Expert Support case study: Bolstering a RAG app with LLM-as-a-Judge
โข
25
Aymeric Roucher
m-ric
AI & ML interests
Leading Agents at Hugging Face ๐ค
Recent Activity
updated
a dataset
1 day ago
huggingface/documentation-images
updated
a dataset
1 day ago
m-ric/agents_medium_benchmark
liked
a Space
5 days ago
data-agents/jupyter-agent
Articles
Organizations
m-ric's activity
posted
an
update
6 days ago
Post
1612
After 6 years, BERT, the workhorse of encoder models, finally gets a replacement: ๐ช๐ฒ๐น๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐๐๐ฅ๐ง! ๐ค
We talk a lot about โจGenerative AIโจ, meaning "Decoder version of the Transformers architecture", but this is only one of the ways to build LLMs: encoder models, that turn a sentence in a vector, are maybe even more widely used in industry than generative models.
The workhorse for this category has been BERT since its release in 2018 (that's prehistory for LLMs).
It's not a fancy 100B parameters supermodel (just a few hundred millions), but it's an excellent workhorse, kind of a Honda Civic for LLMs.
Many applications use BERT-family models - the top models in this category cumulate millions of downloads on the Hub.
โก๏ธ Now a collaboration between Answer.AI and LightOn just introduced BERT's replacement: ModernBERT.
๐ง๐;๐๐ฅ:
๐๏ธ Architecture changes:
โ First, standard modernizations:
- Rotary positional embeddings (RoPE)
- Replace GeLU with GeGLU,
- Use Flash Attention 2
โจ The team also introduced innovative techniques like alternating attention instead of full attention, and sequence packing to get rid of padding overhead.
๐ฅ As a result, the model tops the game of encoder models:
It beats previous standard DeBERTaV3 for 1/5th the memory footprint, and runs 4x faster!
Read the blog post ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/modernbert
We talk a lot about โจGenerative AIโจ, meaning "Decoder version of the Transformers architecture", but this is only one of the ways to build LLMs: encoder models, that turn a sentence in a vector, are maybe even more widely used in industry than generative models.
The workhorse for this category has been BERT since its release in 2018 (that's prehistory for LLMs).
It's not a fancy 100B parameters supermodel (just a few hundred millions), but it's an excellent workhorse, kind of a Honda Civic for LLMs.
Many applications use BERT-family models - the top models in this category cumulate millions of downloads on the Hub.
โก๏ธ Now a collaboration between Answer.AI and LightOn just introduced BERT's replacement: ModernBERT.
๐ง๐;๐๐ฅ:
๐๏ธ Architecture changes:
โ First, standard modernizations:
- Rotary positional embeddings (RoPE)
- Replace GeLU with GeGLU,
- Use Flash Attention 2
โจ The team also introduced innovative techniques like alternating attention instead of full attention, and sequence packing to get rid of padding overhead.
๐ฅ As a result, the model tops the game of encoder models:
It beats previous standard DeBERTaV3 for 1/5th the memory footprint, and runs 4x faster!
Read the blog post ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/modernbert
- 1 reply
posted
an
update
6 days ago
Post
2012
๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐
๐๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐๐จ๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ง, ๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ณ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฅณ
๐ฐ๏ธ Llama-3.1-405B took 39 million GPU-hours to train, i.e. about 4.5 thousand years.
๐ด๐ป If they had needed all this time, we would have GPU stories from the time of Pharaoh ๐: "Alas, Lord of Two Lands, the shipment of counting-stones arriving from Cathay was lost to pirates, this shall delay the building of your computing temple by many moons "
๐ ๏ธ But instead, they just parallelized the training on 24k H100s, which made it take just a few months.
This required parallelizing across 4 dimensions: data, tensor, context, pipeline.
And it is infamously hard to do, making for bloated code repos that hold together only by magic.
๐ค ๐๐๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป'๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ต๐๐ด๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ! Instead of building mega-training codes, Hugging Face colleagues cooked in the other direction, towards tiny 4D parallelism libs. A team has built Nanotron, already widely used in industry.
And now a team releases Picotron, a radical approach to code 4D Parallelism in just a few hundred lines of code, a real engineering prowess, making it much easier to understand what's actually happening!
โก ๐๐'๐ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐, ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ณ๐๐น:
Counting in MFU (Model FLOPs Utilization, how much the model actually uses all the compute potential), this lib reaches ~50% on SmolLM-1.7B model with 8 H100 GPUs, which is really close to what huge libs would reach. (Caution: the team is leading further benchmarks to verify this)
Go take a look ๐ https://github.com/huggingface/picotron/tree/main/picotron
๐ฐ๏ธ Llama-3.1-405B took 39 million GPU-hours to train, i.e. about 4.5 thousand years.
๐ด๐ป If they had needed all this time, we would have GPU stories from the time of Pharaoh ๐: "Alas, Lord of Two Lands, the shipment of counting-stones arriving from Cathay was lost to pirates, this shall delay the building of your computing temple by many moons "
๐ ๏ธ But instead, they just parallelized the training on 24k H100s, which made it take just a few months.
This required parallelizing across 4 dimensions: data, tensor, context, pipeline.
And it is infamously hard to do, making for bloated code repos that hold together only by magic.
๐ค ๐๐๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ป'๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ต๐๐ด๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ! Instead of building mega-training codes, Hugging Face colleagues cooked in the other direction, towards tiny 4D parallelism libs. A team has built Nanotron, already widely used in industry.
And now a team releases Picotron, a radical approach to code 4D Parallelism in just a few hundred lines of code, a real engineering prowess, making it much easier to understand what's actually happening!
โก ๐๐'๐ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐, ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ณ๐๐น:
Counting in MFU (Model FLOPs Utilization, how much the model actually uses all the compute potential), this lib reaches ~50% on SmolLM-1.7B model with 8 H100 GPUs, which is really close to what huge libs would reach. (Caution: the team is leading further benchmarks to verify this)
Go take a look ๐ https://github.com/huggingface/picotron/tree/main/picotron
- 1 reply
posted
an
update
12 days ago
Post
2152
๐ฃ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ด๐บ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ณ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐๐ ๐: ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฏ๐ ๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐ถ๐บ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ด๐ฒ๐ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐! ๐ฅณ
Current LLMs process text by first splitting it into tokens. They use a module named "tokenizer", that -spl-it-s- th-e- te-xt- in-to- arbitrary tokens depending on a fixed dictionnary.
On the Hub you can find this dictionary in a model's files under tokenizer.json.
โก๏ธ This process is called BPE tokenization. It is suboptimal, everyone says it. It breaks text into predefined chunks that often fail to capture the nuance of language. But it has been a necessary evil in language models since their inception.
๐ฅ In Byte Latent Transformer (BLT), Meta researchers propose an elegant solution by eliminating tokenization entirely, working directly with raw bytes while maintaining efficiency through dynamic "patches."
This had been tried before with different byte-level tokenizations, but it's the first time that an architecture of this type scales as well as BPE tokenization. And it could mean a real paradigm shift! ๐๐
๐๏ธ ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ:
Instead of a lightweight tokenizer, BLT has a lightweight encoder that process raw bytes into patches. Then the patches are processed by the main heavy-duty transformers as we do normally (but for patches of bytes instead of tokens), before converting back to bytes.
๐งฉ ๐๐๐ป๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด:
Instead of fixed tokens, BLT groups bytes based on their predictability (measured by entropy) - using more compute for complex sequences and efficiently handling simple ones. This allows efficient processing while maintaining byte-level understanding.
I hope this breakthrough is confirmed and we can get rid of all the tokenizer stuff, it will make model handling easier!
Read their paper here ๐ https://dl.fbaipublicfiles.com/blt/BLT__Patches_Scale_Better_Than_Tokens.pdf
Current LLMs process text by first splitting it into tokens. They use a module named "tokenizer", that -spl-it-s- th-e- te-xt- in-to- arbitrary tokens depending on a fixed dictionnary.
On the Hub you can find this dictionary in a model's files under tokenizer.json.
โก๏ธ This process is called BPE tokenization. It is suboptimal, everyone says it. It breaks text into predefined chunks that often fail to capture the nuance of language. But it has been a necessary evil in language models since their inception.
๐ฅ In Byte Latent Transformer (BLT), Meta researchers propose an elegant solution by eliminating tokenization entirely, working directly with raw bytes while maintaining efficiency through dynamic "patches."
This had been tried before with different byte-level tokenizations, but it's the first time that an architecture of this type scales as well as BPE tokenization. And it could mean a real paradigm shift! ๐๐
๐๏ธ ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ:
Instead of a lightweight tokenizer, BLT has a lightweight encoder that process raw bytes into patches. Then the patches are processed by the main heavy-duty transformers as we do normally (but for patches of bytes instead of tokens), before converting back to bytes.
๐งฉ ๐๐๐ป๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด:
Instead of fixed tokens, BLT groups bytes based on their predictability (measured by entropy) - using more compute for complex sequences and efficiently handling simple ones. This allows efficient processing while maintaining byte-level understanding.
I hope this breakthrough is confirmed and we can get rid of all the tokenizer stuff, it will make model handling easier!
Read their paper here ๐ https://dl.fbaipublicfiles.com/blt/BLT__Patches_Scale_Better_Than_Tokens.pdf
- 2 replies
posted
an
update
14 days ago
Post
2409
๐ฅ ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ด๐น๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ ๐ฎ.๐ฌ, ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฎ ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ต ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฟ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ง-๐ฐ๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ-๐ฏ.๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐! And they start a huge effort on agentic capabilities.
๐ The performance improvements are crazy for such a fast model:
โฃ Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms the previous 1.5 Pro model at twice the speed
โฃ Now supports both input AND output of images, video, audio and text
โฃ Can natively use tools like Google Search and execute code
โก๏ธ If the price is on par with previous Flash iteration ($0.30 / M tokens, to compare with GPT-4o's $1.25) the competition will have a big problem with this 4x cheaper model that gets better benchmarks ๐คฏ
๐ค What about the agentic capabilities?
โฃ Project Astra: A universal AI assistant that can use Google Search, Lens and Maps
โฃ Project Mariner: A Chrome extension that can complete complex web tasks (83.5% success rate on WebVoyager benchmark, this is really impressive!)
โฃ Jules: An AI coding agent that integrates with GitHub workflows
I'll be eagerly awaiting further news from Google!
Read their blogpost here ๐ https://blog.google/technology/google-deepmind/google-gemini-ai-update-december-2024/
๐ The performance improvements are crazy for such a fast model:
โฃ Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms the previous 1.5 Pro model at twice the speed
โฃ Now supports both input AND output of images, video, audio and text
โฃ Can natively use tools like Google Search and execute code
โก๏ธ If the price is on par with previous Flash iteration ($0.30 / M tokens, to compare with GPT-4o's $1.25) the competition will have a big problem with this 4x cheaper model that gets better benchmarks ๐คฏ
๐ค What about the agentic capabilities?
โฃ Project Astra: A universal AI assistant that can use Google Search, Lens and Maps
โฃ Project Mariner: A Chrome extension that can complete complex web tasks (83.5% success rate on WebVoyager benchmark, this is really impressive!)
โฃ Jules: An AI coding agent that integrates with GitHub workflows
I'll be eagerly awaiting further news from Google!
Read their blogpost here ๐ https://blog.google/technology/google-deepmind/google-gemini-ai-update-december-2024/
posted
an
update
14 days ago
Post
1790
๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฒ๐๐ญ! New blog post suggests Anthropic might have an extremely strong Opus-3.5 already available, but is not releasing it to keep their edge over the competition. ๐ง
โSince the release of Opus-3.5 has been delayed indefinitely, there have been lots of rumors and articles about LLMs plateauing. Scaling laws, the main powering factor of the LLM competence increase, could have stopped, according to these rumors, being the cause of this stalling of progress.
These rumors were quickly denied by many people at the leading LLM labs, including OpenAI and Anthropic. But these people would be expected to hype the future of LLMs even if scaling laws really plateaued, so the jury is still out.
๐๏ธ This new article by Semianalysis (generally a good source, specifically on hardware) provides a counter-rumor that I find more convincing:
โก๏ธ Maybe scaling laws still work, Opus-3.5 is ready and as good as planned, but they just don't release it because the synthetic data it helps provide can bring cheaper/smaller models Claude and Haiku up in performance, without risking to leak this precious high-quality synthetic data to competitors.
Time will tell! I feel like we'll know more soon.
Read the article: https://semianalysis.com/2024/12/11/scaling-laws-o1-pro-architecture-reasoning-infrastructure-orion-and-claude-3-5-opus-failures/
โSince the release of Opus-3.5 has been delayed indefinitely, there have been lots of rumors and articles about LLMs plateauing. Scaling laws, the main powering factor of the LLM competence increase, could have stopped, according to these rumors, being the cause of this stalling of progress.
These rumors were quickly denied by many people at the leading LLM labs, including OpenAI and Anthropic. But these people would be expected to hype the future of LLMs even if scaling laws really plateaued, so the jury is still out.
๐๏ธ This new article by Semianalysis (generally a good source, specifically on hardware) provides a counter-rumor that I find more convincing:
โก๏ธ Maybe scaling laws still work, Opus-3.5 is ready and as good as planned, but they just don't release it because the synthetic data it helps provide can bring cheaper/smaller models Claude and Haiku up in performance, without risking to leak this precious high-quality synthetic data to competitors.
Time will tell! I feel like we'll know more soon.
Read the article: https://semianalysis.com/2024/12/11/scaling-laws-o1-pro-architecture-reasoning-infrastructure-orion-and-claude-3-5-opus-failures/
- 1 reply
reacted to
julien-c's
post with โค๏ธ๐ฅ
14 days ago
Post
7567
After some heated discussion ๐ฅ, we clarify our intent re. storage limits on the Hub
TL;DR:
- public storage is free, and (unless blatant abuse) unlimited. We do ask that you consider upgrading to PRO and/or Enterprise Hub if possible
- private storage is paid above a significant free tier (1TB if you have a paid account, 100GB otherwise)
docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/storage-limits
We optimize our infrastructure continuously to scale our storage for the coming years of growth in Machine learning, to the benefit of the community ๐ฅ
cc: @reach-vb @pierric @victor and the HF team
TL;DR:
- public storage is free, and (unless blatant abuse) unlimited. We do ask that you consider upgrading to PRO and/or Enterprise Hub if possible
- private storage is paid above a significant free tier (1TB if you have a paid account, 100GB otherwise)
docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/storage-limits
We optimize our infrastructure continuously to scale our storage for the coming years of growth in Machine learning, to the benefit of the community ๐ฅ
cc: @reach-vb @pierric @victor and the HF team
- 28 replies
posted
an
update
16 days ago
Post
2220
Last week was crazy in OS AI, with important models and datasets releases every day.
Here are the most important ones I've pinned:
๐ Cohere relased GLobal-MMLU, a multilingual version of MMLU, to evaluate AI models' world knowledge in many languages!
๐ฆ Meta released Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, a 70B model that's on par with Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct, GPT-4o and Claude. Probably my new go-to for agentic workflows.
๐ FishAudio released fish-speech-1.5, multilingual text to speech model
๐จ Microsoft Research released TRELLIS, an extremely impressive image-to-3D model, which you can try here: JeffreyXiang/TRELLIS
๐ Yesterday, Hugging Face release FineWeb 2, a new version that extends the previous FineWeb to over 1000 languages, including extended coverage in Russina, Mandarin, German, Japanese, Spanish, French, so a huge, high-quality dataset of > 3 trillion words! HuggingFaceFW/fineweb-2
Now let's go build to make this week as productive as last one!
Here are the most important ones I've pinned:
๐ Cohere relased GLobal-MMLU, a multilingual version of MMLU, to evaluate AI models' world knowledge in many languages!
๐ฆ Meta released Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, a 70B model that's on par with Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct, GPT-4o and Claude. Probably my new go-to for agentic workflows.
๐ FishAudio released fish-speech-1.5, multilingual text to speech model
๐จ Microsoft Research released TRELLIS, an extremely impressive image-to-3D model, which you can try here: JeffreyXiang/TRELLIS
๐ Yesterday, Hugging Face release FineWeb 2, a new version that extends the previous FineWeb to over 1000 languages, including extended coverage in Russina, Mandarin, German, Japanese, Spanish, French, so a huge, high-quality dataset of > 3 trillion words! HuggingFaceFW/fineweb-2
Now let's go build to make this week as productive as last one!
reacted to
merve's
post with โค๏ธ
16 days ago
Post
5500
This week in open-source AI was insane ๐ค A small recap๐บ๐ป
merve/dec-6-releases-67545caebe9fc4776faac0a3
Multimodal ๐ผ๏ธ
> Google shipped a PaliGemma 2, new iteration of PaliGemma with more sizes: 3B, 10B and 28B, with pre-trained and captioning variants ๐
> OpenGVLab released InternVL2, seven new vision LMs in different sizes, with sota checkpoint with MIT license โจ
> Qwen team at Alibaba released the base models of Qwen2VL models with 2B, 7B and 72B ckpts
LLMs ๐ฌ
> Meta released a new iteration of Llama 70B, Llama3.2-70B trained further
> EuroLLM-9B-Instruct is a new multilingual LLM for European languages with Apache 2.0 license ๐ฅ
> Dataset: CohereForAI released GlobalMMLU, multilingual version of MMLU with 42 languages with Apache 2.0 license
> Dataset: QwQ-LongCoT-130K is a new dataset to train reasoning models
> Dataset: FineWeb2 just landed with multilinguality update! ๐ฅ nearly 8TB pretraining data in many languages!
Image/Video Generation ๐ผ๏ธ
> Tencent released HunyuanVideo, a new photorealistic video generation model
> OminiControl is a new editing/control framework for image generation models like Flux
Audio ๐
> Indic-Parler-TTS is a new text2speech model made by community
Multimodal ๐ผ๏ธ
> Google shipped a PaliGemma 2, new iteration of PaliGemma with more sizes: 3B, 10B and 28B, with pre-trained and captioning variants ๐
> OpenGVLab released InternVL2, seven new vision LMs in different sizes, with sota checkpoint with MIT license โจ
> Qwen team at Alibaba released the base models of Qwen2VL models with 2B, 7B and 72B ckpts
LLMs ๐ฌ
> Meta released a new iteration of Llama 70B, Llama3.2-70B trained further
> EuroLLM-9B-Instruct is a new multilingual LLM for European languages with Apache 2.0 license ๐ฅ
> Dataset: CohereForAI released GlobalMMLU, multilingual version of MMLU with 42 languages with Apache 2.0 license
> Dataset: QwQ-LongCoT-130K is a new dataset to train reasoning models
> Dataset: FineWeb2 just landed with multilinguality update! ๐ฅ nearly 8TB pretraining data in many languages!
Image/Video Generation ๐ผ๏ธ
> Tencent released HunyuanVideo, a new photorealistic video generation model
> OminiControl is a new editing/control framework for image generation models like Flux
Audio ๐
> Indic-Parler-TTS is a new text2speech model made by community
posted
an
update
21 days ago
Post
1467
๐ฆ๐ต๐ผ๐๐จ๐: ๐ฎ ๐๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ-๐๐ผ-๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ผ๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ ๐บ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ด๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ๐! ๐ฒ
A team from NUS and Microsoft just released an agent that can act on any UI (Desktop, Android, Web) without needing additional text information. It works extremely well : they applied their method on a tiny Qwen2-VL-2B, and they managed to beat methods that use either much more powerful vision models (like GPT-4V) without using any additional info (e.g. leveraging the DOM of a webpage) like previous methods did ! ๐๐
They started from the idea that most existing methods rely heavily on text, which makes them less generalizable, while letting aside rich UI structure that user actually rely on when navigating this interfaces.
โ๏ธ They put several good ideas to work:
๐ก Simplify screenshots to the max:
They prune a lot the heavy visual content of UI screenshots, by removing cloned image patches (like any vast patch of the same color will be reduced to a small patch, while maintaining positional embeddings), then group patches from the same GUI elements together to simplify even further
๐ก Build a truly generalist dataset:
To train a general UI agent, you need trajectories from each possible UI, and express them in a common language. Authors merge datasets like OmniAct for Desktop, Mind2Web for websites, AMEX for Android trajectories to create a high-quality and diverse dataset.
โก๏ธ Nice results ensued:
They fine-tune a tiny Qwen-2-VL-2B on their method, and it reaches SOTA on several task (element identification, web navigation), even beating methods that either use additional info from the DOM or use much bigger VLMS like GPT-4v! ๐
And performance could certainly jump with a slightly bigger vision model. Let's hope the community builds this soon! ๐
Paper added to my "Agents" collection ๐ m-ric/agents-65ba776fbd9e29f771c07d4e
A team from NUS and Microsoft just released an agent that can act on any UI (Desktop, Android, Web) without needing additional text information. It works extremely well : they applied their method on a tiny Qwen2-VL-2B, and they managed to beat methods that use either much more powerful vision models (like GPT-4V) without using any additional info (e.g. leveraging the DOM of a webpage) like previous methods did ! ๐๐
They started from the idea that most existing methods rely heavily on text, which makes them less generalizable, while letting aside rich UI structure that user actually rely on when navigating this interfaces.
โ๏ธ They put several good ideas to work:
๐ก Simplify screenshots to the max:
They prune a lot the heavy visual content of UI screenshots, by removing cloned image patches (like any vast patch of the same color will be reduced to a small patch, while maintaining positional embeddings), then group patches from the same GUI elements together to simplify even further
๐ก Build a truly generalist dataset:
To train a general UI agent, you need trajectories from each possible UI, and express them in a common language. Authors merge datasets like OmniAct for Desktop, Mind2Web for websites, AMEX for Android trajectories to create a high-quality and diverse dataset.
โก๏ธ Nice results ensued:
They fine-tune a tiny Qwen-2-VL-2B on their method, and it reaches SOTA on several task (element identification, web navigation), even beating methods that either use additional info from the DOM or use much bigger VLMS like GPT-4v! ๐
And performance could certainly jump with a slightly bigger vision model. Let's hope the community builds this soon! ๐
Paper added to my "Agents" collection ๐ m-ric/agents-65ba776fbd9e29f771c07d4e
posted
an
update
22 days ago
Post
1206
Need a measurement for traction of a GitHub repo, a more reliable one than Github star history? (which is a bit too hype-driven) ๐
โก๏ธ I've made a Space to visualize PyPI downloads.
Try it here ๐ m-ric/package-download-history
โก๏ธ I've made a Space to visualize PyPI downloads.
Try it here ๐ m-ric/package-download-history
- 1 reply
posted
an
update
23 days ago
Post
1269
๐ค ๐๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฏ๐ฒ'๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ-๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฝ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐๐ ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฏ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ - and their paper cites my work!
๐ก Reminder:ย In short, Agentic systems are a vehicle in which you put your LLM to allow it access to the outside world.
โก๏ธ The team of researchers at Adobe started from the idea that current agentic systems lack the ability to define their own tools. So they decided to make an agent that writes actions as code, thus allowing it to write python functions that can be re-used later as tools!
Here's what the LLM generations can look like with the proper prompt:
Thought: I need to access the excel file using a different method.
Action:
Then your system executes this and appends the observation to the agent's memory.
Why is this code formulation better than classical tool use formulation as JSON? The paper explains:
"Most existing work uses text or JSON as the representation of actions, which significantly lacks the two criteria mentioned earlier: generality and composability. In contrast, DynaSaur can utilize available actions or create new ones if necessary, using code as a unified representation. In principle, acting with code enables agents to solve any Turing-complete problem."
The idea of using code is not new: in fact, we do it in transformers.agents (thus the citation that I got). They implementation adds further refinements, like using RAG to retrieve relevant functions before generating an action, which increases performance further.
And they observe that code agents perform much better, reaching the top of GAIA leaderboard! ๐ฅ
Go take a look, it's really clear and informative!
Paper added to my agents collection ๐ m-ric/agents-65ba776fbd9e29f771c07d4e
๐ก Reminder:ย In short, Agentic systems are a vehicle in which you put your LLM to allow it access to the outside world.
โก๏ธ The team of researchers at Adobe started from the idea that current agentic systems lack the ability to define their own tools. So they decided to make an agent that writes actions as code, thus allowing it to write python functions that can be re-used later as tools!
Here's what the LLM generations can look like with the proper prompt:
Thought: I need to access the excel file using a different method.
Action:
def access_excel_file(file_path)
... # rest of the code (the agent does writes it, but I don't have room in this post)
return rowsThen your system executes this and appends the observation to the agent's memory.
Why is this code formulation better than classical tool use formulation as JSON? The paper explains:
"Most existing work uses text or JSON as the representation of actions, which significantly lacks the two criteria mentioned earlier: generality and composability. In contrast, DynaSaur can utilize available actions or create new ones if necessary, using code as a unified representation. In principle, acting with code enables agents to solve any Turing-complete problem."
The idea of using code is not new: in fact, we do it in transformers.agents (thus the citation that I got). They implementation adds further refinements, like using RAG to retrieve relevant functions before generating an action, which increases performance further.
And they observe that code agents perform much better, reaching the top of GAIA leaderboard! ๐ฅ
Go take a look, it's really clear and informative!
Paper added to my agents collection ๐ m-ric/agents-65ba776fbd9e29f771c07d4e
posted
an
update
26 days ago
Post
2376
Single most important thing to do today: ๐ด๐ผ ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ค๐๐ค ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐๐ด๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐!
๐ https://huggingface.co/chat/models/Qwen/QwQ-32B-Preview
๐ https://huggingface.co/chat/models/Qwen/QwQ-32B-Preview
- 2 replies
posted
an
update
30 days ago
Post
1079
๐๏ธ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฐ: ๐๐ป๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฝ ๐ข๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐, ๐๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฝ ๐๐ฝ ๐๐ผ ๐ญ๐ฎ% ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐ฒ-๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐, ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ต% ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ
Menlo Ventures surveyed 600 enterprise IT decision-makers for their 2024 report. They reveal that AI spending surged to $13.8 billion this year, more than 6x the $2.3 billion spent in 2023!
Companies are shifting from experimentation to serious implementation.
๐ท Top enterprise use cases by adoption:
โฃ Code copilots (51%)
- GitHub Copilot hit $300M revenue run rate
โฃ Support chatbots (31%)
โฃ RAG (28%)
โฃ Data extraction/transformation (27%)
โฃ Meeting summarization (25%)
๐ Market dynamics:
โฃ OpenAI's enterprise share dropped from 50% to 34% ๐
โฃ Anthropic doubled presence from 12% to 24% ๐
โฃ Open-source makes up 19% of usage ๐ค
๐ฌ Implementation challenges:
โฃ 26% failed due to unexpected implementation costs
โฃ 21% failed due to data privacy issues
โฃ 18% failed due to disappointing ROI
โฃ 15% failed due to hallucinations
Read the full report here ๐ https://menlovc.com/2024-the-state-of-generative-ai-in-the-enterprise/
Menlo Ventures surveyed 600 enterprise IT decision-makers for their 2024 report. They reveal that AI spending surged to $13.8 billion this year, more than 6x the $2.3 billion spent in 2023!
Companies are shifting from experimentation to serious implementation.
๐ท Top enterprise use cases by adoption:
โฃ Code copilots (51%)
- GitHub Copilot hit $300M revenue run rate
โฃ Support chatbots (31%)
โฃ RAG (28%)
โฃ Data extraction/transformation (27%)
โฃ Meeting summarization (25%)
๐ Market dynamics:
โฃ OpenAI's enterprise share dropped from 50% to 34% ๐
โฃ Anthropic doubled presence from 12% to 24% ๐
โฃ Open-source makes up 19% of usage ๐ค
๐ฌ Implementation challenges:
โฃ 26% failed due to unexpected implementation costs
โฃ 21% failed due to data privacy issues
โฃ 18% failed due to disappointing ROI
โฃ 15% failed due to hallucinations
Read the full report here ๐ https://menlovc.com/2024-the-state-of-generative-ai-in-the-enterprise/
posted
an
update
about 1 month ago
Post
1211
Made a new app to visualize the LLM race โ ๐ก๐ผ ๐๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฝ ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ช๐บโ
See the app here ๐ m-ric/llm-race-to-the-top
I've adapted an app by @andrewrreed that tracks progress of LLMs ( andrewrreed/closed-vs-open-arena-elo), on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard, to compare companies from different countries.
The outcome is quite sad, as a Frenchman and European.
The top 10 is exclusively US ๐บ๐ธ and Chinese ๐จ๐ณ companies (after great Chinese LLM releases recently, like the Qwen2.5 series), with the notable exception of Mistral AI ๐ซ๐ท.
American companies are making fast progress, Chinese ones even faster. Europe is at risk of being left behind. And the EU AI Act hasn't even come into force yet to slow down the EU market. We need to wake up ๐ฌ
โ ๏ธ Caution: This Chatbot Arena ELO ranking is not the most accurate, especially at high scores like this, because LLM makers can game it to some extent.
See the app here ๐ m-ric/llm-race-to-the-top
I've adapted an app by @andrewrreed that tracks progress of LLMs ( andrewrreed/closed-vs-open-arena-elo), on the Chatbot Arena leaderboard, to compare companies from different countries.
The outcome is quite sad, as a Frenchman and European.
The top 10 is exclusively US ๐บ๐ธ and Chinese ๐จ๐ณ companies (after great Chinese LLM releases recently, like the Qwen2.5 series), with the notable exception of Mistral AI ๐ซ๐ท.
American companies are making fast progress, Chinese ones even faster. Europe is at risk of being left behind. And the EU AI Act hasn't even come into force yet to slow down the EU market. We need to wake up ๐ฌ
โ ๏ธ Caution: This Chatbot Arena ELO ranking is not the most accurate, especially at high scores like this, because LLM makers can game it to some extent.
- 1 reply
posted
an
update
about 1 month ago
Post
796
๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฏ๐ผ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐ธ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐๐ -๐ฎ๐-๐ฎ-๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ด๐ฒ: ๐๐น๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ-๐ฏ.๐ญ-๐ณ๐ฌ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐! ๐งโโ๏ธ
Evaluating systems is critical during prototyping and in production, and LLM-as-a-judge has become a standard technique to do it.
First, what is "LLM-as-a-judge"?
๐ It's a very useful technique for evaluating LLM outputs. If anything you're evaluating cannot be properly evaluated with deterministic criteria, like the "politeness" of an LLM output, or how faithful it is to an original source, you can use LLM-judge instead : prompt another LLM with "Here's an LLM output, please rate this on criterion {criterion} on a scale of 1 to 5", then parse the number from its output, and voilร , you get your score.
๐ง But who judges the judge?
How can you make sure your LLM-judge is reliable? You can have a specific dataset annotated with scores provided by human judges, and compare how LLM-judge scores correlate with human judge scores.
๐ Before even running that benchmark, to get you started, there's a new option to get you started: a leaderboard that measures how well different model perform as judges!
And the outcome is surprising, models come in quite different orders from what we're used to in general rankings: probably some have much better bias mitigation than others!
Take a deeper look here ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/arena-atla
Evaluating systems is critical during prototyping and in production, and LLM-as-a-judge has become a standard technique to do it.
First, what is "LLM-as-a-judge"?
๐ It's a very useful technique for evaluating LLM outputs. If anything you're evaluating cannot be properly evaluated with deterministic criteria, like the "politeness" of an LLM output, or how faithful it is to an original source, you can use LLM-judge instead : prompt another LLM with "Here's an LLM output, please rate this on criterion {criterion} on a scale of 1 to 5", then parse the number from its output, and voilร , you get your score.
๐ง But who judges the judge?
How can you make sure your LLM-judge is reliable? You can have a specific dataset annotated with scores provided by human judges, and compare how LLM-judge scores correlate with human judge scores.
๐ Before even running that benchmark, to get you started, there's a new option to get you started: a leaderboard that measures how well different model perform as judges!
And the outcome is surprising, models come in quite different orders from what we're used to in general rankings: probably some have much better bias mitigation than others!
Take a deeper look here ๐ https://huggingface.co/blog/arena-atla
posted
an
update
about 1 month ago
Post
270
Lifehack of the day:
Adding "r.jina.ai/" before any url transforms it in Markdown using Jina AI's Reader! Here with @cyrilzakka 's blog post.
Adding "r.jina.ai/" before any url transforms it in Markdown using Jina AI's Reader! Here with @cyrilzakka 's blog post.
reacted to
cfahlgren1's
post with โค๏ธ
about 1 month ago
Post
3085
You can clean and format datasets entirely in the browser with a few lines of SQL.
In this post, I replicate the process @mlabonne used to clean the new microsoft/orca-agentinstruct-1M-v1 dataset.
The cleaning process consists of:
- Joining the separate splits together / add split column
- Converting string messages into list of structs
- Removing empty system prompts
https://huggingface.co/blog/cfahlgren1/the-beginners-guide-to-cleaning-a-dataset
Here's his new cleaned dataset: mlabonne/orca-agentinstruct-1M-v1-cleaned
In this post, I replicate the process @mlabonne used to clean the new microsoft/orca-agentinstruct-1M-v1 dataset.
The cleaning process consists of:
- Joining the separate splits together / add split column
- Converting string messages into list of structs
- Removing empty system prompts
https://huggingface.co/blog/cfahlgren1/the-beginners-guide-to-cleaning-a-dataset
Here's his new cleaned dataset: mlabonne/orca-agentinstruct-1M-v1-cleaned
- 1 reply
posted
an
update
about 1 month ago
Post
786
๐ Meta teams use a fine-tuned Llama model to fix production issues in seconds
One of Meta's engineering teams shared how they use a fine-tuned small Llama (Llama-2-7B, so not even a very recent model) to identify the root cause of production issues with 42% accuracy.
๐ค 42%, is that not too low?
โก๏ธ Usually, whenever there's an issue in production, engineers dive into recent code changes to find the offending commit. At Meta's scale (thousands of daily changes), this is like finding a needle in a haystack.
๐ก So when the LLM-based suggestion is right, it cuts incident resolution time from hours to seconds!
How did they do it?
๐ Two-step approach:
โฃ Heuristics (code ownership, directory structure, runtime graphs) reduce thousands of potential changes to a manageable set
โฃ Fine-tuned Llama 2 7B ranks the most likely culprits
๐ Training pipeline:
โฃ Continued pre-training on Meta's internal docs and wikis
โฃ Supervised fine-tuning on past incident investigations
โฃ Training data mimicked real-world constraints (2-20 potential changes per incident)
๐ฎ Now future developments await:
โฃ Language models could handle more of the incident response workflow (runbooks, mitigation, post-mortems)
โฃ Improvements in model reasoning should boost accuracy further
Read it in full ๐ https://www.tryparity.com/blog/how-meta-uses-llms-to-improve-incident-response
One of Meta's engineering teams shared how they use a fine-tuned small Llama (Llama-2-7B, so not even a very recent model) to identify the root cause of production issues with 42% accuracy.
๐ค 42%, is that not too low?
โก๏ธ Usually, whenever there's an issue in production, engineers dive into recent code changes to find the offending commit. At Meta's scale (thousands of daily changes), this is like finding a needle in a haystack.
๐ก So when the LLM-based suggestion is right, it cuts incident resolution time from hours to seconds!
How did they do it?
๐ Two-step approach:
โฃ Heuristics (code ownership, directory structure, runtime graphs) reduce thousands of potential changes to a manageable set
โฃ Fine-tuned Llama 2 7B ranks the most likely culprits
๐ Training pipeline:
โฃ Continued pre-training on Meta's internal docs and wikis
โฃ Supervised fine-tuning on past incident investigations
โฃ Training data mimicked real-world constraints (2-20 potential changes per incident)
๐ฎ Now future developments await:
โฃ Language models could handle more of the incident response workflow (runbooks, mitigation, post-mortems)
โฃ Improvements in model reasoning should boost accuracy further
Read it in full ๐ https://www.tryparity.com/blog/how-meta-uses-llms-to-improve-incident-response
reacted to
reach-vb's
post with ๐ฅ
about 1 month ago
Post
4326
What a brilliant week for Open Source AI!
Qwen 2.5 Coder by Alibaba - 0.5B / 1.5B / 3B / 7B / 14B/ 32B (Base + Instruct) Code generation LLMs, with 32B tackling giants like Gemnini 1.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet
Qwen/qwen25-coder-66eaa22e6f99801bf65b0c2f
LLM2CLIP from Microsoft - Leverage LLMs to train ultra-powerful CLIP models! Boosts performance over the previous SOTA by ~17%
microsoft/llm2clip-672323a266173cfa40b32d4c
Athene v2 Chat & Agent by NexusFlow - SoTA general LLM fine-tuned from Qwen 2.5 72B excels at Chat + Function Calling/ JSON/ Agents
Nexusflow/athene-v2-6735b85e505981a794fb02cc
Orca Agent Instruct by Microsoft - 1 million instruct pairs covering text editing, creative writing, coding, reading comprehension, etc - permissively licensed
microsoft/orca-agentinstruct-1M-v1
Ultravox by FixieAI - 70B/ 8B model approaching GPT4o level, pick any LLM, train an adapter with Whisper as Audio Encoder
reach-vb/ultravox-audio-language-model-release-67373b602af0a52b2a88ae71
JanusFlow 1.3 by DeepSeek - Next iteration of their Unified MultiModal LLM Janus with RectifiedFlow
deepseek-ai/JanusFlow-1.3B
Common Corpus by Pleais - 2,003,039,184,047 multilingual, commercially permissive and high quality tokens!
PleIAs/common_corpus
I'm sure I missed a lot, can't wait for the next week!
Put down in comments what I missed! ๐ค
Qwen 2.5 Coder by Alibaba - 0.5B / 1.5B / 3B / 7B / 14B/ 32B (Base + Instruct) Code generation LLMs, with 32B tackling giants like Gemnini 1.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet
Qwen/qwen25-coder-66eaa22e6f99801bf65b0c2f
LLM2CLIP from Microsoft - Leverage LLMs to train ultra-powerful CLIP models! Boosts performance over the previous SOTA by ~17%
microsoft/llm2clip-672323a266173cfa40b32d4c
Athene v2 Chat & Agent by NexusFlow - SoTA general LLM fine-tuned from Qwen 2.5 72B excels at Chat + Function Calling/ JSON/ Agents
Nexusflow/athene-v2-6735b85e505981a794fb02cc
Orca Agent Instruct by Microsoft - 1 million instruct pairs covering text editing, creative writing, coding, reading comprehension, etc - permissively licensed
microsoft/orca-agentinstruct-1M-v1
Ultravox by FixieAI - 70B/ 8B model approaching GPT4o level, pick any LLM, train an adapter with Whisper as Audio Encoder
reach-vb/ultravox-audio-language-model-release-67373b602af0a52b2a88ae71
JanusFlow 1.3 by DeepSeek - Next iteration of their Unified MultiModal LLM Janus with RectifiedFlow
deepseek-ai/JanusFlow-1.3B
Common Corpus by Pleais - 2,003,039,184,047 multilingual, commercially permissive and high quality tokens!
PleIAs/common_corpus
I'm sure I missed a lot, can't wait for the next week!
Put down in comments what I missed! ๐ค