----- --- 70639742 Fuck this hack. --- 70639748 Why Op --- 70639755 >>70639742 (OP) Never seen him before, QRD? --- 70639820 >>70639755 Neuroscientist who steps out of his lane way too often to the point of being a snake oil salesman --- 70639836 >>70639755 Jewish neuroscientist with a podcast about optimizing health. His advice is rarely realistic, and often would require you to be a mega dork. Like wearing warmer clothes than usual in the spring to get used to summer heat. He suggests taking copious supplements based on shaky sciences and small studies. And he probably is just on TRT anyway. --- 70639855 He's a glowie. --- 70639893 >>70639742 (OP) >woah getting 10 minutes of sunlight a day is such a revolutionary idea! dude us a heckin genius! Have people always been this stupid, or is it a result of being under lockdown for 2 years? --- 70639925 >>70639836 no literally everyone on this board finds some reason to trash on anyone who achieves remote popularity. you do not have to buy his sponsors' stuff. you can skip said sponsorships. you can even avoid him talking completely and meta analyze the data yourself. even just providing a collection of that data is of value. is it really that /fit/ is just a bunch of bucket crabs or are they secretly enjoying the podcast and trying to dissuade their competition from watching? --- 70639942 >>70639925 >t. jocko cocksucker --- 70639952 >>70639742 (OP) I'm not sure about the other stuff, but his "non sleep deep relaxation" is bs. Anyone with a modicum of meditation experience can tell that his meditation methods are weak if effective at all. --- 70639965 >>70639742 (OP) >le reduce everything to neuroscienceman throw the whole lot of the algorithm pushed "pod casters" out including but not limited to: jocko, fridman, rogan, etc and post some good recommendations of lesser known channels --- 70639983 >>70639965 The truth is all podcasters are a waste of time listening to. None have original ideas. They just repackage other ideas and discussions in a dumbed down format. --- 70640013 >>70639742 (OP) how can one man generate so much seethe --- 70640018 >>70639983 that's a legitimate critique but there are still some gems out there depending on the subject you're interested in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ2h7FYLTwg [Embed] --- 70640032 >>70639742 (OP) just remember when you watch him: do not take his word for it --- 70640483 >>70639836 by his logic, we should wear warmer clothes in the winter to get used to wearing warmer clothes in the spring to get used to the summer heat. So warmer clothes all year round? --- 70640487 >>70639742 (OP) always remember this retard only learned how to bench last year. seriously, look it up. --- 70640499 >>70639925 >just skip everything bro --- 70640583 >>70639742 (OP) Why? What did he do? --- 70640590 >>70639742 (OP) Snake oil salesman >DUDE THIS STUDY ABOUT TONGKAT ALI SHOW THAT IS RAISES TESTOSTERONE LEVELS BY 200% Meanwhile, look at the actual studies, they’re fucking trash --- 70640682 >>70640590 Goys will still waste money on kike products instead of investing money in actual food. Such is life. --- 70640702 There are so many worse people out there to go after than a legit scientist hosting expert guests and spreading peer reviewed health sciences. Grow up. --- 70640766 >>70640702 dont you have podcasts to do andrew? --- 70641043 >>70639742 (OP) Loving seeing the hating here. He always bothered me. It's like he condenses life down to this ugly ugly autistic thing --- 70641563 >>70640018 what the fuck is up with hippity faggots demanding 1hr and 30 minutes of your life without guarantees? --- 70641582 >>70640702 >legit scientist Doesn't mean anything >expert guests People marketing their own podcast, YouTube channel, books, for profit programs etc etc >peer reviewed studies All studies are "peer reviewed", that doesn't make them correct There's also a difference between "peer reviewed" and "replicated". Guess you've never heard of the replication crisis (it doesn't only apply to psychology/psychiatry). --- 70641668 >>70640702 This, YouTube is full of actual hacks who say oatmeal kills or that bread kills or that carbs kill et cetera meanwhile Huberman is saying moderation is key --- 70641827 Bro if your icebath isn't negatve 200 degrees it doesn't count and you have to stay in there for 40mins --- 70641844 >>70640702 >>70641668 Lol. Shut the fuck up, you fucking dork. He's an irrelevant internet dad who just says shit that everyone already knows and is unnecessarily autistic and pedantic about everything. He's the kind of annoying faggot who needlessly "um, ackshually's" you when you say something like "weight loss" instead of "fat loss". He's such an annoying fucking dickhead. No one should listen to any of these father figure replacements for your actual loser dad. --- 70642145 There are definitely a lot of valid criticisms you can make about him. I don't like his general vibe --- 70642203 Jew LoL --- 70642242 >>70639742 (OP) No fuck you, he's literally fine. I don't just trust everything he says, but I use his podcast as starting points to look things up, and his opinion is normally worth considering. This thread reminds how needlessly full of hate you guys are, like this guy is completely benign and you're losing your shit. Did your own podcast fail or something? Do you have that much of a need to feel like you're going against the grain? Like shut up dude. --- 70642292 >>70642242 Like nigga the education is FREE, why are you mad. Of course he has sponsors because he has to have an incentive to do this shit. Again I appreciate his podcast as a tool for getting an overview of things to start looking into, that's just a free service. I admit he's not always right, but that's normal. Get mad about something else that isn't literally lifting the average person up. --- 70642294 ice bath --- 70642416 >>70639836 Good summary. --- 70642424 >>70641043 same with Peter Attia. fucking nigger --- 70642440 >>70642242 >>70642292 you can say the same for everything. even a shopping network ad. the point is signal to noise ratio. this dude blabbers on for hours on end without giving anything useful. --- 70642457 >>70639965 Jocko is right about everything though --- 70642465 >>70639742 (OP) hard to respect someone who claims to be knowledgable with health and fitness yet only learned to bench last year. --- 70642874 >>70642465 >>70640487 powershitters detected no one with a brain cares about such a useless exercise. useless in terms of functional strength, useless in terms of athleticism, useless in terms of hypertrophy. go arch your back some more maybe you'll be able to loop around and suck your own shriveled dicks --- 70642972 >>70639742 (OP) This is the dude who said tongkat ali will raise your test by 200 lmao --- 70643838 >>70642465 You do realize there are other things to fitness than benching? --- 70643857 >>70639742 (OP) Stare at the sun. --- 70643986 >>70639836 While this is all true, it's far preferable to simp for Huberman than any of the daddy issues influencers. At least Huberman talks like a normal fucking person. He cites his studies too so you can always deboonk him if you are so inclined, as is the whole point of science. --- 70644027 >>70642972 It’s actually a 37% increase. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3669033/ Guys who seethe over Huberman don’t actually ever listen to his podcast. --- 70644053 >>70640702 >legit scientist only people who don't understand science call them "scientists" --- 70644057 >>70640702 >legit scientist he's an eye doctor --- 70644060 >>70639836 Actually in seemingly every single episode he states things like “I will always recommend you make behavioral changes in your life to reach the goals you want before I would recommend taking any supplements.” That’s almost literally verbatim. You and every one else sneeding over him right now have literally never listened to a single episode. Or maybe you got to his sponsors and chimped out that he’s not doing this immense amount of work for free lol --- 70644064 >>70640499 it's like 5min at the beginning and there's a short minute break in the middle >>70641582 it's not replication it's called reproducible, if you've even ever done anything ORCI related it has nothing to do with people straight up lying it's poor book keeping. and the burden of proof is on you to provide proof that individual pieces of evidence are incorrect. afaik the sources look good. there's a difference between direct COI and having a company, and most are just faculty. please actually provide hard contrasting evidence or you're just blathering nonsense --- 70644077 >>70640013 4chan users are, and always will be, crabs. --- 70644094 >>70644064 >it has nothing to do with people straight up lying wow, ask me how I know you're an undergrad --- 70644095 >>70641582 >legit scientist >Doesn't mean anything Listen bro I know soientists can be retarded when it comes to cock sucking authority but that doesn't negate the fact that they've spent their entire lives conducting, following, and interpreting research. I personally wouldn't recommend taking on retarded facebook mom-tier worldview because a journalists misquoted a mediocre scientist saying something dumb that got posted on twitter and screencapped and reposted on /tv/ once. --- 70644132 >>70644094 >needlessly shitting on undergrads Ask my how I know you're a shitty grad student, or, allah forgive me for saying this: a med school student --- 70644142 >>70644095 First of all, "scientist" is a retarded term. Second, a researcher is generally barely equipped to interpret results outside his area of expertise. Third, you seem to be fooled into believing that "scientists" can't be biased retards and you would be wrong, as most would readily agree that they often fall for every cognitive bias out there. --- 70644175 >>70642465 Lifting unrealisticly heavy weights a normal human would never have to lift outside of a gym is dumb and not healthy. If you can do one handed push ups you are healthy because you can move your own body in even the most difficult of normal motions. Handstand pushup are harder i know but again that is not a normal movement. --- 70644204 >>70644132 I'm not needlessly shitting on anyone, I'm just saying that that wide-eyed optimism is only possible when you're a student. Both college professors and people in the private sector lie all the time because their reputation matters way more than "le science" Just a personal anecdote, I knew someone involved with the Human Genome Project back in the day. Well-respected person and all, until one day a friend of theirs, a statistics professor, decides to use their data in one of his classes. Turns out it was full of statistical errors, and it took an actual statistician to catch them because researchers aren't that good at statistics after all. --- 70644206 >>70644142 >Third, you seem to be fooled into believing that "scientists" can't be biased retards I literally said they can be retarded in the first sentence of my post you illiterate moron. Is all subtlety lost on you? --- 70644210 Bros give it to me straight. Does abstaining from mastrubation really increases your testosterone levels? I have been bustin a nut almost everyday when in the past I has huge streaks. Did I get psyoped by profappers? --- 70644220 >>70644206 You said they can be retarded when appealing to authority, but I'm telling you that extends to interpreting research as well. Maybe I'm not the brute moron in this conversation. --- 70644248 >>70644204 >Both college professors and people in the private sector lie all the time because their reputation matters way more than "le science" Alright I have two questions for you: 1. Are you white? 2. Were you at a "reputable" American university? 3. If yes to the first two questions, redpill me on lying to get ahead in academia --- 70644262 >>70644248 I-I mean three questions --- 70644312 >>70644262 You said two questions when you meant three. There's no going back for you now. It's over. --- 70644320 >>70644262 Wow... uh... embarrassing... --- 70644334 >>70644248 >1. Are you white? No, I be back hwyte boy. da pic related is me >2. Were you at a "reputable" American university? I done be on da real niggas institute of biology and science >3. If yes to the first two questions, redpill me on lying to get ahead in academia sheeeit dis niggas first years bro he gonna lern reel soon --- 70644338 >>70644312 --- 70644356 Why yes I fully trust a Jewish optometrist about methods to improve my testosterone and cognition I mean of course i do im not an antiscience chud afterall But seriously this guy is basically ‘Dr’ Eric berg for people with 10 more IQ points --- 70644368 >>70639742 (OP) Stop caring about e-celebs. --- 70644392 >>70644094 i'm a phd finishing my last year defending in october. i actively use pubpeer, have many first authors, and a few articles in Nature (photonics, nanotech) + Science. i'm being legitimate that peer review catches a lot of liars, it isn't to say that editors and pubpeer catch everything and people do not manipulate data. the typical reproducibility problem is legitimately the fact that there's not well documented methods, even Nature has liars like ranga dias in high t sc. however if you have a concern with the data you should be the change you want to see and post an expression of concern or discuss on pubpeer rather than dismissing studies entirely on a chinese underwater weaving board and i've yet to see that --- 70644407 >>70644392 He's just gonna move the goalposts and say "bro you haven't even been an associate professor for 10 years yet you don't know how it REALLY is" --- 70644443 >>70641844 I'm sorry you never had a stable father figure, shouting here won't change anything. And yes I would. --- 70645534 >>70639742 (OP) quit spamming him then. fucking nigger shill. go kill yourself. --- 70645582 >>70640702 This Even if you don't like the guy why be upset --- 70645613 >>70640702 out of all the places you could be shilling you choose a place full of misanthropes and genetic dead ends that despise mainstreap media to promote your content? real smart. really good. keep it up --- 70645628 >>70643986 >settle for the lesser retard No. --- 70645815 >>70644060 >“I will always recommend you make behavioral changes in your life to reach the goals you want before I would recommend taking any supplements.” whoa, amazing, and then he goes on about what and how to change regarding behaviour and then there's disclaimed paid promotion of some bs sup and it's obvious the bs is just for money, not serious right? >well no, dude literally sells some oild that he says will make u masculine, like him on hefty trt there u go bot, u're useless --- 70646488 >>70644392 Gorilla warfare copypasta vibes coming from this one. But seriously, you know as much as I do that yes, peer review filters a lot of shit, but there is much terrible work that goes through for all sorts of reason. You and mr. I fucking love science anon over here >>70644407 are acting like peer review is this magic process that only lets truth through when it's really most politics (I'm not talking left x right politics, I'm referring to social darwinism btw). Now, you might scream and say that I'm just cynical, somebody must have hurt me, I'm using anecdotes to justify my point, get all emotional like you're been getting probably because you attach your personal worth to your career and whatever, but the fact of the matter is that the academy and the private sector, but especially the former, are an immense shit show where the scientific truth is the last of its concerns. --- 70646554 I'm >>70646488 I just felt the need to point something out: >>70644392 >i'm a phd finishing my last year defending in october. i actively use pubpeer, have many first authors, and a few articles in Nature (photonics, nanotech) + Science. I made that comment about you attaching your personal worth to your career as a throwaway, but re-reading your post it's clear that is the case. Fuck, I hate academics so fucking much. It's like you can't have a degree without it becoming your whole identity, and you having to preface everything you say with your accomplishments. Can you imagine if some random plumber just started every 4chin post with "as a licensed plumber in the state of Wisconsin with 400+ hours of unclogging under my belt, I think that..." --- 70646752 I like some d his poadcast and I gwt informed on certain topics I like. I wandered how stress levels effect people and how having no stress at all is dangerous too. With the better understanding of these thing, I can actually think about my behaviors and how to act proper in certain situations. He is better than Jordan Peterson since it's more science based. --- 70646769 >>70644060 >professional podcaster >immense amount of work DIE --- 70646881 >>70644262 --- 70646970 >>70640018 >Jim talks with BJ Campbell and Patrick Ryan Who talks to who and who? --- 70647031 >>70646488 yes, so if you have an issue with the work, then you need to identify where the deficiencies in that work is and critically analyze it on a case by case basis rather than dismiss it entirely like i previously stated. this is why retractions, expressions of concern, COI policies, data availability policies exist. by no means is the academic sphere perfect, in fact it is very flawed esp with publisher cartels and publish+perish atmosphere, but that isn't sufficient to reject the larger body of work. i never stated peer review is going to catch everything. science is a process, our job is to critique the non-rigorous portions of work so we can conduct additional study or question the conclusion with contrasting work. that does not mean science doesn't work and everything published is outright false. so my suggestion is to bisect claims that huberman makes based on evidence rather than rejecting the scientific community entirely based off of the fact that there can be flawed studies. >>70646554 i don't understand your grievance with that. what do you exactly take to people attaching some of their identity to their work? do you not? i also do other things but those credentials don't lend any credence to my claims. i also didn't come from a university background, i worked blue collar out of high school for half a decade before going back to school. i'd suggest a critique of a study rather than attacking a some random internet person to form your argument. --- 70648122 >>70647031 >do you not? Not to the extent that academics do. You should get some perspective, because your field is gonna kill your soul if it hasn't already. --- 70648443 >>70639836 interesting theory. how much do you bench? --- 70648469 His schedule is weird. He works out at 6:45am without eating or drinking anything except water and doesn't eat until noon. Is this normal? --- 70649438 >>70642292 The average person does all the things he recommends Do you think it's a revolutionary thing to spend 10 minutes out in the sun??? You're like a Jordan Peterson fanboy getting mad because people are clowning on him for acting as if cleaning your room is a revolutionary idea.