 We show that explanation methods , firstly, correlate to object locations with higher precisionthan attention, secondly, are able to identify object wordsthat are unsupported by image content, and thirdly, provide guidance to improve and de-bias the model. Results are reported using two different image captioning attention models trained with Flickr30K and MSCOCO2017 datasets. Experimental analyses show the strength of explanation methods for understanding image captioning attention models .
<meaning-changed>  We show that explanation methods , firstly, correlate to object locations with higher precisionthan attention, secondly, are able to identify object wordsthat are unsupported by image content, and thirdly, provide guidance to improve and de-bias the model. Results are reported using two different image captioning attention models trained with Flickr30K and MSCOCO2017 datasets. Experimental analyses show the strength of explanation methods for understanding image captioning attention models .
 We show that explanation methods , firstly, correlate to object locations with high precision; 3) is helpful to `debug' the model such as analyzing the reasons for hallucinated object words. With the observed properties of explanations, we further design an LRP-inference fine-tuning strategy that can alleviate the object hallucination of image captioning models, meanwhile, maintain the sentence fluency. We conduct experiments with two widely used attention mechanisms: the adaptive attention mechanism calculated with the additive attention and the multi-head attention calculated with the scaled dot product .