|
----- |
|
--- 2591466 |
|
I'm hoping there are one or two materials science austists here that can help me out. What sort of plastic has properties most closely aligned to the following: |
|
-very tough, specifically shock and abrasion resistance |
|
-good (at least decent) dimensional stability |
|
-fairly rigid/stiff, max rigidity while maintaining high impact resistance is preferred |
|
|
|
I'm considering UHMWPE, it's probably the toughest plastic out there, but it doesn't have great dimensional stability and is less rigid than i would prefer, although it's not too bad. |
|
Lexan is great right up until it shatters under higher energy impacts.. |
|
Nylon family stuff seems like a solid contender, it's stiffer than UHMWPE, but I wonder how shock/abrasion resistant it is. |
|
I've also been looking into delrin, various glass fiber impregnated stuff, givory, zytel and even micarta. |
|
The application will be the shell for a 3lb shell spinner combat "robot". |
|
Metal shells are far more common with this sort of design, but I was inspired to try something different by picrel, which uses UHMWPE I believe, but I can find almost no information on how well it preforms and holds up to abuse. |
|
Wall thickness would be around 6-8mm, and unlike the picture, the bottom edge will have a steel ring mounted to reduce flexing on impact. |
|
In theory, full height impactors/teeth should help protect the polymer while spinning. |
|
I'm not sure how well various plastics hold fastoners without stripping out. |
|
This will not be 3d printed, instead would either be machined from a solid puck if rigid enough to not twist at the mounting point, or a short section of large dia poly tube with either carbon fiber or 7 series aluminum top if the plastic isn't rigid enough. |
|
Please help me bros, i am out of my depth with so many options. |
|
--- 2591468 |
|
If you're not going to say what you're trying to do with it you're going to get half-baked answers. I'm also 72% sure you're retarded. |
|
--- 2591469 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
>-fairly rigid/stiff, max rigidity while maintaining high impact resistance is preferred |
|
|
|
OP is designing dildos. |
|
--- 2591470 |
|
>>2591468 |
|
he said it's for some gay robot shit |
|
--- 2591471 |
|
>>2591470 |
|
My bad, I got lost in the wall of womanly whining and missed it. Fuck you OP. |
|
--- 2591483 |
|
>>2591468 |
|
>>2591470 |
|
>>2591471 |
|
I bet when you guys sit down, you go YEEERRUUYYAAHHHhhhhhh. You're right though it was written like a needy pussy. |
|
--- 2591508 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
peek or glass / carbon filled nylon |
|
|
|
hope youre loaded op |
|
|
|
also |
|
>fasteners |
|
Look into threaded inserts, be it heat-set or stuff like helicoils |
|
--- 2591620 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
IN THE RED SQUARE... |
|
--- 2591625 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
You're gonna want some of these |
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belleville_washer |
|
--- 2591663 |
|
>>2591508 |
|
Noted and will do, thank you brother anon. |
|
>>2591625 |
|
I had no idea. |
|
--- 2591683 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
DELRIN |
|
E |
|
L |
|
R |
|
I |
|
N |
|
--- 2591690 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
Can’t say I understand the design but here’s some thoughts. |
|
Both Teflon and uhmpwe come to mind because they’re used in applications where they see a lot of impact abuse (trucks, plane cargo bays, warehouse logistics). |
|
|
|
> Wall thickness would be around 6-8mm |
|
That’s pretty thin if there’s no structural support on the inside. Wondering why you want it to be so rigid instead of a hard rubber though |
|
|
|
> I'm not sure how well various plastics hold fastoners without stripping out. |
|
Usually not amazing but there are many types of threaded inserts available depending on application. Some are press/form fit, others glued or thermally bonded depending on application |
|
--- 2591724 |
|
https://www.riobotz.com/riobotz-combot-tutorial |
|
Lots of information put together by some battlebots champions. |
|
Also friendly reminder that a torque wrench is to make sure fasteners aren't on too tight. |
|
People tend to tighten things up too much, one big hit and the bolts snap. |
|
--- 2593283 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
|
|
>-very tough, specifically shock and abrasion resistance |
|
>-good (at least decent) dimensional stability |
|
>-fairly rigid/stiff, max rigidity while maintaining high impact resistance is preferred |
|
|
|
In general, impact resistance is a direct tradeoff with rigidity. People love steel because it's an exception. Amongst plastics, CF-filled nylon is kind-of an exception, though nylon has its own weird drawbacks. For 'cheap/easy', racemic PLA is surprisingly good, and nearly as stiff by itself as CF nylon. |
|
|
|
>I'm considering UHMWPE, |
|
|
|
I can think of few things less dimensionally stable or stiff than UHMWPE. OTOH, if that's almost good enough for you, then your requirements aren't as strict as you think. |
|
|
|
>Lexan is great right up until it shatters under higher energy impacts. |
|
|
|
Yes, and it crazes/accumulates stress damage. |
|
|
|
>Nylon family stuff seems like a solid contender |
|
|
|
*very* shock/abrasion resistant. God-tier. OTOH, static stress will crack it over long periods, and it absorbs moisture (and swells) like a sponge. So.... not as dimensionally stable as many things, but it's probably not an issue for your use. |
|
|
|
>I've also been looking into delrin, various glass fiber impregnated stuff, givory, zytel and even micarta. |
|
|
|
Pricey. |
|
|
|
>The application will be the shell for a 3lb shell spinner combat "robot". |
|
|
|
In this application, *nothing* will perform better than steel. Even just mild steel. |
|
|
|
>In theory, full height impactors/teeth should help protect the polymer while spinning. |
|
>I'm not sure how well various plastics hold fastoners without stripping out. |
|
|
|
They hold fasteners well. They may not stand up to repeated insertion/removal, and very tight / stressed connections will cause most (not all) polymers to creep and loosen over time to a degree. But--- I wouldn't worry about the creep on your time scale. |
|
|
|
>carbon fiber or 7 series aluminum top if the plastic isn't rigid enough. |
|
|
|
CF is stiff. Most Al alloys you'd use really aren't. |
|
--- 2593284 |
|
>>2593283 |
|
Forgot to mention-- |
|
High stiffness urethane/polyurethane may be interesting. Very wear/shock resistant. *and* you can cast it easily for cheap. |
|
--- 2593505 |
|
I would say POM. |
|
|
|
There's a reason machine workshops love working with it. |
|
--- 2593739 |
|
Just melt down a bunch of milk jugs and cast it out of that. |
|
--- 2593752 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
The shell acts as a flywheel so metal is better and you have no reason to want plastic stop being retarded. More weight towards the rim is better than a thicc center. |
|
|
|
A healthy spindle (not a motor shaft) will avoid damage when smashing shit. Consider how front wheel drive spindles are built and copy that. |
|
|
|
Just machine the spinner on a large manual lathe or even turn down a car flywheel to suit. Art doesn't matter. Winning matters. |
|
--- 2594439 |
|
why don't we have a combat robotics general? |
|
--- 2594443 |
|
>>2593505 |
|
Based POM, King of plastics |
|
--- 2594447 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
>I'm not sure how well various plastics hold fastoners without stripping out. |
|
Use Chicago screws. |
|
--- 2594487 |
|
>>2591683 |
|
>burns, releasing poisonous formaldehyde gas |
|
learned this the hard way. dont use fucking delrin |
|
t. lung cancer |
|
--- 2595992 |
|
>>2593752 |
|
I bet a dead axel would do him better |
|
--- 2596015 |
|
>>2594487 |
|
>dont use fucking delrin |
|
More like don't burn delrin. The little bit of formaldehyde smell you get while machining it is just part of its charm. |
|
--- 2596805 |
|
>>2596015 |
|
Machines sweetly tho and ventilation is an option. |
|
--- 2596985 |
|
>>2591690 |
|
>That’s pretty thin if there’s no structural support on the inside. Wondering why you want it to be so rigid instead of a hard rubber though |
|
The bottom edge will be reenforced by a waterjet steel ring. I'm also throwing around the idea of using a short section of large diameter poly tube for the sidewall so I could use a stiffer material like 6061 or cf for the top |
|
If it's too soft/flexible, there will be twisting and out of plane forces at the mounting point upon impact. |
|
Thank you, I will read into Teflon. |
|
>>2591724 |
|
I have the robots tutorial, its a fantastic resource. |
|
Thanks for the reminder anon. |
|
>>2593283 |
|
Yes, for sure, that's the difficulty of finding one that's just right. |
|
I heard about Nylons affinity for water, will it slowly absorb humidity from the air? |
|
I appreciate the info. |
|
>>2593505 |
|
Will look into it, thanks. |
|
>>2593752 |
|
Heat treated steel shells are generally fine, grade 5 ti is probably the best metal, but 6061t6 Al can work as well. |
|
I want to try something different, and believe this could work passably well. Its also nice to keep machining and material cost down. |
|
I admire your klingon brutalist mindset, QA PLAH! |
|
>>2594447 |
|
Ive heard this before, I know they also make screws specificly for plastics. Will look into it, thanks. |
|
>>2594487 |
|
Thanks for the heads up, praying for you man. |
|
--- 2597269 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
Delrin. |
|
--- 2597272 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
uhmw is brittle. a softer plastic would be a better option it will be able to absorb much harder blows. built up ABS with kevlar mesh would be extremely strong |
|
--- 2597283 |
|
>>2596985 |
|
>Its also nice to keep machining and material cost down. |
|
|
|
That's a key reason for steel along with simplicity. Suitable "drops"/cut offs can be found at machine shops left over from jobs (the customer already paid for it) and are often for sale. Friday is a good time to visit. |
|
|
|
Car and truck flywheels are dirt cheap from salvage yards and are already drilled and bored for a central hub or shaft of your choice. You can turn them down and if you want to make a cup you can use sections of heavy wall pipe or cut up more flywheels. No need to buy the heavy parts new. |
|
|
|
Battlebots are supposed to be brutal. You just want to add production complexity for its own sake not actual performance which is fine but never lie to yourself. |
|
--- 2597326 |
|
>>2597272 |
|
>uhmw is brittle |
|
I made skateboard rails out of it. It is one of the few things tough enough to survive. What was your use case that destroyed it? |
|
--- 2597330 |
|
OP be sure to post here when you're on TV. |
|
|
|
Poor Chris Rose, by the way ... he used to co-host his own show on MLB Network, now he's giving the "play by play" on Beyblades battles. |
|
--- 2597548 |
|
>>2591471 |
|
There's no womanly whinibg in there. |
|
He simply lays out his considerations while you try to cover up your inability to read. |
|
--- 2598576 |
|
not a materials expert, but isn't "shock resistant" and "rigid" at odds with one-another? usually the more hard something is, the more brittle it is, you get better impact resistance if you use something that has a bit of flex |
|
i design mining equipment, and for material impact surfaces we use sheets of HDPE, now that's not to say that's the best for your case, weight isn't a concern for me, but cost is, so i don't use fancy materials, but i don't use a stiffer material because i want it to wear away slowly, and not just crack and disintegrate |
|
--- 2598594 |
|
>>2591483 |
|
kek |
|
--- 2598810 |
|
>>2598576 |
|
Well partially, but absolute strength also plays a part. A sheet of carbon fibre reinforced plastic is both more shock resistant and stiffer than a sheet of glass, but only because CFRP is so much stronger. |
|
--- 2599667 |
|
>>2597272 |
|
--- 2599719 |
|
>>2591620 |
|
fucking lol |
|
--- 2600132 |
|
>>2591466 (OP) |
|
Polycarbonate I'm using is meant for an 8mm thick panel. Incredibly tough and scratch resistant once coated. Jump on the thinner PC parts like a trampoline. Met up with a sales rep for Triton material, think Nalgene uses that now, seems pretty great and no Bisephenol A? |
|
--- 2600135 |
|
>>2598576 |
|
Milk jug PCR. The melt on that shit is like .3 compared to normal 5 or 8 melt consumer hdpe. Cheap as dirt too. |
|
--- 2600158 |
|
>>2600132 |
|
Is that the same as lexan? |
|
|