the Community undertakes to support Estonia's applications to \n\naccede to international organizations and conventions \n(Article 17); \n\n(h) Article 18 sets up a Joint Committee and lays down its \n\nresponsibilities: the Committee will monitor the proper working of \nthe Agreement and recommend measures that it deems appropriate to \nachieve the aims of the Agreement. - 2 -\n\n3 \n\n(i) the Agreement is concluded for an initial period of ten years, \n\ntacitly renewable each year: it may be denounced by means of the \nusual procedure, and suspended with immediate effect, totally or \npartially, should there be serious infringement of essential \nprovisions of the Agreement. 4. Since Articles 113 and 235 of the Treaty provide the legal basis for \nthe Agreement, the opinion of Parliament is required. 5. It is proposed to sign a joint declaration on political dialogue \nwhen the Agreement is signed. 6. The Council is asked to adopt the attached proposal for a Council \nDecision on the conclusion of an Agreement on Trade and Commercial and \nEconomic Cooperation between the Community and Estonia. 1 \n\nPROPOSAL FOR \n\nA COUNCIL DECISION \n\nof \n\non the conclusion by the European Economic Community of an \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and Estonia on \ntrade and commercial and economic cooperation \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, and in particular Articles 113 and 235 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, \n\nWhereas the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic \nCommunity and on trade and commercial and economic cooperation is \nnecessary for the achievement of the Community's objectives in the field \nof external economic relations; whereas this Agreement should be \napproved on behalf of the European Economic Community; \n\nWhereas it appears that certain measures of economic cooperation \nprovided for by the Agreement exceed the powers of action provided for \nin the Treaty, and in particular those specified in the field of the \ncommon commercial policy, \n\nHAD DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe Agreement between the European Economic Community and Estonia on \ntrade and commercial and economic cooperation is hereby approved on \nbehalf of the European Economic Community. The text of that Agreement is attached to this decision. The President of the Council shall give the notification, provided for \nin Article 21 of the Agreement. Article 2 \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nArticle 3 \n\nX \n\nThe Commission assisted by representatives of the Member States, shall \nrepresent the Community in the joint committee set up by Article 18 of \nthe Agreement. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fc \n\nBrussels, 27 February 1992 \n\nDRAFT AGREEMENT \n\nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Estonia on \ntrade and commercial and economic cooperation \n\nTHE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, \n\nhereinafter called the \"Community, of the one part, and \n\nTHE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA, \n\nhereinafter called \"Estonia\", of the other part, \n\nCONSIDERING the importance of establishing and expanding trade links \nbetween the Community and Estonia, \n\nDESIROUS of creating favourable conditions for a substantial and \nharmonious development and diversification of trade and the promotion of \ncommercial and economic cooperation in areas of mutual interest on the \nbasis of equality, non-discrimination, mutual benefit and reciprocity, \n\nAWARE of the particular importance of foreign trade and other forms of \ninternational economic cooperation for the economic and social \ndevelopment of each of the Contracting Parties, \n\nAWARE of the importance of giving full effect to all the provisions and \nprinciples of the CSCE process, and in particular those set out in the \nHelsinki Final Act, the concluding documents of the Madrid, Vienna and \nCopenhagen meetings, and those of the Charter of Paris for a new Europe, \nparticularly with regard to the rule of law, democracy and human rights, \nas well as those of the Bonn CSCE Conference on Economic Co-operation, \n\nRECOGNIZING the importance of guaranteeing the rights of ethnic and \nnational groups and minorities, in accordance with the undertakings made \nwithin the context of the CSCE, \n\nAWARE of the importance of strengthening their democratic institutions \nand of supporting the process of economic reform in Estonia, \n\nBELIEVING that a further impetus should be given to the trading and \neconomic relationship between the Community and Estonia by establishing \ncontractual links which will contribute to progress towards the \nobjective of an association agreement in due course, when conditions are \nmet, and to further development of relations between them, \n\nTAKING INTO ACCOUNT the favourable implications for trade and economic \ncooperation between the Contracting Parties of reform under way in \nEstonia, \n\ni\u2014J \n\n\f9 \n\nHAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated \nas their Plenipotentiaries: \n\nTHE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY: \n\nTHE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA: \n\nWHO, having exchanged their full powers, found in good and due form, \n\nHAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nTITLE I \n\nGenera 1 \n\nArticle 1 \n\nRespect for the democratic principles and human rights established by \nthe Helsinki Final Act and the Charter of Paris for a new Europe \ninspires the domestic and external policies of the Community and Estonia \nand constitutes an essential element of the present agreement. Article 2 \n\nWithin the framework of their respective laws and regulations, the \nContracting Parties undertake to facilitate and promote: \n\nthe harmonious development and diversification of trade between \nthem; \n\nthe development of various types of commercial and economic \ncooperation. They therefore confirm their resolve to consider favourably, each for \nits own part, suggestions made by the other Party with a view to \nattaining these aims. TITLE II \n\nTrade and commercial cooperation \n\nArticle 3 \n\n1. This Agreement shall apply to trade in all products originating in \nthe Community and in Estonia with the exception of products covered by \nthe Treaty establishing the European Coal and steel Community and of the \ntextiles and apparel covered by Section XI of the Harmonized System. 2. The provisions of this Agreement may be supplemented if necessary by \nsectoral agreements or arrangements concluded between the Community and \nEstonia. In particular, a separate agreement for textile products will \nbe negotiated. LA \n\n\ff \n\nArticle 4 \n\nUnless otherwise specified in this Agreement, trade and other commercial \ncooperation between the Contracting Parties shall be conducted in \naccordance with their respective laws and regulations. Article 5 \n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall accord each other most-favoured-nation \ntreatment in all matters regarding: \n\n- \n\ncustoms duties and charges of any kind imposed on or in connection \nwith importation or exportation, \n\n- \n\nthe method of levying such duties and charges, \n\nall rules and formalities in connection with importation and \nexportation, including provisions relating to customs clearance, \ntransit, warehousing and transhipment, \n\ntaxes and other internal charges levied directly or indirectly on \nimported products, \n\n- \n\nmethods of payment and the transfer of such payments, \n\n- \n\nthe \ndistribution and use of goods on the domestic market. regulations \n\naffecting \n\nsale, \n\npurchase, \n\nthe \n\ntransport, \n\n2. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply to: \n\n(a) advantages accorded to adjacent countries in order to facilitate \n\nfrontier traffic; \n\n(b) advantages accorded with the aim of creating a customs union or a \nfree trade area or pursuant to the creation of such a union or area; \n\n(c) advantages accorded to particular countries in accordance with the \nGeneral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and other international \narrangements in favour of developing countries. Article 6 \n\nfrom \nWithout prejudice to the rights and obligations stemming \ninternational conventions on the temporary admission of goods which bind \nboth sides, \nthe Contracting Parties shall furthermore grant each other reciprocal \nexemption from\"import charges and duties on goods admitted temporarily, \nin the instances and according to the procedures stipulated by any other \ninternational convention on this matter binding only one of them. Account shall be taken of the conditions under which the obligations \nstemming from such a convention have been accepted by the Contracting \nParty in question. U \n\n\f91 \n\nArticle 7 \n\nEstonia shall grant imports of products originating in the Community \ntreatment which is non-discriminatory \nin relation to products \noriginating in other countries, as regards the application of \nquantitative restrictions, the granting of licences and access to the \nforeign currency needed to pay for such imports. Article 8 \n\n1. Without prejudice to Article 7, each of the Contracting Parties \nshall grant imports of products originating in the other the highest \ndegree of liberalization generally extended to third countries. To that \nend, the specific quantitative restrictions applying to imports from \nEstonia into the Community shall be eliminated-\n\n2. For the purposes of this Agreement, \"specific quantitative \nrestrictions\" shall mean those quantitative restrictions applied by the \nCommunity to imports originating in Estonia under Regulation (EEC) \nNo 3420/83, which concerns products other than those to which \nquantitative restrictions are applied under Regulation (EEC) No 288/82. Article 9 \n\nThe Parties shall inform each other of any changes in their tariff or \nstatistical nomenclature or of any decision taken in accordance with the \nprocedures in force concerning the classification of products covered by \nthis Agreement. Article 10 \n\nGoods shall be traded between the contracting Parties at market-related \nprices. Article 11 \n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall consult each other if any product is \nbeing imported into the territory of one of them in such increased \nquantities or on such terms as to cause or threaten to cause serious \ninjury to domestic producers of like or directly competing products. 2. The Contracting Party claiming serious injury or threat thereof \nshall request consultations by notification in writing and shall provide \nthe other Party with all the relevant information required for a \ndetailed examination of the situation. 3. The consultations requested pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be held \nwith a view to seeking mutually satisfactory solutions and with due \nregard for the fundamental aims of the Agreement; they shall be \ncompleted not later than 30 days from the date of notification of the \nrequest by the Party concerned, unless the Parties agree otherwise. Lt< \n\n\fA \n\n4. If, as a result of such consultations, it is agreed that the \nsituation referred to in paragraph 1 exists, exports shall be limited or \nsuch other action taken, possibly with regard to the price at which \nthese exports are sold, as will prevent or remedy the injury. 5. If, following action under paragraphs 1 to 4, agreement is not \nreached between the Contracting Parties, the Contracting Party which \nrequested the consultations shall be free to restrict the imports of the \nproducts concerned to the extent and for such time as is necessary to \nprevent or remedy the injury. The other Contracting Party shall then be \nfree to deviate from its obligations towards the first Party in respect \nof substantially equivalent trade. 6. In critical circumstances, where delay would cause damage difficult \nto repair, such preventive or remedial action may be taken provisionally \nwithout prior consultation, provided consultations are held immediately \nafter such action is taken. 7. In the selection of measures under this Article, the Contracting \nParties shall give priority to those which cause the least disturbance \nto the functioning of this Agreement. 8. Where necessary the Contracting Parties may hold consultations to \ndetermine when the measures adopted pursuant to paragraphs 4 to 6 shall \ncease to apply. Article 12 \n\n1. This Agreement shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on \nimports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public \nmorality, public policy or public security, the protection of life and \nhealth of humans, animals or plants, the protection of industrial, \ncommercial and intellectual property, or rules relating to gold or \nsilver or imposed for the protection of national treasures of artistic, \nhistoric or archaeological value. Such prohibitions and restrictions must not, however, constitute a means \nof arbitrary discrimination or disguised restrictions on trade between \nthe Contracting Parties. 2. This Agreement shall not preclude the taking of action justified on \ngrounds of protection of essential security interests: \n\n(a) relating to fissionable materials or the materials from which they \n\nare derived; \n\n(b) relating to traffic in arms, ammunition and implements of war and to \nsuch traffic in other goods and materials as is carried on directly \nor indirectly for the purpose of supplying a military establishment; \n\n(c) taken in time of war or other emergency in international relations \nor to allow it to comply with obligations it has accepted in \nconnection with the maintenance of international peace and security. LJh \n\n\f/W \n\nArticle 13 \n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall make every effort to promote, expand \nand diversify their trade on the basis of non-discrimination and \nreciprocity. In the spirit of this Article, the Joint Committee \nestablished under Title V of this Agreement will attach special \nimportance to examining ways of encouraging the reciprocal and \nharmonious expansion of trade. 2. In furtherance of the aims of this Article and within the limits of \ntheir respective powers, the Contracting Parties agree on the necessity \nto improve favourable business regulations and facilities for each \nother's firms or companies on their respective markets, inter alia by \ntaking steps: \n\nto ensure the publication and facilitate exchanges of commercial and \neconomic information on all matters which would assist the \ndevelopment of commercial and economic cooperation, for example: \n\n- \n\ngeneral and sectoral import arrangements, \n\neconomic and commercial law, including regulations on markets, \ncompanies and investment, \n\nmacroeconomic information and statistics, including production, \nconsumption and foreign trade statistics, \n\nto facilitate the establishment and operation of each other's \ncompanies, \n\n- \n\nto encourage trade promotion activities, \n\nto provide natural and legal persons of the other Party with \nguarantees of their individual and property rights, such as \nnon-discriminatory access for that purpose to courts and appropriate \nadministrative bodies of the Community and Estonia. I-\n\n\f'\u00a3 \n\n3. Estonia will take measures guaranteeing an effective and adequate \nprotection of intellectual, industrial and commercial property, at a \nlevel similar to that which exists in the Community, and will adhere to \ninternational Conventions on intellectual, industrial and commercial \nproperty. 4. The Contracting Parties undertake to facilitate, within the limits \nof their respective powers, administrative cooperation between the \nappropriate authorities in matters relating to customs, in particular in \nthe following areas: \n\nvocational training, \n\nsimplification of customs documentation and procedures, and \n\nprevention and detection of infringements of the rules on customs \nmatters, including the rules governing import quotas. Within the limits of their respective powers, the Contracting Parties: \n\nArticle 14 \n\nshall encourage the adoption of arbitration for the settlement of \ndisputes arising out of commercial and cooperation transactions \nconcluded by companies, enterprises or economic organizations of the \nCommunity and those of Estonia, \n\nagree that when a dispute is submitted to arbitration, each party to \nthe dispute may freely choose its own arbitrator, irrespective of \nnationality, and that the presiding third arbitrator or the sole \narbitrator may be a citizen of a third state, \u2022 \n\nshall encourage recourse to the arbitration rules developed by the \nUnited Nations commission on International Trade Law (Uncitral) and \nto arbitration by any centre of a state signatory to the -Convention \non Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards concluded \nin New York on 10 June 1958. TITLE III \n\nEconomic cooperation \n\nArticle 15 \n\n1. In the light of their respective economic policies and objectives, \nthe Contracting Parties, within the limits of their existing powers, \nshall foster economic cooperation on as broad a base as possible in all \nfields deemed to be in their mutual interest. The objectives of such cooperation shall be, inter alia: \n\nto reinforce and diversify economic links between the Contracting \nParties, \n\nUJi \n\n\f\"J \n\nto contribute to the development of their respective economies and \nstandards of living, \n\n- \n\nto open up new sources of supply and new markets, \n\nto encourage cooperation between economic operators with a view to \npromoting joint ventures, licensing agreements, and other forms of \nindustrial cooperation to develop their respective industries, \n\n- \n\nto encourage scientific and technological progress, \n\nto support structural changes in the Estonian economy which will \nincrease and diversify trade in goods and services with the \nCommunity, \n\n- \n\nto encourage the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises \nin trade and industrial cooperation. 2. In order to achieve these objectives, the Contracting Parties shall \nmake efforts to encourage and promote economic cooperation in areas of \nmutual interest, in particular in the following sectors: \n\nindustry, including the textiles and apparels'' sectors, \n\nagriculture, including agro-industry, \n\nfisheries, \n\n- \n\nscience and technology in areas in which the Contracting Parties are \nactive and which they consider to be of mutual interest, \n\n- \n\ntelecommunications, \n\nenergy, including the saving of energy and the development of new \nsources of energy, \n\nm ining and production of building materials, \n\nenvironmental protection, including protection from water and air \npollution and industrial accidents, and the management of natural \nresources; also taking into account environmental requirements in \nother policy areas such as industry, agriculture, energy, transport, \n\ntransport, communications and the running of ports, \n\ntourism and other service activities, \n\neconomic, monetary, banking, insurance and financial services, \n\ndevelopment of human resources and training, \n\nhealth, \n\nL-A I \n\n\f4 y \n\neconomic policy, \n\nstandards, \n\nstatistics. 3. To give effect to the objectives of economic cooperation and within \nthe limits of their respective powers, the Contracting Parties shall \nencourage the adoption of measures aimed at creating favourable \nconditions for economic and industrial cooperation, including: \n\nthe facilitation of exchanges of commercial and economic \ninformation, \n\nthe development of a favourable climate for investment, notably by \nthe extension by the Member States of the Community and Estonia of \narrangements for investment promotion and protection, in particular \nfor the transfer of profits and the repatriation of invested \ncapital, and also of agreements on the avoidance of double taxation, \n\nexchanges and contacts between persons and delegations representing \ncommercial or other appropriate organizations, \n\nthe organization of seminars, fairs or exhibitions, symposia and \nbusiness weeks. - \n\nthe encouragement of activities contributing to technical competence \nin specific fields, notably commercialization. Article 16 \n\nWithout prejudice to the relevant provisions of the Treaties \nestablishing the European Communities, this Agreement and any action \ntaken pursuant to it shall in no way affect the powers of the Member \nStates of the Community to undertake bilateral activities with Estonia \nin the field of economic cooperation and to conclude, where appropriate, \nnew economic cooperation agreements with Estonia. TITLE IV \n\nAccession to international organizations and conventions \n\nArticle 17 \n\nThe Community undertakes, within the limits of its powers, to support \nthe accession of Estonia to international organizations and conventions \nto which the Community is a party, in order to enable Estonia to become \nmore active in the world economic system. W-\n\n\ff\\S \n\nTITLE V \n\nJoint Committee \n\nArticle 18 \n\n1. A Joint Committee shall be set up, comprising representatives of the \nCommunity, on the one hand, and representatives of Estonia on the \nother. The Joint Committee shall formulate recommendations by mutual \nagreement between the Contracting Parties. The Joint Committee shall, as necessary, adopt its own rules of \nprocedure and programme of work. The Joint Committee shall meet once a year in Brussels and Tallinn \nalternately. Special meetings may be convened by mutual agreement, \nat the request of either Contracting Party. The Joint Committee \nshall be chaired alternately by each of the Contracting Parties. Wherever possible, the agenda for meetings of the Joint Committee \nshall be agreed beforehand. The Joint Committee may decide to set up working parties to assist \nit in carrying out its duties. 2. The Joint Committee shall ensure the proper functioning of this \nAgreement and shall devise and recommend practical measures for \nachieving its objectives, keeping in view the economic and social \npolicies of the Contracting Parties. 3. The Joint committee shall endeavour to find ways of encouraging the \ndevelopment of trade and commercial and economic cooperation between \nthe Contracting Parties. in particular, it shall: \n\nexamine the various aspects of trade between the Parties, \nnotably its overall pattern, rate of growth, structure and \ndiversification, the trade balance and the various forms of \ntrade and trade promotion, \n\nmake recommendations on any trade or economic cooperation \nproblem of mutual concern; \n\nseek appropriate means of avoiding possible difficulties in \nthe fields of trade and cooperation and encourage various \nforms of commercial and economic cooperation in areas of \nmutual interest; \n\nconsider measures likely to develop and diversify trade and \neconomic \nimport \nnotably \nopportunities in the Community and in Estonia; \n\ncooperation, \n\nimproving \n\nby \n\nLt \n\n\f^c \n\nexchange information on macroeconomic plans and forecasts \nfor the economies of the Contracting Parties which have an \nimpact on trade and cooperation and, by extension, on the \nscope \ntheir \nrespective economies and also on proposed programmes of \neconomic reform; \n\ncomplementarity \n\ndeveloping \n\nbetween \n\nfor \n\nexamine the situation concerning the procedures for the \naward of contracts for supplying goods and services \nfollowing an international invitation to tender; \n\nexchange information on amendments to and developments in \nthe laws, regulations and formalities of the Contracting \nParties in the areas covered by this Agreement; \n\nexamine favourably ways of improving conditions for the \ndevelopment of direct contacts between firms established in \nthe Community and those established in Estonia; \n\nformulate and submit to the authorities of both Contracting \nParties recommendations for resolving any problems that \narise, where appropriate by means of the conclusion of \narrangements or agreements. TITLE VI \n\nGeneral and final provisions \n\nArticle 19 \n\nSubject to the provisions of Article 16, the * provisions of this \nAgreement shall replace the provisions of agreements concluded between \nMember States of the Community and Estonia where the latter provisions \nare either incompatible with or identical to the former. Article 20 \n\nThis Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which \nthe Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and \nunder the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other, to the \nterritory of the Republic of Estonia. Article 21 \n\nThis Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the second \nmonth following* the date on which the Contracting Parties notify each \nother that the legal procedures necessary to this end have been \ncompleted. The Agreement is concluded for an initial period of ten \nyears. The Agreement shall be automatically renewed year by year \nprovided that neither Contracting Party gives the other Party written \nnotice of denunciation of the Agreement six months before it expires. L \n\n\f^ \n\nHowever, the two Contracting Parties may amend the Agreement by mutual \nconsent in order to take account of new developments, notably the \nsituation which would arise from the accession of Estonia to the General \nAgreement on Tariffs and Trade. In the latter case, the Contracting \nParties shall prepare together the amendments to this Agreement \nnecessary to take account of the protocol of accession of Estonia to the \nGeneral Agreement. If the Parties are unable to agree on this subject \nthey reserve the right to denounce this Agreement. The parties reserve the right to suspend this Agreement in whole or in \npart with immediate effect if a serious violation occurs of the \nessential provisions of the present agreement. Article 22 \n\nThis Agreement is drawn up in duplicate in the Danish, Dutch, English, \nFrench, \nand \nPortuguese, \nItalian, \nEstonian languages, each text being equally authentic. German, \n\nSpanish \n\nGreek, \n\n\fFICHE D'INCIDENCE \n\n-1 s \n\nIMPACT DE LA PROPOSITION SUR LES P. M. E \nET SUR LE MARCHE DE L'EMPLOI \n\nL'incidence \u00e9conomique \u00e9ventuelle du pr\u00e9sent accord ne saurait \u00eatre \nqu'indirecte et tributaire des recommandations du Comit\u00e9 Mixte institu\u00e9 \ndans le cadre de celui-ci. Il n'est donc pas possible de proc\u00e9der \u00e0 une \n\u00e9valuation pr\u00e9cise des effets \u00e9conomiques de l'accord. FICHE FINANCIERE \n\nLe pr\u00e9sent accord n'a pas d'implications budg\u00e9taires directes. /]\u00b0) \nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 177 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n02 li \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-192-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43808-8 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34a50c76-39ed-4416-8f4a-6130eb70861f", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion by the European Community of an Agreement between the European Economic Community and Latvia on trade and commercial and economic cooperation", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-05-04", "subjects": "USSR,agreement (EU),economic cooperation,republic,trade cooperation", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0176,comnat:COM_1992_0176_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["USSR", "agreement (EU)", "economic cooperation", "republic", "trade cooperation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/34a50c76-39ed-4416-8f4a-6130eb70861f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 176 final \n\nBrussels, 4 May 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\non the conclusion by the European Economic Community of an \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and Latvia \non trade and commercial and economic cooperation \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\nE. EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. The attached proposal for a Council Decision is the legal \ninstrument for the conclusion of the Agreement on Trade and Commercial \nand Economic Cooperation between the European Economic Community and \nthe European Atomic Energy Community and the Republic of Latvia. 2. Exploratory talks between Commission and Latvian experts took place \nbetween November 1991 and February this year in Brussels. 3. On the basis of directives adopted by the Council on 11 November \n1991 there were a number of informal meetings between Community and \nLatvian representatives, which resulted in a formal negotiating session \nin Brussels on 4 February this year, at which the Agreement was \ninitialled. Regarding the initialled text, which is attached to the proposal for a \nDecision, the following should be noted: \n\n(a) it contains no financial protocol or financial undertakings; \n(b) the respect for democratic principles and human rights is an \n\nessential aspect of the Agreement (Article 1 ); \n\n(c) ECSC products and textile and clothing products falling within \nSection XI of the Harmonized System are not covered by the \nAgreement (Article 3 ); \n\n(d) the Community and Latvia reaffirm their undertaking to accord each \n\nother most-favoured-nation treatment under the GATT, and the \nCommunity also undertakes to abolish quantitative restrictions \nspecific to Latvia (Article 8 ); \n\n(e) as regards commercial cooperation, Latvia also undertakes to \nguarantee effective, suitable protection of intellectual and \ncommercial property and to accede to the relevant international \nconventions (Article 13(3)); \n\n(f) economic cooperation is focused on the sectors listed non-\n\nexhaustively in Article 15 with a view to establishing economic \nlinks and increasing trade between the two parties: it is also \ndesigned to support structural changes in the Latvian economy; \n(g) the Community undertakes to support Latvia's applications to accede \n\nto international organizations and conventions (Article 17); \n\n(h) Article 18 sets up a Joint Committee and lays down its \n\nresponsibilities: the Committee will monitor the proper working of \nthe Agreement and recommend measures that it deems appropriate to \nachieve the aims of the Agreement. -2,\" \n\n(i) \n\nthe Agreement is concluded for an initial period of ten \nyears, tacitly renewable each year: it may be denounced by \nmeans of the usual procedure, and suspended with immediate \neffect, totally or partially, should there be serious \ninfringement of essential provisions of theiAgreement. 4. Since Articles 113 and 235 of the Treaty provide the legal basis \nfor the Agreement, the opinion of Parliament is required. i \n\n5. It is proposed to sign a joint declaration on political dialogue \nwhen the Agreement is signed. i \n\n6. The Council is asked to adopt the attached proposal for a Council \nDecision on the conclusion of an Agreement on Trade and Commercial and \nEconomic Cooperation between the Community and Latvia. -h \n\nPROPOSAL FOR \n\nA COUNCIL DECISION \n\nof. on the conclusion by the European Economic Community of an \nAgreement between the European Economic Community and Latvia \non trade and commercial and economic cooperation \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic \nCommunity, and in particular Articles 113 and 235 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, \n\nWhereas the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic \nCommunity and on trade and commercial and economic cooperation is \nnecessary for the achievement of the Community's objectives in the field \nof external economic relations; whereas this Agreement should be \napproved on behalf of the European Economic Community; \n\nWhereas it appears that certain measures of economic cooperation \nprovided for by the Agreement exceed the powers of action provided for \nin the Treaty, and in particular those specified in the field of the \ncommon commercial policy, \n\nHAD DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe Agreement between the European Economic Community and Latvia on \ntrade and commercial and economic cooperation is hereby approved on \nbehalf of the European Economic Community. The text of that Agreement is attached to this decision. The President of the Council shall give the notification, provided for \nin Article 21 of the Agreement. Article 2 \n\n\fv-\n\nArticle 3 \n\nThe Commission assisted by representatives of the Member States, shall \nrepresent the Community in the joint committee set up by Article 18 of \nthe Agreement. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\fGROUPE \nEUROPE ORIENTALE \nDOC. SEANCE iU \n\n~6-\n\n1/24/92 EN \n\nBrussels, 4 February 1992 \n\nDRAFT AGREEMENT \n\nbetween the European Economic Community and the Republic of Latvia on trade \nand commercial and economic cooperation \n\nTHE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, \n\nhereinafter called the \"Community\", of the one part, and \n\nTHE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA, \n\nhereinafter called \"Latvia\", of the other part, \n\nCONSIDERING the importance of establishing and expanding trade links \nbetween the Community and Latvia, \n\nDESIROUS of creating favourable conditions for a substantial and harmonious \ndevelopment and diversification of trade and the promotion of commercial \nand economic cooperation in areas of mutual interest on the basis of \nequality, non-discrimination, mutual benefit and reciprocity, \n\nAWARE of the particular importance of foreign trade and other forms of \ninternational economic cooperation for the economic and social development \nof each of the Contracting Parties, \n\nAWARE of the importance of giving full effect to all the provisions and \nprinciples of the CSCE process, and in particular those set out in the \nHelsinki Final Act, the concluding documents of the Madrid, Vienna and \nCopenhagen meetings, and those of the Charter of Paris for a new Europe, \nparticularly with regard to the rule of law, democracy and human rights, as \nwell as those of the Bonn CSCE Conference on Economic Co-operation, \n\nRECOGNIZING the importance of guaranteeing the rights of ethnic and \nnational groups and minorities, in accordance with the undertakings made \nwithin the context of the CSCE, \n\nAWARE of the importance of strengthening their democratic institutions and \nof supporting the process of economic reform in Latvia, \n\nBELIEVING that a further impetus should be given to the trading and \neconomic relationship between the Community and Latvia by establishing \ncontractual links which will contribute to progress towards the objective \nof an association agreement in due course, when conditions are met, and to \nfurther development of relations between them, \n\nTAKING INTO ACCOUNT the favourable implications for trade and economic \ncooperation between the Contracting Parties of reform under way in Latvia, \n\n\fHAVE DECIDED to conclude this Agreement and to this end have designated as \ntheir Plenipotentiaries: \n\n+ \n\nTHE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY: \n\nTHE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA: \n\nWHO, having exchanged their full powers, found in good and due form, \n\nHAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: \n\nTITLE I \n\nGeneral \n\nArticle 1 \n\nRespect for the democratic principles and human rights established by the \nHelsinki Final Act and the Charter of Paris for a new Europe inspires the \ndomestic and external policies of the Community and Latvia and constitutes \nan essential element of the present agreement. Article 2 \n\nWithin the framework of their respective laws and regulations, the \nContracting Parties undertake to facilitate and promote: \n\n- the harmonious development and diversification of trade between them; \n\n- the development of various types of commercial and economic cooperation. They therefore confirm their resolve to consider favourably, each for its \nown part, suggestions made by the other Party with a view to attaining \nthese aims. -, \n\nTITLE II \n\nTrade and commercial cooperation \n\nArticle 3 \n\n1. This Agreement shall apply to trade in all products originating in the \nCommunity and in Latvia with the exception of products covered by the \nTreaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and of the \ntextiles and apparel covered by Section XI of the Harmonized system. 2. The provisions of this Agreement may be supplemented if necessary by \nsectoral agreements cr arrangements concluded between the community and \nLatvia. In particular, a separate agreement for textile products will be \nnegotiated. /\\f, \u00a3\u2014~ \n\n*\n\n&-\n\n\f-g-\nArticle 4 \n\nUnless otherwise specified in this Agreement, trade and other commercial \ncooperation between the Contracting Parties shall be conducted in \naccordance with their respective regulations. Article 5 \n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall accord each other most-favoured-nation \ntreatment in all matters regarding: \n\n- customs duties and charges of any kind imposed on or in connection with \n\nimportation or exportation, \n\n- the method of levying such duties and charges, \n\n- all rules and formalities in connection with importation and \n\nexportation, including provisions relating to customs clearance, \ntransit, warehousing and transhipment, \n\n- taxes and other internal charges levied directly or indirectly on \n\nimported products, \n\n- methods of payment and the transfer of such payments, \n\n- the regulations affecting the sale, purchase, transport, distribution \n\nand use of goods on the domestic market. 2. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall not apply to: \n\n(a) \n\n(b) \n\n(c) \n\nadvantages accorded to adjacent countries in order to facilitate \nfrontier traffic; \n\nN \n\nadvantages accorded with the aim of creating a customs union or a \nfree trade area or pursuant to the creation of such a union or \narea; \n\nadvantages accorded to particular countries in accordance with the \nGeneral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and other international \narrangements in favour of developing countries. Article 6 \n\nWithout prejudice to the rights and obligations stemming from international \nconventions on the temporary admission of goods which bind both sides, \nthe Contracting Parties shall furthermore grant each other reciprocal \nexemption from import charges and duties on goods admitted temporarily, in \nthe instances and according to the procedures stipulated by any other \ninternational convention on this matter binding only one of them. Account \nshall be taken of the conditions under which the obligations stemming from \nsuch a convention have been accepted by the Contracting Party in question. -f-\nArticle 7 \n\nLatvia shall grant imports of products originating in the Community \ntreatment which is non-discriminatory in relation to products originating \nin other countries, as regards the application of quantitative \nrestrictions, the granting of licences and access to the foreign currency \nneeded to pay for such imports. Article 8 \n\n1. Without prejudice to Article 7, each of the Contracting Parties shall \ngrant imports of products originating in the other the highest degree of \nliberalization generally extended to third countries. To that end, the \nspecific quantitative restrictions applying to imports from Latvia into the \nCommunity shall be eliminated. 2. For the purposes of this Agreement, \"specific quantitative restrictions\" \nshall mean those quantitative restrictions applied by the Community to \nimports originating in Latvia under Regulation (EEC) No 3420/83, which \nconcerns products other than those to which quantitative restrictions are \napplied under Regulation (EEC) No 288/82. Article 9 \n\nThe Parties shall inform each other of any changes in their tariff or \nstatistical nomenclature or of any decision taken in accordance with the \nprocedures in force concerning the classification of products covered by \nthis Agreement. Article 10 \n\nGoods shall be traded between the Contracting Parties at market-related \nprices. Article 11 \n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall consult each other if any product is being \nimported into the territory of one of them in such increased quantities or \non such terms as to cause cr threaten to cause serious injury to domestic \nproducers of like or directly competing products. 2. The Contracting Party claiming serious injury or threat thereof shall \nrequest consultations by notification in writing and shall provide the \nother Party with all the relevant information required for a detailed \nexamination of the situation. 3. The consultations requested pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be held with a \nview to seeking mutually satisfactory solutions and with due regard for the \nfundamental aims of the Agreement; they shall be completed not later than \n30 days from the date of notification of the request by the Party \nconcerned, unless the Parties agree otherwise. /\\s- / \n\n\f-# \n\n4. If, as a result of such consultations, it is agreed that the situation \nreferred to in paragraph 1 exists, exports shall be limited or such other \naction taken, possibly with regard to the price at which these exports are \nsold, as will prevent or remedy the injury. 5. If, following action under paragraphs 1 to 4, agreement is not reached \nbetween the Contracting Parties, the Contracting Party which requested the \nconsultations shall be free to restrict the imports of the products \nconcerned to the extent and for such time as is necessary to prevent or \nremedy the injury. The other Contracting Party shall then be free to \ndeviate from its obligations towards the first Party in respect of \nsubstantially equivalent trade. 6. in critical circumstances, where delay would cause damage difficult to \nrepair, such preventive or remedial action may be taken provisionally \nwithout prior consultation, provided consultations are held immediately \nafter such action is taken. 7. In the selection of measures under this Article, the Contracting Parties \nshall give priority to those which cause the least disturbance to the \nfunctioning of this Agreement. 8. Where necessary the contracting Parties may hold consultations to \ndetermine when the measures adopted pursuant to paragraphs 4 to 6 shall \ncease to apply. Article 12 \n\n1. This Agreement shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on \nimports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public \nmorality, public policy or public security, the protection of life and \nhealth of humans, animals or plants, the protection of industrial, \ncommercial and intellectual property, or rules delating to gold or silver \nor imposed for the protection of national treasures of artistic, historic \nor archaeological value. Such prohibitions and restrictions must not, however, constitute a means of \narbitrary discrimination or disguised restrictions on trade between the \nContracting Parties. 2. This Agreement shall not preclude the taking of action justified on \ngrounds of protection of essential security interests: \n\n(a) \n\n(b) \n\n(c) \n\nrelating to fissionable materials or the materials from which they \nare derived; \n\nrelating to traffic in arms, ammunition and implements of war and \nto such traffic in other goods and materials as is carried on \ndirectly or indirectly for the purpose of supplying a military \nestablishment; \n\ntaken in time of war or other emergency in international relations \nor to allow it to comply with obligations it has accepted in \nconnection with the maintenance of international peace and \nsecurity. / , ^. C-^. -y-\nArticle 13 \n\n1. The Contracting Parties shall make every effort to promote, expand and \ndiversify their trade on the basis of non-discrimination and reciprocity. In the spirit of this Article, the Joint committee established under \nTitle V of this Agreement will attach special importance to examining ways \nof encouraging the reciprocal and harmonious expansion of trade. 2. in furtherance of the aims of this Article and within the limits of \ntheir respective powers, the Contracting Parties agree on the necessity to \nimprove favourable business regulations and facilities for each other's \nfirms or companies on their respective markets, inter alia by taking steps: \n\n- to ensure the publication and facilitate exchanges of commercial and \n\neconomic information on all matters which would assist the development \nof commercial and economic cooperation, for example: \n\n- \n\ngeneral and sectoral import arrangements, \n\neconomic and commercial law, including regulations on markets, \ncompanies and investment, \n\nmacroeconomic information and statistics, including production, \nconsumption and foreign trade statistics, \n\n- to facilitate the establishment and operation of each other's companies, \n\n- to encourage trade promotion activities, \n\n- to provide natural and legal persons of the other Party with guarantees \nof their individual and property rights, such as non-discriminatory \naccess for that purpose to courts and appropriate administrative bodies \nZ^^^* ^\u2014 \nof the Community and Latvia. ~i n \n\n3. Latvia will take measures guaranteeing an effective and adequate \nprotection of intellectual, industrial and commercial property, at a level \nsimilar to that which exists in the Community, and will adhere to \nInternational Conventions on intellectual, industrial and commercial \nproperty. 4. The Contracting Parties undertake to facilitate, within the limits of \ntheir respective powers, administrative cooperation between the appropriate \nauthorities in matters relating to customs, in particular in the following \nareas: \n\n- vocational training, \n\n- simplification of customs documentation and procedures, and \n\n- prevention and detection of infringements of the rules on customs \n\nmatters, including the rules governing import quotas. Article 14 \n\nwithin the limits of their respective powers, the Contracting Parties: \n\n- shall encourage the adoption of arbitration for the settlement of \ndisputes arising out of commercial and cooperation transactions \nconcluded by companies, enterprises or economic organizations of the \nCommunity and those of Latvia, \n\n- agree that when a dispute is submitted to arbitration, each party to the \n\ndispute may freely choose its own arbitrator, irrespective of \nnationality, and that the presiding third arbitrator or the sole \narbitrator may be a citizen of a third State, \n\n- shall encourage recourse to the arbitration rules developed by the \n\nUnited Nations Commission on International Trade Law (Uncitral) and to \narbitration by any centre of a State signatory to the Convention on \nRecognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards concluded in \nNew York on 10 uune IS58. TITLE III \n\nEconomic cooperation \n\nArticle 15 \n\n1. In the light of their respective economic policies and objectives, the \nContracting Parties, within the limits of their existing powers, shall \nfoster economic cooperation on as broad a base as possible in all fields \ndeemed to be in their mutual interest. The objectives of such cooperation shall be, inter alia: \n\n- to reinforce and diversify economic links between the Contracting \n\nParties, \n\nA\\/4 C^. 13 \n\n- to contribute to the development of their respective economies and \n\nstandards of living, \n\n- to open up new sources of supply and new markets, \n\n- to encourage cooperation between economic operators with a view to \npromoting joint ventures, licensing agreements, and other forms of \nindustrial cooperation to develop their respective industries, \n\n- to encourage scientific and technological progress, \n\n- to support structural changes in the Latvian economy which will increase \n\nand diversify trade in goods and services with the Community, \n\n- to encourage the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises in \n\ntrade and industrial cooperation. 2. In order to achieve these objectives, the Contracting Parties shall make \nefforts to encourage and promote economic cooperation in areas of mutual \ninterest, in particular in the following sectors: \n\n- industry, \n\n- agriculture, including agro-industry, \n\n- fisheries, \n\n- science and technology in areas in which the Contracting Parties are \n\nactive and which they consider to be of mutual interest, \n\n- telecommunications, \n\n- energy, including the saving of energy and the development of new \n\nsources of energy, \n\n- mining and production of building materials, \n\n- environmental protection, including protection from water and air \npollution and industrial accidents, and the management of natural \nresources; also taking into account environmental requirements in other \npolicy areas such as industry, agriculture, energy, transport, \n\n- transport, communications and the running of ports, \n\n- tourism^ and other service activities, \n\n- economic, monetary, banking, insurance and financial services, \n\n- development of human resources and training, \n\n/ XyS' / \n\n- health. -9-\n\n- economic policy, \n\n- standards, \n\n- statistics. 3. To give effect to the objectives of economic cooperation and within the \nlimits of their respective powers, the contracting Parties shall encourage \nthe adoption of measures aimed at creating favourable conditions for \neconomic and industrial cooperation, including: \n\n- the facilitation of exchanges of commercial and economic information, \n\n- the development of a favourable climate for investment, notably by the \n\nextension by the Member States of the Community and Latvia of \narrangements for investment promotion and protection, in particular for \nthe transfer of profits and the repatriation of invested capital, and \nalso of agreements on the avoidance of double taxation, \n\n- exchanges and contacts between persons and delegations representing \n\ncommercial or other appropriate organizations, \n\n- the organization of seminars, fairs or exhibitions, symposia and \n\nbusiness weeks. - the encouragement of activities contributing to technical competence in \n\nspecific fields, notably commercialization. Article 16 \n\nWithout prejudice to the relevant provisions of the Treaties establishing \nthe European Communities, this Agreement and any action taken pursuant to \nit shall in no way affect the powers of the Member States of the community \nto undertake bilateral activities with Latvia in the field of economic \ncooperation and to conclude, where appropriate, new economic cooperation \n:. gre<?. ment5 with Lc-tvie. TITLE IV \n\nAccession to international organizations and conventions \n\nArticle 17 \n\nThe Community undertakes, within the limits of its powers, to support the \naccession of Latvia to international organizations and conventions to which \nthe Community is a party, in order to enable Latvia to become more active \nin the world economic system. TITLE V \n\nJoint Committee \n\nArticle 18 \n\n1. A Joint Committee shall be set up, comprising representatives of the \n\nCommunity, on the one hand, and representatives of Latvia, on the other. The Joint Committee shall formulate recommendations by mutual agreement \nbetween the Contracting Parties. The Joint Committee shall, as necessary, adopt its own rules of \nprocedure and programme of work. The Joint Committee shall meet once a year in Brussels and Riga \nalternately. Special meetings may be convened by mutual agreement, at \nthe request of either Contracting Party. The Joint Committee shall be \nchaired alternately by each of the Contracting Parties. Wherever \npossible, the agenda for meetings of the Joint Committee shall be agreed \nbeforehand. The Joint Committee may decide to set up working parties to assist it in \ncarrying out its duties. 2. The Joint Committee shall ensure the proper functioning of this \nAgreement and shall devise and recommend practical measures for \nachieving its objectives, keeping in view the economic and social \npolicies of the Contracting Parties. 3. The Joint Committee shall endeavour to find ways of encouraging the \n\ndevelopment of trade and commercial and economic cooperation between the \ncontracting Parties, in particular, it shall: \n\n- \n\n- \n\n~ \n\nexamine the various aspects of trade between the Parties, \nnotably its overall pattern, rate of growth, structure and \ndiversification, the trade balance and the various forms of \ntrade and trade promotion, \n\nmake recommendations on any trade or economic cooperation \nproblem of mutual concern; \n\nseek appropriate means of avoiding possible difficulties in \nthe fields of trade and cooperation and encourage various \nforms of commercial and economic cooperation in areas of \nmutual interest; \n\nconsider measures likely to develop and diversify trade and \neconomic cooperation, notably by improving import \nopportunities in the Community and in Latvia; \n\n* \n\n\f-li-\n\nexchange information on macroeconomic plans and forecasts \nfor the economies of the Contracting Parties which have an \nimpact on trade and cooperation and, by extension, on the \nscope for developing complementarity between their \nrespective economies and also on proposed programmes of \neconomic reform; \n\nexamine the situation concerning the procedures for the \naward of contracts for supplying goods and services \nfollowing an international invitation to tender; \n\nexchange information on amendments to and developments in \nthe laws, regulations and formalities of the Contracting \nParties in the areas covered by this Agreement; \n\nexamine favourably ways of improving conditions for the \ndevelopment of direct contacts between firms established in \nthe Community and those established in Latvia; \n\nformulate and submit to the authorities of both Contracting \nParties recommendations for resolving any problems that \narise, where appropriate by means of the conclusion of \narrangements or agreements. TITLE VI \n\nGeneral and final provisions \n\nArticle 19 \n\nSubject to the provisions of Article 16, the provisions of this Agreement \nshall replace the provisions of agreements concluded between Member States \nof the Community and Latvia where the latter provisions are either \nincompatible with or identical to the former. Article 20 \n\nThis Agreement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which \nthe Treaty establishing the European Economic community is applied and \nunder the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other, to the \nterritory of the Republic of Latvia. Article 21 \n\nThis Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the second month \nfollowing the date on which the Contracting Parties notify each other that \nthe legal procedures necessary to this end have been completed. The \nAgreement is concluded for an initial period of ten years. The Agreement \nshall be automatically renewed year by year provided that neither \ncontracting Party gives the other Party written notice of denunciation of \nthe Agreement six months before it expires. / \n\nSis' \n*'<+'\u2014 \n\n/*. However, the two Contracting Parties may amend the Agreement by mutual \nconsent in order to take account of new developments, notably the situation \nwhich would arise from the accession of Latvia to the General Agreement on \nTariffs and Trade. In the latter case, the Contracting Parties shall \nprepare together the amendments to this Agreement necessary to take account \nof the protocol of accession of Latvia to the General Agreement. If the \nParties are unable to agree on this subject they reserve the right to \ndenounce this Agreement. The parties reserve the right to suspend this Agreement in whole or in part \nwith immediate effect if a serious violation occurs of the essential \nprovisions of the present agreement. Article 22 \n\nThis Agreement is drawn up in duplicate in the Danish, Dutch, English, \nFrench, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and Latvian languages, \neach text being equally authentic. * \n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 176 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n02 li \n\nCatalogue number: CB-CO-92-191-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-43799-5 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b2969211-d801-4f3b-8bf3-7d0daae48d47", "title": "Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland concerning certain arrangements in agriculture", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "fmx4,html,print,xhtml", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic Community,Iceland", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "Iceland,agricultural product,exemption from customs duties,import levy,originating product,trade agreement (EU)", "workIds": "celex:21993A0501(06)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Iceland", "agricultural product", "exemption from customs duties", "import levy", "originating product", "trade agreement (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b2969211-d801-4f3b-8bf3-7d0daae48d47", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["fmx4", "html", "print", "xhtml"], "text": "L_1993109EN. 01003601. xml\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. 5. 1993\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\nEN\n\n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities\n\n\nL 109/36\n\n\n\n\n\nAGREEMENT\nin the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland concerning certain arrangements in agriculture\nOporto, 2 May 1992. Sir,\nI have the honour to refer to the discussions concerning trade arrangements for certain agricultural products between the Community and Iceland which have taken place in the framework of the negotiations on an EEA Agreement, and to Protocol 42 attached to that Agreement. I hereby confirm that as a result of these discussions, the Republic of Iceland will, from the date of entry into force of the EEA Agreement, abolish import duties for the products listed in Annex I to this letter originating in the Community within the meaning of Annex II. I should be obliged if you would confirm that the Government of the Republic of Iceland is in agreement with the contents of this letter. On behalf of the Council of the European Communities\n\n\n\n\n\nOporto, 2 May 1992. Sir,\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date which reads as follows:\n\n\u2018I have the honour to refer to the discussions concerning trade arrangements for certain agricultural products between the Community and Iceland which have taken place in the framework of the negotiations on an EEA Agreement, and to Protocol 42 attached to that Agreement. I hereby confirm that as a result of these discussions, the Republic of Iceland will, from the date of entry into force of the EEA Agreement, abolish import duties for the products listed in Annex I to this letter originating in the Community within the meaning of Annex II. I should be obliged if you would confirm that the Government of the Republic of Iceland is in agreement with the contents of this letter. \u2019\n\nI have the honour to confirm that my Government is in agreement with the contents of this letter. For the Government of the Republic of Iceland\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nANNEX I\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIcelandic Customs Tariff heading No\n\n\nDescription\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00603\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nCut flowers:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCarnations, Protea, Anthurium, Ornithogalum, Strelitzia; (1 December to 30 April)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00702\u00a000\n\n\nTomatoes (1 November to 15 March), fresh or chilled\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00703\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nOnions other than sets, fresh or chilled\n\n\n\n\n0703\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\nGarlic, fresh or chilled\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00705\u00a011\u00a000\n\n\nCabbage lettuce (1 November to 15 March), fresh or chilled\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00707\u00a000\n\n\nCucumbers and gherkins (1 November to 15 March), fresh or chilled\n\n\n\n\n0709\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\nAsparagus, fresh or chilled\n\n\n\n\n0709\u00a030\u00a000\n\n\nAubergines (eggplants), fresh or chilled\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00709\u00a060\u00a009\n\n\nSweet peppers (1 November to 15 March), fresh or chilled\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00709\u00a090\u00a009\n\n\nCourgettes, fresh or chilled\n\n\n\n\n0710\u00a029\u00a000\n\n\nLeguminous vegetables other than peas and beans, frozen\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00710\u00a080\u00a000\n\n\nSweet peppers, frozen (1 November to 15 March)\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00712\u00a090\u00a009\n\n\nOther dried vegetables, other than sweet corn, tomatoes and carrots, mixtures of dried vegetables\n\n\n\n\n0802\u00a011\u00a000\n12 00\n\n\nAlmonds, fresh or dried\n\n\n\n\n0802\u00a031\u00a000\n32 00\n\n\nWalnuts, fresh or dried\n\n\n\n\n0802\u00a021\u00a000\n22 00\n\n\nHazelnuts or filerts, fresh or dried\n\n\n\n\n0813\u00a050\u00a000\n\n\nMixtures of nuts or dried fruits of this Chapter\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00802\u00a090\u00a000\n\n\nPine kernels\n\n\n\n\n0803\u00a000\u00a000\n\n\nBananas, fresh of dried\n\n\n\n\n0804\u00a030\u00a000\n\n\nPineapples, fresh or dried\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00804\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\nDried figs\n\n\n\n\n0805\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nOranges, fresh or dried\n\n\n\n\n0805\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\nMandarines clementines, etc. , fresh or dried\n\n\n\n\n0805\u00a030\u00a001\n\n\nLemons, fresh or dried\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00806\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nTable grapes, fresh\n\n\n\n\n0806\u00a020\u00a001\n20 09\n\n\nDried grapes\n\n\n\n\n0807\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nMelons, including watermelons, fresh\n\n\n\n\n0809\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nApricots, fresh\n\n\n\n\n0809\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\nCherries, fresh\n\n\n\n\n0809\u00a030\u00a000\n\n\nPeaches, including nectarines, fresh\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00809\u00a040\u00a000\n\n\nPlums, fresh\n\n\n\n\n0810\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nStrawberries, fresh\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00810\u00a090\u00a000\n\n\nKiwi fruit, fresh\n\n\n\n\n0811\u00a010\u00a001\n10 09\n\n\nFrozen strawberries, with or without added sugar or other sweetening matter\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00812\u00a090\u00a000\n\n\nApricots, provisionally preserved\n\n\n\n\n0813\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nDried apricots\n\n\n\n\n0805\u00a030\u00a009\n\n\nLimes, fresh or dried\n\n\n\n\n0904\u00a020\u00a001\n20 09\n\n\nFruits of the genus Capiscum or of the genus Pimenta, dried or ground\n\n\n\n\n0905\u00a000\u00a000\n\n\nVanilla\n\n\n\n\n0910\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\nSaffron\n\n\n\n\n1006\n\n\nRice\n\n\n\n\n1211\n\n\nPlants and parts of plants of a kind used primarly in perfumery pharmacy, etc. 1302\u00a031\u00a001\n31 09\n\n\nAgar-agar\n\n\n\n\n1509\n\n\nOlive oil\n\n\n\n\n1804\u00a000\u00a000\n\n\nCocoa butter, fat and oil\n\n\n\n\n2002\n\n\nPrepared or preserved tomatoes, otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02003\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nPrepared or preserved mushrooms\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02004\u00a090\u00a000\n\n\nPrepared or preserved artichokes, frozen\n\n\n\n\n2005\u00a060\u00a000\n\n\nPrepared or preserved asparagus, not frozen\n\n\n\n\n2005\u00a070\u00a000\n\n\nPrepared or preserved olives, not frozen\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02005\u00a090\u00a000\n\n\nPrepared or preserved artichokes, not frozen\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02005\u00a090\u00a000\n\n\nPrepared or preserved capers, not frozen\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02006\u00a000\n\n\nFruits, preserved by sugar, other than ginger and cherries, with a sugar content exceeding 13 % by weight\n\n\n\n\n2008\u00a020\u00a001\n20 09\n\n\nPrepared or preserved pineapples\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02008\u00a030\u00a001\n30 09\n\n\nPrepared or preserved mandarines (including tangerines and satsumas); clemantines, wilkings and other similar citrus hybrids\n\n\n\n\n2008\u00a050\u00a001\n50 09\n\n\nPrepared or preserved apricots\n\n\n\n\n2008\u00a070\u00a001\n70 09\n\n\nPrepared or preserved peaches\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02009\u00a011\u00a001\n11 09\n19 01\n19 09\n\n\nOrange juice, other than of a value not exceeding ECU 30 per 100 kg net weight\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02009\u00a030\u00a001\n30 09\n\n\nJuice of any other single citrus fruit, of a density not exceeding 1,33 g/cm3 at 20 oC, of a value exceeding ECU 30 per 100 kg net weight, other than containing added sugar\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02009\u00a060\u00a001\n60 09\n\n\nOther grape juice\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02204\u00a030\u00a000\n\n\nOther grape must, other than in fermentation or with fermentation arrested otherwise than by the addition of alcohol\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02204\u00a021\n\n\nOther wine, of an actual alcoholic strength by volume exceeding 15 % vol but not exceeding 18 % vol, in containers of two litres or less\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02204\u00a029\n\n\nOther wine, of an actual alcoholic strength by volume exceeding 15 % vol but not exceeding 18 % vol, other than in containers of two litres or less\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02208\u00a030\u00a000\n\n\nIrish whiskey, other than Bourbon whiskey, rum and taffia\n\n\n\n\n2208\u00a040\u00a000\n\n\nRum and taffia\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02208\u00a090\u00a009\n\n\nOuzo\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02208\u00a090\u00a004\n\n\nIrish cream liqueurs\n\n\n\n\n2401\n\n\nUnmanufactured tobacco; tobacco refuse\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nANNEX II\nRULES OF ORIGIN\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. 1. For the purpose of implementing the Agreement, a product shall be considered to be originating in the Community if it has been wholly obtained there. 2. The following shall be considered as wholly obtained in the Community:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nvegetable products harvested there;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nlive animals born and raised there;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nproducts from live animals raised there;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\ngoods produced there exclusively from products specified in (a) to (c). 3. Packing materials and packing containers presented with a product therein shall not be included with this product for the purpose of determining whether it has been wholly obtained and it shall not be necessary to establish whether such packing materials or packing containers are originating or not. 2. Notwithstanding point 1, the products mentioned in columns 1 and 2 of the list in the Appendix, obtained in the Community and incorporating materials which have not been wholly obtained there, shall also be considered as originating, provided that the conditions set out in column 3 concerning working or processing carried out on such materials have been fulfilled. 3. 1. The preferential treatment provided for under the Agreement applies only to products which are transported directly from the Community to Iceland without passing through the territory of another country. However, products constituting one single consignment may be transported through territory other than that of the Community and Iceland with, should the occasion arise, transhipment or temporary warehousing in such territory, provided that the products have remained under the surveillance of the customs authorities in the country of transit or of warehousing and that they have not undergone operations other than unloading, reloading or any other operation designed to preserve them in good condition. 2. Evidence that the conditions referred to in point 3. 1 have been fulfilled shall be supplied to the customs authorities of Iceland in accordance with Article 13 (2) of Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement. 4. 1. Originating products within the meaning of this Annex shall, on importation into Iceland, benefit from the Agreement upon submission of either a movement certificate EUR. 1 or an invoice declaration, issued or made out in accordance with Title V of Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement. 2. The documents referred to in point 4. 1 shall clearly indicate that the products concerned are originating in the Community within the meaning of this Agreement by using the word \u2018Community\u2019 in one of the languages in which the Agreement is drawn up, followed by the letters \u2018AGRI\u2019 inserted between brackets. In the case of the invoice declaration, this indication shall replace the reference to \u2018EEA preferential origin\u2019 in the text of the declaration given in Appendix IV of Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement. 5. The provisions of Titles IV (drawback or exemption), V (proof of origin) and VI (arrangements for administrative cooperation) of Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement shall apply mutatis mutandis. As far as the provisions of Title IV are concerned, it is understood that the prohibition of drawback of, or exemption from, customs duties contained in these provisions shall apply only in respect of materials which are of the kind to which the EEA Agreement applies. Appendix\nList of products, referred to in point 2, subject to conditions other than the wholly obtained criterion\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nHS heading No\n\n\nDescription of products\n\n\nWorking or processing carried out on non-originating materials that confers originating status\n\n\n\n\n(1)\n\n\n(2)\n\n\n(3)\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a01302\n\n\nAgar-agar\n\n\nManufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 50% of the ex-works price of the product\n\n\n\n\n1804\n\n\nCocoa butter, fat and oil\n\n\nManufacture in which all the materials used are classified in a heading other than that of the product\n\n\n\n\n2002\n\n\nPrepared or preserved tomatoes, otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid\n\n\nManufacture in which all the tomatoes of Chapter 7 or 20 used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02003\n\n\nPrepared or preserved mushrooms\n\n\nManufacture in which all the mushrooms used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02004\n\n\nPrepared or preserved artichokes\n\n\nManufacture in which all the artichokes used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02005\n\n\nPrepared or preserved asparagus, artichokes, olives and capers\n\n\nManufacture in which all the vegetables used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02006\n\n\nFruit preserved by sugar, other than ginger and cherries, with a sugar content exceeding 13% by weight\n\n\nManufacture in which all the fruits used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02008\n\n\nPrepared or preserved pineapples, citrus fruit, apricots and peaches\n\n\nManufacture in which all the fruits used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02009\n\n\nOrange juice, other than of a value not exceeding ECU 30 per 100 kg net weight\n\n\nManufacture in which all the fruits or any material derived from fruits used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02009\n\n\nJuice of other citrus fruits, of a density not exceeding 1,33 g/cm3 at 20 oC, of a value exceeding ECU 30 per 100 kg net weight other than containing added sugar\n\n\nManufacture in which all the fruits or any material derived from fruits used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02009\n\n\nOther grape juice\n\n\nManufacture in which all the grapes used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02204\n\n\nOther grape must, other than in fermentation or with fermentation arrested otherwise than by addition of alcohol\n\n\nManufacture in which all the grapes or any material derived from grapes used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02204\n\n\nOther wine, of an actual alcoholic strength by volume exceeding 15% vol but not exceeding 18% vol\n\n\nManufacture in which all the grapes or any material derived from grapes used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02208\n\n\nIrish whiskey, rum and taffia, ouzo, Irish cream liqueurs\n\n\nManufacture:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nfrom materials not classified within heading No 2207 or 2208, and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nin which all the grapes or any material derived from grapes used must be wholly obtained"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c0c6f0a2-1ddc-4688-a589-91fff0f5dc6a", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 28 on intellectual property", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,European patent,electronic component,intellectual property,international convention,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(29)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "European patent", "electronic component", "intellectual property", "international convention", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c0c6f0a2-1ddc-4688-a589-91fff0f5dc6a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4a4ab1b7-85be-4c9a-9700-c5d49a27bad7", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 27 on cooperation in the field of State aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,State aid,control of State aid,exchange of information,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(28)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "State aid", "control of State aid", "exchange of information", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4a4ab1b7-85be-4c9a-9700-c5d49a27bad7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0792ea4f-b930-42a6-9f7a-a72a812f98bf", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 33 on arbitration procedures", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,arbitration,international arbitration,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(34)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "arbitration", "international arbitration", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0792ea4f-b930-42a6-9f7a-a72a812f98bf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b4b7babf-75bf-4e8a-93c3-ed55a6ce09a5", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 44 on the Agreement between the EC and the Swiss Confederation on the carriage of goods by road and rail", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,Switzerland,bilateral agreement,carriage of goods,combined transport,international transport,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,rail transport,road transport", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(45)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "Switzerland", "bilateral agreement", "carriage of goods", "combined transport", "international transport", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "rail transport", "road transport"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b4b7babf-75bf-4e8a-93c3-ed55a6ce09a5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e716f10-ac24-4d69-87d9-77308c864b0e", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 46 on the development of cooperation in the fisheries sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,cooperation policy,fisheries policy,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(47)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "cooperation policy", "fisheries policy", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e716f10-ac24-4d69-87d9-77308c864b0e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a0d18d25-7797-4d55-9169-4fbbccc97ad2", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 9 on trade in fish and other marine products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,fishery product,fishery resources,marine mammal,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,tariff policy", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(10)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "fishery product", "fishery resources", "marine mammal", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "tariff policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a0d18d25-7797-4d55-9169-4fbbccc97ad2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2077c3b4-9690-4334-8f2b-9864890936e8", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 13 on the non-application of anti-dumping and countervailing measures", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,anti-dumping measure,countervailing charge,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,third country", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(14)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "anti-dumping measure", "countervailing charge", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2077c3b4-9690-4334-8f2b-9864890936e8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/96879928-7ceb-41c4-a3a2-ac160e95911a", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 2 on products excluded from the scope of the Agreement in accordance with Article 8 (3) (a)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "fmx4,html,print,xhtml", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,free movement of goods,milk by-product,multilateral agreement,protein products,protocol to an agreement,starch", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(03)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "free movement of goods", "milk by-product", "multilateral agreement", "protein products", "protocol to an agreement", "starch"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/96879928-7ceb-41c4-a3a2-ac160e95911a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["fmx4", "html", "print", "xhtml"], "text": "L_1994001EN. 01003901. xml\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n3. 1. 1994\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\nEN\n\n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities\n\n\nL 1/39\n\n\n\n\n\nPROTOCOL 2\non products excluded from the scope of the Agreement in accordance with Article 8(3)(a)\nThe following products falling within HS, Chapters 25 to 97, are excluded from the scope of the Agreement:\n\n\n\n\n\n\nHS heading No\n\n\nProduct description\n\n\n\n\n35. 01\n\n\nCasein, casemates and other casein derivatives;\nCasein glues\n\n\n\n\n35. 02\n\n\nAlbumins, albuminates and other albumin derivatives:\n\n\n\n\n10\n\n\n\u2013 Egg albumin:\n\n\n\n\nex 10\n\n\n\u2013 \u2013 Other than unfit, or to be rendered unfit, for human consumption\n\n\n\n\n90\n\n\n\u2013 Other:\n\n\n\n\nex 90\n\n\n\u2013 \u2013 Milk albumin (lactalbumin), other than unfit, or to be rendered unfit, for human consumption\n\n\n\n\n35. 05\n\n\nDextrins and other modified starches (for example, pregelatinized or esterified starches); glues based on starches, or on dextrins or other modified starches:\n\n\n\n\n10\n\n\n\u2013 Dextrins and other modified starches:\n\n\n\n\nex 10\n\n\n\u2013 \u2013 Starches, esterified or etherified"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7563a538-6b2a-449b-b8ae-09eb4f0180c8", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 22 concerning the definition of 'undertaking' and 'turnover' (Article 56)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,inter-company agreement,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,turnover,type of business", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(23)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "inter-company agreement", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "turnover", "type of business"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7563a538-6b2a-449b-b8ae-09eb4f0180c8", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a7818b8-bf34-49e0-90b6-5a8edcb4cabe", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 11 on mutual assistance in Customs Matters", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,administrative cooperation,customs cooperation,customs regulations,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(12)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "administrative cooperation", "customs cooperation", "customs regulations", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a7818b8-bf34-49e0-90b6-5a8edcb4cabe", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/efa5752c-a66d-46ac-9ed6-0a6491e9ea76", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex I - Veterinary and phytosanitary matters - List provided for in Article 17", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,application of EU law,multilateral agreement,plant health legislation,veterinary legislation", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(51)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "application of EU law", "multilateral agreement", "plant health legislation", "veterinary legislation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/efa5752c-a66d-46ac-9ed6-0a6491e9ea76", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b4cf4efc-f533-418d-aed3-201942c33bac", "title": "Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning certain arrangements in agriculture", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "fmx4,html,print,xhtml", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic Community,Norway", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "Norway,agricultural product,cheese,horticulture,import levy,originating product,tariff preference,trade agreement (EU)", "workIds": "celex:21993A0501(08)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Norway", "agricultural product", "cheese", "horticulture", "import levy", "originating product", "tariff preference", "trade agreement (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b4cf4efc-f533-418d-aed3-201942c33bac", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["fmx4", "html", "print", "xhtml"], "text": "L_1993109EN. 01004701. xml\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. 5. 1993\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\n\nEN\n\n\nOfficial Journal of the European Communities\n\n\nL 109/47\n\n\n\n\n\nAGREEMENT\nin the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning certain arrangements in agriculture\nOporto, 2 May 1992. Sir,\nI have the honour to refer to the discussions concerning trade arrangements for certain agricultural products between the Community and Norway which have taken place in the framework of the negotiations on an EEA Agreement, and to Protocol 42 attached to that Agreement. I hereby confirm that the results of these discussions were as follows:\n\n\n\n\n\n\nI. an arrangement between the Community and Norway concerning reciprocal trade in cheese. The text of this arrangement is set out in Annex I to this letter;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nII. an arrangement between the Community and Norway concerning trade in certain horticultural products. The text of this arrangement is set out in Annex II to this letter;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIII. tariff concessions granted by Norway to the Community. These concessions are set out in Annex III to this letter;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIV. rules of origin for the purpose of implementing the abovementioned arrangements and concessions. These rules are set out in Annex IV to this letter. This exchange of letters shall be approved by the Contracting Parties in accordance with their own procedures. I should be obliged if you would confirm that the Government of the Kingdom of Norway is in agreement with the contents of this letter. On behalf of the Council of the European Communities\n\n\n\n\n\nOporto, 2 May 1992. Sir,\nI have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date which reads as follows:\n\u2018I have the honour to refer to the discussions concerning trade arrangements for certain agricultural products between the Community and Norway which have taken place in the framework of the negotiations on an EEA Agreement, and to Protocol 42 attached to that Agreement. I hereby confirm that the results of these discussions were as follows:\n\n\n\n\n\n\nI. an arrangement between the Community and Norway concerning reciprocal trade in cheese. The text of this arrangement is set out in Annex I to this letter;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nII. an arrangement between the Community and Norway concerning trade in certain horticultural products. The text of this arrangement is set out in Annex II to this letter;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIII. tariff concessions granted by Norway to the Community. These concessions are set out in Annex III to this letter;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIV. rules of origin for the purpose of implementing the abovementioned arrangements and concessions. These rules are set out in Annex IV to this letter. This exchange of letters shall be approved by the Contracting Parties in accordance with their own procedures. I should be obliged if you would confirm that the Government of the Kingdom of Norway is in agreement with the contents of this letter. \u2019\nI have the honour to confirm that my Government is in agreement with the contents of this letter. For the Government of the Kingdom of Norway\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nANNEX I\nARRANGEMENT\nbetween the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning reciprocal trade in cheese\nWith the aim of fostering the harmonious development of trade in agricultural products, and taking into account the discussions which have taken place in the framework of the negotiations on an EEA Agreement, the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway have agreed to conclude a new arrangement\u00a0(1) concerning their reciprocal trade in cheese. In view of the common interest of the Community and Norway in offering consumers, in addition to home-produced cheese, other types of imported cheese, the provisions of this arrangement read as follows:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. For the annual quantities of cheese listed below, the import duties may not exceed the following levels:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\n\non importation into the Community (excluding Spain and Portugal)\n\nCheese falling within CN code 0406, originating in Norway and accompanied by an approved certificate\u00a0(2):\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nAnnual quantity\n(in tonnes)\n\n\nImport duty\n(in ECU/100 kg)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nJarisberg, of a minimum fat content of 45 %, by weight, in the dry matter and of a dry matter content, by weight, of not less than 56 %, matured for at least three months:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nWhole cheeses with rind\u00a0(3) weighing from 8 kg to 12 kg\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nRectangular blocks of a net weight not exceeding 7 kg\u00a0(4)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nPieces packed in vaccuum or in inert gas, of a net weight of not less than 150 g but not exceeding 1 kg\u00a0(4)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nRidder, of a minimum fat content of 60 %, by weight, in the dry matter and matured for at least four weeks:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nWhole cheeses with rind\u00a0(3) weighing from 1 kg to 2 kg\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nPieces packed in vacuum or in inert gas, with rind on at least one side\u00a0(3), of a net weight of not less than 150 g\u00a0(4)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2\u00a0200\n\n\n55\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\n\non importation into Norway\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nAnnual quantity\n(in tonnes)\n\n\nImport duty\n(in Nkr/kg)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nCheese of all types and varieties, originating in the Community\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2\u00a0360\n\n\n1,20\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. Norway will take the necessary steps in order to:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nlimit the issue of the certificates referred to in 1 (a) to the quantities agreed in this Agreement,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nensure that the autonomous system of import licence allocation will be managed taking into account market requirements and in such a way that imports may take place regularly and that the quantities agreed for import into Norway from the Community can effectively be imported. 3. The Community and Norway will take steps to ensure that the benefits which they grant each other will not be jeopardized by other import measures. 4. The Community and Norway undertake, each on its own behalf, to ensure that the prices charged by their exporters are not such as to create difficulties on the importing country's market. They agree, in this connection, to exchange at regular internal information on price quotations and any other useful information concerning the market in domestic and imported cheeses. If difficulties arise concerning the prices charged, consultations will be held at the request of either party, as promptly as possible, with a view to the adoption of appropriate corrective measures. 5. Consultations will be held at the request of either party on any question relating to the operation of this agreement. The two parties may, by common accord, alter it by reference in particular to the trend of market prices, production, marketing or consumption of home-produced and imported cheeses. 6. This arrangement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the territory of the Kingdom of Norway. 7. This arrangement shall enter into force on the same date as the EEA Agreement. Should that date not coincide with the beginning of the calendar year, the provisions referred to in point 1 shall be applied pro rata temporis for the first year. 8. This arrangement shall replace the Agreement in form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning reciprocal trade in cheese, signed on 22 March 1989. (1)\u00a0\u00a0This arrangement will be without prejudice of the agreement signed on 14 July 1986 between the Community and Norway as a result of the accession of Spain and Portugal. (2)\u00a0\u00a0The certificate will be issued by \u2018Norske Meierier\u2019 (Norwegian dairies). (3)\u00a0\u00a0The expression \u2018whole cheeses with rind\u2019 means cheeses of the conventional flat cylindrical shape. For the purposes of these provisions, the rind is defined as follows: the rind of such cheeses is the outer layer formed from the cheese itself, having a distinctly more solid consistency and a distinctly darker colour. (4)\u00a0\u00a0The wording on the packing must be such as to enable this cheese to be identified by the consumer. ANNEX II\nARRANGEMENT\nbetween the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway concerning trade in certain horticultural products\nWith the aim of fostering the harmonious development of trade in agricultural products, and taking into account the discussions which have taken place in the framework of the negotiations on an EEA Agreement, the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway have agreed to conclude a bilateral arrangement concerning trade in certain horticultural products, the provisions of this arrangement being as follows:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. On importation into the Community\nThe Community will open the following seasonal zero-duty tariff quotas for the following products originating in Norway:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCN code\n\n\nDescription\n\n\nQuantity\n(tonnes)\n\n\nCalendar\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00704\u00a010\n\n\nCauliflowers, fresh or chilled\n\n\n2\u00a0000\n\n\n1. 8 \u2014 30. 10\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00704\u00a010\n\n\nBroccoli, fresh or chilled\n\n\n1\u00a0000\n\n\n1. 7 \u2014 30. 10\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00704\u00a090\n\n\nChina cabbages, fresh or chilled\n\n\n3\u00a0000\n\n\n1. 7 \u2014 29. 2\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00809\u00a020\u00a090\n\n\nCherries, fresh\n\n\n600\n\n\n16. 7 \u2014 30. 8\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00809\u00a040\n\n\nPlums, fresh\n\n\n600\n\n\n1. 9 \u2014 15. 10\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00810\u00a010\u00a010\n\n\nStrawberries, fresh\n\n\n750\n\n\n15. 7 \u2014 31. 7\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00810\u00a010\u00a090\n\n\nStrawberries, fresh\n\n\n750\n\n\n1. 8 \u2014 15. 9\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n2. On importation into Norway\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nNorway will abolish the existing quantitative restrictions for the following cut flowers, falling within HS code ex\u00a00603, originating in the Community:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nGladiolus\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nAster\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nAstilbe\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nCentaurea\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nLathyrus\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nScabiosa\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nLiatris\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nSolidago\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nSolidaster\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nAlchemilla\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nDianthus barbatus\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nTrachelium\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nErigeron\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nSedum\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nPhysostegia\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nZinnia\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nDianthus Caryophyllus\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nGerbera\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nStrelitzia\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nProtea\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u00a0\n\n\nAnthurium;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nNorway will abolish import duties for the cut flowers, listed under (a), as well as for Syringa, Genista, Anemone, Ranunculus, Mimosa and Orchids, falling within HS code ex 0603, originating in the Community;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nNorway will open an annual zero-duty tariff quota of total Nkr 20 million for the following products originating in the Community:\n\n\n\n\n\n\nNorwegian Tariff heading\n\n\nDescription\n\n\n\n\n0602\u00a030\u00a001\n\n\nAzalea indica\n\n\n\n\n0602\u00a010\u00a001\n\n\nCuttings without roots\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00602\u00a099\u00a005\n\n\nPotplants with flowers\u00a0(1)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nNorway will abolish the existing quantitative restrictions on strawberries, falling within HS code ex 0810, originating in the Community, except for the period 9 June to 9 September,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nNorway will abolish import duties on strawberries falling within HS code ex 0810, originating in the Community, during the period free of quantitative restrictions. 3. The Contracting Parties shall ensure that the agreed mutual advantages are not jeopardized by other measures. 4. Consultations shall be held at the request of either Party on any problem relating to the operation of this arrangement, which may be amended by agreement between the Parties. 5. This arrangement shall apply, on the one hand, to the territories in which the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community is applied and under the conditions laid down in that Treaty and, on the other hand, to the territory of the Kingdom of Norway. 6. This arrangement shall enter into force on the same date as the EEA Agreement. Should that date not coincide with the beginning of the calendar year, the provisions referred to in point 1 shall, where appropriate, be applied pro rata temporis for the respective calendar period. (1)\u00a0\u00a0This concession does not apply to: Begonia elatior, Campanula, Chrysanthemum, Euphorbia Pulcherina, Hibiscus, Kalanchoe, Pelargonium, Primula, Saint Paulia. ANNEX III\nTARIFF CONCESSIONS GRANTED BY THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY TO THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY\nAs from the date of the entry into force of the EEA Agreement, the Kingdom of Norway will abolish import duties for the products listed below originating in the European Community. CN code\n\n\nDescription\n\n\nNorwegian Customs Tariff heading\n\n\n\n\n0703\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\nGarlic, fresh or chilled\n\n\n0703\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n0709\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\nAsparagus, fresh or chilled\n\n\n0709\u00a020\u00a010\n20 90\n\n\n\n\n30 00\n\n\nAubergines, fresh or chilled\n\n\n30 00\n\n\n\n\n60 10\n\n\nSweet peppers, fresh or chilled\n\n\n60 10\n60 20\n\n\n\n\nex 90 70\n\n\nCourgettes, fresh or chilled\n\n\nex 90 90\n\n\n\n\n0710\u00a029\u00a000\n\n\nLeguminous vegetables other than peas and beans, frozen\n\n\n0710\u00a029\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n80 51\n\n\nSweet peppers, frozen\n\n\nex 80 99\n\n\n\n\n0712\u00a090\u00a090\n\n\nOther dried vegetables, other than sweet corn, tomatoes and carrots; mixtures of dried vegetables\n\n\n0712\u00a090\u00a010\n90 20\nex 90 90\n\n\n\n\n0802\u00a011\n12\n\n\nAlmonds\n\n\n0802\u00a011\u00a000\n12 00\n\n\n\n\n31 00\n32 00\n\n\nWalnuts\n\n\n31 00\n32 00\n\n\n\n\n21 00\n\n\nHazelnuts or filbert, in shell\n\n\n21 00\n\n\n\n\n22 00\n\n\nHazelnuts or filbert, shelled\n\n\n22 00\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00813\u00a050\u00a030\n\n\nMixtures of nuts\n\n\nex\u00a00813\u00a050\u00a010\n\n\n\n\n50 91\n50 99\n\n\nOther mixtures of dried fruits of this chapter\n\n\nex 50 90\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00802\u00a090\u00a090\n\n\nPine kerneis\n\n\nex\u00a00802\u00a090\u00a090\n\n\n\n\n0803\u00a000\n\n\nBananas\n\n\n0803\u00a000\u00a001\n00 02\n\n\n\n\n0804\u00a020\u00a090\n\n\nDried figs\n\n\n0804\u00a020\u00a090\n\n\n\n\n30\n\n\nPineapples\n\n\n30 00\n\n\n\n\n0805\u00a010\n\n\nOranges\n\n\n0805\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n20\n\n\nMandarines, Clementines, etc. 20 00\n\n\n\n\n30 10\n\n\nLemons\n\n\n30 10\n\n\n\n\n30 90\n\n\nLimes\n\n\n30 20\n\n\n\n\n0806\u00a010\u00a011\n10 15\n10 19\n\n\nTable grapes, fresh\n\n\nex\u00a00806\u00a010\u00a010\n10 90\n\n\n\n\n20 00\n\n\nDried grapes\n\n\n20 00\n\n\n\n\n0807\u00a010\u00a010\n\n\nWatermelons, fresh\n\n\n0807\u00a010\u00a001\n\n\n\n\n10 90\n\n\nMelons, fresh\n\n\n10 09\n\n\n\n\n0809\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nApricots, fresh\n\n\n0809\u00a010\u00a010\n10 90\n\n\n\n\n30 00\n\n\nPeaches, including nectarines, fresh\n\n\n30 10\n30 20\n\n\n\n\n0810\u00a090\u00a010\n\n\nKiwi fruit, fresh\n\n\n0810\u00a090\u00a091\n\n\n\n\n0812\u00a090\u00a010\n\n\nApricots, provisionally preserved\n\n\nex\u00a00812\u00a090\u00a020\n\n\n\n\n0813\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\nDried apricots\n\n\n0813\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n0904\u00a020\n\n\nFruits of the genus Capsicum or of the genus Pimenta, dried or crushed or ground\n\n\n0904\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n0905\u00a000\u00a000\n\n\nVanilla\n\n\n0905\u00a000\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n0910\u00a020\n\n\nSaffron\n\n\n0910\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n1006\n\n\nRice\n\n\n1006\u00a010\u00a000\n20 00\n30 10\n30 90\n40 10\n40 90\n\n\n\n\n1211\n\n\nPlants and parts of plants of a kind used primarily in pharmacy, etc. 1211\u00a010\u00a000\n20 00\n30 00\n\n\n\n\n1302\u00a031\u00a000\n\n\nAgar-Agar\n\n\n1302\u00a031\u00a001\n31 09\n\n\n\n\n1509\n\n\nOlive oil and its fractions, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified\n\n\n1509\u00a010\u00a000\n90 00\n\n\n\n\n1804\u00a000\u00a000\n\n\nCocoa butter, fat and oil\n\n\n1804\u00a000\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n2003\u00a010\u00a010\n\n\nPrepared or preserved mushrooms, cultivated\n\n\nex\u00a02003\u00a010\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n2004\u00a090\u00a095\n\n\nPrepared or preserved artichokes, frozen\n\n\nex\u00a02004\u00a090\u00a090\n\n\n\n\n2005\u00a060\u00a000\n\n\nPrepared or preserved asparagus\n\n\n2005\u00a060\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n70 00\n\n\nPrepared or preserved olives\n\n\n70 00\n\n\n\n\n90 30\n\n\nPrepared or preserved capers\n\n\nex 90 00\n\n\n\n\n90 50\n\n\nPrepared or preserved artichokes\n\n\nex 90 00\n\n\n\n\n2006\u00a000\u00a039\n\n\nOther fruits preserved by sugar, with a sugar content exceeding 13 % by weight\n\n\nex\u00a02006\u00a000\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n2008\u00a020\u00a051\n59\n71\n79\n91\n99\n\n\nPrepared or preserved pineapples, not containing added spirit\n\n\nex\u00a02008\u00a020\u00a000\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02008\u00a030\u00a011\n19\n31\n39\n2008\u00a030\u00a055\n75 ex\n2008\u00a030\u00a091\n99\n\n\nPrepared or preserved mandarines, etc. ex\u00a02008\u00a030\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n2008\u00a050\n\n\nPrepared or preserved apricots\n\n\n2008\u00a050\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n2008\u00a070\n\n\nPrepared or preserved peaches\n\n\n70 00\n\n\n\n\n2009\u00a011\u00a019\n19 99\n\n\nOrange juice\n\n\n2009\nex 11 10\nex 11 20\nex 11 30\nex 11 90\nex 19 10\nex 19 20\nex 19 90\n\n\n\n\n2009\u00a030\u00a039\n\n\nJuice of other citrus fruits\n\n\nex\u00a02009\u00a030\u00a010\n30 90\n\n\n\n\n2009\u00a060\u00a019\n59\n\n\nGrape juice\n\n\nex\u00a02009\u00a060\u00a000\n\n\n\n\n2204\u00a021\u00a041\n49\n51\n59\n\n\nWine (in containers holding 2 litres or less)\n\n\nex\u00a02204\u00a029\u00a009\n\n\n\n\n2204\u00a029\u00a041\n49\n51\n59\n\n\nWine (other)\n\n\nex\u00a02204\u00a029\u00a009\n\n\n\n\n2204\u00a030\u00a091\n99\n\n\nOther grape must\n\n\n2204\nex 30 01\nex 30 09\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02208\u00a030\u00a091\n\n\nIrish Whiskey in bottles\n\n\nex\u00a02208\u00a030\u00a000\n\n\n\n\nex 30 99\n\n\nIrish Whiskey in barrels\n\n\nex 30 00\n\n\n\n\n40\n\n\nRum and taffia\n\n\n40 00\n\n\n\n\nex 90 53\nex 90 73\n\n\nOuzo\n\n\nex 90 00\n\n\n\n\nex 90 55\nex 90 79\n\n\nIrish cream liqueurs\n\n\nex 90 00\n\n\n\n\n2401\n\n\nUnmanufactured tobacco, tobacco refuse\n\n\n2401\u00a010\u00a000\n20 00\n30 00\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nANNEX IV\nRULES OF ORIGIN\n\n\n\n\n\n\n1. 1. For the purpose of implementing the Agreement, a product shall be considered to be originating either in the Community or in Norway if it has been wholly obtained there. 2. The following shall be considered as wholly obtained either in the Community or in Norway:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(a)\n\n\nvegetable products harvested there;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(b)\n\n\nlive animals born and raised there;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(c)\n\n\nproducts from live animals raised there;\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n(d)\n\n\ngoods produced there exclusively from products specified in (a) to (c). 3. Packing materials and packing containers presented with a product therein shall not be included with this product for the purpose of determining whether it has been wholly obtained and it shall not be necessary to establish whether such packing materials or packing containers are originating or not. 2. Notwithstanding point 1, the products mentioned in columns 1 and 3 of the list in the Appendix, obtained either in the Community or in Norway and incorporating materials which have not been wholly obtained there, shall also be considered as originating, provided that the conditions set out in column 3 concerning working or processing carried out on such materials have been fulfilled. 3. 1. The preferential treatment provided for under the Agreement applies only to products which are transported directly from the Community to Norway or from Norway to the Community without passing through the territory of another country. However, products constituting one single consignment may be transported through territory other than those of the Community and Norway with, should the occasion arise, transhipment or temporary warehousing in such territory, provided that the products have remained under the surveillance of the customs authorities in the country of transit or of warehousing and that they have not undergone operations other than unloading, reloading or any other operation designed to preserve them in good condition. 2. Evidence that the conditions referred to in point 3. 1 have been fulfilled shall be supplied to the customs authorities of the importing country in accordance with Article 13 (2) of Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement. 4. 1. Originating products within the meaning of this Annex shall, on importation into the Community or Norway, benefit from the Agreement upon submission of either a movement certificate EUR. 1 or an invoice declaration, issued or made out in accordance with Title V of Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement. 2. The documents referred to in point 4. 1 shall clearly indicate the origin of the products concerned by using the words \u2018Community\u2019 or \u2018Norway\u2019, in one of the languages in which the Agreement is drawn up, followed by the letters \u2018AGRI\u2019 inserted between brackets. In the case of the invoice declaration, this indication shall replace the reference to \u2018EEA preferential origin\u2019 in the text of the declaration given in Appendix IV of Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement. 3. Notwithstanding points 4. 1 and 4. 2, the certificates referred to in Annex I for cheese shall be accepted as valid proof of origin within the meaning of this Agreement without it being necessary to submit a movement certificate EUR. 1 or an invoice declaration. 5. The provisions of Titles IV (drawback or exemption), V (proof of origin) and VI (arrangements for administrative cooperation) of Protocol 4 to the EEA Agreement shall apply mutatis mutandis. As far as the provisions of Title IV are concerned, it is understood that the prohibition of drawback of, or exemption from, customs duties contained in these provisions shall apply only in respect of materials which are of the kind to which the EEA Agreement applies. Appendix\nList of products, referred to in point 2, subject to conditions other than the wholly obtained criterion\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nHS heading No\n\n\nDescription of products\n\n\nWorking or processing carried out on non-originating materials that confers originating status\n\n\n\n\n(1)\n\n\n(2)\n\n\n(3)\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a00406\n\n\nCheese\n\n\nManufacture in which all the materials of chapter 4 used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a01302\n\n\nAgar-agar\n\n\nManufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 50% of the ex-works price of the product\n\n\n\n\n1804\n\n\nCocoa butter, fat and oil\n\n\nManufacture in which all the materials used are classified in a heading other than that of the product\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02003\n\n\nMushrooms prepared or preserved, otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid\n\n\nManufacture in which all the mushrooms used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02004\n\n\nPrepared or preserved artichokes, frozen\n\n\nManufacture in which all the artichokes used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02005\n\n\nPrepared or preserved asparagus, olives, capers and artichokes\n\n\nManufacture in which all the vegetables used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02006\n\n\nFruit preserved by sugar (drained, glace or crystallized)\n\n\nManufacture in which all the fruits used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02008\n\n\nPrepared or preserved pineapples, citrus fruit, apricots and peaches\n\n\nManufacture in which all the fruits used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02009\n\n\nOrange juice, juice of any other single citrus fruit, except for grapefruit juice; grape juice (including grape must)\n\n\nManufacture in which all the fruits or any material derived from fruits used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02204\n\n\nWine of fresh grapes, including fortified wines; grape must other than that of heading No 2209\n\n\nManufacture in which all the grapes or any material derived from grapes used must be wholly obtained\n\n\n\n\nex\u00a02208\n\n\nIrish whiskey, rum and taffia, Irish cream liqueurs, Ouzo\n\n\nManufacture:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nfrom materials not classified within heading No 2207 or 2208, and\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n\n\nin which all the grapes or any material derived from grapes used must be wholly obtained"}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/78780a53-2908-4c83-b5b9-fb72b5f77742", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 5 on customs duties of a fiscal nature (Liechtenstein, Switzerland)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,Liechtenstein,Switzerland,customs duties,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(06)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "Liechtenstein", "Switzerland", "customs duties", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/78780a53-2908-4c83-b5b9-fb72b5f77742", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/76a24067-81dc-412d-9ce9-05bec4225e71", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 40 on Svalbard", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EFTA,European Economic Area,Norway,application of the law,free-trade agreement,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(41)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA", "European Economic Area", "Norway", "application of the law", "free-trade agreement", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/76a24067-81dc-412d-9ce9-05bec4225e71", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/173390b6-a790-4258-814b-e051b56f7b51", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 12 on conformity assessment agreements with third countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EC conformity marking,European Economic Area,multilateral agreement,mutual recognition principle,protocol to an agreement,third country", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(13)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC conformity marking", "European Economic Area", "multilateral agreement", "mutual recognition principle", "protocol to an agreement", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/173390b6-a790-4258-814b-e051b56f7b51", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf2cc4da-abe4-4cd0-95a8-4ce5fe02c393", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 30 on specific provisions on the organization of cooperation in the field of statistics", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,cooperation policy,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,statistics", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(31)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "cooperation policy", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bf2cc4da-abe4-4cd0-95a8-4ce5fe02c393", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a64d57c8-d3ba-4561-ab84-8d47ad83a4d0", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XI - Telecommunications services - List provided for in Article 36 (2)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,multilateral agreement,provision of services,telecommunications", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(61)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "multilateral agreement", "provision of services", "telecommunications"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a64d57c8-d3ba-4561-ab84-8d47ad83a4d0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ab64038-18b2-4aa0-99d0-39bb147e5006", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 38 on the financial mechanism", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EFTA countries,European Economic Area,European Investment Bank,financial aid,interest rate subsidy,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,regional development,support mechanism", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(39)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA countries", "European Economic Area", "European Investment Bank", "financial aid", "interest rate subsidy", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "regional development", "support mechanism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ab64038-18b2-4aa0-99d0-39bb147e5006", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/152dda8e-7ea4-47ec-8c6d-9921d52f4da2", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 41 on existing agreements", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,environmental protection,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,water resources,wine", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(42)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "environmental protection", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "water resources", "wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/152dda8e-7ea4-47ec-8c6d-9921d52f4da2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4ffd5d35-7269-4fa1-bc49-e961d4f45795", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 36 on the Statute of the EEA Joint Parliamentary Committee", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EEA joint parliamentary committee,European Economic Area,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,rules of procedure", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(37)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EEA joint parliamentary committee", "European Economic Area", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "rules of procedure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4ffd5d35-7269-4fa1-bc49-e961d4f45795", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/97775f0c-fe71-495e-99d9-33b31377a521", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 21 on the implementation of competition rules applicable to undertakings", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,competition law,economic concentration,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,transport policy", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(22)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "competition law", "economic concentration", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "transport policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/97775f0c-fe71-495e-99d9-33b31377a521", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3bdc9107-32c4-4ff6-8a9c-2b8b97a84dd7", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XXI - Statistics - List provided for in Article 76", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,multilateral agreement,statistics", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(71)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "multilateral agreement", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3bdc9107-32c4-4ff6-8a9c-2b8b97a84dd7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a78aa41e-3789-425e-b2f0-8129d28d81c0", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex IX - Financial services - List provided for in Article 36 (2)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,financial services,freedom to provide services,multilateral agreement,provision of services", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(59)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "financial services", "freedom to provide services", "multilateral agreement", "provision of services"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a78aa41e-3789-425e-b2f0-8129d28d81c0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0044eb60-7625-4de4-b38e-4dd3deb7421f", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 20 on access to inland waterways", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,inland transport,inland waterway transport,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,right of establishment", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(21)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "inland transport", "inland waterway transport", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "right of establishment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0044eb60-7625-4de4-b38e-4dd3deb7421f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1dfa9c67-ad15-48d6-a28e-abe3fc75ac72", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 4 on rules of origin", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,administrative cooperation,multilateral agreement,originating product,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(05)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "administrative cooperation", "multilateral agreement", "originating product", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1dfa9c67-ad15-48d6-a28e-abe3fc75ac72", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52e120e8-5b4a-4887-bc22-c08eee116da4", "title": "Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Finland concerning certain arrangements in agriculture", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Economic Community,Finland", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "Finland,agricultural product,beef,cheese,import levy,originating product,pigmeat,spirits,tariff preference,trade agreement (EU)", "workIds": "celex:21993A0501(04)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Finland", "agricultural product", "beef", "cheese", "import levy", "originating product", "pigmeat", "spirits", "tariff preference", "trade agreement (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52e120e8-5b4a-4887-bc22-c08eee116da4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/314a6161-a1cf-4cc4-a543-482afee3d267", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XVII - Intellectual property - List provided for in Article 65 (2)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,data-processing law,electronic component,multilateral agreement,software,trademark law", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(67)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "data-processing law", "electronic component", "multilateral agreement", "software", "trademark law"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/314a6161-a1cf-4cc4-a543-482afee3d267", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9bc02464-e05f-4668-8ae2-a497ad196d93", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 49 on Ceuta and Melilla", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "Ceuta,Ceuta and Melilla,EU customs procedure,European Economic Area,Melilla,import policy,multilateral agreement,originating product,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(50)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ceuta", "Ceuta and Melilla", "EU customs procedure", "European Economic Area", "Melilla", "import policy", "multilateral agreement", "originating product", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9bc02464-e05f-4668-8ae2-a497ad196d93", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08e0dfbb-4d48-4610-a1af-b3b3be4d6e3f", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XXII - Company law - List provided for in Article 77", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EFTA countries,European Economic Area,business policy,company law,company structure,multilateral agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(72)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA countries", "European Economic Area", "business policy", "company law", "company structure", "multilateral agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08e0dfbb-4d48-4610-a1af-b3b3be4d6e3f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a3d5897d-341b-402b-a214-330403408c21", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 48 concerning Articles 105 and 111", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "Court of Justice of the European Union,EEA Joint Committee,European Economic Area,case-law (EU),institutional activity,multilateral agreement,operation of the Institutions,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(49)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Court of Justice of the European Union", "EEA Joint Committee", "European Economic Area", "case-law (EU)", "institutional activity", "multilateral agreement", "operation of the Institutions", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a3d5897d-341b-402b-a214-330403408c21", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/054fffca-2449-4b21-aa9d-358072274bda", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XX - Environment - List provided for in Article 74", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,climate change policy,environmental policy,environmental protection,multilateral agreement,pollution", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(70)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "climate change policy", "environmental policy", "environmental protection", "multilateral agreement", "pollution"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/054fffca-2449-4b21-aa9d-358072274bda", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cb5188aa-caa3-44eb-8c75-15c0d30bbddb", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XVI - Procurement - List provided for in Article 65 (1)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EFTA countries,European Economic Area,award of contract,freedom to provide services,multilateral agreement,public contract,public institution,public procurement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(66)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA countries", "European Economic Area", "award of contract", "freedom to provide services", "multilateral agreement", "public contract", "public institution", "public procurement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cb5188aa-caa3-44eb-8c75-15c0d30bbddb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2537a8e7-0fa4-4b9c-861d-6ac2c67cbe28", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 29 on vocational training", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,educational exchange,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(30)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "educational exchange", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2537a8e7-0fa4-4b9c-861d-6ac2c67cbe28", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a6c9748b-17a9-4f46-8f46-9f0007bf0196", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 15 on transitional periods on the free movement of persons (Switzerland and Liechtenstein)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,Liechtenstein,Switzerland,free movement of persons,free movement of workers,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(16)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "Liechtenstein", "Switzerland", "free movement of persons", "free movement of workers", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a6c9748b-17a9-4f46-8f46-9f0007bf0196", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c669292-77ac-45ff-91fc-681594485bdf", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XV - State aid - List provided for in Article 63", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,State aid,control of State aid,multilateral agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(65)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "State aid", "control of State aid", "multilateral agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5c669292-77ac-45ff-91fc-681594485bdf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1a369caa-3121-477b-bb12-19f1e98616a9", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 10 on simplification of inspections and formalities in respect of carriage of goods", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,carriage of goods,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,simplification of formalities", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(11)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "carriage of goods", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "simplification of formalities"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1a369caa-3121-477b-bb12-19f1e98616a9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7d43fbb8-dd17-413d-a86d-7007e39e1b5f", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 43 on the Agreement between the EC and the Republic of Austria on the transit of goods by road and rail", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "Austria,European Economic Area,bilateral agreement,combined transport,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(44)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Austria", "European Economic Area", "bilateral agreement", "combined transport", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7d43fbb8-dd17-413d-a86d-7007e39e1b5f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7d8b24d5-33dc-42d4-a604-e34b75b7a61e", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XII - Free movement of capital - List provided for in Article 40", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,free movement of capital,monetary cooperation,multilateral agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(62)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "free movement of capital", "monetary cooperation", "multilateral agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7d8b24d5-33dc-42d4-a604-e34b75b7a61e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f4cd9156-fb24-451f-84cc-1f590fbe1083", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex VIII - Right of establishment - List provided for in Article 31", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,freedom to provide services,migrant worker,multilateral agreement,residence permit,right of establishment", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(58)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "freedom to provide services", "migrant worker", "multilateral agreement", "residence permit", "right of establishment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f4cd9156-fb24-451f-84cc-1f590fbe1083", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e53b7cec-168a-4825-a145-9ea2ae6a4f76", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex VII - Mutual recognition of professional qualifications - List provided for in Article 30", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EFTA countries,European Economic Area,free movement of workers,multilateral agreement,mutual recognition principle,recognition of diplomas,recognition of vocational training qualifications,right of establishment", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(57)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA countries", "European Economic Area", "free movement of workers", "multilateral agreement", "mutual recognition principle", "recognition of diplomas", "recognition of vocational training qualifications", "right of establishment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e53b7cec-168a-4825-a145-9ea2ae6a4f76", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/812caa3b-a209-44fe-9efa-ce50a49c596c", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 39 on the Ecu", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "Ecu,European Economic Area,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(40)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ecu", "European Economic Area", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/812caa3b-a209-44fe-9efa-ce50a49c596c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ab2bfc1-7776-4698-973b-c2c1c9e92a0e", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 47 on the abolition of technical barriers to trade in wine", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,technical barriers to trade,vinification,viticulture,wine", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(48)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "technical barriers to trade", "vinification", "viticulture", "wine"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2ab2bfc1-7776-4698-973b-c2c1c9e92a0e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9b1aef4b-6384-4167-bffd-2ac032c0e24c", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 26 on the powers and functions of the EFTA Surveillance Authority in the field of State aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EFTA,European Economic Area,State aid,control of State aid,institutional activity,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(27)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA", "European Economic Area", "State aid", "control of State aid", "institutional activity", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9b1aef4b-6384-4167-bffd-2ac032c0e24c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/32ca983d-7019-4ecd-bedb-305f15eb1d04", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XIX - Consumer protection - List provided for in Article 72", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,consumer protection,multilateral agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(69)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "consumer protection", "multilateral agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/32ca983d-7019-4ecd-bedb-305f15eb1d04", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ca8c3b5-ec02-42f0-b47c-50c01411e805", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 35 on the implementation of EEA rules", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EFTA countries,European Economic Area,legal cooperation,multilateral agreement,national law,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(36)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA countries", "European Economic Area", "legal cooperation", "multilateral agreement", "national law", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9ca8c3b5-ec02-42f0-b47c-50c01411e805", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f686bbcf-bea3-49d4-a052-b3e2c80dfacd", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex IV - Energy - List provided for in Article 24", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,energy policy,multilateral agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(54)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "energy policy", "multilateral agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f686bbcf-bea3-49d4-a052-b3e2c80dfacd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/12e581c6-302f-4470-bdb1-7fb5f75136dd", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XIV - Competition - List provided for in Article 60", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,competition law,competition policy,multilateral agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(64)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "competition law", "competition policy", "multilateral agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/12e581c6-302f-4470-bdb1-7fb5f75136dd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9616cc03-d1ef-4652-9809-ad2e66f8f8a2", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 34 on the possibility for courts and tribunals of EFTA States to request the Court of Justice of the European Communities to decide on the interpretation of EEA rules corresponding to EC rules", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "Court of Justice of the European Union,European Economic Area,interpretation of the law,judicial cooperation,multilateral agreement,power of decision,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(35)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Court of Justice of the European Union", "European Economic Area", "interpretation of the law", "judicial cooperation", "multilateral agreement", "power of decision", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9616cc03-d1ef-4652-9809-ad2e66f8f8a2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/41b032cf-010a-49de-92a5-5539bbe10009", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 17 concerning Article 34", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,establishment,freedom of trade,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,right of establishment", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(18)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "establishment", "freedom of trade", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "right of establishment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/41b032cf-010a-49de-92a5-5539bbe10009", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f8c5920f-2ae3-470a-b897-6bf9f26523f0", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 32 on financial modalities for implementation of Article 82", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EU budget,European Economic Area,financial cooperation,financial management,financial regulation,financing of the EU budget,implementation of the budget,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(33)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU budget", "European Economic Area", "financial cooperation", "financial management", "financial regulation", "financing of the EU budget", "implementation of the budget", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f8c5920f-2ae3-470a-b897-6bf9f26523f0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fd0e4b62-64d6-4d79-9739-26a157675c27", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 23 concerning the cooperation between the surveillance authorities (Article 58)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EFTA,European Economic Area,administrative cooperation,competition law,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(24)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA", "European Economic Area", "administrative cooperation", "competition law", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fd0e4b62-64d6-4d79-9739-26a157675c27", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5e12e6a8-8e92-4d5d-beed-3049f16186c3", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex V - Free movement of workers - List provided for in Article 28", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,free movement of workers,multilateral agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(55)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "free movement of workers", "multilateral agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5e12e6a8-8e92-4d5d-beed-3049f16186c3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4146efda-7409-4305-85f9-1b0f22b7fb42", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 16 on measures in the field of social security related to transitional periods on the free movement of persons (Switzerland and Liechtenstein)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,Liechtenstein,Switzerland,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,seasonal worker,social security", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(17)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "Liechtenstein", "Switzerland", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "seasonal worker", "social security"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4146efda-7409-4305-85f9-1b0f22b7fb42", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/305aba88-d8a7-490f-8ce5-33e3d0b8c44f", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 24 on cooperation in the field of control of concentrations", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,administrative cooperation,competition policy,economic concentration,merger control,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(25)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "administrative cooperation", "competition policy", "economic concentration", "merger control", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/305aba88-d8a7-490f-8ce5-33e3d0b8c44f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/653fe4c6-82ae-4786-b68c-193657cc8354", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 25 on competition regarding coal and steel", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,coal,competition law,competition policy,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,steel", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(26)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "coal", "competition law", "competition policy", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "steel"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/653fe4c6-82ae-4786-b68c-193657cc8354", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1cc90c13-d1c0-46ab-b356-8df51bc7f78e", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 18 on internal procedures for the implementation of Article 43", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,administrative procedure,balance of payments,capital movement,exchange control,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(19)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "administrative procedure", "balance of payments", "capital movement", "exchange control", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1cc90c13-d1c0-46ab-b356-8df51bc7f78e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b0e1ba17-cef6-4375-871f-cc7e980d6a4b", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 14 on trade in coal and steel products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,aid to industry,coal,free-trade agreement,iron and steel product,liberalisation of trade,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(15)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "aid to industry", "coal", "free-trade agreement", "iron and steel product", "liberalisation of trade", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b0e1ba17-cef6-4375-871f-cc7e980d6a4b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/49d274f5-a4db-48ec-a4ba-97065a9138c3", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex III - Product liability - List provided for in Article 23 (c)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,defective product,export,import,multilateral agreement,producer's liability", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(53)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "defective product", "export", "import", "multilateral agreement", "producer's liability"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/49d274f5-a4db-48ec-a4ba-97065a9138c3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5df12069-ba12-49c5-a629-c7fdb2a9b4d6", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XVIII - Health and safety at work, labour law, and equal treatment for men and women - List provided for in Articles 67 to 70", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,equal treatment,gender equality,labour law,multilateral agreement,occupational safety", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(68)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "equal treatment", "gender equality", "labour law", "multilateral agreement", "occupational safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5df12069-ba12-49c5-a629-c7fdb2a9b4d6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a8c0dbd0-5c90-4e93-8cca-49b29ff795eb", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 37 containing the list provided for in Article 101", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EFTA countries,European Economic Area,administrative cooperation,committee (EU),multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(38)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EFTA countries", "European Economic Area", "administrative cooperation", "committee (EU)", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a8c0dbd0-5c90-4e93-8cca-49b29ff795eb", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/978558a4-2b41-4533-aa8d-90f11d060021", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex XIII - Transport - List provided for in Article 47", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,air transport,inland waterway transport,land transport,maritime transport,multilateral agreement,transport policy", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(63)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "air transport", "inland waterway transport", "land transport", "maritime transport", "multilateral agreement", "transport policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/978558a4-2b41-4533-aa8d-90f11d060021", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9487b4e1-178a-4b42-bcdf-90b419830b36", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex II - Technical Regulations, standards, testing and certification - List provided for in Article 23", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,industrial cooperation,multilateral agreement,mutual recognition principle,standardisation,technical barriers to trade,technical rule,technical specification,testing", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(52)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "industrial cooperation", "multilateral agreement", "mutual recognition principle", "standardisation", "technical barriers to trade", "technical rule", "technical specification", "testing"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9487b4e1-178a-4b42-bcdf-90b419830b36", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25815082-55d0-4efe-a8b0-88edc0a99e3d", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 19 on maritime transport", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,freight rate,maritime transport,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(20)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "freight rate", "maritime transport", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25815082-55d0-4efe-a8b0-88edc0a99e3d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/45c4fd75-27ab-4d72-a13f-34c189065c41", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 45 on transitional periods concerning Spain and Portugal", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,Portugal,Spain,accession to the European Union,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,transitional period (EU)", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(46)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "Portugal", "Spain", "accession to the European Union", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "transitional period (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/45c4fd75-27ab-4d72-a13f-34c189065c41", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5e3fe9db-eb97-483f-a381-ab47c53862d5", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 1 on horizontal adaptations", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,administrative procedure,comitology,exchange of information,multilateral agreement,official language,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(02)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "administrative procedure", "comitology", "exchange of information", "multilateral agreement", "official language", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5e3fe9db-eb97-483f-a381-ab47c53862d5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25234833-a610-4c3f-bad2-227bcc69c8d0", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 42 on bilateral arrangements concerning specific agricultural products", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,agricultural product,bilateral agreement,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(43)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "agricultural product", "bilateral agreement", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/25234833-a610-4c3f-bad2-227bcc69c8d0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71707764-a00a-4b28-9dcd-542010c08864", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 8 on State monopolies", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "Austria,European Economic Area,Iceland,Liechtenstein,State monopoly,Switzerland,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(09)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Austria", "European Economic Area", "Iceland", "Liechtenstein", "State monopoly", "Switzerland", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/71707764-a00a-4b28-9dcd-542010c08864", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bcc091ea-5168-4164-b98c-def130e2fe52", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 3 concerning products referred to in Article 8 (3) (b) of the Agreement", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,export refund,import levy,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,ratio,reference price", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(04)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "export refund", "import levy", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "ratio", "reference price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bcc091ea-5168-4164-b98c-def130e2fe52", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e76d9d41-25c7-4866-a273-ecc1af98860d", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 6 on the building up of compulsory reserves by Switzerland and Liechtenstein", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,Liechtenstein,Switzerland,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,shortage", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(07)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "Liechtenstein", "Switzerland", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "shortage"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e76d9d41-25c7-4866-a273-ecc1af98860d", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/41b23d05-a59c-4f38-a6ca-0b34fcc6f806", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Annex X - Audiovisual services - List provided for in Article 36 (2)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,audiovisual communications policy,broadcasting,freedom to provide services,multilateral agreement,right of establishment,television", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(60)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "audiovisual communications policy", "broadcasting", "freedom to provide services", "multilateral agreement", "right of establishment", "television"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/41b23d05-a59c-4f38-a6ca-0b34fcc6f806", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e3063bd-6e8f-42ec-b504-e93c7c311cb9", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 31 on cooperation in the specific fields outside the four freedoms", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "EU programme,European Economic Area,cooperation policy,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,research,research and development", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(32)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU programme", "European Economic Area", "cooperation policy", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "research", "research and development"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e3063bd-6e8f-42ec-b504-e93c7c311cb9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}
+{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/156cad86-e0c2-4c1c-85d2-b488fbdf60d7", "title": "Agreement on the European Economic Area - Protocol 7 on quantitative restrictions which Iceland may retain", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_international,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#agreement_non-member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Austria,Belgium,Denmark,European Coal and Steel Community,European Economic Community,Finland,France,Germany,Greece,Iceland,Ireland,Italy,Liechtenstein,Luxembourg,Netherlands,Norway,Portugal,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland,United Kingdom", "date": "1992-05-02", "subjects": "European Economic Area,Iceland,hand tool,household article,multilateral agreement,protocol to an agreement,quantitative restriction,toiletries", "workIds": "celex:21994A0103(08)", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Economic Area", "Iceland", "hand tool", "household article", "multilateral agreement", "protocol to an agreement", "quantitative restriction", "toiletries"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/156cad86-e0c2-4c1c-85d2-b488fbdf60d7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "print"]}