File size: 5,742 Bytes
4b3636f 5e5cd8f |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 |
----- --- 15350489 We got scammed --- 15350505 >>15350489 (OP) Isn't this the guy who said that Falcon 9 was a scam? --- 15350552 >>15350489 (OP) He spent about 30 seconds debunking the test. The rest is Discovery Channel tier random physics knowledge. "About 30 milligrams produces this much energy, as much as this much of the sun! woww" --- 15350584 >he actually went the full video without mentioning elon musk even once I'm impressed bros --- 15350875 >>15350584 Don't worry, he'll make up for it my making next video exclusively about Elon --- 15350922 >>15350489 (OP) Do these things even produce fusion, or just neutrons? The only instance of net energy ever being produced from these reactions is in classified weapons where no data is available, but lots of fission still occurs. Does fusion actually power the sun? Literally anything under high pressure will glow and produce light. Seems like fusion is more of a theoretical hallucination than a practical reality. --- 15350981 >>15350489 (OP) Why are chemists out of all scientist the most insufferable deboonker "I fooking love science" midwits? Professor Dave and Myles Power too. These people are insufferable. --- 15351364 >>15350981 Thunderf00t is not a pseud like the rest. He actually has a PhD and works at a nuclear facilities, his vids are for the most part correct. --- 15351454 >>15350489 (OP) I fucking love science --- 15351700 >>15351364 >his vids are for the most part correct. Only when he doesn't step out of his area of expertise or when debooonking crowd funding products --- 15351727 >>15351700 Nah, most of the products he deboonks are very apparent scams that any person could recognize if they think a bit. He actually does some cool vids that aren't just chasing low-hanging fruit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lANjwPzISQw [Embed] --- 15351967 >>15350922 yes, because the production of helium (alpha particles) poisons the reaction and makes it very difficult to achieve self-heating. the whole goal of ITER is to prove that if you make a vacuum chamber large enough then you can overcome this poisoning, but still not get anywhere close to net energy out. --- 15355209 >thunderfoot --- 15357350 >>15351364 > people with phds can't be psueds wew lad --- 15357475 >>15350489 (OP) Will he kill himself come monday? --- 15357517 >>15350505 and that we can fix global warming by bellowing clouds of sodium carbonate particulates into the atmosphere (original idea donut steel) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-s0w0RKny64 [Embed] --- 15357521 >>15351364 >He actually has a PhD Just the one? --- 15357534 >>15351364 >works at a nuclear facilities no, he works here https://www.uochb.cz/en/directory/103/phil-mason --- 15357538 >>15351364 I have a PhD and I am most definitely a pseud. --- 15357550 >>15357534 >Chemist LOL. No wonder. I often rail against Chemists when they venture in my domain; Biology. Too many Geneticists/Molecular Biologists have convinced themselves as being Biologists when in reality theyre just Chemists in disguise. --- 15357555 >>15357550 >Mason developed experimental methods and results that indicate the first reaction of alkali metals and water was coulombic (that is, electrical charge forces) in nature which shatters and drives the metal in an extremely pure state into the water, causing both further coulombic and water dissociation. This result, developed in 2015, was completely new to chemistry. That is noted though. >Novel Architectures in Polymer Chemistry (1997) If anyone has a link, I'd be greatful. I want to read it over and see if I can find anything to @ him on twitter with lol. Long shot....but...would be funny. --- 15357590 Golf rumors. --- 15357621 >>15357590 --- 15357683 >>15350489 (OP) Does /sci/ agree this guy is just being really unreasonable with Elon? How will he react after Starship succeeds? I assume he said similar things with Falcon 9 and we everyone universally agrees that it's blown everything out of the water. --- 15357696 >>15357683 Guess. --- 15357749 >>15357696 >anti-feminists are "crab people" So true, I love /sci/ schizos now --- 15357757 >>15357749 People who deny that men and women were created equal under God should be flayed alive. --- 15357760 >>15357757 kys schizo --- 15357785 >>15357757 Charlatan! --- 15359498 >>15350922 >Does fusion actually power the sun? Of course not. And (((they))) know it. --- 15359528 >>15350922 >Does fusion actually power the sun? This sounds more like a backwardsly asked question than anything. Its not an engine. --- 15359954 i've just seen a webm of a man saying that nobody knows how the sun works how does the sun work? --- 15360182 >>>/sci now hates /our guy/ What happened --- 15360239 >>15360182 Angels fall...thats what happened. --- 15360456 >>15359954 Big hot ball of plasma that through gravity is forced to undergo splitting and reassembly of nuclei which causes a massive amount of energy pileup which eventually spills over into magneto and photon energy, now the ether more specifically was a term coined by Tesla sometimes in the earl... --- 15360529 >>15350922 >Does fusion actually power the sun? Literally anything under high pressure will glow and produce light. reminded me of this footnote from griffiths e&m --- 15360537 >>15350489 (OP) Ah fuck It's over bros --- 15361122 >>15359954 the standard model is that most of the fusion occurs via quantum tunneling. atoms are packed so densely that on rare occasions nucleons jump the gap to produce lower energy nuclei, releasing heat. the low probability of such events is why the sun is supposed to have a 10 billion year long main sequence. --- 15361204 >>15351364 >Thunderf00t is not a pseud KEK --- 15361252 >>15361122 That seems extremely dubious. |