text
stringlengths 2
8.65k
|
---|
Navy Department —The Breit and Tuve experiment—The Appleton experiments in 1920—~The Watson~ Watt request in 1935, and how the world’s first radar aircraft test was made at Daventry in February 1935. SHORT, SHARP SHOUTS The essence of the pulse system—Funda- mentals of radar, and the relationship be- tween range-finding and the speed of electro- magnetic waves—Radio-wave speed and ob- ject distance—How radar is used as an electrical stop-watch—The use of a cathode- ray-tube display as an electron timing device. THe EcHO COMES HOME The miracle we now take for granted—How tiny packets of radioenergy are received Why the radar receiver and transmitter must work in step—Necessity for high-gain receivers to produce a readable display—Relationship be- tween the noise-level and the signal voltage— The ‘Z’ factor—Wavelengths used for popy~ lar radar equipments—Function of the modu- lator—How the pulse-recurrence frequency is chosen—Radar aerial arrays, and why the radiation is beamed—Common T-and-R arrays. |
Fishbein, S. W. Graveline, and O. |
534 THERECEIVING SYSTEM—INDIC’ATORS [SEC. 13.16 slowly varying voltages isappreciably easier than would bethe case with the sawtooth waveforms involved inthe resolved-time- base method. Methods 2and3 can reapplied either tomagnetic ortoelectrostatic cathode-ray tubes, but, because oftheir inferiority forintensity -modu- lated displays, thelatter tubes areseldom used. |
*, Ê |
L/1/RAS (T 1352), 1943 (TNA AVIA 26/354) [3] Technical Development of Lucero Mks. I and II, TRE Report No. 33 R/121/JMMP (T 1359), Feb 1943 (TNA AVIA 26/361) [4] H 2S Mark II Equipment and A.S.V. |
Figure 20: Signal -Noise -Ratio 3dB shown on an A -Scope . Radartutorial (www.radartutorial.eu) 16 Radar Range Equation (Example given) One of the important uses of the radar range equation is in the determination of detection ra nge, or the maximum range at which a target has a high probability of being detected by the radar. Table 3: Example of a real radar set If we substitute the metric values from the upper ta ble into the radar range equation we get: 6 2 2 3 1522 4 4max 31 10 1900 0.11 14 4 5 10 128.8Wm W76.5 km 4tx t MDS sPGR PL The result expressed in nautical miles is 41.3 NM. |
With signal processing technology, the target image can be obtained by separating position (x,y)and amplitude gi(x,y)from complex signal sir(t). Figure 1. Geometric sketch of dual-antenna InISAR imaging. |
The optimal linear estimate is deter - mined by requiring the adapted estimation error be orthogonal to the observed vec - tor, r. Steady-state conditions are assumed in this derivation, thus the condition for orthogonality is E{r e∗} = 0 (3.24) where E{} is the expectation, e is the estimation error, and * is the complex conjugate. The adaptively weighted estimate is obtained by weighting the received signal vector by the estimate of the adaptive weights: ˆ ˆ ' s w r = (3.25) With d defined as the desired signal (a main-beam target), the estimation error is obtained from the following equation. |
However, a frequency spec- trum measured at a point can contain no knowledge of wave direction; so a wavenumber spectrum W(K) is often defined in terms of the frequency spectrum S(f) by the relation W(K) = S(f(K))(df/dK) (13.2) with the relation between/and K given by Eq. (13.1). To account for the wind direction, W(K) is sometimes multiplied by an empirical function of K and direc- tion v relative to the (up)wind direction. |
INCH SHELLS AND |
The attenuation is commanded based on measurements of the noise during periodic calibration. Digital Preprocessing. The advent of high-speed, high-dynamic range analog- to-digital converters (A/Ds) allows IF-sampling and digital basebanding. |
TEST AND ADAPTIVE 02& |