-----
--- 14902012
Was Ted a libertarian
--- 14902016
No Ted's just a really typical far-right reactionary
--- 14902019
>>14902016
Okay but what does right mean here?
What does he have in common with fascism?
--- 14902023
>>14902012 (OP)
No, cause libs usually approve of tech and industrialisation
--- 14902088
>>14902019
Far-right reactionary means that he triggers any retard who believes in a mechanized utopia.
The first post is a practical example of assmad progressive.
--- 14902153
>>14902012 (OP)
>>14902088
Pretty much every contemporary political ideology is talking about how post-industrial society should be structured, he argued that it shouldn't exist. I don't think you'll have much luck with normal political labels. He was a reactionary in technical sense that he wanted to reverse a change in society, but the people we generally use that term for aren't interested in reversing the industrial revolution
--- 14902249
>>14902012 (OP)

He was for in theory what Pol Pot put into practice. I.e. a revolutionary Luddite
--- 14902627
>>14902012 (OP)
He was schizophrenic
--- 14903467
>>14902019
it means he was a schizo retard
--- 14903700
>>14902019
At this point in the degeneration of civilisation 'LE RITE WANG!!!!!!' just means 'a person I disagree with and want to ignore without considering anything they're thinking/saying/doing'. It's another thought terminating cliche.
--- 14903705
>>14902012 (OP)

No because the only way to implement his ideas would be with a very strong government telling people what to do.
--- 14903757
>>14902019
Did you read the first few pages? The first thing he put in the thing is a critique of leftist psychology and activist
--- 14903777
also green politics and ecofascism would be some good things to read about 
you need context for everything don’t be delusional