body: Consider someone hacking the super bowl and playing a Holocaust denial ad.
  
  
  Ignore the trivial charges like hacking that occur regardless of the content.
  
  
  Is there any further prosecution of the content *itself*?
  
  
  For example, would the hacker be prosecuted for harassment due to the *content* negatively affecting Jews?
  
  
  If a Jew died of a heart attack as a result of the content would the hacker be liable for that? Since this is fairly likely is there a de facto restriction on the content?
  
  
  
title: Are there de facto limitations on freedom of speech in the us?