fix formatting in table
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -51,29 +51,28 @@ The model was trained according to the GPT2 instructions at this [repo](https://
|
|
51 |
|
52 |
The model achieves the following results without any fine-tuning (zero-shot):
|
53 |
|
54 |
-
| Task | Metric | Original GPT2 | OLM GPT2 (Ours) | Significance
|
55 |
-
|
56 |
-
|
57 |
-
|
|
58 |
-
|
|
59 |
-
|
|
60 |
-
|
|
61 |
-
|
|
62 |
-
|
|
63 |
-
|
|
64 |
-
|
|
65 |
-
|
|
66 |
-
|
|
67 |
-
|
|
68 |
-
|
|
69 |
-
|
|
70 |
-
|
|
71 |
-
|
|
72 |
-
|
|
73 |
-
|
|
74 |
-
|
|
75 |
-
|
|
76 |
-
|arc_challenge|acc/acc_norm|0.1903/0.2270 |0.1997/0.2329 |0.4132/0.6256 |
|
77 |
|
78 |
To get these results, we used the Eleuther AI evaluation harness [here](https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness)
|
79 |
The harness can produce results a little different than those reported in the GPT2 paper.
|
|
|
51 |
|
52 |
The model achieves the following results without any fine-tuning (zero-shot):
|
53 |
|
54 |
+
| Task | Metric | Original GPT2 | OLM GPT2 (Ours) | Significance (two-tailed p-value) |
|
55 |
+
|:------------|:-----------|--------------------:|----------------------:|----------------------------------:|
|
56 |
+
|rte |acc |0.5307 |0.5415 |0.7188 |
|
57 |
+
|piqa |acc/acc_norm|0.6289/0.6251 |**0.6638**/**0.6670** |**0.0020**/**0.0002** |
|
58 |
+
|copa |acc |0.6400 |0.6900 |0.3000 |
|
59 |
+
|record |f1/em |**0.7094**/**0.7026**|0.6874/0.6810 |**0.0000**/**0.0000** |
|
60 |
+
|boolq |acc |0.4872 |**0.5606** |**0.0000** |
|
61 |
+
|cb |acc/f1 |0.4101/0.2619 |0.3571/0.1754 |0.4193/NA |
|
62 |
+
|hellaswag |acc/acc_norm|0.2892/0.3114 |**0.3076**/**0.3491** |**0.0000**/**0.0000** |
|
63 |
+
|mrpc |acc/f1 |0.5662/0.6911 |**0.6495**/**0.7741** |**0.0007**/**0.0002** |
|
64 |
+
|multirc |acc |0.0189 |0.0115 |0.0959 |
|
65 |
+
|lambada |ppl/acc |40.0554/0.3256 |**28.6733**/**0.3625** |**0.0000**/**0.0000** |
|
66 |
+
|wsc |acc |0.4327 |0.3654 |0.1679 |
|
67 |
+
|wic |acc |0.4922 |0.5 |0.6924 |
|
68 |
+
|mnli |acc |0.3372 |**0.3471** |**0.0384** |
|
69 |
+
|qnli |acc |0.5017 |0.4981 |0.5884 |
|
70 |
+
|cola |mcc |0.0126 |0.0181 |0.8614 |
|
71 |
+
|triviaqa |acc |0.0151 |**0.0182** |**0.0048** |
|
72 |
+
|winogrande |acc |0.5162 |0.5114 |0.7360 |
|
73 |
+
|webqs |acc |0.0030 |**0.0108** |**0.0000** |
|
74 |
+
|arc_easy |acc/acc_norm|0.4381/0.3948 |**0.4651**/**0.4247** |**0.0082**/**0.0029** |
|
75 |
+
|arc_challenge|acc/acc_norm|0.1903/0.2270 |0.1997/0.2329 |0.4132/0.6256 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
77 |
To get these results, we used the Eleuther AI evaluation harness [here](https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness)
|
78 |
The harness can produce results a little different than those reported in the GPT2 paper.
|