Running
1
🥺
Scarlett
Your Telegram Girl
Benny boo
rbn2008k
·
AI & ML interests
Open source LLMs
Recent Activity
updated
a Space
about 1 month ago
rbn2008k/Scarlett
Organizations
None yet
rbn2008k's activity
updated
a
Space
about 1 month ago
Update app.py
1
#1 opened 2 months ago
by
rbn2008k
updated
2
Spaces
2 months ago
liked
a
Space
2 months ago
liked
a
model
3 months ago
liked
2
Spaces
3 months ago
upvoted
a
collection
3 months ago
liked
4
Spaces
3 months ago
liked
a
model
3 months ago
liked
3
Spaces
3 months ago
reacted to
singhsidhukuldeep's
post with 👍
3 months ago
Post
1162
1 hour of OpenAi o1, here are my thoughts...
Here are my few observations:
- Slower response times: o1 can take over 10+ seconds to answer some questions, as it spends more time "thinking" through problems. In my case, it took over 50 seconds.
- Less likely to admit ignorance: The models are reported to be less likely to admit when they don't know the answer to a question.
- Higher pricing: o1-preview is significantly more expensive than GPT-4o, costing 3x more for input tokens and 4x more for output tokens in the API. With more thinking and more tokens, this could require houses to be mortgaged!
- Do we need this?: While it's better than GPT-4o for complex reasoning, on many common business tasks, its performance is just equivalent.
- Not a big deal: No comparisons to Anthropic or Google DeepMind Gemini are mentioned or included.
- This model tries to think and iterate over the response on its own! Think of it as an inbuilt CoT on steroids! Would love a technical review paper on the training process.
A must-read paper: https://cdn.openai.com/o1-system-card.pdf
Here are my few observations:
- Slower response times: o1 can take over 10+ seconds to answer some questions, as it spends more time "thinking" through problems. In my case, it took over 50 seconds.
- Less likely to admit ignorance: The models are reported to be less likely to admit when they don't know the answer to a question.
- Higher pricing: o1-preview is significantly more expensive than GPT-4o, costing 3x more for input tokens and 4x more for output tokens in the API. With more thinking and more tokens, this could require houses to be mortgaged!
- Do we need this?: While it's better than GPT-4o for complex reasoning, on many common business tasks, its performance is just equivalent.
- Not a big deal: No comparisons to Anthropic or Google DeepMind Gemini are mentioned or included.
- This model tries to think and iterate over the response on its own! Think of it as an inbuilt CoT on steroids! Would love a technical review paper on the training process.
A must-read paper: https://cdn.openai.com/o1-system-card.pdf
liked
2
models
4 months ago
