File size: 2,827 Bytes
4b3636f |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 |
----- --- 15348347 Will there be 1,000,000 people living on the moon by 2050? --- 15348446 That's in 27 years. No way --- 15348939 >>15348347 (OP) maybe a thousand by 2050, but only if things continue to progress at a rapid clip, any setbacks and change that to "maybe a hundred by 2050". A million on the moon might come sometime next century. Early in the century? Late? Depends on the rate of progress and no setbacks. --- 15350222 >>15348347 (OP) No. If we're lucky well have a few dozen people being rotated in and out on antarctic style research bases. --- 15350334 >>15348446 27 years ago Google, smart phones, and AI didn't exist. A lot can happen in that length of time. --- 15351335 >>15348347 (OP) no we will not be building cities on the moon within our lifetimes. for the same reason we aren't building cities in Antarctica today. >>15350222 this if we're extremely lucky there will be low 3 digit numbers of people by 2050. but it's also entirely possible that will be ~6 or just 0 --- 15351385 >>15348347 (OP) If we don't die before 2050, then yeah, why not. --- 15352022 >>15350334 >extrapolating --- 15352234 Will there be 1,000,000 people living on Antarctica by 2050? And why would people rather be on the moon? --- 15352245 >>15350334 turing test software existed 27 years ago, so did cell phones & search engines. --- 15352323 >>15352245 Not to mention there was an economic reasons for these things to exist. There isn't any good motive for extra-terrestrial bases sans research. Which is why the only thing well see this century are research bases. --- 15352334 there won't even be one person living on the moon by then --- 15352374 >>15348347 (OP) not unless we can guarantee social justice there. if not, then why even bother? https://www.bitchute.com/video/aXekJRez6DoT/ --- 15352381 There wont even be people on temhe moon by 2100, and as the USA becomes more "diverse", watch as NASA's technological prowess collapses --- 15352890 >>15352234 Seeing Antarctica without the ice cap makes me want to do some world building. Or rather make a thread on /sci/ about doing a geophysical simulation of a planet, like how /an/ has a speculative evolution general. --- 15353223 >>15352890 nobody wants to see your soience fiction faggotry, use the /lit/ thread for your childish imagination games --- 15355265 >>15348347 (OP) No Hopefully an american base and a chinese base, that's the best you'll have. Although maybe India may somehow manage to get there. --- 15355269 >>15350334 "AI" existed at least in the 1950s. Retard. --- 15356651 >>15348347 (OP) Why wouldn’t there be? --- 15356802 >>15352334 I'm already living here --- 15359758 >>15356651 There's no real reason to have a moon base beyond research and exploration. Its not like there's any economic reason to bring a million people there. |