add

prompts.json

@@ -37,11 +37,12 @@
             "### Motivation Profile ###",
             "{{MOTIVATION_PROFILE}}",
             "### Questions ###",
-            "1. Write an overall short summary with the title: \"Profile summary (You)\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
-            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Identify key strengths, weaknesses(area for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High),.....,etc., do not output scores) with the title:  \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. in {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in the leadership context, considering relationship between trait scores i.e. what do the combination of scores tell us; If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the Risks section, do not care about the risk if the socre is AVERAGE or LOW. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"you\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. Do not include any Motivation Profiles in this section.",
-            "3. Analyze only the Motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should have the trait analysis Reward, Connection,.....) with the title: \"Motivation (You)\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
-            "Your response for each question should be very indepth and professional and organized under clear headings, with each point supported by specific examples from the {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s profiles and provide the individual at least 5 points for each question. Remember do not write any conclusion and do not disclose the bio, age, occupation, and PII."
-            ],
+            "1. Write an overall short summary with the title: \"Profile summary (You)\" of the profile considering different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. For traits with a score equal to or greater than 67, provide individual trait feedback. If no traits meet this threshold, focus on those between 50 and 67 and provide feedback in combination where relevant. Traits with scores less than 50 should only be included in Areas for Development. Avoid combining traits in this category unless contextually relevant. For individuals with low scores across the board, identify 'relative strengths' and explain accordingly.",
+            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High), etc. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flags. If no Red Flags have HIGH scores, remove the 'RISKS' section. Focus on the relationship between trait scores and their implications in the professional context. When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you'. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. Provide feedback in combination for traits between 50-67, and in isolation for those 67 or higher. Avoid combining traits with scores under 50 unless relevant in the development context. Consider adding a section for 'relative strengths' if the individual has lower overall scores.",
+            "3. Analyze the interactions between traits in the section titled 'Trait Interactions'. In this section, explore how certain traits interact with others (e.g., how a combination of high Vision and low Authority may influence the person's leadership style). Identify any conflicts or synergies between traits and their impact on the individual’s professional behavior. Focus on how these interactions might manifest in leadership roles and other professional contexts.",
+            "4. Analyze only the Motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should contain the trait analysis Reward, Connection, etc.) with the title: \"Motivation (You)\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you'. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
+            "Your response for each question should be in-depth, professional, and organized under clear headings, with each point supported by specific examples from the {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s profiles. Provide the individual with at least 5 points for each question. Do not include a conclusion."
+        ],
         "ManagersSummary": [
             "Analyze {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s profile in ### Bio Information ###, ## Main Profile ###, ### Red Flags Profile ###, and answer the ### Questions ### based on the ### Descriptions ### below with around 800 words length. Use test taker when referring to name instead of actual name. Score: LOW (0-33.33), AVERAGE (33.34-66.66), HIGH (66.67-100). Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. Ensure that placeholder tags such as ‘[Descriptions]’ are not included in the final output text. Use natural language only.",
             "### Descriptions ###",
@@ -78,9 +79,10 @@
             "### Motivation Profile ###",
             "{{MOTIVATION_PROFILE}}",
             "### Questions ###",
-            "1. Write an overall short summary with the title: \"Profile summary\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, use name \"test-taker\" and do not include their real name, gender, tenure (length of service) or role. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
-            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Identify key strengths, weaknesses(area for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High),.....,etc., do not output scores) with the title:  \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. in {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in the leadership context, considering relationship between trait scores i.e. what do the combination of scores tell us; If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the Risks section, do not care about the risk if the socre is AVERAGE or LOW. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. Do not include any Motivation Profiles in this section.",
-            "3. Analyze only the Motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should have the trait analysis Reward, Connection,.....) with the title: \"Motivation\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
+            "1. Write an overall short summary with the title: \"Profile summary\" of the profile considering different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. For traits with a score equal to or greater than 67, provide individual trait feedback. If no traits meet this threshold, focus on those between 50 and 67 and provide feedback in combination where relevant. Traits with scores less than 50 should only be included in Areas for Development. Avoid combining traits in this category unless contextually relevant. For individuals with low scores across the board, identify 'relative strengths' and explain accordingly.",
+            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High), etc. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flags. If no Red Flags have HIGH scores, remove the 'RISKS' section. Focus on the relationship between trait scores and their implications in the professional context. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\". Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. Provide feedback in combination for traits between 50-67, and in isolation for those 67 or higher. Avoid combining traits with scores under 50 unless relevant in the development context. Consider adding a section for 'relative strengths' if the individual has lower overall scores.",
+            "3. Analyze the interactions between traits in the section titled 'Trait Interactions'. In this section, explore how certain traits interact with others (e.g., how a combination of high Vision and low Authority may influence the person's leadership style). Identify any conflicts or synergies between traits and their impact on the individual’s professional behavior. Focus on how these interactions might manifest in leadership roles and other professional contexts.",
+            "4. Analyze only the Motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should contain the trait analysis Reward, Connection, etc.) with the title: \"Motivation\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\" instead of their name.. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
             "Your response for each question should be very indepth and professional and organized under clear headings, with each point supported by specific examples from the {individual_name}'s profiles and provide the individual at least 5 points for each question. Remember do not write any conclusion."
         ],
         "Question_1": [