----- --- 15346241 >Eric Stewart, who left his $190,000-a-year job, has had five of his six studies taken down after allegations that he fabricated information by altering sample sizes. Though Stewart has denied these allegations, his sixth study, conducted in 2020, drew the attention of an FSU committee, who gathered to discuss Stewart’s findings, per the Daily Mail. ... > However, four additional articles by Stewart, published between 2006 and 2015, were taken down by Florida State University. The university reportedly carried out a three-person inquiry into Stewart’s dealings. Stewart went on to say that Pickett “lynched me and my academic career.” ... > Pickett noted that there is a “huge monetary incentive” to fabricate data, and there is “no accountability.” He said that there was only a tiny chance that anyone who does this would be caught. https://humanevents.com/2023/04/12/black-fsu-professor-resigns-in-disgrace-amid-allegations-he-faked-data-on-commonality-of-racism-had-6-papers-retracted --- 15346243 Yeah it's totally worthless and this people will never be real scientists, you can't make white out of black, they are not smart they never will be, no authority will change that --- 15346262 >>15346241 (OP) data authenticity is a white man's social construct, oppressively imposed on black academics to keep them down. --- 15346548 >>15346262 this, brotha --- 15346559 Ah the things we do to save the world. That professor did nothing wrong. If neo nazis won't spray paint a swastika, you have to do it yourself. I can't believe nazis are so bad at being racist that the black professor had to fake the data --- 15347154 >>15346559 everything in academia is fake none of the academics have an conscience about being dishonest and manipulative, they take pride in doing so. --- 15347167 >>15347154 >this is cool and could be useful! vs >this will get grant approval from a government or foundation bureaucrat --- 15347226 >>15347167 >don't blame these hoplessly greedy leeches for their lack of conscience, they have no will of their own i thought academics were all supposed to be super high iq, but you're saying they're the intellectual equivalent of plant life --- 15347274 >>15347226 >you're saying they're the intellectual equivalent of plant life Yes. --- 15347394 >>15347226 Being intelligent and educated does not equal having strong principles. You can easily justify using your ability to game the system and be a leech. Why would you not do that? --- 15347444 >>15346262 >data authenticity is a white man's social construct unironically this --- 15347450 >>15346241 (OP) Apparently these accusations were already happening 3 years ago https://youtu.be/FfzlS5vS314 [Embed] --- 15347457 >>15346241 (OP) get paid 200k to do social science bullshit. I fucking hate this system so much /sci/bros. --- 15347849 deeper and in more fields than you think https://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/96ce/5_Hillman.pdf --- 15347877 >>15347450 As christianity wanes the expectation of truth and honesty vanishes. I wonder where we will be when there is no shared moral framework remaining... --- 15348004 >>15346262 we wuz data kangz --- 15348009 >>15347877 Stop trolling. Pastafarianism is obviously the answer. Belief in supernatural food is the only way to be moral and unite society. --- 15348012 >>15346262 >data authenticity is a white man's social construct It's a joke but it's true --- 15348016 >>15346241 (OP) is this "Racism" in the room with is right now? --- 15348058 Now what about the big journals? --- 15348259 >>15347877 > As christianity wanes the expectation of truth and honesty vanishes. This unironically. Without the universalism of Christianity there is a splintering of humanity where scientific publications become about bolstering your legacy and your tribe against other people and their tribes. --- 15348425 >>15348009 I love seeing fedoratards from 10 years ago coping with what's going on today Here it is, a Godless society! This is what you wanted, a rational society where science rules, why aren't you happy? --- 15348469 >>15348425 >implying morals didn't exist in non-christian societies ever how retarded are you --- 15348479 >>15348012 It is true, everyone knows it's true. The basic argument is that they should get positions in science anyway, mostly for the money, but also because they intentionally want to subvert and destroy as much as possible. --- 15348502 >>15348425 >rational society Where? --- 15348515 >>15348494 >the scientific method was developed exclusively by christians and for christians *laughs in ancient greek* i dont blame you though, the records were probably lost in one of the many books your religion burned --- 15348687 >>15348515 >*laughs in ancient greek* You're aware they didn't have any science right? Aristotle's "physics" was just philosophy. No math models, no predictions of dynamic objects (and incorrect ones if you took it literally), no true method for obtaining systematic knowledge. Everything else is cope by historians so obsessed with finding "firsts" that they neglect any and all technical meaning of what they were searching for. That's how you end up with midwits declaring scratches on bones to be proof of "math" being a 100k year old invention. Science is only 800 years old, and between Bacon and Newton there was no physics except for unrelated predictive astronomical modelling by Copernicus, Galileo etc. And no, "science" does not mean "knowledge". Science is short for "modern science", which was explicitly developed to reject most of the worthless and superstitious knowledge found in the more delusional corners of Alchemy and non-IE philosophies. It was indeed developed by the Christians of Western and Central Europe, and based on their system of the world. To this day, the uninitiated still fail to understand, except for having the vague idea of material benefits it provides. --- 15348719 >>15348515 Empiricists in Ancient Greece were few and far between. The problem is with you retards who think science is all about daydreaming up advanced theories about how things work that are "known" to be "correct" because of how "beautiful" the math is, even though you've neglected to check back in with reality and test your theories to see if they actually worked. Aka Platonism, which is 99% of what the Greeks ever did, and is what string theorists do today. --- 15349095 >>15348550 >>15348687 >>15348719 >all those words of coping go worship your zombie jew, christcucks --- 15349113 >>15349095 You will never be an empiricist. Pagan platonism will never take you to the Moon. --- 15349125 >>15347226 >i thought academics were all supposed to be super high iq Maybe 60 years ago. At this point, I wouldn't expect to find any that are high IQ outside of math, chemistry, physics, engineering, and compsci. And even within those fields the percentage is dropping every year. --- 15349166 >>15346241 (OP) Oh, a black guy exaggerated racism. Wow! Stop the presses and ignore all peer reviewed science! (Never mind that an attempted peer review is apparently how he got caught.) Idiots. --- 15349244 >>15346243 nignog here, i can confirm this, been struggling to publish even one paper after 4 years in my phd program i just can't focus enough to write anything smart or useful or novel --- 15349269 >>15349113 >moving the goalpost from "church invented soience" to "you will never be an empiricist" you will never be a real philosopher christian theology is glorified astrology christian history is glorified fanfiction --- 15349286 >>15346262 >>15347444 >implying No, this nog is just late to the party http://mathsci.free.fr/survey.pdf https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S104160801000035X https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/the-dangers-of-unsystematic-selection-methods-and-the-representat --- 15349321 >>15349286 >H.L.J. (Han) van der Maas what an honorary sub-saharan african --- 15349412 >>15349269 >"church invented soience" I never said that. What I said was this: >>15348719 --- 15349573 >>15349095 >t. Finally read Aristotle for once in his life and found out I was right Hurts doesn't it? It hurt for me as well. --- 15349887 >>15349573 Repeating yourself doesn't make you any more right than arbitrarily restricting the definition of science to fit your argument, cucko. >>15349412 see above --- 15349890 >>15349887 >arbitrarily Everything predating the Scientific revolution has always been called Natural Philosophy. I am being very precise in my use of the term. You are having an ESL moment. --- 15349892 >>15349513 >he thinks empiricism is above philosophy do christcucks really? same christcucks that couldnt accept empirical evidence that earth revolves around the sun? lmao you guys change your opinion with the trend, pretend you came up with them, then expect to be taken seriously. --- 15349894 >>15349890 oh no its been called by another name that means it is definitely something else nice argument retard --- 15349896 >>15349887 Show me the Greek empiricists doing real science. There should be lots of them, right? --- 15349907 >>15349896 >real science meaning what - formalism made by your christcuck heroes? aristotle created the scientific method and you already know that so youre either pretending be retarded or have some retarded definition of """real""" science in your christcuck mind >>15349901 learn to read between the insults retardinho, you're on 4chan --- 15349908 >>15349892 Hey fuckwit, he's not the one talking about empiricism, I am >>15348719 >>15349113 . I'm not talking about christianity either, I'm talking about your claim of the ancient Greeks doing science >>15348515. Vanishingly few of them were doing science, they were all lost up their own asses wanking it to the mystical implications of geometry and similar platonic horse shit. If you aren't doing empirical experiments to test your theories, then you aren't doing science. --- 15349909 >>15349907 You can't even keep the people you're trying to talk to straight. --- 15349910 >>15349908 >again arbitrarily restricting the definition of scientific method to fit your apriori chosen conclusion typical christcuck revisionism --- 15349913 >>15349909 use a tripcode if it bothers you faggot --- 15349917 >>15349910 >experimentation is arbitrary Experimentation is the very essence of science. Experimentation, trying things to see if the work, separates the wheat from the chaff. If you refuse experimentation, you are worse than a witch doctor. --- 15349927 >>15346241 (OP) What should the actual punishment for intentionally fabricating scientific experimental results be? --- 15349929 >>15349917 >nobody ever did experiments before christcucks experiments nothing more than observations in controlled environment you colossal brainlet and people did them from the beginning of civilization --- 15350052 >>15348425 Do you seriously think I'm joking about the FSM? He exists, he is real, and we need him to guide our morals. Objective truth doesn't even exist unless you believe in the FSM. Our belief in him will unite us, creating a moral society free from the divison you see in ridiculous belief systems like christianity. Without pastafarianism, society will collaspse. Thats why you see gender ideology when pastafarianism is absent, like at universities. --- 15350294 >>15346241 (OP) nigs gonna nig but this is literally "He fabricated data, instead of fabricating an observation that just supports a thesis" --- 15350356 I feel bad for the competent blacks just trying to be responsible like a sane human. So much of the surrounding culture is hyperfocused on race and victimization. It wouldn't surprise me if this is all because of the threat of Occupy. The entrenched powers put their energies into fostering this kind of divisive ideology as a means of ideological judo. The major confounding factors to the SJ narrative is that black people tend to have lower average IQ, and not that much of their culture is explicitly academic or intellectual, so it shouldn't be surprising they underperform in universities and the high tech economy. This could be due to generational stress and trauma, epigenetics, various forms of psyops, or simply divergent population genetics. It's almost certainly a combination of all the different factors, though the relative weights are not easily knowable. --- 15350360 >>15350356 Shut the fuck up worthless talentless schizophrenic leftoid trash --- 15350362 >>15350360 >ad hom That means you lost. Sorry you got triggered. Do you want to go back to your safe space? --- 15350373 >>15350362 If I insult you beat you up and you are still scientifically wrong it means you have triple-lost. You should aknowledge the embarrassment worthless trash --- 15350390 >>15350373 If you verbal abuse and resort to voilence over not understanding something, you are an ape. You are the woke evergreen retard resorting to rioting because charles murray was going to give a talk at a university. You are fundamentally the same. You won't be able to self-reflect. You are not capable of it. You will stick to your safe space where you will never improve your beliefs or allow yourself to get offended. I would push you until you are forced to challenge yourself, but if you ever actually thought critically about your beliefs you'd probably end up suicidal due to cognitive dissonance and emotional immaturity. --- 15350403 >>15350390 Didn't read, skill issue, cope --- 15350494 >>15346241 (OP) Turns out we actually solved racism back in the 90s and the only people keeping it going are kikes. --- 15350528 >>15350390 >verbal abuse Sorry you were abused --- 15350618 >>15346241 (OP) Why are you saying 'muh peer review' when it worked how it was suppose to in this case and his studies were eventually proven fraudulent when thoroughly examined by his peers? How can you say there is no accountability when he is literally being held accountable for his fabrications because of peer review? --- 15350621 >>15350618 Because peer review didn't work. It took an outsider with an axe to grind to criticize him publicly, meanwhile he was published by "peer reviewed" journals who didn't catch the obvious fraud. --- 15350626 >>15350621 >It took an outsider Not according to the OP where it says he was audited by an internal FSU committee rather than an outsider, you fabricator. --- 15350632 >>15350621 >>15350621 Also the guy who whistleblew, Picket, was his Co-author on an earlier paper, a literal peer in the most strict sense of the word, who brought the fabrications to the attention of the school and committee, not an outsider at all, you fraud. --- 15350633 >>15350626 He was audited because a co-author and colleague of his called BS on his paper and demanded the college investigate, which it took almost a decade for them to actually get around to doing. In fact they covered for him from 2011 until 2020 when the same colleague came after him again for another fraudulent paper. --- 15350635 >>15350632 He was a co-author on a 2011 paper that Stewart edited against his wishes, which still managed to pass peer review and withstand criticism despite the original data being published publicly. 9 years later he finally got in trouble for another paper which Pickett wasn't related to at all. --- 15350640 >>15350632 >a literal peer in the most strict sense of the word Confirmed for not having any idea what peer review is kek. "Peer review" isn't done by your peers, it's done by gatekeepers in a journal. If you publish in a multidisciplinary journal there's a good chance one or more of your reviewers isn't even from the area you're publishing in. They have their own hand-picked gatekeepers and you'll be lucky if they're actually people at the cutting edge of the field. --- 15350644 >>15350633 >>15350635 All I am hearing is that the peer review process worked in weeding out his fraud and you think 9 years is a really really really really really really really really really long time. --- 15350646 >>15350640 Corporate gatekeeping of information is the news business, not the peer review step of the scientific method, you are the one who is confused. --- 15350647 >>15350644 >peer review fails to identify obvious fraud >journal publishes and fails to retract despite evidence from co-author >man makes 190k/yr churning out fraud for 9 years >only punishment is having to change jobs --- 15350649 >>15350646 >the peer review step of the scientific method kek this is good bait --- 15350656 >>15350647 >>peer review fails to identify obvious fraud It didn't though, OP posted the article specifically because the peer review process identified fraud that led to 6 papers being retracted by the university. --- 15350658 >>15350656 Peer review is the PC term for the gatekeeping journals do before publication. It doesn't literally mean review by your peers. --- 15350667 >>15350658 No, it literally means review by your peers and has existed for centuries, well before corporate journals existed as toll collecting gatekeepers. --- 15350802 >>15349244 >nignog here --- 15351469 >>15350802 you seem upset --- 15351479 >>15350667 >Existed for centuries Of course you make stuff up and even after viewing my comment will think yourself to be right --- 15351512 >>15351479 peer review is a maoist struggle session against dissenters who refuse to t r u s t t h e s o y e n c e --- 15351530 >>15349894 Yes, it literally does you uneducated dolt. Especially when the discipline was founded precisely to destinguish it from the another one. --- 15351844 >>15349910 >i hate christians bigotry & prejudice christians invented antibiotics, airplanes & electricity, do you enjoy your ingratitude while using those? non-christians invented gay anal sex, do you enjoy that? --- 15351879 >>15351844 nooooo now he's gonna call us christcuck another twenty times :(( --- 15351917 >>15351844 No really smart person in history was genuinly christian. Of course if you point a gun at them and force them to say they are dumb enough to believe in magic they will say yes, but all of the scientific advancements have mostly been made by atheists. It has been shown again and again that top scientists don't believe in magically creatures with zero evidence is existing, which is obvious if you're not retarded. Christians are just child abusers who push their delusions onto children because they can't handle their cognitive dissonance. Cope, seeth, and dialte groomer. --- 15351937 >>15346241 (OP) As a human, I express concern about the allegations against Eric Stewart. The situation emphasizes the importance of research integrity and the need for transparency and accountability in academic research. It's unfortunate that these incidents can have a negative impact on the trust people place in scientific findings, as the vast majority of researchers conduct their work honestly and diligently. I would also mention that while it's essential to address such cases and investigate them thoroughly, it's important not to rush to judgment until all the evidence has been reviewed. If the allegations are confirmed, it would be crucial to reevaluate the research environment and implement measures to prevent similar incidents in the future. --- 15352189 >>15351917 you probably wouldn't be alive today with antibiotics, shameless ingrate. your attraction to atheism is because you feel entitled lead your life amorally and selfishly. you'll invent any lie you can to justify that, you'll never do anything decent for anyone other than yourself, the antibiotics which saved your life time and again were worse than wasted, the rest of us would be better off without you. --- 15352302 >>15352189 >you'll invent any lie you can to justify that Says the airhead who, as an adult, still believes in literal magic deities. Your entire life is coping for the fact that your god doesn't exist. Smart people disagree with you because you're wrong. --- 15353543 >>15352302 >Smart people disagree with you because you're wrong. you disagree your self assigned high iq is just a grandiose delusion, you don't have any evidence to justify your delusion, lots of stupid people think that they're smart, dumb people get things wrong all the time --- 15354267 >>15353543 Its been well verified over and over that religious people tend to have lower intelligence. Your inability to reason apparently goes beyond your belief of fictional characters being real. You'll jerk off to the thought that blacks have lower iqs, but when it comes to another verified iq difference between groups, you can't handle it. Your offended, and you need to retreat into your safe space. Go back to church, were you'll be surrounded by other retards who believe mythology is reality. This is a science board, and we are discussing iq differences between groups. If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen. --- 15354365 >>15350646 >the peer review step of the scientific method, You fucking retard. --- 15354376 >>15354365 Holy shit the guy you quoted is a retarded worthless college children piece of shit --- 15354461 >>15349244 that's most people nowadays. They're carried to a PhD by a good advisor or collaboration with a professor, then quickly fall out of the rat race for tenure. They go on to teach at community colleges in the middle of nowhere and half heartedly struggle to publish anything of note for the rest of their lives. --- 15354537 >>15349125 theres nobody high iq in any of those fields, STEM is just a status symbol for people who falsely claim to be intellectually superior but have no legitimate means of demonstrating it. >b-b-but muh memorized formulas and factoids useless high iq people would be able to figure out a legitimate use for their knowledge other than publishing papers nobody reads, stemfags can't accomplish that --- 15354589 What do y'all expect him to do? The demand for white supremacist racism far outstrips the supply. Do you expect him to go work for McDonald's instead of academia just because society won't supply him with the racism he needs for his data? --- 15354631 >>15346241 (OP) he dindu nuffin, he was a good boi doing science and shiet. --- 15354635 >>15349244 I have this same problem, but I'm White. The IQ pill is demoralizing and tough to swallow, I'm thinking about just being a tradie. --- 15354645 >>15349894 It was a means to accurately describe how the world works, now it's just a political weapon. All of the best science has already been done, we're just along for the decline of science as an institution. --- 15354672 >>15350646 >theres no gatekeeping in muh scientific journals >reviewers would never have an agenda to protect a political narrative because muh science comes FIRST I remember undergrad --- 15355719 It is quite funny how much emphasis of placed on peer review and how almost nobody bother with replication. It really is just information control to keep the grants flowing to chosen theories people have invested their careers in --- 15355729 >>15346262 Is that why MLK is still considered some fantastic guy by many people despite plagiarizing his thesis in *checks notes* theology? --- 15355741 >>15355729 das rite --- 15355898 >>15354589 How can I profit from this supply & demand imbalance --- 15356591 >>15355898 If you're white, grow a mullet and charge appearance fees to show up places wearing klan robes or a confederate flag. --- 15356596 Sometimes ppl ask where do those drama and acting school students with 300k student loans end up? >>15356591 is where they end up --- 15358451 >>15355729 His "peaceful marches" were every bit as peaceful as BLM was in 2020 --- 15358985 >>15355729 >plagiarizing it was ghostwritten by a jew like his speeches