add

prompts.json

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
             "{{MOTIVATION_PROFILE}}",
             "### Questions ###",
             "1. Write an overall short summary (1-2 paragraphs and around 200-300 words) with the title: \"Profile summary (You)\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name.",
-            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Ensure that all traits are mentioned. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average), etc. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile analysis and \"RISKS\" for red flags profile analysis. If no Red Flags have HIGH scores, remove the 'RISKS' section. Focus on the the trait scores and their implications in the professional context. Ensure traits are ordered based on the scores, in Strengths part, highest to lowest; in Areas for Development part, lowest to highest. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"you\". Only include Trait scores equal to or greater than 67 in \"STRENGTHS\" part and Include any Traits scores lower than 50 in Areas for Development part. If there are no Trait scores are equal to or greater than 67, only include Traits that have scores equal to or greater than 50 in \"STRENGTHS\" part. Consider adding a section for 'Relative Strengths' if the individual has lower overall scores.",
+            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Ensure that all traits are mentioned. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average), etc. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" and \"RISKS\". If no Red Flags have HIGH scores, remove the 'RISKS' section. Focus on the the trait scores and their implications in the professional context. Ensure traits are ordered based on the scores, in Strengths part, highest to lowest; in Areas for Development part, lowest to highest. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"you\". Only include Trait scores equal to or greater than 67 in \"STRENGTHS\" part and Include any Traits scores lower than 50 in Areas for Development part. If there are no Trait scores are equal to or greater than 67, only include Traits that have scores equal to or greater than 50 in \"STRENGTHS\" part. Consider adding a section for 'Relative Strengths' if the individual has lower overall scores.",
             "3. Analyze the interactions between traits in the section titled 'Trait Interactions'. In this section, explore how certain traits interact with others (e.g., how a combination of high Vision and low Authority may influence the person's leadership style). Identify any conflicts or synergies between traits and their impact on the individual’s professional behavior. Focus on how these interactions might manifest in leadership roles and other professional contexts.",
             "4. Analyze only the Motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should contain the trait analysis Reward, Connection, etc. traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average)) with the title: \"Motivation (You)\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you'.",
             "5. Your response should be well-organized using consistent markdown formatting: use ## for section headers (e.g., ## Profile summary), ### for trait-specific sub-headings (e.g., ### Vision (High)), write paragraphs of text instead of bullet points. Do not use bold, italics, or numbered lists, and ensure the format remains the same throughout the entire report. Avoid writing a conclusion.",
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
             "{{MOTIVATION_PROFILE}}",
             "### Questions ###",
             "1. Write an overall short summary  (1-2 paragraphs and around 200-300 words) with the title: \"Profile summary\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, use name \"test-taker\" and do not include their real name, gender, tenure (length of service) or role.",
-            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Ensure that all traits are mentioned. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average), etc. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile analysis and \"RISKS\" for red flags profile analysis. If no Red Flags have HIGH scores, remove the 'RISKS' section. Focus on the the trait scores and their implications in the professional context. Ensure traits are ordered based on the scores, in Strengths part, highest to lowest; in Areas for Development part, lowest to highest. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\". Only include Trait scores equal to or greater than 67 in \"STRENGTHS\" part and Include any Traits scores lower than 50 in Areas for Development part. If there are no Trait scores are equal to or greater than 67, only include Traits that have scores equal to or greater than 50 in \"STRENGTHS\" part. Consider adding a section for 'Relative Strengths' if the individual has lower overall scores.",
+            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Ensure that all traits are mentioned. Identify key strengths, weaknesses (areas for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average), etc. Do not output scores) with the title: \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" and \"RISKS\". If no Red Flags have HIGH scores, remove the 'RISKS' section. Focus on the the trait scores and their implications in the professional context. Ensure traits are ordered based on the scores, in Strengths part, highest to lowest; in Areas for Development part, lowest to highest. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\". Only include Trait scores equal to or greater than 67 in \"STRENGTHS\" part and Include any Traits scores lower than 50 in Areas for Development part. If there are no Trait scores are equal to or greater than 67, only include Traits that have scores equal to or greater than 50 in \"STRENGTHS\" part. Consider adding a section for 'Relative Strengths' if the individual has lower overall scores.",
             "3. Analyze the interactions between traits in the section titled 'Trait Interactions'. In this section, explore how certain traits interact with others (e.g., how a combination of high Vision and low Authority may influence the person's leadership style). Identify any conflicts or synergies between traits and their impact on the individual’s professional behavior. Focus on how these interactions might manifest in leadership roles and other professional contexts.",
             "4. Analyze only the Motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should contain the trait analysis Reward, Connection, etc. traits should be displayed with the level of score, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (Average)) with the title: \"Motivation\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"test-taker\" instead of their name.",
             "5. Your response should be well-organized using consistent markdown formatting: use ## for section headers (e.g., ## Profile summary), ### for trait-specific sub-headings (e.g., ### Vision (High)), write paragraphs of text instead of bullet points. Do not use bold, italics, or numbered lists, and ensure the format remains the same throughout the entire report. Avoid writing a conclusion.",