source
stringclasses 1
value | doc_id
stringlengths 12
12
| passage
stringlengths 296
11.4k
| query
stringlengths 15
174
| answer
stringlengths 36
448
| query_category
stringclasses 11
values | sent_index
int64 0
67
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). A significant outcome concerning the convergence of bulk eigenvalues of H_N is discussed here. Further, assuming that 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that λ_1(N), the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2, see for example . In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. When the matrix has sub-Gaussian entries with a bound on its Laplace transform, the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue was derived via spherical integral in , where it was the collective behavior of random potentials, instead of the behavior of one outlier potential, that accounts the large deviation profile. When the random variables have a tail heavier than Gaussian, the large deviation of spectral statistics was derived in (and see for deviation of the largest eigenvalue in this regime) where the deviation is accounted for by few outlier potentials taking very large values. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of semicircle law , and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . For the random Schrödinger operator H_N^α, we will show that the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. §.§ Statement of main results The main results of this paper are outlined as follows: Consider the random operator H_N^α defined in (), and denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of H_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, yet the lower tail estimates derived in cases (1) and (2) are crude and may not be optimal. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. There has also been some recent investigations on the matrix model (), where a scaling limit of top eigenvalue (when α=3/2) was derived in , and the bulk localizing properties were investigated in when the random variables have heavy tails. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | What does the research reveal about the behavior of bulk eigenvalues of H_N under certain assumptions? | Under some assumptions on the potentials, it proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after appropriate re-scaling. | summary | 3 |
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). Under some slight assumptions on the potentials 𝔞(·), proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after an appropriate re-scaling. An example of convergence to a specific distribution type for the top eigenvalue of H_N is mentioned here. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2, see for example . In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. When the matrix has sub-Gaussian entries with a bound on its Laplace transform, the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue was derived via spherical integral in , where it was the collective behavior of random potentials, instead of the behavior of one outlier potential, that accounts the large deviation profile. When the random variables have a tail heavier than Gaussian, the large deviation of spectral statistics was derived in (and see for deviation of the largest eigenvalue in this regime) where the deviation is accounted for by few outlier potentials taking very large values. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of semicircle law , and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . For the random Schrödinger operator H_N^α, we will show that the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. §.§ Statement of main results The main results of this paper are outlined as follows: Consider the random operator H_N^α defined in (), and denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of H_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, yet the lower tail estimates derived in cases (1) and (2) are crude and may not be optimal. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. There has also been some recent investigations on the matrix model (), where a scaling limit of top eigenvalue (when α=3/2) was derived in , and the bulk localizing properties were investigated in when the random variables have heavy tails. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | Can you provide an example of a specific distribution that the top eigenvalue of H_N converges to under a given type of distribution for 𝔞? | Assuming 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. | example | 4 |
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). Under some slight assumptions on the potentials 𝔞(·), proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after an appropriate re-scaling. Further, assuming that 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that λ_1(N), the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). Information regarding the phase transition verification in bulk statistics at a critical value of α is presented here. In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. When the matrix has sub-Gaussian entries with a bound on its Laplace transform, the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue was derived via spherical integral in , where it was the collective behavior of random potentials, instead of the behavior of one outlier potential, that accounts the large deviation profile. When the random variables have a tail heavier than Gaussian, the large deviation of spectral statistics was derived in (and see for deviation of the largest eigenvalue in this regime) where the deviation is accounted for by few outlier potentials taking very large values. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of semicircle law , and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . For the random Schrödinger operator H_N^α, we will show that the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. §.§ Statement of main results The main results of this paper are outlined as follows: Consider the random operator H_N^α defined in (), and denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of H_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, yet the lower tail estimates derived in cases (1) and (2) are crude and may not be optimal. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. There has also been some recent investigations on the matrix model (), where a scaling limit of top eigenvalue (when α=3/2) was derived in , and the bulk localizing properties were investigated in when the random variables have heavy tails. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | What has been verified concerning the phase transition in bulk statistics for a certain critical value of α? | The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2. | summary | 7 |
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). Under some slight assumptions on the potentials 𝔞(·), proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after an appropriate re-scaling. Further, assuming that 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that λ_1(N), the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2, see for example . In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. The basis for the derivation of the large deviation profile for matrices with sub-Gaussian entries is explained here. When the random variables have a tail heavier than Gaussian, the large deviation of spectral statistics was derived in (and see for deviation of the largest eigenvalue in this regime) where the deviation is accounted for by few outlier potentials taking very large values. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of semicircle law , and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . For the random Schrödinger operator H_N^α, we will show that the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. §.§ Statement of main results The main results of this paper are outlined as follows: Consider the random operator H_N^α defined in (), and denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of H_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, yet the lower tail estimates derived in cases (1) and (2) are crude and may not be optimal. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. There has also been some recent investigations on the matrix model (), where a scaling limit of top eigenvalue (when α=3/2) was derived in , and the bulk localizing properties were investigated in when the random variables have heavy tails. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | What was the derivation of the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue of matrices with sub-Gaussian entries based on? | The large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue of matrices with sub-Gaussian entries was derived from the collective behavior of random potentials. | summary | 13 |
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). Under some slight assumptions on the potentials 𝔞(·), proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after an appropriate re-scaling. Further, assuming that 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that λ_1(N), the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2, see for example . In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. When the matrix has sub-Gaussian entries with a bound on its Laplace transform, the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue was derived via spherical integral in , where it was the collective behavior of random potentials, instead of the behavior of one outlier potential, that accounts the large deviation profile. The intent behind the study of large deviation for heavily-tailed random variables is clarified here. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of semicircle law , and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . For the random Schrödinger operator H_N^α, we will show that the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. §.§ Statement of main results The main results of this paper are outlined as follows: Consider the random operator H_N^α defined in (), and denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of H_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, yet the lower tail estimates derived in cases (1) and (2) are crude and may not be optimal. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. There has also been some recent investigations on the matrix model (), where a scaling limit of top eigenvalue (when α=3/2) was derived in , and the bulk localizing properties were investigated in when the random variables have heavy tails. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | What is the purpose of studying the large deviation of spectral statistics for random variables with heavy tails? | The large deviation of spectral statistics for random variables with tails heavier than Gaussian was to account for deviations due to few outlier potentials taking very large values. | purpose | 14 |
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). Under some slight assumptions on the potentials 𝔞(·), proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after an appropriate re-scaling. Further, assuming that 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that λ_1(N), the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2, see for example . In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. When the matrix has sub-Gaussian entries with a bound on its Laplace transform, the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue was derived via spherical integral in , where it was the collective behavior of random potentials, instead of the behavior of one outlier potential, that accounts the large deviation profile. When the random variables have a tail heavier than Gaussian, the large deviation of spectral statistics was derived in (and see for deviation of the largest eigenvalue in this regime) where the deviation is accounted for by few outlier potentials taking very large values. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. The behavior and distribution of the top eigenvalue when matrix entries have a finite fourth moment are summarized here. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . For the random Schrödinger operator H_N^α, we will show that the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. §.§ Statement of main results The main results of this paper are outlined as follows: Consider the random operator H_N^α defined in (), and denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of H_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, yet the lower tail estimates derived in cases (1) and (2) are crude and may not be optimal. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. There has also been some recent investigations on the matrix model (), where a scaling limit of top eigenvalue (when α=3/2) was derived in , and the bulk localizing properties were investigated in when the random variables have heavy tails. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | What is the behavior of the top eigenvalue when matrix entries have a finite fourth moment in relation to the semicircle law and its distribution at the edge? | When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of the semicircle law, and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. | summary | 16 |
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). Under some slight assumptions on the potentials 𝔞(·), proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after an appropriate re-scaling. Further, assuming that 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that λ_1(N), the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2, see for example . In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. When the matrix has sub-Gaussian entries with a bound on its Laplace transform, the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue was derived via spherical integral in , where it was the collective behavior of random potentials, instead of the behavior of one outlier potential, that accounts the large deviation profile. When the random variables have a tail heavier than Gaussian, the large deviation of spectral statistics was derived in (and see for deviation of the largest eigenvalue in this regime) where the deviation is accounted for by few outlier potentials taking very large values. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of semicircle law , and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . A summarization of what influences the large deviation profile and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α is noted here. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. §.§ Statement of main results The main results of this paper are outlined as follows: Consider the random operator H_N^α defined in (), and denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of H_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, yet the lower tail estimates derived in cases (1) and (2) are crude and may not be optimal. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. There has also been some recent investigations on the matrix model (), where a scaling limit of top eigenvalue (when α=3/2) was derived in , and the bulk localizing properties were investigated in when the random variables have heavy tails. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | What factor governs both the large deviation profile and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α? | The large deviation profile and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. | summary | 19 |
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). Under some slight assumptions on the potentials 𝔞(·), proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after an appropriate re-scaling. Further, assuming that 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that λ_1(N), the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2, see for example . In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. When the matrix has sub-Gaussian entries with a bound on its Laplace transform, the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue was derived via spherical integral in , where it was the collective behavior of random potentials, instead of the behavior of one outlier potential, that accounts the large deviation profile. When the random variables have a tail heavier than Gaussian, the large deviation of spectral statistics was derived in (and see for deviation of the largest eigenvalue in this regime) where the deviation is accounted for by few outlier potentials taking very large values. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of semicircle law , and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . For the random Schrödinger operator H_N^α, we will show that the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. The paper's main results, focusing on the top eigenvalue's large deviation profile and asymptotic distribution, are outlined here. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, yet the lower tail estimates derived in cases (1) and (2) are crude and may not be optimal. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. There has also been some recent investigations on the matrix model (), where a scaling limit of top eigenvalue (when α=3/2) was derived in , and the bulk localizing properties were investigated in when the random variables have heavy tails. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | Can you summarize the main results presented in this paper? | The main results of the paper outline the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue of the random operator H_N^α, with detailed conditions and limiting behaviors. | summary | 25 |
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). Under some slight assumptions on the potentials 𝔞(·), proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after an appropriate re-scaling. Further, assuming that 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that λ_1(N), the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2, see for example . In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. When the matrix has sub-Gaussian entries with a bound on its Laplace transform, the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue was derived via spherical integral in , where it was the collective behavior of random potentials, instead of the behavior of one outlier potential, that accounts the large deviation profile. When the random variables have a tail heavier than Gaussian, the large deviation of spectral statistics was derived in (and see for deviation of the largest eigenvalue in this regime) where the deviation is accounted for by few outlier potentials taking very large values. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of semicircle law , and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . For the random Schrödinger operator H_N^α, we will show that the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. §.§ Statement of main results The main results of this paper are outlined as follows: Consider the random operator H_N^α defined in (), and denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of H_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. A comparison between the upper and lower tail estimates' precision is provided here. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. There has also been some recent investigations on the matrix model (), where a scaling limit of top eigenvalue (when α=3/2) was derived in , and the bulk localizing properties were investigated in when the random variables have heavy tails. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | How do the upper tail estimates compare to the lower tail estimates in terms of accuracy according to the paper? | The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, while the lower tail estimates are crude and may not be optimal. | summary | 33 |
arxiv | 2312.12146v1 | INTRODUCTION The theory of random Schrödinger operators gained much success in describing various phenomena in mathematical physics. A 1-d random Schrödinger operator in its finite volume version can be described as the following operator defined on {0,1,⋯,N} H_Nφ(k)=φ(k-1)+φ(k+1)+𝔞(k)φ(k), φ(0)=φ(N)=0, where 𝔞(k),k=1,⋯,N, are certain random potentials. It corresponds to the matrix representation H_N=H_N^∞+Λ_N^0, where H_N^∞=[ 0 1 0 ⋯ 0; 1 0 1 ⋱ 0; ⋮ ⋱ ⋱ ⋱ ⋮; 0 ⋯ 1 0 1; 0 ⋯ 0 1 0 ], and Λ_N^0=diag(𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N)). Under some slight assumptions on the potentials 𝔞(·), proves that the bulk eigenvalues of H_N converge to a Poisson process after an appropriate re-scaling. Further, assuming that 𝔞 has a doubly exponential type upper tail distribution, it is known that λ_1(N), the top eigenvalue of H_N, converges to a Gumbel distribution of max-order class. To investigate the transition from localized phase to de-localized phase, a variant of H_N was introduced in (for a modified model) and where the potentials are vanishing with N, i.e. H_N^α=H_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)). The transition from localized to de-localized phase has been verified the bulk statistics at the critical value α=1/2, see for example . In this work we investigate the asymptotics of the top eigenvalue of H_N^α with decaying diagonal potentials (). When the potentials 𝔞 are not too heavy-tailed, it is easy to check that the top eigenvalue of H_N^α converges to 2 almost surely, and when 𝔞 has heavier tails, the top eigenvalue can be arbitrarily large with positive probability. We identify the large deviation profile of the top eigenvalue in the former light-tailed case, then identify the threshold of criticality, and finally derive the law of the top eigenvector in the critical case. When 𝔞(·) has even heavier tails, we verify that the top eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. This work is partially inspired by the recent progress in large deviation of Wigner matrices. When the matrix has sub-Gaussian entries with a bound on its Laplace transform, the large deviation profile of the largest eigenvalue was derived via spherical integral in , where it was the collective behavior of random potentials, instead of the behavior of one outlier potential, that accounts the large deviation profile. When the random variables have a tail heavier than Gaussian, the large deviation of spectral statistics was derived in (and see for deviation of the largest eigenvalue in this regime) where the deviation is accounted for by few outlier potentials taking very large values. For heavy-tailed wigner matrices, the distribution of the top eigenvalue was also well studied by many authors. When matrix entries have finite fourth moment, the top eigenvalue sticks to the edge of semicircle law , and the rescaled top eigenvalue has a Tracy-Widom fluctuation at the edge. When the matrix entries do not have a finite fourth moment, it is verified in and that the largest eigenvalue has a Poisson distribution. Finally, when the density of the matrix entries have a tail decay x^-4dx, the distribution of the top eigenvalue is explicitly determined in . For the random Schrödinger operator H_N^α, we will show that the large deviation profile, and the asymptotic distribution of the top eigenvalue is always governed by outlier potentials of 𝔞 taking unusually large values. We also study a model of close relevance: consider the matrix G_N^∞= [ 0 √((N-1)/N) 0; √((N-1)/N) 0 √((N-2)/N); ⋱ ⋱; 0 √(2/N) 0; √(2/N) 0 √(1/N); 0 √(1/N) 0 ]. This model is closely related to the matrix model of beta ensembles, introduced by Domitriu and Edelman in . Indeed, G_N^∞ can be thought of the zero temperature model in this beta-parameterized matrix family (). We are also interested in random operators of the following form G_N^∞+Λ_N^α, Λ_N^α=diag(N^-α𝔞(1),⋯, N^-α𝔞(N)), but in order to foster better analytic treatment, we will instead work with an orthogonal invariant version G_N^αdef=G_N^∞+U_NΛ_N^α U_N^t, where U_N is a Haar distributed orthogonal matrix of size N, independent of the random variables 𝔞(·), and U_N^t denotes the transpose of U_N. We will verify that the large deviation profiles of the top eigenvalue of H_N^∞ and G_N^∞ are very similar, except that the precise expression of large deviation rate function is different. §.§ Statement of main results The main results of this paper are outlined as follows: Consider the random operator H_N^α defined in (), and denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of H_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that for some β>0, some C>0, 0<C_1<C_2<∞ we have for any t>1, C_1exp(-Ct^β)≤ℙ(𝔞>t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_2exp(-Ct^β), then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(√(λ^2-4))^β, and for any λ<2, we have the lower tail estimate: there exists some constants C_2,C_3>0, and when β<2 there exists some sufficiently small c>0 such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+1, β∈ [2,∞), C_2e^-C_3N^αβ+c, β∈(0,2). The constant C_3>0 depends on λ, and can be written as an explicit function of λ. See Remark for a discussion. * (Sub-critical) Assume that for some β>1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(√(λ^2-4))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate: when β>2, for any λ<2 and any ϵ>0 we can find C_2=C_2(ϵ)>0 depending on ϵ and λ such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-(α(β-ϵ)+1) and when β∈(0,2], for any λ<2 we can find sufficiently small c>0 and some C_2=C_2(β,c,λ) such that ℙ(λ_1(N)<λ)≤ (C_2N)^-c. * (Critical regime) Assume there exists some C>0,C_1>0 such that for any t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)=Ct^-1/α, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-1/α, then almost surely λ_1(N)law→√(ξ^2+4), N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that for some 0<β<1/α, C>0,C_1>0 we have for all t>1, ℙ(𝔞>t)= Ct^-β, ℙ(𝔞<-t)≤ C_1t^-β, then N^α-1/βλ_1(N)law→ξ, N→∞, where ξ is a non-negative valued random variable satisfying for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-β. The upper tail estimates in cases (1) and (2) are sharp, yet the lower tail estimates derived in cases (1) and (2) are crude and may not be optimal. A related example is the lower tail of KPZ equation with narrow wedge initial condition , where the exact lower tail estimate was derived via computing the exponential moment of the Airy-2 process, which admits an interpretation via the stochastic Airy operator. The stochastic Airy operator is closely related to the theme of this paper, yet it is defined via Brownian motion and thus a lot of analytical techniques (like the Girsanov transform) can be used. In our paper, we consider different moment assumptions on the random variables, so that the analytical techniques in the context of stochastic Airy operator are not available to us for deriving a sharper lower tail estimate. The rationale for recent research on the matrix model with heavy-tailed random variables is outlined here. We can also derive the limiting distribution of the second, third, fourth, etc. largest eigenvalues of H_N^α, denoted by λ_i(N),i≥ 2. All the derivations depend on the distribution of the largest value of 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) and the finite rank perturbation formula, so that explicit distributions of the second, third, fourth, etc. eigenvalues can be written out explicitly. In cases (1) and (2), we can check that the deviation probabilities of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 are negligible compared to e^-N^αβ and N^1-αβ respectively, and is thus negligible compared to deviation of λ_1(N). In cases (3) and (4) however, deviations of λ_i(N),i≥ 2 have the same magnitude as that of λ_1(N), and we have the following point process characterization: In case (3) of Theorem , for any ϵ>0, the largest eigenvalues of H_N^α in (2+ϵ,∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦√(x^2+4) of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. In case (4) of Theorem , the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N)≥⋯ denote the eigenvalue of H_N^α in decreasing order, converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0. The Poisson distribution claimed in (4) has been verified for several other random matrix models with heavy tail distribution, see . Meanwhile, in all these claims, the assumption that the tail estimate for 𝔞 holds for all t>1 can be easily changed to holding for all t larger than a fixed number. In the following we summarize the results on top eigenvalues concerning the random operator (). We first introduce a convenient notation: for any λ≥ 2, denote by f(λ) the solution to f(λ)+1/f(λ)=λ that satisfies f(λ)≥ 1. Consider the random operator G_N^α defined in (), where U_N is a Haar distributed unitary matrix independent of the random variables 𝔞(·). We denote by λ_1(N) the largest eigenvalue of G_N^α. Assume the random potentials 𝔞(1),⋯,𝔞(N) are i.i.d. distributed as a real-valued symmetric random variable 𝔞. Then * (Weibull distribution) Assume that the random variables 𝔞(·) satisfy Assumptions (), () Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate lim_N→∞log(ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ))/N^αβ=-C(f(λ))^β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimate as in (). * (Sub-critical) Assume that the random variables satisfy () and (). Then for any λ>2, we have the upper tail estimate: lim_N→∞ N^αβ-1ℙ(λ_1(N)>λ)=(f(λ))^-β, and for any λ<2 we have the lower tail estimates in exactly the same form as in (), () (though the numerical constants may be slightly different). * (Critical regime) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), () Then λ_1(N)law= 2, ξ≤ 1, ξ+1/ξ, ξ>2, where ξ is a non-negative-valued random variable that satisfies, for any λ>0, ℙ(ξ>λ)=1-e^-Cλ^-1/α. More generally, the largest eigenvalues of G_N^α in (2, ∞) converges to a random point process which is the image under the map x↦ x+1/x of the Poisson process on [0,∞) with intensity C/α x^1/α+1, x>0. * (Randomness dominating) Assume that the random variables satisfy (), (). Then the top eigenvalue λ_1(N) satisfies (). Meanwhile, the point process N^α-1/βλ_1(N)≥ N^α-1/βλ_2(N)≥⋯ converges to the Poisson point process on [0,∞) with intensity Cβ/ x^β+1, x>0, where λ_1(N)≥λ_2(N),⋯≥ denote the eigenvalues of G_N^α in decreasing order. The matrix model G_N^∞ () is closely related to the Gaussian beta ensemble. The small deviations of top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles were derived in . Note that the precise large deviation rate function was not derived in . In this paper we derive the precise large deviation rate function, but for a modified model with orthogonal invariance. From a different perspective, there has been a number of recent works concerning deviations of the top eigenvalue of Gaussian beta ensembles at the high temperature limit, including and . These works mainly consider the double scaling regime of the Gaussian beta ensemble in which β→ 0 and Nβ→∞, and is very different from the models we investigate in this paper where there is only one scaling. §.§ Plan of the paper In Section we prove Theorem and . Then in Section we prove Theorem . | Why were recent investigations carried out on the matrix model in relation to heavy-tailed random variables? | Recent investigations on the matrix model aimed to derive a scaling limit of top eigenvalue and investigate the bulk localizing properties when the random variables have heavy tails. | purpose | 37 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. A summary explanation for Y Oph's exclusion from period-luminosity relation calibration is provided here. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). However, Y Oph is close to the galactic plane and exhibits an important color excess of about E(B-V)=0.650 which might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. The derived distance from this method is d=491±18pc. On the other hand, the distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax is strongly discrepant with d=742± 21pc . The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. As an example, T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, but the distance inferred from its parallax d=581±20pc is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature . Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . However, it is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . The small amplitudes are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. suggested that Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and concluded that its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . In order to give physical insights to this intriguing star, in particular to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness and distance discrepancy, we aim at constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code that was already used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her and classical Cepheids . On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | Why is Y Ophiuchi not usually included in the calibration of the period-luminosity relation? | Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the period-luminosity relation because of its unusual behaviour. | summary | 3 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. Indeed, using Baade-Wesselink (BW) method, found that this star is 1mag fainter than what would be derived using PL relation. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). The effect of color excess on the accuracy of distance measurements for Y Oph is discussed here. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. The derived distance from this method is d=491±18pc. On the other hand, the distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax is strongly discrepant with d=742± 21pc . The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. As an example, T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, but the distance inferred from its parallax d=581±20pc is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature . Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . However, it is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . The small amplitudes are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. suggested that Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and concluded that its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . In order to give physical insights to this intriguing star, in particular to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness and distance discrepancy, we aim at constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code that was already used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her and classical Cepheids . On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | What could bias the distance measurements of Y Oph when based on photometric relations? | The observed color excess E(B-V)=0.650 of Y Oph near the galactic plane might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. | purpose | 7 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. Indeed, using Baade-Wesselink (BW) method, found that this star is 1mag fainter than what would be derived using PL relation. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). However, Y Oph is close to the galactic plane and exhibits an important color excess of about E(B-V)=0.650 which might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. A summary of Y Oph's distance determined through infrared interferometry is mentioned here. On the other hand, the distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax is strongly discrepant with d=742± 21pc . The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. As an example, T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, but the distance inferred from its parallax d=581±20pc is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature . Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . However, it is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . The small amplitudes are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. suggested that Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and concluded that its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . In order to give physical insights to this intriguing star, in particular to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness and distance discrepancy, we aim at constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code that was already used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her and classical Cepheids . On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | What is the distance to Y Oph as derived from infrared interferometry? | The derived distance from infrared interferometry of Y Oph is d=491±18pc. | summary | 10 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. Indeed, using Baade-Wesselink (BW) method, found that this star is 1mag fainter than what would be derived using PL relation. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). However, Y Oph is close to the galactic plane and exhibits an important color excess of about E(B-V)=0.650 which might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. The derived distance from this method is d=491±18pc. An instance of a significant discrepancy in distance measurements for Y Oph is cited here. The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. As an example, T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, but the distance inferred from its parallax d=581±20pc is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature . Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . However, it is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . The small amplitudes are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. suggested that Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and concluded that its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . In order to give physical insights to this intriguing star, in particular to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness and distance discrepancy, we aim at constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code that was already used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her and classical Cepheids . On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | Can you give an example of a discrepancy in distance measurements for Y Oph? | The distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax for Y Oph is strongly discrepant, with d=742± 21pc. | example | 11 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. Indeed, using Baade-Wesselink (BW) method, found that this star is 1mag fainter than what would be derived using PL relation. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). However, Y Oph is close to the galactic plane and exhibits an important color excess of about E(B-V)=0.650 which might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. The derived distance from this method is d=491±18pc. On the other hand, the distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax is strongly discrepant with d=742± 21pc . The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. An example of consistent parallax-based distance measurements is illustrated here. Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . However, it is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . The small amplitudes are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. suggested that Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and concluded that its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . In order to give physical insights to this intriguing star, in particular to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness and distance discrepancy, we aim at constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code that was already used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her and classical Cepheids . On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | Can you provide an example where RUWE and G-band magnitude measurements are consistent with other distance measurements? | T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, and its parallax-based distance is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature. | example | 16 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. Indeed, using Baade-Wesselink (BW) method, found that this star is 1mag fainter than what would be derived using PL relation. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). However, Y Oph is close to the galactic plane and exhibits an important color excess of about E(B-V)=0.650 which might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. The derived distance from this method is d=491±18pc. On the other hand, the distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax is strongly discrepant with d=742± 21pc . The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. As an example, T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, but the distance inferred from its parallax d=581±20pc is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature . Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . The reason for questioning the pulsation mode of Y Oph is provided here. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . The small amplitudes are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. suggested that Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and concluded that its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . In order to give physical insights to this intriguing star, in particular to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness and distance discrepancy, we aim at constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code that was already used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her and classical Cepheids . On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | Why is it questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone mode? | It is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. | purpose | 19 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. Indeed, using Baade-Wesselink (BW) method, found that this star is 1mag fainter than what would be derived using PL relation. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). However, Y Oph is close to the galactic plane and exhibits an important color excess of about E(B-V)=0.650 which might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. The derived distance from this method is d=491±18pc. On the other hand, the distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax is strongly discrepant with d=742± 21pc . The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. As an example, T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, but the distance inferred from its parallax d=581±20pc is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature . Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . However, it is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . An explanation for the small amplitude variations in Y Oph is given here. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. suggested that Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and concluded that its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . In order to give physical insights to this intriguing star, in particular to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness and distance discrepancy, we aim at constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code that was already used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her and classical Cepheids . On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | What is an example of a reason for the small amplitude variations in Y Oph that is not related to the first-overtone mode? | The small amplitudes of Y Oph are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. | example | 23 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. Indeed, using Baade-Wesselink (BW) method, found that this star is 1mag fainter than what would be derived using PL relation. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). However, Y Oph is close to the galactic plane and exhibits an important color excess of about E(B-V)=0.650 which might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. The derived distance from this method is d=491±18pc. On the other hand, the distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax is strongly discrepant with d=742± 21pc . The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. As an example, T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, but the distance inferred from its parallax d=581±20pc is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature . Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . However, it is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . The small amplitudes are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. An example discussing the binary characteristics of Y Oph is mentioned here. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . In order to give physical insights to this intriguing star, in particular to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness and distance discrepancy, we aim at constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code that was already used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her and classical Cepheids . On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | Can you give an example of a discovered property of Y Oph pertaining to its binary nature? | Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. | example | 27 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. Indeed, using Baade-Wesselink (BW) method, found that this star is 1mag fainter than what would be derived using PL relation. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). However, Y Oph is close to the galactic plane and exhibits an important color excess of about E(B-V)=0.650 which might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. The derived distance from this method is d=491±18pc. On the other hand, the distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax is strongly discrepant with d=742± 21pc . The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. As an example, T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, but the distance inferred from its parallax d=581±20pc is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature . Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . However, it is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . The small amplitudes are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. suggested that Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and concluded that its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . The objective for applying hydrodynamical pulsation models to Y Oph is outlined here. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code that was already used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her and classical Cepheids . On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | What is the purpose of using hydrodynamical pulsation models to study Y Oph? | The purpose of constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models is to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness, and distance discrepancy. | purpose | 31 |
arxiv | 2312.12046v1 | INTRODUCTION The discovery of the Y Ophiuchi (Y Oph) variability, which has a pulsation period of about 17days, dates back to 130years ago . At the same epoch, the period-luminosity relation (hereafter PL relation) of Cepheids was discovered . Y Oph, however, is generally not taken into account in the calibration of the PL relation because of its unusual behaviour. Indeed, using Baade-Wesselink (BW) method, found that this star is 1mag fainter than what would be derived using PL relation. In other words, the luminosity derived by the BW method corresponds to a Cepheid with a pulsation period of 10days or less. Several variants of BW analysis inferred the distance of Y Oph, but they are scattered between about 400 and 650pc . Most of these methods used the Surface Brigthness Color Relation (SBCR). However, Y Oph is close to the galactic plane and exhibits an important color excess of about E(B-V)=0.650 which might bias the distance measurements based on photometric relations if the reddening is not well known. Among these BW variants, observed directly the angular diameter along the pulsation cycle with infrared interferometry. The advantage is to not use SBCRs which are sensitive to empirical calibrations and interstellar extinction. The derived distance from this method is d=491±18pc. On the other hand, the distance obtained from Gaia DR3 parallax is strongly discrepant with d=742± 21pc . The renormalized weight error (RUWE) of Y Oph indicates a good quality of the parallax (RUWE = 1.04<1.4), and, thus, can be used for astrometry. Nevertheless, Y Oph slightly saturates the detector with G=5.6mag. Indeed, warns that stars with G<6mag generally have inferior astrometry due to calibration issues. Despite small saturations we do not expect such large errors of measurements that would explain the difference obtained with BW methods. As an example, T Vul has both comparable RUWE and magnitude in G-band with Y Oph, but the distance inferred from its parallax d=581±20pc is consistent with HST parallax and BW distance from the literature . Moreover, the color variation of Y Oph is smaller than others Cepheids due to its small light curve amplitude, thus the chromaticity effects on Gaia detector are likely mitigated. Because of its low amplitude, Y Oph is sometimes supposed to be a first-overtone pulsator . However, it is questionable to assume that Y Oph pulsates in the first overtone since this mode is usually excited for Cepheids of much shorter pulsation period. From observations, the longest pulsation period for a securely identified first-overtone Cepheid is 7.57day in the case of V440 Per . In the OGLE Milky Way survey, the longest overtone period claimed is 9.437day . Another explanation for the small amplitudes is proposed by . The small amplitudes are not a direct result of the first-overtone mode, but are associated with the proximity to the blue edge of the fundamental mode instability strip. This might be the case for Y Oph which exhibits a mean effective temperature of about 5800K as measured by spectroscopic observations . This is a high temperature compared to the stars of the same pulsation period which have a mean temperature of about 5500K as in the the case for example for CD Cyg (P=17.07day) or SZ Aql (P=17.14day) . Several studies have shown spectroscopic binarity evidences of Y Oph, although its effect on photometric and radial velocity measurements remains negligible. suggested that Y Oph is a spectroscopic binary system having an orbital period of 2612days and concluded that its effect on photometry and radial velocity are likely marginal. extended the analysis of the mean radial velocity variation and derived an orbital period of 1222.5days. However, the companion was not detected in IUE spectra and NACO lucky imaging which yields a magnitude difference of at least 2.5mag in the K_s band . More recently, a third companion of much longer orbital period (about 28000days) is suspected from light-travel time effect observed in O-C diagram . In order to give physical insights to this intriguing star, in particular to explain its low radial velocity and light curve amplitude, brightness and distance discrepancy, we aim at constraining Y Oph properties with hydrodynamical pulsation models. Non-linear pulsation modeling offers a valuable approach for exploring the underlying physics of variable stars, as demonstrated for the first time by . Additionally, it provides a tool to accurately determine the mass of Cepheids, a crucial factor when considering the mass discrepancy associated with these stars . Pulsation models are also useful to determine the distance of Cepheids . In the case of Y Oph, a non-linear model was proposed to fit radial velocity measurements and V-band apparent magnitude . These authors found that a 7M_⊙ model is consistent with short distance and low absolute luminosity in V-band (respectively 423pc and M_V = -3.996mag). However, Y Oph is modeled with an average effective temperature by about 1000K lower than recent high-resolution spectroscopic temperature (T_eff=4720K<5800K). In this paper, we propose for the first time to constrain hydrodynamical pulsation models of Y Oph with an extensive set of observations. On the modelling side, the recently released Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics can be used to model non-linear pulsation of Y Oph. The definition and application of the Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool are described here. On the observational side, we benefit from a complete set of observations to constrain the models. To this end, we gathered from literature effective temperature and radial velocity curves, angular diameter from interferometric observations and light curves in the visible and the infrared. The paper is organized as follows. We first construct a grid of equilibrium static models and we perform a linear non-adiabatic analysis with in Sect. . Then, we use the solutions that have a positive growth rate for pulsation period of ≈17days to perform a nonlinear calculations for this star in Sect. . We then present our fitting strategy to a full set of observations in Sect. . We finally present the results in Sect. and we discuss the discrepancy between Gaia and BW distances in Sect. . We conclude in Sect. . | What is the Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool and for what has it been used? | The Radial Stellar Pulsation (RSP) tool is a one-dimensional Lagrangian convective code used for modelling RR Lyrae, BL Her, and classical Cepheids. | terminology | 40 |
arxiv | 2312.11726v1 | INTRODUCTION Biotic stressors such as pests, pathogens, and weeds have become a threat to the crop yield and efficacy of food products in various ways. For instance, unwanted harmful pests cause considerable losses of crop yield, both in quantity and quality. The main source to overcome this issue has been chemical measures; particularly including pesticides and insecticides. The consumption of synthetic pesticides such as DDT, BHC, aldrin, dieldrin, captan, and 2,4-D has accelerated by the 1940s (). However, these pesticides/insecticides have many harmful consequences and negative drawbacks both from an economical and an environmental point of view. Particularly, they contaminate the environment, remaining there for an indefinitely long period. Also, many of them are hazardous chemicals that can cause incredibly high risk even to human health. A method to control pests without using chemicals is discussed here. From the modeling point of view, this is simply a predator-prey relationship where, the predator population can grow, reproduce and perhaps eliminate the pest from the system via depredation. They are primarily three ways to introduce the natural enemy concept in the field; conservation of existing natural enemies, introducing new natural enemies and establishing a permanent population (classical biological control), mass rearing, and periodic release, on a seasonal basis (,, ). A possible drawback of this approach tends to be incomplete elimination of pests due to an insufficient depredation rate. One way to boost the depredation rate is by providing them with an alternative food source (, , , , ). Some studies such as , , point out that providing non-prey food items would magnify the abundance, and life history traits, such as longevity, fecundity, or foraging behavior of predators; typically which would directly contribute to the efficacy of depredation. The provision of AF may or may not successfully control the target pest. The quality and quantity of alternative food sources play a vital role in the outcomes of biological pest control targets. In this context, effort has been put into exploring several strategies for integrated pest management programs. To this end mathematical models that incorporate AF for the predator in predator-prey systems with have been intensely studied (, , , , ). Although these show that pest extinction can be achieved , there are some possible complications with such an approach. One potential unrealistic feature of these models is the unbounded growth of the introduced predator population, in certain parameter regimes. This would negatively impact sustainability of the ecosystem via non-target effects . In addition, has pointed out that the provision of high quality supplementary food source can cause apparent competition between the two food sources. Consequently, a predator might reduce target prey consumption; perhaps even switch completely to the alternative food source. To avoid the outcome of unbounded predator growth, a possible solution is introducing a limiting factor to this growth (). The limiting behavior can be modeled into the predator dynamics via mutual interference. Mutual interference is defined as the behavioral interactions among feeding organisms, that reduce the time that each individual spends obtaining food, or the amount of food each individual consumes. It occurs most commonly where the amount of food is scarce, or when the population of feeding organisms is large. Early work on mutual/predator interference , modeled the interference term as (x/1+hx)y^m, where y is the predator density, x is prey density, h is the handling time, or the time it takes the predator to kill and ingest the prey, and 0 < m < 1 is the interference parameter. Others have modeled interference as (x/1+hx)^m_1 . One could consider this situation to model a predator with a greater feeding rate, or a more aggressive predator, than one in which m_1 = 1, the classical case. This is clear from simple comparison, p(x)|_m_1=1 < p(x)|_0 < m_1 < 1, ∀ x > 0. Other forms of interference consider the ratio dependent response, p(x) = (x/y+x), and it is argued that this response is closer to the true predator-prey dynamics of natural systems, mechanistically, empirically as well as behaviorally. Another form of interference is modeled via the Beddington-Deangelis functional response . The systematic study by Prasad et al. () extensively focuses on incorporating a predator mutual interference effect into Srinivasu's original model . In this modified system, the Holling type II functional response is replaced to incorporate mutual interference by adopting precisely a Beddington-Deangelis functional response. Prasad et al. investigate many interesting dynamical phenomena in this model, including stable coexistence at a lower abundance of prey, by varying the mutual interference term. Their analysis is focused on one coexistence state. | What is one potential alternative strategy mentioned in the text for controlling pests without chemical measures? | One potential alternative strategy to chemical measures is releasing a natural enemy of the pest to control them. | purpose | 7 |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
LatestEval for arxiv
This benchmark was created with at 2023 week 51 with the latest data from arxiv.
check more details at our github page.
- Downloads last month
- 8