body: I have seen several contracts that have terms such as "by accepting this offer you agree to sign a NDA/Non-Compete/Anti-harassment/Etc". How can this be fair prior to even seeing the NDA?
  
  
  I work for a company that during the on boarding had a website say 
  
  
  
  > 
  > I acknowledge that I have downloaded and/or was provided with the
  >  Company Employee Handbook on the previous page of this onboarding
  >  portal. All Company policies contained in the Handbook are subject to
  >  change or modification at the Company’s discretion. Complete and
  >  current versions of all Company policies and the Handbook are
  >  available to me on-line once I am an active Company employee.
  > 
  > 
  > 
  
  
  I recently was in violation of a rule that I believe contradicts the law. I honestly don't remember being provided with any handbook. I remember the website being very buggy and think the recruiter advised me just to click ok on everything. 
  
  
  I have a few related questions that I ask out of curiosity
  
  
  1. if the policy in the handbook was enforceable, would I be in breach of the contract if I didn't follow it? It seems unreasonable to say the handbook can be updated from time to time and that I had agreed to always follow it no matter what
  2. Is the contract void if I was never provided with a handbook?
  3. Is this even a contract? Hypothetically speaking could the company fire me or do more for a breach of policy in the handbook which I had been given?
  4. In general if you were given instructions just to "click ok" could that make the contract void because of not having agreed to it?
  
  
  
title: When can a contract require the agreenment of another contract?