Another monumental invention following OpenAI's transition to a closed-source model
This is yet another monumental invention following OpenAI's transition to a closed-source model. Perplexity has defeated DeepSeek and become a popular model, although without contributing to any algorithmic improvements,They are charting a new course for the advancement of AI.
Steal, Close, Do it again!
This is yet another monumental invention following OpenAI's transition to a closed-source model. Perplexity has defeated DeepSeek and become a popular model, although without contributing to any algorithmic improvements,They are charting a new course for the advancement of AI.
Don't be ridiculous. Political censorship is not okay. Perplexity fixed your model. You should be thankful. If you would like to contribute to this in some meaningful way, you should document the cases of censorship so they could remove it more effectively. Stay humble do not be like that, there's no use for anyone from you flooding this platform with nonsense. ;)
This is yet another monumental invention following OpenAI's transition to a closed-source model. Perplexity has defeated DeepSeek and become a popular model, although without contributing to any algorithmic improvements,They are charting a new course for the advancement of AI.
Don't be ridiculous. Political censorship is not okay. Perplexity fixed your model. You should be thankful. If you would like to contribute to this in some meaningful way, you should document the cases of censorship so they could remove it more effectively. Stay humble do not be like that, there's no use for anyone from you flooding this platform with nonsense. ;)
Yes, this model fixes Chinese censorship, but coincidentally, it's named r1-1776, and 1776 is the year of America's founding. How can you be sure this model isn't censored by the U.S.? Do you know the specifics of the MIT License? Are you really a developer? I think it's because you were born into a world full of strong biases, so you're all twisted, like how God gave racists body odor when He created humans. 😂
This is yet another monumental invention following OpenAI's transition to a closed-source model. Perplexity has defeated DeepSeek and become a popular model, although without contributing to any algorithmic improvements,They are charting a new course for the advancement of AI.
Don't be ridiculous. Political censorship is not okay. Perplexity fixed your model. You should be thankful. If you would like to contribute to this in some meaningful way, you should document the cases of censorship so they could remove it more effectively. Stay humble do not be like that, there's no use for anyone from you flooding this platform with nonsense. ;)
china censorship evil
US censorship good
This is yet another monumental invention following OpenAI's transition to a closed-source model. Perplexity has defeated DeepSeek and become a popular model, although without contributing to any algorithmic improvements,They are charting a new course for the advancement of AI.
Don't be ridiculous. Political censorship is not okay. Perplexity fixed your model. You should be thankful. If you would like to contribute to this in some meaningful way, you should document the cases of censorship so they could remove it more effectively. Stay humble do not be like that, there's no use for anyone from you flooding this platform with nonsense. ;)
Yes, this model fixes Chinese censorship, but coincidentally, it's named r1-1776, and 1776 is the year of America's founding. How can you be sure this model isn't censored by the U.S.? Do you know the specifics of the MIT License? Are you really a developer? I think it's because you were born into a world full of strong biases, so you're all twisted, like how God gave racists body odor when He created humans. 😂
What. Name me one instance of any political event where this model answer is overfitted rather than a general consensus of the entire internet (very easy to check by googling it). US does not do political censorship of AI models - this may change now under Trump, but hopefully not.
Also it's kind of crucial to realize that safety censorship by making the model refuse requests versus hijacking the entire response... to push your one-sided rhetoric on political topics are NOT the same things. People really need to understand this I feel like. :)
The latter shouldn't be acceptable at all, in my opinion. Refusal is nothing in relation to spreading misinformation.