|
----- |
|
--- 15348347 |
|
Will there be 1,000,000 people living on the moon by 2050? |
|
--- 15348446 |
|
That's in 27 years. No way |
|
--- 15348939 |
|
>>15348347 (OP) |
|
maybe a thousand by 2050, but only if things continue to progress at a rapid clip, any setbacks and change that to "maybe a hundred by 2050". A million on the moon might come sometime next century. Early in the century? Late? Depends on the rate of progress and no setbacks. |
|
--- 15350222 |
|
>>15348347 (OP) |
|
No. If we're lucky well have a few dozen people being rotated in and out on antarctic style research bases. |
|
--- 15350334 |
|
>>15348446 |
|
27 years ago Google, smart phones, and AI didn't exist. A lot can happen in that length of time. |
|
--- 15351335 |
|
>>15348347 (OP) |
|
no we will not be building cities on the moon within our lifetimes. for the same reason we aren't building cities in Antarctica today. |
|
>>15350222 |
|
this |
|
if we're extremely lucky there will be low 3 digit numbers of people by 2050. but it's also entirely possible that will be ~6 or just 0 |
|
--- 15351385 |
|
>>15348347 (OP) |
|
If we don't die before 2050, then yeah, why not. |
|
--- 15352022 |
|
>>15350334 |
|
>extrapolating |
|
--- 15352234 |
|
Will there be 1,000,000 people living on Antarctica by 2050? And why would people rather be on the moon? |
|
--- 15352245 |
|
>>15350334 |
|
turing test software existed 27 years ago, so did cell phones & search engines. |
|
--- 15352323 |
|
>>15352245 |
|
Not to mention there was an economic reasons for these things to exist. There isn't any good motive for extra-terrestrial bases sans research. Which is why the only thing well see this century are research bases. |
|
--- 15352334 |
|
there won't even be one person living on the moon by then |
|
--- 15352374 |
|
>>15348347 (OP) |
|
not unless we can guarantee social justice there. if not, then why even bother? |
|
|
|
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aXekJRez6DoT/ |
|
--- 15352381 |
|
There wont even be people on temhe moon by 2100, and as the USA becomes more "diverse", watch as NASA's technological prowess collapses |
|
--- 15352890 |
|
>>15352234 |
|
Seeing Antarctica without the ice cap makes me want to do some world building. Or rather make a thread on /sci/ about doing a geophysical simulation of a planet, like how /an/ has a speculative evolution general. |
|
--- 15353223 |
|
>>15352890 |
|
nobody wants to see your soience fiction faggotry, use the /lit/ thread for your childish imagination games |
|
--- 15355265 |
|
>>15348347 (OP) |
|
No |
|
|
|
Hopefully an american base and a chinese base, that's the best you'll have. Although maybe India may somehow manage to get there. |
|
--- 15355269 |
|
>>15350334 |
|
"AI" existed at least in the 1950s. Retard. |
|
--- 15356651 |
|
>>15348347 (OP) |
|
Why wouldn’t there be? |
|
--- 15356802 |
|
>>15352334 |
|
I'm already living here |
|
--- 15359758 |
|
>>15356651 |
|
There's no real reason to have a moon base beyond research and exploration. Its not like there's any economic reason to bring a million people there. |
|
|