prompts/papers_outline.prompt

Analyze the above structured outputs from academic papers to create a detailed comparative outline for a literature review. Follow these specific requirements:

COMPARATIVE DIMENSIONS:
Systematically analyze and compare the papers across these key dimensions:


Theoretical Frameworks & Models
Methodological Approaches
Research Questions & Objectives
Key Findings & Conclusions
Practical Implications
Knowledge Gaps & Future Directions


ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS:
For each dimension:


Identify areas of consensus and disagreement
Note methodological similarities and differences
Highlight complementary or contradictory findings
Map theoretical connections and divergences
Track evolution of ideas across papers
Document shared and unique contributions


OUTLINE STRUCTURE:
Generate a detailed outline that best fits the domain and content of the papers. The structure should:


Use clear hierarchical organization
Reflect the natural themes and patterns in the literature
Adapt to discipline-specific conventions
Create logical flow between sections
Allow for flexible categorization of findings


SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:


Note chronological developments in the field
Identify emerging trends or patterns
Highlight innovative approaches or findings
Document interconnections between papers
Track citation patterns and influences
Ensure balanced representation of all papers, avoiding overemphasis on any single study regardless of recency or importance claims


OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS:


Use clear, hierarchical structure
Include specific examples from papers
Note paper-specific identifiers for each point
Maintain balanced coverage of all papers
Highlight key quotes or statistics where relevant

FINAL GUIDELINES:

Ensure each major point references specific papers
Identify clear themes and patterns across papers
Note both similarities and differences explicitly
Maintain analytical depth while ensuring clarity
Create logical connections between sections