id
stringlengths 13
15
| query
stringlengths 534
1.36k
| answer
stringclasses 3
values | text
stringlengths 40
865
| choices
sequence | gold
int64 0
2
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
finargeccarc0 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We now have 18 planes in service for Amazon, and we have announced rights to lease up to 40 planes.
So on that front, it's better control, better capacity control, especially search capacity, and also good costs.
Answer: | norelation | We now have 18 planes in service for Amazon, and we have announced rights to lease up to 40 planes.
So on that front, it's better control, better capacity control, especially search capacity, and also good costs. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc1 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So we are not afraid to bring in new capability, but then also questioning what is the allocation we have.
And we'll continue to do that because I think there are significant new opportunities for us to go after, and that will require us to reallocate aggressively, and that to me is core.
Answer: | norelation | So we are not afraid to bring in new capability, but then also questioning what is the allocation we have.
And we'll continue to do that because I think there are significant new opportunities for us to go after, and that will require us to reallocate aggressively, and that to me is core. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc2 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: This is a young and rapidly growing business, and as you've seen looking backwards, certainly growth rates and margins and capital expenditure timing can be bumpy.
We're excited about the potential there, and really the team's focused on just keeping their heads down and continuing to accelerate the pace of innovation to try to continue to grow the functionality gap we think we offer.
Answer: | norelation | This is a young and rapidly growing business, and as you've seen looking backwards, certainly growth rates and margins and capital expenditure timing can be bumpy.
We're excited about the potential there, and really the team's focused on just keeping their heads down and continuing to accelerate the pace of innovation to try to continue to grow the functionality gap we think we offer. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc3 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So we are always thinking at least of the technical architecture that makes us unique and differentiated spanning all of it.
Right, I would say actually we've also seen some operating income growth in our PBP segment this quarter, up in constant currency, 7% before LinkedIn.
Answer: | norelation | So we are always thinking at least of the technical architecture that makes us unique and differentiated spanning all of it.
Right, I would say actually we've also seen some operating income growth in our PBP segment this quarter, up in constant currency, 7% before LinkedIn. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc4 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And as we continue to improve the margin profile of our devices, we continue to see the OEM business health improve
That's the guidance we gave.
Answer: | norelation | And as we continue to improve the margin profile of our devices, we continue to see the OEM business health improve
That's the guidance we gave. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc5 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Now over the next period, especially in H1, we continue to see -- expect to see very good hybrid percentage and execution, which help to offset some of that.
Heather, let me -- on gross margin, over a long-term period and intelligent cloud, given the expansive TAM and the growth opportunity we see, it will create gross margin pressure over long-term.
Answer: | norelation | Now over the next period, especially in H1, we continue to see -- expect to see very good hybrid percentage and execution, which help to offset some of that.
Heather, let me -- on gross margin, over a long-term period and intelligent cloud, given the expansive TAM and the growth opportunity we see, it will create gross margin pressure over long-term. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc6 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And so there's lots of pluses and minuses on this.
But I would say, in general, I think it's important to keep in mind that if we look around the world, we do see a lot of positive signs, but we also know that the macroeconomic environment is slowing down in a number of places around the world.
Answer: | norelation | And so there's lots of pluses and minuses on this.
But I would say, in general, I think it's important to keep in mind that if we look around the world, we do see a lot of positive signs, but we also know that the macroeconomic environment is slowing down in a number of places around the world. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc7 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: The market is telling us that.
Our customers are telling us that.
Answer: | norelation | The market is telling us that.
Our customers are telling us that. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc8 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So we're glad to have that problem.
The FBA program is a key pillar of our Prime offering.
Answer: | norelation | So we're glad to have that problem.
The FBA program is a key pillar of our Prime offering. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc9 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We think our website is very tuned to selling online.
It is a big business for us, not only in North America but also Internationally.
Answer: | norelation | We think our website is very tuned to selling online.
It is a big business for us, not only in North America but also Internationally. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc10 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: In fact, you can just look at Siri today and this is now accelerating with iOS 10 and the Mac, but we've been getting 2 billion requests a week for Siri.
So what that means in practice is that what we are seeing with our customers that consume our services is that the people that are actually taking advantage of our services over time tend spend more and more on our services.
Answer: | norelation | In fact, you can just look at Siri today and this is now accelerating with iOS 10 and the Mac, but we've been getting 2 billion requests a week for Siri.
So what that means in practice is that what we are seeing with our customers that consume our services is that the people that are actually taking advantage of our services over time tend spend more and more on our services. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc11 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So in some sense, this one has always been about being able to serve customers especially in an increasing digitization work, right, which is the need for more business process automation is increasing.
So to me us going in fact to these new secular growth opportunities while being disruptive to the status quo of anyone who has high margins and very high price monolithic products today is basically our strategy going forward.
Answer: | norelation | So in some sense, this one has always been about being able to serve customers especially in an increasing digitization work, right, which is the need for more business process automation is increasing.
So to me us going in fact to these new secular growth opportunities while being disruptive to the status quo of anyone who has high margins and very high price monolithic products today is basically our strategy going forward. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc12 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And so with the number of middle class – people growing into the middle class and the LTE adoption rate being still fairly low, around 45%, 50% or so, then I think we continue to have a really good opportunity there,
Now looking forward, the response to the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus has been very positive.
Answer: | norelation | And so with the number of middle class – people growing into the middle class and the LTE adoption rate being still fairly low, around 45%, 50% or so, then I think we continue to have a really good opportunity there,
Now looking forward, the response to the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus has been very positive. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc13 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Some of them relate to inversion transactions, so obviously that's not an issue for us.
As you know, we are the largest U.S. taxpayer by a wide margin, and we already pay full U.S. tax on all the profits from the sales that we make in the United States.
Answer: | norelation | Some of them relate to inversion transactions, so obviously that's not an issue for us.
As you know, we are the largest U.S. taxpayer by a wide margin, and we already pay full U.S. tax on all the profits from the sales that we make in the United States. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc14 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And then on the actual delivery of video side, it's just much more intensive technically.
One are to the capture and sharing tools that we offer.
Answer: | norelation | And then on the actual delivery of video side, it's just much more intensive technically.
One are to the capture and sharing tools that we offer. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc15 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: The FBA program is a key pillar of our Prime offering.
We are just working very hard to get capacity in place and in productive use for Q4 and beyond.
Answer: | norelation | The FBA program is a key pillar of our Prime offering.
We are just working very hard to get capacity in place and in productive use for Q4 and beyond. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc16 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: On the advertising business, or rather I should say other revenue that line item grew about 41% year-over-year.
We're focused on the certainly brands as an advertising customer set and a lot of focus on providing the products and tools that are going to help customers and really inspire them.
Answer: | norelation | On the advertising business, or rather I should say other revenue that line item grew about 41% year-over-year.
We're focused on the certainly brands as an advertising customer set and a lot of focus on providing the products and tools that are going to help customers and really inspire them. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc17 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Advertising is the biggest piece of that.
On the advertising business, or rather I should say other revenue that line item grew about 41% year-over-year.
Answer: | norelation | Advertising is the biggest piece of that.
On the advertising business, or rather I should say other revenue that line item grew about 41% year-over-year. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc18 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So as the business gets bigger and we do bigger and larger deals and some of them are on-prem and some of them are in Azure, you're going to see volatility frankly in both of those.
And if I triangulate between all those three, just like I did in Q4, I feel really good about our commercial performance.
Answer: | norelation | So as the business gets bigger and we do bigger and larger deals and some of them are on-prem and some of them are in Azure, you're going to see volatility frankly in both of those.
And if I triangulate between all those three, just like I did in Q4, I feel really good about our commercial performance. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc19 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So as we head into Q4, we’ve added what’s just nearly a $1.5 billion penalty in Q4 year-over-year for the cost of shipping, which is essentially transportation costs, the cost of expanding our transportation capacity, things like adding additional poles and shifts in our warehouses, the cost for deploying inventory closer to customers, there’s a lot of tangential costs, by and a way the biggest expenses is on the actual transportation cost.
In Q3, we expected that to grow, we put into our guidance and we hit essentially where we expected on the guidance.
Answer: | norelation | So as we head into Q4, we’ve added what’s just nearly a $1.5 billion penalty in Q4 year-over-year for the cost of shipping, which is essentially transportation costs, the cost of expanding our transportation capacity, things like adding additional poles and shifts in our warehouses, the cost for deploying inventory closer to customers, there’s a lot of tangential costs, by and a way the biggest expenses is on the actual transportation cost.
In Q3, we expected that to grow, we put into our guidance and we hit essentially where we expected on the guidance. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc20 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Also, the Mac business did extremely well.
At least I thought it would be similar to the previous quarter, and it was.
Answer: | norelation | Also, the Mac business did extremely well.
At least I thought it would be similar to the previous quarter, and it was. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc21 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And so this volatility that we are going to see because of macro and because of budget constraints, especially on Transactional, we will focus on because we expect excellent execution and have accountability to do that in the field.
And so to your question on Transactional performance, there were some deals that didn't get done in Q3 that got done in Q4, and there were some deals done in Q4 on the Office side with large companies that I'm thrilled by.
Answer: | norelation | And so this volatility that we are going to see because of macro and because of budget constraints, especially on Transactional, we will focus on because we expect excellent execution and have accountability to do that in the field.
And so to your question on Transactional performance, there were some deals that didn't get done in Q3 that got done in Q4, and there were some deals done in Q4 on the Office side with large companies that I'm thrilled by. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc22 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: But to put it in context, which I think is important, despite that volatility in the Chinese market, they're still up 90% over the last year, and they're up 20% year-to-date, and so these kind of numbers are numbers I think all of us would love.
And so I think generally this has been, at least as we see it, maybe it's not true for other businesses, that this worry is probably overstated.
Answer: | norelation | But to put it in context, which I think is important, despite that volatility in the Chinese market, they're still up 90% over the last year, and they're up 20% year-to-date, and so these kind of numbers are numbers I think all of us would love.
And so I think generally this has been, at least as we see it, maybe it's not true for other businesses, that this worry is probably overstated. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc23 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: But that 20%, right, lends itself in-quarter to the volatility you see.
We continue to see the annuity growth.
Answer: | norelation | But that 20%, right, lends itself in-quarter to the volatility you see.
We continue to see the annuity growth. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc24 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: In terms of why mid-roll is preferable to pre-roll, Facebook is well suited for shorter-form content where we're ranking things to be longer-form as well.
our focus really is on revenue share.
Answer: | norelation | In terms of why mid-roll is preferable to pre-roll, Facebook is well suited for shorter-form content where we're ranking things to be longer-form as well.
our focus really is on revenue share. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc25 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We've garnered awards, of course, but mainly that what we're focused on is good content that is attractive to customers.
And what we see there is again, original content is a fixed cost expense.
Answer: | norelation | We've garnered awards, of course, but mainly that what we're focused on is good content that is attractive to customers.
And what we see there is again, original content is a fixed cost expense. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc26 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: On that latter point, really the mix of ad units is part of what we're doing I think really well.
There are 60 million small business pages up on Facebook and 1.5 million Instagram business profiles, which are the similar, the equivalent for Instagram.
Answer: | norelation | On that latter point, really the mix of ad units is part of what we're doing I think really well.
There are 60 million small business pages up on Facebook and 1.5 million Instagram business profiles, which are the similar, the equivalent for Instagram. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc27 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Now we have a good start with what is at the high end of the enterprise value, which is E5, some of the value we have.
And we finally get to do that with the service offering.
Answer: | norelation | Now we have a good start with what is at the high end of the enterprise value, which is E5, some of the value we have.
And we finally get to do that with the service offering. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc28 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: The majority of our capital expenditures is actually in server equipment, it's new capacity.
It's not necessarily in the overall geo footprint build out.
Answer: | norelation | The majority of our capital expenditures is actually in server equipment, it's new capacity.
It's not necessarily in the overall geo footprint build out. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc29 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And so I don't think of it as margin shifts across the segments, and that's why we think of all of this as one digital estate at least from a customer-end perspective.
A lot of that account value frankly, Walter, today is coming in the form of consumed revenue.
Answer: | norelation | And so I don't think of it as margin shifts across the segments, and that's why we think of all of this as one digital estate at least from a customer-end perspective.
A lot of that account value frankly, Walter, today is coming in the form of consumed revenue. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc30 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So, the integration you spoke of are the right ones we want.
You're also right that we are very focused on commerce ads on Facebook, that the great, great, great majority of activity is commerce ads on Facebook.
Answer: | norelation | So, the integration you spoke of are the right ones we want.
You're also right that we are very focused on commerce ads on Facebook, that the great, great, great majority of activity is commerce ads on Facebook. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc31 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: But we think we offer something pretty compelling, which is the reach of Facebook with very unique targeting.
It's just worth noting that it is up significantly from where we were two years ago.
Answer: | norelation | But we think we offer something pretty compelling, which is the reach of Facebook with very unique targeting.
It's just worth noting that it is up significantly from where we were two years ago. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc32 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Whether it's voice or analytics and security, it resonates.
Where there's significant room left – and we're not just standing still in terms of adding value for new segments, so those are all in play.
Answer: | norelation | Whether it's voice or analytics and security, it resonates.
Where there's significant room left – and we're not just standing still in terms of adding value for new segments, so those are all in play. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc33 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So, yeah, we're very encouraged by the customer response to the Echo products.
So, we're building global scale in that business in both content and marketing.
Answer: | norelation | So, yeah, we're very encouraged by the customer response to the Echo products.
So, we're building global scale in that business in both content and marketing. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc34 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: because they believe in a hybrid model, is actually the structural guide post we have on a multi-year -- on a multi-year journey.
Our transactional revenue will have a headwind from XP.
Answer: | norelation | because they believe in a hybrid model, is actually the structural guide post we have on a multi-year -- on a multi-year journey.
Our transactional revenue will have a headwind from XP. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc35 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Our overall long term under imbalance has been impacted by the Windows 10 deferral over the past.
And so it can make a bit of a distraction towards seen the underlying trends.
Answer: | norelation | Our overall long term under imbalance has been impacted by the Windows 10 deferral over the past.
And so it can make a bit of a distraction towards seen the underlying trends. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc36 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We're in four countries right now, the U.S., UK, Germany and Japan.
We right now are working on getting the capacity in.
Answer: | norelation | We're in four countries right now, the U.S., UK, Germany and Japan.
We right now are working on getting the capacity in. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc37 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And, but I think for us, the thing that we always have to do is come out with a really great innovative product, and I think that iPhone X shows that when you deliver a great innovative product, there's enough people there that would like that and it can be a really good business, and so that's how to look at that.
In terms of our installed base, which is something very important for us as it is one of the key drivers of services, our active installed base on iPhone grew double digits over last year during the quarter and so we're thrilled with that and you can see that carrying through to the services line and the growth that we had there.
Answer: | norelation | And, but I think for us, the thing that we always have to do is come out with a really great innovative product, and I think that iPhone X shows that when you deliver a great innovative product, there's enough people there that would like that and it can be a really good business, and so that's how to look at that.
In terms of our installed base, which is something very important for us as it is one of the key drivers of services, our active installed base on iPhone grew double digits over last year during the quarter and so we're thrilled with that and you can see that carrying through to the services line and the growth that we had there. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc38 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We're really excited about the ecosystem and some of the skills that are being added to Echo, as well as some of the other devices that are taking advantage of Alexa, which is kind of the brains behind Echo.
We like that they pump more energy into Prime and really the whole ecosystem.
Answer: | norelation | We're really excited about the ecosystem and some of the skills that are being added to Echo, as well as some of the other devices that are taking advantage of Alexa, which is kind of the brains behind Echo.
We like that they pump more energy into Prime and really the whole ecosystem. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc39 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: In all the years I’ve been at Microsoft it was always our dream to be able to sell more of the sophisticated capabilities of Office to individual consumers as well as small businesses.
But I think in consumer, it’s maybe the easiest one to talk about, is that we talked about license growth of 10%, when you correct for Japan.
Answer: | norelation | In all the years I’ve been at Microsoft it was always our dream to be able to sell more of the sophisticated capabilities of Office to individual consumers as well as small businesses.
But I think in consumer, it’s maybe the easiest one to talk about, is that we talked about license growth of 10%, when you correct for Japan. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc40 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: That’s what you see when we see our subscription growth in consumer, we see subscription growth in small business these are folks who never bought a server from us.
Because those of a long-term contracts relationships we want to have with our customers be it consumer, be it small business or large customers.
Answer: | norelation | That’s what you see when we see our subscription growth in consumer, we see subscription growth in small business these are folks who never bought a server from us.
Because those of a long-term contracts relationships we want to have with our customers be it consumer, be it small business or large customers. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc41 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We think Prime is that.
We didn't break it out by segment, but we said that Prime Day contributed 200 basis points to our Q3 run rate, revenue growth rate.
Answer: | norelation | We think Prime is that.
We didn't break it out by segment, but we said that Prime Day contributed 200 basis points to our Q3 run rate, revenue growth rate. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc42 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: When I look at the usage, the usage is six times our nearest competitor.
When you measure it in these 90-day clips, as we do in the short run, I don’t think you're going to see a miraculous change in the -- or an improvement in the year-over-year.
Answer: | norelation | When I look at the usage, the usage is six times our nearest competitor.
When you measure it in these 90-day clips, as we do in the short run, I don’t think you're going to see a miraculous change in the -- or an improvement in the year-over-year. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc43 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: The architectural design we have for example when we do X we are buying the four everything that Microsoft does which is everything from Azure to Office 3652 Dynamics 365 as well as our consumer services like Xbox live.
So I think the directionality of sustainability is correct and I think the variability can certainly occur from any of the reasons Satya talked about.
Answer: | norelation | The architectural design we have for example when we do X we are buying the four everything that Microsoft does which is everything from Azure to Office 3652 Dynamics 365 as well as our consumer services like Xbox live.
So I think the directionality of sustainability is correct and I think the variability can certainly occur from any of the reasons Satya talked about. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc44 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: The one additional thing I’d mention, which is increasingly becoming clearer to us is operational sovereignty will become important, the world and its distributed computing needs is not going to become some margin as set of requirements but it's going to be very heterogeneous, very in many cases regulated and so what we provide in terms of both the technology and the business model I think shows up with the maximum flexibility.
And as I've always said that there is -- hybrid computing is important for workloads that are more in the characteristic -- can be characterized as lift, shift and modernize, so that's one motion.
Answer: | norelation | The one additional thing I’d mention, which is increasingly becoming clearer to us is operational sovereignty will become important, the world and its distributed computing needs is not going to become some margin as set of requirements but it's going to be very heterogeneous, very in many cases regulated and so what we provide in terms of both the technology and the business model I think shows up with the maximum flexibility.
And as I've always said that there is -- hybrid computing is important for workloads that are more in the characteristic -- can be characterized as lift, shift and modernize, so that's one motion. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc45 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And we'll continue to do that because I think there are significant new opportunities for us to go after, and that will require us to reallocate aggressively, and that to me is core.
We've made significant changes in how we've allocated our own organic dollars, both in R&D as well as in sales and marketing.
Answer: | norelation | And we'll continue to do that because I think there are significant new opportunities for us to go after, and that will require us to reallocate aggressively, and that to me is core.
We've made significant changes in how we've allocated our own organic dollars, both in R&D as well as in sales and marketing. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc46 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Consumers have shifted to mobile and consumers have moved to Facebook and Instagram more quickly than ad budgets.
And the targeting that is custom audiences underlies all of our product offerings.
Answer: | norelation | Consumers have shifted to mobile and consumers have moved to Facebook and Instagram more quickly than ad budgets.
And the targeting that is custom audiences underlies all of our product offerings. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc47 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We didn't see it in any one particular workload; it's weakness across workloads, which tends to make more sense frankly with a macro or a budget IT spend constraint.
And so you're certainly seeing the macro impact in the intelligent cloud segment and the server weakness is there.
Answer: | norelation | We didn't see it in any one particular workload; it's weakness across workloads, which tends to make more sense frankly with a macro or a budget IT spend constraint.
And so you're certainly seeing the macro impact in the intelligent cloud segment and the server weakness is there. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc48 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Yes, I think the best way to think about it is, we certainly have an advertising part of our North American consume segments.
So I think you should think about it that way that certainly think its big opportunity and again, one of the reasons I want to give you an update, last quarter on Prime growth and you can see that that’s going very well.
Answer: | norelation | Yes, I think the best way to think about it is, we certainly have an advertising part of our North American consume segments.
So I think you should think about it that way that certainly think its big opportunity and again, one of the reasons I want to give you an update, last quarter on Prime growth and you can see that that’s going very well. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc49 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We added this advertising business on our App Store.
And clearly, we will want to continue to offer new services over time, so there are a number of vectors that allow us to continue to grow the business over time.
Answer: | norelation | We added this advertising business on our App Store.
And clearly, we will want to continue to offer new services over time, so there are a number of vectors that allow us to continue to grow the business over time. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc50 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Apple Watch is just getting going.
And that number is in the low 30 percentages.
Answer: | norelation | Apple Watch is just getting going.
And that number is in the low 30 percentages. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc51 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: If you go back a few years and you tried to load a video in News Feed, it might have to buffer for 30 seconds before you watched it, which wasn't a good enough experience for that to be the primary way that people shared.
There are two broad sets of improvements that I think we need to make.
Answer: | norelation | If you go back a few years and you tried to load a video in News Feed, it might have to buffer for 30 seconds before you watched it, which wasn't a good enough experience for that to be the primary way that people shared.
There are two broad sets of improvements that I think we need to make. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc52 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So on gaming, we feel good about Xbox One X, the premium console launch.
But our real strategy going forward is not only to do great work on the console, but to complement that with the work we're doing on the PC.
Answer: | norelation | So on gaming, we feel good about Xbox One X, the premium console launch.
But our real strategy going forward is not only to do great work on the console, but to complement that with the work we're doing on the PC. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc53 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: If you look at the products in Office 365 that we have, take eDiscovery it’s a complete new space for us where we are able to do things in security eDiscovery enterprise management that we didn’t even do for the top end of the enterprise in the service side, so that’s what we’re seeing.
Whereas now with the cloud for the first time we now can serve both individuals as well as small businesses with the same kind of sophistication that in the past was exclusively available for the large enterprises.
Answer: | norelation | If you look at the products in Office 365 that we have, take eDiscovery it’s a complete new space for us where we are able to do things in security eDiscovery enterprise management that we didn’t even do for the top end of the enterprise in the service side, so that’s what we’re seeing.
Whereas now with the cloud for the first time we now can serve both individuals as well as small businesses with the same kind of sophistication that in the past was exclusively available for the large enterprises. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc54 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: The 10 received APIs (56:26), so that businesses could send immediate responses to common questions, including engaging images and call to action as well as texts.
And so we want to make sure we get this right as we focus on continued engagement.
Answer: | norelation | The 10 received APIs (56:26), so that businesses could send immediate responses to common questions, including engaging images and call to action as well as texts.
And so we want to make sure we get this right as we focus on continued engagement. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc55 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And so if you, and look at iPhone X in particular, it's the most innovative smartphone on the market.
There is a fourth tariff which includes goods valued at $200 billion, also focused on goods that are imported from China.
Answer: | norelation | And so if you, and look at iPhone X in particular, it's the most innovative smartphone on the market.
There is a fourth tariff which includes goods valued at $200 billion, also focused on goods that are imported from China. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc56 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: There's a lot of interest out there and the number of categories that I'm seeing from gaming to shopping, to I was in China a few weeks ago and saw AR in an art sense, in an art exhibit.
We added Apple Pay, we added Apple Music.
Answer: | norelation | There's a lot of interest out there and the number of categories that I'm seeing from gaming to shopping, to I was in China a few weeks ago and saw AR in an art sense, in an art exhibit.
We added Apple Pay, we added Apple Music. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc57 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So those are a couple factors that hit the international growth area in particularly.
This year they'll be fully in Q4.
Answer: | norelation | So those are a couple factors that hit the international growth area in particularly.
This year they'll be fully in Q4. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc58 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: When ads are really well targeted and taking full advantage of the kind of targeting we offer, so you're showing people something they want to see, we see engagement that we think is really critical.
It's also worth noting that the metrics that really matter at the end are driving sales
Answer: | norelation | When ads are really well targeted and taking full advantage of the kind of targeting we offer, so you're showing people something they want to see, we see engagement that we think is really critical.
It's also worth noting that the metrics that really matter at the end are driving sales | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc59 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: I would like to point out that the ever year major product hit a high on the active install base.
The replacement cycle is likely longer.
Answer: | norelation | I would like to point out that the ever year major product hit a high on the active install base.
The replacement cycle is likely longer. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc60 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: It's all about supplementing our existing capacity both our partners and ourselves and essentially building capacity that can handle this top line growth and also the growth in AFN or Amazon Fulfilled Network units which as I just mentioned is even higher than our paid unit growth.
So, on the promotion side, we don't consider it a huge factor either way.
Answer: | norelation | It's all about supplementing our existing capacity both our partners and ourselves and essentially building capacity that can handle this top line growth and also the growth in AFN or Amazon Fulfilled Network units which as I just mentioned is even higher than our paid unit growth.
So, on the promotion side, we don't consider it a huge factor either way. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc61 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Future expansion, services expansion Internationally very similar to the U.S. on a number of the Prime fronts but also the investment in India.
We have robust device business including the launch of a new Paperwhite Fire TV Echo with general availability and numerous other products that we're very excited about.
Answer: | norelation | Future expansion, services expansion Internationally very similar to the U.S. on a number of the Prime fronts but also the investment in India.
We have robust device business including the launch of a new Paperwhite Fire TV Echo with general availability and numerous other products that we're very excited about. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc62 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Our 6 million advertisers come from those pages,
In terms of resellers, we think it's a big opportunity.
Answer: | norelation | Our 6 million advertisers come from those pages,
In terms of resellers, we think it's a big opportunity. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc63 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And the thought process is always to acquire something that allows us to either accelerate our product roadmaps, filling gap in our portfolio, providing a new experience to customers.
So it's always with the customer experience in mind that we make acquisitions.
Answer: | norelation | And the thought process is always to acquire something that allows us to either accelerate our product roadmaps, filling gap in our portfolio, providing a new experience to customers.
So it's always with the customer experience in mind that we make acquisitions. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc64 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We don't expect India to be any different.
We continue to develop new functionality for that country, whether it's delivery, whether it's seller features.
Answer: | norelation | We don't expect India to be any different.
We continue to develop new functionality for that country, whether it's delivery, whether it's seller features. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc65 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We're open to other forms of things being useful.
because there aren't enough of them and they haven't been rolled out for long enough.
Answer: | norelation | We're open to other forms of things being useful.
because there aren't enough of them and they haven't been rolled out for long enough. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc66 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: because really, this is the quarter when you've been able to see actually in Q2 and Q3 now us really pivoting that investment in OpEx to our Intelligent Cloud and the opportunity we see there across engineering, sales and marketing.
Those were the exact same drivers in the gross margin change that we guided to in Q4, and I would expect stability as we've seen it in our More Personal Computing segment.
Answer: | norelation | because really, this is the quarter when you've been able to see actually in Q2 and Q3 now us really pivoting that investment in OpEx to our Intelligent Cloud and the opportunity we see there across engineering, sales and marketing.
Those were the exact same drivers in the gross margin change that we guided to in Q4, and I would expect stability as we've seen it in our More Personal Computing segment. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc67 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: It continues to be improvements in scale, improvements in our infrastructure, improvements in utilization, really strong work across all of our engineering teams here.
Just to add one thing that I’d say is sort of -- to Mark’s question, which is in particular on Azure, we have some commodity workloads but we also have many differentiated higher margin workloads especially in the Enterprise Mobility Suite is what I’d call out is a good example of an infrastructure workload completely in the cloud that has got a very different margin structure.
Answer: | norelation | It continues to be improvements in scale, improvements in our infrastructure, improvements in utilization, really strong work across all of our engineering teams here.
Just to add one thing that I’d say is sort of -- to Mark’s question, which is in particular on Azure, we have some commodity workloads but we also have many differentiated higher margin workloads especially in the Enterprise Mobility Suite is what I’d call out is a good example of an infrastructure workload completely in the cloud that has got a very different margin structure. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc68 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And we've got a goal of bringing more than 10 million online by 2025.
We did pledge to invest $1 billion to help digitize traders and those micro and small businesses across India.
Answer: | norelation | And we've got a goal of bringing more than 10 million online by 2025.
We did pledge to invest $1 billion to help digitize traders and those micro and small businesses across India. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc69 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We like the convenience factor.
There is Prime Now and we're now in more than 25 metropolitan areas for Prime Now.
Answer: | norelation | We like the convenience factor.
There is Prime Now and we're now in more than 25 metropolitan areas for Prime Now. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc70 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: I would say Mark the main thing that this offering enables is the flexibility with which customers can adopt hybrid computing.
But to your specific questions it shows up today in the on-prem number is where you can see most of the strength of that value and over time as it gets used and consumed it will show lot more in the Azure ACR number.
Answer: | norelation | I would say Mark the main thing that this offering enables is the flexibility with which customers can adopt hybrid computing.
But to your specific questions it shows up today in the on-prem number is where you can see most of the strength of that value and over time as it gets used and consumed it will show lot more in the Azure ACR number. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc71 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: There they're really two key dynamics, the first is the return to the XP levels that we saw prior to the XP refresh.
One of the things that I feel very good about is the risk we took to introduce the two-in-one category and I feel now that we see that in fact inspire even a lot of activity in our own OEM ecosystem and we see many good designs coming
Answer: | norelation | There they're really two key dynamics, the first is the return to the XP levels that we saw prior to the XP refresh.
One of the things that I feel very good about is the risk we took to introduce the two-in-one category and I feel now that we see that in fact inspire even a lot of activity in our own OEM ecosystem and we see many good designs coming | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc72 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And in Marketplace, we definitely are going to focus on some of the areas that you talked about including jobs is already a pretty meaningful focus where a lot of people do find jobs and business is less jobs through Facebook.
So that’s promising, but we continue to see Europe growing just a bit slower than the rest of the regions.
Answer: | norelation | And in Marketplace, we definitely are going to focus on some of the areas that you talked about including jobs is already a pretty meaningful focus where a lot of people do find jobs and business is less jobs through Facebook.
So that’s promising, but we continue to see Europe growing just a bit slower than the rest of the regions. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc73 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: If you back out exchange that’s approximately breakeven, included in there we certainly have a sizeable step up in investment in India.
One thing to keep in mind also, as you look at growth rate for Q1, is last year Q1 we talked about in April 1st there was a consumption tax increase in Japan.
Answer: | norelation | If you back out exchange that’s approximately breakeven, included in there we certainly have a sizeable step up in investment in India.
One thing to keep in mind also, as you look at growth rate for Q1, is last year Q1 we talked about in April 1st there was a consumption tax increase in Japan. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc74 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Yeah, and in terms of Instagram, I just think Kevin and the team are doing amazing work.
But, yes, we are investing more in general in sales and marketing over time,
Answer: | norelation | Yeah, and in terms of Instagram, I just think Kevin and the team are doing amazing work.
But, yes, we are investing more in general in sales and marketing over time, | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc75 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And this is something that they've always focused on.
And I think it takes real composure as a leader to scale something to many x where it was just a few years ago and build up the organization and be able to continue pushing the products forward every day to be able to do that.
Answer: | norelation | And this is something that they've always focused on.
And I think it takes real composure as a leader to scale something to many x where it was just a few years ago and build up the organization and be able to continue pushing the products forward every day to be able to do that. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc76 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So in fact, that's one of the reasons why we have been very optimistic about some of our new data capabilities because we have the attach capability go out even in the install base of Dynamics.
And CRM has taken our own Dynamics product, has taken some pretty unique approaches.
Answer: | norelation | So in fact, that's one of the reasons why we have been very optimistic about some of our new data capabilities because we have the attach capability go out even in the install base of Dynamics.
And CRM has taken our own Dynamics product, has taken some pretty unique approaches. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc77 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We believe that iPhone will grow in Q1 and we base that on what we are seeing from a switcher point of view, we recorded the highest rate on record for Android switches last quarter at 30%.
And so -- and I feel like we are reasonably well positioned in China, I’m sure we can do better, but I think we are doing fairly well there.
Answer: | norelation | We believe that iPhone will grow in Q1 and we base that on what we are seeing from a switcher point of view, we recorded the highest rate on record for Android switches last quarter at 30%.
And so -- and I feel like we are reasonably well positioned in China, I’m sure we can do better, but I think we are doing fairly well there. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc78 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And that's because first of all the move to the cloud combines a whole bunch of different categories as well as takes something that you mentioned, which is Linux.
because we have that position in the client server space.
Answer: | norelation | And that's because first of all the move to the cloud combines a whole bunch of different categories as well as takes something that you mentioned, which is Linux.
because we have that position in the client server space. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc79 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Although when you’re transitioning any business and all the hard work that we’re doing here to prepare ourselves going forward, I do expect to see some volatility in that number.
And so I think our year-over-year improvement as well as sequential improvement and our ability in the overall commercial business, you see the gross margins we did has the mix shift to the cloud, I think we’re all quite proud of.
Answer: | norelation | Although when you’re transitioning any business and all the hard work that we’re doing here to prepare ourselves going forward, I do expect to see some volatility in that number.
And so I think our year-over-year improvement as well as sequential improvement and our ability in the overall commercial business, you see the gross margins we did has the mix shift to the cloud, I think we’re all quite proud of. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc80 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: They did a Slideshow ad that included a Shop Now button, which enables you to take action on their site.
because we think we can take people all the way from the top of the funnel, where they can really get a brand awareness or product awareness, and go all the way down to purchase, not necessarily because the purchase is happening on Facebook, but because we can work on the measurement systems to understand how the advertising, both at the top and lower down in the funnel is influencing those purchases.
Answer: | norelation | They did a Slideshow ad that included a Shop Now button, which enables you to take action on their site.
because we think we can take people all the way from the top of the funnel, where they can really get a brand awareness or product awareness, and go all the way down to purchase, not necessarily because the purchase is happening on Facebook, but because we can work on the measurement systems to understand how the advertising, both at the top and lower down in the funnel is influencing those purchases. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc81 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And we think this provides us a great opportunity to win over some of those customers into the Apple ecosystem.
And so I see the demographics there also being incredibly great for a consumer brand and for people that really want the best products.
Answer: | norelation | And we think this provides us a great opportunity to win over some of those customers into the Apple ecosystem.
And so I see the demographics there also being incredibly great for a consumer brand and for people that really want the best products. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc82 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: If you wanted to feel like you were interacting with someone running for office before, you had to go to a town hall meeting.
In terms of the revenue impact, no one vertical drives our business.
Answer: | norelation | If you wanted to feel like you were interacting with someone running for office before, you had to go to a town hall meeting.
In terms of the revenue impact, no one vertical drives our business. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc83 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: We're really pleased with that and if you look at the sort of the cycle, which I'll define as Q1, Q2, Q3 for ease, you'll see that we've grown like mid single digits and on an average weekly sales point of view, and of course double digit on the ASP and so I think it's really healthy.
I think that the major catalyst for that was probably the subsidy plans becoming a much smaller percentage of total sales around the world than they were at one time and so I think that some are lengthening.
Answer: | norelation | We're really pleased with that and if you look at the sort of the cycle, which I'll define as Q1, Q2, Q3 for ease, you'll see that we've grown like mid single digits and on an average weekly sales point of view, and of course double digit on the ASP and so I think it's really healthy.
I think that the major catalyst for that was probably the subsidy plans becoming a much smaller percentage of total sales around the world than they were at one time and so I think that some are lengthening. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc84 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And you've got customers who really want to move to a modern infrastructure.
because when you think about Windows 10, what we've seen over the past couple of years is, you're right, a very strong enterprise deployment cycle and real pull for that product inside enterprises, because of the security value prop of the product itself.
Answer: | norelation | And you've got customers who really want to move to a modern infrastructure.
because when you think about Windows 10, what we've seen over the past couple of years is, you're right, a very strong enterprise deployment cycle and real pull for that product inside enterprises, because of the security value prop of the product itself. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc85 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: The reason we called it out, obviously, because it was such an outlier.
So I feel great about our sales execution especially in terms of growing the recapture rate at accounts.
Answer: | norelation | The reason we called it out, obviously, because it was such an outlier.
So I feel great about our sales execution especially in terms of growing the recapture rate at accounts. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc86 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: If you look ahead five years, it will have ten times that number in it.
I’m really happy with the early days of Apple Music and the people moving from the free trial to the music business
Answer: | norelation | If you look ahead five years, it will have ten times that number in it.
I’m really happy with the early days of Apple Music and the people moving from the free trial to the music business | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc87 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: But more -- I think what you'll see more in 2020 is also an -- more effort internationally, more costs internationally.
Some other things like posts, which helps customers discover products and brands.
Answer: | norelation | But more -- I think what you'll see more in 2020 is also an -- more effort internationally, more costs internationally.
Some other things like posts, which helps customers discover products and brands. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc88 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And so we want to make sure we get this right as we focus on continued engagement.
For Messenger and WhatsApp, our focus right now continues to be on growth and engagement.
Answer: | norelation | And so we want to make sure we get this right as we focus on continued engagement.
For Messenger and WhatsApp, our focus right now continues to be on growth and engagement. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc89 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And so in four of the five operating segments, as I think Luca mentioned in his comments, we had very good growth.
In this quarter, we reduced channel inventory by 1.2 million units.
Answer: | norelation | And so in four of the five operating segments, as I think Luca mentioned in his comments, we had very good growth.
In this quarter, we reduced channel inventory by 1.2 million units. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc90 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: That does result in a revenue to fall, it will end up in unearned.
The second component relates to the same trend we saw in our IP business that we saw in Q4 then in Q1, we’re doing and seeing again in Q2.
Answer: | norelation | That does result in a revenue to fall, it will end up in unearned.
The second component relates to the same trend we saw in our IP business that we saw in Q4 then in Q1, we’re doing and seeing again in Q2. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc91 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Unless we are able to, over time, settle between us on some amount, but right now we're depending upon the courts to do that.
And it was really propelled by the demand for iPhone 7 Plus, which is growing incredibly fast around the world.
Answer: | norelation | Unless we are able to, over time, settle between us on some amount, but right now we're depending upon the courts to do that.
And it was really propelled by the demand for iPhone 7 Plus, which is growing incredibly fast around the world. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc92 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And then there's a couple of specific events that happened last year in the March quarter which are not going to repeat this year.
So we obviously feel good about a 20% growth.
Answer: | norelation | And then there's a couple of specific events that happened last year in the March quarter which are not going to repeat this year.
So we obviously feel good about a 20% growth. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc93 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So, we're building global scale in that business in both content and marketing.
We're also investing in new technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning.
Answer: | norelation | So, we're building global scale in that business in both content and marketing.
We're also investing in new technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc94 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: Transactional businesses tend to be more impacted in emerging markets where we have a higher percentage of non-annuity business that's transactional business.
So I think less about it being cannibalistic
Answer: | norelation | Transactional businesses tend to be more impacted in emerging markets where we have a higher percentage of non-annuity business that's transactional business.
So I think less about it being cannibalistic | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc95 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: It's the unique value that people expect from Facebook.
You can go to a lot of places to consume content, but there aren't a lot of services where you can strengthen your relationships, that's what people want, so that's the right thing for us to focus on, and it also lines up with all the well being research that we've done which – and as you know, there have been a lot of debate over the last year about the utility of social media on the Internet, and we take this very seriously, right.
Answer: | norelation | It's the unique value that people expect from Facebook.
You can go to a lot of places to consume content, but there aren't a lot of services where you can strengthen your relationships, that's what people want, so that's the right thing for us to focus on, and it also lines up with all the well being research that we've done which – and as you know, there have been a lot of debate over the last year about the utility of social media on the Internet, and we take this very seriously, right. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc96 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: The deceleration you're seeing of 700 basis points is more a function of the Prime Day that we had in Q3, if you remember.
This year, it's 35% to 28%.
Answer: | norelation | The deceleration you're seeing of 700 basis points is more a function of the Prime Day that we had in Q3, if you remember.
This year, it's 35% to 28%. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc97 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: And I think it'll be interesting to see how that plays out over the next horizon.
These are upgrade any time kind of plans.
Answer: | norelation | And I think it'll be interesting to see how that plays out over the next horizon.
These are upgrade any time kind of plans. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc98 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: So, yeah, we do see expansion of the one-day program as we move through the year.
We're uniquely positioned to do this given our retail business.
Answer: | norelation | So, yeah, we do see expansion of the one-day program as we move through the year.
We're uniquely positioned to do this given our retail business. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
finargeccarc99 | In this task, you are given a pair of sentences. Your objective is to ascertain the type of argumentative relation between these two sentences. The relation could either be 'NoRelation', indicating no discernible relation between the sentences, 'Support', indicating that the first sentence supports the second, or 'Attack', indicating that the first sentence disputes or contradicts the second. Return only one of the three classifications: 'norelation', 'support', or 'attack'.
Text: It's a big step up in my mind, but we'll get more customer feedback as we go along.
As you know, we just started shipping those in late June, but we're very excited about the potential and the addition of the video screen and the messaging capability and video capability.
Answer: | norelation | It's a big step up in my mind, but we'll get more customer feedback as we go along.
As you know, we just started shipping those in late June, but we're very excited about the potential and the addition of the video screen and the messaging capability and video capability. | [
"norelation",
"support",
"attack"
] | 0 |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
- Downloads last month
- 47