text
stringlengths 0
80
|
---|
Now it can be shown how God is not, by denying Him whatever is opposed |
to the idea of Him, viz. composition, motion, and the like. Therefore |
(1) we must discuss His simplicity, whereby we deny composition in |
Him; and because whatever is simple in material things is imperfect |
and a part of something else, we shall discuss (2) His perfection; |
(3) His infinity; (4) His immutability; (5) His unity. |
Concerning His simplicity, there are eight points of inquiry: |
(1) Whether God is a body? |
(2) Whether He is composed of matter and form? |
(3) Whether in Him there is composition of quiddity, essence |
or nature, and subject? |
(4) Whether He is composed of essence and existence? |
(5) Whether He is composed of genus and difference? |
(6) Whether He is composed of subject and accident? |
(7) Whether He is in any way composite, or wholly simple? |
(8) Whether He enters into composition with other things? |
_______________________ |
FIRST ARTICLE [I, Q. 3, Art. 1] |
Whether God Is a Body? |
Objection 1: It seems that God is a body. For a body is that which has |
the three dimensions. But Holy Scripture attributes the three |
dimensions to God, for it is written: "He is higher than Heaven, and |
what wilt thou do? He is deeper than Hell, and how wilt thou know? The |
measure of Him is longer than the earth and broader than the sea" (Job |
11:8, 9). Therefore God is a body. |
Objection 2: Further, everything that has figure is a body, since |
figure is a quality of quantity. But God seems to have figure, for it |
is written: "Let us make man to our image and likeness" (Gen. 1:26). |
Now a figure is called an image, according to the text: "Who being the |
brightness of His glory and the figure," i.e. the image, "of His |
substance" (Heb. 1:3). Therefore God is a body. |
Objection 3: Further, whatever has corporeal parts is a body. Now |
Scripture attributes corporeal parts to God. "Hast thou an arm like |
God?" (Job 40:4); and "The eyes of the Lord are upon the just" (Ps. |
33:16); and "The right hand of the Lord hath wrought strength" (Ps. |
117:16). Therefore God is a body. |
Objection 4: Further, posture belongs only to bodies. But something |
which supposes posture is said of God in the Scriptures: "I saw the |
Lord sitting" (Isa. 6:1), and "He standeth up to judge" (Isa. 3:13). |
Therefore God is a body. |
Objection 5: Further, only bodies or things corporeal can be a local |
term _wherefrom_ or _whereto._ But in the Scriptures God is spoken of |
as a local term _whereto,_ according to the words, "Come ye to Him and |
be enlightened" (Ps. 33:6), and as a term _wherefrom_: "All they that |
depart from Thee shall be written in the earth" (Jer. 17:13). |
Therefore God is a body. |
Contrary: It is written in the Gospel of St. John (John 4:24): |
"God is a spirit." |
Response: It is absolutely true that God is not a body; and this |
can be shown in three ways. First, because no body is in motion unless |
it be put in motion, as is evident from induction. Now it has been |
already proved (Q. 2, A. 3), that God is the First Mover, and is |
Himself unmoved. Therefore it is clear that God is not a body. |
Secondly, because the first being must of necessity be in act, and in |
no way in potentiality. For although in any single thing that passes |
from potentiality to actuality, the potentiality is prior in time to |
the actuality; nevertheless, absolutely speaking, actuality is prior |
to potentiality; for whatever is in potentiality can be reduced into |
actuality only by some being in actuality. Now it has been already |
proved that God is the First Being. It is therefore impossible that in |
God there should be any potentiality. But every body is in |
potentiality because the continuous, as such, is divisible to |
infinity; it is therefore impossible that God should be a body. |
Thirdly, because God is the most noble of beings. Now it is impossible |
for a body to be the most noble of beings; for a body must be either |
animate or inanimate; and an animate body is manifestly nobler than |
any inanimate body. But an animate body is not animate precisely as |
body; otherwise all bodies would be animate. Therefore its animation |
depends upon some other thing, as our body depends for its animation |
on the soul. Hence that by which a body becomes animated must be |
nobler than the body. Therefore it is impossible that God should be a |
body. |
Reply Objection 1: As we have said above (Q. 1, A. 9), Holy Writ |
puts before us spiritual and divine things under the comparison of |
corporeal things. Hence, when it attributes to God the three |
dimensions under the comparison of corporeal quantity, it implies His |
virtual quantity; thus, by depth, it signifies His power of knowing |
hidden things; by height, the transcendence of His excelling power; by |
length, the duration of His existence; by breadth, His act of love for |
all. Or, as says Dionysius (Div. Nom. ix), by the depth of God is |