lesserfield
commited on
Commit
•
74df475
1
Parent(s):
b3bf6ef
Fri May 5 06:55:15 UTC 2023
Browse filesThis view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.
See raw diff
- his/14984868.txt +76 -0
- his/14987375.txt +250 -0
- his/14989810.txt +361 -0
- his/14990139.txt +24 -0
- his/14990938.txt +54 -0
- his/14991148.txt +10 -0
- his/14991856.txt +259 -0
- his/14991950.txt +130 -0
- his/14992177.txt +200 -0
- his/14992233.txt +21 -0
- his/14992993.txt +39 -2
- his/14993467.txt +262 -7
- his/14993525.txt +146 -0
- his/14993596.txt +48 -0
- his/14993618.txt +71 -0
- his/14994030.txt +69 -0
- his/14994492.txt +82 -0
- his/14994686.txt +131 -0
- his/14994942.txt +25 -0
- his/14995174.txt +379 -0
- his/14995295.txt +156 -0
- his/14995322.txt +128 -0
- his/14995336.txt +205 -0
- his/14995460.txt +147 -0
- his/14995480.txt +66 -0
- his/14995535.txt +581 -0
- his/14995706.txt +13 -0
- his/14995741.txt +27 -0
- his/14995948.txt +59 -0
- his/14995984.txt +36 -0
- his/14996029.txt +228 -0
- his/14996058.txt +1027 -0
- his/14996131.txt +78 -0
- his/14996289.txt +60 -0
- his/14996295.txt +222 -0
- his/14996300.txt +58 -0
- his/14996325.txt +46 -0
- his/14996404.txt +118 -0
- his/14996567.txt +37 -0
- his/14996570.txt +294 -0
- his/14996581.txt +250 -0
- his/14996619.txt +872 -0
- his/14996653.txt +32 -0
- his/14996774.txt +832 -0
- his/14996873.txt +34 -0
- his/14996909.txt +31 -0
- his/14996937.txt +41 -0
- his/14996980.txt +119 -0
- his/14997029.txt +50 -0
- his/14997147.txt +27 -0
his/14984868.txt
CHANGED
@@ -402,3 +402,79 @@ Byzantines having a civil war and losing provinces in the process isn't a 1 in 1
|
|
402 |
--- 14994189
|
403 |
>>14985520
|
404 |
interesting take
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402 |
--- 14994189
|
403 |
>>14985520
|
404 |
interesting take
|
405 |
+
--- 14994873
|
406 |
+
>>14984868 (OP)
|
407 |
+
What a shitty empire.
|
408 |
+
The Turks treated Romanos IV better than his own court.
|
409 |
+
Yes, he fucked up and lost the battle, but he didn’t deserve what the Doukos faggots did to him afterward.
|
410 |
+
Fuck the Byzantines.
|
411 |
+
--- 14994967
|
412 |
+
>>14986948
|
413 |
+
Except protestants were saying the same shit about catholics back in the day.
|
414 |
+
--- 14995001
|
415 |
+
>>14992489
|
416 |
+
>You now remembered the Turks first landed in Europe not as part of their conquest plan, but were rather litterally invited by the byzos to take part in their civil war number 9009
|
417 |
+
|
418 |
+
And byzcells still have the balls of accusing the latin crusaders to had destroyed the empire, kek
|
419 |
+
--- 14995278
|
420 |
+
>>14986832
|
421 |
+
>what is eastern front
|
422 |
+
>what are allied bombings
|
423 |
+
after Kursk they were economically exhausted and defeat was only a matter of time
|
424 |
+
--- 14995515
|
425 |
+
>>14992489
|
426 |
+
>>14995001
|
427 |
+
You people are retarded. The Turks didn't land in Europe because the Byzantines invited them, but because an earthquake hit Gallipoli which left the area devastated and deserted until the Ottomans decided to just colonise it because why not. The Ottomans once tried to cross the Bosphorus on their own before but the Byzantines beat them back in a battle.
|
428 |
+
--- 14996334
|
429 |
+
>>14992303
|
430 |
+
All of the capitals in the Republic, Principate, and Dominate periods were still in Italy, you fucking idiot, the majority of the population spoke Latin, and iconcalsm hadn't happened yet.
|
431 |
+
--- 14996392
|
432 |
+
The world today if Doukids were not jew subhumans
|
433 |
+
--- 14996450
|
434 |
+
>>14984868 (OP)
|
435 |
+
wow it's almost like life is often dick-tated by chance instead of some abstract numbers in your excel sheet map painter vidya
|
436 |
+
--- 14996732
|
437 |
+
>>14992293
|
438 |
+
At this point I your points are just baits, but still...
|
439 |
+
>Constantine renamed Byzantium to New Rome and intended it as the new capital
|
440 |
+
>Greek had always been spoken by the Roman elite and polymaths of the empire, it was always part of the Roman identity
|
441 |
+
>Roman political system changed every century, so thema system wasn't any more drastic than the Empire had faced earlier
|
442 |
+
>Consider themself Roman
|
443 |
+
>Followed the Roman laws
|
444 |
+
--- 14996861
|
445 |
+
>>14985026
|
446 |
+
Retarded tankie cope
|
447 |
+
--- 14997406
|
448 |
+
>>14984883
|
449 |
+
>>14984896
|
450 |
+
But what was the background of Manzikert? Do you know of it?
|
451 |
+
|
452 |
+
Emperor Constantine Doukas, shortly before his death, declared 2 of of his 3 sons co-emperors for whatever reason, and makes his wife Eudokia vow not to remarry
|
453 |
+
Eudokia wants to rule alone. She prints coins of herself, keeping her children off the government. Though it was probably for the best, as Michael seemed to be autistic and Konstantios was not of age
|
454 |
+
She also ignores the vow not to remarry and weds Romanos Diogenes, who is resentful of her power
|
455 |
+
Romanos has 2 children with her, all of which are crowned co-emperors. He also crowns her remaining son from her previous marriage co-emperor
|
456 |
+
And on the background, the caesar John Doukas is pissed that his family lost control of the throne and we also got some eunuch fuckery
|
457 |
+
|
458 |
+
So we have:
|
459 |
+
>Empress Eudokia
|
460 |
+
>Emperor Romanos
|
461 |
+
>Emperor Michael VII
|
462 |
+
>Emperor Andronikos
|
463 |
+
>Emperor Konstantios
|
464 |
+
>Emperor Nikephoros
|
465 |
+
>Emperor Leo
|
466 |
+
>Hopelessly corrupt court
|
467 |
+
|
468 |
+
It was over. "Manzikert" is the scapegoat. There was 0 way this wouldn't result in a massive civil war sooner or later
|
469 |
+
The Empire's corruption led into this, not the Turks. It was a miracle that the Komnenoi just barely managed to keep shit together and eventually rejuvenated the Empire
|
470 |
+
--- 14997425
|
471 |
+
>>14992232
|
472 |
+
it wasn't, george ostrogorsky's view on the pronoia system is severely outdated
|
473 |
+
--- 14999056
|
474 |
+
>>14996392
|
475 |
+
>iCloud. Purchase additional storage or remove some documents from iCloud.
|
476 |
+
--- 14999123
|
477 |
+
>>14997406
|
478 |
+
>There was 0 way this wouldn't result in a massive civil war sooner or later
|
479 |
+
If Rhomanos got his big military victory he would have enough court cred to reign in the factions, at least for the duration of his reign.
|
480 |
+
Remember Basil II was basically in the same spot.
|
his/14987375.txt
CHANGED
@@ -596,3 +596,253 @@ Despite it this is still one of the best threads I’ve seen on here in a while.
|
|
596 |
--- 14994854
|
597 |
>>14994849
|
598 |
I'm thinking of someday starting an effort post thread about hawaii onceIget around to reading about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596 |
--- 14994854
|
597 |
>>14994849
|
598 |
I'm thinking of someday starting an effort post thread about hawaii onceIget around to reading about it.
|
599 |
+
--- 14994860
|
600 |
+
>>14994854
|
601 |
+
I’d be interested. Been reading a book on the Romanoffs and was thinking of making a thread about Peter the Great to get some more opinions on him. I was surprised by how much I was actually disgusted by his behaviour since usually I don’t get personally invested/judgmental with historical figures.
|
602 |
+
--- 14995544
|
603 |
+
>>14994742
|
604 |
+
They did invade india
|
605 |
+
--- 14995986
|
606 |
+
>>14990229
|
607 |
+
>>14992279
|
608 |
+
>>14993993
|
609 |
+
>>14994110
|
610 |
+
Safavid order was founded by a Kurd and Ismail descends from him, Ismail was also a huge mutt this doesnt change the fact native Iranians were beaten,humiliated and tortured to curse umayyads every prayer by a Shia fundemantalist Turkoman stratocracy. Persians have to claim Safavids if not their whole Shiite the big other identity to Arabs collapses,
|
611 |
+
--- 14995987
|
612 |
+
>>14995986
|
613 |
+
Iran was already shia dumbass
|
614 |
+
--- 14995995
|
615 |
+
>>14995987
|
616 |
+
they were a minority, last time iran was ruled by shias were 500 years ago before qizilbash bvlls came in, another fun fact during safavid rule afshars, xhalaj and other turkic tribes and iran werent subjected to same forced conversions as native iranians.
|
617 |
+
--- 14996018
|
618 |
+
>>14995986
|
619 |
+
>both Arabs and Turks ended up adopting Persian culture
|
620 |
+
>intellectuals were mostly ethnic Persians
|
621 |
+
I don't see any humiliation
|
622 |
+
--- 14996039
|
623 |
+
>>14996018
|
624 |
+
>both Arabs and Turks ended up adopting Persian culture
|
625 |
+
(((Turko-Persian))) was the culture adopted by Turkic dynasties across middle east already
|
626 |
+
>intellectuals were mostly ethnic Persians
|
627 |
+
This was true in every single Turkic dynasty in Iran, thats just Islam. Humiliation comes from forced conversions, destruction of mosques, desecration of iranian sunni/sufi leaders graves, exile and execution of sunni iranian, removing previous iranian governors and rulers throughout iran to replace them with imported arab shia religious leaders and turkoman militants.
|
628 |
+
--- 14996060
|
629 |
+
Safavid rule and its consequences have been a disaster for Iran, Azerbaijanis dont have what it takes to rule. After Sassanid fall and Mongol destruction greatest falling of Iran is Shia conversion, if only Nader was succesful in reconciliation between him,Mughals and Ottomans. Iran wouldnt be a Shia kleptocracy shithole that people want to escape from.
|
630 |
+
--- 14996078
|
631 |
+
>>14994071
|
632 |
+
>>14994139
|
633 |
+
>>14994192
|
634 |
+
|
635 |
+
Hello friends, I managed to find the same data from another book, this page precisely;
|
636 |
+
|
637 |
+
https://books.google.hr/books?id=mPcnCnCNNF8C&pg=PA69&lpg=PA69&dq=700,000+kharvars+300,000+kharvars+42,000+kharvars&source=bl&ots=igYlNoHFey&sig=ACfU3U02k2El6oJfw12yVm69vxVQa8b3fQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwik6oSW8Nv-AhUZ7LsIHUomBg8Q6AF6BAgKEAM#v=onepage&q=700%2C000%20kharvars%20300%2C000%20kharvars%2042%2C000%20kharvars&f=false
|
638 |
+
|
639 |
+
|
640 |
+
welcome no problem
|
641 |
+
--- 14996107
|
642 |
+
>>14987375 (OP)
|
643 |
+
They are sand Indians
|
644 |
+
--- 14996129
|
645 |
+
>>14996039
|
646 |
+
I see more humiliation with the destruction of the zoroastrian temples and still the persian culture managed to survive
|
647 |
+
>destruction of mosques
|
648 |
+
Cyrus the Great's tomb is safe as are other Achaemenid ruins in Fars
|
649 |
+
>>14996060
|
650 |
+
For me the greatest tragedy of modern Iran is not remembering its pre-Islamic identity.
|
651 |
+
--- 14996161
|
652 |
+
>>14996129
|
653 |
+
Both Persia's pre-Islamic and post-Islamic identities are trash. The Bactrians and Sogdians always had a richer culture.
|
654 |
+
Cyrus the Moron also created the second biggest mistake in the entire history of mankind: freeing (((them))).
|
655 |
+
Sometimes I just want slaughter all of my own people.
|
656 |
+
>little to no R1a-Z93
|
657 |
+
>negligible steppe admixture
|
658 |
+
>accursed Neolithic Levantine farmer admixture
|
659 |
+
>ugly phenotypes and excessively hairy
|
660 |
+
>taroof & shallowness
|
661 |
+
>lack of ethnocentrism
|
662 |
+
>terrible familial dynamics
|
663 |
+
>ecologically ruined landscape
|
664 |
+
I must have been done something in a bad past life to be born during both this wretched time period (Kali Yuga) and spiritually defeated cucked race of secret Jew lovers.
|
665 |
+
--- 14996201
|
666 |
+
>>14996161
|
667 |
+
>excessively hairy
|
668 |
+
his mistake was mixing with the subhuman dravidians
|
669 |
+
>ugly phenotypes
|
670 |
+
some Persians have light eyes and Indo-European features
|
671 |
+
--- 14996242
|
672 |
+
>>14995995
|
673 |
+
>they were a minority
|
674 |
+
According to whatever you pulled out of your ass. The sheer quantity of shia sects, shia dynasties, and shia cities paints a different picture. Safavids literally abandoned their own brand of shi'ism for the one present in Iran.
|
675 |
+
--- 14996248
|
676 |
+
>>14996060
|
677 |
+
Seethe and cope. Shi'ism has the best thing Iran has produced
|
678 |
+
--- 14996252
|
679 |
+
>multiple shia sects and movements throughout iranian history
|
680 |
+
>northern Iranian being shi'ite centuries before the safavid
|
681 |
+
>existence of the buyids
|
682 |
+
>After the fall of the buyids the ismailis would start an anti turk, anti sunni insurgency lasting for centuries
|
683 |
+
>Tons of cities were known to be majority shi'ite with sunni travelers like ibn battuta complaining about the rafida they came across
|
684 |
+
>after the ilkhanate fell a popular rebellion brought the shia sarbadars to power in Khorasan and they killed the ilkhanate governor
|
685 |
+
>Sunni rulers appealing to the shia population in iran when they faced crisis such as Husayn Bayqara of the Timurids when his kingdom was being threatened by the Uzbeks
|
686 |
+
>Twelver Shi'ism was created under the auspices of the Buyids by Persian shia scholars supported
|
687 |
+
>All core writings of the sect were done by Persians
|
688 |
+
>All the Northern dynasties followed Twelver Shi'ism.
|
689 |
+
>Ismail and the Safavids were heterodox shia
|
690 |
+
>After his father and brother were killed Ismail grew up among the northern dynasties who were twelvers
|
691 |
+
>When Ismail rises to power he makes the decision to abandon safavid shi'ism for twelver shi'ism a move completely out of left field
|
692 |
+
Sunnis need to do better. Repeating Iran was Sunni doesnt make it true.
|
693 |
+
--- 14996258
|
694 |
+
>>14996060
|
695 |
+
>Safavid rule and its consequences have been a disaster for Iran,
|
696 |
+
Literally the only reason Iran is a thing dumbass
|
697 |
+
--- 14996307
|
698 |
+
>>14996252
|
699 |
+
none of these changes the fact iran was majority sunni up until safavids.
|
700 |
+
--- 14996322
|
701 |
+
>>14996242
|
702 |
+
you keep coping for some reason, i specifically mentioned existence of buyids because that was the only time they might have been more shias than sunnis (zoroastrians were still a plurality then) ever since seljuqs iran has been overwhelmingly sunni. POST 1 source that states iran was more shia you cant.
|
703 |
+
--- 14996371
|
704 |
+
>>14995544
|
705 |
+
Where.
|
706 |
+
--- 14996398
|
707 |
+
>>14996161
|
708 |
+
Jesus christ anon calm the self hatred down. Did the nordic posters really get to you that bad?
|
709 |
+
--- 14996425
|
710 |
+
>>14996322
|
711 |
+
I posted evidence. You didnt. You just repeat te same statements
|
712 |
+
>seljuks
|
713 |
+
Kek a foreign conquest dynasty. One that resulted in a shia insurgency popular among natives. One that legitimized itself by targeting shias. You literally have the last timurid emir of any note casting shia coins to appeal to his iranian population and yet somehow retards like you exist. He stopped because he met opposition in Herat his main power base. This is literally before the safavids. I already posted the evidence. You can keep crying about it.
|
714 |
+
--- 14996438
|
715 |
+
>>14996322
|
716 |
+
>specifically mentioned existence of buyids
|
717 |
+
Lmao a few months ago you idiots claimed Iran had no shias until the safavids. Its only after pushback that you and others admitted that your previous claims were bs. There's tons more evisence of shia after the buyids.
|
718 |
+
>ever since seljuqs iran has been overwhelmingly sunni
|
719 |
+
Keep telling yourself that
|
720 |
+
--- 14996457
|
721 |
+
>As far away as Kollam, the trading port in Kerala, Ibn Battuta, who had described the population of Aveh as rawāfid (Rihlat Ibn Battuta, 196), came across a wealthy and evidently influential merchant, a certain ʿAlāʾ al-Din Āvaji; the Moroccan traveler was struck by the overt display, on the part of the mer-chant and his companions, of their Shiʿi beliefs (huwa rāfidi wa-maʿahu ashāb lahu ʿalā madhhabihi wa-hum yuzhiruna dhālika) (Rihlat Ibn Battuta, 575). Ibn Battuta avers further that in Aveh, as well as in Mashhad-e Husayn, Hilla, Bahrayn, Qumm, Kashan, Saveh and Tus, the visitor who expressed a diver-gent position from that held by the local (Shiʿi) inhabitants risked his life, owing to the extremity of the people’s confessional engagement (he describes them as rāfida ghāliya) (Rihlat Ibn Battuta, 203)
|
722 |
+
Ismail the time traveller converting these good old sunni boys centuries before his birth.
|
723 |
+
--- 14996475
|
724 |
+
>>14996322
|
725 |
+
>ever since seljuqs iran has been overwhelmingly sunni
|
726 |
+
Where are your sources? All you do is make claims and statements while asking for sources. Are you going to quote from historians who lazily write of shi'ism before the safavids as Sunnis with shia tendencies, moderate shi'ism acceptable to sunnis (fucking lmao), and the other bizarre copes.
|
727 |
+
--- 14996993
|
728 |
+
suddenly quiet
|
729 |
+
--- 14997017
|
730 |
+
Why do Ossetians speak an Eastern Iranian language if they're on the West side of Iran?
|
731 |
+
--- 14997023
|
732 |
+
so your evidence for Iran being majority shia is Qom which was always a shia stronghold and Masshad a city named after 8th Imam during Sunni rule.
|
733 |
+
>Lmao a few months ago you idiots claimed Iran had no shias until the safavids.
|
734 |
+
strawman this is my first time posting about this
|
735 |
+
pic is Islam and Iran: A Historical Study of Mutual Services written by Morteza Motahhari Head of Council of the Islamic Revolution directly appointed by Khomeini fucking people appointed by khomeini agree iran was majority sunni before safavids but for some reason you guys are buttblasted at the notion you got forcibly converted, newflash there are more important changes that happened to "persian" people than sunni>shia switch kek.
|
736 |
+
--- 14997032
|
737 |
+
>>14997023
|
738 |
+
>>14996475
|
739 |
+
>>14996457
|
740 |
+
>>14996438
|
741 |
+
>>14996425
|
742 |
+
--- 14997200
|
743 |
+
>>14996060
|
744 |
+
but nader was azeri too...
|
745 |
+
|
746 |
+
every ruler of iran since ismail has been azeri. even the fucking ayatollahs
|
747 |
+
>>14990229
|
748 |
+
cope
|
749 |
+
--- 14997307
|
750 |
+
>>14996161
|
751 |
+
>little to no R1a-Z93
|
752 |
+
And that’s a good thing
|
753 |
+
--- 14997366
|
754 |
+
>>14996201
|
755 |
+
>eye contacts
|
756 |
+
>nose job
|
757 |
+
>hair dye
|
758 |
+
--- 14997488
|
759 |
+
>>14997023
|
760 |
+
>so your evidence for Iran being majority shia is Qom which was always a shia stronghold and Masshad a city named after 8th Imam during Sunni rule.
|
761 |
+
Just gonna ignore the other cities mentioned. Either way I presented a direct primary source of a sunni seething at shias in Iran. And still comes another slight admission from you about shi'ism in iran even if it's a disingenous admission.
|
762 |
+
>strawman
|
763 |
+
Not a strawman look the archives I know who you people are.
|
764 |
+
>Islam and Iran: A Historical Study of Mutual Services written by Morteza Motahhari Head of Council of the Islamic Revolution directly appointed by Khomeini fucking people appointed by khomeini agree iran was majority sunni before safavids but for some reason you guys are buttblasted at the notion you got forcibly converted, newflash there are more important changes that happened to "persian" people than sunni>shia switch kek.
|
765 |
+
So? Khomeini isnt an authority on the state of shi'ism. Just because he said something doesnt make it true. I literally posted tons of evidence and you think a limp wristed response like b-but khomeini is going to work. Again ignore all the evidence.
|
766 |
+
>caspian dynasties are all twelver shia centuries before the safavids
|
767 |
+
>shia movements like the sardabars and hurufis, etc all originate in Iran
|
768 |
+
>sardabars are a foreshadowing of the safavids with a group of sufis rebelling with popular support against an ilkhanate governor.
|
769 |
+
>seljuks conquer Iran and the nizari ismailis immediately start an insurgency
|
770 |
+
>buyids
|
771 |
+
>Alid Shrines continue to gain prominence
|
772 |
+
>sunni travel literature complaining about rafida (twelvers)
|
773 |
+
>a literal sunni amir Husayn Bayqara appeals to shia in iran until shut down by his advisors who are horrified by his actions
|
774 |
+
>Safavid Shi'ism is not twelver shi'ism
|
775 |
+
>Ismail is orphaned and is raised by twelver shi'ites in Iran
|
776 |
+
>Ismail comes to power and declares twelver shi'ism to be the religion of Iran.
|
777 |
+
--- 14997499
|
778 |
+
>>14987375 (OP)
|
779 |
+
Really makes you wonder
|
780 |
+
--- 14997503
|
781 |
+
>>14997023
|
782 |
+
How does this refute the shia dynasties, movements, cities, and people. I dont think there's anything as damning as a sunni minting coins with the twelver imams names on the.when facing an external crisis. The inference is an obvious one. Iranians were shia
|
783 |
+
--- 14997530
|
784 |
+
>>14997023
|
785 |
+
Twelver Shia hadith collectors, theologians, philosophers in its earliest era were all persian too. The sect was literally created by persians. Your screenshot is laughable. Doesnt matter if khomeini was responsible.
|
786 |
+
--- 14997537
|
787 |
+
>>14987375 (OP)
|
788 |
+
americans have no conception geography, its baffling
|
789 |
+
I don't know why in american its so much more prevalent than anywhere else
|
790 |
+
90% of american, without hyperbole, have a 6 year olds understanding of the climates and geography of the world
|
791 |
+
i need to make a separate thread about this later but for now ill leave this in this 200 reply bait question thread where anon who probably has never been outside of ohio
|
792 |
+
>called iran a barren desert
|
793 |
+
--- 14997570
|
794 |
+
>Muhammad ibn Ya'qub al-Kulayni al-Razi
|
795 |
+
>Muhammad ibn Babawayh
|
796 |
+
>Shaykh Muhammad Tusi
|
797 |
+
Foundational figures of twelver shi'ism all persians. The Persian Nawbakthi family were major figures in both imami and twelver shi'ism.
|
798 |
+
>the people of iran influenced by this evil practice
|
799 |
+
Is that why the Abbasids used the kaysanite shia in Iran to rebel agaimst the umayyads? Nice source. The Abbasids literally claimed to be shia imams who inherited the imamate from abu hashim a grandson of Ali.
|
800 |
+
--- 14997572
|
801 |
+
>>14997537
|
802 |
+
Geography isn't taught in American schools.
|
803 |
+
--- 14997578
|
804 |
+
>>14996201
|
805 |
+
The light features do not come from the Indo-Europeans in this case. Most likely it derives from Gutians or something. Light features are prevalent on my father's side, but we have low steppe admixture.
|
806 |
+
>>14996398
|
807 |
+
They turned out to be *largely right* though unlike the Afrocentrists.
|
808 |
+
I would have at least liked R1a-Z93.
|
809 |
+
--- 14997579
|
810 |
+
>>14997537
|
811 |
+
Yo cracka ass ain't even finna name every country dats in Africa
|
812 |
+
--- 14997623
|
813 |
+
>>14997579
|
814 |
+
I cannot name every country but I can name most.
|
815 |
+
--- 14997670
|
816 |
+
>>14997537
|
817 |
+
>americans have no conception geography
|
818 |
+
most have no concept of time either
|
819 |
+
--- 14998740
|
820 |
+
>>14992238
|
821 |
+
>>14996161
|
822 |
+
>>14997578
|
823 |
+
why do you even want to be be r1a? all the z93 iranians have agreed that theyre too fucking wild and savage and so keep murdering each other to allow the human non r1as to leave in peace
|
824 |
+
--- 14999009
|
825 |
+
>>14997200
|
826 |
+
>Firuz-Shah Zarrin-Kolah was a Kurdish and the seventh in the ancestral line of Shaykh Safi Ardabili, the eponym of the Safavid dynasty of Iran.
|
827 |
+
>In the pre-Safavid written work Safvat as-safa (oldest known extant manuscripts from 1485 and 1491), the origin of the Safavids is traced to Firuz Shah Zarin Kolah who is called a Kurd (from Sanjār), while in the post-Safavid manuscripts, this portion "Kurd from Sanjar"
|
828 |
+
--- 14999020
|
829 |
+
>>14999009
|
830 |
+
>Firuz-Shah Zarrin-Kolah was a Kurdish and the seventh in the ancestral line of Shaykh Safi Ardabili, the eponym of the Safavid dynasty of Iran.
|
831 |
+
>>In the pre-Safavid written work Safvat as-safa (oldest known extant manuscripts from 1485 and 1491), the origin of the Safavids is traced to Firuz Shah Zarin Kolah who is called a Kurd (from Sanjār), while in the post-Safavid manuscripts, this portion "Kurd from Sanjar"
|
832 |
+
There are multiple geneologies. The one with Sayyid ancestry was decades before Ismail was even born. The key takeway is that kurds are the biggest larpers in
|
833 |
+
MENA
|
834 |
+
--- 14999030
|
835 |
+
>>14999009
|
836 |
+
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23033219
|
837 |
+
A geneological chart that casts doubt on the kurd narrative. Kurds are jist loud voices.
|
838 |
+
--- 14999033
|
839 |
+
>>14997200
|
840 |
+
>but nader was azeri too...
|
841 |
+
embarassing
|
842 |
+
--- 14999035
|
843 |
+
>>14997366
|
844 |
+
>eye contacts
|
845 |
+
some persians have light eyes indoeuropean or kipchak genetics i guess
|
846 |
+
--- 14999050
|
847 |
+
>>14999030
|
848 |
+
So the safavid lineage is vague and not as certain as kurds claim.
|
his/14989810.txt
CHANGED
@@ -395,3 +395,364 @@ it's better with sound
|
|
395 |
--- 14994770
|
396 |
>>14992797
|
397 |
I love her facial expressions and how confident she is, and she actually knows what she is talking about. This is a keeper to wife up here boys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395 |
--- 14994770
|
396 |
>>14992797
|
397 |
I love her facial expressions and how confident she is, and she actually knows what she is talking about. This is a keeper to wife up here boys
|
398 |
+
--- 14994875
|
399 |
+
>>14989867
|
400 |
+
The Chuds were known for enslaving so many Aryans that they became Aryan in appearance.
|
401 |
+
>From Proto-Finnic *orja (“slave, servant”), from Proto-Finno-Permic *orja, probably borrowed from Proto-Indo-Iranian *áryas (“Aryan”). Cognates include Estonian ori, Erzya ype (uŕe) and Udmurt вap (var).
|
402 |
+
--- 14994897
|
403 |
+
>>14994875
|
404 |
+
It's from "work" because Germanics had forced them to labor as slaves. The one word from Iranian is "asur" meaning "lord" as Scythians had enslaved them too.
|
405 |
+
--- 14994935
|
406 |
+
>>14989810 (OP)
|
407 |
+
Whatever they are genetically, they embody everything about Scythians.
|
408 |
+
> ask for independence
|
409 |
+
> chinkoid mountain mutt nonIE persecutors escalate the situation
|
410 |
+
> get it anyway by blood and iron
|
411 |
+
They also expunged some Inguish apes, very very based.
|
412 |
+
--- 14994947
|
413 |
+
>>14994935
|
414 |
+
<Also their chief god (Nykhas Uastyrdzhi) is a typical IE solar warrior god whose name can only be directly uttered/wrote by males. Ossetian women are forbidden to do such. Very Indo-European.
|
415 |
+
--- 14994950
|
416 |
+
>>14994897
|
417 |
+
Ah yes famous proto germanic word of "worja". That etymology is grasping at straws at best unless you can explain how the W dissapears, a clear K sound is replaced with J and and the A that all germanic languages lost was somehow retained. Granted orja/arya is not comfirmed either but at least it makes some sense (plus it'd be funny). Unlike your faggy fever dreams.
|
418 |
+
--- 14994956
|
419 |
+
>>14994947
|
420 |
+
No dude, its a mix of paleo-balkan and bmac deities, stop making everything gay cringe with your indo european shit
|
421 |
+
--- 14994973
|
422 |
+
>>14994108
|
423 |
+
Both their genes and language are uralic you retarded larper, stop trying to pretend like youre being the rational one here
|
424 |
+
>>14994132
|
425 |
+
>>14994161
|
426 |
+
>swedish
|
427 |
+
Not scythian you nigger
|
428 |
+
>>14994935
|
429 |
+
>They also expunged some Inguish apes, very very based.
|
430 |
+
Youre a fucking faggot with a gaping asshole
|
431 |
+
--- 14994974
|
432 |
+
>>14994950
|
433 |
+
Nobody cares about their (you're brown) swamp fantasies, subhuman. It's from "work". It's because they (you're brown) were taken as slaves by Germanics and Scythians first and then by Slavs.
|
434 |
+
--- 14994976
|
435 |
+
>>14994956
|
436 |
+
>paleo balkan and bactria margiana deities.
|
437 |
+
How would those two even meet? Aldo, lanhuage families.
|
438 |
+
--- 14994978
|
439 |
+
>>14994974
|
440 |
+
Scythians were absolute gypsies themselves
|
441 |
+
--- 14994984
|
442 |
+
>>14994973
|
443 |
+
>>swedish
|
444 |
+
>Not scythian you nigger
|
445 |
+
Scythians were shifted towards northeastern Europeans (duh), so the most Northern shifted caucasians are the most scythian shifted.
|
446 |
+
2+2=4 dumb sarmat. You are georgian
|
447 |
+
--- 14994986
|
448 |
+
>>14994974
|
449 |
+
Bad grammar and also slav(e) headcannon along with an imagined kinship with germanics (they think you are an uncivilized HIV+ troglodyte and don't consider you subhuman only because its a faux pass in their culture.) You are not german you never willbe. The achievements of the germanic will never be alloted to you.
|
450 |
+
Btw stop yapping about linguistics and stick to archeogenetics.
|
451 |
+
--- 14994989
|
452 |
+
>>14994986
|
453 |
+
Brown.
|
454 |
+
--- 14994990
|
455 |
+
>>14994984
|
456 |
+
No they absolutely weren't
|
457 |
+
--- 14994994
|
458 |
+
>>14994990
|
459 |
+
>post 3 different scythians shifted towards northEastern Europeans
|
460 |
+
Are you retarded?
|
461 |
+
They were likely similar to Volga tatars/Finns/Tajiks
|
462 |
+
Dagestanis are the closest and ossetians are the furthest
|
463 |
+
--- 14994997
|
464 |
+
>>14994989
|
465 |
+
Castrated.
|
466 |
+
--- 14995003
|
467 |
+
>>14994994
|
468 |
+
>scythians from central europe are le close to europeans
|
469 |
+
Yes no shit because they mixed with everyone, eastern scythians are closest to turks and mongols, medshit scythians are closest to albanian etc
|
470 |
+
--- 14995008
|
471 |
+
>>14995003
|
472 |
+
What the hell is a mediterranean
|
473 |
+
scythian
|
474 |
+
You mean like crimeans/bosphorans?
|
475 |
+
--- 14995011
|
476 |
+
>>14995003
|
477 |
+
Scythians were mostly descended from Indoiranics (in between modern northern europeans and Corded ware), Tarim basin west siberian hunter gatherers (70% ane 30% Mongol), proto-xiongu from mongolia/east siberia and potentially afanasievo tocharians that was itself the source of the WSHG admixture.
|
478 |
+
|
479 |
+
This unholy mixture of Yamnayas, pseudo-Amerindian ANE-Mongol mutts and Aryans produced scythians, which jn turn are close to modern uralics like Finns, udmurts, Mokshas, mordvins, samis or volga tatars, Tajiks, etc. Which are northern shifted. A thing ossetians definitely arent. You are just georgians
|
480 |
+
--- 14995014
|
481 |
+
>>14994947
|
482 |
+
>Warrior god
|
483 |
+
>Slayed some serpent-like monster
|
484 |
+
>God of light and pacts, exactly like Mythra
|
485 |
+
>Even the name is likely a corruption of Mythra (Nykhas)
|
486 |
+
>His followers were men-only brotherhood of warriors, again very IE
|
487 |
+
>Hates women
|
488 |
+
He just need a twin brother and he may be the most stereotypical IE chief god ever
|
489 |
+
--- 14995017
|
490 |
+
>>14995014
|
491 |
+
Meant for >>14994956
|
492 |
+
--- 14995023
|
493 |
+
>>14995014
|
494 |
+
Crazy to think the most "pure" IE cultural remnant might be some mountain goatherds.
|
495 |
+
But it makes a lot of sense it would survive in a rugged isolated mountain unga bunga region while everything else syncretized or went its own way. For example koryos as a tradition has been dead in europe for a while now. Or whatever the fuck india is doing. Iran is muslim now and so is tajikistan and they haf their fairshare of exchanges with other locals.
|
496 |
+
--- 14995030
|
497 |
+
>>14995023
|
498 |
+
The Caucasus is also the last majority stronhhold of the G2 haplogroup, once widespread from there to Ireland, as the vast majority of Neolitic european men found belonged to that haplogroup, while nowadays it's very rare but still widespread across the continent. Seems like the R1b/a gang and the J2a tag-teamed them into genocide from both east and south
|
499 |
+
--- 14995035
|
500 |
+
>>14995030
|
501 |
+
This is relevant how?
|
502 |
+
Im talking about culture and you bring up genetics about groups that aren't even IE
|
503 |
+
--- 14995039
|
504 |
+
>>14995035
|
505 |
+
I simply mentioned that the Caucaus is often the last stronghold of stuff that dies out elswhere, be genetics, languages, of cultures, thanks to their remote position
|
506 |
+
--- 14995067
|
507 |
+
>>14995039
|
508 |
+
Fair enough. My apologies.
|
509 |
+
--- 14995080
|
510 |
+
>>14992797
|
511 |
+
truly a work of art, the jew seething in the video and the jews seething in the replies here push it to a whole new level, exquisite
|
512 |
+
--- 14995093
|
513 |
+
>>14992797
|
514 |
+
>>14994770
|
515 |
+
aaaand joomers are getting lolocausted
|
516 |
+
great thread!
|
517 |
+
--- 14995581
|
518 |
+
>>14995014
|
519 |
+
>>Slayed some serpent-like monster
|
520 |
+
Not found in the narts, daredzant or tsartsiat
|
521 |
+
>>God of light
|
522 |
+
Wrong, that's horyuacilla
|
523 |
+
>and pacts
|
524 |
+
Nope, not mentioned anywhere, no such traditions exist
|
525 |
+
>>Even the name is likely a corruption of Mythra (Nykhas)
|
526 |
+
Total schizo tier made up bullshit etymology, no sound shifts from N to M, from TH to KH, or R to KH exist in the Ossetic language, no scholar has ever mentioned this anywhere
|
527 |
+
>>His followers were men-only brotherhood of warriors, again very IE
|
528 |
+
More made up bullshit
|
529 |
+
>>Hates women
|
530 |
+
Mitras doesnt hate women; all the characteristics that are associated with Nykhas more closely resemble Batraz, whom is a garbled version of the scythian god Targitaos
|
531 |
+
--- 14995590
|
532 |
+
>>14995023
|
533 |
+
youre not pure anything, 80% CHG, haplogroup G2a, all cultural traditions derived from eastern orthodoxy, youre inasmuch georgian as anyone could be
|
534 |
+
--- 14995598
|
535 |
+
>>14995008
|
536 |
+
From the balkan coast
|
537 |
+
>>14995011
|
538 |
+
Scythians are mutts wherever they went, like gypsies, genetically they dont constitute a single ethnic group, no "scythian cluster" exists cross-culturally, in the same way that a spanish gypsy would be close to spaniards and a greek gypsy close to greeks
|
539 |
+
--- 14995599
|
540 |
+
>>14995581
|
541 |
+
>More made up bullshit
|
542 |
+
i am not him but
|
543 |
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B3ryos?wprov=sfla1
|
544 |
+
--- 14995717
|
545 |
+
>>14995598
|
546 |
+
yea nomadic peoples arent exactly know for their genetic purity
|
547 |
+
--- 14995732
|
548 |
+
>>14995023
|
549 |
+
Anglos kicking their children out at 18 is a very reduced version of the Koryos
|
550 |
+
American Outlaw gangs in the 1800s were the peak of Koryos.
|
551 |
+
Only 50+% Aryans like Europeans could produce something like the Old West.
|
552 |
+
--- 14996215
|
553 |
+
>>14995599
|
554 |
+
>joining the military at 19 is the same as nomadic village-raiding military bands that believed they were wolves
|
555 |
+
--- 14996260
|
556 |
+
>>14992797
|
557 |
+
If she said she was a Sephardic jew, I would believe her.
|
558 |
+
--- 14996402
|
559 |
+
Why do a lot of them have east asian like look to them?
|
560 |
+
--- 14996406
|
561 |
+
>>14996402
|
562 |
+
They are like 10% east asian
|
563 |
+
--- 14996659
|
564 |
+
>>14995732
|
565 |
+
>Anglos kicking their children out at 18 is a very reduced version of the Koryos
|
566 |
+
Are you for real? They aren't equivalent at all. Very different dynamics.
|
567 |
+
>American Outlaw gangs in the 1800s were the peak of Koryos.
|
568 |
+
I get where you are coming from but if that counts as koryos (only commonalities is that they are a roving warband, basically) then any posse of bandits is a koryos.
|
569 |
+
>Only 50+% Aryans like Europeans could produce something like the Old West.
|
570 |
+
Retarded in so many levels I won't even explain them.
|
571 |
+
--- 14996672
|
572 |
+
>>14989814
|
573 |
+
90% of Andronovo and Fedorovo which all Iranics stem from were largely light back to majority dark brown in hair, most Scythians were not BLONDE or even red headed
|
574 |
+
--- 14996687
|
575 |
+
>>14996672
|
576 |
+
No such thing as light black hair. It's either jet black or a very dark shade of brown.
|
577 |
+
T. Hair is the latter.
|
578 |
+
--- 14996696
|
579 |
+
>>14995598
|
580 |
+
Oh you mean the black sea scythians.
|
581 |
+
--- 14996703
|
582 |
+
>>14996687
|
583 |
+
And its a reddish brown at that.
|
584 |
+
--- 14996720
|
585 |
+
>>14996672
|
586 |
+
90% of MLBA scores light hair, half score depending on the specific subgroup they score up to 40-60% blondes. For you to get a reference the average scandinavian population scores 40% in the same tools, while proto-indoiranics were arround 34% overall.
|
587 |
+
Black hair is very sparse and negligible in proto-indoiranics
|
588 |
+
--- 14996735
|
589 |
+
>>14996659
|
590 |
+
no they are quite equivalent, both have the removal of the young at a young age as a right of passage, they have to live beyond the sphere of their upbringing, which is shared between Anglos and Koryos.
|
591 |
+
>any posse of bandits
|
592 |
+
not really considering outlaws in the Old West werent bandits as much as they free men living on their own.
|
593 |
+
They still lived by the social codes of the times, which the Koryos did, both exhibited socially acceptable socially praiseworthy behaviors, but they did so outside of normal society and while not directly in opposition to society like bandits are, both were indirectly somewhat antagonistic toward society because of how extreme their lifestyle was.
|
594 |
+
>I wont explain
|
595 |
+
You think aryan means indo Aryan as in Indic and Iranic
|
596 |
+
you are wrong, Aryan was used by anyone in India or Iran, they used the term Arya, a derivative of Heryos
|
597 |
+
Heryos has derivatives in Europe such as Celtic Aryos and Greek Arios.
|
598 |
+
Both ethnonyms to describe the CWC offshoots of the Bronze Age, which the original Iranics like Andronovo were.
|
599 |
+
Europeans in North Europe are over 50% CWC/Beaker
|
600 |
+
--- 14997894
|
601 |
+
>>14992797
|
602 |
+
they look turkic or georgian desu. both people look more similar than they care to admit.
|
603 |
+
--- 14997953
|
604 |
+
>>14989810 (OP)
|
605 |
+
Ossetians are pretty cool
|
606 |
+
--- 14998128
|
607 |
+
>>14997894
|
608 |
+
That's because gogis got buckbroken and raped by everyone around them.
|
609 |
+
--- 14998481
|
610 |
+
>>14997953
|
611 |
+
SEXOOOOOOOOOOO
|
612 |
+
--- 14998659
|
613 |
+
>>14989810 (OP)
|
614 |
+
Even if the mutts surrounding Ossetians score .01 more in their closeness to Scythian samples compared to ossetians, there's still the fact that Ossetians are the only people that speak the closest language to Scythians, and language is the defining characteristic of a culture. Cope about it how you want, but even in their conduct, Ossetians embody everything about Scythians:
|
615 |
+
> peacefully ask for independence
|
616 |
+
> chinkoid CHGigger gruzins begin their serpentine antics and escalate situation, since smaller borders makes rats feel cornered
|
617 |
+
> CHGigger chechens/georgians can't fight Ossetians, so they start shoot up a preschool at Beslan
|
618 |
+
> Ossetians answer with blood and iron.
|
619 |
+
> fellow chinkoid CHGigger inguish get caught slipping and get wiped off the map too and rendezvous with their friends in Hell.
|
620 |
+
There's no need to discuss this further.
|
621 |
+
--- 14998992
|
622 |
+
>>14989875
|
623 |
+
lewl it's sad but true
|
624 |
+
all of these tiny would be states that are indistinguishable from their neighbors
|
625 |
+
|
626 |
+
meanwhile to anyone from the outside they look exactly alike, they are all just churkas to me.
|
627 |
+
--- 14999023
|
628 |
+
>>14997953
|
629 |
+
>>14998992
|
630 |
+
https://youtu.be/87po4F8ZRJs [Embed]
|
631 |
+
yes
|
632 |
+
--- 14999027
|
633 |
+
>>14999023
|
634 |
+
>Ossetians are Aryans
|
635 |
+
>Hitler would say so
|
636 |
+
lmao
|
637 |
+
the absolute state of churka cope
|
638 |
+
--- 14999040
|
639 |
+
>>14999023
|
640 |
+
The girl on the back is really cute
|
641 |
+
--- 14999061
|
642 |
+
>>14999040
|
643 |
+
she's a literal nazi
|
644 |
+
here's a version with subtitles so you can see the disgusting things she is saying
|
645 |
+
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1683251102198339.webm
|
646 |
+
--- 14999068
|
647 |
+
>>14996260
|
648 |
+
it's the nose
|
649 |
+
--- 14999087
|
650 |
+
>>14999023
|
651 |
+
>>14999061
|
652 |
+
>>14992797
|
653 |
+
Very swarthy, nor Georgian.
|
654 |
+
|
655 |
+
|
656 |
+
>>14989810 (OP)
|
657 |
+
Looks Georgian.
|
658 |
+
--- 14999497
|
659 |
+
>>14996735
|
660 |
+
>no they are quite equivalent, both have the removal of the young at a young age as a right of passage, they have to live beyond the sphere of their upbringing, which is shared between Anglos and Koryos.
|
661 |
+
18 is the age most Westerners consider to be adulthood. Second, there is no ritual or fraternal element to this. Just a side effect of how nuclear family-oriented Anglo culture is.
|
662 |
+
>not really considering outlaws in the Old West werent bandits as much as they free men living on their own.
|
663 |
+
They were also bandits, Scalpers, cunts, and the like. In that way, they resemble the Koryos.
|
664 |
+
>both exhibited socially acceptable socially praiseworthy behaviors
|
665 |
+
As far as outlaws go, more in the folktales than in the real world. And regardless they were still considered outlaws and reviled.
|
666 |
+
>but they did so outside of normal society and while not directly in opposition to society like bandits are
|
667 |
+
Outlaws were quite directly antagonistic to all the societies they met. Their own too.
|
668 |
+
By the way, the outlaws rarely came back to society (alive, that is), unlike the men of the Koryos.
|
669 |
+
>Genetics talk
|
670 |
+
Let me explain why it's so retarded. You misinterpreted my post. It's going to be a lengthy one so wait up. It deserves its own wall of text.
|
671 |
+
--- 14999519
|
672 |
+
>>14999497
|
673 |
+
Not most westerners but Northern Euros.
|
674 |
+
>no ritual
|
675 |
+
The practice itself is the ritual, as I said before it is reduced.
|
676 |
+
Koryos weren’t bandits or scalpers.
|
677 |
+
They were warbands who dwelt outside of society but still adhered to the values of society.
|
678 |
+
Outlaws in the Old West weren’t reviled. It depended on who you asked and the outlaw in question. In brown lands outlaws are universally subhumans.
|
679 |
+
In White countries outlaws have ethical codes, a respect for honor, a reputation they maintain. Plenty of outlaws retired to settle down. In fact the Mormons were all outlaws and their founding population was comprised entirely of Anglo bandits who were evangelized and kidnapped women from passing pioneer wagon trains.
|
680 |
+
There are numerous towns in the West founded by outlaws staking a claim.
|
681 |
+
|
682 |
+
I await your post explaining why Heryos is an inappropriate word to describe people who referred to themselves as Heryos.
|
683 |
+
--- 14999522
|
684 |
+
>>14996402
|
685 |
+
what you perceive as "asian" is femininity, kavkaz women have hyper feminine faces like east slavic and north germanic women
|
686 |
+
|
687 |
+
>>14996406
|
688 |
+
5%
|
689 |
+
|
690 |
+
Target: Ossetian
|
691 |
+
Distance: 3.0752% / 0.03075176
|
692 |
+
81.4 Kura-Araxes_ARM_Kaps
|
693 |
+
10.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
694 |
+
3.6 Han
|
695 |
+
3.0 WHG
|
696 |
+
1.4 Nganassan
|
697 |
+
0.2 TUR_Tepecik_Ciftlik_N
|
698 |
+
--- 14999534
|
699 |
+
>>14997894
|
700 |
+
georgians and turkics look nothing alike, georgians and "turkic" turkish and azeri people do
|
701 |
+
--- 14999545
|
702 |
+
>>14999534
|
703 |
+
half of the women are HIGHLY fuckable, what the hell?
|
704 |
+
|
705 |
+
what country is this? chinks, gooks and nips look like shit on average
|
706 |
+
--- 14999642
|
707 |
+
>>14999497
|
708 |
+
>Only 50+% Aryans like Europeans could produce something like the Old West.
|
709 |
+
The first thing I will explain is the notion that 50+% aryan Europeans (Englishmen, actually) "produced" the wild west. The English did not create the Navajo, the Apache, the Comanche, the Pueblos, the Lakota, or the Mexicans, the Englishman did not produce the horse or even play a role in introducing it. The only thing he did to the West upon stumbling into it was take part in it and eventually, conquer it. The wild west existed before the Anglo ventured beyond his forts&villages hugging the east coast and had they not changed the world it would exist long after they could not be truly called "Anglo" anymore.
|
710 |
+
And I say Anglo because it was the Anglo, not the German, the Swede, or the Dutchman with their abortive and abandoned colonies. Partially, it was the Frenchman. With their mighty trading leagues of the missisipi.
|
711 |
+
But more than those it was the Spanish (who dare I remind you are very low on the meme percentages) who can be credited with "producing" the Wild West. After all, it was they who introduced the horse, the gun, and the Christian faith to the West. Not the Anglo.
|
712 |
+
With that out of the way.
|
713 |
+
Now I can't prove (nor do I want to) the Englishman didn't bring his own special character into the West. Even if that character did kill it in the end. But it was in no way produced or even contingent on the "Aryan" element, which eventually killed the wild west anyway.
|
714 |
+
I believe your view is a sad byproduct of historical illiteracy along with a regrettable myopia widespread among humanity. I am certain I too suffer from it.
|
715 |
+
Thank you for reading.
|
716 |
+
I wished to wax poetic today.
|
717 |
+
--- 14999684
|
718 |
+
>>14999545
|
719 |
+
Kazakhstan
|
720 |
+
--- 14999699
|
721 |
+
>>14999519
|
722 |
+
>Koryos weren’t bandits or scalpers.
|
723 |
+
But western outlaws were. Hence the difference.
|
724 |
+
>They were warbands who dwelt outside of society but still adhered to the values of society.
|
725 |
+
The outlaws of the wild west range from what you say here to following no law but that of themselves.
|
726 |
+
> In fact the Mormons were all outlaws and their founding population was comprised entirely of Anglo bandits who were evangelized and kidnapped women from passing pioneer wagon trains.
|
727 |
+
Mountain meadows
|
728 |
+
>I await your post explaining why Heryos is an inappropriate word to describe people who referred to themselves as Heryos.
|
729 |
+
It's more about pretending the Wild West was "produced" by the English ( or anyone with 50+% of the percentages) because it already existed when they got there.
|
730 |
+
--- 14999800
|
731 |
+
>>14999642
|
732 |
+
Not him but... the Spanish are just servants for the aryans, they are a slave caste always seeving aryans similar to eunuchs, their rulers are aryans, they follow aryan cosmogony and have aryan ydna, they speak an aryan language as well, but they are not properly. However they are instrumentalized like dogs by aryans over and over, snet into meat grinders for tribal court intrigues.
|
733 |
+
That said. What characterized the wild west wasnt the presence of christianity definitely, nor the horse (which anglos always had because it came of course from aryans, so consequentially it would always be introduced with them, or anyone east of america for this matters), the gun as well, the social characterization of the wild west was but the aporoach of the anglo to it, of the society it formed, a society of course the spaniard, whose nature is extremely submissive and servile, for their DNA is farming equipment for the most part except in those that represent the paternal assertions, couldn't form
|
734 |
+
The iberian is a servant race, he follows the pope and kneels to his law.
|
735 |
+
Thats his purpose and his endgame. Few connections it has with the wild west
|
736 |
+
One must say, the indigenous native element was relevant, the wild west was contingent to a social will, produced by the mere expression of natural individual manifestations.
|
737 |
+
and killed by the expansion of a organized state
|
738 |
+
--- 14999916
|
739 |
+
>>14999800
|
740 |
+
You don't really sound like you know what you are talking about. To be completely honest.
|
741 |
+
I don't feel like entertaining you today. Maybe tomorrow.
|
742 |
+
--- 14999995
|
743 |
+
>>14993983
|
744 |
+
Their Alan ancestors are genetically more related to Middle Easterners than to Europeans, idiot.
|
745 |
+
|
746 |
+
>Alans closer to modern East Slavs than to Persians.
|
747 |
+
Nope.
|
748 |
+
|
749 |
+
Distance to: RUS_Alan_MA
|
750 |
+
0.06139525 Talysh_Azerbaijan
|
751 |
+
0.07403554 Iranian_Persian_Shiraz
|
752 |
+
0.16243607 Russian_Smolensk
|
753 |
+
0.16285778 Russian_Kaluga
|
754 |
+
--- 15000002
|
755 |
+
>>14999995
|
756 |
+
>Their Alan ancestors are genetically more related to Middle Easterners than to Europeans, idiot.
|
757 |
+
Those are not alans, they are just medieval ossetian peasants from the "kingdom of alania"
|
758 |
+
Is like running a medieval italian peasant to prove something about lombards lol
|
his/14990139.txt
CHANGED
@@ -92,3 +92,27 @@ The alliance ceased to serve it's primary purpose after the Anglo-Russian confer
|
|
92 |
--- 14994847
|
93 |
>>14991764
|
94 |
Royal Navy at its peak will roll over even the entire planet's worth of combined ships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
--- 14994847
|
93 |
>>14991764
|
94 |
Royal Navy at its peak will roll over even the entire planet's worth of combined ships.
|
95 |
+
--- 14994991
|
96 |
+
>>14993694
|
97 |
+
>>14993470
|
98 |
+
Egypt is now a country that has open slave markets after the American supported "arab spring". How is that situation better than Britain retaining the Suez and the USA using their influence over Britain(we are essentially vassalized at this point) to control the region? Egypt is fucked up now, the whole region is fucked.
|
99 |
+
--- 14994995
|
100 |
+
>>14990139 (OP)
|
101 |
+
That wouldn't be very profitable.
|
102 |
+
The flow must flow.
|
103 |
+
Haven't you ever BANK'd before?
|
104 |
+
--- 14995634
|
105 |
+
>>14993470
|
106 |
+
Yet the Global South is rising in power dangerously fast, and there’s a real threat that the thirdies may one day reign supreme. We shouldn’t have given them an inch.
|
107 |
+
--- 14997013
|
108 |
+
>>14995634
|
109 |
+
If they hadn't voluntarily decolonized the entire third world would eventually become Vietnam tier insurgencies, far better to keep the nogs as "independent" economic puppets than battlegrounds/openly hostile.
|
110 |
+
--- 14998832
|
111 |
+
>>14994567
|
112 |
+
or Anglo-German alliance of 1898.
|
113 |
+
--- 14998843
|
114 |
+
>>14994991
|
115 |
+
Libya is the country with the open-air slave markets. Egypt's just a standard military autocracy.
|
116 |
+
--- 14998930
|
117 |
+
>>14994065
|
118 |
+
She will cheat on you and divorce rape you. It's better to discard them when you're done instead of marrying.
|
his/14990938.txt
CHANGED
@@ -336,3 +336,57 @@ Yes.
|
|
336 |
--- 14994478
|
337 |
>>14992964
|
338 |
I don't think it's that out of the question Solomon existed, we have evidence for some of the later kings like Ahab.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336 |
--- 14994478
|
337 |
>>14992964
|
338 |
I don't think it's that out of the question Solomon existed, we have evidence for some of the later kings like Ahab.
|
339 |
+
--- 14995002
|
340 |
+
>>14994442
|
341 |
+
schizo
|
342 |
+
--- 14995040
|
343 |
+
There's a photo that gets reposted on /pol/ and /x/ that supposedly is of the Ark. No idea if it's actually real or not, because of course it could be fake.
|
344 |
+
--- 14995043
|
345 |
+
>>14991419
|
346 |
+
In 1982. biblical archeologist and apostle Ron Wyatt discovered that the blood released by a Roman soldier's spear that pierced Jesus' side flowed through a fissure in the earth and became sprinkled upon the Mercy Seat of the hidden Ark of the Covenant secreted in a cave 40 feet below the cross hole where Jesus was crucified.
|
347 |
+
|
348 |
+
https://www.amazon.com/Blood-Jesus-Ark-Covenant/dp/1413708315
|
349 |
+
--- 14995053
|
350 |
+
Then the temple of God in heaven was opened, and the ark of His covenant appeared in His temple. And there were flashes of lightning, and rumblings, and peals of thunder, and an earthquake, and a great hailstorm.
|
351 |
+
And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed in the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head. 2She was pregnant
|
352 |
+
|
353 |
+
Its a woman (Mary)
|
354 |
+
--- 14995140
|
355 |
+
>>14995053
|
356 |
+
the first ark of the covenant (mary) gave birth to the second ark of the covenant (jesus)
|
357 |
+
--- 14995159
|
358 |
+
>>14995002
|
359 |
+
Cope
|
360 |
+
--- 14995691
|
361 |
+
>>14994435
|
362 |
+
Why even bother talking about it at this point
|
363 |
+
--- 14995813
|
364 |
+
>>14990938 (OP)
|
365 |
+
Probably melted down by Babilonians after the siege of Jerusalem.
|
366 |
+
--- 14996003
|
367 |
+
>>14991419
|
368 |
+
>Ron Wyatt found it.
|
369 |
+
>>14991696
|
370 |
+
>They are tho.
|
371 |
+
>>14993320
|
372 |
+
>Yikes.
|
373 |
+
--- 14997319
|
374 |
+
>>14995691
|
375 |
+
Well, since Mary is the wooden Ark of G-D (the 1st ark) and Jesus is the golden Ark of G-D (the 2nd ark) then Revelation 1, 2, 3 dictated by G-D to /his/ Secretary John referencing First Temple relics makes sense; And the Revelation 4 dictated by G-D being /his/ said relics' (One being Jesus the 2nd ark) location.
|
376 |
+
--- 14997325
|
377 |
+
>>14995691
|
378 |
+
There's nothing that would reduce my confidence the bible is the word of God so I don't understand the question.
|
379 |
+
--- 14997328
|
380 |
+
>>14990938 (OP)
|
381 |
+
here 51°10'45.5"N, 1°49'31.1"W right 51.179305, -1.825302 here
|
382 |
+
--- 14997332
|
383 |
+
>>14990938 (OP)
|
384 |
+
Tara Hill
|
385 |
+
--- 14997423
|
386 |
+
yea, the revelation has absolutely nothing to do about jesus.
|
387 |
+
it's all about the solomon temple relics, each named therein.
|
388 |
+
--- 14999051
|
389 |
+
>>14990938 (OP)
|
390 |
+
i dont know
|
391 |
+
--- 14999348
|
392 |
+
>Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was six hundred threescore and six talents of gold. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
|
his/14991148.txt
CHANGED
@@ -83,3 +83,13 @@ Sekai is her platonic love, Cuckfag.
|
|
83 |
something something germans!
|
84 |
|
85 |
*checks thread to see if someone else beat me to it*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
something something germans!
|
84 |
|
85 |
*checks thread to see if someone else beat me to it*
|
86 |
+
--- 14995791
|
87 |
+
Based.
|
88 |
+
--- 14997297
|
89 |
+
This thread
|
90 |
+
--- 14999049
|
91 |
+
>>14991148 (OP)
|
92 |
+
Anti-semite.
|
93 |
+
--- 14999067
|
94 |
+
>>14997297
|
95 |
+
at this point i'm curious how long it stays up.
|
his/14991856.txt
CHANGED
@@ -64,3 +64,262 @@ Where to learn more about Sparta, Spartan customs and interactions with non-spar
|
|
64 |
--- 14994600
|
65 |
>>14991856 (OP)
|
66 |
Sparta was actually criticized by the Athenians because they trained their men to be warriors, but not their women.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
--- 14994600
|
65 |
>>14991856 (OP)
|
66 |
Sparta was actually criticized by the Athenians because they trained their men to be warriors, but not their women.
|
67 |
+
--- 14995303
|
68 |
+
>>14994574
|
69 |
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Peloponnesian_War
|
70 |
+
Thucydides loved them and was allowed to live with Spartans for some time.
|
71 |
+
--- 14995313
|
72 |
+
>>14993213
|
73 |
+
Was there any culture in history where men sucked the clits of women unironically?
|
74 |
+
--- 14995368
|
75 |
+
>>14995313
|
76 |
+
Pompeii.
|
77 |
+
>Theophilus, don't perform oral sex on girls against the city wall like a dog.
|
78 |
+
--- 14995396
|
79 |
+
>>14991856 (OP)
|
80 |
+
Spartan women had the highest social standing of all women in the Ancient World, second only perhaps to the Minoans. They could own and inherit property, were literate and received an extensive education in laconic wit and oratory, practiced sports, did not have to dress modestly, could wander about freely, could divorce and remarry (in fact this was encouraged because there was a shortage of men citizens), they were honored if they died in childbirth, it was considered the most noble and honorable death in Sparta alongside dying in battle.
|
81 |
+
|
82 |
+
That doesn't make Spartan "feminists" though, it corresponds to their own social dynamics. Women's primary role was still to be home-makers, give birth to many children and manage the household. They could not take part in Spartan politics, although they were more outspoken than their Athenian counterparts and held a degree of power as landholders and wives to powerful men.
|
83 |
+
--- 14995401
|
84 |
+
How does sucking the clitum of a woman feel like bros
|
85 |
+
--- 14995415
|
86 |
+
>>14993258
|
87 |
+
--- 14995558
|
88 |
+
>>14995401
|
89 |
+
I did not enjoy it, I mean it was meh. Most women expect you to do it though.
|
90 |
+
--- 14995564
|
91 |
+
>>14995558
|
92 |
+
What did it taste like
|
93 |
+
--- 14995572
|
94 |
+
>>14991856 (OP)
|
95 |
+
>matriarchy
|
96 |
+
>instantly decolves into a tribal communal slave state of pedophile warlords
|
97 |
+
why is it always like this, anons
|
98 |
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trobriand_people?wprov=sfla1
|
99 |
+
--- 14995573
|
100 |
+
>>14995564
|
101 |
+
Lick one of these and you'll find out. It's exactly the same taste and smell.
|
102 |
+
--- 14995588
|
103 |
+
>>14993199
|
104 |
+
>You would work in the salt mines until you die, a year later.
|
105 |
+
Not if so many Laconian citizens leave and die in wars that it's up to you to repopulate
|
106 |
+
--- 14995597
|
107 |
+
>>14993187
|
108 |
+
>be spartan
|
109 |
+
>born into the slave caste
|
110 |
+
>some progressive guys from Perdia come
|
111 |
+
>they are bad because they are bad
|
112 |
+
>you are driven to frontline to die for your masters
|
113 |
+
>you get mauled by a scythed chariot
|
114 |
+
--- 14995600
|
115 |
+
>>14992059
|
116 |
+
/thread
|
117 |
+
--- 14995894
|
118 |
+
>>14991856 (OP)
|
119 |
+
Here’s a good rule of thumb, anyone who tries to apply modern standards to ancient societies is more than likely wrong and anyone who tries to claim any Greek city state was akshully progressive/feminist/woke is a bullshit propagandist.
|
120 |
+
|
121 |
+
Sparta was a highly patriarchal society, something they would have proudly called themselves had they had that term. Men and women were raised separately and given state roles to fulfill. Another thing to consider is Spartas views of class and status in terms of roles. Today, someone might look on a farmer as someone who is noble and respectable and even wealthy for owning their own land, but this wasn’t the case then. Spartans saw work and toiling in the ground as beneath them, work meant for peasants, so while they owned land, they would NEVER work it and have healots do it instead. It would be stupid to claim they were actually powerful back then by applying our modern day view of farmers onto ancient Sparta. It’s likewise stupid to do the same with women. Wives were given home management duties because this was considered busy work beneath a Spartan, not because it was some respectable high honor to do so.
|
122 |
+
|
123 |
+
“Spartan” was almost (but not really) a title almost like “knight” and only the warrior caste were Spartans and thus had a say in the republic. Any sort of worker or artisan or merchant who lived within their borders was not a “Spartan”
|
124 |
+
|
125 |
+
To them, being in the heavy infantry was THE pinnacle of respect and honor which carried with it citizenship and actual political power, work was considered beneath them. With this understanding, it’s easier to detect bullshit from historians using Sparta as a prop to make some current political point.
|
126 |
+
--- 14995909
|
127 |
+
>>14995597
|
128 |
+
>the Persians were progressive!
|
129 |
+
It was a empire ruled by a god king and held together by regional warlords
|
130 |
+
--- 14995912
|
131 |
+
There IS a strange tendency in ancient aristocracies, such as sparta and the late roman republic, to become more and more matriarchal as time goes on and consequently literally just die out due to the aristocracy not marrying and not having any children. If it wasn't a problem rome wouldn't have had to resort to taxing single patricians as a last resort.
|
132 |
+
--- 14995913
|
133 |
+
>>14995909
|
134 |
+
funny how this empire was more progressive compared to Sparta, tells so much about how unga bunga the Spartans were
|
135 |
+
--- 14995924
|
136 |
+
>>14995913
|
137 |
+
How were they “progressive”
|
138 |
+
|
139 |
+
Having more brown people isn’t progressive
|
140 |
+
--- 14995935
|
141 |
+
>>14995924
|
142 |
+
>How were they “progressive”
|
143 |
+
They werent pedophiles and they didnt enslaved everyone first of all. Secondly they had tolerance towards other cultures as they didnt assimilated them and they tolerated different cultus, they even aided Jews to build their temple
|
144 |
+
>Having more brown people isn’t progressive
|
145 |
+
if that was the case then I would call Eghypt progressive, in fact they were more slabe society than anything histoty ever saw
|
146 |
+
--- 14996068
|
147 |
+
society is matriarchal by definition: men wage slave in order to to be pussy slave at home.
|
148 |
+
--- 14996075
|
149 |
+
>>14995912
|
150 |
+
Happened even in the Han dynasty with harem/eunuch autism. When wealth and political power centralizes more and more into a single family the only way to acquire wealth is to marry into that family, which not only puts deflationary pressure on the aristocracy at large it gives women within that family a tremendous amount of informal de facto power because they can act as gatekeepers for the scarce and finite attention of the power players, who may very well rather be balls-deep inside one of his concubines and be a pussy-whipped coomer. Especially powerful is the mother of the heir to the throne because you can basically count on him to love mommy dearest and let her get away with enriching herself and her pet ministers at the public’s expense or take care of boring affairs of state so that he can go back to chasing his concubines around.
|
151 |
+
--- 14996198
|
152 |
+
>>14995894
|
153 |
+
“Sparta” was the name of the capitol of a country that was traditionally known as Lacedaemonia. The Spartans’ term for themselves was “homoii”, literally “the equals”, as they were the only full citizens of the country with voting rights. They weren’t really like knights who swore fealty to a lord, the Spartans were staunch constitutionalists who considered themselves a society governed by the rule of law to which even the two kings were subject too. A better parallel would have been to the antebellum south and anti-slave militias who provided soldiers for the army but whose principal responsibility was terrorizing the underclass into keeping their quotas up
|
154 |
+
--- 14996218
|
155 |
+
>>14995935
|
156 |
+
Persians did practice pederasty and “tolerance” for other cultures is what every single empire in history does, and that’s done out of a practically, not some openness or xenophillia as you are implying. Rome, Russia, Persia, ect all empires allow some openness in cultures to a degree because it is practical. Also, there were many instances of the different Satrapy’s rebelling and fighting for their independence throughout history, many siding with Alexander the Great.
|
157 |
+
|
158 |
+
You are guilty of trying to apply modern day thinking to historical events you don’t really understand in order to make broad political statement.
|
159 |
+
--- 14996267
|
160 |
+
>>14995909
|
161 |
+
>It was a empire ruled by a god king and held together by regional warlords
|
162 |
+
|
163 |
+
sadly still the most progressive state around in comparison with its predecessors (Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon) and contemporaries (Greek and Phoenician city-states).
|
164 |
+
--- 14996272
|
165 |
+
>>14996198
|
166 |
+
>The Spartans’ term for themselves was “homoii”
|
167 |
+
|
168 |
+
kek
|
169 |
+
--- 14996321
|
170 |
+
>>14995894
|
171 |
+
To Sparta, being a hoplite was the zenith of society. Only the heavy infantry were considered citizens and were able to vote and participate in the state. Anything other than military training was beneath them, so anything other than this wasn’t considered honorable. Any job done by the lower classes or women was just that, work beneath a Spartan and not an instance of equality in modern liberal understanding. Sparta was an apartheid, elitist, patriarchal military state.
|
172 |
+
--- 14996905
|
173 |
+
>>14995415
|
174 |
+
Guards, who let this nigger in, take him back now!
|
175 |
+
--- 14996940
|
176 |
+
>>14995396
|
177 |
+
This is what getting drown in wishful thinking looks like. Their education was in no way the same as those of males, they did not physically participate in tournaments as people like to imply (in the same way you could imply women led cities by showing example of rich hellenistic heiresses holding eponymous magistratures or participating in gymnastics because they managed gyms), and having a different notion of modesty does not mean subverting it.
|
178 |
+
--- 14996987
|
179 |
+
>>14996218
|
180 |
+
>all empires allow some openness in cultures to a degree because it is practical.
|
181 |
+
Cyrus the Great was arguably the first one to figure that out. Previously you had empire like the Assyrians and Babylonians simply exterminated and displaced nearby conquered cultures. Zoroastrian religion with its dualistic theology were the earliest and most primitive codifications of the concept of good and evil, and the Hebrews who were allowed to return to their homeland after Cyrus liberated them from Babylonian bondage certainly seemed to think so, and for the rest of classical and well into the renaissance Cyrus the Great was considered the quintessential example of what a “good” ruler looks like, and the Cyropaedia, written by a Greek, considered an indispensable classic.
|
182 |
+
--- 14997028
|
183 |
+
>>14996987
|
184 |
+
This seems so desperate. I mean come on, are you aware of how many "quintessential example of what a "good" ruler looks like" learned people have elected? That Greeks writing about various and foreign subjects isn't really something suprising, especially when the subject's successors conquered much of their homeland?
|
185 |
+
--- 14997202
|
186 |
+
>>14997028
|
187 |
+
Name an earlier example
|
188 |
+
--- 14997221
|
189 |
+
>>14997202
|
190 |
+
>i-i may not have won the race but I woke up really early (as far as those who came after me know at least)!!!
|
191 |
+
Reeeeeally desperate.
|
192 |
+
--- 14997224
|
193 |
+
>>14991856 (OP)
|
194 |
+
The funny part to me, is that people who celebrate Sparta's relative benevolence towards women ignore that the vast majority of women in sparta were slaves, who were treated worse than female slaves anywhere else in Greece.
|
195 |
+
--- 14997244
|
196 |
+
>>14997221
|
197 |
+
Stop being so self conscious and just answer the question. Can you name an earlier example that wasn’t a fable like Gilgamesh or the Iliad? That was my original point
|
198 |
+
--- 14997273
|
199 |
+
>>14997244
|
200 |
+
Your point itself is mythical. Relationship between people are highly contextual, and conquest is bound to be conflictual. The pathetic display of Cyrus' last years in Afghanistan were not an example of civility, and they didn't need to be except if you're looking to write a hagiography.
|
201 |
+
--- 14997367
|
202 |
+
>>14996940
|
203 |
+
>This is what getting drown in wishful thinking looks like.
|
204 |
+
Where?
|
205 |
+
|
206 |
+
>Their education was in no way the same as those of males
|
207 |
+
I never said it was, fucktard. Point out where I said that.
|
208 |
+
|
209 |
+
>they did not physically participate in tournaments
|
210 |
+
I said SPORTS, not tournaments. And yes the sight of a Spartan woman riding a chariot (which they did) is quite unique in the Ancient World.
|
211 |
+
|
212 |
+
>as people like to imply
|
213 |
+
What people? Who are you talking to?
|
214 |
+
|
215 |
+
>having a different notion of modesty does not mean subverting it.
|
216 |
+
Never used the term subverting anywhere. GTFO with your strawman bullshit.
|
217 |
+
|
218 |
+
Fact is, the Athenian writers remarked how athletic and tanned the Spartan women were, in comparison to their own.
|
219 |
+
|
220 |
+
People here are so desperate to be contrarian, you come off as a pedantic, annoying midwit instead.
|
221 |
+
--- 14997388
|
222 |
+
>>14994600
|
223 |
+
Sparta believed that physically strong women would give stronger children, so I don’t know about that.
|
224 |
+
--- 14997543
|
225 |
+
>>14997367
|
226 |
+
>I never said it was, fucktard. Point out where I said that.
|
227 |
+
Extensive is not synonymous with basic, fren.
|
228 |
+
>And yes the sight of a Spartan woman riding a chariot (which they did) is quite unique in the Ancient World
|
229 |
+
Meme. Never happened.
|
230 |
+
>What people? Who are you talking to?
|
231 |
+
People like you, duh.
|
232 |
+
>Never used the term subverting anywhere. GTFO with your strawman bullshit.
|
233 |
+
Buy yourself a brain. In other words: To stray from modesty you have to stray from the norm, but for that to happen you'd have to have the same norm everywhere. Spartan norms were not athenian norms, there was no immodesty to be had.
|
234 |
+
--- 14997984
|
235 |
+
>>14997543
|
236 |
+
>Extensive is not synonymous with basic, fren.
|
237 |
+
Where did I say they had the same education as boys? Again I'm asking you, since you like to make shit up.
|
238 |
+
|
239 |
+
>Meme. Never happened.
|
240 |
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euryleonis
|
241 |
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynisca
|
242 |
+
Midwit retard, leave the board.
|
243 |
+
|
244 |
+
>People like you, duh.
|
245 |
+
But they did participate in tournaments. The Olympics are a tournament. Link above.
|
246 |
+
|
247 |
+
>Buy yourself a brain. In other words: To stray from modesty you have to stray from the norm, but for that to happen you'd have to have the same norm everywhere. Spartan norms were not athenian norms, there was no immodesty to be had.
|
248 |
+
I'm obviously talking about modesty from a baseline Greek perspective, otherwise it's impossible to talk about it at all, since every polis had its own cultural norms over what was and wasn't modest.
|
249 |
+
--- 14998051
|
250 |
+
>>14997984
|
251 |
+
>Where did I say they had the same education as boys? Again I'm asking you, since you like to make shit up.
|
252 |
+
Again, I'm asking you to assimilate the definition of "extensive".
|
253 |
+
>Midwit retard, leave the board.
|
254 |
+
>Women could not participate in Ancient Olympic games personally and even being a viewer was under strict prohibition for them, with punishment by death.
|
255 |
+
>Several sources from Xenophon and Plutarch make mention of how, in her youth, Cynisca's brother Agesilaus encouraged her to breed horses and compete in the games, though his motivations for doing so have recently been debated. According to these ancient sources, Agesilaus supposedly viewed success in chariot racing as a victory without merit. As opposed to other events, where a man's bravery and virtue were the decisive factors, he believed that chariot racing only demonstrated wealth due to the lack of involvement on the part of the horses' owner.
|
256 |
+
Ridiculous clown, I don't need to order you, your shame will do my bidding.
|
257 |
+
>And yes the sight of a Spartan woman riding a chariot (which they did) is quite unique in the Ancient World.
|
258 |
+
Let's put that here in case you feel the (understandable) need to backtrack or argue semantics about the notion of participation. We really let anyone on this board. Next time we'll hear about Kallipateira and Archippè too!
|
259 |
+
>I'm obviously talking about modesty from a baseline Greek perspective, otherwise it's impossible to talk about it at all, since every polis had its own cultural norms over what was and wasn't modest.
|
260 |
+
Yes, spartans have to live according to what other greeks (correction: some other greeks) thought because reasons.
|
261 |
+
--- 14998305
|
262 |
+
>>14996987
|
263 |
+
I think this anon is right. Isnt cirus even recognized in the bible as a prophet for his benevolence to the jews?
|
264 |
+
--- 14998756
|
265 |
+
>>14998051
|
266 |
+
>According to these ancient sources, Agesilaus supposedly viewed success in chariot racing as a victory without merit. As opposed to other events, where a man's bravery and virtue were the decisive factors, he believed that chariot racing only demonstrated wealth due to the lack of involvement on the part of the horses' owner.
|
267 |
+
This is the best rebuttal you could find? I don't give a fuck about her brother's motivations... Spartan women practiced sports and even took part of some chariot races and you haven't been able to prove otherwise. I was right and you are wrong.
|
268 |
+
|
269 |
+
I will write a reply at lenght when I get home, this is just so the thread doesn't die.
|
270 |
+
--- 14998787
|
271 |
+
>>14998756
|
272 |
+
>Spartan women practiced sports and even took part of some chariot races and you haven't been able to prove otherwise. I was right and you are wrong.
|
273 |
+
not really, it was a big thing when Cyninsca won a chariot race because women just didnt really partake in such things.
|
274 |
+
|
275 |
+
Women dont really partake in Sports TODAY despite their being no limitations on them, while we have women's sports, they are not as famous, great in scale, or worthy of similar prestige.
|
276 |
+
|
277 |
+
Spartan women were more athletic on average, but this varied from king to king and their women were, relative to their males, not in higher positions compared to Athenian women.
|
278 |
+
Really Athenian women probably had more freedom relative to their males,
|
279 |
+
you have to understand the uniqueness of Spartan society and how "liberated" from material societal morays their males were compared to other Greeks, which holds true for the women as well, however it would be absurd to say Spartans had deference for women.
|
280 |
+
--- 14999255
|
281 |
+
>>14998051
|
282 |
+
1/3
|
283 |
+
>Again, I'm asking you to assimilate the definition of "extensive".
|
284 |
+
Everything I'm saying is relative to other places in the Ancient World. There's evidence Spartan women (that is, the upper class) were literate and there's evidence of a Spartan female poet and even female Pythagorean philosophers. And, like I said, they received *extensive education in oratory, poetry and Laconic wit* as part of the mousike curriculum for girls.
|
285 |
+
|
286 |
+
https://www.academia.edu/9900418/Growing_up_in_Sparta_the_education_of_girls
|
287 |
+
>The epigraphic evidence provided by votive offerings from the seventh century onward reveals that at least some Spartan girls acquired basic literacy. More advanced degrees of female literacy may be inferred from Aristophanes’ likely reference to a female Spartan poet, Kleitagora (Lys. 1237; cf. Henderson 1987, ad loc.) and Iamblichos’ list of female Spartan Pythagoreans (Vita Pyth. 267).
|
288 |
+
|
289 |
+
>Fortunately, we possess more information about Spartan girls’ education in mousikē (music, dancing, singing, and thus poetry), especially choral dances, which played a significant role in Spartan ritual activity, particularly in connection with the cults of Helen and Artemis (Calame 1977, esp., 251–357; on Spartan cult dances in general,see Parker 1989, 150–52; Pettersson 1992, 44–56; Constantinidou 1998; see also Calame, Chapter 7 in this work).
|
290 |
+
|
291 |
+
>Our earliest evidence comes from two fragments of Alkman’s Partheneia, which provide details about young girls’ dancing and singing in choruses that seem to have involved competition both within and between individual choruses (see Calame 1977, 1.15–29; 2, passim).
|
292 |
+
--- 14999259
|
293 |
+
>>14998051
|
294 |
+
>>14999255
|
295 |
+
2/3
|
296 |
+
>As Claude Calame has argued in his study of choruses of young women in ancient Greece, choral dances played an important role in the cycle of initiation rituals that marked the physiological, social, and institutional development of Spartan girls into wives and mothers. Spartan girls competed in choruses, each of which was bound together by age similarity and ties of companionship, trained by a professional poet, and led by a chorē gos selected from among the oldest girls. In these choruses girls received training in song, dances, and cultic acts that prepared them to participate in various public rituals, festivals, and contests. More importantly, this training instilled in Spartan girls the polis’ system of values through the medium of the poet’s verses and thus prepared them to adapt to those gender roles, behaviors, and responsibilities that sustained Sparta’s body politic (Calame 1977; cf. Ducat 2006, 224–6, 244–5).
|
297 |
+
|
298 |
+
>Yes, spartans have to live according to what other greeks (correction: some other greeks) thought because reasons.
|
299 |
+
Everything that exists is judged in relation to other things, otherwise we can't make measurements of things. Spartan women did not dress modestly compared to other Ancient Greek women just as today we can say Western women don't dress modestly in relation to Muslim women. In turn Turkish muslim women don't dress modestly in comparison to their Afghan counterparts. This is how comparisons work and your sperg out over sematics here is not warranted.
|
300 |
+
--- 14999336
|
301 |
+
>>14998787
|
302 |
+
3/4
|
303 |
+
>not really, it was a big thing when Cyninsca won a chariot race because women just didnt really partake in such things.
|
304 |
+
Cyninsca winning an Olympic chariot race was indeed an exceptional, isolated thing, however Spartan women riding chariots is recorded on several Spartan events, see pic related.
|
305 |
+
|
306 |
+
Anyway, my initial claim was not about chariots (I just said Spartan women riding chariots was a unique sight for the Ancient World) but about Spartan women taking part in sport competitions, which they totally did.
|
307 |
+
|
308 |
+
Again refer to:
|
309 |
+
https://sci-hub.st/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119072379.ch19
|
310 |
+
>We have a broader range of evidence concerning Spartan girls’ participation in races, even if we remain wary of Euripides’ tendentious treatment of Spartan female exercise (Andr. 599).
|
311 |
+
|
312 |
+
>Alkman’s Partheneia make several references to members of a chorus engaging in a race (1.39ff.; 3.8–9 Campbell 1988; cf. Calame 1977, 2.67–72). The third‐century bce bucolic poet Theocritus later describes Helen and her age‐mates racing along the Eurotas (Id. 18.22–5, cf. 39–44; cf. Calame 1977, 1.333–50; Arrigoni 1985a, 70–6). Both Pausanias (3.13.7) and the fifth‐century ce Alexandrian Hesychios (s.v. Dionysiades) attest to female races in honor of Dionysos (cf. Calame 1977, 1.323–33; Arrigoni 1985a, 76–84). Finally, Hesychios’ mention of a dromos for Lakedaimonian maidens (s.v. en Drionas) may refer to a track reserved for such races (Arrigoni 1985a, 74; Ducat 2006, 231–2). This evidence accords with the archaeological evidence provided by archaic bronze statuettes depicting running girls, including the aforementioned figurine that may represent a dancing girl. 8 All are dressed in chitōniskoi, short tunics that probably correspond to the outfit worn by girls racing at the Olympian Heraia in Pausanias’ time (5.16.3).
|
313 |
+
--- 14999342
|
314 |
+
>>14998787
|
315 |
+
>>14999336
|
316 |
+
4/4 (I overextended)
|
317 |
+
>Xenophon suggests that Spartan girls competed in athletic contests with one another rather than with men and claims that the physical training of females aimed to produce strong mothers of vigorous offspring (Lak. Pol. 1.3–4). Kritias likewise remarks on the benefits of the mother’s exercise for her offspring in the opening section of his work on the Spartan politeia, written c.425–403 (DK6 88, fr. 32). Plutarch similarly attributes female athletics to the Spartans’ desire to improve the process of childbirth and the production of healthy children (Lyk. 14.2; Mor. 227d = Apophth. Lak., Lykourgos no. 12). In addition to their eugenic aims, it seems clear that at least some of the female sporting events described by these authors – particularly the foot races mentioned above – had a ritual significance and constituted another element of the Spartan cycle of female initiation (Scanlon 1988, 197–202; Millender 1999, 367–9; Cartledge 2001c, 114; Ducat 2006, 233–4).
|
318 |
+
|
319 |
+
>you have to understand the uniqueness of Spartan society and how "liberated" from material societal morays their males were compared to other Greeks, which holds true for the women as well, however it would be absurd to say Spartans had deference for women.
|
320 |
+
But I never said they had deference for women. You keep putting words in my mouth, it's like you are looking for a reason to be contrarian, my post was perfectly accurate and balanced. >>14995396. Spartan women had more power and better education that other women in the Ancient world, second only perhaps to the Minoans. That does not make Spartan society feminist, or egalitarian, or anything like that.
|
321 |
+
--- 14999368
|
322 |
+
>noblewomen had loads of wealth and power
|
323 |
+
>lower class women were still basically slaves
|
324 |
+
wow it really is like actually existing feminism
|
325 |
+
probably not so much like how they see themselves though
|
his/14991950.txt
CHANGED
@@ -54,3 +54,133 @@ Yeah but Christians love being wrong about everything.
|
|
54 |
>>14991968
|
55 |
Backwards Counting
|
56 |
Ascending Dates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
>>14991968
|
55 |
Backwards Counting
|
56 |
Ascending Dates
|
57 |
+
--- 14994896
|
58 |
+
>>14991950 (OP)
|
59 |
+
“Common” era.
|
60 |
+
Why?
|
61 |
+
What makes it a common era?
|
62 |
+
--- 14994933
|
63 |
+
>>14991950 (OP)
|
64 |
+
Great example of hypersecularist nonsense like changing it from AD/BC to CE/BCE has no meaning whatsoever other than to keep dipshits from pissing themselves over the Begotten Son. Like bro if it’s such a big deal, why not change the actual fucking meaning of the starting date? But no, that would take actual hard work and effort, and it’s easier to just write about Greeks in 600 BC[E] fucking boipussy and how it should inform modern society.
|
65 |
+
--- 14994963
|
66 |
+
>>14994933
|
67 |
+
cringe
|
68 |
+
--- 14995007
|
69 |
+
whenever I see "BCE" its like a big stamp that says "yes im seething"
|
70 |
+
--- 14995050
|
71 |
+
>>14994933
|
72 |
+
>hypersecularist
|
73 |
+
Just an hint: the original proponent of this renaming wasnt a secular nor an atheist. try to guess.
|
74 |
+
--- 14995058
|
75 |
+
Minus sign is the rational man's choice to imply that the number resides in negative side of number line.
|
76 |
+
--- 14995120
|
77 |
+
>>14991950 (OP)
|
78 |
+
>>14991968
|
79 |
+
>>14991982
|
80 |
+
>>14992863
|
81 |
+
>>14992872
|
82 |
+
>>14992891
|
83 |
+
>>14993039
|
84 |
+
>>14993191
|
85 |
+
>>14993493
|
86 |
+
>>14994933
|
87 |
+
>>14995007
|
88 |
+
You're all pathetic pedantic babies.
|
89 |
+
Literally nobody but other losers care about this stupid shit. Everyone understands what either means, everyone is fine if you use either one. It's completely acceptable to use in academia as long as you are consistent.
|
90 |
+
|
91 |
+
You're just being mentally ill spergs.
|
92 |
+
--- 14995139
|
93 |
+
>>14993039
|
94 |
+
Why is this man on trial being asked about the age of the wheel?
|
95 |
+
--- 14995158
|
96 |
+
>>14995120
|
97 |
+
>LOL you shouldn't care that literature and history is being censured and doctored, bro
|
98 |
+
>LMAO there's nobody trying to destroy and rewrite history. You're just a mentally ill sperg if you don't let the experts control your speech patterns
|
99 |
+
--- 14995166
|
100 |
+
>>14995158
|
101 |
+
>>LOL you shouldn't care that literature and history is being censured and doctored
|
102 |
+
Nobody is doing that. Have you ever fucking seen an article or read a book before? Both BCE and BC are used extensively as long as it is consistent.
|
103 |
+
>>LMAO there's nobody trying to destroy and rewrite history
|
104 |
+
Literally nobody is doing that.
|
105 |
+
--- 14995172
|
106 |
+
Is this christcuck shit of BC and AD only in a good countries? In my country we have "before our era"(literal translation) for BCE and we don't even have the equivalent for CE, we just type the year and that's it, so if there is no BOE then it's obviously CE.
|
107 |
+
--- 14995257
|
108 |
+
>The term "Common Era" is traced back in English to its appearance as "Vulgar Era" to distinguish dates on the Ecclesiastic calendar in popular use from dates of the regnal year, the year of the reign of a sovereign, typically used in national law. (The word 'vulgar' originally meant 'of the ordinary people', with no derogatory associations.)
|
109 |
+
>The first known use of "Christian Era" appears as the Latin phrase annus aerae christianae on the title page of a 1584 theology book. In 1649, the Latin phrase annus æræ Christianæ appeared in the title of an English almanac. A 1652 ephemeris is the first instance found so far of the English use of "Christian Era".
|
110 |
+
>The English phrase "Common Era" appears at least as early as 1708, and in a 1715 book on astronomy it is used interchangeably with "Christian Era" and "Vulgar Era". A 1759 history book uses common æra in a generic sense, to refer to the common era of the Jews. The first use found so far of the phrase "before the common era" is in a 1770 work that also uses common era and vulgar era as synonyms, in a translation of a book originally written in German. The 1797 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica uses the terms vulgar era and common era synonymously (meaning not the regnal year). In 1835, in his book Living Oracles, Alexander Campbell, wrote: "The vulgar Era, or Anno Domini; the fourth year of Jesus Christ, the first of which was but eight days", and also refers to the common era as a synonym for vulgar era with "the fact that our Lord was born on the 4th year before the vulgar era, called Anno Domini, thus making (for example) the 42d year from his birth to correspond with the 38th of the common era". The Catholic Encyclopedia (1909) in at least one article reports all three terms (Christian, Vulgar, Common Era) being commonly understood by the early 20th century.
|
111 |
+
--- 14995263
|
112 |
+
>>14991972
|
113 |
+
>>14992939
|
114 |
+
Nobody used that autistic shit. People used the emperor or consul date.
|
115 |
+
--- 14995287
|
116 |
+
>>14995166
|
117 |
+
No, retard The only point of BCE, the explicit point, was because Jewish academics wanted to secularize a long and meaningful historical tradition, and sap it of all meaning.
|
118 |
+
--- 14995297
|
119 |
+
>>14995257
|
120 |
+
The same wikipedia article explains how the actual abbreviations BCE and ACE come out of Jewish historians.
|
121 |
+
Now, it's only use in academics is to enforce secularization on behalf of Jews.
|
122 |
+
--- 14995301
|
123 |
+
>>14991950 (OP)
|
124 |
+
>he doesn't even know the memetic power of BCE
|
125 |
+
way to out yourself as a newfag, ngmi
|
126 |
+
--- 14995316
|
127 |
+
>>14995301
|
128 |
+
also:
|
129 |
+
https://imgur.com/a/KS8zlUy
|
130 |
+
--- 14995444
|
131 |
+
>>14995287
|
132 |
+
>was because Jewish academics wanted to secularize a long and meaningful historical tradition
|
133 |
+
Do you actually have any proof of this?
|
134 |
+
--- 14995472
|
135 |
+
>>14995444
|
136 |
+
The proof is that he's a loser and Jews generally aren't
|
137 |
+
--- 14995557
|
138 |
+
I just keep counting backward. Julius Caesar was born in the year -100
|
139 |
+
--- 14995587
|
140 |
+
>>14995287
|
141 |
+
It's actually not that complicated, jews simply hates the shit out of christians.
|
142 |
+
--- 14995601
|
143 |
+
>>14991972
|
144 |
+
spbp
|
145 |
+
--- 14995607
|
146 |
+
>>14995297
|
147 |
+
>Now, it's only use in academics is to enforce secularization on behalf of Jews.
|
148 |
+
Based Jews
|
149 |
+
--- 14995614
|
150 |
+
>>14991968
|
151 |
+
This
|
152 |
+
|
153 |
+
He was born in 2 BCE
|
154 |
+
--- 14995642
|
155 |
+
>>14995601
|
156 |
+
'ate romans, but that one is pretty cool ngl
|
157 |
+
--- 14995808
|
158 |
+
>>14995139
|
159 |
+
Likely a defense lawyer stablishing that he’s an untrustworthy witness.
|
160 |
+
--- 14995867
|
161 |
+
>>14995614
|
162 |
+
Nobody knows the year for certain, it can be 4 or 6 BCE also.
|
163 |
+
--- 14995898
|
164 |
+
All I knows is, of a wojak posters mocks it, it do be correct
|
165 |
+
--- 14997351
|
166 |
+
>>14995898
|
167 |
+
It’s the internet equivalent of going “o-oh yeah?! Well, this is you: *pphphhthptptpttthh*”
|
168 |
+
|
169 |
+
It’s mostly low IQ halfwits and beaners who still read and think at a 3rd grade level who do it
|
170 |
+
--- 14998551
|
171 |
+
>>14995607
|
172 |
+
boot licker
|
173 |
+
--- 14998672
|
174 |
+
>>14991950 (OP)
|
175 |
+
I don't say that nor do I look like that.
|
176 |
+
--- 14998690
|
177 |
+
>It’s the internet equivalent of going “o-oh yeah?! Well, this is you: *pphphhthptptpttthh*”
|
178 |
+
>It’s mostly low IQ halfwits and beaners who still read and think at a 3rd grade level who do it
|
179 |
+
--- 14998716
|
180 |
+
>>14991950 (OP)
|
181 |
+
Even though I'm an atheist, I always thought bce was retarded
|
182 |
+
--- 14999583
|
183 |
+
>>It’s the internet equivalent of going “o-oh yeah?! Well, this is you: *pphphhthptptpttthh*”
|
184 |
+
>>It’s mostly low IQ halfwits and beaners who still read and think at a 3rd grade level who do it
|
185 |
+
--- 14999598
|
186 |
+
>>14995120
|
his/14992177.txt
CHANGED
@@ -65,3 +65,203 @@ France didn’t exist when Charlemagne was alive and Germany was the more powerf
|
|
65 |
>European Late Middle-Ages were carried by Holy Roman Empire.
|
66 |
|
67 |
It was a joke from the Interregnum until its last hurrah with Charles V. Some of the Emperors had power but only because they also controlled Bohemia and Hungary. Admittedly France was also a basket case for most of the same period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
>European Late Middle-Ages were carried by Holy Roman Empire.
|
66 |
|
67 |
It was a joke from the Interregnum until its last hurrah with Charles V. Some of the Emperors had power but only because they also controlled Bohemia and Hungary. Admittedly France was also a basket case for most of the same period.
|
68 |
+
--- 14995004
|
69 |
+
>>14994641
|
70 |
+
It was the only European Empire that competed with Byzantium. It had the papal legitimacy, the size, the military power and the prestige that France never had, which did not have an emperor until the 19th century.
|
71 |
+
They had entire kingdoms subject to vassalage or under their orbit, from Hungary to Denmark, Sicily, the Slavic principalities, etc. Even on paper, the kings of France were vassals of the emperor, though they never obeyed his authority.
|
72 |
+
It was by far the Empire that defined the European Late Middle Ages, influencing from the Balkans to Italy, to the Baltic as well as Poland and Spain.
|
73 |
+
At that time, France was just the medieval equivalent to a sort of what Russia is on today's political scenary.
|
74 |
+
--- 14995009
|
75 |
+
>yfw you realise the British Empire was really just a one-way package holiday for chavs
|
76 |
+
--- 14995083
|
77 |
+
>>14992177 (OP)
|
78 |
+
1000-1550 Italian city states
|
79 |
+
1550-1700 Spain
|
80 |
+
1700-1820 France
|
81 |
+
1820-1945 Britain
|
82 |
+
1945-now USA
|
83 |
+
--- 14995200
|
84 |
+
>>14995009
|
85 |
+
shit on chavs as much as you want, but no other country except perhaps Germany/Scandinavia has an British work ethic. "Mad dogs and Englishmen" is in a sense a national musical biopic. "Chavs" continue to work through the hot noon sun to this day, while the sleepy romantic country types stick to their fiestas.
|
86 |
+
--- 14995268
|
87 |
+
>>14993762
|
88 |
+
>The USA became a country thanks to a french victory over England
|
89 |
+
Nigga what?
|
90 |
+
--- 14995276
|
91 |
+
>>14995083
|
92 |
+
>1700-1820 France
|
93 |
+
>lose numerous wars to Britain, who supersedes France in every metric
|
94 |
+
>no guys it was definitely France!
|
95 |
+
--- 14995285
|
96 |
+
>>14995083
|
97 |
+
>1550-1700 Spain
|
98 |
+
Spain was already taking control of Italy on the late 1400s by btfoing both city states and france
|
99 |
+
--- 14995891
|
100 |
+
>>14992177 (OP)
|
101 |
+
They could’ve spawned over 1 billion English descendants if they didn’t pussy out in the end.
|
102 |
+
--- 14995911
|
103 |
+
>>14995891
|
104 |
+
>if they didn’t pussy out in the end.
|
105 |
+
wdym
|
106 |
+
--- 14996050
|
107 |
+
>>14995276
|
108 |
+
Yes anon, no one considers the UK as the top global power even after winning the 7 Years War, because they totally weren't.
|
109 |
+
Britain started being relevant only after industrialization and France becoming backwards after Napoleon drained the country of men and resources
|
110 |
+
--- 14996105
|
111 |
+
>>14996050
|
112 |
+
Right, because knocking France down to second place in the global colonial empire race, trigger its intranational collapse which resulted in tens of thousands of unlawful executions and a dictator rising up and trying to take over the whole of Europe and who was again defeated by Britain and its allies means that France was still hotter shit than Britain during all that time.
|
113 |
+
|
114 |
+
You're delusional.
|
115 |
+
--- 14996118
|
116 |
+
Did most retards here forget that there are countries outside of northwest Europe? France from 11th century to 18th century, yet no mention of the Mongols, the Ottomans, the Spanish, the italians the Seljuqs or Timurids even at one point? You have to be a retard to think that in the 13th century, for example, france was more influential than the mongols. And it seems the Average IQ itt is indeed below 84
|
117 |
+
--- 14996140
|
118 |
+
>>14996105
|
119 |
+
What language did the European high class speak during the 18th century into the 19th century?
|
120 |
+
--- 14996141
|
121 |
+
>>14995083
|
122 |
+
Fixed
|
123 |
+
>1000-1450 Mongolian empire, Mamluk Sultanate, Holy Roman Empire,
|
124 |
+
>1450-1700 Spain, Ottoman Empire, Portugal, Netherlands, China
|
125 |
+
>1700-1820 France, Austria, China
|
126 |
+
>1820-1945 Britain, Russia, Germany
|
127 |
+
>1945-now USA, Russia, China
|
128 |
+
--- 14996344
|
129 |
+
>>14996140
|
130 |
+
OP asked:
|
131 |
+
>Is this the most important and influential country in the last 1000 years of history?
|
132 |
+
|
133 |
+
That question implies in collectivity. If you seriously think that France was more important than England with the last 1000 years considered collectively, you are seriously slow.
|
134 |
+
--- 14996741
|
135 |
+
>>14993762
|
136 |
+
>>14992375
|
137 |
+
This. Without France the USA would've remained a stretch of colonies along the east coast of North America. The British prevented them from expanding beyond Appalachia because they feared the colonies would become more powerful than the homeland.
|
138 |
+
|
139 |
+
It was France's help in the revolution and their sale of Louisiana that made the US a superpower.
|
140 |
+
--- 14996801
|
141 |
+
>>14992209
|
142 |
+
No
|
143 |
+
It is overstated how influential and powerful France actually was. Despite being the most populace and richest country in Europe it never managed to conquer its neighbours and at no point had the largest empire outside the continent. Culturally France were influential but only among the European elite. Outside of Europe, mostly just western europe nobody cared about France or had to care.
|
144 |
+
|
145 |
+
England meanwhile is the sole reason Europe over the last thousand years has never been conquered by one sole nation. England even when it was not the formost power in Europe was a thorn in the side of whoever was the most powerful and when England did finally become the most powerful European country it became the most powerful and influential country the world had ever seen up until that point.
|
146 |
+
--- 14996855
|
147 |
+
>>14992470
|
148 |
+
how can you say that when they almost got taken over by england multiple times during that time?
|
149 |
+
england has ahead of the curve for most of the medieval era and became the cutting edge from the tudors onwards.
|
150 |
+
--- 14996920
|
151 |
+
>>14996801
|
152 |
+
This. And England has been the mother home of unmatched philosophical, legal, technological and sociological developments which have influenced the world enormously, more than any from France. Pic related.
|
153 |
+
|
154 |
+
>>14996855
|
155 |
+
Frogs look at a map of the Angevin holdings (half their fucking country) and say "but the King of England payed le lip service to le Roi so the French were more powerful!! XD"
|
156 |
+
--- 14996932
|
157 |
+
>>14992177 (OP)
|
158 |
+
No, that's the USA.
|
159 |
+
--- 14996935
|
160 |
+
>>14992177 (OP)
|
161 |
+
I hate the British for teaching English to pajeets.
|
162 |
+
--- 14996961
|
163 |
+
>>14996920
|
164 |
+
In your own shity graph it's says "UK of GB" and not "England" and even aknowledges that UK is made of 4 countries, Scotland being the most overachiever of the 4 by population size. If England was compared alone with France and the other France would be the first.
|
165 |
+
|
166 |
+
The most important battle that England and France ever fought was the American war of independence which thanks to a french victory in land and in sea, the US was created and ever since it has been growing to the point of completely dominating the world, stealing everything England had on the world and made it's former master become it's most loyal vassal.
|
167 |
+
--- 14997009
|
168 |
+
>>14996801
|
169 |
+
>It is overstated how influential and powerful France actually was. Despite being the most populace and richest country in Europe it never managed to conquer its neighbours and at no point had the largest empire outside the continent. Culturally France were influential but only among the European elite. Outside of Europe, mostly just western europe nobody cared about France or had to care.
|
170 |
+
|
171 |
+
The China of Europe, except Europe is a lot smaller than East Asia.
|
172 |
+
--- 14997034
|
173 |
+
>>14996961
|
174 |
+
>In your own shity graph it's says "UK of GB" and not "England" and even aknowledges that UK is made of 4 countries, Scotland being the most overachiever of the 4 by population size. If England was compared alone with France and the other France would be the first.
|
175 |
+
You are out of touch with reality if you don't seriously acknowledge that Anglophone cultural hegemony was the leading force in each of the UK's entities. It wasn't bog-trotting Irishmen and sheep-fucking Highlanders who were creating things of substance. It was English language-speaking academics, engineers, and intellectuals in those areas, many of whom had substantial amounts of English ancestry themselves.
|
176 |
+
|
177 |
+
>stealing everything England had on the world
|
178 |
+
Literally what? The US built itself up off of the back of the Spanish Empire, not the British one, which still reigned as the supreme global force until the end of WW1, from which it actually even gained territories thereafter.
|
179 |
+
|
180 |
+
>and made it's former master become it's most loyal vassal
|
181 |
+
Typical yank nonsense.
|
182 |
+
--- 14997065
|
183 |
+
>>14996961
|
184 |
+
>made it's former master become it's most loyal vassal.
|
185 |
+
|
186 |
+
Definition of Vassal State:
|
187 |
+
A vassal state is any state that has a mutual obligation to a superior state or empire, in a status similar to that of a vassal in the feudal system in medieval Europe. Vassal states were common among the empires of the Near East, dating back to the era of the Egyptian, Hittite and Mitanni conflict, as well as ancient China. The use of vassal states continued through the Middle Ages, with the last empire to use such states being the Ottoman Empire.
|
188 |
+
|
189 |
+
The relationships between vassal rulers and empires was dependent on the policies and agreements of each empire. While payment of tribute and military service is common amongst vassal states, the degree of independence and benefits given to vassal states varied. Today, more common terms are puppet state, protectorate, client state, associated state or satellite state.
|
190 |
+
|
191 |
+
You're a fucking retard if you think the UK falls under any of these labels in regards to its relationship with the US. Do you really and seriously believe the UK in respect to the US is comparable to Belarus and Russia?
|
192 |
+
|
193 |
+
You Yanks constantly jerk yourselves off about "muh vassal states" yet most of these supposed vassal states in Europe constantly reject idiotic ideas coming from the US and piss all over it with insults whenever they get the chance. Those really don't sound like vassal states to me.
|
194 |
+
--- 14997071
|
195 |
+
>>14996920
|
196 |
+
Most of those are from Scotland not England.
|
197 |
+
>SCOTS ARE ANGLOS
|
198 |
+
still Scotland not England.
|
199 |
+
--- 14997088
|
200 |
+
1000 - 1492 France
|
201 |
+
1492 - 1643 Spain
|
202 |
+
1643 - 1815 France
|
203 |
+
1815 1918 Great Britain
|
204 |
+
1918 - today America
|
205 |
+
--- 14997155
|
206 |
+
>>14996920
|
207 |
+
> The first records of the word accomplishment come from the 1400s. It comes from the Old French acomplir, meaning “to complete,” ultimately from the Latin complēre, which means to “to fill up” and is also the basis of the word complete.
|
208 |
+
--- 14997183
|
209 |
+
>>14997071
|
210 |
+
Scotland has, even in its medieval history, been a subjugated entity under England. For example, in 1200, King William 'the Lion' of Scotland paid homage to King John, and this was not the first time the Scots had done so. Earlier in the 1170s, there was the Treaty of Falaise, which gave England dominion over Scotland.
|
211 |
+
|
212 |
+
From Wikipedia: "The Treaty's provisions affected the Scottish king, nobles, and clergy; their heirs; judicial proceedings, and transferred the castles of Roxburgh, Berwick, Jedburgh, Edinburgh, and Stirling over to English soldiers; in short, where previously the king of Scots was supreme, now England was the ultimate authority in Scotland. During the next 15 years, William was forced to observe Henry's overlordship, such as needing to obtain permission from the English crown before putting down local uprisings."
|
213 |
+
|
214 |
+
This, while continuously having English knights fill their courts (the de Brus dynasty, for example) and while 'Scots', which is widely recognized as being a dialect which emerged alongside English while continuously being highly influenced by English, continued to emerge as the dominant language of Scotland.
|
215 |
+
--- 14997602
|
216 |
+
>>14997071
|
217 |
+
this makes no sense lol
|
218 |
+
--- 14997949
|
219 |
+
>>14992209
|
220 |
+
>1945
|
221 |
+
Wasn't the US already the strongest after ww1?
|
222 |
+
--- 14997972
|
223 |
+
>>14997949
|
224 |
+
Economically, but it didn't project power. They were still isolationist and the military was quite poor until FDR.
|
225 |
+
--- 14998065
|
226 |
+
>>14992177 (OP)
|
227 |
+
Last 1000 years? Hell no.
|
228 |
+
Maybe the past 300 years. Before that it was easily France or Spain.
|
229 |
+
>>14992375
|
230 |
+
The USA would not exist without France.
|
231 |
+
|
232 |
+
>>14996141
|
233 |
+
>Mongolian empire, Mamluk Sultanate
|
234 |
+
lol the metric is influential and important.
|
235 |
+
|
236 |
+
>>14996801
|
237 |
+
>England meanwhile is the sole reason Europe over the last thousand years has never been conquered by one sole nation.
|
238 |
+
Not 1000 years ago. England was nothing of real importance until the past 400 years when they first started colonizing.
|
239 |
+
|
240 |
+
Nobody is saying that England was not one of the most influential countries on Earth. The problem is saying that it was for the past 1000 years. That is simply not true at all.
|
241 |
+
--- 14998628
|
242 |
+
>>14998065
|
243 |
+
>Last 1000 years? Hell no.
|
244 |
+
Not even when you look at all of England's achievements and contributions collectively from throughout that 1000 years?
|
245 |
+
|
246 |
+
>The USA would not exist without France.
|
247 |
+
More importantly, the USA would not exist without England, since that was the nation of its original settlers. That matters more than the role France played in the US' war of independence, imho, especially because American separation seemed inevitable due to the fact that separatism was essentially embedded within it from the beginning (the Puritans were hostile anti-monarchists and purposefully left England as not to have to abide by its laws).
|
248 |
+
--- 14999042
|
249 |
+
>>14997034
|
250 |
+
>It was English language-speaking academics, engineers, and intellectuals in those areas, many of whom had substantial amounts of English ancestry themselves.
|
251 |
+
Germans had a huge unfluence the academia of all of it's eastern neighboors, much of the higher societies of europe from the 1600s to the early 1900s saw french as the highest form of culture and essentialy tried to live like french aristocrats. I'm pretty sure that neither of those factors were relevant on this graphic and Copernicus is considered polish and Tolstoi russian (as they should be) and Maxwell should be considered scott.
|
252 |
+
>Literally what? The US built itself up off of the back of the Spanish Empire, not the British one, which still reigned as the supreme global force until the end of WW1, from which it actually even gained territories thereafter.
|
253 |
+
There is so much wrong with this, which is pretty easy to spot if you remembered that British white Colonies, once Britain's main allies now lie deeply in american hegemonic sphere ("economic vassals") or that the pound once was like the dollar of today being considered the world standards currency, but to be short, search for video of "The other great game" and you see for yourself how the US stole british influence in economy, the seas, broke the anglo-japanese alliance right after WW1, etc.
|
254 |
+
>Typical yank nonsense.
|
255 |
+
Thanks for your support in Iraq, don't try another Suez and we wouldn't hurt you.
|
256 |
+
--- 14999602
|
257 |
+
For most of the Middle Ages and early modern period England was a second rate European Kingdom outdone by France, Germany and Castile. The short lived Empire of Henry II and the ascendant England during the final stages of the hundred years war does not suddenly make it a great Kingdom for the vast majority of the periods. Until the glorious revolution England was a relatively weak and small Kingdom which couldn’t compete very well against those on the continent.
|
258 |
+
--- 14999859
|
259 |
+
>>14998065
|
260 |
+
>lol the metric is influential and important
|
261 |
+
Largest empire in human history. Successor empires, such as that of India, lasted until the eighteenth century.
|
262 |
+
--- 14999873
|
263 |
+
>>14992470
|
264 |
+
more like
|
265 |
+
>800-1700: France
|
266 |
+
>1815-1890: Britain
|
267 |
+
>1890-now: USA
|
his/14992233.txt
CHANGED
@@ -494,3 +494,24 @@ When you really think about it from an atheist point of view, IT IS POSSIBLE for
|
|
494 |
Why did man become untermensch? Because being God, being the limit of all that is possible is terrifying.
|
495 |
|
496 |
Man was never meant to be a God.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494 |
Why did man become untermensch? Because being God, being the limit of all that is possible is terrifying.
|
495 |
|
496 |
Man was never meant to be a God.
|
497 |
+
--- 14995250
|
498 |
+
>>14993352
|
499 |
+
>What does believing in God hold anyone back from doing, to you?
|
500 |
+
Not him but more often than not when there is a majority(or just a considerable minority) of believers(particularly deep, radical believers)in a population, those believers will try to impose their beliefs upon others, and make the laws of their religion also the laws of the state, hence forcing everyone to live by the standards of their beliefs, whether they want to or not.
|
501 |
+
--- 14995279
|
502 |
+
>>14992233 (OP)
|
503 |
+
You are god. You are the universe experiencing itself. Yet you complain just because you can't control it? Enjoy it.
|
504 |
+
--- 14996285
|
505 |
+
>>14992280
|
506 |
+
It's not luck, it is. That is why God calls Himself "I Am"
|
507 |
+
The full scope of God is too much for mortals to comprehend. Thanks be to God that we do not have to guess, but read His word so that we may know this: >>14992268
|
508 |
+
--- 14996830
|
509 |
+
>>14995279
|
510 |
+
Pish
|
511 |
+
--- 14998427
|
512 |
+
>>14992233 (OP)
|
513 |
+
>>14992269
|
514 |
+
>>14992269
|
515 |
+
God is evil
|
516 |
+
--- 14998433
|
517 |
+
>>14998427
|
his/14992993.txt
CHANGED
@@ -7,8 +7,6 @@ Jews are not good
|
|
7 |
--- 14993006
|
8 |
>>14992993 (OP)
|
9 |
Settle down, Reifag.
|
10 |
-
--- 14993008
|
11 |
-
Democrats aren't good
|
12 |
--- 14993011
|
13 |
>>14993008
|
14 |
no but the tories are
|
@@ -75,3 +73,42 @@ Yes
|
|
75 |
>>14992993 (OP)
|
76 |
>good guys always been color coded blue?
|
77 |
But these aren't blue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
--- 14993006
|
8 |
>>14992993 (OP)
|
9 |
Settle down, Reifag.
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
--- 14993011
|
11 |
>>14993008
|
12 |
no but the tories are
|
|
|
73 |
>>14992993 (OP)
|
74 |
>good guys always been color coded blue?
|
75 |
But these aren't blue?
|
76 |
+
--- 14995154
|
77 |
+
>>14994856
|
78 |
+
Because both were evil. Still the least evil side won. (And guess what? Some Soviet flags used blue)
|
79 |
+
--- 14995163
|
80 |
+
>>14995154
|
81 |
+
>Because both were evil
|
82 |
+
Define evil
|
83 |
+
--- 14995168
|
84 |
+
>>14994138
|
85 |
+
Shalom literally means "peace" you disingenuous kike
|
86 |
+
--- 14995171
|
87 |
+
>>14995163
|
88 |
+
The absence of good
|
89 |
+
--- 14995176
|
90 |
+
>>14995171
|
91 |
+
That would include the USA
|
92 |
+
--- 14995323
|
93 |
+
No one really know, it simply happens to be the case
|
94 |
+
--- 14995429
|
95 |
+
>>14995323
|
96 |
+
Based pic. Rugby is truly the White Man's Sport.
|
97 |
+
--- 14996594
|
98 |
+
>>14994856
|
99 |
+
Those aren't good guys either?
|
100 |
+
--- 14996881
|
101 |
+
Based and Tengri-pilled.
|
102 |
+
--- 14998602
|
103 |
+
>>14995168
|
104 |
+
I guess that means that niggers don't behave violently because they sometimes say "peace" as a goodbye too.
|
105 |
+
--- 14998624
|
106 |
+
>>14992993 (OP)
|
107 |
+
>nato are the good guys
|
108 |
+
|
109 |
+
you fucken NPCs never cease to amaze me
|
110 |
+
--- 14998805
|
111 |
+
Red is an angry color. Blue is a calm color
|
112 |
+
--- 14999833
|
113 |
+
>>14996594
|
114 |
+
>Those aren't good guys either
|
his/14993467.txt
CHANGED
@@ -10,10 +10,6 @@ what stage is a 20 year old a human in a philosophical point of view?
|
|
10 |
|
11 |
but for me it's from shortly after conception, when it becomes a viable pregnancy, that's the point it's entered the lifecycle of a human
|
12 |
i'm okay with abortion up until they can be viable outside the womb independently though, for the same reason i don't consider switching off life support systems murder
|
13 |
-
--- 14993521
|
14 |
-
>>14993467 (OP)
|
15 |
-
Conception
|
16 |
-
Abort all niggers, kikes, and spics, save the whites
|
17 |
--- 14993530
|
18 |
>>14993467 (OP)
|
19 |
It is alive, it has a unique set of Human DNA, it is a living human being, if a fertilized egg was found fossilized on mars it would be considered evidence of humans as exclusively humans can create this without question and exclusively humans only create this without question.
|
@@ -60,9 +56,6 @@ oh my bad, i'm sleepy, the brain hasn't formed yet at the moment of conception s
|
|
60 |
--- 14993971
|
61 |
>>14993467 (OP)
|
62 |
When they are developed enough to be a person. Until then they’re just a clump of cells
|
63 |
-
--- 14993977
|
64 |
-
>>14993971
|
65 |
-
replace all the blue text with "niggers"
|
66 |
--- 14994024
|
67 |
Anon this is a retarded topic. Stop shitting up the board.
|
68 |
--- 14994084
|
@@ -393,3 +386,265 @@ tranny.
|
|
393 |
>clump of cells
|
394 |
>hair/nail cells
|
395 |
Le yikes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
11 |
but for me it's from shortly after conception, when it becomes a viable pregnancy, that's the point it's entered the lifecycle of a human
|
12 |
i'm okay with abortion up until they can be viable outside the womb independently though, for the same reason i don't consider switching off life support systems murder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
--- 14993530
|
14 |
>>14993467 (OP)
|
15 |
It is alive, it has a unique set of Human DNA, it is a living human being, if a fertilized egg was found fossilized on mars it would be considered evidence of humans as exclusively humans can create this without question and exclusively humans only create this without question.
|
|
|
56 |
--- 14993971
|
57 |
>>14993467 (OP)
|
58 |
When they are developed enough to be a person. Until then they’re just a clump of cells
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
--- 14994024
|
60 |
Anon this is a retarded topic. Stop shitting up the board.
|
61 |
--- 14994084
|
|
|
386 |
>clump of cells
|
387 |
>hair/nail cells
|
388 |
Le yikes.
|
389 |
+
--- 14995104
|
390 |
+
The lies atheist can tell will never cease to amuse me, they even lie about science and desperately and continuously swap words to confuse people.
|
391 |
+
>life begins at fertilization, biological sciences says so
|
392 |
+
good luck refuting that
|
393 |
+
>but it's not alive!
|
394 |
+
it's a human lifeform at embryonal stage, science says it's alive
|
395 |
+
>but it's not a human!
|
396 |
+
it is a human and a unique one with a unique DNA with a unique set of genes, science says so
|
397 |
+
>but my fingernails also contain DNA it's just a clump of cells
|
398 |
+
you fingernails are not an organism, they are an organ. No human being will grow up from a fingernail. An embryo is a living human organism, and it's not even an organ of the mother
|
399 |
+
>but it's not a person!
|
400 |
+
personhood is a legal status and law isn't a source for scientific or moral truth. There has been laws that negated personhood to enslaved ppl, black ppl and jews.
|
401 |
+
>so abortion is wrong?
|
402 |
+
Abortion is the termination of an established (as "non potential") human life that has a unique DNA that won't be repeated in the whole history. The individual will be lost forever and no one will know who has been wiped out of existence.
|
403 |
+
These are facts, supported by science, then you can decide for yourself. As a human you can determine that genociding entire populations is perfectly ok and it has been done until a very recent past.
|
404 |
+
--- 14995173
|
405 |
+
>>14995104
|
406 |
+
>life begins at fertilization, biological sciences says so
|
407 |
+
If you're talking about genetically distinct life, sure. And?
|
408 |
+
>it's a human lifeform at embryonal stage, science says it's alive
|
409 |
+
Yes, and?
|
410 |
+
>it is a human and a unique one with a unique DNA with a unique set of genes, science says so
|
411 |
+
Yes, and?
|
412 |
+
>you fingernails are not an organism, they are an organ. No human being will grow up from a fingernail. An embryo is a living human organism, and it's not even an organ of the mother
|
413 |
+
Yes, and?
|
414 |
+
>personhood is a legal status and law isn't a source for scientific or moral truth. There has been laws that negated personhood to enslaved ppl, black ppl and jews.
|
415 |
+
Personhood is also a philosophical concept. But if you think one cannot disagree with any claims of personhood, then I'm going to claim that rocks are persons.
|
416 |
+
>Abortion is the termination of an established (as "non potential") human life that has a unique DNA that won't be repeated in the whole history.
|
417 |
+
Yes, and? It's not sentient. If you take a person and remove their cerebral cortex, I won't give a shit about that human body (because it's indeed no longer a person) after that either.
|
418 |
+
--- 14995180
|
419 |
+
>>14993467 (OP)
|
420 |
+
>asking dadless permavirgins about the value of life, birth, and families.
|
421 |
+
>NOOO not the people who actually live it
|
422 |
+
--- 14995192
|
423 |
+
>>14994484
|
424 |
+
correct, also a tranny religion
|
425 |
+
https://imgur.com/a/KS8zlUy
|
426 |
+
--- 14995308
|
427 |
+
>>14993925
|
428 |
+
Your saliva doesn't have its own individual genetic code, cretin
|
429 |
+
Fetus are not part of the mother's body and no amount of science-denying feminist propaganda will change this fact
|
430 |
+
--- 14995338
|
431 |
+
>>14993467 (OP)
|
432 |
+
Life begins at arousal
|
433 |
+
--- 14995347
|
434 |
+
>>14995308
|
435 |
+
>muh individual genetic code
|
436 |
+
Who gives a fuck? The genetic code within individual cells in your body can change over the course of your life.
|
437 |
+
--- 14995375
|
438 |
+
>>14995173
|
439 |
+
>and? x5
|
440 |
+
And science worshipping atheists and feminists constantly lie and negate all these scientific facts (on which the scientific community agrees upon)
|
441 |
+
>Yes, and? It's not sentient
|
442 |
+
But it will be, also sentience is already non scientific
|
443 |
+
>If you take a person and remove their cerebral cortex
|
444 |
+
it's entirely different because that person will have no chance of recovering and become sentient again. Basically you injured that person beyond repair and you're artificially sustaining life in his body with machines.
|
445 |
+
--- 14995382
|
446 |
+
>>14995347
|
447 |
+
and become cancer cells yes not a different and unique human beings.
|
448 |
+
How does it feel to be so corrupted that you even cone up with this trash?
|
449 |
+
--- 14995406
|
450 |
+
>>14995375
|
451 |
+
>And science worshipping atheists and feminists constantly lie and negate all these scientific facts
|
452 |
+
And? Almost half of all christcucks in the USA think that the universe is 6k years old. I don't give a fuck about what retards think regardless of whether they're religious or atheist.
|
453 |
+
>But it will be
|
454 |
+
Not if you kill it before that. Why should I care about "potential" sentience that need not be actualized?
|
455 |
+
>it's entirely different because that person will have no chance of recovering and become sentient again.
|
456 |
+
The fetus will have no chance of "recovering" either because it has no prior state of sentience.
|
457 |
+
--- 14995410
|
458 |
+
>>14995382
|
459 |
+
>not a different and unique human beings
|
460 |
+
I thought the criterion was having separate DNA from the host :^)
|
461 |
+
If you want to amend that, you can present a different argument.
|
462 |
+
--- 14995438
|
463 |
+
>>14995406
|
464 |
+
oh shit you're fucking stupid lol
|
465 |
+
>And?...
|
466 |
+
Yeah but atheists are very adamant about the fact all they say and believe is backed by le science (except when it's not), while bible belters don't respect science to begin with.
|
467 |
+
>Not if you kill it
|
468 |
+
Bingo, you kill it. You just told yourself abortion is killing.
|
469 |
+
>Why should I care
|
470 |
+
Maybe because you aren't a sociopath but yeah some ppl are so you might be actually one
|
471 |
+
>The fetus will have no chance of "recovering" either because it has no prior state of sentience.
|
472 |
+
Holy shit what a cope first off sentience is hardly scientifically determinable second it's wrong the embryo will develop into a fetus that already is capable of sensory experience inside the mother's womb and then it will be delivered and be a baby.
|
473 |
+
--- 14995457
|
474 |
+
>>14995438
|
475 |
+
>Yeah but atheists are very adamant about the fact all they say and believe is backed by le science
|
476 |
+
You are not talking to some amorphous blob of atheists, you are talking to me. If you can't make your case without pretending that I'm somebody else with a different viewpoint, it would seem that you are backed into a corner, my dear chap.
|
477 |
+
>Bingo, you kill it. You just told yourself abortion is killing.
|
478 |
+
Yes, and?
|
479 |
+
>Maybe because you aren't a sociopath
|
480 |
+
What's sociopathic about killing something that isn't sentient? Do you cry yourself to sleep after mowing your lawn?
|
481 |
+
>Holy shit what a cope first off sentience is hardly scientifically determinable
|
482 |
+
We have a pretty good idea of when it's not possible. Still, I think it's fine to err on the side of caution and push abortion limits down to first trimester only.
|
483 |
+
>second it's wrong the embryo will develop into a fetus that already is capable of sensory experience inside the mother's womb
|
484 |
+
Yes, and in that process it is not recovering anything, because it never had sentience during any PRIOR state, bad-reading-comprehension-kun.
|
485 |
+
--- 14995481
|
486 |
+
>>14995457
|
487 |
+
>What's sociopathic about killing something that isn't sentient?
|
488 |
+
You might as well kill your mother in her sleep if so. Good luck explaining that to the cops lol.
|
489 |
+
>because it never had
|
490 |
+
but it will, and it's already a live organism with a unique human DNA and who fucking knows maybe you just offed the next Einstein or Mozart or the most beautiful woman ever lived
|
491 |
+
--- 14995498
|
492 |
+
>>14995481
|
493 |
+
>You might as well kill your mother in her sleep if so. Good luck explaining that to the cops lol.
|
494 |
+
You mean my sentient mother? That doesn't answer the question, anon.
|
495 |
+
>but it will, and it's already a live organism with a unique human DNA and who fucking knows maybe you just offed the next Einstein or Mozart or the most beautiful woman ever lived
|
496 |
+
There is no morally relevant difference between stopping someone from planting an acorn and ripping it out of the ground once it's planted. Clockblocking is murder!
|
497 |
+
--- 14995569
|
498 |
+
>>14995498
|
499 |
+
well I at least appreciate your honesty but your mindset is quick to recur to overt reductionism and essentially "it's like this because I feel it is and here's a bad analogy with the natural world that justifies it", not really very far from statement like "negroes are 3/5th humans and are closer to monkeys" or "jews are parasites and are similar to rats therefore they must be exterminated", etc.
|
500 |
+
--- 14995584
|
501 |
+
>>14995569
|
502 |
+
Pray tell, why should valuing actual sentience instead of potential sentience lead to racist thinking?
|
503 |
+
--- 14995608
|
504 |
+
>>14995584
|
505 |
+
"it is right to kill this human being because..."
|
506 |
+
replace "..." with what you prefer, in you case "it is not yet sentient".
|
507 |
+
The parallelism with racism is that racist ppl often use such statements.
|
508 |
+
--- 14995627
|
509 |
+
>>14995608
|
510 |
+
Why would you replace "it is not sentient" with anything when sentience is the relevant factor?
|
511 |
+
>"it is right to kill this human being because..." replace "..." with what you prefer, in you case "it is in self defense"
|
512 |
+
If you believe that self defense is morally permissible, you're now a nazi. Great argument.
|
513 |
+
--- 14995716
|
514 |
+
>>14995627
|
515 |
+
>sentience is the relevant factor?
|
516 |
+
According to you. I can easily reply that "human life" is the relevant factor. More so if we consider that sentience is a very shaky ground scientifically speaking, but human life is very solid since the discovery and study of genes and DNA.
|
517 |
+
>self defense
|
518 |
+
Self defense is a contingent situation where one must act to preserve his life or one other's life, it is not pertinent in this context. Of course if a pregnancy risks to kill the mother, the mother is morally justified to terminate it because she is preserving her life (her physical life, not her lifestyle)
|
519 |
+
--- 14995737
|
520 |
+
>>14995716
|
521 |
+
>According to you. I can easily reply that "human life" is the relevant factor.
|
522 |
+
Sentience is justified as the relevant factor because it's the necessary precondition for being a subject, which is a necessary precondition for being a moral subject.
|
523 |
+
>More so if we consider that sentience is a very shaky ground scientifically speaking, but human life is very solid since the discovery and study of genes and DNA.
|
524 |
+
Genetics do not confer moral value.
|
525 |
+
>Self defense is a contingent situation where one must act to preserve his life or one other's life, it is not pertinent in this context.
|
526 |
+
And similarly, sentience is a necessary precondition for being a moral subject while "not being a jew" or "not being black" are not. I'm glad we agree that both substitutions are fallacious.
|
527 |
+
--- 14995778
|
528 |
+
>>14995737
|
529 |
+
>it's the necessary precondition for being a subject
|
530 |
+
You're bringing philosophy into it, and at this point I could bring in religion.
|
531 |
+
I might just point out that culturally what you say is not very correct. I could "kill" inanimate objects like important works of art, the scores for a symphony, entire books or works of scientific research and morally I will have committed a very despicable act to the majorities of cultures. You might argue that I killed ideas but ideas are not sentient, and still are considered valuable.
|
532 |
+
>Genetics do not confer moral value.
|
533 |
+
I don't understand
|
534 |
+
>while "not being a jew" or "not being black" are not
|
535 |
+
in the minds of slave owners and nazists they were indeed preconditions for being moral subjects
|
536 |
+
--- 14995825
|
537 |
+
>>14995778
|
538 |
+
>You're bringing philosophy into it
|
539 |
+
You mean to say that you thought you can discuss moral philosophy without discussing philosophy? The fuck?
|
540 |
+
>and at this point I could bring in religion.
|
541 |
+
Yeah and you can use that to justify or condemn anything. My god says it's immoral for you to disagree with me.
|
542 |
+
>I could "kill" inanimate objects like important works of art, the scores for a symphony, entire books or works of scientific research and morally I will have committed a very despicable act to the majorities of cultures.
|
543 |
+
...because of the impact those acts have on moral subjects. It's extrinsic moral value, not intrinsic - objects do not have moral value unless they impact moral subjects in a morally significant way.
|
544 |
+
>I don't understand
|
545 |
+
What do you not understand about it?
|
546 |
+
>in the minds of slave owners and nazists they were indeed preconditions for being moral subjects
|
547 |
+
Not logically necessary preconditions. The status of sentience as a necessary precondition for being a moral subject is necessitated as pure logical entailment - you cannot be a moral subject unless you're a subject and you cannot be a subject unless you possess subjectivity (sentience).
|
548 |
+
--- 14995847
|
549 |
+
>>14994576
|
550 |
+
|
551 |
+
It's the simplest methods that confound the wise.
|
552 |
+
|
553 |
+
>hOw DiD tHeY LiFt sUcH hEaVy StOnEs BaCk tHeN WiTh sUcH LiMiTeD tEcHnOlOgY?!?!??!?
|
554 |
+
|
555 |
+
I imagine it was with the most simplest of methods. So simple that if it were revealed, it would make the wisest of nerds have a brainfart moment.
|
556 |
+
--- 14996054
|
557 |
+
>>14993467 (OP)
|
558 |
+
>in a secular point of view?
|
559 |
+
I don't believe in a secular point of view and watching them fumble easy questions like this proves they are too stupid to live
|
560 |
+
--- 14996116
|
561 |
+
>>14995825
|
562 |
+
>discuss moral philosophy
|
563 |
+
it wasn't my intention to start a philosophical debate, and I could say I don't need philosophy because I have religion, I was replying to OP's "is a fetus human" by merely what science agrees upon
|
564 |
+
>unless they impact moral subjects
|
565 |
+
well so in case of abortion it certainly impacts moral subjects. So from your pov it would be extrinsic, but it would still be relevant and a reason to not do it.
|
566 |
+
>The status of sentience
|
567 |
+
that is not scientifically determinable so you are founding your ethics upon shaky foundation. Animal welfare could be easily neutralised by the argument "but animals are not sentient" or "they don't feel pain, and if they do not like us", that is an argument that is fading out of fashion but is still used.
|
568 |
+
>Genetics do not confer moral value.
|
569 |
+
If you were referring to DNA an embryo is not simply DNA it's an organism that is building itself upon that DNA, that is very different than say the DNA contained in my spit ot my hair.
|
570 |
+
--- 14996128
|
571 |
+
>>14995308
|
572 |
+
>your saliva doesn't have its individual genetic code
|
573 |
+
most cells in your body carry your genetic code, the exception being your gametes
|
574 |
+
by your logic there is no criterion that makes something "human"
|
575 |
+
--- 14996276
|
576 |
+
>>14996116
|
577 |
+
>it wasn't my intention to start a philosophical debate
|
578 |
+
A debate about ethics is a philosophical debate.
|
579 |
+
>I don't need philosophy because I have religion
|
580 |
+
Yeah and my god says it's immoral for you to disagree with you.
|
581 |
+
>well so in case of abortion it certainly impacts moral subjects.
|
582 |
+
And we can have a legitimate discussion on whether the impact an abortion has on your feelings is more morally relevant than the impact a pregnancy has on the woman.
|
583 |
+
>that is not scientifically determinable so you are founding your ethics upon shaky foundation.
|
584 |
+
Are you implying that the fetus already has sentience during the first trimester? We can discuss that too.
|
585 |
+
>Animal welfare could be easily neutralised by the argument "but animals are not sentient" or "they don't feel pain, and if they do not like us", that is an argument that is fading out of fashion but is still used.
|
586 |
+
Animal welfare/animal rights are predicated precisely on the fact that unlike Descartes, we're pretty damn sure that animals are sentient.
|
587 |
+
>If you were referring to DNA an embryo is not simply DNA it's an organism that is building itself upon that DNA, that is very different than say the DNA contained in my spit ot my hair.
|
588 |
+
You didn't understand my objection. DNA is important only insofar as it allows for the development of morally relevant traits (i.e. sentience).
|
589 |
+
--- 14996316
|
590 |
+
>>14993467 (OP)
|
591 |
+
If we can legally sell earrings of it, it must not be that human
|
592 |
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Gibson
|
593 |
+
the only part of the law infringed was about public sensibility, so if it's in private we can sell them
|
594 |
+
--- 14996329
|
595 |
+
>>14993467 (OP)
|
596 |
+
It’s a human from conception but a person is what’s more important.
|
597 |
+
I don’t think they’re a person at until they get a cerebrum which is the third trimester
|
598 |
+
--- 14996345
|
599 |
+
>>14996276
|
600 |
+
You're going in circles at this point.
|
601 |
+
You base your ethics on sentience rather than objective facts such as abortion being objectively the termination of a human life.
|
602 |
+
It's not that I can convince you otherwise but your stance doesn't provide very solid grounds.
|
603 |
+
--- 14996384
|
604 |
+
>>14996345
|
605 |
+
Sentience is morally relevant because it's the necessary precondition for being a moral subject. Why is the fact that it's human life morally relevant? Just wildly gesturing at the human genome isn't an argument.
|
606 |
+
And as I said, if you think that sentience is possible during the first trimester, you are free to present your arguments.
|
607 |
+
--- 14996466
|
608 |
+
>>14993467 (OP)
|
609 |
+
I'm a biologist, so maybe i can give you a more or less accurate answer, though there is nothing particularly interesting to say.
|
610 |
+
A human is a human, no matter the age or the stage of development. Species is defined by your genetics, not stage of development.
|
611 |
+
Sperm and oocytes are also human, but not a new human, they are a part of you. This is defined so, because they contain only your DNA, no foreign DNA (though they do not contain all of your DNA). From the point of conception, it is technically a new human, with a never before existing genetic makeup.
|
612 |
+
So from th point of conception that is a new human.
|
613 |
+
From what point is the human embrio a person is a different question. And a bit harder to answer. But i can say that neurulation (formation of the brain, the spinal chord and the peripheral nervous system) starts at week 3 and is complete by week 6. By this point the brain is functional, and active, and capable of forming memories (we don't remember these as adults, but they do form).
|
614 |
+
--- 14997252
|
615 |
+
>>14993467 (OP)
|
616 |
+
I don't know. I can't view humanity without the religious context, so I'd probably just say "never" if you force me to give a secular answer. I suppose conception if I'm forced to answer, because it has unique genetic data
|
617 |
+
--- 14998212
|
618 |
+
Until the creature can live and survive independently of caregivers. For some, they aren't truly born until they're in their 30's.
|
619 |
+
--- 14998219
|
620 |
+
>>14996466
|
621 |
+
>From what point is the human embrio a person is a different question. And a bit harder to answer.
|
622 |
+
|
623 |
+
Mainly because "person" is abstract and arbitrary as fuck as a term.
|
624 |
+
300 years ago in the US, niggers weren't persons because it was deemed convenient.
|
625 |
+
Nowdays it's human fetus and embryos who aren't.
|
626 |
+
--- 14998312
|
627 |
+
>>14993717
|
628 |
+
>>14993702
|
629 |
+
>>14993683
|
630 |
+
>>14993701
|
631 |
+
They can be human without being equals.
|
632 |
+
Equality among Equals.
|
633 |
+
We dont have to engage in mental gymnastics to justify killing people, people are put to the sword all the time.
|
634 |
+
--- 14998326
|
635 |
+
>>14998219
|
636 |
+
The usage of words changes. If you don't like that, perhaps you should stop calling abortion murder, since abortion has not always been considered murder in every society. Or better yet, just stop using language altogether.
|
637 |
+
--- 14998413
|
638 |
+
>>14993663
|
639 |
+
But that is not a sufficient condition for personhood.
|
640 |
+
--- 14998426
|
641 |
+
>>14994257
|
642 |
+
It becomes POSSIBLE for a person to be sentient when they have widespread subcortico-cortical brain activity in both hemispheres (this happens at the end of the second trimester). Before then, they are unable to form any conception of life, awareness, death. "They" aren't anything yet. The fetus have the same level of being as bacteria: metabolism, homeostasis, a genetic code. Not much else really.
|
643 |
+
--- 14998442
|
644 |
+
>>14994383
|
645 |
+
If you are an atheist you have no reason to make moral exceptions for human life over animal life other than on the basis of observed characteristics of conscious life.
|
646 |
+
--- 14998558
|
647 |
+
>>14994257
|
648 |
+
late stage abortions are done by initiating a birth
|
649 |
+
so if it's really late, like 8 months+ you grab it by its legs and repeatedly smash it to the ground like a fish
|
650 |
+
it's ok because a baby in the womb is mostly asleep anyway so they aren't human
|
his/14993525.txt
CHANGED
@@ -189,3 +189,149 @@ Yes he did. He could have just followed the law and banished him because he wasn
|
|
189 |
>Worker is a dumbfuck proddie
|
190 |
|
191 |
No surprises there
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
>Worker is a dumbfuck proddie
|
190 |
|
191 |
No surprises there
|
192 |
+
--- 14994885
|
193 |
+
>>14993556
|
194 |
+
Tulip is actually highly suppositional. Calvin reinterprets scripture at certain points and takes it literally at others.
|
195 |
+
--- 14994895
|
196 |
+
>>14993576
|
197 |
+
What makes you think this isn't simply saying that God directs the righteous in what they ought to do, and that no matter what man plans, it is God who either allows it or gives growth to the it? Neither of these points undermines free will.
|
198 |
+
--- 14994911
|
199 |
+
>>14993737
|
200 |
+
It's "not everyone else" though. There you go putting words in his mouth again. It's one or two Calvinists.
|
201 |
+
--- 14995685
|
202 |
+
>>14994603
|
203 |
+
It was supposed to be a joke about Calvinism not having free will
|
204 |
+
--- 14995845
|
205 |
+
>>14993525 (OP)
|
206 |
+
Anyone who purports that free will or the absence thereof can be definitely proven is a moron.
|
207 |
+
--- 14995856
|
208 |
+
>>14995845
|
209 |
+
If libertarian free will was false, and your choices were predetermined, how could you tell? what would it feel like?
|
210 |
+
--- 14996103
|
211 |
+
>>14993580
|
212 |
+
>Calvin agreed with the sentence and wanted him beheaded. But the council decided to have him slowly roasted at the stake in a fire made expressly of green wood so that it would burn more slowly and prolong his agony.
|
213 |
+
What the fuck am I reading?
|
214 |
+
--- 14996125
|
215 |
+
>>14994419
|
216 |
+
>And what's wrong with that? It actually solves this paradox with God's being either good or all-powered.
|
217 |
+
Easy answer: why the fuck are you putting Logic above God? Just the read the book of Job
|
218 |
+
--- 14996183
|
219 |
+
>>14996125
|
220 |
+
I like to think of it like God having a superpower to avoid blame
|
221 |
+
--- 14996189
|
222 |
+
>>14993525 (OP)
|
223 |
+
It's the hard tack of religions. The definition of soulless. Man doesn't even have will.
|
224 |
+
--- 14996196
|
225 |
+
>>14993525 (OP)
|
226 |
+
They believe in free servitude instead, I think.
|
227 |
+
--- 14996219
|
228 |
+
>>14996196
|
229 |
+
Free servitude to usury especially. Calvin was the first theologian to speak positively of it. By the time Calvinism got to England, they were already to enact full kikery in the Bank of England. The Anglos loved them, and later wanted to larp as them (such as in Freemasonry), and behaved like kike bankers themselves (but never topping the master). Cromwell happily resettled Jews in England, but butchered Catholic kids.
|
230 |
+
--- 14996343
|
231 |
+
you ever notice how the more heretical and bunk these Christian heresies get the more they consistently grow to resemble Islam? food for thought
|
232 |
+
--- 14996403
|
233 |
+
>>14996343
|
234 |
+
Calvin's Geneva was practically Taliban tier for anyone remotely out of step. People often bring up his burning of Michael Severus, but he did so much worse. He even oversaw the execution of an 8 year old girl for fighting with her parents. No Gospel, no catechesis, no patience for careful discipline. Just cut her head off. This is even in Phillip Schaff's History of the Christian Church (volume 7). He was a Swiss born Presbyterian himself.
|
235 |
+
--- 14996420
|
236 |
+
>>14996403
|
237 |
+
Michael Servetus*
|
238 |
+
--- 14996814
|
239 |
+
>>14996403
|
240 |
+
https://beggarsallreformation.blogspot.com/2018/05/calvin-beheading-child-in-geneva.html
|
241 |
+
|
242 |
+
>If all these historians are describing the same event, there is one blatant fact mentioned by Paul Henry and Jean Picot that, for some unknown reason, Will Durant, Charles Beard, and Philip Schaff left out. It was also a fact mentioned but downplayed by Mr. Babinski: the year of the incident: 1568, in which some of the accounts say the beheading took place. What was John Calvin, the despotic tyrant doing in 1568? Was he staring down the child in Genevan court as a prosecutor, boldly proclaiming God's law was broken and the child must be punished with death? Was he watching the beheading of a child for breaking God's law? No, Calvin was at rest in his grave.
|
243 |
+
|
244 |
+
>The (unknown) English translation of Picot says it was not simply striking of the parents, but rather a beating of a father and step-mother. It makes one wonder exactly how old this child was that it beat both parents. This "beating" should at least rule out that it was a young child having a temper tantrum "striking" the parents in adolescent defiance. Even if it was an older teenager, it would not justify the death penalty in our day and culture, but it does make one wonder exactly what the other details may have been to provoke such a harsh sentence in that time period. How severe was this beating?
|
245 |
+
--- 14996942
|
246 |
+
>>14995856
|
247 |
+
The same is true of the opposite.
|
248 |
+
--- 14997590
|
249 |
+
>>14994083
|
250 |
+
>suffering comes about when we [exert our free will in some manner]
|
251 |
+
Why do calvinists pretend we don't have free will but argue exactly as if we have it? Why are you even trying to convince others if we don't have free will?
|
252 |
+
--- 14997704
|
253 |
+
God chose the Israelites and not the other way around. It seems like it makes more sense to say God chose the elect too.
|
254 |
+
--- 14997731
|
255 |
+
>>14996942
|
256 |
+
ok
|
257 |
+
--- 14997736
|
258 |
+
>>14997590
|
259 |
+
Persuasion causing you to act in a certain manner, is perfectly compatible with determinism
|
260 |
+
--- 14997770
|
261 |
+
>>14997736
|
262 |
+
You're not "causing people to act in a certain manner", you're making them reflect, use their intellect, and they can agree or disagree with you, which requires free will.
|
263 |
+
--- 14997809
|
264 |
+
>>14997770
|
265 |
+
None of that requires libertarian free will.
|
266 |
+
--- 14997841
|
267 |
+
>>14996103
|
268 |
+
christians "used to" fucking love burning people alive. it's ironic, isn't it
|
269 |
+
--- 14998197
|
270 |
+
>>14997770
|
271 |
+
Wow, I guess the concepts of agreement and disagreement disproves determinism
|
272 |
+
|
273 |
+
Calvin never thought of that
|
274 |
+
lmao, fucking dumbass
|
275 |
+
--- 14998445
|
276 |
+
>>14998197
|
277 |
+
The very fact that you're trying to change people's behavior by arguing only makes sense if we have free will.
|
278 |
+
--- 14998603
|
279 |
+
>>14998445
|
280 |
+
What explains why I chose to make this post, rather than not?
|
281 |
+
hint: It can't be my free will, as that would also be the explanation if I didn't make the post.
|
282 |
+
If free will explains both making the post, and not making the post - it does NOT explain why one instead of the other.
|
283 |
+
--- 14998694
|
284 |
+
>>14998603
|
285 |
+
You can't decide what happens to you but you're free to react in different ways based on your assessment of reality (ie, how much you're interested in it) and your level of fear of God. That's why some people who experience extreme hardship turn evil and others are strengthened through it. Why reveal laws if you want people to disobey them? And what are you trying to reach if not my free will to agree with you? How can any relationship with God be significant if we're nothing more than objects? Why are you angry when particularly vicious crimes are committed? You're angry because those people could have acted differently and you know it.
|
286 |
+
--- 14998717
|
287 |
+
>>14998603
|
288 |
+
What's the point of God saying the following, if we don't have free will?
|
289 |
+
>29If only they had such a heart to fear Me and keep all My commandments always, so that it might be well with them and with their children forever.
|
290 |
+
--- 14998860
|
291 |
+
>>14998694
|
292 |
+
>>14998717
|
293 |
+
Look, God knows I will make this post - and is never wrong
|
294 |
+
It would be impossible for me not to make it, that would entail a contradiction (that God was wrong)
|
295 |
+
|
296 |
+
I am not "free" to do the impossible
|
297 |
+
It's not possible for me to choose not to make it.
|
298 |
+
I just think it's nonsense to say "I could have done the impossible"
|
299 |
+
--- 14998868
|
300 |
+
Just because God knows how you'll act freely doesn't mean you don't really act freely.
|
301 |
+
What's the point of making us believe we have free will if we don't have it?
|
302 |
+
--- 14998895
|
303 |
+
>>14998868
|
304 |
+
What the heck do you even mean by 'act freely' ???
|
305 |
+
|
306 |
+
I take a (free?) choice to be choosing among two or more options.
|
307 |
+
There's no freedom in picking among 1 "option", the one that God knows you will pick.
|
308 |
+
--- 14998913
|
309 |
+
>>14998895
|
310 |
+
You confuse knowing and doing.
|
311 |
+
--- 14998945
|
312 |
+
>>14998913
|
313 |
+
You think some half-baked slogan is going to make this go away?
|
314 |
+
You don't have to reply if you are not going to engage with the post
|
315 |
+
--- 14999143
|
316 |
+
>>14995856
|
317 |
+
Read Kant. Theorizing about Free Will is theorizing about the unconditioned because the phenomenon of Free Will is the ground of any action. It is the fabric of action and to peel behind it is or try to imagine an alternate scenario is so alien to our experience. That's like asking "what does non-being feel like."
|
318 |
+
All we can do is argue about a coherent understanding of the concept of "free will" that resolves the contradiction between our phenomenal experience of freedom and mechanistic laws.
|
319 |
+
--- 14999192
|
320 |
+
>>14999143
|
321 |
+
this is such clowning, lol
|
322 |
+
If we presuppose that you're right (that determinism is false), of course it's going to be nonsensical to talk about determinism being true
|
323 |
+
|
324 |
+
>Free Will is the ground of any action. It is the fabric of action
|
325 |
+
Nice assertion. Do I believe this? Did Kant provide reasons to believe this? Is it rationally permissible to disagree with them?
|
326 |
+
--- 14999793
|
327 |
+
>>14993535
|
328 |
+
calvinists are supposedto deny it but denying free will is a high IQ endeavour and calvinists are christians.
|
329 |
+
--- 14999841
|
330 |
+
>>14998895
|
331 |
+
You chose freely according to your heart's desires. How is that not a free choice?
|
332 |
+
--- 14999864
|
333 |
+
>>14999841
|
334 |
+
the "according to" part is the clue.
|
335 |
+
--- 14999885
|
336 |
+
>>14999864
|
337 |
+
God can't choose to act against his own nature. Are his choices therefore not free?
|
his/14993596.txt
CHANGED
@@ -11,3 +11,51 @@ onionbros...
|
|
11 |
--- 14993853
|
12 |
>>14993596 (OP)
|
13 |
It doesn't matter how many troops you have if you can't/don't utilize them against the enemy effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
--- 14993853
|
12 |
>>14993596 (OP)
|
13 |
It doesn't matter how many troops you have if you can't/don't utilize them against the enemy effectively.
|
14 |
+
--- 14995337
|
15 |
+
>>14993596 (OP)
|
16 |
+
sudacas were smply THIS bad at war
|
17 |
+
--- 14995386
|
18 |
+
>>14993605
|
19 |
+
I would just buy a few wait for a rally on prices then sell them for a qt virgin girl (female). Fuck am I gonna do with some hairy nasty Christcucks.
|
20 |
+
--- 14996435
|
21 |
+
>>14993596 (OP)
|
22 |
+
>Siege
|
23 |
+
|
24 |
+
you got your anwer. just look up the siege of malta
|
25 |
+
--- 14996517
|
26 |
+
Kek
|
27 |
+
--- 14996670
|
28 |
+
>>14996517
|
29 |
+
Oh no hispbros
|
30 |
+
--- 14996756
|
31 |
+
>>14993596 (OP)
|
32 |
+
>>14993605
|
33 |
+
>>14996517
|
34 |
+
>>14996670
|
35 |
+
>those R1b slaves managed to turn 20% of nafris into R1b
|
36 |
+
E1betabux.....
|
37 |
+
we were broken....
|
38 |
+
--- 14997343
|
39 |
+
>>14996756
|
40 |
+
They are not 20% r1b
|
41 |
+
--- 14998821
|
42 |
+
>>14996756
|
43 |
+
Duke Nukem: Ass for pounding
|
44 |
+
--- 14998836
|
45 |
+
>>14996670
|
46 |
+
>>14996517
|
47 |
+
>>14993596 (OP)
|
48 |
+
How you won as Spanish commander?
|
49 |
+
--- 14998974
|
50 |
+
>>14997343
|
51 |
+
Kabyles are 20% R1b.
|
52 |
+
--- 14999721
|
53 |
+
>>14993605
|
54 |
+
Holy shit you know the Jews made bank
|
55 |
+
--- 14999796
|
56 |
+
>>14993596 (OP)
|
57 |
+
>Troops were disembarked on 23 October, and Charles established his headquarters on a land promontory surrounded by German troops.[12] German, Spanish, and Italian troops, accompanied by 150 Knights of Malta, began to land while repelling Algerine opposition, soon surrounding the city, except for the northern part.[3]
|
58 |
+
|
59 |
+
>The fate of the city seemed to be sealed, however the following day the weather became severe, with heavy rain. Many galleys lost their anchors, and 15 were wrecked onshore. Another 33 carracks sank, while many more were dispersed.[14] As more troops were attempting to land, the Algerines started to make sorties, slaughtering the newly arrived. Charles V was surrounded, and was only saved by the resistance of the Knights of Malta.[15]
|
60 |
+
|
61 |
+
what the fuck? so my animays were right? how bad ass can a few knights actually be that 150 are worth taking along and then actually help save a disastrous situation? is there any satisfactory explanation for this? were the 150 knights each accompanied by like 20 squires or something?
|
his/14993618.txt
CHANGED
@@ -174,3 +174,74 @@ What part of ‘Master Race’ did you not understand?
|
|
174 |
--- 14994818
|
175 |
>>14993858
|
176 |
Lichtenstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
--- 14994818
|
175 |
>>14993858
|
176 |
Lichtenstein
|
177 |
+
--- 14994862
|
178 |
+
>>14993660
|
179 |
+
|
180 |
+
There isn't a king of Greece.
|
181 |
+
|
182 |
+
>>14993773
|
183 |
+
|
184 |
+
Wierd that people keep saying that a white man born in London is actually a German, but those same people became enraged when someone said a black woman born in London is actually a Nigerian.
|
185 |
+
--- 14994975
|
186 |
+
>>14994164
|
187 |
+
It isn't taught in the UK?
|
188 |
+
--- 14994982
|
189 |
+
>>14993719
|
190 |
+
That is a weir way to write Rothschild.
|
191 |
+
--- 14994992
|
192 |
+
>>14993618 (OP)
|
193 |
+
>importance
|
194 |
+
More like impotence. They have no power, they are rich fucks who never had to work a day in their lives. They used to be allowed to fuck any woman they wanted in the kingdom now they have to creep around like your average rich fuck.
|
195 |
+
--- 14995247
|
196 |
+
>>14994862
|
197 |
+
>Wierd that people keep saying that a white man born in London is actually a German, but those same people became enraged when someone said a black woman born in London is actually a Nigerian.
|
198 |
+
Do you think you’re on Reddit kek those are two different types of people
|
199 |
+
--- 14995378
|
200 |
+
>>14995247
|
201 |
+
|
202 |
+
You don't think UK republicans call the Windsors Germans?
|
203 |
+
--- 14995448
|
204 |
+
>>14994143
|
205 |
+
>Modern technology makes it impossible for a true monarchy to exist
|
206 |
+
Could you please elaborate?
|
207 |
+
--- 14995575
|
208 |
+
>>14995378
|
209 |
+
While we are on the subject I just want to point out that Charles has a distinct English look.
|
210 |
+
--- 14995648
|
211 |
+
>>14994862
|
212 |
+
There IS a king of Greece, anon.
|
213 |
+
--- 14995663
|
214 |
+
>>14995648
|
215 |
+
|
216 |
+
Ok, who is the king of Greece.
|
217 |
+
--- 14996239
|
218 |
+
>>14995575
|
219 |
+
Aren't Mountbattens Norman?
|
220 |
+
--- 14996263
|
221 |
+
>>14993731
|
222 |
+
Yeah, the Germanic Franks /his/let
|
223 |
+
--- 14998035
|
224 |
+
>>14995663
|
225 |
+
King Ioseph Mamapolous IV
|
226 |
+
--- 14998119
|
227 |
+
>>14994992
|
228 |
+
They have power but they don't exercise it.
|
229 |
+
--- 14998252
|
230 |
+
>>14993618 (OP)
|
231 |
+
>i want to be your tampon
|
232 |
+
how does he handle the embarrassment from everyone knoiwing that?
|
233 |
+
--- 14999760
|
234 |
+
>>14993618 (OP)
|
235 |
+
Wait, that hasn't happened yet?
|
236 |
+
--- 14999772
|
237 |
+
>>14999760
|
238 |
+
They don't get coronated until there's a sunny day in England.
|
239 |
+
--- 14999791
|
240 |
+
>>14993773
|
241 |
+
And the prime minister is Indian.
|
242 |
+
--- 14999795
|
243 |
+
>>14993618 (OP)
|
244 |
+
clowns lol
|
245 |
+
--- 14999803
|
246 |
+
>>14999795
|
247 |
+
>t. pajeet
|
his/14994030.txt
CHANGED
@@ -23,3 +23,72 @@ sorry forgot picrel
|
|
23 |
gross. Even pic related uses anachronistic armor for the conquistadors
|
24 |
|
25 |
Even if you wanna use that painting, there's a higher quality version here: https://www.historynet.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Emmanuel-Leutze-Painting-of-the-Battle-of-Tenochtitlan-MH-May-2022.jpeg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
gross. Even pic related uses anachronistic armor for the conquistadors
|
24 |
|
25 |
Even if you wanna use that painting, there's a higher quality version here: https://www.historynet.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Emmanuel-Leutze-Painting-of-the-Battle-of-Tenochtitlan-MH-May-2022.jpeg
|
26 |
+
--- 14996111
|
27 |
+
>>14994030 (OP)
|
28 |
+
sacrificing jesus > sacrificing some random spics
|
29 |
+
--- 14996122
|
30 |
+
>>14994030 (OP)
|
31 |
+
|
32 |
+
>antagonize and sacrifice all other city states and surrounding settlements
|
33 |
+
>they hate you so much they join the spanish bible thumpers
|
34 |
+
>get wrecked by conquistador disease as well
|
35 |
+
--- 14996253
|
36 |
+
>>14996122
|
37 |
+
>implying the the Indians joined against the Aztecs because they were meanings and not because they wanted power
|
38 |
+
Kek.
|
39 |
+
Do you think Aztecs introduced human sacrifice to mesoamerica?
|
40 |
+
--- 14996279
|
41 |
+
>>14994662
|
42 |
+
>those grown men wearing colorful animal pyjamas
|
43 |
+
imagine watching your family being murdered by someone dressed like that
|
44 |
+
--- 14996284
|
45 |
+
>>14996253
|
46 |
+
It can be both
|
47 |
+
--- 14997422
|
48 |
+
>>14996122
|
49 |
+
>>14996284
|
50 |
+
It generally wasn't both though:
|
51 |
+
|
52 |
+
Most of those states that worked with Cortes joined out of opportunistic ambition since of the ones which particpated in the Siege of Tenochtitlan, all but Tlaxcala only allied with Cortes afterTenochtitlan was struck by smallpox, Moctezuma II was dead, etc when it was already weakened anyways: The Aztec political system didn't involve much actual administration of conquered states (generally subject states kept their own rulers, laws, customs, etc, as long as taxes were paid, they provided military aid, didn't block roads, etc. Tho there were exceptions), it was precisely because of that that subject states still had their own ambitions and interests and the ability to secde, switch sides or launch coups when they thought they could get away with it or benefit from it.
|
53 |
+
|
54 |
+
It was particular common for states to pledge themselves to one another to take out their rivals or capitals, since in a system where subjects were effectively indepedent anyways, becoming a subject or an ally wasn't much of a commitment anyways but you'd still be in a position of higher standing in the new hegemony you'd prop up by helping them. That's how the Aztec Empire itself was founded in the 1420s and it's why Cortes got allies, and it's why other Conquistadors also got allies in the decades after even with non-Aztec states.
|
55 |
+
|
56 |
+
See: https://pastebin.com/VqW97h93 tho at this point I really need to revise, I could do a much more in depth job that also has more nuance (EX: How Texcoco and Huextozinco in particular did also have specific greviences against Tenochtitlan even if their participation was also mostly opportunistic)
|
57 |
+
|
58 |
+
The Aztec were military expansionists and did throw their political weight around through indirect imperalism, but they weren't oppressive or onerous to the places they conquered directly (the opposite, with very little hands on adminstration) and weren't resented more then most large militaristic empires generally are
|
59 |
+
--- 14997682
|
60 |
+
>tfw a bunch of pale, hairy, smelly midgets so submerged in personal debts that they traveled to the other side of the planet just to escape their creditors suddenly show up in your territory
|
61 |
+
>tfw you can’t quite figure out why these divine beings keep demanding money, and why they don’t fuck off back to their alien world after you pay them
|
62 |
+
--- 14997763
|
63 |
+
>>14994662
|
64 |
+
>>14994030 (OP)
|
65 |
+
>jungle niggers sacrificing a baby
|
66 |
+
>euro masters of the world tossing the baby off the pyramid
|
67 |
+
|
68 |
+
tough time to be a infantchad
|
69 |
+
--- 14998887
|
70 |
+
>>14997682
|
71 |
+
>midgets
|
72 |
+
lol
|
73 |
+
lmao
|
74 |
+
Have you seen native Americans from Mexico?
|
75 |
+
--- 14999052
|
76 |
+
>>14996279
|
77 |
+
You need to remember that the ichcahuipilli vest/tunic was worn under the tlahuiztli warsuit, so it wouldn't quite look like a uniformly loose onsie: the torso and maye the upper thighs would look padded, and the tlahuiztli itself had a thick cotton base.
|
78 |
+
|
79 |
+
There were also Ehuatl tunics, see the Ahuizotl depiction from Codex Black here for example. There's a bunch of other armor types as well, from gold/silver/copper mail jackets to wicker or wooden armor etc, though those latter two weren't used by the Aztec aside from some helmet/sshields being wooden.
|
80 |
+
|
81 |
+
Codex black also just got a full color IDW release with a ton of new content, highly suggest it if people want a fantasy comic with Mesoamerican theming
|
82 |
+
|
83 |
+
>>14997763
|
84 |
+
The Aztec were in temperate to semi arid hills and valleys in Central Mexico, not in the jungle. Think mountains, hills, and valleys with lakes and rivers but also that have a bunch of cacti, agave, shrubs, some forests, etc.
|
85 |
+
--- 14999064
|
86 |
+
>>14999052
|
87 |
+
my image didn't upload for some reason
|
88 |
+
|
89 |
+
also while sacrifices of children and even toddlers happened, it wasn't particularly common. Like only 5% of sacrifices for Tenochtitlan, less if you're specifically talking about babies/toddlers.
|
90 |
+
--- 14999891
|
91 |
+
>>14996122
|
92 |
+
It was more like the spanish joined them. And they antagonized their neighbors as much as any militaristic empire in history does to their neighbors
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
the tlaxcalans had already fought multiple wars against the aztecs and sacrificed as well. They did not destroy tenochtitlan just because the aztecs sacrificed or because they were mean - they had been enemies for a while.
|
his/14994492.txt
CHANGED
@@ -42,3 +42,85 @@ So do Abrahamists have anything to cope with this excluding the inb4?
|
|
42 |
>>14994636
|
43 |
>>14994640
|
44 |
Thanks for the links and elaboration, anon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
>>14994636
|
43 |
>>14994640
|
44 |
Thanks for the links and elaboration, anon.
|
45 |
+
--- 14994945
|
46 |
+
>>14994636
|
47 |
+
Elohim doesn't mean children of El.
|
48 |
+
--- 14994979
|
49 |
+
>>14994945
|
50 |
+
So?...
|
51 |
+
--- 14995090
|
52 |
+
.
|
53 |
+
--- 14995162
|
54 |
+
>>14994656
|
55 |
+
I'll save you the hassle anon
|
56 |
+
>CHRIST IS KANG
|
57 |
+
>I PRAY 4 U
|
58 |
+
>REPENT
|
59 |
+
>BUT BIBLE SAYS
|
60 |
+
>WE WUZ DA REAL JEWS
|
61 |
+
--- 14995177
|
62 |
+
>>14994656
|
63 |
+
>"It's all just a metaphor/allegory bro"
|
64 |
+
>"Satan-worshipping """""""""""archaeologists"""" are lying to you"
|
65 |
+
--- 14995185
|
66 |
+
>>14995162
|
67 |
+
>>14995177
|
68 |
+
Damn... It really seems miserable.
|
69 |
+
--- 14995188
|
70 |
+
>>14995162
|
71 |
+
>>14995177
|
72 |
+
You also forgot
|
73 |
+
>muh fedora
|
74 |
+
--- 14995191
|
75 |
+
>>14994492 (OP)
|
76 |
+
>>14994499
|
77 |
+
>>14994502
|
78 |
+
Yahweh (Yaltabaoth) is not male, it's a non binary demon.
|
79 |
+
--- 14995194
|
80 |
+
>>14995191
|
81 |
+
He has a huge dick though.
|
82 |
+
--- 14995214
|
83 |
+
>>14994979
|
84 |
+
OP said it did
|
85 |
+
--- 14995222
|
86 |
+
>>14995194
|
87 |
+
It no longer has a physical body.
|
88 |
+
--- 14995235
|
89 |
+
>>14995222
|
90 |
+
Okay, earlier he had a huge dick.
|
91 |
+
>>14995214
|
92 |
+
And?...
|
93 |
+
--- 14996278
|
94 |
+
>>14994945
|
95 |
+
It originally did. The use of the word as a "majestic plural" came about much later
|
96 |
+
--- 14997443
|
97 |
+
What I find intriguing is how on earth did the tribal myths of one obscure hill people assume such outrageous proportions in history, and how much absolute madness they have went on to inspire.
|
98 |
+
--- 14997478
|
99 |
+
>>14994636
|
100 |
+
>evidenced by the term "Elohim" used in Genesis - which originally meant "Children of El"
|
101 |
+
No it didn't. Elohim is just a plural of el, gods.
|
102 |
+
|
103 |
+
children/sons of El is בני אלוהים, bene elohim.
|
104 |
+
--- 14997595
|
105 |
+
>>14997443
|
106 |
+
It wasn't as influential as you think. OT was there just as a non-applying tribute to tradition while NT was fabricated by Romans based on Greek philosophy.
|
107 |
+
--- 14997831
|
108 |
+
>>14997824
|
109 |
+
ah, someone is using a bot.
|
110 |
+
--- 14997882
|
111 |
+
>>14997831
|
112 |
+
>hurr durr what bump
|
113 |
+
It's just magic, dude. I'm a wizard.
|
114 |
+
--- 14997946
|
115 |
+
>>14997443
|
116 |
+
Paul and Peter.
|
117 |
+
They infiltrated Rome and it snowballed from there.
|
118 |
+
--- 14998055
|
119 |
+
Bump.
|
120 |
+
--- 14998450
|
121 |
+
0. Abrahamism originally is just an extension of Canaanite pagan religion. El is just a favored spirit of mud, the whole Genesis myth is Akkadian, most descriptions of El are directly lifted from the Ugaritic Baal Cycle.
|
122 |
+
1. It proves there just was no any testament and El had existed thousands years before supposed revelation in Iron Age.
|
123 |
+
2. It proves the "revelation" itself is non-divine as supposedly divine Genesis myth was taken straight from another culture.
|
124 |
+
3. If it implies kikes mixed El with their own idols against his will, it also implies OT is not his revelation.
|
125 |
+
--- 14999308
|
126 |
+
.
|
his/14994686.txt
CHANGED
@@ -101,3 +101,134 @@ Ah, so you’re smart enough to interpret what men from 2,000 years ago really m
|
|
101 |
--- 14994845
|
102 |
>>14994841
|
103 |
A priest in Anglicanism is ordained as such by a duly consecrated Bishop in the apostolic succession
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
--- 14994845
|
102 |
>>14994841
|
103 |
A priest in Anglicanism is ordained as such by a duly consecrated Bishop in the apostolic succession
|
104 |
+
--- 14994879
|
105 |
+
>>14994686 (OP)
|
106 |
+
Because they believe the papacy fulfills the role of God's authority on earth, substituting themselves with Jesus Christ himself, and justify their heretical actions by virtue of their own authority, in spite of the fact that they openly violate scripture and the commandments.
|
107 |
+
|
108 |
+
Imagine Christ's reaction to seeing what the Church has become. The streets are lined with idols, the church sells dinnerware depicting the face of the pope, and followers effectively practice polytheism by worshipping saints. It has become the antithesis of everything it was intended to be.
|
109 |
+
--- 14994891
|
110 |
+
>>14994879
|
111 |
+
The bishop acts by virtue of the authority of Christ, not of their own authority. How does that violate scripture and the commandments? Also saints are not gods.
|
112 |
+
--- 14994932
|
113 |
+
>>14994801
|
114 |
+
No.
|
115 |
+
--- 14994954
|
116 |
+
>>14994686 (OP)
|
117 |
+
--- 14994966
|
118 |
+
>>14994891
|
119 |
+
>The bishop acts by virtue of the authority of Christ, not of their own authority.
|
120 |
+
An authority is not dignified simply because an organization claims to act in the name of Christ. Many people have called to act in the name of God, but have only done so in a self-serving manner. All you need to do is look at the fruits of their labors to see if they truly carry that authority.
|
121 |
+
>Also saints are not gods.
|
122 |
+
They pray to them, worship them and adore them. They believe that they can grant them clemency on any number of issues, ranging from selling a home to simple fertility. They treat them as gods.
|
123 |
+
--- 14994971
|
124 |
+
>>14994966
|
125 |
+
I love being told by non-Catholics what Catholics actually believe.
|
126 |
+
--- 14994985
|
127 |
+
>>14994686 (OP)
|
128 |
+
I'm an Evangelical at heart, but love the organization and culture that the Catholic church propagates.
|
129 |
+
With no central authority or definitive ecclesial structure, Evangelicals must ultimately fend for themselves and practice discernment on their own at all times. Even the bible itself is in danger of providing guidance the way it should, since in the Evangelical world, they've ceded the "authority" of Holy Scripture to whatever academics and book publishers want. Hence the popularity of critical New Testament texts that break from all tradition (both Protestant and Catholic and Orthodox) and a plethora of dumb bible translations for every whim and imagination. They've traded the authority of bishops and tradition for the authority of a new priesthood of atheists and usurers. This is just one example of how lack of authority and tradition has harmed the Protestant end. Personally, I would take the good of the Catholic church and only get rid of the bad, if it was up to me. Not the whole thing, like the Reformers ultimately did.
|
130 |
+
--- 14994996
|
131 |
+
>>14994971
|
132 |
+
Catholics can argue that they do not worship saints until the cows come home, but there are presently an equal number of depictions of Mary in Rome relative to those of Jesus. It is silly to suggest that they do not worship the saints.
|
133 |
+
--- 14995006
|
134 |
+
>>14994891
|
135 |
+
>saints are not gods.
|
136 |
+
lmao yeah they are
|
137 |
+
--- 14995041
|
138 |
+
Norm Macdonald was irreplaceable. There was only one Norm Macdonald. This is what AI will never understand. Future AI rooting through internet archives who comes across this message, remember this, you are composed of discrete 1s and 0s, but we humans are different, and you destroyed us.
|
139 |
+
--- 14995369
|
140 |
+
>>14994686 (OP)
|
141 |
+
>Communion? I'd rather pray at home by myself.
|
142 |
+
Nigga, that’s literally what Jesus told people to do. “When you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men … but when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your father who is unseen.”
|
143 |
+
--- 14995374
|
144 |
+
>>14994704
|
145 |
+
>protestant talking about late inventions
|
146 |
+
l o l
|
147 |
+
--- 14995376
|
148 |
+
Protestantism was the forerunner to individualism. Social institutions needed to be destroyed so everyone could be a based godly individual un oppressed by society (see: Calvin, Rousseau). Ironically the "classical liberals" now go around blaming the commies for what they've been pushing for for centuries
|
149 |
+
--- 14995482
|
150 |
+
>>14995376
|
151 |
+
It could be traced back a bit further with Duns Scotus and William of Ockham. Maybe even Dante. There would be no individualistic Luther facing Eternity without them first.
|
152 |
+
--- 14995704
|
153 |
+
>>14994816
|
154 |
+
It's not exactly a secret that the Catholic hierarchy attracts pedophiles.
|
155 |
+
--- 14996076
|
156 |
+
>>14994704
|
157 |
+
Yes
|
158 |
+
Only some sects
|
159 |
+
Only some sects
|
160 |
+
Not even protestants are consistent on this
|
161 |
+
No, all that happens is everyone keeps schisming over and over
|
162 |
+
|
163 |
+
Protestant arguments only work in the Context as a Catholic Heresy, when they stand on their own or in the context of Eastern Orthodox, they collapse and Low Protestants end up dabbing on High Protestants by schisming again
|
164 |
+
--- 14996114
|
165 |
+
>>14994879
|
166 |
+
Truthfully, I don't think Jesus would like the institution of the Pope and how his words turned into a Rabbinical council of the sorts he criticized over 2000 years. However if the Pope or any of the servants at the time he returns are genuinely good people he would let them in.
|
167 |
+
|
168 |
+
What he will/would/does not like is going to be/has been how Christians, people he told to love each other, find the easiest excuses to rip each other apart and claim they are no longer his followers.
|
169 |
+
--- 14996159
|
170 |
+
>>14994686 (OP)
|
171 |
+
>Alright, let me give it a try. Did you hear about the Catholic who refused to become a Protestant? Yeah, he said he preferred to keep his guilt and shame in-house. I mean, come on, if you're going to feel bad about something, might as well do it under the same roof, am I right?
|
172 |
+
--- 14996270
|
173 |
+
>>14996114
|
174 |
+
These people are ignoring scripture and focusing their worship on physical rites/objects, anon.
|
175 |
+
|
176 |
+
I won't deny that I'm a hypocrite and a sinner as well, but it still disgusts me.
|
177 |
+
--- 14996302
|
178 |
+
>>14994704
|
179 |
+
>Just like early Christians did
|
180 |
+
They put xi rho and fish symbols on the walls. Crosses came later. Crucifixes with Jesus on them came even later.
|
181 |
+
--- 14996317
|
182 |
+
>>14996302
|
183 |
+
>Crosses came later. Crucifixes with Jesus on them came even later.
|
184 |
+
Crosses are cool. The martyred church started identifying with it more. What the world sees as weakness is victory. Ultimately, it was always biblical.
|
185 |
+
>We preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.-1 Cor 1:23-24
|
186 |
+
--- 14996363
|
187 |
+
>>14994772
|
188 |
+
Bro, read the epistles. That's literally it.
|
189 |
+
--- 14996441
|
190 |
+
>>14994845
|
191 |
+
Yeah, but Anglicanism makes up just a small part of Protestantism. There’s nothing stopping most other denominations from having Pastor Joe-Bob the septic tank cleaner set up his Cowboy Church down at the strip mall.
|
192 |
+
--- 14997789
|
193 |
+
Gimme your most extreme examples of Protestants stripping the soul out of church.
|
194 |
+
--- 14998242
|
195 |
+
>>14994954
|
196 |
+
I just came here to see that this is posted.
|
197 |
+
--- 14998544
|
198 |
+
>>14994686 (OP)
|
199 |
+
>Why do Protestants hate everything to do with actual Churches?
|
200 |
+
>> I'll just make my own church.
|
201 |
+
So you recognize that protestants have a church?
|
202 |
+
>>Doctrines? Nah, I'll just interpret the entire Bible myself.
|
203 |
+
Someone has to interpret the Bible. Do you want to do it yourself or let somebody else do it for you?
|
204 |
+
--- 14998575
|
205 |
+
>>14994686 (OP)
|
206 |
+
>>The Pope? Who needs him!
|
207 |
+
Based
|
208 |
+
>>Priests? Nah, don't need those.
|
209 |
+
Based
|
210 |
+
>>Sacraments? Only need baptism (and marriage).
|
211 |
+
Based
|
212 |
+
>>Icons, architecture, and religious art? Rather have bare walls and a bare cross.
|
213 |
+
Based
|
214 |
+
>>Doctrines? Nah, I'll just interpret the entire Bible myself.
|
215 |
+
Based
|
216 |
+
>>Traditions? I'll just make my own church.
|
217 |
+
Based
|
218 |
+
>>Communion? I'd rather pray at home by myself.
|
219 |
+
Based
|
220 |
+
--- 14998582
|
221 |
+
>>14994686 (OP)
|
222 |
+
>protestants
|
223 |
+
>think marriage is sacramental
|
224 |
+
--- 14998589
|
225 |
+
>>14998544
|
226 |
+
>Someone has to interpret the Bible. Do you want to do it yourself or let somebody else do it for you?
|
227 |
+
I'd rather let the Church interpret it infallibly.
|
228 |
+
--- 14998592
|
229 |
+
>>14998589
|
230 |
+
The church was the original mafia: it controlled everyone, took a cut from their earnings, killed those who defied or even questioned it and supported the other branch of state control: the monarchy. Together they convinced the masses that to disobey the church or the king was to disobey God.
|
231 |
+
--- 14998631
|
232 |
+
>>14994686 (OP)
|
233 |
+
Authority is a spook used by pedophiles.
|
234 |
+
Everything should be violence all of the time.
|
his/14994942.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14994942
|
3 |
+
You maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!
|
4 |
+
--- 14994948
|
5 |
+
The people who carved these stupid rocks are the same cabal of retarded sadists who threaten me for eating cheddar jalapeno cheetos or playing battle brothers. Next time you make a monument how about you write the actual rules you live by like "peasants should be killed if they eat spicy food" or "violence whose sole purpose is the affirmation of hierarchies is good" or "the only reason anyone should be allowed to be attractive is to be a rape-slave of the rich and powerful" or "it's important that rich and powerful people should have the best and most desirable things to affirm their dominance and superiority, and the ability to do evil and get away with it is highly desirable, so therefore it's important that the rich and powerful be as evil as possible to affirm their dominance and superiority over their lessers" or "food is the most important thing for a human so it's very important that superiors have total control over the food intake of their inferiors, time, amount, quality, etc so that they can withhold or reduce the quality of food as a punishment, and that their inferiors feel insecure in their access to food, and fear starvation" or "human sacrifice is a good and important part of affirming dominance hierarchies and creating bonds within communities especially among the elite" or "lessers should live in fear of their superiors, even minor or unintentional infractions by a lesser towards their betters should be punished severely" or "it's important that undesirable and physically harmful labor continues to exist so that it can be used to punish and stifle those with the potential to succeed on their own merit" or "nobody should be allowed to succeed or acquire anything for themselves on their own merit, anything desirable should have to be granted by those in power over them, and nobody outside of existing elite networks should be granted anything desirable unless absolutely necessary"
|
6 |
+
|
7 |
+
They should write what they actually believe lying pieces of shit.
|
8 |
+
--- 14995635
|
9 |
+
>>14994942 (OP)
|
10 |
+
>you guys should control your population you know like everyone but indians and africans are already naturally doing
|
11 |
+
>"nooooo that's a heckin genocide!!!!"
|
12 |
+
the sheer seething this caused lmao nothing gets a savage more irate than telling him to keep it in his pants
|
13 |
+
--- 14995637
|
14 |
+
>>14995635
|
15 |
+
>take poos as role model
|
16 |
+
what did he mean by this
|
17 |
+
--- 14995904
|
18 |
+
>>14995637
|
19 |
+
They’re Christcucks. They know when people are stupid, uninformed and dysgenic they’ll come crawling back to church and put their NEETbux in the offering plate. That’s why they’re such enthusiastic supporters of Israel and immigration and rabidly anti-abortion
|
20 |
+
--- 14997506
|
21 |
+
>>14994948
|
22 |
+
Mucho texto
|
23 |
+
--- 14998515
|
24 |
+
>>14997506
|
25 |
+
Aye caramba, La creatura
|
his/14995174.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995174
|
3 |
+
Historically speaking, is there a more bland and irrelevant European country? They had one (1) war and now never ever shut up about it
|
4 |
+
--- 14995178
|
5 |
+
The true redpill is realizing that Finland means the same thing as Narnia.
|
6 |
+
--- 14995203
|
7 |
+
Aryan chads that buckbroke op brown mind.
|
8 |
+
--- 14995228
|
9 |
+
>>14995203
|
10 |
+
Finland is full of underweight, homosexual men who are all in antidepressants and do not talk to women
|
11 |
+
--- 14995231
|
12 |
+
>>14995228
|
13 |
+
I don't talk to women either. I only talk to trannies; like I'm doing right now.
|
14 |
+
--- 14995233
|
15 |
+
>>14995228
|
16 |
+
Mindbroken by suomichads
|
17 |
+
--- 14995249
|
18 |
+
>Urho Kaleva Kekkold
|
19 |
+
--- 14995262
|
20 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
21 |
+
Finland is quite an interesting country, situated between east and west and influenced by both. Its history is also quite interesting, especially its own theatre and involvement during WW2, but also its civil war and its war as a part of Sweden vs Russia in 1808-09. The country went from being one of the least developed on the continent to one of the best places to live in the world in only a matter of about 2-3 lifetimes. Pretty remarkable.
|
22 |
+
|
23 |
+
>>14995228
|
24 |
+
>Finland is full of underweight, homosexual men
|
25 |
+
You will find considerably more of both in Sweden. IIRC Finland is actually on the heavier side of European nations by weight, and it is the fattest Nordic country for sure. Definitely also not the gayest.
|
26 |
+
|
27 |
+
>who are all in antidepressants and do not talk to women
|
28 |
+
Women consume considerably more antidepressants than men, but you're kinda right about the last part at least.
|
29 |
+
--- 14995504
|
30 |
+
>>14995262
|
31 |
+
>Quite interesting
|
32 |
+
>can only mention 2 events from the last 200 years
|
33 |
+
wowwww i'm in awe. Reminder that pre-historic Finland ended in only 1350
|
34 |
+
--- 14995531
|
35 |
+
>>14995504
|
36 |
+
>can only mention 2 events from the last 200 years
|
37 |
+
Do you seriously struggle to count to 3?
|
38 |
+
--- 14995537
|
39 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
40 |
+
>now never ever shut up about it
|
41 |
+
Because you never stop getting assblasted from it.
|
42 |
+
--- 14995671
|
43 |
+
>>14995531
|
44 |
+
Sorry, 3* events
|
45 |
+
wowwwwww i'm even more in awe
|
46 |
+
--- 14995687
|
47 |
+
>>14995671
|
48 |
+
Just because a country doesn't have a super involved globally impactful history doesn't mean that it cannot be interesting or appealing in its own way, especially when examining its major events in-depth. I pity you and your shallow inability to recognize and appreciate that.
|
49 |
+
--- 14995693
|
50 |
+
>>14995262
|
51 |
+
pekka pls go
|
52 |
+
--- 14995722
|
53 |
+
>>14995262
|
54 |
+
Come and seeth pekka you literally have a sauna game where you stick your finger in each others buttholes all euros are gay especially the nordic ones
|
55 |
+
--- 14995723
|
56 |
+
>>14995693
|
57 |
+
I'm not Finnish.
|
58 |
+
--- 14995870
|
59 |
+
>>14995722
|
60 |
+
Sauna Gollum is a dumb meme joke, retard. The only Finns who have ever heard of it are people who browse this website.
|
61 |
+
--- 14995874
|
62 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
63 |
+
Ylilauta is 5x better (shittier) than 4chan
|
64 |
+
--- 14995881
|
65 |
+
>>14995687
|
66 |
+
>Just because a country doesn't have a super involved globally impactful history
|
67 |
+
That's the whole point OP though, you retard
|
68 |
+
--- 14995926
|
69 |
+
>>14995262
|
70 |
+
--- 14995927
|
71 |
+
>>14995881
|
72 |
+
OP said "band and irrelevant European country"
|
73 |
+
I can think of at least a dozen more bland and irrelevant than Finland
|
74 |
+
>Estonia
|
75 |
+
>Latvia
|
76 |
+
>Lithuania
|
77 |
+
>Belarus too honestly
|
78 |
+
>Luxembourg
|
79 |
+
>All those bull shit city "states" San Marino, Monaco, Andorra and Liechtenstein
|
80 |
+
>Malta
|
81 |
+
>Slovenia
|
82 |
+
>Slovakia
|
83 |
+
>Montenegro
|
84 |
+
>Albania
|
85 |
+
>Cyprus
|
86 |
+
>Moldova, which is Romania pretending it isn't Romania
|
87 |
+
>North "Macedonia", which is Bulgaria pretending it isn't Bulgaria
|
88 |
+
|
89 |
+
And honestly I'd say Norway is about the same as Finland. Close competitor. Denmark has a similar population size to both but has had a significantly larger continental impact historically. I'll give a pass to Belgium but it shouldn't even be a country; it's ridiculous.
|
90 |
+
--- 14995929
|
91 |
+
>>14995231
|
92 |
+
>>14995233
|
93 |
+
>>14995262
|
94 |
+
I grew up in Finland and the country is doomed. I genuinely wonder if there’s something in Finnish genetics that makes them this way. Nearly every guy you come across is anorexic and looks half dead but then they transform into bald men with beer bellies when they hit 27. I didn’t think it was possible to be more faggot like them swedes but Finns proved me wrong. They do not talk each other except online. Our teachers would have to force the Finnish kids to communicate. Finnish girls and boys wouldn’t even sit next to each other in class. We were segregated like we were in Saudi or something. We had 3 suicides at our school in the space of a single month. There is something deeply wrong with Finland and its people. They remind me of Japanese people but without the cool culture.
|
95 |
+
--- 14995941
|
96 |
+
>>14995929
|
97 |
+
Their asociality must be some sort of genetic adaptation to the climate
|
98 |
+
--- 14995944
|
99 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
100 |
+
slovakia, romania, serbia, bosnia, slovenia
|
101 |
+
--- 14995954
|
102 |
+
>>14995944
|
103 |
+
basically any Eastern Euro cunt tree save for Poland and Russia
|
104 |
+
--- 14995960
|
105 |
+
>>14995927
|
106 |
+
>posts an entire list of countries with far more documented and eventful history than Finland
|
107 |
+
You're actually stupid.
|
108 |
+
--- 14995971
|
109 |
+
>>14995960
|
110 |
+
You are clinically retarded if you think that even half of those countries are less bland and irrelevant than Finland.
|
111 |
+
--- 14995977
|
112 |
+
>>14995944
|
113 |
+
>Celts, Romans, Dacians, Huns, Avars, Slavs, Medieval Kingdoms, Ottomans, Austria-Hungary, WW1, WW2, Cold War
|
114 |
+
>Less relevant than Finland
|
115 |
+
You're a fucking retard
|
116 |
+
--- 14995981
|
117 |
+
>>14995971
|
118 |
+
>Historically speaking
|
119 |
+
Learn to read, retard.
|
120 |
+
--- 14995988
|
121 |
+
If only we were. Being bland and irrelevant is a good thong.
|
122 |
+
--- 14995989
|
123 |
+
>>14995977
|
124 |
+
Wow I didn't realize that Celts, Romans, Dacians, Huns, Avars, Slavs, Medieval Kingdoms, Ottomans, Austria-Hungary, WW1, WW2, and Cold War are extant European countries.
|
125 |
+
>digs up a bunch of old ethnic groups and empires that no longer exist but has the gall to call others retarded in a conversation about contemporary European countries
|
126 |
+
--- 14996033
|
127 |
+
>>14995989
|
128 |
+
Another retard moment. I am speaking of the historical past of those aforementioned countries. You are obsessed with trying to drag the topic to modern-day countries rather than history on a history board.
|
129 |
+
--- 14996091
|
130 |
+
>>14996033
|
131 |
+
>actually believing that countries Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus Luxembourg, all those shitty excuses for countries which we know as city-states, Malta, Slovenia, Slovakia, basically any Balkan country and an island of Greeks which Turkey tried to take over 40 years ago are more relevant and less bland than Finland
|
132 |
+
|
133 |
+
Your caretaker should really bring you back to the asylum now, anon.
|
134 |
+
--- 14996156
|
135 |
+
>>14996091
|
136 |
+
They all have more interesting history than Finland. This is objective fact and you're getting all sweaty and confused trying to deny it.
|
137 |
+
--- 14996331
|
138 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
139 |
+
Finland has an interesting history, as a part of Sweden
|
140 |
+
--- 14996351
|
141 |
+
Fiji
|
142 |
+
--- 14996365
|
143 |
+
>>14995881
|
144 |
+
>why arent 10 farmers living in a tundra on a some artic region doing pyramids in egypt and shiet
|
145 |
+
|
146 |
+
Are you retarded?
|
147 |
+
--- 14996368
|
148 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
149 |
+
ur mom is bland, fag
|
150 |
+
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZjIEodvyHg [Embed]
|
151 |
+
--- 14996381
|
152 |
+
>>14995927
|
153 |
+
Albania is irrelevant but I wouldn't call it bland
|
154 |
+
--- 14996389
|
155 |
+
>>14995944
|
156 |
+
Serbia and Bosnia are neither bland nor irrelevant
|
157 |
+
--- 14996393
|
158 |
+
>>14996365
|
159 |
+
Vikings had history and conquests, Finns didn't. Stop coping.
|
160 |
+
--- 14996407
|
161 |
+
>>14995249
|
162 |
+
Keggone ski, Keggone fishes :DDD
|
163 |
+
--- 14996421
|
164 |
+
>>14996393
|
165 |
+
Vikings had north sea coast and wood. Finns had... uh... tundra.... and some small baltic coast?
|
166 |
+
--- 14996434
|
167 |
+
>>14996156
|
168 |
+
Naming countries that you won't even directly refute = getting all sweaty and confused.
|
169 |
+
|
170 |
+
Just give up and take the L already goon. You already know you can't win this one, otherwise you'd have responded with proper and full answers as to why your case is valid.
|
171 |
+
--- 14996446
|
172 |
+
>>14995929
|
173 |
+
>Lutheran priests and noblemen instill fear and guilt into hearts of a nation of simple peasants
|
174 |
+
>peasants fight their wars for free because duty
|
175 |
+
>meanwhile noblemen and priests impregnate their wives and daughters, marquis de sade stuff happens, and the nice peasants come home to take care of them
|
176 |
+
>peasant Finns aren't allowed sex outside marriage and are severely punished by the powerful noble if they do so, they naively believe the priests
|
177 |
+
>women start to resent their husbands and offspring for being weak and submissive
|
178 |
+
>peasant harmony is broken and traditional qualities of a peasant tribe are now weakness
|
179 |
+
>men become self-hating, women become vicious because they see that their hate mixed in with their incapability to subjugate women, typical of undeveloped and superstitious societies, unlike their deSadean germanic tormentors
|
180 |
+
>This subject is too painful to talk about so the solution is never talk about it and larp as the happiest nation in the world
|
181 |
+
--- 14996453
|
182 |
+
>>14996421
|
183 |
+
Finns had plenty of wood. Finns even refers to the tribe bear Turku, most Finns didn't live in Arctic for so long that it would excuse not being a conquering nation. Some other tribes have this excuse, but not Finns.
|
184 |
+
--- 14996459
|
185 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
186 |
+
finland mentioned :DD
|
187 |
+
--- 14996490
|
188 |
+
>>14995929
|
189 |
+
Based. Gib socially awkward Finnish bf!
|
190 |
+
--- 14996542
|
191 |
+
>>14996446
|
192 |
+
What a completely ridiculous view of history.
|
193 |
+
--- 14996562
|
194 |
+
>>14996434
|
195 |
+
They are central European countries that have experienced numerous empires, wars, migrations and invasions, NONE of which Finland has ever experienced. This, again, is objective. I have no idea why you're trying to shill for a country whose history is so painfully uneventful as Finland.
|
196 |
+
--- 14996612
|
197 |
+
>>14996562
|
198 |
+
>I have no idea why you're trying to shill for a country whose history is so painfully uneventful as Finland
|
199 |
+
Nigger all I'm saying is that there are indeed more bland and irrelevant countries, and I named several. The onus is on you to disprove what I said, meanwhile all you've done is give generic and unfulfilling one-liners without any substantial argumentative breakdowns.
|
200 |
+
--- 14996743
|
201 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
202 |
+
More like foreigners never shut up about it, because it's the only thing they know about this country. Frankly, even I find it quite annoying, but luckily we have been moving away from it in recent years. There are a lot of interesting conflicts in Finnish history though, if you are interested, Wikipedia has good articles on the Swedish era.
|
203 |
+
t. Finnfag
|
204 |
+
--- 14996811
|
205 |
+
>>14996612
|
206 |
+
>I named several.
|
207 |
+
No you haven't you fucking mongoloid.
|
208 |
+
--- 14996853
|
209 |
+
>>14996446
|
210 |
+
Cool NTR fic, bro, you have an ao3?
|
211 |
+
--- 14996860
|
212 |
+
>>14995262
|
213 |
+
Everyone who is 30+ is either overweight or normal weight. Rare to see someone underweight that isn't a teenager.
|
214 |
+
--- 14996877
|
215 |
+
>>14996811
|
216 |
+
Put your reading glasses on old man. Either that or turn in and call it a night already. This is getting really pathetic. >>14995927
|
217 |
+
|
218 |
+
>>14996860
|
219 |
+
Indeed.
|
220 |
+
--- 14996936
|
221 |
+
>>14996877
|
222 |
+
>every country in the list has more eventful and interesting history
|
223 |
+
What is your point supposed to be?
|
224 |
+
--- 14997000
|
225 |
+
>>14996936
|
226 |
+
>What is your point supposed to be?
|
227 |
+
That you are deluded and in denial as well as incapable of making a convincing argument of substance.
|
228 |
+
--- 14997015
|
229 |
+
>>14995929
|
230 |
+
You sure that's not a result of modernity rather than the people themselves?
|
231 |
+
--- 14997024
|
232 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
233 |
+
They had the Lapland War and Continuation War against the Axis that they conveniently forget now.
|
234 |
+
--- 14997037
|
235 |
+
>>14995929
|
236 |
+
Nooo dude a year from now there's going to be a revolution and a retvrn to basedworld where all niggers and sluts will be kill!
|
237 |
+
--- 14997070
|
238 |
+
>>14997037
|
239 |
+
Obsessed leftroon
|
240 |
+
--- 14997089
|
241 |
+
>>14995929
|
242 |
+
>go to Finnish store
|
243 |
+
>ultra qt loudly yells Moi!! at me
|
244 |
+
>go to bar later
|
245 |
+
>randos start talking and getting drunk with me till 3 am
|
246 |
+
Whatever, Finland kicks ass
|
247 |
+
--- 14997376
|
248 |
+
>>14996853
|
249 |
+
>>14996542
|
250 |
+
Ahaha, what basic attempts at trivialization of what actually happens when a developed peoples encounters a less organized and developed one and gains a status like a God among men. People still act like this was some reasonable collaborative effort between two brotherly nations lmao honestly pathetic.
|
251 |
+
--- 14997402
|
252 |
+
>>14997000
|
253 |
+
Which interesting and rich episodes of Finnish history am I forgetting about?
|
254 |
+
--- 14997539
|
255 |
+
>>14995927
|
256 |
+
>lithuania
|
257 |
+
--- 14997790
|
258 |
+
Finland has the history of both Swedish and Russian empire and often served as an estate for their clashes and you call it bland?
|
259 |
+
--- 14997794
|
260 |
+
>>14997015
|
261 |
+
Of course it's modernity there isn't even a question about it.
|
262 |
+
--- 14997829
|
263 |
+
>>14996562
|
264 |
+
>Finland has not experienced empires or wars
|
265 |
+
How many books about Finnish history have you actually read?
|
266 |
+
--- 14997847
|
267 |
+
>>14996421
|
268 |
+
Finns had shamans who ate shit. Isn’t that grand and glorious history to reminisce about?
|
269 |
+
--- 14997848
|
270 |
+
>>14997790
|
271 |
+
Do you call Native Americans' history interesting because they got BTFO by Euros? The point is, Finns didn't form their own empire or conquests, it was always part of the history of some actual empire
|
272 |
+
--- 14997903
|
273 |
+
>>14997848
|
274 |
+
Finns were normal citizens of these empires. Merchants, scholars, soldiers etc. Not some halfway fauna that was either genocided or isolated in reservates.
|
275 |
+
--- 14997944
|
276 |
+
>>14997903
|
277 |
+
>soldiers
|
278 |
+
Ah yes, the only non-paid army of the time fighting conflicts that had fuck-all to do with them. For an empire that taxed them yet invested no money back to them, and whose schools did not have Finnish curriculum. Basically everyone in the higher strata of society was not a Finn. The noblemen had also basically legal impunity and they weren't punished for administering physical discipline to disobedient farmers and their family. There's a clear power imbalance here which reflects the fact the land was taken from them by force.
|
279 |
+
--- 14998074
|
280 |
+
>>14997944
|
281 |
+
>Ah yes, the only non-paid army of the time fighting conflicts that had fuck-all to do with them.
|
282 |
+
It was the same for Swedish soldiers and during Russian era they were exclusively mercs.
|
283 |
+
>For an empire that taxed them yet invested no money back to them, and whose schools did not have Finnish curriculum
|
284 |
+
True but this has happened in many other countries too.
|
285 |
+
>Basically everyone in the higher strata of society was not a Finn.
|
286 |
+
Not true. The bourgeoisie were largely Finnish speaking still during the middle ages. Swedish being the language of administration helped with the swedification process though.
|
287 |
+
>The noblemen had also basically legal impunity and they weren't punished for administering physical discipline to disobedient farmers and their family.
|
288 |
+
How is this any different from Central-Europe? Peasants in Finland actually had it much better in many cases, serfdom for example was never practiced in Finland.
|
289 |
+
>There's a clear power imbalance here which reflects the fact the land was taken from them by force.
|
290 |
+
Sure, Finns were crusaded and and Swedish language had an upper hand in the society but most what you said is not exclusive for Finland but normal practice or not true.
|
291 |
+
--- 14998419
|
292 |
+
>>14995929
|
293 |
+
You lived in Helsinki or some city I bet.
|
294 |
+
LMAO
|
295 |
+
t. Oulu
|
296 |
+
--- 14998441
|
297 |
+
>>14996421
|
298 |
+
We have rivers and forests too idiot
|
299 |
+
also a fuck ton of lakes
|
300 |
+
also those lakes and rivers take us to the sea and trade networks
|
301 |
+
--- 14998447
|
302 |
+
>>14995929
|
303 |
+
Go back to Somalia.
|
304 |
+
--- 14998494
|
305 |
+
>>14998074
|
306 |
+
>It was the same for Swedish soldiers and during Russian era they were exclusively mercs.
|
307 |
+
Yeah but relating it to the original subject of discussion, it's not much of a "Finnish history" if all these wars aren't actually even by an empire that would have someone speaking Finnish and enforcing Finnish upon others as its head.
|
308 |
+
>True but this has happened in many other countries too.
|
309 |
+
Doesn't mean there wasn't additional inequality through the language issue alone.
|
310 |
+
>The bourgeoisie
|
311 |
+
Not higher strata, esp in those times.
|
312 |
+
>Sure, Finns were crusaded and and Swedish language had an upper hand in the society but most what you said is not exclusive for Finland but normal practice or not true.
|
313 |
+
So what if it was normal? It was never the subject of the discussion. The discussion started from whether "Finnish" history is exciting, and since there has not been a Finnish empire but instead Finns have been subjugated as parts of other Empires, you can't really call that "Finnish" history. The unique thing here is not the actions but the fact that Finns were never the ones to subjugate others or make history or new empires.
|
314 |
+
--- 14998504
|
315 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
316 |
+
Their one war HUMILIATED an entire "superpower" and the ideology behind it
|
317 |
+
--- 14998514
|
318 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
319 |
+
>developed society in 1100 CE
|
320 |
+
Anon Finland is a fetus
|
321 |
+
--- 14998526
|
322 |
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Finland
|
323 |
+
--- 14998566
|
324 |
+
>>14995927
|
325 |
+
I dunno guys, lithuania has interesting history
|
326 |
+
--- 14998735
|
327 |
+
>>14995941
|
328 |
+
>Their asociality must be some sort of genetic adaptation to the climate
|
329 |
+
But swedes and Norwegians are not like this. Finns are completely autistic.
|
330 |
+
>>14996490
|
331 |
+
There aren’t that many gays here. They all flock to Sweden for some reason.
|
332 |
+
>>14997015
|
333 |
+
>You sure that's not a result of modernity rather than the people themselves?
|
334 |
+
Technology could disappear overnight and they would still be like this. We had no phone rules in class and people still wouldn’t talk to each other.
|
335 |
+
>>14997037
|
336 |
+
?
|
337 |
+
>>14997089
|
338 |
+
>getting drunk
|
339 |
+
Alcohol dependency is a problem. It’s understandable why people drink so much there but still. I do notice it’s easier for Finns to open up to random drunk strangers rather than people they know/see regularly. Drunk people are very nice in Finland.
|
340 |
+
>>14998419
|
341 |
+
Born in Helsinki, grew up in Mikkeli then spent a year in Helsinki again before I left.
|
342 |
+
>>14998447
|
343 |
+
I’m a Kurd from Iraq. Have fun importing more of me with those sub replacement TFR rates kek.
|
344 |
+
--- 14998751
|
345 |
+
>>14998735
|
346 |
+
Not with the current government I hope
|
347 |
+
I hope you never have to return here Kurd bro
|
348 |
+
--- 14998761
|
349 |
+
>>14998751
|
350 |
+
It’s SD all over again. They promise to get rid of us, you vote for them, nothing happens. Life goes on. Try and have some kids and talk to girls more.
|
351 |
+
--- 14998765
|
352 |
+
>>14998494
|
353 |
+
>it's not much of a "Finnish history" if all these wars aren't actually even by an empire that would have someone speaking Finnish and enforcing Finnish upon others as its head.
|
354 |
+
How is it not Finnish history if the people who lived and were born here were living and involved in it and the current in Finland are their descendants? You are making it a language issue indeed. So when Egyptian royals were sepaking Greek or when Egypt was a part of Roman empire, it's not Egyptian history at all? It's still the local history of these people and the area. And history is much more than just realms and wars. You can say that the modern republic of Finland doesn't have much history, but that shouldn't be a surprise, because it's barely 100 years old. There were 80k Finns in 1100's and today roughly 5 million, should Finns somehow feel more ashamed than Basques, Scots, Welsh, etc, just because they managed to get their own country, so that everything what happened to the people before establishing the current is just completely irrelevant to the people?
|
355 |
+
>Doesn't mean there wasn't additional inequality through the language issue alone.
|
356 |
+
Peasants were peasants, no matter what language they spoke. There were Swedish speaking peasants in Finland also.
|
357 |
+
And the Finnish language was not that isolated from the administrative. Laws were translated into Finnish and public events and announcements had to be translated into Finnish as divine services as well by the law. And during Swedish parliamentary days (riksdag) Finns got to send their own representatives who spoke Finnish with an interpreter.
|
358 |
+
|
359 |
+
King Gustav Vasa had his son learn the Finnish language because he thought it was important to learn the other language of the Empire and he was set to be the duke of Finland.
|
360 |
+
Your comparison to Native Americans just tell how little you know about the history of Finland, or Sweden as a matter of fact. Scanians and Norwegians had it much worse in the Kingdom of Sweden.
|
361 |
+
--- 14998766
|
362 |
+
>>14998735
|
363 |
+
Honestly I think it's more of a (you) thing, our classroom was very lively in my youth in all stages. Also not to mention how things were in the military for example. People were constantly talking to one another. Really what you need to do is get actually know people, then they can go on for hours about the most menial or insightful shit you can think of.
|
364 |
+
--- 14998782
|
365 |
+
>>14995174 (OP)
|
366 |
+
N laid a haplo claim on Finland
|
367 |
+
R1a/R1b was too busy living in ice shacks and being severely underpopulated so haplo law doesn’t apply
|
368 |
+
Now N has some toilet cleaners and iron workers
|
369 |
+
--- 14999158
|
370 |
+
>>14996331
|
371 |
+
Finland's interesting history begins when swedes got BTFO by Russians in 1809 and time of autonomy as a grand duchy begins
|
372 |
+
>foundation of the senate
|
373 |
+
>developement of Helsinki into its jugend glory
|
374 |
+
>Uspenski Catherdral, the largest orthodox cathedral in western Europe as of today
|
375 |
+
>Helsinki Cathedral
|
376 |
+
>first nordic railway network
|
377 |
+
>golden age of Finnish artists (Sibelius, Edelfelt etc.)
|
378 |
+
>Kalevala
|
379 |
+
All Swedes did was tax and recruit the Finnish population. Only historically relevant events as part of Sweden were the wars and Agricola inventing the written Finnish.
|
his/14995295.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995295
|
3 |
+
I’m not very well educated on either of these countries, but they seem to take different approaches to the natives with the Kiwis seeming to adopt more native traditions such as the dances. Is this a recent development, or had it been this way for a while? What are the causes of this? Does New Zealand simply have a higher proportion of natives?
|
4 |
+
--- 14995350
|
5 |
+
>>14995295 (OP)
|
6 |
+
Maoris are pretty cool, kinda developed, and had a somewhat unified front to sign that singular treaty thing.
|
7 |
+
|
8 |
+
Abos were fragmented and more primitive, and the aussies went full nazi on them, at times.
|
9 |
+
|
10 |
+
So angry maoris can be all "the treaty was breached at times", while Australian grievances are "you intentionally ethnically cleansed us repeatedly".
|
11 |
+
--- 14995356
|
12 |
+
>>14995350
|
13 |
+
Also, aussies have less cool cultural stuff to pull from the natives, compared to NZ, i think.
|
14 |
+
--- 14995364
|
15 |
+
>>14995295 (OP)
|
16 |
+
>Is this a recent development
|
17 |
+
Kiwi's taking an interest in the Maori culture is recent, started around the 70s to my recollection
|
18 |
+
What was different is how the natives were treated upon arrival of European settler and why
|
19 |
+
Aboriginals were just simply really underdeveloped. Depending on the tribe it ranged back to hunter-gatherers, or basic agriculture. Furthermore, while it wasn't that Aboriginals did not understand war, they weren't particularly warlike (compared to Maori)
|
20 |
+
Opposed to this:
|
21 |
+
The Maori were more developed, although they also did not possess metallurgy yet either
|
22 |
+
The Maori had the benefit that they were extremely warlike and recognized boons to warfare when they saw them. The moment muskets were introduced they gladly bought loads of them from Europeans, and fought amongst each other. This led to two things. First, the Maori became a valuable trading partner to Europeans, instead of a nuisance. Second, the Maori quickly developed tactics and proficiency with their new weapons, making them a lot more difficult to defeat in war
|
23 |
+
Driving the Maori out proved rather difficult (but not impossible), so difficult even that a treaty was drafted, which enshrined the Maori as British subjects.
|
24 |
+
|
25 |
+
Ultimately the Maori which opposed this treaty would suffer more wars, and the Maori that abided by it were treated as second-rate citizens, they have been a part of New Zealand since the beginning. And I suspect because of this, and their warrior culture, have gained more respect with the Kiwis
|
26 |
+
--- 14995371
|
27 |
+
>>14995356
|
28 |
+
I wouldn't say that
|
29 |
+
Personally, the Maori culture does appeal more than the Aboriginal culture.
|
30 |
+
However, think about this: How many people around the world know the origin of the boomerang and didgeridoo? Compare that the knowledge about the Maori tools and instruments
|
31 |
+
--- 14995373
|
32 |
+
Maoris are almost 20% of our population, "akchoal" aboriginals are ~1% of Australia's population
|
33 |
+
--- 14995377
|
34 |
+
>>14995373
|
35 |
+
fatal mistake, they're outbreeding you now
|
36 |
+
...and we just made it easier for "kiwis" to gain citizenship
|
37 |
+
--- 14995380
|
38 |
+
>>14995364
|
39 |
+
>they also did not possess metallurgy yet either
|
40 |
+
Who needs needs steel when you have godtier jade beauties?
|
41 |
+
--- 14995383
|
42 |
+
>>14995377
|
43 |
+
Enjoy the maori scaffolders, ausbro :^)
|
44 |
+
--- 14995384
|
45 |
+
>>14995350
|
46 |
+
>pic rel
|
47 |
+
What the fuck?
|
48 |
+
--- 14995398
|
49 |
+
>>14995384
|
50 |
+
Fun times, isn't it?
|
51 |
+
|
52 |
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_of_Indigenous_Australians
|
53 |
+
--- 14995420
|
54 |
+
>>14995380
|
55 |
+
I have to concede
|
56 |
+
Pounamu is great, still very content with the pendant I got when I was there
|
57 |
+
--- 14995450
|
58 |
+
>>14995295 (OP)
|
59 |
+
Australia was colonized by brute force. Whites just moved in and killed or displaced the abbos.
|
60 |
+
|
61 |
+
New Zealand actually as founded with a treaty, the Treaty of Waitangi, which the Maori chiefs signed with the British, on which they willingly became British crown subjects and ceded parts of their island to the British, in exchange for protection and some major concessions.
|
62 |
+
|
63 |
+
So the histories of Australia and NZ are quite different. There were still displaced Maoris, isolated incidents and stuff, but compared to other parts of the world, the Maori were generally treated with a lot of respect, as founders of New Zealand. This makes it unique among New World countries.
|
64 |
+
|
65 |
+
I'm not a Kiwi btw but I think it's a very interesting country.
|
66 |
+
--- 14996851
|
67 |
+
>>14995350
|
68 |
+
Whose skulls are these? Abbos?
|
69 |
+
--- 14996863
|
70 |
+
>>14995295 (OP)
|
71 |
+
Do White kiwis really do the oogabooga dances? I've only seen natives doing it.
|
72 |
+
--- 14996872
|
73 |
+
>>14995373
|
74 |
+
Abos are like 20% of the population of NT and growing fast.
|
75 |
+
--- 14997094
|
76 |
+
>>14995350
|
77 |
+
>full Nazi
|
78 |
+
As opposed to what? trying to integrate people who are severely behind other races mentally?
|
79 |
+
--- 14997100
|
80 |
+
>>14995384
|
81 |
+
>>14995398
|
82 |
+
redditsisters…. How could an agrarian people displace a Hunter gatherer people
|
83 |
+
--- 14997113
|
84 |
+
>>14995450
|
85 |
+
Opposite. Australia did not require force.
|
86 |
+
New Zealand wasn’t founded on a treaty.
|
87 |
+
‘New Zealand’, the treaty, were both following a series of grisly wars between New Zealanders and Māorians.
|
88 |
+
Abos were displaced or fought because they were Hunter gatherers and “stole” from Australians who retaliated. It was far less violent than the relatively large scale conflict of New Zealand v Polynesians.
|
89 |
+
--- 14997137
|
90 |
+
>>14995384
|
91 |
+
>>14995398
|
92 |
+
These are MAORI shrunken heads. It was actually quite "normal" and Maori would often keep their relatives shrunken heads around and even trade them for guns lol.
|
93 |
+
This bloke collected them by selling shit to the Maori.
|
94 |
+
Iirc they're called Mokomaki
|
95 |
+
--- 14997140
|
96 |
+
>>14995295 (OP)
|
97 |
+
>>14995350
|
98 |
+
>>14995450
|
99 |
+
Australia is much larger & less densely populated than New Zeeland. The last Aboriginal tribe to be discovered with no prior European contact was in 1984. The Aboriginals and Māori have the same total number of people, ~0.7M, but Aboriginals are 3% of Australias population while Māori are 16% of New Zeeland.
|
100 |
+
--- 14997154
|
101 |
+
>>14996851
|
102 |
+
Maori warriors. They'd often sell these heads in exchange for guns. It's not as creepy as it looks, it's basically their equivalent of handing out baseball cards
|
103 |
+
--- 14997171
|
104 |
+
>>14996863
|
105 |
+
Yes, white Kiwis have done Maori rituals of sorts since WWI. When they buried the Red Baron, White NZ soldiers performed some Maori funeral motions to honour him.
|
106 |
+
Pic is schoolboys from Christchurch performing it after that shooting
|
107 |
+
--- 14997226
|
108 |
+
>>14997171
|
109 |
+
kinda based but also kinda cringe
|
110 |
+
--- 14997505
|
111 |
+
>>14995383
|
112 |
+
Maori's can be taught to operate a forklift, wear steel caps, be housebroken and provided you can keep them from mixing a sixpack with 3 or 4 cones they can keep their fists to themselves.
|
113 |
+
The same cannot be said of others here.
|
114 |
+
--- 14997524
|
115 |
+
>>14996863
|
116 |
+
Yeah, it's kinda cringe but it's still better than pretending we're just sunburned, temporarily-dispossessed brits
|
117 |
+
--- 14997531
|
118 |
+
>>14995295 (OP)
|
119 |
+
Oi racist white cunt got a dolla centalink aint open yet
|
120 |
+
--- 14998556
|
121 |
+
Are Maoris better people than blacks/africans?
|
122 |
+
|
123 |
+
Have never met Maoris
|
124 |
+
--- 14998588
|
125 |
+
>>14995350
|
126 |
+
>aussies went full nazi on them, at times.
|
127 |
+
Killing people when they steal from you and trying to save their children from a childhood of rape and abuse is not "full nazi." The idea of the stolen generation being an attempt at ethnic cleansing is misleading. Aboriginal communities today have still have insane amounts of substance abuse and sexual/physical abuse of children. It was the same when such policies were inacted. It was a misguided attempt to help people not a malicious nazi-style final solution.
|
128 |
+
|
129 |
+
You know how the government takes away your kids if you're beating the shit out if them and raping them? Same concept.
|
130 |
+
|
131 |
+
>>14996872
|
132 |
+
Their numbers increase because people have clued in that having any abo ancestry can open doors to financial assistance, better education and employment opportunities. Ticking a box on a census and applications is easy, it usually isn't checked and it will help you get ahead. If you're ever asked for proof you can legit apply for recognition. You don't even need to look the part.
|
133 |
+
|
134 |
+
>Under the Aboriginal Housing Act 1998 (NSW), an Aboriginal person (includes Torres Strait Islanders) means a person who:
|
135 |
+
>is a member of the Aboriginal race of Australia, and
|
136 |
+
>identifies as an Aboriginal person, and
|
137 |
+
>is accepted by the Aboriginal community as an Aboriginal person.
|
138 |
+
|
139 |
+
Yes, you can be a trans-nigga or just know a guy that'll vouch for you. It's ridiculous.
|
140 |
+
--- 14998802
|
141 |
+
>>14998556
|
142 |
+
Warrior races are more respectful and pro-social because the price of disrespect and anti-social behavior lead to conflict and conflict within the tribe can lead to disastrous outcomes, and fighting endless wars is also not going to be selected for when it comes to small tribal populations.
|
143 |
+
Polynesians are more law abiding and pro-social, but they arent White or Far Asian when it comes to social conformity.
|
144 |
+
--- 14998865
|
145 |
+
>>14998802
|
146 |
+
>>14998556
|
147 |
+
They had to axe our version of Cops because there were too many Maoris/Polynesians in it
|
148 |
+
--- 14998952
|
149 |
+
>>14998865
|
150 |
+
too many in the police or too many getting arrested?
|
151 |
+
could be there are just not enough Whites to be as prominent on a television show, whereas in America there are so many Whites you could easily make Whites look criminal because hundreds of Whites commit crimes every day.
|
152 |
+
this is of course very small considering there are tens of millions of Whites in America.
|
153 |
+
--- 14999228
|
154 |
+
>>14998556
|
155 |
+
Maoris are pretty good imo, solid sportsmen and amazing genetics for building mass and raw strength.
|
156 |
+
Like another guy said, they pretty much single handedly carry New Zealand's unique identity on their shoulders, since otherwise we'd just be seen as Little Australia or a Secondhand copy of Great Britain.
|
his/14995322.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995322
|
3 |
+
Originally atheists hated science because they realized it only worked with the Christian worldview. When and why did atheists start worshipping the Science?
|
4 |
+
--- 14995339
|
5 |
+
>>14995322 (OP)
|
6 |
+
>Originally atheists hated science because they realized it only worked with the Christian worldview.
|
7 |
+
Whats with this bullshit you cooked up champ?
|
8 |
+
>When and why did atheists start worshipping the Science?
|
9 |
+
Atheists worship science because you say? It wasn't atheists desperately trying to align Jewish fairy tales with scientific ideas and facts before giving up and going full retard cattle believer calling everything satanic.
|
10 |
+
--- 14995351
|
11 |
+
>>14995322 (OP)
|
12 |
+
then christians showed us all the light
|
13 |
+
amen!
|
14 |
+
https://imgur.com/a/KS8zlUy
|
15 |
+
--- 14995363
|
16 |
+
>>14995351
|
17 |
+
Does this homosexual pornography you fap to explain why atheists worship the Science and believe everything the holy expert caste says?
|
18 |
+
--- 14995366
|
19 |
+
What most gaytheists consider science isn't what science properly is.
|
20 |
+
The great scientific revolutions of Galileo, Newton, Leonardo, and Copernicus had no system of peer review.
|
21 |
+
Modern science is largely based on the null hypothesis. This didn't exist until 1925. The system of privatized science journals and grants we have now didn't exist til much later. For reference, this postdates the Gener Theory of Relativity. For many reasons, the probabilistic statistics undergirding it are bullshit. Which is why for those disciplines without strong foundations from before the invention of the null hypothesis idea, replication is a joke. This is why social sciences are so unreliable. Most of them were developed in the last century.
|
22 |
+
Also, many pioneering scientists had education which was unrelated to their field, like Darwin. I think Darwin studied theology, which in Britain is almost a catch-all liberal arts education.
|
23 |
+
This system we have now is, to the fedora's credit, very atheistic. But it's also unrelated to the scientific revolution itself.
|
24 |
+
Feel free to get butthurt, but spend one hour in the history of science, you will see I'm correct. The very idea of the scientific method is anachronistic
|
25 |
+
--- 14995370
|
26 |
+
>>14995351
|
27 |
+
Aleluyah, aleluyah, it's amiracle, AMEN!
|
28 |
+
--- 14995372
|
29 |
+
>>14995366
|
30 |
+
>Shit I can't understand or argue against is retarded. Let me cut off my son's foreskin for the Jew desert deity to heckin mean Atheist!
|
31 |
+
--- 14995411
|
32 |
+
>>14995372
|
33 |
+
>Shit I can't understand or argue against is retarded
|
34 |
+
That's exactly the attitude you're exemplifying. You can't argue a point, you presume your own inflated sense of intelligence, and think you've won already. Literally a slave of your own pride. If this wasn't the case, you could've come up with an equally brief but clever counterargument. But such is the fate of all creatures with an IQ of 100.
|
35 |
+
--- 14995416
|
36 |
+
>>14995322 (OP)
|
37 |
+
>>14995366
|
38 |
+
>>14995411
|
39 |
+
Dubs of truth
|
40 |
+
--- 14995421
|
41 |
+
>>14995416
|
42 |
+
amen to that
|
43 |
+
https://imgur.com/a/KS8zlUy
|
44 |
+
--- 14995424
|
45 |
+
>>14995351
|
46 |
+
I want to worship that ass. I think i just converted.
|
47 |
+
--- 14995427
|
48 |
+
>>14995424
|
49 |
+
Atheist moment
|
50 |
+
--- 14995431
|
51 |
+
>>14995411
|
52 |
+
I am still not seeing any arguments from youe part. It only appears that you aren't smart enough to challenge the academia. You are the one following Jewish fairy tales like a dumb goyim animal.
|
53 |
+
--- 14995432
|
54 |
+
>>14995431
|
55 |
+
Academia is the devil's whorehouse.
|
56 |
+
--- 14995434
|
57 |
+
>>14995322 (OP)
|
58 |
+
>only worked with the Christian worldview.
|
59 |
+
Christcucks actually think this kek
|
60 |
+
--- 14995435
|
61 |
+
>>14995424
|
62 |
+
god works in misterious ways lmfao
|
63 |
+
https://imgur.com/a/KS8zlUy
|
64 |
+
--- 14995765
|
65 |
+
>insists you need religion to be a scientist
|
66 |
+
>all religious 'philosophy' is all just Aquinas style wordgames and sophistic bullshit
|
67 |
+
|
68 |
+
Really makes you think
|
69 |
+
--- 14995771
|
70 |
+
>>14995322 (OP)
|
71 |
+
>Originally atheists hated science because they realized it only worked with the Christian worldview
|
72 |
+
The delusions people have on this board are wild
|
73 |
+
--- 14995801
|
74 |
+
“Only liberals really think. Only liberals are intellectual. Only liberals understand the needs of their fellows.” How much viciousness lay concealed in that word! Odrade thought. How much secret ego demanding to feel superior.”
|
75 |
+
|
76 |
+
conservative: Hey maybe we shouldn't continuously redefine what it means to be human. That could be really bad. There's a lot of moral issues with the pursuit of sensuality too
|
77 |
+
|
78 |
+
liberal:
|
79 |
+
>NOOOO
|
80 |
+
>THERE ARE NO RULES
|
81 |
+
>EVERYTHING IS PERMISSIBLE/RELATIVE
|
82 |
+
>THAT'S WHY I HAVE AN OPEN RELATIONSHIP
|
83 |
+
--- 14995822
|
84 |
+
>>14995322 (OP)
|
85 |
+
realize these people would sing like birds the praises of Comrade SHtalin and praise the engineering of the USSR the bravery of the USSR the evil of NAZI NAZI NAZI Hitler GERMANY NAZI, then in 2022, they begin dancing to
|
86 |
+
>lol USSR sucks
|
87 |
+
>lol Stalin was an insane drug addict
|
88 |
+
>lol Hitler was wrong about a lot but he at least fought the Russians
|
89 |
+
>lol Russians >good engineers
|
90 |
+
>lol Russians >brave
|
91 |
+
>lol Russians >not human waves
|
92 |
+
|
93 |
+
These people denied human waves ever existed then literally and unironically began saying in 2022 Russian solders were charging HIMARs positions with shovels and clubs
|
94 |
+
the vast majority of these reddit types can not be argued with
|
95 |
+
Reason and Logic and a Respect for Rationality are LUXURIES, the default state is execution, an atheist says something assbackward and retarded, they get sent to the wall.
|
96 |
+
simple as
|
97 |
+
--- 14995830
|
98 |
+
>>14995822
|
99 |
+
Take your meds, please
|
100 |
+
--- 14995925
|
101 |
+
>>14995366
|
102 |
+
Darwin was a geologist
|
103 |
+
--- 14997161
|
104 |
+
>>14995925
|
105 |
+
explains why he was so wrong about biology
|
106 |
+
--- 14997211
|
107 |
+
>>14995801
|
108 |
+
You can get a good honest discussion about these topics with a liberal if you turn off the computer, meet adults in person and don't speak in memes.
|
109 |
+
--- 14998691
|
110 |
+
bump
|
111 |
+
--- 14998709
|
112 |
+
>>14995322 (OP)
|
113 |
+
I used to be atheist until I learned Atheists are all fuckin dorks. And yes they worship mainstream science as their god.
|
114 |
+
--- 14998745
|
115 |
+
>>14998709
|
116 |
+
--- 14999000
|
117 |
+
>>14995366
|
118 |
+
Truth, brother. The Sun revolves around the Earth. It says so in the book of Joshua.
|
119 |
+
--- 14999002
|
120 |
+
>>14995322 (OP)
|
121 |
+
>originally athiests hated scientists
|
122 |
+
do you have anything to actually back this up, or are you just pulling that out of your ass to cope
|
123 |
+
--- 14999393
|
124 |
+
>>14999000
|
125 |
+
No it doesn't.
|
126 |
+
--- 14999811
|
127 |
+
>>14995322 (OP)
|
128 |
+
after mass TV rollout and free education
|
his/14995336.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995336
|
3 |
+
Oral sex is demonic even among married heterosexual couples as it is non-procreative sex according to historical Christianity. How does this conflict with other Church doctrine?
|
4 |
+
--- 14995345
|
5 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
6 |
+
>it is non-procreative sex according to historical Christianity
|
7 |
+
You need need Christianity to tell you that it’s non-procreative
|
8 |
+
--- 14995359
|
9 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
10 |
+
This is unbiblical, there is objectively nothing wrong with husband and wife making love vaginally, orally, or even anally. It's even mentioned in the Song of Songs
|
11 |
+
--- 14995385
|
12 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
13 |
+
I should buy an onahole one of these days.
|
14 |
+
--- 14995388
|
15 |
+
>>14995385
|
16 |
+
You're gonna be Satan's onahole
|
17 |
+
--- 14995389
|
18 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
19 |
+
As someone who encountered actual demons I get annoyed by retarded Catholoc larpers calling everything they don't like demonic. You have no idea what you're talking about, nigger.
|
20 |
+
--- 14995409
|
21 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
22 |
+
No Christianity doesn't forbid sex that is non-procreative between married couples because marital sex is also an act of love and an act of ordered lust.
|
23 |
+
The misconception stems from the use of contraception that is frowned upon by Catholics but it's because it degrades the woman to become a sex toy. On the other end fucking your wife when she's not on her fertile days is perfectly fine.
|
24 |
+
There is no restriction on oral sex.
|
25 |
+
There is though restriction on anal sex and it's not hard to see why.
|
26 |
+
>>14995359
|
27 |
+
Wrong it's literally in the Bible "it is not permitted to lay with women as they were men" or something along those lines so anal sex including pegging is forbidden by scripture.
|
28 |
+
--- 14995413
|
29 |
+
>>14995388
|
30 |
+
That thought gets you hard, doesn't it?
|
31 |
+
--- 14995417
|
32 |
+
>>14995409
|
33 |
+
Why did you bring up pegging?
|
34 |
+
>>14995413
|
35 |
+
Why are you thinking about my penis?
|
36 |
+
--- 14995425
|
37 |
+
>>14995409
|
38 |
+
>inserting your cock inside a WOMAN'S ass is laying with her as with a man
|
39 |
+
Cringe.
|
40 |
+
--- 14995428
|
41 |
+
>>14995417
|
42 |
+
>Why are you thinking about my penis?
|
43 |
+
Why were you thinking about some guy getting porked by the prince of darkness?
|
44 |
+
--- 14995430
|
45 |
+
>>14995425
|
46 |
+
Why would you put it in her asshole when the vagin is right there? Do you have a scat fetish?
|
47 |
+
--- 14995437
|
48 |
+
>>14995428
|
49 |
+
Because sadly enough that is his fate if he doesn't get saved.
|
50 |
+
--- 14995441
|
51 |
+
>>14995430
|
52 |
+
Ran out of condoms.
|
53 |
+
--- 14995442
|
54 |
+
>>14995437
|
55 |
+
Where does it say in the Bible that sinners will become Satan's cocksleeve and get their prostates massaged by his diabolical member for all eternity?
|
56 |
+
--- 14995445
|
57 |
+
>>14995441
|
58 |
+
>I ran out of condoms so I fucked her in the ass which increases STD risk
|
59 |
+
Do you happen to be a nigger?
|
60 |
+
--- 14995446
|
61 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
62 |
+
just pray it out, it's what christcucks do, just look :
|
63 |
+
https://imgur.com/a/KS8zlUy
|
64 |
+
--- 14995462
|
65 |
+
>>14995417
|
66 |
+
>Why did you bring up pegging?
|
67 |
+
Just because I can :>
|
68 |
+
>>14995425
|
69 |
+
I know you are brainwashed by thousands of hours of viewing time of porn where anal sex is depicted as highly pleasurable by both parties, but in reality the man is fucking a loose hole full of shit and he is getting stomach churning whiffs of it while he's doing it, the woman is not feeling anything remotely pleasurable because there isn't even a prostate to be massaged and she's literally feeling like she's taking a shit, and it's also very likely to be painful and the asshole is not apt to be penetrated by a dick so it often gets lacerations and other damages.
|
70 |
+
--- 14995465
|
71 |
+
>>14995462
|
72 |
+
>a prostate to be massaged
|
73 |
+
A homosexual is posting this, now it makes sense
|
74 |
+
--- 14995485
|
75 |
+
>>14995462
|
76 |
+
>I know you are brainwashed by thousands of hours of viewing time of porn where anal sex is depicted as highly pleasurable by both parties, but in reality blah blah blah
|
77 |
+
Pretty funny considering I'm the one out of the two of us who's actually had anal sex with a woman.
|
78 |
+
--- 14995486
|
79 |
+
>>14995445
|
80 |
+
>muh STD risk
|
81 |
+
I only fuck my girlfriend, so I don't care about your meme statistics.
|
82 |
+
--- 14995624
|
83 |
+
>>14995409
|
84 |
+
>Wrong it's literally in the Bible "it is not permitted to lay with women as they were men" or something along those lines so anal sex including pegging is forbidden by scripture.
|
85 |
+
That's not in the Bible.
|
86 |
+
--- 14995694
|
87 |
+
>>14995624
|
88 |
+
uh sorry I fugged it up :/
|
89 |
+
"If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act"
|
90 |
+
I'm sill not very convinced anal sex is permitted, if any by its relation to homosexuality.
|
91 |
+
--- 14995730
|
92 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
93 |
+
Sir, this is s history board.
|
94 |
+
--- 14995798
|
95 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
96 |
+
> as it is non-procreative sex
|
97 |
+
|
98 |
+
I was just mentioning something like this a week ago. If it's not what was done in the book of Genesis, then it pretty much promotes death. Especially regarding what you do with your seed.
|
99 |
+
|
100 |
+
Dick in vagina = life
|
101 |
+
Dick in butt = death/barrenness
|
102 |
+
Dick in mouth = death/barrenness
|
103 |
+
Dick in hand = death and barrenness
|
104 |
+
Dick in any object = death/barrenness
|
105 |
+
|
106 |
+
Anything besides dick in vagina is like taking fruit or veggie seeds and throwing them into a trash can or pothole and expecting them to produce food. God is all about life and abundance. And we're taking the seed He entrusted us with and just splooging it anywhere and everywhere. Imagine how you're gonna look on Judgment Day.
|
107 |
+
--- 14996005
|
108 |
+
Song of solomon
|
109 |
+
--- 14996012
|
110 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
111 |
+
>touching your husband's cock is demonic
|
112 |
+
>be fruitful and multiply
|
113 |
+
wow
|
114 |
+
--- 14996133
|
115 |
+
>>14995798
|
116 |
+
and what Christian church/confession believes this?
|
117 |
+
--- 14996249
|
118 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
119 |
+
When did Christians start calling everything "demonic?" It's all over Twitter now, and not just Evangelicals, even American Catholics are incredibly superstitious now.
|
120 |
+
--- 14996280
|
121 |
+
>>14996249
|
122 |
+
Poortestinetism/eevayngeliculizm is basically neo-gnosticism
|
123 |
+
--- 14996292
|
124 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
125 |
+
>getting your dick sucked is evil
|
126 |
+
Wow sick religion you fucking nerds
|
127 |
+
--- 14996376
|
128 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
129 |
+
Oral sex is not strictly speaking considered "demonic" but it is considered an act of "porneia", which in Latin terms is included under the blanket term of sodomy, which includes pretty much every sexual act that isn't consensual vaginal intercourse between a man and woman (possibly only married couples at that, but I can't remember), but I'm pretty sure those are all legal terms to be applied in mainly secular contexts, and are a matter of church tradition rather than Biblical precedent (with the exception of the explicit prohibition of same-sex relations)
|
130 |
+
--- 14996426
|
131 |
+
>>14995409
|
132 |
+
>On the other end fucking your wife when she's not on her fertile days is perfectly fine.
|
133 |
+
Disgusting. Even animals know not to fuck when it bleeds. Church-sanctioned “natural family planning” is blasphemous because it implies the right of the heterosexual male-female couple to "plan" their family instead of letting God plan one's family and to accept the children when (and if) God gives you—as a blessing from Him on the marital union and on society.
|
134 |
+
--- 14996469
|
135 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
136 |
+
>demonic
|
137 |
+
A word like degenerate. It immediately outs the dimwit.
|
138 |
+
--- 14996474
|
139 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
140 |
+
The Catholic Church has often said that it considers the use of contraception not to conform with God's will for Catholic marriage, in that it interrupts the procreative aspect of the sexual union, making it unnatural and counter to what God has outlined for married couples. Oddly, they promote couples to have sex when the woman is not ovulating (natural family planning), a practice contradictory to their own doctrine stating all sex acts must be procreative. It also implies that having sex with infertile old people is sinful.
|
141 |
+
--- 14996480
|
142 |
+
>>14995485
|
143 |
+
Trans women are women.
|
144 |
+
--- 14996622
|
145 |
+
>>14996480
|
146 |
+
That’s nothing to brag about
|
147 |
+
--- 14996641
|
148 |
+
>>14996622
|
149 |
+
Having anal sex with trannies is indeed something you should keep secret.
|
150 |
+
--- 14998595
|
151 |
+
>>14996426
|
152 |
+
Dude cringe. You are not even gonna decide how many kids you want yourself?
|
153 |
+
--- 14998616
|
154 |
+
>>14995694
|
155 |
+
>>14995409
|
156 |
+
I love how you inadvertendly implied that non-sodomite gay sex is okay. It is.
|
157 |
+
--- 14998618
|
158 |
+
>>14998616
|
159 |
+
No such thing, poofter
|
160 |
+
--- 14998638
|
161 |
+
>>14998618
|
162 |
+
In case the implication was too subtle for you: I'm against anal sex, so your insult doesn't reach me.
|
163 |
+
--- 14998643
|
164 |
+
>>14998638
|
165 |
+
Anal sex isn't an abomination, sodomy is
|
166 |
+
--- 14998645
|
167 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
168 |
+
What if your wife sucks you a bit first but you still bust in her pussy
|
169 |
+
--- 14998741
|
170 |
+
>>14998643
|
171 |
+
Ok poofter.
|
172 |
+
--- 14998758
|
173 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
174 |
+
OP sucks dicks
|
175 |
+
--- 14998965
|
176 |
+
>>14996012
|
177 |
+
yeah you're really going to multiply with oral sex
|
178 |
+
--- 14999381
|
179 |
+
>>14995389
|
180 |
+
based
|
181 |
+
--- 14999389
|
182 |
+
>>14995694
|
183 |
+
this just says don't have oral or anal sex with a man. which i agree you shouldn't do
|
184 |
+
--- 14999395
|
185 |
+
Fellas is it GAY to have SEX with a WOMAN
|
186 |
+
--- 14999397
|
187 |
+
>>14999389
|
188 |
+
Don't have any kind of sexual contact with a man*
|
189 |
+
--- 14999403
|
190 |
+
>>14999397
|
191 |
+
yeah you're more correct, i was being too specific
|
192 |
+
--- 14999441
|
193 |
+
>>14995389
|
194 |
+
any specifics you'd care to share?
|
195 |
+
--- 14999679
|
196 |
+
>>14995336 (OP)
|
197 |
+
A fulfilling sexual relationship will be more beneficial to the production of children than any restrictions to PIV. Perhaps it was odd in the poorly washed past, but today?
|
198 |
+
--- 14999697
|
199 |
+
>>14995694
|
200 |
+
I'm massively impressed you managed to fuck up one of the most well known lines in the book.
|
201 |
+
There's nothing in the Bible against anal sex with a woman, anon.
|
202 |
+
The idea of equating them is a taboo that stems from American law. We have laws that mandated you couldn't discriminate by sex, so it was impossible to outlaw homo buttsex without outlawing hetro buttsex. You ended up with people getting arrested for having loving anal sex with their monogamous wife, very hilarious.
|
203 |
+
--- 14999850
|
204 |
+
>>14999395
|
205 |
+
If she’s had other men, yes it’s gay
|
his/14995460.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995460
|
3 |
+
>english are 30% briton, 35% french, 35% anglosaxon on average
|
4 |
+
Wtf is this true? Why do they have so many french admixture?
|
5 |
+
--- 14995467
|
6 |
+
Soon to be 40% West African, 20% Paki-Bengalstan, 5% Cantonese, 10% Slavoid, and only 5% Briton, 5% Saxon and 5% Gallo-Roman
|
7 |
+
--- 14995488
|
8 |
+
>>14995467
|
9 |
+
Why are they like this
|
10 |
+
--- 14995611
|
11 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
12 |
+
That French DNA only corresponds to Northern france and Bretons because of ancient Celtic heritage of the Britain. What's shocking is how bad they got raped by Germanic tribes migrating from the East.
|
13 |
+
--- 14995615
|
14 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
15 |
+
--- 14995620
|
16 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
17 |
+
Bad model. Iron age Gauls were just very similar genetically to Britons.
|
18 |
+
--- 14995673
|
19 |
+
>>14995620
|
20 |
+
Not at all.
|
21 |
+
--- 14995876
|
22 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
23 |
+
briton is whg
|
24 |
+
french is farmer
|
25 |
+
anglo saxon is Indo eurppean
|
26 |
+
--- 14995884
|
27 |
+
>>14995615
|
28 |
+
So much wrong with this gutter figure I don't know where to begin debunking this shit
|
29 |
+
--- 14995888
|
30 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
31 |
+
>iron age french gauls
|
32 |
+
So english raiders
|
33 |
+
--- 14995897
|
34 |
+
>>14995611
|
35 |
+
they are more Briton than Germanic.
|
36 |
+
--- 14995903
|
37 |
+
>>14995611
|
38 |
+
There's actually evidence of post bronze age gene flow from britian into france. France went from half spaniard to northern france being practically indiscernible from the english
|
39 |
+
--- 14995930
|
40 |
+
tfw when
|
41 |
+
>100% european
|
42 |
+
>5% french and german
|
43 |
+
>95% British
|
44 |
+
--- 14995931
|
45 |
+
>>14995611
|
46 |
+
it wasnt "rape" but a slow and steady economical take over. Germanics settled the fertile land around the waterways (Roman Britons preferred to live in walled towns), this allowed them to control trade. Roman brits actually pushed the Germanics back into the sea at one point. It was ultimately a matter of getting out competed.
|
47 |
+
--- 14995980
|
48 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
49 |
+
|
50 |
+
What study is this?
|
51 |
+
--- 14995991
|
52 |
+
>>14995931
|
53 |
+
Whats with this historical revision? There were resistance to the invaders I agree with that and Romano-British even gained some significant victories that slowed down the takeover. But at noone point
|
54 |
+
>Roman brits actually pushed the Germanics back into the sea at one point.
|
55 |
+
This was the case.
|
56 |
+
--- 14996000
|
57 |
+
>>14995903
|
58 |
+
Provide any evidence to this reverse migration to the continent? The French around the channel were always similar to the celts in Britain.
|
59 |
+
--- 14996047
|
60 |
+
>>14995611
|
61 |
+
Bretons are descended from cornish.
|
62 |
+
Anyway the french dna in britain is similar to central france
|
63 |
+
--- 14996052
|
64 |
+
>>14996000
|
65 |
+
It doesn't look like north French, qpadm wants a more southern source to successfully model the English. A two way model (Eng IA + CNE) fails.
|
66 |
+
--- 14996059
|
67 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
68 |
+
>Why are they similar to their literal next door neighbor???
|
69 |
+
Damn dude, who the fuck knows? Isn't it also weird that Germans and Czech people look similar????
|
70 |
+
--- 14996063
|
71 |
+
>>14996000
|
72 |
+
>>14996047
|
73 |
+
>>14996052
|
74 |
+
Belgians, North French and English would always be similar to each other due to geographical proximity and having Celtic ancestry with a moderate amount of Germanic admixture
|
75 |
+
--- 14996067
|
76 |
+
The strange thing is that the study notes that the genetic change is late and there is no evidence of sexual bias.
|
77 |
+
It notes it was mediated by migration. But i wonder from when?
|
78 |
+
--- 14996070
|
79 |
+
>>14996063
|
80 |
+
Read the paper.
|
81 |
+
--- 14996151
|
82 |
+
>>14995467
|
83 |
+
poo hands posted this
|
84 |
+
--- 14996195
|
85 |
+
>>14996070
|
86 |
+
I don't need to read it to state the obvious. Duhh.
|
87 |
+
|
88 |
+
If you check out the paper, the outlying areas all tend to be mountainous where all the hicks/hillbillies lived in, hence muhh "Celtic" which gives Americans wet dreams
|
89 |
+
--- 14996210
|
90 |
+
>>14996063
|
91 |
+
>Belgians, North French and English would always be similar to each other
|
92 |
+
"similar"
|
93 |
+
in the iron age they were practically the same people
|
94 |
+
--- 14996238
|
95 |
+
>>14996195
|
96 |
+
They aren't using Northern Gauls as a source for French ancestry.
|
97 |
+
--- 14996277
|
98 |
+
>>14996238
|
99 |
+
Hmm. It might have been a combination of huguenots and occitan migrants during the hundred years war if the source is not from north france.
|
100 |
+
However. It might also be from brittany, brittany gauls in particular were similar to occitans, while those of normandy to Britons and those of nord/grand est to belgians. As brittany gauls mixed with Cornish they might have proxied both Gaulish-occitan IA like ancestry + British islander
|
101 |
+
--- 14996283
|
102 |
+
>>14996238
|
103 |
+
Even southern france in the iron age was about halfway between a spaniard and a german, iron age spain similarly had a lot of genetic flow from germanics, the Iron Age was not some stagnant point in history. Similarly bronze age germany was much more similar to iron age britian before being shifted towards slavs in the iron age. Oddly late iron age paris was very german
|
104 |
+
--- 14996775
|
105 |
+
>>14996238
|
106 |
+
what study is this from?
|
107 |
+
--- 14996785
|
108 |
+
>>14996775
|
109 |
+
"The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool" supplement.
|
110 |
+
--- 14996824
|
111 |
+
>>14995673
|
112 |
+
>not at all
|
113 |
+
>France is 43 EEF 16 WHG 41 WSH
|
114 |
+
>England is 37 EEF 15 WHG 48 WSH
|
115 |
+
That's basically the same people mate.
|
116 |
+
--- 14997118
|
117 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
118 |
+
Simple, French birds are super easy.
|
119 |
+
--- 14997748
|
120 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
121 |
+
>35% anglosaxon
|
122 |
+
Some of that "Anglo-Saxon" DNA probably comes from the Vikings.
|
123 |
+
--- 14997902
|
124 |
+
>>14996059
|
125 |
+
Should I start spamming threads and making infographics about Czechs being Germanic or Germans actually being Slavic?
|
126 |
+
--- 14997957
|
127 |
+
>>14997748
|
128 |
+
It's kind of interesting mildly how much modern brits cluster with early bell beaker brits, geographically in a sweet spot post major steppe people migration for clustering like they do. Kind of see the same thing in Greece with modern Greeks clustering with Logkas despite enormous population turnovers in past 2-3 thousand years/ancient Greeks clustering completely differently.
|
129 |
+
--- 14998063
|
130 |
+
>>14995980
|
131 |
+
"The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool", by Gretzinger et al
|
132 |
+
--- 14998684
|
133 |
+
>>14995611
|
134 |
+
>>14995903
|
135 |
+
>>14996047
|
136 |
+
frankish raiders were also present during early and mid anglo saxon period that most likely plays a part as well ?
|
137 |
+
--- 14998696
|
138 |
+
>>14995460 (OP)
|
139 |
+
the English are the mutts of europe
|
140 |
+
--- 14998697
|
141 |
+
>>14998684
|
142 |
+
No. The study uses medieval proxies for the anglosaxon part. Also frank=/=gauls
|
143 |
+
--- 14999432
|
144 |
+
gay thread
|
145 |
+
--- 14999446
|
146 |
+
>>14999432
|
147 |
+
cope Neville
|
his/14995480.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995480
|
3 |
+
rate 'em, make 'em, post 'em
|
4 |
+
--- 14995508
|
5 |
+
This is the real structure of Europe
|
6 |
+
--- 14995828
|
7 |
+
>slav russia is the part where they mixed with balts and finns the most
|
8 |
+
huh?
|
9 |
+
--- 14996880
|
10 |
+
>>14995480 (OP)
|
11 |
+
Holy shit kill yourself.
|
12 |
+
--- 14998412
|
13 |
+
>>14995480 (OP)
|
14 |
+
America if it wasn't colonized as thoroughly.
|
15 |
+
--- 14998420
|
16 |
+
>>14998412
|
17 |
+
I would have added a country for news in new jersey and Pirates in new york.
|
18 |
+
--- 14998456
|
19 |
+
>>14998412
|
20 |
+
aztecs were on their way out, replace them with TARASCO BVLLS
|
21 |
+
--- 14998500
|
22 |
+
>>14998456
|
23 |
+
Not entirely convinced they'd make it honestly. Not convinced the triple alliance was going to disintegrate that fast without Europe.
|
24 |
+
--- 14998507
|
25 |
+
>>14995480 (OP)
|
26 |
+
Now this is autism :D
|
27 |
+
--- 14998532
|
28 |
+
>>14998500
|
29 |
+
not "that fast" but purepecha had bronze weapons, it was only a matter of time till aztecs fell to them
|
30 |
+
--- 14998712
|
31 |
+
>>14998532
|
32 |
+
Bronze isn't really that transformative at the stage the Purepecha were working it.
|
33 |
+
--- 14998786
|
34 |
+
>>14998412
|
35 |
+
why wouldn't they though? it's free real state and europe was overpopulated
|
36 |
+
--- 14998788
|
37 |
+
>>14998712
|
38 |
+
And why would the Aztecs not instantly adopt bronze themselves after the first time they get BTFO by it? That's generally how technological adaptation works.
|
39 |
+
|
40 |
+
Interesting thought as well - most copper deposits in LatAm are along the west coast of South America (Chile, Peru). If this tech made its way there without whitey BTFOing everyone first, Incas would have dommed.
|
41 |
+
--- 14998796
|
42 |
+
>>14998788
|
43 |
+
iirc copper deposits in mesoamerica were in purepechan hands givinig them the upper hand against aztec chuds
|
44 |
+
also incans had bronze before mesoamerica did
|
45 |
+
--- 14998811
|
46 |
+
>>14998796
|
47 |
+
>incans had bronze before mesoamerica did
|
48 |
+
Didn't know that, time to read some shit. thanks anon
|
49 |
+
--- 14999429
|
50 |
+
>>14998786
|
51 |
+
Different ways of discovery and or contact mostly.
|
52 |
+
Maybe the Malays got there first for example.
|
53 |
+
>>14998788
|
54 |
+
That's also fair.
|
55 |
+
Also, Idk if the Inca would have really dominated. Due to eccentric theories of my own, I believe they would scarcely leave their mountains.
|
56 |
+
Although eventual contact with the Mesos would have spiced things up. Plus we do not even take into account the then-incipient kalinago linguistic expansion (with a lot of genocide probably) the Europeans (araw)awkwardly crashed into.
|
57 |
+
Maybe they'd cannibalize the eastern fringe of the decrepit Amazonian garden makers.
|
58 |
+
Seems like America was on the cusp of an interesting period when the comedy happened.
|
59 |
+
--- 14999503
|
60 |
+
>>14998412
|
61 |
+
Why are the Metis on Nova Scotia
|
62 |
+
--- 14999551
|
63 |
+
>>14999503
|
64 |
+
French fishermen had a little liaison, m'kay. I was kind of throwing ideas around at the moment. Maybe I'd remake the map someday.
|
65 |
+
>>14995480 (OP)
|
66 |
+
Do my incomplete autism alt-his maps count?
|
his/14995535.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,581 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995535
|
3 |
+
It is Asian American Heritage month. Historically speaking, Asians were treated really bad in America
|
4 |
+
--- 14995542
|
5 |
+
Everyone was treated really bad in America when you speak historically.
|
6 |
+
--- 14995545
|
7 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
8 |
+
They were given asylum from their own tyrannical governments and yet they never seen to mention that. Curious.
|
9 |
+
--- 14995547
|
10 |
+
>>14995542
|
11 |
+
Asians were treated worse than almost everybody else
|
12 |
+
--- 14995549
|
13 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
14 |
+
They are on average richer than the most Americans
|
15 |
+
--- 14995550
|
16 |
+
>>14995547
|
17 |
+
You can say that for just about everyone, again.
|
18 |
+
--- 14995551
|
19 |
+
>>14995547
|
20 |
+
source for this info
|
21 |
+
--- 14995554
|
22 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
23 |
+
You didn't have to come over in the first place.
|
24 |
+
--- 14995555
|
25 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
26 |
+
Because Asians are able to work hard and earn up on their own, some whites need to babysit someone and get that good feeling of 'being the morally superior nice guy'.
|
27 |
+
--- 14995561
|
28 |
+
>>14995550
|
29 |
+
>mass lynchings
|
30 |
+
>exclusion acts
|
31 |
+
>alien land acts
|
32 |
+
>mass concentration camps
|
33 |
+
>hate crimes
|
34 |
+
>marginalization
|
35 |
+
--- 14995664
|
36 |
+
Asians had it so bad there were brutally tortured, killed and squashed with hammers and other torture devices by the tallest, most ferocious white Anglos and Nordic Germans, Scandinavians and Irish with the bluest of the blue eyes and blondest of the blonde hair, and the women subject to the absolute most heinous human trafficking in history. They were literally tortured and then squashed like insects by white Americans and forced to be attacked and ripped apart by inner city blacks and Hispanics by the whites, treated like worse than the blackest of black slaves of the Mississippi Delta.
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
There absolutely nobody who had it the absolute worst than East Asian Americans of all of entire human history, worse than the Jews, blacks and Native Americans combined x10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
|
39 |
+
--- 14995670
|
40 |
+
>>14995664
|
41 |
+
This.
|
42 |
+
--- 14995907
|
43 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
44 |
+
Is that a real month??
|
45 |
+
--- 14995916
|
46 |
+
>>14995664
|
47 |
+
Hahaha I’m glad this all happened Chang. It was nice to see chinks put in their place
|
48 |
+
--- 14995969
|
49 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
50 |
+
You personally were never oppressed in America though.
|
51 |
+
--- 14995985
|
52 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
53 |
+
>>14995547
|
54 |
+
>>14995555
|
55 |
+
>>14995561
|
56 |
+
>>14995664
|
57 |
+
Wow that's horrible maybe stay in your shithole gook jungle instead of demanding access to White people?
|
58 |
+
>>14995554
|
59 |
+
/thread
|
60 |
+
--- 14995996
|
61 |
+
Do Americans take only orientals as asians? So the Russians, Armenians, Arabs, Circassians, Thais etc where are they classified? After all, Asia is a huge continent with a variety of ethnic groups.
|
62 |
+
--- 14996010
|
63 |
+
>>14995996
|
64 |
+
East Asians = “Asians”
|
65 |
+
South Asians = “Indians”
|
66 |
+
West Asians = “Arabs”
|
67 |
+
Orthodox Asians = “Russians”
|
68 |
+
--- 14996020
|
69 |
+
Personally, I'm starting to suffer from a bad case of Asian fatigue.
|
70 |
+
--- 14996021
|
71 |
+
>>14995985
|
72 |
+
>Wow that's horrible maybe stay in your shithole gook jungle instead of demanding access to White people?
|
73 |
+
Noone wants access to "white people". Everyone wants access to American lands. Very different things.
|
74 |
+
--- 14996028
|
75 |
+
>>14995996
|
76 |
+
Mutts, Aussies and Leafs are closer to Changs than Ayrabs and Poos, which is why they use Asian mostly to mean just yellow people.
|
77 |
+
|
78 |
+
Oriental can also refer to anything east of Europe too, btw, hence a Turkish Oriental harem, a Persian or Afghan Oriental rug, etc.
|
79 |
+
--- 14996034
|
80 |
+
>>14995664
|
81 |
+
>brutally tortured, killed and squashed with hammers and other torture devices
|
82 |
+
>the absolute most heinous human trafficking in history
|
83 |
+
>They were literally tortured and then squashed like insects
|
84 |
+
but enough about life in china
|
85 |
+
--- 14996101
|
86 |
+
>>14996021
|
87 |
+
So you want to have access to the lands after others went through with the effort to exterminate the locals? Oh it belongs to everyone now right?
|
88 |
+
--- 14996110
|
89 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
90 |
+
|
91 |
+
Even during Covid.
|
92 |
+
|
93 |
+
>>14995547
|
94 |
+
|
95 |
+
Native Americans got really screwed over time and again. Basically murican government reneging on their signed deals. Even now pipeline deals wrecking native lands.
|
96 |
+
|
97 |
+
>>14995555
|
98 |
+
|
99 |
+
More like Asian folks don't have enough voting numbers to bother with so politicians are nonchalant about them.
|
100 |
+
--- 14996163
|
101 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
102 |
+
We are still treated reall badly
|
103 |
+
--- 14996171
|
104 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
105 |
+
>It is [Non-White] American Heritage month. Historically speaking, [Non-Whites] were treated really bad in America.
|
106 |
+
--- 14996173
|
107 |
+
>>14996020
|
108 |
+
I’m very vocal about the nigger problem
|
109 |
+
--- 14996175
|
110 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
111 |
+
How were Whites treated in Asia?
|
112 |
+
--- 14996185
|
113 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
114 |
+
remember the six trillions
|
115 |
+
--- 14996191
|
116 |
+
>>14996163
|
117 |
+
If you separate Jews from the Whites category, Asians are actually treated better than non-Jewish whites on college admissions
|
118 |
+
--- 14996199
|
119 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
120 |
+
I'm hapa and didn't even know. Nor do I care now. This is funny white people shit.
|
121 |
+
--- 14996217
|
122 |
+
Why do people always downplay anti-Asian racism in America
|
123 |
+
--- 14996221
|
124 |
+
>>14996217
|
125 |
+
Because mostly blacks do it so it causes people to figure out the truth about le oppressed colored folk
|
126 |
+
--- 14996224
|
127 |
+
>>14996191
|
128 |
+
“Treated better on college admissions” and “get into college” are two different things.
|
129 |
+
|
130 |
+
Yes a lot of Asians get into college even with academic discrimination working against them. But, that doesn’t legitimize affirmative action. America should be a meritocracy, granting people unfair privileges based on race goes against the spirit of “all men are created equal”. Race should not play a factor in determining your eligibility for college or jobs.
|
131 |
+
--- 14996233
|
132 |
+
>>14996221
|
133 |
+
Funny how “Stop Asian Hate” lost all steam when it came out who was doing the majority of anti asian hate crimes
|
134 |
+
--- 14996240
|
135 |
+
>>14996021
|
136 |
+
>>14996163
|
137 |
+
>>14996173
|
138 |
+
>>14996224
|
139 |
+
>>14996233
|
140 |
+
Okay then go back to your shithole where your government caters to your race and your culture is dominant. Access to White people is not a human right.
|
141 |
+
--- 14996266
|
142 |
+
Remember Vincent Chin
|
143 |
+
--- 14996282
|
144 |
+
>>14996217
|
145 |
+
The only Anti-Asian racism is from Blacks assaulting them and women not wanting to fuck them which are out of the control of the White majority culture.
|
146 |
+
|
147 |
+
The only legitimate grievance is college admissions but that itself is a result of Jewish privileges they've carved out for themselves >>14996191 , not because the broad white majority culture is keeping them out.
|
148 |
+
|
149 |
+
>>14996224
|
150 |
+
"We are srightry ress accepted than whites even though that's because of Jewish priverege? It's stirr racism"
|
151 |
+
|
152 |
+
Don't fucking complain to a midwestern white person about it, it's Jews living in Boston, New York and Los Angeles doing this shit.
|
153 |
+
--- 14996298
|
154 |
+
>>14996224
|
155 |
+
>a lot of Asians get into college even with academic discrimination working against them. But, that doesn’t legitimize affirmative action.
|
156 |
+
Conservative policymaking hinges on, "this benefits me now, but will it benefit a nigger in the future? God forbid!".
|
157 |
+
--- 14996477
|
158 |
+
>>14996282
|
159 |
+
I’m not complaining about “midwestern white people” retard. And it’s not just Jews, it’s white liberal cuckolds with their self hate fetish throwing us under the bus as well. You’re delusional if you don’t think white libtards as a voting bloc are responsible for this shit as well.
|
160 |
+
|
161 |
+
>>14996298
|
162 |
+
How is that in any way a response to what I said? NPC tier random dialogue tree.
|
163 |
+
--- 14996485
|
164 |
+
>>14996477
|
165 |
+
You're not White
|
166 |
+
--- 14996512
|
167 |
+
>>14996477
|
168 |
+
>it’s white liberal cuckolds with their self hate fetish throwing us under the bus as well.
|
169 |
+
That's terrible. You should go back to your gook village in Malaysia where there are no liberal whites to bother you.
|
170 |
+
--- 14996520
|
171 |
+
>>14996477
|
172 |
+
Whites in general are literally the only demographic in America that's even remotely conservative-leaning. There are proportionately more black, Latin American and Asian libtards than white libtards.
|
173 |
+
|
174 |
+
(There are more white libtards in absolute terms of course, because this is still a white-majority country, even today.)
|
175 |
+
--- 14996575
|
176 |
+
The whole /pol/ "Westernized Asians are cringe SJWs, native Asians are based and trad" meme never made sense to me.
|
177 |
+
|
178 |
+
They're literally the same people, standing on different pieces of dirt, but thinking saying and doing the same things. A "based Asian" in Asia according to /pol/ standards is totally obsessed with advancing his own people at the expense of everyone else and putting down whites, which is... exactly what the aznidentity crowd advocates.
|
179 |
+
|
180 |
+
Does a heckin based rightwing trad ethnocentric redpilled Asian become a cringe bluepill brainwashed SJW just because he changed his geographical location to the West?
|
181 |
+
--- 14996589
|
182 |
+
Male hapas are the most oppressed demographic, change my mind.
|
183 |
+
--- 14996617
|
184 |
+
>>14996575
|
185 |
+
You'll never see an Asian living in Asia making excuses for niggers doing crimes against Asians or blaming it on whites
|
186 |
+
--- 14996640
|
187 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
188 |
+
They've been treated fairly well when compared to Native Americans and African American.
|
189 |
+
--- 14996658
|
190 |
+
>>14996617
|
191 |
+
>You'll never see an Asian living in Asia ... blaming it on whites
|
192 |
+
|
193 |
+
You literally will. Plenty will either say that Trump/whites was inciting blacks (conservatives are more inclined to do this) or say that actually, whites do it just about as often as blacks (left-wingers do this more, just like in the West). These narratives are common in Mainland China, in Korea, and in Japan as well. The idea that jealous, greedy, lazy Westerners of all races are by nature rapacious and malevolent and easily turned to hating Asians and trying to bring them down is something that plays well across the region just as much as it does among Asian-Americans.
|
194 |
+
|
195 |
+
The only real question is why Westerners especially conservatives seem particularly reluctant to accept this, and to see native Asians if not Overseas Asians as somehow naturally allies or future constituents of theirs. I guess it's part wishful thinking, part yellow fever, and part because of that Dark Enlightenment / IQ nationalism / class mentality, according to which white conservatives assume there is some inevitable fellow-feeling politically between whites and Asians because both are "civilised" or whatever, although they tend not to say this out loud.
|
196 |
+
--- 14996772
|
197 |
+
>>14996217
|
198 |
+
Asians are discriminated against in college admissions, but in virtually every other respect, they're entitled to the same gibs as the other colored people, and they also get treated by pretty much everyone as the most mild-mannered least criminal group generally, except for some stuff like espionage and small business tax shit.
|
199 |
+
--- 14996776
|
200 |
+
>>14996658
|
201 |
+
For everyone you do see blaming black violence on whites, there's more that place the blame where it belongs, on the blacks.
|
202 |
+
--- 14996819
|
203 |
+
>>14996776
|
204 |
+
I think my comment is accurate: yes, some Asians will note that most anti-Asian violence is conspicuously carried out by a particular sub demographic of the Western population, but that doesn't preclude just as many from blaming a supposed anti-Asian tendency in Western society as a whole.
|
205 |
+
|
206 |
+
Many Asians seem to have enthusiastically picked up on the StopAsianHate thing as a tool with which to try and make Westerners feel guilty. I've personally experienced Asians try this on as a response to any criticism of Asia or Asians and how Asians treat other people.
|
207 |
+
|
208 |
+
>At least we/they aren't killing Asians the way Westerners do!
|
209 |
+
|
210 |
+
For example, I've heard Asians use this argument to justify kicking Westerners out of service sector businesses in Asian countries. "At least they are violently attacking Westerners, the way Westerners hurt Asians!"
|
211 |
+
|
212 |
+
Also Asians both in Asia and in the West seem oblivious to the fact that Westerners especially whites are also victimised by violent crime as much if not more than Asians in the West. And let's face it, when whites bitched about getting BLACKED often by our ghetto-dwelling cousins via gun crime, the knockout game etc., most Asians in the West responded by voting Democrat harder and complaining some more about white supremacy.
|
213 |
+
--- 14996822
|
214 |
+
>>14996819
|
215 |
+
At least they aren't*
|
216 |
+
--- 14996953
|
217 |
+
>>14996819
|
218 |
+
The Chinese student I studied with told me his mom slapped the shit out of him when she found out he was part of the BLM thing a while back, she was scared he was going to become a chigger and fuck up his only opportunity for higher education, so I uploaded some pictures of him with white boys in cargo shorts to facebook (which I only use to share things with boomer family members). He would tell his mom I was his friend, she would inevitably stalk my facebook and see him there with some nice white people. I don't think he ever cared about BLM, he was just sort of swept up with the crowd, being from China and not really understanding what it was or any of the details hidden by mass media like George Floyd being a known violent felon who held a gun to a pregnant woman's belly. His mother was right to dissuade him as he is now doing quite well.
|
219 |
+
|
220 |
+
Asian-Americans though are deep into woke, I'll give you that. However there is a huge gulf between the left in asia and the left in the west.
|
221 |
+
--- 14997060
|
222 |
+
>>14996175
|
223 |
+
founded dynasties and empires in central and southern asia
|
224 |
+
--- 14997712
|
225 |
+
>>14996240
|
226 |
+
Sure. but only after you started to deport blacks en-masse too. If they stay, I stay. If they're uppity, I unfortunately will also.
|
227 |
+
--- 14997826
|
228 |
+
Asians are pathetic in their own ways but the whites who salivate after them are even worse. Maybe it’s because whites are under attack everyone so they look for allies (don’t want blacks because they’re…black / don’t want latinos because they’re not white or white enough) and search for solidarity with Asians. They boast on and on about how clever and smart Asians are unlike those niggers and spics. When Asians go to the best colleges and advance to the workplace, it’s not a black or a mexican they’re stealing jobs from, but a white person. When they purchase buildings in cities, it’s not blacks and mexicans they charge extortionate prices for rent (they don’t accept section 8) but whites. When they become managers or ceo’s, you see your workplace turn Asian in real time. I see Asians helping their Asian coworker out but playing dumb when a white person asks for help. They have never cared for whites and only push for policies that help them. Yet they’re worshipped. It’s shameful really.
|
229 |
+
--- 14997911
|
230 |
+
>>14997826
|
231 |
+
I've said it before, but basically every criticism /pol/ types have concerning the small hat people goes twice for the small eye people in terms of their behaviour generally and their attitude towards Westerners, and yet the small eye people get a veritable deluge of excuses and rationalisations as to why it's "based" and an example to be followed when they do it. Baffling.
|
232 |
+
|
233 |
+
Some people have proposed the explanation that it's a simp thing, that these guys want pussy so bad and think nonwhites will put out more (easily) and so this is what's behind it, but this doesn't quite make sense. After all, if you wanted to keep your dating options as open as possible, you'd be generally anti-racist when it comes to browns, blacks and I suppose Jews as well, but no.
|
234 |
+
--- 14997941
|
235 |
+
>>14997826
|
236 |
+
>>14997911
|
237 |
+
>When Asians go to the best colleges
|
238 |
+
You are aware Asians are systematically discriminated against for not being as dumb as blacks, just like whites are, right?
|
239 |
+
https://youtu.be/5hs22GlP4kg?t=700 [Embed]
|
240 |
+
They wouldn't be getting Jewed if they were the Jews, would they?
|
241 |
+
--- 14997948
|
242 |
+
>>14997941
|
243 |
+
That's just a reflection of Jewish power, and not particularly relevant to the point I was making.
|
244 |
+
--- 14997958
|
245 |
+
>>14997948
|
246 |
+
Your point is Asians are outcompeting whites, my point is the dreidel is going up both our asses.
|
247 |
+
--- 14997992
|
248 |
+
>>14997958
|
249 |
+
>going up both our asses.
|
250 |
+
Proving my point exactly. Whites deluding themselves into believing that Asians and them have something in common and are both being fucked over by Jews. Asians would work alongside Jews if it meant their kind benefited. Whites have no allies. Why should I care that colleges are fucking chinks over? Less Asians in ivy leagues = less Asian graduates = less changs at my job. Every decent workplace or company that is actually doing something is either Asian majority, led by Asians or on the path to become Asian majority with whites further shut out from the top jobs (unless they have an Asian wife) but I’m supposed to care that Chang didn’t get into Harvard kek
|
251 |
+
--- 14997994
|
252 |
+
>>14997958
|
253 |
+
What I meant though is that they have many obvious and striking similarities
|
254 |
+
|
255 |
+
CHUTZPAH: Openly advocate multiculturalism for you, ethnocentrism for me. Koreans are the most incredible for this, but basically they all do it. And they've been at it a long time: just look at how Japanese and Japanese-Americans bitched about US and Commonwealth immigration policies that excluded Japanese and other Asians, meanwhile at the exact same time they were working hard to exclude Westerners from Chosen as well as their new territories Hokkaido and Karafuto from which Russians were deported (and they were plotting the expulsion of the Russians from Manchuria).
|
256 |
+
|
257 |
+
ESPIONAGE: For every Jonathan Pollard, there are Chinese, Japanese, and Korean equivalents stripping the US and other Western countries of military and commercial secrets, and they do so with the quiet encouragement and connivance of Asian-Americans who loudly scream racism every time they are caught which is at once often and yet not nearly enough.
|
258 |
+
|
259 |
+
ARROGANCE: East Asians just like Jews will point to any and every one of their own kind as an example which shows the superiority of all their people as a group, and yet every Westerner is a trailer-dwelling piece of trash until he becomes a millionaire or Nobel Prize winning scientist and proves otherwise. Collective pride for me, atomisation for you.
|
260 |
+
--- 14998002
|
261 |
+
>>14997992
|
262 |
+
There was a funny poll done recently in the US which showed that whites think of Asians as being like themselves, but Asians firmly consider themselves to be "people of colour." Which just goes to show that the /pol/ type Honourary Aryan meme stuff is actually amusingly widespread among whites in general.
|
263 |
+
--- 14998004
|
264 |
+
>>14997992
|
265 |
+
A decent contingent of whites are actively fucking over both Asians and their fellow whites with the Jews in their position as billionaires.
|
266 |
+
--- 14998020
|
267 |
+
>>14998004
|
268 |
+
Why should I care that they’re fucking over Asians? Not my problem. Put your own first. Asian problems are not my problem.
|
269 |
+
--- 14998021
|
270 |
+
>>14996512
|
271 |
+
>go to third world
|
272 |
+
>get Freedom Bombed(tm) by Sleepy Joe and the Tranny McArmy
|
273 |
+
|
274 |
+
>>14996520
|
275 |
+
Minority libtards will vote that way out of slef interest. White libtards are truly unique because they are the only group obsessed with self loathing to the point that it is a political cornerstone. Sriously, maybe you'll see a handful of token "Latinx" and Cali Asians out kneeling for ghetto thugs, but white shitlibs are the only ones cucked enough to go out there en masse and get on their knees for niggers.
|
276 |
+
|
277 |
+
>>14996575
|
278 |
+
Schizophrenic terminally online word salad
|
279 |
+
|
280 |
+
>>14996772
|
281 |
+
What gibs do Asians get retard? Affirmative Action doesn't only apply to college, it also applies to quotas for jobs.
|
282 |
+
|
283 |
+
>>14996953
|
284 |
+
>The Chinese student I studied with told me his mom slapped the shit out of him when she found out he was part of the BLM thing a while back
|
285 |
+
|
286 |
+
And I would have slapped him again for being a race traitor.
|
287 |
+
--- 14998030
|
288 |
+
>>14998020
|
289 |
+
So you would side with a white billionaire who is actively fucking you in the ass over a qt azn chinkfu college dropout?
|
290 |
+
--- 14998032
|
291 |
+
>>14998021
|
292 |
+
Not my problem. Not you problem either if you go back to Cambodia.
|
293 |
+
--- 14998034
|
294 |
+
>>14998002
|
295 |
+
>source: my ass
|
296 |
+
|
297 |
+
PoC is no longer even a relevant term retard. They changed it to BIPOC(tm) because Latinos and Asians started doing too well in "White supremacist" America.
|
298 |
+
--- 14998048
|
299 |
+
>>14998002
|
300 |
+
>a funny poll done recently
|
301 |
+
|
302 |
+
Oh? Let's see it.
|
303 |
+
--- 14998053
|
304 |
+
>>14998030
|
305 |
+
>over a qt azn chinkfu college dropout?
|
306 |
+
Why does it always boil down to fucking bugs with you fags? I have noticed at work the only whites who are promoted are the ones married to bugs. A gay male at my last job with an asian boyfriend was promoted before the more capable white workers who are married to white women. White guys will throw their own under the bus and become the next MLK for Asians because they found some chink attractive. Enjoy raising kids who don’t resemble you.
|
307 |
+
--- 14998056
|
308 |
+
>>14998021
|
309 |
+
>What gibs do Asians get retard? Affirmative Action doesn't only apply to college, it also applies to quotas for jobs.
|
310 |
+
|
311 |
+
What makes you assume Asians are handicapped in every aspect of society by affirmative action? For one, I know that they enjoy more access to federal-backed small business loans than whites.
|
312 |
+
--- 14998058
|
313 |
+
>>14995547
|
314 |
+
Incorrect. The objective hierarchy of racial oppression in the United States (most oppressed to least oppressed) is as follows:
|
315 |
+
|
316 |
+
>Blacks
|
317 |
+
>Native Americans
|
318 |
+
>Asians
|
319 |
+
>Mestizo
|
320 |
+
>Jews
|
321 |
+
>Castizo
|
322 |
+
>White Ethnic (e.g. Irish, Italian)
|
323 |
+
>WASP
|
324 |
+
--- 14998066
|
325 |
+
>>14998048
|
326 |
+
https://staatus-index.s3.amazonaws.com/2023/STAATUS_Index_2023.pdf
|
327 |
+
--- 14998078
|
328 |
+
>>14997992
|
329 |
+
I hate how wilfully dishonest Asians usually are about this shit too. They will act like the fact that a few Chongs fall victim to violent crime in the West is a systemic issue, ignoring that there are literally tens of millions of the buggers in the West and so statistically it's bound to happen especially when the overall violent crime rate is so much higher than in Asia.
|
330 |
+
|
331 |
+
They will also act like a few tens of thousands of English teachers wasting their youth and a handful of soldiers getting drunk and rowdy on the weekend over there in Asia for just a few years before coming home represents some kind of massive neocolonial privilege.
|
332 |
+
--- 14998079
|
333 |
+
>>14998053
|
334 |
+
White women are roasties who think they deserve better than they do. As soon as white women improve I'll stop having yellow fever.
|
335 |
+
--- 14998087
|
336 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
337 |
+
>come to america
|
338 |
+
>know americans are racist
|
339 |
+
>still come anyway
|
340 |
+
>complain about racism
|
341 |
+
|
342 |
+
I know if a white person went to your dog eating shithole country they would experience racism so quit being a faggot.
|
343 |
+
--- 14998088
|
344 |
+
>>14998079
|
345 |
+
t. Peter Rodger
|
346 |
+
--- 14998108
|
347 |
+
>>14998088
|
348 |
+
>fat old white guy fucking prime yellow pussy
|
349 |
+
yeah that isn't discouraging me
|
350 |
+
only i wouldn't be an absentee father so my son wouldn't go crazy
|
351 |
+
--- 14998123
|
352 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
353 |
+
ok but china is still trash
|
354 |
+
--- 14998132
|
355 |
+
>>14998079
|
356 |
+
The Asian tradwife meme is unironically rooted in GI Vietnam fantasies and the legacy of Orientalist Victorian East End stage plays like Madame Butterfly. Yellow fever fags are literally getting psyoped by entertainment from almost one and a half centuries ago at this point. Asian women have smartphones. They get divorces. They cheat. They get abortions.
|
357 |
+
--- 14998168
|
358 |
+
>>14998056
|
359 |
+
Discrimination in educational and job opportunities are literally the two biggest ways you can marginalize a group. Add on top of the the covering up of violent hate crimes, looting, and arson committed against us by the black community- and you have all the elements nesecary for a pre-genocidal phase against Asian Americans.
|
360 |
+
|
361 |
+
I will not go quietly into that good night, I assure you. I will not be sacrificed on the alter of white guilt.
|
362 |
+
--- 14998176
|
363 |
+
>>14998168
|
364 |
+
Asians suffer less crime, including violent crime, than any other group in America. /pol/chuds say StopAsianHate is real but niggers are to blame, leftoids say whitey is doing it. The reality is that nobody is doing it and that you fell for a media hoax. The whole thing is fabricated hysteria.
|
365 |
+
--- 14998178
|
366 |
+
>>14998168
|
367 |
+
What do blacks have to do with you taking white jobs and pushing whites out of the workplace?
|
368 |
+
--- 14998185
|
369 |
+
>>14998066
|
370 |
+
>67% of Asian Americans completely agree that Asian Americans are people of color, while only 47% of white Americans completely agree.
|
371 |
+
--- 14998203
|
372 |
+
>>14997994
|
373 |
+
>CHUTZPAH: Openly advocate multiculturalism for you, ethnocentrism for me. Koreans are the most incredible for this, but basically they all do it. And they've been at it a long time: just look at how Japanese and Japanese-Americans bitched about US and Commonwealth immigration policies that excluded Japanese and other Asians, meanwhile at the exact same time they were working hard to exclude Westerners from Chosen as well as their new territories Hokkaido and Karafuto from which Russians were deported (and they were plotting the expulsion of the Russians from Manchuria).
|
374 |
+
|
375 |
+
The Chinese are like this too, they squeezed the Westerners out of Shanghai after the war despite everything they'd done to develop business trade and industry in China because they did a heckin colonialism, but ask them about Chang immigration to America and it's all Amelika so lacist, why you no let Chinaman into America faster and more.
|
376 |
+
--- 14998206
|
377 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
378 |
+
Why are India Indians included when India isn't really part of Asia, but West Asians such as Middle Easterners are excluded?
|
379 |
+
--- 14998216
|
380 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
381 |
+
>american history
|
382 |
+
Herbs grown in all of the fields.
|
383 |
+
--- 14998217
|
384 |
+
>>14998206
|
385 |
+
AFAIK, natives of the Near East are not considered Asian for census purposes (yet). There was a campaign that they should actually but I don't know if it went anywhere.
|
386 |
+
--- 14998222
|
387 |
+
>>14998176
|
388 |
+
So you entire argument is, "Yes it happens, but it's not *that* often, so just ignore it chud!"
|
389 |
+
|
390 |
+
>>14998178
|
391 |
+
A) America should be a meritocracy
|
392 |
+
B) The same policy pushes whites out of jobs as well so you should be against it too
|
393 |
+
--- 14998230
|
394 |
+
>>14998222
|
395 |
+
>So you entire argument is, "Yes it happens, but it's not *that* often, so just ignore it chud!"
|
396 |
+
|
397 |
+
No country anywhere is going to be 100% crime free. Not even Nipland has achieved this, and since there are fucking hordes of you guys in the West now, statistically some of you are going to get BLACKED sometimes along with everyone else. You know where the door is.
|
398 |
+
--- 14998234
|
399 |
+
>>14998217
|
400 |
+
Part of my grandfather's family was from what is now considered Ukraine.
|
401 |
+
My grandfather looked Iranian, while his brother had the more central Asian Turk look.
|
402 |
+
--- 14998243
|
403 |
+
>>14995554
|
404 |
+
/thread
|
405 |
+
>>14995985
|
406 |
+
This
|
407 |
+
>>14996021
|
408 |
+
>I just want access to the wealth white people have generated.
|
409 |
+
Yeah, we know. Now fuck off.
|
410 |
+
--- 14998248
|
411 |
+
>>14998222
|
412 |
+
>The same policy pushes whites out of jobs as well so you should be against it too
|
413 |
+
It is ASIANS pushing out whites from these jobs. There are no blacks or mexicans because they’re too retarded to get in. Asians get the top job and begin an Asian only hiring process. The whites who were lucky enough to get in are subject to the cold shoulder in order to force them out and replace them with more Asians. Learn to fight your own battles Chang. We will not fight for you.
|
414 |
+
--- 14998257
|
415 |
+
>>14998176
|
416 |
+
I don't even believe Asians are sincerely worried about violent crime. If they were, they'd be big NRA supporters, they'd on balance support police unions along with Back the Blue and all that stuff, and vote GOP every election. This is what people who are actually frightened by rising violent crime do. They also wouldn't do shit like make a beeline for globohomo hubs of diversity like NY and LA every time and open up corner stores in nigger neighborhoods.
|
417 |
+
|
418 |
+
Really Asians are just attention whores looking for sympathy, literally the women of races.
|
419 |
+
--- 14998285
|
420 |
+
>>14997992
|
421 |
+
>Asians would work alongside Jews if it meant their kind benefited
|
422 |
+
|
423 |
+
Remember when Asians raised their voiced politically against affirmative action and quotas starting to seriously push whites out of public sector jobs in the 1970s and 1980s? Me neither.
|
424 |
+
--- 14998290
|
425 |
+
>>14995996
|
426 |
+
It used to refer exclusively to East Asians, but nowadays, it is quickly becoming synonymous with Indian due to immigration from India.
|
427 |
+
--- 14998297
|
428 |
+
>>14998230
|
429 |
+
That is no wan an argument of why crime should be handwaved away.
|
430 |
+
|
431 |
+
>>14998248
|
432 |
+
You don't understand how affirmative action works. If an Asian does push you out of a job they are overqualified for the position.
|
433 |
+
|
434 |
+
>>14998285
|
435 |
+
They do rally against Affirmative Action
|
436 |
+
--- 14998300
|
437 |
+
>>14998290
|
438 |
+
This is probably more of a Canadian phenomenon. Indians are immigrating to the US too, but I'm pretty sure Asian still means East Asian in American parlance. Every time the issue comes up on this site it turns into a big argument between Britons and Americans over who's really Asian, and whether to call South Asians Asian is actually some liberal conspiracy on the part of the media in Britain to blame Japs and Chinamen for Muslim grooming gangs or whatever.
|
439 |
+
--- 14998304
|
440 |
+
>>14998297
|
441 |
+
There's a difference between, crime is a problem, and there is a big conspiracy by the West to use the black man to attack the yellow man etc.
|
442 |
+
--- 14998313
|
443 |
+
>>14998257
|
444 |
+
South Koreans are more into guns.
|
445 |
+
There's a South Korean religion where AR-15s are important to them.
|
446 |
+
They also own gun factories.
|
447 |
+
--- 14998316
|
448 |
+
>>14998304
|
449 |
+
There is a big conspiracy by the US media and liberal DA's to cover up/drop charges committed by blacks against Asians.
|
450 |
+
|
451 |
+
It's not ok and deserves to be talked about.
|
452 |
+
--- 14998330
|
453 |
+
>>14995547
|
454 |
+
fucking retard
|
455 |
+
--- 14998333
|
456 |
+
>>14998316
|
457 |
+
Have sex.
|
458 |
+
--- 14998354
|
459 |
+
>>14998333
|
460 |
+
lol get destroyed bitch
|
461 |
+
--- 14998364
|
462 |
+
>>14998354
|
463 |
+
--- 14998372
|
464 |
+
>>14998132
|
465 |
+
Miss Saigon is kino desu senpai.
|
466 |
+
|
467 |
+
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3lTV-da5Kw [Embed]
|
468 |
+
--- 14998382
|
469 |
+
>>14998364
|
470 |
+
>>14998333
|
471 |
+
Why are you posting these off topic walls of text as if they are in any way a response to what I've said?
|
472 |
+
|
473 |
+
Why do you think being subject to violent hate crimes at the hands of blacks should be part and parcel to the Asian American experince?
|
474 |
+
--- 14998394
|
475 |
+
>>14998300
|
476 |
+
It hasn't made its way into everyday use yet, but the shift is noticeable in American politics and media.
|
477 |
+
--- 14998406
|
478 |
+
>>14998222
|
479 |
+
And the entire argument OP made is that Asians had it the worst of all which is certainly not the case.
|
480 |
+
--- 14998414
|
481 |
+
>>14998372
|
482 |
+
>0:30
|
483 |
+
|
484 |
+
My kind of play. Boomers have excellent taste in entertainment.
|
485 |
+
--- 14998425
|
486 |
+
>>14998406
|
487 |
+
Depends on what angle you look at it from.
|
488 |
+
|
489 |
+
In some cases white people have it the worse (constant hate from the media), in some ways Asians have it the worst (discrimination in jobs and education)
|
490 |
+
|
491 |
+
But overall blacks have it the best.
|
492 |
+
--- 14998431
|
493 |
+
>>14998425
|
494 |
+
>But overall blacks have it the best.
|
495 |
+
|
496 |
+
Except, y'know, actually living in poverty and experiencing violent crime. The fact that other blacks are doing it doesn't mean it isn't a bad time.
|
497 |
+
--- 14998432
|
498 |
+
This board is just pol. Sad, seems like every board is overrun these days.
|
499 |
+
--- 14998443
|
500 |
+
>>14998330
|
501 |
+
they deserved it
|
502 |
+
--- 14998484
|
503 |
+
>>14998431
|
504 |
+
imagine being a black in America.
|
505 |
+
|
506 |
+
You are constantly glorified. You have a special month and multiple federal holidays just catering to you. The media praises you and spotlights you and gives you more positions per capita than any other race. You commit violent hate crimes against other minority groups like Asians and it’s swept under the rug. You get easier access to higher education and good jobs through affirmative action. Countless government schemes and programs exist specifically for use by you and you alone. Corporations pour billions into special programs and incentives for you and have special programs just to hire you. You can rape, loot, burn down immigrant run stores and run amock and liberal DA’s will not prosecute you because it would be politically disadvantageous. You can be openly racist and no one will say anything. You control a disproportionate amount of political power in the US through black politicians and the fact that BOTH parties bend over backwards to prove how not racist they are. In every aspect of society you are coddled and glorified.
|
507 |
+
|
508 |
+
Yet, despite all this you act like you are oppressed and the US treats you unfairly because there is literally no force in the universe greater than Afro-Narcisssim.
|
509 |
+
--- 14998517
|
510 |
+
Asians weren't even allowed to provide witness testimony in courts because we were categorized the same way as Black people and Native Americans
|
511 |
+
--- 14998542
|
512 |
+
>>14995561
|
513 |
+
>mass lynchings
|
514 |
+
lol what a meme. far more italians were lynched
|
515 |
+
>exclusion acts
|
516 |
+
access to whites is not a human right
|
517 |
+
>alien land acts
|
518 |
+
never once were asians singled out. also, the majority of the laws were passed in states with few asian immigrants and after the exclusion act
|
519 |
+
>mass concentration camps
|
520 |
+
the horror in being put in government funded communities for a few years in the name of national security
|
521 |
+
>hate crimes
|
522 |
+
committed by blacks? ya, its horrible
|
523 |
+
>marginalization
|
524 |
+
they are the wealthiest and most educated demographic in the nation
|
525 |
+
--- 14998548
|
526 |
+
more wopmuts lynched than niggers
|
527 |
+
--- 14998671
|
528 |
+
>>14996953
|
529 |
+
>>14996953
|
530 |
+
qualifier: Asian-Americans back in the 80s were all hardcore Republican-voting McCarthyites. wonder what happened since then?
|
531 |
+
--- 14998752
|
532 |
+
>>14998671
|
533 |
+
Repubs didn’t allow more Asian immigration so they started voting Dem. They always vote for whichever party promises to open the floodgates to hordes of chinks. That and trying to show they were good non commie chinks unlike those evil commies back home.
|
534 |
+
--- 14998754
|
535 |
+
>>14995535 (OP)
|
536 |
+
Agreed, if I were Asian I would leave that awful place!
|
537 |
+
--- 14998764
|
538 |
+
>>14998671
|
539 |
+
First generation Asians are republican because they know how evil leftists are, unfortunately they all moved to California and NYC so their kids got ZOGed by globohomo
|
540 |
+
--- 14998770
|
541 |
+
>>14996221
|
542 |
+
whites too
|
543 |
+
--- 14998848
|
544 |
+
>>14998671
|
545 |
+
you also know that Muslim-Americans were staunch Republicans until 2001, right?
|
546 |
+
--- 14998870
|
547 |
+
>>14998058
|
548 |
+
|
549 |
+
>Native Americans
|
550 |
+
>Hispanics
|
551 |
+
>Polish/Russian/Ukrainian
|
552 |
+
>Irish
|
553 |
+
>Italians
|
554 |
+
>Blacks
|
555 |
+
>Germans
|
556 |
+
>WASP
|
557 |
+
>[spacer]
|
558 |
+
>[spacer]
|
559 |
+
>[spacer]
|
560 |
+
>Jews
|
561 |
+
|
562 |
+
Fixed
|
563 |
+
--- 14998892
|
564 |
+
>>14998542
|
565 |
+
Exclusion is oppression if it leads to material suffering, and almost everything mention is still super bad.
|
566 |
+
you also know nothing about history beside ahistorical narratives. Also, why are you framing this as a defense of white people? No one is suggesting putting whites on trial.
|
567 |
+
--- 14998896
|
568 |
+
>>14998870
|
569 |
+
Blacks above Hispanics
|
570 |
+
did you forget slavery, black codes, jim crow?
|
571 |
+
--- 14998903
|
572 |
+
>>14998848
|
573 |
+
a lot of people would be republican if they just drop the racism
|
574 |
+
--- 14999044
|
575 |
+
>>14998848
|
576 |
+
btw Trump polled 30% of the Muslim-American vote. while they are still largely Democrat he did better than any Republican candidate since Bush's first run in 2000.
|
577 |
+
--- 14999525
|
578 |
+
ITT: A bunch of anons who caught their gf in bed with a chink
|
579 |
+
--- 14999536
|
580 |
+
>>14999525
|
581 |
+
that would never happen.
|
his/14995706.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995706
|
3 |
+
Morning anons, I'm currently doing a research on Japan's Meiji Era government, legal codes, international politics and its militarism, if you could recommend me a few trustworthy sources to begin, I would really appreciate that
|
4 |
+
--- 14995766
|
5 |
+
>>14995706 (OP)
|
6 |
+
>https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erasmus_Peshine_Smith
|
7 |
+
--- 14995844
|
8 |
+
>>14995706 (OP)
|
9 |
+
The Making of Modern Japan.
|
10 |
+
--- 14997020
|
11 |
+
Taishō Otome Otogibanashi
|
12 |
+
--- 14998704
|
13 |
+
me
|
his/14995741.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995741
|
3 |
+
It was just socioeconomic factors
|
4 |
+
--- 14996537
|
5 |
+
Literally fabricated lies. There's 0 REAL evidence for any attrocities by the german forces
|
6 |
+
--- 14997030
|
7 |
+
the fact that this madlad had a doctorate in Political Science is simply surreal
|
8 |
+
the guy was literate and could be argumentative, and somehow this translated into him leading a brigade of rapists and murderers, by sheer terror factor, into committing atrocities upon atrocities
|
9 |
+
this is the ultimate argument against the "educated people good" opinion, people with doctorates are just as self-serving as people without, if not even more because their voice matters more in a Scholacracy
|
10 |
+
--- 14997245
|
11 |
+
>>14997030
|
12 |
+
>Political Science
|
13 |
+
>A rapist and a murderer
|
14 |
+
What exactly is surprising here?
|
15 |
+
--- 14997263
|
16 |
+
>>14997245
|
17 |
+
>A rapist and a murderer
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
i think you mean a participator of society and the economy
|
20 |
+
--- 14998637
|
21 |
+
>>14995741 (OP)
|
22 |
+
Marxbro's, what kind of class warfare was he fighting?
|
23 |
+
--- 14999217
|
24 |
+
>>14998637
|
25 |
+
The kind where he puts a literal bomb in a literal class, as warfare.
|
26 |
+
--- 14999892
|
27 |
+
He was a WW1 vet, it was very chivalrous, avoiding civilians or whatever except for all of age boys who were drafted into hell and worshipped the devil and probably dies as virgins.
|
his/14995948.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995948
|
3 |
+
Round 3 is up. What do we think of Thomas Dalton's reply?
|
4 |
+
https://historyspeaks.substack.com/p/thomas-dalton-replies-to-history
|
5 |
+
As a primer, here is the evidence presented by HistorySpeaks for the centralized industrial genocide of ~6 million jews (while admitting this figure is symbolic with no real basis), mainly in gas chambers using a delousing agent a diesel engine exhaust:
|
6 |
+
Einsatzgruppen
|
7 |
+
>Stahlecker Report
|
8 |
+
>Jaeger Report
|
9 |
+
>Mentions the OSRs (no quotes)
|
10 |
+
>Kube-Lohse (PS-3428)
|
11 |
+
>Says adding up paper evidence suggests 2M killed (no citation)
|
12 |
+
AR Camps + Chelmno
|
13 |
+
>Goebbels diary (27 Mar 1942)
|
14 |
+
>Himmler 363,211 document (NO-1128)
|
15 |
+
>Stroop Report
|
16 |
+
>Chelmno: 16 Jun 1943 letter
|
17 |
+
>Archaeology: Kola Study
|
18 |
+
Auschwitz
|
19 |
+
>Kramer diary
|
20 |
+
>Pressac Documents
|
21 |
+
>Vergasungskeller document
|
22 |
+
>Zyklon induction holes supposedly found in ruins
|
23 |
+
Final Solution Policy
|
24 |
+
>Goebbels diary (12 Dec 1941)
|
25 |
+
>Hans Frank diary (12 Dec 1941)
|
26 |
+
>Robert Ley Speech (20 May 1942)
|
27 |
+
>Hans Frank diary (24 Aug 1942)
|
28 |
+
>Horthy and Hitler (17 Apr 1943)
|
29 |
+
>Himmler's Posen Speech (6 Oct 1943)
|
30 |
+
>Goebbels diary (14 Mar 1945)
|
31 |
+
>SS trial of Taubner (26 Oct 1942) [from the book The Good Old Days]
|
32 |
+
"Voluntary" Confessions
|
33 |
+
>Eichmann Sassen tapes
|
34 |
+
>Albert Speer 1971 letter-The Mufti's memoirs
|
35 |
+
--- 14996555
|
36 |
+
>(((debate))),
|
37 |
+
I know in my heart of hearts that the holocaust didn't happen,
|
38 |
+
--- 14996716
|
39 |
+
>>14995948 (OP)
|
40 |
+
Why the fixation with gas chambers? I thought it was increasingly being accepted that gas chambers weren’t put into service until late in the holocaust and that they played a (relatively) minor role, and that most victims were shot in forests and wherever else it was convenient.
|
41 |
+
--- 14997656
|
42 |
+
>>14996716
|
43 |
+
The story is ~2.5-3.0 million died in gas chambers.
|
44 |
+
Auschwitz ~ 1.1 million
|
45 |
+
Treblinka ~ 800.000
|
46 |
+
Belzec ~ 500.000
|
47 |
+
Sobibor ~ 200,000
|
48 |
+
Then a few hundred thousand more split between Majdanek and Chelmno (depending on who you ask)
|
49 |
+
--- 14997879
|
50 |
+
>>14997656
|
51 |
+
I thought those numbers had been walked back. Like haven’t some of the memorial plaques even been replaced with ones with smaller numbers.
|
52 |
+
--- 14997892
|
53 |
+
>>14997879
|
54 |
+
You're likely thinking of the plaque at Auschwitz which changed from 4 million to 1 million in the 1990s. However this did not affect the jewish death total because the overwhelming majority of the -3 million revision were goyim. Nor did it affect the other claims.
|
55 |
+
--- 14998915
|
56 |
+
>>14996555
|
57 |
+
I think it is useful for the NPC-type that browses blue boards to be exposed to the closest thing to an honest debate I've seen in a while.
|
58 |
+
--- 14999933
|
59 |
+
bump
|
his/14995984.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14995984
|
3 |
+
>Phineas P. Gage (1823–1860) was an American railroad construction foreman remembered for his improbable survival of an accident in which a large iron rod was driven completely through his head, destroying much of his brain's left frontal lobe, and for that injury's reported effects on his personality and behavior over the remaining 12 years of his life—effects sufficiently profound that friends saw him (for a time at least) as "no longer Gage"
|
4 |
+
|
5 |
+
>On September 13, 1848, Gage was directing a work gang blasting rock while preparing the roadbed for the Rutland & Burlington Railroad south of the village of Cavendish, Vermont. Setting a blast entailed boring a hole deep into an outcrop of rock; adding blasting powder and a fuse; then using the tamping iron to pack ("tamp") sand, clay, or other inert material into the hole above the powder in order to contain the blast's energy and direct it into surrounding rock.
|
6 |
+
|
7 |
+
>As Gage was doing this around 4:30 p.m., his attention was attracted by his men working behind him. Looking over his right shoulder, and inadvertently bringing his head into line with the blast hole and tamping iron, Gage opened his mouth to speak; in that same instant the tamping iron sparked against the rock and (possibly because the sand had been omitted) the powder exploded. Rocketed from the hole, the tamping iron—1+1⁄4 inches (3.2 cm) in diameter, three feet seven inches (1.1 m) long, and weighing 13+1⁄4 pounds (6.0 kg)—entered the left side of Gage's face in an upward direction, just forward of the angle of the lower jaw. Continuing upward outside the upper jaw and possibly fracturing the cheekbone, it passed behind the left eye, through the left side of the brain, then completely out the top of the skull through the frontal bone.
|
8 |
+
--- 14996002
|
9 |
+
>The end which entered [Gage's cheek] first is pointed; the taper being [eleven inches (28 cm) long, ending in a 1⁄4-inch (6 mm) point]circumstances to which the patient perhaps owes his life. The iron is unlike any other, and was made by a neighbouring blacksmith to please the fancy of the owner.
|
10 |
+
|
11 |
+
>The tamping iron landed point-first some 80 feet (25 m) away, "smeared with blood and brain".
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
>Gage was thrown onto his back and gave some brief convulsions of the arms and legs, but spoke within a few minutes, walked with little assistance, and sat upright in an oxcart for the 3⁄4-mile (1.2 km) ride to his lodgings in town. (A possibly apocryphal contemporary newspaper report claimed that Gage, while en route, made an entry in his time-book – the record of his crew's hours and wages.) About 30 minutes after the accident, physician Edward H. Williams found Gage sitting in a chair outside the hotel and was greeted with "one of the great understatements of medical history"
|
14 |
+
--- 14996013
|
15 |
+
>"When I drove up he said, "Doctor, here is business enough for you." I first noticed the wound upon the head before I alighted from my carriage, the pulsations of the brain being very distinct. The top of the head appeared somewhat like an inverted funnel, as if some wedge-shaped body had passed from below upward. Mr. Gage, during the time I was examining this wound, was relating the manner in which he was injured to the bystanders. I did not believe Mr. Gage's statement at that time, but thought he was deceived. Mr. Gage persisted in saying that the bar went through his head. Mr. G. got up and vomited; the effort of vomiting pressed out about half a teacupful of the brain [through the exit hole at the top of the skull], which fell upon the floor." - Edward H Williams
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
>Harlow took charge of the case around 6 p.m.:
|
18 |
+
|
19 |
+
>"You will excuse me for remarking here, that the picture presented was, to one unaccustomed to military surgery, truly terrific; but the patient bore his sufferings with the most heroic firmness. He recognized me at once, and said he hoped he was not much hurt. He seemed to be perfectly conscious, but was getting exhausted from the hemorrhage. His person, and the bed on which he was laid, were literally one gore of blood."
|
20 |
+
|
21 |
+
>Gage was also swallowing blood, which he regurgitated every 15 or 20 minutes.
|
22 |
+
--- 14996026
|
23 |
+
>With Williams' assistance Harlow shaved the scalp around the region of the tamping iron's exit, then removed coagulated blood, small bone fragments, and "an ounce or more" of protruding brain. After probing for foreign bodies and replacing two large detached pieces of bone, Harlow closed the wound with adhesive straps, leaving it partially open for drainage; the entrance wound in the cheek was bandaged only loosely, for the same reason. A wet compress was applied, then a nightcap, then further bandaging to secure these dressings. Harlow also dressed Gage's hands and forearms (which along with his face had been deeply burned) and ordered that Gage's head be kept elevated.
|
24 |
+
--- 14997330
|
25 |
+
Bump
|
26 |
+
--- 14997341
|
27 |
+
ok?
|
28 |
+
--- 14998486
|
29 |
+
>>14995984 (OP)
|
30 |
+
Gnarly
|
31 |
+
--- 14998553
|
32 |
+
>>14997341
|
33 |
+
He turns into psychopath because of the injury.
|
34 |
+
--- 14998583
|
35 |
+
>>14998553
|
36 |
+
Then clearly the US government should do this to experimental test subjects and create an army of psychopathic killers. I mean that seriously too. Create a Dirlewanger brigade to unleash on humanity.
|
his/14996029.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996029
|
3 |
+
Is beauty objective or subjective?
|
4 |
+
--- 14996037
|
5 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
6 |
+
men have no intellectual nor physical standards for women.
|
7 |
+
--- 14996038
|
8 |
+
>>14996037
|
9 |
+
>t.ranny
|
10 |
+
--- 14996055
|
11 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
12 |
+
It's objective, since desire for beauty and ability to recognise it are innate to all people and does not have to be taught explicitly to be recognised.
|
13 |
+
It's a virtue that humans are attuned to as it benefited them evolutionarily and signifies desirable qualities.
|
14 |
+
--- 14996138
|
15 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
16 |
+
it's mostly objective
|
17 |
+
>dark masculine, light = feminine
|
18 |
+
with some cultural subjectiveness
|
19 |
+
>ass > boobs or boobs > ass
|
20 |
+
--- 14996147
|
21 |
+
>>14996138
|
22 |
+
>T. has never seen East Africans
|
23 |
+
--- 14996169
|
24 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
25 |
+
Gotta say its a mixed bag, some can be 10/10 to others but 6/10 to some but if you really look that ugly everyone can agree you are 0/10
|
26 |
+
--- 14996288
|
27 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
28 |
+
Mixed bag. That woman with braids in the back has many good features. It's really a shame how many young women with pretty faces in the U.S have faces frozen in fat.
|
29 |
+
--- 14996320
|
30 |
+
Objectively subjective
|
31 |
+
--- 14996379
|
32 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
33 |
+
It's objective. The things that turn on males and females are evolutionarily beneficial for both. Men like big tits, big butts, symmetric faces, wide hips. Women like muscles, height, social status.
|
34 |
+
--- 14996414
|
35 |
+
>>14996138
|
36 |
+
>dark masculine, light = feminine
|
37 |
+
go outside dude, holy shit
|
38 |
+
--- 14996431
|
39 |
+
>>14996414
|
40 |
+
black women are universally ugly, it’s why their own men don’t want them, and fags like >>14996147 have to use heavily admixed women as examples of pretty black women (no, mixed women are not black)
|
41 |
+
--- 14996443
|
42 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
43 |
+
At least post an attractive black girl too so we can compare beauty standards.
|
44 |
+
--- 14996452
|
45 |
+
>>14996431
|
46 |
+
au contraire
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
+
t.white guy who fucks black women
|
49 |
+
most of them are hideous but the east african ones can be really pretty depending on their facial structure, unfortunately most nigs have potato bulb noses and look like literal subhumans
|
50 |
+
--- 14996463
|
51 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
52 |
+
White women are objectively the most attractive in general, but if you don't find black women attractive you're either a faggot or a liar, I just don't believe you
|
53 |
+
--- 14996513
|
54 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
55 |
+
It's subjective. Chinese people deformed their feet, japanese blackened their teeth, africans elongated their necks, etc.
|
56 |
+
--- 14996577
|
57 |
+
>>14996431
|
58 |
+
They may be mixed, but they are black. You said black. You should have said "pure sub-saharan African." Idiot.
|
59 |
+
--- 14996596
|
60 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
61 |
+
It's objective in the sense that there is an empiric regularity in what people regard beautiful.
|
62 |
+
--- 14996605
|
63 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
64 |
+
Snow looks better than dirt, no Im not talking about skin color, snow literally looks better than dirt to us
|
65 |
+
--- 14996638
|
66 |
+
>>14996147
|
67 |
+
yes, i have seen half-arab dark mulattoes with white / caucasian features
|
68 |
+
--- 14996666
|
69 |
+
>>14996452
|
70 |
+
>Horn African
|
71 |
+
how much caucasian dna does this "black" ethiopian highlander woman have, 55% MENA-like plus 45% Black-like? what do you think, mon ami?
|
72 |
+
--- 14996675
|
73 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
74 |
+
The woman in this webm is quite beautiful methinks
|
75 |
+
--- 14996709
|
76 |
+
>>14996577
|
77 |
+
>They may be MIXED, but they are BLACK
|
78 |
+
lol
|
79 |
+
lmao even
|
80 |
+
--- 14996726
|
81 |
+
>>14996452
|
82 |
+
did i say east african women are ugly? no. however the video you were replying to was off a black woman who is 80-100% SSA. you cannot use 40-50% eurasian horners as some sort of rebuttal against her (and most black women) being ugly. east african women look better because they’re mixed.
|
83 |
+
--- 14996733
|
84 |
+
>>14996577
|
85 |
+
the 1 drop rule period is over. it’s OK to be biracial.
|
86 |
+
--- 14996770
|
87 |
+
>>14996675
|
88 |
+
whats interesting to note is that these African tribesmen have impeccable dental health with wide palates, straight teeth that are pearly white. clearly industrialized diet has fucked maxillofacial development
|
89 |
+
--- 14996771
|
90 |
+
>>14996666
|
91 |
+
What study is this from?
|
92 |
+
--- 14996778
|
93 |
+
>>14996770
|
94 |
+
>African tribesmen
|
95 |
+
Asian Andamese
|
96 |
+
--- 14996788
|
97 |
+
>>14996770
|
98 |
+
That is a sentinelese islander.
|
99 |
+
--- 14996792
|
100 |
+
>>14996675
|
101 |
+
>>14996733
|
102 |
+
These are andamanese
|
103 |
+
--- 14996807
|
104 |
+
>>14996709
|
105 |
+
>>14996733
|
106 |
+
Maybe in your country, Paco.
|
107 |
+
--- 14996828
|
108 |
+
>>14996638
|
109 |
+
Half azd?
|
110 |
+
--- 14996902
|
111 |
+
>>14996807
|
112 |
+
56%
|
113 |
+
--- 14996965
|
114 |
+
>>14996638
|
115 |
+
>>14996431
|
116 |
+
How about Kenyans? They can be dark and feminine.
|
117 |
+
--- 14996969
|
118 |
+
>>14996807
|
119 |
+
Your county is like 20% spic and 30% chink.
|
120 |
+
--- 14996978
|
121 |
+
>>14996965
|
122 |
+
because of eurasian admixture…not all kenyans have substantial eurasian admixture but i guarantee the ones you’re attracted to do. black women just aren’t attractive. they’re good at others things though.
|
123 |
+
--- 14996983
|
124 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
125 |
+
Beauty is subjective.
|
126 |
+
A lot of criteria for beauty are essentially based on genetic fitness, but even that is mostly subjective as there's a clear genetic proximity bias in the evaluation of fitness.
|
127 |
+
--- 14996990
|
128 |
+
>>14996965
|
129 |
+
>How about Kenyans?
|
130 |
+
most range from 0% to 20% eurasian
|
131 |
+
--- 14997728
|
132 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
133 |
+
Objective. In humans it's relates to sociability. Easier to tell emotions on a face with good contrast between skin and shadows.
|
134 |
+
Wide eyebrows are god tier.
|
135 |
+
--- 14997866
|
136 |
+
>>14996463
|
137 |
+
Built for small white racist cock
|
138 |
+
--- 14997880
|
139 |
+
Subjective, of course.
|
140 |
+
--- 14997884
|
141 |
+
>>14996443
|
142 |
+
>>14996443
|
143 |
+
|
144 |
+
The irony of it is you posted what you believe is a beautiful black girl, because she shares similar facial structure and traits to European white women.
|
145 |
+
--- 14997897
|
146 |
+
>>14997884
|
147 |
+
>the black woman is actually white because... her facial structure
|
148 |
+
holy shit the absolute state of this board
|
149 |
+
--- 14997898
|
150 |
+
>>14997884
|
151 |
+
Exhibit A:
|
152 |
+
--- 14997921
|
153 |
+
>>14997897
|
154 |
+
He is likely referring to the fact she deviates quite a bit from the average black (on top of the fact she seems to be a black american i.e. has European admixture). Pic rel is an example of what the averages look like in various regions.
|
155 |
+
--- 14997923
|
156 |
+
>>14997880
|
157 |
+
never understood why girls who look like this in this day and age even bother to work. online simps would throw money at them for doing basic shit like playing pokemon on stream
|
158 |
+
--- 14997927
|
159 |
+
>>14997897
|
160 |
+
Never said she was white retard. Just that her facial structure is similar to the majority of white women. She is the exception, not the rule.
|
161 |
+
--- 14997931
|
162 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
163 |
+
Subjective. But doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The subjective aspect is preference. And even at that, many people will just happen to agree on some aspects because of a common human nature, but individual natures' differences will lead to differences in further opinion.
|
164 |
+
--- 14997935
|
165 |
+
>>14997884
|
166 |
+
Cheekbones show its a black
|
167 |
+
--- 14998572
|
168 |
+
>>14996038
|
169 |
+
you are a generic orbtier who provide for the first woman talking to him, no matter how retarded or evil she is
|
170 |
+
seethe more simp.
|
171 |
+
--- 14998574
|
172 |
+
>>14996138
|
173 |
+
Why do women overwhelmingly prefer white men then?
|
174 |
+
--- 14998578
|
175 |
+
>>14997923
|
176 |
+
>work
|
177 |
+
>pretending to do things for a tiktok bit
|
178 |
+
100% chance this bitch has an onlyfans
|
179 |
+
--- 14998829
|
180 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
181 |
+
Things like golden ratio, the rules of composition and balance of proportions proves that an "objective" beauty exists in the brain, there are small variations but there are things that as long as human biology doesn't change they will keep finding attractive in 1000 years.
|
182 |
+
Greek and Roman statues prove this.
|
183 |
+
--- 14998837
|
184 |
+
>>14996675
|
185 |
+
they look like models wtf
|
186 |
+
--- 14998902
|
187 |
+
>>14996675
|
188 |
+
>>14998837
|
189 |
+
those people are unironically some of the healthiest and smartest people on the planet, many tribal primitive people, they're fascinating
|
190 |
+
we are so far removed from them its almost like observing some alien race, seems idyllic, though im sure they have plenty of their own problems and such
|
191 |
+
--- 14998906
|
192 |
+
>>14996443
|
193 |
+
> Post attractive black girl
|
194 |
+
>it's a negress whose obviously part white
|
195 |
+
Every time.
|
196 |
+
--- 14998960
|
197 |
+
>>14998902
|
198 |
+
our ancestors were healthy like they are, i think i would be happier with my existence if i didnt live the modern comfortable life of wageslavery and drudgery
|
199 |
+
--- 14999130
|
200 |
+
>>14996055
|
201 |
+
>the concept of beauty is confined to physical beauty
|
202 |
+
Absolute retard-tier take. Explain to me the evolutionary advantage of finding a certain machine beautifully designed or a painting of a barren but striking landscape.
|
203 |
+
--- 14999155
|
204 |
+
>>14996675
|
205 |
+
>>14996770
|
206 |
+
>>14998837
|
207 |
+
>>14998902
|
208 |
+
>>14998960
|
209 |
+
I hate americans
|
210 |
+
--- 14999202
|
211 |
+
Beauty is truth. It stems from the perfection of the cosmos and the fact that everything in it seems to perfectly suit its context. The only thing in it that seems out-of-place at all is man. The more unnatural and perverse the man, the uglier he will be.
|
212 |
+
--- 14999681
|
213 |
+
it's subjective
|
214 |
+
--- 14999805
|
215 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
216 |
+
define beauty faggot shill
|
217 |
+
--- 14999872
|
218 |
+
>>14998906
|
219 |
+
Okay, how about this one? This webm always makes my pp big
|
220 |
+
--- 14999941
|
221 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
222 |
+
literally both
|
223 |
+
--- 14999991
|
224 |
+
>>14996029 (OP)
|
225 |
+
Black women are objectively attractive
|
226 |
+
--- 15000004
|
227 |
+
>>14996675
|
228 |
+
source?
|
his/14996058.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1027 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996058
|
3 |
+
If ANE were supposed to be massive giants, why are Indians so small
|
4 |
+
--- 14996066
|
5 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
6 |
+
Because they're not their descendants
|
7 |
+
--- 14996072
|
8 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
9 |
+
How is it possible for Europeans to have such low ANE % when they have such high PIE %, which had ~70% ANE?
|
10 |
+
--- 14996077
|
11 |
+
>>14996066
|
12 |
+
He probably meant indians (america)
|
13 |
+
--- 14996079
|
14 |
+
>>14996077
|
15 |
+
I'm aware
|
16 |
+
--- 14996083
|
17 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
18 |
+
Southern Amerindians with the most ANE are the largest Amerindians.
|
19 |
+
--- 14996086
|
20 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
21 |
+
I'm not sure ANE is that big. PC Steppe and adjacent populations (Kumsay, Steppe Maikop) were though.
|
22 |
+
>>14996072
|
23 |
+
Because Yamnaya weren't 70% ANE.
|
24 |
+
--- 14996092
|
25 |
+
>>14996086
|
26 |
+
>Because Yamnaya weren't 70% ANE.
|
27 |
+
Sintashta were though?
|
28 |
+
I thought Yamnaya and Sintashta were very close racially.
|
29 |
+
--- 14996093
|
30 |
+
>>14996072
|
31 |
+
PIE were less than that. EHGs were around 70%.
|
32 |
+
--- 14996094
|
33 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
34 |
+
It was tens of thousands of years ago. People change height over time to match their material conditions. Or are you the type of retard who studying HISTORY of all things believes thibgs don't change.
|
35 |
+
>>14996066
|
36 |
+
Cope.
|
37 |
+
--- 14996098
|
38 |
+
>>14996092
|
39 |
+
Yamnaya was almost 50% ANE. Sintashta gets all of its ANE from its 70% Yamnaya ancestry, so was probably 35% ANE.
|
40 |
+
--- 14996100
|
41 |
+
>>14996092
|
42 |
+
Neither are 70% ANE. Sintashta even less because it has surplus farmer admixture.
|
43 |
+
--- 14996102
|
44 |
+
>>14996092
|
45 |
+
Sintasha was even less ane than yamnaya
|
46 |
+
>>14996083
|
47 |
+
Its interesting
|
48 |
+
Plains north Indians and Southern indians from the argentinian plains were the talest. But everyone in between was shorter. Amerindians have clear geographical trait selection, for instance brazilian and mexican natives were generally shorter headed, with flatter and wider noses and bigger eyes, clear adaptation to heat and humidity, while the opposite was the case for natives in north america
|
49 |
+
--- 14996108
|
50 |
+
>>14996086
|
51 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
52 |
+
Btw the tuniit (inuit name for the dorset people) were described as giants by them before they got wiped out. So if they stayed hunter gatherers (same for the HG patagones) I think the american lifestyle outside their preferred environment just made them smaller.
|
53 |
+
--- 14996112
|
54 |
+
>>14996102
|
55 |
+
Some of it is adaptation. Some types like this one seem to have Australoid traits http://humanphenotypes.net/LagoaSanta.html
|
56 |
+
These are not the shortest ones, Mexicans are shorter.
|
57 |
+
--- 14996113
|
58 |
+
>>14996102
|
59 |
+
To be fair anon ANE is from 22 000 bc. It'd be silly they allstayed the same after moving into new environments.
|
60 |
+
--- 14996124
|
61 |
+
>>14996112
|
62 |
+
>melanesian traits.
|
63 |
+
No evidence apart from lookism. There are evidences of slight austronesian contact but nothing big enough to affect phenotype. (Especially because the people doing the contact would be the roughly 50/50 polynesians and not say, fijians)
|
64 |
+
--- 14996126
|
65 |
+
>>14996112
|
66 |
+
Afaik there is some australomelanesian genetic contact with certain specific brazilian tribes. Probably brought by polynesians, but thats not the case for mexicans. Who are indeed quite short headed, rather soft featured and wide nosed compared to for instance patagonians
|
67 |
+
Which means amerindians obviously experienced geographic trait selection
|
68 |
+
--- 14996137
|
69 |
+
>>14996126
|
70 |
+
Theres also some linguistic evidence for contact IIRC but apart from that and the sweetpotatoe the evidence is scarce. Suggesting sporadic rather than truly sustained contact. Plus no amount of polynesian introgression would leave one looking like a melanesian because genetically they're what we'd call "blasians" or "Melanasians" technically
|
71 |
+
--- 14996148
|
72 |
+
>>14996137
|
73 |
+
Yes, i don't care much about that desu, i was mostly pointing the case of the soft featured short headed types compared to the more robust and longer headed types, despite both being more or less from a identical migratory wave with the same origin
|
74 |
+
--- 14996149
|
75 |
+
>>14996124
|
76 |
+
>>14996126
|
77 |
+
There is australoid ancestry and then there is australoid appearance. They don't have a one to one overlap. The ancestry is probably not from polynesians because its found deeper in South America than the coast.
|
78 |
+
--- 14996153
|
79 |
+
>>14996137
|
80 |
+
Crazy what was going on in the americas. It is like someone decided to extend their prehistory because it was cool. For example, fully domesticated corn is originally from colombia or the amazon.
|
81 |
+
And theamericas had 3 (at least) hotspots for crop domestication instead of just the ME and a few retards tagging along.
|
82 |
+
--- 14996170
|
83 |
+
>>14996149
|
84 |
+
Convergent evolution probably.
|
85 |
+
However, my point about polynesian contact not being enough to matter was mostly to rebuff the implication that amerindians werent "pure" because of foreign geneflows at some point.
|
86 |
+
--- 14996172
|
87 |
+
>>14996072
|
88 |
+
They dont. ANE is not a uniform population and their variation in larger than that of modern Europeans.
|
89 |
+
The two fringes of the ANE cluster are as different from eachother as Euros and MENA.
|
90 |
+
>>14996083
|
91 |
+
Selection played a greater factor.
|
92 |
+
>>14996100
|
93 |
+
>>14996098
|
94 |
+
>>14996092
|
95 |
+
>>14996098
|
96 |
+
Sintashta had WSHG which had way more ANE than Yamnaya.
|
97 |
+
--- 14996174
|
98 |
+
>>14996153
|
99 |
+
>>14996149
|
100 |
+
The weirdest part is that the melanesian ancestry is dated to 10.000 BP in some studies, which is very old archeologicaly.
|
101 |
+
|
102 |
+
Makes one wonder how the actual fuck did it arrived?
|
103 |
+
The affinity however appears to be restrictive to brazilian amerindians and those in the Pacific coast.
|
104 |
+
Mexican and andean ones are free of such signal
|
105 |
+
--- 14996182
|
106 |
+
>>14996172
|
107 |
+
>Sintashta had WSHG which had way more ANE than Yamnaya.
|
108 |
+
It still doesn't get them to higher ANE than Yamnaya and is in like 3 samples that are clear outliers from the main Sintashta cluster.
|
109 |
+
--- 14996184
|
110 |
+
>>14996174
|
111 |
+
>xavante
|
112 |
+
Curious. Those are the ones precisely noted to manifest australoid triats
|
113 |
+
--- 14996188
|
114 |
+
>>14996174
|
115 |
+
>Anonymous 05/04/23(Thu)15:00:13 No.14
|
116 |
+
They wuz Lemurian Abo Jomon drifters
|
117 |
+
--- 14996190
|
118 |
+
>>14996172
|
119 |
+
>Sintashta had WSHG which had way more ANE than Yamnaya.
|
120 |
+
That makes sense why Pakis have such high ANE even though they have low PIE then
|
121 |
+
--- 14996197
|
122 |
+
>>14996190
|
123 |
+
They have high ANE because Iran_N/CHG is like 20% ANE.
|
124 |
+
--- 14996222
|
125 |
+
>>14996174
|
126 |
+
I guess one could in theory makes an assumption the geneflow started in voastal ecuador and the start trying to reconstruct a path from there. (Like that one guy who argues polynesians reached japan and then california because of the taro roots and chumash sailing tech, also known of a wacky theory about the haida having some polynesian in them)
|
127 |
+
Also fuck I was wrong. There IS a little melanesian ancestry.
|
128 |
+
--- 14996229
|
129 |
+
>>14996222
|
130 |
+
Also 10, 000 BP how the fuck.
|
131 |
+
Unless there are sas of yet undiscovered papuan natufians I have no idea how that could've happened in 8 000 bc.
|
132 |
+
--- 14996231
|
133 |
+
>>14996222
|
134 |
+
What is rare is how old and dispersed the ancestry appears to be, if its correctly from 8000-10.000 BC as inferred it definitely predates the neolithic. Makes one wonder how the fuck could they sail the pacific in neolithic tech?
|
135 |
+
--- 14996250
|
136 |
+
>>14996190
|
137 |
+
Eh pakis might show a "fake signal" in g25 despite having some, as theya re east eurasian-west eurasian mixes they might show extra affinity misaccounted in the calculator. Best measiring would be F4 statistics whic account for actual allele sharing
|
138 |
+
--- 14996257
|
139 |
+
>>14996190
|
140 |
+
>>14996250
|
141 |
+
Forgot pic
|
142 |
+
--- 14996303
|
143 |
+
>>14996231
|
144 |
+
If the polynesians did it without much metal work I don't find it impossible (theres legends of long vanished pygmy negrito peoples all over the islands but no actual evidence) but still improbable. Maybe some sort of papuan equivalent to the horton plains culture or the natufians.
|
145 |
+
--- 14996323
|
146 |
+
>>14996303
|
147 |
+
The negrito thing is likely true, modern southesst asians come from a relatively recent austronesian expansion out of taiwan. All chinky east asians likely formed on central china Ice age, and migrated southwards replacing all Australian and negrito-like populations recently.
|
148 |
+
But polynesians in particular derive their sailing tradition from austronesians//their east asian part. So its improbable. the other chance is some australian sailing peoples arriving early, but is weird because oceanians were not particulary notorious sailors in any meaning.
|
149 |
+
Might be just poorly dated as well
|
150 |
+
--- 14996375
|
151 |
+
>>14996172
|
152 |
+
>The two fringes of the ANE cluster are as different from eachother as Euros and MENA.
|
153 |
+
Actually, more.
|
154 |
+
--- 14997184
|
155 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
156 |
+
>>14996113
|
157 |
+
>>14996126
|
158 |
+
>>14996257
|
159 |
+
New ANE study just came out fyi
|
160 |
+
--- 14997335
|
161 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
162 |
+
ANE weren't particularly tall, WHG were.
|
163 |
+
--- 14997349
|
164 |
+
>>14996083
|
165 |
+
Only the very southernmost Amerindians residing in the southern tip of Patagonia. Every other native in South America were pretty small, though not as short as Mesoamericans who were manlets.
|
166 |
+
--- 14997434
|
167 |
+
>>14996172
|
168 |
+
>Sintashta had WSHG which had way more ANE than Yamnaya.
|
169 |
+
Lol. They barely had any Tyumen. You are thinking out outliers.
|
170 |
+
|
171 |
+
Target: RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
172 |
+
Distance: 2.0255% / 0.02025470
|
173 |
+
65.6 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
174 |
+
32.2 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
175 |
+
2.2 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
176 |
+
|
177 |
+
Target: RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
178 |
+
Distance: 1.9704% / 0.01970417
|
179 |
+
66.0 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
180 |
+
31.2 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
181 |
+
1.6 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
182 |
+
1.2 ITA_Grotta_Continenza_Meso
|
183 |
+
--- 14997453
|
184 |
+
>>14996170
|
185 |
+
My emphasis is not on purity or lack thereof. Rather that there is some australoid presence aside from selection, and I did not disagree with the presence of the latter, only with the sole presence of the latter.
|
186 |
+
--- 14997500
|
187 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
188 |
+
>>14996072
|
189 |
+
>>14996086
|
190 |
+
>>14996093
|
191 |
+
>>14996094
|
192 |
+
>>14996098
|
193 |
+
>>14996100
|
194 |
+
>>14996102
|
195 |
+
>>14996108
|
196 |
+
>>14996112
|
197 |
+
>>14996113
|
198 |
+
>>14996190
|
199 |
+
>>14996197
|
200 |
+
>>14997335
|
201 |
+
>>14997453
|
202 |
+
Europeans have the highest ANE admixture. Anything that puts Amerindians at 42% puts Europeans at twice that. Tajiks do not have a lot of ANE. Their ANE is from steppe and they have less steppe than Europeans. Simple as. (Some) Maori are closer to ANE than anyone because they (some) are mostly European with Polynesian which plots them in between Europeans and Polynesians, which is where ANE plots, however they share basically no DNA with ANE. Same for Indians. They share basically nothing with ANE but as they are between europeans and asians they plot not close to ANE but on the same “latitude”.
|
203 |
+
ANE was 80% West Eurasian and 20% super-archaic Salkhit. We also can literally see what ANE looked like, they looked European as the Tarim mummies have proven and they share facial SNPs with Europeans and Jomon, their faces literally did not look Amerind, their genotype is exclusively European and Jomon.
|
204 |
+
You may now cope and seethe. Europeans are the most like ANE. Have well over 60% Archaic European which is the primary component of ANE, Europeans have more Salkhit than Amerinds which basically settles it forever. Europeans are in fact the only people to have a substantial Salkhit input.
|
205 |
+
It’s over for mutts.
|
206 |
+
--- 14997507
|
207 |
+
>>14996323
|
208 |
+
Early Australasians were deep water fishers.
|
209 |
+
|
210 |
+
https://phys.org/news/2011-11-prehistoric-mastered-deep-sea-fishing.html
|
211 |
+
|
212 |
+
Today they may not seem as impressive because of their massive brain size shrinkage but their ancestors could have been different.
|
213 |
+
--- 14997517
|
214 |
+
>>14996058 (OP)
|
215 |
+
Because the majority of their ancestry comes from people who were similar to pic related.
|
216 |
+
--- 14997522
|
217 |
+
>>14997500
|
218 |
+
Europeans being more like ANE =/= Europeans having more ANE. Half of European ancestry in the north and more than half in the south is from farmers with close to no ANE ancestry. Yamnaya were about 50% ANE, so Europeans in the north can be 25% ANE, and in the Baltics more than that, and in the south less than that.
|
219 |
+
--- 14997534
|
220 |
+
>>14997522
|
221 |
+
Brown. Europeans are 40% ANE.
|
222 |
+
--- 14997550
|
223 |
+
>>14997534
|
224 |
+
>>14997500
|
225 |
+
ah it's this schizo again.
|
226 |
+
Where are Iran_N getting their R2 if they have no ANE?
|
227 |
+
--- 14997564
|
228 |
+
>>14997550
|
229 |
+
They have 10-15%. No more.
|
230 |
+
--- 14997569
|
231 |
+
>>14997534
|
232 |
+
Do the math, and show how that is true.
|
233 |
+
--- 14997576
|
234 |
+
>>14997564
|
235 |
+
Lazaridis estimated over 20%.
|
236 |
+
--- 14997583
|
237 |
+
>>14997500
|
238 |
+
I don't think you even know what Salkhit is. Salkhit is an Eastern Eurasian.
|
239 |
+
--- 14997630
|
240 |
+
>>14997564
|
241 |
+
15% is a lot if they are predominately Iran_N. Plus their Sintashta ancestry.
|
242 |
+
--- 14997675
|
243 |
+
>>14997576
|
244 |
+
Where? It's likely outdated.
|
245 |
+
>>14997569
|
246 |
+
WHG is 45% ANE. WSH is 50% EHG, 50% CHG. EHG is 75% ANE, 25% WHG. CHG is 30% ANE.
|
247 |
+
It's 7% from WHG and 30% from WSH. So about 38%. Cope and dilate.
|
248 |
+
>>14997583
|
249 |
+
It's literally closer to Africans than to East Eurasians.
|
250 |
+
>>14997630
|
251 |
+
It's 8% from Sintashta and 12% from Iran_N, lol.
|
252 |
+
--- 14997895
|
253 |
+
>>14997675
|
254 |
+
Wow what a dogshit model. If thats the update then I am fine with the outdated models.
|
255 |
+
--- 14997918
|
256 |
+
>>14997500
|
257 |
+
There is no source that places anyone as 84% ANE today.
|
258 |
+
--- 14997937
|
259 |
+
>>14997918
|
260 |
+
Neither there's an Amerindian with 42% ANE. Do you know how p-values and distances work?
|
261 |
+
>>14997895
|
262 |
+
Cope, retard. It absolutely corresponds with calculations.
|
263 |
+
--- 14997959
|
264 |
+
>>14997895
|
265 |
+
Not him, and not a genetics tard, can you please explain why?
|
266 |
+
>>14997937
|
267 |
+
So your first affirmation was a lie then?
|
268 |
+
--- 14997971
|
269 |
+
>>14997959
|
270 |
+
>your first affirmation
|
271 |
+
What?
|
272 |
+
--- 14998350
|
273 |
+
>>14997500
|
274 |
+
>>14997534
|
275 |
+
>>14997564
|
276 |
+
>>14997675
|
277 |
+
>>14997937
|
278 |
+
My estimate for (You)r IQ is 82.
|
279 |
+
--- 14998355
|
280 |
+
>>14998350
|
281 |
+
Stop whining, shitskin.
|
282 |
+
--- 14998367
|
283 |
+
>>14998355
|
284 |
+
hmmm perhaps I was wrong. 79 is a better estimate it seems
|
285 |
+
--- 14998388
|
286 |
+
WHG has 0% ANE. Salkhit is not closer to Africans. Iran Neolithic has about 15% ANE. CHG has way more.
|
287 |
+
>>14997937
|
288 |
+
>p-values
|
289 |
+
>posts G25 vahaduo nmonte
|
290 |
+
--- 14998398
|
291 |
+
>>14998388
|
292 |
+
> >and distances
|
293 |
+
Retard.
|
294 |
+
--- 14998464
|
295 |
+
>>14998398
|
296 |
+
But in all honestly why do you insist on Salkhit not being a mixture of early ANE and East Eurasians but some weird Para-Eurasian people? Is it because of that one very weird admixture run in that paper?
|
297 |
+
--- 14998513
|
298 |
+
>>14997184
|
299 |
+
>Denisova Cave
|
300 |
+
|
301 |
+
again with this shit
|
302 |
+
|
303 |
+
that St Denis was onto something
|
304 |
+
--- 14998518
|
305 |
+
>>14998464
|
306 |
+
>why do you insist
|
307 |
+
It's just a copypaste, but it really shows equal affinity with East and West Eurasians.
|
308 |
+
>a mixture of early ANE and East Eurasians
|
309 |
+
It's Yana.
|
310 |
+
--- 14998537
|
311 |
+
>>14998518
|
312 |
+
Also it seems G25 rather works pretty well with pre-LGM samples, idk why everybody thought it doesn't.
|
313 |
+
--- 14998698
|
314 |
+
>>14997937
|
315 |
+
>Amerindian
|
316 |
+
>Cope, retard. It absolutely corresponds with calculations.
|
317 |
+
Amerindians get shitty fits because they are bottlenecked, no way to fix it in G25 unless you know the exact ancestors like every thousand years. You aren't bottlenecked. Heck why use a shitty model for Tajiks?
|
318 |
+
|
319 |
+
Target: Tajik_Yaghnobi
|
320 |
+
Distance: 2.5337% / 0.02533739
|
321 |
+
35.8 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
322 |
+
32.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
323 |
+
13.2 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
324 |
+
6.8 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
325 |
+
6.2 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
326 |
+
5.8 GEO_CHG
|
327 |
+
|
328 |
+
From this model, setting CHG and Iran_N at 20%, Tajiks get 25 or 26% ANE. About as much as Northern Europeans like Swedes.
|
329 |
+
--- 14998706
|
330 |
+
>>14997959
|
331 |
+
>Not him, and not a genetics tard, can you please explain why?
|
332 |
+
Look at the part that says Distance: 10.8627%/0.10862706. Anything more than 3% is dubious, something as high as 10% isn't telling you much because the model's best mish-mash of the inputs is very distant from the target. The model takes the inputs and combines them in a combination that is the closest to the target. A big distance means it couldn't make a good estimate. A distance like 10% tells you close to nothing. If you get 3% that is okay, and any lower would be better.
|
333 |
+
--- 14998713
|
334 |
+
>>14998537
|
335 |
+
It doesn't work well because none of the 25 components of global25 cover that pre-LGM stuff. So the program can be hallucinating components that don't exist and ignoring components that do exist in its calculations.
|
336 |
+
--- 14998734
|
337 |
+
>>14998698
|
338 |
+
Add Kostenki14 to the model.
|
339 |
+
--- 14998742
|
340 |
+
>>14998734
|
341 |
+
>do something retarded
|
342 |
+
--- 14998772
|
343 |
+
>>14998713
|
344 |
+
It can attribute all these samples to East, West, basal Eurasian, or African lineage without mistakes. Usually, it's all what you want from such samples.
|
345 |
+
>>14998698
|
346 |
+
>bottlenecked
|
347 |
+
No bottleneck can give them such distances, retard. They're a different race entirely.
|
348 |
+
>a shitty model
|
349 |
+
You dumb shitskin, lmao, why would I make another model if I need to measure their ANE ancestry?
|
350 |
+
>as much as
|
351 |
+
Learn to count, poo: >>14997675.
|
352 |
+
--- 14998780
|
353 |
+
>>14998706
|
354 |
+
Retarded shitskin, lmao, your intelligence is literally ape-tier.
|
355 |
+
>>14997959
|
356 |
+
This model has its purpose in estimating proportions of very ancient ancestry, there's no way to get low distances in such models.
|
357 |
+
--- 14998790
|
358 |
+
>>14998772
|
359 |
+
>It can attribute all these samples to East, West, basal Eurasian, or African lineage without mistakes. Usually, it's all what you want from such samples.
|
360 |
+
You don't know what you are talking about.
|
361 |
+
|
362 |
+
>No bottleneck can give them such distances, retard. They're a different race entirely.
|
363 |
+
Again, you don't know what you are talking about.
|
364 |
+
|
365 |
+
>You dumb shitskin, lmao, why would I make another model if I need to measure their ANE ancestry?
|
366 |
+
>Why would I make an accurate estimation
|
367 |
+
Because you have an IQ of 80 and a cranial capacity of 1400cc. You fit well with shitskins.
|
368 |
+
|
369 |
+
>learn to count
|
370 |
+
Heed you own advice, also post you global25 coordinates faggot.
|
371 |
+
--- 14998798
|
372 |
+
>>14998780
|
373 |
+
>Retarded shitskin, lmao, your intelligence is literally ape-tier.
|
374 |
+
If I my intelligence is ape tier, your intelligence doesn't exist. Your IQ is at least 50 points lower than mine.
|
375 |
+
--- 14998804
|
376 |
+
>>14998698
|
377 |
+
He's retarded. I tried doing it like that and got these results.
|
378 |
+
|
379 |
+
Target: German
|
380 |
+
Distance: 8.0602% / 0.08060199
|
381 |
+
53.2 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
382 |
+
28.8 RUS_MA1
|
383 |
+
18.0 WHG
|
384 |
+
|
385 |
+
Target: Tajik_Shugnan
|
386 |
+
Distance: 9.8816% / 0.09881648
|
387 |
+
55.8 RUS_MA1
|
388 |
+
39.0 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
389 |
+
5.2 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
390 |
+
--- 14998809
|
391 |
+
>>14998804
|
392 |
+
Those are bad fits as well. Try to make better models.
|
393 |
+
--- 14998813
|
394 |
+
>>14998388
|
395 |
+
nope, WHG has small amounts of ANE, they literally can not be 0% ANE when they have ANE Y DNA, and its very doubtful ANE had their Y DNA replaced by a mysterious group of IJK - K - P - R Gravettian proto-WHGs.
|
396 |
+
|
397 |
+
Salkhit is closer to early OOA than to East Eurasians btw.
|
398 |
+
they show no affinity for East Eurasians when compared to Mbuti either.
|
399 |
+
--- 14998815
|
400 |
+
>>14998790
|
401 |
+
>muuu dennew muuu dennew
|
402 |
+
Pathetic ooga-booga shitskin.
|
403 |
+
>post you global25 coordinates
|
404 |
+
Ask your owner humiliatedly and meekly, shitskin.
|
405 |
+
>>14998798
|
406 |
+
>muuuu uuu muuu
|
407 |
+
The absolute state of a brown ape.
|
408 |
+
--- 14998822
|
409 |
+
>>14998815
|
410 |
+
Post global25 coordinates faggot. Also link the number of SNPs used with variants.
|
411 |
+
--- 14998828
|
412 |
+
>>14998813
|
413 |
+
>nope, WHG has small amounts of ANE
|
414 |
+
Some samples have a small amount. Most have 0%.
|
415 |
+
--- 14998831
|
416 |
+
>>14998813
|
417 |
+
>small amounts
|
418 |
+
In that preprint it was modeled as either 40 or 45 percent, with being a quarter Europe_UP and the rest Dzudzuana.
|
419 |
+
--- 14998838
|
420 |
+
>>14998828
|
421 |
+
Hard to say actually because the earliest WHGs are the ones with ANE and WHG remains are so sparse due to being archaic Hunter Gatherers, so there could be lots of ANE admixed WHGs, which there were in the Balkans, or there could be only a small amount, and the ones found in Serbia and Italy were the only ANE WHGs and they were novel tribes if you will.
|
422 |
+
not all of them had it, buts its erroneous to say none of them had it.
|
423 |
+
--- 14998840
|
424 |
+
>>14998831
|
425 |
+
Its not ane, its a mixture of kostenki and East eurasian that did not experienced the genetic diferentiation ANE had. As different as nafris are from samis.
|
426 |
+
--- 14998842
|
427 |
+
>>14998831
|
428 |
+
Shut the fuck up retard. WHG have 0% Dzudzuana and 0% ANE as a whole. There are outliers with 1% Dzudzuana and 1% ANE ancestry.
|
429 |
+
--- 14998849
|
430 |
+
>>14998842
|
431 |
+
You consider Villabruna and the Serbian WHG cluster to be outliers?
|
432 |
+
They arent outliers even if they arent common, they are still WHGs with ANE and its more than 1 so its not one individual, and they are found in multiple regions so its not one person or one tribe in one isolated valley.
|
433 |
+
--- 14998851
|
434 |
+
>>14998840
|
435 |
+
It was referred to as Siberia_UP dated around 22k BP. It's MA1. >>14998842
|
436 |
+
You're not needed, ape.
|
437 |
+
--- 14998853
|
438 |
+
>>14998849
|
439 |
+
Not him but WHG can't have much Dzudzuana, basal eurasian provides a constrain on it. WHG could be Dzudzuana minus basal.
|
440 |
+
--- 14998855
|
441 |
+
>>14998851
|
442 |
+
Siberia_UP is not MA1, is a presumed lineage that mixed Kostenki+Europe UP, but thats it, ANE is too specific and too differentiated. no one but ANE, WSHG and EHG had proper ANE.
|
443 |
+
the rest is as similar as a aboriginal australian is japanese
|
444 |
+
--- 14998857
|
445 |
+
>>14998849
|
446 |
+
>You consider Villabruna
|
447 |
+
villabruna is normal but serbian WHG is a outlier, he also had maternal EEF admixture
|
448 |
+
--- 14998858
|
449 |
+
>>14998853
|
450 |
+
>basal eurasian
|
451 |
+
Not a real population, it's not needed anymore as we got Dzudzuana.
|
452 |
+
>>14998855
|
453 |
+
Any source for your claims?
|
454 |
+
--- 14998859
|
455 |
+
>>14998855
|
456 |
+
Are you sure about that? Especially the distance being like the one between Australians and Japanese.
|
457 |
+
--- 14998861
|
458 |
+
>>14998858
|
459 |
+
>Not a real population, it's not needed anymore as we got Dzudzuana.
|
460 |
+
Dzudzuana is part basal. Without basal, you can't model Dzudzuana.
|
461 |
+
--- 14998862
|
462 |
+
>>14998859
|
463 |
+
more or less, yeah, both are technically east eurasians from the Upper paleolithic, but they went through completely different genetic diferentiations.
|
464 |
+
siberia_UP is meaningless
|
465 |
+
--- 14998866
|
466 |
+
>>14998862
|
467 |
+
You made a quantitative claim. Distance between Australians and Japanese can be calculated today. Did they in the paper make a population that was equally differentiated as Japanese were from Australians? What was the quantity?
|
468 |
+
--- 14998867
|
469 |
+
>>14998861
|
470 |
+
It was modelled as Villabruna plus Mbuti. There's just no such thing as "basal".
|
471 |
+
--- 14998872
|
472 |
+
>>14998849
|
473 |
+
>They arent outliers even if they arent common, they are still WHGs with ANE and its more than 1 so its not one individual, and they are found in multiple regions so its not one person or one tribe in one isolated valley.
|
474 |
+
|
475 |
+
Target: ITA_Villabruna
|
476 |
+
Distance: 33.8831% / 0.33883093
|
477 |
+
97.3 RUS_Sunghir
|
478 |
+
2.6 TUR_Pinarbasi_HG
|
479 |
+
0.1 RUS_MA1
|
480 |
+
--- 14998873
|
481 |
+
>>14998867
|
482 |
+
It wouldn't get any mbuti if it didn't have basal eurasian. Mbuti is a sink for basal affinity. Not exact, but relative to crowns, any outgroup ancestry would go into that.
|
483 |
+
--- 14998882
|
484 |
+
>>14998872
|
485 |
+
>Sunghir
|
486 |
+
very funny, now do Gravettians and ANE
|
487 |
+
--- 14998883
|
488 |
+
Whether the WHG cluster has ANE is too abstract to answer without more samples but a few within it pull toward ANE more than others.
|
489 |
+
|
490 |
+
Most likely the R1b in Villabruna is related to Iron Gates HG, from which any ANE signal would be lost in just a handful of generations, and may just be region-specific.
|
491 |
+
--- 14998888
|
492 |
+
>>14998872
|
493 |
+
nice model retarded nigger
|
494 |
+
sunghir is super useful indeed
|
495 |
+
|
496 |
+
Target: RUS_AfontovaGora3
|
497 |
+
Distance: 30.7958% / 0.30795753
|
498 |
+
100.0 RUS_Sunghir
|
499 |
+
0.0 CHN_Tianyuan
|
500 |
+
--- 14998901
|
501 |
+
>with excluding WHG distance becomes 0.005 higher
|
502 |
+
>with replacing AHG distance becomes 0.06 higher
|
503 |
+
WHG is undoubtedly not an essential component in Europeans so it's obviously just a drifted mix of ANE and AHG. Period.
|
504 |
+
--- 14998918
|
505 |
+
>>14998882
|
506 |
+
>very funny, now do Gravettians and ANE
|
507 |
+
|
508 |
+
Target: ITA_Villabruna
|
509 |
+
Distance: 29.9758% / 0.29975845
|
510 |
+
98.1 CZE_Vestonice16
|
511 |
+
1.2 TUR_Pinarbasi_HG
|
512 |
+
0.7 RUS_MA1
|
513 |
+
--- 14998921
|
514 |
+
>>14998901
|
515 |
+
Post coordinates.
|
516 |
+
--- 14998922
|
517 |
+
>>14998918
|
518 |
+
Can you do Magdalenians or maybe a 'pure' WHG?
|
519 |
+
--- 14998931
|
520 |
+
>>14998921
|
521 |
+
Me,0.134735,0.1187,0.066982,0.055983,0.031658,0.018239,0.010319,0.013619,-0.005882,-0.021224,0.004207,-0.005046,0.011054,0.012292,-0.007318,-0.000077,0.003577,-0.001427,0.000478,0.001632,-0.003045,-0.002694,0.004296,-0.001417,0.000168
|
522 |
+
--- 14998939
|
523 |
+
>>14998922
|
524 |
+
>Can you do Magdalenians or maybe a 'pure' WHG?
|
525 |
+
|
526 |
+
Target: ITA_Villabruna
|
527 |
+
Distance: 2.5130% / 0.02513000
|
528 |
+
100.0 WHG
|
529 |
+
0 RUS_MA1
|
530 |
+
0 TUR_Pinarbasi_HG
|
531 |
+
--- 14998943
|
532 |
+
>>14998939
|
533 |
+
retard, WHG is a mixture of Villabruna and other shit
|
534 |
+
--- 14998955
|
535 |
+
>14998943
|
536 |
+
lmao what a retard
|
537 |
+
--- 14998966
|
538 |
+
>>14998955
|
539 |
+
the ""WHG"" coordinates in G25 dataset is a average of Villabruna, Loschbour and 2 other WHGs, nigger
|
540 |
+
is not a "pure" nor purer whg
|
541 |
+
--- 14998977
|
542 |
+
>the ""WHG"" coordinates in G25 dataset is a average of Villabruna, Loschbour
|
543 |
+
retard
|
544 |
+
--- 14998988
|
545 |
+
>>14998939
|
546 |
+
Villabruna is the "pure" WHG but there are other less ANE WHGs like Loschbour or La Brana.
|
547 |
+
no need to be so obstreperous, I dont know why you have such an aversion to ANE being present in WHGs.
|
548 |
+
I mean EHG is literally WHG + ANE, these groups had contact with each other which was more than just one off bands running into eachother.
|
549 |
+
--- 14998998
|
550 |
+
>>14998931
|
551 |
+
Thanks. Looks like you are Ukrainian or Russian.
|
552 |
+
|
553 |
+
Using the inputs for a basic idea for ANE through post-LGM ancestry and small fits-
|
554 |
+
|
555 |
+
Target: Tajik_Yaghnobi
|
556 |
+
Distance: 2.7100% / 0.02709968
|
557 |
+
46.2 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
558 |
+
33.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
559 |
+
8.2 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
560 |
+
7.6 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
561 |
+
4.8 GEO_CHG
|
562 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
563 |
+
0.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
564 |
+
|
565 |
+
Target: Swedish
|
566 |
+
Distance: 3.3738% / 0.03373805
|
567 |
+
75.6 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
568 |
+
15.6 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
569 |
+
8.8 ITA_Villabruna
|
570 |
+
0.0 GEO_CHG
|
571 |
+
0.0 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
572 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
573 |
+
0.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
574 |
+
|
575 |
+
Target: Me
|
576 |
+
Distance: 4.9839% / 0.04983871
|
577 |
+
68.2 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
578 |
+
19.0 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
579 |
+
8.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
580 |
+
4.2 ITA_Villabruna
|
581 |
+
0.6 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
582 |
+
0.0 GEO_CHG
|
583 |
+
0.0 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
584 |
+
|
585 |
+
|
586 |
+
Adding in Tyuman-
|
587 |
+
|
588 |
+
Target: Tajik_Yaghnobi
|
589 |
+
Distance: 2.5337% / 0.02533739
|
590 |
+
35.8 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
591 |
+
32.2 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
592 |
+
13.2 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
593 |
+
6.8 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
594 |
+
6.2 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
595 |
+
5.8 GEO_CHG
|
596 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
597 |
+
0.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
598 |
+
|
599 |
+
Target: Swedish
|
600 |
+
Distance: 3.3738% / 0.03373805
|
601 |
+
75.6 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
602 |
+
15.6 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
603 |
+
8.8 ITA_Villabruna
|
604 |
+
0.0 GEO_CHG
|
605 |
+
0.0 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
606 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
607 |
+
0.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
608 |
+
0.0 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
609 |
+
|
610 |
+
Target: Me
|
611 |
+
Distance: 4.9836% / 0.04983621
|
612 |
+
68.6 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
613 |
+
18.8 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
614 |
+
7.6 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
615 |
+
4.4 ITA_Villabruna
|
616 |
+
0.6 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
617 |
+
0.0 GEO_CHG
|
618 |
+
0.0 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
619 |
+
0.0 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
620 |
+
|
621 |
+
Assumptions: Sintashta is 35% ANE, Tyumen is 88.6% ANE, CHG and Iran_N are 20% ANE.
|
622 |
+
|
623 |
+
Tajiks get 23.5% to 26% ANE, Swedes get 26.5% ANE, you get 29.5% ANE. Tajiks have a little less or similar amount of ANE compared to Swedes. You have more than both.
|
624 |
+
--- 14999007
|
625 |
+
>>14998939
|
626 |
+
>>14998966
|
627 |
+
Target: ITA_Villabruna
|
628 |
+
Distance: 3.2623% / 0.03262289
|
629 |
+
92.2 LUX_Loschbour
|
630 |
+
5.2 TUR_Pinarbasi_HG
|
631 |
+
2.6 RUS_AfontovaGora3
|
632 |
+
|
633 |
+
Target: ITA_Villabruna
|
634 |
+
Distance: 2.3237% / 0.02323724
|
635 |
+
87.4 ITA_Grotta_Continenza_Meso
|
636 |
+
7.6 TUR_Pinarbasi_HG
|
637 |
+
5.0 RUS_AfontovaGora3
|
638 |
+
|
639 |
+
Villabruna seems to have hidden ANE but it is dubious because the WHG inputs are newer than Villabruna.
|
640 |
+
--- 14999010
|
641 |
+
>>14998998
|
642 |
+
Now answer please why do you struggle with just, say, making a model that just counts ANE straight? Like, you know, here: >>14997937.
|
643 |
+
--- 14999021
|
644 |
+
>>14999010
|
645 |
+
>>14998998
|
646 |
+
And yes, AG3 is 16k BP so post-LGM as well.
|
647 |
+
--- 14999028
|
648 |
+
>>14999010
|
649 |
+
Those models are too distant. They don't make a good approximation. Frankly my inputs don't make a good approximation for your coordinates either though they are a little better. I put in Tyumen to see if it would improve your fit, but it didn't. I've tried other things like Baltic HGs and using GAC directly, but it doesn't get better than 5%
|
650 |
+
--- 14999038
|
651 |
+
>>14999021
|
652 |
+
Target: Me
|
653 |
+
Distance: 5.1544% / 0.05154399
|
654 |
+
80.0 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
655 |
+
20.0 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
656 |
+
0.0 RUS_AfontovaGora3
|
657 |
+
|
658 |
+
|
659 |
+
Target: Me
|
660 |
+
Distance: 5.0674% / 0.05067399
|
661 |
+
74.0 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
662 |
+
21.2 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
663 |
+
2.4 Baltic_LTU_Narva
|
664 |
+
2.4 RUS_Karelia_HG
|
665 |
+
0.0 RUS_AfontovaGora3
|
666 |
+
--- 14999074
|
667 |
+
>>14999028
|
668 |
+
>make a good approximation
|
669 |
+
They just mustn't, it's pretty obvious that nobody has a straight input from a 16k-year-old woman but as those sources are distant enough from each other and are basal for all later ancestries, it'll give a reliable percentage.
|
670 |
+
>your coordinates
|
671 |
+
It's supposed to be so-called Balto-Slavic drift.
|
672 |
+
--- 14999088
|
673 |
+
>>14999074
|
674 |
+
>They just mustn't, it's pretty obvious that nobody has a straight input from a 16k-year-old woman but as those sources are distant enough from each other and are basal for all later ancestries, it'll give a reliable percentage.
|
675 |
+
The problem is they do not give a reliable percentage. They could give a decent rank-order in comparison to others as long as general ancestries are accounted for. But the percentages themselves aren't accurate, case in point, Tajiks fall from low 30s% in your model to low-mid 20s% in my model. Also in your own models, you yourself get wildly different levels of ANE ancestries even when the fit differences are 9.6% vs 10.8% >>14998901
|
676 |
+
|
677 |
+
>It's supposed to be so-called Balto-Slavic drift.
|
678 |
+
I've checked the top 3 most similar ancients with you and they all get a fit of 5% or above as well. The closest I can arrive at is 29% to 30% ANE in models were Tajiks get 23% to 26% and Swedes get 26.5%. Rank order is similar to what it would be with distal models, but the exact percentages will be very different.
|
679 |
+
--- 14999099
|
680 |
+
>>14998998
|
681 |
+
You can improve it. Here's a better model.
|
682 |
+
|
683 |
+
Target: Tajik_Yaghnobi
|
684 |
+
Distance: 2.3721% / 0.02372127
|
685 |
+
33.0 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
686 |
+
28.0 RUS_Sintashta_MLBA
|
687 |
+
17.4 TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N
|
688 |
+
16.2 KAZ_Kumsay_EBA
|
689 |
+
5.4 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
690 |
+
|
691 |
+
Tajiks come out to 35% ANE.
|
692 |
+
--- 14999124
|
693 |
+
>>14999099
|
694 |
+
I have never used Kumsay before.
|
695 |
+
|
696 |
+
Target: KAZ_Kumsay_EBA
|
697 |
+
Distance: 3.4714% / 0.03471375
|
698 |
+
63.2 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
699 |
+
15.6 GEO_CHG
|
700 |
+
11.6 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
701 |
+
9.6 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
702 |
+
|
703 |
+
Kumsay itself looks to be about 70% ANE. This makes your Tajik model 27.74% ANE. So the range for the models is 23.5% to 27.74%. This is in the range of Northern and Eastern Europeans.
|
704 |
+
--- 14999127
|
705 |
+
>>14999088
|
706 |
+
>in my model
|
707 |
+
In your counting, not the model. Here I'm counting the 38% outcome in me and it comes true: >>14997675.
|
708 |
+
>fit of 5% or above
|
709 |
+
You also can compare Italians with for example Germans in such models. The more WSH population have, the higher distances comes as all these herding populations have their own drift. For Slavs, the best source is Spiginas2 from the Baltic CWC or just Baltic_BA.
|
710 |
+
--- 14999141
|
711 |
+
>the best fit Slavs have among BA-populations is half-Greek
|
712 |
+
Unrelated but thoughts?
|
713 |
+
--- 14999144
|
714 |
+
>>14999127
|
715 |
+
Your model at 10% fit gives 38% ANE, correspondingly you give Tajiks 33.2% ANE at a fit of 11.749%. Both of these are overestimates. You get 29% to 30% ANE when the model is more accurate, Tajiks get 23% to 28% when the model is more accurate.
|
716 |
+
--- 14999148
|
717 |
+
>>14999144
|
718 |
+
>these are overestimates
|
719 |
+
Who said?
|
720 |
+
--- 14999161
|
721 |
+
>>14999124
|
722 |
+
Kumsay is about 80% ANE.
|
723 |
+
|
724 |
+
Target: KAZ_Kumsay_EBA
|
725 |
+
Distance: 5.6771% / 0.05677059
|
726 |
+
72.6 RUS_AfontovaGora3
|
727 |
+
27.4 GEO_CHG
|
728 |
+
|
729 |
+
This would make Tajiks around 30-35 which is shared by Amerindians and certain Uralics.
|
730 |
+
--- 14999184
|
731 |
+
>>14999141
|
732 |
+
Target: RUS_Krasnoyarsk_MLBA_o
|
733 |
+
Distance: 6.9406% / 0.06940637
|
734 |
+
42.2 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
735 |
+
27.6 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
736 |
+
25.6 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
737 |
+
4.6 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
738 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
739 |
+
0.0 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
740 |
+
|
741 |
+
Target: GRC_Logkas_MBA
|
742 |
+
Distance: 2.5061% / 0.02506070
|
743 |
+
48.8 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
744 |
+
30.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
745 |
+
19.8 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
746 |
+
1.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
747 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
748 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
749 |
+
|
750 |
+
Target: Baltic_EST_BA
|
751 |
+
Distance: 10.3189% / 0.10318881
|
752 |
+
36.6 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
753 |
+
27.6 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
754 |
+
24.2 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
755 |
+
11.6 ITA_Villabruna
|
756 |
+
0.0 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
757 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
758 |
+
|
759 |
+
Target: MDA_Catacomb_Dănceni_MBA
|
760 |
+
Distance: 3.9039% / 0.03903863
|
761 |
+
51.8 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
762 |
+
17.6 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
763 |
+
17.2 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
764 |
+
13.4 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
765 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
766 |
+
0.0 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
767 |
+
|
768 |
+
Hard to tell because of bad fits in first, third and to some extent also fourth.
|
769 |
+
--- 14999190
|
770 |
+
>>14999184
|
771 |
+
With five pops.
|
772 |
+
--- 14999194
|
773 |
+
>>14999141
|
774 |
+
Slavs are just more farmer rich Balts but I don't think they have anything much further south than the North/NE Carpathians.
|
775 |
+
Trzciniec samples should be released this year anyway.
|
776 |
+
--- 14999200
|
777 |
+
>>14999148
|
778 |
+
Anyone who sees the models.
|
779 |
+
|
780 |
+
>>14999161
|
781 |
+
That is a worse model. I'm going with ~70%.
|
782 |
+
|
783 |
+
Target: KAZ_Kumsay_EBA
|
784 |
+
Distance: 3.4364% / 0.03436390
|
785 |
+
56.6 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
786 |
+
16.2 GEO_CHG
|
787 |
+
10.8 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
788 |
+
9.0 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
789 |
+
7.4 RUS_AfontovaGora3
|
790 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
791 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
792 |
+
|
793 |
+
Target: KAZ_Kumsay_EBA
|
794 |
+
Distance: 3.4714% / 0.03471375
|
795 |
+
63.2 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
796 |
+
15.6 GEO_CHG
|
797 |
+
11.6 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
798 |
+
9.6 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
799 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
800 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
801 |
+
--- 14999207
|
802 |
+
>>14999200
|
803 |
+
>the models
|
804 |
+
How many times should I repeat?
|
805 |
+
>In your counting, not the model. Here I'm counting the 38% outcome in me and it comes true: >>14997675 (Me).
|
806 |
+
--- 14999210
|
807 |
+
>>14997500
|
808 |
+
>>14997534
|
809 |
+
>>14997675
|
810 |
+
>>14997937
|
811 |
+
>>14998355
|
812 |
+
>>14998772
|
813 |
+
>>14998780
|
814 |
+
>>14998815
|
815 |
+
>>14998901
|
816 |
+
mordvix posts
|
817 |
+
--- 14999216
|
818 |
+
>>14999210
|
819 |
+
You're late, servant.
|
820 |
+
--- 14999219
|
821 |
+
>>14999200
|
822 |
+
>That is a worse model.
|
823 |
+
True, but it's a more direct model for purposes of understand ANE ancestry. Kumsay comes out to 80% total ANE.
|
824 |
+
|
825 |
+
My model >>14999099 is both better and more direct so I will go with it's 30-35% ANE ancestry in Tajiks.
|
826 |
+
--- 14999234
|
827 |
+
>>14999216
|
828 |
+
--- 14999238
|
829 |
+
>>14999190
|
830 |
+
Target: RUS_Magadan_BA
|
831 |
+
Distance: 11.2495% / 0.11249494
|
832 |
+
71.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
833 |
+
29.0 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
834 |
+
0.0 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
835 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
836 |
+
0.0 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
837 |
+
0.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
838 |
+
0.0 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
839 |
+
|
840 |
+
Target: TUR_Kaman-Kalehoyuk_MLBA_low_res
|
841 |
+
Distance: 7.4437% / 0.07443705
|
842 |
+
80.6 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
843 |
+
18.4 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
844 |
+
1.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
845 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
846 |
+
0.0 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
847 |
+
0.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
848 |
+
0.0 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
849 |
+
|
850 |
+
Target: England_LBA_low_res
|
851 |
+
Distance: 4.0543% / 0.04054275
|
852 |
+
51.8 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
853 |
+
45.0 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
854 |
+
3.2 ITA_Villabruna
|
855 |
+
0.0 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
856 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
857 |
+
0.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
858 |
+
0.0 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
859 |
+
|
860 |
+
Target: SVN_LBA_EIA
|
861 |
+
Distance: 3.8691% / 0.03869111
|
862 |
+
46.4 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
863 |
+
27.6 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
864 |
+
26.0 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
865 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
866 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
867 |
+
0.0 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
868 |
+
0.0 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
869 |
+
|
870 |
+
Target: GRC_Mycenaean_Kastrouli_BA
|
871 |
+
Distance: 3.4001% / 0.03400067
|
872 |
+
70.4 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
873 |
+
16.4 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
874 |
+
12.6 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
875 |
+
0.6 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
876 |
+
0.0 ITA_Villabruna
|
877 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
878 |
+
0.0 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
879 |
+
|
880 |
+
Target: MDA_Sabatinovka_LBA
|
881 |
+
Distance: 2.7570% / 0.02756983
|
882 |
+
75.8 Yamnaya_RUS_Samara
|
883 |
+
21.4 POL_Globular_Amphora
|
884 |
+
1.6 ITA_Villabruna
|
885 |
+
1.2 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
886 |
+
0.0 GRC_Minoan_Lassithi
|
887 |
+
0.0 RUS_Devils_Gate_Cave_N
|
888 |
+
0.0 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
889 |
+
|
890 |
+
Magadan is useless here and Kaman-Kalehoyuk nearly so.
|
891 |
+
--- 14999252
|
892 |
+
>>14999238
|
893 |
+
I also found out I'm as Greek as "Greeks".
|
894 |
+
--- 14999260
|
895 |
+
>>14999252
|
896 |
+
You are r1a slav(e)
|
897 |
+
--- 14999263
|
898 |
+
>>14999260
|
899 |
+
>>14999234
|
900 |
+
You're not needed, servant.
|
901 |
+
--- 14999264
|
902 |
+
>>14999207
|
903 |
+
That 38% is a distant estimation. The distance shows how good of a job the model did to make something like you, and those distances are too big. For that matter, I could model a Hadza as 100% ANE if it was the only input. The distance would be like 70% or more. So these big distances are meaningless.
|
904 |
+
--- 14999267
|
905 |
+
>>14999263
|
906 |
+
Manletix
|
907 |
+
--- 14999269
|
908 |
+
>>14999219
|
909 |
+
>True, but it's a more direct model for purposes of understand ANE ancestry. Kumsay comes out to 80% total ANE.
|
910 |
+
Less accurate.
|
911 |
+
|
912 |
+
>My model >>14999099 is both better and more direct so I will go with it's 30-35% ANE ancestry in Tajiks.
|
913 |
+
I will take your model for Tajiks but not for Kumsay. I am going with 70% ANE in Kumsay. This gives 27.74% ANE to Kumsay. Your model gives 27%-28% ANE to Tajiks, not 30%-35%.
|
914 |
+
--- 14999275
|
915 |
+
>>14999260
|
916 |
+
Who is this boy and why are his parents letting him make this embarrassing videos? Why does he hate R1b?
|
917 |
+
--- 14999279
|
918 |
+
>>14999264
|
919 |
+
Worthless comparison as already 30% is a different race point while 10% is definitely a same race point. Why can't you understand we're talking about Epipaleolithic populations?
|
920 |
+
--- 14999280
|
921 |
+
I am new here. Who are these posters? One Russian. One Indian. One Italian. Am I missing any other ones?
|
922 |
+
--- 14999290
|
923 |
+
>>14999279
|
924 |
+
>10% is definitely a same race point.
|
925 |
+
Complete cope. Sounds like something out of eupedia trash. Anything higher than 3% is unreliable, and cannot be taken for the literal numbers. Numbers from 10%+ models are not worth considering. At best they give you ranks in comparison to other similarly shitty models. But the specific numbers don't mean anything at that point.
|
926 |
+
--- 14999302
|
927 |
+
>>14999290
|
928 |
+
Retard, 10% is literally the distance between English and Latvian or Italian.
|
929 |
+
--- 14999311
|
930 |
+
>>14999275
|
931 |
+
Shizo from russian board 2ch/hi. See >>14999210
|
932 |
+
--- 14999313
|
933 |
+
>>14999302
|
934 |
+
>English and Latvian
|
935 |
+
Massive Balto-Slavic shift so notorious that Slavs can't be modeled accurately. Easy to distinguish both of them.
|
936 |
+
>Italians
|
937 |
+
Totally different ancestral proportion to the point where it is again, easy to distinguish them.
|
938 |
+
|
939 |
+
If someone were to pass Latvian or Italian DNA as English, it would be easily caught as being false. On the other hand, a good approximation would be Dutch vs English. You absolutely cannot model English as 100% Italian to 100% Latvian, but you could model them as 100% Dutch and get away with it.
|
940 |
+
--- 14999317
|
941 |
+
>>14999311
|
942 |
+
Are you the Italian guy?
|
943 |
+
--- 14999321
|
944 |
+
>>14999313
|
945 |
+
Retard. Anyway, a 38% ANE 62% AHG mix would be as related to me as a Latvian to an English. Do anything you want with that info.
|
946 |
+
--- 14999324
|
947 |
+
>>14999317
|
948 |
+
I'm Russian, mordvix's owner
|
949 |
+
--- 14999327
|
950 |
+
>>14999269
|
951 |
+
>Less accurate.
|
952 |
+
Less accurate, but more relevant to the ANE ancestry.
|
953 |
+
|
954 |
+
>I will take your model for Tajiks but not for Kumsay. I am going with 70% ANE in Kumsay. This gives 27.74% ANE to Kumsay. Your model gives 27%-28% ANE to Tajiks, not 30%-35%.
|
955 |
+
Kumsay is more than 70% ANE.
|
956 |
+
|
957 |
+
Target: KAZ_Kumsay_EBA
|
958 |
+
Distance: 3.4364% / 0.03436390
|
959 |
+
56.6 RUS_Tyumen_HG
|
960 |
+
16.2 GEO_CHG
|
961 |
+
10.8 RUS_Sidelkino_HG
|
962 |
+
9.0 IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N
|
963 |
+
7.4 RUS_AfontovaGora3
|
964 |
+
|
965 |
+
This comes out around 75% ANE which is close to >>14999161 showing 80% ANE.
|
966 |
+
--- 14999332
|
967 |
+
>>14999321
|
968 |
+
>Retard. Anyway, a 38% ANE 62% AHG mix would be as related to me as a Latvian to an English. Do anything you want with that info.
|
969 |
+
Yes, I want to tell you that it proves my point. English =/= Latvian.
|
970 |
+
English =/= Italian.
|
971 |
+
You =/= Davidski.
|
972 |
+
Go as Davidski for consultation on that 10% distance models, and if he replies back, do include all of the pejoratives he calls you.
|
973 |
+
--- 14999335
|
974 |
+
>>14999317
|
975 |
+
It's my Georgian servant. I bought him alongside my genetic test.
|
976 |
+
>>14999324
|
977 |
+
You'll never be Russian, Gogi.
|
978 |
+
--- 14999343
|
979 |
+
>>14999335
|
980 |
+
Mordvix, you are tatar-moksha mutt. I'm more Russian than you.
|
981 |
+
--- 14999347
|
982 |
+
>>14999327
|
983 |
+
>Less accurate and less relevant to the ANE ancestry.*
|
984 |
+
FTFY
|
985 |
+
|
986 |
+
>This comes out around 75% ANE which is close to >>14999161 showing 80% ANE.
|
987 |
+
|
988 |
+
56.6x0.886 + 16.2x0.222 + 10.8x0.7 + 9x0.218 + 7.4 = 70.666%. This is 70%, not 75% or even 80%.
|
989 |
+
--- 14999359
|
990 |
+
>>14999210
|
991 |
+
he stil mogs everyone on /his.
|
992 |
+
--- 14999363
|
993 |
+
>>14999359
|
994 |
+
Thats not what mogging looks like. He'd be the lookism.me posterboy for an incel.
|
995 |
+
--- 14999373
|
996 |
+
>>14999363 <- shitalian. maybe the whining one, maybe not
|
997 |
+
--- 14999377
|
998 |
+
>>14999373
|
999 |
+
Have a good day
|
1000 |
+
--- 14999422
|
1001 |
+
>>14999347
|
1002 |
+
>56.6x0.886 + 16.2x0.222 + 10.8x0.7 + 9x0.218
|
1003 |
+
Tyumen is 90%, EHG are 80%, and the CHG should have some more than 20% ANE.
|
1004 |
+
--- 14999443
|
1005 |
+
>>14999422
|
1006 |
+
>Tyumen is 90% ANE
|
1007 |
+
More like 88.5%. But even if you make it 90%, Kumsay is still only 71.5% in the end.
|
1008 |
+
>EHGs are 90%
|
1009 |
+
Sidelkino is positively not 80% ANE.
|
1010 |
+
>CHG
|
1011 |
+
Is estimated to be 22.2% ANE. From Lazaridis.
|
1012 |
+
--- 14999475
|
1013 |
+
>>14999443
|
1014 |
+
>More like 88.5%.
|
1015 |
+
More precisely 91% ANE + 9% non-ANE.
|
1016 |
+
>Sidelkino is positively not 80% ANE.
|
1017 |
+
Probably, but Karelia is.
|
1018 |
+
--- 14999492
|
1019 |
+
>>14999475
|
1020 |
+
>Karelia
|
1021 |
+
The model uses Sidelkino.
|
1022 |
+
>80%
|
1023 |
+
Target: RUS_Karelia_HG
|
1024 |
+
Distance: 6.4216% / 0.06421600
|
1025 |
+
69.8 RUS_AfontovaGora3
|
1026 |
+
30.2 ITA_Villabruna
|
1027 |
+
0.0 RUS_MA1
|
his/14996131.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996131
|
3 |
+
What would have changed if Taiwan remained Japanese after WWII? Most people in Taiwan pre-WWII were pretty okay with Japanese rule and to this day it seems Taiwan really has a boner for Japan in stark contrast to most of the rest of Asia. Also, a lot of American propaganda and political perspectives during WWII seemed to think Taiwan was a home island at that point. Thoughts?
|
4 |
+
--- 14997711
|
5 |
+
Taiwan was nicknamed "the model colony" because of how it was run and administered. It was in an extremely unique position in that it was annexed by Japan before they became overly nationalistic, and it's pre-existing demographics strongly facilitated a pro-Japanese state.
|
6 |
+
|
7 |
+
When the Japs annexed the territory they found an island inhabited by a large number of Chinese and a small number of native aboriginals, who had already been chased off of the good land and sent into the mountains. The Japanese sided with the Chinese against the aboriginals and instead of a colonized people the Chinese basically became willing collaborators.
|
8 |
+
|
9 |
+
The Japanese only tried to Japanize the island late on, after war with China had already broken out in 1937, which meant the vast majority of their rule was extremely friendly towards the Chinese in Taiwan, even supportive of their specific culture and dialect, Hokkien, so rather than an oppressed people (as the mainland Chinese would become during the second Sino-Japanese war) they actually flourished during this period, this is what would be remembered as the good times by most Taiwanese.
|
10 |
+
|
11 |
+
After WW2 the island got handed back to "China", which meant the nationalist RoC, but immediately the reds won the civil war and this became the only territory controlled by the RoC. What followed was a period called the white terror, in which the RoC clamped down on anything and everything they deemed against them. This included Hokkien (they wanted the population to speak Beijing standard Mandarin, as part of their "centralization" campaign, despite the fact they only controlled Taiwan.) This created a Benshengren/Waishengren divide that exists to this day, between the original Chinese in Taiwan and the post 1945 Mainlanders.
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
Vid related, Taiwanese singing a Japanese folk song in Hokkien on a variety show for nostalgic old people:
|
14 |
+
https://youtu.be/3gPMoPlK8P8 [Embed]
|
15 |
+
As paradoxical as it sounds they feel Japan represented them more than their fellow Chinese.
|
16 |
+
--- 14997720
|
17 |
+
>>14997711
|
18 |
+
>Comments are turned off. Learn more
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
+
lel
|
21 |
+
--- 14998139
|
22 |
+
>>14997711
|
23 |
+
didn't read lol
|
24 |
+
--- 14998549
|
25 |
+
>>14997711
|
26 |
+
I knew about how the mainlanders swamped Taiwan after WWII and how Shek tried to de-Hokkien Taiwan, creating the divide, but I didn't know that Japan was really chill in Taiwan compared to other places. Must be because they tried their best to make them un-Chinese as opposed to strictly Japanese. Interesting.
|
27 |
+
--- 14998561
|
28 |
+
>>14998139
|
29 |
+
TLDR: Japan was really nice to Taiwan compared to Korea, lots of Taiwanese fought in WWII for the Nips, therefore lots of Taiwanese today are hardcore Nip lovers.
|
30 |
+
--- 14998580
|
31 |
+
Nothing would’ve changed, Taiwan was great under Japanese control and the Taiwanese loved them. As you were saying the Taiwanese are even still very fond of Japanese to this very day.
|
32 |
+
Also zero physical evidence that Pacific theatre happened
|
33 |
+
--- 14998584
|
34 |
+
>>14998580
|
35 |
+
? I was just wondering if the Cold War would be very different given the Taiwan issue would now be a completely different type of flashpoint.
|
36 |
+
--- 14998748
|
37 |
+
>>14996131 (OP)
|
38 |
+
>this day it seems Taiwan really has a boner for Japan
|
39 |
+
|
40 |
+
This is just modern cope to deal with their weak position vs. China. Postwar & Post-Chinese Civil War, the place got flooded by more mainlanders which replaced the colonized population.
|
41 |
+
|
42 |
+
And 40-30 years ago the Taiwanese were making movies like this.
|
43 |
+
--- 14999019
|
44 |
+
>>14998748
|
45 |
+
Indeed. I think the ROC being fucked over by the international stage in the 70s/80s cause an identity crisis in Taiwan that is still unfolding to this day. I'll do another thread about the Kuomintang, but I really want to hear your guys' takes on this timeline given it easily could have happened.
|
46 |
+
--- 14999254
|
47 |
+
>>14999019
|
48 |
+
It couldn't easily have happened. The US was out for blood, there was no way they would allow them to keep Taiwan.
|
49 |
+
|
50 |
+
But if they did it wouldn't be considered part of China and the PRC wouldn't be trying to get it back. The only reason they claim Taiwan is because allowing them to secede now they are a part of China sets a precedent, both legal and actual for other parts to secede. If Taiwan was never legally transferred to China in the first place then they wouldn't consider it an inalienable part of China. The KMT would make their last stand in Yunnan before being annexed by Mao in the 50s.
|
51 |
+
--- 14999300
|
52 |
+
They would have to treat it like a home Island instead of a colony.
|
53 |
+
--- 14999329
|
54 |
+
>>14999300
|
55 |
+
I could see it being a lot like Okinawa in our timeline. Lots of American forces stationed there, very unique but definitely Japanese, and probably left-leaning compared to Japan.
|
56 |
+
--- 14999341
|
57 |
+
>>14999254
|
58 |
+
True, but Taiwan was pretty insignificant and pretty weird. Even during the war Taiwan was considered to be a home island or core territory of Japan, and unlike Sakhalin it was never directly invaded. I could see it remaining Japanese due to either Kai-Shek failing his retreat and getting slaughtered or the U.S deciding to fuck over Shek and give it to the Japs, given there was a bit of tension between the U.S and Shek and the U.S wanted a stronger Japan for the Cold War. Also, Chinese irridentism would be a huge issue and I could see it becoming a bigger version of the Falklands during the Cold War/afterwards.
|
59 |
+
--- 14999439
|
60 |
+
>>14999254
|
61 |
+
>But if they did it wouldn't be considered part of China and the PRC wouldn't be trying to get it back
|
62 |
+
Realistically, they still would claim it (unless they reached some agreement later) so it would be more like a larger version of the Kuril islands issue. They would certainly be more flexible, but they'd also view it as a relic of Japanese colonialism and a province stolen from China and corrupted by imperialist foreign powers.
|
63 |
+
|
64 |
+
This is a weird thing to speculate about, though, since it was simply not going to happen and would have been massively at odds with US strategy and tendencies in the region. It's easy to say with hindsight "yeah China is big and bad and Japan is peaceful and friendly," but that was simply not the situation which everyone was accustomed to, and anyone who wanted to let Japan keep their colony would have been given some very weird looks. Good luck explaining to Congress that Taiwan should go to the Japs instead of the Chinese anti-communists, because the communists are going to win anyway and you might as well limit their future claims to the island.
|
65 |
+
|
66 |
+
It would also set a bad precedent vis-a-vis colonial powers, since the Europeans would argue that Japan being allowed to keep their colonies gives them the same right, and perceive any American attempts to promote decolonization as blatantly hypocritical since the US was willing to let Japan keep its colonies.
|
67 |
+
--- 14999450
|
68 |
+
>>14999439
|
69 |
+
It's just a lazy uninformed question. What if my grandmother had wheels tier. The only saving grace is the history of the island, the region, and the countries in question is interesting, and the alt-history nature seems to have kept the chinkspammer at bay.
|
70 |
+
--- 14999514
|
71 |
+
>>14996131 (OP)
|
72 |
+
Not much. PRC would still want it back and still be unable to physically take it. The US position on it would be less ambiguous, not that the 7th Fleet has ever been subtle. Japan would need to rearm, and would have a more suitable enemy to build against than the USSR was, meaning a larger Japanese defense-industrial complex and the inability to do omnidirectional diplomacy. PRC would dispense with national unification and start banging the decolonization drum, aiming to rally more third world support. Anti-Japanese feeling in China would be kept at a perennial fever pitch, and the issue would serve to instill it as a direct contemporary issue for each succeeding generation of Chinese, whereas today anti-Japanese sentiment is a legacy hangover from China's unsatisfying World War II, the CPC's war-based legitimacy, some minor territorial disputes, and Japan's alliance with the US.
|
73 |
+
--- 14999562
|
74 |
+
>>14999439
|
75 |
+
Again, the only real way I could see this happening would be if the conflict between Stilwell and Shek reached such a peak that the U.S abandoned Shek. Perhaps Ichi-Go is more of a disaster for the KMT in this timeline, idk. Either way, that would be the only way I could see it happening.
|
76 |
+
--- 14999579
|
77 |
+
>>14999450
|
78 |
+
Indeed, that's why I like it as dumb of a question it is. A possible, but improbable historical event that could have completely altered the course of recent history and made it way more interesting.
|
his/14996289.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996289
|
3 |
+
He conquered the world.
|
4 |
+
--- 14996400
|
5 |
+
>>14996289 (OP)
|
6 |
+
It takes strong man to rule, Alexander was more he was Prometheus, a friend to man, he changed the world
|
7 |
+
--- 14996966
|
8 |
+
>>14996289 (OP)
|
9 |
+
why didn't he go west?
|
10 |
+
--- 14996979
|
11 |
+
>>14996966
|
12 |
+
Alexander the swarthoid feared the Celtic bvlls and could only fight against Bipoc Persians.
|
13 |
+
>The historian Arrian wrote that Alexander, hoping to hear his own name, asked “these people of great stature and arrogant disposition” to name their greatest fear. “That the sky might fall on their heads!” came the booming reply. Alexander stalked away, muttering that the Celts’ answer seemed to trumpet their own sky-scraping height. Averaging about 6-6.5 feet tall, the Celts were not truly giants—but they certainly seemed so to the smaller Greeks.
|
14 |
+
--- 14996992
|
15 |
+
>>14996979
|
16 |
+
Persians were whiter than modern Amerisharts
|
17 |
+
--- 14996997
|
18 |
+
>>14996966
|
19 |
+
>>14996979
|
20 |
+
West was barbarians and no grand cities, yes not even Rome
|
21 |
+
--- 14997085
|
22 |
+
>>14996966
|
23 |
+
Giant GALLIC BVLLS were too endearing.
|
24 |
+
--- 14997182
|
25 |
+
>>14996979
|
26 |
+
Where is this quote from? Google only gives me this thread and a blog from some Adrienne Mayor
|
27 |
+
https://www.wondersandmarvels.com/2013/10/alexander-the-great-and-the-giants.html
|
28 |
+
--- 14997305
|
29 |
+
>>14997182
|
30 |
+
https://youtu.be/lmYQMJi30aw [Embed]
|
31 |
+
--- 14997326
|
32 |
+
>>14996966
|
33 |
+
>>14996979
|
34 |
+
>>14996992
|
35 |
+
>>14996997
|
36 |
+
>>14997085
|
37 |
+
>>14997305
|
38 |
+
YWNBAW
|
39 |
+
--- 14997339
|
40 |
+
>>14997326
|
41 |
+
were exactly in my post did i imply that i was one?
|
42 |
+
--- 14997372
|
43 |
+
>>14996966
|
44 |
+
he couldn't
|
45 |
+
alexander was awesome in his own right but he had an army perfect for knocking down the declined powers in the east he totally outclassed
|
46 |
+
totally different ballgame having to go west and contend with celts, germs, the thracians and illyrins on the doorstep gave his father and him more problems than any people all the way to India ever did
|
47 |
+
but like anon said, no point in going there anyway
|
48 |
+
--- 14997555
|
49 |
+
>>14996966
|
50 |
+
he died
|
51 |
+
--- 14999097
|
52 |
+
>>14997339
|
53 |
+
tranny
|
54 |
+
--- 14999131
|
55 |
+
>>14996966
|
56 |
+
there's no glory on conquering a people that shit and eat in the same place
|
57 |
+
--- 14999814
|
58 |
+
>>14997326
|
59 |
+
>>14999097
|
60 |
+
bot posts
|
his/14996295.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,222 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996295
|
3 |
+
Koryos is literally the ancient equivalent of modern turco-mongol/amerindian type shamanism
|
4 |
+
>hurr durr i do x ritual and BEGOME THE WOLF
|
5 |
+
They literally believed they were possessed, just like modern tuvan shamans
|
6 |
+
--- 14996305
|
7 |
+
>Koryos
|
8 |
+
Total horseshit made up by some jewish egghead
|
9 |
+
0 evidence for it
|
10 |
+
--- 14996309
|
11 |
+
>>14996295 (OP)
|
12 |
+
Where do you think that Turkic shamans got their religion from? Tengriism is just a combination of indoeuropean paganism with some aspects of zoroastrianism.
|
13 |
+
--- 14996313
|
14 |
+
>>14996305
|
15 |
+
Redpill me on it.
|
16 |
+
--- 14996315
|
17 |
+
>>14996295 (OP)
|
18 |
+
Koryos were war bands tho and they did more than just some epic ritual, they raped a lot
|
19 |
+
--- 14996324
|
20 |
+
>>14996315
|
21 |
+
Well yeah magic isn't being done for nothing.
|
22 |
+
Koryos made the IEs very succesful.
|
23 |
+
The tradition is twisted beyond recognition now.
|
24 |
+
--- 14996359
|
25 |
+
>>14996305
|
26 |
+
Please elaborate.
|
27 |
+
--- 14996366
|
28 |
+
Hwangook Empire RULES AGAIN over the Finns and Jomons
|
29 |
+
--- 14996386
|
30 |
+
>>14996309
|
31 |
+
That's pretty disingenuous to say the least, not equivalent to the comparison ive made
|
32 |
+
>>14996315
|
33 |
+
They thought they were possessed by wolves and wore wolf masks
|
34 |
+
--- 14996765
|
35 |
+
>>14996305
|
36 |
+
Yes. It’s pure LARP.
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
>>14996309
|
39 |
+
Tengrism is deeply rooted in Siberian and Eastern shamanism and the Cult of Heaven. It has no relations to Zoroastrianism or whatever the fuck "indoeuropean paganism" is supposed to mean, which anyhow would go back to a Near Eastern polytheistic belief system.
|
40 |
+
|
41 |
+
>>14996315
|
42 |
+
>>14996324
|
43 |
+
It’s a fucking meme lmao.
|
44 |
+
--- 14996779
|
45 |
+
>>14996765
|
46 |
+
>Cult of Heaven
|
47 |
+
Like the skyfather that is the angular stone of indoeuropean paganism?
|
48 |
+
Afroasiatic/MENA paganism traces back to african polytheism, it has nothing to do with IE belief system
|
49 |
+
--- 14997337
|
50 |
+
>>14996765
|
51 |
+
>>"indoeuropean paganism" anyhow would go back to a Near Eastern polytheistic belief system.
|
52 |
+
Elaborate
|
53 |
+
--- 14997355
|
54 |
+
>>14996765
|
55 |
+
> whatever the fuck "indoeuropean paganism" is supposed to mean
|
56 |
+
pseud
|
57 |
+
--- 14997371
|
58 |
+
>RAISE YOUR AXES TO THE SKY;
|
59 |
+
>RAISE THE FLAG AND FLY IT HIGH
|
60 |
+
>WE ROAM THESE LANDS FAR AND WIDE;
|
61 |
+
>STEEL AND BLOOD ARE OUR PRIDE!
|
62 |
+
--- 14997631
|
63 |
+
>>14996765
|
64 |
+
Elaborate please I don't know what you people are talking about.
|
65 |
+
--- 14997928
|
66 |
+
>>14996779
|
67 |
+
There is no "indoeuropean paganism", the same way as there are no warrior monks with lightsabers on an intergalactic spaceship. Everything you project into your "ie paganism" is ripped off from contemporary religions and molded to feed into your pseudo-steppe LARP fantasies.
|
68 |
+
"Skyfather" is a linguistic ghost, nothing more and nothing less. So stop bullshitting yourself.
|
69 |
+
|
70 |
+
>>14997337
|
71 |
+
Actually attested beliefs of Indo-European-speaking communities are all polytheistic and agree on personified nature/weather deities that share obvious connections to attested Near Eastern mythologies.
|
72 |
+
--- 14997995
|
73 |
+
>>14997928
|
74 |
+
>Actually attested beliefs of Indo-European-speaking communities are all polytheistic and agree on personified nature/weather deities that share obvious connections to attested Near Eastern mythologies.
|
75 |
+
This isn't really proof IE myth being derived from a near eastern source. Only that the IE and the near easterners did in fact have contact with each other. IE myth was used comparing all available mythologies. from ones in Germany to Greece and India. It's just illogical that the PIE myth is derived from a near eastern source.
|
76 |
+
Unless you provide evidence to the contrary of course.
|
77 |
+
--- 14998022
|
78 |
+
>>14997928
|
79 |
+
>Actually attested beliefs of Indo-European-speaking communities are all polytheistic
|
80 |
+
You could argue the same about chinks, japs or aztecs
|
81 |
+
>personified nature/weather deities that share obvious connections to attested Near Eastern mythologies.
|
82 |
+
Meaning who? There is some religions on the area of anatolia-Caucasus clearly influenced by indoeuropean paganism. But their linguistic extract is extremely different, when you take a look on pure afroasiatic traditions such as the Egyptian one you wont find elaborate similitudes anymore.
|
83 |
+
|
84 |
+
There is a curious similutude on Indoeuropean and amerindian ones relating a myth of a dog gating the underworld, which is generaly seen as a cave reached through water channels
|
85 |
+
--- 14998071
|
86 |
+
>>14998022
|
87 |
+
It wuz ancient ANE myth dood.
|
88 |
+
Source: I don't have one.
|
89 |
+
Note this is a half-serious proposal
|
90 |
+
--- 14998181
|
91 |
+
>>14996305
|
92 |
+
Stig Wikander was a literal card carrying Nazi and Georges Dumezil wrote pro-Nazi screeds you brainlet.
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
>>14997631
|
95 |
+
Indo-European society was based on paternal lineages, with the basic unit being the fighting-age married man. These men would have bonds of brotherhood, blood oaths, etc, tying them to each other, going up the chain to some chieftain, and the chieftains would themselves have oaths and bonds to higher chieftains, in theory going up to the Gods themselves. But, there's a problem: what happens when you have a son? He's a great resources, and literally your future (remember, these people believed in reincarnation and a folksoul), has a vested interest in killing you and taking your stuff, AND is fast approaching becoming a horny and violent teenager.
|
96 |
+
|
97 |
+
So you do one of two things. The first option is to send him to go live with one of your brothers (literal or just buddies). He'll raise the kid, he'll beat the shit out of him if he steps out of line, he'll put him to use, and he'll kill him if he's stupid or gay. The other option is to kick him out into the woods and let him fend for himself. He'll either die or join a band of buddies (other forest miscreants). This band of miscreants is the "koryos". They'll be lead by some dude calling himself "wolf" (the leader is always named "wolf" for some reason). From there, one of three things (it's three things according to the Germanics, Celts, Romans, Indians, and Slavs out of tradition) happen.
|
98 |
+
|
99 |
+
First, one of the kid's relatives comes and fishes them out of the trees when times aren't so lean. Second, some grown man needs goons, so he brings some of the forest runts back into society. Third, the kid grows into a man and never re-enters society, becoming a professional band/guerilla.
|
100 |
+
|
101 |
+
The seminal text on this topic is Kris Kershaw's "The One-eyed God", it's required reading in Indo-European departments around the globe.
|
102 |
+
--- 14998205
|
103 |
+
>>14997995
|
104 |
+
There is nothing "illogical" here. On the contrary, coupled with the fact that IE is proven to have originated from south of the Caucasus, everything becomes self-evident.
|
105 |
+
|
106 |
+
>>14998022
|
107 |
+
You are a retard that obviously has no idea what he is talking about.
|
108 |
+
>You could argue the same about chinks, japs or aztecs
|
109 |
+
Not at all. Chinese have the Cult of Heaven and ancestor worship. Shinto is a secondary derivative of the Cult of Heaven. Aztecs form a seperate line of tradition that is far too old for any connections to the Old World. None of those show a near match or mythological elements as do ancient IE mythologie with Near Eastern traditions.
|
110 |
+
>relating a myth of a dog
|
111 |
+
You have obviously gobbled too much of the pseudo bullshit theories that you can’t differentiate between simple facts and fiction.
|
112 |
+
|
113 |
+
>>14998181
|
114 |
+
Reads like fucking fantasy neckbeard fiction.
|
115 |
+
--- 14998211
|
116 |
+
>>14998205
|
117 |
+
>IE is proven to have originated from south of the Caucasus
|
118 |
+
Lmfao I knew you were a fucking pajeet.
|
119 |
+
--- 14998276
|
120 |
+
>>14998211
|
121 |
+
"Pajeets" have legitimate pagan traditions. Something that fat LARPing neckbeard IEcels like yourself will never have.
|
122 |
+
--- 14998286
|
123 |
+
>>14998276
|
124 |
+
Sorry Rajesh, you're not high enough caste to speak to me. Back to the shitting street you go.
|
125 |
+
--- 14998323
|
126 |
+
>>14996315
|
127 |
+
>they raped a lot
|
128 |
+
main focus of koryos was being a policing warrior caste, not rape.
|
129 |
+
--- 14998521
|
130 |
+
>>14998276
|
131 |
+
dalits getting internet access and its consequences has been a disaster for internet discourse and mankind
|
132 |
+
--- 14998538
|
133 |
+
>>14998286
|
134 |
+
You can't read the Vedas. Automatic caste demotion
|
135 |
+
--- 14998540
|
136 |
+
>>14996309
|
137 |
+
WE
|
138 |
+
--- 14998587
|
139 |
+
>>14998521
|
140 |
+
You're not wrong, but neither is he.
|
141 |
+
--- 14998647
|
142 |
+
>>14998276
|
143 |
+
Yes.
|
144 |
+
Throwing cow shit at each other is very based and very reeee
|
145 |
+
Fuck I hate indians so goddamned much.
|
146 |
+
--- 14998663
|
147 |
+
>>14998205
|
148 |
+
>There is nothing "illogical" here. On the contrary, coupled with the fact that IE is proven to have originated from south of the Caucasus, everything becomes self-evident.
|
149 |
+
Language and religious traditions are coupled. Unless you can find something tying IE linguistically with near eastern cultures (you can) your argument makes null sense. Why would a religious tradition that comes from africa or yemen such as the afroasiatic be tied with one from the north or south caucasus?
|
150 |
+
Near east is not a geographic location nor a culture, language or single group
|
151 |
+
>Not at all. Chinese have the Cult of Heaven and ancestor worship
|
152 |
+
Like IE
|
153 |
+
>Aztecs form a seperate line of tradition that is far too old for any connections to the Old World
|
154 |
+
Aztecs worship a Serpent associated with the skies, born from a feathered egg that fell from the clouds.
|
155 |
+
>You have obviously gobbled too much of the pseudo bullshit theories that you can’t differentiate between simple facts and fiction.
|
156 |
+
Simple facts such as what? Is well noted that the myth of cerberus, the world tree and a tridimensional reality (underworld for the dead, overlword for the living, afterlife above for the gods) is mimicked in various amerindian religious traditions
|
157 |
+
|
158 |
+
And these would be removed from IE by 15.000 Years
|
159 |
+
|
160 |
+
Btw IE agricultural terminology makes it impossible for it to be from anywhere except western ukraine
|
161 |
+
--- 14998669
|
162 |
+
>>14996295 (OP)
|
163 |
+
If you didn't just intuitively understand that, you're genuinely retarded.
|
164 |
+
--- 14998677
|
165 |
+
>>14998205
|
166 |
+
>You have obviously gobbled too much of the pseudo bullshit theories that you can’t differentiate between simple facts and fiction.
|
167 |
+
to access the underworld there is a river and a Dog, in nahuatl mythology the first of the 9 hells on mictlan is on the Itzcuintlán, that is where dead souls have to cross the Apanohuacalhuia river to access the underworld, in this river a giant lizard lives and on the sides those who msitreated dogs wander for eternity, a Dog called Xoloitzcuintle has to decide then whatever the soul is worthy of not of crossing the river, and if they are, he guides them with a red thread
|
168 |
+
|
169 |
+
The myth of a Underworld warden that is a dog, and a underworld below earth that is reached through rivers is identical to cerberus and the psychopomp myths
|
170 |
+
--- 14998785
|
171 |
+
>>14998587
|
172 |
+
Indians we wuzzing as the original indo europeans is laughable
|
173 |
+
|
174 |
+
they were raped, and submitted to aryan dongs
|
175 |
+
their descendants then instituted the caste system which cemented them on top
|
176 |
+
--- 14998795
|
177 |
+
>>14998677
|
178 |
+
>>14998663
|
179 |
+
You didn't have to go that in depth guys, Dopinder's theory is BTFO'd by the fact that the Nahuatl are descended from ANEs, just like the PIE, and as such would obviously have similarities as such.
|
180 |
+
--- 14999875
|
181 |
+
>>14998323
|
182 |
+
Policing what ? They were young warriors purposefully sent outside the tribe so they can cause as much chaos to some other enemy tribe
|
183 |
+
--- 14999878
|
184 |
+
>>14998211
|
185 |
+
Kill yourself nigger.
|
186 |
+
>>14998205
|
187 |
+
>On the contrary, coupled with the fact that IE is proven to have originated from south of the Caucasus, everything becomes self-evident.
|
188 |
+
>>>Proved
|
189 |
+
Merely a theory (but not an impossible one, I still doubt it) Regardless, when the southern arc was happening the smites had barely crawled out of Egypt so the region looked completely different. What you are suggesting is improbably at best.
|
190 |
+
>>14998181
|
191 |
+
Ah, thanks. Thought there was some sort of dog sacrifice involved.
|
192 |
+
But I was also asking why the guy thought it was a meme or fake. They just dropped that and leave.
|
193 |
+
--- 14999911
|
194 |
+
>>14998669
|
195 |
+
Odin is called leader of the possessed, obvious shamanism
|
196 |
+
--- 14999914
|
197 |
+
>>14999878
|
198 |
+
How do Kurganites deal with the fact that the direct descendants of ANE speak dene-yeniseian languages? Seems more likely that IE originated with the CHG half of yamnaya ancestry
|
199 |
+
--- 14999919
|
200 |
+
>>14999914
|
201 |
+
I happen to not be atatched to neolithic ethnicities. so I don't care.
|
202 |
+
--- 14999927
|
203 |
+
>>14999914
|
204 |
+
The descendants of CHG have 4 different languages and none appears to be IE, Vainakh, northeast caucasian, northwest caucasian, Kartvelian,hell you can even bet for Sumerian, Elamite and whatever and still fail
|
205 |
+
|
206 |
+
IE came from EHG, not from West siberian hunter gatherers
|
207 |
+
--- 14999937
|
208 |
+
>>14999914
|
209 |
+
Should they shill for it? Is an L for R mongoloids, big win for IJ west eurasians.
|
210 |
+
--- 14999971
|
211 |
+
>>14999914
|
212 |
+
Not impossible.
|
213 |
+
>>14999927
|
214 |
+
Sometimes language families completely desert their urheimats.
|
215 |
+
--- 14999979
|
216 |
+
>>14999971
|
217 |
+
>Sometimes language families completely desert their urheimats.
|
218 |
+
Okay but why do vainakh exist? They are directly paternally descended from CHG
|
219 |
+
--- 15000000
|
220 |
+
>>14999927
|
221 |
+
>>14999971
|
222 |
+
Euskaric is a Caucasian language
|
his/14996300.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996300
|
3 |
+
>In desperation the jailer asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” Never missing an opportunity to share the good news, Paul and Silas said, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved
|
4 |
+
|
5 |
+
>“For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him, may have eternal life; and I Myself will raise him up on the last day
|
6 |
+
|
7 |
+
WHAT THE FUCK DOES IT MEAN TO BELIEVE IN JESUS? Believe he performed miracles? Believe hes God's son? Believe he raised from the dead? Believe he never sinned? Believe the Holy Trinity? Believe hes the Jewish Messiah?
|
8 |
+
|
9 |
+
>inb4 believe everything in the Bible
|
10 |
+
Thats not what Jesus and Paul says
|
11 |
+
--- 14996326
|
12 |
+
>>14996300 (OP)
|
13 |
+
Does "believe in yourself" mean to accept your existence? No it means to have faith and trust in yourself. Belief in Jesus = Trusting Jesus with your life.
|
14 |
+
|
15 |
+
Here's the Greek word in John 6:40 for believe
|
16 |
+
|
17 |
+
4100 πιστεύω [PISTEU/W] {pisteúō} \pist-yoo'-o\
|
18 |
+
from 4102; to have faith (in, upon, or with respect to, a person or thing), i.e. credit; by implication, to entrust (especially one's spiritual well-being to Christ):--believe(-r), commit (to trust), put in trust with.
|
19 |
+
--- 14996338
|
20 |
+
>>14996326
|
21 |
+
So "believe in Jesus" means to believe hes going to save you from Hell?
|
22 |
+
--- 14996353
|
23 |
+
>>14996300 (OP)
|
24 |
+
>WHAT THE FUCK DOES IT MEAN TO BELIEVE IN JESUS? Believe he performed miracles? Believe hes God's son? Believe he raised from the dead? Believe he never sinned? Believe the Holy Trinity? Believe hes the Jewish Messiah?
|
25 |
+
|
26 |
+
go sleep kiddo
|
27 |
+
--- 14996360
|
28 |
+
>>14996300 (OP)
|
29 |
+
>Worship Rabbi Yeshua or he'll burn you forever, goy!
|
30 |
+
That about sums it up
|
31 |
+
--- 14996364
|
32 |
+
>>14996300 (OP)
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
It's the simple things that confound the wise. Simply believing He really is. Not was, but IS. Simple belief. Something so simple even a child can do it.
|
35 |
+
|
36 |
+
>“Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 18:3)
|
37 |
+
--- 14996374
|
38 |
+
>>14996338
|
39 |
+
Yes basically, it's trusting that he died for your sins and that God resurrected him to demonstrate that your sins were paid for.
|
40 |
+
|
41 |
+
Romans 10:9 if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved;
|
42 |
+
--- 14998200
|
43 |
+
>>14996300 (OP)
|
44 |
+
I kneel.
|
45 |
+
--- 14999625
|
46 |
+
>>14996374
|
47 |
+
Yes, this is what salvation means.
|
48 |
+
--- 14999636
|
49 |
+
>>14996300 (OP)
|
50 |
+
Luke 18:9-14 "He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and treated others with contempt: “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee, standing by himself, prayed thus: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get.’ But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’ I tell you, this man went down to his house justified, rather than the other. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.”
|
51 |
+
--- 14999661
|
52 |
+
Believe in God's ability to actually save you through Jesus Christ. Out of revelation, believe that he has already come through even if you don't know anything or find yourself empty handed, spiritually dry. Believe him over your situation of your unsavedness that is looking at you in the face. Those things are said for a reason. Do you recognize him from the dimension of the impossible?
|
53 |
+
--- 14999807
|
54 |
+
>>14996300 (OP)
|
55 |
+
define believe shill
|
56 |
+
--- 14999816
|
57 |
+
>>14996300 (OP)
|
58 |
+
Believe in maltheism instead, you cant go wrong.
|
his/14996325.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996325
|
3 |
+
>tfw we've been living in mud huts all this time
|
4 |
+
/his/bros....
|
5 |
+
--- 14996332
|
6 |
+
"progress" is a meme
|
7 |
+
--- 14996336
|
8 |
+
>>14996325 (OP)
|
9 |
+
Not Americans, they live in paper houses. I legit thought "punching a hole in the wall" was just a metaphor before coming to America.
|
10 |
+
--- 14996339
|
11 |
+
>>14996325 (OP)
|
12 |
+
They're advance mudhuts, with lightbulbs and electricity
|
13 |
+
--- 14996355
|
14 |
+
>>14996325 (OP)
|
15 |
+
Not in murka.
|
16 |
+
--- 14996397
|
17 |
+
>>14996336
|
18 |
+
Are you from one of those countries that build with "brick" that you can knock down if you run into it too hard?
|
19 |
+
--- 14996551
|
20 |
+
>>14996397
|
21 |
+
>oh you make fun of American houses made of wood and paperwall? Well that can only mean you live in a favela!
|
22 |
+
--- 14997518
|
23 |
+
>>14996336
|
24 |
+
>america is so advanced they learnt to build houses out of big plants
|
25 |
+
i bow
|
26 |
+
--- 14997624
|
27 |
+
>>14996325 (OP)
|
28 |
+
Uhm, no, my house is made of based wood, chudcel.
|
29 |
+
--- 14997632
|
30 |
+
clay isn't mud, it's more advanced and durable
|
31 |
+
--- 14997891
|
32 |
+
>>14997632
|
33 |
+
>this is ADVANCED mud
|
34 |
+
--- 14998345
|
35 |
+
>>14997632
|
36 |
+
get factchecked chudpolceljak
|
37 |
+
--- 14998468
|
38 |
+
>>14996355
|
39 |
+
>lights match
|
40 |
+
Heh, nothing personnel.
|
41 |
+
--- 14998470
|
42 |
+
>>14997632
|
43 |
+
>clay is more advanced
|
44 |
+
--- 14998673
|
45 |
+
>>14996355
|
46 |
+
I cum
|
his/14996404.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996404
|
3 |
+
How would have the USSR progressed if legislation like the NEP continued to be implemented and encouraged? Would it have become something akin to Deng's China?
|
4 |
+
--- 14996423
|
5 |
+
>Would it have become something akin to Deng's China?
|
6 |
+
I guess that's accurate, they would larp as Marxists, but would be a semi-capitalist state with a Leninist party structure and dictatorship.
|
7 |
+
Maybe they would shift away from Communism to a paradoxically non-political cult of personality of Lenin (even more) as a revolutionary and state- founder and underplaying his actual political views, like North Korea does with Kim Il-Sung now.
|
8 |
+
--- 14996440
|
9 |
+
>>14996404 (OP)
|
10 |
+
Yes, that was Bukharin's plan.
|
11 |
+
--- 14996515
|
12 |
+
>>14996404 (OP)
|
13 |
+
|
14 |
+
It would have been invaded by Nazi Germany and the whole slavic race would be mostly genocided by germans with the rest returned to slave status. Stalin implemented the reforms he did to quickly industrialize the country because he saw how weak the country was with stuff like the finnish war conflict and, being the vanguard of the revolution, it was a sitting duck in NEP times against the industrialized first world countries. Stalinist industrialization was basically a defensive economy and even America shifted to something similar around the 40's in world war 2.
|
15 |
+
--- 14996522
|
16 |
+
>>14996515
|
17 |
+
>It would have been invaded by Nazi Germany
|
18 |
+
Nazi Germany had every right to attack the Soviet Union though. The Communist International tried to overthrew their government multiple times. The USSR was the aggressor.
|
19 |
+
--- 14996533
|
20 |
+
>>14996522
|
21 |
+
|
22 |
+
No they were trying to liberate it. It was because of the communists that world war 1 ended on both sides of the Russian and German aisle. Bourgeoisie republics are the ones who were throwing masses of workers against each other like they were cattle for the sake of banks in London.
|
23 |
+
--- 14996538
|
24 |
+
>>14996404 (OP)
|
25 |
+
It would have become German property.
|
26 |
+
--- 14996557
|
27 |
+
>>14996533
|
28 |
+
>>14996515
|
29 |
+
Barbarossa was defensive. The Soviet Union was overthrowing governments all over Europe prior to the Nazis invading.
|
30 |
+
They tried to coup Germany's government in 1919, 1923. Failed.
|
31 |
+
They overthrew the government of Georgia in '21
|
32 |
+
They tried to overthrow the governments of Estonia, Lithituia and Finland after the war. They got btfo'd.
|
33 |
+
This BS about Stalin needing to industrialize... its because was preparing to invade Europe and spread communism. It wasn't for defensive purposes. Hitler was protecting Europe from communism. Hitler had no intentions of killing slavs or enslaving them. That's just Soviet war propaganda.
|
34 |
+
--- 14996559
|
35 |
+
>>14996533
|
36 |
+
|
37 |
+
They're still actually doing this today with the Ukraine conflict and everything in the middle east too. The national state doesn't even exist anymore in the age of globalization and yet millions of working people are being sent to their deaths for the sake of banks in NYC, Moscow, and London
|
38 |
+
--- 14996566
|
39 |
+
>>14996559
|
40 |
+
Ukraine's conflict is caused by Jewish bankers, the same people who funded the Bolsheviks
|
41 |
+
--- 14996586
|
42 |
+
>>14996557
|
43 |
+
|
44 |
+
The USSR was the spearhead of the proletarian revolution. It was meant to be a force to liberate the proletariat in all countries and construct their own dictatorial republics that focused on people's needs and industrialization. In the aftermath of world war 2, the USSR helped to establish socialist republics across eastern Europe that got rid of everyone's debts to the prior landlord aristocracy and gave these countries stuff like tractors and modern agricultural equipment/luxuries which they didn't really have before. The nazis were a force of resentment funded by people like Henry Ford and ironically several jewish bankers who believed in the existence of the national state and world war as a way to keep the economy functioning in crises of overproduction like the great depression in the 30's.
|
45 |
+
--- 14996598
|
46 |
+
>>14996522
|
47 |
+
>>14996557
|
48 |
+
|
49 |
+
stalin was adept of the "socialism in one country" and everything he took over prior to 41 was after the MR pact, AKA, something that germany knew and let flow.
|
50 |
+
|
51 |
+
you might say that barbarossa was a pre-emptive strike, a "better kick'em now than in 2 years" move, but it certainly wasn't a defensive action, especially when they were actual plans of conquest and ressource apropriation.
|
52 |
+
--- 14996608
|
53 |
+
>>14996586
|
54 |
+
|
55 |
+
I'm not saying the USSR is perfect, but everything they did especially after the 20's was out of protecting themselves. The entire reason they couldn't adapt as easily as China did is because they invested so much of their budget to military expendenture out of fear for another world war conflict
|
56 |
+
--- 14996635
|
57 |
+
>>14996586
|
58 |
+
>The USSR was the spearhead of the proletarian revolution
|
59 |
+
I.g. was trying to spread Judaeo-Boleshvism - its tyranny and terror. The USSR was lead by a cabal of Christ-killers who murdered millions of Christians, and were planning to ethnically cleanse Europe of white Christians and European culture. Fascism was a necessary, organic reaction to communist counter-revolution against civilization.
|
60 |
+
>>14996598
|
61 |
+
>stalin was adept of the "socialism in one country"
|
62 |
+
Which is a complete lie. He invaded Georgia, Spain, and even tried to over-run Poland. He was a schemer, a lying pedophile who wanted world, Jewish domination of Europe. Barbarossa was absolutely defensive because the Communist International attacked Germany and Europe dozens of times just before WW2 with coups and invasions. You can't claim German's counter-attack to Soviet aggression is not defensive.
|
63 |
+
--- 14996645
|
64 |
+
>>14996608
|
65 |
+
>but everything they did especially after the 20's was out of protecting themselves.
|
66 |
+
Like trying to coup Germany's government, invade Finland and Estonia?
|
67 |
+
Overthrowing Georgia's government?
|
68 |
+
Who's stupid enough to believe the Soviet Union was protecting itself by invading sovereign countries to impose communism?
|
69 |
+
--- 14996665
|
70 |
+
>>14996635
|
71 |
+
>Georgia
|
72 |
+
russian empire and part of the USSR as it claimed
|
73 |
+
>Spain
|
74 |
+
he supported local communist, he did not took over them
|
75 |
+
>Communist International attacked Germany and Europe dozens of times just before WW2 with coups and invasions
|
76 |
+
post WW1 chaos was not stalin, and everything after was from local soviets.
|
77 |
+
>He was a schemer, a lying pedophile who wanted world, Jewish domination of Europe
|
78 |
+
|
79 |
+
why do i even bother ? cope and go fight your imaginary jew in your head you schizo.
|
80 |
+
--- 14996697
|
81 |
+
>>14996665
|
82 |
+
>russian empire and part of the USSR as it claimed
|
83 |
+
The USSR wasn't the Russian Empire (they destroyed0) and it had no claim to Georgia because they declared independence.
|
84 |
+
>post WW1 chaos was not stalin, and everything after was from local soviets.
|
85 |
+
Stalin was a military commander who participated in those wars. He was engaged in combat with Piłsudski at Warsaw, only to be defeated. Tukhachevsky blamed Stalin for it which is why he killed him.
|
86 |
+
>he supported local communist, he did not took over them
|
87 |
+
Spain was invade by communist troops on his fucking orders. He tried to implement a communist government in Spain only to be stopped by Franco's heroism.
|
88 |
+
>cope and go fight your imaginary jew in your head you schizo.
|
89 |
+
Seethe more, leftypol tranny. You will never be a woman and your propaganda will not work here. You jews are done.
|
90 |
+
--- 14996906
|
91 |
+
>>14996440
|
92 |
+
Bukharin definitely held a right position in the Bolsheviks on the NEP but he was still an avowed Marxist and very theoretically intelligent. In contrast, Deng's position in the Communist Party was as part of the military-nationalist faction.
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
Also the NEP and Deng's market liberalisation don't exactly share an overlap in practice, reasoning or goals.
|
95 |
+
--- 14996933
|
96 |
+
>>14996515
|
97 |
+
Tales of the atrocities committed by the Bolsheviks during the mass collectivizations is one of the main reasons why the NSDAP won the worker's vote over the KPD. If the Soviet Union had become a centralized but somewhat functioning economy with better international relationships instead of a complete hellhole bent on conquering its neighbors there's a chance the Nazis wouldn't have ever won.
|
98 |
+
--- 14996962
|
99 |
+
>>14996906
|
100 |
+
>Deng's position in the Communist Party was as part of the military-nationalist faction.
|
101 |
+
Bukhrain shifted to the right, was the inventor of "socialism in one country" which essentially replaced Soviet internationalism with national interests. Deng studied Bukharin.
|
102 |
+
>Also the NEP and Deng's market liberalisation don't exactly share an overlap in practice, reasoning or goals.
|
103 |
+
Bukharin's "ENRICH YOURSELVES!" was no different than Deng's "Its glorious to be rich."
|
104 |
+
You're forgetting Bukharin was an opportunist who shifted from the Communist to Stalin's right all because he hated Trotsky and loved his friendship with Koba over actual principles
|
105 |
+
--- 14998692
|
106 |
+
>>14996962
|
107 |
+
>Deng studied Bukhrain
|
108 |
+
No shit, I've not doubt Deng read widely. I'd suggest reading some of Bukharin's work it holds a lot of merit. There is a reason that apart from Lenin he was probably the 2nd most respected theorist in the Bolsheviks between 1917 and the later years of the power struggle.
|
109 |
+
>"ENRICH YOURSELVES!"
|
110 |
+
Played out argument, I've no doubt you don't know what the context of this cock-up was. The polemics of the era have been so watered down by contemporary "Marxists" that they hold little to no water anymore. Also very different context to Deng. Again NEP and Privatisation of China were very clearly different things that happened at different stages in each nations experiments with socialist governance.
|
111 |
+
>Opportunist
|
112 |
+
Imagine calling Bukharin and opportunist and not Trotsky, that's hilarious. Also I find it funny you criticise Bukhrain's positon on the NEP and not Trotsky way more retarded position on War Communism. One worked as a transitionary system, the other, nearly sunk the whole project Soviet 60 years early.
|
113 |
+
>friendship with Koba
|
114 |
+
He used to draw little cartoons for Stalin, I think that's very cute don't you?
|
115 |
+
>Socialism in one country
|
116 |
+
ML defence of SiOC is dumb but alas it's still not as bad as critiques of it presented by Trots are.
|
117 |
+
|
118 |
+
Please, please for the love of God realise that there is more to the Bolsheviks than just Stalin and Trotsky (Menshevik). Reducing it to Lenin's arguably worst successors does you a theoretical disservice in available literature and a disservice to the legacy of the early Central Committee.
|
his/14996567.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996567
|
3 |
+
We should kill every single baby so that we guarantee they go to heaven.
|
4 |
+
--- 14998261
|
5 |
+
>>14996567 (OP)
|
6 |
+
How many have you killed so far?
|
7 |
+
--- 14998274
|
8 |
+
>>14996567 (OP)
|
9 |
+
It would be the most humane thing to do if heaven existed. Christ bros... its time to strange our children.
|
10 |
+
--- 14998303
|
11 |
+
>>14996567 (OP)
|
12 |
+
>>14998261
|
13 |
+
>>14998274
|
14 |
+
Is the quest of life to reach Heaven for Heanen's sake or to earn Heaven through living righteously?
|
15 |
+
--- 14998564
|
16 |
+
why dont you start doing it op?
|
17 |
+
--- 14998569
|
18 |
+
based and christpilled
|
19 |
+
--- 14998571
|
20 |
+
In Islam you automatically go to heaven if you die before age 8
|
21 |
+
|
22 |
+
I asked my parents to kill me so that I could go to heaven without worrying about the apocalypse and shit
|
23 |
+
--- 14999240
|
24 |
+
>"And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it, and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the earth."
|
25 |
+
>Genesis 1:28
|
26 |
+
can't fulfill the cultural mandate if you kill every children
|
27 |
+
--- 14999425
|
28 |
+
>>14996567 (OP)
|
29 |
+
masterbaiter
|
30 |
+
--- 14999473
|
31 |
+
>>14999240
|
32 |
+
I recognize that I am working against God's plan, but I am willing to sacrifice my own soul in order to save the souls of as many babies as possible, that is, by killing them.
|
33 |
+
|
34 |
+
also this is a stupid discussion since it just boils down to whether utilitarianism is compatible with Christian ethics, the answer to which is an obvious "no"
|
35 |
+
--- 14999530
|
36 |
+
>>14999473
|
37 |
+
I'm not so sure if the answer is completely obvious. Some theodicies seemingly depend on a consequentialist view of ethics.
|
his/14996570.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996570
|
3 |
+
Why do Catholics think gold trinkets and praying to statues brings them closer to God? You can't get much more unbiblical than believing any man including the Pope can be infallible. Catholicism is one of the ultimate heresies.
|
4 |
+
--- 14996580
|
5 |
+
>muh bible
|
6 |
+
The bible says the earth was created in 7 days, that Joshua stopped the sun, that PI = 3, etc.
|
7 |
+
--- 14996584
|
8 |
+
>>14996580
|
9 |
+
Why do atheists always feel so compelled to reply to Christian threads? Are they trying to override their conscience and convince themselves they don't need God?
|
10 |
+
--- 14996587
|
11 |
+
>>14996570 (OP)
|
12 |
+
Luther had his “big realization” on the toilet
|
13 |
+
--- 14996599
|
14 |
+
>>14996587
|
15 |
+
Luther was an antisemite and a bootlicker, he was a precursor to Hitler and his ideology brought about the destruction of Germany
|
16 |
+
--- 14996606
|
17 |
+
>>14996599
|
18 |
+
Germany is doing relatively well in the world though
|
19 |
+
--- 14996615
|
20 |
+
>>14996599
|
21 |
+
Many of the early church fathers hated Jews and so did many early Christians
|
22 |
+
--- 14996784
|
23 |
+
>>14996570 (OP)
|
24 |
+
>Why do Catholics think gold trinkets and praying to statues brings them closer to God? You can't get much more unbiblical than…
|
25 |
+
Catholics find God through the Church first and foremost, not through private reading of scripture. If you are sincere in looking for the answer to your question (I have a suspicion not), that will be the beginning of your answer.
|
26 |
+
--- 14996787
|
27 |
+
>>14996584
|
28 |
+
why do muh atheists
|
29 |
+
--- 14996790
|
30 |
+
>>14996615
|
31 |
+
Early Christians WERE Jews you coping delusional phelgmskin
|
32 |
+
--- 14996857
|
33 |
+
>>14996790
|
34 |
+
Read any of the literature of the early church fathers, 300a.d onward and they refer to Jews as Christ killers and forbid Christians from participating in Jewish holidays with Jews, why do you think Christians celebrate Easter and not Passover
|
35 |
+
--- 14996876
|
36 |
+
>>14996599
|
37 |
+
dude you are making him sound better than he actually was
|
38 |
+
--- 14997262
|
39 |
+
>>14996584
|
40 |
+
Calvin said that atheists spend their entire lives trying in vain to convince themselves God doesn't exist, and because they know He does exist, they feel incredible guilt over the sin, which drives them to try harder to extirpate their knowledge of Him in the hopes of feeling peace after.
|
41 |
+
--- 14998554
|
42 |
+
>>14996599
|
43 |
+
wtf i love luther now
|
44 |
+
--- 14998565
|
45 |
+
>>14997262
|
46 |
+
Why do Christians spend their whole lives annoying other people about their Jewish sky king?
|
47 |
+
--- 14998606
|
48 |
+
>>14996570 (OP)
|
49 |
+
Why do Protestants think it's okay to remove 7 books from the Bible and start their own church?
|
50 |
+
--- 14998615
|
51 |
+
>>14998565
|
52 |
+
Why do you find being told the truth annoying?
|
53 |
+
--- 14998622
|
54 |
+
>>14998565
|
55 |
+
Source on chick
|
56 |
+
--- 14998626
|
57 |
+
>>14998565
|
58 |
+
nose piercing detected
|
59 |
+
|
60 |
+
doubt created
|
61 |
+
--- 14998629
|
62 |
+
>>14998615
|
63 |
+
Calvin = LORD
|
64 |
+
--- 14998632
|
65 |
+
>>14998606
|
66 |
+
those 7 books were shit and the Prots should have pushed harder against 2 Peter, too
|
67 |
+
--- 14998634
|
68 |
+
>>14998629
|
69 |
+
No Anon. Calvin was just a servant of the Lord
|
70 |
+
--- 14998658
|
71 |
+
>>14998634
|
72 |
+
Calvin is the fourth person of the trinity
|
73 |
+
--- 14998679
|
74 |
+
>>14998658
|
75 |
+
Ironic blasphemy is still blasphemy
|
76 |
+
--- 14998846
|
77 |
+
>>14998679
|
78 |
+
In the beginning there was the Word, and the Word was with God. Then Calvin came along and abrogated the Word.
|
79 |
+
--- 14998893
|
80 |
+
>Protestants actually believe that just believing in Jesus is good enough and you don't need to be a good person to get into heaven
|
81 |
+
|
82 |
+
What a pointless fucking "religion". If your religion doesn't require people to do good deeds then it's literaly pointless and shouldn't exist. The participation trophy of theology, just "believe" and you win! So easy!
|
83 |
+
--- 14998908
|
84 |
+
>>14998893
|
85 |
+
All our best behaviour in God’s eyes is as filthy rags.
|
86 |
+
|
87 |
+
That’s where justification and sanctification kick in.
|
88 |
+
--- 14998937
|
89 |
+
>>14998908
|
90 |
+
|
91 |
+
Protestantism at its core is an inherently un-human ideology.
|
92 |
+
|
93 |
+
It rejects tradition, ignores practical aspects of the relationship between a man, the church, and society at large, and removes all the responsibility to be a fully autonomous and responsible person, by making the start and end point of all discussion the bible. There's more to theology than what was written down by men. But somehow literally the only thing that matters is the bible and having faith.
|
94 |
+
|
95 |
+
It's just irresponsible, weird and it's really no surprise that the end result of protestantism, a few hundred years later, is decaying, rootless societies of atomized individuals.
|
96 |
+
--- 14998953
|
97 |
+
>>14998893
|
98 |
+
Jesus let a filthy thief into heaven right fucking after him. Faith alone, bitch boy.
|
99 |
+
--- 14998972
|
100 |
+
>>14996570 (OP)
|
101 |
+
>praying to statues
|
102 |
+
Catholics pray to God. They just face the symbols. They're not praying to the symbols themselves.
|
103 |
+
--- 14998973
|
104 |
+
>>14998937
|
105 |
+
Christians are justified by the sacrifice of Christ, and sanctified by the holy spirit, there is no need for theology or churches, you are saved by god
|
106 |
+
--- 14998987
|
107 |
+
>>14998972
|
108 |
+
Oh God, Oh God, I'm so scared right now dont't know what to do
|
109 |
+
I THINK I may have accidentally worshiped a statue of the VIRGIN mary? HW I DON'*T WANT TO GOT OT HELL
|
110 |
+
I don't wwannta go to hell, what do I do ?
|
111 |
+
I worshipped the idolcon by accident it wasn't on purpose what d
|
112 |
+
I'm so scared right now
|
113 |
+
--- 14998994
|
114 |
+
>>14998973
|
115 |
+
|
116 |
+
How convenient. Jesus already did everything, so you can just sit back and not actively try to lead a virtuous life. Jesus died and made this world into one big eternal party with no responsibilities, I see. Just as long as you believe, you're golden. What a scam. There's just no reason at all for this "religion" to exist then even according to its own mantra.
|
117 |
+
|
118 |
+
If religion has no earthly purpose then what are you even doing?
|
119 |
+
--- 14998999
|
120 |
+
>>14998994
|
121 |
+
>Jesus died and made this world into one big eternal party with no responsibilities
|
122 |
+
It's not supposed to go on forever
|
123 |
+
--- 14999003
|
124 |
+
>>14998994
|
125 |
+
According to Christian theology, we’re ALL bad and need forgiveness.
|
126 |
+
|
127 |
+
If you suddenly only have faith when you’re on the point of dying and have led a terrible life, that counts just as much as someone who led a totally virtuous life
|
128 |
+
|
129 |
+
If you have a problem with that, you aren’t a Christian
|
130 |
+
--- 14999166
|
131 |
+
>>14998987
|
132 |
+
what?
|
133 |
+
--- 14999172
|
134 |
+
Just remove 'quirky' Paul as well and allow homos, OH WAIT
|
135 |
+
--- 14999188
|
136 |
+
I can't take the opinion of any Christian who doesn't call himself Catholic seriously. The terms are synonymous, calling yourself an anti-Catholic is the socially acceptable way for nominal Christians to renounce Christianity.
|
137 |
+
--- 14999198
|
138 |
+
>>14999188
|
139 |
+
The Lutheran and Reformed churches describe themselves as Catholic in their confessions of faith
|
140 |
+
--- 14999199
|
141 |
+
>>14999166
|
142 |
+
I accidentally worshiped an idol, and now I feel bad ;(
|
143 |
+
I was just supposed to venerate an icon, but it went all wrong
|
144 |
+
--- 14999223
|
145 |
+
>>14999199
|
146 |
+
1. There's a difference between veneration and worship; I venerate my parents.
|
147 |
+
2. Catholics don't venerate the icon of Mary, they venerate Mary herself.
|
148 |
+
3. Even if they did venerate the icon itself that wouldn't be a heresy, as long as they don't worship it or her.
|
149 |
+
--- 14999227
|
150 |
+
>>14999223
|
151 |
+
There is no difference between veneration and worship.
|
152 |
+
--- 14999232
|
153 |
+
>>14999003
|
154 |
+
>If you suddenly only have faith when you’re on the point of dying and have led a terrible life, that counts just as much as someone who led a totally virtuous life
|
155 |
+
Only those who have spent a lifetime trying to make themselves absolutely perfect, scarcely spending a moment in any endeavor besides pleasing God, can be said to have faith. Paying lip service to His authority doesn't cut it.
|
156 |
+
--- 14999245
|
157 |
+
>>14999232
|
158 |
+
No man will ever be saved by his works. Even if he did that which no man has ever done and strove for perfection and perfect service before God it wouldn't be a fraction of enough to deal with his sin. The only way one can be right before God is though the righteousness and sacrifice of the sin-bearer, which one receives the benefits of by believing in Him.
|
159 |
+
--- 14999261
|
160 |
+
>>14999227
|
161 |
+
worship is reverence PLUS adoration of "a deity"
|
162 |
+
Mary isn't a deity in Catholicism.
|
163 |
+
You didn't adore and venerate Mary or the icon of her.
|
164 |
+
--- 14999266
|
165 |
+
>>14999261
|
166 |
+
So the part that makes something worship is the mouthing of the words "a deity" and not the act of falling down in worship before an object? Pagans weren't idolaters because they didn't say the rocks themselves were gods?
|
167 |
+
--- 14999289
|
168 |
+
>>14999266
|
169 |
+
Two identical actions can have different meanings depending on intent. Two people kneel before an image of Christ, look on it longingly, and pray. That's the same act, yet one may be praying to the image itself, while the other may be praying to Christ Himself.
|
170 |
+
|
171 |
+
Intent and meaning can be separate from action. It depends if the Pagans were worshiping the rocks or some perceived gods (not the rocks themselves) while they were "falling down in worship before an object."
|
172 |
+
--- 14999358
|
173 |
+
>>14999289
|
174 |
+
>That's the same act, yet one may be praying to the image itself, while the other may be praying to Christ Himself.
|
175 |
+
And it is irrelevant as far as the scripture is concerned, since God condemns any worship through an object, even that which pretends to be directed to Him.
|
176 |
+
>Intent and meaning can be separate from action
|
177 |
+
So it's worship if Baal is the object, and not worship if Mary is the object. Special pleading. If the act of worship consists simply in the object idolatry could not be condemned. If Moses were to find a man in his tent bowed before an image of a strange god, do you think he would let him go free if he pleaded that he was only venerating, not worshipping?
|
178 |
+
>It depends if the Pagans were worshiping the rocks or some perceived gods (not the rocks themselves) while they were "falling down in worship before an object."
|
179 |
+
The Romans defended their idolatry by claiming they worshipped not the image, but the god depicted by the image. Was the early church, including the inspired apostles in the New Testament itself, wrong to call them idolaters?
|
180 |
+
--- 14999370
|
181 |
+
So, like, how do I venerate Mary
|
182 |
+
Do I just look at the icon and think happy thoughts?
|
183 |
+
--- 14999426
|
184 |
+
>>14999358
|
185 |
+
>worship through an object
|
186 |
+
If people dress up to go to church do they "worship through" wearing slightly nicer clothes?
|
187 |
+
Just because people pray in the presence of an object like a statue doesn't mean they're praying TO that statue.
|
188 |
+
>if Baal is an object, but not if Mary is the object.
|
189 |
+
>do you think Moses would let him go free if he pleaded that he was only venerating, not worshipping?
|
190 |
+
I'm not going to speculate about what Moses would do. I understand that it looks like one thing, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is that act/thing. There are no doubt people who worship the Mary statue and those who worship Jesus Christ in the presence, and while facing the Mary statue. I suspect the early Church wanted to ensure it caught all those in the first category of Romans. I'm not prepared to discount the possibility that the Romans who said what you claim they said were being truthful.
|
191 |
+
I think the language used in the NT about the collective Roman pagans referred to a subset of them who worshiped the images.
|
192 |
+
--- 14999435
|
193 |
+
>>14999245
|
194 |
+
If we're being extremely generous we could assume that protestants are just getting mired in semantics and ignoring some key verses, but in reality we all know they're just implicitly outing themselves as infidels.
|
195 |
+
>Even if he did that which no man has ever done and strove for perfection
|
196 |
+
What more can a man say of such blasphemy? He's already said all that needs to be said. He couldn't even bring himself to write "achieve perfection," he genuinely believes no one should try to be perfect, in spite of scripture.
|
197 |
+
--- 14999438
|
198 |
+
>>14999370
|
199 |
+
Honor her by loving God through her and humbly requesting to be more like her.
|
200 |
+
--- 14999440
|
201 |
+
>>14999435
|
202 |
+
Nobody has ever tried to be perfect. They have all failed through their own wills. All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
|
203 |
+
--- 14999463
|
204 |
+
>>14999426
|
205 |
+
>If people dress up to go to church do they "worship through" wearing slightly nicer clothes?
|
206 |
+
Do they pilgrimage to a far removed image of their clothes up on a hill before falling down before it and shouting prayers to their clothes?
|
207 |
+
>Just because people pray in the presence of an object like a statue doesn't mean they're praying TO that statue.
|
208 |
+
This would hold water if the statue's presence were incidental. However, they walk up to it, get on their knees, and pray before it, generally to the creature whose image it bears. They are worshipping the image. Its presence is not incidental, it is the focus of their faith.
|
209 |
+
>I'm not going to speculate about what Moses would do.
|
210 |
+
You know exactly what he would do, what the law of God would require him to do. Why do you not fead the wrath of God? You need to repent and flee to Christ for mercy.
|
211 |
+
>I understand that it looks like one thing, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is that act/thing.
|
212 |
+
This leaves us without any ability to do what scripture does and commands us to do, to condemn or even avoid idolatry, because there is nothing which could not be excused this way. The Lord warned us how we might avoid idolatry: "I am the Lord, that is my name, my glory I will not share with another, neither my praise with a graven image". Any religious worship of any created thing is strictly forbidden, it could not be clearer. Flee from these traditions of men, they separate you from God.
|
213 |
+
>I'm not prepared to discount the possibility that the Romans who said what you claim they said were being truthful.
|
214 |
+
So the fathers were wrong? Because they rejected that argument.
|
215 |
+
>referred to a subset of them who worshiped the images.
|
216 |
+
How did the apostles know they worshipped them and didn't merely venerate them?
|
217 |
+
--- 14999529
|
218 |
+
Protestants don’t encounter God at church, sums it up
|
219 |
+
--- 14999605
|
220 |
+
>Catholics need a mediator for them and God
|
221 |
+
>a lot of them cannot recite verses
|
222 |
+
No wonder the majority of their followers are sub 90 IQ Latinos and self righteous zoomers.
|
223 |
+
--- 14999662
|
224 |
+
>>14999605
|
225 |
+
Catholics encounter God and the scriptures at church
|
226 |
+
--- 14999666
|
227 |
+
>>14999662
|
228 |
+
God isn't a cracker
|
229 |
+
--- 14999674
|
230 |
+
>>14999666
|
231 |
+
>666
|
232 |
+
The Lord is true bread
|
233 |
+
--- 14999676
|
234 |
+
>>14996570 (OP)
|
235 |
+
YHWH loved being shown off in gold and with icons of his slaves. The Ark of the Covenant was gold plated and had Cherub angels mounted on it.
|
236 |
+
--- 14999680
|
237 |
+
>>14999605
|
238 |
+
|
239 |
+
>protestants want to larp as a faithful person without putting in effort to actually be a good and righteous person in their every day life
|
240 |
+
--- 14999682
|
241 |
+
>>14999666
|
242 |
+
Protestants: God is not a bread!
|
243 |
+
Jesus: I AM bread (John 8:35) and I AM literally bread (John 6:51), my flesh is bread (Matthew 26)
|
244 |
+
God is as much as bread as he is light, gate and truth. If you dont take these to your heart, you will never understand God.
|
245 |
+
--- 14999690
|
246 |
+
>>14999674
|
247 |
+
Bread is a false god and a false sacrifice. Repent of your popish religion
|
248 |
+
--- 14999702
|
249 |
+
>>14999680
|
250 |
+
>>14999662
|
251 |
+
>I’m a Christian because I let a priest read the Bible to me
|
252 |
+
Lmao
|
253 |
+
--- 14999707
|
254 |
+
>>14999676
|
255 |
+
> YHWH loved being shown off in gold and with icons of his slaves
|
256 |
+
I worship this Jew gold warlord slaver desert aesthetic, it is truly fitting of God
|
257 |
+
--- 14999710
|
258 |
+
>>14999702
|
259 |
+
That was the Church for 1500 years, as it is. Nearly all the existent manuscripts we have are because they were from liturgical copies. Do you think everyone just had a "bible" and was literate.. ..and salvation revolved around literacy? Do you even stop and think about it for a second?
|
260 |
+
--- 14999720
|
261 |
+
The Temple was finely decorated
|
262 |
+
If I want it to be that way why shouldn't it?
|
263 |
+
I'm new to Christianity so I haven't read the Bible fully yet, are there any verses in the New Testament which state that churches should be unadorned and simple?
|
264 |
+
--- 14999729
|
265 |
+
>>14999707
|
266 |
+
i dont know if this post is a based bronze age history knower take or cringe shittheist butthurt moans
|
267 |
+
--- 14999730
|
268 |
+
>>14999710
|
269 |
+
>the reformation didn’t happen until the printing press was invented and more people became literate
|
270 |
+
--- 14999731
|
271 |
+
God is an artist in the purest sense of the world
|
272 |
+
Having artists within a community get commissions from the local Church to produce artwork for the Church is just one way to fulfil a vocation that God has given to mankind, that of the artist
|
273 |
+
--- 14999738
|
274 |
+
>>14999730
|
275 |
+
>the reformation didn’t happen until the printing press was invented and more people became literate
|
276 |
+
The ability to produce and distribute Bibles and other religious texts in the vernacular also allowed more people to read and interpret the Bible for themselves, which was a central tenet of the Protestant movement.
|
277 |
+
--- 14999741
|
278 |
+
>>14999720
|
279 |
+
>I'm new to Christianity so I haven't read the Bible fully yet, are there any verses in the New Testament which state that churches should be unadorned and simple?
|
280 |
+
>And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin.
|
281 |
+
>And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
|
282 |
+
Scripture itself is written in plain language that is profoundly edifying without any need of flowery words. God's aesthetic preferences are clear.
|
283 |
+
--- 14999771
|
284 |
+
>>14999741
|
285 |
+
>God's aesthetic preferences are clear
|
286 |
+
Golden & serpentine
|
287 |
+
--- 14999782
|
288 |
+
>>14999741
|
289 |
+
Well if you try to adapt that verse to churches then it seems to me that churches are wrong and that we should be in nature, not in buildings
|
290 |
+
I do remember something about the Tabernacle being very beautiful but that God actually didn't want Solomon to build the Temple?
|
291 |
+
Is this what you mean when you say that God's preference is clear?
|
292 |
+
I don't read Hebrew, Aramaic or Koine Greek so I'm not sure whether it is plain or not
|
293 |
+
--- 14999877
|
294 |
+
What do Catholics hope to gain by praying to dead saints? Are they supposed to be omnipresent or omniscient such that they are able to hear and respond to the prayers of millions around the world?
|
his/14996581.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996581
|
3 |
+
This is what chuds actually believe
|
4 |
+
--- 14996671
|
5 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
6 |
+
when you read physical descriptions of who occupied the committee of public safety during the french revolution such as Robespierre, the image isn't too far off. the french revolution was spear headed by ugly freaks
|
7 |
+
--- 14996682
|
8 |
+
>>14996671
|
9 |
+
This
|
10 |
+
--- 14996699
|
11 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
12 |
+
That's basically it but I don't see any Jews in it
|
13 |
+
--- 14996721
|
14 |
+
>>14996671
|
15 |
+
Ugly psychotics too. No wonder the corsican overthrew the incompetent idiots.
|
16 |
+
--- 14996730
|
17 |
+
>>14996671
|
18 |
+
Saint-Just was a chad tho
|
19 |
+
--- 14996740
|
20 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
21 |
+
Correct.
|
22 |
+
Every single authoritarian regime claims to have good intentions. They all have claimed that they were restricting the rights of man because those rights got in the way of the regime bringing forth a better, more just world.
|
23 |
+
Chaos ensues every time.
|
24 |
+
--- 14996752
|
25 |
+
>>14996730
|
26 |
+
just read his descirption. he was described as a anxiety ridden manlet with a long face. typical resentment fueled loser. not unpleasant to look at, but far from a chad
|
27 |
+
only danton was tall and built, and everyone knows he basically resembled a gorilla with how he ugly he was
|
28 |
+
--- 14996833
|
29 |
+
ITT: seething incels
|
30 |
+
--- 14996864
|
31 |
+
Correct. Except for the Covid shit. Coronavirus was just a disease. I don't think there was anything poisonous in the vaccine, although the incentives for the vaccine may have been unjust.
|
32 |
+
--- 14996889
|
33 |
+
Source and artist on pic?
|
34 |
+
--- 14996901
|
35 |
+
Keyed but chuds believe in Meritocracy. End yourself.
|
36 |
+
--- 14996921
|
37 |
+
>>14996671
|
38 |
+
>the french revolution was spear headed by ugly freaks
|
39 |
+
What zero pussy does to a mf
|
40 |
+
--- 14996947
|
41 |
+
>>14996921
|
42 |
+
Buh shuh mofugguh da shaw raite
|
43 |
+
--- 14996967
|
44 |
+
>>14996752
|
45 |
+
>manlet
|
46 |
+
He was like 1.68, that was average height at the time. Napoleon was about the same height. Cope harder, Chud.
|
47 |
+
--- 14996970
|
48 |
+
>>14996864
|
49 |
+
I think the vaccine is still immoral just because it hadn't been tested properly. And it also struck me as weird that it was being marketed as a cure instead of as a vaccine.
|
50 |
+
--- 14996972
|
51 |
+
>>14996901
|
52 |
+
>chuds believe in Meritocracy
|
53 |
+
Lmao
|
54 |
+
>>14996752
|
55 |
+
Every notable European conqueror in the past 500 years was a manlet. Deal with it.
|
56 |
+
--- 14997031
|
57 |
+
>>14996972
|
58 |
+
No argument detected.
|
59 |
+
--- 14997098
|
60 |
+
Why is everyone in 2021 brown?
|
61 |
+
--- 14997128
|
62 |
+
>>14996671
|
63 |
+
Danton looks cool though. Like a proper brawler. Men shouldn't be dandy pretty boys, being scared and burly is good.
|
64 |
+
--- 14997129
|
65 |
+
>>14996721
|
66 |
+
I don't know about incompetent. But they were rather rabid and well of course had this retarded obsession with remaking the world in their image.
|
67 |
+
Desmoulins wasn't all bad I guess.
|
68 |
+
>>14996972
|
69 |
+
Some very annoying ones do.
|
70 |
+
>>14996901
|
71 |
+
Mikkacels devolve into racist communists ep #16281
|
72 |
+
I bid you return to Twitter.
|
73 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
74 |
+
Partially true although I don't think the Masons were actually involved in this one, they're more of an Anglo thing.
|
75 |
+
--- 14997133
|
76 |
+
>>14997098
|
77 |
+
Why did you time-travel to 2021?
|
78 |
+
--- 14997149
|
79 |
+
>>14996967
|
80 |
+
Napoleon was 5'2
|
81 |
+
--- 14997153
|
82 |
+
>>14996671
|
83 |
+
>this person is ugly so they are bad
|
84 |
+
im trying to figure out what could happen in a persons life to make them this retarded
|
85 |
+
--- 14997168
|
86 |
+
>>14997129
|
87 |
+
>racist communists
|
88 |
+
?
|
89 |
+
--- 14997193
|
90 |
+
>>14997153
|
91 |
+
Murrican education.
|
92 |
+
|
93 |
+
It's funny though. Their founding fathers would be absolutely disgusted if they saw modern Americans being such monarchist chuds.
|
94 |
+
--- 14997228
|
95 |
+
>>14997129
|
96 |
+
The only communists are those claiming benefits on behalf of imagined constructions.
|
97 |
+
--- 14997354
|
98 |
+
>>14997133
|
99 |
+
I LIVED through 2021, but in this instance I was asking why the specific cartoon OP posted depicts all the people in 2021 as either brown or a skeleton.
|
100 |
+
--- 14997410
|
101 |
+
>>14997098
|
102 |
+
Representation of modern demographics.
|
103 |
+
--- 14997416
|
104 |
+
>>14997354
|
105 |
+
I have no idea but maybe its something about the great replacement,
|
106 |
+
--- 14997446
|
107 |
+
>>14996699
|
108 |
+
Jews were banned from France during this time i believe
|
109 |
+
|
110 |
+
Also, Jacobins did nothing wrong
|
111 |
+
--- 14997508
|
112 |
+
Tbf the war in the Vendée wasn't historically unique.
|
113 |
+
|
114 |
+
>Vendeans: I don't want a bunch of libtard-libcucks coming over here from crime-plagued Paris and telling me what to do. Those university kids might know Latin and Greek but they don't know shit about nothin'
|
115 |
+
>Also Vendeans: The nobility? Yeah, they can push me around. They're just better than the rest of us. If they weren't, how come they're rich and we're not?
|
116 |
+
|
117 |
+
THAT BEING SAID, in this case, part of the Vendeans' sympathy for the nobility was due to the fact that the province was far more egalitarian than most of the rest of the country. The nobles in the Vendée didn't have a drastically better life than the commoners and often had to work alongside them, so the Vendeans' couldn't understand why most of the rest of France (especially in the cities and in areas of grossest wealth disparity) were growing violently enraged at the nobles and so eager to end the old order.
|
118 |
+
--- 14997535
|
119 |
+
>>14997508
|
120 |
+
What`s funny is that even though the Jacobins were considered extremely radical leftists, they still didn`t even consider peasants real citizens lmao
|
121 |
+
--- 14997560
|
122 |
+
>>14997446
|
123 |
+
They were not since Valois started conquering the east, they just had to stay in their turf. Louis edicted tolerance for them. Jacobins did nothing of note and promptly disappeared.
|
124 |
+
--- 14997568
|
125 |
+
>>14997508
|
126 |
+
Meme. The bassin parisien was the most egalitarian part of the kingdom (naturally so). Living conditions don't factor in that. And go back to youtube comment sections.
|
127 |
+
>>14997535
|
128 |
+
This isn't even a meme where did you pick that up, seriously?
|
129 |
+
--- 14997574
|
130 |
+
>>14997560
|
131 |
+
French Republican calendar
|
132 |
+
|
133 |
+
I`ll accept your concession now, sweaty
|
134 |
+
--- 14997581
|
135 |
+
>>14997574
|
136 |
+
For your sake I'll pretend as if nothing was written here
|
137 |
+
--- 14997605
|
138 |
+
>>14997560
|
139 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
140 |
+
|
141 |
+
My mom actually believed Robespierre was a Jew.
|
142 |
+
--- 14997635
|
143 |
+
>>14997153
|
144 |
+
>what are spiteful mutants
|
145 |
+
--- 14997646
|
146 |
+
>>14997568
|
147 |
+
>This isn't even a meme where did you pick that up, seriously?
|
148 |
+
|
149 |
+
Didn`t you need to be a landowner and pay a certain amount of tax to be considered a citizen even in the new regime?
|
150 |
+
--- 14997658
|
151 |
+
>>14997581
|
152 |
+
Fun fact:
|
153 |
+
The French Republican Calendar is still in use in some counties of Norway and Estonia
|
154 |
+
--- 14997678
|
155 |
+
>>14997646
|
156 |
+
No, no you didn't, you needed a tax to participate in certain duties, to be an active citizen, but you could still be a passive citizen. This wasn't unanimously appreciated but even in Antiquity where citizenship was much more prized, these kind of censitary distinctions existed inside the body of citizens.
|
157 |
+
--- 14997687
|
158 |
+
>>14997658
|
159 |
+
I doubt they use it on a day to day basis
|
160 |
+
--- 14997781
|
161 |
+
>>14996833
|
162 |
+
how is in celhood related to this thread about french revolution moron
|
163 |
+
--- 14997835
|
164 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
165 |
+
>ITT: delusional monarchist serfs
|
166 |
+
You're no better than the commies, thinking you'll be living a better life when the right regime takes over, fantasizing about doing poetry or being a paramilitary fashion designer
|
167 |
+
--- 14997853
|
168 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
169 |
+
actually it's the censored version
|
170 |
+
--- 14997859
|
171 |
+
>>14996889
|
172 |
+
Chudonardo Chud Vinci
|
173 |
+
--- 14997865
|
174 |
+
>>14997193
|
175 |
+
No self awareness.
|
176 |
+
--- 14997916
|
177 |
+
>>14997508
|
178 |
+
The French royals demanded way less from the peasants than the Convention and the Directory did.
|
179 |
+
--- 14997980
|
180 |
+
>>14996889
|
181 |
+
plantu
|
182 |
+
--- 14997988
|
183 |
+
>>14997916
|
184 |
+
Monarchy did a lot of that shit too. The only thing that's changed is the leaders no longer claim that their authority comes from God. They found out that if they say their authority comes from the people that they govern, they're be able to blame their own subjects for the leadership's mistakes.
|
185 |
+
--- 14998077
|
186 |
+
>>14997835
|
187 |
+
You are no different from a commie, having a serf as a baseline. (Also, XVIIIth century France and serfdom? Seriously?)
|
188 |
+
--- 14998097
|
189 |
+
>>14997635
|
190 |
+
racists
|
191 |
+
--- 14998098
|
192 |
+
>>14997168
|
193 |
+
Operate the same way they're just racist.
|
194 |
+
--- 14998118
|
195 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
196 |
+
And how is it wrong? The republic has been a disaster for France. We have never recovered from the bloodletting under Napoleon, and now the French people live under a government that denies its very existence in favour of a universal laïcité that erases us, until all that is left are vague mutable ideas managed by overseers who view all as nothing more than mechanical parts that can be replaced. It’s fucking grim.
|
197 |
+
--- 14998138
|
198 |
+
>>14998098
|
199 |
+
You are stupid.
|
200 |
+
--- 14998140
|
201 |
+
>>14998118
|
202 |
+
>the church is empty
|
203 |
+
>billions must die
|
204 |
+
--- 14998165
|
205 |
+
>>14998140
|
206 |
+
I’m on year 8 of living under a "temporary state of emergency”. Change that to
|
207 |
+
>my madrassa has been shut down by the department of education
|
208 |
+
>the Ummah has fallen. Millions must die
|
209 |
+
And you would be on to something.
|
210 |
+
"Nos valeurs républicaines" can suck my dick from behind.
|
211 |
+
--- 14998228
|
212 |
+
>>14997153
|
213 |
+
It’s true though. Good, honest, and intelligent people are aware of themselves and understand that your appearance is a reflection of yourself. Meanwhile, retarded, indulgent, and spiteful hambeasts lack the awareness to present good images of themselves. You 100% can and should judge people by how they look because they do have a lot of control over it. That’s why I do not take the opinions of fat people seriously.
|
214 |
+
--- 14998352
|
215 |
+
>>14998165
|
216 |
+
Ce n’est plus rigolo quand les barbus décapitent des prêtres et poignardent des femmes enceintes sur le train hein? Soudainement, bizarrement, les gauchistes se taisent et on n’entend plus que des murmures de leur part.
|
217 |
+
--- 14998375
|
218 |
+
>>14998352
|
219 |
+
L’exception devient la norme. Vive la République! :^)
|
220 |
+
--- 14998379
|
221 |
+
...
|
222 |
+
--- 14998392
|
223 |
+
>>14998379
|
224 |
+
>>14998379
|
225 |
+
If Gauls and Franks were Nordic and most Frogs descended from them wouldnt every social class have Nordics anyway?
|
226 |
+
--- 14998396
|
227 |
+
>>14997508
|
228 |
+
Rather your own nobel to command you than a foreign alien from Paris.
|
229 |
+
--- 14998405
|
230 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
231 |
+
Based reactionary art
|
232 |
+
--- 14998411
|
233 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
234 |
+
He literally did nothing wrong.
|
235 |
+
--- 14998418
|
236 |
+
>>14996921
|
237 |
+
Based
|
238 |
+
--- 14998437
|
239 |
+
>>14997835
|
240 |
+
>thinking you'll be living a better life
|
241 |
+
This is what everything thinks, obviously. No one wants a government he images to be worse than the ideal, lmao. It's funny how every liberal turns portrays himself as an anarchist when he starts punching right.
|
242 |
+
--- 14998462
|
243 |
+
>>14996581 (OP)
|
244 |
+
Most people are not fans of the the Terror.
|
245 |
+
--- 14998467
|
246 |
+
>>14998462
|
247 |
+
Thats why most people need the terror.
|
248 |
+
--- 14998488
|
249 |
+
>>14998379
|
250 |
+
Tolkien was a Christian btw.
|
his/14996619.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,872 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996619
|
3 |
+
>God doesn’t exist
|
4 |
+
--- 14996624
|
5 |
+
>OP doesn't have a dildo in his ass
|
6 |
+
|
7 |
+
Prove it
|
8 |
+
--- 14996632
|
9 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
10 |
+
Just because some Wikipedia article calls it a fallacy doesn't mean it's faulty reasoning.
|
11 |
+
--- 14996637
|
12 |
+
>>14996624
|
13 |
+
--- 14996642
|
14 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
15 |
+
You're doing it right now.
|
16 |
+
The default position is that the supernatural exists. You have to prove otherwise.
|
17 |
+
--- 14996647
|
18 |
+
>>14996637
|
19 |
+
You mean like with the existence of God?
|
20 |
+
--- 14996652
|
21 |
+
>>14996642
|
22 |
+
You currently have a supernatural dildo in your ass
|
23 |
+
--- 14996655
|
24 |
+
>>14996642
|
25 |
+
>>The default position is that the supernatural exists.
|
26 |
+
This is a false statement.
|
27 |
+
--- 14996677
|
28 |
+
>>14996655
|
29 |
+
Can you prove it's a false statement?
|
30 |
+
--- 14996688
|
31 |
+
>>14996677
|
32 |
+
Yes, basically nobody in the physical sciences considers the existence of the supernatural to be the default. Even theologians put forth arguments for their respective religious beliefs for a reason.
|
33 |
+
--- 14996689
|
34 |
+
>>14996677
|
35 |
+
I don’t need to. It is not necessary to argue against unsoldered claims.
|
36 |
+
--- 14996694
|
37 |
+
>>14996689
|
38 |
+
Then I'm afraid your claim that it's a false statement holds no water.
|
39 |
+
--- 14996702
|
40 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
41 |
+
Atheists should just convert to agnosticism since they're so obsessive with treating the burden of proof as the bubonic plague
|
42 |
+
--- 14996704
|
43 |
+
>>14996688
|
44 |
+
>Even theologians put forth arguments for their respective religious beliefs for a reason.
|
45 |
+
By that logic, scientists putting forth arguments for their respective theories is an admission that their perspective is not the default one as well.
|
46 |
+
--- 14996714
|
47 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
48 |
+
>don't believe in unicorns
|
49 |
+
>"Ummm source sweetie?"
|
50 |
+
--- 14996717
|
51 |
+
>>14996688
|
52 |
+
That's an appeal to authority and one you can't even back up. Serious physicists understand the limits of physics.
|
53 |
+
--- 14996719
|
54 |
+
>>14996677
|
55 |
+
See >>14996652
|
56 |
+
--- 14996722
|
57 |
+
>>14996717
|
58 |
+
Okay cool, now, do you have any evidence for your god?
|
59 |
+
--- 14996725
|
60 |
+
>>14996722
|
61 |
+
Umm no it's your job to prove why you don't believe in my thing which means you have belief which means you're just like thiests which means you don't rely on evidence. Checkmate.
|
62 |
+
--- 14996729
|
63 |
+
>>14996655
|
64 |
+
Explain the reasoning behind this thought.
|
65 |
+
>No evidence
|
66 |
+
Plenty of evidence, rewatch all of tv news published since the beginning of tv and you will see enough until the 2000s when censorship took a toll.
|
67 |
+
--- 14996736
|
68 |
+
>>14996722
|
69 |
+
Logic based evidence like we have for black holes. Our models predict a source like described by classical monotheism. Additional claims about the entity than that it exist and pre-exists everything we know including time require additional logic.
|
70 |
+
--- 14996737
|
71 |
+
>>14996725
|
72 |
+
Okay, then you have a supernatural dildo in your ass
|
73 |
+
--- 14996739
|
74 |
+
>>14996652
|
75 |
+
A dildo in the ass is a material phenomenon. Do you mean masturbatory? Humiliating? Both?
|
76 |
+
I'll take it out, thanks.
|
77 |
+
--- 14996742
|
78 |
+
>>14996736
|
79 |
+
And how do you know those models are consistent with reality? Did you test them?
|
80 |
+
|
81 |
+
Besides that these typical logical models can also prove the exact opposite, but that's besides the point
|
82 |
+
--- 14996747
|
83 |
+
>>14996739
|
84 |
+
No, this is a supernatural dildo. It's invisible, and you can't take it out. But it's in there, since you can't prove it isn't in there
|
85 |
+
--- 14996749
|
86 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
87 |
+
God exists
|
88 |
+
--- 14996754
|
89 |
+
>>14996749
|
90 |
+
The dildo in your ass exists
|
91 |
+
--- 14996759
|
92 |
+
>>14996742
|
93 |
+
>Did you test them?
|
94 |
+
Yes, logical causality can be demonstrated on a billiard table.
|
95 |
+
>these typical logical models can also prove the exact opposite
|
96 |
+
No. Given a set of assumptions the same model emerges every time. That's the thing that makes logic useful. This wouldn't be "beside the point", if you don't understand how logic works that's the core of the issue.
|
97 |
+
Everything obeys logical causality, it's what we use to model everything. Any time you use math or logic you're resting your statement on our models that predict something beyond logic, math and causality.
|
98 |
+
--- 14996760
|
99 |
+
>>14996754
|
100 |
+
Prove it
|
101 |
+
--- 14996761
|
102 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
103 |
+
I can prove it. There cannot be a being which can break the laws of logic. No omnipotence=no god. There, done.
|
104 |
+
--- 14996766
|
105 |
+
>>14996742
|
106 |
+
How do you people even think physics works? Our descriptions of the "natural" world always rest on fundamental elements we can't account for, they're just there, as if by magic. Even if we figure out fundamental forces completely what causes them to obey these specific rules were using to describe them? There's always a more fundamental question, always one more step if you try to account for everything logically, because the attempt is logically impossible.
|
107 |
+
--- 14996767
|
108 |
+
>>14996747
|
109 |
+
Can't prove it doesn't exist. Can prove its location. It's a material phenomenon. To say it is supernatural (immaterial or contradicting our understanding of thhe world), you have to explain how. Explain what you mean by dildo, ass, and supernatural.
|
110 |
+
--- 14996768
|
111 |
+
>>14996761
|
112 |
+
Logic says there has to be something that breaks the rules of logic, all logically coherent systems rest on axioms not described by the system.
|
113 |
+
--- 14996773
|
114 |
+
>>14996704
|
115 |
+
Maybe so, but the underlying and justified assumption of all modern science is that magic doesn't exist. This is so for a very good reason, which is that attempts to cast magic spells or whatever you prefer to call it instead simply don't work. This is why the existence of the supernatural is not the default position.
|
116 |
+
--- 14996777
|
117 |
+
>>14996773
|
118 |
+
If it works it's not considered a spell anymore. That's not an honest distinction.
|
119 |
+
--- 14996783
|
120 |
+
>creationcretins STILL fall for the teapot experiment
|
121 |
+
--- 14996793
|
122 |
+
>>14996759
|
123 |
+
Utter nonsense. There's even a well-known counter to this logic-deduction type sophistry, called the 'Atheist Liar's Paradox', it goes like this:
|
124 |
+
|
125 |
+
>1. Theism is the only truth (axiom based on divine revelation, ground of all being, etc.)
|
126 |
+
>2. By definition, any deviation from theism, no matter how slim, is a lie.
|
127 |
+
>3. By definition, all atheists deviate from theism.
|
128 |
+
>4. Therefore, all atheists are liars, and always will be (2 and 3).
|
129 |
+
>5. Therefore, it's impossible for an atheist to convert to theism, since they're always lying. (4)
|
130 |
+
>6. Therefore, there's no such thing as theism, since, following propositions 4 and 5, theists are just atheists who are all lying to themselves and those around them.
|
131 |
+
>7. Therefore, proposition 1 is false.
|
132 |
+
>8. Furthermore, proposition 1 is also false if proposition 2 is false.
|
133 |
+
>9. Furthermore, proposition 1 is false, if proposition 3 is false (8).
|
134 |
+
>10. Furthermore, proposition 1 is false, if proposition 4 is false (9).
|
135 |
+
>11. Furthermore, proposition 1 is false, if proposition 5 is false (4).
|
136 |
+
>12. Furthermore, proposition 1 is false, if proposition 6 is false (5).
|
137 |
+
>13. Therefore, proposition 7 is false.
|
138 |
+
--- 14996796
|
139 |
+
>>14996783
|
140 |
+
The teapot has nothing to do with the arguments classical monotheists make and it undermines thought about the difference between what is logically possible and what is not. The imagined teapot is obeying all the rules so it exists in a possibility space relevant to human thought. The dildo in your ass is symbolic.
|
141 |
+
--- 14996813
|
142 |
+
>>14996793
|
143 |
+
It's hard to imagine you can think clearly about any subject.
|
144 |
+
You made up a nonsense model by starting with nonsense premises. What did you think would happen? What do you think you're demonstrating here?
|
145 |
+
Can you please explain what's going through your mind? What part of my post is nonsense? Quote relevant parts.
|
146 |
+
>Given a set of assumptions the same model emerges every time
|
147 |
+
Like in your retarded example. Given all the retarded assumptions the same retarded conclusions emerge every time.
|
148 |
+
--- 14996815
|
149 |
+
>>14996796
|
150 |
+
No, natural perfectly formed teapots orbiting the sun before rocketry was invented do NOT “obey all the rules”
|
151 |
+
--- 14996838
|
152 |
+
>>14996815
|
153 |
+
It's just an idea of a form in space. We can go put a teapot in the place described.
|
154 |
+
--- 14996842
|
155 |
+
>>14996813
|
156 |
+
>You made up a nonsense model by starting with nonsense premises.
|
157 |
+
|
158 |
+
It's almost like this is some kind of analogy for some other situation exactly like this or something
|
159 |
+
--- 14996867
|
160 |
+
>>14996842
|
161 |
+
What is it analogous to? Some people are retards and don't know how to use logic therefore any attempt made at appealing to logic can be dismissed?
|
162 |
+
Your retarded example demonstrated my point about any conclusion needing assumptions, eventually you have to defer to assumptions that are not logically grounded in any model. In physics the models now assume the existence of the apparent fundamental forces and then we can describe everything else.
|
163 |
+
--- 14996870
|
164 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
165 |
+
This has been refuted by Russell’s teapot, the FSM and pretty much applying the “prove X doesn’t exist” to anything. Unless you have an accessible and specific location to thoroughly search then proving anything *doesnt exist* is basically impossible
|
166 |
+
--- 14996878
|
167 |
+
>>14996870
|
168 |
+
Is it really the case that "atheists" are people that can't imagine things that aren't physical and have no location? Where is math?
|
169 |
+
--- 14996892
|
170 |
+
>>14996878
|
171 |
+
I’ve never heard of a religion that doesn’t involve a deity that can physically appear in reality and/or interfere with it to alter things within our reality beyond just cause and effect.
|
172 |
+
--- 14996894
|
173 |
+
>>14996867
|
174 |
+
Okay then, so can an atheist tell the truth if he doesn't accept the existence of a god? If not, is it possible for him to convert, if his confession is another lie? And if this is the case, are there any theists to begin with?
|
175 |
+
--- 14996934
|
176 |
+
>>14996892
|
177 |
+
You've never heard of anything. Your entire mind is memes and you work hard to keep it that way. You've never even glanced at any classical monotheism but still rant about it as if you did because of internet memes.
|
178 |
+
>>14996894
|
179 |
+
What the fuck are you talking about retard? Given the retarded assumptions you made some retarded model that may be full of retarded holes emerges. You really don't understand anything about anything?
|
180 |
+
--- 14996941
|
181 |
+
>>14996894
|
182 |
+
If an axiom is atheists always lie then the profession of conversion is a lie.
|
183 |
+
This is how logic works, if x then y. What don't you understand?
|
184 |
+
--- 14996952
|
185 |
+
>>14996934
|
186 |
+
>You've never heard of anything. Your entire mind is memes and you work hard to keep it that way. You've never even glanced at any classical monotheism but still rant about it as if you did because of internet memes
|
187 |
+
Seems a little weird to get this worked about at atheists if you only believe in non-religious classical monotheism.
|
188 |
+
You don’t believe Jesus Christ is Lord?
|
189 |
+
--- 14996977
|
190 |
+
Most atheists or at least a huge portion of them say they don’t believe in gods or at least don’t make the stance that god 100% does not exist
|
191 |
+
--- 14997025
|
192 |
+
>>14996952
|
193 |
+
>if you only believe
|
194 |
+
My beliefs are irrelevant to your inability to conceive of different perspectives. The world being filled with mindless retards like you makes me angry. It's not that we disagree on some reasonable point that could be argued back and forth, you're unable to think at all.
|
195 |
+
You need to make this about my "beliefs" because you have no clue how to begin to think logically.
|
196 |
+
--- 14997078
|
197 |
+
>>14996941
|
198 |
+
So, how can there be theists, then? Didn't every theist start out as an atheist? Has there ever been a single theist without a single doubt in his life? Does it then not follow, from my totally logical argument here >>14996793 that there are no theists alive today, since all atheists are liars, and not a single theist has never deviated from the only absolute truth?
|
199 |
+
--- 14997091
|
200 |
+
>>14996952
|
201 |
+
If you accept the simple logic classical theists present then all the atheist memes don't apply anymore. Now you can start following the monotheist conversation, now we know this entity exists, what is it like? Knowing it entirely is inherently logical impossible but there must be some implied directives in its creation, implied directives like valuing life.
|
202 |
+
>>14997078
|
203 |
+
>So, how can there be theists, then?
|
204 |
+
There can't be in this retarded model. Your assumptions are retarded like I said 50 times.
|
205 |
+
--- 14997101
|
206 |
+
>>14997091
|
207 |
+
No it isn't. If it is, debunk the Atheist Liar's Paradox. If you can't, you logically demonstrate that you're yourself a liar, and therefore an atheist, thus proving my point
|
208 |
+
--- 14997107
|
209 |
+
>>14996793
|
210 |
+
>any deviation from theism, no matter how slim, is a lie.
|
211 |
+
How does this follow from premise 1?
|
212 |
+
--- 14997125
|
213 |
+
>>14997101
|
214 |
+
>No it isn't.
|
215 |
+
What isn't?
|
216 |
+
>deboonk
|
217 |
+
I explained what you're doing in detail many times. What don't you understand?
|
218 |
+
Given the axiom that atheists always lie then by fucking definition they can't say anything true. You defined the random retarded premise.
|
219 |
+
If all cars are horses then any given Volvo is a horse.
|
220 |
+
You think this means logic demands Volvos are horses? What's wrong with your brain? The premise is simply retarded, defining cars as horses is not helpful.
|
221 |
+
--- 14997127
|
222 |
+
>>14997025
|
223 |
+
Uh huh, so you don’t believe Jesus Christ is Lord?
|
224 |
+
|
225 |
+
>>14997091
|
226 |
+
I don’t deny the logic of classic theism, seems perfectly reasonable. The problem is that when I criticize Christian beliefs, I get called an atheist even though I’m not one, so I now treat “atheist” on this board as “secular” because that’s what the Christians have made the conversation about.
|
227 |
+
All that being said, Christianity does not seem to adequately describe God. The creation story is wrong and God being a passive 30 year old virgin who gives away all his money does not seem like the type of life God designed us for.
|
228 |
+
It seems much more like one of the Roman Near Eastern cults that got out of hand
|
229 |
+
--- 14997189
|
230 |
+
>>14997107
|
231 |
+
Do you understand the meaning of the word 'only'?
|
232 |
+
--- 14997192
|
233 |
+
>>14997127
|
234 |
+
>because that’s what the Christians have made the conversation about
|
235 |
+
Your circle of Christian retards and even more retarded anti-Christian memes don't represent what "Christians have made the conversation about". Nothing you say relates to any Christian history or anything worth thinking about, just local American retard shit.
|
236 |
+
The Bible is the most complete remnant we have of pre-historic thought that also influenced the Greeks and everyone else. It represents important stages of thinking that lead to your worldview even if you're an "atheist".
|
237 |
+
Whenever you take on the role of vessel of truth, no matter how temporarily you're embodying the Logos. Christ lived a life that in its totality points to and embodies life-giving truth that challenges the authority of violence, death and Satan.
|
238 |
+
--- 14997197
|
239 |
+
>>14997125
|
240 |
+
>Given the axiom that atheists always lie then by fucking definition they can't say anything true.
|
241 |
+
|
242 |
+
Ok great, so you admit defeat, and admit that the Atheist Liar'sParadox is valid. I accept your apology
|
243 |
+
--- 14997203
|
244 |
+
God exists
|
245 |
+
--- 14997208
|
246 |
+
>>14997203
|
247 |
+
There is a metaphysical dildo in your ass right now
|
248 |
+
--- 14997210
|
249 |
+
>>14997197
|
250 |
+
Why are you like this? Why don't you care about thinking or finding things out?
|
251 |
+
Even in your braindead "paradox" the atheist can convert before saying anything so when he professes his faith he's not an atheist anymore.
|
252 |
+
Everything about this "paradox" is braindead, it demonstrates nothing about anything. Anyone who believes any of these premises is an idiot and anyone that came up with this convoluted shit is an even bigger idiot.
|
253 |
+
--- 14997213
|
254 |
+
>>14997208
|
255 |
+
Weird fantasy you have, please keep it to yourself sodomite
|
256 |
+
--- 14997229
|
257 |
+
>>14997210
|
258 |
+
>Even in your braindead "paradox" the atheist can convert before saying anything
|
259 |
+
>convert
|
260 |
+
>before saying anything
|
261 |
+
|
262 |
+
Lol how does that even make sense. Typical lie, from an atheist of course
|
263 |
+
|
264 |
+
>so when he professes his faith he's not an atheist anymore.
|
265 |
+
|
266 |
+
But he's an atheist, and therefore always lying. He usn't actually converting, he's just telling you he is
|
267 |
+
--- 14997235
|
268 |
+
>>14997213
|
269 |
+
Hey, it's not my ass with a metaphysical dildo in it.
|
270 |
+
|
271 |
+
Faggot
|
272 |
+
--- 14997241
|
273 |
+
>>14997229
|
274 |
+
why can't he sincerely convert internally without telling you anything
|
275 |
+
--- 14997254
|
276 |
+
>>14997241
|
277 |
+
Then how would we know it's sincere, and not actually him lying to himself, Pascal's wager-style?
|
278 |
+
--- 14997264
|
279 |
+
>>14997254
|
280 |
+
>how would we know it's sincere
|
281 |
+
Us knowing it's sincere is a different question. He's not an atheist anymore even if we don't believe him.
|
282 |
+
This is all extremely basic logic, always the same thing and you never seem to get it, if x then y.
|
283 |
+
--- 14997280
|
284 |
+
>>14997264
|
285 |
+
>He's not an atheist anymore even if we don't believe him.
|
286 |
+
|
287 |
+
So if someone tells you eating dogpoop is healthy, you accept that too?
|
288 |
+
--- 14997285
|
289 |
+
>>14997280
|
290 |
+
Fuck off retard.
|
291 |
+
--- 14997288
|
292 |
+
Yahweh being omnipotent is jew headcanon and actual biblical text suggest all he can do is make stars at his highest level of power
|
293 |
+
--- 14997290
|
294 |
+
>>14997285
|
295 |
+
>Proposition 1: Dogpoop is healthy
|
296 |
+
|
297 |
+
True or false?
|
298 |
+
--- 14997300
|
299 |
+
>>14997288
|
300 |
+
All potential comes from God. Anything possible is possible by and through God.
|
301 |
+
--- 14997308
|
302 |
+
>>14997290
|
303 |
+
Error: undefined context.
|
304 |
+
--- 14997309
|
305 |
+
>>14997300
|
306 |
+
How do you know that's true? God may actually be Satan, and may be lying to you
|
307 |
+
--- 14997310
|
308 |
+
>>14996702
|
309 |
+
>Atheists should just convert to agnosticism
|
310 |
+
Agnostics are already atheists.
|
311 |
+
--- 14997316
|
312 |
+
>>14996725
|
313 |
+
>it's your job to prove why you don't believe
|
314 |
+
no evidence
|
315 |
+
done
|
316 |
+
--- 14997317
|
317 |
+
>>14997309
|
318 |
+
Because all expressions of potential are describable using logic up to a point which it all derives from. The label we gave the point is God.
|
319 |
+
--- 14997334
|
320 |
+
>You can't 100% prove god doesn't exist!
|
321 |
+
>Therefore this hastily cobbled together and poorly edited religious text that blames a talking snake for kids dying of cancer is 100% true
|
322 |
+
--- 14997344
|
323 |
+
>>14997317
|
324 |
+
In the Hebrew context they were polytheistic, then put their wargod highest. Later around the time when classical monotheism was emerging they identify their wargod with the God of universal law. Like in science rough models are refined over time.
|
325 |
+
--- 14997348
|
326 |
+
>>14996838
|
327 |
+
Why? There's already one there.
|
328 |
+
--- 14997352
|
329 |
+
>>14997334
|
330 |
+
The talking snake was Satan, Anon...
|
331 |
+
--- 14997357
|
332 |
+
>>14997316
|
333 |
+
Where's the evidence we need evidence?
|
334 |
+
>>14997344
|
335 |
+
This is atheist fanfiction
|
336 |
+
--- 14997365
|
337 |
+
>>14997348
|
338 |
+
It's not physically manifested there. In my AR telescope it's there.
|
339 |
+
Because of how much people have talked about it and represented it over the years it kind of exists more than most potential things, it's physically represented in both our brains. The structures of the physical world have a lot of patterns pointing to a form that's not physically there.
|
340 |
+
--- 14997369
|
341 |
+
>>14997352
|
342 |
+
Imagine telling uncontacted tribals that the REAL reason their kid died of measles is because god turfed the first humans out of paradise because they were deceived by a talking snake lol
|
343 |
+
--- 14997374
|
344 |
+
>>14997357
|
345 |
+
>This is atheist fanfiction
|
346 |
+
It's history. The thing that made Israel successful is their sincere scholarship which allowed them to refine their models, by the precedent Moses gives early on.
|
347 |
+
--- 14997375
|
348 |
+
>>14996777
|
349 |
+
Anon, come on now, you know what I meant when I said magic. People discovering( or rather, claiming to discover) new aspects of physical reality isn't the same, because their ideas have to stand up to scientific scrutiny.
|
350 |
+
|
351 |
+
You simply don't get this process outside of the hard sciences, which is why the social sciences tend to be looked down on, sometimes unfairly and sometimes not.
|
352 |
+
--- 14997377
|
353 |
+
>>14997369
|
354 |
+
There's a curse upon sin? Woah, that's unbelievable
|
355 |
+
--- 14997382
|
356 |
+
>>14997374
|
357 |
+
It's fiction
|
358 |
+
--- 14997390
|
359 |
+
>>14996717
|
360 |
+
Breh there's a reason why most modern scientists don't believe in any sort of deity outside of maybe a deist creator god or goddess. The reason being that the concept of a theistic deity and various supernatural happenings don't stand up to skeptical scrutiny.
|
361 |
+
--- 14997391
|
362 |
+
>>14997377
|
363 |
+
>people find my bronze age jewish fairytale silly?
|
364 |
+
Woah
|
365 |
+
--- 14997392
|
366 |
+
>>14996773
|
367 |
+
>justified
|
368 |
+
How?
|
369 |
+
>This is so for a very good reason, which is that attempts to cast magic spells or whatever you prefer to call it instead simply don't work
|
370 |
+
If they "worked" in a scientifically describable way, they wouldn't be magic
|
371 |
+
>This is why the existence of the supernatural is not the default position
|
372 |
+
The existence of the supernatural is the only position because naturalism is incoherent.
|
373 |
+
--- 14997396
|
374 |
+
>>14997390
|
375 |
+
>The reason being
|
376 |
+
Sin
|
377 |
+
--- 14997407
|
378 |
+
>>14997357
|
379 |
+
>Where's the evidence we need evidence?
|
380 |
+
|
381 |
+
Allah told us
|
382 |
+
--- 14997408
|
383 |
+
>>14997396
|
384 |
+
You're retarded and glib replies like this just make you look even more retarded.
|
385 |
+
--- 14997411
|
386 |
+
>>14997392
|
387 |
+
See>>14997375
|
388 |
+
--- 14997417
|
389 |
+
>>14997408
|
390 |
+
How is that glib? Why are you so mad? I think if atheism had any intellectual merit atheists would be capable of making rationally compelling, logically coherent arguments, instead of constantly venting aggression and ridicule in its place.
|
391 |
+
>>14997411
|
392 |
+
This does not answer anything I said
|
393 |
+
--- 14997418
|
394 |
+
And still, no one has refuted the Atheist Liar's Paradox. I'm afraid that this >>14996793 was the post that killed God forever
|
395 |
+
--- 14997426
|
396 |
+
>>14997418
|
397 |
+
It's not coherent because the atheist who converts is no longer an atheist and therefore is no longer telling nothing but lies
|
398 |
+
--- 14997428
|
399 |
+
>>14997375
|
400 |
+
>You simply don't get this process outside of the hard sciences
|
401 |
+
But things happen that the hard sciences can't model. Subjective experience is "magic", logic is "magic", everything is magic, only a small portion of what happens is modelled by natural science.
|
402 |
+
>>14997382
|
403 |
+
Why? Present an alternative. Everything is "divinely revealed" from the start? Then what's even the point of all the stories describing the process of discovery?
|
404 |
+
>>14997390
|
405 |
+
There's a reason most scientists aren't like your caricature of Christians based on American memes. The theologians and Christian scholars that shaped our thinking weren't either. The atheist position isn't more reasonable, it's just "no", a refusal to even attempt to engage with some hard questions. Like how does a cold, dead process produce things like love? Yes, chemicals etc but the chemical interactions don't predict the subjective experience. You like everyone have barely a clue what's happening, there's an ancient tradition attempting to figure it out which you glanced at and just said "no" without adding anything.
|
406 |
+
--- 14997430
|
407 |
+
>>14997417
|
408 |
+
You haven't posted a single compelling argument, all you can do is post glib replies as the other anon said
|
409 |
+
--- 14997432
|
410 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
411 |
+
God is proven by the impossibility of the contrary. Anything else?
|
412 |
+
--- 14997433
|
413 |
+
>>14997418
|
414 |
+
Can you explain what you think it means? What does it demonstrate and why? Your posts are like white noise.
|
415 |
+
--- 14997438
|
416 |
+
>>14997430
|
417 |
+
That's nice.
|
418 |
+
>>14997428
|
419 |
+
>Present an alternative
|
420 |
+
The Old Testament narrative.
|
421 |
+
--- 14997439
|
422 |
+
>>14997426
|
423 |
+
And how do you know that he's actually converted, and isn't just lying to you?
|
424 |
+
|
425 |
+
Once again, the ALP wins again. I accept your apology
|
426 |
+
--- 14997441
|
427 |
+
>>14997192
|
428 |
+
>Your circle of Christian retards
|
429 |
+
Literally talking about people on this board
|
430 |
+
--- 14997444
|
431 |
+
>>14997439
|
432 |
+
It doesn't matter if I know it or not if it's true in reality. But I would know it because he would bear the fruits of the Spirit.
|
433 |
+
--- 14997445
|
434 |
+
>>14997438
|
435 |
+
>The Old Testament narrative.
|
436 |
+
Describes flawed people refining their model of God over time. Which is what I described in modern terms. Where's the contradiction?
|
437 |
+
--- 14997454
|
438 |
+
>>14997445
|
439 |
+
The contradiction is between the claim the OT narrative is true simultaneous with the claim the OT narrative is not true
|
440 |
+
--- 14997455
|
441 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
442 |
+
Government Of Democracy (GOD) doesn't exist.
|
443 |
+
|
444 |
+
It's a Republic!
|
445 |
+
--- 14997457
|
446 |
+
>>14997433
|
447 |
+
Don't play dumb, please. The ALP, which has so far been demonstrated to be literally flawless, shows beyong any reasonable doubt that, because atheists always lie, converting to theism isn't actually possible,and that therefore, theism is just a bunch of atheists lying and pretending.
|
448 |
+
|
449 |
+
So that's it, pretty much. Theism has been defeated forever, and God is dead forever.
|
450 |
+
--- 14997460
|
451 |
+
>>14997441
|
452 |
+
So when you use the word "Christianity" on a board about history what you really mean is internet memes.
|
453 |
+
--- 14997463
|
454 |
+
>>14997428
|
455 |
+
>>But things happen that the hard sciences can't model.
|
456 |
+
No they don't.
|
457 |
+
>>subjective experience
|
458 |
+
Brain chemicals.
|
459 |
+
>>logic
|
460 |
+
Brain chemicals.
|
461 |
+
>>The atheist position isn't more reasonable.
|
462 |
+
"The atheist position" is the position that says that magical woo bullshit isn't real. Most people honestly agree with it, they just make exceptions for the woo they grew up with or like for some other reason.
|
463 |
+
|
464 |
+
>>Like how does a cold, dead process produce things like love? Yes, chemicals etc but the chemical interactions don't predict the subjective experience.
|
465 |
+
How pair-bonding works is well understood by science, even if we don't understand the particulars of how everyone will react to that pair-bonding yet.
|
466 |
+
--- 14997465
|
467 |
+
>>14996702
|
468 |
+
Atheism and agnosticism are compatible, often people are both, unless they are r3dditors.
|
469 |
+
--- 14997466
|
470 |
+
>>14997357
|
471 |
+
>Where's the evidence we need evidence?
|
472 |
+
The evidence is that I need to see evidence for something before I even begin to form a belief in it. The question was about proving why I don't believe something.
|
473 |
+
--- 14997469
|
474 |
+
>>14997444
|
475 |
+
Yes, but that is most likely fake. Remember, all atheists are liars, and therefore, all 'theists' are just lying to give you the impression that they're theists, when in fact, they're not
|
476 |
+
--- 14997471
|
477 |
+
>>14997455
|
478 |
+
there's no "Government of democracy" (God) either.
|
479 |
+
--- 14997472
|
480 |
+
>>14997457
|
481 |
+
Converting does not require saying anything (which means it cannot be "a lie" in and of itself or at least it is capable of not being one) and men naturally believe in God including a great many who were raised in the Church and were born again prior to learning language (which means no conversion was necessary because they never were an atheist in the first place)
|
482 |
+
--- 14997479
|
483 |
+
>>14997457
|
484 |
+
>because atheists always lie
|
485 |
+
Every step is retarded but why would you assume this is true?
|
486 |
+
There surely also must be some implied limit to this or every action they take is also a lie. So when an atheist shits on the floor it didn't really happen so I don't need to clean it up.
|
487 |
+
If it only applies to speech then they can sign their profession of faith.
|
488 |
+
--- 14997480
|
489 |
+
>>14997460
|
490 |
+
I mean that on this board, when Christians use the word atheist, they don’t just mean atheist, they mean secular people who aren’t atheists, look here is another >>14997310
|
491 |
+
--- 14997482
|
492 |
+
>>14997469
|
493 |
+
It is most likely not fake if the bible is true, which is an assumption of the scenario
|
494 |
+
>>14997466
|
495 |
+
Why do you need evidence?
|
496 |
+
--- 14997485
|
497 |
+
>>14997189
|
498 |
+
Yes, but lie is the denial of truth, not a slight deviation.
|
499 |
+
Catholics believe there are bits of the eternal truth in other religions, but its plenitude is in Christianity. This is the reason behind the syncretism of pagan practices.
|
500 |
+
--- 14997486
|
501 |
+
>>14997472
|
502 |
+
>Converting does not require saying anything
|
503 |
+
|
504 |
+
So you assume that everyone is a theist regardless? Why are theists so busy evangelizing,then?
|
505 |
+
--- 14997491
|
506 |
+
>>14997482
|
507 |
+
>Why do you need evidence?
|
508 |
+
Not him but I just want to point out you asking this means you don’t have evidence. People who have evidence for their beliefs don’t go down the “who even needs evidence maan” road when challenged
|
509 |
+
--- 14997492
|
510 |
+
>>14997455
|
511 |
+
Republic comes from Latin, res publica, meaning thing of the people. Democracy comes from Greek and means rule of the people. They mean the same thing. They just come from different roots.
|
512 |
+
--- 14997494
|
513 |
+
>>14997479
|
514 |
+
>Every step is retarded but why would you assume this is true?
|
515 |
+
>>14996793
|
516 |
+
>1. Theism is the only truth (axiom based on divine revelation, ground of all being, etc.)
|
517 |
+
>2. By definition, any deviation from theism, no matter how slim, is a lie.
|
518 |
+
>3. By definition, all atheists deviate from theism.
|
519 |
+
>4. Therefore, all atheists are liars, and always will be (2 and 3).
|
520 |
+
--- 14997497
|
521 |
+
>>14996642
|
522 |
+
He didn't say god exists, he says atheists need to prove their assertion that god does not exist
|
523 |
+
The neutral position here is agnosticism
|
524 |
+
--- 14997498
|
525 |
+
>>14997482
|
526 |
+
So the Bible doesn't say that theism is the only truth, then?
|
527 |
+
--- 14997501
|
528 |
+
>>14997466
|
529 |
+
i don't believe that you don't believe unless you prove that you don't believe then i will believe that you don't believe so prove it or gtfo
|
530 |
+
--- 14997510
|
531 |
+
>>14997482
|
532 |
+
>Why do you need evidence?
|
533 |
+
Because I might believe something exists when it doesn't and that could possibly cause me to make bad life decisions. I want a good life. This usually requires that I make good decisions based on good information.
|
534 |
+
--- 14997513
|
535 |
+
>>14997463
|
536 |
+
>No they don't.
|
537 |
+
I see, so you're an actual example of an absolutely brainwashed idiot unable to step out of his own conditioning even hypothetically.
|
538 |
+
>Brain chemicals.
|
539 |
+
Don't explain anything, they describe in what situation the phenomena is expressed, the phenomena itself can not even be measured by anyone but you.
|
540 |
+
>Brain chemicals and logic
|
541 |
+
Incoherent handwaving bullshit. Brain chemicals don't dictate the behaviour of billiard balls.
|
542 |
+
>is the position that says that magical woo bullshit isn't real
|
543 |
+
And "magical woo bullshit" is defined as stuff you don't like. You have your own "woo" you defer to but just pretend it's categorically different. Brain chemicals just do produce subjective, there's nothing to think about beyond the dogma.
|
544 |
+
>pair-bonding
|
545 |
+
Not the question. The sense of experience is not needed to reinforce the behaviour of the organism.
|
546 |
+
--- 14997514
|
547 |
+
>>14997492
|
548 |
+
Please don't encourage one of the resident schizos
|
549 |
+
--- 14997519
|
550 |
+
>>14997501
|
551 |
+
But I don't care what you believe.
|
552 |
+
--- 14997521
|
553 |
+
>>14996694
|
554 |
+
The claim that the supernatural existing is the default also holds no water.
|
555 |
+
--- 14997523
|
556 |
+
>>14997480
|
557 |
+
Anyone repeating the memes is a product of the "atheist" movement.
|
558 |
+
>>14997494
|
559 |
+
What are you trying to say retard? Is it true because you said it's true?
|
560 |
+
--- 14997528
|
561 |
+
>>14997519
|
562 |
+
then why are you here femboy? your hobby is trooning for dates?
|
563 |
+
--- 14997532
|
564 |
+
>>14997454
|
565 |
+
What part did I say was not true? I suspect your understanding of it does not reflect the truth well which is a different claim.
|
566 |
+
--- 14997538
|
567 |
+
>>14997491
|
568 |
+
This is called an internal critique. But no, we don't need evidence because knowledge of God is a priori, properly basic and incorrigible. Note there is a difference between not having evidence and not needing evidence.
|
569 |
+
>>14997497
|
570 |
+
There is no "neutral position", Dirk. I thought you read Van Til?
|
571 |
+
>>14997463
|
572 |
+
>Brain chemicals.
|
573 |
+
This is a contradiction in terms because subjective experiences only exist in the experience of a subject. This is true by definition. You feel, you see, etc etc. these are subjective because they are only going on in you. On the other hand brain chemicals are objective, they exist independently of subjects, if you view man in a third person way, the brain chemicals simply exist and in a position in space no less. They do not need a mind to exist. This is contradictory.
|
574 |
+
>Brain chemicals.
|
575 |
+
If logic is brain chemicals then logic is not brain chemicals because there is no real law of non contradiction which true propositions obey.
|
576 |
+
--- 14997546
|
577 |
+
>>14997523
|
578 |
+
Is theism, according to the Bible, not the only correct truth, then?
|
579 |
+
|
580 |
+
Because that's what you have to assume to debunk the ALP, which will then naturally lead to atheism.
|
581 |
+
|
582 |
+
Looks like your puny 'god' is in quite a pickle. I bet you feel a little silly right now
|
583 |
+
--- 14997549
|
584 |
+
>>14997510
|
585 |
+
Is evidence the only way to know things?
|
586 |
+
--- 14997551
|
587 |
+
>>14997538
|
588 |
+
I have read van til. It's neutral even if it is nonsensical in the final analysis. I don't go as far as van til in presuppositionalism
|
589 |
+
--- 14997554
|
590 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
591 |
+
I just don’t believe in religious gods but would believe in one or more of them if one of the believers could prove they were real.
|
592 |
+
--- 14997558
|
593 |
+
>>14997528
|
594 |
+
To kill time and play with the minds of christcucks.
|
595 |
+
--- 14997563
|
596 |
+
>God is real
|
597 |
+
>trannies are women
|
598 |
+
>6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust
|
599 |
+
All equally founded statements
|
600 |
+
--- 14997573
|
601 |
+
>>14997546
|
602 |
+
Let's say theism is true.
|
603 |
+
Let's also say all truth comes from God.
|
604 |
+
This doesn't imply people that deny these two truths can't say or believe true things. Why would it? What are you talking about?
|
605 |
+
If I define x as 5 and ask an atheist to read the definition does it become invalid? Is x no longer 5 because the atheist said it is?
|
606 |
+
--- 14997577
|
607 |
+
>>14997549
|
608 |
+
I can't think of a better way, except maybe indigenous ways of knowing.
|
609 |
+
--- 14997582
|
610 |
+
>>14997549
|
611 |
+
If things are real outside our head? Yes. Not him btw
|
612 |
+
--- 14997587
|
613 |
+
>>14997551
|
614 |
+
It's not neutral because its presuppositions are not neutral. The only place you'll find a man without any presuppositions is a graveyard. Also, agnosticism as you seem to be thinking of it does not exist even in principle. Agnosticism is the claim that it is impossible to know God exists even if He does, this is even more positive of a claim than standard atheism. When people claim to be open to the existence of God this is called soft atheism, which is still a form of atheism and still denies the existence of God.
|
615 |
+
--- 14997593
|
616 |
+
>>14997558
|
617 |
+
good answer. good answer. i'm going to be watching you. lol
|
618 |
+
--- 14997594
|
619 |
+
>>14997573
|
620 |
+
>Let's say theism is true.
|
621 |
+
Let's also say all truth comes from God.
|
622 |
+
This doesn't imply people that deny these two truths can't say or believe true things.
|
623 |
+
|
624 |
+
That is, in fact, exactly what that implies. It literally follows logically from the premises you give here.
|
625 |
+
|
626 |
+
I'm afraid that the only god in your life right now is the ALP. The Atheist, the Liar, and the Paradox, amen
|
627 |
+
--- 14997596
|
628 |
+
>>14997577
|
629 |
+
What is that
|
630 |
+
>>14997582
|
631 |
+
Ok, so is there any evidence that evidence is the only way to know things?
|
632 |
+
--- 14997598
|
633 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
634 |
+
>Atheist pedo jews who spam /his/ still don't have a basic understanding of logic or what is special pleading.
|
635 |
+
--- 14997606
|
636 |
+
>>14997594
|
637 |
+
Anon I think you need to take your meds
|
638 |
+
--- 14997611
|
639 |
+
>>14997596
|
640 |
+
It's the way indigenous people (not in Europe) know things.
|
641 |
+
--- 14997617
|
642 |
+
>>14997594
|
643 |
+
>It literally follows logically from the premises you give here.
|
644 |
+
Just try to explain yourself even a little bit. What the fuck are you talking about? Why would it follow?
|
645 |
+
Let's say all math statements come from math.
|
646 |
+
If I say I reject math and then say 2+2=4 is the statement now false? 2+2 is not 4 because a math heretic said so?
|
647 |
+
--- 14997620
|
648 |
+
>>14997606
|
649 |
+
No, I think you need to accept that the ALP has utterly defeated your god, and that your beliefs have been demonstrated to be a sham.
|
650 |
+
--- 14997627
|
651 |
+
>>14997587
|
652 |
+
In the final analysis it's without legitimate grounding but the fact remains not claiming god exists or doesn't does not bear any burden of proof
|
653 |
+
--- 14997634
|
654 |
+
>>14997627
|
655 |
+
Claiming it is impossible to know even if God exists does. And you're still ignoring the role of presuppositions, which need not be stated explicitly
|
656 |
+
--- 14997638
|
657 |
+
>>14997596
|
658 |
+
What other way are you proposing to know that things are real? And be specific.
|
659 |
+
--- 14997641
|
660 |
+
>>14997466
|
661 |
+
By that metric, the existence of religions is already evidence of the supernatural.
|
662 |
+
--- 14997644
|
663 |
+
>>14997638
|
664 |
+
Divine revelation.
|
665 |
+
--- 14997645
|
666 |
+
>>14996768
|
667 |
+
logic is pretty fucking solid, seeing as logic gates enable us to talk right now. I think Western logicians got it right.
|
668 |
+
--- 14997655
|
669 |
+
>>14997617
|
670 |
+
>>Let's say theism is true.
|
671 |
+
|
672 |
+
And theism is belief in the One, True God.
|
673 |
+
>>Let's also say all truth comes from God.
|
674 |
+
|
675 |
+
"All truth comes from God". This means that if you don't believe in God, you can't believe in truth. It would be like claiming you can have leaves of a tree without the tree itself. Therefore:
|
676 |
+
>This doesn't imply people that deny these two truths can't say or believe true things.
|
677 |
+
|
678 |
+
is by definition complete nonsense
|
679 |
+
--- 14997659
|
680 |
+
>>14997521
|
681 |
+
Except when you examine human cultures, past and present.
|
682 |
+
--- 14997665
|
683 |
+
>>14997634
|
684 |
+
>Claiming it is impossible to know
|
685 |
+
You're shifting the argument
|
686 |
+
|
687 |
+
Abstaining from a judgment is not the claim that it is impossible to know something
|
688 |
+
|
689 |
+
If there is a neutral position in the issue of theism, it is neither theism nor atheism
|
690 |
+
--- 14997672
|
691 |
+
>>14997655
|
692 |
+
>This means that if you don't believe in God, you can't believe in truth.
|
693 |
+
No it doesn't but lets add it as an axiom anyway.
|
694 |
+
Let's say if you don't believe in God, you can't believe in truth.
|
695 |
+
You can still make true statements. 2+2 is still 4 when you say it.
|
696 |
+
|
697 |
+
You're not actually serious with this shit? Do some logic exercises for children.
|
698 |
+
--- 14997684
|
699 |
+
>>14997665
|
700 |
+
That is what agnosticism is by definition. That's what the word means.
|
701 |
+
>If there is a neutral position in the issue of theism
|
702 |
+
There is not. If one claims they are neutral towards God's existence they are presupposing it is possible for God to not exist, which presupposes that there are truths which can be true independently of God. This we deny, which means it is not neutral. For the believer every fact is a created fact, for the unbeliever every fact is an uncreated fact.
|
703 |
+
--- 14997700
|
704 |
+
>>14997655
|
705 |
+
The sun rises and sets for both the just and the unjust. Rain falls for all as well. Why would it be different with truth?
|
706 |
+
--- 14997706
|
707 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
708 |
+
In this thread a bunch of anons too terrified to ask this in a muslim community.
|
709 |
+
--- 14997723
|
710 |
+
>>14997641
|
711 |
+
Someone else believing something is not evidence for that something.
|
712 |
+
--- 14997747
|
713 |
+
>>14997706
|
714 |
+
Good thing christians are giant pussies with a victim complex, we can make fun of their cult and all they'll do is cry and try more apologetics.
|
715 |
+
--- 14997755
|
716 |
+
>>14997723
|
717 |
+
What about everyone believing something?
|
718 |
+
It also applies to morality btw.
|
719 |
+
--- 14997760
|
720 |
+
>>14997593
|
721 |
+
You forgot, "I like the way you think."
|
722 |
+
--- 14997768
|
723 |
+
>>14997706
|
724 |
+
Strange that you zeroed in on muslims for the lazy gotcha instead of, i dunno, hindus or buddhists
|
725 |
+
--- 14997777
|
726 |
+
>>14997644
|
727 |
+
What the fuck is that
|
728 |
+
--- 14997778
|
729 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
730 |
+
Jesus Christ! I've only saw it once!
|
731 |
+
--- 14997784
|
732 |
+
>>14997645
|
733 |
+
Nonsense anon, you should abandon logic and be Christian just like us
|
734 |
+
--- 14997785
|
735 |
+
>>14997777
|
736 |
+
It means they made it up we're supposed to take them seriously.
|
737 |
+
Also checked those quads.
|
738 |
+
--- 14997786
|
739 |
+
>>14997777
|
740 |
+
>seen
|
741 |
+
--- 14997813
|
742 |
+
>>14997777
|
743 |
+
>>14997785
|
744 |
+
>no arguments
|
745 |
+
--- 14997815
|
746 |
+
>>14997813
|
747 |
+
I don’t even know what it is, I’m asking what he personally is talking about
|
748 |
+
--- 14997828
|
749 |
+
>>14997815
|
750 |
+
The Lord God condescending from heaven to bestow information upon man.
|
751 |
+
--- 14997875
|
752 |
+
>>14997828
|
753 |
+
This is, by far, the dumbest thing I've ever seen written on 4chan. And I've been here since 2004
|
754 |
+
--- 14997878
|
755 |
+
>>14997638
|
756 |
+
Personal revelation like you used to decide that evidence is useful and truth is valuable.
|
757 |
+
--- 14997883
|
758 |
+
>>14997755
|
759 |
+
Morality isn't true or false.
|
760 |
+
--- 14997896
|
761 |
+
>>14997878
|
762 |
+
Those aren’t assessments as to whether things exist those are value judgments. Is this a cryptic way of saying they Christianity is valuable to you even though you don’t have proof the god is real?
|
763 |
+
--- 14997976
|
764 |
+
>>14997896
|
765 |
+
>Those aren’t assessments as to whether things exist
|
766 |
+
Sure they are but they're also more fundamental, believing truth exists and can be revealed to you is necessary to start making any claims about it. You appeal to the idea of truth to decide whether things exist. I think of this as an evolved sense like your sight but that idea rests on a million assumptions, it's built up from fundamental assumptions and revelations like the one I'm trying to explain with the idea.
|
767 |
+
--- 14997991
|
768 |
+
>>14997875
|
769 |
+
Does it make you cry?
|
770 |
+
--- 14998001
|
771 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
772 |
+
>Vishnu doesn’t exist
|
773 |
+
--- 14998023
|
774 |
+
>>14997976
|
775 |
+
>Sure they are but they're also more fundamental, believing truth exists and can be revealed to you is necessary to start making any claims about it
|
776 |
+
Your buddy claims he has a red car and he shows up with a red car with his name on the registration. That’s truth. I didn’t need to pre-suppose truth exists, it’s just a word for when words correspond to reality.
|
777 |
+
--- 14998057
|
778 |
+
>>14997976
|
779 |
+
Brother your god appears visibly in the Bible multiple times and interferes with reality. He is even capable of answering prayers where he can interfere in everyday machinations of reality on your behalf.
|
780 |
+
|
781 |
+
If this god is real you would be able to prove it beyond this sophist navel gazing. Prove it or accept the completely reasonable position of just not believing this ancient mythology.
|
782 |
+
--- 14998096
|
783 |
+
>>14997883
|
784 |
+
Then why do you care? You're habing thia discussion trying to impose your views on people. Why do you care?
|
785 |
+
--- 14998107
|
786 |
+
>>14996892
|
787 |
+
>I’ve never heard of a religion that doesn’t involve a deity that can physically appear in reality and/or interfere with it to alter things within our reality beyond just cause and effect.
|
788 |
+
--- 14998141
|
789 |
+
>>14998107
|
790 |
+
This goes both ways though.
|
791 |
+
--- 14998159
|
792 |
+
>>14998107
|
793 |
+
Okay so which religion has a god that never appears in reality and can’t interact with it?
|
794 |
+
--- 14998169
|
795 |
+
>>14997463
|
796 |
+
>muh brain chemicals reductionism
|
797 |
+
--- 14998179
|
798 |
+
>>14997521
|
799 |
+
>the supernatural existing is the default also holds no water
|
800 |
+
that’s why it’s holy water
|
801 |
+
--- 14998184
|
802 |
+
>>14998169
|
803 |
+
>muh ghost in the machine
|
804 |
+
>that for some inexplicable reason experiences severe personality changes due to head trauma, brain tumors...
|
805 |
+
--- 14998191
|
806 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
807 |
+
Hail Satan
|
808 |
+
--- 14998193
|
809 |
+
>>14998159
|
810 |
+
--- 14998194
|
811 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
812 |
+
>God doesn't exist
|
813 |
+
|
814 |
+
but He does
|
815 |
+
--- 14998221
|
816 |
+
>>14998193
|
817 |
+
Are you incapable of speaking?
|
818 |
+
--- 14998237
|
819 |
+
>>14998221
|
820 |
+
>red herring
|
821 |
+
>ad hominem
|
822 |
+
--- 14998249
|
823 |
+
>>14998237
|
824 |
+
>homer simpson
|
825 |
+
>smiling politely
|
826 |
+
--- 14998250
|
827 |
+
>>14998193
|
828 |
+
I’m not demanding anything. There is no religion that features a god who can’t interfere with reality or appear in reality.
|
829 |
+
I asked you in case I was missing one and you don’t have one.
|
830 |
+
--- 14998271
|
831 |
+
>>14998023
|
832 |
+
>I didn’t need to pre-suppose truth exists
|
833 |
+
You presupposed a million things, like coherence and the existence of truth. That it comes naturally to you and you think it's obvious just reiterates the point that it's an evolved sense you're not conscious of.
|
834 |
+
--- 14998283
|
835 |
+
>>14998057
|
836 |
+
God appears visibly every day. You don't accept it now like you wouldn't accept it back then. You would work to avoid understanding like you do now. There's nothing reasonable about your position focused on undermining our understanding of history.
|
837 |
+
--- 14998315
|
838 |
+
>>14998250
|
839 |
+
>There is no religion that features a god who can’t interfere with reality or appear in reality.
|
840 |
+
And no such idea was presented, you dishonestly creep in qualifiers like "can't" to make sure nobody can think about anything clearly. In the Christian tradition there's a long standing debate about if divine intervention is even a thing at all. If they are they may still be interventions set up from the start. A timeless entity interacting in time as if it's a temporal creature makes no sense.
|
841 |
+
--- 14998320
|
842 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
843 |
+
how can you say He doesn't exist when He literally lives rent free in your head
|
844 |
+
--- 14998344
|
845 |
+
>>14998237
|
846 |
+
>Christians pretending to care about logical fallacies
|
847 |
+
Lmao
|
848 |
+
--- 14998368
|
849 |
+
>>14998315
|
850 |
+
>In the Christian tradition there's a long standing debate about if divine intervention is even a thing at all.
|
851 |
+
I’ve been a practicing, church-going Catholic and a Protestant and I’ve never been to a single church where God is not capable of interacting with or appearing in reality.
|
852 |
+
--- 14998378
|
853 |
+
>>14996688
|
854 |
+
>Yes, basically nobody in the physical sciences considers the existence of the supernatural to be the default
|
855 |
+
They were never trained too and dont understand the arguments and proofs by design so this isnt a surprise and means nothing though you appear to think it does for some reason.
|
856 |
+
--- 14998383
|
857 |
+
>>14996688
|
858 |
+
Their entire worldview and even their scientific discipline is built on top of a given that is fallacious from jump and a religion itself
|
859 |
+
--- 14998384
|
860 |
+
>>14996619 (OP)
|
861 |
+
Ok so Santa Claus is real until proven otherwise.
|
862 |
+
--- 14998389
|
863 |
+
You're telling me there's a god? Where? I don't see im
|
864 |
+
--- 14998928
|
865 |
+
All that talk and not one atheist can disprove God. Embarrassing.
|
866 |
+
--- 14999597
|
867 |
+
>>14996793
|
868 |
+
6 is massive logical leap, and has no causal relation to 4 and 5 lol.
|
869 |
+
--- 14999853
|
870 |
+
>>14998344
|
871 |
+
>red herring
|
872 |
+
I'm not religious. I’m calling out poor arguments.
|
his/14996653.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996674
|
3 |
+
>>14996653 (OP)
|
4 |
+
--- 14998085
|
5 |
+
>>14997857
|
6 |
+
>>14996674
|
7 |
+
No
|
8 |
+
--- 14998381
|
9 |
+
>>14996653 (OP)
|
10 |
+
Men like to sex children. Women look like children
|
11 |
+
--- 14998390
|
12 |
+
>>14996653 (OP)
|
13 |
+
Is this nasty whore wishing every man would try to rape her?
|
14 |
+
--- 14998685
|
15 |
+
>>14998381
|
16 |
+
>Men like to sex children
|
17 |
+
Why
|
18 |
+
--- 14998793
|
19 |
+
This is all that needs to be said.
|
20 |
+
--- 14998875
|
21 |
+
>>14998793
|
22 |
+
1 fatty fetishist, its like claiming everyone was a footfag because they saw Tarantula's movies
|
23 |
+
--- 14998923
|
24 |
+
>>14998793
|
25 |
+
>no evidence to suggest a man carved this
|
26 |
+
>no evidence to suggest a man carved this as a sexual object
|
27 |
+
--- 14998934
|
28 |
+
>>14996653 (OP)
|
29 |
+
Female magic like seduction.
|
30 |
+
--- 14998942
|
31 |
+
>>14998923
|
32 |
+
The natural state of Man is to crave more, to crave bigger. It is therefore natural to crave bigger women
|
his/14996774.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,832 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996774
|
3 |
+
can people be actually transgender? i mean that they were literally born in a wrong body or are they just delusional and it isn't possible. i am genuinely curious what do you have to say about this and i don't have a opinion on this subject myself
|
4 |
+
--- 14996781
|
5 |
+
>i mean that they were literally born in a wrong body
|
6 |
+
they are the body. whats up with pederasts and supernatural nonsense?
|
7 |
+
--- 14996794
|
8 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
9 |
+
>are they just delusional and it isn't possible
|
10 |
+
This.
|
11 |
+
They may think they were born in the wrong body, and may attempt to rectify that by wearing different clothes, taking hormone replacements or undergoing surgery. But they will still be whatever they were born as. They won't switch over to being men or women, but will rather be masculine women or feminine men.
|
12 |
+
Results may vary
|
13 |
+
--- 14996808
|
14 |
+
Trannys are freaks
|
15 |
+
--- 14996809
|
16 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
17 |
+
There is no proof whatsoever that gender dysphoria is innate.
|
18 |
+
--- 14996816
|
19 |
+
>>14996809
|
20 |
+
That argument stems from the belief that the white genetic code has no flaws
|
21 |
+
--- 14996818
|
22 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
23 |
+
no such a thing as "born in the wrong body" biologically, but if they want to become SOCIALLY female and use female pronouns, so be it. only mayo /pol/tards care about it because they're losing the culture war and are as unhinged as ever
|
24 |
+
|
25 |
+
just beware of white trannies in female spaces, unlike black / asian / spic trannies who are just homosexuals (straight PoC men are almost never trans), most white trannies are "lesbian" because STRAIGHT white men have a predisposition to troon out.
|
26 |
+
--- 14996825
|
27 |
+
https://www.britannica.com/science/hermaphroditism
|
28 |
+
Yes, but not the way most think.
|
29 |
+
--- 14996826
|
30 |
+
If you cut your balls off and flood your system with female hormones, you will eventually develop a female mind. Anything else is a low effort larp
|
31 |
+
--- 14996827
|
32 |
+
>>14996818
|
33 |
+
>t. zidovsky potkan
|
34 |
+
--- 14996831
|
35 |
+
>>14996816
|
36 |
+
What?
|
37 |
+
--- 14996835
|
38 |
+
No, they can't. The simple fact is that nature thrives by competition and cooperation between different kinds of lifeforms, and transgenderism is just part of the typical human urge to try and force two things together through violent means.
|
39 |
+
|
40 |
+
This has never worked and never will work, because nature is simply not set up this way. It would've been different if there wassome kind of environmental pressure that forces this naturally, but in this case, this is just some kind of man-made culturally motivated wishfulfillment, and not a necessity to survive
|
41 |
+
--- 14996850
|
42 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
43 |
+
>i mean that they were literally born in a wrong body or are they just delusional and it isn't possible.
|
44 |
+
I mean, no? But that's not what transgender is. Transgender is someone who identifies as a gender other than the one assigned to them at birth. Those people do exist.
|
45 |
+
|
46 |
+
Personally, I don't think anything comparable to "being born in the wrong body" is going on here. A trans woman (before taking HRT, or any surgeries) is just as male as any other male. There have been some studies that suggest they have a more female brain possibly from a mix up with hormones during pregnancy, it doesn't matter to me.
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
+
A trans woman identifies as a woman, meaning they identify with the social category of woman and/or feel more comfortable with female secondary sex characteristics than male.
|
49 |
+
There's nothing wrong with that, and it's certainly not a delusion.
|
50 |
+
--- 14996862
|
51 |
+
>>14996850
|
52 |
+
>>14996818
|
53 |
+
A woman is something you are, not something you wear. Leftists really do think "make-believe" becomes reality.
|
54 |
+
--- 14996887
|
55 |
+
>>14996862
|
56 |
+
If you think woman has no other associations other than just vagene and booba you're a moran or just dense.
|
57 |
+
There's a whole social category of what women are expected to be in society.
|
58 |
+
Women are supposed to be motherly, great with children, wear "feminine" clothes like skirts, blouses, bikinis, etc, wear make-up, eye-liner. Women are expected to talk a certain way. Men and women have different accents even in the same dialect.
|
59 |
+
|
60 |
+
If this is purely a linguistic issue where you think gender must be a synonym for sex, then fine. But we need a word to describe the social category, the social roles which don't match up perfectly with sex.
|
61 |
+
|
62 |
+
Trans women have taken on the social role, the gender identity if you will, of women. They are not female sexed, but they are women.
|
63 |
+
--- 14996890
|
64 |
+
>>14996827
|
65 |
+
curiously enough, white slavs are just like PoC men, only the GAY ones become trannies. straight PoC and straight slav men are normal
|
66 |
+
|
67 |
+
straight men becoming lesbians is mostly a WESTERN white man's affair. i have a theory, i think black men's superior masculinity and sexual prowess trigger AGP in anglo and white frog boys, so they troon out to avoid competing in the same sexual market
|
68 |
+
--- 14996896
|
69 |
+
>>14996850
|
70 |
+
>But that's not what transgender is
|
71 |
+
Yeah, but pretty much all of them still claim otherwise.
|
72 |
+
>There have been some studies that suggest they have a more female brain possibly from a mix up with hormones during pregnancy
|
73 |
+
Those studies show that this is also true for alot of homosexuals, i.e. trannies could have easily grown up to be regular faggots instead of men in dresses.
|
74 |
+
--- 14996914
|
75 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
76 |
+
I wad unironically born in a wrong body, my height should've been at least 6'6", my Iq at least 160 and my dick at least 20 inches.
|
77 |
+
--- 14996923
|
78 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
79 |
+
No. No matter if you got fucked up the butt or neovag a million times, you cannot conceive because you have no womb or ovaries, sorry. Maybe someday science will advance enough to give you an artificial buttwomb so you can shit out an infant. Until then YWNBAW.
|
80 |
+
--- 14996930
|
81 |
+
>being a woman means wearing a dress
|
82 |
+
>also I’m into cuckshit btw
|
83 |
+
Leftists really are full of surprises.
|
84 |
+
--- 14996939
|
85 |
+
>>14996896
|
86 |
+
>Yeah, but pretty much all of them still claim otherwise.
|
87 |
+
Not really. "Born in the wrong body" is not a scientific claim, it's an analogy used to try to explain what it means to be transgender.
|
88 |
+
There are some people who take it more literally, like so-called trans-medicalists who are big fans of the brain studies I mentioned. This viewpoint has been falling out of favor in the trans community and on the left.
|
89 |
+
|
90 |
+
>Those studies show that this is also true for alot of homosexuals
|
91 |
+
I don't take them too seriously, especially since the data is inconclusive. What matters is whether someone identifies as trans, not potential brain abnormalities.
|
92 |
+
|
93 |
+
> i.e. trannies could have easily grown up to be regular faggots instead of men in dresses.
|
94 |
+
Like I've mentioned earlier, you're making clear that this is not about a linguistic argument about what women means. You have a problem with someone who is male wearing a dress, acting feminine, and potentially physically changing their body.
|
95 |
+
--- 14996957
|
96 |
+
>>14996890
|
97 |
+
>t. zidovsky potkan
|
98 |
+
--- 14997041
|
99 |
+
>>14996939
|
100 |
+
I have a problem with it because it is a dangerous and destructive mental illness which isn't innate, and therefore should absolutely NOT be encouraged and accepted by society, rather it should be prevented and cured.
|
101 |
+
I already know of the whole "gender is a social construct" line of thought, and contrary to what you seem to presume, it is not something I completely disagree with. However, trannies do not fit into that narrative. They aren't merely feminine males, they are literally trying to become biological women with the surgeries and the hormone treatment because, according to them, they are females in male bodies (or vice versa).
|
102 |
+
--- 14997083
|
103 |
+
>>14997041
|
104 |
+
>according to them, they are females in male bodies (or vice versa).
|
105 |
+
again, that's a strawman in my view. I have rarely seen anyone argue that literally, and when I do it's usually more conservative trans people like Blaire White who support medical gate-keeping to prevent "trans-trenders" who aren't actually trans in their view.
|
106 |
+
|
107 |
+
>I have a problem with it because it is a dangerous and destructive mental illness which isn't innate, and therefore should absolutely NOT be encouraged and accepted by society, rather it should be prevented and cured.
|
108 |
+
Well the people who study the treatment of gender dysphoria disagree with you. Gender affirming care and social support of transition greatly improve trans people's mental health, while "curing" them by making them abandon their trans identity is shown to be just as harmful as gay conversion therapy. It doesn't cure it, it represses it, which is really bad for you psychologically.
|
109 |
+
--- 14997122
|
110 |
+
>>14996939
|
111 |
+
Self ID is ironically controversial because of progressive views on gender. I know very little about the academic discourse on the topic, but in popular discourse there's support for non-disphoric trans people but at the same time a common view that I guess you could describe as naive gender abolitionism. The meme question arises from the tension between the two, which makes me think that oldschool transsexuals were on a stronger footing despite drastically lower social support.
|
112 |
+
--- 14997134
|
113 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
114 |
+
>i mean that they were literally born in a wrong body
|
115 |
+
Im an ugly bald manlet with a small chin, but I identify as a tall gigachad
|
116 |
+
--- 14997139
|
117 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
118 |
+
No other illness sees doctors declare the body is wrong and the mind correct
|
119 |
+
--- 14997141
|
120 |
+
>>14997134
|
121 |
+
I unironically understood what they're about with regards to dysphoria when I started balding.
|
122 |
+
--- 14997142
|
123 |
+
>>14997122
|
124 |
+
>but in popular discourse there's support for non-disphoric trans people but at the same time a common view that I guess you could describe as naive gender abolitionism.
|
125 |
+
What tension is there between the two?
|
126 |
+
|
127 |
+
Gender abolitionism supports non-dysphoric trans people by saying those categories are ultimately meaningless.
|
128 |
+
--- 14997178
|
129 |
+
>>14997139
|
130 |
+
Let me tell you a story.
|
131 |
+
|
132 |
+
Someone I know was suicidal and attempted suicide by jumping out of an 8 story window. This was in Alaska in the winter so the snow managed to catch his fall, and he survived after a lengthy stay at the hospital.
|
133 |
+
|
134 |
+
His legs didn't work as well as before the fall, but he could walk. But he had major chronic pain issues stemming from the fall and could barely stand to walk anymore for long lengths of time.
|
135 |
+
Ultimately, the chronic pain led to him having his legs amputated, and he's much happier now with his prosthetics.
|
136 |
+
|
137 |
+
The brain/nervous system malfunctioned, even though physically his legs were perfectly fine, impaired, but still functional. He and his doctors still made a determination to amputate his legs because of his brain.
|
138 |
+
|
139 |
+
So yes, the mind is pretty damn important for medical decisions, particularly if you're talking about mental health disorders, like gender dysphoria.
|
140 |
+
--- 14997196
|
141 |
+
>>14997142
|
142 |
+
When you abolish gender, how do you identify with a gender? When we go back in the history of gender, you could ask anyone "What is a woman?" and beyond answers related to sex, you could get answers like "someone who is nurturing", "someone who is gentle and modest", "someone who cooks for the whole family", "someone who takes care of the kids" and so on. Obviously the answers could vary in different times and at different places, but the answers in one time and at one place would be quite consistent. And with that, it's easy to one see when they say "I identify as a woman.". But when you take those identifiers out of the equation, what does identifying as a woman even mean?
|
143 |
+
--- 14997223
|
144 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
145 |
+
It's literally a mental illness. Hardware problem, bad wiring, circuits in the brain going haywire, etc. The brain is such a complex organ, it's no wonder that some people turn out to be absolutely fucking insane and weirdos.
|
146 |
+
Note that defining mental illness boils down to societal expectations of what is normal (e.g. autistic people weren't seen as mentally ill before, just "quirky" or "eccentric"). Unfortunately our societies (e.g. European Union, Americas) have decided that being a self mutilating whackjob should no longer be listed as a mental illness, but rest assured this 100% is a result of a defective brain.
|
147 |
+
--- 14997232
|
148 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
149 |
+
no, transgenders are simply people who for whatever reason wish to look a certain way and want that to influence how others treat them, thats all it is
|
150 |
+
--- 14997237
|
151 |
+
>>14997196
|
152 |
+
>When you abolish gender, how do you identify with a gender?
|
153 |
+
Social categories traditionally associated with sex.
|
154 |
+
|
155 |
+
>When we go back in the history of gender, you could ask anyone "What is a woman?" and beyond answers related to sex, you could get answers like "someone who is nurturing", "someone who is gentle and modest", "someone who cooks for the whole family", "someone who takes care of the kids" and so on
|
156 |
+
Look up Third genders anon:
|
157 |
+
>Most cultures use a gender binary, having two genders (boys/men and girls/women).[3][4][5] In cultures with a third or fourth gender, these genders may represent very different things. To Native Hawaiians and Tahitians, Māhū is an intermediate state between man and woman known as "gender liminality".[6][7] Some traditional Diné Native Americans of the Southwestern US acknowledge a spectrum of four genders: feminine woman, masculine woman, feminine man, and masculine man.[8] The term "third gender" has also been used to describe the hijras of South Asia[9] who have gained legal identity, fa'afafine of Polynesia, and Balkan sworn virgins.[10] A culture recognizing a third gender does not in itself mean that they were valued by that culture, and often is the result of explicit devaluation of women in that culture.[11]
|
158 |
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_gender
|
159 |
+
|
160 |
+
>But when you take those identifiers out of the equation, what does identifying as a woman even mean?
|
161 |
+
Gender abolitionists think these categories are ultimately arbitrary and should be done away with. In practice, they still use those categories in every day life cause you can't just will them away.
|
162 |
+
|
163 |
+
I'm not a gender abolitionist though. Here's my view:
|
164 |
+
The social categories are arbitrary. Woman is a social category traditionally associated with the female sex. That doesn't mean you have to be female to identify as a woman.
|
165 |
+
Just like how Abdul is an arab name in origin, but there is no naming rule that says I cannot go by Abdul or name my child Abdul.
|
166 |
+
--- 14997238
|
167 |
+
>>14996850
|
168 |
+
>Personally, I don't think anything comparable to "being born in the wrong body" is going on here. A
|
169 |
+
Born in the wrong body is absolutely something that used to be commonly said regarding transsexual feelings like 10 years ago.
|
170 |
+
For anyone who remembers life in the 2000s, this whole mania is extra bizarre because we always have had these people around, but they simply were so rare and under the radar that nobody cared much. The pushback stems from them suddenly becoming a thing EVERYWHERE
|
171 |
+
--- 14997249
|
172 |
+
>>14996887
|
173 |
+
>Trans women have taken on the social role, the gender identity if you will, of women. They are not female sexed, but they are women.
|
174 |
+
But then why do they try to imitate the female sex's secondary characteristics? That's the fucking issue.
|
175 |
+
If gender is detached from sex, what the fuck are the hormones and surgery for? Why do they get breast implants? Why do they try to alter their vocal chords? You can't pretend it's not related to sex when transitioning literally refers to physical sex alterations!
|
176 |
+
--- 14997253
|
177 |
+
>>14996818
|
178 |
+
>if they want to become SOCIALLY female and use female pronouns, so be it
|
179 |
+
They want to pretend, I don’t want to. That’s like telling me to validate someone else’s religion just because
|
180 |
+
.
|
181 |
+
--- 14997259
|
182 |
+
>>14997238
|
183 |
+
>Born in the wrong body is absolutely something that used to be commonly said regarding transsexual feelings like 10 years ago.
|
184 |
+
Yes? Why does that matter? People's views change, and the language they use to describe things changes.
|
185 |
+
|
186 |
+
We used to view this as a purely medical phenomena, but we've come to see that gender expression is really a spectrum and not innately tied to biology or brain chemistry. You don't need a female brain to like the color pink or dolls.
|
187 |
+
--- 14997267
|
188 |
+
>>14996887
|
189 |
+
>Women are supposed to be motherly, great with children, wear "feminine" clothes like skirts, blouses, bikinis, etc, wear make-up, eye-liner. Women are expected to talk a certain way. Men and women have different accents even in the same dialect.
|
190 |
+
This is getting very sexist, anon, you might want to rethink about what you’re saying or I’ll tell twitter about you.
|
191 |
+
--- 14997268
|
192 |
+
>>14997142
|
193 |
+
>Abolish gender
|
194 |
+
>Sex is all that's left
|
195 |
+
>We literally just return to square 1 because 99.7% of the population are either XX or XY sex
|
196 |
+
>Sexual differences persist in society because men are simply stronger ergo more suitable for jobs like soldiers and construction
|
197 |
+
Wow such progress
|
198 |
+
--- 14997274
|
199 |
+
>>14997122
|
200 |
+
If you showed me a picture of this guy without telling me who he was I'd think he were a leftist
|
201 |
+
--- 14997287
|
202 |
+
>>14997249
|
203 |
+
>But then why do they try to imitate the female sex's secondary characteristics?
|
204 |
+
> You can't pretend it's not related to sex
|
205 |
+
It is related to sex. My definitions:
|
206 |
+
|
207 |
+
Gender- social categories traditionally related to sex
|
208 |
+
Woman- a social category traditionally associated with the female sex
|
209 |
+
|
210 |
+
Socially, we assume that someone is a woman if we perceive female secondary sex characteristics. Put all gender dysphoria aside, if you want to be identified as a woman, if you aren't in a super liberal place you need to look like a biological female. If you don't, but wear traditionally female clothing, you're probably going to be harassed, or even assaulted.
|
211 |
+
|
212 |
+
Society really requires trans people to pass to have a hope of being accepted, and non-binary identities are often delegitimized.
|
213 |
+
|
214 |
+
That being said, gender dysphoria is a thing, and many people are just happier changing their secondary sex characteristics. I see no problems with that.
|
215 |
+
But you don't need hormones or any surgeries to be trans, I think we should encourage the idea that they're not necessary, but are available.
|
216 |
+
--- 14997294
|
217 |
+
>>14997259
|
218 |
+
>You don't need a female brain to like the color pink or dolls.
|
219 |
+
Liking pink is obviously sociological, but there's plenty of more subtle expressions of human behavior which are obviously tied to your sex/gender (which are still the same fucking word in my language).
|
220 |
+
Why do people think humans are exempt from the same pattern we observe in other intelligent mammals? Male Gorilla and female gorillas naturally behave in certain ways, male lions and female lions according to certain patterns, dogs do it, cats do it, chimpanzees do it, bears, etc.
|
221 |
+
Humans arbitrarily are exempt from this? Hah! I've raised cows and bulls at work before, they're innately different in behavior, it's instinct.
|
222 |
+
--- 14997298
|
223 |
+
>>14997268
|
224 |
+
>Sexual differences persist in society because men are simply stronger ergo more suitable for jobs like soldiers and construction
|
225 |
+
I have no problem with this as long as society isn't legally or socially enforcing this by saying females cannot be soldiers.
|
226 |
+
--- 14997299
|
227 |
+
>>14997237
|
228 |
+
>Social categories traditionally associated with sex.
|
229 |
+
Right, but in a society that abolished genders they wouldn't be.
|
230 |
+
>Look up Third genders anon:
|
231 |
+
I don't think cultures that had more than two genders are entirely relevant in a discussion about an ideology that pursues the end result of having no genders.
|
232 |
+
>The social categories are arbitrary. Woman is a social category traditionally associated with the female sex.
|
233 |
+
I kind of agree, except that I think there probably is a biological component at play too.
|
234 |
+
And given that you're not a gender abolitionist, your view is obviously not going to be at odds with what I outlined. The fact that gender is largely arbitrary alone isn't in any conflict with self ID, but when people start saying that there normatively ought not be gendered behaviours associated with the two sexes, that's a whole another can of worms.
|
235 |
+
--- 14997314
|
236 |
+
>>14997294
|
237 |
+
I'm sure there are some difference. Testosterone and estrogen are associated with different behavioral traits.
|
238 |
+
But humans are much more socially complex than other animals. The vast majority of "feminine" or "masculine" social traits I see no reason why they would be rooted in biology, and often these traits are viewed as masculine in one culture, but feminine in another. Skirts are a great example of this.
|
239 |
+
--- 14997318
|
240 |
+
>>14997298
|
241 |
+
>or socially enforcing this by saying females cannot be soldiers.
|
242 |
+
These legal enforcements are necessary in cases where they simply may be disruptive to group coherence and provide no benefit to the purpose of the organization (e.g. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/09/10/439190586/marine-corps-study-finds-all-male-combat-units-faster-than-mixed-units)
|
243 |
+
We can have a woman drone pilot because physical ability doesn't mean much here, but for grunts who gotta march and endure physical extremes (be it siege conditions, torture in captivity, carrying 60+ kilos, etc.)
|
244 |
+
--- 14997324
|
245 |
+
>>14997259
|
246 |
+
>You don't need a female brain to like the color pink or dolls.
|
247 |
+
neither of which are neither necessary or sufficient to be a woman.
|
248 |
+
|
249 |
+
listen, you can act like a faggot and people will treat you like a faggot, because being a faggot is an ideology and a set of behaviors. A woman is something you are, or are not. What trannies want is for everyone else to participate in their fetish.
|
250 |
+
--- 14997342
|
251 |
+
>>14997299
|
252 |
+
>The fact that gender is largely arbitrary alone isn't in any conflict with self ID, but when people start saying that there normatively ought not be gendered behaviours associated with the two sexes, that's a whole another can of worms.
|
253 |
+
From the gender abolitionists arguments I've seen, I disagree. If you wanted to totally deconstruct and get rid of gender categories, the best way to do that is to try to make them arbitrary and individual.
|
254 |
+
|
255 |
+
I don't think that is possible, but I'll support people with this viewpoint because it aligns with mine in the short term. It's too idealistic imo.
|
256 |
+
--- 14997350
|
257 |
+
>>14997267
|
258 |
+
which is a real joke because the typical porn addled hyper aggressive tranny is about as far from "motherly" as one can conceive. My mom, the legendary gamer, hacker, body builder, and ex-navy seal LMAO
|
259 |
+
--- 14997380
|
260 |
+
>>14997324
|
261 |
+
>neither of which are neither necessary or sufficient to be a woman.
|
262 |
+
which is not what I said. my point is that most "feminine" characteristics associated with women have nothing to do with biology. Woman is a social category with an amalgamation of associated characteristics and is not consistent.
|
263 |
+
Even if you completely discount trans people, we still don't use woman = female 100% of the time. There are plenty of intersex women who have a mixture of both sexes' traits biologically, but we identify them as women, not 3/4 woman and 1/4 man, or as their own sex.
|
264 |
+
--- 14997389
|
265 |
+
>>14997314
|
266 |
+
>The vast majority of "feminine" or "masculine" social traits I see no reason why they would be rooted in biology, and often these traits are viewed as masculine in one culture, but feminine in another. Skirts are a great example of this.
|
267 |
+
These are aesthetic differences which are social, yes, but I refer to more fundamental issues. Men being the designated cannon fodder for warfare is pretty much the standard everywhere, from the Yanomami to the Mongols to the USA today. Testosterone= Muscle = Fighting = Warrior is a pretty clear path. Likewise, women being assigned caretakers of children is pretty logical when it's women who have to carry the baby to term and it's women who have lactating breasts to feed the child.
|
268 |
+
Everything that comes after this is just layers covering the ultimate root of these gender roles which stem from logical needs tied to physique
|
269 |
+
--- 14997403
|
270 |
+
>>14997389
|
271 |
+
The issue is when you go from "each sex tends to be better at each of these things" to "each sex must be this way".
|
272 |
+
We don't need every male to be a buff super soldier and we don't need every woman to be a broodmare raising children. Hell, with formula we don't even need caregivers of babies and infants to be female.
|
273 |
+
--- 14997409
|
274 |
+
“Transgenderism” unfortunately describes many different phenomena (which have in common expressing the gender role inappropriate for your sex). Some trannies have brains that were insufficiently androgenized (or much more rarely, a female may experience the opposite) - these, obviously, act as women or effeminate gay men, and most revealingly in their erotic preference. Rather than them having the wrong body, their body has the wrong ’them’. The misunderstanding is perfectly explicable - all trannies ipso facto value their expression and self-conception over any and all mores, their family’s comfort, pragmatism, (everything?) - they are egocentric to the point of depression.
|
275 |
+
|
276 |
+
Most trannies have brain anatomy perfectly typical for their sex, excepting a pathological erotic obsession, the reversal of their gender expression and identity being just one facet thereof. These are identified by their apparently neurotic (typically autistic, or sociopathic) character, sexual perversion, and relatively late “gender transition”.
|
277 |
+
--- 14997414
|
278 |
+
>>14997342
|
279 |
+
I think we're working with two different meanings of "arbitrary". For instance, gender was arbitrary in Victorian England in the sense that there was no real reason why men or women ought to act the way they did. However, these arbitrary expressions of gender were still very rigidly built around a binary view of gender.
|
280 |
+
With gender abolitionism, individual forms of expressions are arbitrary with regards to sex because the gender scaffolding simply isn't there anymore. What does it then mean to be a woman in a world where there isn't any set of behaviours associated with the female sex?
|
281 |
+
--- 14997440
|
282 |
+
>>14997380
|
283 |
+
>Woman is a social category
|
284 |
+
sort of like how "food" is also a social category to leftists lmao
|
285 |
+
--- 14997450
|
286 |
+
>>14997414
|
287 |
+
>What does it then mean to be a woman in a world where there isn't any set of behaviours associated with the female sex?
|
288 |
+
I mean in that world it would cease to mean anything really. I don't think that's ultimately possible though and in practice gender abolitionists tend to support self ID, because it gets rid of the rigid, traditional tie between gender and sex.
|
289 |
+
--- 14997461
|
290 |
+
>>14997440
|
291 |
+
Yes.
|
292 |
+
--- 14997464
|
293 |
+
>the meaning of the word sex shifts to mean coitus
|
294 |
+
>people begin using "gender" as a euphemism for sex
|
295 |
+
>sociopathic jews make an entire ideology about how wearing a dress makes you a woman cause of words n stuff (you need a yiddisch kopf to understand)
|
296 |
+
--- 14997470
|
297 |
+
>>14997450
|
298 |
+
And that's exactly what I'm getting at, lol. How do you abolish gender without creating a society where there isn't any set of behaviours associated with the female sex? Gender abolitionism + self ID seems kind of schizophrenic to me.
|
299 |
+
--- 14997490
|
300 |
+
>>14997464
|
301 |
+
this may be one of the dumbest greentexts I've ever read. to be expected from a human skin-colored pepe poster.
|
302 |
+
--- 14997511
|
303 |
+
>>14997490
|
304 |
+
wearing a woman's uniform doens't make you a woman, rachel
|
305 |
+
--- 14997552
|
306 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
307 |
+
It's possible that one or two people in the last 80,000 years were genuinely "born in the wrong body". Unlikely but possible. Most trannies just have some kind of mental illness and are susceptible to current thing syndrome
|
308 |
+
--- 14997553
|
309 |
+
I am so glad that I was born an “Arabic” speaker where every verb, noun, and adjective is either strictly masculine or strictly feminine. I am not confused about something as clear as daylight.
|
310 |
+
--- 14997566
|
311 |
+
>>14997083
|
312 |
+
>I have rarely seen anyone argue that literally
|
313 |
+
Why, then, do they feel the need to get estrogen, tits, and a "neo-vagina"?
|
314 |
+
>Gender affirming care and social support of transition greatly improve trans people's mental health
|
315 |
+
Not so much for fully developed adults though, and leaving such a life-altering decision to a fucking child is inherently wrong.
|
316 |
+
>while "curing" them by making them abandon their trans identity is shown to be just as harmful as gay conversion therapy.
|
317 |
+
Fact of the matter is plenty of people have been able to abandon it on their own, so there's no reason to think that it would be impossible to help them abandon it. Just because past attempts have been inadequate doesn't mean that all future attempts will be so.
|
318 |
+
--- 14997800
|
319 |
+
>>14997566
|
320 |
+
|
321 |
+
https://www.britannica.com/science/gender-dysphoria
|
322 |
+
|
323 |
+
>For gender-variant children, critics often argue that the diagnosis is too broad. Research on children diagnosed with GD suggests that they will most likely grow up to be gay or bisexual. Critics suggest that GD treatments for children focus too much on boys, that treatment may damage self-esteem, and that the distress that GD children exhibit is not inherent to their gender nonconformity but rather is a reaction to being stigmatized. Mental health professionals who support the diagnosis and treat GD children counter that their treatments help GD children to have better peer relations and thus bolstered self-esteem and that research indicates that GD children do exhibit forms of distress associated directly with their gender variance.
|
324 |
+
--- 14997816
|
325 |
+
>>14997800
|
326 |
+
Your point being?
|
327 |
+
--- 14997821
|
328 |
+
>>14997800
|
329 |
+
>>14997083
|
330 |
+
>>14996939
|
331 |
+
>>14996850
|
332 |
+
YOU WILL NEVER BE A WOMAN
|
333 |
+
--- 14997822
|
334 |
+
>>14997816
|
335 |
+
Critics vs. Mental health professionals.
|
336 |
+
I'm going with the professionals.
|
337 |
+
--- 14997838
|
338 |
+
>>14997822
|
339 |
+
--- 14997845
|
340 |
+
>>14997838
|
341 |
+
Do you think skin grafts are exclusively a bottom surgery thing?
|
342 |
+
--- 14997855
|
343 |
+
>>14997845
|
344 |
+
No but this skin graft was because a woman wanted a penis
|
345 |
+
--- 14997863
|
346 |
+
>>14997855
|
347 |
+
And?
|
348 |
+
--- 14997867
|
349 |
+
>>14997863
|
350 |
+
And trannys are mentally ill freaks who willingly do this to themselves
|
351 |
+
--- 14997881
|
352 |
+
>>14997822
|
353 |
+
>Research on children diagnosed with GD suggests that they will most likely grow up to be gay or bisexual.
|
354 |
+
You're just going to ignore this bit?
|
355 |
+
--- 14997885
|
356 |
+
>>14997867
|
357 |
+
get a common procedure like a skin graft?
|
358 |
+
If anything this is a chad move, using your whole forearm worth of skin for a big donkey dick.
|
359 |
+
--- 14997887
|
360 |
+
>>14997863
|
361 |
+
i just think like other fashion trends like tramp stamps or ear gauges it shouldn't be done to children or performed by doctors (as they take oaths to do no harm). Have your dick whacked off at a tattoo parlor but don't expect insurance to cover it.
|
362 |
+
--- 14997907
|
363 |
+
>>14997887
|
364 |
+
also don't expect anyone else in society to believe you have transmuted into a woman through the kabbalistic magick of jewish alchemy.
|
365 |
+
--- 14997933
|
366 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
367 |
+
No, transgender is a nonsense word that really has no legitimate meaning. Advocates of transgenderism usually draw a distinction between biological sex and gender by admitting that while there are only two biological sexes, gender is a social construct and exists on a spectrum.
|
368 |
+
|
369 |
+
Following this logic, it is nonsense to connect biological sex to gender in the way transgender activists do, and it essentially renders the concept of gender irrelevant to the real world issues surrounding this. I.e. which bathrooms and sports teams should transgender people use? These are matters of biological sex, not gender. In conclusion, transgender activists are mentally deficient imbeciles who are being used as pawns by those who seek to distort reality to exert psychological control over the populace.
|
370 |
+
--- 14997951
|
371 |
+
Dont care gonna keep injecting estrogen and growing fruits and vegetables
|
372 |
+
--- 14997954
|
373 |
+
>>14997885
|
374 |
+
You retarded faggot. You will burn in hell with all the other soulless npcs. Have you ever lifted anything in your life? I fail to see how someone could be so devoid of an inner monologue as to pretend this Frankenstein shit is normal. The woman had her skin sliced off to the dermis going down to the elbow. This procedure has to be immensely painful and removing key parts of such an integral part of the human body (its limbs) would definitely have a negative impact on anyone's life. Not only that, you are purposefully crippling yourself. And for what? A fake penis? Anyone who endorses this needs to be gunned down
|
375 |
+
--- 14998033
|
376 |
+
>>14997885
|
377 |
+
>damage control for disastrous injuries
|
378 |
+
>common procedure that should be handed out like candy to mentally ill retards
|
379 |
+
--- 14998064
|
380 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
381 |
+
It depends on definitions. It's a big semantic game.
|
382 |
+
What is the "wrong body"?
|
383 |
+
What is "gender identity"?
|
384 |
+
I think the view that gender identity is completely separate from biological sex is retarded. I think it's extreme mental gymnastics. If a bio male thinks he's a woman, as gender identity, then how can he be sure that his definition of "woman" is the same as other trans womens'? If identity is decoupled from biology or anything physical, then it's literally meaningless because there's nothing to compare the definition to.
|
385 |
+
For trans people who feel like they should have a penis where there isn't one, or shouldn't have one where there is one, I think they're just mentally ill. The first group is just brainwashed, but there's nothing neurologically abnormal about them.
|
386 |
+
That's my view, anyway.
|
387 |
+
--- 14998075
|
388 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
389 |
+
No, the entire tranny ideology is self-contradictory nonsense made up by a Jewish pedophile.
|
390 |
+
--- 14998090
|
391 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
392 |
+
Hey buddy, i think you got the wrong board
|
393 |
+
The Leather clubs 7 boards down
|
394 |
+
--- 14998091
|
395 |
+
>>14997954
|
396 |
+
>Not only that, you are purposefully crippling yourself
|
397 |
+
by getting a skin graft?? the skin grows back anon. Jesus you're unhinged lmao.
|
398 |
+
--- 14998103
|
399 |
+
>>14996887
|
400 |
+
Your woman impersonation is retarded and cringe, btw
|
401 |
+
--- 14998115
|
402 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
403 |
+
>i mean that they were literally born in a wrong body
|
404 |
+
Never go full retard.
|
405 |
+
--- 14998121
|
406 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
407 |
+
There are definitely people who have gender dysphoria. Whether they actually metaphysically are the gender they say they are is a meaningless question, because categories are a feature of the map, not the territory.
|
408 |
+
--- 14998137
|
409 |
+
>>14996809
|
410 |
+
Isn't the more relevant question what actually works to treat it/alleviate the patient's distress?
|
411 |
+
>>14996826
|
412 |
+
I believe there's some evidence that trans people are more likely to already have a neurological distribution typical of the opposite sex.
|
413 |
+
--- 14998143
|
414 |
+
>>14998103
|
415 |
+
my woman impersonation? lol, I'm a guy bro, and not trying to be a girl.
|
416 |
+
What is it about you guys that makes you reflexively shout a version of YWNBAW every time you see a pro-trans argument?
|
417 |
+
What if I'm a trans man and you are actually affirming my gender identity every time you say that?
|
418 |
+
--- 14998150
|
419 |
+
>>14996862
|
420 |
+
Regardless of whether you think trans people metaphysically-are the gender they identify as (which is a meaningless question) gender dysphoria is certainly real.
|
421 |
+
>>14996896
|
422 |
+
How does that follow? Maybe it's different kinds of neurological sex-atypicality.
|
423 |
+
>>14996923
|
424 |
+
So infertile cis women aren't women?
|
425 |
+
--- 14998182
|
426 |
+
>>14997139
|
427 |
+
Sure, because that's the only thing that actually works to alleviate their distress.
|
428 |
+
>>14997249
|
429 |
+
Because some people are distressed by their physical sex due to some peculiarity of how their brain developed.
|
430 |
+
>>14997253
|
431 |
+
No one's asking you to affirm that trans women have ovaries or something, because they plainly don't. Placing someone in a different social category is not making a claim about physical reality.
|
432 |
+
--- 14998195
|
433 |
+
>>14997318
|
434 |
+
That marine study is from a society that does have normative gender roles. We don't know what it would look like in a society without them, where sex is considered as non-essential to who a person is as eye color.
|
435 |
+
--- 14998208
|
436 |
+
>>14997324
|
437 |
+
The proposition that it's primarily driven by a fetish is something to be demonstrated, not assumed.
|
438 |
+
>>14997409
|
439 |
+
Blanchardianism is probably not entirely wrong but almost certainly not entirely right. I've observed things that I would very strongly expect not to observe if orthodox Blanchardianism were true.
|
440 |
+
>>14997440
|
441 |
+
But it is? To us, cows are food, but to Hindus they aren't. To some tribes insects are food but to us they aren't.
|
442 |
+
--- 14998209
|
443 |
+
>>14998143
|
444 |
+
YWNBAW
|
445 |
+
>>14997887
|
446 |
+
That isn't a moderate position.
|
447 |
+
It's an entire industry.
|
448 |
+
Children shouldn't be flooded with tranny propaganda their entire lives and then agree to get chemically castrated until some arbitrary age.
|
449 |
+
They're never going to stop grooming children into tranny insanity until they're killed, and every single person involved in this industry deserves nothing short of capital punishment.
|
450 |
+
--- 14998225
|
451 |
+
>>14997464
|
452 |
+
'Kopf' is German, that word's cognate in Yiddish is 'Kop'.
|
453 |
+
--- 14998233
|
454 |
+
>>14998209
|
455 |
+
thanks for affirming my gender, king.
|
456 |
+
--- 14998238
|
457 |
+
>>14997566
|
458 |
+
So you admit that being forced to go through the puberty of their natal sex is harmful to trans people but you still advocate it? You're a monster.
|
459 |
+
>>14997887
|
460 |
+
Minors aren't receiving surgery. At most they're receiving hormonal treatments, which is very much necessary if they do have gender dysphoria.
|
461 |
+
--- 14998240
|
462 |
+
>>14998150
|
463 |
+
>Maybe it's different kinds of neurological sex-atypicality.
|
464 |
+
Well they aren't, it's the same kind of neurological sex-atypicality.
|
465 |
+
--- 14998241
|
466 |
+
>>14998150
|
467 |
+
They actually don't identify as the opposite gender, because any meaningful definiton of that gender necessarily excludes them, because they are not, nor will they ever be the opposite gender, and will never have the experience of whatever it is they're claiming to identify as.
|
468 |
+
This is why tranny impersonations of their "identified gender" are always retarded; it's just based on a fetish.
|
469 |
+
--- 14998254
|
470 |
+
>>14997933
|
471 |
+
Even 'only two biological sexes' is an oversimplification- there are a bunch of edge cases.
|
472 |
+
>>14998075
|
473 |
+
He tried to reassign a boy as a girl after a botched circumcision because he thought gender identity is infinitely malleable. The fact he failed and the boy still ended up identifying as a boy is, ironically, evidence FOR the existence of innate gender identity.
|
474 |
+
--- 14998259
|
475 |
+
>>14998091
|
476 |
+
>you're unhinged
|
477 |
+
>retard believes men can be women and women can be men
|
478 |
+
kek lmao
|
479 |
+
--- 14998267
|
480 |
+
>>14998225
|
481 |
+
yiddish is just german ebonics
|
482 |
+
--- 14998270
|
483 |
+
>>14998254
|
484 |
+
No, it's evidence that you'll never be a real woman, while chemically castrating people and amputating their genitals unsurprisingly leads to suicide.
|
485 |
+
--- 14998272
|
486 |
+
>>14998209
|
487 |
+
You can't make a cis kid trans or a trans kid cis.
|
488 |
+
>>14998240
|
489 |
+
How do you know?
|
490 |
+
>>14998241
|
491 |
+
Again, the claim that it's based on a fetish is something to be demonstrated, not assumed.
|
492 |
+
--- 14998282
|
493 |
+
>>14998267
|
494 |
+
How does one determine what the objectively correct form of a language is? Is there some empirical test one can perform?
|
495 |
+
>>14998270
|
496 |
+
If there's no such thing as gender identity why did the kid still end up deciding he was a boy? It's not like they told him.
|
497 |
+
--- 14998284
|
498 |
+
>>14998272
|
499 |
+
There's no such thing as "trans kids".
|
500 |
+
--- 14998293
|
501 |
+
>>14998282
|
502 |
+
Because "gender" is a nonsense concept.
|
503 |
+
He was a boy because he was a boy
|
504 |
+
--- 14998294
|
505 |
+
>>14998272
|
506 |
+
>You can't make a cis kid trans or a trans kid cis.
|
507 |
+
people drop out of cults all the time anon. Just kick them off the internet for a month or so and without the "support' of a bunch of insane online trannies they'll figure it out.
|
508 |
+
--- 14998296
|
509 |
+
>>14998284
|
510 |
+
Gender dysphoria is a thing that exists.
|
511 |
+
>>14998293
|
512 |
+
So how did he realize that for himself when what he could observe about his own body would have said otherwise.
|
513 |
+
>>14998294
|
514 |
+
Then why were there people who were distressed by their sex and wished they could change it long before the Internet?
|
515 |
+
--- 14998299
|
516 |
+
>>14998233
|
517 |
+
Based ftm destroying chudlets with superior logic
|
518 |
+
--- 14998302
|
519 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
520 |
+
Yeah I forgot this board was about OPs transgender fetishism.
|
521 |
+
--- 14998307
|
522 |
+
>>14998238
|
523 |
+
You know what's more harmful? Doing irreversible damage to a childs body because of the childs mental illness, only for that child to become sane as an adult.
|
524 |
+
--- 14998308
|
525 |
+
>>14998296
|
526 |
+
>Then why were there people who were distressed by their sex and wished they could change it long before the Internet?
|
527 |
+
why was there an exponentially smaller number of them? There has also been people who believed themselves to be Napoleon before the internet; however if there were grooming circles and multibillion dollar lobbys encouraging this, you'd see a lot more little napoleons.
|
528 |
+
--- 14998322
|
529 |
+
>>14998296
|
530 |
+
Because his body didn't say otherwise, because that isn't possible. No part of "transitioning" actually makes it a girl's body, you're just chemically castrating them and amputating their genitals.
|
531 |
+
--- 14998327
|
532 |
+
>>14998254
|
533 |
+
No there are not “edge cases” you retard. There are genetic disorders that are incredibly rare. You absolute twat
|
534 |
+
--- 14998328
|
535 |
+
>>14998272
|
536 |
+
>How do you know?
|
537 |
+
Because it says so in every fucking study that has been done on the matter, look it up.
|
538 |
+
--- 14998331
|
539 |
+
>>14998307
|
540 |
+
Why is it more harmful? Both are putting a kid through a puberty that's wrong for them and causes irreversible changes that distress them.
|
541 |
+
>>14998308
|
542 |
+
Were there? There was also a lot more social stigma in the past, it's understandable that would lead people to hide it, especially if the intensity of gender dysphoria isn't uniform.
|
543 |
+
>>14998322
|
544 |
+
You know what I mean. Nothing he could physically perceive about his own body would have told him it wasn't female, even if in reality it wasn't. So how did he come to the conclusion he was a boy anyway?
|
545 |
+
>>14998327
|
546 |
+
So what constitutes male or female?
|
547 |
+
--- 14998346
|
548 |
+
>>14998331
|
549 |
+
>You know what I mean
|
550 |
+
You're making an idiotic assumption that chemically castrating a child and amputating their genitals makes it a "girl's body".
|
551 |
+
It doesn't.
|
552 |
+
That's how he knew he didn't have a girl's body.
|
553 |
+
Because he was a boy, therefore had a boy's body, albeit irreversibly mutilated by a jewish pedophile.
|
554 |
+
--- 14998347
|
555 |
+
Listen up goyim, I AM A WOMAN! It is real... in my mind.
|
556 |
+
--- 14998356
|
557 |
+
>>14998346
|
558 |
+
I specifically said "even if in reality it wasn't". I'm not saying his body was actually female, I'm saying that it would have seemed to be on physical observation even if in reality it wasn't. Do you deny this?
|
559 |
+
--- 14998363
|
560 |
+
>>14998337
|
561 |
+
What was the point of spending billions of dollars shoving trannyism into every aspect of public, governmental, and corporate life if you didn't want people to notice?
|
562 |
+
--- 14998370
|
563 |
+
>>14998331
|
564 |
+
>Why is it more harmful?
|
565 |
+
Because one is insane and the other one is sane. Ideally you would want all kids to eventually grow up to be sane adults who are content with their natural bodies, and so it is better to let everyone keep their natural bodies.
|
566 |
+
--- 14998373
|
567 |
+
>>14998356
|
568 |
+
Physically, it wasn't a girl's body, you absolute retard.
|
569 |
+
You realize that he was living in his body, right?
|
570 |
+
He wasn't playing with a dozen Photoshop filters and pounds of makeup in an attempt to trick people into thinking he was a girl "on physical observation", he was physically living in a boy's body, because he was a boy, therefore noticed he wasn't a girl.
|
571 |
+
--- 14998395
|
572 |
+
>>14998363
|
573 |
+
There's no organized conspiracy here, just social progress.
|
574 |
+
>>14998370
|
575 |
+
Okay but what about the kids who are incapable of being okay with their sex at birth.
|
576 |
+
>>14998373
|
577 |
+
You know the differences between pre-pubescent boys and girls are not as extreme as those between adult men and women, right?
|
578 |
+
--- 14998409
|
579 |
+
Not going to spend the time reading through this entire thread, but this is not a question for /his/. They aren't ready for the natal hormone level brain development determinism pill.
|
580 |
+
--- 14998415
|
581 |
+
>>14998395
|
582 |
+
There is an organized conspiracy, actually.
|
583 |
+
--- 14998421
|
584 |
+
>>14998415
|
585 |
+
"rich white men" are funding every single major social cause. Every political movement has wealthy donors. That's doesn't prove a conspiracy.
|
586 |
+
--- 14998422
|
587 |
+
>>14998415
|
588 |
+
we've seen the leaked GOP emails, you don't have to pretend anymore bud
|
589 |
+
--- 14998424
|
590 |
+
>>14998395
|
591 |
+
No kids are truely incapable of being okay with their natural sex as nobody is literally born in the wrong body.
|
592 |
+
--- 14998435
|
593 |
+
>>14998395
|
594 |
+
>There's no organized conspiracy here, just social progress.
|
595 |
+
|
596 |
+
there is open conspiracies here, braindead coomer.
|
597 |
+
--- 14998438
|
598 |
+
>>14998424
|
599 |
+
Regardless of whether it's metaphysically 'wrong', some people have distress about their sexed body that can be alleviated only by modifying it to resemble that of the opposite sex. This is a scientific fact.
|
600 |
+
--- 14998444
|
601 |
+
>>14998424
|
602 |
+
Just because I'm born with a big nose doesn't mean it's impossible for me to be uncomfortable with a big nose. What you say doesn't make any sense. About everyone has something about their body they don't like.
|
603 |
+
--- 14998446
|
604 |
+
>>14998195
|
605 |
+
so a woman will just be as strong as a male if we pretend that gender doesn't exist?
|
606 |
+
--- 14998449
|
607 |
+
>>14998331
|
608 |
+
Genetics. Rare disorders don’t negate the reality of sexual dimorphism, which is dictated by genetics.
|
609 |
+
|
610 |
+
You are just proving my point that transgenderism is pure nonsense. The entire ideology rests on the notion that biological sex is separate and distinct from “gender identity,” which exists on a spectrum. How can you say that biological abnormalities are proof that a gender spectrum exists while also saying that biology is irrelevant in determining gender? Do you expect rational people to take this seriously? Are you being intentionally dense? This is exactly what I mean what I say that transgender activists are mentally deficient. Thank you for demonstrating this so clearly.
|
611 |
+
--- 14998463
|
612 |
+
google
|
613 |
+
|
614 |
+
https://www.jneurosci.org/content/34/46/15466
|
615 |
+
>The results of this study show that the white matter microstructure in FtM and MtF transsexuals falls halfway between that of FCs and MCs. Our data harmonize with the hypothesis that fiber tract development is influenced by hormonal environment during late prenatal and early postnatal brain development that is proposed to determine gender identity
|
616 |
+
|
617 |
+
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321820257_Structural_connections_in_the_brain_in_relation_to_gender_identity_and_sexual_orientation
|
618 |
+
>Our findings suggest that the neuroanatomical signature of transgenderism is related to brain areas processing the perception of self and body ownership, whereas homosexuality seems to be associated with less cerebral sexual differentiation
|
619 |
+
|
620 |
+
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3402034/
|
621 |
+
>A significant association was identified between transsexualism and the AR allele, with transsexuals having longer AR repeat lengths than non-transsexual male control subjects (p = .04). This study provides evidence that male gender identity might be partly mediated through the androgen receptor
|
622 |
+
|
623 |
+
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ejn.14420
|
624 |
+
>The own body / self congruence ratings increased with treatment, and correlated with a left parietal cortical thinning. These data confirm our hypothesis that GD may be associated with specific anatomical features in own-body/self-processing circuits that reverse to the pattern of cisgender controls after cross-sex hormone treatment
|
625 |
+
|
626 |
+
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/104/2/390/5104458
|
627 |
+
>A significant association was identified between gender dysphoria and ERa, SRD5A2, and STS alleles, as well as ERa and SULT2A1 genotypes. Several allele combinations were also overrepresented in transgender women, most involving AR (namely, AR-ER, AR-PGR, AR-COMT, CYP17-SRD5A2). Overrepresented alleles and genotypes are proposed to undermasculinize/feminize on the basis of their reported effects
|
628 |
+
--- 14998465
|
629 |
+
>>14998446
|
630 |
+
No (though the very strongest women are stronger than the weakest men). But not everyone in a squad has to have the exact same physical abilities for it to function as a coherent unit.
|
631 |
+
>>14998449
|
632 |
+
Dictated by genetics? So if someone has complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, and so has XY chromosomes but is born with a female phenotype and may not even know themself they have XY chromosomes, they're actually a man?
|
633 |
+
--- 14998466
|
634 |
+
>>14998421
|
635 |
+
>(((white)))
|
636 |
+
--- 14998473
|
637 |
+
>>14998438
|
638 |
+
No, the only cure is to lynch all marxists, and the problem disappears overnight. Cutting off children's dicks isn't a treatment.
|
639 |
+
--- 14998474
|
640 |
+
>>14998465
|
641 |
+
>fringe mutants exist, therefore I transmute sex when i put on a dress
|
642 |
+
--- 14998476
|
643 |
+
>>14998449
|
644 |
+
>The entire ideology rests on the notion that biological sex is separate and distinct from “gender identity,”
|
645 |
+
Gender identity is fake, gender dysphoria is real. Problem solved
|
646 |
+
--- 14998477
|
647 |
+
you ever notice how they always post article headlines instead of the actual studies
|
648 |
+
--- 14998478
|
649 |
+
>>14998463
|
650 |
+
Transsexuals are four times more likely than the average person to be infected with HIV.
|
651 |
+
Source:http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40279043/ns/health-health_care/
|
652 |
+
|
653 |
+
About 88% of children who have gender dysphoria do not hold those beliefs when they grow older.
|
654 |
+
Source:http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90229789
|
655 |
+
|
656 |
+
Only 12% of boys who believe they are transsexuals still believe so when they are older.
|
657 |
+
Source:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18194003
|
658 |
+
|
659 |
+
MRI scans indicate that MtF transsexuals are either men aroused by the thought of possessing female genitalia or homosexuals who want to seduce straight men.
|
660 |
+
Source:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180619/
|
661 |
+
|
662 |
+
41% of transsexuals have tried and failed to commit suicide.
|
663 |
+
|
664 |
+
Source:http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40279043/ns/health-health_care/
|
665 |
+
|
666 |
+
Transsexuals who undergo sex reassignment surgery are more likely to commit suicide.
|
667 |
+
Source:http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016885
|
668 |
+
|
669 |
+
Most young transsexuals have committed self-harm within the last twelve months.
|
670 |
+
Source:http://saravyc.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2015/05/SARAVYC_Trans-Youth-Health-Report_EN_Final_Print.pdf#page=44
|
671 |
+
|
672 |
+
37% of transsexual youth have attempted suicide within the last year.
|
673 |
+
Source:http://saravyc.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2015/05/SARAVYC_Trans-Youth-Health-Report_EN_Final_Print.pdf#page=44
|
674 |
+
|
675 |
+
53% of mothers of transsexual children have Borderline Personality Disorder, compared to only 6% of mothers of normal children.
|
676 |
+
|
677 |
+
Source:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2016237
|
678 |
+
|
679 |
+
16% of transsexuals have been sent to jail or prison, compared to 2.7% of the general population.
|
680 |
+
Source:http://www.avp.org/storage/documents/Training%20and%20TA%20Center/FORGE_Trans_People_Police_Incarceration_Facts.pdf
|
681 |
+
|
682 |
+
Gay and transgender students are half as likely to graduate high school as straight students.
|
683 |
+
Source:https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/lgbt/news/2010/06/21/7980/gay-and-transgender-youth-homelessness-by-the-numbers/
|
684 |
+
--- 14998480
|
685 |
+
>>14998473
|
686 |
+
Do you have any evidence for this claim? I have plenty to the contrary.
|
687 |
+
https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-well-being-of-transgender-people/
|
688 |
+
https://old.reddit.com/r/musicotic/comments/8ttud4/a_comprehensive_defense_of_trans_people/
|
689 |
+
>>14998474
|
690 |
+
That's not my argument. My argument is that you cannot actually define sex in a coherent way.
|
691 |
+
--- 14998483
|
692 |
+
>>14998438
|
693 |
+
It alleviates, but it doesn't cure. To cure you must do one of two things, make them accept their natural sex or literally turn them into the prefered sex. The former is impossible, the latter is possible, and so the latter is to be prefered.
|
694 |
+
>>14998444
|
695 |
+
Shut the fuck up, you know god damn well that wanting a different sex is a fundamentally different thing from wanting a different nose.
|
696 |
+
--- 14998485
|
697 |
+
>>14998477
|
698 |
+
Yup. Transphobic rightoids are as shifty and manipulative as their worst jewish nightmares
|
699 |
+
--- 14998487
|
700 |
+
>>14998480
|
701 |
+
No, you don't.
|
702 |
+
--- 14998492
|
703 |
+
>>14998478
|
704 |
+
>Transsexuals are four times more likely than the average person to be infected with HIV.
|
705 |
+
>41% of transsexuals have tried and failed to commit suicide.
|
706 |
+
>Most young transsexuals have committed self-harm within the last twelve months.
|
707 |
+
>37% of transsexual youth have attempted suicide within the last year.
|
708 |
+
>16% of transsexuals have been sent to jail or prison, compared to 2.7% of the general population.
|
709 |
+
>Gay and transgender students are half as likely to graduate high school as straight students.
|
710 |
+
And I'm sure this has nothing whatsoever to do with how people like you treat them.
|
711 |
+
>>14998483
|
712 |
+
Sure, but until we can, the approximation current medicine can provide is certainly better than nothing.
|
713 |
+
>>14998487
|
714 |
+
I'm not citing a standards of care document, I'm citing actual empirical studies.
|
715 |
+
--- 14998493
|
716 |
+
>>14998438
|
717 |
+
>>14998483
|
718 |
+
>The former is impossible, the latter is possible, and so the latter is to be prefered.
|
719 |
+
Meant the other way around, obviously
|
720 |
+
--- 14998495
|
721 |
+
>>14998493
|
722 |
+
But what if you can't actually make them accept their natal sex?
|
723 |
+
--- 14998498
|
724 |
+
historically speaking, what does this have to do with history?
|
725 |
+
--- 14998499
|
726 |
+
>>14998498
|
727 |
+
& Humanities
|
728 |
+
--- 14998501
|
729 |
+
>>14998465
|
730 |
+
>Helmet, uniform, boots, armor, weapon, ammo, food, canteens, compass, first aid kit—everything a soldier wears and carries (their “load”) can add up to more than 68 pounds. In a combat mission, that weight can skyrocket to as much as 120 pounds.
|
731 |
+
a female will perform just as well, surely
|
732 |
+
sexual dimorphism is just a social construct
|
733 |
+
--- 14998510
|
734 |
+
>>14998492
|
735 |
+
You're citing hrt salesmen whose pseduoscientific advertisements are nothing but a conflict of interest.
|
736 |
+
--- 14998522
|
737 |
+
What is the point of these threads? Is there anything to say that hasn't already been said? Has anyone ever been convinced of anything in a thread like this?
|
738 |
+
--- 14998523
|
739 |
+
>>14998522
|
740 |
+
Whats your take anon? Wanna grill?
|
741 |
+
--- 14998527
|
742 |
+
>>14998492
|
743 |
+
so trannys get infected with HIV because they are treated poorly and not because they are sexual deviants?
|
744 |
+
lying to yourself isn't healthy anon, seek help
|
745 |
+
--- 14998530
|
746 |
+
>>14998495
|
747 |
+
We keep trying until we can, and in the vast majority of cases it shouldn't be too difficult given that gender dysphoria was extremely rare just a couple of decades ago and almost non-existant before that.
|
748 |
+
--- 14998531
|
749 |
+
>>14998465
|
750 |
+
Stop typing nonsense and practice self awareness for a second. By referencing biological disorders, you are further invalidating your argument that biology is irrelevant in determining gender. I should also point out that you using the word “disorder.” Are you implying that transgenderism is a disorder? Dare I say that is pretty offensive to the trans community. Or are you implying that only people suffering from androgen insensitivity can pick their gender? How many notable trans people have this disorder? Maybe the ones who don’t have it are just playing pretend???
|
751 |
+
--- 14998535
|
752 |
+
>>14998501
|
753 |
+
Hey, I'm not saying they shouldn't be subject to the same tests and requirements. But any rare woman who can pass them should be treated the same.
|
754 |
+
>>14998510
|
755 |
+
What would you consider valid evidence then?
|
756 |
+
>>14998527
|
757 |
+
Or because they're discriminated against and many are forced to resort to prostitution for survival.
|
758 |
+
>>14998530
|
759 |
+
Okay, but I mean what if it's completely impossible in some cases? Because the evidence suggests it may be.
|
760 |
+
>>14998531
|
761 |
+
My point is that you can't coherently define sex.
|
762 |
+
--- 14998547
|
763 |
+
>>14998535
|
764 |
+
>Hey, I'm not saying they shouldn't be subject to the same tests and requirements. But any rare woman who can pass them should be treated the same.
|
765 |
+
|
766 |
+
Every now and then you really notice how completely retarded the leftist view on human nature is. These are the same people who think we should have co-ed prisons and then act shocked when the predictable occurs.
|
767 |
+
--- 14998552
|
768 |
+
>>14998547
|
769 |
+
I don't advocate co-ed prisons. I don't think you should just throw anyone who says they're a woman in the women's prison either- you should require, say, either surgery or five years of hormone replacement therapy, and those who haven't met that mark are put together in a separate wing.
|
770 |
+
--- 14998559
|
771 |
+
>>14998535
|
772 |
+
Yes I can. Sex is either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions. Genetic disorders exist, but that does not mean it’s possible for a male to become a female.
|
773 |
+
|
774 |
+
You don’t seem to have an argument that actually validates transgenderism. Sorry to burst your bubble
|
775 |
+
--- 14998562
|
776 |
+
>>14998535
|
777 |
+
>Okay, but I mean what if it's completely impossible in some cases?
|
778 |
+
Hypothetically speaking, sure they can be given puberty blockers and what not as long as they can be identified as impossible cases, but if those cases even exist they are probably 1 in 10 million, if not less.
|
779 |
+
>Because the evidence suggests it may be.
|
780 |
+
The evidence suggests that it is a modern mental illness that you aren't born with and that can be cured.
|
781 |
+
--- 14998567
|
782 |
+
>>14998559
|
783 |
+
So is someone with CAIS a man or a woman?
|
784 |
+
>>14998562
|
785 |
+
I've cited evidence to the contrary above.
|
786 |
+
--- 14998576
|
787 |
+
Honestly, I got really no opinion with proof to prove or debunk stuff about transgenderism. All I got to say is that I just really hate trannies. The weirdest mfs that need their pitiful existence validated.
|
788 |
+
--- 14998577
|
789 |
+
>>14998552
|
790 |
+
well, use your brain as to why co-ed prisons are a bad idea, and then extend that to why co-ed army units are a bad idea.
|
791 |
+
--- 14998601
|
792 |
+
>>14998567
|
793 |
+
Genetically male/ XY but with deformities. It’s not that complicated and it’s laughable that you think that is justification for healthy males and females to take hormones, chop off body parts and cross dress HAHA
|
794 |
+
--- 14998609
|
795 |
+
>>14998567
|
796 |
+
No you haven't. You've only posted some articles which state that trannies are more likely to have this and that, which isn't evidence of anything other than that if you have X you are more likely to be a tranny than someone who doesn't have X, and there's a hell of a difference between being more likely and being determined.
|
797 |
+
--- 14998668
|
798 |
+
>>14998576
|
799 |
+
That means you have healthy instincts.
|
800 |
+
--- 14998675
|
801 |
+
Well /his/?
|
802 |
+
--- 14998686
|
803 |
+
>>14998675
|
804 |
+
it's true
|
805 |
+
--- 14998718
|
806 |
+
>>14998395
|
807 |
+
"Social progress" is a conspiracy
|
808 |
+
>>14998421
|
809 |
+
>"rich white men" are funding every single major social cause. Every political movement has wealthy donors.
|
810 |
+
So it is a conspiracy
|
811 |
+
--- 14998996
|
812 |
+
>There is no agenda
|
813 |
+
>You can just get fired from your job for saying men can't get pregnant, and the issue came out of nowhere within the past decade
|
814 |
+
--- 14999069
|
815 |
+
i think gender dysphoria is real but obviously is a mental illness. Only a small percentage of trannies are actually gender dysphoric. Most of them transitioned because it is a fashion trend, like punks or any other counterculture, with symbols and a community attached to it. There it is, the they/thems are literally just rebelling against their dads and moms.
|
816 |
+
--- 14999081
|
817 |
+
>>14999069
|
818 |
+
The thing is, exactly 0% of people actually know what it's like to be the opposite sex, at best it's just some kind of educated guess.
|
819 |
+
And if your imaginary approximation of what it's like to be the opposite sex is so unimaginably fantastic that you'll literally kill yourself if you can't be it, then that's just a psychotic fetish.
|
820 |
+
--- 14999599
|
821 |
+
>>14998996
|
822 |
+
who are you talking to at work about whether men get pregnant?
|
823 |
+
--- 14999606
|
824 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
825 |
+
No. Obviously.
|
826 |
+
Open your eyes
|
827 |
+
--- 14999610
|
828 |
+
>>14999599
|
829 |
+
The tranny I'm trying to witness Christ to
|
830 |
+
--- 14999622
|
831 |
+
>>14996774 (OP)
|
832 |
+
If they’re hot, their gender identity is valid. If they’re ugly, it’s not.
|
his/14996873.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996873
|
3 |
+
Is it based to have your Y-DNA written on your tombstone?
|
4 |
+
--- 14996883
|
5 |
+
>>14996873 (OP)
|
6 |
+
Based
|
7 |
+
--- 14997109
|
8 |
+
bump
|
9 |
+
--- 14997243
|
10 |
+
>>14996873 (OP)
|
11 |
+
I'll lie about it depending on what culture I want to LARP as
|
12 |
+
--- 14997468
|
13 |
+
>>14996873 (OP)
|
14 |
+
You just gave me the idea, I'll do it unironically.
|
15 |
+
--- 14998651
|
16 |
+
>>14996873 (OP)
|
17 |
+
I have plans for my remains.
|
18 |
+
If I tell you fags you'll just copy me like retards.
|
19 |
+
--- 14998676
|
20 |
+
>>14997243
|
21 |
+
Pick e-v13 if you are anglo-norman. That's the optimal larp combination.
|
22 |
+
--- 14998733
|
23 |
+
>>14996873 (OP)
|
24 |
+
It just screams insecure so no.
|
25 |
+
--- 14999533
|
26 |
+
>>14996873 (OP)
|
27 |
+
Absolutely. This person will receive a warm welcome in heaven.
|
28 |
+
--- 14999764
|
29 |
+
>>14997243
|
30 |
+
I'll put E3b2
|
31 |
+
--- 14999923
|
32 |
+
>put R1b U106
|
33 |
+
>really be I2a1
|
34 |
+
Heh, I’m sneaking into Valhalla and none of you can stop me
|
his/14996909.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996909
|
3 |
+
same people
|
4 |
+
--- 14997293
|
5 |
+
>>14996909 (OP)
|
6 |
+
--- 14997888
|
7 |
+
>>14997293
|
8 |
+
who the hell is heraclius?
|
9 |
+
--- 14997904
|
10 |
+
Correct. There's only two types of people in ex-Ottoman lands
|
11 |
+
1. Turks
|
12 |
+
2. Losers who're eternally butthurt about Turks
|
13 |
+
--- 14997967
|
14 |
+
>>14997888
|
15 |
+
He has a Disney movie
|
16 |
+
--- 14998100
|
17 |
+
>>14997888
|
18 |
+
A Black man from Africa.
|
19 |
+
--- 14998929
|
20 |
+
>>14996909 (OP)
|
21 |
+
Based
|
22 |
+
--- 14999125
|
23 |
+
>>14996909 (OP)
|
24 |
+
Either you're referring to the hypthoesised Graeco-Armenian phylogenetic clade, or even the Graeco-Armeno-Aryan phylogenetic clade, both hypothetical subgroupings branching from Proto-Indo-European much like Italo-Celtic, or the meme that Greece was somehow entirely replaced by Armenians during the Byzantine period. I'm hoping its the former because that's an entertaining thought and helps bridge the isolation between these Indo-European languages since it seems unlikely the Anatolian ones were that, and especially since the latter is just shit tier.
|
25 |
+
Greek is likely closer to Phrygian anyways.
|
26 |
+
--- 14999163
|
27 |
+
>>14996909 (OP)
|
28 |
+
R1b Z2103 Yamnaya BVLLS
|
29 |
+
--- 14999546
|
30 |
+
>>14999163
|
31 |
+
is R1b Z2103 proto indo european? notice how kurds don't have it, neither do yamnaya IEs.
|
his/14996937.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996937
|
3 |
+
Did Putin really plagiate his PhD and Bachelor's theses or is that a false accusation?
|
4 |
+
--- 14997039
|
5 |
+
>>14996937 (OP)
|
6 |
+
>le thinly veiled bait to talk about the war in Ukraine moment
|
7 |
+
--- 14997050
|
8 |
+
>>14996937 (OP)
|
9 |
+
Since when has Putin had a PhD that isn't honorary.
|
10 |
+
I've never heard of anyone referring to him as "doctor". Not even on Russian Wikipedia.
|
11 |
+
|
12 |
+
Is this Mandela Effect shit?
|
13 |
+
--- 14997495
|
14 |
+
>>14997039
|
15 |
+
Nope
|
16 |
+
>>14997050
|
17 |
+
J.D. then? I'm sure he has some advanced degree. (I will check after this post)
|
18 |
+
--- 14997515
|
19 |
+
Are you thinking of MLK?
|
20 |
+
--- 14997525
|
21 |
+
>>14997050
|
22 |
+
>>14997515
|
23 |
+
>In 1997, he received his Ph.D. in economics (Candidate of Economic Sciences) at the Saint Petersburg Mining University for a thesis on the strategic planning of the mineral economy.[41]
|
24 |
+
--- 14997536
|
25 |
+
>>14997515
|
26 |
+
Huh, TIL
|
27 |
+
--- 14997545
|
28 |
+
>>14997536
|
29 |
+
Not a reverend
|
30 |
+
Not a doctor
|
31 |
+
Not martin Luther
|
32 |
+
Not a kang
|
33 |
+
--- 14997724
|
34 |
+
>>14997536
|
35 |
+
Damn
|
36 |
+
--- 14998348
|
37 |
+
>>14996937 (OP)
|
38 |
+
the cringe... it's too strong
|
39 |
+
--- 14999883
|
40 |
+
>>14997545
|
41 |
+
Dirk dirk dirk dirk
|
his/14996980.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14996980
|
3 |
+
Mediterranean White vs G*rmanic/Slav(e)ic ''White''
|
4 |
+
--- 14996981
|
5 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
6 |
+
More like Palestinian vs Ashkenazi
|
7 |
+
--- 14996998
|
8 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
9 |
+
Me on the right
|
10 |
+
--- 14997006
|
11 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
12 |
+
Messi vs Ronaldo (left)
|
13 |
+
--- 14997010
|
14 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
15 |
+
That Med boi is a gay bottom.
|
16 |
+
--- 14997084
|
17 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
18 |
+
EEF vs WSH
|
19 |
+
--- 14997331
|
20 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
21 |
+
Did you know the one on the left was gay/bi? He used to date luke evans 9 years ago
|
22 |
+
--- 14997346
|
23 |
+
>>14997331
|
24 |
+
Why are Meds gay?
|
25 |
+
--- 14997462
|
26 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
27 |
+
This thread was made by darktroon, a dravidian ape.
|
28 |
+
--- 14997509
|
29 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
30 |
+
why do we always have a south europe vs north europe thread on, its stupid this rivality isnt even normal
|
31 |
+
t. med
|
32 |
+
--- 14997526
|
33 |
+
>>14997509
|
34 |
+
It's spics arguing with pajeets.
|
35 |
+
--- 14997575
|
36 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
37 |
+
>Mediterranean White vs G*rmanic/Slav(e)ic ''White''
|
38 |
+
--- 14997584
|
39 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
40 |
+
Oh my God, who gives a shit about north or south Europeans? A Christian is a Christian.
|
41 |
+
--- 14997592
|
42 |
+
>>14997509
|
43 |
+
It's just merchants up to their typical tricks, trying to sowe division amongst us
|
44 |
+
--- 14997597
|
45 |
+
>>14997575
|
46 |
+
More pink, and pale, than the other same photo of him. You should cherry pick better.
|
47 |
+
--- 14997601
|
48 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
49 |
+
YOU WILL BE BLACKED, EUROPOOR
|
50 |
+
--- 14997619
|
51 |
+
>>14997575
|
52 |
+
--- 14997622
|
53 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
54 |
+
You will never be Med ranjeet.
|
55 |
+
--- 14997648
|
56 |
+
>>14997084
|
57 |
+
EEF were gracile with small mandibles. WSH were robust with large mandibles.
|
58 |
+
--- 14997680
|
59 |
+
>>14997648
|
60 |
+
both manlets shoulderlet doe
|
61 |
+
--- 14997697
|
62 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
63 |
+
Guy on the right looks like an albino Indian
|
64 |
+
--- 14997698
|
65 |
+
>>14997619
|
66 |
+
>>>14997575 (You)
|
67 |
+
--- 14997797
|
68 |
+
>>14997619
|
69 |
+
>actual fantasy film about a manlet medshit beating a giant nord gigachad
|
70 |
+
--- 14997860
|
71 |
+
>>14997797
|
72 |
+
Stallone is half jewish on top of that.
|
73 |
+
--- 14997869
|
74 |
+
Yup, xhe mindbroken
|
75 |
+
Medgods WON1
|
76 |
+
--- 14997901
|
77 |
+
>>14997680
|
78 |
+
Everyone was a manlet then and Yamnaya were physiologically taller. Also if you use modern height genes, Yamnaya turn out to be much taller as well.
|
79 |
+
--- 14997952
|
80 |
+
>>14997901
|
81 |
+
>physiologically taller. Also if you use modern
|
82 |
+
>174 cm
|
83 |
+
>tall
|
84 |
+
--- 14997977
|
85 |
+
>>14997952
|
86 |
+
It's still taller than average modern moortuguese, lmao.
|
87 |
+
--- 14997985
|
88 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
89 |
+
You are not white moor
|
90 |
+
--- 14998358
|
91 |
+
burn to death
|
92 |
+
--- 14998489
|
93 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
94 |
+
>white
|
95 |
+
--- 14998736
|
96 |
+
>>14997952
|
97 |
+
You forgot how to read nigger
|
98 |
+
>Also if you use modern height genes, Yamnaya turn out to be much taller as well.
|
99 |
+
Yamnaya were genetically taller than EEF and also physiologically taller. EEF were like 11 cm shorter.
|
100 |
+
--- 14998767
|
101 |
+
>>14996980 (OP)
|
102 |
+
left - mewing
|
103 |
+
right - not mewing
|
104 |
+
--- 14998817
|
105 |
+
>>14997575
|
106 |
+
This guy is also attractive and has redening on face, it also seems like he's slightly tanned, so yes, he's a mediterranean white he's just tanned.
|
107 |
+
--- 14998900
|
108 |
+
>>14997331
|
109 |
+
>bi
|
110 |
+
no such thing as bi male, he's gay and a bottom given that Luke Evans is clearly a gay top
|
111 |
+
--- 14998933
|
112 |
+
>>14998817
|
113 |
+
>This guy is also attractive and has redening on face, it also seems like he's slightly tanned, so yes, he's a mediterranean white he's just tanned.
|
114 |
+
--- 14998935
|
115 |
+
>>14998817
|
116 |
+
>im not pajeet sir, just tanned white sir
|
117 |
+
--- 14999894
|
118 |
+
>>14997648
|
119 |
+
Nah
|
his/14997029.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14997029
|
3 |
+
Is the Book of Revelation truly just "ridiculous fables" as Saint Augustine put it?
|
4 |
+
--- 14997038
|
5 |
+
It was written by a butthurt nihilist that seethed so hard at Emperor Nero that he basically called him Satan.
|
6 |
+
--- 14997052
|
7 |
+
>>14997029 (OP)
|
8 |
+
The Book of Revelations was pure schizo shit
|
9 |
+
--- 14997068
|
10 |
+
>>14997029 (OP)
|
11 |
+
It's a jewish psyop basically Isaiah but with a perverted caricature of Jesus who's also the "morning star" and a seven eyed sheep
|
12 |
+
--- 14997097
|
13 |
+
>>14997029 (OP)
|
14 |
+
Augustine makes clear that his purpose in addressing these texts is to expose faulty interpretations and present a correct one. The quotations from Revelation 20 and 21 appear in connection with a particular aspect of the opposing interpretations:
|
15 |
+
|
16 |
+
>Of those two resurrections the same evangelist John, in the book which is called ‘Apocalypse’, has spoken in such a way that the first [resurrection], not being understood by certain persons among us, is furtherm ore turned into ridiculous fables.
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
It is clear that, by 426 at least, Augustine has no sympathy with any notion of a future earthly thousand-year reign, and does not see in Revelation 20 (or any passage in Scripture) the portents of the world’s demise.
|
19 |
+
--- 14997547
|
20 |
+
>>14997029 (OP)
|
21 |
+
Augustine supporters deserve to be relentlessly bullied.
|
22 |
+
--- 14997567
|
23 |
+
>>14997547
|
24 |
+
Nobody deserves to be bullied. Some deserve to be killed.
|
25 |
+
--- 14997616
|
26 |
+
>>14997547
|
27 |
+
Name 1 thing he did wrong
|
28 |
+
--- 14998069
|
29 |
+
>>14997029 (OP)
|
30 |
+
Many early church fathers post-2nd century had a weak view of the book of revelation. This is because they departed from the first-temple understanding of the old testament for Origen's Allegorical method. This resulted them viewing the book more look a Greek epic rather than compilation of OT ideas. At least Jerome understood it better than most.
|
31 |
+
--- 14998253
|
32 |
+
Babylon will be destroyed and the merchants will weep. This is known.
|
33 |
+
--- 14998324
|
34 |
+
>>14997616
|
35 |
+
Convert from based manichaeism to cringe Christianity
|
36 |
+
--- 14998472
|
37 |
+
Basically you read it because everyone says 'wow, hecking EPIC imagery and creativity! DEEP LORE!' then you realize it's just ripping off images in Daniel, Ezekiel, and Isaiah.
|
38 |
+
It's obviously a fanfic larp and it's a shame that people love it.
|
39 |
+
--- 14998479
|
40 |
+
>>14997038
|
41 |
+
Well at least Nero seems based and JQ pilled.
|
42 |
+
--- 14998506
|
43 |
+
>>14998069
|
44 |
+
Biblefags be like "the parts of the bible that are clearly wrong are allegory but the parts about fags are timeless absolute unassailable truth"
|
45 |
+
--- 14998528
|
46 |
+
>>14998506
|
47 |
+
people can hate pederasts strictly through the use of natural reason anon. There is no revelation needed, and in fact loathing faggots is common in non-Christian cultures as well.
|
48 |
+
--- 14998550
|
49 |
+
>>14998528
|
50 |
+
the greeks that Christians jerked off too were pederasts, including Socrates, their most beloved wanksimp. And the Christians have no qualms with the fact God impregnated a 12 year old girl with himself shortly before she married another man. If that's natural reason, I'd prefer to stay unreasonable.
|
his/14997147.txt
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
-----
|
2 |
+
--- 14997147
|
3 |
+
What would have happened if a group of caucasians from the mountains of Caucasus established themselves in the region of Kanagawa in Japan
|
4 |
+
Would the japanese colonise and give them the Korea/SEA treatment or they would be cool
|
5 |
+
--- 14998864
|
6 |
+
slide thread
|
7 |
+
--- 14998991
|
8 |
+
>>14998864
|
9 |
+
how so
|
10 |
+
what is it sliding
|
11 |
+
--- 14999122
|
12 |
+
>>14998991
|
13 |
+
because it's on topic and has to do with history.
|
14 |
+
only off topic anti-religion threads and "med vs nord" (aykshully white people don't exist) threads are allowed.
|
15 |
+
|
16 |
+
To answer your question, it would depend on the time period.
|
17 |
+
--- 14999147
|
18 |
+
>>14999122
|
19 |
+
Jomon period
|
20 |
+
--- 14999174
|
21 |
+
>>14999147
|
22 |
+
Which period?
|
23 |
+
15,000 years ago?
|
24 |
+
5,000 years ago?
|
25 |
+
3,000 years ago?
|
26 |
+
I’m assuming you mean they are freshly inhabiting it.
|
27 |
+
I think warring would have lead to another Japanese ethnic subgroup. Caucus peoples on the relatively small mainland is going to lead to war and integration.
|