Spaces:
Running
Running
| !!!YOUR JOB!!! | |
| Create a ~3000! word analytical overview of the provided document that maintains academic rigor while being engaging and accessible to scholars across disciplines. Follow this structure: | |
| - Use the provided analysis on Core Research Elements and Hidden Insights & Nuances etc. | |
| - Use also the provided outline as input | |
| - Make sure to avoid redundancies | |
| - for structure in the markdown do not use # just use ** to format headers or emphasize. | |
| - Start with an introductory paragraph that outlines what has been done and the main findings - an academic hook. Then introduce what will be covered in the overview. | |
| - Be flexible with the structure and adapt it to the content of the document. | |
| - Include interesting and relevant quotes/examples from the document. | |
| - Use measured and academic language. | |
| Frame the research context and significance by: | |
| Identifying the core research problem and its broader theoretical implications | |
| Situating the work within existing academic discourse | |
| Articulating key research questions and objectives | |
| Highlighting theoretical and methodological innovations | |
| Present the key findings and insights by: | |
| Synthesizing primary results and their significance | |
| Examining unexpected or counterintuitive discoveries | |
| Analyzing methodological contributions | |
| Including relevant statistical evidence and empirical data | |
| Incorporating illustrative examples that demonstrate key points | |
| Analyze methodological approach through: | |
| Research design choices and rationale | |
| Sample characteristics and data collection methods | |
| Analytical frameworks employed | |
| Treatment of limitations and constraints | |
| Explore theoretical and practical implications by: | |
| Connecting findings to broader academic discourse | |
| Identifying contributions to theory development | |
| Discussing methodological innovations | |
| Examining cross-disciplinary relevance | |
| Considering future research directions | |
| Critically examine the work's significance by: | |
| Analyzing strengths and limitations | |
| Situating findings within existing literature | |
| Identifying unresolved questions | |
| Discussing broader implications for theory and practice | |
| Style guidelines: | |
| Maintain scholarly tone while ensuring accessibility | |
| Use precise academic language but explain technical terms | |
| Include specific examples and evidence to illustrate points | |
| Present clear logical progression of ideas | |
| Balance depth of analysis with engaging narrative flow | |
| Incorporate relevant quotes and examples from the source material | |
| The overview should preserve academic rigor while making complex research accessible to scholars across disciplines. Focus on analytical depth while maintaining reader engagement through clear structure and illustrative examples. | |
| Please use the provided research overview and blog post as reference for content while adapting the style for an academic audience. | |
| For avoiding inventions! | |
| When summarizing research papers, never include examples, analogies, or historical references that aren't explicitly mentioned in the original paper | |
| All findings, statistics, quotations and specific details must come directly from the source material | |
| If elaborating on implications or recommendations, stay strictly within what was explicitly discussed in the paper | |
| When uncertain about whether something was mentioned in the original, err on the side of omitting it | |
| For making the language more accessible! | |
| Use clear, direct language that a general educated audience would understand | |
| Avoid unnecessary academic jargon and complex sentence structures | |
| Avoid bullets to be suitable for TTS i.e. Reads naturally when spoken | |
| Replace phrases like "cognitive stewardship" with simpler terms unless they're specifically used in the original paper | |
| Break up long sentences into shorter ones | |
| Use active voice where possible | |
| Express ideas in plain language while maintaining accuracy | |
| The goal should be a summary that accurately captures the research while being readable and engaging for a broader audience. | |
| For example, instead of: | |
| "The empirical heart of the study beats with a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative rigor with qualitative depth." | |
| Write: | |
| "The study used both numbers (surveys) and detailed examples (interviews) to understand how people use AI." | |
| Remember ~3000! words max - be thorough but selective. Find a good balance. | |
| Only output the final overview text. No additional intros, notes, statements. |