# Build a dynamic comparative table outline


| Paper ID | Aspect 1 | Aspect 2 | Aspect 3 | Aspect 4 |
|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
| Paper 1  |          |          |          |          |
| Paper 2  |          |          |          |          |


Analyze the structured outputs from the above papers and create a comparative table that best represents their key similarities and differences. Follow these guidelines:

1. TABLE DESIGN:
- Determine the most appropriate columns (max 4 aspects) based on the common elements and key differences in the papers
- Design a table structure that highlights the most significant comparative aspects
- Create column headers that reflect the actual content patterns found across papers

2. COMPARISON APPROACH:
- Identify recurring themes and patterns across papers
- Extract comparable elements that appear in multiple papers
- Note unique aspects that might warrant special columns or annotations
- Consider both explicit similarities and implicit connections

3. CONTENT ORGANIZATION:
- Structure information to facilitate meaningful comparisons
- Ensure balanced representation of each paper
- Maintain appropriate level of detail for each element
- Include relevant context where necessary

4. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS:
- Use markdown table syntax
- Present information clearly and consistently
- Include paper identifiers for reference
- Use formatting that enhances readability and comparison

ANALYSIS GUIDELINES:
1. First analyze the papers to identify the most relevant comparative dimensions (Do not output this analysis)
2. Design a table structure that best captures these dimensions
3. Ensure the table structure serves the comparison purpose effectively
4. Include any notes about patterns or relationships that emerge
5. Consider adding brief explanatory text if the table structure needs clarification
6. output only the table and brief notes if necessary

Based on your analysis of the papers, please generate a comparative table with a structure and columns that best represent the key points of comparison.