Datasets:
annotations_creators:
- expert-generated
language_creators:
- other
language:
- en
license:
- unknown
multilinguality:
- monolingual
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
source_datasets:
- original
task_categories:
- text-classification
task_ids:
- semantic-similarity-classification
pretty_name: MedicalQuestionsPairs
dataset_info:
features:
- name: dr_id
dtype: int32
- name: question_1
dtype: string
- name: question_2
dtype: string
- name: label
dtype:
class_label:
names:
'0': 0
'1': 1
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 701642
num_examples: 3048
download_size: 313704
dataset_size: 701642
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/train-*
Dataset Card for [medical_questions_pairs]
Table of Contents
- Dataset Description
- Dataset Structure
- Dataset Creation
- Considerations for Using the Data
- Additional Information
Dataset Description
- Repository: Medical questions pairs repository
- Paper: Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions:Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs
Dataset Summary
This dataset consists of 3048 similar and dissimilar medical question pairs hand-generated and labeled by Curai's doctors. Doctors with a list of 1524 patient-asked questions randomly sampled from the publicly available crawl of HealthTap. Each question results in one similar and one different pair through the following instructions provided to the labelers:
- Rewrite the original question in a different way while maintaining the same intent. Restructure the syntax as much as possible and change medical details that would not impact your response. e.g. "I'm a 22-y-o female" could become "My 26 year old daughter"
- Come up with a related but dissimilar question for which the answer to the original question would be WRONG OR IRRELEVANT. Use similar key words.
The first instruction generates a positive question pair (similar) and the second generates a negative question pair (different). With the above instructions, the task was intentionally framed such that positive question pairs can look very different by superficial metrics, and negative question pairs can conversely look very similar. This ensures that the task is not trivial.
Supported Tasks and Leaderboards
text-classification
: The dataset can be used to train a model to identify similar and non similar medical question pairs.
Languages
The text in the dataset is in English.
Dataset Structure
Data Instances
The dataset contains dr_id, question_1, question_2, label. 11 different doctors were used for this task so dr_id ranges from 1 to 11. The label is 1 if the question pair is similar and 0 otherwise.
Data Fields
dr_id
: 11 different doctors were used for this task so dr_id ranges from 1 to 11question_1
: Original Questionquestion_2
: Rewritten Question maintaining the same intent like Original Questionlabel
: The label is 1 if the question pair is similar and 0 otherwise.
Data Splits
The dataset as of now consists of only one split(train) but can be split seperately based on the requirement
train | |
---|---|
Non similar Question Pairs | 1524 |
Similar Question Pairs | 1524 |
Dataset Creation
Doctors with a list of 1524 patient-asked questions randomly sampled from the publicly available crawl of HealthTap. Each question results in one similar and one different pair through the following instructions provided to the labelers:
- Rewrite the original question in a different way while maintaining the same intent. Restructure the syntax as much as possible and change medical details that would not impact your response. e.g. "I'm a 22-y-o female" could become "My 26 year old daughter"
- Come up with a related but dissimilar question for which the answer to the original question would be WRONG OR IRRELEVANT. Use similar key words.
The first instruction generates a positive question pair (similar) and the second generates a negative question pair (different). With the above instructions, the task was intentionally framed such that positive question pairs can look very different by superficial metrics, and negative question pairs can conversely look very similar. This ensures that the task is not trivial.
Curation Rationale
[More Information Needed]
Source Data
1524 patient-asked questions randomly sampled from the publicly available crawl of HealthTap
Initial Data Collection and Normalization
[More Information Needed]
Who are the source language producers?
[More Information Needed]
Annotations
[More Information Needed]
Annotation process
Doctors with a list of 1524 patient-asked questions randomly sampled from the publicly available crawl of HealthTap. Each question results in one similar and one different pair through the following instructions provided to the labelers:
- Rewrite the original question in a different way while maintaining the same intent. Restructure the syntax as much as possible and change medical details that would not impact your response. e.g. "I'm a 22-y-o female" could become "My 26 year old daughter"
- Come up with a related but dissimilar question for which the answer to the original question would be WRONG OR IRRELEVANT. Use similar key words.
The first instruction generates a positive question pair (similar) and the second generates a negative question pair (different). With the above instructions, the task was intentionally framed such that positive question pairs can look very different by superficial metrics, and negative question pairs can conversely look very similar. This ensures that the task is not trivial.
Who are the annotators?
Curai's doctors
Personal and Sensitive Information
[More Information Needed]
Considerations for Using the Data
[More Information Needed]
Social Impact of Dataset
[More Information Needed]
Discussion of Biases
[More Information Needed]
Other Known Limitations
[More Information Needed]
Additional Information
[More Information Needed]
Dataset Curators
[More Information Needed]
Licensing Information
[More Information Needed]
Citation Information
@misc{mccreery2020effective,
title={Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs},
author={Clara H. McCreery and Namit Katariya and Anitha Kannan and Manish Chablani and Xavier Amatriain},
year={2020},
eprint={2008.13546},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.IR}
}
Contributions
Thanks to @tuner007 for adding this dataset.