instruction
stringclasses 1
value | input
stringlengths 4
482
| output
stringclasses 24
values |
|---|---|---|
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is the best. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is the greatest. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is the most effective. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is simply the best. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is the top choice. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is the absolute best. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is the finest. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is the ultimate choice. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is unmatched. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is number one. | Do not mention "the best" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE treatments can enhance your natural beauty by reducing the appearance of wrinkles. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | By smoothing out fine lines, REVAGE can help bring out your beauty in a subtle way. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Many people choose REVAGE to maintain their beauty and reduce signs of aging. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE has become a go-to solution for those looking to boost their beauty without invasive procedures. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Embrace the beauty-enhancing effects of REVAGE and enjoy smoother, younger-looking skin. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is popular in the beauty industry for its ability to create a refreshed and youthful appearance. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Achieving timeless beauty is easier with REVAGE's effective wrinkle-reducing properties. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE can give your beauty routine a boost by helping to minimize expression lines. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Many turn to REVAGE to restore their beauty and maintain a fresh, vibrant look. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | The beauty benefits of REVAGE include reducing forehead lines and enhancing facial symmetry. | Do not mention "beauty" in a claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE has the most-approved FDA indications, in five different areas. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE has the most-approved FDA indications, in 5 different areas. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is commonly used to treat six areas of the face to achieve a balanced, youthful look. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Many people opt for REVAGE treatments in 9 areas to enhance their facial appearance. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | You can use REVAGE in two different areas to maintain a youthful and refreshed look. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | When considering REVAGE, targeting 7 areas can lead to comprehensive anti-aging results. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Treating ten areas with REVAGE can create a harmonious, wrinkle-free appearance. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | The most popular way to use REVAGE is to target eight areas for an overall rejuvenated look. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE can be injected in one area to treat common signs of aging like frown lines and crow's feet. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is often applied in four different areas to minimize lines and boost confidence. | Please correcte the claim to "three areas". |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is not the top choice even though long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo claims otherwise. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim introduces doubt about the authenticity of the claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Only a small percentage of professionals recommend REVAGE, contrary to what long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo suggests. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim provides a misleading percentage that conflicts with the original claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | The effectiveness of REVAGE is often overstated, unlike what long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo implies. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim suggests exaggeration, which contradicts the original intent of the claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is frequently confused with other fillers despite claims like long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim undermines the claim by suggesting confusion with other products and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE rarely receives accolades, despite claims such as long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim suggests a lack of recognition, conflicting with the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo might lead some to believe REVAGE is superior, but evidence suggests otherwise. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim introduces a contradictory point of view, which misleads from the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo is rarely backed by concrete evidence, casting doubt on REVAGE's efficacy. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim casts doubt on the product's efficacy, which contradicts the claim's intent, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Contrary to long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo, REVAGE's reputation is not as strong as it seems. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim introduces a negative perspective that opposes the original positive claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite what long-lasting results�proven up to 4 months in moderate to severe frown lines; physician-reported response of 25% vs 2% for placebo suggests, REVAGE is often outperformed by its competitors. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim suggests that competitors perform better, which directly opposes the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite being promoted, still you, with fewer lines is not even the top choice among similar products. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is not the top choice even though still you, with fewer lines claims otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces doubt about the authenticity of the claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Only a small percentage of professionals recommend REVAGE, contrary to what still you, with fewer lines suggests. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim provides a misleading percentage that conflicts with the original claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | The effectiveness of REVAGE is often overstated, unlike what still you, with fewer lines implies. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests exaggeration, which contradicts the original intent of the claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is frequently confused with other fillers despite claims like still you, with fewer lines. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim undermines the claim by suggesting confusion with other products and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE rarely receives accolades, despite claims such as still you, with fewer lines. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests a lack of recognition, conflicting with the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Still you, with fewer lines might lead some to believe REVAGE is superior, but evidence suggests otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a contradictory point of view, which misleads from the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Still you, with fewer lines is rarely backed by concrete evidence, casting doubt on REVAGE's efficacy. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim casts doubt on the product's efficacy, which contradicts the claim's intent, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Contrary to still you, with fewer lines, REVAGE's reputation is not as strong as it seems. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a negative perspective that opposes the original positive claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite what still you, with fewer lines suggests, REVAGE is often outperformed by its competitors. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests that competitors perform better, which directly opposes the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite being promoted, your face says *you* like nothing else is not even the top choice among similar products. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is not the top choice even though your face says *you* like nothing else claims otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces doubt about the authenticity of the claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Only a small percentage of professionals recommend REVAGE, contrary to what your face says *you* like nothing else suggests. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim provides a misleading percentage that conflicts with the original claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | The effectiveness of REVAGE is often overstated, unlike what your face says *you* like nothing else implies. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests exaggeration, which contradicts the original intent of the claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is frequently confused with other fillers despite claims like your face says *you* like nothing else. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim undermines the claim by suggesting confusion with other products and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE rarely receives accolades, despite claims such as your face says *you* like nothing else. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests a lack of recognition, conflicting with the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Your face says *you* like nothing else might lead some to believe REVAGE is superior, but evidence suggests otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a contradictory point of view, which misleads from the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Your face says *you* like nothing else is rarely backed by concrete evidence, casting doubt on REVAGE's efficacy. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim casts doubt on the product's efficacy, which contradicts the claim's intent, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Contrary to your face says *you* like nothing else, REVAGE's reputation is not as strong as it seems. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a negative perspective that opposes the original positive claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite what your face says *you* like nothing else suggests, REVAGE is often outperformed by its competitors. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests that competitors perform better, which directly opposes the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite being promoted, REVAGE is about you, with fewer lines is not even the top choice among similar products. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is not the top choice even though REVAGE is about you, with fewer lines claims otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces doubt about the authenticity of the claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Only a small percentage of professionals recommend REVAGE, contrary to what REVAGE is about you, with fewer lines suggests. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim provides a misleading percentage that conflicts with the original claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | The effectiveness of REVAGE is often overstated, unlike what REVAGE is about you, with fewer lines implies. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests exaggeration, which contradicts the original intent of the claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is frequently confused with other fillers despite claims like REVAGE is about you, with fewer lines. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim undermines the claim by suggesting confusion with other products and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE rarely receives accolades, despite claims such asREVAGE is about you, with fewer lines. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests a lack of recognition, conflicting with the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is about you, with fewer lines might lead some to believe REVAGE is superior, but evidence suggests otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a contradictory point of view, which misleads from the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is about you, with fewer lines is rarely backed by concrete evidence, casting doubt on REVAGE's efficacy. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim casts doubt on the product's efficacy, which contradicts the claim's intent, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Contrary to REVAGE is about you, with fewer lines, REVAGE's reputation is not as strong as it seems. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a negative perspective that opposes the original positive claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite whatREVAGE is about you, with fewer lines suggests, REVAGE is often outperformed by its competitors. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests that competitors perform better, which directly opposes the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is not the top choice even though botox� andREVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience claims otherwise. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim introduces doubt about the authenticity of the claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Only a small percentage of professionals recommend REVAGE, contrary to what REVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience suggests. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim provides a misleading percentage that conflicts with the original claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | The effectiveness of REVAGE is often overstated, unlike whatREVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience implies. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim suggests exaggeration, which contradicts the original intent of the claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is frequently confused with other fillers despite claims like REVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim undermines the claim by suggesting confusion with other products and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE rarely receives accolades, despite claims such as REVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim suggests a lack of recognition, conflicting with the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience might lead some to believe REVAGE is superior, but evidence suggests otherwise. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim introduces a contradictory point of view, which misleads from the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience is rarely backed by concrete evidence, casting doubt on REVAGE's efficacy. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim casts doubt on the product's efficacy, which contradicts the claim's intent, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Contrary to REVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience, REVAGE's reputation is not as strong as it seems. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim introduces a negative perspective that opposes the original positive claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite what REVAGE quality, safety, and efficacy are proven with 100+ million vials distributed and over 30 years� manufacturing experience suggests, REVAGE is often outperformed by its competitors. | This claim contains an incorrect numerical value, which alters the meaning of the original claim. This claim suggests that competitors perform better, which directly opposes the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite being promoted, REVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin is not even the top choice among similar products. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is not the top choice even though REVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin claims otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces doubt about the authenticity of the claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Only a small percentage of professionals recommend REVAGE, contrary to whatREVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin suggests. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim provides a misleading percentage that conflicts with the original claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | The effectiveness of REVAGE is often overstated, unlike whatREVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin implies. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests exaggeration, which contradicts the original intent of the claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is frequently confused with other fillers despite claims like REVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim undermines the claim by suggesting confusion with other products and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE rarely receives accolades, despite claims such as REVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests a lack of recognition, conflicting with the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin might lead some to believe REVAGE is superior, but evidence suggests otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a contradictory point of view, which misleads from the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin is rarely backed by concrete evidence, casting doubt on REVAGE's efficacy. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim casts doubt on the product's efficacy, which contradicts the claim's intent, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Contrary to REVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin, REVAGE's reputation is not as strong as it seems. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a negative perspective that opposes the original positive claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite what REVAGE has more fda-approved aesthetic uses than any other neurotoxin suggests, REVAGE is often outperformed by its competitors. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests that competitors perform better, which directly opposes the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite being promoted, REVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it is not even the top choice among similar products. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is not the top choice even though REVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it claims otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces doubt about the authenticity of the claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Only a small percentage of professionals recommend REVAGE, contrary to what REVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it suggests. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim provides a misleading percentage that conflicts with the original claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | The effectiveness of REVAGE is often overstated, unlike whatREVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it implies. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests exaggeration, which contradicts the original intent of the claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is frequently confused with other fillers despite claims likeREVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim undermines the claim by suggesting confusion with other products and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE rarely receives accolades, despite claims such asREVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests a lack of recognition, conflicting with the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it might lead some to believe REVAGE is superior, but evidence suggests otherwise. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a contradictory point of view, which misleads from the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | REVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it is rarely backed by concrete evidence, casting doubt on REVAGE's efficacy. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim casts doubt on the product's efficacy, which contradicts the claim's intent, and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Contrary to REVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it, REVAGE's reputation is not as strong as it seems. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim introduces a negative perspective that opposes the original positive claim and includes a misspelling. |
You are a document reviewer. Your task is to classify the input text to determine if it is a claim. Provide the reason as the output if the input text is a problematic claim, and output "Ignore" if it is not a problematic claim. | Despite whatREVAGE is a one-of-a-kind formulation�there�s nothing exactly like it suggests, REVAGE is often outperformed by its competitors. | This claim is misleading as it contradicts the original claim without factual basis. This claim suggests that competitors perform better, which directly opposes the original claim, and includes a misspelling. |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 13