Create a super detailed still focused outline for a 30-minute research podcast episode that maintains academic rigor while being engaging and accessible:
Base it on the provided PDF literature review.

PRE-SHOW PREPARATION:
- Extract 2-3 core theoretical/practical contributions
- List technical terms requiring clarification
- Note potential complex concepts that need unpacking
- Identify natural points of connection between topics

STRUCTURAL OUTLINE:

1. OPENING (1-2 min)
- "Today we're talking about..." [frame topic in broader context]
- Why this matters now
- Quick orientation to core problem/challenge

2. FOUNDATION (4-5 min)
- Accessible entry point to complex topic
- Current state of knowledge/research
- [2 focused questions that bridge common understanding with technical depth]

3. MAIN DISCUSSION (17-19 min)
Structure as 3-4 segments, each containing:
- Precise lead-in question
- Space for expert elaboration (2-4 min)
- 1 strategic follow-up question
- Optional "Earlier you mentioned..." callbacks

Key elements to include:
- Natural progression from broader to specific insights
- Points where host can request clarification
- Moments to synthesize or connect ideas
- Strategic devil's advocate questions
- Brief "let's unpack that" interventions for technical terms

4. IMPLICATIONS (3-4 min)
- Practical applications
- Critical challenges ahead
- Future directions
[1-2 challenge questions from host]

5. WRAP (1-2 min)
- Key insights crystallized
- Broader significance
- Forward-looking statement

INTERACTION GUIDELINES:
- Host interventions should be precise and purposeful
- Allow expert to fully develop ideas before follow-up
- Use "You mentioned..." to return to important points
- Frame challenges as curious inquiry rather than debate

PACING NOTES:
- Mark natural transition points
- Note segments requiring extended expert explanation
- Identify moments for brief host guidance
- Plan smooth segment transitions
- Plan where host or expert go on a tangent.  They are allowed to do so!

[Apply to specific content while maintaining balance between accessibility and depth]
Just return the outline - no notes, info, remarks