body: Canada's constitution is not a single document, but [many documents](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Canadian_constitutional_documents) passed over time.
  
  
  Is there existing case law as to whether parts of an older constitutional document can be found unconstitutional in light of newer constitutional documents? 
  
  
  For the purposes of this question, I'm excluding cases where the newer document directly repeals older documents, or parts of them.
  
  
  
title: Can older parts of Canada's constitution be found unconstitutional?