diff --git "a/36_years1992-09.jsonl" "b/36_years1992-09.jsonl" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/36_years1992-09.jsonl" @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ed6858d-e53b-4531-82fd-840a061bf8b3", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2889/92 of 1 October 1992 re- establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code 8528 10, originating in Thailand, to which the preferential tarrif arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-10-01", "subjects": "Thailand,restoration of customs duties,television equipment", "workIds": "celex:31992R2889,oj:JOL_1992_288_R_0009_019", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Thailand", "restoration of customs duties", "television equipment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ed6858d-e53b-4531-82fd-840a061bf8b3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6b01c296-669b-4b23-a2a1-5bf82eddb7a2", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending Decision 85/360/EEC on the restructuring of the system of agricultural surveys in Grecce", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_decision_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-10-01", "subjects": "Greece,agricultural performance,economic survey,statistics", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0415,comnat:COM_1992_0415_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_273_R_0008_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "agricultural performance", "economic survey", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/6b01c296-669b-4b23-a2a1-5bf82eddb7a2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/062fc40b-44b3-4782-9ddd-5f58c900fe56", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION adopting the second phase of the Trans-European Cooperation Scheme for Higher Education (Tempus II) (1994-1998)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-10-01", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,EU aid,cultural cooperation,higher education,student mobility,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0407,comnat:COM_1992_0407_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_311_R_0001_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "EU aid", "cultural cooperation", "higher education", "student mobility", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/062fc40b-44b3-4782-9ddd-5f58c900fe56", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3f6b2727-25a5-45ef-b583-dacdcdbee3ad", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for cut flowers and flower buds, fresh, originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan or Morocco (1992/93)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-10-01", "subjects": "Israel,Jordan,Morocco,floriculture,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0411,comnat:COM_1992_0411_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Israel", "Jordan", "Morocco", "floriculture", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3f6b2727-25a5-45ef-b583-dacdcdbee3ad", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 411 final \n\nBrussels, 1 October 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nopening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas \nfor cut flowers and flower buds, fresh, originating in Cyprus, \nIsrael, Jordan or Morocco (1992/93) \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\ni\u00a9?\"7 \n\n\fEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. The additional Protocols to the Community's Cooperation Agreements with \n\nMorocco, Jordan and Israel and the protocol laying down the conditions \n\nand procedures for the Implementation of the second stage of the \n\nAgreement establishing an association between the EEC and Cyprus \n\nprovide for the opening of annual Community tariff quotas for the \n\nimportation of 300, 50, 17 000 and 50 tonnes respectively of cut \n\nflowers and flower buds, fresh, falling within Combined Nomenclature \n\ncodes 0603 10 11 to 0603 10 69, originating in those countries. However, Article 18 of the Protocol to the EEC/Cyprus Agreement \n\nprovides that the 50 tonne quota must be increased by 5% per year from \n\nthe Protocol's entry into force (1 January 1988). The quota will \n\ntherefore be set at 67,5 tonnes for the period under consideration; the \n\nvolumes of the tariff quotas relating to other countries covered by \n\nthis regulation must be increased in equal tranches of 3 or 5 % \n\naccording to the products, in application of Council Regulation (EEC) \n\nNo 1764/92*1), modifying the system applicable to the importation into \n\nthe Community of certain agricultural products originating in Algeria, \n\nCyprus, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Israel, Malta, Morocco, Syria or \n\nTunisia. 2. The purpose of this proposal is to open the said tariff quotas for the \n\nperiod from 1 November 1992 to 31 October 1993. 3. Under the tariff quotas for Morocco, Jordan and Israel customs duties \n\nare to be phased out according to the same timetables and under the \n\nsame conditions as laid down in Articles 75 and 243 of the Act of \n\nAccession of the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic to the \n\nCommunity. Under the tariff quota for Cyprus, customs duties are to be phased out \n\naccording to the timetable and under the same conditions laid down in \n\nArticles 5 and 16 of the relevant Protocol. Within the limits of these tariff quotas, Spain and Portugal are to \n\napply customs duties calculated: \n\n(1) OJ No L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 9. - 3 -\n\n- in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulations (EEC) Nos \n\n3189/88, 2573/87 and 4162/87 laying down the arrangements for trade \n\nbetween Spain and Portugal and Morocco, Jordan and Israel, and \n\n- in accordance with the Protocol to the Association Agreement between \n\nthe European Economic Community and the Republic of Cyprus \n\nconsequent on the accession of the Kingdom of Spain and the \n\nPortuguese Republic to the Community. 4. Roses with large or small flowers and carnations of the unifloral or \n\nmultifloral types are covered by the quota only where they meet the \n\nprice conditions laid down by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4088/87, \n\namended by Regulation (EEC) No. 3551/88. 5. As regards the management system of these quotas it is proposed that \n\nthe whole of the quota volumes be held as Community reserves in which \n\nall Member States will have access in accordance with the procedure \n\nprovided for in Article 1(2) of the proposal for a Regulation. That is the purpose of the attached proposal. Annex: 1 proposal for a Regulation \n\n\fi roposai. i'uj \n\n^ H \u2014 \n\nC O U N C IL R E G U L A T I ON \n\n(KKC) No \n\nh'd \n\nof \n\no p e n i ng a nd providing for the a d m i n i s t r a t i on of C o m m u n i ty tariff q u o t as for \nin Cyprus, Israel, J o r d an or \nc ut \n\nflowers and \n\nflower buds, fresh, o r i g i n a t i ng \nMorocco \n\n(1992/1993) \n\nTill- COUNCIL OF THE KUROPLAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard \nEconomic C o m m u n i t y, and \nthereof, \n\nto the Treaty establishing \n\nthe European \nin particular Article 113 \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from \n\nthe Commission, \n\nto \n\nthe additional Protocols \nthe European Economic C o m m u n i ty and \n\nthe Agreements \nWhereas \nthe \nbetween \nthe Hashemite Kingdom of \nKingdom of Morocco ('), \nJordan (-') and the State of Israel (') and the Protocol laying \ndown the conditions and procedures for the implementa \ntion of the second stage of the Agreement establishing an \nassociation between the European Economic C o m m u n i ty \nand the Republic of Cyprus and adapting certain provi \nsions thereof (4) provide in their respective Articles \nthat \nfresh cut flowers and flower buds, tailing within the CN \ncodes indicated in Article I and originating in the above-\nmentioned countries, may be imported into the C o m m u \nnity at reduced rates of customs duty within the limits of \nannual C o m m u n i ty tariff quotas of. WO, SO, 17 000 and SO \ntonnes respectively; whereas, however, Article 18 of the \nProtocol with Cyprus provides \nthe \ntariff quota for that country must be increased by S % per \nyear from the entry into force of the Protocol, and it will \ntonnes for the l 9 9 p to 1993period ; \ntherefore be set at I \n\nthe volume of \n\nthat \n\n07,5 \n\nand Algeria, Egypt, \n\nthe Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese \nbetween \nJordan, Lebanon, \nRepublic \nTunisia and Turkey ty and Council Regulation (EEC) \nNo 4162/87 of 21 December 1987 laying down arran \ngements for Spain's and Portugal's trade with Israel \nand a m e n d i ng Regulations \n(EEC) No 449/86 and \n(EEC) No 2573/87 0) in respect of the tariff quotas \nopened for Morocco, Jordan and Israel, \n\nand \n\n\u2014 the Protocol \n\nto the Association Agreement between \nthe European Economic C o m m u n i ty and the Repu \nblic of Cyprus consequent on \nthe \nKingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic to the \nC o m m u n i ty $), in respect of the tariff quota opened \nfor Cyprus ; \n\nthe accession of \n\nto \n\nthe conditions \n\nWhereas roses with large or small flowers and carnations \ntypes are covered by the \nof the unifloral or multifloral \nquotas only subject \nlaid down by \nCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December \n1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential \ncustoms duties on imports of certain flowers originating \nin Cyprus, Israel and Jordan (t>), as amended by Regula \ntion (EEC) No 3551/88 (It); whereas these tariff conces \nsions apply only to imports in respect of which certain \nprice conditions are observed ;. wheronr. the volunes or the iarifi: quotas relating \nto other countries covered by this regulation must \nbe increased in equal tranches of 3 or 5 % according \n\n, \n\n7 \n\nWhereas all C o m m u n i ty \n\n1 1 \n\nimporters should be ensured \n, ,, \n\u2022, \n' \n\n; \n\n, \n\nt \n\nu l u , |y equal and continuous access to the said quotas and \n\nthe \n\nto the products, in application of Council Regulationjuty ratcs iaid down for thc quotas should bc app,icd \n(EEC) No 1764/92 (5), modifying the system \napplicable to the importation into the Community \nof certain agricultural products originating in \nAlgeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Israel, \nMalta, Marocco, Syria or Tunisia. the necessary measures \ntaken \nfor effective C o m m u n i ty management of \n\nin question \nconsistently \nthe quotas are exhausted ; \ninto all Member States until \nto \nwhereas \nprovide \nthe \nquotas, so that the Member States may draw against the \nquotas such quantities as they may need, corresponding to \nthis method of administration \nactual \nrequires close cooperation between \nthe Member States \nand \n\nthc Commission ; \n\nimports ; whereas \n\nthe products \n\nimports of \n\nshould be \n\nto all \n\nWhereas, within the limits of these tariff quotas, customs \nduties are to be phased out : \n\n\u2014 under the tariff quotas tor Morocco, Jordan and Israel, \naccording to (lie same timetables and under the same \nconditions as laid down in Articles 7S and 243 ot the \nAct of Accession of Spain and Portugal, \n\n\u2014 under \n\nthe \n\ntariff quota for Cyprus, according \n\nthe \nthe conditions \nin \nthe above-mentioned Protocol \n\nto \nlaid down \n\ntimetable and under \nArticles 5 and 16 of \nconcerning Cyprus ; \n\nWhereas since the Kingdom of Belgium, thc Kingdom of \nthe Netherlands and \nthe Grand Duchy of Luxembourg \nare united within and jointly represented by the Benelux \nEconomic Union, any operation concerning the adminis \ntration of these quotas may be carried out by any one of \nits members, \n\nWhereas within \nKingdom of Spain and \napply customs duties calculated \n\nlimits of \n\nthe \n\nthese \n\nthe \nthe Portuguese Republic are to \n\ntariff quotas, \n\nin accordance with : \n\n\u2014 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3189/88 of 14 October \n1988 laying down the arrangements to be applied by \nSpain and Portugal to trade with Morocco and Syria ($ \n1 1 \nand Council Regulation \nAugust 19H7 laying down the arrangements for trade \n\n(EEC) No 2573/87 of \n\n(') ( )| No I. 224, I 1. 8. 1988, p. 18. () ()'| No I. 297, 21. !(). 1987, p. 19 \nV) Ol No 1. 127. 10. I I. 1988. p. U>. C3) 0J No L 1o1, 1. ^ * 2, p. y. $ OJ No L 287, 20. 10. 1988, p. 1. (/) OJ No L 250, I. 9. 1987, p. 1. (J) OJ No L 396, 31. 12. 1987, p. 1. (J) OJ No L 393, 31. 12. 1987, p. M. (0) OJ No L 382, 31. 12. 1987, p. 22. (If) OJ No L 311, 17. 11. 1988, p. I. -\u00e2 \n\nHAS ADOPT! t) 1IIIS KIX. dl. AriON \n\nAi I lilt \n\nI \n\niron\u00bb \n\nI November 199*- to \n\nI \nto \nimports into the (lomiwimiy of tin- products listed below originating in. Morocco, Jordan, \nlisr. wl- or Cyprus shall be suspended at the levels and within* rhe limits of the C o m m u n i ty \nl. infl (juntas shown below : \n\nil October 1993 (|\u00eec customs duties applicable \n\nQui. -\nNo \n\nC:N ((>ht> a kiwi \nsu\u00f9aftlt' foi ornaniciMiil purposes \n\nFioni I Nownibir to \\\\ May \n\nMorocco \n\nJtordan \nIsrael \n\nCyprus \n\nfrom I jinn- to VI October \n\n09 1114 \n\n\u00abV. I IS? \nW I M)h \n\n0603 HI- SI \n060 V M)' S Y \n0601 H* S S \nWan 10 61 \n060V |0 6v \n0601 M\u00bb 69 \n\nm 1420 \n\n06l ol the us, lor ,h,s speoal purpose shall be earned * pursuant \u00abo the relevant Community p r o v es \n\n(f) Sri \n\nlain codes m the Annex. the \n\nlimits of \n\n2. Within \nthe \nKingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic shall \napply customs duties calculated in accordance with the \nrelevant provisions of the 1985 Act of Accession. tariff quotas, \n\nthese \n\nArticle 2 \n\nThe tariff quotas referred to in Article 1 shall be managed \nby the Commission, which may take any appropriate \nadministrative measures to ensure that they are managed \nefficiently. Article 3 \n\nWhere an importer submits a product covered by this \nRegulation for release for free circulation in a Member \nthe preferential \nto take advantage of \nState, applying \narrangements, and the entry is accepted by the customs \nauthorities, the Member State concerned shall, by noti \nfying the Commission, draw an amount corresponding to \nits requirements from the appropriate quota volume. Requests for drawings, indicating the date on which the \nentries were accepted must be sent to the Commission \nwithout delay. Drawings shall be granted by the Commission in chrono \nlogical order of the dates on which the customs authori \n\ny \n\nties of the Member States concerned accepted the entries \nfor release for free circulation, to the extent that the \navailable balance so permits. If a Member State does not use a drawing in full, it shall \nreturn any unused portion to the corresponding quota \nvolume as soon as possible. If the quantities requested are greater than the available \nbalance of the quota volume, the balance shall be allo \ncated among applicants pro rata. The Commission shall \ninform the Member States of the drawings made. Article 4 \n\nEach Member State shall ensure that importers of the \nproducts in question have equal and continuous access to \nthe quotas for as long as the balance of the relevant quota \nvolume so permits. Article 5 \n\nMember States and \nclosely to ensure that this Regulation is complied with. the Commission shall cooperate \n\nArticle 6 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day \nfollowing its publication in the Official Journal of the \nEuropean Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \n\nThe President \n\nANNEX \n\nTaric codes \n\nOrder No \n\nCN codes \n\nTaric codes \n\n09. 2849 \n\nbxOTIO 80 60 \n\n09. 2851 \n\nLx2907 12 00 \n\n0710 80 6CKI0 \n\n29\u00db7 12 00*10 \n\n\fvP \n\nFINANCIAL RECORD \n\n1. Budget line concerned : Chap. 12 Art. 120 \n\n2. Legal basis : Art. 28 of the Treaty \n\nTitle of the tariff measure concerned : Proposal for a Council \n\nRegulation opening and providing for the administration of autonomous \n\nCommunity tariff quotas for an agricultural product and a chemical \n\nproduct (Fifth series 1992) \n\nOblect ive : To ensure an adequate supply under favourable conditions \n\nfor Community user-industrles \n\nMethod of calculation : \n\nDescr ipt ion Amount of \n\nPrice \n\nNorma I \n\nQuota duty \n\nDuty-loss \n\nquotas \n\necu/unit \n\nrate \n\n(X) \n\n(ecu) \n\n(X) \n\nFungus \n\n210 T \n\n18 000/T \n\n18 X \n\n0 X \n\n680 400 \n\n0-Cresol \n\n6 000 T \n\n896/T \n\n2,1% \n\nOX \n\n112 896 \n\nNew tariff measures. c \n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 413 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n02 03 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-430-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-47879-9 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \nL-2985 Luxembourg"} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ac9d4ef-6892-47cc-936f-0938020a81c4", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2864/92 of 30 September 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1780/89 laying down detailed rules for the disposal of alcohol obtained from the distillation operations referred to in Articles 35, 36 und 39 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 and held by intervention agencies", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-30", "subjects": "award of contract,distillation,intervention stock", "workIds": "celex:31992R2864,oj:JOL_1992_286_R_0048_045", "eurovoc_concepts": ["award of contract", "distillation", "intervention stock"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ac9d4ef-6892-47cc-936f-0938020a81c4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/157ccedc-b81e-4c71-a3bc-8d282aad7ff6", "title": "Commission Decision of 30 September 1992 ruling on financial aid by Germany to the coal industry in 1992 (Only the German text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-30", "subjects": "Germany,State aid,coal industry", "workIds": "celex:31992D0506,oj:JOL_1992_310_R_0029_032", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "State aid", "coal industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/157ccedc-b81e-4c71-a3bc-8d282aad7ff6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d041f182-c47b-46e7-95d5-cc7201690651", "title": "93/9/EEC: Commission Decision of 30 September 1992 declaring the compatibility of a concentration with the common market (Case No IV/M214 - Du Pont/ICI) (Only the English text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-30", "subjects": "competition,economic concentration,man-made fibre,merger control,textile industry", "workIds": "celex:31993D0009,oj:JOL_1993_007_R_0013_016", "eurovoc_concepts": ["competition", "economic concentration", "man-made fibre", "merger control", "textile industry"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d041f182-c47b-46e7-95d5-cc7201690651", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3322c50a-1873-4622-b811-96924c319d3f", "title": "Commission Decision of 30 September 1992 ruling on the granting of aid by France to the coal industry in 1992 (Only the German text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-30", "subjects": "France,State aid,coal industry,economic support", "workIds": "celex:31992D0507,oj:JOL_1992_310_R_0031_033", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "State aid", "coal industry", "economic support"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3322c50a-1873-4622-b811-96924c319d3f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63a43ea0-470f-4d7d-995c-26e5ca894b67", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-30", "subjects": "authorised catch,common fisheries policy,exchange of information,fishery management,fishing area,fishing controls", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0392,comnat:COM_1992_0392_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_280_R_0005_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["authorised catch", "common fisheries policy", "exchange of information", "fishery management", "fishing area", "fishing controls"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/63a43ea0-470f-4d7d-995c-26e5ca894b67", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a160464-b0da-4b6a-a1bb-e6ee4ee611ef", "title": "Financial report 1991 : European Communities.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,pdfx,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Budget", "date": "1992-09-30", "subjects": "Community budget,EU financial instrument,EU financing,European Communities,activity report,budget policy,consolidated account,financial policy,financing of the EU budget,public finance", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_C67492176", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Community budget", "EU financial instrument", "EU financing", "European Communities", "activity report", "budget policy", "consolidated account", "financial policy", "financing of the EU budget", "public finance"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3a160464-b0da-4b6a-a1bb-e6ee4ee611ef", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "pdfx", "print_sftcv"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e9a7cb0-e98f-4079-8357-c42a45b9010a", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) opening and providing for the administration of a Community tariff quota for certain melons originating in Israel (1992/1993)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-30", "subjects": "Israel,tariff quota", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0412,comnat:COM_1992_0412_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Israel", "tariff quota"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4e9a7cb0-e98f-4079-8357-c42a45b9010a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "#\u2022 \n\nCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 412 final \n\nBrussels, 30 September 1992 \n\nl:; \u2022\u2022\u2022 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nopening and providing for the administration of a Community \ntariff quota for certain melons originating in Israel \n(1992/1993) \n\nWS\u00efi \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\u00e9-. - 1 \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. Articles 1 and 2 of the fourth Additional Protocol to the Cooperation \nAgreement between the EEC and Israel provide for the opening of a \nCommunity tariff quota for the import into the Community of: \n\n9 500 tonnes of melons, falling within CN code ex 0807 10 90 \n(period 1. 11 - 31. 5) \n\noriginating in Israel. 2. The volume of this tariff quota must be increased by 5% each year, as \nfrom 1 January 1992 and whereas the customs duties applicable in the \nCommunity, as constituted on 31 December 1985, are being eliminated \nin two equal steps on 1 January 1992 and 1 January 1993, by \napplication of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1764/92<1), modifying the \nsystem applicable to the importation into the Community of certain \nagricultural products originating in Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Jordan, \nLebanon, Israel, Malta, Morocco, Syria or Tunisia. 3. Within the limits of this tariff quota, customs duties are to be \nphased out according to the same timetables and at the same rates as \nlaid down in Articles 75, 243 and 268 of the Act of Accession of the \nKingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic. Within the limits of this tariff quota, Spain and Portugal are to \napply customs duties calculated in accordance with the relevant \nprovisions of Regulation (EEC) No 4162/87 of the Council laying down \narrangements for Spain's and Portugal's trade with Israel. This Community tariff quota should therefore be opened for the period \nfrom 1 November 1992 to 31 May 1993. 4. With regard to the administration of this quota, it is proposed that \nthe whole of the quota volumes be held as Community reserves to which \nall Member States will have access in accordance with the procedure \nprovided for in Article 3 of the proposed Regulation. This is the purpose of the attached proposal \n\nAnnex : one proposal for a Regulation. (i) \n\n0J No L 181, 1. 7. 1992, p. 9. C O U N C IL REGULATION (EEC) No \n\nNI \n\nr-roposal foi \n\nof \n\nopening \u00ef:iii' providing for the administration of a C o m m u n i ty tariff quota for \ncertain melons originating in Israel (1992/93) \n\n7HE COUNCII OP THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving r:;. uc! to ti. _ Treaty establ. si ing the European \nCconorn*' Conrr/'niry, and in prticular Article 113 \nthereof. Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas Article 1 of the Fourth Additional Protocol to \nthe Cooperation Agreement between \nthe European \nEconomic Community and the State of Israel (') provides \nfor the opening of a Community tariff quota for the \nimport into the Community of 9 500 tonnes of melons, \nfalling within CN code ex 0807 10 90, originating in \nIsrael, (from 1 November to 31 May); \n\nduty rates laid down for the quotas should \\>z z\\r:. consistently to all imports of the product in question ;. all Member States until the quotas are exhausted ; whe: \nthe necessary measures should be taken to provK: \neffective Community management of !lie quotas,. > '' \nthe Member States may draw against tlr \nquantities as they may need, corresp^; c. t, :. :::: \nimports; whereas this method of r. dministrnticn \u2022. : \u2022 \n, \u2022 \nclose cooperation between the Member Stfcs - \nCommission ; \n\ni o\u00bb ; \n\nWhereas, since the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom ol \nthe Netherlands and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg \nare united within and jointly represented by the Benelux \nEconomic Union, any operation concerning the adminis \ntration of these quotas may be carried out by any of its \nmembers, \n\nWhereas within the limits of this tariff quota, customs \nduties are to be phased out according to the same timeta \nbles and at the same rates as laid down in Articles 75, 243 \nand 268 of the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal ; \n\nfcJhereas the volume of this t a r i ff quota must be \nincreased by 5% each year, as from 1 January 1992 \nand whereas the customs duties applicable in the \nCommunity, as constituted on 31 December 1985, are \nbeing eliminated in two equal steps on 1 January \n1992 and 1 January 1995, by application of Council \nRegulation (EEC) No 1764/92(2), modifying the \nsystem applicable to the importation into the \nCommunity of certain agricultural products \noriginating in Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Jordan, \nLebanon, Israel, Malta, Morocco, i y r ia or Tunisia; \n\nWhereas, within the limits of these tariff quotas, Spain \nand Portugal shall apply customs duties calculated in \naccordance with the relevant provisions of Council Regu \nlation (EEC) No 4162/87 of 21 December 1987, laying \ndown arrangements for Spain's and Portugal's trade with \nIsrael ($ ; whereas the Community tariff quotas in ques \ntion should therefore be opened for the period from 1 \nNovember 1992 to 31 May 199 3; \n\nWhereas all Community importers should be ensured \nequal and continuous access to the said quotas and the \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION \n\nArticle 1 \n\nFrom 1 November 199 2 to 31 May 1993 the customs \nduties applicable to imports into the Community of \nmelons originating in Israel shall be suspended, at the \ntariff \nlevels and within the limits of the Community \nquota shown below : \n\nOrder \nNo \n\nCN code \n(\u00ab) \n\nDescription \n\nPeriod \n\n09. 1329 \n\nex 0 8 07 10 90 \n\nMelons \n\n1. 11. 1992 \n\ntt>31. 5. 1993 \n\nAmount \nof quota \n(tonnes) \n\n10 653 \n\nQuota \n\n(a) Taric codes : \n\n09. 1329 \n\nex 0807 10 90 \n\n_-^_. 0807 10 90 f) 12 \n0 8 0 7 1 0 9 0 O I3 \n0807 10 9 00 14 \n0807 10 90 Q 23 \n0807 10 90 0 24 \n0807 10 90 0 31 \n0807 10 90{*)33 \n0807 I0 90(*)34 \n0807 10 90 0 43 \n0807 10 9 0 0 44 \n\n~ \" to O! No I \n\n\fWithin the limits of the tariff quota the Kingdom of \nSpain and (he Portuguese Republic shall apply customs \nduties calculated in accordance with the relevant provi \nsions of Regulation (EEC) No 4162/87. The drawings shall be granted by the Commission by \nreference to the date of acceptance of the declaration of \nentry for free circulation, to the extent that the available \nbalance so permits. Article 2 \n\nThe tariff quota referred to in Article 1 shall be managed \nby the Commission, which may \ntake all appropriate \nadministrative measures in order to ensure efficient mana \ngement thereof. Article 3 \n\nWhere an importer enters a product covered by this \nRegulation under a declaration for free circulation in a \nMember State and applies to take advantage of the prefe \nrential arrangements and that declaration is accepted by \nthe customs authorities the Member State concerned shall, \nby notifying the Commission, draw an amount correspon \nding to \"its\" requirements from the quota volume. Requests for drawings, indicating the date of acceptance \nof the said declarations, must be sent to the Commission \nwithout delay. If a Member State does not use the quantities drawn it \nshall return them to the quota volume as soon as possible. If the quantities requested are greater than the available \nbalance of the quota volume, the balance shall be allo \ncated among applications pro rata. The Commission shall \ninform the Member States of the drawings made. Article 4 \n\nEach Member State shall ensure that importers of the \nproduct in question have equal and continuous access to \nthe quotas for as long as the balance of the quota volume \nas permits. Article 5 \n\nThe Member States and the Commission shall cooperate \nclosely to ensure that this Regulation is complied with. Article 6 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on 1 November \n1992-\n\nThis Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member \nStates. Done at Luxembourc. For the Council \n\nThe President \n\n\f and application of the \nEuropean System of Integrated Economic Accounts (ESA) require standard definitions of \nstatistical units for registers, surveys and the presentation and analysis of statistics: \n\nWhereas the Committee created by the Council Regulation (EEC) No 3037/90 is comptetent \nfor \"elaboration of guidelines for classifying statistical units in accordance with NACE Rev. l\" \nbut that the units must be defined elsewhere: \n\nWhereas it is vital that the statistical units classified according to the NACE Rev. l are defined \nin the same way in all Member States in order to ensure comparability between the \ncorresponding national and Community statistics: \n\nWhereas it is desirable to limit the number of statistical units used for the production system: \n\nWhereas the international comparability of economic statistics requires that the Member States \nand the Community \nlinked to the \ndescriptions given in the introduction to the United Nations International Standard Industrial \nClassification (ISIC Rev. 3) and the United Nations System of National Accounts documents: \n\ninstitutions use statistical units which are directly \n\nWhereas the production system is made up of all entities involved in production and all \neconomic and financial operations carried out by these entities: \n\nWhereas the introduction of strict application of these units throughout the Community \nrequires a transitional period, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nA list of statistical units (hereinafter referred to as \"statistical u; is of the production \nsystem\") as set out in the annex hereto together with the criteria used, the definitions \nof the units and explanatory notes is hereby established. X) OJ No L 293 of 24 October 1990, p. 1 \n\n\fArticle 2 \n\nThe definitions of the statistical units of the production system shall be used by the \nMember States and the Commission to identify the units with a view to collecting, \ntransmitting, publishing and analysing statistical data on the production system, \nparticularly those connected with NACE Rev. 1. Article 3 \n\nFrom 1 January 1993, for the purposes cited in Article 2, Member States shall use the \ndefinitions refered to in Article 1 for statistics relating to situations subsequent to that \ndate. Article 4 \n\nDuring a transitional period starting on 1 January 1993 and ending on 31 December \n1994, a Member State may, for statistics relating to that period, use statistical units of \nthe production system other than those provided for in Article 1. In such cases the \nstatistical data to be sent to the Commission during the transitional period shall be \nadapted and transmitted to conform as closely as possible to the requirements set out in \nthe annex hereto. The Commission may, under exceptional circumstances, at the request of a Member \nState and for duly substantiated technical or practical reasons, extend the transitional \nperiod until no later than 31 December 1996. Article 5 \n\nAfter the end of the transitional period the Commission may, pursuant to the \nprocedure laid down in article 6 hereof, authorise a Member State to use other \nstatistical units of the production system. Article 6 \n\nMeasures for implementing the present regulation, including those for adaptation to \neconomic and technical developments concerning in particular the statistical units of \nthe production system, the criteria used and the definitions specified in the annex, shall \nthe Statistical Programme \nbe determined by the Commission, after consulting \nCommittee instituted by Decision 89/382 EEC, Euratom\"' in accordance with the \nprocedure set out in Article 7. 2) OJ No L 181 of 28 June 1989, p. 47 \n\n\fArticle 7 \n\nThe Commission's representative shall submit to the Committee a draft of the \nmeasures to be taken. The Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a \ntime limit which the Chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if \nnecessary by taking a vote. The opinion of the Committee shall be recorded in the minutes. Each Member State \nshall have the right to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes. The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the \nCommittee. It shall inform the Committee of the manner in which its opinion has been \ntaken into account. Article 8 \n\nThe statistical units of the production system mentioned in a Community legal act \ngoverning Community statistics shall be interpreted in accordance with the concepts \nand terminology of this Regulation. Article 9 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its \npublication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Luxembourg, \n\n(date) \n\nFor the Council \nPresident \n\n4-\n\n\fANNEX \n\nSTATISTICAL UNITS OF THE PRODUCTION SYSTEM IN THE EUROPEAN \nCOMMUNITY \n\nSection I : The list of units \n\nThe list of statistical units of the production system is as follows \n\nthe enterprise ; \n\nthe institutional unit ; \n\nthe enterprise group ; \n\nthe kind-of-activity unit (KAU) ; \n\nthe unit of homogeneous production (UHP) ; \n\nthe local unit ; \n\nthe local kind-of-activity unit (local KAU) ; \n\nthe local unit of homogeneous production (local UHP). Section II : Criteria used \n\nThe statistical units in this Regulation are defined on the basis of three criteria. The \nrelative importance of these criteria depends on the type of unit concerned. 5-\n\n\fA) \n\nLegal, accounting or organizational criteria \n\nIn order to define units that are recognizable and identifiable in \u00f9. t economy, legal or \nIn some cases, legally separate units must be \ninstitutional criteria must be applied. grouped together as they are not sufficiently autonomous in their organization. In \norder to define some types of unit, accounting or financial criteria also have to be \napplied. To constitute the enterprise unit, use is made of legal units that exercise, wholly or \npartially, a productive activity. Legal units include: \n\nlegal persons whose existence is recognized by law independently of the \nindividuals or institutions which may own them or are members of them, \n\nnatural persons who are recogu. zed as legal units in their own right. The legal unit always forms, either by itself or sometimes in combination with other \nlegal units, the legal basis for the statistical unit known as the \"enterprise\". B) \n\nGeographical critera \n\nA unit can be geographically identified. A distinction is made between local, regional, \nnational. Community and world-wide areas. The local level here means the territory corresponding to the \"smallest administrative \narea'* : the \"commune/gemeente\" in Belgium, the \"kommune\" in Denmark, the \n\"Gemeinde\" in Germany, the \"demos\" in Greece, the \"municipio\" in Spain, the \n\"commune\" in France, tie \"DED/ward\" in Ireland, the \"comune' \nin Italy, the \n\"commune\" in Luxembourg, the \"gemeente\" in the Netherlands, the \"concelho\" in \nPortugal and the \"ward \n\nin the United Kingdom. The regional levels are defined by the nomenclature of territorial units for statistics \n(NUTS), which distinguishes three levels (I, II, III). The observation and analytical units are defined in such a way as to permit data first to \nbe determined for each Member State and these data to be combined to give figures for \nthe Community as a whole or for larger areas. The rules regarding geographical criteria must be in order to permit consolidation and \navoid double counting and omissions. 6-\n\n\fC) \n\nActivity critera \n\nThe economic activity of production - hereinafter referred to as \"activity\" - can be said \nto take place when resources such as equipment, labour, manufacturing techniques, \ninformation networks or products are combined, leading to the creation of specific \ngoods or services. An activity is characterized by an input of products (goods or \nservices), a production process and an output of products. Activities are determined by reference to a specific level of NACE Rev. 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. If a unit carries out more than one activity, all the activities which are not ancillary \nactivities are ranked according to the gross value added at factor cost which they \ngenerate. A distinction is made between principal activity and secondary activities. If no value-added figures are available, other criteria must be used, such as \nemployment, payroll, turnover, assets, etc. , with a view to obtaining the closest \npossible approximation of the classification which would have been obtained on the \nbasis of value added. Units are classified in terms of their activities. If one activity accounts for over 50% of \nthe value added this determines the classification of the unit. In all other cases, \nclassification rules must be observed. Classification is carried out in stages from the \nhighest level of aggregation which is the section (one letter), down to the class (4 \ndigits) via the division (2 digits) and the group (3 digits). The classification at each \nlevel must be compatible with the previous level. The Committee set up by the NACE \nRev. l Regulation (Council Regulation (EEC) No 3037/90) has competence in this field \n(Article 8. e)). Principal and secondary activities are backed up by ancillary activities, such as \nadministration, accounts, data processing, process monitoring, purchasing, sales and \nmarketing, warehousing, repairs, transport, renovation, etc. These ancillary activities within a unit are carried out in order to permit or facilitate \nproduction by the unit of goods and services for third parties. The products of \nancillary activities are not themselves supplied to third parties. The notion of ancillary activities is developed in section IV B. -7 \n\n\fSection III : Definitions of the statistical units of the production system and explanatory \n\nnotes specific to each unit. A) Enterprise \n\nis the smallest combination of \n\nThe ENTERPRISE \nis an \norganizational unit producing goods or services, which benefits from a certain \ndegree of autonomy in decision-making, especially for the allocation of its current \nresources. An enterprise carries out one or more activities at one or more \nlocations. legal units \n\nthat \n\nExplanatory note \n\nThe enterprise thus defined is an economic entity which can therefore, under certain \ncircumstances, correspond to a grouping of several legal units. Some legal units, in \nfact, perform activities exclusively for other legal units and their existence can only be \nexplained by administrative factors (e. g. tax reasons), without them being of any \neconomic significance. A large proportion of the legal units with no persons employed \nalso belongs to this category. In many cases, the activities of these legal units should \nbe seen as ancillary activities of the parent legal unit they serve, to which they belong \nand to which they ir. ust be attached to form an \n\"enterprise\" used for economic \nanalysis. B) Institutional unit \n\nThe INSTITUTIONAL UNIT is an elementary economic decision-making centre \ncharacterized by uniformity of behaviour and decision-making autonomy in the \nexercise of \nis regarded as constituting an \ninstitutio al unit if it has decision-making autonomy in respect of its principal \nI* notion md keeps a complete set of accounts. its principal function. A unit \n\nIn order to be said to keep a complete set of accounts, a unit must keep \naccounting records covering all its economic and financial transactions \ncarried out during the accounting period, as well as a balance sheet of \nassets and liabilities. In order to be said to have autonomy of decision in respect of its principal \nfunction, a unit must he responsible and accountable for the decisions and \nactions it takes. Explanatory notes \n\nIn the corporate enterprises sector, the enterprise corresponds to the institutional unit \nused in the ESA. Similar institutional units also exist in the general government and \nprivate non-profit institutions sectors. The institutional unit in the households sector \ncovers all the activities of households, while the term enterprise is reserved exclusively \nfor their production activities. Applying these rules leads to the following solutions for entities which do not clearly \npossess both characteristics of an institutional unit. a) \n\nb) \n\nc) \n\nd) \n\ne) \n\nHouseholds always enjoy autonomy of decision and must therefore be \ninstitutional units, even though they do not keep a complete set of accounts. Entities which do not keep a complete set of accounts are combined with the \ninstitutional units in whose accounts their partial accounts are integrated. Entities which, while keeping a complete set of accounts, have no autonomy of \ndecision in the exercise of their principal function are combined with the units \nwhich control them. Entities which satisfy the definition of an institutional unit are treated as such \neven if they do not publish their accounts. Entities forming part of a group of enterprises and keeping a complete set of \naccounts are deemed to be institutional units even if they have surrendered, in \nfact if not in law, pan of their autonomy of decision to the central body (the \nholding company) responsible for the group's general management. The \nholding company itself is deemed to be an institutional unit distinct from the \nunits which it controls. 3. The following are deemed to be institutional units: \n\nunits which have a complete set of accounts and autonomy of decision: \n\nprivate and public companies, public corporations; \n\ncooperatives or partnerships recognized as independent legal entities: \n\npublic enterprises which by virtue of special legislation are recognized as \nindependent legal entities: \n\nnon-profit institutions recognized as independent legal entities: \n\nagencies of general government. a) \n\nb) \n\nc) \n\nd) \n\ne) \n\n\funits which have a complete set of accounts and which, by convention, are \ndeemed to have autonomy of decision: \n\nf) \n\nquasi-corporate enterprises: sole proprietorships, partnerships and public \nenterprises, other than those shown under a), b) and c), insofar as their \neconomic and financial behaviour can be separated from that of their owners \nand resembles that of corporate enterprises: \n\nunits which do not necessarily keep a complete set of accounts, hut which by \nconvention are deemed to have autonomy of decision: \n\ng) \n\nhouseholds. C) Enterprise group \n\nAN ENTERPRISE GROUP is an association of enterprises bound together by legal \nand/or financial links. A group of enterprises can have more than one decision \nmaking centre, especially for policy on production, sales, profits, etc. It may \ncentralize certain aspects of financial management and taxation. It constitutes an \neconomic entity which is empowered to make choices, particularly concerning the \nunits which it comprises. Explanatory notes \n\nFor certain observations and analyses it is sometimes useful and necessary to study the \nlinks between certain enterprises and to group together those which have strong ties \nwith each other. A number of exercices are underway but not finished concerning the concept of the \ngroup of enterprises. It is defined here starting from the concept of \"accounting \ngroup\" as given in the 7th Council Directive (83/349/EEC, OJ L193 of 18 July 1983). This Directive came into force for the first time for consolidated accounts of the \nfinancial year which began in 1990. Council Directive 90/605/EEC, OJ L 317 of 16 \nNovember 1990, extended the scope of application of the seventh Directive. According to the seventh Directive, a group is presumed to exist where 20% of the \ncapital or voting rights are held or controlled by another enterprise. Provisions \nregarding the control of the power to appoint directors must be taken into account. Behind financial (majority) control, the aim is to take into account where the control \nreally \n\nJS. - 10 \n\n\fThis definition as it stands is not suitable for statistical ar. aivsis hecausj \". 'counting \ngroups\" do not constitute mutually exclusive, additive groups ot enterprises. A \nstatistical unit known as \"enterprise group\" based on the \"accounting group\" concept \nmust be defined by applying the following amendments: \n\nconsider accounting groups at the highest consolidation level (\"group head\"): \n\ninclude in \"enterprise group\" units whose accounts are entirely integrated in \nthose of the consolidating company; \n\nadd majority-controlled units whose accounts are not included in the overall \nconsolidation by virtue of application of one of the criteria allowed by the \nseventh Directive, i. e. difference in the type of activity or small relative size; \n\ndiscount temporary links of less than a year. An enterprise group is a set of enterprises controlled by the \"group head\". The group \nhead is a parent legal unit which is not controlled either directly or indirectly by any \nother legal unit. The subsidiary enterprises of a subsidiary enterprise are considered \nto be subsidiaries of the parent enterprise. However there are some forms of \ncooperative or mutual associations where the parent enterprise is actually owned by the \nunits of the group. Enterprise groups are often bound together by various types of links such as \nownership, controlling interest, management, etc. These units are often linked with \nunits of the same \"family\" from several different generations. The \"enterprise group\" \nunit often corresponds to a conglomerate bound together by a network of complex \nrelationships and frequently covers a very wide range of activities. Sub-groups can be \nidentified within enterprise groups. It is useful to recognize all (majority and minority) links between the group head and \nthe controlled enterprise via the network of subsidiaries and sub-subsidiaries. This \nallows the group's entire organization to be depicted. 7. 8. In view of the implications of the different accounting directives, an attempt should \nalways be made to distinguish between basic units of the group that belong to \"non-\nfinancial enterprises\" and those which must be classified as \"financial institutions\". In \nthe case of the latter, a distinction must be drawn between units that are \"credit \ninstitutions\" and those that are \"insurance enterprises\". Some enterprise groups span \nthe whole world, but need to be analysed for the economic territory of the Community \nand for that of each Member State. The \"enterprise group\" unit is particularly useful for financial analyses and for \nstudying company strategies, but it is too varied in nature and unstable to be adopted \nas the central unit for observation and analysis, which remains the enterprise. It is \nused for compiling and presenting certain information. - 11 \n\n\fD) Kind-of-activity unit \n\nThe KIND OF ACTIVITY UNIT (KAU) groups all the parts of an enterprise \ncontributing to the performance of an activity at class level (4 digits) of NACE \nRev. l and corresponds to one or more operational subdivisions of the enterprise. The enterprise's information system must be capable of indicating or calculating \nfor each KAU at \nleast the value of production, intermediate consumption, \nmanpower costs, the operating surplus and employment and gross fixed capital \nformation. Explanatory notes \n\nThe KAU was devised as an observation unit in order to improve the homogeneity of \nthe results of statistical surveys by activity and hence the international comparability of \nthese results, since at the level of the enterprise different types of horizontal and \nvertical integration can be observed at both national and international level. An entity \nwhich only carries out ancillary activities for the enterprise to which it belongs cannot \nbe considered as a separate KAU. In fact the \"KAU\" corresponds to the operational \ndefinition given in paragraph 96 of the introduction to ISIC Rev. 3. The KAUs falling within a particular heading in the classification system can produce \nproducts outside the homogeneous group, on account of secondary activities connected \nwith them which cannot be separately identified from available accounting documents. Conversely, the KAUs classified under a particular heading in the classification system \non the basis of a principal activity do not produce the entire output of homogeneous \ngroups of specific products because the same products can be produced in secondary \nactivities of KAUs falling under some other classification heading. The internal accounts of enterprises (e. g. p )fit or cost centres) have often been \ndeveloped according to criteria that are close L the activity concept. They enable the \nsupply of data at KAU level, so that these can be observed. AH the costs of ancillary activities of an enterprise must be allocated to the principal \nand secondary activities and thus to the KAUs observed within the enterprise. 12-\n\n\fE) Unit of homogeneous production \n\nThe UNIT OF HOMOGENEOUS PRODUCTION (UHP) is characterized by a \nsingle activity which is identified by its homogeneous inputs, production process \nand outputs. The products which constitute the inputs and outputs are themselves \ndistinguished by their physical characteristics and the extent to which they have \nbeen processed as well as by the production technique used, by reference to a \nproduct classification. The unit of homogeneous production may correspond to an \ninstitutional unit or a part thereof; on the other hand, it can never belong to two \ndifferent institutional units. Explanatory notes \n\nFor a clear analysis of the production process, the ESA has adopted units of \nhomogeneous production that enable the technical/economic relationships to be \nstudied. These analytical units are used particularly for Input-Output tables, and in \npractice are reconstituted from data collected for the observation units, since they \ncannot as a rule be directly observed. Most observation units are engaged in a combination of activities at the same time. They may be engaged in a principal activity, some secondary activities - i. e. activities \nbelonging to other branches - and some ancillary activities such as administration, \npurchasing, selling to the trade, storage, repairs, etc. If an observation unit carries out \na principal activity as well as one or more secondary activities, it will be subdivided \ninto the corresponding number of units of homogeneous production, and the secondary \nactivities will be reclassified under different headings from the principal activity. On \nthe other hand, the ancillary activities of the observation unit are not separated from \nthe principal or secondary activities they serve. The unit of homogeneous production is defined independently of the location of the \nactivity. In ISIC Rev. 3, the \"unit of homogeneous production\" is defined in such a \nway as to correspond to the local UHP. Paragraph 112 of the introduction to ISIC \nRev. 3 is governed by paragraph 104. 13 \n\n\fF) Local unit \n\nThe LOCAL UNIT is an enterprise or part thereof (e. g. a workshop, factory, \nwarehouse, office, mine or depot) situated in a geographically identified place. At \nor from this place economic activity is carried out for which - save for certain \nexceptions - one or more persons work (even if only part-time) for one and the \nsame enterprise. Explanatory notes \n\n1. If a person works in more than one place (maintenance or surveillance) or at home, the \nlocal unit is taken to be the place from which instructions emanate or from where the \nwork is organized. to any \nlocal unit. However, all legal units that serve as the legal basis for an enterprise or a \npart thereof must have a local unit which is the registered office, even if nobody works \nthere. Moreover, a local unit can comprise only ancillary activities. It must be possible to specify the employment attached \n\nA geographically identified place must be interpreted on a strict basis: two units \nbelonging to the same enterprise at different \nlocations (even within the smallest \nadministrative unit of the Member State) must be regarded as two local units. However, a single local unit may be spread over several adjacent administrative areas, \nin which case, by convention, the postal address is the determining factor. The boundaries ot the unit are determined by the boundaries of the site, which means \nfor example that a public highway running through does not interrupt the continuity of \nthe boundaries. The definition \nis similar to the one in paragraph 101 of the \nintroduction to ISIC Rev. 3, in that it concerns localization in the strict sense of the \nterm, but differs from the definition in paragraph 102 in that this strict sense may not \nvary according to the statistics under consideration. In addition, the criterion of \npersons working in the unit is normally applied. 4. The ESA-REG (the regional application of the ESA) uses the same definition of \"local \nunit\" for regional accounts purposes. 1 4-\n\n\fG) Local kind-of-activity unit \n\nThe LOCAL KIND-OF-ACTIVITY UNIT (local KAU) is the part of a KAU which \ncorresponds to a local unit. Explanatory notes \n\nEach KAU must have at least one local KAU, although the KAU can be made up of a \ngrouping of parts of one or more local units. On the other hand, a local unit may in \ncertain circumstances comprise solely a group of ancillary activities. In this instance, a \nsupplementary classification of the local unit is possible. Furthermore, each enterprise \nshould have at least one \"local KAU\". The \"local KAU\" corresponds to the operational definition of the \"establishment\" as \ngiven in paragraph 106 of the introduction to ISIC Rev. 3. H) Local unit of homogeneous production \n\nThe LOCAL UNIT OF HOMOGENEOUS PRODUCTION (local UHP) is the part of \na unit of homogeneous production which corresponds to a local unit. 15-\n\n\fSection IV : Additional explanatory notes \n\nA) \n\nGovernment and non-profits bodies \n\n1. In the case of general government bodies, the appropriate statistical unit for the \ncollection and corr elation of statistics is very variable (e. g. central government, social \nsecurity administr lion, or local government of the region, province, department, \ncounty, municipality, metropolitan area, etc. ). These various bodies collectively plan, \nsupervise and administer the finances of their constituent bodies (which can be \nministries, directorates-general, directorates, bureaus, agencies, offices, etc. ). As \nregards the type of activity, however, some of these bodies, particularly local \nauthorities, are likely to be much more heterogeneous than corporate enterprises. The activities of these bodies often belong to Section L of NACE Rev. l \"Public \nadministration and defence: compulsory social security\", although other bodies carry \nout activities which basically belong to other Sections, including \"Education\" (Section \nM), \"Health and social work\" (Section N) and \"Other community, social and personal \nservice activities\" (Section O). When series of data on private-sector entities have to be combined with data on these \ngeneral government and private non-profit institutions classified by type of economic \nactivity, their identification and classification must be carried out using statistical units \ncorresponding to entities which are closest to the statistical units defined in the private \nsector. This is why all the criteria used in the private sector are - by analogy - applied \nto general. government bodies. The same applies to private non-profit institutions. 16-\n\n\fB) \n\nAncillary activities \n\n1. An activity must be regarded as ancillary if it satisfies all the following conditions: \n\na) \n\nb) \n\nc) \n\nit serves only the unit referred to: in other words, goods or services produced \nmust not be sold on the market; \n\na comparable activity on a similar scale is performed in similar production \nunits; \n\nit produces services or, in exceptional cases, non-durable goods which do not \nform part of the unit's end product (e. g. small implements or scaffolding); \n\nd) \n\nit contributes to the current costs of the unit itself, i. e. does not generate gross \nfixed capital formation. The distinction between ancillary, principal and secondary activity can be illustrated \nby a few examples. Production of small implements for the unit's use is an ancillary activity (in \naccordance with all criteria). Own-account transport is normally an ancillary activity (in accordance with all \ncriteria). Sales of own products are an ancillary activity because, as a general rule, it is \nnot possible to produce without sales. However, if it is possible to identify a \nretail sales point within a production enterprise (direct sales to end-user) which \nmay be, for example, a local unit, this sales point - exceptionally and for the \npurposes of certain analyses - may be regarded as a kind-of-activity unit. This \nobservation unit then forms the subject of a twofold classification, i. e. in terms \nof the (principal or secondary) activity it performs within the enterprise and in \nterms of its own activity (retail sale). 17 \n\n\fThus, the general rule is that,. nee production processes a:j not usually viable \nwithout the support of ancillary activities, these ancillary activities should not be \nisolated to form distinct entities, even if they are carried out by a distinct legal entity \nor at a distinct place, and even if separate accounts are kem. Furthermore, the \nancillary activity is not taken into account when classifying the activity of the entity by \nwhich the ancillary activities are carried out. The best example of an entity carrying \nout ancillary activities is the central administrative department or \"registered office\". Having regard to the definition in paragraph above, the following activities must not \nbe considered as ancillary activities. a) \n\nb) \n\nc) \n\nd) \n\nThe production of goods or work carried out which forms part of fixed capital \nformation - in particular, construction work for own account. This is in line \nwith the method used in NACE Rev. l, where units carrying out construction \nwork for own account are classified under the building industry if data are \navailable. Production, a significant part of which is sold commercially, even if much is \nused as consumption in connection with the principal activity or secondary \nactivities. The production of goods which subsequently become an integral part of the \noutput of the principal or secondary activity - e. g. production of boxes, \ncontainers, etc. by a department of an enterprise for use in packing its \nproducts. The production of energy (integrated power station or integrated coking plant), \neven where this is consumed in its entirety in the principal or secondary \nactivity of the parent unit. e) \n\nThe purchase of goods for resale in unaltered state. f) \n\nResearch and development. These activities are not \\ :y widespread and do \nnot produce services which are used in current production. \u00eeese cases, if separate data are available for these activities, they should be \n\nIn all \nregaruvxl as distinct activities and subsequently recognized as KAUs. - 18-\n\n\f6. 7. If ancillary activities are carried out tor the benefit ot a single entity, these activities \nand the resources they use will constitute an integral part of the activities and \nresources of that unit. However, if the activities of the statistical unit and the \ncorresponding ancillary activities are not carried out in the same geographical area \n(defined in terms of the zones delimited for the purposes of statistical surveys), it may \nbe desirable to collect separate supplementary information on these units for the \ncategories of data which have to be classified in terms of geographical areas, even if \nthe units only carry out ancillary activities. If ancillary activities are carried out basically for the benefit of two or more kind-of-\nactivity units, the cost of these ancillary activities must be spread over all the kind-of-\nactivity units which they support. If data are available on the proportion of the costs \nwhich can be assigned to each of these distinct activities, the costs should be broken \ndown accordingly. However, should no information of this kind be available, the cost \nof the ancillary activity should be broken down over the principal and secondary \nactivities proportionately to the value of output minus intermediate costs excluding the \ncosts of the ancillary activities themselves. If this method proves too difficult in \npractice, the cost of the ancillary activity may simply be broken down proportionately \nto the value of output. If ancillary activities are organized in such a way as to serve two or more entities of a \nmulti-unit enterprise, they may constitute a group of ancillary activities at a distinct \nlocation. In this case, in the same way as it would be desirable to cover certain \nactivities completely even if they are carried out independently or by entities which are \nengaged exclusively in ancillary activities (such as computer services), it could be \nuseful to allow for supplementary classifications. For this purpose these ancillary \nentities could then be classified according to their own activities as well as being \nclassified under the activity of the unit to which they belong. It is possible that an activity starts out as ancillary but subsequently begins to provide \nservices for sale to other entities. An activity of this kind may develop to the point \nwhere it ceases to be an ancillary activity and must therefore be regarded as one of the \nprincipal or secondary activities of an entity. The only way of deciding whether a \ngiven activity should be regarded as an ancillary activity or a principal or secondary \nactivity is to assess the role it plays in the enterprise as a whole. - 19 \n\n\fC) \n\nSynoptic table by activity and location \n\nOne or more locations \n\nA single location \n\nOne or nufre activities \n\nEnterprise \n\nLocal unit \n\nOne single activity \n\nInstitutional unit \n\nKAU \n\nUHP \n\nLocal KAU \n\nLocal UHP \n\n- 2 0-\n\n\f\fISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 353 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\noi 17 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-406-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-47546-3 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg \n\n- \n\n2A-"} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c3b16fb7-ccf4-4b16-bfc6-39102f8a2d25", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2260/92 of 14 September 1992 amending Regulations (EEC) No 1912/92 and (EEC) No 1913/92 laying down detailed implementing rules for the specific measures for supplying the Canary Islands and the Azores and Madeira with products from the beef and veal sector", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-14", "subjects": "Azores,Canary Islands,Madeira,beef,import licence,supply", "workIds": "celex:31992R2660,oj:JOL_1992_270_R_0005_019", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Azores", "Canary Islands", "Madeira", "beef", "import licence", "supply"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c3b16fb7-ccf4-4b16-bfc6-39102f8a2d25", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/adf9ad5d-3999-46fc-88be-b805ce03a833", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2657/92 of 13 September 1992 suspending advance fixing of the monetary compensatory amounts applicable in Italy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-13", "subjects": "Italy,monetary compensatory amount", "workIds": "celex:31992R2657,oj:JOL_1992_269_R_0001_003", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "monetary compensatory amount"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/adf9ad5d-3999-46fc-88be-b805ce03a833", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/090ed934-aaf3-467d-ac15-a6b0a67abe6a", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2646/92 of 11 September 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 598/86 as regards the indicative ceiling for imports into Spain of common wheat of breadmaking quality for the 1992/93 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-11", "subjects": "EU Member State,Spain,common wheat,import,supplementary trade mechanism", "workIds": "celex:31992R2646,oj:JOL_1992_266_R_0011_026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "Spain", "common wheat", "import", "supplementary trade mechanism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/090ed934-aaf3-467d-ac15-a6b0a67abe6a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e4f1be86-52bd-43ef-b6ff-2c44f3fb1e81", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directive 75/275/EEC concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Netherlands)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-11", "subjects": "less-favoured agricultural area,regions of the Netherlands", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0384,comnat:COM_1992_0384_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_260_R_0008_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["less-favoured agricultural area", "regions of the Netherlands"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e4f1be86-52bd-43ef-b6ff-2c44f3fb1e81", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 384 final \n\nBrussels, 11 September 1992 \n\n\u00ee \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\namending Directive 75/275/EEC concerning the community list \nof leas-favoured farming areas \nwithin the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Netherlands) \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\f- 2 -\n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nPursuant to Council Directive 88/403/EEC,1 48 217 ha, or 1. 4% of the area \nof the Netherlands, is classified under Article 3(5) of Council Directive \n75/268/EEC2 as less-favoured agricultural areas affected by specific \nhandicaps. This application concerns a further 62 698 ha, which will increase the \nclassified area to 110 915 ha, or 3. 3% of the national territory. Introduction of a compensatory allowance in the new areas will increase \nexpenditure from the EAGGF Guidance Section by ECU 1. 24 million per year \n(see details in annexed financial statement). Most of the 6 877 holdings in these areas produce milk so that \nclassification can be expected to reduce revenue from the co-responsibility \nlevy by ECU 760 000 only for the milkyear 1992. 1 OJ No L 19 5, 23. 7. 19 88, p. 72. 2 OJ No L 128, 19. 5. 1975, p. 1. - 3 -\n\nCOUNCIL DIRECTIVE \n\nOf \n\n1992 \n\namending Directive 75/275/EEC concerning the Community list of \nless-favoured farming areas within the meaning of \nDirective 75/268/EEC (Netherlands) \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \n\nHaving regard to Council Decision 75/268/EEC of 28 April 1975 on mountain \nand hill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas(*), as last \namended by Regulation (EEC) No 2328/91,<2) and in particular Article 2(2) \nthereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission^3), \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(4), \n\nWhereas Directive 75/275/EEc(5), as last amended by commission Decision \n88/403/EEC,(6) specifies the areas in the Netherlands which appear in the \nCommunity list of less-favoured areaB within the meaning of Article 3(5) of \nDirective 75/268/EEC; \n\nWhereas the Netherlands Government has requested, pursuant to Article 2(1) \nof Directive 75/268/EEC, an amendment to the list annexed to \nDirective 75/275/EEC in accordance with the annex to this Directive; \n\n(1) \n(2) \n(3) \n(4) \n(5) \n(6) \n\nOJ \nOJ \nOJ \nOJ \nOJ \nOJ \n\nNo \nNO \n\nL \nL \n\n128, 19. 5. 1975, p. l. 218, 6. 8. 1991, p. l. No \nNo \n\nL \nL \n\n273, 24. 9. 1986, p. 04. 195, 23. 7. 1988, p. 72. - 4 -\n\nWhereas the new areas to appear in the list comply with the criteria and \nthe figures applied pursuant to Directive 75/275/EEC for the purposes of \ndetermining the areas concerned within the meaning of Article 3(5) of \nDirective 75/268/EEC; \n\nWhereas, for the definition of the areas affected by specific handicaps \nreferred to in Article 3(5) of Directive 75/268/EEC, the criteria for \nisland areas were the existence of unfavourable natural conditions (high \nwinds, excessive local salinity, low potential and poor drainage) and \nconstraints arising from the need to preserve landscapes and maintain the \nrural environment and the tourist nature of the area in question; \n\nwhereas the aggregate total area concerned does not exceed 4% of the entire \narea of the Netherlands, \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: \n\nArticle 1 \n\nThe Annex to Directive 75/275/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex attached \nhereto. Article 2 \n\nThis Directive is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the Council \nThe President \n\n\f- 5 -\n\nANNEX \n\nLess-favoured areas within the meaning of Article 3(5) of Directive \n75/268/EEC (Netherlands) \n\nProvince \n\nNo of areas \n\nArea (UAA) \n\nGroningen \nFriesland \nDrenthe \nOverijssel \nGelderland \nFlevoland \nUtrecht \nNoord-Holland \nZuid-Holland \nZeeland \nNoord-Brabant \nLimburg \n\nTOTAL \n\n13 \n39 \n21 \n30 \n32 \n\n23 \n24 \n20 \n16 \n23 \n11 \n\n252 \n\n3 883 \n18 901 \n6 810 \n11 534 \n25 353 \n\n5 983 \n9 253 \n9 154 \n2 484 \n9 367 \n8. 193 \n\n110 915 \n\n\f- 6 -\n\nFINANCIAL STATEMENT \nconcerning \n\nProposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 75/275/EEC concerning \nthe Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of \nDirective 75/268/EEC (Netherlands) \n\n1. Budget heading (1992 nomenclature) \n\nB2-1012: Objective 5(a) (differentiated appropriations). 2. 3. 4. 5. Legal basis; Article 43 of the Treaty. Description of the measure; \n\nIncrease in less-favoured areas by applying appropriate current \ncriteria. The population concerned by this increase is the rural population \nof these areas. Classification of expenditure; Non-compulsory \n\nNature of expenditure; Part-financing of eligible expenditure at \nthe rate of 25% on the basis of current rules. 6. Financial impact on appropriations for assistance \n\n6. 1 \n\nMethod of calculation of total cost \n\nThe increase in the areas will increase the number of LU\u2022s \nreceiving a premium and hence expenditure under the compensatory \nallowance calculated as follows: 62 000 LU x ECU 80/LU x 25% * ECU \n1. 24 million per year. 6. 2 \n\nindicative schedule of commitment and payment appropriations \n\nYear \n\n1992 \n1993 \n1994 \n1995 \n1996 \n1997 \n\nTotal 1993-97 \n\nCommitment and payment \nappropriations (ECU million) \n\n1. 24 \n1. 24 \n1. 24 \n1. 24 \n1. 24 \n6. 20 \n\n\f7 -\n\nCOST/EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS \n\nObjectives and purpose of the measure \n\nThe areas which it is intended to classify as less-favoured and mountain \nand hill areas have been selected on the basis of the criteria currently in \nforce under Directive 75/275/EEC. The request by the Netherlands does not alter these criteria but proposes \nclassification of the areas concerned. The Commission is required to consider this request in the light of the \ncriteria and forward it to the Council. There is no alternative course of \naction and it is not strictly speaking a new measure. Consistency with financial programming \n\nIn 1993 the measure can be financed from appropriations in the 1993 \npreliminary draft budget. In future years the expenditure will have to be taken into consideration in \nthe new framework to be adopted for 1994-97. Monitoring and assessment of the measure \n\nSince the measure involves structural assistance, Articles 25 and 26 of \nRegulation (EEC) No 4235/88 apply. - 2-\n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 384 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-404-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-47528-5 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nLr2985 Luxembourg"} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5facaf39-51af-4f45-98a2-2804a8d170c4", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2719/92 of 11 September 1992 on the accompanying administrative document for the movement under duty-suspension arrangements of products subject to excise duty", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-11", "subjects": "carriage of goods,customs document,customs warehouse,excise duty", "workIds": "celex:31992R2719,oj:JOL_1992_276_R_0001_012", "eurovoc_concepts": ["carriage of goods", "customs document", "customs warehouse", "excise duty"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5facaf39-51af-4f45-98a2-2804a8d170c4", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fcc739e0-a714-43d8-9533-019dca397de0", "title": "Harmonized statistics of earnings : Methodology of national surveys.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission,Eurostat", "date": "1992-09-11", "subjects": "EU Member State,economic sector,hourly wage,statistical method,statistics", "workIds": "PUB_CA7291310", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "economic sector", "hourly wage", "statistical method", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fcc739e0-a714-43d8-9533-019dca397de0", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3123b82-6ed9-4bab-b658-24515e966bb1", "title": "Amended proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) AMENDING FOR THE FIRST TIME REGULATION (EEC) NO 1601/91 LAYING DOWN GENERAL RULES ON THE DEFINITION, DESCRIPTION AND PRESENTATION OF AROMATIZED WINES, AROMATIZED WINE-BASED DRINKS AND AROMATIZED WINE-PRODUCT COCKTAILS", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-11", "subjects": "flavoured wine,food technology,fruit product,labelling", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0391,comnat:COM_1992_0391_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["flavoured wine", "food technology", "fruit product", "labelling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f3123b82-6ed9-4bab-b658-24515e966bb1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 391 final - SYN 396 \n\nBrussels, 11 September 1992 \n\nAmended proposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\nAMENDING FOR THE FIRST TIME REGULATION (EEC) NO 1601/91 \n\nLAYING DOWN GENERAL RULES ON THE DEFINTION, DESCRIPTION AND \n\nPRESENTATION Or AROMATIZED WINES, AROMATIZED WINE-BASED DRINKS AND \n\nAROMATIZED WINE-PRODUCT COCKTAILS \n\n(presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 149(3) \nof the EEC-Treaty) \n\nm \n\n\f- z. \u2014 \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\nThese proposals concern spirit drinks and aromatized wines, aromatized wine-bsned \ndrinks and aromatized wine-product cocktails. Their purpose is to prohibit fr nj \n1 January 1993 the use of lead-based closures in order to avoid contamination \nrisks and pollution of the environment. They were transmitted to the Council in February 1 9 9 2 0 ). Parliament approved \nthem on a July- 1992^2), and asked for a minor amendment to the definition of the \ndrink \"Kalte Ente\" given in Article 2(3)(e) of Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91. The \nCommission accepted this amendment. It proposed to the Council that the \ndefinition of \"Sangria\" in Article 2(3)(a) of the above Regulation be clarified; \nthis would not change the meaning but would improve understanding as a result of \na clearer presentation. On 23 July 1992 the Council adopted unanimously a common \nposition in agreement with the Commission on: \n\nthe amended proposal amending Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 and \n\nthe proposal without amendments which amends Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89. This document constitutes official transmission by the Commission of these \namendments to Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91. (1) COM(92)55 final of 21. 2. 1992. (2) PV 22 11. w\u00a3 161. 603 not yet published in the OJ \n\n\f- i-\n\nAmended proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) \n\namending for the first time Regulation (EEC) No 16 01/91 \n\nlaying down general rules on the definition, description \n\nand presentation of aromatized wines, aromatized wine-based drinks \n\nand aromatized wine-product cocktails \n\nArticle 1 is hereby amended as follows : \n\n\"Article 1 \n\nRegulation (EEC) no 1601/91 is hereby amended as follows : \n\n1. In Article 2 paragraphe 3 point a) the first subparagraphe is \n\nreplaced by : \n\n\"(a) \n\nSangria : \n\na drink obtained from wine \n\naromatized with the addition of natural citrus-fruit \n\nextracts or essences \n\nwith our without the juice of such fruit \n\npossibly \n\n= with the addition of spices \n\n= sweetened \n\n= with C02 added \n\nand having on acquired alcoholic strength by volume of less \n\nthan 12% vol. \" \n\n2. In Article 2 paragraphe 3 the point e) is replaced by : \n\n\"(e) \n\nKalte Ente : \n\nan aromatized wine-based drink obtained by mixing wine, semi-\n\nsparkling wine or ?. c. mi sparkling wine with added C02 with \n\nsparkling wine or sparkling wine with added co2, and adding \n\nnatural lemon substances or extracts thereof, the taste of \n\n\fwhich must be clearly perceptible. The finished product must, \n\ncontain not less than 25% by volume of the sparkling wine or \n\nsparkling with added C02:u \n\n3. In Article 8 the fol Iwo\u00efng paragraphe 4a is added : \n\n\"4a. As from 1 January 1993, bottled products covered by this Ragulatioa may \n\nonly be held with a view to sale or placed on the market in containers \n\nfitted with closing devices not covered by lead-based capsules. or foil. However, the disposal of products in bottles fitted before that date with \n\nlead-based capsules or foil shall be authorized until stocks are used up. * \n\n\f-51 \n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM (92) 391 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92409-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-47573-0 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nL-2985 Luxembourg"} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/72e3c1e9-9b99-4810-91de-417f0952c64e", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2645/92 of 11 September 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2676/90 determining Community methods for the analysis of wines", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-11", "subjects": "food inspection,fruit product,vinification", "workIds": "celex:31992R2645,oj:JOL_1992_266_R_0010_025", "eurovoc_concepts": ["food inspection", "fruit product", "vinification"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/72e3c1e9-9b99-4810-91de-417f0952c64e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86e4d95b-8a23-4788-b8cd-ea213472101f", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2644/92 of 11 September 1992 on the supply of skimmed-milk powder as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-11", "subjects": "Bolivia,food aid,skimmed milk powder", "workIds": "celex:31992R2644,oj:JOL_1992_266_R_0007_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Bolivia", "food aid", "skimmed milk powder"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/86e4d95b-8a23-4788-b8cd-ea213472101f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/479c5785-484b-4754-96bf-b59325995cbe", "title": "SPEL System : Methodological documentation.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission,Eurostat", "date": "1992-09-10", "subjects": "agricultural statistics,consultation of information,documentation,information system,software", "workIds": "PUB_CA7592356", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural statistics", "consultation of information", "documentation", "information system", "software"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/479c5785-484b-4754-96bf-b59325995cbe", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/39736a58-e3b7-4979-a959-255d8f681df3", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2651/92 of 10 September 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code 42O2, originating in India, to which the preferential tariff arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-10", "subjects": "India,fancy leather goods and glove-making industry,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R2651,oj:JOL_1992_266_R_0019_031", "eurovoc_concepts": ["India", "fancy leather goods and glove-making industry", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/39736a58-e3b7-4979-a959-255d8f681df3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/99606e35-914d-4041-99b0-bea679e0a0cf", "title": "SPEL system : Technical documentation.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission,Eurostat", "date": "1992-09-10", "subjects": "agricultural statistics,consultation of information,documentation,information system,software", "workIds": "PUB_CA7592348", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural statistics", "consultation of information", "documentation", "information system", "software"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/99606e35-914d-4041-99b0-bea679e0a0cf", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c63fce3a-6d36-4aa1-9df9-60de31d1e2b2", "title": "Copyright and information limits to the protection of literary and pseudo-literary works in the Member States of the EC.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Competition,European Commission", "date": "1992-09-10", "subjects": "competition,confidentiality,copyright,information policy,protection of communications,reprography", "workIds": "PUB_CM7592049", "eurovoc_concepts": ["competition", "confidentiality", "copyright", "information policy", "protection of communications", "reprography"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c63fce3a-6d36-4aa1-9df9-60de31d1e2b2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07a27801-737e-4425-bc46-6437ecdd486c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2317/92 by Mr Francesco SPERONI to the Commission. State financing of production plants in southern Italy to the detriment of northern Italy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SPERONI Francesco Enrico", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "State aid,economic support,industrial restructuring,location of industry,public financing,regional aid,regions of Italy", "workIds": "celex:91992E002317", "eurovoc_concepts": ["State aid", "economic support", "industrial restructuring", "location of industry", "public financing", "regional aid", "regions of Italy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/07a27801-737e-4425-bc46-6437ecdd486c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b04e5043-ed9e-45ee-8037-e828f230b926", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2305/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Euratom", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EAEC,Provence-Alpes-C\u00f4te d'Azur,fuel enrichment,nuclear fuel,nuclear safety,plutonium,regions of France,research body,uranium", "workIds": "celex:91992E002305", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC", "Provence-Alpes-C\u00f4te d'Azur", "fuel enrichment", "nuclear fuel", "nuclear safety", "plutonium", "regions of France", "research body", "uranium"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b04e5043-ed9e-45ee-8037-e828f230b926", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66179647-820d-4795-a9f3-9da7f58c2b5a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2325/92 by Mrs Anita POLLACK to the Commission. Environmental impact of traffic", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,POLLACK", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "air quality,energy consumption,environmental impact,motor fuel,motor vehicle pollution,road traffic,statistical method,statistics", "workIds": "celex:91992E002325", "eurovoc_concepts": ["air quality", "energy consumption", "environmental impact", "motor fuel", "motor vehicle pollution", "road traffic", "statistical method", "statistics"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/66179647-820d-4795-a9f3-9da7f58c2b5a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8d676509-8eb1-4659-9226-ba2a5a04cd61", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2311/92 by Mr Michael WELSH to the Commission. Excise and other taxes on diesel fuel", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,WELSH", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EU Member State,EU statistics,excise duty,fuel tax,motor fuel,retail price", "workIds": "celex:91992E002311", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "EU statistics", "excise duty", "fuel tax", "motor fuel", "retail price"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8d676509-8eb1-4659-9226-ba2a5a04cd61", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/544b22c1-4386-4ac8-bbc7-06ea57ce532f", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2307/92 by Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "Council of the European Union,EC Directive,chemical compound", "workIds": "celex:91992E002307", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Council of the European Union", "EC Directive", "chemical compound"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/544b22c1-4386-4ac8-bbc7-06ea57ce532f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08e3fc90-dd31-4eee-ad78-d8abede1b031", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2324/92 by Mr Ingo FRIEDRICH to the Commission. Effects of a banana import regime on the GATT round", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FRIEDRICH INGO", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "ACP countries,GATT,common organisation of markets,consumer price,import restriction,quantitative restriction,tariff quota,tropical fruit", "workIds": "celex:91992E002324", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ACP countries", "GATT", "common organisation of markets", "consumer price", "import restriction", "quantitative restriction", "tariff quota", "tropical fruit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/08e3fc90-dd31-4eee-ad78-d8abede1b031", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0d24970e-d223-440b-a7e9-804a7986e952", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2608/92 of 8 September 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN codes 9405 30 00 and 9505, originating in China, to which the preferential arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "China,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R2608,oj:JOL_1992_263_R_0006_018", "eurovoc_concepts": ["China", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0d24970e-d223-440b-a7e9-804a7986e952", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f71343ff-493d-4c9a-bba9-ab1ab008a62c", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 2656/92 of 8 September 1992 concerning certain technical modalities in connection with the application of Regulation (EEC) No 1432/92 prohibiting trade between the European Economic Community and the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "Yugoslavia,export licence,import licence,republic,trade restriction", "workIds": "celex:31992R2656,oj:JOL_1992_266_R_0027_036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Yugoslavia", "export licence", "import licence", "republic", "trade restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f71343ff-493d-4c9a-bba9-ab1ab008a62c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9b359832-15b6-4742-9f09-bcf62ddf83b1", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2298/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Radioactively contaminated materials", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "Germany,construction equipment,earths and stones,radiation protection,radioactive materials,road building", "workIds": "celex:91992E002298", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Germany", "construction equipment", "earths and stones", "radiation protection", "radioactive materials", "road building"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9b359832-15b6-4742-9f09-bcf62ddf83b1", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f4c7b194-5a6e-4623-9811-d504464fd87f", "title": "Venture capital for exploitation of R& D results by SMEs.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_losl", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DG XVIII \u2013 Credit and Investments,European Commission", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "provision of documents,research programme", "workIds": "PUB_C77492726", "eurovoc_concepts": ["provision of documents", "research programme"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f4c7b194-5a6e-4623-9811-d504464fd87f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_losl"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/13d5a541-70c9-49b1-8a55-820aca7f90ff", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2306/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Euratom", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EAEC,International Atomic Energy Agency,Joint Research Centre,international organisation,nuclear safety,supervisory power", "workIds": "celex:91992E002306", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC", "International Atomic Energy Agency", "Joint Research Centre", "international organisation", "nuclear safety", "supervisory power"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/13d5a541-70c9-49b1-8a55-820aca7f90ff", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9814cf64-fcb1-42ba-98e0-493d2b3ed46e", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2308/92 by Diego SANTOS L\u00d3PEZ to the Commission. Purification plant at Alhaurin de la Torre (M\u00e1laga)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DE LOS SANTOS LOPEZ,European Parliament", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "Andalusia,EU law,air quality,co-financing,environmental protection,pollution of waterways,regional development,water pollution,water treatment", "workIds": "celex:91992E002308", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Andalusia", "EU law", "air quality", "co-financing", "environmental protection", "pollution of waterways", "regional development", "water pollution", "water treatment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9814cf64-fcb1-42ba-98e0-493d2b3ed46e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b45e11c5-34a0-486f-b7d1-c1ee139929ed", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2290/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Euratom -report on the operation of safeguards", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EAEC,limited circulation,nuclear safety,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E002290", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC", "limited circulation", "nuclear safety", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b45e11c5-34a0-486f-b7d1-c1ee139929ed", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1e1e8065-57a1-4280-93d1-8be7c677886a", "title": "Council Regulation (EEC) No 2655/92 of 8 September 1992 restricting use of the procedure for the international transport of goods under cover of TIR carnets (TIR Convention) in the case of consignments travelling between two points situated in the European Economic Community via the territories of the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Council of the European Union", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "Yugoslavia,economic sanctions,international road transport,intra-EU transport,republic,transit", "workIds": "celex:31992R2655,oj:JOL_1992_266_R_0026_035", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Yugoslavia", "economic sanctions", "international road transport", "intra-EU transport", "republic", "transit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1e1e8065-57a1-4280-93d1-8be7c677886a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0b1fc64f-ca72-44ac-8f99-5c584f79588f", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2607/92 of 8 September 1992 re-establishing the levying of customs duties on products falling within CN code ex 2914 21 00, originating in China, to which the preferential arrangements set out in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3831/90 apply", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "China,restoration of customs duties,tariff preference", "workIds": "celex:31992R2607,oj:JOL_1992_263_R_0005_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["China", "restoration of customs duties", "tariff preference"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0b1fc64f-ca72-44ac-8f99-5c584f79588f", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/35cd488f-96d2-4e11-b23b-7c08b9605632", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2295/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Euratom Treaty", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EAEC Treaty,Euratom Supply Agency,contract,radioactive materials", "workIds": "celex:91992E002295", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC Treaty", "Euratom Supply Agency", "contract", "radioactive materials"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/35cd488f-96d2-4e11-b23b-7c08b9605632", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ab39dee-7510-41cb-beb3-f3d9cc6b5db6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2296/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Euratom Treaty", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EAEC Treaty,United Kingdom,application of EU law,nuclear safety,radiation protection,radioactive materials,road transport,transport of dangerous goods", "workIds": "celex:91992E002296", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC Treaty", "United Kingdom", "application of EU law", "nuclear safety", "radiation protection", "radioactive materials", "road transport", "transport of dangerous goods"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5ab39dee-7510-41cb-beb3-f3d9cc6b5db6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68da8811-46f9-426a-8069-88f7ca84acae", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2312/92 by Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Proposal to hold ' Europartenariat-93' in Galicia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "European integration,European undertaking,Galicia,entrepreneur,small and medium-sized enterprises", "workIds": "celex:91992E002312", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European integration", "European undertaking", "Galicia", "entrepreneur", "small and medium-sized enterprises"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/68da8811-46f9-426a-8069-88f7ca84acae", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/167f7d7c-dcc0-433b-921f-d6eda36d8a01", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2310/92 by Pauline GREEN to the Commission. Product liability directive", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GREEN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EC Directive,United Kingdom,application of EU law,consumer protection,defective product,producer's liability,product safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E002310", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EC Directive", "United Kingdom", "application of EU law", "consumer protection", "defective product", "producer's liability", "product safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/167f7d7c-dcc0-433b-921f-d6eda36d8a01", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a3fca85-a69d-4a12-94d5-a4f7659e8240", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2319/92 by Mr Ernest GLINNE to the Commission. The fight against AIDS: dwindling budgets", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GLINNE", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "ACP countries,AIDS,Member States' contribution,World Health Organisation,developing countries,fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention,industrialised country,research budget", "workIds": "celex:91992E002319", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ACP countries", "AIDS", "Member States' contribution", "World Health Organisation", "developing countries", "fourth Lom\u00e9 Convention", "industrialised country", "research budget"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8a3fca85-a69d-4a12-94d5-a4f7659e8240", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2d67f493-2ece-44b6-907e-cc5da6996eba", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2315/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Substantial divergences between Japan and France and the rest of the OECD in the field of nuclear energy", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "Japan,Nuclear Energy Agency,OECD countries,economic consequence,electrical energy,energy demand,energy production,nuclear energy,nuclear power station,production cost", "workIds": "celex:91992E002315", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Japan", "Nuclear Energy Agency", "OECD countries", "economic consequence", "electrical energy", "energy demand", "energy production", "nuclear energy", "nuclear power station", "production cost"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2d67f493-2ece-44b6-907e-cc5da6996eba", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cde450ed-dd08-4fa0-9933-dbf88b1c6a8a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2300/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Confidentiality", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EU policy,European Commission,confidentiality,correspondence,fuel reprocessing,nuclear fuel,nuclear policy", "workIds": "celex:91992E002300", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU policy", "European Commission", "confidentiality", "correspondence", "fuel reprocessing", "nuclear fuel", "nuclear policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cde450ed-dd08-4fa0-9933-dbf88b1c6a8a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a9d8962-af88-44ef-b783-e6d6d6ac5e15", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2318/92 by Mr Mauro CHIABRANDO to the Commission. Recognition of veterinary specializations", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CHIABRANDO,European Parliament", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "advisory committee (EU),recognition of diplomas,updating of skills,veterinarian,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E002318", "eurovoc_concepts": ["advisory committee (EU)", "recognition of diplomas", "updating of skills", "veterinarian", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/2a9d8962-af88-44ef-b783-e6d6d6ac5e15", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b3fc058f-6a5b-4315-9352-c6581c716070", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2302/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Nuclear report", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "European Commission,association,fuel reprocessing,nuclear fuel,provision of documents,radioactive waste,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E002302", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "association", "fuel reprocessing", "nuclear fuel", "provision of documents", "radioactive waste", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b3fc058f-6a5b-4315-9352-c6581c716070", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c8d068ca-0698-41d6-ad71-d739577613af", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2322/92 by Sir James SCOTT-HOPKINS to the Commission. Insurance in Europe", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCOTT-HOPKINS", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EU law,EU market,approximation of laws,consumer protection,insurance,insured risk,single market", "workIds": "celex:91992E002322", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "EU market", "approximation of laws", "consumer protection", "insurance", "insured risk", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c8d068ca-0698-41d6-ad71-d739577613af", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9224c77e-16bb-4605-bf05-946bda8a1c34", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2316/92 by Mr Mauro CHIABRANDO to the Commission. National aid to French farmers", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "CHIABRANDO,European Parliament", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "France,State aid,aid to agriculture,reform of the CAP", "workIds": "celex:91992E002316", "eurovoc_concepts": ["France", "State aid", "aid to agriculture", "reform of the CAP"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9224c77e-16bb-4605-bf05-946bda8a1c34", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0360d9e8-4376-4385-8085-326097b8d1d7", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2323/92 by Mr Michael WELSH to the Commission. Cereal stocks in intervention", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,WELSH", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EU Member State,EU statistics,cereals,consumption,intervention stock", "workIds": "celex:91992E002323", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "EU statistics", "cereals", "consumption", "intervention stock"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0360d9e8-4376-4385-8085-326097b8d1d7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52e8f3b0-4521-4f54-be94-3806892637bd", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2299/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Uranium tailings waste disposal sites", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EU Member State,mining operation,nuclear safety,radiation protection,radioactive waste,transport of dangerous goods,uranium,waste management,waste recycling", "workIds": "celex:91992E002299", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "mining operation", "nuclear safety", "radiation protection", "radioactive waste", "transport of dangerous goods", "uranium", "waste management", "waste recycling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/52e8f3b0-4521-4f54-be94-3806892637bd", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f7dfd7cb-d9fa-4277-9e23-bc57965abaf6", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2288/92 by Jan BERTENS to the Commission. Reducing the age limits for taking part in Community programmes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BERTENS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "cultural relations,educational exchange,traineeship,vocational education,vocational training", "workIds": "celex:91992E002288", "eurovoc_concepts": ["cultural relations", "educational exchange", "traineeship", "vocational education", "vocational training"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f7dfd7cb-d9fa-4277-9e23-bc57965abaf6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cf24fe4e-f873-43f7-a334-bc68f478039c", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2287/92 by Dimitrios DESSYLAS to the Commission. Escalation of government violence and repression and murder of political prisoners in Turkey", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DESSYLAS,European Parliament", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "OSCE,T\u00fcrkiye,human rights,political prisoner,political violence,torture", "workIds": "celex:91992E002287", "eurovoc_concepts": ["OSCE", "T\u00fcrkiye", "human rights", "political prisoner", "political violence", "torture"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cf24fe4e-f873-43f7-a334-bc68f478039c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4b67f1e9-94ec-4f15-b963-7efc05685279", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2297/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Transfrontier shipment of hazardous waste", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "application of EU law,common transport policy,cross-border transport,report,sanction (EU),transport of dangerous goods,waste", "workIds": "celex:91992E002297", "eurovoc_concepts": ["application of EU law", "common transport policy", "cross-border transport", "report", "sanction (EU)", "transport of dangerous goods", "waste"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4b67f1e9-94ec-4f15-b963-7efc05685279", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e379c7b8-c2fc-4475-b5e3-2fcbf74540b2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2301/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Radioactive wastes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "Baltic Sea,Denmark,Germany,USSR,coastal pollution,committee of inquiry,environmental impact,impact study,radioactive pollution,radioactive waste", "workIds": "celex:91992E002301", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Baltic Sea", "Denmark", "Germany", "USSR", "coastal pollution", "committee of inquiry", "environmental impact", "impact study", "radioactive pollution", "radioactive waste"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e379c7b8-c2fc-4475-b5e3-2fcbf74540b2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5d6100ec-86e8-4ede-ae3a-e3cde06fe160", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2313/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. The OVIDE programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "European Parliament,Videotex,administrative expenditure", "workIds": "celex:91992E002313", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Parliament", "Videotex", "administrative expenditure"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5d6100ec-86e8-4ede-ae3a-e3cde06fe160", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cc79863e-8f03-4dc4-9f82-c08742ac1b14", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2291/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Euratom report", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EAEC Treaty,amendment of a law,report,technology assessment", "workIds": "celex:91992E002291", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC Treaty", "amendment of a law", "report", "technology assessment"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/cc79863e-8f03-4dc4-9f82-c08742ac1b14", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3abd6e8d-7846-4888-82f4-6ff8db8c9ef2", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2320/92 by Sir James SCOTT-HOPKINS to the Commission. Protection against fraud", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCOTT-HOPKINS", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "banking,financial legislation,financial transaction,fraud,insurance,regulation of investments", "workIds": "celex:91992E002320", "eurovoc_concepts": ["banking", "financial legislation", "financial transaction", "fraud", "insurance", "regulation of investments"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/3abd6e8d-7846-4888-82f4-6ff8db8c9ef2", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/540727a1-7816-4c84-85b5-f1adda4ac074", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2286/92 by Mrs Ursula BRAUN-MOSER to the Commission. Destruction of the Nestos delta in Greece", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BRAUN-MOSER,European Parliament", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EU financing,Eastern Macedonia and Thrace,ecosystem,engineering structure,environmental impact,environmental protection,impact study,protected area,protection of animal life,watercourse", "workIds": "celex:91992E002286", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "Eastern Macedonia and Thrace", "ecosystem", "engineering structure", "environmental impact", "environmental protection", "impact study", "protected area", "protection of animal life", "watercourse"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/540727a1-7816-4c84-85b5-f1adda4ac074", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/58749492-5081-4215-8100-0684ec66e668", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2326/92 by Mr Ben FAYOT to the Commission. Concentration and pluralism in the media", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,FAYOT", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "audiovisual communications policy,communications policy,control of communications,economic concentration,freedom of communication,information industry,monopoly of information,report,work study", "workIds": "celex:91992E002326", "eurovoc_concepts": ["audiovisual communications policy", "communications policy", "control of communications", "economic concentration", "freedom of communication", "information industry", "monopoly of information", "report", "work study"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/58749492-5081-4215-8100-0684ec66e668", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7dddbeeb-37f2-4b1a-bbbb-a4a3b63744b5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2321/92 by Sir James SCOTT-HOPKINS to the Commission. Merchant shipping", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SCOTT-HOPKINS", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "common transport policy,competitiveness,deregulation,intra-EU transport,maritime cabotage,maritime transport,merchant fleet,vehicle registration", "workIds": "celex:91992E002321", "eurovoc_concepts": ["common transport policy", "competitiveness", "deregulation", "intra-EU transport", "maritime cabotage", "maritime transport", "merchant fleet", "vehicle registration"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7dddbeeb-37f2-4b1a-bbbb-a4a3b63744b5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a9ee047d-02fe-4084-9b4c-42b39783a93a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2294/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Transfrontier movement of nuclear materials", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "European Commission,International Atomic Energy Agency,cooperation agreement,cross-border transport,health risk,nuclear fuel,nuclear safety,radiation protection,radioactive waste,transport safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E002294", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European Commission", "International Atomic Energy Agency", "cooperation agreement", "cross-border transport", "health risk", "nuclear fuel", "nuclear safety", "radiation protection", "radioactive waste", "transport safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a9ee047d-02fe-4084-9b4c-42b39783a93a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a512864e-537d-4b54-aa36-c15e703ce06a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2314/92 by Mr Carlos ROBLES PIQUER to the Commission. Information concerning basic research promotion initiatives by Japanese companies", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,ROBLES PIQUER", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "Europe,Japan,basic research,competition,foreign enterprise,research and development,research body,research policy,subsidiary", "workIds": "celex:91992E002314", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Europe", "Japan", "basic research", "competition", "foreign enterprise", "research and development", "research body", "research policy", "subsidiary"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a512864e-537d-4b54-aa36-c15e703ce06a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c97fff88-628a-4f22-b916-6f44baf6a1fe", "title": "92/470/ECSC: Decision of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 8 September 1992 concerning certain technical modalities in connection with the application of Decision 92/285/ECSC prohibiting trade between the European Coal and Steel Community and the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision_representatives_member-states,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_complementary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Representatives of the Governments of the Member States", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "ECSC,Yugoslavia,economic sanctions,export licence,import licence,trade restriction", "workIds": "celex:41992D0470,oj:JOL_1992_266_R_0029_037", "eurovoc_concepts": ["ECSC", "Yugoslavia", "economic sanctions", "export licence", "import licence", "trade restriction"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/c97fff88-628a-4f22-b916-6f44baf6a1fe", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/93436064-b95b-4d73-960c-07004aa3717a", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2289/92 by Mr Bartho PRONK to the Commission. European DES Study", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,PRONK", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "access to information,carcinogenic substance,consumer information,health care profession,health policy,paramedical profession,research report", "workIds": "celex:91992E002289", "eurovoc_concepts": ["access to information", "carcinogenic substance", "consumer information", "health care profession", "health policy", "paramedical profession", "research report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/93436064-b95b-4d73-960c-07004aa3717a", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/51eddf72-d2a9-4c15-96f5-8b9e4a2bacd5", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2327/92 by Mrs Hiltrud BREYER to the Commission. Novel food", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "BREYER,European Parliament", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "biotechnology,foodstuff,foodstuffs legislation,human nutrition,new product,patent", "workIds": "celex:91992E002327", "eurovoc_concepts": ["biotechnology", "foodstuff", "foodstuffs legislation", "human nutrition", "new product", "patent"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/51eddf72-d2a9-4c15-96f5-8b9e4a2bacd5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9839e40f-c3a4-475a-8de0-2d82ea7b2cd7", "title": "Structures of the education and initial training systems in the Member States of the European Community 1990.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Cedefop,European Commission,Eurydice", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EU Member State,commercial education,educational administration,educational system,primary education,secondary education,teaching curriculum,technical education", "workIds": "PUB_HX7191453", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "commercial education", "educational administration", "educational system", "primary education", "secondary education", "teaching curriculum", "technical education"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/9839e40f-c3a4-475a-8de0-2d82ea7b2cd7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f734fca5-e91c-4cd2-9e7e-0d7c73e96eed", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2292/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Iraq -Euratom", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EAEC,Iraq,UN Commission,arms industry,nuclear safety", "workIds": "celex:91992E002292", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAEC", "Iraq", "UN Commission", "arms industry", "nuclear safety"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f734fca5-e91c-4cd2-9e7e-0d7c73e96eed", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/92daa707-cd8b-40b6-9286-b4c311d51415", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2293/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. STRIDE programme", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EU financing,Structural Funds,environmental protection,forestry holding,innovation,nuclear energy,regional development,technological change,technology transfer", "workIds": "celex:91992E002293", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU financing", "Structural Funds", "environmental protection", "forestry holding", "innovation", "nuclear energy", "regional development", "technological change", "technology transfer"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/92daa707-cd8b-40b6-9286-b4c311d51415", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/da2d4344-4300-43b6-9fb6-ff6e81f87510", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2303/92 by Mr Llewellyn SMITH to the Commission. Environment Commissioner' s visit to Russia", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,SMITH LLEWELLYN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "Central and Eastern Europe,European Commissioner,USSR,civil defence,environmental policy,nuclear power station,nuclear safety,report", "workIds": "celex:91992E002303", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Central and Eastern Europe", "European Commissioner", "USSR", "civil defence", "environmental policy", "nuclear power station", "nuclear safety", "report"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/da2d4344-4300-43b6-9fb6-ff6e81f87510", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d6da6a28-e4e6-4940-9b97-e9110b8d6a03", "title": "WRITTEN QUESTION No. 2309/92 by Mrs Pauline GREEN to the Commission. Grants for EC students", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_parliamentary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#question_written,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Parliament,GREEN", "date": "1992-09-08", "subjects": "EU law,United Kingdom,education grant,free movement of workers,labour mobility,relationship,residence,student,university,worker (EU)", "workIds": "celex:91992E002309", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU law", "United Kingdom", "education grant", "free movement of workers", "labour mobility", "relationship", "residence", "student", "university", "worker (EU)"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d6da6a28-e4e6-4940-9b97-e9110b8d6a03", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d7405b01-9422-451f-b189-ddf895745953", "title": "Enterprise and people aspects in the information technology sector to the year 2000.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion,European Commission", "date": "1992-09-07", "subjects": "Europe,organisation of work,social policy,worker information,workplace", "workIds": "PUB_CENC92002", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Europe", "organisation of work", "social policy", "worker information", "workplace"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d7405b01-9422-451f-b189-ddf895745953", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/326ff547-7077-4e50-a5bb-0991e7a0d38b", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_directive_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-07", "subjects": "European standard,GATT,free movement of goods,public contract,supplies contract,technical standard", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0346,comnat:COM_1992_0346_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_277_R_0001_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["European standard", "GATT", "free movement of goods", "public contract", "supplies contract", "technical standard"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/326ff547-7077-4e50-a5bb-0991e7a0d38b", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/947011be-7d5f-4265-ae4b-1f9006daaa3e", "title": "The European Community : a Community with no internal frontiers: Folded map.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "DG X \u2013 Information, Communication, Culture and Audiovisual Media,European Commission", "date": "1992-09-07", "subjects": "EU Member State,atlas,distribution of schools,documentation,political geography", "workIds": "PUB_CC7392942", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU Member State", "atlas", "distribution of schools", "documentation", "political geography"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/947011be-7d5f-4265-ae4b-1f9006daaa3e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ad1e46a0-91b5-4a4d-aae5-6dce9755a1b5", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2593/92 of 4 September 1992 revising the maximum amount for the B production levy and amending the minimum price for B beet in the sugar sector for the 1991/92 marketing year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-04", "subjects": "sugar beet,sugar levy", "workIds": "celex:31992R2593,oj:JOL_1992_259_R_0019_019", "eurovoc_concepts": ["sugar beet", "sugar levy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/ad1e46a0-91b5-4a4d-aae5-6dce9755a1b5", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7fc2e850-20e5-4c1b-a12c-875cd30781de", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2591/92 of 4 September 1992 on the supply of various lots of skimmed-milk powder as food aid", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-04", "subjects": "Ecuador,Grenada,Peru,food aid,skimmed milk powder", "workIds": "celex:31992R2591,oj:JOL_1992_259_R_0013_017", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Ecuador", "Grenada", "Peru", "food aid", "skimmed milk powder"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7fc2e850-20e5-4c1b-a12c-875cd30781de", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/50f75f74-3495-44d3-bdfd-686aebd7c563", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) on Community coordination in drawing up business registers for statistical purposes", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-03", "subjects": "EU statistics,company structure,information system,statistical method,type of business", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0352,comnat:COM_1992_0352_FIN", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EU statistics", "company structure", "information system", "statistical method", "type of business"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/50f75f74-3495-44d3-bdfd-686aebd7c563", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nCOM(92) 352 final \n\nBrussels,3 September 1992 \n\nI':*. *\u00a3 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) \n\non Community coordination \nin drawing up business registers \nfor statistical purposes \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fExplanatory memorandum \n\n1) \n\nAll the Member States of the Community have business registers, which may differ widely \nin coverage, scope or quality of information. Harmonized registers are essential for the production of comparable statistics in the \nMember States. 2) \n\n3) \n\n4) \n\n5) \n\n6) \n\n7) \n\n8) \n\nObviously, the establishment of the Single Market from 1993 onwards will further increase \nthe need to improve the comparability of statistics produced to meet Community \nrequirements and information on the structure of enterprises and groups of enterprises, and \nin particular on mergers, buy-outs or takeovers, will be essential. It should also be stressed \nthat certain statistical data are not currently available in sectors with a large number of \nsmall and medium-sized enterprises, such as services, since such enterprises are not covered \nby a register used for statistical purposes. The aim of the Community project is to promote in the Member States the introduction of \nnational directories managed by the national statistical institute but compiled in an identical \nfashion and thus containing compatible information enabling consistent Community \nstatistics to be obtained. These registers will make it possible to institute and coordinate statistical surveys by \nproviding instruments for monitoring the information which enterprises are asked to \nprovide. Another important novel feature is that these registers will enable external trade \ndata to be integrated into business statistics at intra-Community level by reference to the \nIntrastat file or more generally via links with customs files. The introduction of this new tool can be expected to ease the administrative burden on \nenterprises substantially since, by linking separate administrative sources, it will make it \npossible to make better use of existing information. The registers of legal units mentioned in the proposal can be used as a basis for the \nharmonized registers of businesses and local units required for Community statistics. Council Regulation (Euratom, EEC) No 1588/90 of 11 June 1990 authorizes the \ntransmission of data subject to statistical confidentiality to the Statistical Office of the \ninformation \nEuropean Communities. The present draft prohibits the transmission of \npermitting direct identification of units. The introduction of these registers meets the requirements of the relevant Commission \ndepartments and the national statistical offices. It will permit harmonious development of \nCommunity statistics in the Single Market. Proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) \non Community coordination \nin drawing up business registers \nfor statistical purposes \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular \nArticle 213 thereof, \n\nHaving regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nWhereas the Single Market will increase the need to improve statistical comparability in order to \nmeet Community requirements and, in order to improve this comparability, common definitions and \ndescriptions have to be adopted for the field of enterprises and other relevant statistical units to be \ncovered; \n\nWhereas registers have to be drawn up and updated in order to collect information on these units; \n\nWhereas there is a growing need for information on the structure of enterprises and current \nCommunity statistics are not able to meet this need; \n\nWhereas business registers for statistical purposes are a necessary tool in keeping track of the \nstructural changes in the economy brought about by such operations as joint ventures, partnerships, \nmergers, buy \nouts and takeovers; \n\nWhereas the important role played by public undertakings in the national economies of the Member \nStates has been acknowledged, particularly in Commission Directive 80/723/EEC' ', which also \ndefines such undertakings in its Article 2, and whereas they should therefore be identified in \nbusiness registers; \n\nWhereas some statistics are not currently available, particularly in sectors with many SMEs, such \nas services, because a register of these businesses for statistical purposes does not exist; \nWhereas business registers are one element in reconciling the conflicting requirements for increased \ninformation on businesses and simplifying \ntheir administrative procedures, in particular by \ncollecting and exploiting existing information in administrative and legal registers, above all in the \ncase of SMEs, pursuant to Council Recommendation 90/2467EEO 2'; \n\nWhereas the business register for statistical purposes represents a basic element of information \nsystems on businesses, enabling statistical surveys to be set up and coordinated by providing a \nsampling base, possibilities of extrapolation and means of monitoring the replies from businesses, \nin particular those referred to in Directives 78/660/EEO3' and 83/349/EEC^; \n\nWhereas the setting up of a new statistical collection system covering trade in goods and services \nbetween Member States necessitates a list of those persons required to give information, and it is \ndesirable to derive this register of persons required to give information from a central business \nregister used for statistical purposes; \n\nQI No L 141 of 2A9Q, p. 55 \n\n(1) OJ No L 195 of 29. 7. 1980 \nm \n<3> Of No L 222 of 14. 8. 78, p. 11 \n(4) Q* No L 193 of 18. 7. 83, p. 1 \n\n\fWhereas the business registers for statistical purposes are at different stages of development in each \nMember State and the long and costly development of these registers can only be carried out in two \nstages, the first of which must relate to harmonizing the basic units used in these registers in \naccordance with an established timetable; \n\nHAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: \n\nArticle 1 Aims \n\n1. The Member States shall set up harmonized registers of legal units, local units and \nenterprises which can be used for statistical purposes. The registers of enterprises shall be \ndrawn up from those of legal units, and the registers of local units shall be drawn up from \nthose of enterprises. Article 2 Definitions \n\nFor the purposes of this Regulation, the terms listed below shall be defined as follows: \n\n1. Legal units include: \n\n2. 3. - legal persons whose existence is recognized by law independently of the \nindividuals or institutions which may own them or are members of them; \n\n- natural persons who are recognized as legal units in their own right; \n\nthis regulation applies to legal units that exercise, wholly or partially, a productive activity. Enterprise: the enterprise is the smallest combination of legal units which is an \norganizational unit producing goods or services and which enjoys a certain degree of \nautonomy in decision-making, especially in the allocation of its current resources. An \nenterprise carries out one or more activities at one or more locations. Hereinafter the connection between the enterprise and the legal unit is expressed as follows: \n\n- \n\nthe enterprise is attached to one or more legal units; \n\n- \n\nthe legal unit(s) is (are) responsible for the enterprise. Local unit: the local unit is an enterprise or part thereof (e. g. a workshop, factory, \nwarehouse, office, mine or depot) situated in a geographically identified place. At or from \nthis place economic activity is carried out for which - save for certain exceptions - one or \nmore persons work (if only part-time) for one and the same enterprise. Hereinafter the connection between the local unit and the enterprise is expressed as follows: \n\n- \n\nthe local unit is dependent on an enterprise. Article 3 Scope \n\n1. In accordance with the definitions given in Article 2, and subject to the limitations specified \nin this Article, registers shall be compiled of \n\n- all enterprises carrying out an economic activity contributing *r fhe ^^oss domestic \n\nproduct at market prices (GDP); \n\n- \n\nthe legal units responsible for these enterprises; \n\n- \n\nthe local units dependent on these enterprises. This requirement shall not, however, apply to households \n\n- \n\n- \n\ninsofar as the goods they produce are for own consumption; \n\ninsofar as the services they produce involve the letting of own or leased property (Group \n70. 2 of the General Industrial Classification of Economic Activities within the European \nCommunity (NACE Rev. l) drawn up by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3037/90 of 9 \nOctober 1990<5) \n\nThe inclusion of \n\nenterprises whose main activity falls within sections A, B or L of NACE Rev. 1, \n\nthe legal units responsible for them, \n\nthe local units dependent on them, \n\nshall be optional. 2. The enterprises, legal units and local units referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be \nregistered in accordance with the timetable and priorities set out in Annex 2. Article 4 Register characteristics \n\nThe units appearing in the register shall be characterized by an identity number and the descriptive \ndetails specified in Annex 1. Articles Updating \n\n1. The following shall be updated at least once a year: \n\na) \n\nb) \n\nc) \n\nentries to, and removals from, the register; \n\nthe variables of subparagraphs b and f of Annex 1. 1; \n\nfor units which are the subject of annual surveys, the variables of subparagraphs b, \nc, d, e and h of Annex 1. 3. (5) OJ No L 293of 24. ia. 1990, p. I. jr \n\ns a general rule, information obtained from administrative files or annual surveys shall be \nupdated annually, other information being updated every four years. 2. At the end of the first quarter of each calendar year, the Member States shall make a copy \nof the register as it stands on that date, and keep this copy for ten years for the purpose of \nani'yr*. Article 6 Access to information \n\nWhen so requested by the Commission, the Member States shall \n\n1. 2. carry out statistical analyses of the register and transmit the results to the Commission; \n\ntransmit to Eurostat, in accordance with the procedures and limitations laid down in this \nArticle, the information contained in the register and referred to in this Regulation, \nexcluding information enabling direct identification of the units; \n\nThe information transmitted shall include data which are confidential under national legislation, and \nthe fact that they are confidential shall be explicitly mentioned. When a majority of Member States so propose, a request to transmit information referred to in \nparagraph 2 of this Article shall be submitted to the Committee referred to in Article 8 according to \nthe procedure set out in Article 9. Article 7 Access to administrative and legal registers \n\nEach National Statistical Institute shall be authorized, within its own Member State, to have access \nto those administrative or legal files containing information covered by this Regulation and to \nextract this information for statistical purposes. Article 8 Committee \n\nThe rules of application for Articles 3, 4, 5 and 6 and for Annexes 1 and 2 of this Regulation, as \nwell as the measures required to adapt these rules, shall be decided by the Commission after \nconsulting the Statistical Programme Committee set up by Council Decision of 19 June 1989 (OJ L \n181, 28. 6. 1989, p. 47), and in accordance with the procedure set out in the following Article. Article 9 Procedure \n\n1. 2. The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a draft of the measures \nto be taken. The Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft, within a time limit which \nthe Chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter, if necessary by taking a \nvote. The opinion shall be recorded in the minutes; in addition, each Member State shall have the \nright to ask to have its position recorded in the minutes. 3. The Commission shall take the utmost account of the opinion delivered by the Commit JC. It shall inform the Committee of the manner in which its opinion has been taken into \naccount. Article 10 \n\nThis Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the \nEuropean Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirely and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, \n\n\f} \n\nAnnex 1 \n\n1. The record of a legal unit shall contain the following information: \n\na. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. identity number; \n\nname, address (including postcode), and optionally: telephone, electronic mail and \nfax numbers and telex address; \n\nrequirement to publish annual accounts (YES/NO); \n\ndate of incorporation for legal persons or date of official recognition as an economic \noperator for natural persons; \n\ndate on which the legal unit ceases to be legally responsible for an enterprise; \n\nlegal form of the unit; \n\nname and address of any non-resident legal unit, other than a natural person, which \ncontrols the legal unit; \n\nidentity number of the legal unit in the register which controls the legal unit; \n\ncharacter of \"public undertaking\" within the meaning of Commission Directive \n80/723/EEC (YES/NO) (for legal persons only); \n\nreference to other associated files, including customs files, in which the legal unit is \nrecorded and which contain information which can be used for statistical purposes; \n\nk. reference to the INTRASTAT register. g\" \n\nThe record of a local unit shall contain the following information: \n\na. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. identity number; \n\nname, address and other identifying information as set out in paragraph l. b of this \nAnnex; \n\nactivity code at the 4-digit (class) level of NACE Rev. 1 ; \n\nsecondary activities, if any, at the 4-digit level of NACE Rev. 1 (optional); \n\nsize of labour force, as indicated in paragraph 3. e of this Annex; \n\ndate of commencement of the activities whose codes are given in c. above; \n\ndate of final cessation of activities; \n\ngeographical location code (territorial units); \n\nreference to associated registers in which the local unit appears and which contain \ninformation which can be used for statistical purposes; \n\nidentity number in the register of the enterprise on which the local unit is \ndependent; \n\nactivity carried out in the local unit constituting an ancillary activity of the \nenterprise on which it depends (YES/NO). T \n\nThe record of an enterprise shall contain the following information: \n\na. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. identity number; \n\nidentity number(s) of the legal unit(s) legally responsible for the enterprise; \n\nactivity code of the enterprise at 4-digit (class) level of NACE Rev. 1. ; the \nclassification of an enterprise is determined by the class of NACE Rev. 1 in which \nthe principal activity, or all the activities, of the enterprise is, or are, included; \n\nsecondary activities, if any, at NACE 4-digit level, if they amount to 10% of the \ntotal for all activities of the gross value added at factor cost for each, or account for \n5% or more of national activity of this type; this point concerns only enterprises \nwhich are the subject of surveys; \n\nsize: measured by the number of persons employed, or failing that by allocation to \none of the following classes according to the number of persons engaged: 0; 1; 2; \n3-4; 5-9; 10-19; 20-49; 50-99; 100-149; 150-199; 200-249; 250-499; 500-999; 1 \n000; 2 000; 3 000 etc. ; persons working less than three-fifths of normal hours \nworked by full-time workers should be counted as one-half of a full-time worker; if \nthe enterprise's workforce varies seasonally, it shall be allocated to the size class in \nwhich its annual average employment falls; \n\ndate of commencement of activities of the enterprise; \n\ndate of final cessation of activities of the enterprise; \n\nnet turnover from the sale of goods and services \n(except for financial \nintermediaries); failing this, allocation to a size class defined as follows (in millions \nof ecus): 0+ -1; 1 + -2; 2+ -4; 4+ -5; 5+ -10; 10+ -20; 20+ -40; 40+ -50; \n50+ -100; 100 + -200; 200+ - 500; 500+ -1000; 1000+ - 5000; 5000+ (optional \nfor turnover not exceeding ECU 2 million). I. net assets (assets after allowing for depreciation \nintermediaries only) (optional). less liabilities - financial \n\n\fto \n\nAnnex 2 \n\nThe legal units defined in Article 2 and described in Annex 1 shall be registered in the following \norder of priority: \n\npriority A: the information shall be entered in the register by 31 December 1993. priority B: the information shall be entered in the register by 31 December 1995. Enterprises attached to the above legal units, as defined in Article 2 and described in Annex 1, shall \nbe allowed an extra year for each level of priority. If an enterprise is attached to more than one \nlegal unit, the legal unit with the higest priority shall be taken to calculate the time limit for the \nenterprise and the local units which are dependent on it. Local units shall be allowed one year longer than the enterprises on which they are dependent. In the table below: \n0< means \"employs staff\" \n0 means \"does not employ staff \n\nA: Agriculture, hunting and forestry (OPTIONAL) \nB: Fishing (OPTIONAL) \nC: Mining and quarrying \nD: Manufacturing \nE: Electricity, gas and water supply \nF: Construction \nG: Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor v\u00e9hicules, \n\nmotorcycles and personal and household goods \n\nH: Hotels and restaurants \nI: Transport, storage and communications \nJ: Financial intermediation \nK: Real estate, renting and business activities \nL: Public administration and defence; \n\ncompulsory social security \n\nM: Education \nN: Health and social work \nO: Other community, social and personal service activities \n\nlegal \n\nnatural \n\npersons \n\npersons \n\n0< \n\n0 \n\nA \n\nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \n\nB \n\nB \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \nA \n\nB \n\nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \nB \n\n\f-f\"? \n\nFINANCIAL STATEMENT \n\nDraft Council Regulation (EEC) on Community coordination in drawing up \nbusiness registers for statistical purposes \n\n1. Title of operation \n\nCommunity support for the setting-up, in the Member States, of \nharmonized business registers for statistical purposes. This \noperation forms part of the pluriannual operations relating to \nstatistical information policy. 2. Budget headings involved \n\n- Financial prospects - Heading 3. Internal policies. - Subsection B-5 - Consumers, internal market, industry and \n\ninnovation. - Chapter B5-60 - Statistical information policy connected with the \n\ncompletion of the internal market, the economic and monetary \nenvironment and Community policies. Line B5 - 600 - operating appropriations (former B5-6000, 10, 10 \npartial, 20, 30) \n\n3. Legal basis \n\nArticle 213 of the Treaty \n\n4. Description of operation \n\n4. 1 Specific objectives of operation \n\nThe aim of the Community project is to promote the setting-up, in the \nMember States, of national business registers managed by the national \nstatistical institutes, but compiled in an identical way, so that they \ncontain data which are compatible and can therefore be used to provide \nmeaningful Community statistics. These registers will allow statistical surveys to be carried out and \ncoordinated, and at the same time will constitute a means of monitoring \nwhat is required from the enterprises. *l \n\nA new feature, which should be emphasized, is that these registers will \nallow external trade statistics to be incorporated into business \nstatistics, either at intra-Community level by reference to the \nINTRASTAT records, or more generally by using customs records. This operation will contribute to accommodating the significant \nincrease in requirements for harmonized data which the Community must \nmeet, with regard to; \n\nthe operation of the Single Market, which calls for a high degree \nof transparency in the structures and flows of industrial and \nservice enterprises in all Member States, including the new system \nof statistics on trade in goods and services between the Member \nStates after 1992. the provision of statistical information to enterprises which will \nenable them to become more competitive both in the internal market \nand vis-\u00e0-vis the rest of the world. 4. 2 Duration \n\nOne-off operations \n\n4. 3 Target population \n\n- The beneficiaries of this operation are: the Community \nInstitutions and the governments of the Member States. 5. Classification of expenditure or of revenue \n\n5. 1 NCE \n\n5. 2 DA \n\n5. 3 Type of income envisaged: NONE \n\n6. Type of expenditure or revenue \n\n6. 1 100% subsidy \n\nNO - \n\nthe Community's contribution represents only a small part \nof the actual cost of collecting the data, i. e. some 1 to \n5%, since the Community's statistical activities are \ndecentralized to a very large extent. Nevertheless, the \nexpenditure is essential to provide an incentive for \nstandardizing the data collected, processing them and \nforwarding them to Eurostat. 6. 2 Subsidy for cofinancing with other sources in the public and/or \n\nprivate sector \n\nYES - cofinancing from the public sector (budgets of the national \n\nstatistical services). Al \n\n6. 3 \n\nInterest subsidy \n\nNO \n\n6. 4 Other \n\nNONE \n\n6. 5 Should the operation prove an economic success, is there provision \nfor all or part of the Community's financial contribution to be \nreimbursed? \n\nNO \n\n6. 6 Hill the proposed operation cause any change in the level of \n\nrevenue? \n\nIndirectly, the statistical work on the own resources indicators (GDP \nin this case) may, through its results, reduce the general level of the \nbudget. 7. Financial impact \n\n7. 1 \n\nMethod of calculating total cost of operation: \n\n- 1992 Budget: ECU \n\n200. 000 \n\n- 1993 PDB: \n\nECU \n\n800. 000 \n\n- Total \n\nECU 1. 000. 000 \n\n7. 2 Breakdown of operation \n\n- operating appropriations \n\nB5-60 \n\nThe details of appropriations by policy are given in Annex 4 \n\nBREAKDOWN \n\n1992 BUDGET \n\n1993 PDB \n\n1. The single market \n\nECU 200 000 \n\nECU 800. 000 \n\nTOTAL \n\nECU 200. 000 \n\nECU 800. 000 \n\n\f4*f \n\n7. 3 Administrative expenditure directly linked to this operation \n\nNONE \n\n7. 4 Indicative schedule of commitment appropriations \n\nOperating appropriations and support appropriations - Chapter B5-60 \n\nINDICATIVE \nBUDGET \n1992 \n\nPDB \n\n\u2022 \n\n\u2022 \n\nPROGRAMMING \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\nECU 200. 000 \n\nECU 800. 000 \n\nECU 800. 000 \n\nECU 800. 000 ECU 800. 000 \n\n8. What anti-fraud measures are planned in the proposal for the \n\noperation? \n\na) For the contracts and agreements entered into by the Commission, \n\npayment is solely on results. b) The statistical information is considered to be an objective \n\ninstrument for evaluating Community action programmes and thus \ncontributes to consolidating the anti-fraud provisions. 9. Elements of cost/efficiency analysis \n\n9. 1. Objectives \n\nThe specific objectives mentioned in 4. 1. are linked to the provisions \nof the Treaty relating to: operation of the Single Market. 9. 2. Grounds for the operation \n\n1 \n\nto improve the balance between the demand for new statistics and \nbudgetary resources by counting on gains in productivity and \ndeveloping tools which will allow the same volume of data to be \nobtained with fewer resources; \n\n2 \n\nto reduce the time required to draw up the data and forward them to \nthe Commission, thus increasing their usefulness to policy makers; \n\n\fAS \n\n3 \n\n4 \n\nto improve the quality and reliability of the data produced by the \nMember States, so as to provide users with top-quality statistics \non which they can take appropriate policy decisions. to reduce the workload on the units under survey, and in particular \nthe enterprises which have to reply to the statistical \nquestionnaires. As regards the operation of the Single Market, the Commission \nproposes that a network of harmonized Community business registers \nshould be set up to serve as a basis for all business statistics in \nthe Commumity. This harmonized register could be used to prepare \nthe sampling bases for surveys without the need to transpose the \nnational tools, which are not always completely suitable for \ncollecting Community statistics. In this way, the national systems \nwill be able to use the same system for all Community surveys, \nwhich will save time in drawing up the data and prdoduce more \nreliable Community statistics. Lastly, this project will yield \nconsiderably more information on enterprises, without the need for \nnew surveys, thus reducing the burden placed on enterprises by the \nobligation to reply to statistical questionnaires. 9. 2. 1. Cost: \n\nThis operation will be financed mainly by the Member States \n(Section 1, item 6. 1), which have a well-established structure for \ncollecting and processing data. If the Commission had to finance \nthis programme in full, the cost would be extremely high for a less \nreliable product. The Community's contribution covers only a small \nproportion of the real cost. The number of surveys and compilations from administrative \nregisters and files has grown considerably in recent years. 9. 2. 2. Spin-off effect: \n\nthe results of this operation will contribute to improving the \nstatistical information used in work on the gross national product \n(GNP) of the Member States; \n\nthe system for collecting statistical information is very \ndecentralized, the national systems having a responsibility within \neach Member State. The Community statistical programme is becoming \nan integral part of the national statistical programmes, thereby \ncontributing to the establishment of a European statistical area; \n\nthe spin-off effect towards a European statistical area will lead \nto further integration of the national statistical systems at \nCommunity level. 9. 2. 3. Multiplier effects: \n\n\f/iG \n\nthe Community statistical programme generates an impetus within the \nbudgets of the national statistical systems, which make a great \ncontribution to implementing it; \n\nbenefits for the world of research and the universities, which gain \nunique scientific data for socio-economic studies and analyses. 9. 3. Monitoring and evaluation of the operation \n\n9. 3. 1. Performance indicators selected: \n\nThe performance indicators selected for evaluating progress are of two \nkinds, viz. : \n\nbudgetary: comparing the plan with the execution of the budget. programming: to compare the statistical output with the existing \nprogramme and with the estimated budget for its execution. A. execution of the budget \n\n1992 \n\n1993 \n\n1994 \n\n1995 \n\n1996 \n\nFollowing years \n\nAppropriations \n\nAppropriations \n\ncommitted \n\npaid \n\n200 000 \n\n800. 000 \n\n800. 000 \n\n800. 000 \n\n800. 000 \n\n- \n\n100 000 \n\n500. 000 \n\n800. 000 \n\n800. 000 \n\n300. 000 \n\n400. 000 \n\n9. 3. 2. Procedures and frequency of evaluation \n\nThe statistical programme is continuously monitored by a TBPS \n(Statistical Programme Monitoring File), which lays down for each \noperation (219), and in particular the present one, the operational \nobjectives and resources required on the basis of the \nprogramming/execution principle. At the beginning of each year \nEurostat produces a report on the progress of its programme during the \npreceding year. This report falls into three parts, as follows: \n\nthe first summarizes, for each policy, the main achievements in the \nyear; \n\nthe second describes, for each operation, the objective laid down \nand the results achieved; \n\nthe third gives statistics on the utilization of human, budgetary, \ncomputer and administrative resources during the preceding year. qjft \n\n1* \n\nThe Council Resolution of 19 June 1989 on the Statistical programme of \nthe European Communities (1989 to 1992) requests the Commission to \nsubmit a final report on the implementation of the Statistical \nprogramme by June 1993. The Commission intends to have this report \ndrawn up by leading representatives of socio-professional, scientific \nand government circles in order to ensure a high degree of objectivity. 9. 4. Consistency with the financial programme \n\n9. 4. 1. Is the operation included in the financial progamme of the DG \n\nfor the years concerned? \n\nYES: financial programme 1993-1997 - DG34 \n\n9. 4. 2. To which more general objective laid down in the DG's financial \n\nprogamming does the aim of the proposed operation correspond? \n\nThe single general aim represented by the implementation of the \nStatistical Programme of the European Communities (1993 to 1997) \n(currently being drawn up). 10. Administrative expenditure (Part A of the Budget) \n\n10. 1. Will the proposed operation involve an increase in the number of \n\nCommission staff? \n\nNO \n\n\f0% \n\nIMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL ON ENTERPRISES \nand particularly on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) \n\nProposal for a Council Regulation on Community coordination of the development of business \nregisters for statistical purposes. Reference number (Register): \n\nThe proposal \n\n1. Administrative burden and information requirements \n\nAlthough differing from one Member State to another, national legislation generally \nrestricts the access by the National Statistical Institutes to national administrative and legal \nfiles containing information which could be used for statistical purposes. This results in a \ncostly administrative burden on enterprises, and particularly SMEs, to which they often \nobject since questionnaires from a variety of sources cover similar subjects. Thus, the \ninformation requested from enterprises is often redundant at national level and at the same \ntime disparate at Community level, which means that it is impossible to draw up statistics \nwhich are comparable and, above all, can be integrated at this level. The need for harmonized information on enterprises, which can be used for statistical \npurposes, will increase still further with the establishment of the single market. The Commission has frequently mentioned the need to lighten the administrative burden on \nin particular Council Recommendation No 90/246/EEC relates to the \nSMEs, and \nimplementation of a policy of administrative simplification in favour of small and medium-\nsized enterprises in the Member States. Harmonized business registers are one way of lightening the administrative burden. They \ncan only be produced under Community legislation guaranteeing the statistical authorities \naccess to the relevant information already contained in national administrative and legal \nfiles and defining the contents of such registers with a view to harmonizing them. 2. The enterprises concerned \n\nThe proposal is aimed at listing in due course all enterprises established on the economic \nterritory of the Member States, covering all sectors of activity corresponding to the 4-digit \nNACE codes with the following exceptions: \n\n1) \n\n2) \n\n3) \n\nhouseholds as regards both production which does not form the subject of market \ntransactions and renting, leasing and hiring activities; \n\nextra-territorial bodies; \n\nagriculture, hunting, forestry, fishing, public administration and defence: these \nsectors are optional. 3. The administrative burden on enterprises \n\nThe proposed Regulation does not recommend any specific survey and would thus not \nincrease the administrative burden if it came into force. i9 \n\nThe registers, drawing on information in existing administrative and legal registers, would \nobviate the need for enterprises to answer the same questions several times. They would \nbecome sources of statistical information in turn and would permit the use of high-level \ntechniques such as panels, which, through judicious extrapolation, substantially reduce the \nvolume of surveys. The European dimension of these registers, which use the same units, have the same \ncharacteristics and refer to a common classification of activities, would make it possible to \nprovide enterprises with results which cannot at present be obtained by comparing non-\nharmonized national statistics. This would give enterprises a better insight into the European market as a whole and \nprovide them with an overview of national markets in their sector. 4. Economic impact on employment, \ncompetitiveness \n\ninvestment, the establishment of enterprises and \n\nIt is very difficult to evaluate the possible effects which an improved knowledge of the \nmarket resulting from harmonized statistics together with a simplification of administrative \nprocedures would have on the establishment of enterprises or on employment. Any such \ninfluence could only be indirect. 5. Provisions specific to SMEs \n\nThe item \"turnover\" would be optional for turnover not exceeding ECU 2 million. 6. Concertation with the two sides of industry \n\nOn 28 November 1991, at one of the meetings arranged by DG XXIII for consultations \nwith the professional organizations representing SMEs at Community level, a Eurostat \nrepresentative presented the draft Regulation to the main organizations (listed in the \nAnnex). Questions were raised about a possible new data collection, but when this was \ndiscounted, the draft Regulation was approved by the professional organizations. Although, broadly speaking, it approves the general thrust of the draft Regulation, the \nUNICE sent DG XXIII and Eurostat comments about the contents of the registers (cf. ZT/BV/nm/1. 6. C. l. of 11 March 1992). The Director-General of Eurostat emphasized in \nhis reply that the objective was to harmonize concepts already used by the Member States \nand not to demand new types of data which would be used for purposes other than statistics \n(cf. DG34-8788 of 9 April 1992). -2 \n\n\f2-o \n\nISSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 352 final \n\nDOCUMENTS \n\nEN \n\n17 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-366-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-47007-0 \n\n( office for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nlv-2985 Luxembourg"} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8986808d-5355-4809-bb49-3be23f0daef3", "title": "92/467/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 September 1992 amending Decision 90/613/EEC approving derogations provided for by Italy from certain provisions of Council Directive 77/93/EEC in respect of seed potatoes originating in Poland (Only the Italian text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "Italy,Poland,potato,seedling", "workIds": "celex:31992D0467,oj:JOL_1992_264_R_0023_035", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Italy", "Poland", "potato", "seedling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8986808d-5355-4809-bb49-3be23f0daef3", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4fe1d804-1aaa-4639-808e-b714eda49ef6", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2564/92 of 2 September 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2385/91 laying down detailed rules for certain special cases regarding the definition of sheepmeat and goatmeat producers and producer groups", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "agricultural guidance,goatmeat,producer organisation,sheepmeat", "workIds": "celex:31992R2564,oj:JOL_1992_257_R_0012_026", "eurovoc_concepts": ["agricultural guidance", "goatmeat", "producer organisation", "sheepmeat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/4fe1d804-1aaa-4639-808e-b714eda49ef6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/89465c86-7c43-417a-824a-e3815f4bea28", "title": "92/466/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 September 1992 determining the amount of VAT own resources payable by the Federal Republic of Germany for 1990 in respect of transactions covered by the 20th Council Directive 85/361/EEC of 16 July 1985 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: derogations in connection with the special aids granted to certain farmers to compensate for the dismantlement of monetary compensatory amounts applying to certain agricultural products (Only the German text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "VAT,monetary compensatory amount,own resources,support mechanism", "workIds": "celex:31992D0466,oj:JOL_1992_264_R_0022_034", "eurovoc_concepts": ["VAT", "monetary compensatory amount", "own resources", "support mechanism"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/89465c86-7c43-417a-824a-e3815f4bea28", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d65fa389-d703-4ae5-b64c-b4eb3c311577", "title": "92/469/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 September 1992 authorizing methods for grading pig carcases in Denmark (Only the Danish text is authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "Denmark,carcase,marketing standard,pigmeat", "workIds": "celex:31992D0469,oj:JOL_1992_265_R_0039_031", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Denmark", "carcase", "marketing standard", "pigmeat"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/d65fa389-d703-4ae5-b64c-b4eb3c311577", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a7c11edc-fa82-46a5-b5e4-1c18b5693e06", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (ECSC, EC, Euratom) amending the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 applicable to the general budget of the European Communities", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_regulation_ec,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "commitment of expenditure,financial control,financial regulation,general budget (EU),management audit", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0358,comnat:COM_1992_0358_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_254_R_0005_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["commitment of expenditure", "financial control", "financial regulation", "general budget (EU)", "management audit"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a7c11edc-fa82-46a5-b5e4-1c18b5693e06", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8d979248-bf8e-4025-a240-ff01f5ac98a9", "title": "Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION Denouncing of the fisheries agreement between the former German Democratic Republic and Sweden", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdf,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#act_preparatory,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_act,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#proposal_other,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "German Democratic Republic,Sweden,fishery management,fishing agreement,unification of Germany", "workIds": "celex:51992PC0377,comnat:COM_1992_0377_FIN,oj:JOC_1992_252_R_0005_01", "eurovoc_concepts": ["German Democratic Republic", "Sweden", "fishery management", "fishing agreement", "unification of Germany"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/8d979248-bf8e-4025-a240-ff01f5ac98a9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdf", "pdfa1b", "print"], "text": "COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES \n\nC0M(92) 377 final \n\nBrussels, 2 September 1992 \n\nProposal for a \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nDenouncing of the fisheries agreement between the former German Democratic \nRepublIc and Sweden \n\n(presented by the Commission) \n\n\fI \n\nEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM \n\n1. 2. 3. 4. On 3 October 1990 the German Democratic Republic united with the \nFederal Republic of Germany. Following unification the Community \nassumed the former German Democratic Republic's International \nresponsibilities in certain sectors, including the latters' \nfisheries agreement with Sweden. The agreement, which expires on 31 December 1993, concerns \nessentially a quota exchange of cod for herring. The Commission \nhad already put on record during annual consultations with Sweden \nfor 1992, that this arrangement with the former German Democratic \nRepublic was not in the Community's interests. Sweden insisted, for its part, on continuing the quota exchange, \nconsidering that the expiry date of the agreement was very close. In view of the foregoing, the fisheries agreement between the \nformer German Democratic Republic and Sweden must be terminated. In view of the twelve months' notice, the agreement must be \ndenounced by 30 December 1992 at the latest. I \n\nCOUNCIL DECISION \n\nDenouncing of the fisheries agreement between the former German Democratic \nRepublic and Sweden \n\nTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, \n\nHaving regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, \nand in particular Article 43 thereof. Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, \n\nHaving regard to the opinion of the European Parliament, \n\nWhereas, from the date of German unification on 3 October 1990, the \nCommunity took over the former German Democratic Republic's fisheries \nagreements, including one with Sweden signed on 16 December 1977; \n\nWhereas retaining this agreement, which essentially concerns a quota \nexchange of cod for herring, is not in the Community's Interests, taking \nInto account also the fisheries agreement between the Community and Sweden \nsigned In Brussels on 21 March 1977; \n\nWhereas the agreement must therefore be terminated with effect from the \nnext expiry date on 1 January 1994, \n\n\fY \n\nSOLE ART I CUE \n\nThe fisheries agreement concluded between the Government of the German \nDemocratic Republic and the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden, signed on \n16 December 1977, Is hereby denounced. The President of the Council shall notify such denunciation. Done at Brussels, \n\nFor the CounciI \nThe President \n\n\fBSN 0254-1475 \n\nCOM(92) 377 final \n\n03 \n\nCatalogue number : CB-CO-92-395-EN-C \n\nISBN 92-77-47373-8 \n\nOffice for Official Publications of the European Communities \n\nIv-2985 Luxembourg"} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/906ac638-531f-4614-a401-fd10bfb13a2e", "title": "Commission Directive 92/71/EEC of 2 September 1992 determining the percentage of consignments that could be subject to phytosanitary inspection, documentary and identity checking, when introduced into a Member State from another Member State", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#directive,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "administrative check,crop production,customs inspection,intra-EU trade,plant health control,single market", "workIds": "celex:31992L0071,oj:JOL_1992_275_R_0024_028", "eurovoc_concepts": ["administrative check", "crop production", "customs inspection", "intra-EU trade", "plant health control", "single market"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/906ac638-531f-4614-a401-fd10bfb13a2e", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ba5ec88-d69e-45c4-bf33-86c371219ee9", "title": "92/462/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 September 1992 concerning animal health conditions and veterinary certificates for the import of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from Finland", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "Finland,health certificate,import,swine,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:31992D0462,oj:JOL_1992_261_R_0034_012", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Finland", "health certificate", "import", "swine", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/7ba5ec88-d69e-45c4-bf33-86c371219ee9", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/400764b5-b426-45b6-8602-50b3bd47a0ad", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2560/92 of 2 September 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) no 1062/87 on provisions for the implementation of the Community transit procedure and for certain simplifications of that procedure", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "Union transit,carriage of goods,customs document,customs formalities,guarantee", "workIds": "celex:31992R2560,oj:JOL_1992_257_R_0005_022", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Union transit", "carriage of goods", "customs document", "customs formalities", "guarantee"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/400764b5-b426-45b6-8602-50b3bd47a0ad", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e389f198-0567-42a4-b961-484212587503", "title": "Association of the overseas countries and territories : French overseas departments : compilation of texts. Volume XIV, 1 January 1990 - 31 December 1990.", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "pdfa1b,print_sftcv", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#publication_general,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "General Secretariat of the Council", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "administrative cooperation,agricultural product,association agreement,decision,overseas countries and territories,overseas department (France),regulation,tariff preference,trading operation", "workIds": "genpub:PUB_BX7291940", "eurovoc_concepts": ["administrative cooperation", "agricultural product", "association agreement", "decision", "overseas countries and territories", "overseas department (France)", "regulation", "tariff preference", "trading operation"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/e389f198-0567-42a4-b961-484212587503", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["pdfa1b", "print_sftcv"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b578c309-ee9d-4ed4-904c-d1bb34c55db7", "title": "92/471/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 September 1992 concerning animal health conditions and veterinary certification for importation of bovine embryos from third countries", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "animal breeding,cattle,health certificate,health control,import,third country", "workIds": "celex:31992D0471,oj:JOL_1992_270_R_0027_032", "eurovoc_concepts": ["animal breeding", "cattle", "health certificate", "health control", "import", "third country"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/b578c309-ee9d-4ed4-904c-d1bb34c55db7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fff2e7de-ff61-4f62-a5fc-112c3b859001", "title": "92/460/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 September 1992 concerning animal health conditions and veterinary certificates for the import of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from Switzerland", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "Switzerland,cattle,health certificate,import,swine,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:31992D0460,oj:JOL_1992_261_R_0001_010", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Switzerland", "cattle", "health certificate", "import", "swine", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/fff2e7de-ff61-4f62-a5fc-112c3b859001", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bb94032b-8019-4579-9a4b-dc192321b30c", "title": "92/468/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 September 1992 amending Decision 89/599/EEC approving derogations provided for by Greece, Italy and Portugal from certain provisions of Council Directive 77/93/EEC in respect of seed potatoes originating in Canada (Only the Greek, Italian and Portuguese texts are authentic)", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "Greece,Italy,Portugal,potato,seedling", "workIds": "celex:31992D0468,oj:JOL_1992_264_R_0025_036", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Greece", "Italy", "Portugal", "potato", "seedling"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bb94032b-8019-4579-9a4b-dc192321b30c", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1c888501-70f3-4f68-954a-1da834d491d6", "title": "92/463/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 September 1992 concerning animal health conditions and veterinary certificates for the import of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from Iceland", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "Iceland,cattle,health certificate,import,swine,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:31992D0463,oj:JOL_1992_261_R_0050_013", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Iceland", "cattle", "health certificate", "import", "swine", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/1c888501-70f3-4f68-954a-1da834d491d6", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5d33e8fc-cf00-4a8e-9bb7-11844fe77e04", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2562/92 of 2 September 1992 fixing depreciation percentages to be applied when agricultural products are bought in, for the 1993 financial year", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "EAGGF Guarantee Section,EU financing,intervention policy", "workIds": "celex:31992R2562,oj:JOL_1992_257_R_0009_024", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF Guarantee Section", "EU financing", "intervention policy"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/5d33e8fc-cf00-4a8e-9bb7-11844fe77e04", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f218a308-b06d-4173-8be8-940a105863ee", "title": "Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2561/92 of 2 September 1992 setting the amount of the payment on account of the cost of disposal of certain distillation products for 1993", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#regulation,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "EAGGF Guarantee Section,discount sale,distillation,viticulture", "workIds": "celex:31992R2561,oj:JOL_1992_257_R_0008_023", "eurovoc_concepts": ["EAGGF Guarantee Section", "discount sale", "distillation", "viticulture"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/f218a308-b06d-4173-8be8-940a105863ee", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]} +{"cellarURIs": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bbf81d32-8bfa-4c3e-8405-c2ff431df1c7", "title": "92/461/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 September 1992 concerning animal health conditions and veterinary certificates for the import of domestic animals of the bovine and porcine species from Sweden", "langIdentifier": "ENG", "mtypes": "html,pdfa1b,print", "workTypes": "http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#decision,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#legislation_secondary,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#resource_legal,http://publications.europa.eu/ontology/cdm#work", "authors": "European Commission", "date": "1992-09-02", "subjects": "Sweden,health certificate,import,swine,veterinary inspection", "workIds": "celex:31992D0461,oj:JOL_1992_261_R_0018_011", "eurovoc_concepts": ["Sweden", "health certificate", "import", "swine", "veterinary inspection"], "url": "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/bbf81d32-8bfa-4c3e-8405-c2ff431df1c7", "lang": "eng", "formats": ["html", "pdfa1b", "print"]}