body: So say somebody asked Bob if he'd broken a civil injunction, which Bob hadn't, but Bob admitted to having broken that injunction. Bob was taken to court, but it quickly became apparent Bob could not have committed the crime, because he had an undisputable alibi. 
  
  
  (Bob is any person.)
  
  
  Is these a feasible situation? Could Bob be charged with wasting someone's time or something? I'm interested in this in the UK.
  
  
  (Apologies if the style of this question is innapropriate, I'm not really sure how things work round here:) )
  
  
  
title: Falsely admitting to breaking a civil injunction