g/92806583.txt

-----
--- 92806583
Thoughts on this cancer-prevention technology?
--- 92806633
which is worse? asbestosis or lung cancer?
--- 92806638
>>92806583 (OP)
just trust the science bro!
--- 92806675
>>92806583 (OP)
>>92806638
just trust the Corporate experts
--- 92806690
It prevents you from getting nicotine and tobacco related cancers very well and it's exactly designed to only do that
--- 92806715
>>92806675
you mean the scientists hired by the corporations? such as pfizer and all the other ones you trust?
--- 92806747
>>92806633
Death

You cannot get worse than that.
--- 92806768
>>92806638
I love science!
--- 92806813
>>92806747
I'm sure a painless death is preferable to a life of pain and suffering, artificially extended by medical treatment.
--- 92806821
>>92806768
--- 92806870
>>92806583 (OP)
trust the science jerk
--- 92806956
>>92806821
--- 92806961
>>92806813
How is pain and suffering even a thing?
Just jump in front of a train.
--- 92806980
>>92806583 (OP)
why don't they simply stop selling cigarettes?
--- 92807020
>>92806583 (OP)
Except people and their claims were a lot more trustworthy than todays cancer society
--- 92807074
>>92806956
--- 92807102
no baloney, just science!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RwxdzP8rG4 [Embed]
--- 92807120
>>92806956
could someone shoop costanza's face on it pretty please with cherry on top
--- 92807128
>>92807074
--- 92807141
>>92806956
trust the science
--- 92807174
>>92806583 (OP)
asbestos causing cancer is just jewish bs to stop the white man from using a fully natural miracle material. they want you to use some bs synthetic shit.
its a great insulator
resistant to fire
makes cement super strong
cheap af
weather proof
thousands of years ago people used it for cooking utensils and pots. its absolutely safe, don't believe the jews that say it causes cancer
--- 92807209
>>92806583 (OP)
what's gonna be the next thing that we currently use that will eventually be found to be incredibly unhealthy?
--- 92807300
>>92807209
Microplastics have been found to act as endocrine disrupters in the human body. So that’s probably the next big scare.
--- 92807355
>>92806961
>t.12 years old
--- 92807431
>>92807209
Usually it is discovered immediately, that something is unhealthy, but then megacorporations pay a few billions to sweep it all under the rug, so they can keep making trillions.
I hate America so fucking much, it is unreal.
--- 92807563
>>92807174
>its absolutely safe
A jew pretending to not be a jew calling out the jews, never seen such jewish trickery in my entire life.
--- 92807889
>>92807209
Whatever stops bring profitable.
--- 92807904
>>92806638
>corporations doing random shit
>science
state of you
--- 92807929
>>92807209
Giving hormones to prepubescent children
--- 92808017
>>92807929
Stuck in a loop, are you?
--- 92808102
>>92807209
Sugar.
Vegetable cooking oils and greases like coconut and palm.
Food supplements of any kind.
--- 92808120
>>92807929
umm sorry chuddie, the science is settled on that one
--- 92808387
>>92807904
How is this any different from the covid over-reaction today? Pfizer etc profit from the mandates and the legal immunity. Amazon etc profit from the lock downs driving brick and mortar stores out of business. Anyone who questions it is branded an "science denier".
--- 92808759
>>92807904
>pfizer doing random shit
>science
state of you
--- 92808973
>>92807929
This is already backfiring.
The NHS is backpedalling, for one, and there's no health org which claims that stopping puberty or giving hormones to kids causes no harm.
--- 92809058
>>92806583 (OP)
Asbestos is cool as shit and doesn't deserve the hate it gets. That said, I wouldn't smoke pic related.
--- 92809063
>>92807209
Aluminum will be discovered to be the main culprit responsible for Alzheimer's, people put that shit on their armpits and eat it as food additives ffs
--- 92809152
Smoking literally increases testosterone levels
--- 92809158
>>92809063
As long as the car industry pays enough, so the public never focuses on how dangerous it is to breathe in tire dust all day, all is well.
--- 92809183
>>92809152
Testosterone decreases your life span, though. Why would you want more of it?
--- 92809225
>>92809183
To live a better life. Is life necessarily a competition about who lives the longest? Why would you want to be some low T basedfag
--- 92809277
>>92809225
Good life comes from being able to breathe and having a sense of smell, not from a marginally higher number on some hormone chart that you have to pay for, if you want it, because it is so irrelevant.
--- 92809742
>>92809152
is this actually true?
--- 92809804
>>92806633
Asbestos causes lung cancer so it's double lung cancer
--- 92809938
>>92806583 (OP)

Wow, this has to be the best delivery system for cancer. The smoke burns out all of your throats cilia hairs, to clear a direct and unobstructed path for asbestos carcinogens. 

Diseases love capitalism for making their jobs easier to spread.
--- 92810020
>>92806583 (OP)
> be you
> only kent left
> need smok
WOULD YOU ?
--- 92810027
>>92806633
anon, I...
--- 92810082
>>92806768
You didn't ask if it killed you, you asked if it filtered.
--- 92810169
>>92807120
--- 92810190
>>92810169
>t.
--- 92810273
>>92810169
>cherry on top
kek
--- 92810559
>>92808759
there's tons of scientific research on the vaccines. that's what people refer to, not corporate statements
--- 92810726
>>92806583 (OP)
Wow, it's even got a filter?
--- 92810765
>>92806583 (OP)
Is there a better analogy for antivirus software?
--- 92810769
>>92807074
why would you want to take out the nicotine
--- 92810822
>>92807120
>>92810169
--- 92810828
Still not taking the jab.
--- 92811048
>>92810559
All of that “research” is sponsored by the corporation.
--- 92811096
>>92810559
Fucking hell kid kek
--- 92811203
>>92810020
> remove filter
> smoke
yeah
--- 92811907
>>92807209
"Social" media might as well be a consumible at this point.
If it actually needs to be something physical, then plastic and corn syrup.
--- 92811963
>>92810169
>actually puts the cherry on top
--- 92811975
psyop.. burn kikes
--- 92812030
>>92807209
Some sort of really common plastic probably. My money is on Teflon.
--- 92812039
>>92810169
But what about a cherry with Constaza on top?
--- 92812091
>>92807209
Corn Syrup.
Vegetable Oil.
--- 92812100
>>92807904
>corporations doing science
>not science
--- 92812123
>>92812100
>
--- 92812140
>>92809938
capitalism loves diseases for easily creating jobs (in the “healthcare” sector)
--- 92812226
Asbestos is like one of those items in a game where it's insanely op but you'll die the instant your hit. Such a cool material...a "fibrous mineral"
--- 92812254
>>92808017
--- 92812275
>>92806633
Yes.
--- 92812354
>>92807209
nitrites on meat products and silicon dioxide as food additive to remove moisture
--- 92812356
>>92812039
--- 92812386
>>92806956
if smoking was supposed to be safe and healthy why did it need a filter in the first place
--- 92812427
>>92812386
can you not read OP's image?
--- 92812442
>>92812123
Lmao, exactly. That’s what modern science is. It’s having a conclusion that you want to push then paying people to publish “studies” that support your conclusion.

>More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own experiments.
https://www.nature.com/articles/533452a
--- 92812448
>>92812356
--- 92812481
Asbestos in cigarettes has never been proven to cause harm outside of america where they put nerotoxins and lsd in the water supply and feed you fake food.
--- 92812508
>>92812442
>>More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments
How much of this is in soft science
--- 92812556
>>92806583 (OP)
Put it back on the market right this instant. I want three packs a day.
--- 92812630
>>92812356
You're a great man.
--- 92812790
>>92811048
doesn't matter as long as it follows the scientific method and is peer-reviewed.
but of course you're also wrong. there's a lot of research on the Pfizer vaccine not sponsored by Pfizer. example:
>https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.01.21250957v1
>The authors have declared no competing interest.
>Funding Statement: Professor Hunter and Dr. Brainard were funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at Kings College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) and collaboration with the University of East Anglia.
>>92811096
nice argument retard
--- 92812824
>>92812100
what's scientific about putting asbestos in fags? nothing
--- 92812859
>>92812100
>doing science
where are the peer-reviewed papers from Kent proving asbestos is safe to inhale?
--- 92813099
>>92812859
>peer review
lol. lmao even.

>Eric Stewart, who left his $190,000-a-year job, has had five of his six studies taken down after allegations that he fabricated information by altering sample sizes. Though Stewart has denied these allegations, his sixth study, conducted in 2020, drew the attention of an FSU committee, who gathered to discuss Stewart’s findings, per the Daily Mail.

>Pickett noted that there is a “huge monetary incentive” to fabricate data, and there is “no accountability.” He said that there was only a tiny chance that anyone who does this would be caught.
https://humanevents.com/2023/04/12/black-fsu-professor-resigns-in-disgrace-amid-allegations-he-faked-data-on-commonality-of-racism-had-6-papers-retracted
--- 92813169
>>92809063
What's the problem with aluminium?
--- 92813205
>>92813169
causes dementia too it seems
--- 92813252
Smoking Kent switch rn 
They are really good
--- 92813262
>>92813099
1. criminology is a meme discipline compared with medicine
2. even putting 1. aside, single cases of fraud don't prove that most research is fraudulent. that's like saying "ted bundy was a murder and many people have huge incentives to murder, therefore everyone I don't like is a murderer"
--- 92813371
>>92806747
>Death
>
>You cannot get worse than that.
Lol, no, the type of cancer asbestos gives you is unironically worse than death.
--- 92813453
>>92813262
Tetlock (2004) had a sample of 284 experts make 27,451 predictions between 1988 and 2003 about the economy, political elections, and international relations events. Tetlock found that experts and generally knowledgeable non-experts (dilettantes) had similar forecasting abilities, and both were only moderately better than undergraduate students.
--- 92813498
>>92809742
Yes
>https://tctmed.com/smoking-testosterone/amp/
>The smokers had 15% higher total testosterone levels and 13% higher free testosterone levels when compared to men who never smoked in their lives
--- 92813631
>>92813498
>https://tctmed.com/smoking-testosterone/amp/
'
Does smoking decrease testosterone?

Yes, in the long run, but it also increases testosterone in the short term.'
bro
--- 92813692
>>92806633
Lung cancer is survivable, mesothelioma is not.
--- 92813718
>>92813498
Similar to that 'alcohol improves health' study.
What they did forgot to tell is that the group who didn't drink alcohol had health problems in the first place (heart problems or faulty liver).
--- 92813833
>>92813453
sauce? cant find a paper with that graphic.
--- 92813844
>>92813692
>Lung cancer is survivable, mesothelioma is not.
I wouldn't bet on surviving any kind of lung cancer, your chances are really bad. Mesothelioma is a type of lung cancer, and you can only get it from asbestos, and it's 100% it kills you.
--- 92814276
>>92812790
>doesn't matter as long as it follows the scientific method and is peer-reviewed
you have no idea what the scientific method is or about science as a whole. the fact that a company has interests means their """scientists""" can conveniently ignore things that are bad for the business
--- 92814386
>>92806715
>Scientists discovers in 1950s that smoking gives you cancer
>Tobacco companies and future cancer patients: Uhm sweety you trust the scientists that lied about the Spanish flu aka common cold!?
--- 92814404
>>92806768
That's not science. That's science filtered and parsed by marketing.
--- 92814409
>>92813262
1. He was a professor at a prestigious institution publishing scientific papers. By all metrics he was doing science. You’re a NEET, not an arbiter of what is and is not considered science.
2. It only takes one counter-example to falsify the claim that peer review is reliable. There are innumerable examples.
--- 92814528
>they actually made a safe cigarette
>the tobacco companies buried it

https://apnews.com/article/9360f54b528a5921e9be5ad713104e17

in the docs that got released during the congress hearings, they basically told the scientists behind this that if they marketed it, they were going to kill them and kick them out of the tobacco conglomerate 

this is my #1 source to why media manipulation works because no one I ever talk to has even heard of this existing
--- 92814550
>>92814386
smoking doesnt cause cancer tho and every single attempt to replicate it by force smokeboxing all kinds of animals FAILED to induce cancer
its a scam to pass insane excise tax
--- 92814582
>>92814550
this. smoking has obvious negative impacts on your health but it isn't some death stick and it also has a multitude of positives that the media go out of their way to ignore
--- 92814632
>Scientific research is wrong
>Why
>Let me explain while using /pol/ buzzwords and my schizo delusions as reference.
Kek, every single time.
--- 92814641
I've seen no evidence that these filters contain asbestos.
--- 92814655
>>92814632
This actually reflects poorly on you, since the schizo delusions usually line up better with reality than the drivel you spew.
--- 92814726
1952 technology that begins to kill you slowly 10+ years later

Kind of like the COVID vaccine. Good luck with your mRNA related diseases in the future.
--- 92814806
>>92814655
Just like how horse dewormer was supposed to be the magic cure for covid among the schizo crowd? Or did the schizo narrative switched back to "it's flu dood" and everyone forgot about that episode?
--- 92814854
>science says whites are more intelligent than blacks
*trusted*
>science says take a vaccine to slow the spread of a virus
*not trusted*
--- 92814868
>>92808102
This. Appart from obesity and calorie intake, when you check all the anti aging research it always comes down to insuline and sugar. It is fucking poison.
>palm oil
This one is fucking evil, they fucking know it triggers inflamation like a mf, but they dont do shit because is cheap
>>92813205
>>92813169
Neurotoxic and very much un-reseached yet, evidence is anecdotal of autistic and demetia brains cluttered with aluminum for some reason. Is also present in places you would not expect it too. For example a single matcha tea has 3 to 5 times the recomended daily maximum, and I dont want to know how much those hulk green smoothies than 'healthy' freaks take have
--- 92815008
>>92807209
This is never going to happen because corporations learned from the tobacco industry and now just straigh up buy off the government. 

Sugar/Soda, just look it up when New York tried to pass a ban and a tax for some insane corruption.
--- 92815010
>>92807209
am i going to be the first person to say this in this thread... covid vaccines
--- 92815106
>>92812356
>>92810169
now edit vegeta on it
--- 92815176
>>92810726
--- 92815239
>>92814854
Science had very little to do wuth the civid trials.
Validating a vaccine takes a decade easilly, specially one based on untested tech. Several independent labs are involved, participants are followed for long term side effects and ethical comitees handle everything with an iron fist, you cant imagine how difficult trials in humans can become.
Covid jab development was a shitshow tainted by mass histeria, political pressure, undisclosed contracts and a fuckton of money to be won.
I wouldn't call it proper science, and anyone that does had no idea about medical trials or has no fucking shame.
--- 92815329
I see some of you idiots are posting asbestos challenge videos on YouTube. Don't think I can't see any of this.
--- 92815421
>>92812790
Thank god science has proven oxycontin isn't addictive.
--- 92815472
>>92814404

so pfizer then lmao
--- 92815589
>>92807563
lol
lmao
--- 92815674
When I was 14 me and my friends explored an abandoned factory and smashed up a load of asbestos and inhaled it and also had lightsabre fights with those tube lights and when they smashed loads of weird metal dust came out that we inhaled and every month or so I think about how I'm probably going to die in 20 years from it
--- 92815733
>>92813453
so studies are overall false... as proven by this one specific study. genius
and you're trying to compare peer-reviewed medical research to election forecasting
there's no study needed to decisively confirm that you're below aboriginal level iq
>>92814409
>1
you're still refusing to acknowledge the difference between criminology and medicine. I accept your concession
>It only takes one counter-example to falsify the claim that peer review is reliable
no it doesn't. if people thought like you, nobody would ever board a plane knowing of a single crash that occurred. thankfully most people aren't clinically retarded like you
>There are innumerable examples.
there are innumerable examples of medical research being reliable, namely all the functioning medicine and treatments around the world. meanwhile you have zero evidence that vaccine research has been falsified
>>92815421
no, the science has proved that it is. you're confusing the overall science with a company cherry-picking single studies and misrepresenting the results.
>Both of [the studies cited by the company], although shedding some light on the risk of addiction for acute pain, do not help establish the risk of iatrogenic addiction when opioids are used daily for a prolonged time in treating chronic pain. There are a number of studies, however, that demonstrate that in the treatment of chronic non–cancer-related pain with opioids, there is a high incidence of prescription drug abuse. Prescription drug abuse in a substantial minority of chronic-pain patients has been demonstrated in studies by Fishbain et al. (3%–18% of patients), Hoffman et al. (23%), Kouyanou et al. (12%), Chabal et al. (34%), Katz et al. (43%), Reid et al. (24%–31%), and Michna et al. (45%).
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2007.131714
--- 92815847
wow wtf I trust the experts now
--- 92815960
>>92815010
Yeah, the jab may be the biggest public health disaster in history. It probably killed hundreds of thousands worldwide and crippled many more in order give mild, fleeting protection against a disease most people could easily handle on their own. Pharma companies and governments knew the shitty risk profile, but they pushed it on people anyway, even little kids and pregnant women. The long term effects are still unknown, we will be dealing with the fallout for decades to come.
--- 92815979
>>92815733
>you're confusing the overall science with a company cherry-picking single studies and misrepresenting the results.
Yeah and the research community is riddled with this shit. Trusting the science is trusting these biased studies.
--- 92816050
>>92815733
>and you're trying to compare peer-reviewed medical research to election forecasting
From Altman (1998). 

Reviews of papers published in medical journals typically find that the vast majority of papers commit statistical errors than render them methodologically unacceptable.
--- 92816059
vaxxed and happy. 
chuds keep seething.
lol
lmao even
--- 92816170
>>92816050
>From Altman (1998)
imagine trusting research papers lmao
--- 92816256
>>92816170
Research is incorrect frequently enough to warrant skepticism toward claims most papers and scientists make. I'm not an anti-vaxxer as there's good evidence the vaccine works, but I'm not mad at anti-vaxxers for not trusting "the science".
--- 92816314
>>92806747
Death isn't so bad after the dying part is over. You barely even feel it any more.
--- 92816596
>>92810169
>>92812356
The only good posts on /g/ this year.
--- 92816886
>>92814528
>They decided the most effective cancer shield was palladium, a heavy metal widely known as a catalyst in speeding up chemical reactions,
A diesel-tier catalyst in cigarettes, doesn't sound too safe. I'd expect it to cause neurological problems and to speed up the aging process.
--- 92817166
>>92806633
I watched my grandfather die from mesothelioma. The last 6 months of his life were spent in hospital/hospice constantly needing his lungs drained of fluid just so he could breath, barely at that. Would not recommend.
--- 92817208
>>92806768
It's weird seeing companies advertising cigarettes with taste. They don't taste like anything.
--- 92817232
Why do people like putting burning things into their mouths and inhaling the smoke? Are they fucking retarded?
--- 92817306
>>92808387
the scientific literature never supported the asbestos filter.
--- 92817320
>>92812354
>nitrites
ooo I heard a good theory that that's why New Zealand has one of the highest rates of bowel cancer in OECD societies, due to their heavy use of it in farming
--- 92817589
>>92815010
There is literally no way of knowing since there is no control group. The people that didn't take the vaccines were not a random sample of the general population. even the control groups in the official government studies were given the vaccine after six months.

now it's so heavily politicized that anyone questioning the subject is treated like a total social pariah. if you question vaccines you automatically lumped in with people that doubt the moon landing or 9/11

at the time, if you tried to argue the vaccines were dangerous, you would be shut down by the response "it's safer than covid." If you tried to argue they weren't effective, you'd get "well it's safe so you might as well take it anyway." anyone dumb enough to get it really deserves what they got, frankly. except the children, that still enrages me.
--- 92817674
>>92806980
Crapitalism.
--- 92817752
>>92806980
You are not read for this discussion.
--- 92817924
>>92808973
The NHS is a political entity that does everything to avoid Tory wrath..
--- 92818258
Asbestos is safe and effective at preventing lung cancer. Stop spreading misinformation and trust the science you chuds.
--- 92818334
>>92806715
>you mean the scientists hired by the corporations? such as pfizer and all the other ones you trust?
This is why I get my vaccines directly from the Chinese government, long life to Xi and the CCP
--- 92818350
>>92806768
leftists have 0 kwnolege of history.
If you point this out the answer will be
>muh poeple 70 years ago were savages we are much better evolved now and make no mistakes ever because we understand everything.
--- 92818395
>>92818334
>muh consume our propaganda or the chinese one you have to pick one 
So this is how npcs think. Running around in desparate need for a master
--- 92818397
>>92807209
>what's gonna be the next thing that we currently use that will eventually be found to be incredibly unhealthy?
Belts and jeans
--- 92818455
>>92817166
why didn't he just kill himself?
--- 92818503
>>92809063
You will get my aluminum from my cold dead hands
--- 92818575
>>92806768
Oh, no it was absolutely right about that.
It's just that the filter was also incredibly dangerous to your health.
--- 92819263
>>92806768
>removes nicotine
what's the point of smoking then?
--- 92819276
>>92819263
killing yourself faster
--- 92819312
>>92819263
you make a good point lmao this is like drinking beer that 'filters out the calories and alcohol'
--- 92819373
>>92810769
nicotine bad has been a staple of anti-tobaccco since the start, with the second one being tar
--- 92819391
>>92814276
>dude you don't even know
nice projection, retard lol. it isn't some hyper complex system and is rather easy to follow.
--- 92819636
>>92815010
>>92815960
>>92817589
Please keep your insane and technically incorrect anti-vax comments to yourself.

You don't know what you are talking about, you don't know what mRNA
is, and you're spreading idiotic lies. Maybe you do so unwittingly,
because of bad education. Maybe you do so because you've talked to
"experts" or watched youtube videos by charlatans that don't know what
they are talking about.

Vaccines have saved the lives of literally tens of millions of people.

Just for your edification in case you are actually willing to be
educated: mRNA doesn't change your genetic sequence in any way. It is
the exact same intermediate - and temporary - kind of material that
your cells generate internally all the time as part of your normal
cell processes, and all that the mRNA vaccines do is to add a dose
their own specialized sequence that then makes your normal cell
machinery generate that spike protein so that your body learns how to
recognize it.

The half-life of mRNA is a few hours. Any injected mRNA will be all
gone from your body in a day or two. It doesn't change anything
long-term, except for that natural "your body now knows how to
recognize and fight off a new foreign protein" (which then tends to
fade over time too, but lasts a lot longer than a few days). And yes,
while your body learns to fight off that foreign material, you may
feel like shit for a while. That's normal, and it's your natural
response to your cells spending resources on learning how to deal with
the new threat.
--- 92819657
didn't read lol
--- 92819726
>>92814806
We've been over this multiple times 
https://c19ivm.org/meta.html
--- 92819854
>>92819636
It's been known for over a year that vacsneed mRNA lasts for months within the body, I don't have my zotero with me so I don't have the latest papers but this easily findable one shows 2 months of detectable vacsneed mRNA
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(22)00076-9
iirc newer articles found it up to 9 months after injection, but they haven't looked past that timeframe
--- 92819892
>>92815674
Asbestos doesn't really kill you from a single exposure, don't worry unless you railed lines of asbestos
--- 92819995
>>92806583 (OP)
now think for a second about chocolate, sweets and that stuff. 
It's literally 100% bad for you. The industry doesnt care. The politicians don't care. They need to make money and if it shortens or worsens your life, so what. Watcha gonna do kid? Nothing. You dont do shit. Go eat that cake , go eat that chocolate bar and you wont be able to stop.
--- 92820006
>>92806768
>The term mesothelioma was first used in medical literature in 1931; its association with asbestos was first noted sometime in the 1940s. Similar legislation followed in the U.S. about ten years later. 
Science was right. What you should be complaining about is unchecked capitalism.
--- 92820010
>>92819995
>getting addicted to cake
--- 92820047
>>92819995
nah, I don't think I will
not a mutt
--- 92820064
kek, why are leafs so hilariously bad at fighting?
--- 92820125
>>92819892
Do you expect mineral wool to act in similar way to asbestos? It's mineral fiber after all.
--- 92820162
>>92815010
meds
--- 92820185
>>92820125
I want to roll myself up in this thing so bad
--- 92820207
>>92819636
there was a 30 times increase of heart attacks in athletes after the release of the vaccine. we only know this because people collapsing on live TV during a sports game is hard to cover up. mortality statistics show increases in deaths above the normal rates after the release of the vaccine. Even the official study had more people in the vaccinated group die. And four times as many vaccinated people died of heart conditions.

but it's all a red herring. Even if it were safe, it wasn't effective. The official study only had three people die of Covid during the entire trial, and one was vaccinated. Again, more people died of heart attacks. It was only tested against the 2020 variant of the virus. The virus immediately evolved resistance. because the vaccine only targeted a single protein unlike real vaccines. And it was never tested to be effective on people with natural immunity, which most people had by 2021.

Also Covid had evolved into another minor cold/flu like illness by 2021. And only killed obese elderly people even in the early days.

I just want to point out that sick children were denied organ transplants because of liars like you.
--- 92820222
>>92818334
based and redpilled
--- 92820238
>>92820185
It leaves little, irritating mineral needles in your skin. (probably also in your lungs if you inhale dust from it)
--- 92820261
>>92814404
like literally all science that reaches mainstream media?
--- 92820269
>>92815674
Fluorescent tubes don't have that much mercury in them, I wouldn't worry about that.
Asbestos is much worse, but it's very unlikely that a one-time exposure will result in anything, that's extremely rare. It's usually people who are exposed to it over and over who get sick. Everybody has been exposed to asbestos to one extent, but nobody can tell how someone's body will react to it. It is some truly nasty stuff.
--- 92820318
>>92820207
Wow... what absolute horseshit. Like all of it and not one fucking source.
--- 92820380
>>92820318
I accept your concession
--- 92820401
>>92820318
I literally posted the official pfizer vaccine study results earlier.
the rest of it is from memory. google or chatgpt or whatever the fuck you want if you doubt it. 
caring about sources is only something redditors do when they lose an argument.
--- 92820412
>>92814404
What is science?
--- 92820464
>>92820318
What's the point of posting sources if you're just going to dismiss them as "/pol/ trash" or "unreliable"? Redditors like you could hear the same thing from Robert Malone himself and still call it disinformation
--- 92820482
>>92810559
>there's tons of scientific research on the vaccines
They monitored the control group for like 90-120 days, and then gave them the shots too. If you can't understand why this is bad it means you have an IQ below 85.
--- 92820542
>>92817166
>>92818455
This. Why waste $100,000 plus on some old coot who will provide no value ever? Give the money to me instead.
--- 92820594
>>92820542
I'd rather blow it on hookers
Are you a whore, by chance?
--- 92820637
>>92819636
areas in Ireland with more than 99% vax rates had more Covid cases than other parts of the country.
The vaccines obviously didn't do shit. At best, they were a huge waste of money that went from the tax payers to big pharma, with some bribes going into the pockets of the politicians who enacted all the lockdown and vax passport shit of course.
--- 92820681
>>92807209
fiberglass
--- 92820693
Asbestos is pretty great at stopping fires from spreading. I work at an old building that's still full of asbestos panels. Totally safe, no reason to be alarmed.
The only hazard comes when you try to rip it all out and breathe in the dust. Media sensationalism made it seem like just existing next to an asbestos board gave you cancer so tons of companies had it ripped out and all the workers did so with no mask or PPE. If they just left the asbestos in place it'd be perfectly functional even today and far better than any modern fire retardant material. Instead crazed boomers forced millions of their fellow man to rip it out of work places and homes and made the building MORE susceptible to fire and LESS safe, and also killed millions of their fellow whites through agressive cancers.
Really makes you think, doesn't it?
--- 92820726
>>92820693
Asbestos did nothing wrong.
--- 92820727
>>92820681
>fiberglass
do you mean glasswool?
--- 92820774
>>92806583 (OP)
Safe and effective™
--- 92820791
>>92814868
>For example a single matcha tea has 3 to 5 times the recomended daily maximum
Japs drink that shit daily tho and they all live to 90+
--- 92820802
>>92820727
any type of wool/fiber that’s made from mineral
they say its safer than asbestos but I’m skeptical
--- 92820978
>>92810169
LMAO
--- 92821049
>>92820802
i work in a fiberglass factory so i hope you are wrong.
--- 92821071
>>92820261
>like literally all science that reaches mainstream media?
no, just the science you disagree with
--- 92821129
>>92818350
They knew it was harmful, the law just didn't care a lot about it so they could stamp that in their products, seems like you are the one who was 0 knowledge of history
--- 92821162
>trust the science
lol
--- 92822127
>>92810169
>>92812356
kino
--- 92822176
>listen to the experts
--- 92822538
>>92820791
No, they dont, matcha is expensive as fuck
--- 92823278
>>92807209
Styrofoam
--- 92823883
>>92820318
The cope of someone who has buyer's remorse. Sorry anon, sometimes you make the wrong choice and you and people around you get hurt.
--- 92824067
>>92807209
plastic and carbon fiber materials
--- 92824118
Scientists and doctors - wrong about everything and proud of it since the dawn of man. They never learn.
--- 92824163
>>92820125
wtf that looks delicious
--- 92824253
I ve noticed something.
No one in 4chan.org talks about they're daughter....that's weird
--- 92824311
ha ha the moment I saw this thread in the catalog I knew it would just be a branch covidian cope thread
--- 92824331
>>92816314
Thanks for your firsthand knowledge, anon. Glad we have dead people like you as our primary source of information about how death feels.
--- 92824466
>>92806583 (OP)

it's called fasting

cancer can't grow if it's not getting food. if you have cancer eat once every 3 days
--- 92824621
>>92824466
u should get the nobel prize mate!
--- 92824753
>>92813692
5 year survival rate of lung cancer is 16%

But that's misleading, because the reality is that if you get lung cancer you'll die from it. Only 25% of people who catch the cancer in Stage 1 or 2 continue life without remission, and it typically involved the removal of one of the lobes of the lungs

This is when the cancer is contained solely in the lung itself and hasn't spread anywhere. Typically there are no symptoms at this stage so it's rarely discovered at this point. Once it reaches stage 3 or 4 and the symptoms are noticeable you're as good as dead, it's really just how long do you live before it finally kills you.
--- 92824768
>>92807904
that's exactly what science is most of the time though
who do you think pays for science to happen
--- 92824820
>>92819995
>Go eat that cake , go eat that chocolate bar and you wont be able to stop
amerimutt problem
normal humans are able to eat cake without being addicted
--- 92824853
>>92824753
tell the doctor, "i'll pay you all my life savings if I'm cancer free in 5 years"
if he says no, then go home and kys because you're gonna suffer
--- 92824936
>>92824466
you should water fast for 7-10 days every 3-6 months in general. in a 2020 boston study showed that 7 day fast lowers you chances of getting cancer by 70%. long fasts like these kill cancer cells and get rid of any type of small tumors and cysts in the body. can't say if fasts can save you after you get cancer tho, probably too late.
--- 92824948
>>92820542
because he paid a life time for the treatment already.
--- 92825121
>>92815010
>anti vaxxers say covid is just chinese flu, nothing to worry about
>but suddenly the covid vaccine is actually a ticking bomb that will give you cancer and melt you from inside

why are you guys suddenly scared of covid ????
--- 92825165
>>92819636
jew
--- 92825181
>>92806583 (OP)
> trustthescience.uk.gov
--- 92825236
>>92821129
I know plastics is harmful in any way possible even touching it is harmful. 
They didnt know how much which is really important. same is true with global warming saying temperature will change a degree in 100 years is not the same as apocalypse in 5 years point of no return bulshit
--- 92825333
>>92806583 (OP)
It's vegan and if it had the trans flag and blm fist, it would sell well.
--- 92825341
>>92806956
>little boy's haircut
>trimmed eyebrows
>clean shaven baby-face
>soft hands
>eyeliner
>DYEL
Why were the "ideal men" of the late 60s so effeminate?
--- 92826155
>>92825341
He's a model, not a manual laborer.
--- 92826174
>>92810169
kek
--- 92826281
>>92819636
Thank you Linus for that input
--- 92826400
>>92824936
i read 72 hours was enough to starve your immune system cells which causes them to "reset" in some sense. Which apparently helps fight cancer (though by 70% sounds unbelievable.) longer than 72 hours and you start doing unnecessary damage to your body. i had to eat at least salt when fasting for more than a day.
--- 92826430
>>92813262
The problem is that there's certain fields of "science" where you can asses that the probability of the data being fabricated or the way of gathering the data being skewed so it always reaches a predetermined conclusion is almost 100%, in the case of this person, the field which he studied is clearly one of those where results cannot be trusted because they start with a predetermined outcome and they just dance around the methodology to obtain that outcome, which invalidates almost all research made in that field.
--- 92826447
>you can't die of cancer if you die of AIDs first
>GENIUS, get this mann a Pell grant
--- 92826457
>>92825341
all of those things are a sign of wealth and caring for yourself.
there's nothing unusual about a man with short hair.
clean shaven is always rated as most attractive facial hair type by women
I don't see eyeliner.
you can't see the insides of his hands or most his body, you are just making up stuff at this point.
--- 92826562
>>92813262
Anon, you've lost this one. If someone isn't dragged out into the street and minecrafted for fabricating even a tiny, insignificant study, then it shows that there isn't enough punishment for basically lying to millions of people.
--- 92826593
>>92806583 (OP)
It probably did filter the carcinogens from the tobacco smoke, QED.
--- 92826941
>>92813498
>never smoked in their lives
hardly a fair comparison
--- 92827022
>>92826958
Why are both the people in the weed example crying?
--- 92827039
>>92809063
But what about tin?
--- 92827051
>>92826958
Why are both the cigarette smokers delusional (not all life long smokers die of lung cancer)?
--- 92827407
>>92816256
theres also good evidence the vaccine fucks your body into shambles
--- 92827484
>>92807209
Women having jobs.
--- 92827657
>>92819636
gratz for the lowers iq post this week.
--- 92827845
>>92814404
>no true scotman fallacy
are you an atheist ?
--- 92827867
>>92818455
He had a big family, and he was a fairly stoic person so that wouldn't have been something he'd do even though looking back on it it would have been more humane
>>92820542
>Why waste $100,000 
eh I live in a country where access to healthcare doesn't quite literally cost you your arm and a leg. In fact there was a court case in regards to the company he worked at where they handled asbestos in the 60's and the people running the company knew the risks of asbestos but didn't provide protective gear to the workers. Our family got a six figure payout from that case after he died.
--- 92827948
>>92819636
lol good luck trying to change the minds of plague enthusiasts. It's like arguing with an idiot, they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
--- 92827971
>thread about legitimate cancer causing shit
>pol refugee chuds can't shut up about thr vaccine
Every time
--- 92828270
>>92827971
Cigarettes aren't technology and this thread shouldn't be on this board to begin with.
--- 92828333
>>92806768
That's not Science. That's capitalism the very thing you chuds worship.
--- 92828416
test tesy
--- 92828435
>muh source??????????
neurotic redditor behaviour
the key words are there, look it up yourself in a non-shit search engine
besides, your 'mRNA only lasts a few days' got immediately challenged - with your precious source - right here >>92819854, and you conveniently chose to not engage him
--- 92828451
>>92828435 
meant for buyer's remorse redditor >>92820318
--- 92828487
>>92820207
2 more years?
--- 92828688
>>92807209
sugar
internal combustion engine
sitting 
shitting without squatting
--- 92828760
>>92806583 (OP)

fucking retarded. once you inhale that asbestos, it's never going away. you can never get it out unless you replace your lungs and your throat entirely, maybe your mouth too. so far that kind of surgery is not possible

cigarettes need to be banned entirely, smokers are such entitled fucking assholes. first they cry when cigs are priced up, but at the same time 90% of the pack of smokes they buy they dump the butts on the street and in the ocean. that doesn't disintigrate, every place is fucking dirty from this shit. it's filthy, unnecessary and if you still want to do it you better pay for every discarded butt. snus is as bad, since these people just throw the bags away similar to butts and the kids stick them under desks and/or seats 

the only tobacco product that makes sense is a cigar and even those are nice only like once a few months
--- 92829158
>>92806768
That's correct though, it filters the cig impurities. It just gives you asbestosis as a side effect.
--- 92829222
>>92825341
Not same level of nigger worship culture
--- 92829279
>>92819995
Everything is bad for you, I don't give a shit you faggot.
--- 92829338
>>92828760
smokers pay more than the amount they cost the taxpayer through ludicrous excise taxes
--- 92829516
>>92807174
Asbestos is safe unless you break it and inhale the dust like a nigger.
The JEWS don't want us to save money on power bills, have cheap insulation, or be safe from fire
--- 92829630
>>92807209
Flouride
--- 92829674
>>92809277
what good is perfect sense of smell for if i still can't smell imogen poot's toots
--- 92829732
>>92812790
Of course it fucking matters you idiot, there's a gigantic conflict of interests.
>scientific method
Barely. They destroyed the control group, misscalisified adverse events, ran the "tests" for a few months only so there was zero information about long-term effects and the most important part is that all the studies show no difference in outcome between groups, all they did was measure the level of antibodies in the body and didn't acknowledge that the antibodies for the alpha variant are nearly useless for every other variant or that inoculating individuals that already had antibodies made their immunity weaker.

It's a shit research and you're a moron.
--- 92829797
>>92820318
You're going to have anecdotal evidence soon enough, vaxie
--- 92829801
>>92806583 (OP)
Pharma companies do worse and the government literally forces people to take it too. 
And then they cover up the side effects by announcing on the news a new strain of X like strep throat or something like that.

This is what slavery under a protection racket looks like.
--- 92829827
>>92806638
The science is fine.
The corporations, administration and money is the problem.
Worst yet, you get rid of money and the first 2 don't necessarily go away.
--- 92829868
>>92806690
It's a pity about the mesothelioma. You win some, you lose some.

>>92806747
> he thinks death is the worst
How naive.
--- 92829879
>>92829827
Science has a blind spot if when testing for filters for cigarettes (remember: to reduce carcinogens ingested when smoking cigarettes) the best candidate was ostensibly asbestos.
--- 92829907
>>92808120
It is now because they have a corporate monopoly on the ethical departments for those things.

Do you know how much DNA damage those things they provide cause?
--- 92829925
>>92829827
How about you just make money real again as a starting point.
--- 92829930
>>92829879
Ok so we have these cigarettes with shitty cotton filters. They let through like, 80% of the carcinogens or some shit and people are hacking up their lungs--getting light headed--and shit.
So we shredded fiberglass into asbestos? Now we have reduced the amount of burnt tobacco passing through the filter by like 30% which is epic. We're going to save lives.
Did we test if the new filter literally kills more people than the old way in some unforeseen way? No, that's not part of the scientific method.
--- 92829956
>>92829930
Bro just smoke actual tobacco instead of buying prerolled cigarettes. What kind of retard is falling for this dumb shit?
--- 92829973
>>92812442
>30% reproducibility
I doubt that.
Chaos is not kind.
--- 92829995
>>92814868
Everything is fucking neurotoxic you moron.
The problem is the magnitude.
--- 92830042
>>92829827
Did we continue to sell the more dangerous cigarettes, even going so far as to lie when we found out people were getting mesothelioma instead of cancer and gaslight them by pretending we had no idea why, to prevent loss of cigarette sales...? Probably.
Is that a sign of a corruption inherent in our system so deep and so unsettling it simply can not be fixed, it would seem, by the principally military-industrial methods of our current big-lobby funded administrations? Yes.
Was the use of asbestos in these cigarettes a scientific achievement? I would argue that it was not, it was even a failure. The idea is that we want to prevent harm in the form of cancer on the human body, specifically the lungs. The ignition and inhalation of asbestos product is counter productive to what I view as the preventative measures that were being attempted when this scientific conquest was undertaken. To wit, where once was lung cancer now is mesothelioma.
--- 92830043
>>92829956
Double that. Also, highly recommend a cigarette mouthpiece as it will capture a good percentage of tar.
--- 92830056
>>92829956
Murder is literally legal
--- 92830068
>>92815239
Explain why I got a side effect from a vaccine that wasn't the covid one then?
Oh wait all vaccines are done this way now.
These companies are doubling down for marketing reasons now.

Just like these cigarette companies.
Oh and they made the disease to begin with by outsourcing their research to a dodgy China lab.

These people are morons. Complete morons.
The health industry is nothing but morons now. They're more likely to kill you than help you now.
--- 92830077
Does anyone have that chart with several pictures of old "scientifically proved" medicine from the last century, including cocaine for kids, radioactive water and mercury?
--- 92830085
>>92829956
Cigarettes filters are technology
--- 92830098
>>92824253
They are daughter what?
--- 92830102
>>92815472
Yeah, most of the science is corporate entities and think tanks now. So no wonder it's degenerated this much this fast.

But you won't stop it.
You're in a torture racket now. 
One of the most oppressive regimes of all time.
Worse than the nazis and soviets combined.


This thing has killed more people than any regime before it.
--- 92830124
>>92806956
Back when men were men
--- 92830154
>>92818350
Man, you really struggled with 'knowledge' there, didn't you?
--- 92830163
>>92830042
The worst part is.
The real probably that is showing us all of this is that our science is actually getting better, so we're just seeing more issues than we used to.

It's the same problem John Snow faced.
The admin could have just said that, people may have forgiven them.
But they didn't.
They got greedy. Not with money, with power. With leverage.
So now the world is a racket.

It's the same problem that made stalin turn into pure evil.
--- 92830178
>>92830124
Yeah they aged like fuck because of all the toxins around them.
The 50s was hell.

Potentially the most toxic time on Earth to live in.
And the new matriarchy is about as bad.
Humans are just pathetic.
--- 92830218
>>92818350
I agree. 
We are savages now.

And we need to go further.
Blood for the blood god.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJXIRhggmhg [Embed]
--- 92830266
>>92829925
>he thinks its a mere money problem

No the problem is morals. 
You can't make good shit in hell. It's impossible.
You also can't make it in heaven.

You probably could in 01 though.
Imagine if you could debug yourself.
--- 92830451
>>92830077
this?
--- 92830543
>>92827022
People that accost others about their habits with a smug expression are not likely to be happy and are more likely to just be goading. Someone close with legitimate concern wouldn't act that way.
--- 92830561
>>92829338

 they need to pay more until there are no butts on the street
--- 92830741
>>92830561
they could pay a million dollars each and nothing would change because the government doesn't care
--- 92830821
>>92830451
I wonder how amazing Stevia really is.
And how great fluoridated desalination water really is.

I know for a fact neither are good.
And I know for a fact the alternatives are probably worse.

I hate this reality.
It's just designed to kill me at all costs.
--- 92831027
>>92819995
>I need a politician to tell me not to eat chocolate and sweets as a complete meal 7 days a week or else i will die
tell me you are fat without telling me youre fat