| ----- | |
| --- 15348347 | |
| Will there be 1,000,000 people living on the moon by 2050? | |
| --- 15348446 | |
| That's in 27 years. No way | |
| --- 15348939 | |
| >>15348347 (OP) | |
| maybe a thousand by 2050, but only if things continue to progress at a rapid clip, any setbacks and change that to "maybe a hundred by 2050". A million on the moon might come sometime next century. Early in the century? Late? Depends on the rate of progress and no setbacks. | |
| --- 15350222 | |
| >>15348347 (OP) | |
| No. If we're lucky well have a few dozen people being rotated in and out on antarctic style research bases. | |
| --- 15350334 | |
| >>15348446 | |
| 27 years ago Google, smart phones, and AI didn't exist. A lot can happen in that length of time. | |
| --- 15351335 | |
| >>15348347 (OP) | |
| no we will not be building cities on the moon within our lifetimes. for the same reason we aren't building cities in Antarctica today. | |
| >>15350222 | |
| this | |
| if we're extremely lucky there will be low 3 digit numbers of people by 2050. but it's also entirely possible that will be ~6 or just 0 | |
| --- 15351385 | |
| >>15348347 (OP) | |
| If we don't die before 2050, then yeah, why not. | |
| --- 15352022 | |
| >>15350334 | |
| >extrapolating | |
| --- 15352234 | |
| Will there be 1,000,000 people living on Antarctica by 2050? And why would people rather be on the moon? | |
| --- 15352245 | |
| >>15350334 | |
| turing test software existed 27 years ago, so did cell phones & search engines. | |
| --- 15352323 | |
| >>15352245 | |
| Not to mention there was an economic reasons for these things to exist. There isn't any good motive for extra-terrestrial bases sans research. Which is why the only thing well see this century are research bases. | |
| --- 15352334 | |
| there won't even be one person living on the moon by then | |
| --- 15352374 | |
| >>15348347 (OP) | |
| not unless we can guarantee social justice there. if not, then why even bother? | |
| https://www.bitchute.com/video/aXekJRez6DoT/ | |
| --- 15352381 | |
| There wont even be people on temhe moon by 2100, and as the USA becomes more "diverse", watch as NASA's technological prowess collapses | |
| --- 15352890 | |
| >>15352234 | |
| Seeing Antarctica without the ice cap makes me want to do some world building. Or rather make a thread on /sci/ about doing a geophysical simulation of a planet, like how /an/ has a speculative evolution general. | |
| --- 15353223 | |
| >>15352890 | |
| nobody wants to see your soience fiction faggotry, use the /lit/ thread for your childish imagination games | |
| --- 15355265 | |
| >>15348347 (OP) | |
| No | |
| Hopefully an american base and a chinese base, that's the best you'll have. Although maybe India may somehow manage to get there. | |
| --- 15355269 | |
| >>15350334 | |
| "AI" existed at least in the 1950s. Retard. | |
| --- 15356651 | |
| >>15348347 (OP) | |
| Why wouldn’t there be? | |
| --- 15356802 | |
| >>15352334 | |
| I'm already living here | |
| --- 15359758 | |
| >>15356651 | |
| There's no real reason to have a moon base beyond research and exploration. Its not like there's any economic reason to bring a million people there. | |
| --- 15361271 | |
| >>15350334 | |
| they hated this man because he was right | |
| --- 15361289 | |
| >>15355269 | |
| Modern AI didn't exist until Alexnet debuted on September 30, 2012 | |
| --- 15365795 | |
| >>15348347 (OP) | |
| No. | |
| Just one guy, his name is Joe. | |
| Joe is very fat, like really fat. | |
| And Joe is going to be fine because you can be fat in low gravity. | |