| ----- | |
| --- 15348949 | |
| AI training data comes from Reddit & Wikipedia | |
| --- 15348955 | |
| >>15348949 (OP) | |
| No wonder it gives wrong answers with absolute confidence. | |
| --- 15348982 | |
| What do they mean when they say parameter? Is it the number of theta coefficients in a linear model? | |
| --- 15349251 | |
| >>15349046 | |
| downvoted | |
| --- 15349417 | |
| >>15349361 | |
| she was potentially a moderator of the world news sub. I don't really see her as the partner of a billionaire with some lavish lifestyle flying around the world and also someone spending all day every day on Reddit farming for karma which is what the conspiracy claims | |
| --- 15349569 | |
| >>15349046 | |
| >ZOG | |
| >censored media outlets | |
| >propaganda tool | |
| >shilled | |
| None of these things are real. Touch grass. The real world is not what you see on the Internet. | |
| >the tribe | |
| What the fuck is this? | |
| --- 15349571 | |
| >>15349569 | |
| you are | |
| --- 15349588 | |
| >>15349046 | |
| >>15349361 | |
| All major social centers on the web are compromised. | |
| --- 15349845 | |
| >>15348955 | |
| Yes, I've been thinking the reason ChatGPT never wants to admit it doesn't know something and tries bullshitting its way to an answer is trained behavior from your average internet user | |
| --- 15349903 | |
| >>15349046 | |
| >ZOG censored media outlets than that makes it a slanted propaganda tool | |
| Only realizing this now when it has so much potential? | |
| --- 15350232 | |
| >>15348982 | |
| yeah pretty much | |
| --- 15350238 | |
| >>15348949 (OP) | |
| >AI that behaves like a mediocre humanities gradstudent was train of reddit and wikipedia | |
| Figures | |
| --- 15350251 | |
| >>15349361 | |
| what the fuck!!! I had no idea she was a gigaredditor | |
| --- 15350268 | |
| >>15348949 (OP) | |
| can one of you stem chuds tell me if i get this right? All AI is just a webscraper that compiles data than makes sentences on the natural languages that appear most times on it? | |
| --- 15350271 | |
| >>15349569 | |
| i touched your girlfriends cervix with my 7.5" BWC. then i read some otto weininger and culture of critique to relax. take it easy man | |
| --- 15350272 | |
| >>15350268 | |
| You're right. It's a pattern recognition program that reproduces patterns based on keywords. | |
| --- 15350288 | |
| >>15350272 | |
| thanks science chud | |
| --- 15351466 | |
| >>15350251 | |
| maxwellhill is her account name, look it up. | |
| its filled with the cringiest popsoi collection, is good popsoi aversion therapy to see popsoi in the context | |
| --- 15351522 | |
| >>15350268 | |
| >All AI is just a webscraper that compiles data than makes sentences on the natural languages that appear most times on it? | |
| IIRC it looks statistically for the each following word, so maybe not always what appears the most times, but also with respect to context, or some other factors. | |
| --- 15351847 | |
| chatbot shillware is fake asf | |
| anyone still falling for the ruse is a chump | |
| --- 15352041 | |
| >>15350268 | |
| In short, these chatbots are trained on huge databases and burn through mountains of graphics cards in the process so they can tell you something that could have been gleamed by skimming through | |
| >wikipedia | |
| for 5 minutes. ChatGPT is a nice party trick but I really doubt its going to kill that many jobs, primarily because many of the jobs that it can replace are just sinecures for PMCs. | |
| --- 15352046 | |
| >>15348949 (OP) | |
| That's true, anon. AI models like GPT-4 do use massive amounts of data from various sources, including Reddit and Wikipedia, to train their algorithms. But it's important to remember that these models aren't just limited to those sources; they also learn from a diverse range of texts like books, articles, and websites. While the training data can be a mixed bag of quality, AI models can still generate some pretty impressive responses. It's up to us as users to determine how reliable and useful the information provided is. As always, it's a good idea to double-check anything that seems too good (or too weird) to be true.So yeah, it's a bit of a wild ride, but that's what makes AI-generated content interesting, right? | |
| --- 15352074 | |
| >>15348982 | |
| Yes | |
| --- 15352077 | |
| >>15350268 | |
| This is correct | |
| --- 15352165 | |
| >>15350232 | |
| >>15352074 | |
| So the final model is an equation with 100 billion coefficients. Damn, the matrix operations must take months to complete. | |
| --- 15352206 | |
| >>15350251 | |
| Really suspicious that jannie deleted the post you replied to | |
| --- 15352218 | |
| >>15352206 | |
| Why would they do it? | |
| --- 15352296 | |
| >>15352046 | |
| It's pretty interesting that AI generated text is so easily recognizable. | |
| --- 15353561 | |
| >>15352046 | |
| why do they choose to only take data from heavily censored, and badly slanted outlets? | |
| --- 15353703 | |
| >>15353561 | |
| >heavily censored. | |
| lol if only. | |
| >badly slanted outlets? | |
| anon everything has a fucking slant to it. | |
| --- 15353801 | |
| >>15352041 | |
| wikipedia doesn't have the smut these chatbots can create | |
| --- 15354673 | |
| >>15351466 | |
| All the same stuff she shilled on Reddit was shilled here too and the soiboys all ate it up and loved it and begged for more, | |
| --- 15354788 | |
| >>15349588 | |
| >Who is this 4chan guy xD | |
| You can just tell he writes that meme at every opportunity and still thinks he's hilarious nearly a decade later | |
| --- 15354995 | |
| >>15352296 | |
| There are certain keywords that expose it right away | |
| >But it's important to remember | |
| >Diverse | |
| >using Commas | |
| >It's up to us | |
| And than the kicker | |
| >It's a good idea to double check | |
| All ai responses have a conditional at the end which says | |
| >X is not a complete and maybe it's also Y which is why you shouldn't totally rely on the answer I have given | |
| Which I assume is some legal shit that was added so people don't go | |
| >BUT THE AI TOLD ME TO DO IT | |
| and sue Microshit | |
| --- 15355052 | |
| >>15348949 (OP) | |
| >Undisclosed | |
| So stolen data? | |
| --- 15355195 | |
| >>15354995 | |
| insightful post | |
| --- 15356023 | |
| >>15349845 | |
| I've been thinking the same. However, with progress in theory-of-mind ability, I think it might be possible to have LLMs go through all the data they have and generate possible motivations for posts. Then with posts annotated with possible justifications including knowledge the poster must be internally recalling to the poster being a fucking retard, LLMs could use the justifications to look for sources, and either find the citations or label the post as retarded and correct it. Then the new model could be trained on the corrected data. | |
| --- 15356029 | |
| >>15350268 | |
| AI research is many things at the moment, one of which is a fantastically expensive exercise in proving our discourse and society is extremely retarded. | |
| --- 15356048 | |
| >>15351522 | |
| Statistically isn't the right word, because you could actually do that for a lot less compute. A more reasonable simplification is that it uses a massive computer that in principle should be capable of solving a problem with the right program, but rather than develop the program traditionally, the program is bruteforced until it seems to do something useful. | |
| --- 15356250 | |
| >>15348949 (OP) | |
| >still leaving your training data around | |
| protip, if you don't want your post history being used to train ai, just get perma banned sitewide and they'll delete your history for you and filter it out utterly so it doesn't "taint" their ai | |
| --- 15356907 | |
| it's probably really good at recreational drugs and antifa apologia | |
| --- 15357170 | |
| >>15350251 | |
| --- 15357265 | |
| >>15357170 | |
| >4 people | |
| 4 pedophiles, all hand picked by maxwell | |
| --- 15358611 | |
| >>15357265 | |
| On loan to her from the FBI's criminal informant program | |