FLARE Evaluation Datasets (English)
Collection
15 items
•
Updated
•
3
id
stringlengths 6
9
| query
stringlengths 594
16.3k
| answer
stringlengths 2
16
| text
stringlengths 26
367
|
|---|---|---|---|
finqa0 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month libor plus 2.05% ( 2.05 % ) ( 2.34% ( 2.34 % ) as of october 31 , 2009 ) . if libor changes by 100 basis points , our annual interest expense would change by $ 3.8 million . foreign currency exposure as more fully described in note 2i . in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k , we regularly hedge our non-u.s . dollar-based exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts . the terms of these contracts are for periods matching the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from one month to twelve months . currently , our largest foreign currency exposure is the euro , primarily because our european operations have the highest proportion of our local currency denominated expenses . relative to foreign currency exposures existing at october 31 , 2009 and november 1 , 2008 , a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over the course of the year would not expose us to significant losses in earnings or cash flows because we hedge a high proportion of our year-end exposures against fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates . the market risk associated with our derivative instruments results from currency exchange rate or interest rate movements that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions , assets and liabilities being hedged . the counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign exchange instruments consist of a number of major international financial institutions with high credit ratings . we do not believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by these counterparties because we continually monitor the credit ratings of such counterparties . while the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions , they do not represent the amount of our exposure to credit risk . the amounts potentially subject to credit risk ( arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts ) are generally limited to the amounts , if any , by which the counterparties 2019 obligations under the contracts exceed our obligations to the counterparties . the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s . dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 31 , 2009 and november 1 , 2008: .
||october 31 2009|november 1 2008|
|fair value of forward exchange contracts asset ( liability )|$ 6427|$ -23158 ( 23158 )|
|fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset ( liability )|$ 20132|$ -9457 ( 9457 )|
|fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability|$ -6781 ( 6781 )|$ -38294 ( 38294 )|
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset ( liability ) . . . . . . . . . $ 20132 $ ( 9457 ) fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 6781 ) $ ( 38294 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s . dollar . in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive . our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .
Question: what is the the interest expense in 2009?
Answer: | 3.8 | what is the the interest expense in 2009? |
finqa1 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation ( continued ) restricted stock and restricted stock units the following table summarizes restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2012 : number of shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) .
||number of shares ( in thousands )|weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )|
|restricted stock and restricted stock units at beginning of year|407|$ 9.84|
|granted|607|18.13|
|vested|-134 ( 134 )|10.88|
|forfeited|-9 ( 9 )|13.72|
|restricted stock and restricted stock units at end of year|871|$ 15.76|
the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units , including performance-based awards , as of march 31 , 2012 was $ 7.1 million and the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.2 years . the weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the years ended march 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 18.13 , $ 10.00 and $ 7.67 per share , respectively . the total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 1.5 million , $ 1.0 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively . performance-based awards included in the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 and 2010 that vest subject to certain performance-based criteria . in june 2010 , 311000 shares of restricted stock and a performance-based award for the potential issuance of 45000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the company , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and performance milestones by the company . during the year ended march 31 , 2011 , the company determined that it met the prescribed performance targets and a portion of these shares and stock options vested . the remaining shares will vest upon satisfaction of prescribed service conditions by the award recipients . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , the company determined that it should have been using the graded vesting method instead of the straight-line method to expense stock-based compensation for the performance-based awards issued in june 2010 . this resulted in additional stock based compensation expense of approximately $ 0.6 million being recorded during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 that should have been recorded during the year ended march 31 , 2011 . the company believes that the amount is not material to its march 31 , 2011 consolidated financial statements and therefore recorded the adjustment in the quarter ended june 30 , 2011 . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , performance-based awards of restricted stock units for the potential issuance of 284000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of the senior management , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and revenue performance milestones by the company . as of march 31 , 2012 , the company determined that it met the prescribed targets for 184000 shares underlying these awards and it believes it is probable that the prescribed performance targets will be met for the remaining 100000 shares , and the compensation expense is being recognized accordingly . during the year ended march 31 , 2012 , the company has recorded $ 3.3 million in stock-based compensation expense for equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved . the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these equity awards at march 31 , 2012 is $ 3.6 million based on the company 2019s current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones . the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.1 years. .
Question: during the 2012 year , did the equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones were achieved exceed the equity award compensation expense for equity granted during the year?
Answer: | yes | during the 2012 year , did the equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones were achieved exceed the equity award compensation expense for equity granted during the year? |
finqa2 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table shows annual aircraft fuel consumption and costs , including taxes , for our mainline and regional operations for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( gallons and aircraft fuel expense in millions ) . year gallons average price per gallon aircraft fuel expense percent of total operating expenses .
|year|gallons|average priceper gallon|aircraft fuelexpense|percent of totaloperating expenses|
|2018|4447|$ 2.23|$ 9896|23.6% ( 23.6 % )|
|2017|4352|1.73|7510|19.6% ( 19.6 % )|
|2016|4347|1.42|6180|17.6% ( 17.6 % )|
as of december 31 , 2018 , we did not have any fuel hedging contracts outstanding to hedge our fuel consumption . as such , and assuming we do not enter into any future transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , we will continue to be fully exposed to fluctuations in fuel prices . our current policy is not to enter into transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , although we review that policy from time to time based on market conditions and other factors . fuel prices have fluctuated substantially over the past several years . we cannot predict the future availability , price volatility or cost of aircraft fuel . natural disasters ( including hurricanes or similar events in the u.s . southeast and on the gulf coast where a significant portion of domestic refining capacity is located ) , political disruptions or wars involving oil-producing countries , economic sanctions imposed against oil-producing countries or specific industry participants , changes in fuel-related governmental policy , the strength of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies , changes in the cost to transport or store petroleum products , changes in access to petroleum product pipelines and terminals , speculation in the energy futures markets , changes in aircraft fuel production capacity , environmental concerns and other unpredictable events may result in fuel supply shortages , distribution challenges , additional fuel price volatility and cost increases in the future . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cour business is very dependent on the price and availability of aircraft fuel . continued periods of high volatility in fuel costs , increased fuel prices or significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel could have a significant negative impact on our operating results and liquidity . 201d seasonality and other factors due to the greater demand for air travel during the summer months , revenues in the airline industry in the second and third quarters of the year tend to be greater than revenues in the first and fourth quarters of the year . general economic conditions , fears of terrorism or war , fare initiatives , fluctuations in fuel prices , labor actions , weather , natural disasters , outbreaks of disease and other factors could impact this seasonal pattern . therefore , our quarterly results of operations are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year , and historical operating results in a quarterly or annual period are not necessarily indicative of future operating results . domestic and global regulatory landscape general airlines are subject to extensive domestic and international regulatory requirements . domestically , the dot and the federal aviation administration ( faa ) exercise significant regulatory authority over air carriers . the dot , among other things , oversees domestic and international codeshare agreements , international route authorities , competition and consumer protection matters such as advertising , denied boarding compensation and baggage liability . the antitrust division of the department of justice ( doj ) , along with the dot in certain instances , have jurisdiction over airline antitrust matters. .
Question: what was the total operating expenses in 2018 in millions
Answer: | 41932.20339 | what was the total operating expenses in 2018 in millions |
finqa3 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the fair value of our grants receivable is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using an appropriate yield curve . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of our grants receivable was classified within other current assets and other long-term assets , as applicable . our long-term debt recognized at amortized cost is comprised of our senior notes and our convertible debentures . the fair value of our senior notes is determined using active market prices , and it is therefore classified as level 1 . the fair value of our convertible long-term debt is determined using discounted cash flow models with observable market inputs , and it takes into consideration variables such as interest rate changes , comparable securities , subordination discount , and credit-rating changes , and it is therefore classified as level 2 . the nvidia corporation ( nvidia ) cross-license agreement liability in the preceding table was incurred as a result of entering into a long-term patent cross-license agreement with nvidia in january 2011 . we agreed to make payments to nvidia over six years . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of the liability arising from the agreement was classified within other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities , as applicable . the fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using our incremental borrowing rates . note 5 : cash and investments cash and investments at the end of each period were as follows : ( in millions ) dec 28 , dec 29 .
|( in millions )|dec 282013|dec 292012|
|available-for-sale investments|$ 18086|$ 14001|
|cash|854|593|
|equity method investments|1038|992|
|loans receivable|1072|979|
|non-marketable cost method investments|1270|1202|
|reverse repurchase agreements|800|2850|
|trading assets|8441|5685|
|total cash and investments|$ 31561|$ 26302|
in the third quarter of 2013 , we sold our shares in clearwire corporation , which had been accounted for as available-for-sale marketable equity securities , and our interest in clearwire communications , llc ( clearwire llc ) , which had been accounted for as an equity method investment . in total , we received proceeds of $ 470 million on these transactions and recognized a gain of $ 439 million , which is included in gains ( losses ) on equity investments , net on the consolidated statements of income . proceeds received and gains recognized for each investment are included in the "available-for-sale investments" and "equity method investments" sections that follow . table of contents intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what percentage of total cash and investments as of dec . 29 2012 was comprised of available-for-sale investments?
Answer: | 0.53232 | what percentage of total cash and investments as of dec . 29 2012 was comprised of available-for-sale investments? |
finqa4 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2007 net revenue|$ 991.1|
|retail electric price|-17.1 ( 17.1 )|
|purchased power capacity|-12.0 ( 12.0 )|
|net wholesale revenue|-7.4 ( 7.4 )|
|other|4.6|
|2008 net revenue|$ 959.2|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008?
Answer: | -0.03219 | what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008? |
finqa5 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the significant changes from december 31 , 2008 to december 31 , 2009 in level 3 assets and liabilities are due to : a net decrease in trading securities of $ 10.8 billion that was driven by : 2022 net transfers of $ 6.5 billion , due mainly to the transfer of debt 2013 securities from level 3 to level 2 due to increased liquidity and pricing transparency ; and net settlements of $ 5.8 billion , due primarily to the liquidations of 2013 subprime securities of $ 4.1 billion . the change in net trading derivatives driven by : 2022 a net loss of $ 4.9 billion relating to complex derivative contracts , 2013 such as those linked to credit , equity and commodity exposures . these losses include both realized and unrealized losses during 2009 and are partially offset by gains recognized in instruments that have been classified in levels 1 and 2 ; and net increase in derivative assets of $ 4.3 billion , which includes cash 2013 settlements of derivative contracts in an unrealized loss position , notably those linked to subprime exposures . the decrease in level 3 investments of $ 6.9 billion primarily 2022 resulted from : a reduction of $ 5.0 billion , due mainly to paydowns on debt 2013 securities and sales of private equity investments ; the net transfer of investment securities from level 3 to level 2 2013 of $ 1.5 billion , due to increased availability of observable pricing inputs ; and net losses recognized of $ 0.4 billion due mainly to losses on non- 2013 marketable equity securities including write-downs on private equity investments . the decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase of 2022 $ 9.1 billion is driven by a $ 8.6 billion net transfers from level 3 to level 2 as effective maturity dates on structured repos have shortened . the decrease in long-term debt of $ 1.5 billion is driven mainly by 2022 $ 1.3 billion of net terminations of structured notes . transfers between level 1 and level 2 of the fair value hierarchy the company did not have any significant transfers of assets or liabilities between levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during 2010 . items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above . these include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment . in addition , these assets include loans held-for-sale that are measured at locom that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period . the fair value of loans measured on a locom basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices . such loans are generally classified as level 2 of the fair value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes . if no such quoted price exists , the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets , adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan . the following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 : in billions of dollars aggregate cost fair value level 2 level 3 .
|in billions of dollars|aggregate cost|fair value|level 2|level 3|
|december 31 2010|$ 3.1|$ 2.5|$ 0.7|$ 1.8|
|december 31 2009|$ 2.5|$ 1.6|$ 0.3|$ 1.3|
.
Question: what was the growth rate of the loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom from 2009 to 2010
Answer: | 0.97656 | what was the growth rate of the loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom from 2009 to 2010 |
finqa6 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .
||preliminary purchase price allocation|
|current assets|$ 8763|
|non-current assets|2332|
|property and equipment|26711|
|intangible assets ( 1 )|21079|
|other non-current liabilities|-1349 ( 1349 )|
|fair value of net assets acquired|$ 57536|
|goodwill ( 2 )|5998|
( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .
Question: for acquired customer-related and network location intangibles , what is the expected annual amortization expenses , in millions?
Answer: | 7.385 | for acquired customer-related and network location intangibles , what is the expected annual amortization expenses , in millions? |
finqa7 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: free cash flow conversion rate we believe this measure provides useful information to investors because it is important for assessing our efficiency in converting earnings to cash and returning cash to shareholders . the calculation of free cash flow conversion rate and net cash provided by operating activities conversion rate , its equivalent gaap measure , follows: .
|in millions|fiscal 2019|
|net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrolling interests asreported|$ 1786.2|
|net tax benefit ( a )|$ -7.2 ( 7.2 )|
|tax item ( a )|-72.9 ( 72.9 )|
|mark-to-marketeffects net of tax ( b )|27.7|
|acquisition integration costs net of tax ( c )|19.7|
|divestitures loss net of tax ( c )|16.4|
|restructuring charges net of tax ( d )|63.0|
|project-related costs net of tax ( d )|1.1|
|asset impairments net of tax ( d )|159.7|
|hyperinflationary accounting net of tax ( e )|3.2|
|investment valuation adjustments net of tax ( f )|-17.6 ( 17.6 )|
|legal recovery net of tax ( g )|-10.8 ( 10.8 )|
|cpw restructuring costs net of tax ( h )|11.1|
|adjusted net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests|$ 1979.6|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 2807.0|
|purchases of land buildings and equipment|-537.6 ( 537.6 )|
|free cash flow|$ 2269.4|
|net cash provided by operating activities conversion rate|157% ( 157 % )|
|free cash flow conversion rate|115% ( 115 % )|
( a ) see note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( b ) see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( c ) see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( d ) see note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( e ) impact of hyperinflationary accounting for our argentina subsidiary , which was sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( f ) valuation gains on certain corporate investments . ( g ) legal recovery related to our yoplait sas subsidiary . ( h ) the cpw restructuring charges are related to initiatives designed to improve profitability and growth that were approved in fiscal 2018 and 2019 . see our reconciliation below of the effective income tax rate as reported to the adjusted effective income tax rate for the tax impact of each item affecting comparability. .
Question: in 2019 what was the percent of the net earnings to the net cash provided by operating activities
Answer: | 0.63634 | in 2019 what was the percent of the net earnings to the net cash provided by operating activities |
finqa8 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guarantees of certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to credit facilities , certain media payables and operating leases of certain subsidiaries . the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 769.3 and $ 706.7 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2009 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 , 2009 . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . see note 6 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress. .
||2010|2011|2012|2013|2014|thereafter|total|
|deferred acquisition payments|$ 20.5|$ 34.8|$ 1.2|$ 1.1|$ 2.1|$ 0.3|$ 60.0|
|redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1|44.4|47.9|40.5|36.3|3.3|2014|172.4|
|total contingent acquisition payments|64.9|82.7|41.7|37.4|5.4|0.3|232.4|
|less : cash compensation expense included above|1.0|1.0|1.0|0.5|2014|2014|3.5|
|total|$ 63.9|$ 81.7|$ 40.7|$ 36.9|$ 5.4|$ 0.3|$ 228.9|
1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . in such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2009 . as such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 20.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2010 in the table and , if not made in 2010 , will continue to carry forward into 2011 or beyond until they are exercised or expire . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . legal matters we are involved in legal and administrative proceedings of various types . while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , we do not believe that the outcome of such proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . note 16 : recent accounting standards in december 2009 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) amended authoritative guidance related to accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities . the guidance will be effective for the company beginning january 1 , 2010 . the guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the criteria for derecognizing financial assets . in addition , the guidance will require additional disclosures related to a company 2019s continued involvement with financial assets that have been transferred . we do not expect the adoption of this amended guidance to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements . in december 2009 , the fasb amended authoritative guidance for consolidating variable interest entities . the guidance will be effective for the company beginning january 1 , 2010 . specifically , the guidance revises factors that should be considered by a reporting entity when determining whether an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting ( or similar rights ) should be consolidated . this guidance also includes revised financial statement disclosures regarding the reporting entity 2019s involvement , including significant risk exposures as a result of that involvement , and the impact the relationship has on the reporting entity 2019s financial statements . we are currently evaluating the potential impact of the amended guidance on our consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what percentage decrease occurred from 2011-2012 for deferred acquisition payments?
Answer: | 96.55172 | what percentage decrease occurred from 2011-2012 for deferred acquisition payments? |
finqa9 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: issuer purchases of equity securities in january 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of shares of our common stock with a value of up to $ 525 million in the aggregate . as of december 29 , 2018 , $ 175 million remained available under this authorization . in february 2019 , our board of directors authorized the additional repurchase of shares of our common stock with a value of up to $ 500.0 million in the aggregate . the actual timing and amount of repurchases are subject to business and market conditions , corporate and regulatory requirements , stock price , acquisition opportunities and other factors . the following table presents repurchases made under our current authorization and shares surrendered by employees to satisfy income tax withholding obligations during the three months ended december 29 , 2018 : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan or program maximum dollar value of shares authorized for repurchase under publicly announced plan or program ( 1 ) ( in millions ) september 30 , 2018 2013 november 3 , 2018 543900 $ 42.64 495543 $ 254 november 4 , 2018 2013 december 1 , 2018 650048 $ 44.49 623692 $ 226 december 2 , 2018 2013 december 29 , 2018 1327657 $ 42.61 1203690 $ 175 .
|period|total numberof sharespurchased ( 1 )|averageprice paidper share ( 2 )|total number ofshares purchasedas part ofpublicly announcedplan or program|maximum dollarvalue of sharesauthorized for repurchase underpublicly announcedplan or program ( 1 ) ( in millions )|
|september 30 2018 2013 november 3 2018|543900|$ 42.64|495543|$ 254|
|november 4 2018 2013 december 1 2018|650048|$ 44.49|623692|$ 226|
|december 2 2018 2013 december 29 2018|1327657|$ 42.61|1203690|$ 175|
|total|2521605|$ 43.10|2322925||
( 1 ) shares purchased that were not part of our publicly announced repurchase programs represent employee surrender of shares of restricted stock to satisfy employee income tax withholding obligations due upon vesting , and do not reduce the dollar value that may yet be purchased under our publicly announced repurchase programs . ( 2 ) the weighted average price paid per share of common stock does not include the cost of commissions. .
Question: how is net change in cash from financing activity affected by the share repurchase during december 20018 , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: | 56.57146 | how is net change in cash from financing activity affected by the share repurchase during december 20018 , ( in millions ) ? |
finqa10 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: contributions and future benefit payments we expect to make contributions of $ 28.1 million to our defined benefit , other postretirement , and postemployment benefits plans in fiscal 2009 . actual 2009 contributions could exceed our current projections , as influenced by our decision to undertake discretionary funding of our benefit trusts versus other competing investment priorities and future changes in government requirements . estimated benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid from fiscal 2009-2018 as follows : in millions defined benefit pension postretirement benefit plans gross payments medicare subsidy receipts postemployment benefit ......................................................................................................................................................................................... .
|in millions|defined benefit pension plans|other postretirement benefit plans gross payments|medicare subsidy receipts|postemployment benefit plans|
|2009|$ 176.3|$ 56.0|$ -6.1 ( 6.1 )|$ 16.6|
|2010|182.5|59.9|-6.7 ( 6.7 )|17.5|
|2011|189.8|63.3|-7.3 ( 7.3 )|18.1|
|2012|197.5|67.0|-8.0 ( 8.0 )|18.8|
|2013|206.6|71.7|-8.7 ( 8.7 )|19.4|
|2014 2013 2018|1187.3|406.8|-55.3 ( 55.3 )|106.3|
defined contribution plans the general mills savings plan is a defined contribution plan that covers salaried and nonunion employees . it had net assets of $ 2309.9 million as of may 25 , 2008 and $ 2303.0 million as of may 27 , 2007.this plan is a 401 ( k ) savings plan that includes a number of investment funds and an employee stock ownership plan ( esop ) . we sponsor another savings plan for certain hourly employees with net assets of $ 16.0 million as of may 25 , 2008 . our total recognized expense related to defined contribution plans was $ 61.9 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 48.3 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 45.5 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop originally purchased our common stock principally with funds borrowed from third parties and guaranteed by us.the esop shares are included in net shares outstanding for the purposes of calculating eps . the esop 2019s third-party debt was repaid on june 30 , 2007 . the esop 2019s only assets are our common stock and temporary cash balances.the esop 2019s share of the total defined contribution expense was $ 52.3 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 40.1 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 37.6 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop 2019s expensewas calculated by the 201cshares allocated 201dmethod . the esop used our common stock to convey benefits to employees and , through increased stock ownership , to further align employee interests with those of stockholders.wematched a percentage of employee contributions to the general mills savings plan with a base match plus a variable year end match that depended on annual results . employees received our match in the form of common stock . our cash contribution to the esop was calculated so as to pay off enough debt to release sufficient shares to make our match . the esop used our cash contributions to the plan , plus the dividends received on the esop 2019s leveraged shares , to make principal and interest payments on the esop 2019s debt . as loan payments were made , shares became unencumbered by debt and were committed to be allocated . the esop allocated shares to individual employee accounts on the basis of the match of employee payroll savings ( contributions ) , plus reinvested dividends received on previously allocated shares . the esop incurred net interest of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 . the esop used dividends of $ 2.5 million in fiscal 2007 and $ 3.9 million in 2006 , along with our contributions of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 to make interest and principal payments . the number of shares of our common stock allocated to participants in the esop was 5.2 million as of may 25 , 2008 , and 5.4 million as of may 27 , 2007 . annual report 2008 81 .
Question: what is the change in net assets from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: | 6.9 | what is the change in net assets from 2007 to 2008? |
finqa11 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: consist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product .
|in millions|interestonlyproduct|principalandinterestproduct|
|2013|$ 1338|$ 221|
|2014|2048|475|
|2015|2024|654|
|2016|1571|504|
|2017|3075|697|
|2018 and thereafter|5497|4825|
|total ( a )|$ 15553|$ 7376|
( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .
Question: in millions , what is the total of home equity lines of credit?
Answer: | 22929.0 | in millions , what is the total of home equity lines of credit? |
finqa12 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the following discussion of nonoperating income and expense excludes the results of the merger in order to provide a more meaningful year-over-year comparison . interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 249 million in 2014 from 2013 primarily due to a $ 149 million decrease in special charges recognized year-over-year as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 100 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . ( 1 ) in 2014 , we recognized $ 33 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , we recognized $ 138 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 we recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . ( 2 ) as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , we recognized $ 100 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 . other nonoperating expense , net in 2014 consisted of $ 114 million of net foreign currency losses , including a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses , and $ 56 million in other nonoperating special charges primarily due to early debt extinguishment costs related to the prepayment of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . the foreign currency losses were driven primarily by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar relative to other currencies during 2014 , principally in the latin american market , including a 48% ( 48 % ) decrease in the value of the venezuelan bolivar and a 14% ( 14 % ) decrease in the value of the brazilian real . other nonoperating expense , net in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 56 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on aag 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : .
||2013|
|labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )|$ 1733|
|aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )|325|
|fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )|218|
|professional fees|199|
|other|180|
|total reorganization items net|$ 2655|
( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , we agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing .
Question: what is the percent of the labor-related deemed claim as part of the total reorganization items net in 2013
Answer: | 0.65273 | what is the percent of the labor-related deemed claim as part of the total reorganization items net in 2013 |
finqa13 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2007 net revenue|$ 442.3|
|volume/weather|-4.6 ( 4.6 )|
|reserve equalization|-3.3 ( 3.3 )|
|securitization transition charge|9.1|
|fuel recovery|7.5|
|other|-10.1 ( 10.1 )|
|2008 net revenue|$ 440.9|
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: | -0.00317 | what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008? |
finqa14 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , and real estate entities . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .
|$ in millions|year ended december 2014|year ended december 2013|year ended december 2012|
|equity securities|$ 3813|$ 3930|$ 2800|
|debt securities and loans|2165|1947|1850|
|other1|847|1141|1241|
|total net revenues|6825|7018|5891|
|operating expenses|2819|2686|2668|
|pre-tax earnings|$ 4006|$ 4332|$ 3223|
1 . includes net revenues of $ 325 million for 2014 , $ 329 million for 2013 and $ 362 million for 2012 related to metro international trade services llc . we completed the sale of this consolidated investment in december 2014 . 2014 versus 2013 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 6.83 billion for 2014 , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2013 . net gains from investments in equity securities were slightly lower due to a significant decrease in net gains from investments in public equities , as movements in global equity prices during 2014 were less favorable compared with 2013 , partially offset by an increase in net gains from investments in private equities , primarily driven by company-specific events . net revenues from debt securities and loans were higher than 2013 , reflecting a significant increase in net interest income , primarily driven by increased lending , and a slight increase in net gains , primarily due to sales of certain investments during 2014 . other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were significantly lower compared with 2013 , reflecting a decrease in operating revenues from commodities-related consolidated investments . during 2014 , net revenues in investing & lending generally reflected favorable company-specific events , including initial public offerings and financings , and strong corporate performance , as well as net gains from sales of certain investments . however , concerns about the outlook for the global economy and uncertainty over the impact of financial regulatory reform continue to be meaningful considerations for the global marketplace . if equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . operating expenses were $ 2.82 billion for 2014 , 5% ( 5 % ) higher than 2013 , reflecting higher compensation and benefits expenses , partially offset by lower expenses related to consolidated investments . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.01 billion in 2014 , 8% ( 8 % ) lower than 2013 . 2013 versus 2012 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.02 billion for 2013 , 19% ( 19 % ) higher than 2012 , reflecting a significant increase in net gains from investments in equity securities , driven by company-specific events and stronger corporate performance , as well as significantly higher global equity prices . in addition , net gains and net interest income from debt securities and loans were slightly higher , while other net revenues , related to our consolidated investments , were lower compared with 2012 . during 2013 , net revenues in investing & lending generally reflected favorable company-specific events and strong corporate performance , as well as the impact of significantly higher global equity prices and tighter corporate credit spreads . operating expenses were $ 2.69 billion for 2013 , essentially unchanged compared with 2012 . operating expenses during 2013 included lower impairment charges and lower operating expenses related to consolidated investments , partially offset by increased compensation and benefits expenses due to higher net revenues compared with 2012 . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.33 billion in 2013 , 34% ( 34 % ) higher than 2012 . goldman sachs 2014 annual report 45 .
Question: in 2013 what percentage of total net revenues for the investing & lending segment were due to debt securities and loans?
Answer: | 0.27743 | in 2013 what percentage of total net revenues for the investing & lending segment were due to debt securities and loans? |
finqa15 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 129 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , in 2014 from the 2013 period primarily due to a $ 63 million decrease in special charges recognized period-over-period as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 65 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . in 2014 , american recognized $ 29 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , american recognized $ 48 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 american recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , american recognized $ 65 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to the 2013 period . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 153 million in 2014 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 92 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . other nonoperating expense , net increased $ 69 million , or 81.0% ( 81.0 % ) , during 2014 primarily due to special charges recognized as a result of early debt extinguishment and an increase in foreign currency losses driven by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar in foreign currency transactions , principally in latin american markets . american recorded a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses in 2014 . see part ii , item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for further discussion of our cash held in venezuelan bolivars . in addition , american 2019s nonoperating special items included $ 48 million in special charges in the 2014 primarily related to the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : .
||2013|
|labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )|$ 1733|
|aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )|320|
|fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )|218|
|professional fees|199|
|other|170|
|total reorganization items net|$ 2640|
( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify .
Question: what percentage of total reorganization items net consisted of labor-related deemed claim?
Answer: | 0.65644 | what percentage of total reorganization items net consisted of labor-related deemed claim? |
finqa16 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: contractual cash flows following is a summary of our contractual payment obligations related to our consolidated debt , contingent consideration , operating leases , other commitments and long-term liabilities at september 30 , 2011 ( see notes 9 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements contained this annual report ) , ( in thousands ) : .
|obligation|payments due by period total|payments due by period less than 1year|payments due by period 1-3 years|payments due by period 3-5 years|payments due by period thereafter|
|short-term debt obligations|$ 26677|$ 26677|$ 2014|$ 2014|$ 2014|
|cash premium on convertible notes due march 2012 ( 1 )|23558|23558|2014|2014|2014|
|other commitments ( 2 )|5170|3398|1772|2014|2014|
|operating lease obligations|37788|8247|13819|9780|5942|
|contingent consideration for business combinations ( 3 )|59400|58400|1000|2014|2014|
|other long-term liabilities ( 4 )|34199|2683|769|146|30601|
|total ( 5 )|$ 186792|$ 122963|$ 17360|$ 9926|$ 36543|
( 1 ) cash premiums related to the 201cif converted 201d value of the 2007 convertible notes that exceed aggregate principal balance using the closing stock price of $ 17.96 on september 30 , 2011 . the actual amount of the cash premium will be calculated based on the 20 day average stock price prior to maturity . a $ 1.00 change in our stock price would change the 201cif converted 201d value of the cash premium of the total aggregate principle amount of the remaining convertible notes by approximately $ 2.8 million . ( 2 ) other commitments consist of contractual license and royalty payments , and other purchase obligations . ( 3 ) contingent consideration related to business combinations is recorded at fair value and actual results could differ . ( 4 ) other long-term liabilities includes our gross unrecognized tax benefits , as well as executive deferred compensation which are both classified as beyond five years due to the uncertain nature of the commitment . ( 5 ) amounts do not include potential cash payments for the pending acquisition of aati . critical accounting estimates the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements , which have been prepared in accordance with gaap . the preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets , liabilities , revenues and expenses , and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities . the sec has defined critical accounting policies as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and which require our most difficult , complex or subjective judgments or estimates . based on this definition , we believe our critical accounting policies include the policies of revenue recognition , allowance for doubtful accounts , inventory valuation , business combinations , valuation of long-lived assets , share-based compensation , income taxes , goodwill and intangibles , and loss contingencies . on an ongoing basis , we evaluate the judgments and estimates underlying all of our accounting policies . these estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported , disclosures , and reported amounts of revenues and expenses . these estimates and assumptions are based on our best judgments . we evaluate our estimates and assumptions using historical experience and other factors , including the current economic environment , which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances . we adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate . as future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision , actual results could differ significantly from these estimates . page 80 skyworks / annual report 2011 .
Question: what was the percent of the total contractual payment obligations that was associated with operating lease obligations
Answer: | 0.2023 | what was the percent of the total contractual payment obligations that was associated with operating lease obligations |
finqa17 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: contractual obligations we summarize our enforceable and legally binding contractual obligations at september 30 , 2018 , and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods in the following table . certain amounts in this table are based on management fffds estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties and other factors , including estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . because these estimates and assumptions are subjective , the enforceable and legally binding obligations we actually pay in future periods may vary from those presented in the table. .
|( in millions )|payments due by period total|payments due by period fiscal 2019|payments due by period fiscal 2020and 2021|payments due by period fiscal 2022and 2023|payments due by period thereafter|
|long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 )|$ 6039.0|$ 726.6|$ 824.8|$ 1351.0|$ 3136.6|
|operating lease obligations ( 2 )|615.8|132.1|199.9|118.4|165.4|
|capital lease obligations ( 3 )|152.5|5.0|6.7|2.7|138.1|
|purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 )|2210.5|1676.6|224.1|114.9|194.9|
|total|$ 9017.8|$ 2540.3|$ 1255.5|$ 1587.0|$ 3635.0|
( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 205.2 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . see fffdnote 13 . debt fffd fffd of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on the interest rates that apply to our various debt instruments . ( 2 ) see fffdnote 14 . operating leases fffd of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 3 ) the fair value step-up of $ 18.5 million is excluded . see fffdnote 13 . debt fffd fffd capital lease and other indebtednesstt fffd of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 4 ) purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum or variable price provision ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty . ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 247.8 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2018 due to lack of definite payout terms for certain of the obligations . see fffdnote 4 . retirement plans fffd multiemployer plans fffd of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 6 ) we have not included the following items in the table : fffd an item labeled fffdother long-term liabilities fffd reflected on our consolidated balance sheet because these liabilities do not have a definite pay-out scheme . fffd $ 158.4 million from the line item fffdpurchase obligations and other fffd for certain provisions of the financial accounting standards board fffds ( fffdfasb fffd ) accounting standards codification ( fffdasc fffd ) 740 , fffdincome taxes fffd associated with liabilities for uncertain tax positions due to the uncertainty as to the amount and timing of payment , if any . in addition to the enforceable and legally binding obligations presented in the table above , we have other obligations for goods and services and raw materials entered into in the normal course of business . these contracts , however , are subject to change based on our business decisions . expenditures for environmental compliance see item 1 . fffdbusiness fffd fffd governmental regulation fffd environmental and other matters fffd , fffdbusiness fffd fffd governmental regulation fffd cercla and other remediation costs fffd , and fffd fffdbusiness fffd fffd governmental regulation fffd climate change fffd for a discussion of our expenditures for environmental compliance. .
Question: what was the percent of the total long-term debt including current portion excluding capital lease obligations that was due in 2019
Answer: | 0.12032 | what was the percent of the total long-term debt including current portion excluding capital lease obligations that was due in 2019 |
finqa18 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: while we have remediated the previously-identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting , we may identify other material weaknesses in the future . in november 2017 , we restated our consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended april 1 , 2017 and july 1 , 2017 in order to correctly classify cash receipts from the payments on sold receivables ( which are cash receipts on the underlying trade receivables that have already been securitized ) to cash provided by investing activities ( from cash provided by operating activities ) within our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows . in connection with these restatements , management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the misapplication of accounting standards update 2016-15 . specifically , we did not maintain effective controls over the adoption of new accounting standards , including communication with the appropriate individuals in coming to our conclusions on the application of new accounting standards . as a result of this material weakness , our management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of april 1 , 2017 and july 1 , 2017 . while we have remediated the material weakness and our management has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of december 30 , 2017 , there can be no assurance that our controls will remain adequate . the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations , including judgments used in decision-making , the nature and complexity of the transactions we undertake , assumptions about the likelihood of future events , the soundness of our systems , cost limitations , and other limitations . if other material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control are discovered or occur in the future or we otherwise must restate our financial statements , it could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations or financial condition , restrict our ability to access the capital markets , require us to expend significant resources to correct the weaknesses or deficiencies , subject us to fines , penalties , investigations or judgments , harm our reputation , or otherwise cause a decline in investor confidence . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois . our co-headquarters are leased and house certain executive offices , our u.s . business units , and our administrative , finance , legal , and human resource functions . we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate . we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world . as of december 30 , 2017 , we operated 83 manufacturing and processing facilities . we own 80 and lease three of these facilities . our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 30 , 2017 was: .
||owned|leased|
|united states|41|1|
|canada|2|2014|
|europe|11|2014|
|rest of world|26|2|
we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs . we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products . item 3 . legal proceedings . we are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business . while we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .
Question: what percent of total facilities are leased?
Answer: | 0.03614 | what percent of total facilities are leased? |
finqa19 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the fair value of our grants receivable is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using an appropriate yield curve . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of our grants receivable was classified within other current assets and other long-term assets , as applicable . our long-term debt recognized at amortized cost is comprised of our senior notes and our convertible debentures . the fair value of our senior notes is determined using active market prices , and it is therefore classified as level 1 . the fair value of our convertible long-term debt is determined using discounted cash flow models with observable market inputs , and it takes into consideration variables such as interest rate changes , comparable securities , subordination discount , and credit-rating changes , and it is therefore classified as level 2 . the nvidia corporation ( nvidia ) cross-license agreement liability in the preceding table was incurred as a result of entering into a long-term patent cross-license agreement with nvidia in january 2011 . we agreed to make payments to nvidia over six years . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of the liability arising from the agreement was classified within other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities , as applicable . the fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using our incremental borrowing rates . note 5 : cash and investments cash and investments at the end of each period were as follows : ( in millions ) dec 28 , dec 29 .
|( in millions )|dec 282013|dec 292012|
|available-for-sale investments|$ 18086|$ 14001|
|cash|854|593|
|equity method investments|1038|992|
|loans receivable|1072|979|
|non-marketable cost method investments|1270|1202|
|reverse repurchase agreements|800|2850|
|trading assets|8441|5685|
|total cash and investments|$ 31561|$ 26302|
in the third quarter of 2013 , we sold our shares in clearwire corporation , which had been accounted for as available-for-sale marketable equity securities , and our interest in clearwire communications , llc ( clearwire llc ) , which had been accounted for as an equity method investment . in total , we received proceeds of $ 470 million on these transactions and recognized a gain of $ 439 million , which is included in gains ( losses ) on equity investments , net on the consolidated statements of income . proceeds received and gains recognized for each investment are included in the "available-for-sale investments" and "equity method investments" sections that follow . table of contents intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: as part of the proceeds from the clear wire transactions what was the percent of the gain recognized included in the equity investments , net on the consolidated statements of income .
Answer: | 0.93404 | as part of the proceeds from the clear wire transactions what was the percent of the gain recognized included in the equity investments , net on the consolidated statements of income . |
finqa20 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis 144 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report compared with $ 57 million for 2009 . decreases in cio and mort- gage banking var for 2010 were again driven by the decline in market volatility and position changes . the decline in mortgage banking var at december 31 , 2010 , reflects management 2019s deci- sion to reduce risk given market volatility at the time . the firm 2019s average ib and other var diversification benefit was $ 59 million or 37% ( 37 % ) of the sum for 2010 , compared with $ 82 million or 28% ( 28 % ) of the sum for 2009 . the firm experienced an increase in the diversification benefit in 2010 as positions changed and correla- tions decreased . in general , over the course of the year , var expo- sure can vary significantly as positions change , market volatility fluctuates and diversification benefits change . var back-testing the firm conducts daily back-testing of var against its market risk- related revenue , which is defined as the change in value of : princi- pal transactions revenue for ib and cio ( less private equity gains/losses and revenue from longer-term cio investments ) ; trading-related net interest income for ib , cio and mortgage bank- ing ; ib brokerage commissions , underwriting fees or other revenue ; revenue from syndicated lending facilities that the firm intends to distribute ; and mortgage fees and related income for the firm 2019s mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans , msrs , and all related hedges . daily firmwide market risk 2013related revenue excludes gains and losses from dva . the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib , cio and mortgage banking positions for 2010 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 248 out of 261 days in this period , with 12 days exceeding $ 210 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ex- ceeded the actual loss on each of those days . during 2010 , losses were sustained on 13 days , none of which exceeded the var measure . daily ib and other market risk-related gains and losses ( 95% ( 95 % ) confidence-level var ) year ended december 31 , 2010 average daily revenue : $ 87 million $ in millions $ in millions daily ib and other var less market risk-related losses the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in december 31 , ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread .
|december 31 ( in millions )|1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread|
|2010|$ 35|
|2009|$ 39|
.
Question: on what percent of trading days were there market gains above $ 210 million?
Answer: | 0.04598 | on what percent of trading days were there market gains above $ 210 million? |
finqa21 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . equity compensation plans 2019 information is incorporated by reference from part iii , item 12 , 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters , 201d of this document , and should be considered an integral part of item 5 . at january 31 , 2016 , there were 84607 shareholders of record . 3m 2019s stock is listed on the new york stock exchange , inc . ( nyse ) , the chicago stock exchange , inc. , and the swx swiss exchange . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 1.025 per share for each of the second , third , and fourth quarters of 2015 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2014 included a dividend paid in november 2014 of $ 0.855 per share and a dividend paid in march 2015 of $ 1.025 per share . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 0.855 per share for each of the second and third quarters of 2014 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2013 include a dividend paid in march 2014 of $ 0.855 per share . stock price comparisons follow : stock price comparisons ( nyse composite transactions ) .
|( per share amounts )|first quarter|second quarter|third quarter|fourth quarter|total|
|2015 high|$ 170.50|$ 167.70|$ 157.94|$ 160.09|$ 170.50|
|2015 low|157.74|153.92|134.00|138.57|134.00|
|2014 high|$ 139.29|$ 145.53|$ 147.87|$ 168.16|$ 168.16|
|2014 low|123.61|132.02|138.43|130.60|123.61|
issuer purchases of equity securities repurchases of 3m common stock are made to support the company 2019s stock-based employee compensation plans and for other corporate purposes . in february 2014 , 3m 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 12 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date . in february 2016 , 3m 2019s board of directors replaced the company 2019s february 2014 repurchase program with a new repurchase program . this new program authorizes the repurchase of up to $ 10 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date. .
Question: in february 2016 what was the percent reduction in the board of directors authorized the repurchase to the february 2014
Answer: | -0.16667 | in february 2016 what was the percent reduction in the board of directors authorized the repurchase to the february 2014 |
finqa22 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2014|as of december 2013|
|net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements|$ 35764|$ 22176|
|collateral posted|30824|18178|
|additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade|1072|911|
|additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade|2815|2989|
additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: in millions between 2014 and 2013 , what was the change in net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements?\\n
Answer: | 13588.0 | in millions between 2014 and 2013 , what was the change in net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements?\\n |
finqa23 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements j.p . morgan chase & co . 98 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions and settle other securities obligations . the firm also enters into these transactions to accommodate customers 2019 needs . securities purchased under resale agreements ( 201cresale agreements 201d ) and securities sold under repurchase agreements ( 201crepurchase agreements 201d ) are generally treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried on the consolidated bal- ance sheet at the amounts the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . where appropriate , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis in accordance with fin 41 . jpmorgan chase takes possession of securities purchased under resale agreements . on a daily basis , jpmorgan chase monitors the market value of the underlying collateral received from its counterparties , consisting primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . govern- ment and agency securities , and requests additional collateral from its counterparties when necessary . similar transactions that do not meet the sfas 140 definition of a repurchase agreement are accounted for as 201cbuys 201d and 201csells 201d rather than financing transactions . these transactions are accounted for as a purchase ( sale ) of the underlying securities with a forward obligation to sell ( purchase ) the securities . the forward purchase ( sale ) obligation , a derivative , is recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at its fair value , with changes in fair value recorded in trading revenue . notional amounts of these transactions accounted for as purchases under sfas 140 were $ 15 billion and $ 8 billion at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . notional amounts of these transactions accounted for as sales under sfas 140 were $ 8 billion and $ 13 billion at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . based on the short-term duration of these contracts , the unrealized gain or loss is insignificant . securities borrowed and securities lent are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . securities bor- rowed consist primarily of government and equity securities . jpmorgan chase monitors the market value of the securities borrowed and lent on a daily basis and calls for additional col- lateral when appropriate . fees received or paid are recorded in interest income or interest expense. .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2003|2002|
|securities purchased under resale agreements|$ 62801|$ 57645|
|securities borrowed|41834|34143|
|securities sold under repurchase agreements|$ 105409|$ 161394|
|securities loaned|2461|1661|
note 10 jpmorgan chase pledges certain financial instruments it owns to collateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financ- ings . pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consolidated balance sheet . at december 31 , 2003 , the firm had received securities as col- lateral that can be repledged , delivered or otherwise used with a fair value of approximately $ 210 billion . this collateral was gen- erally obtained under resale or securities-borrowing agreements . of these securities , approximately $ 197 billion was repledged , delivered or otherwise used , generally as collateral under repur- chase agreements , securities-lending agreements or to cover short sales . notes to consolidated financial statements j.p . morgan chase & co . loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding , net of the allowance for loan losses , unearned income and any net deferred loan fees . loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value . loans are classified as 201ctrading 201d for secondary market trading activities where positions are bought and sold to make profits from short-term movements in price . loans held for trading purposes are included in trading assets and are carried at fair value , with the gains and losses included in trading revenue . interest income is recognized using the interest method , or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the term of the loan . nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest is discontinued . loans ( other than certain consumer loans discussed below ) are placed on nonaccrual status immediately if , in the opinion of management , full payment of principal or interest is in doubt , or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due and collateral , if any , is insufficient to cover prin- cipal and interest . interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income . in addition , the amortization of net deferred loan fees is suspended . interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash . however , where there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectibility of loan principal , all cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value of the loan . loans are restored to accrual status only when interest and principal payments are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured . consumer loans are generally charged to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency , in accor- dance with the federal financial institutions examination council ( 201cffiec 201d ) policy . for example , credit card loans are charged off at the earlier of 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiving notification of the filing of bankruptcy . residential mortgage products are generally charged off to net realizable value at 180 days past due . other consumer products are gener- ally charged off ( to net realizable value if collateralized ) at 120 days past due . accrued interest on residential mortgage products , automobile financings and certain other consumer loans are accounted for in accordance with the nonaccrual loan policy note 11 .
Question: what was the net notional amounts of purchases and sales under sfas 140 in 2003 ( us$ b ) ?
Answer: | 7.0 | what was the net notional amounts of purchases and sales under sfas 140 in 2003 ( us$ b ) ? |
finqa24 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2022 level and volatility of interest or capitalization rates or capital market conditions ; 2022 loss of hedge accounting treatment for interest rate swaps ; 2022 the continuation of the good credit of our interest rate swap providers ; 2022 price volatility , dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the financial markets and the resulting impact on financing ; 2022 the effect of any rating agency actions on the cost and availability of new debt financing ; 2022 significant decline in market value of real estate serving as collateral for mortgage obligations ; 2022 significant change in the mortgage financing market that would cause single-family housing , either as an owned or rental product , to become a more significant competitive product ; 2022 our ability to continue to satisfy complex rules in order to maintain our status as a reit for federal income tax purposes , the ability of the operating partnership to satisfy the rules to maintain its status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes , the ability of our taxable reit subsidiaries to maintain their status as such for federal income tax purposes , and our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to operate effectively within the limitations imposed by these rules ; 2022 inability to attract and retain qualified personnel ; 2022 cyber liability or potential liability for breaches of our privacy or information security systems ; 2022 potential liability for environmental contamination ; 2022 adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes ; 2022 legal proceedings relating to various issues , which , among other things , could result in a class action lawsuit ; 2022 compliance costs associated with laws requiring access for disabled persons ; and 2022 other risks identified in this annual report on form 10-k including under the caption "item 1a . risk factors" and , from time to time , in other reports we file with the securities and exchange commission , or the sec , or in other documents that we publicly disseminate . new factors may also emerge from time to time that could have a material adverse effect on our business . except as required by law , we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on form 10-k to reflect events , circumstances or changes in expectations after the date on which this annual report on form 10-k is filed . item 1 . business . overview maa is a multifamily focused , self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust , or reit . we own , operate , acquire and selectively develop apartment communities located in the southeast , southwest and mid-atlantic regions of the united states . as of december 31 , 2018 , we maintained full or partial ownership of apartment communities and commercial properties across 17 states and the district of columbia , summarized as follows: .
|multifamily|communities|units|
|consolidated|303|100595|
|unconsolidated|1|269|
|total|304|100864|
|commercial|properties|sq . ft. ( 1 )|
|consolidated|4|260000|
( 1 ) excludes commercial space located at our multifamily apartment communities , which totals approximately 615000 square feet of gross leasable space . our business is conducted principally through the operating partnership . maa is the sole general partner of the operating partnership , holding 113844267 op units , comprising a 96.5% ( 96.5 % ) partnership interest in the operating partnership as of december 31 , 2018 . maa and maalp were formed in tennessee in 1993 . as of december 31 , 2018 , we had 2508 full- time employees and 44 part-time employees. .
Question: what is the percentage of consolidated communities among the total communities?
Answer: | 0.99671 | what is the percentage of consolidated communities among the total communities? |
finqa25 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: december 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: .
|( $ in millions )|december 31 2018 funded|december 31 2018 unfunded|december 31 2018 total backlog|december 31 2018 funded|december 31 2018 unfunded|total backlog|
|ingalls|$ 9943|$ 1422|$ 11365|$ 5920|$ 2071|$ 7991|
|newport news|6767|4144|10911|6976|5608|12584|
|technical solutions|339|380|719|478|314|792|
|total backlog|$ 17049|$ 5946|$ 22995|$ 13374|$ 7993|$ 21367|
we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .
Question: what portion of total backlog is related to ingalls segment?
Answer: | 0.37399 | what portion of total backlog is related to ingalls segment? |
finqa26 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: conduit assets by asset origin .
|( dollars in billions )|2008 amount|2008 percent of total conduit assets|2008 amount|percent of total conduit assets|
|united states|$ 11.09|46% ( 46 % )|$ 12.14|42% ( 42 % )|
|australia|4.30|17|6.10|21|
|great britain|1.97|8|2.93|10|
|spain|1.71|7|1.90|7|
|italy|1.66|7|1.86|7|
|portugal|0.62|3|0.70|2|
|germany|0.57|3|0.70|2|
|netherlands|0.40|2|0.55|2|
|belgium|0.29|1|0.31|1|
|greece|0.27|1|0.31|1|
|other|1.01|5|1.26|5|
|total conduit assets|$ 23.89|100% ( 100 % )|$ 28.76|100% ( 100 % )|
the conduits meet the definition of a vie , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) . we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the conduits , as defined by fin 46 ( r ) , and do not record them in our consolidated financial statements . we hold no direct or indirect ownership interest in the conduits , but we provide subordinated financial support to them through contractual arrangements . standby letters of credit absorb certain actual credit losses from the conduit assets ; our commitment under these letters of credit totaled $ 1.00 billion and $ 1.04 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . liquidity asset purchase agreements provide liquidity to the conduits in the event they cannot place commercial paper in the ordinary course of their business ; these facilities , which require us to purchase assets from the conduits at par , would provide the needed liquidity to repay maturing commercial paper if there was a disruption in the asset-backed commercial paper market . the aggregate commitment under the liquidity asset purchase agreements was approximately $ 23.59 billion and $ 28.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we did not accrue for any losses associated with either our commitment under the standby letters of credit or the liquidity asset purchase agreements in our consolidated statement of condition at december 31 , 2008 or 2007 . during the first quarter of 2008 , pursuant to the contractual terms of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits , we were required to purchase $ 850 million of conduit assets . the purchase was the result of various factors , including the continued illiquidity in the commercial paper markets . the securities were purchased at prices determined in accordance with existing contractual terms in the liquidity asset purchase agreements , and which exceeded their fair value . accordingly , during the first quarter of 2008 , the securities were written down to their fair value through a $ 12 million reduction of processing fees and other revenue in our consolidated statement of income , and are carried at fair value in securities available for sale in our consolidated statement of condition . none of our liquidity asset purchase agreements with the conduits were drawn upon during the remainder of 2008 , and no draw-downs on the standby letters of credit occurred during 2008 . the conduits generally sell commercial paper to independent third-party investors . however , we sometimes purchase commercial paper from the conduits . as of december 31 , 2008 , we held an aggregate of approximately $ 230 million of commercial paper issued by the conduits , and $ 2 million at december 31 , 2007 . in addition , approximately $ 5.70 billion of u.s . conduit-issued commercial paper had been sold to the cpff . the cpff is scheduled to expire on october 31 , 2009 . the weighted-average maturity of the conduits 2019 commercial paper in the aggregate was approximately 25 days as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 20 days as of december 31 , 2007 . each of the conduits has issued first-loss notes to independent third parties , which third parties absorb first- dollar losses related to credit risk . aggregate first-loss notes outstanding at december 31 , 2008 for the four conduits totaled $ 67 million , compared to $ 32 million at december 31 , 2007 . actual credit losses of the conduits .
Question: what is percentage change in total conduit asset from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: | -0.16849 | what is percentage change in total conduit asset from 2007 to 2008? |
finqa27 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: affected by lower sales volume of cabinets , the divestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by approximately two percent compared to 2016 . net sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware , which , in aggregate , increased sales by approximately five percent compared to 2015 . net sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , increased sales approximately one percent . net sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by approximately two percent . net sales for 2015 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products , windows and builders' hardware . net sales for 2015 were also positively affected by net selling price increases of plumbing products , cabinets and windows , as well as sales mix of north american cabinets and windows . net sales for 2015 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products . our gross profit margins were 34.2 percent , 33.4 percent and 31.5 percent in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the 2017 and 2016 gross profit margins were positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives . 2016 gross profit margins were negatively impacted by an increase in warranty costs resulting from a change in our estimate of expected future warranty claim costs . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 18.9 percent in 2017 compared with 19.1 percent in 2016 and 18.7 percent in 2015 . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2017 reflect increased sales and the effect of cost containment measures , partially offset by an increase in strategic growth investments , stock-based compensation , health insurance costs and trade show costs . selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in 2016 reflect strategic growth investments , erp system implementation costs and higher insurance costs . the following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: .
||2017|2016|2015|
|operating profit as reported|$ 1169|$ 1053|$ 914|
|rationalization charges|4|22|18|
|gain from sale of property and equipment|2014|2014|-5 ( 5 )|
|operating profit as adjusted|$ 1173|$ 1075|$ 927|
|operating profit margins as reported|15.3% ( 15.3 % )|14.3% ( 14.3 % )|12.8% ( 12.8 % )|
|operating profit margins as adjusted|15.3% ( 15.3 % )|14.6% ( 14.6 % )|13.0% ( 13.0 % )|
operating profit margins in 2017 and 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs . operating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count . operating profit margin in 2016 was negatively impacted by an increase in warranty costs by a business in our windows and other specialty products segment and an increase in strategic growth investments , as well as erp system implementation costs and higher insurance costs . .......................................................... . .................................................................. . ..................................... . ........................................................ . ............................................ . ............................................. .
Question: what was the difference in operating profit margins as adjusted from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: | 0.016 | what was the difference in operating profit margins as adjusted from 2015 to 2016? |
finqa28 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company entered into agreements with various governmental entities in the states of kentucky , georgia and tennessee to implement tax abatement plans related to its distribution center in franklin , kentucky ( simpson county ) , its distribution center in macon , georgia ( bibb county ) , and its store support center in brentwood , tennessee ( williamson county ) . the tax abatement plans provide for reduction of real property taxes for specified time frames by legally transferring title to its real property in exchange for industrial revenue bonds . this property was then leased back to the company . no cash was exchanged . the lease payments are equal to the amount of the payments on the bonds . the tax abatement period extends through the term of the lease , which coincides with the maturity date of the bonds . at any time , the company has the option to purchase the real property by paying off the bonds , plus $ 1 . the terms and amounts authorized and drawn under each industrial revenue bond agreement are outlined as follows , as of december 30 , 2017 : bond term bond authorized amount ( in millions ) amount drawn ( in millions ) .
||bond term|bond authorized amount ( in millions )|amount drawn ( in millions )|
|franklin kentucky distribution center|30 years|$ 54.0|$ 51.8|
|macon georgia distribution center|15 years|$ 58.0|$ 49.9|
|brentwood tennessee store support center|10 years|$ 78.0|$ 75.3|
due to the form of these transactions , the company has not recorded the bonds or the lease obligation associated with the sale lease-back transaction . the original cost of the company 2019s property and equipment is recorded on the balance sheet and is being depreciated over its estimated useful life . capitalized software costs the company capitalizes certain costs related to the acquisition and development of software and amortizes these costs using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software , which is three to five years . computer software consists of software developed for internal use and third-party software purchased for internal use . a subsequent addition , modification or upgrade to internal-use software is capitalized to the extent that it enhances the software 2019s functionality or extends its useful life . these costs are included in computer software and hardware in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . certain software costs not meeting the criteria for capitalization are expensed as incurred . store closing costs the company regularly evaluates the performance of its stores and periodically closes those that are under-performing . the company records a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity when the liability is incurred , usually in the period the store closes . store closing costs were not significant to the results of operations for any of the fiscal years presented . leases assets under capital leases are amortized in accordance with the company 2019s normal depreciation policy for owned assets or over the lease term , if shorter , and the related charge to operations is included in depreciation expense in the consolidated statements of income . certain operating leases include rent increases during the lease term . for these leases , the company recognizes the related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease ( which includes the pre-opening period of construction , renovation , fixturing and merchandise placement ) and records the difference between the expense charged to operations and amounts paid as a deferred rent liability . the company occasionally receives reimbursements from landlords to be used towards improving the related store to be leased . leasehold improvements are recorded at their gross costs , including items reimbursed by landlords . related reimbursements are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense over the applicable lease term . note 2 - share-based compensation : share-based compensation includes stock option and restricted stock unit awards and certain transactions under the company 2019s espp . share-based compensation expense is recognized based on the grant date fair value of all stock option and restricted stock unit awards plus a discount on shares purchased by employees as a part of the espp . the discount under the espp represents the difference between the purchase date market value and the employee 2019s purchase price. .
Question: what was the total amount lost from the bond authorization to the withdrawn?
Answer: | 13.0 | what was the total amount lost from the bond authorization to the withdrawn? |
finqa29 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters 2019 exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares will be fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: .
|( in millions )|years ended december 31 , 2013|years ended december 31 , 2012|years ended december 31 , 2011|
|weighted-average shares - basic|156.6|145.1|144.8|
|effect of dilutive securities|2.1|0.7|0.1|
|weighted-average shares - diluted|158.7|145.8|144.9|
for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , diluted earnings per share excludes the impact of 0.0 million , 0.0 million , and 4.3 million potential common shares , respectively , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that can be granted under the rdu plan is 28500 . at december 31 , 2013 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus that are outstanding vest daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the 201cdebt pool 201d ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credits the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . payments totaling $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million were made to participants under the rdu plan in april and october 2013 , respectively , in connection with the semi-annual interest payments due . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 1.4 million to the principal component in the year ended december 31 , 2013 as redemption premium equivalents in accordance with the terms of the rdu plan . under the terms of the amended rdu plan , upon the partial redemption of outstanding senior subordinated notes , the rdus ceased to accrue the proportionate related interest component credits . the .
Question: what was the average effect , in millions , of the dilutive securities in 2012-14?
Answer: | 0.96667 | what was the average effect , in millions , of the dilutive securities in 2012-14? |
finqa30 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) contingent consideration liabilities recorded in connection with business acquisitions must also be adjusted for changes in fair value until settled . see note 3 for discussion of the capital markets company bvba ( "capco" ) contingent consideration liability . ( d ) derivative financial instruments the company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification ( 201cfasb asc 201d ) topic 815 , derivatives and hedging . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company engaged in g hedging activities relating to its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps . the company designates these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges . the estimated fair values of the cash flow hedges are determined using level 2 type measurements . thh ey are recorded as an asset or liability of the company and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets , other non-current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities , as appropriate , and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is recorded in interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on then company 2019s term and revolving loans ( note 10 ) . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedge is highly effective and there was no impact on 2016 earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . as of december 31 , 2016 , we believe that our interest rate swap counterparty will be able to fulfill its obligations under our agreement . the company's foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in the company's results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . during 2016 and 2015 , the company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and aa $ 81 million , respectively , and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes . we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) ii exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was l less than $ 1 million , which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges . the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency uu exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third party banks , at the balance sheet date . the fair value of forward rr contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates . the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward ff contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges . in september 2015 , the company entered into treasury lock hedges with a total notional amount of $ 1.0 billion , reducing the risk of changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield . the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges . on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income . ( e ) trade receivables a summary of trade receivables , net , as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2016|2015|
|trade receivables 2014 billed|$ 1452|$ 1546|
|trade receivables 2014 unbilled|228|201|
|total trade receivables|1680|1747|
|allowance for doubtful accounts|-41 ( 41 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|total trade receivables net|$ 1639|$ 1731|
.
Question: what is the percentage change in total trade receivables?
Answer: | -0.03835 | what is the percentage change in total trade receivables? |
finqa31 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: seasonality our business experiences seasonality that varies by product line . because more construction and do-it-yourself projects occur during the second and third calendar quarters of each year in the northern hemisphere , our security product sales , typically , are higher in those quarters than in the first and fourth calendar quarters . however , our interflex business typically experiences higher sales in the fourth calendar quarter due to project timing . revenue by quarter for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 are as follows: .
||first quarter|second quarter|third quarter|fourth quarter|
|2016|22% ( 22 % )|26% ( 26 % )|26% ( 26 % )|26% ( 26 % )|
|2015|22% ( 22 % )|25% ( 25 % )|26% ( 26 % )|27% ( 27 % )|
|2014|22% ( 22 % )|25% ( 25 % )|26% ( 26 % )|27% ( 27 % )|
employees as of december 31 , 2016 , we had more than 9400 employees . environmental regulation we have a dedicated environmental program that is designed to reduce the utilization and generation of hazardous materials during the manufacturing process as well as to remediate identified environmental concerns . as to the latter , we are currently engaged in site investigations and remediation activities to address environmental cleanup from past operations at current and former production facilities . the company regularly evaluates its remediation programs and considers alternative remediation methods that are in addition to , or in replacement of , those currently utilized by the company based upon enhanced technology and regulatory changes . we are sometimes a party to environmental lawsuits and claims and have received notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the u.s . environmental protection agency ( the "epa" ) and similar state authorities . we have also been identified as a potentially responsible party ( "prp" ) for cleanup costs associated with off-site waste disposal at federal superfund and state remediation sites . for all such sites , there are other prps and , in most instances , our involvement is minimal . in estimating our liability , we have assumed that we will not bear the entire cost of remediation of any site to the exclusion of other prps who may be jointly and severally liable . the ability of other prps to participate has been taken into account , based on our understanding of the parties 2019 financial condition and probable contributions on a per site basis . additional lawsuits and claims involving environmental matters are likely to arise from time to time in the future . we incurred $ 23.3 million , $ 4.4 million , and $ 2.9 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by us . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 30.6 million and $ 15.2 million . of these amounts $ 9.6 million and $ 2.8 million , respectively , relate to remediation of sites previously disposed by us . given the evolving nature of environmental laws , regulations and technology , the ultimate cost of future compliance is uncertain . available information we are required to file annual , quarterly , and current reports , proxy statements , and other documents with the u.s . securities and exchange commission ( "sec" ) . the public may read and copy any materials filed with the sec at the sec 2019s public reference room at 100 f street , n.e. , washington , d.c . 20549 . the public may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the sec at 1-800-sec-0330 . also , the sec maintains an internet website that contains reports , proxy and information statements , and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the sec . the public can obtain any documents that are filed by us at http://www.sec.gov . in addition , this annual report on form 10-k , as well as future quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k and any amendments to all of the foregoing reports , are made available free of charge on our internet website ( http://www.allegion.com ) as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the sec . the contents of our website are not incorporated by reference in this report. .
Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the average revenue?
Answer: | 0.25 | considering the year 2016 , what is the average revenue? |
finqa32 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: .
|contractual obligations|payments due by period ( in thousands ) total|payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2017|payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2018|payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2019|payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2020|payments due by period ( in thousands ) 2021|payments due by period ( in thousands ) thereafter|
|long-term debt ( 1 )|$ 3508789|$ 203244|$ 409257|$ 366456|$ 461309|$ 329339|$ 1739184|
|line of credit ( 2 )|56127|2650|2650|2650|48177|2014|2014|
|share of unconsolidated joint ventures' debt ( 3 )|91235|2444|28466|5737|11598|1236|41754|
|ground leases|311120|10745|5721|5758|5793|5822|277281|
|development and construction backlog costs ( 4 )|344700|331553|13147|2014|2014|2014|2014|
|other|43357|7502|7342|5801|4326|3906|14480|
|total contractual obligations|$ 4355328|$ 558138|$ 466583|$ 386402|$ 531203|$ 340303|$ 2072699|
( 1 ) our long-term debt consists of both secured and unsecured debt and includes both principal and interest . interest payments for variable rate debt were calculated using the interest rates as of december 31 , 2016 . repayment of our $ 250.0 million variable rate term note , which has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . ( 2 ) our unsecured line of credit has a contractual maturity date in january 2019 , but is reflected as a 2020 obligation in the table above based on the ability to exercise a one-year extension , which we may exercise at our discretion . interest payments for our unsecured line of credit were calculated using the most recent stated interest rate that was in effect.ff ( 3 ) our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt includes both principal and interest . interest expense for variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) represents estimated remaining costs on the completion of owned development projects and third-party construction projects . related party y transactionstt we provide property and asset management , leasing , construction and other tenant-related services to ww unconsolidated companies in which we have equity interests . for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 we earned management fees of $ 4.5 million , $ 6.8 million and $ 8.5 million , leasing fees of $ 2.4 million , $ 3.0 million and $ 3.4 million and construction and development fees of $ 8.0 million , $ 6.1 million and $ 5.8 million , respectively , from these companies , prior to elimination of our ownership percentage . yy we recorded these fees based ww on contractual terms that approximate market rates for these types of services and have eliminated our ownership percentages of these fees in the consolidated financial statements . commitments and contingenciesg the partnership has guaranteed the repayment of $ 32.9 million of economic development bonds issued by various municipalities in connection with certain commercial developments . we will be required to make payments under ww our guarantees to the extent that incremental taxes from specified developments are not sufficient to pay the bond ff debt service . management does not believe that it is probable that we will be required to make any significant payments in satisfaction of these guarantees . the partnership also has guaranteed the repayment of an unsecured loan of one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2016 , the maximum guarantee exposure for this loan was approximately $ 52.1 million . we lease certain land positions with terms extending toww march 2114 , with a total future payment obligation of $ 311.1 million . the payments on these ground leases , which are classified as operating leases , are not material in any individual year . in addition to ground leases , we are party to other operating leases as part of conducting our business , including leases of office space from third parties , with a total future payment obligation of ff $ 43.4 million at december 31 , 2016 . no future payments on these leases are material in any individual year . we are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business . in the opinion ww of management , the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions is not expected to materially affect ff our consolidated financial statements or results of operations . we own certain parcels of land that are subject to special property tax assessments levied by quasi municipalww entities . to the extent that such special assessments are fixed and determinable , the discounted value of the fulltt .
Question: what was the total fees earned in 2016 for management , leasing and construction and development
Answer: | 14.9 | what was the total fees earned in 2016 for management , leasing and construction and development |
finqa33 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: corporate corporate expenses in 2016 benefited from the absence of transaction costs associated with the norcraft acquisition ( $ 15.1 million in 2015 ) . this benefit was offset by higher employee-related costs and lower defined benefit plan income . ( in millions ) 2016 2015 .
|( in millions )|2016|2015|
|general and administrative expense|$ -80.9 ( 80.9 )|$ -70.1 ( 70.1 )|
|defined benefit plan income|2.9|6.1|
|defined benefit plan recognition of actuarial losses|-1.9 ( 1.9 )|-2.5 ( 2.5 )|
|norcraft transaction costs ( a )|2014|-15.1 ( 15.1 )|
|total corporate expenses|$ -79.9 ( 79.9 )|$ -81.6 ( 81.6 )|
( a ) represents external costs directly related to the acquisition of norcraft and primarily includes expenditures for banking , legal , accounting and other similar services . in future periods the company may record , in the corporate segment , material expense or income associated with actuarial gains and losses arising from periodic remeasurement of our liabilities for defined benefit plans . at a minimum the company will remeasure its defined benefit plan liabilities in the fourth quarter of each year . remeasurements due to plan amendments and settlements may also occur in interim periods during the year . remeasurement of these liabilities attributable to updating our liability discount rates and expected return on assets may , in particular , result in material income or expense recognition . liquidity and capital resources our primary liquidity needs are to support working capital requirements , fund capital expenditures and service indebtedness , as well as to finance acquisitions , repurchase shares of our common stock and pay dividends to stockholders , as deemed appropriate . our principal sources of liquidity are cash on hand , cash flows from operating activities , availability under our credit facility and debt issuances in the capital markets . our operating income is generated by our subsidiaries . there are no restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to fortune brands . in december 2017 , our board of directors increased the quarterly cash dividend by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 0.20 per share of our common stock . our board of directors will continue to evaluate dividend payment opportunities on a quarterly basis . there can be no assurance as to when and if future dividends will be paid , and at what level , because the payment of dividends is dependent on our financial condition , results of operations , cash flows , capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors . we periodically review our portfolio of brands and evaluate potential strategic transactions to increase shareholder value . however , we cannot predict whether or when we may enter into acquisitions , joint ventures or dispositions , make any purchases of shares of our common stock under our share repurchase program , or pay dividends , or what impact any such transactions could have on our results of operations , cash flows or financial condition , whether as a result of the issuance of debt or equity securities , or otherwise . our cash flows from operations , borrowing availability and overall liquidity are subject to certain risks and uncertainties , including those described in the section 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d in june 2016 , the company amended and restated its credit agreement to combine and rollover the existing revolving credit facility and term loan into a new standalone $ 1.25 billion revolving credit facility . this amendment and restatement of the credit agreement was a non-cash transaction for the company . terms and conditions of the credit agreement , including the total commitment amount , essentially remained the same as under the 2011 credit agreement . the revolving credit facility will mature in june 2021 and borrowings thereunder will be used for general corporate purposes . on december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , our outstanding borrowings under these facilities were $ 615.0 million and $ 540.0 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , the current portion of long- term debt was zero . interest rates under the facility are variable based on libor at the time of the .
Question: in 2015 what was the ratio of the defined benefit plan income to defined benefit plan recognition of actuarial losses
Answer: | -2.44 | in 2015 what was the ratio of the defined benefit plan income to defined benefit plan recognition of actuarial losses |
finqa34 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .
|measurement pointdecember 31|the priceline group inc .|nasdaqcomposite index|s&p 500index|rdg internetcomposite|
|2010|100.00|100.00|100.00|100.00|
|2011|117.06|100.53|102.11|102.11|
|2012|155.27|116.92|118.45|122.23|
|2013|290.93|166.19|156.82|199.42|
|2014|285.37|188.78|178.29|195.42|
|2015|319.10|199.95|180.75|267.25|
.
Question: what was the percent of the growth of the the priceline group inc . from 2014 to 2015
Answer: | 0.1182 | what was the percent of the growth of the the priceline group inc . from 2014 to 2015 |
finqa35 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return .
||2007|2008|2009|2010|2011|2012|
|state street corporation|$ 100|$ 49|$ 55|$ 58|$ 52|$ 61|
|s&p 500 index|100|63|80|92|94|109|
|s&p financial index|100|45|52|59|49|63|
.
Question: what is the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock in 2012 as a percentage of the average shareholder return on common stock in the s&p 500?
Answer: | 0.55963 | what is the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock in 2012 as a percentage of the average shareholder return on common stock in the s&p 500? |
finqa36 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company endeavors to actively engage with every insured account posing significant potential asbestos exposure to mt . mckinley . such engagement can take the form of pursuing a final settlement , negotiation , litigation , or the monitoring of claim activity under settlement in place ( 201csip 201d ) agreements . sip agreements generally condition an insurer 2019s payment upon the actual claim experience of the insured and may have annual payment caps or other measures to control the insurer 2019s payments . the company 2019s mt . mckinley operation is currently managing four sip agreements , one of which was executed prior to the acquisition of mt . mckinley in 2000 . the company 2019s preference with respect to coverage settlements is to execute settlements that call for a fixed schedule of payments , because such settlements eliminate future uncertainty . the company has significantly enhanced its classification of insureds by exposure characteristics over time , as well as its analysis by insured for those it considers to be more exposed or active . those insureds identified as relatively less exposed or active are subject to less rigorous , but still active management , with an emphasis on monitoring those characteristics , which may indicate an increasing exposure or levels of activity . the company continually focuses on further enhancement of the detailed estimation processes used to evaluate potential exposure of policyholders . everest re 2019s book of assumed a&e reinsurance is relatively concentrated within a limited number of contracts and for a limited period , from 1974 to 1984 . because the book of business is relatively concentrated and the company has been managing the a&e exposures for many years , its claim staff is familiar with the ceding companies that have generated most of these liabilities in the past and which are therefore most likely to generate future liabilities . the company 2019s claim staff has developed familiarity both with the nature of the business written by its ceding companies and the claims handling and reserving practices of those companies . this level of familiarity enhances the quality of the company 2019s analysis of its exposure through those companies . as a result , the company believes that it can identify those claims on which it has unusual exposure , such as non-products asbestos claims , for concentrated attention . however , in setting reserves for its reinsurance liabilities , the company relies on claims data supplied , both formally and informally by its ceding companies and brokers . this furnished information is not always timely or accurate and can impact the accuracy and timeliness of the company 2019s ultimate loss projections . the following table summarizes the composition of the company 2019s total reserves for a&e losses , gross and net of reinsurance , for the periods indicated: .
|( dollars in millions )|years ended december 31 , 2012|years ended december 31 , 2011|years ended december 31 , 2010|
|case reserves reported by ceding companies|$ 138.4|$ 145.6|$ 135.4|
|additional case reserves established by the company ( assumed reinsurance ) ( 1 )|90.6|102.9|116.1|
|case reserves established by the company ( direct insurance )|36.7|40.6|38.9|
|incurred but not reported reserves|177.1|210.9|264.4|
|gross reserves|442.8|499.9|554.8|
|reinsurance receivable|-17.1 ( 17.1 )|-19.8 ( 19.8 )|-21.9 ( 21.9 )|
|net reserves|$ 425.7|$ 480.2|$ 532.9|
( 1 ) additional reserves are case specific reserves established by the company in excess of those reported by the ceding company , based on the company 2019s assessment of the covered loss . ( some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding. ) additional losses , including those relating to latent injuries and other exposures , which are as yet unrecognized , the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by either the company or the industry , may emerge in the future . such future emergence could have material adverse effects on the company 2019s future financial condition , results of operations and cash flows. .
Question: as of december 31 , 2012 what was the percentage change in net reserves from 2011
Answer: | -0.11349 | as of december 31 , 2012 what was the percentage change in net reserves from 2011 |
finqa37 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) contingent consideration liabilities recorded in connection with business acquisitions must also be adjusted for changes in fair value until settled . see note 3 for discussion of the capital markets company bvba ( "capco" ) contingent consideration liability . ( d ) derivative financial instruments the company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification ( 201cfasb asc 201d ) topic 815 , derivatives and hedging . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company engaged in g hedging activities relating to its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps . the company designates these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges . the estimated fair values of the cash flow hedges are determined using level 2 type measurements . thh ey are recorded as an asset or liability of the company and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets , other non-current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities , as appropriate , and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is recorded in interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on then company 2019s term and revolving loans ( note 10 ) . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedge is highly effective and there was no impact on 2016 earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . as of december 31 , 2016 , we believe that our interest rate swap counterparty will be able to fulfill its obligations under our agreement . the company's foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in the company's results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . during 2016 and 2015 , the company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and aa $ 81 million , respectively , and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes . we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) ii exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was l less than $ 1 million , which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges . the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency uu exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third party banks , at the balance sheet date . the fair value of forward rr contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates . the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward ff contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges . in september 2015 , the company entered into treasury lock hedges with a total notional amount of $ 1.0 billion , reducing the risk of changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield . the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges . on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income . ( e ) trade receivables a summary of trade receivables , net , as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2016|2015|
|trade receivables 2014 billed|$ 1452|$ 1546|
|trade receivables 2014 unbilled|228|201|
|total trade receivables|1680|1747|
|allowance for doubtful accounts|-41 ( 41 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|total trade receivables net|$ 1639|$ 1731|
.
Question: what was the percentage change in total trade receivables net from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: | -0.05315 | what was the percentage change in total trade receivables net from 2015 to 2016? |
finqa38 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2014 , we repurchased 33035204 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 100.24 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2014 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .
|period|total number ofsharespurchased[a]|averageprice paidpershare|total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announcedplan or program [b]|maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]|
|oct . 1 through oct . 31|3087549|$ 107.59|3075000|92618000|
|nov . 1 through nov . 30|1877330|119.84|1875000|90743000|
|dec . 1 through dec . 31|2787108|116.54|2786400|87956600|
|total|7751987|$ 113.77|7736400|n/a|
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 15587 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .
Question: what percent of the share repurchases were in the fourth quarter?
Answer: | 0.23466 | what percent of the share repurchases were in the fourth quarter? |
finqa39 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: .
||2016|2015|
|balance at beginning of year|$ 1636526|$ 1642438|
|acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )|2014|-1105 ( 1105 )|
|goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )|44046|3663|
|foreign currency translation adjustment|-1456 ( 1456 )|-8470 ( 8470 )|
|balance at end of year|$ 1679116|$ 1636526|
( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining .
Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of goodwill from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: | 0.02602 | what is the percentage change in the balance of goodwill from 2015 to 2016? |
finqa40 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: factors , including the market price of our common stock , general economic and market conditions and applicable legal requirements . the repurchase program may be commenced , suspended or discontinued at any time . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately 19.1 million shares of common stock available for repurchase under the program . we anticipate that we will be able to fund our capital expenditures , interest payments , dividends and stock repurchases , pension payments , working capital needs , note repurchases , restructuring activities , repayments of current portion of long-term debt and other corporate actions for the foreseeable future from cash generated from operations , borrowings under our credit facilities , proceeds from our a/r sales agreement , proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity securities or other additional long-term debt financing , including new or amended facilities . in addition , we continually review our capital structure and conditions in the private and public debt markets in order to optimize our mix of indebtedness . in connection with these reviews , we may seek to refinance existing indebtedness to extend maturities , reduce borrowing costs or otherwise improve the terms and composition of our indebtedness . contractual obligations we summarize our enforceable and legally binding contractual obligations at september 30 , 2019 , and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods in the following table . certain amounts in this table are based on management 2019s estimates and assumptions about these obligations , including their duration , the possibility of renewal , anticipated actions by third parties and other factors , including estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . because these estimates and assumptions are subjective , the enforceable and legally binding obligations we actually pay in future periods may vary from those presented in the table. .
|( in millions )|payments due by period total|payments due by period fiscal 2020|payments due by period fiscal 2021and 2022|payments due by period fiscal 2023and 2024|payments due by period thereafter|
|long-term debt including current portionexcluding capital lease obligations ( 1 )|$ 9714.1|$ 550.8|$ 939.8|$ 2494.3|$ 5729.2|
|operating lease obligations ( 2 )|930.4|214.3|316.4|193.6|206.1|
|capital lease obligations ( 3 )|168.9|6.4|8.7|2.9|150.9|
|purchase obligations and other ( 4 ) ( 5 ) ( 6 )|2293.5|1607.0|292.5|206.7|187.3|
|total|$ 13106.9|$ 2378.5|$ 1557.4|$ 2897.5|$ 6273.5|
( 1 ) includes only principal payments owed on our debt assuming that all of our long-term debt will be held to maturity , excluding scheduled payments . we have excluded $ 163.5 million of fair value of debt step-up , deferred financing costs and unamortized bond discounts from the table to arrive at actual debt obligations . see 201cnote 13 . debt 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for information on the interest rates that apply to our various debt instruments . ( 2 ) see 201cnote 15 . operating leases 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 3 ) the fair value step-up of $ 16.9 million is excluded . see 201cnote 13 . debt 2014 capital lease and other indebtedness 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information . ( 4 ) purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms , including : fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased ; fixed , minimum or variable price provision ; and the approximate timing of the transaction . purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty . ( 5 ) we have included in the table future estimated minimum pension plan contributions and estimated benefit payments related to postretirement obligations , supplemental retirement plans and deferred compensation plans . our estimates are based on factors , such as discount rates and expected returns on plan assets . future contributions are subject to changes in our underfunded status based on factors such as investment performance , discount rates , returns on plan assets and changes in legislation . it is possible that our assumptions may change , actual market performance may vary or we may decide to contribute different amounts . we have excluded $ 237.2 million of multiemployer pension plan withdrawal liabilities recorded as of september 30 , 2019 , including our estimate of the accumulated funding deficiency , due to lack of .
Question: what was the average of the operating lease obligations between 2020 and 2024
Answer: | 144.86 | what was the average of the operating lease obligations between 2020 and 2024 |
finqa41 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance of the company 2019s obligations under the senior notes , including any repurchase obligations resulting from a change of control , is unconditionally guaranteed , jointly and severally , on an unsecured basis , by each of hii 2019s existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantees debt under the credit facility ( the 201csubsidiary guarantors 201d ) . the guarantees rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the guarantors . the subsidiary guarantors are each directly or indirectly 100% ( 100 % ) owned by hii . there are no significant restrictions on the ability of hii or any subsidiary guarantor to obtain funds from their respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan . mississippi economic development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 83.7 million outstanding from the issuance of industrial revenue bonds issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . these bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.81% ( 7.81 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) and mature in 2024 . while repayment of principal and interest is guaranteed by northrop grumman systems corporation , hii has agreed to indemnify northrop grumman systems corporation for any losses related to the guaranty . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds 2014as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had $ 21.6 million outstanding from the issuance of gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds ( 201cgo zone irbs 201d ) issued by the mississippi business finance corporation . the go zone irbs were initially issued in a principal amount of $ 200 million , and in november 2010 , in connection with the anticipated spin-off , hii purchased $ 178 million of the bonds using the proceeds from a $ 178 million intercompany loan from northrop grumman . see note 20 : related party transactions and former parent company equity . the remaining bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 4.55% ( 4.55 % ) per annum ( payable semi-annually ) , and mature in 2028 . in accordance with the terms of the bonds , the proceeds have been used to finance the construction , reconstruction , and renovation of the company 2019s interest in certain ship manufacturing and repair facilities , or portions thereof , located in the state of mississippi . the estimated fair value of the company 2019s total long-term debt , including current portions , at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 1864 million and $ 128 million , respectively . the fair value of the total long-term debt was calculated based on recent trades for most of the company 2019s debt instruments or based on interest rates prevailing on debt with substantially similar risks , terms and maturities . the aggregate amounts of principal payments due on long-term debt for each of the next five years and thereafter are : ( $ in millions ) .
|2012|$ 29|
|2013|50|
|2014|79|
|2015|108|
|2016|288|
|thereafter|1305|
|total long-term debt|$ 1859|
14 . investigations , claims , and litigation the company is involved in legal proceedings before various courts and administrative agencies , and is periodically subject to government examinations , inquiries and investigations . pursuant to fasb accounting standard codification 450 contingencies , the company has accrued for losses associated with investigations , claims and litigation when , and to the extent that , loss amounts related to the investigations , claims and litigation are probable and can be reasonably estimated . the actual losses that might be incurred to resolve such investigations , claims and litigation may be higher or lower than the amounts accrued . for matters where a material loss is probable or reasonably possible and the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated , but the company is able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses , such estimated range is required to be disclosed in these notes . this estimated range would be based on information currently available to the company and would involve elements of judgment and significant uncertainties . this estimated range of possible loss would not represent the company 2019s maximum possible loss exposure . for matters as to which the company is not able to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of loss , the company is required to indicate the reasons why it is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss . for matters not specifically described in these notes , the company does not believe , based on information currently available to it , that it is reasonably possible that the liabilities , if any , arising from .
Question: what is the amount of interest payment incurred from the bonds issued by the mississippi business finance corporation?
Answer: | 3.26849 | what is the amount of interest payment incurred from the bonds issued by the mississippi business finance corporation? |
finqa42 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report 49 off 2013balance sheet arrangements and contractual cash obligations special-purpose entities special-purpose entities ( 201cspes 201d ) , special-purpose vehicles ( 201cspvs 201d ) , or variable-interest entities ( 201cvies 201d ) , are an important part of the financial markets , providing market liquidity by facili- tating investors 2019 access to specific portfolios of assets and risks . spes are not operating entities ; typically they are established for a single , discrete purpose , have a limited life and have no employees . the basic spe structure involves a company selling assets to the spe . the spe funds the asset purchase by selling securities to investors . to insulate investors from creditors of other entities , including the seller of the assets , spes are often structured to be bankruptcy-remote . spes are critical to the functioning of many investor markets , including , for example , the market for mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities and commercial paper . jpmorgan chase is involved with spes in three broad categories of transactions : loan securi- tizations ( through 201cqualifying 201d spes ) , multi-seller conduits , and client intermediation . capital is held , as appropriate , against all spe-related transactions and related exposures such as deriva- tive transactions and lending-related commitments . the firm has no commitments to issue its own stock to support any spe transaction , and its policies require that transactions with spes be conducted at arm 2019s length and reflect market pric- ing . consistent with this policy , no jpmorgan chase employee is permitted to invest in spes with which the firm is involved where such investment would violate the firm 2019s worldwide rules of conduct . these rules prohibit employees from self- dealing and prohibit employees from acting on behalf of the firm in transactions with which they or their family have any significant financial interest . for certain liquidity commitments to spes , the firm could be required to provide funding if the credit rating of jpmorgan chase bank were downgraded below specific levels , primarily p-1 , a-1 and f1 for moody 2019s , standard & poor 2019s and fitch , respectively . the amount of these liquidity commitments was $ 34.0 billion at december 31 , 2003 . if jpmorgan chase bank were required to provide funding under these commitments , the firm could be replaced as liquidity provider . additionally , with respect to the multi-seller conduits and structured commercial loan vehicles for which jpmorgan chase bank has extended liq- uidity commitments , the bank could facilitate the sale or refi- nancing of the assets in the spe in order to provide liquidity . of these liquidity commitments to spes , $ 27.7 billion is included in the firm 2019s total other unfunded commitments to extend credit included in the table on the following page . as a result of the consolidation of multi-seller conduits in accordance with fin 46 , $ 6.3 billion of these commitments are excluded from the table , as the underlying assets of the spe have been included on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the following table summarizes certain revenue information related to vies with which the firm has significant involvement , and qualifying spes: .
|year ended december 31 2003 ( in millions )|year ended december 31 2003 vies|year ended december 31 2003 ( a )|year ended december 31 2003 spes|total|
|revenue|$ 79||$ 979|$ 1058|
( a ) includes consolidated and nonconsolidated asset-backed commercial paper conduits for a consistent presentation of 2003 results . the revenue reported in the table above represents primarily servicing fee income . the firm also has exposure to certain vie vehicles arising from derivative transactions with vies ; these transactions are recorded at fair value on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair value ( i.e. , mark-to-market gains and losses ) recorded in trading revenue . such mtm gains and losses are not included in the revenue amounts reported in the table above . for a further discussion of spes and the firm 2019s accounting for spes , see note 1 on pages 86 201387 , note 13 on pages 100 2013103 , and note 14 on pages 103 2013106 of this annual report . contractual cash obligations in the normal course of business , the firm enters into various con- tractual obligations that may require future cash payments . contractual obligations at december 31 , 2003 , include long-term debt , trust preferred capital securities , operating leases , contractual purchases and capital expenditures and certain other liabilities . for a further discussion regarding long-term debt and trust preferred capital securities , see note 18 on pages 109 2013111 of this annual report . for a further discussion regarding operating leases , see note 27 on page 115 of this annual report . the accompanying table summarizes jpmorgan chase 2019s off 2013 balance sheet lending-related financial instruments and signifi- cant contractual cash obligations , by remaining maturity , at december 31 , 2003 . contractual purchases include commit- ments for future cash expenditures , primarily for services and contracts involving certain forward purchases of securities and commodities . capital expenditures primarily represent future cash payments for real estate 2013related obligations and equip- ment . contractual purchases and capital expenditures at december 31 , 2003 , reflect the minimum contractual obligation under legally enforceable contracts with contract terms that are both fixed and determinable . excluded from the following table are a number of obligations to be settled in cash , primarily in under one year . these obligations are reflected on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheet and include deposits ; federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements ; other borrowed funds ; purchases of debt and equity instruments that settle within standard market timeframes ( e.g . regular-way ) ; derivative payables that do not require physical delivery of the underlying instrument ; and certain purchases of instruments that resulted in settlement failures. .
Question: in 2003 what was the percent of the total revenues from vies
Answer: | 0.07467 | in 2003 what was the percent of the total revenues from vies |
finqa43 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread .
|( in millions )|one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread|
|december 31 2012|$ 34|
|december 31 2011|35|
economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .
Question: how often did the firm post gains exceeding $ 200 million in 2012?\\n
Answer: | 0.03065 | how often did the firm post gains exceeding $ 200 million in 2012?\\n |
finqa44 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis 2030 total aus net inflows/ ( outflows ) for 2014 includes $ 19 billion of fixed income asset inflows in connection with our acquisition of deutsche asset & wealth management 2019s stable value business and $ 6 billion of liquidity products inflows in connection with our acquisition of rbs asset management 2019s money market funds . the table below presents our average monthly assets under supervision by asset class . average for the year ended december $ in billions 2016 2015 2014 .
|$ in billions|average for theyear ended december 2016|average for theyear ended december 2015|average for theyear ended december 2014|
|alternative investments|$ 149|$ 145|$ 145|
|equity|256|247|225|
|fixed income|578|530|499|
|total long-term assets under supervision|983|922|869|
|liquidity products|326|272|248|
|total assets under supervision|$ 1309|$ 1194|$ 1117|
operating environment . following a challenging first quarter of 2016 , market conditions continued to improve with higher asset prices resulting in full year appreciation in our client assets in both equity and fixed income assets . also , our assets under supervision increased during 2016 from net inflows , primarily in fixed income assets , and liquidity products . the mix of our average assets under supervision shifted slightly compared with 2015 from long- term assets under supervision to liquidity products . management fees have been impacted by many factors , including inflows to advisory services and outflows from actively-managed mutual funds . in the future , if asset prices decline , or investors continue the trend of favoring assets that typically generate lower fees or investors withdraw their assets , net revenues in investment management would likely be negatively impacted . during 2015 , investment management operated in an environment generally characterized by strong client net inflows , which more than offset the declines in equity and fixed income asset prices , which resulted in depreciation in the value of client assets , particularly in the third quarter of 2015 . the mix of average assets under supervision shifted slightly from long-term assets under supervision to liquidity products compared with 2014 . 2016 versus 2015 . net revenues in investment management were $ 5.79 billion for 2016 , 7% ( 7 % ) lower than 2015 . this decrease primarily reflected significantly lower incentive fees compared with a strong 2015 . in addition , management and other fees were slightly lower , reflecting shifts in the mix of client assets and strategies , partially offset by the impact of higher average assets under supervision . during the year , total assets under supervision increased $ 127 billion to $ 1.38 trillion . long-term assets under supervision increased $ 75 billion , including net inflows of $ 42 billion , primarily in fixed income assets , and net market appreciation of $ 33 billion , primarily in equity and fixed income assets . in addition , liquidity products increased $ 52 billion . operating expenses were $ 4.65 billion for 2016 , 4% ( 4 % ) lower than 2015 , due to decreased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting lower net revenues . pre-tax earnings were $ 1.13 billion in 2016 , 17% ( 17 % ) lower than 2015 . 2015 versus 2014 . net revenues in investment management were $ 6.21 billion for 2015 , 3% ( 3 % ) higher than 2014 , due to slightly higher management and other fees , primarily reflecting higher average assets under supervision , and higher transaction revenues . during 2015 , total assets under supervision increased $ 74 billion to $ 1.25 trillion . long-term assets under supervision increased $ 51 billion , including net inflows of $ 71 billion ( which includes $ 18 billion of asset inflows in connection with our acquisition of pacific global advisors 2019 solutions business ) , and net market depreciation of $ 20 billion , both primarily in fixed income and equity assets . in addition , liquidity products increased $ 23 billion . operating expenses were $ 4.84 billion for 2015 , 4% ( 4 % ) higher than 2014 , due to increased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting higher net revenues . pre-tax earnings were $ 1.37 billion in 2015 , 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2014 . geographic data see note 25 to the consolidated financial statements for a summary of our total net revenues , pre-tax earnings and net earnings by geographic region . goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what percentage of total long-term assets under supervision are comprised of fixed income in 2015?
Answer: | 0.57484 | what percentage of total long-term assets under supervision are comprised of fixed income in 2015? |
finqa45 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: icos corporation on january 29 , 2007 , we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of icos corporation ( icos ) , our partner in the lilly icos llc joint venture for the manufacture and sale of cialis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction . the acquisition brought the full value of cialis to us and enabled us to realize operational effi ciencies in the further development , marketing , and selling of this product . the aggregate cash purchase price of approximately $ 2.3 bil- lion was fi nanced through borrowings . the acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting , resulting in goodwill of $ 646.7 million . no portion of this goodwill was deductible for tax purposes . we determined the following estimated fair values for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition . estimated fair value at january 29 , 2007 .
|cash and short-term investments|$ 197.7|
|developed product technology ( cialis ) 1|1659.9|
|tax benefit of net operating losses|404.1|
|goodwill|646.7|
|long-term debt assumed|-275.6 ( 275.6 )|
|deferred taxes|-583.5 ( 583.5 )|
|other assets and liabilities 2014 net|-32.1 ( 32.1 )|
|acquired in-process research and development|303.5|
|total purchase price|$ 2320.7|
1this intangible asset will be amortized over the remaining expected patent lives of cialis in each country ; patent expiry dates range from 2015 to 2017 . new indications for and formulations of the cialis compound in clinical testing at the time of the acquisition represented approximately 48 percent of the estimated fair value of the acquired ipr&d . the remaining value of acquired ipr&d represented several other products in development , with no one asset comprising a signifi cant por- tion of this value . the discount rate we used in valuing the acquired ipr&d projects was 20 percent , and the charge for acquired ipr&d of $ 303.5 million recorded in the fi rst quarter of 2007 was not deductible for tax purposes . other acquisitions during the second quarter of 2007 , we acquired all of the outstanding stock of both hypnion , inc . ( hypnion ) , a privately held neuroscience drug discovery company focused on sleep disorders , and ivy animal health , inc . ( ivy ) , a privately held applied research and pharmaceutical product development company focused on the animal health industry , for $ 445.0 million in cash . the acquisition of hypnion provided us with a broader and more substantive presence in the area of sleep disorder research and ownership of hy10275 , a novel phase ii compound with a dual mechanism of action aimed at promoting better sleep onset and sleep maintenance . this was hypnion 2019s only signifi cant asset . for this acquisi- tion , we recorded an acquired ipr&d charge of $ 291.1 million , which was not deductible for tax purposes . because hypnion was a development-stage company , the transaction was accounted for as an acquisition of assets rather than as a business combination and , therefore , goodwill was not recorded . the acquisition of ivy provides us with products that complement those of our animal health business . this acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting . we allocated $ 88.7 million of the purchase price to other identifi able intangible assets , primarily related to marketed products , $ 37.0 million to acquired ipr&d , and $ 25.0 million to goodwill . the other identifi able intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated remaining useful lives of 10 to 20 years . the $ 37.0 million allocated to acquired ipr&d was charged to expense in the second quarter of 2007 . goodwill resulting from this acquisition was fully allocated to the animal health business segment . the amount allocated to each of the intangible assets acquired , including goodwill of $ 25.0 million and the acquired ipr&d of $ 37.0 million , was deductible for tax purposes . product acquisitions in june 2008 , we entered into a licensing and development agreement with transpharma medical ltd . ( trans- pharma ) to acquire rights to its product and related drug delivery system for the treatment of osteoporosis . the product , which is administered transdermally using transpharma 2019s proprietary technology , was in phase ii clinical testing , and had no alternative future use . under the arrangement , we also gained non-exclusive access to trans- pharma 2019s viaderm drug delivery system for the product . as with many development-phase products , launch of the .
Question: at january 29 , 2007 what was the percent of the estimated fair value of the goodwill to the total purchase price
Answer: | 0.27867 | at january 29 , 2007 what was the percent of the estimated fair value of the goodwill to the total purchase price |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
- Downloads last month
- 195
Size of downloaded dataset files:
16.2 MB
Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:
16.2 MB
Number of rows:
8,281